THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT. No In re Search Warrant for Records from AT&T

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT. No In re Search Warrant for Records from AT&T"

Transcription

1 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT No In re Search Warrant for Records from AT&T State s Appeal Pursuant to RSA 606:10 from Judgment of the Second Circuit District Division - Plymouth BRIEF FOR THE APPELLATE DEFENDER AS AMICUS CURIAE Christopher M. Johnson Chief Appellate Defender Appellate Defender Program 10 Ferry Street, Suite 202 Concord, NH NH Bar # (15 minutes oral argument)

2 TABLE OP CONTENTS Page Table of Authorities ii Question Presented 1 Statement of the Case and Pacts 2 Summary of the Argument 3 Argument I. THE CIRCUIT COURT PROPERLY RULED THAT NEW HAMPSHIRE LAW DOES NOT ALLOW IT TO ISSUE A WARRANT AUTHORIZING A SEARCH IN ANOTHER STATE 4 Conclusion 13 1

3 II (August 18 U.S.C U.S.C U.S.C. 2702(2)(b)(1) & (c)(1) 9 18 U.S.C U.S.C. 2711(3)(B) 10 Statutes Constitutional Provisions 177U.S.214(1900) N.H. 117 (2015) 10 Mountain View Park, LLC v. Robson, 23, 2016) A.2d 174 (Md. 1985) 5,6 924 N.E.2d 410 (Ohio App. 2009) 4, P.3d 680 (Or. App. 2014) N.H. 115 (2011) 2,9 - N.H. Lake Forest R.V. Resort, Inc. v. Town of Wakefield, Overby v. Gordon, Cases State v. Intercontinental, Ltd., State v. Jacob, State v. Mello, State v. Rose, Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES N.H. Constitution, pt. I, art. 7 12

4 Va. Code Ann N.H. RSA 613:3 8 N.H. RSA ch. 595-A 7 N.H. RSA 490-F:2 3, 7, 8 Mass. Qen. Laws 276 1(2016) 8 Fla. Stat (2)(d) 9 Fla Stat (2)(b) 8 Ohio Rev. Code Ann (Lexis/Nexis 2016) 8 Minn. Stat (2) 5 Cal. Penal Code (b)(1)

5 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Circuit Court correctly ruled that New Hampshire law does not allow it to issue a warrant authorizing a search in another State.* * Citations to the record are as follows: A refers to the Appendix filed with the State s brief; SB refers to the State s brief. 1

6 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND THE FACTS In February 2016, an Ashland police officer applied to the Second Circuit Court, District Division (Plymouth) for a search warrant seeking cell phone records held by AT&T. Al. The application identified CT Corporation System, a Concord-based business, as the local registered agent for AT&T. Al. The search would take place, though, at an AT&T facility in Florida. The court (Rappa, J.) denied the application, citing State v. Mello, 162 N.H. 115 (2011), for the proposition that the court lacked the authority to issue a warrant for an out-ofstate search. Al. The court subsequently received an unsigned memorandum of law filed by the Ashland police, arguing that the court had the authority to issue the warrant. A4-A9. By a written order, the court again denied the request for the warrant, while encouraging the State to appeal to this Court. Al-A3. The State filed a Notice of Appeal, raising the issue of a New Hampshire court s authority to issue a search warrant under these circumstances. 2

7 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT This case raises the question of whether New Hampshire law authorizes New Hampshire courts to issue search warrants that will be executed out-ofstate. This Court must affirm the Circuit Court s ruling, because New Hampshire law does not empower New Hampshire courts to issue extraterritorial search warrants. In order for a court in an issuing state to authorize a search in a host state, two conditions must prevail. First, the issuing state (here, New Hampshire) must have a law allowing its courts to issue warrants authorizing searches in other jurisdictions. Second, the host state (here, Florida) must have a law permitting searches on the authority of out-of-state warrants. Though the second condition is met, the first is not. RSA 490-F:2 limits the Circuit Court s territorial jurisdiction by providing that the circuit court shall be a court of record with statewide jurisdiction. (Emphasis added). Had the legislature intended the Circuit Court to have authority in other states in certain matters such as the issuance of search warrants, it would not have drawn the court s jurisdictional line at New Hampshire s borders. 3

8 4 Hampshire law does not empower New Hampshire courts to issue warrants authorizing searches in other states. Courts have long recognized the principle that every state possesses persons and property without its territory. The several states are of equal can extend its process beyond its territory so as to subject either persons or That principle applies to search warrants. Crossing state lines by subject to search and seizure crosses [the] constitutional line... State v. Jacob, 924 N.E.2d 410, 415 (Ohio App. 2009). Allowing one state s court to determine when property, residences, and residents of another state may be subject to search and seizure would trample the sovereignty of states to determine the procedures by which a warrant may be issued and executed and property to its decisions. Id. at 223. exclusive jurisdiction and sovereignty over persons and property within its Ashland police. SB 3. This Court must reject the State s argument because New territory. Overby v. Gordon, 177 U.S. 214, 222 (1900). A corollary of that dignity and authority, and the independence of one implies the exclusion of power from all others. Id. As a result, no tribunal established by [one State] principle is that no state can exercise direct jurisdiction and authority over IN ANOTHER STATE. DOES NOT ALLOW IT TO ISSUE A WARRANT AUTHORIZING A SEARCH The State contends that a Florida statute effectively confers jurisdiction on New Hampshire courts to issue the search warrant requested by the allowing an Ohio court to determine when California citizens and property are I. THE CIRCUIT COURT PROPERLY RULED THAT NEW HAMPSHIRE LAW

9 of their courts to determine the consequences of a failure to follow those laws. Id. at Of course, a State may choose to permit a court in another state (the issuing state ) to issue warrants authorizing a search in it, the host state. Florida s statute gives such permission. The fact that Florida is prepared to permit searches on the authority of out-of-state warrants, though, does not answer the question of whether New Hampshire law allows New Hampshire courts to issue them. In order for a court in an issuing state to authorize a search in a host state, two conditions must prevail. First, the issuing state must have a law allowing its courts to issue warrants authorizing searches in other jurisdictions. Some states have such laws. See, Cal. Penal Code (b)(1); Minn. Stat (2); Va. Code Ann ; see also State v. Rose, 330 P.3d 680, (Or. App. 2014) (construing Oregon statute as intending to allow Oregon courts to issue warrants authorizing searches in other states). Second, the host state must have a law permitting searches on the authority of out-of-state warrants. Though the second condition is met, the first is not. As Maryland s highest court has noted, [s]earch warrants were recognized at common law; however, their use... was limited to searching for stolen property. State v. Intercontinental, Ltd., 486 A.2d 174, 176 (Md. 1985). In order for a court to authorize a law officer to conduct a search for items other than stolen property, therefore, jsjtatutoiy authority was generally 5

10 Id. The Court construes all parts of a statute together to effectuate its overall will consider legislative history only if the statutory language is ambiguous held by AT&T. This case therefore poses first a question of New Hampshire law: does a New Hampshire statute allow New Hampshire courts to authorize a the intent of the legislature as expressed in the words of the statute considered authority to issue the requested extra-territorial warrant seeking phone records warrants for searches that take place in another state. The State contends that On appeal, this Court s review on questions of statutory interpretation is de statute itself, and, if possible, construe[sj that language according to its plain (August 23, 2016) (slip op. at 4). The Court looks first to the language of the search in another state? and ordinary meaning. Id. The Court will not consider what the legislature purpose and avoid an absurd or unjust result. Id. Furthermore, [the Courti required. Id. By the same logic, a New Hampshire court requires statutory as a whole. Lake Forest R.V. Resort, Inc. v. Town of Wakefield, might have said or add language that the legislature did not see fit to include. N.H. however, does not constitute an authorization. executed in other states. SB 4, 5 n.3, 11. The absence of a prohibition, prohibit New Hampshire courts from issuing search warrants that will be no such statute is necessary because New Hampshire law does not expressly No New Hampshire statute authorizes New Hampshire courts to issue novo. Id. at 3-4. [n matters of statutory interpretation, [this Court isj the final arbiter of

11 issue the warrant here depends on Florida law. New Hampshire police, in court to issue a search warrant. SB 4. Neither, however, does the statute answer to the question of the extraterritorial authority of the Circuit Court must reject that argument. jurisdiction, New Hampshire law contains the same restriction that In effect, on the State s view, the authority of a New Hampshire court to to issue them, must ascertain whether the contemplated host state would allow Because of that statutory limit on the Circuit Court s territorial drawn the court s jurisdictional line at New Hampshire s borders. certain matters, such as the issuance of search warrants, it would not have legislature intended the Circuit Court to have authority in other states in court of record with statewide jurisdiction. (Emphasis added). Had the limit on the court s jurisdiction in providing that the circuit court shall be a Circuit Court s subject-matter jurisdiction, that statute does enact a territorial Contrary to the State s argument, SB 5, that RSA 490-F:2 limits only the must be sought, then, in that court s general jurisdictional statute, RSA 490- expressly authorize the issuance of extra-territorial search warrants. An issuance of search warrants, contains no territorial limit on the authority of a The State points out that RSA ch. 595-A, the statute governing the a search on the authority of warrants issued by out-of-state courts. This Court F:2. 7 Massachusetts law imposes through the statute, cited by the State, SB 4, that seeking such warrants, and New Hampshire magistrates, in deciding whether

12 8 When the legislature intends to allow New Hampshire courts to exercise Florida s (2)(b). That statute empowers Florida courts to issue extra In order for New Hampshire courts to have authority to issue extra by Florida law, New Hampshire law must contain a provision analogous to Witness from Another State summoned to testify in this State, authorizes a statute to the Court s statewide jurisdiction. RSA 490-F:2. that reference in a search warrant statute to the boundaries of the 1(2016); see also Ohio Rev. Code Ann (Lexis/Nexis 2016) (similarly within the commonwealth and territorial waters thereof. Mass. Gen. Laws 276 referring to the authority of a court within his jurisdiction to issue search Commonwealth. New Hampshire law bars the issuance of extraterritorial confers that authority. For example, the New Hampshire statute that enables authorizes Massachusetts s courts to issue warrants for searches anywhere authority beyond the State s borders, a New Hampshire statute expressly warrants). Massachusetts law bars the issuance of extraterritorial warrants by search warrants by the reference in the Circuit Court s general jurisdictional outside the state expressly provides for that authority. RSA 613:3, captioned witness. RSA 6 13:3, I. our courts to cooperate with out-of-state courts in summoning witnesses from judge of a New Hampshire court to issue a certificate under the seal of the territorial search warrants and thus avail themselves of the opportunity offered territorial warrants by requiring corporations located outside Florida to honor a court stating the facts necessary to justify summoning the out-of-state

13 warrant when properly served by a Florida court or other applicant. The statute further establishes a procedure by which the non-florida corporation can seek to quash a subpoena or warrant it believes to have been issued improperly. l1la. Stat (2)(d). Until our legislature endows them with similar authority, New Hampshire courts do not possess it. State v. Mello, 162 N.H. 115 (2011), merely confirms that understanding of the pertinent law. There, this Court noted that the defense had challenged, and the State had conceded, the invalidity of a search warrant purporting to authorize an out-of-state search by New Hampshire police officers. Id. at In the present case, the State argues the point that in Mello it was willing to concede. Nothing in the relevant Federal statutes, 18 U.S.C et seq., alters New Hampshire law governing the territorial jurisdiction of the Circuit Court. 18 U.S.C enacts a prohibition on the voluntary disclosure of customer communications or records by entities such as AT&T. AT&T thus would violate the Federal law if it chose, upon receiving a mere request, to hand over to the police any customer s records. However, when statutory conditions specified in 2703 are met, such companies must provide requested records. See 18 U.S.C. 2702(2)(b)(l) & (c)(1). 18 U.S.C describes those circumstances in which AT&T and similar entities are required to divulge customer records to the police. For example, 2703(a) provides that a governmental entity may require the disclosure of certain records pursuant to a warrant issued... using State 9

14 [tjo the extent that the plaintiff asserts that public 10 Finally, the State advances certain policy considerations that, in its view, show that it would be convenient or preferable if New Hampshire courts could fonvard the requisite information to local authorities in the foreign jurisdiction policy considerations... require us to reverse the trial Moreover, even if this Court were the proper venue for addressing weigh in favor of empowering New Hampshire courts to issue extraterritorial search warrants. 18 U.S.C (3)(B). While those provisions may be nothing in the Federal statute requires States to invest their courts with court of competent jurisdiction is defined as including a court of general criminal jurisdiction of a State authorized by the law of that State to issue court s decision, this argument is made in the wrong forum. Although we appreciate the importance of such Mountain View Park, LLC v. Robson, 168 N.H. 117, 121 (2015) (citations and of addressing the plaintiff s concerns. for the legislature, and we therefore leave to it the task warrant procedures... by a court of competent jurisdiction. The phrase consistent with the extra-territorial warrant procedure desired by the State, authority to issue extra-territorial search warrants. issue extra-territorial search warrants. SB 8-9. As this Court has noted, considerations, matters of public policy are reserved matters of public policy, the relevant policy considerations do not necessarily though, quotation marks omitted). search warrants. As the State acknowledges, New Hampshire police can and ask them to get the warrant, seize the information, and send the

15 11 location in another State. seized evidence could be excluded. SB 9. The State points to nothing to more substantial problem in the electronic communications setting. warrant in the foreign jurisdiction differ from those in New Hampshire, the communications searches, and there is no reason why it should present any police lose control over the warrant, and if it is defective or the standards for a The State suggests that a flaw in that procedure is that New Hampshire when, in other contexts, New Hampshire police want to search a private Florida police, motivated by the desire to conserve their own resources, initially Florida police, if they have any feeling of law enforcement solidarity, would that New Hampshire law does not authorize our courts to issue such warrants, with respect to Florida-based communications companies. SB 9 n.6. Perhaps would direct out-of-state police to their own courts. However, upon learning given that Florida law allows out-of-state courts to issue valid search warrants In a related vein, in a footnote, the State speculates that Florida law courts. SB 9. Florida, however, has obtained the benefits of hosting these large courts to issue extra-territorial warrants would relieve a burden on the Florida corporations, and one can reasonably doubt that processing search warrant applications imposes a burden greater than Florida courts can bear. enforcement officials might refuse to cooperate with New Hampshire police, The State further argues that investing authority in New Hampshire information back to New Hampshire. SB 8. That is presumably what happens indicate, though, that this has proved an insoluble problem in non-electronic

16 12 United States of America in congress assembled ). Our legislature accordingly may not find appealing the idea of allowing courts in other states, without any exercise and enjoy every power, jurisdiction, and right, pertaining thereto, which is not, or may not hereafter be, by them expressly delegated to the same favor to courts in other states, with respect to similar searches in New issue extra-territorial search warrants, it would seem only fair to extend the Hampshire. The political culture of New Hampshire, though; contains a strong element of pride in our sovereignty. See, mg., N.H. Const. pt. I, art. 7 ( The Moreover, if New Hampshire enacted a statute allowing our courts to people of this state have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves as affirm the ruling of the Circuit Court. consider and decide. Because New Hampshire law does not presently allow New Hampshire courts to issue extra-territorial search warrants, this Court should police to conduct a search in New Hampshire. In the end, these are matters for the New Hampshire legislature to need of consultation with a New Hampshire court, to authorize out-of-state New Hampshire-drafted search warrant application to a Florida court. a free, sovereign, and independent state; and do, and forever hereafter shall, assist New Hampshire investigators in the relatively simple task of forwarding a

17 13 DATED: October 12, 2016 postage prepaid, to: Sean R. Locke, Esq. Criminal Bureau Concord, NH The appealed decision is in writing and is appended to the State s brief. 33 Capitol Street New Hampshire Attorney General s Office Undersigned counsel requests fifteen minutes of oral argument before a requests that this Court affirm the ruling of the Circuit Court. Assistant Attorney General I hereby certify that two copies of the foregoing Brief have been mailed, WHEREFORE, the Appellate Defender, as arnicus curiae, respectfully CONCLUSION full panel. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Christopher M. Johnson Concord, NH Ferry Street, Suite 202 Chief Appellate Defender Appellate Defender Program ChriIpher M. JohrsSn, #15149 Bk KV Respectfully submitted,

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE IN RE SEARCH WARRANT FOR RECORDS FROM AT&T. Argued: January 17, 2017 Opinion Issued: June 9, 2017

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE IN RE SEARCH WARRANT FOR RECORDS FROM AT&T. Argued: January 17, 2017 Opinion Issued: June 9, 2017 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE LAKE FOREST R.V. RESORT, INC. TOWN OF WAKEFIELD & a. Argued: February 10, 2016 Opinion Issued: August 23, 2016

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE LAKE FOREST R.V. RESORT, INC. TOWN OF WAKEFIELD & a. Argued: February 10, 2016 Opinion Issued: August 23, 2016 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

No Kevin Lynch

No Kevin Lynch THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT No. 20 15-0358 State of New Hampshire V. Kevin Lynch Appeal to Rule 7 and Cross-Appeal to RSA 606:10 from of the Rockingham County Superior Court Pursuant Pursuant

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ERIC WINDHURST ORDER ON DEFENDANT S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ERIC WINDHURST ORDER ON DEFENDANT S MOTION TO SUPPRESS THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE MERRIMACK, SS SUPERIOR COURT 05-S-1749 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE V. ERIC WINDHURST ORDER ON DEFENDANT S MOTION TO SUPPRESS LYNN, C.J. The defendant, Eric Windhurst, is charged with

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT. No State of New Hampshire. James Fogg

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT. No State of New Hampshire. James Fogg THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT No. 2016-0268 State of New Hampshire v. James Fogg Appeal Pursuant to Rule 7 from Judgment of the Merrimack Superior Court REPLY BRIEF FOR THE DEFENDANT Thomas

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JEFFREY MAXFIELD. Argued: February 19, 2015 Opinion Issued: May 19, 2015

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JEFFREY MAXFIELD. Argued: February 19, 2015 Opinion Issued: May 19, 2015 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES. Argued: October 15, 2014 Opinion Issued: April 30, 2015

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES. Argued: October 15, 2014 Opinion Issued: April 30, 2015 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE RONALD MCKEOWN. Argued: April 16, 2009 Opinion Issued: December 4, 2009

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE RONALD MCKEOWN. Argued: April 16, 2009 Opinion Issued: December 4, 2009 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 15-3452 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Respondent-Appellant. Appeal From

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE RICHARD POLONSKY TOWN OF BEDFORD. Argued: September 14, 2017 Opinion Issued: June 28, 2018

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE RICHARD POLONSKY TOWN OF BEDFORD. Argued: September 14, 2017 Opinion Issued: June 28, 2018 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE MONICA ANDERSON ESTATE OF MARY D. WOOD. Argued: September 13, 2018 Opinion Issued: November 28, 2018

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE MONICA ANDERSON ESTATE OF MARY D. WOOD. Argued: September 13, 2018 Opinion Issued: November 28, 2018 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2016-0219, Petition of Assets Recovery Center, LLC d/b/a Assets Recovery Center of Florida & a., the court on June 16, 2017, issued the following order:

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Sup. Ct. case no. SC07- DCA case no. 1D LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Sup. Ct. case no. SC07- DCA case no. 1D LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Petitioner, vs. STEPHEN S. DOBSON, III, P.A., Sup. Ct. case no. SC07- DCA case no. 1D05-4326 Respondent.

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DAN GARAND. TOWN OF EXETER & a. Argued: March 17, 2009 Opinion Issued: July 31, 2009

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DAN GARAND. TOWN OF EXETER & a. Argued: March 17, 2009 Opinion Issued: July 31, 2009 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION DARREN VICTORIA. Argued: February 22, 2006 Opinion Issued: June 14, 2006

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION DARREN VICTORIA. Argued: February 22, 2006 Opinion Issued: June 14, 2006 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

State Statutory Provisions Addressing Mutual Protection Orders

State Statutory Provisions Addressing Mutual Protection Orders State Statutory Provisions Addressing Mutual Protection Orders Revised 2014 National Center on Protection Orders and Full Faith & Credit 1901 North Fort Myer Drive, Suite 1011 Arlington, Virginia 22209

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DREW FULLER. Argued: May 5, 2016 Opinion Issued: June 14, 2016

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DREW FULLER. Argued: May 5, 2016 Opinion Issued: June 14, 2016 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND Roderick Chavez, et al. Case Number: CAL 12-3774 Plaintiffs, v. Defendants. MOTION FOR ORDER OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT COME NOW, Plaintiffs, by and

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HEIDI BROUILLETTE. Argued: March 5, 2014 Opinion Issued: July 11, 2014

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HEIDI BROUILLETTE. Argued: March 5, 2014 Opinion Issued: July 11, 2014 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

v No Mackinac Circuit Court

v No Mackinac Circuit Court S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S FRED PAQUIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION October 19, 2017 9:00 a.m. v No. 334350 Mackinac Circuit Court CITY OF ST. IGNACE, LC No. 2015-007789-CZ

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. PETITION OF STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (State of New Hampshire v. Michael Lewandowski)

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. PETITION OF STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (State of New Hampshire v. Michael Lewandowski) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO. THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D02-100 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 00-20940 CA 01 MICHAEL E. HUMER Petitioner/Appellant, Vs. MIAMI-DADE

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NATALIE ANDERSON ADAM ROBITAILLE. Submitted: November 13, 2018 Opinion Issued: March 8, 2019

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NATALIE ANDERSON ADAM ROBITAILLE. Submitted: November 13, 2018 Opinion Issued: March 8, 2019 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

If it hasn t happened already, at some point

If it hasn t happened already, at some point An Introduction to Obtaining Out-of-State Discovery in State and Federal Court Litigation by Brenda M. Johnson If it hasn t happened already, at some point in your practice you will be faced with the prospect

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD., ) No. 1 CA-CV 12-0545 a Minnesota corporation, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) v. ) DEPARTMENT C ) FIVE STAR DEVELOPMENT RESORT

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE WILLIAM L. O'BRIEN. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEMOCRATIC PARTY & a.

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE WILLIAM L. O'BRIEN. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEMOCRATIC PARTY & a. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA MARCOS SAYAGO, individually, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: 2014-CA- Division BILL COWLES, in his official capacity as Supervisor

More information

DISTRICT COURT, PUEBLO COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 320 West 10th Street Pueblo, Colorado 81003

DISTRICT COURT, PUEBLO COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 320 West 10th Street Pueblo, Colorado 81003 DISTRICT COURT, PUEBLO COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 320 West 10th Street Pueblo, Colorado 81003 Plaintiff(s): COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION, v. Defendant(s): PUEBLO COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME] [Student Name], v. [Public Agency], IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME] Plaintiff, Defendant Case No. [Number] COMPLAINT Action for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: U. S. (1999) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GABRIEL LAU, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Filed: July 2, 2007

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GABRIEL LAU, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Filed: July 2, 2007 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GABRIEL LAU, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Filed: July 2, 2007 Cite as: 2007 Guam 4 Supreme Court Case No.: CRA06-003 Superior Court

More information

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: L.T. No.: SC12-573 3D10-2415, 10-6837 ANTHONY MACKEY, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. AMICUS CURIAE FLORIDA CARRY, INC. S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT FLETCHER

More information

REPLY OF APPELLANT, DIMP POWELL

REPLY OF APPELLANT, DIMP POWELL E-Filed Document May 7 2014 17:34:51 2013-EC-00928-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2013-TS-00928 DIMP POWELL, V. MUNICIPAL ELECTION COMMISSION, APPELLANT APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE

More information

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. SC08-2389 ERVIN A. HIGGS, as Property Appraiser of Monroe County, Florida 3D08-564 L.C. Case No. 2007-CA-000470-K v. Petitioner, WILLIAM LEO WARRICK,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC L. T. CASE NO.: 4D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC L. T. CASE NO.: 4D IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1644 L. T. CASE NO.: 4D04-1970 SANDRA H. LAND, vs. Petitioner, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER Rebecca J. Covey,

More information

2016 IL App (2d) No Opinion filed June 9, 2016 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT

2016 IL App (2d) No Opinion filed June 9, 2016 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT No. 2-15-0917 Opinion filed June 9, 2016 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT THE HAMPSHIRE TOWNSHIP ROAD ) Appeal from the Circuit Court DISTRICT, ) of Kane County. ) Plaintiff-Appellant,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS NEW CENTER COMMONS CONDOMINIUMS ASSOCIATION, UNPUBLISHED June 24, 2014 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 314702 Wayne Circuit Court ANDRE ESPINO and QUICKEN LOANS, INC., LC

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ULYSSES MCMILLAN. Argued: February 12, 2009 Opinion Issued: May 29, 2009

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ULYSSES MCMILLAN. Argued: February 12, 2009 Opinion Issued: May 29, 2009 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

DAVIS v. GALE Cite as 299 Neb N.W.2d

DAVIS v. GALE Cite as 299 Neb N.W.2d Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/04/2018 07:13 PM CDT - 377 - Tyler A. Davis, relator, v. John A. Gale, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. KEN GRANT & a. TOWN OF BARRINGTON. Argued: January 31, 2008 Opinion Issued: March 13, 2008

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. KEN GRANT & a. TOWN OF BARRINGTON. Argued: January 31, 2008 Opinion Issued: March 13, 2008 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

Case 2:14-cv TLN-CKD Document 19 Filed 03/05/15 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:14-cv TLN-CKD Document 19 Filed 03/05/15 Page 1 of 11 Case :-cv-0-tln-ckd Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 DIANE F. BOYER-VINE (SBN: Legislative Counsel ROBERT A. PRATT (SBN: 0 Principal Deputy Legislative Counsel CARA L. JENKINS (SBN: Deputy Legislative Counsel

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JOHN T. BRAWLEY. Argued: June 14, 2018 Opinion Issued: September 18, 2018

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JOHN T. BRAWLEY. Argued: June 14, 2018 Opinion Issued: September 18, 2018 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff, THOMAS HARRY BRAY, Defendant. J. B., Appellant,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff, THOMAS HARRY BRAY, Defendant. J. B., Appellant, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Filed: November 0, 01 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS HARRY BRAY, Defendant. J. B., Appellant, v. THOMAS HARRY BRAY; BRIGID TURNER, prosecuting attorney;

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE IN RE TREVOR G. Argued: January 16, 2014 Opinion Issued: February 7, 2014

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE IN RE TREVOR G. Argued: January 16, 2014 Opinion Issued: February 7, 2014 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2018] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2018] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #18-3052 Document #1760663 Filed: 11/19/2018 Page 1 of 17 [ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2018] No. 18-3052 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT IN RE:

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: DAVID M. PAYNE Ryan & Payne Marion, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana MARA MCCABE Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA United States of America, Crim. File No. 01-221 (PAM/ESS) Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Dale Robert Bach, Defendant. This matter is before the Court

More information

State of New Hampshire Supreme Court

State of New Hampshire Supreme Court State of New Hampshire Supreme Court NO. 2014-0371 2014 TERM NOVEMBER SESSION ANN & RICHARD DALEY v. LINDA BABIGIAN RULE 7 APPEAL OF FINAL DECISION OF THE ROCKINGHAM COUNTY AND HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY (NORTH)

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. STANLEY COLLA & a. TOWN OF HANOVER. Submitted: November 16, 2005 Opinion Issued: January 27, 2006

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. STANLEY COLLA & a. TOWN OF HANOVER. Submitted: November 16, 2005 Opinion Issued: January 27, 2006 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF ILLINOIS 2018 IL 121995 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 121995) THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee, v. MARK E. LASKOWSKI et al. (Pacific Realty Group, LLC, Appellant). Opinion filed

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE WAYNE H. KASSOTIS TOWN OF FITZWILLIAM. Argued: April 16, 2014 Opinion Issued: August 28, 2014

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE WAYNE H. KASSOTIS TOWN OF FITZWILLIAM. Argued: April 16, 2014 Opinion Issued: August 28, 2014 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. a juvenile, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. BRIEF OF PETITIONER ON JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. a juvenile, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. BRIEF OF PETITIONER ON JURISDICTION N THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORDA CASE NO. L.C., a juvenile, Petitioner, \ "\ \ '- \ -vs- THE STATE OF FLORDA, Respondent. BREF OF PETTONER ON JURSDCTON ON PETTON FOR DSCRETONARY REVEW FROM THE DSTRCT COURT

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C. D. Michel - S.B.N. 1 Sean A. Brady - S.B.N. MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, LLP E. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 00 Long Beach, CA 00 Telephone: -1- Facsimile: -1- Attorneys for Proposed Relator SUPERIOR COURT OF THE

More information

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT LUZHAK, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION

More information

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals RENDERED: JULY 13, 2012; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2010-CA-001691-DG CONNIE BLACKWELL APPELLANT ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE B193327

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE B193327 Filed 10/17/07 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE UNZIPPED APPAREL, LLC, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B193327 (Los Angeles

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY [Cite as Ross Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Roop, 2011-Ohio-1748.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY : COMMISSIONERS OF ROSS : Case No. 10CA3161 COUNTY, OHIO,

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. BEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT & a. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE & a. Argued: April 17, 2018 Opinion Issued: August 17, 2018

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. BEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT & a. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE & a. Argued: April 17, 2018 Opinion Issued: August 17, 2018 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PATRICK CANTWELL J & R PROPERTIES UNLIMITED, INC. Argued: April 3, 2007 Opinion Issued: May 30, 2007

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PATRICK CANTWELL J & R PROPERTIES UNLIMITED, INC. Argued: April 3, 2007 Opinion Issued: May 30, 2007 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, SHANNON L. BROWN n/k/a SHANNON L. HAYES v.

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, SHANNON L. BROWN n/k/a SHANNON L. HAYES v. UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2202 September Term, 2015 SHANNON L. BROWN n/k/a SHANNON L. HAYES v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC. t/a SANTANDER AUTO FINANCE Friedman, *Krauser,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MORGAN STANLEY MORTGAGE HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2005-1, by Trustee DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, UNPUBLISHED October 16, 2014 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 316181

More information

RETURN: This summons may not be served later than three (3) days before the date of appearance. Dated NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF

RETURN: This summons may not be served later than three (3) days before the date of appearance. Dated NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF STATE OF ILLINOIS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY Plaintiff Case No. AR Vs. Defendant THIS IS AN ARBITRATION CASE SUMMONS To: each defendant: You are hereby summoned

More information

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION Page D-1 ANNEX D REQUEST FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PANEL BY ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION WT/DS285/2 13 June 2003 (03-3174) Original: English UNITED STATES MEASURES AFFECTING THE CROSS-BORDER

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE MERRIMACK, SS. SUPERIOR COURT The State of New Hampshire v. Owen Labrie No. 14-CR-617 ORDER The defendant, Owen Labrie, was tried on one count of certain uses of computer services

More information

CACJ CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE

CACJ CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE February 10, 2015 Please respond to: JOHN T. PHILIPSBORN The Honorable Frank A. McGuire Law Offices of J.T. Philipsborn Clerk, California Supreme Court 507 Polk Street, #350 Supreme Court of California

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1564 ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: INITIATIVE EXTENDING SALES TAX TO NON-TAXED SERVICES WHERE EXCLUSION FAILS TO SERVE PUBLIC PURPOSE / INITIAL

More information

BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 255

BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 255 e r e BENNAL REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 255 politan Development Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-754; 43 U.S.C. 901-906)? 2. s the Florida Development Commission authorized to administer a statewide training and

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. APPEAL OF ANNELIE MULLEN (New Hampshire Department of Employment Security)

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. APPEAL OF ANNELIE MULLEN (New Hampshire Department of Employment Security) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. SCOTT L. BACH & a. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY. Argued: February 10, 2016 Opinion Issued: June 2, 2016

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. SCOTT L. BACH & a. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY. Argued: February 10, 2016 Opinion Issued: June 2, 2016 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA JOHN KAZANJIAN, ETC. Petitioner, vs. SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, ET. AL. Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA JOHN KAZANJIAN, ETC. Petitioner, vs. SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, ET. AL. Respondent. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-2284 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D05-4371 JOHN KAZANJIAN, ETC. Petitioner, vs. SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, ET. AL. Respondent. PETITIONER'S

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 118-cv-00443-CCC-KAJ-JBS Document 38 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JACOB CORMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT TORRES, et

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 0:16-cv JIC

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 0:16-cv JIC Case: 16-13477 Date Filed: 10/09/2018 Page: 1 of 14 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-13477 D.C. Docket No. 0:16-cv-60197-JIC MICHAEL HISEY, Plaintiff

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ORANGE, vs. Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC04-2045 Lower Tribunal No.: 5D03-4065 RALEIGH WILSON, SR. EVELYN WILSON and RALEIGH WILSON, JR., Respondents.

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. HELEN MARTIN & a. PAT S PEAK, INC. Argued: February 18, 2009 Opinion Issued: May 21, 2009

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. HELEN MARTIN & a. PAT S PEAK, INC. Argued: February 18, 2009 Opinion Issued: May 21, 2009 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA Village Center Circle, Suite 0 Las Vegas, NV Telephone: (0) - Fax: (0) -0 MOT STANDISH LAW GROUP, LLC THOMAS J. STANDISH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. tjs@juww.com Village Center Circle, #0 Telephone: (0)- Facsimile:

More information

Recall of County Commissioners

Recall of County Commissioners M E M O R A N D U M TO: 2016 Pinellas County Charter Review Commission FROM: Wade C. Vose, Esq., General Counsel DATE: SUBJECT: Preliminary Legal Analysis of Proposed Recall Provision Relating to County

More information

ORDER AFFIRMED. Division VI Opinion by JUDGE LICHTENSTEIN Hawthorne and Booras, JJ., concur. Announced August 4, 2011

ORDER AFFIRMED. Division VI Opinion by JUDGE LICHTENSTEIN Hawthorne and Booras, JJ., concur. Announced August 4, 2011 COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 10CA1409 Morgan County District Court No. 10CV38 Honorable Douglas R. Vannoy, Judge Ronald E. Henderson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Fort Morgan, a municipal

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. APPEAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION OF STATE POLICE (New Hampshire Personnel Appeals Board)

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. APPEAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION OF STATE POLICE (New Hampshire Personnel Appeals Board) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

CASE NO. SC L.T. CASE NO. 4D IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE STANEK-COUSINS, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

CASE NO. SC L.T. CASE NO. 4D IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE STANEK-COUSINS, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. SC05-1987 L.T. CASE NO. 4D05-1129 ========================================================== IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE STANEK-COUSINS, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SHANNON GALLAGHER THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE TIMOTHY A. HUGHES

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SHANNON GALLAGHER THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE TIMOTHY A. HUGHES NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KENNETH JENKINS, v. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC04-2088 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 1:18-cv-00443-CCC-KAJ-JBS Document 79 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JACOB CORMAN, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : ROBERT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARIANNE F. CASWELL, v. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC04-014 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-947

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-947 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-947 ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: FAIRNESS INITIATIVE REQUIRING LEGISLATIVE DETERMINATION THAT SALES TAX EXEMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS SERVE A PUBLIC

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. APPEAL OF BEVERLY DESMARAIS (New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board)

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. APPEAL OF BEVERLY DESMARAIS (New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 110 MAP 2016 DAVID W. SMITH and DONALD LAMBRECHT, Appellees, v. GOVERNOR THOMAS W. WOLF, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE KEVIN BALCH. Argued: May 15, 2014 Opinion Issued: January 29, 2015

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE KEVIN BALCH. Argued: May 15, 2014 Opinion Issued: January 29, 2015 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV

STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI RUSSELL

More information

FIFTY STATES AND D.C. SURVEY OF LAWS THAT AUTHORIZE OR RECOGNIZE PRIVATE CITIZEN-INITIATED INVESTIGATION AND/OR PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES

FIFTY STATES AND D.C. SURVEY OF LAWS THAT AUTHORIZE OR RECOGNIZE PRIVATE CITIZEN-INITIATED INVESTIGATION AND/OR PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES FIFTY STATES AND D.C. SURVEY OF LAWS THAT AUTHORIZE OR RECOGNIZE PRIVATE CITIZEN-INITIATED INVESTIGATION AND/OR PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES The National Crime Victim Law Institute (NCVLI) makes no

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2014

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2014 DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2014 WE HELP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida non-profit corporation, Appellant, v. CIRAS, LLC, an Ohio limited

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE S COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO THE THREE-YEAR CYCLE REPORT OF THE FAMILY LAW RULES COMMITTEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE S COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO THE THREE-YEAR CYCLE REPORT OF THE FAMILY LAW RULES COMMITTEE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES CASE NO. 08-09 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE S COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO THE THREE-YEAR CYCLE REPORT OF THE FAMILY LAW RULES

More information

JEFFREY M. GRAY. TERI E. KELLY & a. Submitted: September 8, 2010 Opinion Issued: November 24, 2010

JEFFREY M. GRAY. TERI E. KELLY & a. Submitted: September 8, 2010 Opinion Issued: November 24, 2010 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BAILEY P. SERPA. Argued: January 18, 2018 Opinion Issued: May 24, 2018

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BAILEY P. SERPA. Argued: January 18, 2018 Opinion Issued: May 24, 2018 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SARA REALTY, LLC COUNTRY POND FISH AND GAME CLUB, INC. Argued: February 18, 2009 Opinion Issued: April 9, 2009

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SARA REALTY, LLC COUNTRY POND FISH AND GAME CLUB, INC. Argued: February 18, 2009 Opinion Issued: April 9, 2009 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc RUTH CAMPBELL, ET AL., ) ) Appellants, ) ) vs. ) No. SC94339 ) COUNTY COMMISSION OF ) FRANKLIN COUNTY, ) ) Respondent, ) ) and ) ) UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, ) d/b/a AMEREN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. In re: Two accounts stored at Google, Case No. 17-M-1235 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. In re: Two  accounts stored at Google, Case No. 17-M-1235 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re: Information associated with one Yahoo email address that is stored at premises controlled by Yahoo Case No. 17-M-1234 In re: Two email

More information

In the District Court of Appeal Second District of Florida

In the District Court of Appeal Second District of Florida In the District Court of Appeal Second District of Florida CASE NO. 2D14-1906 (Lower Tribunal Case No. 10-009347-CI-33) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellant, v. DEBORAH GRIFFIN, Appellee. INITIAL BRIEF OF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KEVIN TRACY. v. Petitioner, Case No. SC07-2057 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS PATE TALLAHASSEE

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. PETITION OF THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (State v. James Milner)

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. PETITION OF THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (State v. James Milner) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A Court of Appeals McKeig, J.

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A Court of Appeals McKeig, J. STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A17-1210 Court of Appeals McKeig, J. In re the Matter of the Annexation of Certain Real Property to the City of Proctor Filed: March 27, 2019 from Midway Township Office

More information