Shepard s Editorial Analysis Definitions (Cases)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Shepard s Editorial Analysis Definitions (Cases)"

Transcription

1 Shepard s Editorial Analysis Definitions (Cases) Analysis a Ab Acq AcqR AD AG aj Amp AW AWR c cc CD CDW Definition On appeal, reconsideration or rehearing, the citing case affirms or adheres to the case you are The citing reference orders that an application for leave to appeal be held in abeyance pending resolution of another case or cases. The Commission acquiesces in the reasoning or result of the decision you are The Commission acquiesces in result only, and not in the reasoning employed to reach the result, in the decision you are The citing order denies allocatur in the case you are The citing order grants allocatur in the case you are The citing case involves the patent, copyright or trademark you are Shepardizing, but there is no holding that calls for a more specific editorial letter. The citing decision expands or extends to a different factual situation the statute, revenue ruling or revenue procedure you are The citing reference notes an application or motion for writ in the case you are The citing reference notes an application for writ of error in the case you are The citing opinion disagrees with the reasoning/result of the case you are Shepardizing, although the citing court may not have the authority to materially affect its precedential value. The citing case is related to the case you are Shepardizing, arising out of the same subject matter or involving the same parties. The citing order denies certiorari or review in the case you are The citing order denies writ of certiorari in the case you are

2 cf The citing reference notes that a certificate for review of the case you are Shepardizing has been filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. CG Clr CN cn The citing order by the U.S. Supreme Court grants certiorari in the case you are The citing decision clarifies the revenue ruling or revenue procedure you are The citing order by the U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in the case you are The citing reference indicates that registration for the trademark you are Shepardizing has been canceled. co Corr CS D d DAF DAP De de dedf dep Depub The citing reference indicates that a correction certificate has been issued for the patent you are The citing reference corrects an error in the regulation you are The citing order by the U.S. Supreme Court dismisses certiorari in the case you are The citing case dismisses an appeal from the case you are The citing case differs from the case you are Shepardizing, either involving dissimilar facts or requiring a different application of the law. The citing reference notes the filing of a direct appeal in the case you are The citing order dismisses, by agreement of the parties, application for writ of error in the case you are The citing case denies review or rehearing of the case you are Shepardizing has been dedicated to the public. Shepardizing has been dedicated to the public and disclaimed. The citing reference indicates that certain claims of the patent you are Shepardizing have been dedicated to the public.

3 df dfde dfg dfp DG The citing reference indicates that a disclaimer has been entered as to the patent you are Shepardizing has been disclaimed and dedicated to the public. Shepardizing has been disclaimed and is owned by the U.S. government. The citing reference indicates that a disclaimer has been entered as to certain claims of the patent you are The citing decision holds for the Government in a dispute concerning the Code section you are DGp The citing decision holds in part for the Government in a dispute concerning the Code section you are DJC The citing order dismisses application for writ of error in the case you are Shepardizing, upholding the judgment as correct. In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied that opinion of court of appeals is correct in all respects. DMA DO Dp DT The citing order dismisses, on motion of the applicant, the application for writ in the case you are The citing order dismisses, with opinion, an appeal from the case you are The citing case dismisses in part an appeal from the case you are The citing decision holds for the taxpayer in a dispute concerning the Code section you are DTp The citing decision holds in part for the taxpayer in a dispute concerning the Code section you are DWB The citing order dismisses, for want of bond, the application for writ in the case you are DWJ The citing order dismisses, for want of jurisdiction, application for writ of error in the case you are DWP The citing order dismisses, for want of prosecution, the application for writ in the case you are

4 e eg egp ER The citing opinion interprets or clarifies the case you are Shepardizing in a significant way. The citing reference indicates that an extension has been granted as to the patent you are The citing reference indicates that an extension has been granted as to certain claims of the patent you are The citing order refuses application for writ of error in the case you are In Texas SC cases, SC is satisfied judgment of court of appeals is correct. er The citing reference indicates that an extension has been refused as to the patent you are f G g GCRE The citing opinion relies on the case you are Shepardizing as controlling or persuasive authority. The citing order grants application for writ of error in the case you are Shepardizing is owned by the U.S. government. The citing order grants, on court s own motion, petition for discretionary review in the case you are GP Gr Grtd h The citing reference grants review of the case you are Shepardizing, and orders that it remain published. The citing reference grants review or certiorari in the case you are The citing reference grants review or rehearing of, and depublishes, the case you are The citing case differs from the case you are Shepardizing, but the citing court reconciles the difference or inconsistency in reaching its decision. HBCD The citing order refuses to issue a writ of habeas corpus in the case you are HCD The citing order denies, without written opinion, application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are HCDO The citing order denies, with written opinion, application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are

5 HCG HCR HCReq id idp Imp j The citing order grants application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are The citing order returns, marked no action, application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are The citing reference notes an application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are The citing case holds that the patent, copyright or trademark you are Shepardizing is infringed. The citing case holds that certain claims of the patent, copyright or trademark you are Shepardizing are infringed. The citing reference adds an improvement to the patent you are A dissenting opinion cites the case you are L The citing opinion restricts the application of the Shepardized case, finding that its reasoning applies only in specific, limited circumstances. LD Li Ln Lnp LnVp m MA MD Mden The citing order denies leave to appeal or application for leave to appeal in the case you are limited and infringed. limited and not infringed. are Shepardizing are limited and not infringed. are Shepardizing are limited, not infringed, and void, invalid or unenforceable. On appeal, reconsideration or rehearing, the citing case modifies or changes in some way, including affirmance in part and reversal in part, the case you are The citing order awards writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing order dismisses application for writ of mandamus in the case you are Shepardizing The citing order denies application for writ of mandamus in the case you are

6 MG MGP MI mi MO MR MRP MWR nd ndp Noacq The citing order grants application for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing order grants in part application for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing order declares that writ of mandamus will issue in the case you are The citing reference notes that mandate in the case you are Shepardizing has issued from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The citing order overrules motion for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing order refuses application for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing order refuses in part application for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing reference notes application for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing case holds that the patent, copyright or trademark you are Shepardizing is not infringed. are Shepardizing are not infringed. The Commissioner refuses to acquiesce in the reasoning or result of the decision you are Np The citing reference orders the Reporter of Decisions not to publish the case you are Nr The citing reference concludes that the decision you are Shepardizing is not recommended for publication. Nu o Op Ori p The citing case nullifies the case you are The citing case expressly overrules or disapproves all or part of the case you are The citing reference is the original opinion in the case you are Shepardizing, reprinted for tracking purposes pending review, and is thus not citable. The citing patent is the original issue of the reissue patent you are The citing case relies on the case you are Shepardizing by describing it as on all fours or parallel to the citing case.

7 pd PDA PDE The citing reference notes that a petition in the case you are Shepardizing has been denied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The citing order dismisses, by agreement of the parties, petition for discretionary review in the case you are The citing order denies petition for discretionary review in the case you are In Texas SC cases, SC is not satisfied opinion of court of appeals is correct in all respects. PDJC PDRD PDRG PDRR PDRR PDWJ The citing order dismisses petition for discretionary review in the case you are Shepardizing, upholding the judgment as correct. In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied that opinion of court of appeals is correct in all respects. The citing order dismisses petition for discretionary review in the case you are The citing order grants petition for discretionary review in the case you are The citing order refuses petition for discretionary review in the case you are In Texas SC cases, the court of appeals opinion in the case has the same precedential value as an opinion of the SC. The citing order refuses petition for discretionary review in the case you are The citing order dismisses, for want of jurisdiction, petition for discretionary review in the case you are pex PFRA PFRD Shepardizing has expired for failure to pay maintenance fee The citing order abates a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are Shepardizing because of the bankruptcy filing of the petitioner or pending judgment on a settlement agreement. The citing order dismisses a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are PFRE The citing order denies a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are PFRG The citing order grants a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are

8 PFRI PFRR PFRW The citing order reinstates a petition for review that was previously abated by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are The citing order refuses a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are The Court of Appeals opinion that you are Shepardizing has the same precedential value as an opinion of the Supreme Court. The citing order withdraws a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are pg PIG PLR pr The citing reference notes that a petition in the case you are Shepardizing has been granted by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces The citing order sets aside grant of review and dismisses petition or denies or refuses review in the case you are The citing letter ruling incorporates the text of the letter ruling you are The citing decision or order involves the docket or rulemaking number you are PR The citing reference notes petition for discretionary review has been filed in the case you are PRD The citing order denies rehearing of a petition for discretionary review in the case you are PRG The citing order grants rehearing of a petition for discretionary review in the case you are PRNE PROM PRRG PRRO The citing order refuses petition for discretionary review in the case you are Shepardizing, finding no reversible error. In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied opinion of court of appeals correct in all respects. The citing order refuses, for want of merit, petition for discretionary review in the case you are In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied opinion of court of appeals correct in all respects. The citing order grants a motion for rehearing on a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are The citing order overrules a motion fro rehearing on a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are

9 PRUF The citing order refuses, as untimely filed, petition for discretionary review in the case you are PRWP PVWM The citing order refuses, without prejudice, petition for discretionary review in the case you are The citing order grants, without reference to the merits, a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court and vacates judgment in the case you are PWRM The citing order grants, without reference to the merits, petition for discretionary review and remands the case you are Shepardizing for rendition of judgment according to a settlement agreement of the parties. q The citing opinion questions the continuing validity or precedential value of the case you are Shepardizing because of intervening circumstances, including judicial or legislative overruling. r On appeal, reconsideration or rehearing, the citing case reverses the case you are RE Re Recon ReD Ref ReG RN RNRE The citing reference orders the Reporter of Decisions to publish the case you are Shepardizing, reversing a previous depublication order. The citing patent is the reissue of the patent you are The citing decision or order reconsiders the decision or order you are The citing order denies rehearing or reconsideration in the case you are The citing decision or order involves the docket or project number you are The citing order grants rehearing or reconsideration in the case you are The citing order by the U.S. Supreme Court denies rehearing in the case you are The citing order refuses application for writ of error in the case you are Shepardizing, finding no reversible error. In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied opinion of court of appeals correct in all respects.

10 Rpl rr The citing decision or order replaces the decision or order you are Shepardizing has been removed from the register. RS RWM Rx s S SLR SO SP The citing order by the U.S. Supreme Court dismisses rehearing in the case you are The citing order refuses, for want of merit, application for writ of error in the case you are In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied opinion of court of appeals correct in all respects. The citing reference indicates results of reexamination for the patent you are The citing case involves the same litigation as the case you are Shepardizing, but at a different stage of the proceedings. On appeal, reconsideration or rehearing, the citing case supersedes or is substituted for the case you are The citing letter ruling is a subsequent letter ruling issued in the case you are letter ruling The citing reference is an order of the court (other than grants and denials of leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals) of general interest to the bench and bar of the state. A special panel of Court of Appeals judges has convened to resolve a conflict between the citing reference and one or more other Court of Appeals decisions. St TD TG US v VaL The citing reference orders that the precedential effect of the cited case be stayed pending consideration of the application for leave to appeal. The citing order denies transfer in the case you are The citing order grants transfer in the case you are Appeal or certiorari is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case you are The citing case vacates or withdraws the case you are valid and limited.

11 Vap Vi Vid Vidp ViL Vip Vld Vn Vnd Vndp Vnp Void Voidp Vpdf W WD WEDR are Shepardizing are valid. valid and infringed. void, invalid or unenforceable and/or infringed. are Shepardizing are void, invalid or unenforceable and/or infringed. valid, infringed and limited. are Shepardizing are valid and infringed. valid. valid and not infringed. void, invalid or unenforceable and/or not infringed are Shepardizing are void, invalid or unenforceable and/or not infringed. are Shepardizing are valid and not infringed. void, invalid or unenforceable. are Shepardizing are void, invalid or unenforceable. The citing reference notes that the patent you are Shepardizing is held void, invalid or unenforceable in part and a disclaimer has been filed. The citing decision or order withdraws the decision or order you are The citing order denies application for writ of error in the case you are In Texas SC cases, SC is not satisfied opinion of court of appeals is correct in all respects. The citing order dismisses writ of error in the case you are

12 WHCD WPD The citing order dismisses application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are The citing order denies, application for writ of prohibition in the case you are WPDO WRD WRG WWRM The citing order denies, with written opinion, application for writ of prohibition in the case you are The citing order denies rehearing of an application for writ in the case you are The citing order grants rehearing of an application for writ in the case you are The citing order grants, without reference to the merits, application for writ of error and remands the case you are Shepardizing for rendition of judgment according to a settlement agreement of the parties.

4.5 No Notice of Judgment or Order of Appellate Court; Effect on Time to File Certain Documents * * * * * *

4.5 No Notice of Judgment or Order of Appellate Court; Effect on Time to File Certain Documents * * * * * * Rule 4. Time and Notice Provisions 4.5 No Notice of Judgment or Order of Appellate Court; Effect on Time to File Certain Documents Additional Time to File Documents. A party may move for additional time

More information

United States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver

United States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver United States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver By: Roland C. Goss August 31, 2015 On October 6, 2015, the second day of this

More information

Paper 24 Tel: Entered: October 9, 2018 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Paper 24 Tel: Entered: October 9, 2018 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Trials@uspto.gov Paper 24 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: October 9, 2018 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD FACEBOOK, INC. Petitioner v. EVERYMD.COM LLC Patent

More information

SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE Accepted and approved, as amended, by the Standing Administrative Committee on June 22, 2001 SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES

More information

Dwayne Roberts appeals an order denying petitions for writ of mandamus in

Dwayne Roberts appeals an order denying petitions for writ of mandamus in IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DWAYNE E. ROBERTS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-4104

More information

Chapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS

Chapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS Chapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS 201. CREATION OF THE BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS. There shall be a Bay Mills Court of Appeals consisting of the three appeals judges. Any number of judges may be appointed

More information

Do-Overs: Overviewing the Various Mechanisms for Reevaluating an Issued Patent and How They Have Changed Over the Last Five Years +

Do-Overs: Overviewing the Various Mechanisms for Reevaluating an Issued Patent and How They Have Changed Over the Last Five Years + Do-Overs: Overviewing the Various Mechanisms for Reevaluating an Issued Patent and How They Have Changed Over the Last Five Years + By: Brian M. Buroker, Esq. * and Ozzie A. Farres, Esq. ** Hunton & Williams

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Page 1 of 5 Order Number 2015-18-Gen ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CIRCUIT COURT APPEALS AND

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (Slip Opinion) Cite as: 537 U. S. (2002) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested

More information

No. SC-CV SUPREME COURT OF THE NAVAJO NATION. A.P., Minor Petitioner, Crownpoint Family Court, Respondent. OPINION

No. SC-CV SUPREME COURT OF THE NAVAJO NATION. A.P., Minor Petitioner, Crownpoint Family Court, Respondent. OPINION No. SC-CV-45-14 SUPREME COURT OF THE NAVAJO NATION A.P., Minor Petitioner, v. Crownpoint Family Court, Respondent. OPINION Before YAZZIE, H., Chief Justice, SHIRLEY, E., Associate Justice, and SLOAN, A.,

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida POLSTON, J. No. SC13-1668 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Petitioner, vs. DAVIS FAMILY DAY CARE HOME, Respondent. [March 26, 2015] This case is before the Court for

More information

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW IN THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT. B. Small number - about 200 out of 5,000 petitions for review filed

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW IN THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT. B. Small number - about 200 out of 5,000 petitions for review filed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW IN THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT I. Criteria for review A. Discretionary review B. Small number - about 200 out of 5,000 petitions for review filed C. Rule 8.500. Petition for review

More information

SIGNED AND ENTERED this 30th day of June, 2011.

SIGNED AND ENTERED this 30th day of June, 2011. Misc. Docket No. 11-003 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS To ensure that all appropriate state and federal courts, officials, and parties shall have an adequate opportunity to review and resolve

More information

Rule Change #1998(14)

Rule Change #1998(14) Rule Change #1998(14) Chapter 32. Colorado Appellate Rules Original Jurisdiction Certification of Questions of Law Rule 21. Procedure in Original Actions The entire existing C.A.R. Rule 21 is repealed

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 05-0300 444444444444 IN RE BROOKSHIRE GROCERY COMPANY, RELATOR 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

More information

TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 82: APPEALS

TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 82: APPEALS TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 82: APPEALS CONTENTS: 82.101 Purpose... 82-3 82.102 Definitions... 82-3 82.103 Judge of Court of Appeals... 82-4 82.104 Term... 82-4 82.105 Chief Judge... 82-4 82.106 Clerk... 82-4

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: 554 U. S. (2008) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Nos. 06 984 (08A98), 08 5573 (08A99), and 08 5574 (08A99) 06 984 (08A98) v. ON APPLICATION TO RECALL AND STAY MANDATE AND FOR STAY

More information

PATENT LAW. SAS Institute, Inc. v. Joseph Matal, Interim Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and ComplementSoft, LLC Docket No.

PATENT LAW. SAS Institute, Inc. v. Joseph Matal, Interim Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and ComplementSoft, LLC Docket No. PATENT LAW Is the Federal Circuit s Adoption of a Partial-Final-Written-Decision Regime Consistent with the Statutory Text and Intent of the U.S.C. Sections 314 and 318? CASE AT A GLANCE The Court will

More information

Rule 8.03 SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF COURT OF APPEALS DECISION

Rule 8.03 SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF COURT OF APPEALS DECISION Rule 8.03 SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF COURT OF APPEALS DECISION (a) Generally. A party aggrieved by a decision of the Court of Appeals may petition the Supreme Court for discretionary review under K.S.A. 20-3018.

More information

CASE NO. 1D S.P. seeks review of a non-final, postdependency order denying his motion

CASE NO. 1D S.P. seeks review of a non-final, postdependency order denying his motion IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA S.P., Father of D.P., v. Petitioner, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.

More information

2015 Session (78th) CA SB53 R2 CA12. Conference Committee Amendment to (BDR 3-156) Senate Bill No. 53 Second Reprint

2015 Session (78th) CA SB53 R2 CA12. Conference Committee Amendment to (BDR 3-156) Senate Bill No. 53 Second Reprint 0 Session (th) CA SB R CA Amendment No. CA Conference Committee Amendment to (BDR -) Senate Bill No. Second Reprint Proposed by: Conference Committee Amends: Summary: No Title: No Preamble: No Joint Sponsorship:

More information

Chapter 157. Hearings and Appeals. Subchapter EE. Informal Review, Formal Review, and Review by State Office of Administrative Hearings

Chapter 157. Hearings and Appeals. Subchapter EE. Informal Review, Formal Review, and Review by State Office of Administrative Hearings Chapter 157. Hearings and Appeals Subchapter EE. Informal Review, Formal Review, and Review by State Office of Administrative Hearings Division 1. Informal Review Statutory Authority: The provisions of

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1560-12 EX PARTE JOHN CHRISTOPHER LO ON APPELLANT S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HARRIS COUNTY Per Curiam. KELLER,

More information

USA v. Frederick Banks

USA v. Frederick Banks 2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-29-2010 USA v. Frederick Banks Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 08-2452 Follow this and

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 09-0715 444444444444 MABON LIMITED, PETITIONER, v. AFRI-CARIB ENTERPRISES, INC., RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit IN RE THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Petitioner. Miscellaneous Docket No. 121 On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Patent and Trademark

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC02-1085 PER CURIAM. MARTHA M. TOPPS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [January 22, 2004] Petitioner Martha M. Topps petitions this Court for writ of mandamus.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Gen

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Gen IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Administrative Order 2018-93-Gen ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER UPDATING PROCEDURES FOR CIRCUIT COURT APPEALS AND PETITIONS

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC91122 CLARENCE H. HALL, JR., Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA and MICHAEL W. MOORE, Respondents. [January 20, 2000] PER CURIAM. We have for review Hall v. State, 698 So.

More information

Anatomy of an Appeal By Michelle May O Neil

Anatomy of an Appeal By Michelle May O Neil By Michelle May O Neil I. What is an appeal? The Nolo online legal dictionary defines an appeal as follows: A written request to a higher court to modify or reverse the judgment of a trial court or intermediate

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Daniel King, : Appellant : : v. : No. 226 C.D. 2012 : SUBMITTED: January 18, 2013 Riverwatch Condominium : Owners Association : BEFORE: HONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE

More information

2017 and entered on the docket on September 29, The relevant facts follow. have any sexual offender registration requirements.

2017 and entered on the docket on September 29, The relevant facts follow. have any sexual offender registration requirements. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH : No. CP-41-CR-2173-2015 Appellant : vs. : CRIMINAL DIVISION : GREGORY PERSON, : Appellee : 1925(a) Opinion OPINION IN SUPPORT

More information

CAN A PATENT ONCE ADJUDICATED TO BE INVALID BE RESURRECTED? RONALD A. CLAYTON Partner FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO NEW YORK, NEW YORK

CAN A PATENT ONCE ADJUDICATED TO BE INVALID BE RESURRECTED? RONALD A. CLAYTON Partner FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO NEW YORK, NEW YORK CAN A PATENT ONCE ADJUDICATED TO BE INVALID BE RESURRECTED? RONALD A. CLAYTON Partner FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO NEW YORK, NEW YORK INTRODUCTION It has long been considered black letter law that

More information

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0585n.06 Filed: August 14, Case No

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0585n.06 Filed: August 14, Case No NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0585n.06 Filed: August 14, 2007 Case No. 03-5681 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RONNIE LEE BOWLING, Petitioner-Appellant, v.

More information

NO CV. IN RE MARK CECIL PROVINE, Relator. Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus * * * NO.

NO CV. IN RE MARK CECIL PROVINE, Relator. Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus * * * NO. Opinion issued December 10, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-09-00769-CV IN RE MARK CECIL PROVINE, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus * * *

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 13-136 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States MEGAN MAREK, v. Petitioner, SEAN LANE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA James D. Schneller, : Appellant : : v. : No. 352 C.D. 2016 : Submitted: August 5, 2016 Clerk of Courts of the First Judicial : District of Pennsylvania; Prothonotary

More information

UNDERSTANDING THE APPELLATE PROCESS IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

UNDERSTANDING THE APPELLATE PROCESS IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL UNDERSTANDING THE APPELLATE PROCESS IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL (Submitted by appellate lawyer members of the Palm Beach County Appellate Practice Committee) THE INFORMATION CONTAINED BELOW

More information

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED 1.1 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL Order By Daniel L. Young PART ONE STATE PROCEEDINGS CHAPTER 1. BAIL 1.2 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL CURRENTLY

More information

POST GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS IN THE PTO STEPHEN G. KUNIN PARTNER

POST GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS IN THE PTO STEPHEN G. KUNIN PARTNER POST GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS IN THE PTO STEPHEN G. KUNIN PARTNER PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD (PTAB) COMPOSITION DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS COMMISSIONER FOR TRADEMARKS APJ 2 PATENT

More information

STUTSON v. UNITED STATES. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit

STUTSON v. UNITED STATES. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit OCTOBER TERM, 1995 193 Syllabus STUTSON v. UNITED STATES on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit No. 94 8988. Decided January 8, 1996 The District

More information

PROPOSED RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AMENDMENT APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES

PROPOSED RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AMENDMENT APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES PROPOSED RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AMENDMENT RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES (a) Applicability. Appeal proceedings in criminal cases shall be as in civil cases except as modified by

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012) Case: 13-55859 05/16/2013 ID: 8632114 DktEntry: 1-2 Page: 1 of 16 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Office of the Clerk After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ALLENTON BROWNE, Appellant/Defendant, v. LAURA L.Y. GORE, Appellee/Plaintiff. Re: Super. Ct. Civ. No. 155/2010 (STX On Appeal from the Superior

More information

CHAPTER 15. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENTAL DETERMINATIONS IN GENERAL

CHAPTER 15. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENTAL DETERMINATIONS IN GENERAL JUDICIAL REVIEW 210 Rule 1501 CHAPTER 15. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENTAL DETERMINATIONS IN GENERAL Rule 1501. Scope of Chapter. 1502. Exclusive Procedure. 1503. Improvident Appeals or Original Jurisdiction

More information

FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 2008 Edition Rules reflect all changes through 969 So.2d 357. Subsequent amendments, if any, can be found at www.floridasupremecourt.org/decisions/rules.shtml. THE

More information

FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS

FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS CITATIONS TO OPINIONS ADOPTING OR AMENDING RULES... 4 RULE 9.010. EFFECTIVE DATE AND SCOPE... 6 RULE 9.020. DEFINITIONS... 7 RULE 9.030. JURISDICTION

More information

Keith Jennings v. R. Martinez

Keith Jennings v. R. Martinez 2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-23-2012 Keith Jennings v. R. Martinez Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 11-4098 Follow

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #12-1342 Document #1426559 Filed: 03/21/2013 Page 1 of 5 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP, et al.,

More information

Lawrence Walker v. Comm Social Security

Lawrence Walker v. Comm Social Security 2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-2-2010 Lawrence Walker v. Comm Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 08-1446 Follow

More information

Copr. West 2004 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works

Copr. West 2004 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works 97 S.W.3d 731 Page 1 Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. MERIDIEN HOTELS, INC. and MHI Leasco Dallas, Inc., Appellants, v. LHO FINANCING PARTNERSHIP I, L.P., Appellee. In re MHI Leasco Dallas, Inc. and

More information

Reginald Castel v. Atty Gen USA

Reginald Castel v. Atty Gen USA 2011 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-12-2011 Reginald Castel v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-2437 Follow

More information

Paper 14 Tel: Entered: December 18, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Paper 14 Tel: Entered: December 18, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Trials@uspto.gov Paper 14 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: December 18, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD BILLY GOAT INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner, v. SCHILLER

More information

Microsoft Corp. v. i4i L.P. et al. U.S. Supreme Court (No )

Microsoft Corp. v. i4i L.P. et al. U.S. Supreme Court (No ) Microsoft Corp. v. i4i L.P. et al. U.S. Supreme Court (No. 10-290) What Will Be the Evidentiary Standard(s) for Proving Patent Invalidity in Future Court Cases? March 2011 COPYRIGHT 2011. DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Stacy Miller, : Appellant : : v. : No. 1930 C.D. 2004 : Argued: March 3, 2005 Charles Klink, David Almond, : Gregory A. Gaines, Laura Kimmel, : Michael Viola,

More information

WESTLAW EDGE CHECKING CITATIONS IN KEYCITE QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE. Accessing KeyCite. Checking Cases and Administrative Decisions in KeyCite

WESTLAW EDGE CHECKING CITATIONS IN KEYCITE QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE. Accessing KeyCite. Checking Cases and Administrative Decisions in KeyCite QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE WESTLAW EDGE CHECKING CITATIONS IN KEYCITE KeyCite is the industry s most complete, accurate, and up-to-the-minute citation service. You can use it to instantly verify whether a case,

More information

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 16, 2009 The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit proposes to amend its Rules. These amendments are

More information

This case is before this Court on Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's BOC Petition For Review Of Final Agency Action.

This case is before this Court on Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's BOC Petition For Review Of Final Agency Action. STATE OF MAINE KENNEBEC, ss. SUPERIOR COURT AUGUSTA DOCKET NO. AP-16-26 MAINE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE, Petitioner v. ORDER ON RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD DAHL et. als., Respondents I. Posture

More information

3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1

3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1 3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments 2008 - Page 1 1 L.A.R. 1.0 SCOPE AND TITLE OF RULES 2 1.1 Scope and Organization of Rules 3 The following Local Appellate Rules (L.A.R.) are adopted

More information

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings Various Post-Grant Proceedings under AIA Ex parte reexamination Modified by AIA Sec. 6(h)(2) Continue to be available under AIA Inter partes reexamination

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: 542 U. S. (2004) 1 Opinion of the Court NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify

More information

Michigan Appellate Assigned Counsel System. Knowing Your Appellate Deadlines Court Rules and Procedure

Michigan Appellate Assigned Counsel System. Knowing Your Appellate Deadlines Court Rules and Procedure Michigan Appellate Assigned Counsel System MAACS Annual Orientation October 14, 2015 Knowing Your Appellate Deadlines Court Rules and Procedure Marla McCowan Michigan Indigent Defense Commission mmccowanidc@gmail.com

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Ex. Rel. Darryl Powell, : Petitioner : v. : No. 116 M.D. 2007 : Submitted: September 3, 2010 Pennsylvania Department of : Corrections,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,867-01 EX PARTE DAVID RAY LEA, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE NO. 52758-A IN THE 239TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BRAZORIA COUNTY

More information

Will the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Rely Upon Dictionary Definitions Newly. Cited in Appeal Briefs? Answer: It Depends

Will the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Rely Upon Dictionary Definitions Newly. Cited in Appeal Briefs? Answer: It Depends Will the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Rely Upon Dictionary Definitions Newly Cited in Appeal Briefs? Answer: It Depends By Richard Neifeld, Neifeld IP Law, PC 1 I. INTRODUCTION Should dictionary

More information

Status Quo at the PTAB for Now: Supreme Court Makes No Change to IPR; Judicial Review and Claim Construction Standard Remain the Same

Status Quo at the PTAB for Now: Supreme Court Makes No Change to IPR; Judicial Review and Claim Construction Standard Remain the Same Status Quo at the PTAB for Now: Supreme Court Makes No Change to IPR; Judicial Review and Claim Construction Standard Remain the Same CLIENT ALERT June 30, 2016 Maia H. Harris harrism@pepperlaw.com Frank

More information

Submitted April 9, 2018 Decided April 23, 2018 Remanded by Supreme Court November 2, 2018 Resubmitted December 21, 2018 Decided January 15, 2019

Submitted April 9, 2018 Decided April 23, 2018 Remanded by Supreme Court November 2, 2018 Resubmitted December 21, 2018 Decided January 15, 2019 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding

More information

Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied March 24, 1993 COUNSEL

Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied March 24, 1993 COUNSEL 1 STATE V. WARE, 1993-NMCA-041, 115 N.M. 339, 850 P.2d 1042 (Ct. App. 1993) STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. Robert S. WARE, Defendant-Appellant No. 13671 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO 1993-NMCA-041,

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 14-1495 In the Supreme Court of the United States ALVARO ADAME, v. Petitioner, LORETTA E. LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Appeal: 12-2000 Doc: 101-1 Filed: 08/29/2013 Pg: 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Petitioner v. No. 12-1514 ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY Board Case

More information

SEC. 6. AIA: POST-GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS

SEC. 6. AIA: POST-GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS SEC. 6. AIA: POST-GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS (a) INTER PARTES REVIEW. Chapter 31 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 3 1 1. I n t e r p a r t e s r e v i e w. 3 1 2. P e

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Stephen Person, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1763 C.D. 2016 : Submitted: April 7, 2017 Department of Corrections, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER,

More information

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Decided November 4, 2008 No. 07-1192 YASIN MUHAMMED BASARDH, (ISN 252), PETITIONER v. ROBERT M. GATES, U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, RESPONDENT

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. PD-0596-13 & PD-0624-13 EX PARTE CHARLIE J. GILL, Appellant EX PARTE TOMMY JOHN GILL, Appellant ON APPELLANTS PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE

More information

Federal Labor Laws. Paul K. Rainsberger, Director University of Missouri Labor Education Program Revised, June 2011

Federal Labor Laws. Paul K. Rainsberger, Director University of Missouri Labor Education Program Revised, June 2011 Federal Labor Laws Paul K. Rainsberger, Director University of Missouri Labor Education Program Revised, June 2011 VIII. NLRB Procedures in C (Unfair Labor Practice) Cases A. The Onset of an Unfair Labor

More information

A The following shall be assigned to the appellate division:

A The following shall be assigned to the appellate division: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2015-13 RE: Appellate Division of the

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida 89,005 AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.020(a) AND ADOPTION OF FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.190. [September 27, 1996] PER CURIAM. The Appellate Rules

More information

THE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

THE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS THE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Effective 1 January 2019 Table of Contents I. General... 1 Rule 1. Courts of Criminal Appeals... 1 Rule 2. Scope of Rules; Title...

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued October 18, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-17-00476-CV BRIAN A. WILLIAMS, Appellant V. DEVINAH FINN, Appellee On Appeal from the 257th District Court

More information

OPINIONS NONE PETITIONS FOR REHEARING NONE

OPINIONS NONE PETITIONS FOR REHEARING NONE "Slip opinions" are the opinions delivered by the Supreme Court Justices and are subject to modification, rehearing, withdrawal, or clerical corrections. Modifications to previously posted opinions will

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 09CR1012

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 09CR1012 [Cite as State v. Blanton, 2012-Ohio-3276.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 24295 v. : T.C. NO. 09CR1012 GREGORY E. BLANTON : (Criminal

More information

No. 106,937 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. MATTHEW PAUL MARKOVICH, Appellant, RANDALL GREEN, et al., Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

No. 106,937 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. MATTHEW PAUL MARKOVICH, Appellant, RANDALL GREEN, et al., Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT No. 106,937 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS MATTHEW PAUL MARKOVICH, Appellant, v. RANDALL GREEN, et al., Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under K.S.A. 22-4506(c), an indigent inmate has

More information

Nevada Constitution Article 19 Section 1. Referendum for approval or disapproval of statute or resolution enacted by legislature. Sec. 2.

Nevada Constitution Article 19 Section 1. Referendum for approval or disapproval of statute or resolution enacted by legislature. Sec. 2. Nevada Constitution Article 19 Section 1. Referendum for approval or disapproval of statute or resolution enacted by legislature. 1. A person who intends to circulate a petition that a statute or resolution

More information

CASE NO. 1D Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA GEORGE LEWIS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-2806

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JIM YOVINO, FRESNO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS v. AILEEN RIZO ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PER

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Gen

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Gen IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Administrative Order 2019-6-Gen ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER UPDATING PROCEDURES FOR CIRCUIT COURT APPEALS AND PETITIONS

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida QUINCE, J. No. SC12-2232 DEBRA LAFAVE, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [October 16, 2014] This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Second District

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 7A 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 7A 1 Chapter 7A. Judicial Department. SUBCHAPTER I. GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Article 1. Judicial Power and Organization. 7A-1. Short title. This Chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Judicial Department

More information

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION JUDICIAL REVIEW PROVISIONS OF THE REAL ID ACT Practice Advisory 1 By: AILF Legal Action Center June 7, 2005 The REAL ID Act of 2005 was signed into law on May 11, 2005

More information

RULES AND STATUTES ON HABEAS CORPUS with Amendments and Additions in the ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996

RULES AND STATUTES ON HABEAS CORPUS with Amendments and Additions in the ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996 RULES AND STATUTES ON HABEAS CORPUS with Amendments and Additions in the ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996 CRIMINAL JUSTICE LEGAL FOUNDATION INTRODUCTION On April 24, 1996, Senate Bill

More information

Michael Ufferman of the Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

Michael Ufferman of the Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Petitioner. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ANTHONY BUSH, JR., v. Petitioner, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D11-3203

More information

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00390-CV IN RE RAY BELL RELATOR ---------- ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ---------- Relator Ray Bell filed a petition

More information

When is a ruling truly final?

When is a ruling truly final? When is a ruling truly final? When is a ruling truly final? Ryan B. McCrum at Jones Day considers the Fresenius v Baxter ruling and its potential impact on patent litigation in the US. In a case that could

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 2000 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 2000 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 2000 Session WILLIAM BOYD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 68808 Richard R. Baumgartner, Judge No.

More information

FEDERAL CIRCUIT DECISIONS FOR WEEK ENDING June 19, 2015

FEDERAL CIRCUIT DECISIONS FOR WEEK ENDING June 19, 2015 P+S FEDERAL CIRCUIT SUMMARIES VOL. 7, ISSUE 24 FEDERAL CIRCUIT DECISIONS FOR WEEK ENDING June 19, 2015 Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC, (June 16, 2015) (en banc) (precedential) (11-1) Patent No. 6,155,840

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Dennis L. Ness and John E. Bowders, : Appellants : : v. : No. 478 C.D. 2013 : Submitted: September 13, 2013 York Township Board of : Commissioners : BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

Adkins, Moylan,* Thieme,* JJ.

Adkins, Moylan,* Thieme,* JJ. REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 0201 September Term, 1999 ON REMAND ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION STATE OF MARYLAND v. DOUG HICKS Adkins, Moylan,* Thieme,* JJ. Opinion by Adkins,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cv JDW-EAJ. versus

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cv JDW-EAJ. versus Kenneth Stewart v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al Doc. 1108737375 Att. 1 Case: 14-11238 Date Filed: 12/22/2015 Page: 1 of 15 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No.

More information

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CV. VICTOR WOODARD, Appellant

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CV. VICTOR WOODARD, Appellant Opinion issued March 26, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-07-00954-CV VICTOR WOODARD, Appellant V. THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AND TRRISTAAN CHOLE HENRY,

More information