Case 1:02-cr PKC Document 54 Filed 08/15/08 Page 1 of 6 U.S. Department of Justice

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 1:02-cr PKC Document 54 Filed 08/15/08 Page 1 of 6 U.S. Department of Justice"

Transcription

1 Case 1:02-cr PKC Document 54 Filed 08/15/08 Page 1 of 6 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York BY HAND TO CHAMBERS United States District Judge Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew s Plaza New York, New York Re: United States v. Glen Hardwick S2 02 Cr (PKC) Dear Judge Castel: The Government respectfully submits this letter to inform the Court of certain in limine motions that Judge Casey considered and ruled upon in connection with the initial trial in this case, and to ask the Court to adhere to those rulings. 1 First, the Government sought permission to adduce testimony concerning uncharged conduct involving defendant Glen Hardwick s co-conspirator and brother, Stacey Hardwick, as inextricably intertwined with the charged offenses, as critical to establishing one of the elements the Government must prove under the murder-for-hire statute, and as highly relevant background concerning the conspiracy charged in the Indictment. Specifically, the Government sought to introduce evidence of Stacey Hardwick s prior gun and drug sales to the undercover officer hired to commit the murder that is the subject of the charges in the Indictment, including the guns themselves, and Judge Casey granted the Government s motion. Second, the 1 Defense counsel has informed the Government that she intends to ask the Court to reconsider Judge Casey s ruling on the admissibility of the prior acts of Stacey Hardwick, wich are discussed in more detail below. Should defense counsel in fact file such a motion or any other motion, the Government, consistent with the Court s oral order at the conference on July 1, 2008, intends to submit a response.

2 Case 1:02-cr PKC Document 54 Filed 08/15/08 Page 2 of 6 Page 2 Government moved to preclude cross-examination of Detective Marco Trujillo concerning a personal incident and related internal New York City Police Department administrative proceedings. Judge Casey permitted limited cross-examination of Detective Trujillo concerning this matter, as described in more detail below. Third, the Government sought to preclude cross-examination of Lieutenant Robert Caffrey (or any other witness) about certain statements made by Hector Santiago. Judge Casey granted the Government s motion. Finally, Judge Casey denied defense counsel s motion to preclude the Government from introducing as evidence at trial photographs of Santiago, Santiago s driver s license, and notes Lieutenant Caffrey took containing information taken from Santiago s identification card. Background As charged in the Indictment, the Government will prove that in September 2002, the defendant and his brother Stacey Hardwick conspired to hire an undercover law enforcement officer ( UC ), Detective Marco Trujillo, to murder Hector, an individual with whom the defendant had recently fought, and that Glen Hardwick aided and abetted Stacey Hardwick s commission of the murder for hire. In connection with this plot, on September 10, 2002, the defendant and Stacey Hardwick met with the UC and provided him with a gun to be used to commit the murder. At trial, the Government will offer into evidence a recording of this meeting, as well as the gun the Hardwicks provided to the UC that day, along with other evidence. I. Prior Acts Evidence In the months leading up to September 2002, Stacey Hardwick sold drugs and firearms to the UC on numerous occasions. In total, Stacey Hardwick sold the UC approximately 120 grams of cocaine, a small quantity of marijuana, and five firearms. The Government sought permission to offer evidence of these acts as inextricably intertwined with the charged crimes (specifically, as necessary for the jury to understand the discussion captured on the recording of the September 10, 2002 meeting), to explain that the gun brought to the meeting was intended as consideration for the murder the Hardwicks wanted the UC to commit, and as background to explain why Stacey Hardwick and the defendant would trust the UC enough to hire him to commit a murder. Judge Casey permitted the Government to introduce evidence of Stacey Hardwick s prior dealings with the UC, including the actual guns that Stacey Hardwick sold to the UC. In an oral ruling delivered

3 Case 1:02-cr PKC Document 54 Filed 08/15/08 Page 3 of 6 Page 3 on June 11, 2003, which is attached to this letter as Exhibit A, Judge Casey ruled that the evidence is relevant as inextricably intertwined with the evidence of the charged offense of conspiracy to commit murder for hire and is necessary to complete the story of the crime on trial. Transcript of June 11, 2003 Pre-Trial Conference at 6. II. Cross-Examination of Detective Trujillo The murder-for-hire charges relate to the defendant s involvement with his brother in the hiring of Detective Trujillo the UC to kill a person named Hector. Prior to his involvement in the investigation of this case, Detective Trujillo was involved in an off-duty incident relating to a verbal dispute he had with his girlfriend in February That dispute culminated in Detective Trujillo grabbing his girlfriend s arm, which resulted in some minor bruising. Acquaintances of Trujillo s girlfriend who had heard the couple arguing loudly called the police. Trujillo left before the police arrived, but later reported to his local precinct to be interviewed. The NYPD ultimately charged Trujillo with two specifications for violating two provisions of the NYPD Patrol Guide: (1) engaging in conduct prejudicial to the good order, efficiency, and discipline of the Department; and (2) failing immediately to notify the Department of the incident. Following an administrative proceeding at which he testified, Detective Trujillo was found guilty of both specifications. The Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Trials who presided over the proceeding found that (1) Trujillo had grabbed and bruised his girlfriend s arm, and (2) Trujillo knew the police were responding to the incident and left the scene. He was punished by having to forfeit fifteen vacation days. Judge Casey permitted limited cross-examination of Detective Trujillo with respect to this incident on the only issue that went to Detective Trujillo s credibility. Judge Casey allowed inquiry only as to whether Trujillo knew about the report to the police and heard sirens, and the ruling by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner that she apparently did not accept his testimony that he was not aware that the police had been contacted. Trial Transcript at 44. Judge Casey further ruled that there would be no inquiry into the specific nature of the off-duty incident that led to the administrative proceeding, but only that there was an incident. Trial Tr. at Judge Casey s oral ruling on this issue is attached to this letter as Exhibit B.

4 Case 1:02-cr PKC Document 54 Filed 08/15/08 Page 4 of 6 Page 4 III. Evidence Concerning Hector Santiago Shortly after the events of September 10, 2002, Lieutenant Robert Caffrey located a person in the vicinity of Mount Hope and Walton Avenue in the Bronx the location where the defendant told the UC that Hector, the intended murder victim, could be found who fit the description of Hector the defendant had provided. This person identified himself to Lieutenant Caffrey as Hector, and produced a New York State identification card in the name of Hector Santiago. During his encounter with Hector Santiago, Lieutenant Caffrey warned Santiago of a potential threat to his life, and asked Santiago whether he had recently had a problem with anyone. Santiago denied having had such a problem. Lieutenant Caffrey did not ask Santiago any questions about the Hardwicks or show him photographs of them. Subsequently, prosecutors and an investigator with the United States Attorney s Office spoke on the telephone with a person who identified himself as Hector Santiago and who claimed he did not know Glen or Stacey Hardwick. Judge Casey granted the Government s motion to preclude cross-examination of Lieutenant Caffrey (and any other witnesses) concerning (1) Hector Santiago s statement that he had not had any recent problems with anyone, and (2) statements the person identifying himself as Hector Santiago made over the telephone disavowing any knowledge of Glen or Stacey Hardwick, on the ground that these out-of-court statements were inadmissible hearsay. Trial Tr. at 578. Judge Casey then denied defense counsel s request to preclude the Government from introducing photographs of Santiago, Santiago s driver s license, and notes Lieutenant Caffrey took containing information from Santiago s identification card, ruling that the the photographs and driver s license were relevant and non-hearsay, and that Lieutenant Caffrey s notes were admissible as statements of identification under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(C). Id. at Judge Casey also permitted the Government to elicit from Lieutenant Caffrey that the individual he located at the intersection of Mount Hope and Walton identified himself as Hector, because the statement was being offered not for the truth, but to show that this person was using the same name as that used by the person the defendant and his brother indicated they wanted to have murdered. Id. at 579. Judge Casey s oral ruling on this issue is attached to this letter as Exhibit C.

5 Case 1:02-cr PKC Document 54 Filed 08/15/08 Page 5 of 6 Page 5 Argument I. The Court Should Adhere to Judge Casey s Rulings on the Motions In Limine Insofar as defense counsel seeks reconsideration of any of Judge Casey s rulings on the in limine motions, the law-ofthe-case doctrine counsels against revisiting those rulings. The Government therefore submits that the Court should adhere to Judge Casey s rulings on the motions in limine described above. The law of the case doctrine posits that when a court decides upon a rule of law, that decision should continue to govern the same issues in subsequent stages in the same case. DiLaura v. Power Auth., 982 F.2d 73, 76 (2d Cir. 1992) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). This doctrine is admittedly discretionary and does not limit a court s power to reconsider its own decisions prior to final judgment. Id. (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted). As the Second Circuit has noted, however, the major grounds justifying reconsideration are an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice. Id. (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). In a criminal case, the Second Circuit has applied the doctrine and noted that district courts may... depart from the law of the case and reconsider their own decisions for cogent and compelling reasons if those decisions have not been ruled on by the appellate court. United States v. Quintieri, 306 F.3d 1217, 1230 (2d Cir. 2002). Here, there are no cogent and compelling reasons to reconsider Judge Casey s rulings on the in limine motions that were previously filed in this case. The Government is not aware of any intervening change in controlling law or any new evidence that would justify revisiting those rulings, and there was certainly no clear error or manifest injustice in any of Judge Casey s rulings. In fact, in the appeal of Glen Hardwick s conviction, defense counsel did not challenge any of the rulings described above. As a result, the Court of Appeals passed soley upon the Confrontation Clause and sufficiency issues that were raised on appeal, and remanded the case having addressed only those issues and having left Judge Casey s other rulings intact. Accordingly, in the absence of a showing that would justify revisiting the prior rulings in this case a burden defense counsel cannot meet the Court should adhere to Judge Casey s rulings on the motions in limine.

6 Case 1:02-cr PKC Document 54 Filed 08/15/08 Page 6 of 6 Page 6 Conclusion For the reasons set forth above, the Government respectfully submits that the Court should adhere to Judge Casey s rulings on the in limine motions. Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL J. GARCIA United States Attorney By: /s/ Brent Wible Assistant United States Attorney Tel.: (212) Fax: (212) cc: Susan V. Tipograph (by fax)

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-22-2016 USA v. Marcus Pough Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 04-2032, 04-2293 & 04-2309 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. DARRON J. MURPHY, SR., Defendant-Appellant,

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-29-2010 USA v. Eric Rojo Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 09-2294 Follow this and additional

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : :... O P I N I O N

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : :... O P I N I O N [Cite as State v. Ali, 2015-Ohio-1472.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee v. OMAR ALI Defendant-Appellant C.A. CASE NO. 2014 CA 59

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No CR (Seitz)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No CR (Seitz) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Case No. 11-20583-CR (Seitz) JOSE M. NOA, Defendant. / RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT NOTICE AND PROFFER OF EVIDENCE OF OTHER

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2003 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-30-2003 USA v. Holland Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 02-4481 Follow this and additional

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1387 United States of America, * * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of

More information

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: July 18, NO. 34,182 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: July 18, NO. 34,182 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: July 18, 2016 4 NO. 34,182 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 6 Plaintiff-Appellee, 7 v. 8 MATIAS LOZA, 9 Defendant-Appellant.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 21 2014 17:48:58 2014-KA-00188-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEFFREY ALLEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-00188-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

Case 2:10-cr CM Document 25 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:10-cr CM Document 25 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 2:10-cr-20029-CM Document 25 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case Nos. 10-20029-01-CM KENNETH G. LAIN,

More information

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-4218 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. KELVIN ROSS SINCLAIR, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District

More information

Rule 404(B) and Reversal on Appeal

Rule 404(B) and Reversal on Appeal GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2008 Rule 404(B) and Reversal on Appeal Stephen A. Saltzburg George Washington University Law School, SSALTZ@law.gwu.edu Follow this and additional

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 13a0140p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

More information

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 08-1900 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. LUIS ROSADO-PÉREZ, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 08-2164, 08-2166 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED January 17, 2006 v No. 263467 Oakland Circuit Court PHIL AL-MAKI, LC No. 2004-196017-FH Defendant-Appellee.

More information

FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GERRILYN G. BRILL, United States Magistrate Judge.

FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GERRILYN G. BRILL, United States Magistrate Judge. Slip Copy, 2011 WL 4479211 (N.D.Ga.) Motions, Pleadings and Filings Judges and Attorneys Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D. C. Docket No CR-UU.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D. C. Docket No CR-UU. [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-12203 Non-Argument Calendar D. C. Docket No. 08-20704-CR-UU FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-19-2008 USA v. Booker Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-3725 Follow this and additional

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-00200-01-CR-W-FJG ) WILLIAM ENEFF, ) ) ) Defendant. )

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-21-2014 USA v. Robert Cooper Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket 09-2159 Follow this and additional

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ABRAHAM HAGOS, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit December 9, 2013 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court Petitioner - Appellant, v. ROGER WERHOLTZ,

More information

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-4609 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, versus Plaintiff - Appellee, DAMON BRIGHTMAN, Defendant - Appellant. No. 05-4612 UNITED STATES OF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION. Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION. Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. MARCUS LADALE DAMPER, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 09-0013 1 CA-CR 09-0014 1 CA-CR 09-0019 DEPARTMENT D OPINION Appeal from

More information

STATE OF OHIO DAVANA SINGH

STATE OF OHIO DAVANA SINGH [Cite as State v. Singh, 2011-Ohio-6447.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96049 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DAVANA SINGH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

Michael Stewart v. State of Maryland - No. 79, 1995 Term

Michael Stewart v. State of Maryland - No. 79, 1995 Term Michael Stewart v. State of Maryland - No. 79, 1995 Term EVIDENCE - Signed prior inconsistent statement made by a recanting witness may be admitted as substantive evidence even though the party calling

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED December 15, 2015 v No. 323033 Wayne Circuit Court DEMETROUS TUSHAI MAGWOOD, LC No. 11-001441-FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-23-2014 USA v. Haki Whaley Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket 13-1943 Follow this and additional

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) ) JERMAINE DOLLARD, ) () ) ) Defendant. ) IN AND FOR KENT COUNT Submitted: April 5, 2013 Decided: Nicole S. Hartman, Esq., Department

More information

Case 1:07-cr EGS Document 176 Filed 06/22/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:07-cr EGS Document 176 Filed 06/22/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:07-cr-00181-EGS Document 176 Filed 06/22/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Crim. No. 07-181 (EGS ZHENLI YE GON, defendant. MOTION

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS CRIMINAL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS CRIMINAL DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS CRIMINAL DIVISION The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN CHURCH, JARED CHASE, BRENT BETTERLY, Defendants. Case No. 12 CR 10985 Honorable

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANGEL MELENDEZ-ORSINI, a/k/a Gelo, a/k/a Cerebro, a/k/a Primo, Defendant, Appellant. No.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANGEL MELENDEZ-ORSINI, a/k/a Gelo, a/k/a Cerebro, a/k/a Primo, Defendant, Appellant. No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANGEL MELENDEZ-ORSINI, a/k/a Gelo, a/k/a Cerebro, a/k/a Primo, Defendant, Appellant. No. 15-2535 United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit September 27,

More information

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Defendant-Appellant Benjamin Salas, Jr. was charged in a two-count

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Defendant-Appellant Benjamin Salas, Jr. was charged in a two-count FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 21, 2007 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court v. Plaintiff - Appellee,

More information

Case 1:12-cr RJL Document 67 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cr RJL Document 67 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:12-cr-00184-RJL Document 67 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL NO. 12-CR-184 (RJL) v. ALFREDO BELTRAN LEYVA,

More information

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals RENDERED: MARCH 3, 2017; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2014-CA-001017-MR WILLIE PALMER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE FRED A. STINE,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 7, 2017

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 7, 2017 04/13/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 7, 2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MORIARCO MONTRELL LEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 7 November 2017

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 7 November 2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-108 Filed: 7 November 2017 Guilford County, No. 14 CRS 67272 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BYRON JEROME PARKER Appeal by defendant from order entered 18

More information

of unfair prejudice. Fed.Rules Evid. Rule 404(b), 28 U.S.C.A.

of unfair prejudice. Fed.Rules Evid. Rule 404(b), 28 U.S.C.A. U.S. v. CARTER Cite as 779 F.3d 623 (6th Cir. 2015) 623 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Jason Anthony CARTER, Defendant Appellant. No. 14 5276. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2013-0875, Alexey Obukhov v. John Bryfonski, the court on November 20, 2014, issued the following order: Having considered the briefs and oral arguments

More information

In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania

In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania No. 166 MDA 2008 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ADAM WAYNE CHAMPAGNE, Appellant. REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT On Appeal from the Judgment of the Court of Common Pleas

More information

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 15-1263 United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Levon Dean, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant No.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 5 July 2016

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 5 July 2016 An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr MCR-WCS-2. versus. No.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr MCR-WCS-2. versus. No. Case: 10-15629 Date Filed: 02/14/2013 Page: 1 of 65 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-15629 D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00009-MCR-WCS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

More information

Hicks v. State of Alabama. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Alex Thrasher*

Hicks v. State of Alabama. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Alex Thrasher* Hicks v. State of Alabama Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Alex Thrasher* The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals will primarily consider three issues in Hicks v. State of Alabama. First, the court will

More information

Case 2:06-cr MCE Document 209 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:06-cr MCE Document 209 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :0-cr-000-MCE Document 0 Filed 0//00 Page of 0 0 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney R. STEVEN LAPHAM ELLEN V. ENDRIZZI Assistant U.S. Attorneys 0 I Street, Suite 0-00 Sacramento, California

More information

v No St. Clair Circuit Court

v No St. Clair Circuit Court S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED November 9, 2017 v No. 334572 St. Clair Circuit Court JAMES AMSDILL, LC No. 13-000170-FH

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2003 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-19-2003 USA v. Mercedes Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket 00-2563 Follow this and additional

More information

USCA No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, SANTANA DRAPEAU, Appellant.

USCA No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, SANTANA DRAPEAU, Appellant. ==================================================================== IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT USCA No. 14-3890 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. SANTANA DRAPEAU,

More information

Case 1:15-cr NGG Document 62 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 549 : :

Case 1:15-cr NGG Document 62 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 549 : : Case 115-cr-00116-NGG Document 62 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID # 549 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x UNITED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CRIMINAL NO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CRIMINAL NO 2:12-cr-20218-SFC-MKM Doc # 221 Filed 12/02/13 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1125 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, CRIMINAL NO. 12-20218

More information

TRIAL EVIDENCE: MAKING AND MEETING OBJECTIONS

TRIAL EVIDENCE: MAKING AND MEETING OBJECTIONS TRIAL EVIDENCE: MAKING AND MEETING OBJECTIONS By: EDWARD A. MALLETT MALLETT GUIBERSON SAPER, L.L.P. 600 Travis Street, Suite 1900 Houston, TX 77002 713-236-1900 telephone 713-228-0321 facsimile edward@mgscounsel.com

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-3-2016 USA v. Jean Joseph Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016

More information

CASE 0:10-cr JNE -XXX Document 246 Filed 12/31/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:10-cr JNE -XXX Document 246 Filed 12/31/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:10-cr-00032-JNE -XXX Document 246 Filed 12/31/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 10-CR-32(01) (JNE/XXX) Plaintiff, v. DENNIS

More information

CHARACTER EVIDENCE PROBLEMS 1

CHARACTER EVIDENCE PROBLEMS 1 CHARACTER EVIDENCE PROBLEMS 1 Problem 1 Defendant is charged w/ S&D/PWISD Cocaine. State calls Witness Shady Hood to testify about previous instances in which defendant bought, sold, and used drugs. State

More information

Case 1:10-cr RDB Document 71 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 1:10-cr RDB Document 71 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Case 1:10-cr-00181-RDB Document 71 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * v. * Criminal No. 1:10-cr-0181-RDB THOMAS ANDREWS

More information

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: FAYE M. FLANCHER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ.

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: FAYE M. FLANCHER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 13, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear

More information

Case 1:10-cr RDB Document 55 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:10-cr RDB Document 55 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION Case 1:10-cr-00181-RDB Document 55 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * * v. * * THOMAS ANDREWS DRAKE,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TYI ANTHONY STEFFENS, Defendant-Appellant.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TYI ANTHONY STEFFENS, Defendant-Appellant. FILED: June, 01 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TYI ANTHONY STEFFENS, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 01 A1 David F. Rees, Judge.

More information

STATE OF OHIO STEVEN MURPHY

STATE OF OHIO STEVEN MURPHY [Cite as State v. Murphy, 2010-Ohio-1422.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 93093 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. STEVEN MURPHY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 13a0523n.06. Nos /3773/3880 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 13a0523n.06. Nos /3773/3880 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 13a0523n.06 Nos. 12-3768/3773/3880 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT United States of America, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, Quin Willis (No. 12-3768,

More information

2017 PA Super 173 OPINION BY PANELLA, J. FILED JUNE 5, In 2007, Appellant, Devon Knox, then 17 years old, and his twin

2017 PA Super 173 OPINION BY PANELLA, J. FILED JUNE 5, In 2007, Appellant, Devon Knox, then 17 years old, and his twin 2017 PA Super 173 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DEVON KNOX Appellant No. 1937 WDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence September 30, 2015 In the Court

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 21 March 2017

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 21 March 2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA16-988 Filed: 21 March 2017 Wake County, Nos. 15 CRS 215729, 215731-33 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BREYON BRADFORD, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from judgments

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED December 30, 2014 V No. 317324 Wayne Circuit Court DALE FREEMAN, LC No. 13-000447-FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information

Case: 2:13-cr MHW-TPK Doc #: 56 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 368

Case: 2:13-cr MHW-TPK Doc #: 56 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 368 Case 213-cr-00183-MHW-TPK Doc # 56 Filed 08/28/14 Page 1 of 7 PAGEID # 368 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No. 213-CR-183

More information

United States of America v. Jemal

United States of America v. Jemal 1994 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-20-1994 United States of America v. Jemal Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 93-5172 Follow this and additional

More information

STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD

STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD In Re: Glenn Robinson, Esq. PRP File No. 2013-172 Disciplinary Counsel s Motion in Limine to Admit Statements by Pamela Binette Which Are Contained in

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 09-2956 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, WILLIAM DINGA, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NO [Cite as State v. Martinez, 2003-Ohio-1821.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NO. 9-02-57 v. GILBERTO MARTINEZ O P I N I O N DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) BACKKGROUND: This case arises out of a marijuana grow operation that was discovered by

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) BACKKGROUND: This case arises out of a marijuana grow operation that was discovered by 0, P.S. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Plaintiff, TYLER S. McKINLEY, Defendant. BACKKGROUND: Case No.: CR--0-WFN- DEFENDANT S IN SUPPORT OF

More information

February 6, United States Attorneys Office 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas Re: United States v. XXXXX, No. YYYY.

February 6, United States Attorneys Office 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas Re: United States v. XXXXX, No. YYYY. February 6, 2003 United States Attorneys Office 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75242 Dear: Re: United States v. XXXXX, No. YYYY Pursuant to the United States Constitution, the laws of the United States,

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ARMANDO GARCIA v. Petitioner, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court of Appeals (7th Cir.)

More information

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: March 5, 2015 105120 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROBERT J.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Lower Case No.: 2012-TR A-W

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Lower Case No.: 2012-TR A-W IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA MICHELLE ANN GLASS, Appellant, CASE NO.: 2013-CV-000038-A-O Lower Case No.: 2012-TR-027060-A-W v. STATE OF FLORIDA,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : v. : : BRADLEY KOMPA, : : Appellee : No. 1912 WDA 2013 Appeal

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jun 14 2017 16:56:06 2016-KA-01711-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL MCKEITHAN APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01711-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER 14-4158-cr(L), 15-487-cr(Con), 15-643-cr(Con) United States v. Fernandez, Reyes & Darge UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 15 2397 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. LANCE SLIZEWSKI, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court

More information

ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1 ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1 Constitution Art. I, 6.01 Basic rights for crime victims. (a) Crime victims, as defined by law or their lawful representatives, including the next of kin of homicide victims,

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DARNELL ANTHONY YOUNG, a/k/a DJ Nelly Nell, a/k/a Nelly, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES

More information

v. ) File No. 08CRS50156 et al. ORDER

v. ) File No. 08CRS50156 et al. ORDER STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) v. ) File No. 08CRS50156 et al. ) SEAN A. LITTLE, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER

More information

COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA

COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA Date: 20171206 Docket: CR 15-01-35066 (Winnipeg Centre) Indexed as: R. v. Ajak Cited as: 2017 MBQB 202 COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA BETWEEN: ) APPEARANCES: ) HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) Libby Standil

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 16-3960 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PHIL LAMONT TRENT, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District

More information

JOSELYN S. KELLY Lancaster, Ohio ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130

JOSELYN S. KELLY Lancaster, Ohio ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 [Cite as State v. Hawkins, 2012-Ohio-3137.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellant -vs- SEAN HAWKINS Defendant-Appellee JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott

More information

STATE OF OHIO ANDRE CONNER

STATE OF OHIO ANDRE CONNER [Cite as State v. Conner, 2010-Ohio-4353.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 93953 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ANDRE CONNER DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

STATE OF OHIO ROBERT HENDERSON

STATE OF OHIO ROBERT HENDERSON [Cite as State v. Henderson, 2008-Ohio-1631.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 89377 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ROBERT HENDERSON

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-1275 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ROSE MARIE WALL. Argued: July 20, 2006 Opinion Issued: October 13, 2006

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ROSE MARIE WALL. Argued: July 20, 2006 Opinion Issued: October 13, 2006 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LAKE COUNTY. CASE No CR

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LAKE COUNTY. CASE No CR Terri Wood, OSB # Law Office of Terri Wood, P.C. 0 Van Buren Street Eugene, Oregon 0 1--1 Attorney for Defendant IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff,

More information

Lyle E. Strom District of Nebraska

Lyle E. Strom District of Nebraska Lyle E. Strom District of Nebraska I know it s no justification or solace to you, but I am serious when I say this is an outrageous sentence, and I apologize to you on behalf of the United States Government.1

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * MOTION TO VACATE OR CORRECT ILLEGAL SENTENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * MOTION TO VACATE OR CORRECT ILLEGAL SENTENCE CHRISTOPHER JONES * UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Petitioner, * v. * UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * Civil No. Criminal No. CCB-14-0234 * * * * * * * * * * * MOTION TO VACATE OR

More information

Evidence for Delaware Criminal Defense

Evidence for Delaware Criminal Defense Evidence for Delaware Criminal Defense Impeachment The Story: Murder Trial Witness: At 11 p.m. I saw defendant, 150 feet away, hit the victim over the head. At prior codefendant s trial: I could see because

More information

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 15 filed 11/21/17 PageID.22 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 15 filed 11/21/17 PageID.22 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION Case 2:17-cr-00039-PLM ECF No. 15 filed 11/21/17 PageID.22 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, KATHRYN MARIA

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED July 2, 1999 v No. 202802 Oakland Circuit Court CARLTON E. BANKS, LC No. 96-145671 FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information

Todd E. Porterfield was convicted of first-degree murder and first-degree

Todd E. Porterfield was convicted of first-degree murder and first-degree NOTICE The text of this opinion can be corrected before the opinion is published in the Pacific Reporter. Readers are encouraged to bring typographical or other formal errors to the attention of the Clerk

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT'S BRIEF

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT'S BRIEF Shaun E. Yurtkuran MSB #I Schwartz & Associates Counsel for the Appellant 162 East Amite Street Jackson, Mississippi 39205 (601) 974-8635 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI - DARON J.

More information

BEFORE THE POLICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

BEFORE THE POLICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO BEFORE THE POLICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO IN THE MATTER OF CHARGES FILED AGAINST ) DETECTIVE JOHN KILLACKEY III, ) No. 14 PB 2847 STAR No. 20163, DEPARTMENT OF POLICE, ) CITY OF CHICAGO, ) ) (CR No.

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE WALTER BEEDE. Submitted: March 22, 2007 Opinion Issued: August 28, 2007

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE WALTER BEEDE. Submitted: March 22, 2007 Opinion Issued: August 28, 2007 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

Appellate Division, Third Department, People v. Young

Appellate Division, Third Department, People v. Young Touro Law Review Volume 19 Number 2 New York State Constitutional Decisions: 2002 Compilation Article 6 April 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department, People v. Young Randy S. Pearlman Follow this and

More information

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Ernest Spiller, Defendant-Appellant. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Ernest Spiller, Defendant-Appellant. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 00-3043 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest Spiller, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF BARRY PLAINTIFF S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF BARRY PLAINTIFF S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF BARRY / THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff, Case No. 08-[redacted] SD Hon. Gary R. Holman [redacted], Defendant. PLAINTIFF S MOTION

More information

STATE OF OHIO MARIO COOPER

STATE OF OHIO MARIO COOPER [Cite as State v. Cooper, 2009-Ohio-2583.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91566 STATE OF OHIO vs. MARIO COOPER PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information