NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL"

Transcription

1 NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Applicant: [X] Respondents: [X] and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) SECTION 29 APPLICATION DECISION Representatives: [X] Action: S.H. No WCB Claim No.: [X] Date of Decision: May 13, 2009 Decision Summary: The action by the Respondents Getson et al against the Applicant is not barred by operation of s. 28 of the Act, according to the reasons of Appeal Commissioners Louanne Labelle, K. Andrew MacNeil and Brent Levy.

2 2 BACKGROUND TO THE APPLICATION: This application was made to the Tribunal on June 25, 2008 by Christina MacDougall under s. 29 of the Workers Compensation Act, S.N.S , c. 10 as amended [the Act ]. Christina MacDougall [ MacDougall ] is the defendant in an action brought on behalf of several plaintiffs who are the survivors of Richard Slauenwhite, tragically killed in a motor vehicle accident on June 5, She is seeking a ruling that the action against her by the plaintiffs in S.H. No , respondents in this application, hereinafter referred to as the Respondents Getson, is barred by operation of s. 28 of the Act. The Tribunal issued a preliminary decision in this matter finding that it had jurisdiction to hear the application pursuant to s. 29 of the Act [Decision PAD, NSWCAT, January 12, 2009]. The application then proceeded by way of written submissions and was considered by a panel of three Appeal Commissioners. The parties to this application filed an Agreed Statement of Facts together with relevant documentation on October 1, Submissions on the merits of the application were filed by all counsel following the issuance of Decision PAD. Counsel for MacDougall filed submissions and supporting book of authorities on February 6, Counsel for the Respondents Getson filed submissions together with supporting documentation on February 9, Counsel for the Board filed written submissions on February 19, ISSUE AND OUTCOME: Is the action by the Respondents Getson against MacDougall barred by operation of s. 28 of the Act? No. The action is not barred by s. 28 of the Act. The Respondents Getson exercised their right under the Act to elect to receive compensation and to be governed by the laws of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador [hereinafter referred to as Newfoundland ]. Their action in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia is an exercise of the right provided to them under that legislation. FACTUAL BACKGROUND: Section 29 of the Act gives exclusive jurisdiction to this Tribunal to determine whether an

3 3 action is barred by operation of the Act. The Respondents Getson have begun an action against MacDougall who has, in turn, applied to this Tribunal for determination as to whether the action is barred by operation of s. 28 of the Act. Section 28 reads as follows: 28 (1) The rights provided by this Part are in lieu of all rights and rights of action to which a worker, a worker's dependant or a worker's employer are or may be entitled against (a) the worker's employer or that employer's servants or agents; and (b) any other employer subject to this Part, or any of that employer's servants or agents, as a result of any personal injury by accident (c) in respect of which compensation is payable pursuant to this Part; or (d) arising out of and in the course of the worker's employment in an industry to which this Part applies. (2) Clause (1)(b) does not apply where the injury results from the use or operation of a motor vehicle registered or required to be registered pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Act , c. 10, s. 28. The parties in this matter have filed an Agreed Statement of Facts. The facts are not in dispute. A motor vehicle accident occurred on June 5, 2007 in Marystown, Newfoundland. Mr. Richard Slauenwhite was one of two people killed in the accident. Mr. Slauenwhite s estate has commenced a legal action in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia against MacDougall, who was the driver of the vehicle in which Mr. Slauenwhite was travelling. At the time of the accident, Ms. MacDougall and Mr. Slauenwhite were employees of RGIS Inventory Specialists of Canada, LLC, [ RGIS ] a body corporate registered to carry on business in Nova Scotia. They were both residents of Nova Scotia working on assignment in Newfoundland for RGIS. Following the accident, counsel for the Respondents Getson advised the Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia, the Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation

4 4 Commission of Newfoundland and Labrador [ WHSCC ] and RGIS that Mr. Slauenwhite s survivors were exercising their rights under s. 27 of the Act to elect to be subject to the laws of Newfoundland and to proceed with an action in damages. At the request of the Newfoundland and Labrador WHSCC, the Respondents Getson completed an election to claim compensation (extra-jurisdictional) form dated July 15, The election form indicated that Getson chose to claim compensation (or damages) under the law of Newfoundland where the fatality occurred. Getson subsequently elected to opt out of claiming compensation under the Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Act, R.S.N.L Chapter W-11, as amended, [the Newfoundland Act ], choosing rather to make a claim in damages before the courts. Getson elected to proceed with an action for damages under Newfoundland and Labrador s Fatal Accidents Act, R.S.N.L., 1990 c. F-6, as amended, in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia as evidenced by the pleadings, particularly the Originating Notice (Action) and Statement of Claim filed in S.H. No in November, MacDougall filed a defence to the action on December 21, 2007claiming that the action was statute-barred pursuant to s. 28 of the Act. There is no dispute that MacDougall and the deceased Slauenwhite were co-workers, both employed by RGIS, a covered employer in Nova Scotia at the time of the accident. There is also no dispute that RGIS was a covered employer in Newfoundland at the time of the accident, as RGIS pays into the workers compensation schemes of any province where RGIS employees work. Attached to the Agreed Statement of Facts is Exhibit G, a statement of account from the Nova Scotia Board indicating a remittance for the month of June 2007 for 66 covered employees. Attached as Exhibit I is a statement from the Newfoundland and Labrador WHSCC indicating that RGIS declared having 61 workers on their payroll for June A copy of the WHSCC claim file in Newfoundland is attached to the Respondents submissions. The file contains documents which include an employer s death report filed with the Newfoundland WHSCC on June 5, 2007 relating to the accident that resulted in Mr. Slauenwhite s death. There is no dispute that the Respondents Getson were entitled to claim compensation under the laws of Newfoundland or of Nova Scotia and that an election was made under s. 27 of the Act. Section 27 of the Act reads as follows: 27 (1) Where a worker is entitled to compensation pursuant to

5 5 (a) the laws of the jurisdiction where the accident occurred; and (b) this Part, the worker shall decide to be compensated according to either the laws of the jurisdiction where the accident occurred, or this Part. (2) Notice in writing of a decision made pursuant to subsection (1) shall be given to the Board within six months of the occurrence of the accident. (3) Where, pursuant to subsection (1), a worker (a) decides to claim compensation in the jurisdiction where the accident occurred; or (b) fails to make an election, the worker may not claim compensation pursuant to this Part , c. 10, s. 27. The Respondents Getson then elected to proceed with an action for damages under s.45(2) of the Newfoundland Act: Where action allowed 45. (1) Where a worker sustains an injury in the course of his or her employment in circumstances which entitle him or her or his or her dependents to an action (a) against some person other than an employer or worker; (b) against an employer or against a worker of that employer where the injury occurred otherwise than in the conduct of the operations usual in or incidental to the industry carried on by the employer; or (c) where section 44.1 applies, the worker or his or her dependents, where they are entitled to compensation, may claim compensation or may bring an action. (2) The worker or his or her dependents shall make an election under subsection (1) within 3 months of the injury and an application for compensation is a valid election for the purpose of this section.

6 6 (3) Where the worker or his or her dependents elect to bring an action, he or she or they shall immediately serve notice in writing of the election on the commission, and where an action is commenced, he or she or they shall immediately serve notice in writing of the action on the commission. Section 45(1) refers to s which states as follows: No compensation 44.1 (1) Section 44 shall not apply where the worker is injured or killed (a) while being transported in the course of the worker's employment by a mode of transportation in respect of which public liability insurance is required to be carried; or (b) as a result of an accident involving the use of a motor vehicle by the worker or another person, in the course of the worker's employment. (2) In subsection (1) "motor vehicle" means (a) a motor vehicle (i) registered under the Highway Traffic Act, or (ii) authorized under section 12 or 17 of the Highway Traffic Act to be operated on a highway in the province without being registered under that Act, whether or not it is being operated on a highway; or (b) another motor vehicle while being operated on a highway in the province and for the purpose of this definition "highway" means a highway as defined in the Highway Traffic Act. ANALYSIS: The issue in this matter revolves around a question of statutory interpretation. What is the effect of an election under s. 27 of the Act? Does it only confer onto the Respondents Getson the right to claim compensation provided in the Newfoundland Act, as opposed

7 7 to damages? Does s. 28 of the Act apply to the circumstances of this action? The historic compromise is the underlying principle behind workers compensation legislation. Section 28 of the Act sets out the historic trade-off in the Nova Scotia legislation. A worker gives up the right to sue in exchange for the right to compensation under the Act. Section 28 provides for an exception. A right of action may exist if the injury or death results from the use or operation of a motor vehicle. However, even though a death, as in this case, arises out of the operation and use of a motor vehicle, it is not an exception to the statutory bar as the exception only applies to the circumstances in s. 28(1)(b), an action against an employer (or that employer s servants) other than the worker s employer or that employer s servants. An action in the same circumstances is not barred by ss. 44 and 44.1 of the Newfoundland Act as the exception applies whether or not it is an action against a co-worker or the worker s employer. The basis of the exception rests, apparently purely, on the fact that there is a liability insurer involved. Board counsel submitted that the Respondents, having exercised their right under s. 27 of the Act, are no longer entitled to compensation under the Act in accordance with s. 27(3). As there is no claim filed with the Board in Nova Scotia and the Respondents Getson opted not to receive compensation in Nova Scotia, the Board took no position with respect to the application. Counsel for the Respondents Getson argued that the Respondents properly exercised their rights under s. 27, therefore, their claims were extinguished under the Act. Having elected to be subject to the laws of Newfoundland, they could then elect to sue for common law damages under ss. 44 and 45 of the Newfoundland Act. Counsel for the Respondents Getson argues further that the statutory bar at s. 28 only applies if a person claims compensation under the Act. However, under s. 28(1) (d) of the Act, an action can be barred if the injury arises out of and in the course of the worker s employment in an industry to which the Act applies. Therefore, the statutory bar is not negated simply because there is no compensation payable. After considering the relevant legislative provisions, the panel agrees that an election duly made under s. 27 of the Act effectively discharges the Respondents Getson from the operation of s. 28. The Respondents Getson can avoid the statutory bar at s. 28 of the Act by opting to claim compensation under the Newfoundland Act where a bar in similar circumstances does not apply. Our findings rest on the interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions and the interplay

8 8 between two distinct schemes of workers compensation legislation, that of Nova Scotia and that of Newfoundland. Similarly, the interplay between the Government Employees Compensation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. G-8 [ GECA ] and the Act has been considered by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal on several occasions. The Court in Cape Breton Development Corporation v. Morrison Estate, 2003 NSCA 103 referred to the relevant principles of statutory interpretation as summarized by the Court of Appeal in Thomson v. Nova Scotia (Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal), (2003) 212 N.S.R. (2d) 81 (N.S.C.A.), which also dealt with the interplay between GECA and the Act: As in any case of statutory interpretation, the Court must strive to give the statute its most appropriate interpretation. The appropriate interpretation is to be arrived at by taking account of the statute s total context having regard to its purpose, the consequences of proposed interpretations and presumptions and special rules of interpretation. The appropriate interpretation is one which is plausible in the sense that it complies with the text of the statute, which is efficacious in the sense that it promotes the legislative purpose and that is acceptable, in the sense that the outcome is reasonable and just. Ruth Sullivan (ed.) Driedger on the Construction of rd Statutes (3, 1994) at 131. The application of these principles leads the panel to the conclusion that s. 27 must be interpreted as giving the option to a worker, or his dependents in this case, to elect to be governed by a workers compensation scheme in another province notwithstanding differences in rights and obligations. Having exercised their rights, they now gain rights under Newfoundland legislation which may be different in many respects to the rights they might have had under Nova Scotia legislation. However, their rights cannot be abrogated or limited by an Act to which they have chosen not to be subject. Section 27 of the Act speaks of a worker deciding to be compensated or to claim compensation. Section 49 of the Newfoundland Act appears to be the statutory foundation for paying compensation to workers from other provinces in a system which is otherwise governed by residency. Section 49 speaks of compensation, as distinguished from damages when dealing with the reciprocity with other provinces. The use of the word compensation in s. 27 of the Act and s. 49 of the Newfoundland Act does not lead to the conclusion that workers only gain rights to compensation, as a benefit under the Act, as distinguished from civil damages. The term compensation can mean remuneration, wages, benefits or even damages

9 9 awarded by the courts [ something awarded to compensate for loss, suffering or injury as rd defined in The Concise Oxford Dictionary, Oxford University Press, 3 ed., 2001]. There is no doubt that, when used in the context of workers compensation legislation, it refers to benefits payable under the legislation. However, the meaning of compensation when used in s. 27 must be viewed in the context of cross-jurisdictional statutes of similar purpose providing workers in certain circumstances the option to choose between two compensation schemes. It should not be interpreted restrictively as giving a worker a choice to receive only the benefits provided for under the workers compensation legislation. The terms compensation, as distinguished from damages are used in s. 49 of the Newfoundland Act so as to specify the circumstances that allow for cross-jurisdictional recognition of claims. Giving the election under s. 27 a wide interpretation also accords with the accepted principle that a liberal interpretation be given to workers compensation legislation. The Court in Morrison, cited above, referred with approval to the following: That liberal interpretation is also reflected by this Court s decision in Workers Compensation Appeal Board v. Penney [(1980), 38 N.S.R. (2d) 623 (S.C.A.D.) at para 7, in which the following passage from Halsbury s Laws of England was quoted with approval: The [Worker s Compensation] Acts are so clearly remedial measures that the courts will be slow to cut down the remedy given either by reference to the schedule of the compensation or by adopting an interpretation which will introduce exceptions not made by the legislature. The more plausible, efficacious and acceptable interpretation is that the right provided to a worker under s. 27 of the Act is the right to choose between legislative schemes and all their respective provisions. Counsel for MacDougall frame the issue as follows: should the law of Nova Scotia be applied by the Tribunal, and the action commenced by the Respondents in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia be barred, by the relevant provisions of the Act? They set out several reasons why the action in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia should be statute-barred under s. 28 of the Act. We summarize these briefly as follows: - the Act is a type of statutory contract between employers and workers and, as such, the laws of the jurisdiction with the closest and most real connection to the transaction between the parties is to be applied...;

10 10 - a worker s right to elect compensation pursuant to s. 27 of the Act may be disjunctive from the provisions of s. 28 in assessing whether an action is statute-barred; - the issue to be decided is not whether the Respondents are entitled to compensation but rather the nature of such compensation and this is a matter for the lex fori (or the law of the forum of the action), which is Nova Scotia; - principles at the heart of workers compensation schemes mitigate for the application of s. 28 as the whole premise of the scheme is based on the protection of employers from civil suits; and, - the issue to be considered by this Tribunal is not the proper law of the tort; even if it is, there is evidence to suggest that the forum conveniens is Nova Scotia. We will address these arguments in no particular order. Counsel for MacDougall find support in the basic principles of the historic compromise. They refer to the often quoted decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Pasiechnyk v. Saskatchewan (Workers Compensation Board), 1997 Carswell Sask 401 (S.C.C.), where the Court discussed the history and purpose of workers compensation legislation and stated in particular the following at paragraph 26: I would add that this so-called negative feature is a necessary feature. The bar to actions against employers is central to the workers compensation scheme as Meredith conceived of it: it is the other half of the trade-off. It would be unfair to allow actions to proceed against employers where there was a chance of the injured worker s obtaining greater compensation, and yet still to force employers to contribute to a no-fault insurance scheme. There is no doubt that the statutory bar is central to workers compensation schemes. However, in this case, although these two statutes are complementary and have similar purposes, there is a conflict between the legislative schemes as to the exception to the statutory bar. The exception to the statutory bar in Newfoundland applies more generally to circumstances where there is a liability insurer in the background, even though it may be the employer s insurer. Whereas Nova Scotia has chosen to limit the exception to the bar to cases involving other employers and their workers, the exception does not apply to a suit against a worker s employer or co-workers. Therefore, applying Newfoundland law as opposed to Nova Scotia law does not offend basic principles of the historic compromise. Counsel for MacDougall suggest that the workers compensation system is a form of statutory contract and that the blind application of the law of Newfoundland, being the

11 11 jurisdiction of the tort, would be an error in law. This Tribunal is not applying the law of Newfoundland because it is the jurisdiction of the tort. It is applying the law of Nova Scotia because the Respondents have a right to elect under the law of Nova Scotia to be governed by the law of Newfoundland. RGIS is a covered employer in Nova Scotia as well as in Newfoundland and as such is bound by the laws of these jurisdictions. We do not accept the proposition that the Respondents Getson have brought a legal action against MacDougall in tort as a negligent driver, therefore ignoring the existence of workers compensation legislation. In fact, the workers compensation legislation allows for the election and also allows for the action. Counsel suggest further that the issue involves the nature of compensation to which the Respondents Getson are entitled and is therefore a matter of procedural law, governed by the laws of Nova Scotia. We disagree that this is a matter of procedural law. If the s. 28 bar applies, the Respondents lose their right of action. This is not a mere procedural question, this is a substantive issue. Counsel also argue that if the reasoning of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in Spencer v. Mansour s Ltd., 2000 Carswell NS 133 (N.S.) is followed, any rights of the Respondents to seek compensation in Newfoundland is a moot issue and only the legislative provisions of the Act relating to the statutory bar of civil actions are to be considered on a stand alone basis. Therefore, an application of the provisions of the Act would clearly bar the action of the Respondents in the civil courts and s. 27 of the Act would be disjunctive from the provision of the Act addressing whether a civil claim is statute-barred. In Spencer, the Court was dealing with an action by a New Brunswick resident who was suing in Nova Scotia after receiving compensation from the New Brunswick commission. The worker was suing with the permission of the New Brunswick commission. The panel accepts the proposition that the fact that a worker may have received compensation does not necessarily impact on the right to sue. It does not justify ignoring the impact of an election under s. 27 of the Act. Counsel for MacDougall refer to a case decided by the Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal in Decision No. 2273/031 and 2273/03, 2004 Carswell Ont 4694 (Ont. WSIAT). In that matter, co-workers in the course of their employment were involved in a motor vehicle accident in Utah. One of them commenced an action in Ontario against the other invoking Utah tort law to avoid a statutory bar. WSIAT found that the provisions of the Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Act [ WSIA ] set out a comprehensive code intended to cover workplace accidents involving Ontario workers and Ontario employers regardless of where the accidents occur. The Tribunal stated further that the relationship between the parties directly and indirectly involved in this action all arose out of contractual arrangements entered into and

12 12 enforceable in Ontario. Therefore, application of the lex loci delicti rule would permit an Ontario worker of an Ontario employer injured outside of Ontario to do what he or she would not be permitted to do, if the accident had occurred within Ontario. It would mean that coverage under the WSIA for Schedule 1 employers, directors, workers, and coworkers would vary whenever a worker left Ontario, no matter how briefly. WSIAT therefore found that the right to sue was barred. This case can be distinguished. The Respondents Getson are suing in Nova Scotia under the tort law of Newfoundland, where the accident occurred. However, in this case, the worker s dependents exercised a right provided by the contractual arrangement between the workers, their employer and the Board. They exercised the right to be covered by the workers compensation legislation of Newfoundland. In essence, the conflict in this case arises because of the difference in the legislative provisions relating to the statutory bar. The Respondents have avoided the statutory bar in Nova Scotia by exercising rights that are granted to them by laws of Nova Scotia. We do not agree that the Respondents Getson opting out of the Nova Scotia legislation, as permitted, is completely contrary to the fundamental principles of the workers compensation system. The workers compensation system, in fact, grants the right to opt out. They have exercised that right, and have acquired the right under Newfoundland s legislation to sue. Therefore, the action is not barred by the operation of s. 28 of the Act. CONCLUSION: The action by the Respondents Getson against MacDougall is not barred by the operation of s. 28 of the Act, for the reasons set out above. DATED AT HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, this 13th day of May, Louanne Labelle Chief Appeal Commissioner K. Andrew MacNeil Appeal Commissioner Brent Levy Appeal Commissioner

13 13

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 955/09

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 955/09 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 955/09 BEFORE: J. Josefo: Vice-Chair HEARING: May 13, 2009 at Ottawa Oral DATE OF DECISION: June 16, 2009 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2009 ONWSIAT 1450

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL PRACTICE MANUAL

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL PRACTICE MANUAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL PRACTICE MANUAL (revised July 2016) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.00 The Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal 1.10 Introduction 1.11 Definitions 1.20 Role of the Tribunal

More information

Page: 2 In the Matter of In the Matter of the Workers Compensation Act, R.S.A. 2000, c.w-15, As Amended ( WCA ) And in the Matter of a Decision by the

Page: 2 In the Matter of In the Matter of the Workers Compensation Act, R.S.A. 2000, c.w-15, As Amended ( WCA ) And in the Matter of a Decision by the Court of Queen s Bench of Alberta Citation: Homes by Avi Ltd. v. Alberta (Workers Compensation Board, Appeals Commission), 2007 ABQB 203 Date: 20070326 Docket: 0603 14909, 0603 14405, 0603 12833 Registry:

More information

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Hyson v. Nova Scotia (Public Service LTD), 2016 NSSC 153

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Hyson v. Nova Scotia (Public Service LTD), 2016 NSSC 153 SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Hyson v. Nova Scotia (Public Service LTD), 2016 NSSC 153 Date: 2016-06-16 Docket: Hfx No. 447446 Registry: Halifax Between: Annette Louise Hyson Applicant v. Nova

More information

REVIEW REPORT FI December 29, 2015 Department of Finance

REVIEW REPORT FI December 29, 2015 Department of Finance Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia Report of the Commissioner (Review Officer) Catherine Tully REVIEW REPORT FI-13-28 December 29, 2015 Department of Finance Summary: The

More information

Civil Law is known as Private Law. Regulates disputes between individuals; between parties; and between individuals and parties.

Civil Law is known as Private Law. Regulates disputes between individuals; between parties; and between individuals and parties. Civil Disputes Civil Law is known as Private Law. Regulates disputes between individuals; between parties; and between individuals and parties. The main purpose of Civil Law is to compensate victims. Civil

More information

On December 14, 2011, the B.C. Court of Appeal released its judgment

On December 14, 2011, the B.C. Court of Appeal released its judgment LIMITATION PERIODS ON DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTES: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MAKING THE NOTE PAYABLE A FIXED PERIOD AFTER DEMAND By Georges Sourisseau and Russell Robertson On December 14, 2011, the B.C. Court of

More information

GLAHOLT LLP CONSTRUCTION LAWYERS

GLAHOLT LLP CONSTRUCTION LAWYERS Choosing Arbitration Arbitration of construction industry disputes is: Based on contract. The power of an arbitrator, or arbitration panel, to decide your dispute must be granted to the arbitrator by the

More information

PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW SUMMARY 2011

PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW SUMMARY 2011 PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW SUMMARY 2011 LAWSKOOL CANADA CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION TO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW... 5 1.1 WHAT IS PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW?... 5 1.2 TERRITORIAL DIMENSIONS OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL

More information

CROWN PROCEEDINGS ACT

CROWN PROCEEDINGS ACT c t CROWN PROCEEDINGS ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 20, 2017. It is intended for information and

More information

NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: Baker v. Nova Scotia (Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal), 2017 NSCA 83

NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: Baker v. Nova Scotia (Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal), 2017 NSCA 83 NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: Baker v. Nova Scotia (Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal), 2017 NSCA 83 Date: 20171128 Docket: CA 453768 Registry: Halifax Between: Jeffrey Baker v. Appellant Nova

More information

NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: Nova Scotia Association of Health Organizations Long Term Disability Plan Trust Fund v. Amirault, 2017 NSCA 50

NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: Nova Scotia Association of Health Organizations Long Term Disability Plan Trust Fund v. Amirault, 2017 NSCA 50 NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: Nova Scotia Association of Health Organizations Long Term Disability Plan Trust Fund v. Amirault, 2017 NSCA 50 Date: 20170613 Docket: CA 460158 Registry: Halifax Between:

More information

Commentary on Bill 28: Limitation of Actions Act. Office of the Attorney General

Commentary on Bill 28: Limitation of Actions Act. Office of the Attorney General Commentary on Bill 28: Limitation of Actions Act Office of the Attorney General January 2009 Introduction On December 16th 2008 the Attorney General introduced Bill 28, a proposed new Limitation of Actions

More information

IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and LAMBERT JAMES-SOOMER. and LAMBERT JAMES-SOOMER

IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and LAMBERT JAMES-SOOMER. and LAMBERT JAMES-SOOMER SAINT LUCIA IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO.: SLUHCV 2003/0138 BETWEEN (1) MICHELE STEPHENSON (2) MAHALIA MARS (Qua Administratrices of the Estate of ANTHONY

More information

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Monkman v. Serious Incident Response Team, 2015 NSSC 325. Director of SIRT (Serious Incident Response Team)

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Monkman v. Serious Incident Response Team, 2015 NSSC 325. Director of SIRT (Serious Incident Response Team) SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Monkman v. Serious Incident Response Team, 2015 NSSC 325 Date: 2015-11-13 Docket: Hfx No. 430152 Registry: Halifax Between: Helen Monkman v. Appellant Director of

More information

KY DRAM SHOP MEMO II

KY DRAM SHOP MEMO II I. Kentucky s Dram Shop Act KY DRAM SHOP MEMO II KRS 413.241 Legislative finding; limitation on liability of licensed sellers or servers of intoxicating beverages; liability of intoxicated person (1) The

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. PRIME EQUIPMENT RENTALS LIMITED Claimant AND AND THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY (TRINIDAD & TOBAGO) LIMITED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. PRIME EQUIPMENT RENTALS LIMITED Claimant AND AND THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY (TRINIDAD & TOBAGO) LIMITED REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2014-00133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PRIME EQUIPMENT RENTALS LIMITED Claimant AND ANAND SINGH Defendant AND THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY (TRINIDAD

More information

SASKATCHEWAN OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER REPORT F Saskatchewan Workers Compensation Board

SASKATCHEWAN OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER REPORT F Saskatchewan Workers Compensation Board Date: January 30, 2012 File No.: 2008/003 SASKATCHEWAN OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER REPORT F-2012-002 Saskatchewan Workers Compensation Board Summary: The Applicant submitted a request

More information

Office of the Auditor General

Office of the Auditor General Office of the Auditor General Our Vision A relevant, valued, and independent audit office serving the public interest as the Legislature s primary source of assurance on government performance. Our Mission

More information

Kaufmann v Saskatchewan Government and General Employees' Union, 2012 SKQB 284

Kaufmann v Saskatchewan Government and General Employees' Union, 2012 SKQB 284 Kaufmann v Saskatchewan Government and General Employees' Union, 2012 SKQB 284 2012-07-17 QUEEN S BENCH FOR SASKATCHEWAN Date: 2012 07 17 Docket: Q.B.G. 557/2012 Citation: 2012 SKQB 284 Judicial Centre:

More information

Administrative Penalties

Administrative Penalties Administrative Penalties Final Report March 2012 Administrative penalties are a mechanism for enforcing compliance with regulatory legislation. They are monetary penalties assessed and imposed by a regulator

More information

Product Recalls: Crisis Management and Class Action Prevention

Product Recalls: Crisis Management and Class Action Prevention Product Recalls: Crisis Management and Class Action Prevention Gord McKee, Jill Lawrie, Nicole Henderson, Robin Linley & Marc-André Landry September 12, 2013 Recall Effectiveness An effective recall An

More information

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Dalhousie University v. Cogeneration and Energy Management Engineering Inc., 2017 NSSC 303

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Dalhousie University v. Cogeneration and Energy Management Engineering Inc., 2017 NSSC 303 SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Dalhousie University v. Cogeneration and Energy Management Engineering Inc., 2017 NSSC 303 Date: 20171128 Docket: Hfx No. 458586 Registry: Halifax Between: Dalhousie

More information

Supreme Court of Canada

Supreme Court of Canada Supreme Court of Canada Statistics - Supreme Court of Canada (2018) ISSN 1193-8536 (Print) ISSN 1918-8358 (Online) Photograph: Philippe Landreville 02. Introduction 04. The Appeal Process in the Supreme

More information

Number 41 of 1961 CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 REVISED. Updated to 13 April 2017

Number 41 of 1961 CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 REVISED. Updated to 13 April 2017 Number 41 of 1961 CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 REVISED Updated to 13 April 2017 This Revised Act is an administrative consolidation of the. It is prepared by the Law Reform Commission in accordance with its

More information

Title 8 Laws of Bermuda Item 71 BERMUDA 1958 : 103 JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT 1958 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Title 8 Laws of Bermuda Item 71 BERMUDA 1958 : 103 JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT 1958 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS BERMUDA 1958 : 103 JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT 1958 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1 Interpretation 2 Judgments to which Act applies 3 Application by judgment creditor to register judgment in Supreme

More information

Responsible Victims and (Partly) Justified Offenders

Responsible Victims and (Partly) Justified Offenders Responsible Victims and (Partly) Justified Offenders R. A. Duff VERA BERGELSON, VICTIMS RIGHTS AND VICTIMS WRONGS: COMPARATIVE LIABILITY IN CRIMINAL LAW (Stanford University Press 2009) If you negligently

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1945/10

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1945/10 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1945/10 BEFORE: HEARING: J. P. Moore : Vice-Chair B. Davis : Member Representative of Employers A. Grande : Member Representative of Workers

More information

Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz, McIntyre, Lamer and La Forest JJ. in effect when accident occurred--statutes barring action repealed before action

Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz, McIntyre, Lamer and La Forest JJ. in effect when accident occurred--statutes barring action repealed before action angus v. sun alliance insurance co., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 256 Sun Alliance Insurance Company v. Diane Hart Angus Appellant Respondent and Owen Hart and James Angus Respondents INDEXED AS: ANGUS v. SUN ALLIANCE

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between KERRON MOE. And GARY HARPER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between KERRON MOE. And GARY HARPER THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No CV 2012-03569 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between KERRON MOE And Claimant GARY HARPER BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER A. RAJKUMAR APPEARANCES Mr. St.

More information

An Overview of U.S. Personal Jurisdiction Law

An Overview of U.S. Personal Jurisdiction Law An Overview of U.S. Personal Jurisdiction Law Jasmine K. Singh Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP singh@kerrwagstaffe.com Personal Jurisdiction Refers to court s jurisdiction over the parties to a lawsuit It is a constitutional

More information

Public Accountants Act

Public Accountants Act Public Accountants Act CHAPTER 369 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, 1989 as amended by 1994, c. 30; 2015, c. 49, ss. 1-10, 11 (except insofar as it enacts ss. 14B(2), 14C, 14D(1)(f)), 12-14 2016 Her Majesty the

More information

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts. PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to November 1, 2003. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This

More information

Section In the Course of and Arising Out of. Subject Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in First Responders and Other Designated Workers

Section In the Course of and Arising Out of. Subject Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in First Responders and Other Designated Workers If a first responder or other designated worker is diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and meets specific employment and diagnostic criteria, the first responder or other designated worker's

More information

Industrial Relations Act 1996 No 17

Industrial Relations Act 1996 No 17 New South Wales Industrial Relations Act 1996 No 17 Contents Chapter 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Preliminary Name of Act Commencement Objects Dictionary Definition of employee Definition of industrial matters

More information

THE ROLE OF AN ESTATE TRUSTEE DURING LITIGATION IN ATLANTIC CANADA. Timothy C. Matthews, QC, TEP Stewart McKelvey

THE ROLE OF AN ESTATE TRUSTEE DURING LITIGATION IN ATLANTIC CANADA. Timothy C. Matthews, QC, TEP Stewart McKelvey THE ROLE OF AN ESTATE TRUSTEE DURING LITIGATION IN ATLANTIC CANADA Timothy C. Matthews, QC, TEP Stewart McKelvey Legislation in the four Atlantic Provinces closely follows the example of the English Judicature

More information

TRANSPORTATION OF DANGEROUS GOODS ACT, 1992 [FEDERAL]

TRANSPORTATION OF DANGEROUS GOODS ACT, 1992 [FEDERAL] PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] TRANSPORTATION OF DANGEROUS GOODS ACT, 1992 [FEDERAL] Published by Quickscribe Services Ltd. Updated To: [includes 2015 Chap. 4 (SI/2016-23)

More information

Builders Liens in Nova Scotia: Reform of the Mechanics Lien Act

Builders Liens in Nova Scotia: Reform of the Mechanics Lien Act Builders Liens in Nova Scotia: Reform of the Mechanics Lien Act Final Report - June 2003 The Law Reform Commission of Nova Scotia was established in 1991 by the Government of Nova Scotia under an Act to

More information

Alberta Immigrant Highlights. Labour Force Statistics. Highest unemployment rate for landed immigrants 9.8% New immigrants

Alberta Immigrant Highlights. Labour Force Statistics. Highest unemployment rate for landed immigrants 9.8% New immigrants 2016 Labour Force Profiles in the Labour Force Immigrant Highlights Population Statistics Labour Force Statistics Third highest percentage of landed immigrants in the working age population 1. 34. ON 2.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR COURT OF APPEAL LIANNU LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER M&M ENGINEERING LIMITED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR COURT OF APPEAL LIANNU LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER M&M ENGINEERING LIMITED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR COURT OF APPEAL Citation: Liannu Limited Partnership v. Modspace Financial Services Canada Ltd., 2016 NLCA 15 Date: April 8, 2016 Docket: 201501H0030 BETWEEN:

More information

1990 CHAPTER S HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan, enacts as follows:

1990 CHAPTER S HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan, enacts as follows: 1990 CHAPTER S-63.1 An Act respecting Summary Offences Procedure and Certain consequential amendments resulting from the enactment of this Act (Assented to June 22, 1990) HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice

More information

Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards in Canada

Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards in Canada McCarthy Tétrault LLP PO Box 48, Suite 5300 Toronto-Dominion Bank Tower Toronto ON M5K 1E6 Canada Tel: 416-362-1812 Fax: 416-868-0673 Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards in Canada DAVID I. W.

More information

Dalhousie University Alumni Association By-Laws

Dalhousie University Alumni Association By-Laws Dalhousie University Alumni Association By-Laws 1) Name 1.0 The name of the Association, the Dalhousie Alumni Association, is hereinafter referred to as the Association. 1.1 The office of the Association

More information

PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES PTY LTD ( PPL ) LEGAL ACCESS PLAN MEMBERSHIP CONTRACT

PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES PTY LTD ( PPL ) LEGAL ACCESS PLAN MEMBERSHIP CONTRACT PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES PTY LTD ( PPL ) LEGAL ACCESS PLAN MEMBERSHIP CONTRACT INDEX LEGAL ACCESS PLAN MEMBERSHIP CONTRACT... 1 TERMS AND CONDITIONS SECTION 1: PREVENTATIVE LEGAL SERVICES... 2 SECTION 2:

More information

Conflicts of Laws in International Aviation

Conflicts of Laws in International Aviation Conflicts of Laws in International Aviation by Paul Stephen Dempsey Tomlinson Professor of Law Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright 2015 by Paul Stephen Dempsey 1 Lex loci

More information

THE JUDGES (REMUNERATION AND TERMINAL BENEFITS) ACT, 2007 PART I PART II

THE JUDGES (REMUNERATION AND TERMINAL BENEFITS) ACT, 2007 PART I PART II THE JUDGES (REMUNERATION AND TERMINAL BENEFITS) ACT, 2007 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section Title PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Application. 3. Interpretation. PART II

More information

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND LC0 00 -- H 1 AS AMENDED STATE OF RHODE ISLAND IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 00 A N A C T RELATING TO MOTOR AND OTHER VEHICLES Introduced By: Representatives McCauley, Slater, Almeida, and

More information

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CIVIL DIVISION MISC. CAUSE NO. 321 OF 2013

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CIVIL DIVISION MISC. CAUSE NO. 321 OF 2013 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CIVIL DIVISION MISC. CAUSE NO. 321 OF 2013 1. ATTORNEY GENERAL 2. HON. NYOMBI PETER ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANTS VERSUS

More information

Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation (Nova Scotia) Act

Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation (Nova Scotia) Act Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation (Nova Scotia) Act CHAPTER 3 OF THE ACTS OF 1987 amended 1988, c. 56; 1992, c. 12; ss. 1-27; 1993, c. 16, ss. 1-6 An Act to Implement

More information

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Lymburner v. Nova Scotia (Health and Wellness) 2016 NSSC 23

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Lymburner v. Nova Scotia (Health and Wellness) 2016 NSSC 23 SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Lymburner v. Nova Scotia (Health and Wellness) 2016 NSSC 23 Date: 20160118 Docket: Hfx No. 435272 Registry: Halifax Between: Dr. Dana Lymburner v. Applicant Her Majesty

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STACEY HELFNER, Next Friend of AMBER SEILICKI, Minor, UNPUBLISHED June 20, 2006 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 265757 Macomb Circuit Court CENTER LINE PUBLIC SCHOOLS and LC

More information

FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT

FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT Arrangement of Sections 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. Part 1: Registration of Foreign Judgments 3. Power to extend Part I of Act to countries giving

More information

Information Brief. British Columbia Law Institute Workplace Dispute Resolution Consultation. British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal

Information Brief. British Columbia Law Institute Workplace Dispute Resolution Consultation. British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal Suite 1170, 605 Robson St. Vancouver BC V6B 5J3 Phone: (604) 775-2000 Toll Free: 1-888-440-8844 TTY: (604) 775-2021 FAX: (604) 775-2020 Internet: www.bchrt.bc.ca

More information

B. Considerations Regarding So-Called Boilerplate Clauses in Cross-Border Commercial Transactions

B. Considerations Regarding So-Called Boilerplate Clauses in Cross-Border Commercial Transactions B. Considerations Regarding So-Called Boilerplate Clauses in Cross-Border Commercial Transactions By: Ava J. Borrasso, Founder, Ava J. Borrasso, P.A., Miami Litigators called to analyze contract disputes

More information

CITATION: David Schnarr v. Blue Mountain Resorts Limited, 2017 ONSC 114 COURT FILE NO.: CV DATE:

CITATION: David Schnarr v. Blue Mountain Resorts Limited, 2017 ONSC 114 COURT FILE NO.: CV DATE: CITATION: David Schnarr v. Blue Mountain Resorts Limited, 2017 ONSC 114 COURT FILE NO.: CV-11-4023 DATE: 20170106 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: David Schnarr, Plaintiff AND: Blue Mountain Resorts

More information

Towards an Inclusive Framework for the Right to Legal Capacity. in Nova Scotia

Towards an Inclusive Framework for the Right to Legal Capacity. in Nova Scotia Towards an Inclusive Framework for the Right to Legal Capacity in Nova Scotia A Brief Submitted in Response to: The Law Reform Commission of Nova Scotia s Discussion Paper on the Powers of Attorney Act

More information

Defence and Counterclaim Training. By Andrew Mckie Barrister Clerksroom.

Defence and Counterclaim Training. By Andrew Mckie Barrister Clerksroom. Defence and Counterclaim Training. By Andrew Mckie Barrister Clerksroom Email andrewmckie@btinternet.com/ mckie@clerksroom.com Telephone Mobile: 07739 964012 Office: 0845 083 3000 Website www.clerksroom.com

More information

TO : THE JUDICIAL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMISSION 2007

TO : THE JUDICIAL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMISSION 2007 TO : THE JUDICIAL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMISSION 2007 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO DOCUMENTS RECEIVED BY THE COMMISSION REGARDING THE SUBMISSION FOR A SALARY DIFFERENTIAL FOR JUDGES OF COURTS OF APPEAL

More information

Provincial Offences Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.33

Provincial Offences Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.33 Français Provincial Offences Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.33 Consolidation Period: From May 15, 2012 to the e-laws currency date. Last amendment: 2011, c. 1, Sched. 1, s. 7. SKIP TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS

More information

P July 14, 2011

P July 14, 2011 P-2011-001 July 14, 2011 Summary: The Complainant submitted a Privacy Complaint alleging that a Town had disclosed his personal information when his name appeared on the agenda for a public meeting regarding

More information

CBABC POSITION PAPER ON THE CIVIL RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL AMENDMENT ACT, 2018 (BILL 22) Prepared by: Canadian Bar Association, BC Branch

CBABC POSITION PAPER ON THE CIVIL RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL AMENDMENT ACT, 2018 (BILL 22) Prepared by: Canadian Bar Association, BC Branch CBABC POSITION PAPER ON THE CIVIL RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL AMENDMENT ACT, 2018 (BILL 22) Prepared by: Canadian Bar Association, BC Branch May 8, 2018 Introduction In April 2012, the government of British Columbia

More information

Arbitration Law of Canada: Practice and Procedure

Arbitration Law of Canada: Practice and Procedure Arbitration Law of Canada: Practice and Procedure Third Edition J. Brian Casey JURIS Questions About This Publication For assistance with shipments, billing or other customer service matters, please call

More information

Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Laseur

Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Laseur Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Laseur Donald Martin Appellant v. Workers' Compensation Board of Nova Scotia and Attorney General of Nova

More information

FINAL REPORT JOINT TORTFEASORS & THE COMMON LAW RELEASE BAR RULE

FINAL REPORT JOINT TORTFEASORS & THE COMMON LAW RELEASE BAR RULE FINAL REPORT JOINT TORTFEASORS & THE COMMON LAW RELEASE BAR RULE Law Reform Commission of Nova Scotia July 2002 The Law Reform Commission of Nova Scotia was established in 1991 by the Government of Nova

More information

Maintenance Enforcement Act

Maintenance Enforcement Act Maintenance Enforcement Act CHAPTER 6 OF THE ACTS OF 1994-95 as amended by 1995-96, c. 28; 1998, c. 30; 1998, c. 12, s. 11; 2002, c. 9, ss. 58, 59; 2004, c. 40; 2005, c. 53; 2006, c. 33; 2007, c. 43; 2014,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Banfield v. RKO Steel Ltd., 2017 NSSC 232. Thomas Banfield D E C I S I O N

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Banfield v. RKO Steel Ltd., 2017 NSSC 232. Thomas Banfield D E C I S I O N SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Banfield v. RKO Steel Ltd., 2017 NSSC 232 Date: 2017-09-07 Docket: Hfx No. 415476 Registry: Halifax Between: Thomas Banfield v. Plaintiff RKO Steel Limited, a body

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN DEOCHAN SAMPATH AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN DEOCHAN SAMPATH AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2012-01734 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN DEOCHAN SAMPATH Claimant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO First Defendant TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

More information

NOTICE MUTUAL RELIANCE REVIEW SYSTEM MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

NOTICE MUTUAL RELIANCE REVIEW SYSTEM MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NOTICE MUTUAL RELIANCE REVIEW SYSTEM MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Introduction The Ontario Securities Commission, together with the other members of the Canadian Securities Administrators (the "CSA") is

More information

PROVINCIAL OFFENCES PROCEDURE ACT

PROVINCIAL OFFENCES PROCEDURE ACT Province of Alberta PROVINCIAL OFFENCES PROCEDURE ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter P-34 Current as of May 1, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISON)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISON) 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISON) UNREPORTABLE In the matter between: Case No: 35420 / 03 Date heard: 17 & 21/02/2006 Date of judgment: 4/8/2006 PAUL JACOBUS SMIT PLAINTIFF

More information

NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION

NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION TRIBUNAL NUMBERS T1073/5405 and T1074/5505 CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: RICHARD WARMAN COMPLAINANT AND CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION AND COMMISSION MARC LEMIRE and THE FREEDOMSITE RESPONDENTS

More information

TITLE 6 SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

TITLE 6 SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY TITLE 6 SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY Contents of Title 6 Chapter 1 - Sovereign Immunity Waiver Chapter 2 - Waiver of Sovereign Immunity and Jurisdiction in Commercial Transactions Chapter 3 - Notice Ordinance Chapter

More information

Article. Migration: Interprovincial, 2009/2010 and 2010/2011. by Nora Bohnert

Article. Migration: Interprovincial, 2009/2010 and 2010/2011. by Nora Bohnert Report on the Demographic Situation in Canada Article Migration: Interprovincial, 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 by Nora Bohnert July, 2013 How to obtain more information For information about this product or

More information

Part 1 Interpretation

Part 1 Interpretation The New Limitation Act Explained Page 1 Part 1 Interpretation This Part defines terms and provides some general principles of interpretation for the new Limitation Act ( new Act ). Division 1 Definitions

More information

CHEYENNE SANTANA MARIE FOX, DECEASED, JOHN GRAHAM TERRANCE FOX, ESTATE TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF CHEYENNE SANTANA MARIE FOX

CHEYENNE SANTANA MARIE FOX, DECEASED, JOHN GRAHAM TERRANCE FOX, ESTATE TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF CHEYENNE SANTANA MARIE FOX SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO CITATION: Fox v. Narine, 2016 ONSC 6499 COURT FILE NO.: CV-15-526934 DATE: 20161020 RE: CHEYENNE SANTANA MARIE FOX, DECEASED, JOHN GRAHAM TERRANCE FOX, ESTATE TRUSTEE

More information

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Smith, 2017 NSSC 122. v. Tyrico Thomas Smith

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Smith, 2017 NSSC 122. v. Tyrico Thomas Smith SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Smith, 2017 NSSC 122 Date: 20170509 Docket: Cr. No. 449182 Registry: Halifax Between: Her Majesty the Queen v. Tyrico Thomas Smith Judge: Heard: Sentencing

More information

Practice Directions Directives de procédure

Practice Directions Directives de procédure Practice Directions Directives de procédure Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal Tribunal d appel de la sécurité professionnelle et de l assurance contre les accidents du travail PRACTICE DIRECTIONS

More information

Process Guide to Appeal Driver s License Suspensions under Section 279B

Process Guide to Appeal Driver s License Suspensions under Section 279B Motor Vehicle Appeal Board Process Guide to Appeal Driver s License Suspensions under Section 279B October 23, 2012 Disclaimer The legislation referred to in this Guide is subject to amendment from time

More information

Organizational By-Laws Last Revised: September 12, 2011

Organizational By-Laws Last Revised: September 12, 2011 Organizational By-Laws Last Revised: September 12, 2011 Article 1 Name and Objectives Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. The name of the organization shall be the LABRADOR NORTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

More information

Small Claims rules are covered in:

Small Claims rules are covered in: Small Claims rules are covered in: CCP 116.110-116.950 CHAPTER 5.5. SMALL CLAIMS COURT Article 1. General Provisions... 116.110-116.140 Article 2. Small Claims Court... 116.210-116.270 Article 3. Actions...

More information

Arbitration Act CHAPTER Part I. Arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement. Introductory

Arbitration Act CHAPTER Part I. Arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement. Introductory Arbitration Act 1996 1996 CHAPTER 23 1 Part I Arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement Introductory 1. General principles. 2. Scope of application of provisions. 3. The seat of the arbitration.

More information

THE INDEPENDENT CONSUMER AND COMPETITION COMMISSION ACT 2002

THE INDEPENDENT CONSUMER AND COMPETITION COMMISSION ACT 2002 THE INDEPENDENT CONSUMER AND COMPETITION COMMISSION ACT 2002 PART I : Preliminary Compliance with Constitutional requirements Interpretation Act binds the State PART II : Independent Consumer and Competition

More information

LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT

LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT LAWS OF KENYA LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT CHAPTER 22 Revised Edition 2012 [2010] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev. 2012]

More information

Overlapping Jurisdiction and Ontario s New Human Rights Code. CBA Elder Law Conference. June 12, 2009

Overlapping Jurisdiction and Ontario s New Human Rights Code. CBA Elder Law Conference. June 12, 2009 Overlapping Jurisdiction and Ontario s New Human Rights Code CBA Elder Law Conference June 12, 2009 David A. Wright Vice-Chair Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario Overlapping Jurisdiction and Ontario s New

More information

In the matter of an Application pursuant to subsection 280(2) of the Insurance Act, RSO 1990, c I.8., in relation to statutory accident benefits. G.K.

In the matter of an Application pursuant to subsection 280(2) of the Insurance Act, RSO 1990, c I.8., in relation to statutory accident benefits. G.K. Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario Licence Appeal Tribunal Tribunaux de la sécurité, des appels en matière de permis et des normes Ontario Tribunal d'appel en matière de permis Automobile

More information

BERMUDA BERMUDA FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE ACT : 76

BERMUDA BERMUDA FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE ACT : 76 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA BERMUDA FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE ACT 1982 1982 : 76 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 6A 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 19A 20 21 22 23 24 Short title and commencement Interpretation

More information

Pre-Incorporation Contracts Who Owns Them?

Pre-Incorporation Contracts Who Owns Them? Pre-Incorporation Contracts Who Owns Them? By Albert S. Frank, LL.B. In January of 2002 the Court of Appeal for Ontario dealt with the law of pre-incorporation contracts under the Business Corporations

More information

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 40, No. 12, 22nd January,

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 40, No. 12, 22nd January, Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 40, No. 12, 22nd January, 2001 000 No. 3 of 2001 First Session Sixth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

More information

LABOUR RELATIONS ACT NO. 66 OF 1995

LABOUR RELATIONS ACT NO. 66 OF 1995 LABOUR RELATIONS ACT NO. 66 OF 1995 [View Regulation] [ASSENTED TO 29 NOVEMBER, 1995] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 11 NOVEMBER, 1996] (Unless otherwise indicated) (English text signed by the President) This

More information

NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF THE EXPROPRIATION ACT. - and -

NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF THE EXPROPRIATION ACT. - and - DECISION 2017 NSUARB 155 M07894 NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF THE EXPROPRIATION ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF a claim by PORRIDGE POT FOODS INC. O/A THE WOODEN MONKEY for compensation

More information

The Public Guardian and Trustee Act

The Public Guardian and Trustee Act Consolidated to September 23, 2011 1 The Public Guardian and Trustee Act being Chapter P-36.3* of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1983 (effective April 1, 1984) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan,

More information

CODE OF GOOD PRACTICE ON PICKETING (GenN 765 in GG of 15 May 1998)

CODE OF GOOD PRACTICE ON PICKETING (GenN 765 in GG of 15 May 1998) LABOUR RELATIONS ACT 66 OF 1995 [ASSENTED TO 29 NOVEMBER 1995] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 11 NOVEMBER 1996] (Unless otherwise indicated) (English text signed by the President) as amended by Labour Relations

More information

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995 PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995 (Certified on 30 th June-1995) Arbitration Act. No. 11 of 1995 1 (Certified on 30 th June-1995) L.D. O.10/93

More information

First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada. - and - Assembly of First Nations. - and - Canadian Human Rights Commission.

First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada. - and - Assembly of First Nations. - and - Canadian Human Rights Commission. Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne Citation: 2016 CHRT 10 Date: April 26, 2016 File No.: T1340/7008 Between: First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada

More information

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims

More information

Private International Law in New Zealand

Private International Law in New Zealand Private International Law in New Zealand 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 What is "private international law"? 1 1.2 The sources of New Zealand private international law 3 1.3 The scope of this booklet 4 2. WHY BOTHER

More information

Caine Fur Farms Ltd. V. Kokolsky, [1963] S.C.R. 315

Caine Fur Farms Ltd. V. Kokolsky, [1963] S.C.R. 315 Osgoode Hall Law Journal Volume 3, Number 2 (April 1965) Article 44 Caine Fur Farms Ltd. V. Kokolsky, [1963] S.C.R. 315 B. I. M. A. Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj

More information

Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal. Annual Report For the Year Ending March 31, 2017

Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal. Annual Report For the Year Ending March 31, 2017 Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal Annual Report For the Year Ending March 31, 2017 Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal Annual Report For the Year Ending March 31, 2017 Diana Whalen Minister of

More information

Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation, Respondents. John Terry and Emily Sherkey, for the Respondents REASONS FOR DECISION

Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation, Respondents. John Terry and Emily Sherkey, for the Respondents REASONS FOR DECISION CITATION: Attorney General of Canada v. Mobil et al., 2016 ONSC 790 COURT FILE NO.: CV-15-11079-00CL DATE: 20160216 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ONTARIO COMMERCIAL LIST RE: Attorney General of Canada, Applicant

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA SUPREME COU~T OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER Rf!.GJ~,-rRY APR 2 5 214 No. Vancouver Registry r ~~, '1

More information