Preparing for Midterms Packet
|
|
- Damian Chase
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Preparing for Midterms Packet Prof. Homer: Prof. Dombrow: Prof. Gutterud: 1
2 Are They Speaking In Code? For better understanding of what your professor is writing on the board and for speedier note taking, here is a list of useful symbols and their meanings. Trust us; these will come in very handy over the course of law school: = Section or D = Defendant or P = Plaintiff = Paragraph $ = Damages Aff d = Affirmed B = Beneficiary BFP = Bona Fide Purchaser BOP = Burden of Proof COA=Cause of Action Corp = Corporation FI = False Imprisonment FRCP = Federal Rules of Civil Procedure FRE = Federal Rules of Evidence Gov or Gov t = Government JNOV = Judgment notwithstanding the verdict Jx or Jxn = Jurisdiction K = Contract OE = Offeree OR = Offeror PJ = Personal Jurisdiction RAP = Rule Against Perpetuities Rev d = Reversed SL = Strict Liability SMJ = Subject Matter Jurisdiction SOL = Statute of Limitations TRO = Temporary Restraining order UCC = Uniform Commercial Code v. = Versus w/ = With w/o or w/out = Without In addition to these symbols, which are perfect for condensing notes and outlines, some common law school accessories a student should not be without are a Black s Law Dictionary and perhaps a supplement or two. For help with note taking, outlining, and determining what, if any, supplement is right for you come to ASP office hours where you can check out a supplement or ask for advice regarding them. Our office hours are: Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Prof. Homer 12:00pm-2:30pm 4:00pm-5:00pm 9:00am-12:00pm 9:00am-12:00pm Prof. Dombrow 9:00am-12:00pm 2:00pm-4:30pm 9:00am-12:00pm 2:00pm-4:30pm 9:00am-12:00pm in library Prof. Gutterud 12:00pm-2:30pm in library 4:00pm-7:00pm in library 8:00am-12:00pm 1:00pm-2:00pm 9:00am-12:00pm 2
3 Full Length Outline Example (for 1 COA) False Imprisonment RULE: Intentional confinement with no reasonable means of escape, without consent or authority of law, that the plaintiff is aware of. ANALYSIS: Intent purpose, desire, or knowledge to a substantial certainty. Confinement within a bounded area an enclosed space with no way out caused by: physical force, threat of force, failure to release, and invalid use of legal authority. Moral pressure and future threats are insufficient. Cases to help: v. showed that taking property can cause a FI where if the person left they would not get their prop back=constructive confinement v. Δ confinement to a boat was still within a bounded area No reasonable means of escape locked door, closed space, etc. Jumping out of a window is usually not reasonable Cases to help: Without consent or authority of law Without consent Δ never received permission. DISCUSS: Implicit (nonverbal) vs. Explicit (verbal/written) Consent Without Authority of Law Legal authority (cops) or Shopkeeper s privilege Shopkeeper s Privilege where a shopkeeper reasonably believes that a person has unlawfully stolen from their shop they may detain that person for a reasonable period of time while awaiting the police/investigating. Awareness: The must be aware of the confinement. can be made aware by being injured from the confinement. Insert cases your Professor identifies as important/need to know 3
4 Skeletal Outline Example: Battery The intentional harmful or offensive touching of another s person. Intent Harmful or offensive Contact Assault intentionally causing of apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. Intent Apprehension Imminence Harmful/Offensive Contact False Imprisonment Intentional confinement with no reasonable means of escape, without consent or authority of law, of which the is aware of. Intent Confinement w/ no reasonable means of escape Without consent or Authority of Law s awareness 4
5 MC Questions: 1) Rhonda and Remus, teenage hikers, came upon a small abandoned barn. While Rhonda explored the interior of the barn, climbing into a hayloft, Remus explored the exterior. He noticed that a horizontal two-by-four slab of wood could seal the only door to the barn from the outside, preventing anyone inside the barn from exiting. Moving this slab into place, Remus locked Rhonda into the barn and called goodbye to her, ignoring her pleas for release. Hoping to gain the attention of a potential rescuer, Rhonda leaned into a crack in the barn wall and called for help. About half an hour after Remus walked away passerby Pia heard Rhonda s cries for help but decided to ignore them. An action by Rhonda against Pia for false imprisonment should fail because: (A) Pia did not confine Rhonda (B) Remus is the proper defendant for a claim of false imprisonment (C) Rhonda entered the barn voluntarily (D) Rhonda was a trespasser. 2) During a commercial flight, one of the plane s three engines stopped working. The captain assured the passengers that the plane could fly safely on its remaining engines and announced that the plane would continue to its scheduled destination. One of the passengers, Frank, was not reassured, and demanded that the plane land at the first available airport. The captain refused, even though the plane s flight path would take it close to another airport. The plane continued on course and landed on time an hour later at its scheduled destination. Frank brings an action against the airline for false imprisonment. Of the following, which constitutes the airlines' strongest argument? (A) Because the plane landed on time at its original destination, there was no confinement. (B) Because Frank was the only passenger who wanted to land earlier, to have done so would have falsely imprisoned all the other passengers by taking them where they did not want to go (C) Frank s confinement was not unlawful (D) Frank was not physically harmed by the confinement. 5
6 2) Frank vs. Airline ANSWER: (A) is incorrect because there was confinement. It was not unlawful, but Frank was certainly confined. (B) is incorrect because it makes no sense. The other passengers would not be falsely imprisoned by landing at a closer airport. In fact their confinement would end sooner than if they proceeded to the original destination. (C) is correct. Frank bought a ticket to a particular destination, as did the other passengers. While one can understand Frank s anxiety after the engine blowout and his desire to land at a closer airport, there was, in fact, no need to divert the plane. Thus, the airline s refusal, which kept Frank confined for longer than he wanted to be, was not unlawful. The airline had Frank s consent to confine him. (D) is incorrect because physical harm is not an element of false imprisonment, as long as the victim knows of the confinement (and Frank is well aware of it in this situation). 6
7 Multiple Choice Study Chart Location of Question Why You Missed It Correct Statement of Law 7
8 Practice Exam Lauren is a 26 year old woman with a troubled past and involvement in a failed reality television series. Having been cancelled from her long running show (which was completely real, mind you), she started facing the reality in her own life. She had dropped out of college and therefore had no college degree, had no income, and was starting to prematurely age due to negligent sun exposure. Thinking of all of these things, she became depressed. She turned to her best friend and former love interest, Brody, for help. Brody consoled Lauren the best he could and then recommended that she turn to religion for guidance. Seeking to change her life and despite the change in her wardrobe that would have to occur, she enrolled in a four-week retreat for young woman held at a local convent in Laguna Beach. After the first week, Sister Heidi, who was in charge of the retreat, explained to the group that it was time to intensify their spiritual work. She explained that each of the women in the group would encounter the holy spirit. Sister Heidi took a liking to Lauren. Choosing Lauren to go first into the encounter, she led her to a small room in the convent s cellar, instructing Lauren to remain inside to search her soul while the other group members prayed outside. Having always suffered from claustrophobia, Lauren began to panic. She shouted to Sister Heidi that she was frightened, but the nun replied that the encounter was a necessary part of Lauren s path to righteousness. The women assembled on the other side of the door, prayed louder and louder, while Lauren sat for over an hour trying to control her breathing. Eventually, she exhausted herself and fell asleep. When she awoke, the rest of the group and Sister Heidi crowded around her, congratulating her for successfully fighting her demons. Does Lauren have a viable claim for the tort if, in this jurisdiction, False Imprisonment elements are: Intent Confinement in a bounded area w/ no reasonable means of escape Without consent or authority of law Plaintiff awareness 8
9 Outlining Chart FACT(S) TO SUPPORT/ s argument FACT(S) THAT DON T SUPPORT/ s argument Intent Confinement w/ no reasonable means of escape Without Consent or Authority of Law Awareness 9
10 I Issue #1 (State parties involved + COA [aka issue]) R (Black letter law [aka rule ], accurate and concise) A C I i r a c i r a c ( Here / In this case / In the case at bar ) (Break down element #1 use heading) (Rule for element #1) (Fact + why fact is important for element #1) (Conclude for element #1 whether it was met or not) (Continue w/ mini-iracs per element use headings) (Overall conclusion only 1 sentence necessary Issue #2 (State parties involved + COA for next issue spotted) One issue (ex. False Imprisonment) R 10
11 Sample A-quality Answer Heidi v. Lauren False Imprisonment The overarching issue is whether or not Lauren was falsely imprisoned. For Lauren to have a viable claim for False Imprisonment the following elements must be satisfied. 1) There must have been an intentional 2) confinement in an enclosed space that has no reasonable means of escape, 3) the detention must have been without consent or authority of law and 4) the plaintiff must have been aware of the confinement. Issue: Did Sister Heidi Intend to Falsely Imprison Lauren? Rule: The defendant has the requisite intent when she had purpose, desire, or knowledge to a substantial certainty to confine. Analysis: Here, Sister Heidi led Lauren into the cellar indicating she wanted Lauren in the cellar room. It is clear that Sister Heidi had the intent to have Lauren in the room, but it is not clear if Sister Heidi had the intent to detain Lauren in the room or just to lead her to an encounter. At the beginning of the exercise Lauren was instructed to remain in the cellar, this is significant because it is a statement indicating that she was meant to be confined in the cellar and not leave. A further clue to Sister Heidi s intent can be seen in when Lauren shouted out of the cellar that she was frightened and the nun replied that the encounter was necessary for Lauren s path to righteous. However, it is unclear if Sister Heidi meant that it was necessary to remain confined in the cellar or that feeling frightened was necessary for the encounter. Nonetheless, even if Sister Heidi merely intended the confinement to facilitate an encounter, she still intended to confine Lauren in some way. Conclusion: Sister Heidi had purpose, desire, or knowledge to a substantial certainty that her actions would confine Lauren. Issue: Was Lauren confined without a reasonable means of escape? Rule: Lauren must have been confined to a bounded area with no reasonable means of escape. One must be actually confined; moral persuasion is insufficient. Analysis: In this case, the room that Sister Heidi led Lauren to was in the cellar. The room was inside of a cellar, likely underground, indicating that it was not likely to have windows or another door from which to leave. Here, during the encounter the nuns prayed on the other side of the door indicating that the door was shut with Lauren inside. Therefore, the room with the door shut created a bounded area. We do not know if Lauren had a reasonable means of escape because the facts do not state whether the door was locked or if the praying nuns on the other side of the door were blocking the exit. However, Lauren could have at least attempted to open the door in order to escape the ordeal. Thus, it is unclear whether there was a reasonable means of escape. Lauren may argue that she felt compelled to stay in the room because Sister Heidi was an 11
12 authority figure within the church and the leader of the retreat and thus she could not say no. Sister Heidi was insistent that participation was necessary and the authority she asserted may have kept Lauren from attempting to escape because she felt trapped into participating in the encounter. However, moral persuasion explicit (Sister Heidi s insistence) or implicit (in Lauren s head), is not sufficient to detain someone. Conclusion: Lauren was confined to a bounded area but it is unclear whether there was a reasonable means of escape. Because Lauren did not even attempt to escape, a jury is likely to find that this element is not met. Issue: Was Lauren confined without consent; did Heidi have authority of law? Rule: There are two types of consent: Express Consent and Implied Consent. Express Consent is verbal consent. Implied consent can be shown though a person s actions that substitute for verbal consent. The defendant must have acted without legal authority. Analysis: In the case at bar, Lauren initially did sign up/enroll in the course; it could be argued that by doing this she gave her implicit consent to take part in the activity. However, we do not know if Lauren was informed of the activities that she would be engaging in prior to enrolling in the course. Verbally, Lauren never explicitly said that she wanted out of the cellar. She did shout out of the cellar that she was frightened. This was an explicit verbal statement, but the question becomes whether her shouting she was frightened is the same as her saying she did not want to participate and that she wanted out of the cellar. Furthermore, Lauren s other actions in the cellar do not show that she wanted out of the cellar. She did not attempt to leave and she continued to participate in the activity. This conduct, along with the fact she did not ask to leave the cellar, makes it appear she was consenting to her participation in the activity. Heidi was the leader or authority figure of the retreat. However, religious institutions are not given the authority to detain people against their will for the purpose of enlightenment. Lauren did not steal anything from the property or act unlawfully in any manner; therefore Heidi has no authority to keep her detained in the cellar. Conclusion: While Lauren did not verbally say she consented to the confinement, she did enroll in the course and participate in the activity, which shows an implied consent. In addition she did not ask to leave the activity, again showing implied consent. Sister Heidi was not acting with legal authority. Issue: Was Lauren aware of the confinement? Rule: The plaintiff must be aware of the confinement. Awareness can be garnered from injury caused by the confinement. Analysis: Lauren was claustrophobic indicating that she was acutely aware of small, enclosed spaces before even entering the cellar. When she saw the cellar she was scared, and while inside of the room, with the door shut, she shouted she was frightened. While 12
13 enclosed in the room she controlled her breathing in order to calm herself down, further indicating that she was aware of the confinement because it activated her anxiety and she had to calm herself down. Sister Heidi may argue that Lauren eventually fell asleep and that while she was asleep she could not possibly be aware of her confinement. However, Lauren was initially aware of the confinement therefore Sister Heidi s argument would fail. Conclusion: Lauren was aware of the confinement. Overall Conclusion: Lauren will not have a viable claim for False Imprisonment because there was a reasonable means of escape and Sister Heidi had consent. 13
14 COMPONENTS OF AN A ESSAY ANSWER IRAC structure Issue Use of Facts Analysis Uses headings for each issue and each sub issue Follows IRAC and mini IRAC structure ALWAYS concludes one way or another- does not leave it up in the air Does NOT waste time giving an introduction of the facts Includes defenses in IRAC format Identifies all possible issues in fact pattern and prioritizes hot issues Uses short headings to identify issues Clearly states parties involved in the issue statement Discusses ALL of the relevant facts as they are stated in the fact pattern Applies ALL relevant facts to appropriate places of analysis Doesn t fall for red herrings or waste time discussing facts or issues that aren t there Does not just list facts- use legal analysis to argue the fact Is not conclusory Heidi led Lauren, therefore she was willfully complied - explain to reader WHY fact is relevant Connects all the dots- do not assume that anything is obvious Explains analysis clearly and simply, with short concise sentences Time management Works on time management- proportions his/her time to properly answer all outstanding issues and prioritizes hot issues Marks at what time you should be at what portion of the exam to ensure effective self-timing Outlines prior to writing and outlines effectively 14
TORTS 1 MID-TERM EXAM MODEL ANSWER (FALL 2006) I. General Comments:
TORTS 1 MID-TERM EXAM MODEL ANSWER (FALL 2006) I. General Comments: The exam was designed to test your ability to recognize the intentional tort causes of action that a potential plaintiff could bring,
More informationSKILLS Workshop Series Academic Support:
Criminal Law: Applying Test-taking Skills to Substantive Law Prof Homer: jhomer@law.whittier.edu Prof Dombrow: kdombrow@law.whittier.edu Prof Gutterud: hgutterud@law.whittier.edu SKILLS Workshop Series
More informationCALIFORNIA ESSAY WRITING WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW
CALIFORNIA ESSAY WRITING WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION A. Bar Exam Basics Editor's Note 1: The Professor refers to specific page numbers throughout
More informationTORTS 1 MID-TERM MODEL ANSWER (FALL 2007) MITCHELL. I. Battery
TORTS 1 MID-TERM MODEL ANSWER (FALL 2007) MITCHELL I. Battery To prevail in a prima facie case for the intentional tort of battery, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant committed a volitional act
More informationESSAY INTRODUCTION PROFESSOR RICHARD T. SAKAI. Copyright 2018 by BARBRI, Inc.
ESSAY INTRODUCTION PROFESSOR RICHARD T. SAKAI Copyright 2018 by BARBRI, Inc. i TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE: OVERVIEW OF THE CALIFORNIA BAR EXAMINATION Pages 3 4 PART TWO: Page 5 THE ESSAY SECTION INSTRUCTIONS
More informationIntentional Torts. Intentional Torts, Generally. Legal Analysis Part Two Fall Types of Intentional Torts 10/23/16
Intentional Torts Legal Analysis Part Two Fall 2016 Types of Intentional Torts 1. Assault 2. Battery 3. False Imprisonment 4. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 5. Trespass 6. Conversion 7. Defamation
More informationTORT LAW NOTES. The case below demonstrates that fault is an essential element of liability in trespass to person.
TORT LAW NOTES TRESPASS TO PERSON Traditionally, there were two types of actions that were concerned with the plaintiff s person. They were trespass and action on the case. The distinction between these
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-KA-01556-COA BENJAMIN SHELTON A/K/A BENJAMIN LEE SHELTON A/K/A BENNY A/K/A BENJAMIN L. SHELTON APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE
More informationMBE WORKSHOP: TORTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
CHAPTER 1: TORTS MBE WORKSHOP: TORTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Editor's Note 1: The below outline is taken from the National Conference of Bar Examiners' website. NOTE: The
More informationProfessor DeWolf Summer 2014 Torts August 18, 2014 SAMPLE ANSWER TO FINAL EXAM MULTIPLE CHOICE
Professor DeWolf Summer 2014 Torts August 18, 2014 SAMPLE ANSWER TO FINAL EXAM MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. (a) Is incorrect, because from Dempsey s perspective the injury was not substantially certain to occur.
More informationSELF- ASSESSMENT FORM
Evaluation Approach To learn the most from your experience of writing this essay, use the Performance, Evaluation, Adjustment (PEA) three-step self-assessment and improvement process when reviewing the
More informationCase 4:08-cv SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Case 4:08-cv-00364-SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION BRETT DARROW, Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. Cause No.
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Criminal Procedure/Criminal Law And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Vicky operates
More informationAnswer 1 to Performance Test A. Memorandum
Answer 1 to Performance Test A Memorandum To: Mary Hamline From: Applicant Date: July 29, 2008 Re: Chris Pearson v. Savings Galore Below is the requested information regarding our client, Chris Pearson
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 00 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA PH (1) -00 FX (1) -01 www.rezlaw.com 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 DAVID A. LOWE (SBN 1) Email: dal@rezlaw.com MICHELLE G. LEE (SBN 1) Email: mgl@rezlaw.com
More informationWhen Shoplifting Prevention Escalates to a Shoplifter Detention
Retail Loss Prevention Publications When Shoplifting Prevention Escalates BILL CAFFERTY RETAIL LOSS PREVENTION CONSULTANT 5/31/12 You ve done your best to display merchandise in a way that maximizes associate
More informationCase: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1
Case: 3:12-cv-02380-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ALFONSO VASQUEZ-PALAFOX, ) ) No. Plaintiff, )
More informationCHAPTER 14. Criminal Law and Juvenile Law
CHAPTER 14 Criminal Law and Juvenile Law CRIMINAL LAW Chapter 14 Section I Case File and 345-347 Review the case file at the beginning of the chapter. Think about the situation (however exaggerated it
More informationQuestion What legal justification, if any, did Dan have (a) pursuing Al, and (b) threatening Al with deadly force? Discuss.
Question 1 Al went to Dan s gun shop to purchase a handgun and ammunition. Dan showed Al several pistols. Al selected the one he wanted and handed Dan five $100 bills to pay for it. Dan put the unloaded
More informationParticular Crimes can be grouped under 3 headings: Crimes against people Crimes against property Crimes against business interests
Criminal Law Particular Crimes can be grouped under 3 headings: Crimes against people Crimes against property Crimes against business interests Crimes Against People Murder unlawful killing of another
More informationTORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce
TORT LAW By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce INTRO TO TORT LAW: WHY? What is a tort? A tort is a violation of a person s protected interests (personal safety or property) Civil, not criminal
More informationWashoe Tribe of Nevada and California. Law & Order Code TITLE 3 TORTS. [Last Amended 10/1/04. Current Through 2/3/09.]
Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California Law & Order Code TITLE 3 TORTS [Last Amended 10/1/04. Current Through 2/3/09.] 3-10 DEFINITIONS The following words have the meanings given below when used in this
More informationConcord University School of Law Practice Essay
Concord University School of Law Practice Essay Instructions: This is a timed practice, and you should take no more than one hour to complete this exercise. Set a timer and allow no interruptions. Before
More informationB. DEFENSE OR LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR CONFINEMENT. It is a complete defense, however, to a claim of false imprisonment if the
CHARGE 3.20B Page 1 of 5 3.20 FALSE IMPRISONMENT (FALSE ARREST) (Approved 6/89) B. DEFENSE OR LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR CONFINEMENT It is a complete defense, however, to a claim of false imprisonment if the
More informationQuestion With what crime or crimes, if any, can Dan reasonably be charged and what defenses, if any, can he reasonably assert? Discuss.
Question 3 Dan separated from his wife, Bess, and moved out of the house they own together. About one week later, on his way to work the night shift, Dan passed by the house and saw a light on. He stopped
More informationBusiness Law Tort Law Unit Textbook
Business Law Tort Law Unit Textbook Tort Law 1 UNIT OUTLINE 1. Tort Law 2. Intentional Torts A. Assault and Battery B. False Imprisonment and Arrest C. Fraud D. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
More informationCase 1:12-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, v. No.
Case 1:12-cv-00066-JEB Document 1 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAWRENCE MILLER 1285 Brentwood Road, NE Apartment # 3 Washington, DC 20019, Plaintiff,
More informationCHAPTER 20 ASSAULT AND BATTERY
CHAPTER 20 ASSAULT AND BATTERY A. ASSAULT 20:1 Elements of Liability 20:2 Apprehension Defined 20:3 Intent to Place Another in Apprehension Defined 20:4 Actual or Nominal Damages B. BATTERY 20:5 Elements
More informationCase 4:10-cv TSH Document 4 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 4:10-cv-40257-TSH Document 4 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 9 WAKEELAH A. COCROFT, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) JEREMY SMITH, ) Defendant ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS C.A. No. 10-40257-FDS
More informationTraffic Stop LAWFUL Notice - Affidavit for Truth
First Middle Last; a Moor Non-Domestic Mail c/o 1234 Your Address Street Example, New Jersey Republic Non-domestic Traffic Stop LAWFUL Notice Affidavit of Truth Dear Police Officer, Code Enforcement Officer,
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-16-2015 USA v. Bawer Aksal Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE TORT LIABILITY DUTIES TO OTHERS. Name: Period: Row:
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE TORT LIABILITY DUTIES TO OTHERS Name: Period: Row: I. WHAT IS A TORT? A. A tort is any unreasonable action that someone or does damage to a person's property. 1. An overtired
More information1. The matter to be determined. Summary
Determination 2018/028 Regarding the decision to issue a notice to fix for the means of escape from fire in a building at 345 to 347 Main Street, Palmerston North Summary This determination considers whether
More informationCode of Conduct March 2015 CODE OF CONDUCT CODE OF CONDUCT FOR PERSONS ON METRO VEHICLES FACILITIES OR PROPERTIES
Section 1.01 Purpose METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS (METRO) CODE OF CONDUCT CODE OF CONDUCT FOR PERSONS ON METRO VEHICLES FACILITIES OR PROPERTIES The Metropolitan Transit Authority
More informationIntentional Torts. What Is a Tort? Tort Recovery
Intentional Torts What Is a Tort? A tort is a civil wrong that is not a breach of contract. There are four types of (civil) wrongfulness. Intent the desire to cause certain consequences or acting with
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING A COMPLAINT IN A NEVADA DISTRICT OR JUSTICE COURT (Generic)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING A COMPLAINT IN A NEVADA DISTRICT OR JUSTICE COURT (Generic) If you have already properly evaluated and researched your case, you have decided who to sue, and you know whether
More informationTime allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes
SPECIMEN MATERIAL Please write clearly, in block capitals. Centre number Candidate number Surname Forename(s) Candidate signature AS LAW Paper 1 Specimen 2016 Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes Instructions
More informationIntroduction to the Constitution and Law Enforcement Exam
Name Date Introduction to the Constitution and Law Enforcement Exam 1. Which level of proof is based on no factual information? A. Mere hunch B. Probable cause C. Reasonable suspicion D. Beyond a reasonable
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Morris S. Getzels, Esq. (SBN 0 MORRIS S. GETZELS Law Office 0 Tampa Avenue, Suite 0 Tarzana, CA - Telephone ( -0 or ( -000 Facsimile ( - email: morris@getzelslaw.com
More informationProtocol for Judge Leo Bowman
Protocol for Judge Leo Bowman Location Fourth Floor - East Wing, Courtroom 4C Telephone: 248-452-2005 Fax: Not available for public use. Orders Presented for Judge s Signature Orders Submitted Under the
More informationCriminal Law Outline intent crime
This outline was created for the July 2006 Oregon bar exam. The law changes over time, so use with caution. If you would like an editable version of this outline, go to www.barexammind.com/outlines. Criminal
More informationCase 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17
Case 3:12-cv-05987 Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA LASHONN WHITE, Plaintiff, vs. No. COMPLAINT CITY OF TACOMA, RYAN KOSKOVICH,
More informationv No Kent Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED October 17, 2017 v No. 333827 Kent Circuit Court JENNIFER MARIE HAMMERLUND, LC
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, vs. Plaintiff William Jason Jones, Emeshia Delayshon Montgomery, aka Emeshia Delayshon
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued April 19, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-10-00725-CR SHAWN FRANK BUTLER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 23rd District Court
More informationCase 1:14-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
Case 1:14-cv-00247-JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION CHRISTINE VON DER HAAR, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:14-cv-247
More informationQuestion What criminal charges, if any, should be brought against Art and Ben? Discuss.
Question 3 After drinking heavily, Art and Ben decided that they would rob the local all-night convenience store. They drove Art s truck to the store, entered, and yelled, This is a stickup, while brandishing
More informationDISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY OF SHASTA PRESS RELEASE NO CRIMINAL CHARGES IN CLUB ICE DEATH. The Facts
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY COUNTY OF SHASTA Gerald PRESSC. RELEASE Benito District Attorney Robert J. Maloney Assistant District Attorney PRESS RELEASE NO CRIMINAL CHARGES IN CLUB ICE DEATH The Facts
More informationGENERAL INSTRUCTIONS SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS
WUCL Final Exam CIVIL PROCEDURE Student Exam No. Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2011 8:30 a.m. 11:30 a.m. Professor J. Dobbins GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS Read only this sheet before the examination begins. Do not turn the
More informationSANCTUARY CONGREGATIONS AND HARBORING FAQ THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND DOES NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY.
SANCTUARY CONGREGATIONS AND HARBORING FAQ NOTE: THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND DOES NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY. What does it mean for a faith group to provide sanctuary to immigrants?
More informationI. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Filed 7/13/07 In re Michael A. CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION NO MEMORANDUM. KEARNEY,J.
LAND v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC. Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT LAND v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-5240 MEMORANDUM KEARNEY,J. December
More informationLAW REVIEW MARCH 1992 SWIMMING POOL NOT "ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE" IN TEEN TRESPASSER DIVING INJURY
SWIMMING POOL NOT "ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE" IN TEEN TRESPASSER DIVING INJURY James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1992 James C. Kozlowski There is a popular misconception that landowners will be liable for maintaining
More informationMODULE TITLE:Business Law
SCHOOL OF ARTS, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF BUSINESS, ENTERPRISE AND MANAGEMENT LEVEL 2 DIET 2 MODULE CODE: B2084 MODULE TITLE:Business Law Section A Multiple Choice Test Paper 2014 MATRICULATION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) -1-
BEN WIZNER, SBN PETER J. ELIASBERG, SBN 0 MARK D. ROSENBAUM, SBN 0 ACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Beverly Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 00- Telephone: (-00 Facsimile: (- REGINALD T. SHUFORD AMERICAN
More informationTHE DEATH OF SAMMY YATIM AND THE TRIAL OF JAMES FORCILLO
THE DEATH OF SAMMY YATIM AND THE TRIAL OF JAMES FORCILLO Introduction In this resource you will learn about the death of Sammy Yatim and the criminal trial of Constable James Forcillo, the police officer
More informationCODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS. Chapter I BASIC PRINCIPLES. Article 1
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS Chapter I BASIC PRINCIPLES Article 1 (1) This Code establishes the rules with which it is ensured that an innocent person is not convicted and the
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: April 4, 2013 104590 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JONEL BEAUVAIS,
More informationBUSINESS LAW Chapter 3 PowerPoint Notes & Assignment Criminal Law
BUSINESS LAW Chapter 3 PowerPoint Notes & Assignment Criminal Law SECTION 3.1 - WHAT IS A CRIME? Classifications of Crimes ** is considered an act against the public good The ** is the person accused of
More informationDOMESTIC VIOLENCE OFFENSES
TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE GUIDE E-BOOK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OFFENSES nealdavislaw.com NEAL DAVIS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CONTENTS FAMILY VIOLENCE OFFENSES...3 WHAT IS FAMILY VIOLENCE?...3 CHOOSING A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
More informationTexas RioGrande Legal Aid
Texas RioGrande Legal Aid Defending Against an Assault Charge In Justice of the Peace (JP) or Municipal Court A Guide for Youth & Parents 1 DEFENDING AGAINST AN ASSAULT CHARGE IN JUSTICE OF THE PEACE
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 113,880 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CRAIG W. GUNTHER, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 113,880 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CRAIG W. GUNTHER, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Jefferson District Court;
More informationMBE WORKSHOP: CRIMINAL LAW PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
CHAPTER 1: CRIMINAL LAW MBE WORKSHOP: CRIMINAL LAW PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Editor's Note 1: While the below outline is taken from the National Conference of Bar Examiners'
More informationDeWolf, Final Exam Sample Answer, December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 6. Professor DeWolf Fall 2015 Criminal Law December 19, 2015 FINAL -- SAMPLE ANSWER
DeWolf, Final Exam Sample Answer, December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 6 Professor DeWolf Fall 2015 Criminal Law December 19, 2015 FINAL -- SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. (a) is incorrect because he still has
More informationI N T H E H I G H C O U R T O F S O U T H A F R I C A ( C A P E O F G O O D H O P E P R O V I N C I A L D I V I S I O N )
REPORTABLE I N T H E H I G H C O U R T O F S O U T H A F R I C A ( C A P E O F G O O D H O P E P R O V I N C I A L D I V I S I O N ) In the matter between: High Court Ref. No.: 061488/06 Magistrate s Serial
More informationTORTS SPECIFIC TORTS NEGLIGENCE
TORTS A tort is a private civil wrong. It is prosecuted by the individual or entity that was wronged against the wrongdoer. One aim of tort law is to provide compensation for injuries. The goal of the
More informationUniversity of Arizona AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE 2012 EDITION
University of Arizona AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE 2012 EDITION The following provisions of the International Fire Code, 2012 Edition, as published by the International Code Council, Inc.
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-04082 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LORETTA MURPHY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationNEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION. LEGALEase. Your Rights if Arrested
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LEGALEase Your Rights if Arrested When making an arrest without a warrant a police officer must tell you the reason for the arrest, unless you are in the act of committing
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-00377 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DEVON ARMSTRONG vs. CIVIL ACTION NO.
More informationREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 1994 PAUL STEFAN RAJNIC STATE OF MARYLAND. Alpert, Bloom, Murphy, JJ.
REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1852 September Term, 1994 PAUL STEFAN RAJNIC v. STATE OF MARYLAND Alpert, Bloom, Murphy, JJ. Opinion by Alpert, J. Filed: September 6, 1995 Paul
More informationSTANSFIELD COLLEGE CRIMINAL LAW Non-Fatal Offences
STANSFIELD COLLEGE CRIMINAL LAW Non-Fatal Offences 2013-2014 CRIMINAL LAW LECTURE 2005 A Q6 1 H hears a rumour that I, his partner, has been unfaithful to him. He grabs at her shoulder but she ducks and
More informationCriminal casework Standard paragraphs for bail summaries
Criminal casework Standard paragraphs for bail summaries Page 1 of 61 Guidance Standard paragraphs for bail summaries 4.0 Valid from 11 August 2014 Standard paragraphs for bail summaries About this guidance
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TERRENCE BRESSI, Case No. Plaintiff, VERIFIED COMPLAINT. vs.
1 1 Ralph E. Ellinwood Ralph E. Ellinwood, Attorney at Law, PLLC SBA: 0 PO Box 01 Tucson, AZ 1 Phone: (0) 1- Fax: () 1- ree@yourbestdefense.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT
More informationAVOIDING AND DEALING WITH VIOLENCE IN THE WORKPLACE
AVOIDING AND DEALING WITH VIOLENCE IN THE WORKPLACE Arizona Labor & Employment Conference Thomas P. Brady (313) 965-8219 tbrady@ INTRODUCTION Define the problem Behavioral characteristics Preventive measures
More informationPlaintiffs, Tony Ivey, Jr., Kelvin Lamar James, and Faheem Loyal, through their
Lawrence S. Lustberg Avidan Y. Cover GIBBONS P.C. One Gateway Center Newark, New Jersey 07102-5310 (973) 596-4731 Edward Barocas Nadia Seeratan American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey Foundation P.O.
More informationCase 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164
Case :-cv-000-rswl-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Genie Harrison, SBN Mary Olszewska, SBN 0 Amber Phillips, SBN 00 GENIE HARRISON LAW FIRM, APC W. th Street, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 T:
More informationLAW ON FOREIGNERS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS. Subject of the Law. Article 1
LAW ON FOREIGNERS CONSOLIDATED TEXT 1 CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS Subject of the Law Article 1 This Law shall regulate the requirements for entry into, exit from, and stay of foreigners in the Republic
More informationMARK SCHEME for the May/June 2010 question paper for the guidance of teachers 9084 LAW. 9084/43 Paper 43, maximum raw mark 75
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS GCE Advanced Level MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2010 question paper for the guidance of teachers 9084 LAW 9084/43 Paper 43, maximum raw mark 75 This mark
More informationTAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF EUGENE, OFFICER BRAD HANNEMAN, NO. 622, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS [ DOES 1-10], inclusive, Defendants.
Case :-cv-0-jr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Jeff Dominic Price SBN 00 Broadway, Suite Santa Monica, California 00 jeff.price@icloud.com Tel. 0.. Attorney for the plaintiff TAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs.
More informationEFiled: Jan :11AM EST Transaction ID Case No. S19C ESB IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
EFiled: Jan 23 2019 09:11AM EST Transaction ID 62887905 Case No. S19C-01-045 ESB IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THERESA COLLINS AND VIRGINIA : COLLINS, AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM : FOR K.C.,
More informationClaimant, Defendant.
CLAIM NO. E15-0277 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/30/2015 STATE OF NEW YORK COURT OF CLAIMS ANTHONY ZAPPIN, - against - STATE OF NEW YORK, Claimant, Defendant. x x Claim No. CLAIM 1. Claimant Anthony
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 26 1
Article 26. Bail. Part 1. General Provisions. 15A-531. Definitions. As used in this Article the following definitions apply unless the context clearly requires otherwise: (1) "Accommodation bondsman" means
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appellee, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY
FILED BY CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO JUL 23 2008 COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, v. VINCENT ZARAGOZA, Appellee, Appellant. 2 CA-CR 2007-0117 DEPARTMENT
More informationTerm 3 Types of Encounters between PO's and Citizens? Definition 1.) Voluntary 2.) Temporary Detention 3.) Arrest
3 Types of Encounters between PO's and Citizens? 1.) Voluntary 2.) Temporary Detention 3.) Arrest What kind of actions is a PO allowed during a Voluntary Encounter w/ Citizens? 1.) May approach a citizen
More informationESSAY QUESTION NO. 4. Answer this question in booklet No. 4
ESSAY QUESTION NO. 4 Answer this question in booklet No. 4 Police Officer Smith was on patrol early in the morning near the coastal bicycle trail when he received a report from the police dispatcher. The
More informationAssault and Battery Common Law
Assault and Battery Common Law Battery Harmful or offensive contact (general intent crime; even negligence that causes the contact) Aggravated Battery (felony version) Battery: o With an intent to kill
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON DREW WILLIAMS, JASON PRICE, COURTNEY SHANNON vs. Plaintiffs, CITY OF CHARLESTON, JAY GOLDMAN, in his individual
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Spoon, 2012-Ohio-4052.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97742 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LEROY SPOON DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationPROFESSOR DEWOLF FALL 2009 December 12, 2009 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER
TORTS PROFESSOR DEWOLF FALL 2009 December 12, 2009 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. (A) is incorrect, because this statement omits the requirement that Blinker intended to cause such fear; (B)
More informationTorts Office: Hazel Hall 307 Office Hours: Tuesday, 8:00 PM to. August 20 through November 27 Exam: Monday, Dec. 10 at 6:00 PM
Law 110, Section 004 Robert Leider Torts Office: Hazel Hall 307 Hazel Hall Office Hours: Tuesday, 8:00 PM to TR: 6:00-7:50 PM 9:00 PM, and by appointment Fall Semester: E-mail: rleider@gmu.edu August 20
More informationEngineering Law. Professor Barich Class 8
Engineering Law Professor Barich Class 8 Review Quiz 2 Announcements Verify Grades on Compass Reminder - Exam #2 March 29 th Joe Barich, 2018. 2 Summary - 1 Statute of Frauds - If a contact is a big deal
More informationDIAGNOSTIC EXAM WORKSHOP: TORTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
DIAGNOSTIC EXAM WORKSHOP: TORTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Intentional Torts Question 1 (Exam Question 90) 6539 MBE TORTS INTENTIONAL TORTS INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURY Battery
More informationLAWYER, ESQ., an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the State of New York,
NOTE: This sample document contains a wholly fabricated scenario and is only to be used as a reference point prior to conducting your own independent legal research and factual investigation. The footnotes
More informationANSWER OF DEFENDANT CITY OF WICHITA
Case 6:18-cv-01018-EFM-KGS Document 12 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS LISA G. FINCH, Individually, as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Andrew
More informationWe refer to DHS and Thornton collectively as appellees.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-CA-01164-COA EMMA BELL APPELLANT v. THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AND DYNETHA THORNTON IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Mullen [2006] QCA 317 PARTIES: R V MULLEN, Todd Kenneth (applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 175 of 2006 DC No 3220 of 2005 DC No 1341 of 2006 DC No 1512 of 2006 DC No
More informationSenate Bill No. 361 Senators Cannizzaro, Segerblom, Manendo, Ratti, Farley; Atkinson, Cancela, Denis, Ford, Parks, Spearman and Woodhouse
Senate Bill No. 361 Senators Cannizzaro, Segerblom, Manendo, Ratti, Farley; Atkinson, Cancela, Denis, Ford, Parks, Spearman and Woodhouse CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to domestic violence; providing under
More informationSocial-Work-Board PACE. NFPA Paralegal Advanced Competency Exam.
Social-Work-Board PACE NFPA Paralegal Advanced Competency Exam http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/pace Question: 53 Homer is paralegal working for the Law Office of Marge Simpson. Ms. Simpson is
More informationLegal and Ethical Considerations (Chapter 3- Mosby s Dental Hygiene)
Legal and Ethical Considerations (Chapter 3- Mosby s Dental Hygiene) Brief Overview of the Legal System A brief review of the fundamentals of how the legal system in the United States operates is important
More information