O R D E R. AND WHEREAS the Council made the following observations:

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "O R D E R. AND WHEREAS the Council made the following observations:"

Transcription

1 F.No /2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi /07/2009 O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Acharya Virag Sagar Vidhyapeeth Shiksha Samiti's Acharya Virag Sagar Vidhyapeeth, Bina Dist., Madhya Pradesh dated 16/04/2009 is against the Order No. NCTE/WRC/MP/APWO1799/223332/2009/R-4075 dated 31/03/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds The institution did not shift to own building within stipulated time. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Acharya Virag Sagar Vidhyapeeth Shiksha Samiti's Acharya Virag Sagar Vidhyapeeth (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 21/04/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Pradeep Shah, Chairman and Shri Sunil Kumar Jain, Principal, Acharya Virag Sagar Vidhyapeeth Shiksha Samiti's Acharya Virag Sagar Vidhyapeeth, Bina Dist., Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution had been running in a leased building for 30 years, with a built up area of 697 sq.mt. and lease deed was executed from a private party and hence this might end the compulsion of shifting to own building. It was further submitted that at the time of inspection, its own building was under construction and now it was completed. It was also submitted that it applied to WRC for inspection of the new building, with a demand draft of Rs. 40,000/-. AND WHEREAS the Council made the following observations: (a). The Council observed that Nagar Palika issued a completion certificate on whereas the institution applied for inspection of the new building on , that is much before the completion of the building itself; On the day of inspection i.e B.Ed course was being run in a rented building with a built up area of 697 sq.mt; From the building plan it was noted that the old building was having 697 sq.mt. and new building was having 9073 sq.mt. So it was neither having adequate built-up area in the leased building nor the new building was completed by the time of inspection and also within stipulated period. The Council, therefore, came to a conclusion there was no justification to accept the appeal that it should be rejected. (b). The Council observed that as per the direction of the Hon ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 6146/2008 filed by Subhash Rahangdale Vs. NCTE & Others the institution was got inspected by the NCTE Hqrs and as a sequel to the report of the inspection, WRC was directed to issue a Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act to initiate action against the institution as the institution was placed under the list of institutions Recognised upto and this status was submitted to the Hon ble Court with the stipulation that the formal action would be taken. As a follow up to the NCTE direction WRC issued Show Cause Notice under Section 17 and after considering the institution reply to the show cause notice, WRC

2 issued an Order dated refusing the recognition of the institution under Section 14(3)(b) of the NCTE Act, on the grounds that the said institution was covered under the principle formulated by the Hon ble High Court of M.P. in its judgement in the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. (c). The Council noted that the institutions was issued a conditional recognition order on followed by formal recognition order on under Section 14 of NCTE Act. As such, WRC should not have issued an Order for Refusal of recognition to an already existing recognised institution, rather WRC should have withdrawn the recognition under Section 17 of NCTE Act 1993, with prospective effect. Also the institution needed to be permitted to continue its recognition during the academic session , as the institution was duly recognised and affiliated by the university during the academic session and was therefore not covered by the directions issued under the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. the Council reasoned out that the order of the refusal of recognition under Section 14(3)(b) be modified to that of withdrawal of recognition under Section 17 of the NCTE Act as per the provisions of the Act. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report Written submission and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council felt the orders issued by WRC for refusal of recognition under Section 14(3)(b) needed modification to the extent that recognition of the institution be withdrawn under Section 17 of the NCTE Act. with prospective effect subject to the following conditions: (a). The student already admitted, with due observance of affiliation norms/conditions, be allowed to complete the programme. (b). No fresh admission, either backdated or post dated (with reference to any backlog whatsoever), shall be made in the institution subsequent to the date of the withdrawal of NCTE recognition. (Hasib Ahmad) Member Secretary 1. The Principal, Acharya Virag Sagar Vidhyapeeth Shiksha Samiti's Acharya Virag Sagar Vidhyapeeth, Virag Bhawan, Pushp Vihar Colony, Bina Dist , Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

3 F.No /2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi O R D E R 30/07/2009 WHEREAS the appeal of Bhagwan Shri Jhulelal Science College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh dated 12/02/2009 is against the Order No. No.NCTE/WRC/MP/Legal/APWO0104/223112/115th/2009/63657 dated 11/04/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds 1) Reply not received within stipulated time. Deficiency: (a) At the time of inspection, the details about land, built up area and instructional facilities were not provided by the institution. (b) The institution has only land with 10 years lease and the built up area was only 3024 sq.ft. which was thoroughly inadequate. (c) The inspection report is totally negative and institution failed to provide any document during inspection. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Bhagwan Shri Jhulelal Science College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 13/02/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Gurudev Jeswani, Secretary and Shri Geetesh Ahuja, Society Member, Bhagwan Shri Jhulelal Science College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the appellant institution did not submit the required documents to the inspection team, to avoid contempt of the Court on the institution part as the institution was a party under SLP No. Civil/CC/349/09, wherein an interim stay was granted by the Hon ble Court. However, the stay was subsequently vacated. The institution however presented the details which indicated that the institution originally executed a lease deed for 3024 sq. ft. of land for 10 years but later it executed another lease deed for 30 years on for college building area measuring 5024 sq. ft. In addition to this, the institution was having playground on sharing basis. The institution was having sq. ft. of builtup area, on four floors of the building and to this effect it submitted building plan & building completion certificate, Staff (1+7) appointed by the institution were as per NCTE norms, Labs & Library facilities were as per NCTE norms. AND WHEREAS the Council noted the following observations: (a) The Council noted that 8248 Sq. ft. ( Sq. ft.) of land and sq. ft. of building was taken on lease. It had taken 5024 Sq. ft. of land along with building on from private party in the name of the trust and 3024 sq. ft. of land with building on , for 10 years lease: Building Plan dated approved by competent authority indicated 1500 sq. mts. of three storey building. The Council however noted that the report of the inspection conducted under Section 13 of the NCTE Act was incomplete as the institution had not provided any documentary evidence. The Council therefore came to the conclusion that the case may be remanded back to WRC, for the causing the inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of adequate infrastructural & other instructional facilities and thereafter issue appropriate orders as deemed fit for an already existing recognized institution.

4 (b). The Council observed that as per the direction of the Hon ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 6146/2008 filed by Subhash Rahangdale Vs. NCTE & Others the institution was got inspected by the NCTE Hqrs and as a sequel to the report of the inspection, WRC was directed to issue a Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act to initiate the process of withdrawal of recognition of the institution as the institution was placed under the list of institutions Not Recognised and this status was submitted to the Hon ble Court with the stipulation that the formal action would be taken to withdraw the recognition. As a follow up to the NCTE direction WRC issued Show Cause Notice under Section 17 and after considering the institution reply to the show cause notice, WRC issued an Order dated refusing the recognition of the institution under Section 14(3)(b) of the NCTE Act, on the grounds that the said institution was covered under the principle formulated by the Hon ble High Court of M.P. in its judgement in the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. (c). The Council noted that the institutions was issued a conditional Recognition order on and unconditional Recognition order on under Section 14 of NCTE Act. As such, WRC would not have issued an Order for Refusal of recognition to an already existing recognised institution, rather WRC should have withdrawn the recognition under Section 17 of NCTE Act 1993, with a prospective effect. Also the institution needed to be permitted to continue its recognition during the academic session , as the institution was duly recognised and affiliated by the university during the academic session and was therefore not covered by the directions issued under the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. the Council therefore came to the conclusion that the case may be remanded back to WRC, for the causing re- inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of adequate infrastructural & other instructional facilities and thereafter issue appropriate orders as deemed fit for an already existing recognized institution, as the present was incomplete. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council felt that the institution should be re-inspected to ascertain availability of necessary infrastructure, instructional and other facilities in accordance with the norms prescribed by the NCTE to become eligible for recognition by NCTE. Accordingly, the Council remanded back the case to the WRC for re-inspection of the Institution immediately and thereafter, issuance of the appropriate order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Bhagwan Shri Jhulelal Science College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above. (Hasib Ahmad) Member Secretary 1. The Secretary, Bhagwan Shri Jhulelal Science College, Taraganj, Gol Pahadia Road, Near Samadia Colony, Laskar, Gwalior , Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

5 F.No.89-96/2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi /07/2009 O R D E R WHEREAS The appeal of Bhawani Prasad Shukla Mahavidyalaya, Jabalpur Dist., Madhya Pradesh dated 03/01/2009 is against the Order No. No.NCTE/WRC/MP/APWO1805/223335/2009/R-4081 dated 31/03/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds Building construction of the college is not as per NCTE norms. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Bhawani Prasad Shukla Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 03/02/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Sunil Shukla, Secretary & Shri Sanjay Dubey, Member, Bhawani Prasad Shukla Mahavidyalaya, Jabalpur Dist., Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on In the appeal and during personal presentation, it was submitted that the appellant was in possession of 07acres of land and 41,000 sq.ft of built up area, out of which sq. ft. was with RCC roof and sq. ft. was with ACC roof. The trust had been running B.Ed, B.A. and B.Com. in the same campus. AND WHEREAS the Council made the following observations: (a). The Council noted from the building completion certificate issued on by Nagar Palika that total built up area available was Sq.ft., out of which Sq.ft. was with RCC roof and Sq.ft. was with ACC roof. It also noted from the lease deed dated that ( Sq.ft.) Sq.ft. of building was on 30 years lease, in the name of the society from a private party. It, however, noted that Sq.ft. RCC roofed building was not sufficient for conducting B.Ed. and other general degree courses, like B.A & B.Com. It further noted from the inspection report dated that The college is housed in a old house and a big shed. For the purpose of classrooms the shed is partition temporarily bite in sheets; Building is shubby and doesn t look like a college building; Library and labs are not as per norms. The Council therefore, came to the conclusion that there was no ground in accepting the appeal and that it should be rejected. (b). The Council observed that as per the direction of the Hon ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 6146/2008 filed by Subhash Rahangdale Vs. NCTE & Others the institution was got inspected by the NCTE Hqrs and as a sequel to the report of the inspection, WRC was directed to issue a Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act to initiate action against the institution as the institution was placed under the list of institutions Not Recognised and this status was submitted to the Hon ble Court with the stipulation that the formal action would be taken. As a follow up to the NCTE direction WRC issued Show Cause Notice under Section 17 and after considering the institution reply to the show cause notice, WRC issued an Order dated refusing the recognition of the institution under Section 14(3)(b) of the NCTE Act, on the grounds that the said institution was covered under

6 the principle formulated by the Hon ble High Court of M.P. in its judgement in the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. (c). The Council noted that the institutions was issued a conditional recognition order on followed by a formal recognition order on under Section 14 of NCTE Act. As such, WRC should not have issued an Order for Refusal of recognition to an already existing recognised institution, rather WRC should have withdrawn the recognition under Section 17 of NCTE Act 1993, with prospective effect. Also the institution needed to be permitted to continue its recognition during the academic session , as the institution was duly recognised and affiliated by the university during the academic session and was therefore not covered by the directions issued under the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. The Council reasoned out that the order of the refusal of recognition under Section 14(3)(b) be modified to that of withdrawal of recognition under Section 17 of the NCTE Act as per the provisions of the Act. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report Written submission and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council felt the orders issued by WRC for refusal of recognition under Section 14(3)(b) needed modification to the extent that recognition of the institution be withdrawn under Section 17 of the NCTE Act., with prospective subject to the following conditions: (a). The student already admitted, with due observance of affiliation norms/conditions, be allowed to complete the programme. (b). No fresh admission, either backdated or post dated (with reference to any backlog whatsoever), shall be made in the institution subsequent to the date of the withdrawal of NCTE recognition. (Hasib Ahmad) Member Secretary 1. The Secretary, Bhawani Prasad Shukla Mahavidyalaya, Hospital Road, Sihora, Jabalpur Dist. -, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

7 F.No /2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi O R D E R WHEREAS The appeal of Bhimrao Ramrao Ambedkar College of Education, Betul Dist., Madhya Pradesh dated 15/04/2009 is against the Order No. NCTE/WRC/MP/Legal/APWO0616/223158/2009/R-4027 dated 31/03/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds 1) WRC considered the reply alongwith original file and all relevant document and considered writ petitions numbers of 2007, 6146 of 2008, of 2008, of 2008 and of 2008 with the legal opinion in its 115th meeting held on March 2009 and found that the said institution falls under the principle of Jan Seva Shiksha Samiti and decided that the recognition of the said institution be refused under section 14(3) (b) of NCTE Act. Deficiency: (a) As per the land document hq. is available in the name of the individual and only sq.mt. is in the name of the institution. (b) Only four staff are continuing since 2004 and 2005, while remaining four were appointed in January and February AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Bhimrao Ramrao Ambedkar College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 27/04/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. M.P. Agarwal, President & Shri. G.D. Deshmukh, Principal, Bhimrao Ramrao Ambedkar College of Education, Betul Dist., Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on In the appeal and during personal presentation, it was submitted that Section of 14(3) (b) does not apply to the Appellant Ambedkar College because this Appellant College had already been granted recognition by the Respondent WRC Under Section 14(3)(a) of the NCTE Act 93 from the academic session The Appellant College had got the affiliation Orders also from Barkatulla University, Bhopal since to for every year; The Institution was inspected U/s 17 and based on this report WRC decided to continue recognition in its 108th meeting held on September 2008; The Institution had been inspected u/s 13 and the report also indicated availability of adequate infrastructure and instructional facilities. AND WHEREAS the Council made the following observations: (a). The Council noted that Hect. of land was transferred from individual to the society vide Order of court of Tahsiladar,Betul bearing No. 2A-06(A) year dated and based on this order land revenue record was also corrected. It further noted that the institution was having Principal and seven Lecturers, qualified as per NCTE norms; The appellant institution was given recognition for conducting B.Ed. course with a basic unit of 100 in the year 2004 and further it was sanctioned an additional unit of 100 vide WRC order It, however noted the institution was having Sq.ft. of built-up area and this was sufficient only for running a basic unit of 100, but not for running both basic unit and additional unit of 100. The Council, therefore, decided to restore the recognition of the

8 institution only for the basic unit of 100 students for conducting B.Ed. course, as the infrastructure was not sufficient for conducting both basic and additional units. (b). The Council observed that as per the direction of the Hon ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 6146/2008 filed by Subhash Rahangdale Vs. NCTE & Others the institution was got inspected by the NCTE Hqrs and as a sequel to the report of the inspection, WRC was directed to issue a Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act to initiate action against the institution as the institution was placed under the list of institutions Not Recognised and this status was submitted to the Hon ble Court with the stipulation that the formal action would be taken. As a follow up to the NCTE direction WRC issued Show Cause Notice under Section 17 and after considering the institution reply to the show cause notice, WRC issued an Order dated refusing the recognition of the institution under Section 14(3)(b) of the NCTE Act, on the grounds that the said institution was covered under the principle formulated by the Hon ble High Court of M.P. in its judgement in the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. (c). The Council noted that the institutions was issued a unconditional recognition order on for a basic unit and on for an additional unit of B.Ed. course. under Section 14 of NCTE Act. As such, WRC should not have issued an Order for Refusal of recognition to an already existing recognised institution. As the institution was duly recognised and affiliated by the university during the academic session and was therefore not covered by the directions issued under the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. The Council therefore came to conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal for conducting B.Ed. with a basic unit of 100 in take only. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report, Written submission and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council felt while there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and WRC s order dated was set aside with the direction to the WRC to restore the recognition to the institution immediately, but for a basic unit of 100 intake only. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against. (Hasib Ahmad) Member Secretary 1. The Principal, Bhimrao Ramrao Ambedkar College of Education, 51, Civil Lines, Tagore Ward, Betul Dist , Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

9 F.No.89-45/2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi /07/2009 O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Bundelkhand Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Chhattarpur Dist., Madhya Pradesh dated 13/01/2009 is against the Order No. WRC/APWO0513/223150/111th/2008/48270 dated 18/12/2008 of the Western Regional Committee, withdrawing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds 1) The College was given permission to function from with stipulation that the college will shift to its own premises within three years. The College should have shifted by But College has not shifted to its own premises. 2) The land and built up areas are insufficient in the existing college as per NCTE norms. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Bundelkhand Shiksha Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 14/01/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri R.K. Arjariya, Principal, Bundelkhand Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Chhattarpur Dist., Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the society has already started construction of new building and that would be completed within six months and it requested WRC to grant additional time of 6 months for shifting to its own premises from rented one; The delay in construction of the building within the stipulated time frame was owing to an order passed by the District Magistrate, Chattarpur, wherein it was mentioned that underground water may not be bored out for other than drinking purpose. With regard to point 2, it was stated that the institution was having 0.9 acre of (6854 Sq. mts.) land in the name of the Society, on ownership basis and Sq. ft. of built-up area, in addition to this it had taken on rent 6587 sq. ft. of building to make the total built up area upto Sq. ft. It

10 was also submitted that the teaching staff appointed in 2004 was duly approved by the University and the same staff had been continuing with replacement of two staff members. The University has been granting temporary affiliation to the institution on yearly basis. AND WHEREAS the Council made the following observations: (a). The Council noted that the institution was running in a rented premises and it was supposed to shift to own premises within three years from the date of recognition i.e and a period of 3 years had already lapsed by November, 2007; The institution was still under the process of construction of its own premises and this was evident as the appellant applied for construction permission to Collectorate office only in It further noted that staff was in position in The Council observed that as per the direction of the Hon ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 6146/2008 filed by Subhash Rahangdale Vs. NCTE & Others, the file was scrutinized by NCTE Hqrs. and on the basis of the scrutiny, it directed WRC to initiate action under Section 17 of NCTE Act 1993 and in compliance to this direction WRC caused inspection of the institution under Section 17 of the NCTE Act on On the basis of the Inspection report, WRC served a withdrawal order as the institution lacked adequate land and built up area and failed to shift to own premises by August the Council, therefore, came to the conclusion that there was no ground in accepting the appeal and that be rejected, as the institution failed to shift to its own premises by November, (b). The Council observed that as per the direction of the Hon ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 6146/2008 filed by Subhash Rahangdale Vs. NCTE & Others the institution was got inspected by the NCTE Hqrs and as a sequel to the report of the inspection, WRC was directed to issue a Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act to initiate the process of withdrawal of recognition of the institution as the institution was placed under the list of institutions Recognised upto and this status was submitted to the Hon ble Court with the stipulation that the formal action would be taken to withdraw the recognition. As a follow up to the NCTE direction WRC issued Show Cause Notice under Section 17 and after considering the institution reply to the show cause notice, WRC issued an Order dated refusing the recognition of the institution under Section 14(3)(b) of the NCTE Act, on the grounds that the said institution was covered under the principle formulated by the Hon ble High Court at Jabalpur in its judgement in the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. (c). The Council noted that the institutions was issued a formal Recognition order on under Section 14 of NCTE Act. As such, WRC would not have issued an Order for Refusal of recognition to an already existing recognised institution, rather WRC should have withdrawn the recognition under Section 17 of NCTE Act 1993, with prospective effect. Also the institution needed to be permitted to continue its recognition during the academic session , as it was duly recognised and affiliated by the university during the academic session and was therefore not covered by the directions issued under the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. The Council reasoned out that the order of the refusal of recognition under Section 14(3)(b) be modified to that of withdrawal of recognition under Section 17 of the NCTE Act as per the provisions of the Act. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report Written submission and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council felt the orders issued by WRC for refusal of recognition under Section 14(3)(b)

11 needed modification to the extent that recognition of the institution be withdrawn under Section 17 of the NCTE Act, with prospective effect subject to the following conditions: (a). The student already admitted, with due observance of affiliation norms/conditions, be allowed to complete the programme. (b). No fresh admission, either backdated or post dated (with reference to any backlog whatsoever), shall be made in the institution subsequent to the date of the withdrawal of NCTE recognition. (Hasib Ahmad) Member Secretary 1. The Principal, Bundelkhand Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Rajmahal, Ta. Prangadh, Chhattarpur Dist , Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

12 F.No /2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi /07/2009 O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Career College of Education and Technology, Balaghat Dist., Madhya Pradesh dated 15/02/2009 is against the Order No. No.NCTE/WRC/MP/APWO5455/223576/2009/53295 dated 06/04/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition of the institution u/s 14(3)(b) of NCTE Act, 1993 for conducting B.Ed.(Co-Ed) course on the grounds 1) Plot area inadequate. 2) Infrastructural and instructional facilities highly inadequate and not as per NCTE norms. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Career College of Education and Technology (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 17/02/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Niranjan Bisen, Member of Committee and Shri Lok Dongre, Vice President, Career College of Education and Technology, Balaghat Dist., Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the appellant was in possession of 2 acre of land on ownership basis and on this land institutions building was constructed as per NCTE norms and to this effect it submitted the building plan approved by the Competent authority; The trust was also running a school in a separate campus and the building of the institution was not shared for running any other course/programme; It was having multipurpose hall Laboratory and other facilities as per NCTE norms AND WHEREAS the Council made the following observations: (a). The Council noted that the building plan was undated and also the claim of possession of two acres of land by the appellant could not be verified in the absence of original land documents. It noted from the inspection report that the institution was running in a school and no separate area had been earmarked for conducting B.Ed. course. Moreover, the institution lacked other infrastructural facilities as per NCTE norms. The Council, therefore came to the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. (b). The Council observed that as per the direction of the Hon ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 6146/2008 filed by Subhash Rahangdale Vs. NCTE & Others the institution was got inspected by the NCTE Hqrs and as a sequel to the report of the inspection, WRC was directed to issue a Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act to initiate the process of withdrawal of recognition of the institution as the institution was placed under the list of institutions Not Recognised and this status was submitted to the Hon ble Court with the stipulation that the formal action would be taken to withdraw the recognition. As a follow up to the NCTE direction WRC issued Show Cause Notice under Section 17 and after considering the institution reply to the show cause notice, WRC issued an Order dated refusing the recognition of the institution under Section 14(3)(b) of the NCTE Act,

13 on the grounds that the said institution was covered under the principle formulated by the Hon ble High Court at Jabalpur in its judgement in the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. (c). The Council noted that the institutions was issued a conditional recognition order on followed by a formal recognition order on under Section 14 of NCTE Act. As such, WRC would not have issued an Order for Refusal of recognition to an already existing recognised institution, rather WRC should have withdrawn the recognition under Section 17 of NCTE Act 1993, with prospective effect. Also the institution needed to be permitted to continue its recognition during the academic session , as the institution was duly recognised and affiliated by the university during the academic session and was therefore not covered by the directions issued under the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. the Council reasoned out that the order of the refusal of recognition under Section 14(3)(b) be modified to that of withdrawal of recognition under Section 17 of the NCTE Act as per the provisions of the Act. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report Written submission and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council felt the orders issued by WRC for refusal of recognition under Section 14(3)(b) needed modification to the extent that recognition of the institution be withdrawn under Section 17 of the NCTE Ac, with prospective effect subject to the following conditions: (a). The student already admitted, with due observance of affiliation norms/conditions, be allowed to complete the programme. (b). No fresh admission, either backdated or post dated (with reference to any backlog whatsoever), shall be made in the institution subsequent to the date of the withdrawal of NCTE recognition. (Hasib Ahmad) Member Secretary 1. The Secretary, Career College of Education and Technology, Waraseoni, Teh. - Waraseoni, Balaghat Dist. -, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

14 F.No /2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi /07/2009 O R D E R WHEREAS The appeal of Chouhan Education Society's Rajeev Gandhi College, Raisen Dist., Madhya Pradesh dated 24/04/2009 is against the Order No. NCTE/WRC/MP/APWO0667/223198/2009/R-4039 dated 31/03/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds that WRC considered the reply alongwith original file and all relevant document, considered writ petitions numbers of 2007, 6164 of 2008, of 2008, of 2008 and of 2008 with the legal opinion in its 115 meeting held on March 2009 and found the said institution falls under the principle of Jan Seva Shiksha Samiti and decided that the recognition of the said institution to be refused under section 14(3)(B) of NCTE Act. Deficiency: (a) The College is running in rented premises. (b) The College has not shifted to new building even after 3 years. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Chouhan Education Society's Rajeev Gandhi College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 27/04/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Mohd. Faisal Khan, Director & Syed Sajio Ali, Secretary, Chouhan Education Society's Rajeev Gandhi College, Raisen Dist., Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on In the appeal and during personal presentation, it was submitted that as per the prevailing regulations, at that time, the permission, was given for the rented premises and the college was given three years time to shift to permanent premises i.e. before December 2008; The College had already applied for shifting to permanent premises vide it s letter dated and also submitted fee of Rs. 40,000/- alongwith the documents of land and approved building plan. It was also submitted that WRC caused inspection under section 17 and based on this report WRC decided to continue the recognition in its 109 meeting held on 19-20/10/2008. AND WHEREAS the Council made the following observations: (a). The Council noted that the institution vide its letter dated applied to WRC for shifting to permanent premises alongwith a DD of Rs.40,000 and land documents and approved building plan As per the condition laid in the Recognition Order it ought to shift to its own building within 3 years from the date of recognition i.e ; Now the college had built up a new building with a built up area of 2297 Sq.mt. and also submitted the requisite fee for a shifting to own premises. It also observed from the inspection report dated that human resources, infrastructural resources, instructional resources have been assembled and only the building was under construction. The Council, therefore, came to a conclusion that there is enough ground to accept the appeal and the case may be remanded back to WRC for causing inspection of the new building.

15 (b). The Council observed that as per the direction of the Hon ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 6146/2008 filed by Subhash Rahangdale Vs. NCTE & Others the institution was got inspected by the NCTE Hqrs and as a sequel to the report of the inspection, WRC was directed to issue a Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act to initiate action against the institution as the institution was placed under the list of institutions Recognised upto and this status was submitted to the Hon ble Court with the stipulation that the formal action would be taken. As a follow up to the NCTE direction WRC issued Show Cause Notice under Section 17 and after considering the institution reply to the show cause notice, WRC issued an Order dated refusing the recognition of the institution under Section 14(3)(b) of the NCTE Act, on the grounds that the said institution was covered under the principle formulated by the Hon ble High Court of M.P. in its judgement in the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. (c). The Council noted that the institutions was issued a unconditional recognition order on under Section 14 of NCTE Act with a condition that the institution would shift to own premises within 3 years. As such, WRC should not have issued an Order for Refusal of recognition to an already existing recognised institution. As the institution was duly recognised and affiliated by the university during the academic session and was therefore not covered by the directions issued under the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. the Council therefore came to conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and the may be remanded back for inspection of own premises. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report, Written submission and after hearing arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council felt while there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and WRC s order dated was set aside with the direction to the WRC to cause inspection of the new building to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per norms and thereafter pass appropriate orders. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Chouhan Education Society's Rajeev Gandhi College, Raisen Dist., Madhya Pradesh to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above. (Hasib Ahmad) Member Secretary 1. The Secretary, Chouhan Education Society's Rajeev Gandhi College, Hoshangabad Road, Obedullahganj, Raisen Dist. -, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

16 F.No /2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi /07/2009 O R D E R WHEREAS The appeal of Chouhan Education Society's Rajeev Gandhi College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh dated 24/04/2009 is against the Order No. NCTE/WRC/MP/213044/Addl./2009/R-4099 dated 31/03/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds Staff list not approved by competent authority. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Chouhan Education Society's Rajeev Gandhi College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 27/04/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Mohd. Faisal Khan, Director & Syed Sajio Ali, Secretary, Chouhan Education Society's Rajeev Gandhi College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that WRC refused recognition on a ground other than the grounds mentioned in the Show Cause Notice. It was also stated that the Barkatullah University, Bhopal vide it s notification dated approved the faculty for the additional division, under College Code no. 28. AND WHEREAS the Council made the following observations: (a). The Council noted that WRC issued a Show Cause Notice on stating that land and built up area is not adequate for B.Ed. 200; M.Ed. 50 & D.Ed. 100 intake, whereas it issued a Refusal Order on stating a new ground which was not pointed out in the Show Cause notice i.e. staff list not approved by the Competent Authority. It further noted from the notification issued by Barkatullah University, Bhopal on that seven lecturers had been approved by the university and the institution issued appointment orders to the staff on It, however, noted that appellant was also sanctioned on additional unit of 100 in B.Ed.; on for additional unit of 50 for D.Ed. and on for 25 additional intake of M.Ed.; The available 4620 Sq.mt. of built-up area was adequate for conducting D.Ed., B.Ed. and M.Ed. with only basic unit. The Council, therefore, came to a conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and to restore the recognition of the institution for conducting D.Ed.; B.Ed.; and M.Ed. with only basic units and not with additional units. (b). The Council observed that as per the direction of the Hon ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 6146/2008 filed by Subhash Rahangdale Vs. NCTE & Others the institution was got inspected by the NCTE Hqrs and as a sequel to the report of the inspection, WRC was directed to issue a Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act to initiate action against the institution as the institution was placed under the list of institutions Recognised upto and this status was submitted to the Hon ble Court with the stipulation that the formal action would be taken. As a follow up to the NCTE direction WRC issued Show Cause Notice under Section 17 and after considering the institution reply to the

17 show cause notice, WRC issued an Order dated refusing the recognition of the institution under Section 14(3)(b) of the NCTE Act, on the grounds that the said institution was covered under the principle formulated by the Hon ble High Court of M.P. in its judgement in the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. (c). The Council noted that the institutions was issued a unconditional recognition order on for a basic unit and on for an additional unit of B.Ed. course. under Section 14 of NCTE Act. As such, WRC should not have issued an Order for Refusal of recognition to an already existing recognised institution. As the institution was duly recognised and affiliated by the university during the academic session and was therefore not covered by the directions issued under the Jan Sewa Shiksha Samiti case. The Council therefore came to conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal for conducting B.Ed. with a basic unit of 100 intake only. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report, Written submission and after hearing arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council felt while there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and WRC s order dated was set aside with the direction to the WRC to restore the recognition to the institution immediately for conducting D.Ed.; B.Ed.; and M.Ed. with only basic units and not with additional units NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against. (Hasib Ahmad) Member Secretary 1. The Secretary, Chouhan Education Society's Rajeev Gandhi College, E-8, Arera Colony, Trilanga, Bhopal -, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

18 F.No.89-94/2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi /07/2009 O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Dr. Rawatmajli Dhanrupmalji Sojatia College of Education, Mandsaur Dist., Madhya Pradesh dated 12/01/2009 is against the Order No. No.NCTE/WRC/MP/APWO1777/223324/2009/53059 dated 01/04/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds Reply not received within stipulated time. Deficiency: (a) The institution is functioning in a rented building even after the expiry of 3 years. (b) Land and built-up area is inadequate. (c) Staff is not present on the day of inspection. (d) Classroom size and multipurpose hall size is not adequate. Other courses are being run in the same building. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Dr. Rawatmajli Dhanrupmalji Sojatia College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 23/02/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Smt. Madhulika, Manager and Shri Kataria, Office in-charge, Dr. Rawatmajli Dhanrupmalji Sojatia College of Education, Mandsaur Dist., Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the appellant did not receive any Show Cause Notice so it could not reply to WRC; At the time of inspection the new building was under construction and staff could not be presented before the team as the staff members were on leave; It was further submitted that the institution was in possession of 2.45 hectare of land on which a building with a built up area of Sq. ft. existed and it earmarked space for conducting B.Ed. as per NCTE norms. AND WHEREAS the Council made the following observations: (a) The Council noted that the institution had been conducting B.Ed. course in a rented premises and as per the NCTE norms it was bound to shift to own premises within a stipulated period of 3 years from the date of recognition, i.e.26th Sep 05 (w.e.f session). It was further noted from the report of inspection conducted by the NCTE that the institution was having only 10, 000 sq. ft. of built up area and it was not having multipurpose hall, laboratory etc. The Council, therefore, came to the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. (b). The Council observed that as per the direction of the Hon ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 6146/2008 filed by Subhash Rahangdale Vs. NCTE & Others the institution was got inspected by the NCTE Hqrs and as a sequel to the report of the inspection, WRC was directed to issue a Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act to initiate the process of withdrawal of recognition of the institution as the institution was placed

F.No /2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi /12/2009

F.No /2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi /12/2009 F.No.89-651/2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 17/12/2009 O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Abhivyakti College of Education

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Writ Appeal Nos.462, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 25, 166, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223,

More information

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. W.P. No.750/2017. Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. W.P. No.750/2017. Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR W.P. No.750/2017 Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.P and another Shri Sameer Seth, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri R.K. Sahu,

More information

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT NOTIFICATION

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT NOTIFICATION NCTE RULES CONTENTS 1. Short title commencement 2. Definition 3. Certain Expert Members of the Council 4. Members representing States and Union Territories 5. Conditions of service of the Chairperson,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017 Om Sai Punya Educational and Social Welfare Society & Another.Petitioners Versus All India Council

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. National Council for Teacher Education and others. Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. National Council for Teacher Education and others. Versus REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1125-1128 OF 2011 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition Nos.17165-17168 of 2009) National Council for Teacher Education

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 WP(C) No.14332/2004 Pronounced on : 14.03.2008 Sanjay Kumar Jha...

More information

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 34/2016

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 34/2016 BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI.. IN THE MATTER OF: ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 34/2016 Naresh Zargar S/o Late Sh. S.P. Zargar, R/o 2235, Shaheed Gulab Singh Ward, Indranagar,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO.. 2017 (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION) IN THE MATTER OF : JOGINDER KUMAR SUKHIJA S/o Sh.Prabhu Dayal Sukhija R/o 174, IInd Floor, Avtar

More information

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI OFFICE OF THE COMMISIONER OF INDUSTRIES 419, UDYOGSADAN, FIE, PATPARGANJ,DELHI -92

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI OFFICE OF THE COMMISIONER OF INDUSTRIES 419, UDYOGSADAN, FIE, PATPARGANJ,DELHI -92 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI OFFICE OF THE COMMISIONER OF INDUSTRIES 419, UDYOGSADAN, FIE, PATPARGANJ,DELHI -92 No. DCI/ILMAC/CI/2011/ I-t ~ 7- 'L - J'D. Dated: 81 ft I J Minutes of the meetina of the Industrial

More information

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3945 OF 2018 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.35786 OF 2016) SISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH OF CLUNY APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF

More information

% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004

% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Judgment delivered on: November 27, 2015 % W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004 M/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI... Petitioner Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. versus

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 30.07.2010 + WP (C) 11932/2009 M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner - versus THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER & ANR... Respondent

More information

IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL

IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL Page 1 of 18 IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL REGIONAL BENCH, GUWAHATI. OA. NO. 23/2012 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H. N. Sarma, Member (J) HON BLE CMDE MOHAN PHADKE (Retd), Member (A) Smti Anupama Sinha

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2. OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014. Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2. OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014. Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015 1 RESERVED ORDER A.F.R ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2 OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014 Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015 Hon ble Mr. Justice Virendra Kumar DIXIT, Judicial Member

More information

I have had the benefit of perusing the judgment of my. esteemed learned brother, Hon ble Justice Shri S.B. Sinha,

I have had the benefit of perusing the judgment of my. esteemed learned brother, Hon ble Justice Shri S.B. Sinha, TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI DATED 18 th JULY, 2011 Petition No. 275 (C) of 2009 Reliance Communications Limited.. Petitioner Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited..... Respondent

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) W.P(C) 2085/2004

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) W.P(C) 2085/2004 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) W.P(C) 2085/2004 Sri Amarendra Kumar Singh Son of Sri M.M.P. Singh Technical Assistant,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RC. REV. No.75/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RC. REV. No.75/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RC. REV. No.75/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 SMT. JAI SHREE LALLA Through: Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

Government of West Bengal Backward Classes Welfare Department Writers Buildings, Kolkata Website:

Government of West Bengal Backward Classes Welfare Department Writers Buildings, Kolkata Website: Government of West Bengal Backward Classes Welfare Department Writers Buildings, Kolkata 700 001 Website: www.anagrasarkalyan.gov.in M E M O R A N D U M No. 1464 BCW/MR 59/10 Dated 30 th April, 2010 Guidelines

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No.865/2000 DIVINE UNITED ORGANISATION Petitioner Through: Mr.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C) 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C) No. 3768 of 2015 ------ M/s Tata Steel Limited, an existing Company under previous Company Law, through Mrs. MeenaLall wife of Shri BehariLall,

More information

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5295 of 2010 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5296 OF 2010 AND SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5297 OF 2010 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA

More information

THE RAILWAYS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2008

THE RAILWAYS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2008 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 19 of 2008 24 of 1989. THE RAILWAYS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2008 A BILL further to amend the Railways Act,1989. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-ninth Year of the

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: 07.03.2012 I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.1674/2011 SURENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Through Mr. J.S. Mann, Adv....

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 353 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO OF 2015) VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 353 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO OF 2015) VERSUS REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 353 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12581 OF 2015) THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, MYSORE & ANR....APPELLANT(S)

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE. Versus

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE. Versus *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.807/2008. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR. Petitioner Through: Mr Prem Kumar and Mr Sharad C.

More information

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD Guna Complex, Annexe-I, 2 nd Floor, 443, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018 (CIRCUIT BENCH SITTING AT DELHI) OA/17/2009/PT/DEL TUESDAY THIS, THE 29 th DAY OF JANUARY,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, DATE OF Decision : 18th January, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, DATE OF Decision : 18th January, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No. 40/2012 DATE OF Decision : 18th January, 2012 M/S SEWA INTERNATIONAL FASHIONS & ORS... Appellants Through : Md. Rashid,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: 28.4.2011 RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD..Appellant Through: Mr.P.K.Seth,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017) (D.No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017) (D.No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 16850 OF 2017 (@ S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017) (D.No.21033/2017) REPORTABLE Himangni Enterprises.Appellant(s) VERSUS Kamaljeet Singh

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) -Vs- WP(C) No. 1846/2010 Sri Ram Prakash Sarki, Constable (Since dismissed from

More information

FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE

FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE 1 FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE Against three mortgages of agricultural lands situated in villages Pal and Bhatha admeasuring

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23 rd July, 2010. + W.P.(C) 11305/2009, CM No.10831/2009 (u/s 151 CPC for stay), CM No.9694/2010 (u/o1 Rule 10 of CPC for impleadment) & CM No.

More information

Appeal, Review and Settlement of Cases

Appeal, Review and Settlement of Cases 1. Introduction: Chapter 31 Appeal, Review and Settlement of Cases 1.1 Like any other taxation statue, the Customs Act contains detailed provisions for judicial review, for resolution of disputes, by way

More information

NOTIFICATION. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH HOUSING & TOWNPLANNING DEPARTMENT Karachi, dated: October, 29, 2002 S NO. REGULATION NO.

NOTIFICATION. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH HOUSING & TOWNPLANNING DEPARTMENT Karachi, dated: October, 29, 2002 S NO. REGULATION NO. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH HOUSING & TOWNPLANNING DEPARTMENT Karachi, dated: October, 29, 2002 NOTIFICATION No. SO (LAND) HTP/KBCA-3-39/2000 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 21-A of the Sindh Building

More information

TENDER FOR INTERIOR WORKS AT BANK OF INDIA, JAUNPUR (ALTERNATE PREMISES), Distt.JAUNPUR

TENDER FOR INTERIOR WORKS AT BANK OF INDIA, JAUNPUR (ALTERNATE PREMISES), Distt.JAUNPUR Ref. No.: ZO:CSD:PP:2013-14: Date: 13/08/2013 TENDER FOR INTERIOR WORKS AT BANK OF INDIA, JAUNPUR (ALTERNATE PREMISES), Distt.JAUNPUR Sealed item rate tenders are invited for Interior works on behalf of

More information

MADHYA PRADESH ZILA YOJANA SAMITI ADHINIYAM, (NO.19 OF 1995)

MADHYA PRADESH ZILA YOJANA SAMITI ADHINIYAM, (NO.19 OF 1995) MADHYA PRADESH ZILA YOJANA SAMITI ADHINIYAM, (NO.19 OF 1995) Status as on 21.03.2007 1 MADHYA PRADESH ACT NO.19 OF 1995 MADHYA P RADESH ZILA YOJANA SAMITI ADHINIYAM, 1995 Table of contents Section 1. Short

More information

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ACT, 1956

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ACT, 1956 ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ACT 1956 Preamble 1 ALL INDIA INSTITUTES OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ACT, 1956 ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ACT, 1956 [Act, No. 25 of 1956] PREAMBLE An Act to

More information

Ministry of Environment and Forests. NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 03 rd February, 2004

Ministry of Environment and Forests. NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 03 rd February, 2004 Ministry of Environment and Forests NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 03 rd February, 2004 G.S.R. 94 (E) In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Forest (Conservation) Act,

More information

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Arbitration Petition No. 21 of 2017 KLA Const. Technologies Private Limited..Petitioner Versus Kajima India Private Limited Respondent Present:- Dr. Amit George,

More information

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH) BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH) Application No. 30 of 2011 Wednesday, the 14 th day of December, 2011 QUORUM: 1. Hon ble Justice Shri C.V. Ramulu (Judicial Member) 2. Hon

More information

The Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (Act No. 18 of 1973) 1 [9th April, 1973]

The Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (Act No. 18 of 1973) 1 [9th April, 1973] The Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (Act No. 18 of 1973) 1 [9th April, 1973] An Act to provide for better organisation and development of school education in the Union Territory of Delhi and for matters

More information

Regd. Off.: First Floor, Malkani Chambers, Off. Nehru Road, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai NOTICE

Regd. Off.: First Floor, Malkani Chambers, Off. Nehru Road, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai NOTICE Regd. Off.: First Floor, Malkani Chambers, Off. Nehru Road, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai 400 099 CIN: U74999MH2007PLC169201 NOTICE Notice is hereby given that an Extra-ordinary General Meeting (EGM) of the

More information

THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS (REGULATION OF FEE) BILL, 2017

THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS (REGULATION OF FEE) BILL, 2017 1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA 5 THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS (REGULATION OF FEE) BILL, 2017 By SHRIMATI SUPRIYA SULE, M.P. A Bill No. 23 of 2017 BILL to provide for regulation of fee in higher educational

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No of 2013 with W.P. (T) No of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No of 2013 with W.P. (T) No of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No. 1686 of 2013 with W.P. (T) No. 1687 of 2013 M/s. The Rameshwara Jute Mills Ltd, Mining Lessee, through Krishna Kant Dubey, Orissa. Versus Petitioner

More information

AGREEMENT FOR THE GRANT OF BIS LICENCE (FOR USE BY THE FOREIGN MANUFACTURER) (On Rs. 100=00 non judicial stamp paper, to be attested by Notary Public)

AGREEMENT FOR THE GRANT OF BIS LICENCE (FOR USE BY THE FOREIGN MANUFACTURER) (On Rs. 100=00 non judicial stamp paper, to be attested by Notary Public) AGREEMENT FOR THE GRANT OF BIS LICENCE (FOR USE BY THE FOREIGN MANUFACTURER) (On Rs. 100=00 non judicial stamp paper, to be attested by Notary Public) THE AGREEMENT MADE AT NEW DELHI ON THIS DAY OF...

More information

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras In the High Court of Judicature at Madras (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2017 H. Navas Basha 24/21, Bharathidasan Street Nehru Nagar Velachery Chennai 600 042 vs 1. The Bar Council of India

More information

MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION BHOPAL

MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION BHOPAL Subject: Dated: 7 th February, 2013 M/s Essar Power M. P. Limited DAILY ORDER (Date of Motion Hearing : 5 th February, 2013) Petition No.03/2013

More information

Standing Counsel for TNPSC

Standing Counsel for TNPSC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.20439 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 E.Bamila.. Petitioner Vs. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. Through: 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 61 days in refiling

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. Through: 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 61 days in refiling * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.2711/2015 % 28 th October, 2015 SH. DEEPAK AGGARWAL Through:... Plaintiff Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate. versus SH. RAJ GOYAL AND ORS. Through:... Defendants

More information

TENDER DOCUMENT FOR RECEPTIONIST REGIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY,BHOPAL

TENDER DOCUMENT FOR RECEPTIONIST REGIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY,BHOPAL TENDER DOCUMENT FOR RECEPTIONIST REGIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY,BHOPAL Government of India Regional Museum of Natural History (Ministry of Environment forests & Climate Change) E-5, Arera Colony, Bhopal-462016

More information

Reserved on: 7 th August, Pronounced on: 13 th August, # SAIL EX-EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION...Petitioner

Reserved on: 7 th August, Pronounced on: 13 th August, # SAIL EX-EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION...Petitioner * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.2254/2002 Reserved on: 7 th August, 2009 Pronounced on: 13 th August, 2009 # SAIL EX-EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION...Petitioner! Through: None VERSUS $ STEEL

More information

LABOUR RELATIONS ACT NO. 14 OF 2007 SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION

LABOUR RELATIONS ACT NO. 14 OF 2007 SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION NO. 14 OF 2007 LABOUR RELATIONS ACT SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION List of Subsidiary Legislation Page 1. Trade Unions Regulations... L2 67 2. Trade Unions (Appeals) Rules... L2 83 3. Trade Unions (Accounts) Regulations...

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF. (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF. (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No. 1343/2012 Shri Sanjib Saikia, S/o. Late Muhiram Saikia R/o. House No. 12,

More information

Supply and Installation of A3 Size Scanner

Supply and Installation of A3 Size Scanner O/o PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS MADHYA PRADESH FOREST DEPARTMENT (Information Technology Wing) Satpura Bhawan, BHOPAL 462004 (MP) Phone no. 0755-2674302 Fax no. 0755-2555480 www.mpforest.gov.in

More information

Suit No. : 570/15 13/01/2016. Counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the defendant.

Suit No. : 570/15 13/01/2016. Counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the defendant. Suit No. : 570/15 Counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the defendant. Vakalatnama filed by the counsel for the defendant alongwith WS. Copy given. Now put up for replication / documents / admission denial

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013 MariyamTirkey Petitioner (in WPS No. 506/13) Sudarshan Khakha Petitioner (in

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8 TH DAY OF APRIL 2015 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO.57422 OF 2013 (CESTAT)

More information

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd.

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd. IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) The Federal Bank Ltd. Petitioner VERSUS Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. Respondents CRP No. 220/2014 The Federal

More information

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) DISTRICT : KOLKATA IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P. No. (W) of 2017 In the matter of :- An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ;

More information

THE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010

THE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA CLAUSES THE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Applicability of Act. 3. Definitions.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 C.R.P. 589/1998. Date of Decision: 6th March, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 C.R.P. 589/1998. Date of Decision: 6th March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 C.R.P. 589/1998 Date of Decision: 6th March, 2009 SURINDER KAUR Through: Petitioner Ms. Nandni Sahni, Advocate. versus SARDAR

More information

The Protection of Human Rights Act, No 10 of 1994

The Protection of Human Rights Act, No 10 of 1994 The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 No 10 of 1994 An Act to provide for the constitution of a National Human Rights Commission. State Human Rights Commission in States and Human Rights Courts for

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment reserved on: 15.03.2011 Judgment delivered on: 18.03.2011 RSA No.243/2006 & CM No.10268/2006 SHRI.D.V. SINGH & ANR...Appellants

More information

No.F.l-20/2016-Sch.4. Government of India. Ministry of Human Resource Development Department of School Education and Literacy.

No.F.l-20/2016-Sch.4. Government of India. Ministry of Human Resource Development Department of School Education and Literacy. No.F.l-20/2016-Sch.4 Government of India Ministry of Human Resource Development Department of School Education and Literacy Notification Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi Dated the 7"^ April, 2017 The National

More information

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation Government of India Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation

More information

Case :- SERVICE BENCH No of Hon'ble Shri Narayan Shukla,J. Hon'ble Sheo Kumar Singh-I,J.

Case :- SERVICE BENCH No of Hon'ble Shri Narayan Shukla,J. Hon'ble Sheo Kumar Singh-I,J. -1- Court No. - 2 Reserved Case :- SERVICE BENCH No. - 1345 of 2014 Petitioner :- Junaid Ahmad Respondent :- Visitor Interal University Lko./His Excellency The Governor Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus: 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4043 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.10173 of 2011) Central Bank of India Appellant :Versus: C.L. Vimla & Ors.

More information

W.P. (C) No. 45 of 2013

W.P. (C) No. 45 of 2013 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) A I Z A W L B E N C H :: A I Z A W L W.P. (C) No. 45 of 2013 Sh. J. Vanlalchhuanga, S/o Ralkapliana R/o Ramhlun,

More information

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. Cr.M.P.No.141 of Binod Kumar Singh..Petitioner V E R S U S

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. Cr.M.P.No.141 of Binod Kumar Singh..Petitioner V E R S U S In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.141 of 2013 Binod Kumar Singh..Petitioner V E R S U S Central Bureau of Investigation through its S.P, (A.C.B), Ranchi Opposite Party CORAM: HON BLE MR.JUSTICE

More information

CHAPATER XVII APPEAL, REVISION, REVIEW PETITIONS AND MEMORIALS. 1. Orders against which appeal lies. an order enhancing a penalty;

CHAPATER XVII APPEAL, REVISION, REVIEW PETITIONS AND MEMORIALS. 1. Orders against which appeal lies. an order enhancing a penalty; CHAPATER XVII APPEAL, REVISION, REVIEW PETITIONS AND MEMORIALS 1. Orders against which appeal lies Under Rule 23 of CCA Rules, a Government servant including a person who has ceased to be in Government

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No. 2131/2004 Shri Dwijendra Nath Deka S/o. Late Monmil Ch. Deka R/o. Madhgharia,

More information

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION NEW DELHI

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION NEW DELHI ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION NEW DELHI Minutes of the 58 th Meeting of the Executive Committee held on October 22, 2008 at 11.00 a.m. in the Meeting Room, AICTE, New Delhi. The following members

More information

MODEL TENDER DOCUMENT FOR E-AUCTION MINING LEASE FOR CEMENT GRADE LIME STONE STATE: MADHYA PRADESH

MODEL TENDER DOCUMENT FOR E-AUCTION MINING LEASE FOR CEMENT GRADE LIME STONE STATE: MADHYA PRADESH MODEL TENDER DOCUMENT FOR E-AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR CEMENT GRADE LIME STONE STATE: MADHYA PRADESH DIRECTORATE OF GEOLOGY & MINING GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH 1 of 101 Issued to All Prospective Bidder

More information

WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN 14.05.2015 WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN Heard Mr. SK Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. P Roy, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam assisted by Ms. B Hazarika,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No. 131/2013 AND IN THE MATTER OF: ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR. PETITIONER

More information

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeals (AT) No.101 to 105 of 2017 (arising out of Order dated 06.02.2017 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi in CP Nos. 16/152/2015,

More information

Grievances No.K/DOS/015/874 of and No. K/DOS/016/875 of

Grievances No.K/DOS/015/874 of and No. K/DOS/016/875 of Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Kalyan Zone Behind Tejashree", Jahangir Meherwanji Road, Kalyan (West) 421301 Ph 2210707, Fax 2210707, E-mail : cgrfkalyan@mahadiscom.in Date of Grievance : 08/10/2013

More information

COURT NO. 3, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI T.A. No. 60 of 2010 Delhi High Court W.P (C) No. 621 of 2003

COURT NO. 3, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI T.A. No. 60 of 2010 Delhi High Court W.P (C) No. 621 of 2003 COURT NO. 3, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI T.A. No. 60 of 2010 Delhi High Court W.P (C) No. 621 of 2003 IN THE MATTER OF:...Applicant Through Shri P.D.P Deo counsel for the Applicant.

More information

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN 18 INSTITUTIONAL AREA SHAHEED JEET SINGH MARG NEW DELHI-l

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN 18 INSTITUTIONAL AREA SHAHEED JEET SINGH MARG NEW DELHI-l ------... ~-----=~--~=~~-----"~==~----'====----~------ KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN 18 INSTITUTIONAL AREA SHAHEED JEET SINGH MARG NEW DELHI-l 10 602. F.II081-4/2008-KVSHQ (Admn-I) Date: 05.11.2008 The

More information

Notification PART I CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY

Notification PART I CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY [TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)] GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION) Notification

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % 1 st October, MRS. VANEETA KHANNA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Sandeep Mittal, Advocate.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % 1 st October, MRS. VANEETA KHANNA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Sandeep Mittal, Advocate. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.1200/2006 % 1 st October, 2015 MRS. VANEETA KHANNA AND ANR.... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sandeep Mittal, Advocate. Versus MR. RAJIV GUPTA AND ORS. Through:...

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 234/2015

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 234/2015 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: 1. Shri Manik Chakraborty S/o late Bijoy Chakravorty R/o Rangapara Town, Ward No. 4, P.O. Rangapara,

More information

Be it enacted by Parliament in the Twenty-ninth year of the Republic of India as follows : CHAPTER I

Be it enacted by Parliament in the Twenty-ninth year of the Republic of India as follows : CHAPTER I An Act to establish a Press Council for the purpose of preserving the freedom of the Press and of maintaining and improving the standards of newspapers and news agencies in India. Be it enacted by Parliament

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Writ Petition (Civil) No of 2008 and CM No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Writ Petition (Civil) No of 2008 and CM No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7230 of 2008 and CM No.13974 of 2008 Decided on: October 03, 2008 1. The Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs

More information

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Urban Zone, Nagpur. Case No. CGRF(NUZ)/040/2009

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Urban Zone, Nagpur. Case No. CGRF(NUZ)/040/2009 Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Urban Zone, Nagpur Case No. CGRF(NUZ)/040/2009 Applicant : Shri Pratap Jaykisan Kanjwani At, 116, Chikhali,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016 (Arising from the Final Judgment dated 21.04.2016 passed by the Hon ble Uttarakhand High Court at Nainital

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1956 W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005 Judgment decided on: 14.02.2011 C.D. SINGH Through: Mr Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

Case No. 135 of Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member Smt. Chandra Iyengar, Member. (1) M/s B.S.Channabasappa & Sons...Petitioner 1

Case No. 135 of Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member Smt. Chandra Iyengar, Member. (1) M/s B.S.Channabasappa & Sons...Petitioner 1 Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No1, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400 005 Tel No 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 022 22163976 E-mail mercindia@mercgovin Website:

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 Date of decision: 24.05.2011 WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.7523/2011 YUDHVIR SINGH Versus Through: PETITIONER Mr.N.S.Dalal,

More information

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017 1 IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017 [Arising out of Order dated 25 th July, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority

More information

TENDER FORM FOR SHOPS AT ESIC COLONY, SECTOR-56, NOIDA (U.P.)

TENDER FORM FOR SHOPS AT ESIC COLONY, SECTOR-56, NOIDA (U.P.) TENDER FORM FOR SHOPS AT ESIC COLONY, SECTOR-56, NOIDA (U.P.) 1. Name of the applicant 2. Full Address 3. Telephone No., if any. 4. Attested true copy of the Ration Card having his/her name (which will

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. I.A. No. 4 OF 2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2011

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. I.A. No. 4 OF 2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. No. 4 OF 2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10535 OF 2011 NON-REPORTABLE Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, NOIDA & Anr. Appellants Versus Mange Ram

More information

LUBE CLEARING & FORWARDING AGENT (CFA) APPLICATION FORM: IMPORTANT POINTS

LUBE CLEARING & FORWARDING AGENT (CFA) APPLICATION FORM: IMPORTANT POINTS LUBE CLEARING & FORWARDING AGENT (CFA) APPLICATION FORM: IMPORTANT POINTS Please refer to the Lube CFA Selection Guidelines uploaded in the website for details of all important guidelines pertaining to

More information

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI Coram: Dr. Pramod Deo, Chairperson Shri S. Jayaraman, Member Shri V.S. Verma, Member Shri M. Deena Dayalan, Member Date of Hearing: 20.11.2012 Date of

More information

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110 001. No. 3/ER/2003/JS-II Dated : 27 th March, 2003 O R D E R 1. Whereas, the superintendence, direction and control, inter alia,

More information

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH) APPEAL NO. 26/2012

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH) APPEAL NO. 26/2012 1 BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH) APPEAL NO. 26/2012 IN THE MATTER OF 1. Antarsingh Patel S/o Late Kalu Singh Village Sulgaon Tehsil Maheshwar District Khargone, M.P. 2.

More information

NOTIFICATION Shimla -2, the 21st January, 2006

NOTIFICATION Shimla -2, the 21st January, 2006 (Authoritative English Text) GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT NOTIFICATION Shimla -2, the 21st January, 2006 No. PER (AR) F (7) -2/98-Vol.1. - In exercise of the powers

More information

Appendix C THE REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS (PROTECTION) BILL, ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and

Appendix C THE REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS (PROTECTION) BILL, ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and Appendix C THE REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS (PROTECTION) BILL, 2006 1 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Principles applicable to refugee

More information

Law on Essential Commodities Act, 1955

Law on Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Law on Essential Commodities Act, 1955. S.S. Upadhyay Legal Advisor to Governor UP, Lucknow Mobile : 9453048988 E-mail : ssupadhyay28@gmail.com 1. Release of Vehicle under E.C. Act, 1955 : Where vehicle

More information