CLSA Response to the JAG consultation on regulatory changes to support QASA (Crime)
|
|
- Audra Kelley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CLSA Response to the JAG consultation on regulatory changes to support QASA (Crime) Criminal Law Solicitors Association Suite 2 Level 6 New England House, New England Street Brighton, BN1 4GH DX 2740 Brighton sue@clsa.co.uk Tel:
2 The Criminal Law Solicitors' Association is the only national association entirely committed to professionals working in the field of criminal law. The CLSA represents criminal practitioners throughout England and Wales and membership of the Association is open to any solicitor prosecution or defence and to legal advisers, qualified or trainee involved with, or interested in, the practice of criminal law. The CLSA is responding to the consultation on behalf of its members. Introduction We shall deal with the proposed Regulatory changes below, dealing with each question in turn. We wish to make some general comments about the scheme that underpins these regulations. The CLSA does not accept the need for the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates. Criminal defence lawyers are already highly regulated and those who exercise higher rights have already undergone an accreditation process and are required to have 6 hours advocacy specific CPD per annum. There is no substantial evidence that there is a widespread problem of advocates being instructed outside their competence and unsubstantiated anecdotes and alleged judicial whisperings do not provide a sound basis for this process. There has been no detailed study to determine if there is in fact a problem that needs addressing. Criminal advocacy is not high risk work and the SRA would be better advised looking at areas such as ancillary relief and personal injury which generate claims against the profession. The proposals artificially restrict the choice of Advocate. The use of a funding order table of cases to determine the Level of advocate deemed appropriate to deal with the case ignores the many variables of complexity and gravity that may arise in any given case. The scheme is bureaucratic, costly and time consuming both for Advocates and Judges. There are also issues of sustainability of publicly funded Criminal Defence firms and client choice. Constant cuts in criminal legal aid funding have meant that the profitability of many firms depends on the use of solicitor advocates. Under the present scheme it will be difficult for some Solicitor Advocates to undertake sufficient trials to achieve Levels 2 and above, notwithstanding that they are at present competently representing clients on Guilty Pleas and other pre trial work. The effect may be to drive many firms over the edge in terms of profitability. This may have an adverse impact upon access to Justice. We consider the scheme provides an unfair advantage to the Bar and the chambers model of working. Solicitor Advocates tend to mix up their practice to include Criminal Litigation work, Magistrates Court work and police station advice. They conduct fewer trials that barristers owing to the listing system that favours a chambers model of working. We are further concerned that the over reliance on judicial evaluation favours the Bar. There is a perception, perhaps supported by some unfortunate and unfounded comments from Judges that have received substantial publicity, that the Judiciary are pro Bar and hostile to Solicitor Advocates. 2
3 Further, there are judges who are from time to time unnecessarily unpleasant and rude. They would not be the appropriate people to assess cases that might for make or break an advocate s career. We believe that we speak for the overwhelming majority of Criminal Defence Firms in saying that this Regulatory Scheme is an unnecessary, bureaucratic and expensive burden and we urge the SRA at this late stage to review the necessity to regulate Solicitors in this way. If the SRA does proceed in the face of overwhelming objection from the profession, then we invite the SRA to re examine in detail the mechanics of this scheme and to consider in particular the following: Removing the presumption that known guilty pleas should be conducted by an Advocate accredited under the new scheme at the offence level. If guilty plea cases are to be required to be conducted by an advocate under the new scheme then cracked trials and guilty plea mitigations, not just trial advocacy, should be capable of being a part of the evaluation process. Removing all judicial accreditation from the assessment route which is set out as a direct alternative to Judicial evaluation. Revisit the classification of cases by relying on the Funding Order Classes. This is dealt with in some detail in the consultation response below. Delaying the roll out of the scheme until a proper pilot involving all advocates at a specific Court centre has been carried out. Phasing the roll out across circuits. Automatic pass porting at Level 2 of all HRAs accredited in the last 5 years (parallel with QCs). Extending the period for self accreditation to go back 5 years and the basket of cases should include cracked trials and guilty pleas. Abandoning the requirement that evaluation must be of consecutive cases. This avoids prejudicing an Advocate appearing in a case with a client who wants to put forward an unattractive case or where a particular relationship between an Advocate and a Judge is strained. If all Judges can be trusted to evaluate fairly and robustly then there should be no fear in allowing advocates to pick, say, any 5 cases over a given period to be assessed. It also preserves fearless advocacy in an unattractive case. Remove the requirement for lead juniors to be one level below the leader. Revisit the QASA entry points for each case (the default level) at Page 3 of Appendix 3 of the JAG proposed scheme which has a requirement for youth court trials to be conducted by Level 2 advocates. This flies in the face of existing practise in those courts without any evidence that there is a problem that needs addressing nor that any additional funding will be available for this work to be conducted by a crown court advocate. 3
4 Response to proposed Regulatory changes Solicitors Regulation Authority proposed regulatory changes Q 1.01 Please comment on these amendments in respect of any impacts you foresee on the interests of the proper administration of justice and the rule of law, or on the public interest. (See p. 6) Magistrates Courts work We do not believe that the report of Lord Carter into the procurement of Legal Aid in 2006 envisaged the implementation of a Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates in the Magistrates Courts and there has never been any reported widespread concern or evidential basis to suggest that there is an issue surrounding the general quality of Magistrates Courts Advocacy. Publicly funded advocates must already be part of a firm that is Quality Assured by the Legal Services Commission. In the absence of evidence of a problem we can see no justification for regulatory intervention at this level. The public interest is not served as firms will have to pass on the cost of accrediting their advocates either to the Public purse as part of the price competitive tendering process that is envisaged by the LSC or by increasing fees to private clients. Most Criminal Defence firms are Small and Medium sized enterprises ("SME's") and any unnecessary increase in bureaucracy and cost to SMEs is to be deplored. Some clients want a Solicitor to represent them who may not regularly practise in the Magistrates Court. They may not be QASA accredited but may have the confidence of the client and capability to carry out the work. It canot be in the public interest to impede client choice in this way in the absence of any evidential basis of a problem. Q 1.02 Please add any other comments you may have on these amendments. (See p. 6) The proposed rule envisages no exceptions. However, some cases may require specialist knowledge. Take, for example, the case of a Solicitor who specialises in Health and Safety matters. He or she may not practise regularly enough in Court to obtain a QASA accreditation. However, if a client is prosecuted for a Health and Safety breach then that solicitor may be be perfectly capable of putting their case. Indeed, they may put it better than a non Health & Safety specialist with QASA accreditation. This rule would prevent them from doing so. The BSB rules specifically provide for such niche practitioners not to be accredited We suggest that the rule should continue with words to the effect of: save where you have particular expertise in an area of law, have explained to your client that you are not QASA accredited and your client agrees to you appearing on their behalf in Court." Q 1.03 Please comment on these amendments in respect of any impacts you foresee on the interests of the proper administration of justice and the rule of law, or on the public interest. (See p. 8) 4
5 Crown Court Work These proposals as presently drafted will undoubtedly reduce the number of Solicitor Advocates practising in the Crown court particularily at Levels 3 and 4; this is because the presently drafted scheme ( which is perceived by many to be Barcentric ) will make it difficult for perfectly competent Solicitor Advocates to perform the requisite number of cases within the period required for passporting. At all levels many Solicitor Advocates who are not trial advocates will be excluded from the scheme altogether. This will have an impact both on client choice as in the magistrates court (arguably the solcitor whom the client knows and trusts is best placed to represent him particularly on a guilty plea) and also on sustainability of practices and of the supplier base which will become overly concentrated in the hands of the Bar We are concerned that there has been no proper impact assessment on the effect of the Regulations on the sustainability of the supplier basis Q 1.04 Please add any other comments you may have on these amendments. (See p. 8) We consider the scheme as presently drafted relies far too heavily on judicial evaluation and that the assessment route is not a direct alternative at levels 3 and 4 as judicial evaluation is required following successful completion of assessment. We consider there should be a pure assessment route for all levels which could include an assessment of live advocacy if appropriate. The makeup of a solicitors practice is very different to that of a barristers chambers and such an alternative would recognise this difference. The present scheme also discriminates against those Higher Rights Advocates who have mixed practices (again more likely to be solicitors than barristers) who may be practising advocacy to a very high standard at circuit or high court level but cannot rely on this for accreditation Q 1.05 Please comment on this amendment in respect of any impacts you foresee on the interests of the proper administration of justice and the rule of law, or on the public interest. (See p. 10) Who are the "parties" referred to in this guidance? It cannot be the parties to the case since the Crown Prosecution Service should have no say in the level of Advocate for the Defence. Neither should the Judge be able to compel the Defendant to have a particular Advocate. The joint submission to the LSB by the JAG includes at Appendix 3 guidance on identifying the appropriate level of advocate for a particular case. It includes the following " the decision to accept instructions is a matter of professional conduct, for each advocate to decide having regard to their own competence." We respectfully agree with this proposition. The guidance sets out a helpful example of when the level of Advocate may depart from the usual level. " in a relatively straightforward level 4 case (eg high value dishonesty with simple facts) a level 3 advocate might be more appropriate." There are very many cases when it may be appropriate to depart from the indicated level of advocate. In particular we point out that: 5
6 1. The level of advocate required is dictated by the level of case and the level of case follows Classes of cases (A H) set out in the LSC funding provisions for advocates and litigators for Crown Court work. Whilst we can see the superficial attraction of this as the basis of advocate grading it is, on analysis, a poor indicator of the level of advocate required. Within the Classes there are significant anomalies. For example, Counterfeiting is a Class G offence and would require a Level 4 advocate. This includes having passing counterfeit notes or coins. Someone might stand trial for passing a single 20 note that they say they didn't know was counterfeit. The issue is very simple and the case well within the competence of a level 2 Advocate and yet the scheme envisages a level 4 advocate. There are other cases that stand out as being in the "wrong" class for these purposes. We highlight just some: Level 4 cases Having indecent photographs of Children All of the Class F offences of dishonesty where the value exceeds 100,000 (The value may have no bearing on the complexity of the case) Money laundering offences of any value Armed Robbery (including armed with any offensive weapon or any imitation firearm) Aggravated Burglary Blackmail False imprisonment Threats to kill Importing class A or class B drugs Possession of Class A or Class B drugs with intent to supply Violent disorder GBH with intent The offences above would be regarded as standard Crown Court work that most competent Advocates of 5 years call or more should be able to cope with at trial, absent any particularly complicating factors. Looking at the QASA standards they are offences that one would expect any level 3 advocate to be able to deal with and yet the scheme envisages the instruction of a level 4 advocate. Some level 3 cases that stand out are: 6
7 Indecent exposure Voyeurism All of the Class F offences of dishonesty where the value exceeds 30,000 (The value may have no bearing on the complexity of the case) The above and other cases within Level 3 may well be within the competence of an experienced Magistrates Court Trial Advocate who has obtained Level 2 accreditation in the Crown Court. 2. Perhaps the most important factor that would suggest a lower level advocate is a known guilty plea. Save in the most exceptional circumstances the conduct of a guilty plea case lacks almost all the complexities and burdens of a Crown Court Trial. Many Solicitor Advocates regularly deal with guilty plea cases but choose not to conduct trials. Solicitors are generally good mitigators and Sentencing Guidelines assist both Advocates and Judges. Of course, there is an art to good mitigation but in our experience a level 2 trial will be substantially more difficult than a level 4 guilty plea. Consequently, a known guilty plea would be a good reason to depart from the indicative level of advocate. We respectfully suggest that the guidance should incorporate and amplify the QASA guidance along the lines of: "In order to certified. However, there may be circumstances in which a more or less experienced advocate is appropriate. For instance, in a relatively straightforward level 4 case (eg high value dishonesty with simple facts) a level 3 advocate might be more appropriate or in a lcase where it is known that the client will plead guilty then it might be appropriate to instruct a lower level advocate." We find that examples usually help when Solicitors have to interpret SRA guidance. Q 1.06 Please add any other comments you may have on this amendment. (See p. 10) It is of some surprise that the QASA scheme does not seek to differentiate between cases expected to go to trial and those where the client's instructions are that he will plead guilty. Whilst of course good advocacy principles apply to both cases there is a qualitative difference in the nature of these cases and there is no evidence that there is or has been any problem with the way in which solicitors have conducted mitigation in the Crown Court. The use of the Funding order categories to decide the level of advocate is a blunt instrument and contains many anomalies that will justify instruction of an advocate at a different level than suggested by the QASA scheme. The classification of offences is far too heavily biased towards levels 3 and 4 and will have funding implications if it remains as drafted as many categories of work currently undertaken by level 3 and below will now be undertaken by Level 4 and are likely to be the subject of an application for a QC certificate. 7
8 We would assert bluntly that the categorisation of offences for each level as currently drafted is wrong in principle and as such will lead to injustice; further that any categorisation much allow for fluidity between levels both upwards and downwards dependent on complexity etc. Q 1.07 Please comment on this amendment in respect of any impacts you foresee on the interests of the proper administration of justice and the rule of law, or on the public interest. (See p. 12) We would only repeat that if the period for reaccreditation is five years then it follows that for passporting the period over which experience is assessed should also be five years not eighteen months as currently proposed Q 1.08 Please add any other comments you may have on this amendment. (See p. 12) We have no additional comments. Q 1.09 Please comment on these amendments in respect of any impacts you foresee on the interests of the proper administration of justice and the rule of law, or on the public interest. (See p. 17) We have no specific comments upon the regulations as drafted. However, we suggest that it should be the aim of the SRA to make amendments to the LPC course to include opitonal enhanced Advocacy modules that enable a Solicitor on admission to be recognised as a Level 2 QASA Advocate, in line with the Bar Vocactional Course that allow Barristers to have Higher Rights of audience following the BVC and 6 months pupillage. Q 1.10 Please add any other comments you may have on these amendments. (See p. 17) We have no additional comment. Q 1.11 Please comment on these amendments in respect of any impacts you foresee on the interests of the proper administration of justice and the rule of law, or on the public interest. (See p. 19) We have no comment on this proposed regulation. Q 1.12 Please add any other comments you may have on these amendments. (See p. 19) We have no additional comment. Q 1.13 Please comment on these amendments in respect of any impacts you foresee on the interests of the proper administration of justice and the rule of law, or on the public interest. (See p. 21) We have no comment on this proposed regulation. Q 1.14 Please add any other comments you may have on these amendments. (See p. 21) We have no additional comment. ILEX Professional Standards proposed regulatory changes Q 2.01 Should IPS separate the entry and course criteria from the Rights of Audience Certification Rules. If not please give reasons. (See p. 36) 8
9 Q 2.02 Provide any comments you have on the definitions added into the Rules. Do you agree that the definitions adequately reflect the principles of the quality assurance scheme? If not, please indicate any changes that should be made. (See p. 37) Q 2.03 Do the appeal rules adequately reflect the proposals on appeals developed by JAG? (See p. 38) Q 2.04 Do the rules adequately reflect the proposals developed by JAG as to reaccreditation. (See p. 39) Q 2.05 Do the rules adequately reflect the proposals developed by JAG that IPS may receive referrals about the competence of advocates from JAG and seek an independent assessor to assess an advocate. (See p. 40) Q 2.06 Do the knowledge and experience guidelines, portfolio guidelines, course outcomes and assessment criteria adequately reflect the standards developed for the quality assurance scheme for advocates. (See p. 40) Bar Standards Board proposed regulatory changes Q 3.01 Comments are welcome on whether the Rules create any difficulty in their application either for individual barristers or for any particular group (protected groups or otherwise) of advocates; (See p. 84) Q 3.02 Comments are welcome on whether the impact of the Rules on the interests of the proper administration of justice and the rule of law, or on the public interest. (See p. 85) Q 3.03 Comments are invited on this proposal. (See p. 87 9
The Core Principles Parity in respect of qualification of Grades The Method of Certification Assessment Centres Forced or Voluntary Leave of Absence
JAG Consultation paper on regulatory changes to Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) Response from South Eastern Circuit and Criminal Bar Association Introduction The original JAG consultation
More informationQuality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (Crime) Invitation to Tender
Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (Crime) Invitation to Tender Joint Advocacy Group, December 2011 Page 1 of 110 Table of Contents PART 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS.................................................
More informationRESPONSE OF CHANCERY BAR ASSOCIATION TO JAG S FOURTH CONSULTATION PAPER ON THE QUALITY ASSURANCE SCHEME FOR ADVOCATES (CRIME)
RESPONSE OF CHANCERY BAR ASSOCIATION TO JAG S FOURTH CONSULTATION PAPER ON THE QUALITY ASSURANCE SCHEME FOR ADVOCATES (CRIME) Introduction 1. This is the response of the Chancery Bar Association ( the
More informationTHE CRIMINAL BAR ASSOCIATION High Holborn. London WC1V 7HZ DX 240 LDE
THE CRIMINAL BAR ASSOCIATION www.criminalbar.com 289-293 High Holborn London WC1V 7HZ DX 240 LDE 020 7 242 1289 ILEX PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS LTD S CONSULTATION PAPER ON THE PROPOSAL FOR ILEX MEMBERS TO
More informationASSOCIATE PROSECUTOR RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND LITIGATION CERTIFICATION RULES
ASSOCIATE PROSECUTOR RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND LITIGATION CERTIFICATION RULES August 2017 ASSOCIATE PROSECUTOR RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND LITIGATION CERTIFICATION RULES DEFINITIONS 1. In these Rules, except where
More informationTransforming legal aid: delivering a more credible and efficient system
Transforming legal aid: delivering a more credible and efficient system Response of the Bar Standards Board Introduction 1. This is the response of the Bar Standards Board (BSB), the independent regulator
More informationQuality Assurance Scheme for Advocates
Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates 1 October 2015 Summary 1. The Joint Advocacy Group (JAG), comprising CILEx Regulation, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and the Bar Standards Board (BSB)
More informationTHE CRIMINAL DEFENCE SERVICE (FUNDING) (AMENDMENT) ORDER THE COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICE (FUNDING) (AMENDMENT No2) ORDER 2011
Margaret McDonald Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London SW1H 9AJ Margaret.mcdonald@justice.gsi.gov.uk 15 New Bridge Street London EC4V 6AU 8 th August 2011 Dear Ms. McDonald THE CRIMINAL DEFENCE
More informationASSOCIATE PROSECUTOR RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND LITIGATION CERTIFICATION RULES
ASSOCIATE PROSECUTOR RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND LITIGATION CERTIFICATION RULES 7 Nov 11 CONTENTS CERTIFICATION RULES 3 Appendix 1 - Associate Prosecutor person specifications.. 19 Appendix 2 - Associate Prosecutor
More informationThe Structure of Self-employed Practice Consultation paper
The Structure of Self-employed Practice Consultation paper August 2009 1 BAR STANDARDS BOARD The Structure of Self-employed Practice Consultation Paper Introduction 1. In February 2008 the Bar Standards
More informationGARDEN COURT CHAMBERS RESPONSE TO AGFS CONSULTATION 2017
GARDEN COURT CHAMBERS RESPONSE TO AGFS CONSULTATION 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government s consultation on reform of AGFS is in fact a consultation on cuts to AGFS. We understand it to be another attempt
More informationThe Code. for Crown Prosecutors
The Code for Crown Prosecutors January 2013 Introduction 1.1 The Code for Crown Prosecutors (the Code) is issued by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) under section 10 of the Prosecution of Offences
More informationTHE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE QUALIFICATION SCHEME
THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE QUALIFICATION SCHEME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS COMPLETING AN APPLICATION FOR A CERTICATE OF ELIGIBILITY INTRODUCTION These guidance notes
More informationForeword 2. Contents Page. Introduction 3. Lists / Panels 3. Remuneration 9. Next Steps 9. (Annex 1) Draft application form for Level 1 Panel 10
Bar Council invitation for views from the Bar on outline proposals for revising the Crown Prosecution Service s process for the selection of selfemployed advocates. Contents Page Foreword 2 Introduction
More informationLSB Discussion Document - Regulation of immigration advice and services. Law Society response 24th May 2012
LSB Discussion Document - Regulation of immigration advice and services Law Society response 24th May 2012 Regulation of immigration advice and services Law Society response The Law Society is the professional
More informationCouncil meeting 15 September 2011
Council meeting 15 September 2011 Public business GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) Recommendation: The Council is asked to agree the GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) at Appendix 1.
More informationRECOMMENDATION FOR DEPORTATION FOLLOWING A CRIMINAL CONVICTION
RECOMMENDATION FOR DEPORTATION FOLLOWING A CRIMINAL CONVICTION About the LCCSA The London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) represents the interests of specialist criminal lawyers in the London
More informationLaw Commission consultation on the Sentencing Code Law Society response
Law Commission consultation on the Sentencing Code Law Society response January 2018 The Law Society 2018 Page 1 of 12 Introduction The Law Society of England and Wales ( The Society ) is the professional
More informationPublic and Licensed Access Review. Consultation on Changes to the Public and Licensed Access Rules
Public and Licensed Access Review Consultation on Changes to the Public and Licensed Access Rules June 2017 Contents Contents... 2 Executive Summary... 3 Part I: Introduction... 7 Background to the suggested
More informationAnnex 3 PUBLIC ACCESS WORK GUIDANCE FOR BARRISTERS
Annex 3 PUBLIC ACCESS WORK GUIDANCE FOR BARRISTERS February 2010 1 INDEX Index First Steps The Nature of Public Lay Access Work General Restrictions on the Acceptance of Work The Conduct of Litigation
More informationCriminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court
Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court Contents Part 1 Underpinning knowledge...3 1.1 An understanding
More informationSexual Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE
Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE Contents Applicability of guideline 7 Rape and assault offences 9 Rape 9 Sexual Offences Act 2003 (section 1) Assault by penetration 13 Sexual
More informationDEFINITIVE GUIDELINE. Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline
DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline Contents Applicability of guideline 7 Rape and assault offences 9 Rape Sexual Offences Act 2003 (section 1) 9 Assault by penetration Sexual Offences
More informationINSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE CERTIFICATION RULES
INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE CERTIFICATION RULES JANUARY 2011 RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE CERTIFICATION RULES DEFINITIONS 1. In these Rules, except where otherwise indicated: "Advocacy Certificate"
More informationSentencing guidelines and the Sentencing Council
Sentencing guidelines and the Sentencing Council Overview of Presentation Evolution of guidelines The Sentencing Council Developing guidelines Comparison with Minnesota Example of guidelines Evolution
More informationLegal Services Commission Duty Solicitor Manual
Legal Services Commission Duty Solicitor Manual References to the Legal Aid Agency are to be read, where appropriate, as including the Legal Services Commission. This duty also extends to the directors
More informationPublic Order Offences Guidelines Consultation CONSULTATION
Public Order Offences Guidelines Consultation CONSULTATION May 2018 Public Order Offences Consultation Published on 9 May 2018 The consultation will end on 8 August 2018 A consultation produced by the
More informationThe learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.
Unit 11 Title: Criminal Litigation Level: 3 Credit Value: 7 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the powers of the police to arrest and detain a person for the purpose of investigating a criminal
More informationRichard Atkins QC Barrister Called 1989 Silk 2011
Richard Atkins QC Barrister Called 1989 Silk 2011 Richard specialises in serious criminal and regulatory offences. Since taking silk he has concentrated on homicide, fraud and regulatory cases, with a
More informationFee Sharing /Referral Fees. Important guidance for holders of LSC Crime Contracts December 2010
Fee Sharing /Referral Fees Important guidance for holders of LSC Crime Contracts December 2010 Introduction Important Guidance: Fee Sharing/Referral fees In response to concerns raised by the Bar, we have
More informationRyan Donoghue. DX: Leeds Park Square T: +44 (0) E: F: +44 (0)
Ryan Donoghue Park Square Contents Crime... 1 Representative Cases... 1 Civil... 2 Commercial... 2 Family... 2 Appointments & Memberships... 3 II Park Square Ryan Donoghue Year of call 2015 For enquiries
More informationConsultation. Amending the definition of employed barrister (non-authorised body)
Consultation Amending the definition of employed barrister (non-authorised body) Purpose 1. This consultation paper seeks views on amending the definition of employed barrister non-authorised body 1 to
More informationPart of the requirement for a criminal offence. It is the guilty act.
Level 1 Award/Certificate/Diploma in Legal Studies Glossary of Terms Term Action Actus reus Barrister Breach of duty of care Case law Chartered Legal Executive Civil law Claimant Common law compensation
More informationRESPONSE THE MOJ CONSULTATION PAPER August 2009
RESPONSE THE MOJ CONSULTATION PAPER August 2009 FAO Annette Cowell Ministry of Justice Dear Madam, Miss Tracey Lloyd-Nesling, Chambers of James Tillyard Q.C., 30 Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3BS 14 th October
More informationThe learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.
Unit 11 Title: Criminal Litigation Level: 3 Credit Value: 7 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the powers of the police to arrest and detain a person for the purpose of investigating a criminal
More informationLaw Society response to the Sentencing Council Consultation on a Draft Bladed Articles and Offensive Weapons Guideline
Law Society response to the Sentencing Council Consultation on a Draft Bladed Articles and Offensive Weapons Guideline January 2017 The Law Society 2017 Page 1 of 6 Law Society response to the Sentencing
More informationDavid Baines. David enjoys a mixed common law practice, largely comprising criminal and civil law.
BARRISTER PROFILE: ST JOHN S BUILDINGS David Baines Email: sheffield.clerk@stjohnsbuildings.co.uk Phone: 0114 273 8951 Year of Call: 2009 David studied Philosophy at Lancaster University and graduated
More informationGuidance For Legal Representatives
Guidance For Legal Representatives Criminal Cases Review Commission Guidance for Legal Representatives This document is designed to help legal representatives who may be approached in relation to applications
More informationSubmission to the Legislative Council Panel On Administration of Justice and Legal Services
Submission to the Legislative Council Panel On Administration of Justice and Legal Services Response of the Hong Kong Bar Association on Briefing-out in civil and criminal cases by the Department of Justice
More informationThe Prohibition of Referral Fees
The Prohibition of Referral Fees Purpose: Scope of application: Issued by: To draw barristers' attention to issues relating to payment for professional instructions All practising barristers The Ethics
More informationPublic Defender Service. Code of Conduct
Public Defender Service Code of Conduct March 2014 Public Defender Service Code of Conduct Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 29 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
More informationGuidelines on the Investigation, Cautioning and Charging of Knife Crime Offences
RM Guidelines on the Investigation, Cautioning and Charging of Knife Crime Offences The Association of Chief Police Officers has agreed to these revised guidelines being circulated to, and adopted by,
More informationTransforming Legal Aid: Next Steps
Transforming Legal Aid: Next Steps This consultation begins on 5 September 2013 This consultation ends on 1 November 2013 Transforming Legal Aid: Next steps A consultation produced by the Ministry of Justice.
More informationAsylum Support Partnership response to Oversight of the Immigration Advice Sector consultation
Asylum Support Partnership response to Oversight of the Immigration Advice Sector consultation August 2009 About the Asylum Support Partnership The Asylum Support Partnership (ASP) consists of five lead
More informationThe learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.
Unit 11 Title: Criminal Litigation Level: 3 Credit Value: 7 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the powers of the police to arrest and detain a person for the purpose of investigating a criminal
More informationThe Prohibition of Referral Fees
The Prohibition of Referral Fees Purpose: Scope of application: Issued by: To draw barristers' attention to issues relating to payment for professional instructions All practising barristers The Ethics
More informationATOC Guidance Note Prosecution Policy
Document issued by ATOC in ATOC Guidance Note Prosecution Policy Synopsis This Guidance Note provides advice on how railway undertakings will manage information received or controlled by the prosecution
More informationASSOCIATE PROSECUTOR RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND LITIGATION CERTIFICATION RULES
ASSOCIATE PROSECUTOR RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND LITIGATION CERTIFICATION RULES 19 JULY 2010 Amended 30 Jan 2011 CONTENTS CERTIFICATION RULES 3 Appendix 1 - Associate Prosecutor person specifications.. 18 Appendix
More informationDaniel Jones. Overview +44 (0)
+44 (0) 207 332 5400 Connect on LinkedIn Daniel Jones YEAR OF CALL: 2013 Dan is a specialist criminal practitioner, who accepts instructions in all areas of criminal law, acting for both the defence and
More informationDate of Decision: 1 June 2012 DECISION
REVIEW AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND [2012] NZRA 000009 Applicant AG Respondent Secretary for Justice Date of Decision: 1 June 2012 DECISION INTRODUCTION [1] In a decision dated 13 March 2012, the Secretary for
More informationRobbery Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE
Robbery Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE Contents Applicability of guideline 2 Robbery street and less sophisticated commercial 3 Theft Act 1968 (section 8(1)) Robbery professionally planned commercial
More informationCriminal Justice: Working Together
Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Lord Chancellor s Department Crown Prosecution Service Home Office Criminal Justice: Working Together Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 29 November
More informationRESPONSE BY THE SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION TO THE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT: SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND A SCOTTISH SENTENCING COUNCIL
1 RESPONSE BY THE SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION TO THE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT: SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND A SCOTTISH SENTENCING COUNCIL The Sheriffs Association welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation
More informationJustice Committee. Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill. Written submission from Victim Support Scotland
Justice Committee Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill Written submission from Victim Support Scotland INTRODUCTION 1. Victim Support Scotland welcomes the introduction of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill.
More informationRESPONSE TO CONSULTATION ON PUBLIC ORDER OFFENCES DRAFT SENTENCING GUIDELINE
1 RESPONSE TO CONSULTATION ON PUBLIC ORDER OFFENCES DRAFT SENTENCING GUIDELINE Introduction 1. The CBA represents the views and interests of practising members of the criminal Bar in England and Wales.
More informationAnthony Cartin. Overview. Practice Areas. Criminal. Year of Call: Telephone: Address:
Anthony Cartin Year of Call: 2010 Telephone: 0121 236 0863 Email Address: anthony.cartin@stiveschambers.co.uk Overview Anthony is a specialist criminal barrister with experience of handling the full range
More informationAdministrative Sanctions: imposing warnings and fines
Administrative Sanctions: imposing warnings and fines Introduction This leaflet provides an overview of the Bar Standards Board s (BSB s) use of administrative sanctions as one of the tools available to
More informationBPTC syllabus and curriculum 2017/18
BPTC syllabus and curriculum 2017/18 1 Contents Civil litigation and evidence... 4 Introduction... 4 1 General Matters... 5 2 Limitation... 6 3 Pre-action Conduct... 7 4 Commencing Proceedings... 8 5 Parties...
More informationQuality and Criminal Legal Aid in England and Wales
Legal Aid Reform and Access to Justice ENGLAND AND WALES Quality and Criminal Legal Aid in England and Wales Due to the high costs of legal aid in England and Wales, the government and the legal profession
More informationTransparency Standards Guidance Annexes
CURRENT GUIDANCE Transparency Standards Guidance Annexes Contents Annex A fact sheet example... 2 Annex B price transparency policy statement... 7 Introduction... 7 Application of price transparency requirements...
More informationThe Bar Training Regulations ANNEX A
The Bar Training Regulations ANNEX A Formatted: Right Contents I. Introduction II. III. IV. Admission to Inns of Court The Academic Stage The Vocational Stage V. The Professional Stage VI. VII. VIII. IX.
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 11332-2015 BETWEEN: SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant and VICTORIA BARBARA WADSWORTH Respondent Before: Miss T.
More informationGiving Legal Advice at Police Stations: Practical Pointers
Giving Legal Advice at Police Stations: Practical Pointers November 2010 For further information contact Jodie Blackstock, Senior Legal Officer Email: jblackstock@justice.org.uk Tel: 020 7762 6436 JUSTICE,
More informationSRA Assessment of Character and Suitability Rules
SRA Assessment of Character and Suitability Rules Introduction All individuals applying for admission or seeking restoration to the roll of solicitors or those applying to become or renewing their registration
More informationBar Council response to the Civil Justice Council s Property Disputes Working Group discussion paper
Bar Council response to the Civil Justice Council s Property Disputes Working Group discussion paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales (the Bar Council) to
More informationWills and Inheritance Quality Scheme
Wills and Inheritance Quality Scheme Scheme Rules Page 1 of 16 Wills and Inheritance Quality Scheme - Scheme Rules Contents 1. Glossary of Terms... 3 2. The Scheme... 5 3. Eligibility Criteria... 8 4.
More informationIntellectual Property Regulation Board
Intellectual Property Regulation Board (on behalf of the Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board) Introduction Consultation on Replacement of the CIPA Higher Courts Qualification Regulations
More informationEHRiC/S5/18/ACR/26 EQUALITIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE AGE OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY (SCOTLAND) BILL SUBMISSION FROM THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND
EQUALITIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE AGE OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY (SCOTLAND) BILL SUBMISSION FROM THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND Ag Introduction The Law Society of Scotland is the professional body for
More informationTHE FUTURE OF THE PAROLE BOARD RESPONSE OF THE CRIMINAL SUB COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL OF HM CIRCUIT JUDGES
THE FUTURE OF THE PAROLE BOARD RESPONSE OF THE CRIMINAL SUB COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL OF HM CIRCUIT JUDGES 1 The Council of Her Majesty s Circuit Judges represents the Circuit Bench in England and Wales.
More informationBusiness Crime & Financial Services
Lewis MacDonald Year of Call: 2014 020 7353 5324 Lewis specializes in criminal, regulatory, professional discipline, tax and public law. He has a particular interest and expertise in cases which span the
More informationRichard Saynor Essex Street London WC2R 3AA Profile
Profile Richard is a highly regarded and sought after practitioner with a busy advisory and court practice. He practises in both criminal and civil law with an emphasis on asset forfeiture and recovery.
More informationGuideline Judgments Case Compendium - Update 2: June 2006 CASE NAME AND REFERENCE
SUBJECT CASE NAME AND REFERENCE (A) GENERIC SENTENCING PRINCIPLES Sentence length Dangerousness R v Lang and others [2005] EWCA Crim 2864 R v S and others [2005] EWCA Crim 3616 The CPS v South East Surrey
More informationI shall deal first of all with the amendments to the fees in Magistrates Courts work in a series of bullet points.
Criminal Defence Service (Funding)(Amendment) Order 2011 The most important event of this month, by a measured mile, was the laying before parliament of the Criminal Defence Service (Funding)(Amendment)
More informationDelegated powers policy
Delegated powers policy Revised September 2013 1 Contents Introduction... 3 The Association of Accounting Technicians... 3 The compliance framework and procedures of AAT... 3 Compliance framework... 4
More informationLCDT 015/10. of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1. Applicant. BRETT DEAN RAVELICH, of Auckland, Barrister
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2011] NZLCDT 11 LCDT 015/10 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND BRETT
More informationS G C. Reduction in Sentence. for a Guilty Plea. Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council
S G C Sentencing Guidelines Council Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea Definitive Guideline Revised 2007 FOREWORD One of the first guidelines to be issued by the Sentencing Guidelines Council related
More informationINITIAL RESPONSE TO THE CARLOWAY REPORT
INITIAL RESPONSE TO THE CARLOWAY REPORT November 2011 For further information contact Maggie Scott QC; Jodie Blackstock, Director of Criminal and EU Justice Policy Email: scottish.justice@advocates.org.uk
More informationJustice Committee. Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill
Justice Committee Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill Written submission from Ross McClelland, David McLean, Ceit-Anna MacLeod, Paul Reid and Usman Tariq, Advocates Introduction 1. This response is written by
More informationPUBLIC ACCESS: HOW TO GIVE A DIRECT INSTRUCTION TO A BARRISTER
7 PUBLIC ACCESS: HOW TO GIVE A DIRECT INSTRUCTION TO A BARRISTER This document is published by Practical Law and can be found at: uk.practicallaw.com/w-010-6430 Get more information on Practical Law and
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
The Tribunal s Order is subject to appeal to the High Court (Administrative Court) by the Respondent. The Order remains in force pending the High Court s decision on the appeal. SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY
More informationRESPONSE TO CONSULTATION ON ARSON AND CRIMINAL DAMAGE DRAFT SENTENCING GUIDELINE
1 RESPONSE TO CONSULTATION ON ARSON AND CRIMINAL DAMAGE DRAFT SENTENCING GUIDELINE Introduction 1. The CBA represents the views and interests of practising members of the criminal Bar in England and Wales.
More informationPleading guilty. The Law in Victoria. The Court Process. Your guide to. Sentencing. in a criminal matter. defence lawyers
Pleading guilty in a criminal matter Your guide to The Law in Victoria The Court Process Sentencing Written by Shaun Pascoe and Kristina Kothrakis defence lawyers Index 3 3 4 5 5 6 6 7 8 8 Pleading Guilty
More informationRESPONSE TO TACKLING ROGUE LANDLORDS AND IMPROVING THE PRIVATE RENTAL SECTOR
RESPONSE TO TACKLING ROGUE LANDLORDS AND IMPROVING THE PRIVATE RENTAL SECTOR About the RLA The RLA represents over 20,000 landlords across England & Wales. Primarily our members are landlords in their
More informationFIRST CONVICTION FOR CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER
Page 1 of 7 FIRST CONVICTION FOR CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER On 15 February 2011, Cotswold Geotechnical (Holdings) Limited became the first company to be convicted of corporate manslaughter under the Corporate
More informationPart V Code Amendments, draft guidance
Part V Code Amendments, draft guidance Investigating or collecting evidence and taking witness statements 1. There is no longer a rule which prohibits a self-employed barrister from investigating or collecting
More informationPractice Guidance Note (draft) Lewes and Chichester Crown Courts. Early Guilty Plea Protocol. Created on 21/08/ :52:00.
Practice Guidance Note (draft) Lewes and Chichester Crown Courts Early Guilty Plea Protocol Deleted: Created on 21/08/2012 13:52:00 PREAMBLE EARLY GUILTY PLEA SCHEME (CROWN COURT) PRACTICE GUIDANCE NOTE
More informationTHE LEGAL EXECUTIVE AS PRACTISING AND QUALIFIED LAWYERS
Irish Institute of Legal Executives Ltd. THE LEGAL EXECUTIVE AS PRACTISING AND QUALIFIED LAWYERS PUTTING CONSUMERS OF LEGAL SERVICES FIRST PAPER FOR STAKEHOLDERS Presented by The Irish Institute of Legal
More informationSENIOR COUNSEL PROTOCOL As at 16 May 2013.
SENIOR COUNSEL PROTOCOL As at 16 May 2013. The principles governing the selection and appointment of those to be designated as Senior Counsel by the President of the Bar Association are as follows: 1.
More informationAccess to the Legal Services Market Post-Brexit
1 Access to the Legal Services Market Post-Brexit Summary The UK legal services market generated 3.3bn of our net export revenue in 2015. More importantly, our exporters confidence in doing business abroad
More informationLEVEL 6 - UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014
LEVEL 6 - UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key
More informationAssessing the impact and implementation of the Sentencing Council s Theft Offences Definitive Guideline
Assessing the impact and implementation of the Sentencing Council s Theft Offences Definitive Guideline Summary The Sentencing Council s Theft Offences Definitive Guideline came into force in February
More information9. Roles and responsibilities of Committee members
9. Overview 9.1. New Committee members are appointed by the BSB s Appointments Board on an annual basis and normally begin their three-year term in January. The roles of members are set out below and further
More informationThe Instruction, qualification and conduct of authorised solicitors in the Higher Courts. Draft Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA)
The Instruction, qualification and conduct of authorised solicitors in the Higher Courts Draft Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) April 2017 96 Victoria Street Belfast BT1 3GN Tel: 02890 23 1614 Fax: 02890
More informationGuidance on making referrals to Disclosure Scotland
Guidance on making referrals to Disclosure Scotland Introduction 1 This document provides guidance on our power to refer information to Disclosure Scotland (DS) when certain referral grounds are met. The
More informationBar Council s Advocates Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS) Working Group Proposal for a new Scheme
Bar Council s Advocates Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS) Working Group Proposal for a new Scheme Executive Summary Our Group 1. This proposal for a new Advocates Graduated Fee Scheme is the work of the Bar
More informationGPhC prosecution policy
Council meeting 10 November 2011 09.11/C/04 Public business GPhC prosecution policy Purpose To consider a prosecution policy for the GPhC. Recommendation The Council is asked to agree the GPhC prosecution
More informationProposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales
Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales Questionnaire Please send your response by 12:00 noon on 14 February 2011 by email to legalaidreformmoj@justice.gsi.gov.uk, or by post to Legal
More informationCriminal Procedure (Reform and Modernisation) Bill 2010
Digest No. 1819 Criminal Procedure (Reform and Modernisation) Bill 2010 Date of Introduction: 15 November 2010 Portfolio: Select Committee: Published: 18 November 2010 by John McSoriley BA LL.B, Barrister,
More informationCriminal Convictions. AAT is a registered charity. No
Criminal Convictions AAT is a registered charity. No. 1050724 Criminal Convictions Contents Introduction... 3 Policy detail... 4 Criminal convictions on application... 4 Criminal convictions on reinstatement...
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC LARKIN, Matthew Peter Registration No: 74917 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2017 Outcome: Erased with Immediate Suspension Matthew Peter LARKIN, a dentist, BDS Lpool 1998
More information