FACTUM AND BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES OF THE RECEIVER (Motion Returnable July 7, 2017)
|
|
- Laurel Jordan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV OOCL B ETWEEN: HARBOUREDGE MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION Applicant - and ONTARIO LIMITED Respondent FACTUM AND BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES OF THE RECEIVER (Motion Returnable July 7, 2017) FOGLER, RUBINOFF LLP Lawyers 77 King Street West Suite 3000, P.O. Box 95 TD Centre North Tower Toronto, ON M5K 1 G8 Vern W. Dane (LSUC# E) Tel: Fax: Lawyers for the Receiver TO: THE SERVICE LIST
2 SERVICE LIST BALDWIN LAW Barristers and Solicitors 54 Victoria Avenue Belleville, ON K8N 1 Z7 Ian Brady/Gregory R.M. Parker Tel.: Fax: ibrady~a~,baldwinlaw.ca / g,~arker e,baldwinlaw.ca Lawyers for Ontario Limited ELIE KHOURI ( elie(cr~,capitalrentals.ca ) 30 Lillico Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1V 9L6 GRUDEFF, BERG Barristers and Solicitors Steeles Ave. West Vaughan, Ontario L4K 2Y4 Sheldon J. Berg Tel: Fax: s.berg~a~rogers.com Lawyers for Giuseppe Mozzone ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION 162 Cumberland Street Suite 300, Toronto, ON MSR 3N5
3 thane. winters(a~j ustice. ~c. ca JUSTICE CANADA Tax Section, P.O. Box 36, Exchange Tower King Street West Toronto, ON MSX 1K6 Tel: Fax: Attention: Diane H. A. Winters Kevin. ohara~u,ontario. ca MINISTRY OF FINANCE Legal Services Branch 33 King Street West, 6~` Floor Oshawa, ON L1H 8H5 Attention: Kevin O'Hara NATIONAL LEASING GROUP INC Buffalo Place Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 1L9 Attention: Anna Neustaedter Anna9093(a,nationalleasin.com HEWLETT-PACKARD FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY 200 Connell Drive Berkeley Heights, New Jersey U.S.A. Attention: Lisa A. Kelder lisa.kelder(a)hpe.com J.D.F.R. INVESTMENTS INC Bayswater Ave. Ottawa, Ontario KlY 2G2
4 Christopher A. Moore Barrister and Solicitor 63 Robert Street, Ottawa, Ontario K2P 1 GS Tel: Fax: chalmo(a,istar.ca Lawyer for HTG Management Group Inc. VICTOR L. VANDERGUST PROFESSIONAL CORP. Barrister and Solicitor 1 1 Hurontario Street P.O. Box 39 Collingwood, ON L9Y 3Z4 Victor L. Vandergust Tel: Fax: vic(c~r~,vandergustlaw.com Lawyers for HarbourEdge Mortgage Investment Corporation O'Flynn Weese LLP 65 Bridge Street E. Belleville, ON K8N 1 L8 William C. King Tel.: x 232 Fax: wkin~a,owtlaw.com Lawyers for Prospective Purchaser.
5 Chaitons LLP 5000 Yonge Street, l Oth Floor Toronto, Ontario M2N 7E9 Harvey Chaiton Tel.: Fax: harve~(a?,chaitons.com Lawyers for Prospective Purchaser Garfin Zeidenberg LLP 5255 Yonge Street, Suite 800 Toronto, Ontario M2N 6P4 David Downs Tel.: Fax: dd(cr~,~zle~al.com Lawyers for Wildwood Capital Inc.
6 ~~.
7 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV OOCL B ETWEEN: HARBOUREDGE MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION Applicant - and ONTARIO LIMITED Respondent FACTUM AND BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES OF THE RECEIVER (Motion Returnable July 7, 2017) TAB DOCUMENT A Factum: Part I: Introduction Part II: Summary of Facts Part III: Statement of Issues, Law and Authorities Part IV: Order Requested Schedule "A": List of Authorities Schedule "B": Relevant Statutes 1 Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. A & A Jewellers Ltd., 2007 CanLll (ON SC)
8
9 FACTUM AND BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES OF THE RECEIVER PART I -INTRODUCTION 1. The Fuller Landau Group Inc., in its capacity as court-appointed receiver (the "Receiver") of the real property and related personal property of Ontario Limited ("217"), brings this motion for, inter alia, an order: (a) approving the Minutes of Settlement regarding the Wildwood Action as described in the Third Report of the Receiver dated June 27, 2017 (the "Third Report"); and (b) lifting the stay with respect to the Wildwood Action imposed by the Appointment Order for the limited purpose of completing the Settlement. PART II -SUMMARY OF FACTS Receiver's Appointment 2. Pursuant to an order dated April 7, 2017 (the "Appointment Order"), the Receiver was appointed as the court-appointed receiver of the real property and personal property of 217 (the "Property") including the property municipally known or commonly known as 500 Brisebois Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario K1 E OA6, which is used in connection with the business operating the hotel known as the Holiday Inn Express &Suites-Orleans(the "Hotel"). Stay of Proceedings Reference: Third Report of the Receiver dated June 27, 2017 ("Third Report"), para. 2, Appendix "A" 3. The Appointment Order imposes, among other things, a stay of proceedings whereby, under section 9, no proceeding against or in respect of 217 or its property shall be "commenced or continued except with the written consent of the Receiver or with leave of this
10 2 Court", and any and all proceedings "currently under way against or in respect of [217] or [its property] are hereby stayed and suspended pending further Order of this Court". The Wildwood Action is caught by the stay of proceedings imposed under the Appointment Order. Reference: Third Report of the Receiver, Para. 2, Appendix "A" Wildwood Action 4. The Appointment Order authorizes the Receiver to, among other things, settle or compromise any proceedings now pending with respect to 217, the Property or the Receiver (s. 3~))~ Reference: Third Report of the Receiver, para. 2, Appendix "A" 5. Wildwood Capital Inc. ("Wildwood") is the plaintiff and 217 and Bhupinder Sandhu are the defendants in the action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice at Toronto that is Court File No. CV (the "Wildwood Action") Reference: Third Report of the Receiver, Para In the Wildwood Action, Wildwood's claim relates to an alleged unpaid mortgage brokerage fee payable pursuant to the terms of a mortgage loan application with 217 dated February 4, Wildwood claims they are owed a brokerage fee of approximately $233,500 on a mortgage commitment arranged by Wildwood in favour of 217, notwithstanding that the mortgage did not close and the mortgage funds were never advanced to 217. Reference: Third Report of the Receiver, pars. 11
11 3 7. Wildwood obtained in the Wildwood Action and registered a certificate of pending litigation (the "CPL") against title of the Hotel. On November 6, 2015, the Court ordered that 217 pay $234, into Court as security funds (the "Security Funds") to the credit of the Wildwood Action and the CPL was discharged from title of the Hotel. The Security Funds were funded by HarbourEdge and paid into Court by 217's legal counsel in December The Receiver is of the view that the Security Funds belong to the estate of 217 for the benefit of the creditors. Wildwood disputes that position. Reference: Third Report of the Receiver, para. 12 Settlement 8. Given the professional costs necessary to litigate the Wildwood Action and the uncertain outcome of litigating whether the Security Funds, in the circumstances, are part of the estate of 217 or trust funds for the potential benefit of Wildwood in the Wildwood Action, the Receiver agreed to settle the Wildwood Action in accordance with Minutes of Settlement dated June 23, 2017 (the "Settlement"). The Settlement is subject to court approval in these receivership proceedings. Reference: Third Report of the Receiver, para Some of the key terms of the Settlement include the following: (i) the Security Funds, upon receipt by the Receiver, shall be divided or paid equally between the Receiver and Wildwood; (ii) the Wildwood Action shall be dismissed without costs; and (iii) the parties to the Wildwood Action and the Receiver shall sign a mutual release. Reference: Third Report of the Receiver, pars. 15
12 D 10. The Receiver is recommending approval of the Settlement for the following reasons: (i) to reduce the professional costs of litigating the Wildwood Action; (ii) to reduce the professional costs of litigating whether the Security Funds belong to the estate of 217 or are trust funds for the benefit of the successful party in the Wildwood Action including, potentially, Wildwood; and (iii) to provide certainty, in light of the uncertain legal status of the Security Funds as either being property of the estate or trust funds, ensuring that half of the Security Funds will be paid into the estate of 217, that the Wildwood Action will be dismissed without costs and that the parties are mutually releasing each other from liability with respect to the Wildwood Action. Reference: Third Report of the Receiver, para. 17 PART III -STATEMENT OF ISSUES, LAW &AUTHORITIES Settlement 1 1. Court-appointed receivers are frequently granted the power to settle litigation involving the debtor or property belonging to the debtor. For example, paragraph 3(j) of the Commercial List standard template receivership order expressly empowers and authorizes the receiver "to settle or compromise any such proceedings". Reference: Appointment Order, para. 3Q) 12. The criteria to be applied when considering the approval of a settlement by a receiver may be summarized as follows: (a) whether the settlement brings certainty of outcome; (b) whether the settlement results in timely payment to the estate;
13 5 (c) whether the settlement resolves the litigation or dispute, and eliminates or reduces the receiver's exposure to "litigation risks and costs" and the "possible delay in completing the receivership"; and (d) if the settlement is based on the business decision of the receiver, the court should be reluctant to substitute its business judgment for that of a receiver except in exceptional circumstances. Reference: Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. A & A Jewellers Ltd., 2007 CanLll (ON SC), paras Tab 1: 13. It is respectfully submitted that the Settlement should be approved by the Court for the following reasons: (i) to reduce the professional costs and risks of litigating the Wildwood Action; (ii) to reduce the professional costs and risks of litigating whether the Security Funds belong to the estate of 217 or are trust funds for the benefit of the successful party in the Wildwood Action including, potentially, Wildwood; and (iii) to provide certainty, in light of the uncertain legal status of the Security Funds as either being property of the estate or trust funds, ensuring that half of the Security Funds will be immediately paid into the estate of 217, that the Wildwood Action will be dismissed without costs and that the parties will mutually release each other from liability with respect to the Wildwood Action. PART IV -ORDER REQUESTED 14. For the reasons set out above, the Receiver respectfully requests the relief sought in the Third Report. ALL OF WHICH IS RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 27th day of June 2017.
14 n ~~~ Vern W. Dane i ~ FOGLER, RUBINOFF LLP Lawyers 77 King Street West Suite 3000, P.O. Box 95 TD Centre North Tower Toronto, ON M5K 1 G8 Vern W. Dane (LSUC# E) Tel: Fax: Lawyers for the Receiver
15 SCHEDULE"A" LIST OF AUTHORITIES Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. A & A Jewellers Ltd., 2007 CanLll 13928
16 SCHEDULE "B" TEXT OF STATUTES Ru/es of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 7990, Reg. 794 PAYMENT OUT OF COURT Authority for Payment Out (1) Money may be paid out of court only in accordance with an order or report, or on consent under subrule (4). Payment Out under Order or Report (2) A person who seeks payment of money out of court in accordance with an order or report shall file with the Accountant, (a) a written request for payment out; (b) the original order or report or a notarized copy or copy certified by the court, unless any of them has already been filed with the Accountant; and (c) an affidavit stating (i) (ii) in the case of a report, that the report has been confirmed and the manner of confirmation, or in the case of an order, that the time prescribed for an appeal has expired and no appeal is pending, unless such an affidavit has already been filed with the Accountant, and the Accountant shall then pay the money to the person to whom the order or report directs that it be paid. (3) Where the Children's Lawyer or the Public Guardian and Trustee seeks payment out in accordance with an order or report, he or she may file one written request dealing with more than one proceeding and need not file the affidavit referred to in clause (2)(c). Payment Out on Consent (4) A party who seeks payment out of court, on consent, of money paid into court shall file with the Accountant, (a) a written request for payment out;
17 2 (b) the consent of all parties or their lawyers; and (c) an affidavit stating that all parties have consented to the payment and that neither the party who paid the money into court nor the party to whom it is to be paid is under disability, and the Accountant shall then pay the money out to the party in accordance with the consent. 4(1) Subrule (4) does not apply if the money was paid into court under an order that provides that a further order is required for the money to be paid out of court. Payment Out of Interest (5) Money paid out of court under subrule (2) or (4) shall be paid out with accrued interest, if any, unless the order, report or consent provides otherwise.
18
19 COURT FILE NO.: 06-CL-6377 DATE: SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE -ONTARIO RE: CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE -- Applicant - and- A & A JEWELLERS LTD. et al -- Respondents BEFORE: Ground, J. COUNSEL: Steven J. Weisz Karen S. Park for PriceWaterhouseCoopers Inc., the Receiver and Manager of the Respondents Alan Merskey.Iennifer Stam for Bogarz Inc. M. Starnino for JPI Limited DATE HEARD: April 16, 2007 ENDORSEMENT [1] The motion before the court is for the approval of a settlement agreement dated as of April 5, 2007 (the "Settlement Agreement") entered into between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce ("CIBC"), the Receiver and PWC in its capacity as Trustee in Bankruptcy of A&A Jewellers Limited of the first part and Neil Travis, Aubrey Sugar, Sugar Management Inc. and J.P.I. Limited (collectively "JPI") of the second part. [2] In essence, the Settlement Agreement provides for the payment by JPI to the estate of the sum of $201,000 as purchase price for moulds and models for A&A's family jewellery line and non-family jewellery line together with intellectual property and designs related thereto (the "Purchased Assets"), the release of $US 150,000 now held in reserve by the Receiver with respect to a disputed claim by JPI pursuant to section 81.1 of the BIA and the settlement of all outstanding disputes and litigation by and between the parties to the Settlement Agreement.
20 2 [3] The approval of the Settlement Agreement is opposed by Bogarz Inc. ("Bogarz"), a competitor of A&A, which had previously submitted an offer to purchase all of the moulds and models and related designs and intellectual property for A&A's family jewellery line for a purchase price of $175,000 conditional upon the Receiver entering into a Settlement Agreement with JPI or a court order declaring that JPI had no right, title or interest in or to such assets. Bogarz has subsequently advised the Receiver that it would be prepared to enter into an ~- agreement to purchase all of the moulds and models and related designs and intellectual property for both the family line of jewellery and the non-family line of jewellery for a purchase price of $400, on an "as is where is" basis and subject to the outstanding litigation. [4] Bogarz submits that the process followed by the Receiver in entering into the Settlement ~ Agreement and seeking court approval to the Settlement Agreement has not been fair and ~ reasonable as between JPI and Bogarz, both of whom have agreements with the Receiver, and that, in any event, the revised agreement that Bogarz is prepared to enter into is more beneficial to the estate. [5] I am not satisfied that there has been anything unfair or unreasonable in the process followed by the Receiver in entering into the Settlement Agreement and seeking court approval of the Settlement Agreement. Bogarz has been aware since prior to the entering into of its agreement with the Receiver on October 25, 2006 (the "Bogarz Agreement"), that JPI was asserting its claim to title to certain of the Purchased Assets and, as reflected in that agreement, that the Receiver was attempting to settle that claim with JPI. A motion was brought before Spence J. on January 8, 2007 for approval of the Bogarz Agreement and for the vesting of the assets subject to that Agreement in Bogarz and for a declaration that JPI had no right, title or interest in any of such assets. On the return of such motion, Spence J. directed a trial of issues to determine whether JPI had any interest in the assets subject to the Bogarz Agreement. On March 21, 2007, Bogarz's counsel was notified by the Receiver's counsel with respect to settlement negotiations with JPI as follows: As I have previously advised Jennifer, the Receiver has been in settlement negotiations with JPI Limited ("JPI") and related parties in respect of various claims, including, inter alia, its claims relating to the design rights associated with A&A's moulds and models, including those that are subject to the Agreement (the "Moulds and Models"). Please note that these settlement discussions may result in a settlement of JPI's claims in respect of the Moulds and Models and related intellectual property in JPI's favour. In such a case, the Receiver would abandon the approval motion with respect to the Agreement with Bogarz. However, as the settlement negotiations with JPI have not concluded, the Receiver would like to request a further extension of the Deadline. [6] Bogarz's counsel was further advised on the evening of April 9, 2007 that the Settlement Agreement had been executed and that the Receiver was bringing a motion before the court on April 16, 2007 for approval of the Settlement Agreement. The motion materials were served upon counsel for Bogarz, effectively on April 11, 2007, which motion materials contained details of the Settlement Agreement. The notice to the Receiver's counsel that it was prepared to make
21 an offer to purchase all of the Purchased Assets on an "as is where is" basis for a purchase price of $400,000 was forwarded late in the evening of April 12, 2007 and was considered by the Receiver and its counsel and CIBC, the only stakeholder with an economic interest in the proceeds of disposition of assets of A&A, during the day on April 13, Counsel for Bogarz was advised on that day that the Receiver could not recommend the proposed new agreement with Bogarz and would be proceeding on April 16, 2007 with the court motion to approve the Settlement Agreement. It appears to me that the Receiver notified Bogarz as soon as possible of the entering into of the Settlement Agreement and forwarded to Bogarz's counsel at the earliest possible time the motion materials setting out the details of the Settlement Agreement. I see no element of unfairness or unreasonableness in the process followed by the Receiver. [7] Bogarz also appears to oppose the approval of the Settlement Agreement on the basis that no opportunity was given to Bogarz or other interested parties to make an offer through the Receiver on terms similar to the Settlement Agreement. I have some difficulty with this submission. The Settlement Agreement is not a simple agreement of purchase and sale of assets. It is the result of lengthy and intense negotiations not only for the sale of the Purchased Assets but for the settlement of all claims by and between the parties to the Settlement Agreement. I am not certain how Bogarz or any other third party offeror could make an offer to the Receiver on terms that would include the settlement of all claims by and between the parties to the Settlement Agreement. v~ z O ca 0 N [8] With respect to the assertion by Bogarz that the proposed new Bogarz Agreement would be more beneficial to the estate, it appears to me that the analysis of the new Bogarz offer as set out in paragraph 21 of the Receiver's Seventh Report to this court is a full and complete answer to this assertion by Bogarz. The report states as follows: While the Bogarz proposal at $400,000 is, on its face, for a higher amount, the Receiver is of the opinion that it is not better than the Settlement Agreement because: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) the Bogarz proposal is incapable of being accepted without further negotiation of a definitive agreement setting out the terms and conditions for the transaction, including, without limitation, the level of assistance that would be required from the Receiver by Bogarz in connection with ongoing litigation with JPI and the funding and indeminities that the Receiver would require from Bogarz in respect thereto; there is no certainty that Bogarz and the Receiver could successfully negotiate such an agreement; the August 3 Order prohibits the Receiver from completing a transaction with Bogarz without an agreement with JPI or further order of the Court; it is the Receiver's opinion that JPI would object to the Receiver accepting the Bogarz proposal and would continue to vigorously assert
22 4 (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) their ownership rights in the moulds and models and related intellectual property and oppose any attempt by the Receiver to convey any of A&A's rights in the same; as described in the Sixth Report, the Receiver sought the approval of the Bogarz Agreement on January 9, 2007, over the objections of JPI. On January 9, 2007, the Honourable Mr. Justice Spence issued his endorsement and ordered that such motion should be dealt with by a trial of the issues. Accordingly, the litigation that would inevitably follow the objection by JPI would be lengthy, time-consuming and expensive; the Settlement Agreement includes a resolution of the JPI 81.1 Claim (as defined in the Sixth Report) in favour of the Receiver and, if approved, results in immediate release of $US150,000, plus accrued interest thereon, to CIBC. Abandoning the Settlement Agreement in favour of the Bogarz proposal would mean the Receiver would continue to incur litigation costs and risks in connection with resolving the outstanding JPI 81.1 Claim; the Settlement Agreement is a global settlement of possible claims between the parties thereto. If the Settlement Agreement were abandoned in favour of the Bogarz proposal, the Receiver would continue to be exposed to litigation risks and costs and possible delay in completing the receivership, which, as indicated in paragraph 22 below, is nearing completion; the Bogarz proposal includes no deposit or non-refundable consideration and abandoning the Settlement Agreement in its favour would therefore put a $200,000 net recovery at risk with no certainty that alternative recovery can be made. c~ z ~; M ~.-. [9] More simplistically, it appears to me that comparing the Settlement Agreement with the new Bogarz proposal leads one to conclude that the Settlement Agreement results in approximately $400,000 paid to the estate, being the $201,000 purchase price and the $US 150,000 being released from the reserve for the section 81.1 claim, the consent of all parties to the discharge of the Trustee and Receiver and the closing of their files, and the settlement of all outstanding litigation and disputes among the parties to the Settlement Agreement whereas the new Bogarz proposal results in approximately the same amount of money being received by the estate and the continuance of prosecution and defense of litigation including the claim by JPI to title to certain of the Purchased Assets, the section 81.1 claim of JPI, the setting aside of a number of transactions between A&A and JPI and other parties as preferences or fraudulent conveyances and the claims of Mr. Travis, JPI and others against the Receiver with respect to letters sent by the Receiver to customers of A&A with the attendant expense, delay and uncertainty to the estate as a result of such litigation.
23 [10] In addition, it appears to me that to reject the recommendation of the Receiver for approval of the Settlement Agreement on the basis that the new Bogarz offer is more beneficial to the estate requires this court to second guess the business decision of the Receiver and to substitute its own business judgment for that of the Receiver. The court should be reluctant to substitute its business judgment for that of a receiver or trustee except in exceptional l ~ circumstances, such as those referred on the authorities cited by Bogarz, none of which, in my z~ view, are applicable m the case at bar. ~; [11] There will no costs of this proceeding. c rs Ground J., r~. Released: Apri120, 2007
24 HARBOUREDGE MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION and ONTARIO LIMITED Court File No. CV OOCL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST PROCEEDING COMMENCED AT TORONTO FACTUM AND BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES OF THE RECEIVER FOGLER, RUBINOFF LLP Lawyers 77 King Street West Suite 3000, P.O. Box 95 TD Centre North Tower Toronto, ON M5K 1 G8 Vern W. Dane (LSUC# E) Tel: Fax: Lawyers for the Receiver
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. ) FRIDAY, THE 27 t1' ROYAL BANK OF CANADA. - and - REVSTONE INDUSTRIES BURLINGTON INC.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-12-9542-OOCL THE HONOURABLE MR. ) FRIDAY, THE 27 t1' JUSTICE CAMPBELL ) DAY OF APRIL, 2012 BETWEEN: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA Applicant -
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-13-10000-OOCL THE HONOURABLE MR. ) THURSDAY, THE 11T1 JUSTICE BROWN ) OF JULY, 2013 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT
More informationMOTION RECORD (re extension of time to file a proposal) (returnable February 27, 2018)
Estate File No.: 32-2338424 Court File No.: 32-2338424 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) IN THE MATTER OF THE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO MAKE A PROPOSAL OF
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) [COMMERCIAL LIST]
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) [COMMERCIAL LIST] Court File No.31-2016058 Estate No. 31-2016058 IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3,
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST
1 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-15-11061-00CL IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 243(1) OF THE BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT, R.S.C. 1985, C. B-3, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 101
More informationRetirement Plan for Executive Employees of Indalex Limited and Associated Companies (the Plan ), Registration No NOTICE OF COURT HEARING
895 Don Mills Road, Tower One, Suite 700 Toronto, Ontario M3C 1W3 INDLEX.0002 November 22, 2013 Dear Member/Former Member: Re: Retirement Plan for Executive Employees of Indalex Limited and Associated
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY)
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) Court File No. 31-2117602 Estate File No. 31-2117602 IN THE MATTER OF THE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO MAKE A PROPOSAL OF ALAN
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST)
Court File No. CV -1 0-9023-00CL Estate File Nos. 31-456611, 31-456614, 31-456616, 31-456617 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY OF DB MEDIA DISTRIBUTION
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - COMMERCIAL LIST IN THE MATTER OF RECEIVERSHIP OF SAGE GOLD INC. and
1 Court File No. CV-18-601307-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - COMMERCIAL LIST IN THE MATTER OF RECEIVERSHIP OF SAGE GOLD INC. and IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 243(1) OF
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE. - and -
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-16-11409-00CL BETWEEN: CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE Applicant - and - URBANCORP (LESLIEVILLE) DEVELOPMENTS INC., URBANCORP (RIVERDALE)
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST BANK OF MONTREAL. - and -
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-10-8556-OOCL THE HONOURABLE ) WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY JUSTICE MORAWETZ ) OF DECEMBER, 2011 BETWFFN: BANK OF MONTREAL Applicant - and -
More informationAND. PONDEROSA PEACHLAND DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, TREEGROUP PONDEROSA DEVELOPMENT CORP. and B.C. LTD. Respondents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA No. S144265 Vancouver Registry IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENTS ACT, R.S.C. 1985, C. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF COMPROMISE
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-12-9545-00CL IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.c-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
Court File No. CV-12-9545-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF
More informationDIVISIONAL COURT, SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE CAPITAL ONE BANK (CANADA BRANCH) APPELLANT S FACTUM I. STATEMENT OF THE APPEAL
Divisional Court File No. DC-12-463-00 DIVISIONAL COURT, SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: CAPITAL ONE BANK (CANADA BRANCH) -and- Plaintiff (Appellant) LAURA M. TOOGOOD aka LAURA MARIE TOOGOOD aka
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST
File No. 09-CL-7950 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ) TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY MORAWETZ OF NOVEMBER, 2013 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSAL OF COGENT FIBRE INC.
Court File No. 31-2016058 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSAL OF COGENT FIBRE INC. AMENDED PROPOSAL Cogent Fibre Inc. ( CFI ), hereby submits
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST ORDER
District of Ontario Division No. 09 Toronto Court File No. 31-1618433 Estate No. 31-1618433 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST THE HONOURABLE FRIDAY, THE 11 DAY JUSTICE C-GL r'~ ~~~~ ) OF
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST
Court File No. CV- n-cs4f531g-i1xl ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST THE HONOURABLE REGIONAL SENIOR JUSTICE MORAWETZ FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION
More informationHA-N EY ) k -;,' 1, Court File No ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) THE HONOURABLE MR- TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY
Court File No. 32-2274852 THE HONOURABLE MR- ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY HA-N EY ) JUSTICE ) OF AUGUST, 2017 --1;rRIOR i6 e3\n / i _-:., i 1,2 k -;,' 1,,.,
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-15-11192-00CL IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST ORDER
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-17-11689-00CL THE HONOURABLE MR. FRIDAY, THE 30 CC c)'n Jo M YERS DAY OF JUNE, 2017 \i N 'THE MATTER OF THE RECEIVERSHIP OF SCOLLARD
More informationCourt File No.: CV OOCL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) THE E ) TUESDAY, THE 9TH. M ~~IJS Nf~ DAY OF OCTOBER 2018
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) Court File No.: CV-18-604759-OOCL THE E ) TUESDAY, THE 9TH ~t~'~ ~~ o'er ~, M ~~IJS Nf~ _~ DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 ~ ~ ~, ~. ~~ ~~ N TH OF THE COMPANIES'
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST
Court File No. CV-15-10832-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST THE HONOURABLE REGIONAL SENIOR JUSTICE WEDNESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015 MORAWETZ \o Er) 71 Ri- IN THE MATTER OF
More informationORDER (appointing Receiver)
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-16-11519-OOCL THE HONOURABLE ) WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH JUSTICE DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016 BETWEEN: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA Applicant - and - 2234241
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (Commercial List)
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (Commercial List) Court File No. CV-17-11697-00GO- THE HONOURABLE MR FRIDAY, THE 15th DAY JUSTICE LEDERMAN OF SEPTEMBER 2017 BETWEEN: VOLKAN BASEGMEZ, CEM BLEDA BASEGMEZ,
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST ) ) ) ROYAL BANK OF CANADA. - and -
) ) ) ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-16-11583-00CL THE HONOURABLE MR. TUESDAY THE 13TH JUSTICE PENNY DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA Applicant - and - STRATHCONA
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/01/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/01/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x CAPITAL ONE EQUIPMENT FINANCE CORP., D/B/A CAPITAL ONE TAXI MEDALLION
More informationWRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF RIOCAN AND KINGSETT (Motion Returnable July 30, 2015)
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) Court File No. CV-15-10832-00CL IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, C. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED
Clerk s Stamp Form 27 [Rules 6.3 and 10.52(1)] COURT FILE NUMBER 1301-02432 COURT JUDICIAL CENTRE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA CALGARY IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C.
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) [COMMERCIAL LIST]
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) [COMMERCIAL LIST] Court File No.31-2016058 Estate No. 31-2016058 IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3,
More informationSUMMARY OF CONTENTS SC-1.
SUMMARY OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Chapter 1. Preliminary Matters............................ 1-1 Chapter 2. Parties...................................... 2-1 Chapter 3. Service......................................
More informationAPPLICATION RECORD OF THE APPLICANT (Returnable February 6, 2018)
Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) B E TW EEN: CHINA MACHINERY ENGINEERING CORPORATION Applicant - and - 2284649 ONTARIO INC., 2270613 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and 2270613 ONTARIO
More informationFACTUM OF FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Motion returnable January 9, 2013)
Court File No. 31-1696322 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSAL OF FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, A COMPANY INCORPORATED PURSUANT TO THE LAWS OF THE PROVINCE
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF.JUSTICE - COMMERCIAL LIST THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2009 IN THE MATTER OF RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF.JUSTICE - COMMERCIAL LIST Commercial List Court File No. 01-CL-4313 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CAMPBELL ) ) ) THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2009 IN THE MATTER OF RELIANCE
More informationSECURITY SHARING AGREEMENT. THIS SECURITY SHARING AGREEMENT (this Agreement) is made as of June 25, 2014.
Execution Copy SECURITY SHARING AGREEMENT THIS SECURITY SHARING AGREEMENT (this Agreement) is made as of June 25, 2014. A M O N G: THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK (hereinafter referred to as the Bank ), a bank
More information- 2 - on August 7, 2014 (the Receivership Order ), applies for an order, substantially in the form attached as Schedule A hereto:
- 2 - on August 7, 2014 (the Receivership Order ), applies for an order, substantially in the form attached as Schedule A hereto: 1. If necessary, abridging the time for service of this Application and
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-12-9545-00CL IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.c-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-14-10493-00CL B E T W E E N: TREZ CAPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA and WYNFORD PROFESSIONAL CENTRE
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY OF PREMIUM DISC CORP., OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA, IN THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO
Estate File No.: 32-158728 Take notice that: IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY OF PREMIUM DISC CORP., OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA, IN THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY AND FIRST MEETING OF CREDITORS
More informationCURATELLE ACT. Act 12 of October 1973 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY. 1. Short title 2. Interpretation
CURATELLE ACT Act 12 of 1973 1 October 1973 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Short title 2. Interpretation PART I PRELIMINARY PART II THE CURATOR 3. Office of Curator 4. Curator to administer certain estates
More informationCALGARY ALBERTA TREASURY BRANCHES AND ALBERTA LTD.
COURT FILE NUMBER 1601-06759 DEe 07 2ot6 COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL CENTRE OF CALGARY JUDICIAL CENTRE CALGARY PLAINTIFF ALBERTA TREASURY BRANCHES DEFENDANT CHINOOK PIPELINE INC., CHINOOK
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA EDMONTON
COURT FILE NUMBER 1703-21274 Clerk's Stam COURT J UDICIAL CENTRE PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA EDMONTON ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 1679775 ALBERTA LTD., REID-BUILT HOMES LTD., REID WORLDWIDE
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. - and - Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
Court File No. 60680 CP ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N : 1688782 ONTARIO INC. Plaintiff - and - MAPLE LEAF FOODS INC. and MAPLE LEAF CONSUMER FOODS INC. Defendants Proceeding under the
More informationCase Name: Enescu v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co.
Page 1 Case Name: Enescu v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. Between Cornel Enescu and 1380470 Ontario Inc., and The Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, Maskell Insurance Brokers Ltd. and William Maskell [2005]
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
Court File No.: CV-10-8944-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED APPLICATION OF TERRESTAR NETWORKS
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) ORDER (Stay Extension)
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) Court File No.: CV-16-11389-00CL HONOURABLE MR. ICE MYERS MONDAY, THE 301" DAY OF APRIL, 2018 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT,
More informationNOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF LEE VALLEY TOOLS LTD. v. CANADA POST CORPORATION CLASS ACTION
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF LEE VALLEY TOOLS LTD. v. CANADA POST CORPORATION CLASS ACTION PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. TO ALL customers of
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST)
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) Court File No. CV-12-9732-00CL THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE WILTON-SIEGEL WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2017 KEITH ALEXANDER, ARTHUR BARKIN, MARSHALL BARKIN,
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST THE HONOURABLE ) MONDAY, THE 2 ND DAY ) MR. JUSTICE FARLEY ) OF JUNE, 2003
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST THE HONOURABLE ) MONDAY, THE 2 ND DAY ) MR. JUSTICE FARLEY ) OF JUNE, 2003 Court File No. 01-CL-4313 IN THE MATTER OF RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY AND IN
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) AND IN THE MATTER OF URBANCORP INC. INITIAL RECOGNITION ORDER (FOREIGN MAIN PROCEEDING)
Court File No.: CV-16-11392-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) THE HONOURABLE MR ) WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY JUSTICE NEWBOULD ) OF MAY, 2016 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS
More informationJustice Marvin A. Zuker ONTARIO SMALL CLAIMS COURT PRACTICE
Justice Marvin A. Zuker ONTARIO SMALL CLAIMS COURT PRACTICE Practice Advisor September 20, 2013 Below please find a comprehensive collection of updates to the legislative provisions that have been amended
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) ) ) ) DAY OF JULY, 2015
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) Court File No. {,v- /s -)/O){t?-cJO CA- THE HONOURABLE MIL. JUSTICE H- J. \/of Il,.. LCN - S;rl ~ ) ) TUESDAY, THE 14th ) DAY OF JULY, 2015
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File # 05-CV -299031 CP THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE BARBARA CONWAY BETWEEN: ) ) ) ) TUESDA Y, THE 25 th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 GERALD CLAYTON GLOVER, LINDA GLOVER,
More informationRULE 60 ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS
RULE 60 ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS DEFINITIONS 60.01 In Rules 60.02 to 60.19, (a) "creditor" means a person who is entitled to enforce an order for the payment or recovery of money; (b) "debtor" means a person
More informationI_\`l ~~ PONDEROSA PEACHLAND DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, TREEGROUP PONDEROSA DEVELOPMENT CORP. and B.C. LTD.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA No. S144265 Vancouver Registry IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENTS ACT, R.S.C. 1985, C. C-36, AS AMENDED I_\`l ~~ IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-15-10832-00CL IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA CALGARY ALBERTA TREASURY BRANCHES
COURT FILE NO. 1701-07734 CI-EIE 0 F-r FILED JUN 1 6 2017 JUDICIAL CL-iv I I-11_- 0F CALGARY COURT COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL CENTRE CALGARY APPLICANT ALBERTA TREASURY BRANCHES RESPONDENT
More informationSMALL CLAIMS COURT RULES SUMMARY OF CONTENTS RULE 1 INTERPRETATION
SMALL CLAIMS COURT RULES SUMMARY OF CONTENTS Rule 1. Interpretation Rule 2. Non-Compliance with the Rules Rule 3. Time Rule 4. Parties Under Disability Rule 5. Partners and Sole Proprietorships Rule 6.
More information[Rule 6.3 and 10.52(1)] COURTFILENO FLED COURT COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA NOV
Form 27 COMPANY OF CANADA, IN ITS CAPACITY AS [Rule 6.3 and 10.52(1)] SECURED LENDERS 0925165 B.C. LTD. DOCUMENT APPLICATION ADDRESS FOR McCARTHY TETRAULT LLP SERVICE AND Barristers & Solicitors Avenue
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) Order Made After Application INITIAL RECOGNITION ORDER (FOREIGN MAIN PROCEEDING)
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) Court File No: CV-14-10663-OOCL THE HONOURABLE MADAM ) FRIDAY, THE 22nd DAY JUSTICE MATHESON ) OF AUGUST, 2014 IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCYACT,
More informationThe Public Guardian and Trustee Act
1 The Public Guardian and Trustee Act being Chapter P-36.3* of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1983 (effective April 1, 1984) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1984-85-86, c.34 and 105; 1988-89,
More informationLimitations Act, 2002: Issues of Concern to Trustees in Bankruptcy
Limitations Act, 2002: Issues of Concern to Trustees in Bankruptcy by Doug Palmateer and John Swan Aird & Berlis LLP June 2005 Notice to Readers: A. Introduction The discussion of the law in this memorandum
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST MOTION RECORD OF THE RECEIVER FOR THE RESPONDENT GLOBAL MILLS INC. Motion Returnable July 4, 2014
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-14-10493-00CL B E T W E E N: TREZ CAPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA and WYNFORD PROFESSIONAL CENTRE
More informationThe Public Guardian and Trustee Act
Consolidated to September 23, 2011 1 The Public Guardian and Trustee Act being Chapter P-36.3* of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1983 (effective April 1, 1984) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan,
More informationdays. If you are served outside Canada and the United States of America, the period is sixty days.
Court File No. SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DARA FRESCO Plaintiff -and - CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE Defendant PROCEEDING UNDER THE CLASS PROCEEDINGS ACT, 1992 TO THE DEFENDANT STATEMENT OF CLAIM A
More informationPart 36 Extraordinary Remedies
Alberta Rules of Court 390/68 R427-430 Part 36 Extraordinary Remedies Replevin Recovery of personal property 427 In any action brought for the recovery of any personal property and claiming that the property
More informationApplication for Homeward Bond and Indemnity Agreement
Application for Homeward Bond and Indemnity Agreement In order to ensure the prompt processing of your application, please ensure that the following documents are provided with it. Fully completed and
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA
Citation: MNP Ltd v Desrochers, 2018 MBCA 97 Date: 20181001 Docket: AI17-30-08933 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA Coram: Mr. Justice Marc M. Monnin Mr. Justice Christopher J. Mainella Madam Justice
More informationCUSTODIAL AGREEMENT. by and among CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE. as Seller, Servicer and Cash Manager. and
Execution Copy CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT by and among CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE as Seller, Servicer and Cash Manager and CIBC COVERED BOND (LEGISLATIVE) GUARANTOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as Guarantor and
More informationSUPERIOR COURT. (Commercial Division) PRESIDING : THE HONOURABLE MARTIN CASTONGUAY, J.S.C.
SUPERIOR COURT (Commercial Division) CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF MONTRÉAL No. 500-11-049214-154 DATE: February 18, 2016 PRESIDING : THE HONOURABLE MARTIN CASTONGUAY, J.S.C. IN THE MATTER OF THE
More informationPage: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND COURT OF APPEAL
Page: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND COURT OF APPEAL Citation: E.R.I. Engine v. MacEachern 2011 PECA 2 Date: 20110107 Docket: S1-CA-1195 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: STEVEN
More informationSCHEDULE 10 LENDERS REMEDIES AGREEMENT
SCHEDULE 10 LENDERS REMEDIES AGREEMENT for the Saskatchewan Joint-Use Schools Project # 2 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA, AS INDENTURE
More informationTHIS INSTRUMENT IS BEING RECORDED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ. NO RECORDING FEE IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Santa Cruz Housing and Community Development Dept. Attn: Norm Daly 809 Center Street, Rm. 206 Santa Cruz, California 95060 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE HERIDGE S.A R.L. GREAT LAKES BIODIESEL INC., EINER CANADA INC. AND BIOVERSEL TRADING INC.
Court File No. CV-14-10672-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST THE HONOURABLE MISTER WEDNESDAY, THE 27nd JUSTICE PATTILLO DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BETWEEN:,o7 1 rn HERIDGE S.A R.L. - and
More informationCOURTS OF LAW AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA COURTS OF LAW AMENDMENT BILL (As amended by the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services (National Assembly)) (The English text is the offıcial text of the Bill)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION IN RE: AMERICAN HISTORIC RACING MOTORCYCLE ASSOCIATION, LTD., Debtor. BK No. 06-06626-MH3-11 ORDER CONFIRMING
More informationAMENDMENTS TO THE ONTARIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Toll-free 1.877.262.7762 www.virtualassociates.ca AMENDMENTS TO THE ONTARIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE This chart is updated as of July 1, 2017. This table is intended as a guideline only. The statutory
More informationFACTUM OF THE APPLICANT (Motion Returnable June 16, 2016)
Court File No.: CV-16-11410-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF PHOENIX
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) ) of 'fiio.«-'", ONTARIO. - and -
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No.: CV- IO-412963-00CP THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE PERELL ) ) ) \'t\.. "'~"'1s ' the.2~"'\ ay of 'fiio.«-'", 201 2 ", BETWEEN: )', ) r I I... ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT
More informationTHE LAWS OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. STATUTORY INSTRUMENT No. 45 of 2005 INSOLVENCY RULES, 2005
THE LAWS OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS STATUTORY INSTRUMENT No. 45 of 2005 INSOLVENCY RULES, 2005 Based on the Insolvency Rules, 2005 (Statutory Instrument No. 45 of 2005) and amendments made by the Insurance
More informationUNPAID OVERTIME CLASS ACTION. FRESCO v CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION
[CIBC TO INSERT RECIPIENT ADDRESS] UNPAID OVERTIME CLASS ACTION FRESCO v CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY You are receiving
More informationE N D O R S E M E N T (corrected)
COURT FILE NO.: 07-CV-334666PD2 DATE: 20070620 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: State Farm Insurance Company v. v. Jean Brijlal and Roy Brijlal BEFORE: Justice D. Brown COUNSEL: Pamela Pengelley,
More informationThe Enforcement of Money Judgments Regulations
ENFORCEMENT OF MONEY JUDGMENTS E-9.22 REG 1 1 The Enforcement of Money Judgments Regulations being Chapter E-9.22 Reg 1 (effective May 28, 2012) as amended by Saskatchewan Regulations 22/2016 and 133/2017.
More informationFTI Consulting TD Waterhouse Tower 79 Wellington Street West Suite 2010, P.O. Box 104 Toronto ON M5K 1G8 Main 416.649.8100 Fax 416.649.8101 fticonsulting.com Estate ID No. 25-094503 Trustee License No.
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF MAPLE BANK GmbH ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA. and.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) Court File No. CV-16-11290-00CL OURABLE REGIONAL TICE MORAWETZ TUESDAY, THE 26th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2017 IN THE MATTER OF MAPLE BANK GmbH AND IN THE MATTER
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) Court File No. CV-17-11785-00CL IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN
More informationExpropriation Act CHAPTER 156 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, as amended by
Expropriation Act CHAPTER 156 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, 1989 as amended by 1992, c. 11, s. 36; 1995-96, c. 19; 2001, c. 6, s. 106; 2006, c. 16, s. 7; 2017, c. 4, ss. 80-82 2018 Her Majesty the Queen in
More informationJ)NTAR/0 YEGALROSEN. -and- BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. FRESH AS AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM
PURSUANT TO CONFORM~MENT A J)NTAR/0 UPERIEURE D~OR COURT OF JUSTICE FFI A LOCAL Court File No. CV-10-39668500CP YEGALROSEN Plaintiff -and- BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. Defendant Proceeding under the Class Proceedings
More informationNo. 1 of 2015 Nevis Limited Liability Company Island of Nevis (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
No. 1 of 2015 Nevis Limited Liability Company Island of Nevis (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Short title and Commencement 2. Amendment of Table of Contents 3. Amendment of Section
More informationCUSTODIAL AGREEMENT. by and among THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK. as Issuer, Seller, Servicer and Cash Manager. and
Execution Copy CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT by and among THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK as Issuer, Seller, Servicer and Cash Manager and TD COVERED BOND (LEGISLATIVE) GUARANTOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as Guarantor and COMPUTERSHARE
More informationThe Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning AARON MURRAY LESSING.
2012 LSBC 19 Report issued: May 28, 2012 Citations issued: March 23, 2011 and July 28, 2011 The Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning
More informationPATENTED MEDICINE PRICES REVIEW BOARD. IN THE MATTER OF the Patent Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. P-4, as amended
PATENTED MEDICINE PRICES REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF the Patent Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. P-4, as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. and the medicine Soliris REPLY BY BOARD STAFF TO
More informationOPERATING AGREEMENT FOR SM ENERGY MANAGEMENT, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
OPERATING AGREEMENT FOR SM ENERGY MANAGEMENT, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE I: DEFINITIONS...1 ARTICLE II: ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION...3 2.1 Filing Articles
More informationGUARANTY OF PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION
EXHIBIT C-1 GUARANTY OF PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION This GUARANTY OF PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION ( Guaranty ) is made as of, 200, by FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the Guarantor ), to the VIRGINIA
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST ) ) - and
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-16-11409-00CL THE-HONOURABLE ) TUESDAY, THE 2nd MR. JUSTICE NEWBOULD ) ) DAY OF MAY, 2017 BETWEEN: CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) MONDAY, THE 1 si DAY OF JUSTICE SARAH PEPALL DECEMBER, 2008
O CL- -7437-1 Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) THE HONOURABLE MONDAY, THE 1 si DAY OF JUSTICE SARAH PEPALL DECEMBER, 2008 IN THE MATTER OF LOOK COMMUNICATIONS INC. Applicant
More informationProvince of Alberta ATB FINANCIAL ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter A Current as of December 15, Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 15, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue
More informationSuncor Energy Products Inc.
Ontario Energy Board Commission de l énergie de l Ontario Application to determine the location of electricity distribution facilities within road allowances owned by the County of Lambton. PROCEDURAL
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, C.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-15-10832-00CL IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, C. c-36, AS AMENDED TARGET CANADA CO., TARGET CANADA
More information