ETHICS SOME CAUTIONARY TALES
|
|
- Polly Matthews
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ETHICS SOME CAUTIONARY TALES INTRODUCTION The legal profession, like many other professions, has developed a system of rules that regulates the conduct of its members. The sanctions for breach of the rules range from simple reprimand, to fines, to loss of the right to practise law. This paper looks at some recent cases that may, it is hoped, serve as a reminder of some of our ethical obligations to our clients and the courts. There is nothing startling or new in these cases but the subject matter in each case is a little different from the usual conflict of interest or hand in the till type issues. They do highlight the ease with which breaches of our duties may occur. A. DISCOURTEOUS, OFFENSIVE OR PROVOCATIVE CONDUCT Lander v Council of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory [2009] ACTSC 117 Higgins CJ, Grey and Refshauge JJ This case dealt with the relations between a solicitor and a third party. 1
2 Lander was a solicitor acting for a Mr Boutsis in relation to an invalidity claim against the ACT Department of Education and Training. Lander s wife was employed by the Department as a teacher. On behalf of his client he sent the Department a letter that contained the following CONDUCT OF YOUR AGENCY AND MR BOUTSIS Your Department has a long history of failing to communicate at all or to communicate substantively and honestly. This has been documented in hundreds of cases and shows no sign of improvement. I act for Mr Boutsis. In my brief encounters with officers of your agency, they have been rude, unhelpful, obsessive and compulsive in relation to their own ego and their own self-importance and otherwise unresponsive. This persists to the present time. Mr Boutsis has been the subject of a recommendation which your Department has that he be promptly medically retired and despite the fact that your Department has had that report for about six weeks, it has not communicated to Mr Boutsis; or, at his specific request, to his solicitor, this firm, what it is doing about having him medically retired or arranging pre-retirement payment or anything else. This is consistent as we say with years of malpractice and maladministration by your organisation. It appears that nothing will change that conduct and that the Department bears grudges against people who engage lawyers, particularly competent ones. We ask that you please immediately summons the people in your case management area and ask them why it is that they have refused to correspond with me in accordance with Mr Boutsis directions and requests, refused to provide reports to me, refused to progress his retirement and otherwise behaved in a shamefully non-communicative and disinterested fashion. The practices of people in your case management area are by and large consistent with Mr Boutsis and my experiences and were documented in 2
3 several Commonwealth AAT proceedings including that of my wife. My wife remains a teacher in your system and I ask that no recriminations be taken against her because her husband happens to be a solicitor acting for teachers. Would you please respond to this correspondence, a copy of which is being forwarded to your Minister who seems to mistakenly believe that there is no cause for any intervention or concern with the conduct of your Department. Thank you, Yours sincerely LANDER & CO David Lander c.c. Minister ACT Department of Education, Youth and Family Services The Department complained to the ACT Law Society alleging a breach of standards from the legal practitioner. That letter of complaint included the following In his letter, Mr Lander made a number of general statements about the Department of Education and Training and its staff failing to communicate, being dishonest, rude, unhelpful, obsessive and compulsive, bearing grudges against people who engage lawyers; as well as general allegations of malpractice and maladministration. Mr Lander also implied that the Department of Education and Training may engage in recriminations against his wife, who is a teacher in the Territory, an employee of the Department, and who has no involvement in the matter addressed in the letter. Departmental staff have been offended by Mr Lander s accusations 3
4 and feel that they have been unfairly targeted by his derogatory and slanderous remarks. Additionally, it is impossible for the Department to respond to any meaningful way to such serious yet non-specific accusations. In a reply to a letter from the Law Society, Lander stated I have the right and the duty as a solicitor to draw on my experience, skill, knowledge and experience when acting for clients. They arise in part because I have had 30 years of experience with ACT Education as a parent, citizen and lawyer. I have acted for many clients, both students and teachers in respect of ACT Education matters. I am entitled to draw and am expected to draw on those skills, that knowledge and that experience. To seek to isolate a lawyer s credentials and to seek to tie their hands behind their back as your solicitor recently suggested in advice to the Society s Council is, with respect, improper. The ACT Government has legislated The Human Rights Act Section 16 of that Act reads as follows: - Freedom of Expression I am a citizen before I am a lawyer. I am a person as defined in The Human Rights Act. The Human Rights Act (sic) overrides any Rule which may be in conflict with a statutorily prescribed freedom of expression. Nothing I wrote to the Department was other than based on my knowledge, experience, skills and the facts of the case. I ask you to look at the experience of the client and my own in trying to deal with the Department. I say as a lawyer and a citizen that my experience, knowledge and skills lead me to believe that the ACT Department of Education systemically engages in maladministration, in cover-ups of wrong doings and in abuses of power. Neither the Department nor the Society can or should prevent citizens or lawyers from expressing such views. We live in an age where lawyers either stand up against the abuses of the State or we succumb to those abuses. It is not the society s role to censor or to adjudicate on these fundamental freedoms and duties, but to defend them. Yours sincerely, LANDER & CO David Lander 4
5 There were further exchanges of correspondence, which are set out in the judgment, including one from the solicitor described by the Court as unsurprisingly truculent. In one letter Mr Lander makes the point that what he said in his letter to the Department he could equally make in a letter to the Canberra Times, or on the airwaves. Included in that letter is the following I remind the Society that both the President of the Appeal Court of our Supreme Court and the Chief Judge have repeatedly urged solicitors when entering the profession to remember to act upon the most solemn duty of all lawyers. That solemn duty as I have brought to the Society s attention before and do so again is to represent people against abuses of power by the State. Council of the Law Society made an application to the Legal Practitioner s Disciplinary Tribunal, the chief allegations being (i) unsubstantiated statements about the Department and its staff and (ii) the tone of the correspondence. The Legal Profession (Solicitors) Rules provide The statement of principles prefacing the section headed Relations With Third Parties contained in the Rules provides: Practitioners should, in the course of their practice, conduct their dealings with other members of the community, and the affairs of their clients which affect the rights of others, according to the same principles of honesty and fairness which are required in relations with the courts and other lawyers and in a manner that is consistent with the public interest. [The Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 2005 (Vic) has the same provision] Rule 25 provides: A practitioner, in all of the practitioner s dealings with other practitioners must take all reasonable care to maintain the integrity of the legal profession by ensuring that the practitioner s 5
6 communications are courteous, and that the practitioner avoids offensive or provocative language or conduct. [Rule 21 of the Victorian Rules is in the same terms] The Legal Practitioner s Disciplinary Tribunal found Lander guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct. (The reasons of the Tribunal are set out in paragraph 23 of the judgment and are well worth a read). On appeal, the Supreme Court supported and endorsed the general principles that the Tribunal adopted in its consideration of the complaint. However, it upheld Mr Lander s appeal. At paragraph 36, the Supreme Court whilst emphatically supporting the notion that the use of insulting language or behaving offensively towards members of the public is not conducive to the maintenance of the good name of the profession stated However, it seems to us that that principle in no way diminishes the right, indeed the duty, of a solicitor to represent his or her client s interests forthrightly and without fear or favour. If the conduct of public officials adversely impacting on a client is considered on reasonable grounds to be rude, unhelpful or any similar characterisation, it is no breach of the obligation of courtesy to point that out to those in authority, even though those criticised may consider the criticism unwarranted and offensive. Such communication may well be regarded as discourteous and provocative but, nevertheless, a subject that needs to be raised in the interests of the client as well as generally. The Court also considered that whilst Rule 25 of the Rules does engage ss 16 (freedom of expression) and 8 (recognition and equality before the law) of the 6
7 Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) it was not inconsistent with those rights to place limits on professional behaviour. 1 Further, whilst stating that there was an obligation on a practitioner to deal with all persons with honesty and fairness, the question of courtesy was more difficult to assess and depended upon the circumstances. 2 The Court noted that under the Rules there was a difference between dealings with other practitioners and those with third parties. For instance, they said, it may be necessary to write a robust letter of demand accusing the recipient of fraud or other misconduct. The recipient, particularly if the accusation is untrue, will no doubt be offended, even outraged. Yet, if the solicitor had received apparently reasonable information supporting such an accusation, he or she is bound to put it to the recipient. 3 In the instant case there was no suggestion of dishonesty on the part of Lander nor that he made any allegation that he knew to be untrue or for which there was no reasonable basis. The Court further stated that the essence of the respondent Department s contention, which must be rejected as too broad, is that there is a general obligation on a solicitor to refrain from that which the recipient might find to be discourteous, or offensive or provocative statements. 4 At [56] - Of course, the fact that Rule 25 requires that practitioners ensure courtesy and the avoidance of offensive or provocative language does not of itself make an apparent non-compliance unsatisfactory professional conduct. The question is whether the solicitor had a 1 See paragraphs [37] [38]. 2 At paragraph [43] 3 At [47] 4 At [52] 7
8 reasonable basis for them. He said there was. That was not a contention that was examined. The Court stated that the real issue to be resolved was not that the solicitor made the comments complained of, but whether Lander s criticisms and accusations were false or without foundation, to his knowledge. That issue was not addressed by the Tribunal. The appeal was therefore upheld. 5 B. FALSE STATEMENTS TO COURT There can be no more serious disciplinary breach than misleading a Court or tribunal. Legal Services Commissioner v C (Legal Practice) [2012] VCAT 890, per Senior Member Smithers C was charged with four counts of professional misconduct relating to representations made to Chief Judge Rozenes, to Judge Hannan and to Judge Coish whilst acting on behalf of a client charged with a criminal offence. C was a solicitor acting for the accused. It was alleged that he made false and misleading representations (and that he did not take steps to correct those representations). The representations were as follows - 1. At a directions hearing he told Chief Judge Rozenes that he had briefed T as counsel for his client s trial, 2. At that directions hearing he stated that there was funding for the trial, 3. At another directions hearing before Judge Hannan he stated that the matter was ready to proceed, 5 At [58] 8
9 4. On the first day of trial he told Judge Coish that he had briefed S to appear. Before VCAT he was charged as follows: Charge 1 professional misconduct within the meaning of s 4.4.4(a) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 and contravention of the Professional Conduct Rules 14.1 (not knowingly make a misleading statement to a court) and 14.2 (must take all necessary steps to correct any misleading statement). This charge related to each of the representations and the failure to take steps to correct them. Charge 2 professional misconduct within the meaning of s 4.4.4(a) and contravention of Rule 30 (Dishonesty). Again this charge was particularised by each of the four representations. Charge 3 Professional misconduct at common law and within the meaning s 4.4.3(1) of the Act as the respondents conduct in misleading the court would reasonably be regarded as disgraceful and dishonourable by professional colleagues of good repute and competency. The particulars related to each of the four representations. Charge 4 Professional misconduct within the meaning of s 4.4.3(1)(a) of the Act in that he engaged in a substantial failure to reach or maintain a reasonable standard of competence and diligence by a) Failing to brief counsel to conduct the trial of the proceeding; b) Failing to procure funding or adequate funding for the conduct of the trial, c) Failing to adduce adequate evidence to explain his clients absence from Court on 2 occasions, and 9
10 d) Causing the trial of the proceeding to be delayed and causing inconvenience to the court and fellow practitioners. Professional misconduct at common law is constituted by conduct by a professional person in practise, which would be reasonably regarded, as disgraceful or dishonourable by professional brethren of good repute and competency. 6 The allegations were clearly made out. C in his evidence and submissions stressed that he was acting out of the best intentions. He had concluded that it was clear that his client had to plead guilty, that his client had no defence and that his ongoing preoccupation was to achieve that outcome. He said he could not tell the judges of this. 7 The Tribunal considered that C s approach was completely misguided. In effect he had kept the court in the dark in order to pursue what he saw as the best outcome for his client. This may have been affected by the fact that he had known his client s brother for 40 years. 8 The Tribunal referred to Guss v The Law Institute of Victoria 9 where Maxwell P stated It is difficult to overstate the importance in the administration of justice of the paramount duty of a legal practitioner not to mislead the court. Where there is any conflict or risk of conflict between that duty and what the practitioner perceives to be his/ her duty to the client, the duty to the court must always prevail. 6 See Re a solicitor [1960] VR 617, At paragraph [15] 8 At [18] 9 [2006] VSCA 88 at [39] 10
11 The Tribunal found that C knowingly misled the Court on each occasion (Charge 1); that he did so dishonestly and that this was likely to a material degree to be prejudicial to the administration of justice, to diminish public confidence in the administration of justice and to prejudice adversely the practitioner s ability to practise according to the rules (Charge 2); that the conduct is correctly characterised as conduct which would be reasonably regarded as disgraceful and dishonourable by professional colleagues of good repute (Charge 3) and that his conduct constituted a substantial failure to reach or maintain a reasonable standard of competence and diligence (Charge 4). He engaged in misconduct. C s practising certificate was cancelled, he was prohibited from obtaining one for 12 months and he was ordered to pay costs in an amount of $10,089. At [32] - There can be no more serious disciplinary breach than misleading a Court or tribunal. C. CROSS EXAMINATION SOME DON Ts Libke v The Queen [2007] HCA 30 Gleeson CJ, Kirby, Hayne, Callinan and Heydon JJ This case considered, amongst other things, whether a miscarriage of justice arose by reason of the manner in which the prosecutor conducted the cross examination of the appellant. Kirby and Callinan JJ set out passages of the offending cross-examination of the appellant at trial at paragraphs [19] [27]. 11
12 It was, as they stated at [18] a scornful cross examination punctuated by interruptions of answers and comments, but not, regrettably, objection by counsel or intervention by the trial judge. By reason of the questioning the appellant, their Honours were unable to conclude that the appellant did have a fair trial. They were however in the minority. The majority dismissed the appeal on the basis that taken as a whole the breaches did not generate unfairness or a miscarriage of justice. However all judges considered the questioning improper. Heydon J stated that there were many respect in which the cross examination was in breach of ethical duties as well as the established laws of evidence. 10 He listed a number of heads of topics with which the cross examination offended. 1) Offensive Questioning a prosecutor must conduct himself with restraint and with due regard to the rights and dignity of accused persons. 11 His Honour described the most striking characteristic of the cross examination as wild, uncontrolled and offensive. It is unbecoming in a legal representative, especially a prosecutor, to subject a witness, particularly an accused, to harassing and badgering cross-examination. 2) Comments counsel infringed the rules when he regularly injected his personal views and editorial comments into the questions he was asking. Comments have several vices including that the witness has no opportunity to answer or that the jury may regard counsel as a person of special knowledge and status and therefore pay particular regard to 10 At [118] 11 At [122] 12
13 the comments. Personal opinion and beliefs should not be injected into a case. 3) Compound questions simultaneously poses more than one inquiry. 4) Cutting off answers before they were completed 5) Questions resting on controversial assumptions on occasion the cross examiner alleged that the accused was inventing evidence when in fact the proposition supposedly invented corresponded with evidence given by the complainant. 6) Argumentative questions some of the questions and observations of counsel did not seek to elicit information, but rather provided merely an invitation to argument. E.g. I suggest to you that or Is your evidence to be taken as suggesting that? Section 41 of the Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) the Court may disallow an improper question or improper questioning. Improper question or improper questioning are defined in s 41(3). D. SLEEPING WITH THE ENEMY If counsel is in a relationship with his or her opponent it is a good idea to disclose that fact to the client before acting. R v Szabo [2000] QCA 194 de Jersey CJ, Davies and Thomas JJA Conviction was set aside following a trial for burglary and rape, despite the prosecution case against the appellant being described by the Court as strong. The appellant complained first that his counsel was flagrantly incompetent in advising him to elect not to give evidence; and secondly he alleged that his counsel was in a relationship with the prosecutor such as to deprive the appellant of truly independent legal advice. 13
14 The first ground was dismissed. Defence counsel and the prosecutor had been in a relationship - they broke off a few months before the trial, spent a weekend together in a motel a few days after the appellant was convicted, and resumed a few months after the trial. The court considered that the overall appearance of the above circumstances is that of a separated couple who retained at least some interest in renewal. They were therefore much closer to each other than ordinary arms-length legal adversaries. 12 The court was unaware of any decision, which applies the well-known apparent bias test to the activity of persons other than decision makers. The true source of law for the resolution of such a question is the power of the Court of Appeal to set aside a conviction when it considers that there was a miscarriage of justice. At [61] Thomas JA stated Applying these principles to the present circumstances, one immediately has to consider whether it is proper for persons in particular relationships to act for contrary interests. Would it be improper for a husband and wife to oppose each other as counsel for different parties in the same case? I am not aware of any general reason of public policy why this should be prohibited, although individual factors may arise in particular instances which make it undesirable. There is no current rule of conduct approved by the Bar Association of Queensland that addresses such a problem. Speaking generally there does not appear to be any sufficient reason to think that by reason of their relationship such persons would not each do their best on behalf of their respective 12 At [47] 14
15 clients. There is of course a risk that counsel living in the same house or with access to each other's property could improperly read the other's brief, although the risk hardly seems any greater than in the case of counsel in the same group of chambers. A client with particularly valuable information might however choose not to take such a risk if notified of the relationship. That is one of the reasons that lead me to consider that in such a situation there is at the very least an ethical duty upon counsel to disclose to the client that such a relationship with opposing counsel exists. I do not think that a similar duty necessarily arises in relation to a case involving counsel in the same group of chambers. While this distinction may not seem entirely logical, its justification is the greater suspicion arising from sexual intimacy and an assumption that persons in a sexual relationship are more likely to be prepared to do a favour for the other than persons not in such a relationship. The court did not consider that there was in the instant case any good reason to suspect any collusion, connivance or lack of dedication. 13 The record suggested counsel acted competently. It was the failure to disclose the relationship in the circumstances that was a matter of concern. The degree of association that followed soon after the trial justified the inference that there existed an interest in renewal. In all the circumstances counsel was under a duty to inform the appellant of the past and present situation just as he would be if he and the prosecutor were still in a relationship. His Honour went on to state that the client should have the opportunity of indicating whether he or she wishes to continue with such counsel. Obtaining the client s consent in writing was considered wise. His Honour concluded that 13 At [63] 15
16 the importance of maintaining full confidence in the integrity and impartiality of those entrusted with the administration of justice, and in particular counsel, should not be under-estimated. In the end I conclude that an ordinary fair-minded citizen in the position of the appellant, with knowledge of all relevant circumstances, would entertain a reasonable suspicion that justice miscarried. 14 E. ONE FINAL OBSERVATION In January 2013 VLA changed its guidelines. Amongst the changes, funding is no longer provided for a solicitor to instruct at trial for more than two half days regardless of the complexity or length of such trial. It is worth remembering our duties to clients and courts before deciding whether or not to act on behalf of a legally aided client facing a serious criminal trial. Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 2005 apply to all regulated practitioners of the LIV practising as solicitors, or as solicitors and barristers. They include the following: Under the heading Relations with Clients Practitioners should serve their clients competently and diligently. They should be acutely aware of the fiduciary nature of their relationship with their clients, and always deal with their clients fairly, free of the influence of any interest which may conflict with a client s best interests. 14 [80] 16
17 Rule 1.1 A practitioner must, in the course of engaging in legal practice, act honestly and fairly in clients best interests and maintain clients confidences. Rule 2 A practitioner should agree to act for a client in a matter only when the practitioner reasonably expects: 2.1 to serve the client honestly and fairly, and with competence and diligence; and 2.2 to attend to work required with reasonable promptness. Rule 6.1 A practitioner must complete the legal services required by the practitioner s engagement unless one or more of the matters set out in to occur. Rule 6.2 deals with a practitioner engaged to act for a client required to stand trial for a serious criminal offence and the termination of the engagement. Rule 6.3 deals with the position of a client who is legally assisted. Without limiting the general application of rule 6.1, a practitioner who is acting for a legally assisted client in any current proceeding may terminate the practitioner s engagement, upon giving reasonable notice in writing to the client of the practitioner s intention to do so, if (a) the client s grant of legal aid is withdrawn or otherwise terminated; and (b) the client is unable to make satisfactory arrangements for payment of the practitioner s costs which would be incurred if the retainer continued. 17
18 G. A. Georgiou SC 27 February
IMMIGRATION CONSULTANTS OF CANADA REGULATORY COUNCIL CODE OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR MEMBERS. Table of Contents
IMMIGRATION CONSULTANTS OF CANADA REGULATORY COUNCIL CODE OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR MEMBERS Table of Contents INTENTION OF CODE... 1 Standard of Professional Conduct... 1 Primary Purpose... 1 Code Binding...
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2015] NZHC 492. FRANCISC CATALIN DELIU Plaintiff
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV 2014-404-002664 [2015] NZHC 492 UNDER the Judicature Amendment Act 1972 IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND of an application for judicial review FRANCISC CATALIN
More informationBAR ASSOCIATION OF QUEENSLAND BARRISTERS CONDUCT RULES. 23 February 2018
BAR ASSOCIATION OF QUEENSLAND BARRISTERS CONDUCT RULES 23 February 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE... 1 PART A NATIONAL RULES... 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 Objects... 1 Principles... 1 Interpretation... 2 Application
More informationLegal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules under the. Legal Profession Uniform Law
Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015 under the Legal Profession Uniform Law The Legal Services Council has made the following rules under the Legal Profession Uniform Law on 26 May
More informationDisclosure Guidelines
Disclosure Guidelines Disclosure Guidelines (for applications for grant or renewal of a local practising certificate and for suitability matters, show cause events and other matters affecting fitness to
More information> LEGAL PROFESSION ACT 2004
> LEGAL PROFESSION ACT 2004 Welcome... to the Legal Profession Act 2004 The fast-approaching new financial year heralds the arrival of the new Legal Profession Act 2004 and with it a raft of changes to
More informationNew South Wales Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 2013 (Solicitors Rules) FORMER RULES
New South Wales Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 2013 (Solicitors Rules) New South Wales Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 2013 (Solicitors Rules) These Rules comprise: a) the Australian Solicitors
More informationCODES OF GOOD PRACTICE Pursuant to section 15(1)(a) of the Public Service Act , I, PAKALITHA BETHUEL MOSISILI
CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE 2005 Pursuant to section 15(1) of the Public Service Act 2005 1, I, PAKALITHA BETHUEL MOSISILI Prime Minister of Lesotho and Minister responsible for public service, make the following
More informationRULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT HTTPS://WWW.LSUC.ON.CA/LAWYER-CONDUCT-RULES/ JANUARY 29, 2016 7 CHAPTERS Chapter 1: Citation and Interpretation Chapter 2: Integrity Chapter 3: Relationship to Clients Chapter
More informationNew Zealand Institute of Surveyors. Policy Statement
New Zealand Institute of Surveyors Policy Statement A19 24 Conduct of Members Policy Number Version Number Date Author Next Review 5.3 3 April 2017 Craig Smith April 2019 Contents Purpose... 3 Introduction...
More informationEthical issues in enforcement Krista Weymouth Senior Associate. 24 February 2015
Ethical issues in enforcement Krista Weymouth Senior Associate 24 February 2015 Overview Model litigant guidelines and professional conduct rules Letters demanding compliance Investigation of complaints
More informationBEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 79. Reference No: IACDT 020/14
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 79 Reference No: IACDT 020/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationCode of Professional Conduct
w General instructions for all staff in event of fire Code of Professional Conduct When the fire alarm sounds act quickly and calmly to ensure a safe evacuation for all staff and guests Never presume that
More informationParalegal Rules of Conduct
Paralegal Rules of Conduct As of October 1, 2014, this version of the Paralegal Rules of Conduct is no longer in effect. Amendments to the Rules resulting from the implementation of the Federation of Law
More informationNATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant. JINYUE (PAUL) YOUNG Practitioner
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZLCDT 20 LCDT 026/17 UNDER The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant AND JINYUE (PAUL) YOUNG
More informationThe Hon Justice Peter McClelland AM Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse GPO Box 5283 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia
14 April 2015 The Hon Justice Peter McClelland AM Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse GPO Box 5283 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia Dear Justice McClelland, SUPPLEMENTARY SUBMISSION
More informationTHERE IS AN ORDER MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006 FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF MEDICAL DETAILS.
THERE IS AN ORDER MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006 FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF MEDICAL DETAILS. PLEASE SEE ORDER 5 ON PAGE 10 FOR FULL SUPPRESSION DETAILS. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS
More informationLAW ADMISSIONS CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE 1 DISCLOSURE GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS FOR ADMISSION TO THE LEGAL PROFESSION
LAW ADMISSIONS CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE 1 DISCLOSURE GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS FOR ADMISSION TO THE LEGAL PROFESSION 1. PURPOSES OF THESE GUIDELINES An applicant for admission is required to satisfy the
More informationLawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (RCCC Rules)
NZLS AUCKLAND Branch Professional standards Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (RCCC Rules) Delay A common complaint to the NZLS Complaints Service A Lawyer must
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: O Keefe & Ors v Commissioner of the Queensland Police Service [2016] QCA 205 CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE O KEEFE (first appellant) NATHAN IRWIN (second appellant)
More information1 October Code of CONDUCT
1 October 2006 Code of CONDUCT The Australian migration advice profession sets high standards. Their high levels of knowledge of Australian migration law/procedures and professional and ethical conduct
More informationBOON GUNN HONG Practitioner
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 37 LCDT 025/12 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER Applicant AND BOON
More informationDECISION. CONSIDERING the Rules of Procedure and Evidence as adopted by the Tribunal on 11 February 1994, as subsequently amended;
U N I T E D N A T I O N S N A T I O N S U N I E S INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA CHURCHILLPLEIN, 1. P.O. BOX 13888 2501 EW THE HAGUE, NETHERLANDS TELEPHONE: 31 70 512-5334 FAX:
More informationPUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE POLICY
1 Policy Statement At Tourism and Events Queensland (TEQ), we believe that Public Interest Disclosures (PIDs) and the ability to make such disclosures without retaliation or reprisal is critically important,
More informationMaking a Complaint Against Members of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants In Ireland
Making a Complaint Against Members of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants In Ireland INDEX Introduction 3 How the Institute can help you 3 Relationship with your CPA 3 Making a complaint to the
More informationCivil Procedure Act 2010
Examinable excerpts of Civil Procedure Act 2010 as at 2 October 2018 1 Purposes CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY (1) The main purposes of this Act are (a) to reform and modernise the laws, practice, procedure and
More informationWESTERN AUSTRALIAN BAR ASSOCIATION BEST PRACTICE PAPER 02/2010 COMMUNICATON AND CONFERRAL IN CIVIL LITIGATION
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN BAR ASSOCIATION BEST PRACTICE PAPER 02/2010 COMMUNICATON AND CONFERRAL IN CIVIL LITIGATION Introduction 1. This paper on Communication and Conferral in Civil Litigation is one of a series
More informationUNTAET REGULATION NO. 2001/24 ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A LEGAL AID SERVICE IN EAST TIMOR
UNITED NATIONS United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor UNTAET NATIONS UNIES Administration Transitoire des Nations Unies au Timor Oriental UNTAET/REG/2001/24 5 September 2001 REGULATION
More informationCODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT & DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT & DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES SMSF Association 9 September 2016 Version 1.2 dated 09 September 2016 Overview The SMSF Association is a self-regulating professional association
More informationIndicative Sanctions Guidance
Indicative Sanctions Guidance AAT is a registered charity. No. 1050724 Indicative Sanctions Guidance Contents Introduction... 3 Policy detail... 4 Sanctions... 5 Aggravating factors... 7 Mitigation...
More informationLAW ADMISSIONS CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE 1 DISCLOSURE GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS FOR ADMISSION TO THE LEGAL PROFESSION
LAW ADMISSIONS CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE 1 DISCLOSURE GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS FOR ADMISSION TO THE LEGAL PROFESSION 1. PURPOSES OF THESE GUIDELINES An applicant for admission is required to satisfy the
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Coss [2016] QCA 44 PARTIES: R v COSS, Michael Joseph (appellant/applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 111 of 2015 DC No 113 of 2012 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT:
More informationTHE LAW SOCIETY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT RULES JULY 2008 REVISION
THE LAW SOCIETY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT RULES JULY 2008 REVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE INCLUDING AMENDMENTS RULES 1. Meaning of terms used... 2. General rules... 3. Maintaining professional
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
The Tribunal s Order is subject to appeal to the High Court (Administrative Court) by the Respondent. The Order remains in force pending the High Court s decision on the appeal. SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC HOUGHTON, Nicola Louise Registration No: 130502 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2015 Outcome: Erasure (with immediate order) Nicola Louise HOUGHTON, Verified competency
More informationIAN DAVID HAY Respondent
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZLCDT 10 LCDT 003/17 UNDER The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND IAN DAVID HAY
More informationPublic Defender Service. Code of Conduct
Public Defender Service Code of Conduct March 2014 Public Defender Service Code of Conduct Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 29 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
More informationSTANDARDS OF PROFESSIONALISM
STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES 1. Principle: A lawyer should revere the law, the judicial system and the legal profession and should, at all times in the lawyer s professional and private lives, uphold the dignity
More informationFOR THE OFFICE OF THE POLICE OMBUDSMAN FOR NORTHERN IRELAND
FOR THE OFFICE OF THE POLICE OMBUDSMAN FOR NORTHERN IRELAND THE POLICE OMBUDSMAN FOR NORTHERN IRELAND CODE OF ETHICS FOREWORD BY THE POLICE OMBUDSMAN As staff employed in the Office of the Police Ombudsman
More informationIN THE MATTER of WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE (No. 1) IN THE MATTER of JEREMY JAMES McGUIRE, Barrister and Solicitor
1 IN THE NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006 [2011] NZLCDT 28 LCDT 030/09 IN THE MATTER of WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE (No. 1) AND IN THE MATTER
More informationNATIONAL DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL GUIDELINES
NATIONAL DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL GUIDELINES June 2013 1 APPLICATION These National Disciplinary Tribunal Guidelines (Guidelines) apply to an Australian Football league that is conducted or administered by:
More informationDelegated powers policy
Delegated powers policy Revised September 2013 1 Contents Introduction... 3 The Association of Accounting Technicians... 3 The compliance framework and procedures of AAT... 3 Compliance framework... 4
More informationSome ethical questions when opposing parties are. unrepresented or upon ceasing to act as a solicitor
Some ethical questions when opposing parties are unrepresented or upon ceasing to act as a solicitor Monash Guest Lecture in Ethics 9 March 2011 G.T. Pagone * I thought I might talk to you today about
More informationGriffith University v Tang: Review of University Decisions Made Under an Enactment
Griffith University v Tang: Review of University Decisions Made Under an Enactment MELISSA GANGEMI* 1. Introduction In Griffith University v Tang, 1 the court was presented with the quandary of determining
More informationThe Role of Counsel Pursuant to Section 3 of the Substitute Decisions Act. Trusts and Estates Division of the Ontario Bar Association
The Role of Counsel Pursuant to Section 3 of the Substitute Decisions Act Trusts and Estates Division of the Ontario Bar Association November 24, 2009 D ARCY HILTZ 1 Section 3 of the Substitute Decisions
More informationThe Law Society of New South Wales Professional Conduct and Practice Rules Legal Profession Act 1987 FORMER RULES
The Law Society of New South Wales Professional Conduct and Practice Rules Legal Profession Act 1987 The Revised Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 1995 commenced on 11 December, 1995. The Revised
More informationAndrew Scotting Barrister
Andrew Scotting Barrister 13th Floor St James Hall 169 Phillip Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 DX 266 SYDNEY P: 9335 3080 F: 9335 3099 E: scotting@stjames.net.au W: 13stjames.net.au CONDUCT OUTSIDE THE COURTROOM
More informationINSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF NEW ZEALAND BILL
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF NEW ZEALAND BILL AS REPORTED FROM THE FINANCE AND EXPENDITURE COMMITTEE Recommendation COMMENTARY The Finance and Expenditure Committee has examined the Institute
More informationCONCERNING CONCERNING. MR PAIGNTON of Auckland DECISION
LCRO 222/09 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN MR BALTASOUND
More informationCONCERNING BETWEEN. The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION
LCRO 092/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Area Standards Committee X BETWEEN RB Applicant
More informationThe Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board. Disciplinary Procedure Rules
The Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board Disciplinary Procedure Rules The Patent Regulation Board of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys and the Trade Mark Regulation Board
More informationStandards of Professional Courtesy and Civility for South Florida
Standards of Professional Courtesy and Civility for South Florida Preamble Attorneys are often retained to represent their clients in disputes or transactions. The practice of law is often an adversarial
More informationREPORT OF THE HEARING COMMITTEE
IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF BRUCE BARRY A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA REPORT OF THE HEARING COMMITTEE [1] On March 12, 2007,
More informationCompliance Operations Report 2015
2 Table of contents Section Introduction 3 Regulating CPAs department Complaints 4 What is a complaint? Sources of complaints Process Professional Conduct Committee Statistics Page Disciplinary proceedings
More informationSENIOR COUNSEL PROTOCOL As at 16 May 2013.
SENIOR COUNSEL PROTOCOL As at 16 May 2013. The principles governing the selection and appointment of those to be designated as Senior Counsel by the President of the Bar Association are as follows: 1.
More informationWhistle Blowing Policy
Great Bedwyn CE VC Primary School Whistle Blowing Policy Date of Last Review: November 2015 Date to be Reviewed: Will stand until LA changes apply Review Body: Full Governing Body 1 Whistle Blowing Policy
More informationThe Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board)
The Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board) Final Draft Disciplinary Procedure Rules The Patent Regulation Board of the Chartered
More informationGUIDE OF PROFESSIONAL COURTESY. and Informal Procedure for Receiving and Treating Breaches to the Guide of Professional Courtesy
GUIDE OF PROFESSIONAL COURTESY and Informal Procedure for Receiving and Treating Breaches to the Guide of Professional Courtesy Table of contents Introduction 1 Guide of Professional Courtesy 2 Preface
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO OPINION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: Filing Date: March 14, 2013 Docket No. 33,280 IN THE MATTER OF GENE N. CHAVEZ, ESQUIRE AN ATTORNEY SUSPENDED FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW BEFORE
More informationNATIONAL MATCH TRIBUNAL GUIDELINES
NATIONAL MATCH TRIBUNAL GUIDELINES June 2013 1 1 APPLICATION These National Match Tribunal Guidelines (Guidelines) apply to an Australian Football league that is conducted or administered by: a State or
More informationProfessional insights
ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS AND DUTIES IN FAMILY LAW This article addresses a number of current ethical issues faced by lawyers in the family law context, in particular: dealing with demanding clients; clients
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Sittczenko; ex parte Cth DPP [2005] QCA 461 PARTIES: FILE NO/S: CA No 221 of 2005 DC No 405 of 2005 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: R v SITTCZENKO, Arkady
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Re Liveri [2006] QCA 152 PARTIES: IN THE MATTER OF THE RULES RELATING TO THE ADMISSION OF LEGAL PRACTITIONERS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND and FILE NO/S: SC
More informationAppellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Miller, Ronald Young and Clifford JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT REASONS OF THE COURT. (Given by Miller J)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA790/2013 [2014] NZCA 106 BETWEEN AND UGESH DUTT Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 4 March 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Miller, Ronald Young and Clifford
More informationGeorgian Police Code of Ethics
Georgian Police Code of Ethics Tbilisi 2013 Table of Contents Preface...3 Chapter 1. The Principles of Policing...4 Chapter 2. General Guidelines of Conduct for Police Officers...5 Chapter 3. Relationship
More informationThe Law Society of Saskatchewan
The Law Society of Saskatchewan DARBY BACHYNSKI HEARING DATE: May 7, 2018 DECISION DATE: May 29, 2018 Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Bachynski, 2018 SKLSS 5 IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT, 1990
More informationA PRACTITIONER Practitioner
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 44 LCDT 003/15 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN THE CANTERBURY STANDARDS COMMITTEE (No 1) Applicant
More informationCODE OF ETHICS (CONDUCT) FOR ADVOCATES
APPROVED BY The Decision # 1/4 of the General meeting of RA Chamber of Advocates Adopted on February 11, 2012 R Sahakyan Chairman of the RA Chamber of Advocates CODE OF ETHICS (CONDUCT) FOR ADVOCATES Yerevan,
More informationLOBBYING PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
LOBBYING PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT WHAT IS LOBBYING? Lobbying is a discipline within public relations where the general intention of the activity is to inform and influence public policy and law. Lobbyists
More informationCriminal Convictions. AAT is a registered charity. No
Criminal Convictions AAT is a registered charity. No. 1050724 Criminal Convictions Contents Introduction... 3 Policy detail... 4 Criminal convictions on application... 4 Criminal convictions on reinstatement...
More informationFINDINGS of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal Constituted under the Solicitors Act 1974
No. 8553/2002 IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW JOHN TEMPEST, Solicitor - AND IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Mr. W.M. Hartley (in the chair) Mrs. E. Stanley Mr. D.Gilbertson Date of Hearing: 24th September
More informationACPO Guidance on the Management of Business Interests and Additional Occupations for Police Officers and Police Staff
Draft revised guidance for consideration of Police Advisory Board (July 2012) ACPO Guidance on the Management of Business Interests and Additional Occupations for Police Officers and Police Staff The Association
More informationPRECIS OF THE REPORT INTO THE DISMISSAL OF DEPUTY HEADMASTER, ROHAN BROWN
PRECIS OF THE REPORT INTO THE DISMISSAL OF DEPUTY HEADMASTER, ROHAN BROWN This precis summarises the principal parts of the report submitted by Mr Ray Finkelstein AO QC and Ms Renee Enbom. For a number
More informationChartered Institute of Housing. Code of conduct
Chartered Institute of Housing Code of conduct All CIH members are expected to commit to meet the professional standards. Respect for others treat themselves and others with respect; make only their professional
More informationLegal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014
Examinable excerpts of Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 as at 10 April 2018 Schedule 1 Legal Profession Uniform Law 169 Objectives PART 4.3 LEGAL COSTS Division 1 Introduction The objectives
More informationNOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS, OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 203 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011.
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS, OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 203 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA254/2014 [2015]
More informationAdministrative Tribunal
United Nations AT/DEC/1206 Administrative Tribunal Distr.: Limited 31 January 2005 Original: English ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL Judgement No. 1206 Case No. 1292: SCOTT Against: The Secretary-General of the
More informationOMBUDSMAN BILL, 2017
Arrangement of Sections Section PART I - PRELIMINARY 3 1. Short title...3 2. Interpretation...3 3. Application of Act...4 PART II OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN 5 ESTABLISHMENT AND FUNCTIONS OF OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN
More informationCORRUPT CONDUCT AND PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE POLICY
CORRUPT CONDUCT AND PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE POLICY DOCUMENT CONTROL Document Name: Version: 002 Corrupt Conduct and Public Interest Disclosure Policy Approved by: Board Date approved: 27 August 2015
More informationCODE OF ETHICS FOR THE POLICE SERVICE OF NORTHERN IRELAND
CODE OF ETHICS FOR THE POLICE SERVICE OF NORTHERN IRELAND CODE OF ETHICS FOR THE POLICE SERVICE OF NORTHERN IRELAND This Code will be made available free on request in accessible formats such as in Braille,
More informationExamination of witnesses
Examination of witnesses Rules and procedures in the courtroom for eliciting (getting information) from witnesses Most evidence in our legal system is verbal. A person conveying their views and beliefs,
More informationCode of Ethics. policing with PRIDE. Professionalism Respect Integrity Dedication Empathy
Code of Ethics policing with PRIDE Professionalism Respect Integrity Dedication Empathy Principles and Standards of Professional Behaviour for the Policing Profession of England and Wales Contents Foreword
More informationGuide to sanctioning
Guide to sanctioning Contents 1. Background. 2 2. Application for registration or continued registration 3 3. Purpose of sanctions. 3 4. Principles in determining sanction.. 4 A. Proportionality... 4 B.
More informationDISCIPLINARY CODE & PROCEDURE
DISCIPLINARY CODE & PROCEDURE Updated: August 2013 Page 1 of 18 CONTENT A. Introduction 4 B. Definitions. 4 C. Guidelines. 4 D. Substantive Fairness... 5 E. Procedural Fairness... 5 F. Sanctions.. 6 i.
More informationDISCIPLINARY POLICY CODE OF CONDUCT AND RULES & PROCEDURES FOR THURSO BOWLING CLUB
DISCIPLINARY POLICY CODE OF CONDUCT AND RULES & PROCEDURES FOR THURSO BOWLING CLUB Page 1 of 6 Thurso Bowling Club Disciplinary Policy, Code of Conduct and Rules & Procedures (Accepted at the Annual General
More informationOFFICIAL MISCONDUCT AND PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE POLICY
OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT AND PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE POLICY DOCUMENT CONTROL Document Name: Version: 001 Official Misconduct and Public Interest Disclosure Policy Approved by: Board Date approved: 29 May
More informationCriminal Law- a guide for legal consumers
Criminal Law- a guide for legal consumers In Scotland, 1 in 3 men and 1 in 10 women are likely to have at least one conviction listed on the Scottish criminal history system. 1 Involvement in criminal
More informationAnnual Report
Annual Report 2015-16 Judicial Conduct Investigations Office Royal Courts of Justice 81 & 82 Queens Building Strand London WC2A 2LL Telephone: 020 7073 4719 Email: inbox@jcio.gsi.gov.uk Published: 2016
More informationETH/PI/POL/3 Original: English UNESCO ANTI HARASSMENT POLICY
ETH/PI/POL/3 Original: English UNESCO ANTI HARASSMENT POLICY UNESCO ANTI-HARASSMENT POLICY Administrative Circular AC/HR/4 - Published on 28 June 2010 HR Manual Item 16.2 A. Introduction 1. Paragraph 20
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC96979 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. MELODY RIDGLEY FORTUNATO, Respondent. [March 22, 2001] PER CURIAM. We have for review a referee s report recommending that attorney
More informationIndicative Sanctions Guidance
Indicative Sanctions Guidance 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Purpose... 3 3. General principles... 3 4. Sanctions... 3 In the case of all members, regardless of membership type... 3 In the case of
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 10971-2012 BETWEEN: SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant and TIMOTHY JAMES PENNY Respondent Before: Mr D. Green (in
More informationAnti-Corruption Policy
Anti-Corruption Policy Version: 1 Page 1 of 10 INTRODUCTION 1 Our Commitment Accolade Wines conducts all of its business in an honest and ethical manner. We take a zero-tolerance approach to bribery and
More informationLegal Truth where the duties to the Court and the Client Collide Professor Alan Paterson OBE
Legal Truth where the duties to the Court and the Client Collide Professor Alan Paterson OBE Director, Centre for Professional Legal Studies Strathclyde University Outline of Presentation 1. Introduction
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 11360-2015 BETWEEN: SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant and JEAN ETIENNE ATTALA Respondent Before: Mr D. Glass (in
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC01-114 PER CURIAM. THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. JONATHAN ISAAC ROTSTEIN, Respondent. [November 7, 2002] We have for review a referee s report regarding alleged ethical
More informationCode of Professional Conduct. The Law Society of Manitoba
Code of Professional Conduct The Law Society of Manitoba Adopted by the Benchers of the Law Society of Manitoba on June 17, 2010 Effective January 1, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE... 4 PREFACE... 5 CHAPTER
More informationCODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS 1 2 CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS DEFINITIONS 1. In this Code, unless the context indicates otherwise any word or phrase defined in the South African
More informationTHE EXPERT WITNESS INSTITUTE COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINE RULES
THE EXPERT WITNESS INSTITUTE COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINE RULES The Expert Witness Institute 159 161 Temple Chambers 3 7 Temple Avenue London EC4Y 0DA 020 7936 2213 info@ewi.org.uk www.ewi.org.uk 1 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationImmigration Law Conference February 2017 Panel discussion Judicial Review: Emerging Trends & Themes
Immigration Law Conference February 2017 Panel discussion Brenda Tronson Barrister Level 22 Chambers btronson@level22.com.au 02 9151 2212 Unreasonableness In December, Bromberg J delivered judgment in
More information