IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS EASTERN DISTRICT APPEAL NO. ED JOHN CHASNOFF, Plaintiff/Respondent

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS EASTERN DISTRICT APPEAL NO. ED JOHN CHASNOFF, Plaintiff/Respondent"

Transcription

1 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS EASTERN DISTRICT APPEAL NO. ED JOHN CHASNOFF, Plaintiff/Respondent v. ST. LOUIS BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants/Appellants. WENDELL ISHMON, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants v. ST. LOUIS BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS, et al., And JOHN CHASNOFF, Intervenor/Respondent. APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-SECOND CIRCUIT, DIVISION 18, HON. ROBERT H. DIERKER, JR. CAUSE NOS CC07278; 1122-CC01598 REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS ST. LOUIS BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNSELOR Mark Lawson #33337 Associate City Counselor 1915 Olive St., Room 773 St. Louis, MO Phone: (314) ; Fax: (314) Attorney for Appellants St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, et al.

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.. ARGUMENT.. CONCLUSION... CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE.. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Ennulat, 231 S.W.3d 297 (Mo. App. 2007)... Chasnoff v. Board of Police Commissioners, 343 S.W.3d 147 (Mo. App. 2011)... Spradlin v. City of Fulton, 982 S.W.2d 255 (Mo. banc 1998)... State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Esswein, 43 S.W.3d 833 (Mo. App. 2000)... Statutes , RSMo , RSMo... Page 7 3, 4, 5, , 7 3 2

4 ARGUMENT I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES SUA SPONTE IN FAVOR OF CHASNOFF FOR THE ENTIRETY OF THE CONSOLIDATED CHASNOFF AND ISHMON CASES AGAINST THE BOARD UNDER THE SUNSHINE LAW ATTORNEY FEE PROVISION, , RSMO. OR, ALTERNATIVELY, THE COLLATERAL LITIGATION EXCEPTION TO THE AMERICAN RULE BECAUSE (A) CHASNOFF NEVER MOVED FOR OR SPECIALLY PLED ATTORNEY FEES, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, (B) THERE WAS NO AUTHORITY TO AWARD ATTORNEY FEES UNDER EITHER THE SUNSHINE LAW ATTORNEY FEE PROVISION OR THE COLLATERAL LITIGATION EXCEPTION. Responding to Point V of Respondent s Brief Apparently, based on the Argument in Chasnoff s Brief responding to the Board s Brief, Respondent s Brief, at 39, the only way the Board could have avoided an award of attorney s fees against it would have been, after this Court s decision in Chasnoff v. Board of Police Commissioners, 334 S.W.3d 147 (Mo. App. 2011) 1, for the Board to essentially defy this Court s recognition that the Police Officers whose names appeared in 1 Chasnoff refers to the 2011 decision as Chasnoff II, apparently to separate it from the trial court s decision, while in the Board s appellate brief, it was referred to as Chasnoff I because it was the first reported decision. The Board will attempt to clarify in this Brief which decision it is referencing without use of the previous designations. 3

5 the records at issue might have a cause of action to keep them from being made public, defy the stay order previously entered by the trial court which this Court in Chasnoff I kept in place, and turn over the Internal Affairs investigation records to Chasnoff. Because if Respondent is to be believed, any litigation that Chasnoff participated in after that apparently requires the Board to pay his attorney fees, even if the Board didn t file the litigation, and even if Chasnoff never requested attorney fees. Chasnoff in his Brief does not deny that he never specially pled nor moved for the attorney fees that the trial court awarded him. Instead, he spends considerable energy and verbiage trying to justify how the trial court could sua sponte award him attorney fees that he didn t even request. First, no amount of legal argument can magically transform Ishmon v. Board of Police Commissioners into a Sunshine Law case, and therefore, the trial court s decision to award attorney fees incurred in Ishmon on the basis of a Sunshine Law violation cannot be supported. The trial court s erroneous references to the Sunshine Law as supporting such an award are particularly troublesome, since this Court, in its aforementioned 2011 opinion, dismissed Police Officers appeal because it purported to be based on the Sunshine Law, which this Court stated could not serve as a basis for the Police Officers assertion that the records should not be made public: A party s claim that a government agency is required to close records is not a claim under the Sunshine Law, which specifically prohibits such claims. Section Rather, it is an independent action that must be based on the assertion of rights under a different statute or constitutional provision. 4

6 Thus, intervenors claim that they have privacy and property rights in records held by the Board that mandate closure of those records would be an independent cause of action against the Board to keep it from disclosing the records. [Citations omitted.] 334 S.W.3d at 152. Police Officers thereafter filed Ishmon, and clearly delineated it as a declaratory judgment action, combined with seeking injunctive relief. Chasnoff s intervention into Ishmon did not turn it into a Sunshine Law case. The Police Officers did not base their request for relief on the Sunshine Law. Rather, they alleged privacy and property rights authorized keeping records in which they were identified from being made public. Chasnoff cites, as he did in a footnote to his Trial Brief filed in the trial court, to a dissenting opinion joined by one other judge of the Missouri Supreme Court in Spradlin v. City of Fulton, 982 S.W.2d 255 (Mo. banc 1998), for a liberal construction of the attorney fee provision in the Sunshine Law, while ignoring the majority opinion that attorney fee statutes, being penal in nature, are to be strictly construed. Id. at This appears tantamount to an admission by Chasnoff that there is no Missouri case which would authorize an award of attorney fees under the Sunshine Law in connection with the Ishmon litigation. 2 2 Even if Spradlin had been decided the other way, it seems questionable that it would have served as precedent for the award of attorney fees in this case. Spradlin was an action brought for violation of the Sunshine Law. An award of attorney fees in a case 5

7 Second, the Board did not align with the Police Officers to file Ishmon. Chasnoff s statement that the Board utilized the Ishmon case as a declaratory judgment action in an attempt to secure a judgment that the records at issue are closed, Respondent s Brief, at 42, not only is fiction, it is insulting, and imputes bad intent to the Board for litigation the Board did not even initiate, and without any support for the accusation. The Ishmon case was completely the creation and strategy of the Police Officers, and obviously was a follow-up to the appeal that the Police Officers had taken, which this Court had dismissed. Much like the trial court s findings of fact and conclusions of law, Chasnoff s Brief fails to explain how the Board, having been sued by Police Officers as the custodian of records of the IAD investigation they sought to keep from being made public, has responsibility for Chasnoff s attorney fees stemming from his involvement in the Ishmon case. That the Board was even a party to Ishmon was only because the Board was the repository of the records at issue. Moreover, a decision in Ishmon declaring that privacy and property interests of the Police Officers require that the records not be made public only marginally benefits the Board going forward. It seems questionable that such a decision would reach beyond what the Sunshine Law already authorizes, which is to close records to the extent they relate to [h]iring, firing, disciplining or promoting of particular employees by a public governmental body when brought on the basis of a Sunshine Law violation would still not authorize attorney fees in a case not brought under the Sunshine Law. Nor would it justify an award of attorney fees to a party who was not the plaintiff and who did not plead or move for attorney fees. 6

8 personal information about the employee is discussed or recorded (3), RSMo.; and [i]ndividually identifiable personnel records, performance ratings or records pertaining to employees or applicants for employment (13), RSMo. Third, Chasnoff s attempt to defend the award of attorney fees under the collateral litigation exception to the American Rule makes two erroneous ex post facto arguments in attempting to refute the Board s argument that the collateral litigation exception does not apply. The collateral litigation exception allows a plaintiff in a case alleging breach of duty against a defendant, to recover the attorneys fees plaintiff expended to defend a different and collateral action brought by a third party. [Emphasis in original.] Auto- Owners Ins. Co. v. Ennulat, 231 S.W.3d 297, 307 (Mo. App. 2007). The Board pointed out in its original Brief that Ishmon was not brought by a third party because Police Officers had been allowed to intervene in Chasnoff s original action. Brief of Appellants St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, at Chasnoff attempts to refute this by arguing that the decision allowing the police officers to intervene was ultimately reversed. Respondent s Brief, at 43. This, of course, constitutes an ex post facto argument. It reviews the subsequent result, rather than judge by what was occurring at the time the purported collateral litigation was filed, which must be the standard for the collateral litigation exception to apply. Moreover, it ignores the materiality of Police Officers being allowed to intervene in Chasnoff s lawsuit to the subsequent lawsuit now being portrayed as collateral litigation. Without Police Officers intervention in Chasnoff s lawsuit, there would have been no appeal to this Court in And without 7

9 that appeal, there would have been no opinion from this Court recognizing intervenors claim that they have privacy and property rights in records held by the Board that mandate closure of those records would be an independent cause of action against the Board to keep it from disclosing the records. 334 S.W.3d at 152. And without that recognition, it seems questionable whether Ishmon would even have been filed. Chasnoff repeats this mistaken ex post facto argument in attempting to rebut the Board s contention that the collateral litigation exception does not apply because the Ishmon case, first, was not the natural and proximate result of the wrong or breach of duty by the other party namely, the Board and second, that Chasnoff s fees were not necessarily and in good faith incurred to protect the wronged party from injury. Chasnoff cites the Consent Judgment between the Board and Police Officers as the basis of the alleged wrong or breach of duty. Once again, Chasnoff views this with hindsight, which is inherently contrary to the requirement that the litigation be the natural and proximate result of a wrong or breach of duty. At the time Ishmon was filed, Police Officers had just pursued an appeal which, while unsuccessful, had clearly included some language which led them to believe they could file a lawsuit to invoke privacy and property rights to keep records identifying them from being made public. There was nothing that the Board did which led them to file this lawsuit. With respect to the Board s argument that Chasnoff s fees from intervening were not necessarily incurred to protect him from injury, the Board was disputing the trial court s finding that intervenor defendant [Chasnoff] was obliged to intervene in the Ishmon case in order to vindicate his judgment in the original Chasnoff case. SLF, 8

10 0124. The Board pointed out that Chasnoff had intervened in Ishmon before the Board was even served with summonses. The Board has never attempted to argue that Chasnoff had no right to intervene. But the Board does contest whether Chasnoff s intervention was necessarily incurred to protect him from injury. Unless Chasnoff has a clairvoyance formerly thought to be the exclusive province of fortune-tellers, he could not know what the Board s position was going to be before the Board even had the opportunity to assert it. The truth is that at the time Chasnoff intervened, even the Board did not know what its position was going to be relative to the allegations in Ishmon. Once again, Chasnoff, in Respondent s Brief, at 44, is viewing his intervention in Ishmon through the prism of subsequent events. This is not appropriate, for purposes of applying the collateral litigation exception. Fourth, there is no basis for awarding attorney fees under the special circumstances or unusual circumstances exception to the American Rule. Preliminarily, it should be noted that the trial court did not purport to base its sua sponte attorney fee award on the special circumstances or unusual circumstances exception, and obviously, since Chasnoff did not move for or specially plead attorney fees, the issue was never raised in the trial court. Review on appeal is limited to issues and theories heard by the trial judge. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Esswein, 43 S.W.3d 833, 839 (Mo. App. 2000). Parties are bound on appeal by the positions they took in the trial court. Id. Since the trial court made no findings citing the special circumstances or unusual circumstances exception, it is wholly inappropriate for Chasnoff to now raise it on appeal. Although this Board would vigorously contest the untrue accusations 9

11 Chasnoff levels against it in Respondent s Brief, at 45-46, the issue simply is not a part of this appeal. CONCLUSION The trial court s sua sponte decision to award attorney fees to Chasnoff and against the Board of Police Commissioners for litigation the Board did not file and for which Chasnoff never even asked the trial court to award attorney fees was erroneous. The Board finds it troubling that the trial court exceeded its mandate from the previous decision of this Court as well as the scope of the pleadings before it and became an advocate for Chasnoff to the point of awarding Chasnoff beyond anything Chasnoff sought. Now Chasnoff attempts to justify on appeal what he never asked for in the trial court. However, he cites no reported opinion from Missouri which supports the trial court s award. In fact, the case he most clearly relies on, Spradlin, supra, counsels a decision that would reject an award of attorney fees in these circumstances. In light of the foregoing, the trial court s award of attorney fees against the Board must be reversed. OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNSELOR POLICE SECTION /s/ Mark Lawson Mark Lawson #33337 Associate City Counselor 1915 Olive St., Room 773 St. Louis, MO (314) (314) mlawson@slmpd.org ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS ST. LOUIS BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS, et al. 10

12 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE The undersigned hereby certifies that: 1. Counsel for Appellants is Mark Lawson, MBE #33337, 1915 Olive St., Room 773, St. Louis, MO 63103; Phone: (314) ; Fax: (314) ; 2. The Brief to which this Certificate is attached complies with the limitations contained in Rule 84.06(c) and Local Rule This Brief contains 2,074 words in Microsoft Word format, using Times New Roman 13-point font. /s/ Mark Lawson Mark Lawson #33337 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on January 12, 2015, the foregoing Brief was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court to be served by operation of the Court s automated filing system on, upon the following attorneys of record: Anthony E. Rothert American Civil Liberties Union of Eastern Missouri 454 Whittier St. St. Louis, MO Co-Counsel for Respondent Gillian R. Wilcox American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri Foundation 3601 Main St. Kansas City, MO Co-Counsel for Respondent Neil J. Bruntrager Mary L. Bruntrager Bruntrager & Billings, P.C S. Big Bend Blvd. St. Louis, MO Attorneys for Appellants Wendell Ishmon, et al. /s/ Mark Lawson 11

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSOURI Chris Lawson, Plaintiff, v. NO.: Missouri Commission on Human Rights, DIVISION: SERVE: Alisa Warren, Executive Director

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION Christopher S. McDaniel, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:16-CV-4243 ) George Lombardi, in his official capacity as ) Director

More information

Defendant State of Missouri s Motion to Dismiss

Defendant State of Missouri s Motion to Dismiss IN CIRCUIT COURT OF MONITEAU COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI RICHARD N. BARRY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CV704-29CC STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., Defendants. Defendant State of Missouri s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff

More information

ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR ) FREEDOM OF THE PRESS et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 14AC-CC00254 ) DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTIONS ) ) Defendant.

More information

WD79893 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT

WD79893 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT WD79893 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT JOAN BRAY, GUARDIAN NEWS AND MEDIA LLC, ET AL, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, ET AL Respondents. v. GEORGE LOMBARDI, ET AL Appellants,

More information

IN THE 13TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI

IN THE 13TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI IN THE 13TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI THE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 09-BA-CV02314 GALEN J. SUPPES, WILLIAM R. SUTTERLIN, RENEWABLE ALTERNATIVES,

More information

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES ON APPEAL

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES ON APPEAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No: 14-3779 Kyle Lawson, et al. v. Appellees Robert T. Kelly, in his official capacity as Director of the Jackson County Department of Recorder of

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DEFENDANT S ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DEFENDANT S ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ROBERTSON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, vs. Plaintiff, CITY OF HAZELWOOD, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cause No. 18SL-CC00771 Division 19 DEFENDANT

More information

In The Missouri Court of Appeals Western District

In The Missouri Court of Appeals Western District In The Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL., ) SAMUEL K. LIPARI, ) Relator, ) ) v. ) ) No. THE HONORABLE ) JUDGE MICHAEL W. MANNERS, ) CIRCUIT COURT OF ) JACKSON COUNTY,

More information

Defendant State of Missouri s Motion for Summary Judgment

Defendant State of Missouri s Motion for Summary Judgment IN CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 04CV323913 STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendant. Defendant State of Missouri s Motion for Summary Judgment

More information

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis The Honorable David Dowd. Reply Brief of Appellant

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis The Honorable David Dowd. Reply Brief of Appellant IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS EASTERN DISTRICT ED103063 ST. LOUIS POLICE LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATION Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS Respondent. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis The

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ERIC GREITENS, v. Petitioner, STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. Attorney General JOSHUA D. HAWLEY, Respondent. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI Case No. Division 18AC-CC00143

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FIVE ROBERT BELLISTRI, ) No. ED91369 ) Respondents, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court v. ) of Jefferson County ) OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, )

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ASSOCIATION DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ASSOCIATION DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ASSOCIATION DIVISION JEFFERSON COUNTY RAINTREE ) COUNTRY CLUB, LLC. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Cause No.: 18JE-AC00739 v. ) ) BLACK HOLE, LLC, ) Division:

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY MISSOURI NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY MISSOURI NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY MISSOURI NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT BEN SANSONE, on behalf of ) THE SUNSHINE PROJECT ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) 17AC-CC00635 ) ERIC GREITENS, ) Div. 1 Governor of Missouri,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENTS JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENTS JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1649 MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ASHLEY COATNEY, etc., et al., Respondents. ON REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO VINCENT ANGERER TRUST and DEWITT BANK & TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of the Vincent Angerer Trust.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO VINCENT ANGERER TRUST and DEWITT BANK & TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of the Vincent Angerer Trust. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO. 17-1964 ELECTRONICALLY FILED JUL 03, 2018 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT VINCENT ANGERER TRUST and DEWITT BANK & TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of the Vincent Angerer Trust Appellants,

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2006 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-20-2006 Murphy v. Fed Ins Co Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-1814 Follow this and

More information

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT GARY COOK and MICHAEL A. COOK, Respondents, v. WILLIAM D. McELWAIN and SHARON E. McELWAIN, Husband and Wife, Appellants. WD76288 FILED: June 3, 2014 Appeal

More information

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Stonecrest Building Company v Chicago Title Insurance Company Docket No. 319841/319842 Amy Ronayne Krause Presiding Judge Kirsten Frank Kelly LC No. 2008-001055

More information

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed August 26, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00750-CV FRANKLIN D. JENKINS, Appellant V. CACH, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the Civil

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Introduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Introduction UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION Kylan Scheele, Plaintiff, v. Independence School District, Defendant. No. 18-CV-407 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR PROSPECTIVE RELIEF

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CLYDE EVERETT, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 15, 2010 v No. 287640 Lapeer Circuit Court AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No. 06-037406-NF Defendant-Appellant.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Cause No. 1822-CR00642-01 v. ) ) Division No. 16 ERIC GREITENS, ) ) Defendant. ) Motion to Intervene

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI The State of Missouri, ex rel. ) ANTHONY SWEARENGIN and ) TIFFANY SWEARENGIN, ) ) Relators, ) ) Vs. ) Case No. SC95607 ) ) ) THE HONORABLE R. CRAIG CARTER, ) ) Respondent.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE CONNIE CURTS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, WAGGIN TRAIN, LLC and NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA Case :-cv-000-smj ECF No. filed // PageID.00 Page of Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr. Steven M. Cady WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 000 Tel.: 0-- scady@wc.com Maren R. Norton 00

More information

WD In the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District. Ray Charles Bate and Deborah Sue Bate, Appellants

WD In the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District. Ray Charles Bate and Deborah Sue Bate, Appellants WD 76086 In the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District Ray Charles Bate and Deborah Sue Bate, Appellants v. Greenwich Insurance Company, Respondent Appeal from the Circuit Court of Boone County,

More information

Case: 4:15-cv RWS Doc. #: 30 Filed: 05/04/15 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #: 183

Case: 4:15-cv RWS Doc. #: 30 Filed: 05/04/15 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #: 183 Case: 4:15-cv-00464-RWS Doc. #: 30 Filed: 05/04/15 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #: 183 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION GRYPHON INVESTMENTS III, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY JAMES G. (CASEY) WALSH, III, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. 1116-CV29191 v. ) ) Division 8 DIOCESE OF KANSAS CITY-ST. JOSEPH, ) et

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS INDEPENDENT BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED October 17, 2013 v No. 305914 Calhoun Circuit Court CITY OF THREE RIVERS, LC No. 2011-000757-CZ and Defendant-Appellee,

More information

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 14-1331 Michelle K. Ideker lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. PPG Industries, Inc.; PPG Industries Ohio, Inc.; Rohm & Haas lllllllllllllllllllll

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR JULIA MATTHEY, ) No. ED92377 ) Plaintiff/Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County v. ) ST. LOUIS COUNTY and ) ERIC

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CW 0863 R GERALD BELL, SR. AND LULAROSE S. BELL VERSUS

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CW 0863 R GERALD BELL, SR. AND LULAROSE S. BELL VERSUS --- ------~-------- STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CW 0863 R GERALD BELL, SR. AND LULAROSE S. BELL VERSUS LOUISIANA STATE POLICE AND WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE On Application

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO.: SC11-734 THIRD DCA CASE NO. s: 3D09-3102 & 3D10-848 CIRCUIT CASE NO.: 09-25070-CA-01 UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11- THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY a Florida Corporation,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11- THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY a Florida Corporation, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11- THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D10-108 UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY a Florida Corporation, Petitioner, -v- KENDALL SOUTH MEDICAL CENTER INC., & DAILYN

More information

WALTER J. ROTHSCHILD JUDGE

WALTER J. ROTHSCHILD JUDGE BRIGITTE B. HOLTHAUSEN, LUCIANO HOLTHAUSEN AND HOLTHAUSEN, INC. A/K.IA "HEMLINE" VERSUS DMARTINO, L.L.C., MURIEL DECKER AND LYNELL DECKER NO. 11-CA-561 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court has before it Defendant E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court has before it Defendant E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT (City of St. Louis DAVID F. SMITH, Plaintiff, vs. UNION CARBIDE CORP., et al., Defendants. Cause No. 1422-CC00457 Division No. 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

More information

Case: 4:18-cv RLW Doc. #: 1 Filed: 05/25/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 4:18-cv RLW Doc. #: 1 Filed: 05/25/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Case: 4:18-cv-00796-RLW Doc. #: 1 Filed: 05/25/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTINE GREEN and JORDAN PITLER, ) on behalf of

More information

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals RENDERED: SEPTEMBER 23, 2016; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2015-CA-000878-MR BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN

More information

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS REL: 07/14/2017 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:06-cv-01891-JTC Document 31 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE LAURENCE EPSTEIN and FRANK L. ROOT, ) No. ED93467 Individually and as Representatives of a Class of ) The Owners of Certain Condominiums

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ) INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ) PROJECT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellees, ) ) v. ) No. 17-1351 ) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., ) ) Defendants-Appellants.

More information

Case 1:05-cv REB-CBS Document 34 Filed 12/09/2005 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:05-cv REB-CBS Document 34 Filed 12/09/2005 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:05-cv-00807-REB-CBS Document 34 Filed 12/09/2005 Page 1 of 11 Civil Action No. 05-cv-00807-REB-CBS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JULIANNA BARBER, by and through

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY RUBIE ELLIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1316-CV04606 ) Division 14 KANSAS CITY 33 SCHOOL ) DISTRICT, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ANSWER

More information

Missouri Court of Appeals

Missouri Court of Appeals Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Division Two CITY OF SULLIVAN, a Missouri ) Municipal Corporation in Franklin ) and Crawford Counties, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD29596 ) JUDITH

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK O'NEIL, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant- Appellant, UNPUBLISHED June 15, 2004 v No. 243356 Wayne Circuit Court M. V. BAROCAS COMPANY, LC No. 99-925999-NZ and CAFÉ

More information

CHALMERS HARDENBERGH PATRONS OXFORD INSURANCE COMPANY. [ 1] Patrons Oxford Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment

CHALMERS HARDENBERGH PATRONS OXFORD INSURANCE COMPANY. [ 1] Patrons Oxford Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2013 ME 68 Docket: Cum-12-387 Argued: April 11, 2013 Decided: July 16, 2013 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY. Plaintiff-Appellee App. Case No

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY. Plaintiff-Appellee App. Case No [Cite as Ballreich Bros., Inc. v. Criblez, 2010-Ohio-3263.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY BALLREICH BROS., INC Plaintiff-Appellee App. Case No. 05-09-36 v. ROGER

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT ) DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) No. 00-0258-CV-W-FJG

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI. Div. CLASS ACTION PETITION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI. Div. CLASS ACTION PETITION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI DARRICK REED, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, CITY OF FERGUSON, Case No. Div. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant.

More information

Case: Document: 16 Filed: 04/23/2012 Pages: 6. Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 16 Filed: 04/23/2012 Pages: 6. Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Nos. 12-1269 & 12-1788 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL MOORE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LISA MADIGAN and HIRAM GRAU, Defendants-Appellees. MARY E. SHEPARD

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION MIKE PADBERG, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:11-cv-04035-NKL

More information

Case: 4:17-cv AGF Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/23/17 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case: 4:17-cv AGF Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/23/17 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 Case: 4:17-cv-00266-AGF Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/23/17 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTINA SWIATEK ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS W. H. MCNAUGHTON BUILDERS, INC., Plaintiff, vs 09CH3402 AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, MEMORANDUM OPINION

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. Fifth District Case No. 5D03-135; 5D03-138; 5D03-139; 5D03-140; 5D03-141; 5D03-142

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. Fifth District Case No. 5D03-135; 5D03-138; 5D03-139; 5D03-140; 5D03-141; 5D03-142 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, vs. Petitioner, BARNES FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC, ETC. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Fifth District Case No. 5D03-135; 5D03-138; 5D03-139; 5D03-140; 5D03-141; 5D03-142

More information

2016 WI APP 85 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION

2016 WI APP 85 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION 2016 WI APP 85 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2015AP2224 Petition for review filed Complete Title of Case: WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION OF STATE PROSECUTORS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, WISCONSIN

More information

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Frank Bacon v County of St Clair Docket No. 328337 Michael F. Gadola Presiding Judge Karen M. Fort Hood LC Nos. 13-101210-CZ; 13-000560-CZ Michael J. Riordan Judges

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DADE COUNTY. Honorable David R. Munton, Judge

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DADE COUNTY. Honorable David R. Munton, Judge In the Matter of: SANDRA LEE KILE. SANDRA LEE KILE, Appellant, vs. No. SD30168 JUDY K. MCGUIRE, Public Administrator of Dade County, Missouri, Respondent. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DADE COUNTY Honorable

More information

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DANIEL KEVIN SCHMIDT, : CASE NO.: SC00-2512 : Lower Tribunal No.: 1D00-4166 Petitioner, : Circuit Court No.: 00-1971 : vs. : : STATE OF FLORIDA et al., : : Respondents. : : AMENDED

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D Electronically Filed 10/09/2013 11:26:52 AM ET RECEIVED, 10/9/2013 11:28:34, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC2013-1834 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D11-3004

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL CASE NO. H MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL CASE NO. H MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SCOTT BROWNING, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL CASE NO. H-10-4478 SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY and CAVALRY CONSTRUCTION CO., Defendants.

More information

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 15-3804 Schnuck Markets, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. First Data Merchant Services Corp.; Citicorp Payment Services, Inc.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Hunter v. Salem, Missouri, City of et al Doc. 59 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ANAKA HUNTER, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SALEM PUBLIC LIBRARY, et

More information

Nuts and Bolts of a Civil Appeal

Nuts and Bolts of a Civil Appeal Nuts and Bolts of a Civil Appeal Legal Research by Richard L. Rollings, Jr. 379 W. Lake Park Camdenton, MO 65020 (573) 873-6060 Rick@RRollings.com www.rrollings.com Program & Presentation Materials The

More information

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. SC

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. SC Electronically Filed 08/26/2013 04:20:02 PM ET RECEIVED, 8/26/2013 16:23:40, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, v. SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA,

More information

Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Wilson Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. Edward A. Fusco, Defendant/Respondent/ Cross-Appellant. Case Number:

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 99,793

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 99,793 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 99,793 BARTON J. COHEN, as Trustee of the Barton J. Cohen Revocable Trust, and A. BARON CASS, III, as Trustee of the A. Baron Cass Family Trust, u/t/a dated

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ASSOCIATE DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ASSOCIATE DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ASSOCIATE DIVISION JEFFERSON COUNTY RAINTREE ) COUNTRY CLUB, LLC, ) Case No.: ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Division: ) BLACK HOLE, LLC, ) ) And ) ) RAINTREE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 20 ) HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, ) Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff, ) v. ) No. 05-1206-CV-W-FJG

More information

FILED FRANK WHITE JR, )

FILED FRANK WHITE JR, ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY SCOTT BURNETT, et al., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CASE NO: 1816-CV01045 vs. ) DIVISION 11 ) FILED FRANK WHITE JR, ) DIVISION 11 ) Defendant. ) 31-Aug-2018

More information

BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA

BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA Filing # 17701401 Electronically Filed 08/29/2014 03:49:59 PM RECEIVED, 8/29/2014 15:53:38, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 14, 2010 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 14, 2010 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 14, 2010 Session SHIRLEY NICHOLSON v. LESTER HUBBARD REALTORS, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-005422-04 Kay

More information

Case 1:17-cv LG-RHW Document 42 Filed 03/19/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:17-cv LG-RHW Document 42 Filed 03/19/18 Page 1 of 8 Case 1:17-cv-00083-LG-RHW Document 42 Filed 03/19/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION JESSICA C. McGLOTHIN PLAINTIFF v. CAUSE NO.

More information

No ATTORNEY GENERAL TROY KING S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND MOTION TO DISMISS OR DENY PETITION

No ATTORNEY GENERAL TROY KING S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND MOTION TO DISMISS OR DENY PETITION E-Filed 04/01/2010 @ 02:07:59 PM Honorable Robert Esdale Clerk Of The Court No. 1090808 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA 444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 Ex parte Bob Riley, Governor, State of

More information

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS EASTERN DISTRICT NO. ED KQUAWANDA MOORE, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs.

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS EASTERN DISTRICT NO. ED KQUAWANDA MOORE, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs. IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS EASTERN DISTRICT NO. ED102765 KQUAWANDA MOORE, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs. LIFE FOR LIFE ACADEMY, INC., Defendant/Respondent. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR DR. J. ALEXANDER MARCHOSKY, ) No. ED95992 ) Appellant, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of vs. ) St. Louis County ) ST. LUKE S EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DOUGLAS BURKE, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant/ Garnishor-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED August 5, 2010 v No. 290590 Wayne Circuit Court UNITED AMERICAN ACQUISITIONS AND LC No. 04-433025-CZ

More information

NO CA-1292 CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL. VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL KEVIN M. DUPART FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * CONSOLIDATED WITH:

NO CA-1292 CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL. VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL KEVIN M. DUPART FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * CONSOLIDATED WITH: CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL. VERSUS KEVIN M. DUPART CONSOLIDATED WITH: KEVIN M. DUPART VERSUS * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2013-CA-1292 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA CONSOLIDATED WITH:

More information

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CA10-636 Opinion Delivered February 9, 2011 RICHARD L. MYERS ET AL. APPELLANTS V. PETER KARL BOGNER, SR., ET AL. APPELLEES APPEAL FROM THE CARROLL COUNTY CIRCUIT

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District GOOD WORLD DEALS, LLC., Appellant, v. RAY GALLAGHER and XCESS LIMITED, Respondents. WD81076 FILED: July 24, 2018 APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY

More information

36 East Seventh St., Suite South Main Street

36 East Seventh St., Suite South Main Street [Cite as Knop Chiropractic, Inc. v. State Farm Ins. Co., 2003-Ohio-5021.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT KNOP CHIROPRACTIC, INC. -vs- Plaintiff-Appellant STATE FARM INSURANCE

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ANDREW COUNTY, MISSOURI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ANDREW COUNTY, MISSOURI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Ú ¼ ô Ö«ïìô îðïé ðîæðï ÐÓ IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ANDREW COUNTY, MISSOURI THE ANDREW COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, et al., v. Plaintiffs, JOSEPH KNORR, et al., Defendants. Case No. 16AW-CC00255 FINAL JUDGMENT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: Case 9:18-cv-81345-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2018 Page 1 of 4 JOHN DOE, vs. Plaintiff, RICHARD L. SWEARINGEN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Florida Department of Law

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES V. CROSBY, JR., Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Petitioner, Case No.: SC04-1153 L.T. Case No. 2D03-4364 vs. CLARENCE W. DOWNS, DC# 251539 Respondent.

More information

In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida

In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida CASE NO. (Circuit Court Case No. and Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE INDYMAC INDA MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2005-AR2,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY Plaintiff(s, Case No. v. Division 3 Defendant(s. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER Now on this day of, 20, this matter is called and

More information

E-Filed Document Jul :13: EC SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

E-Filed Document Jul :13: EC SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jul 26 2016 13:13:30 2015-EC-01677-SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI TASHA DILLON APPELLANT vs. NO. 2015-CA-01677 DAVID MYERS APPELLEE On Appeal From the Circuit Court

More information

and No Wayne Circuit Court SYNERGY SPINE AND ORTHOPEDIC LC No NI SURGERY CENTER,

and No Wayne Circuit Court SYNERGY SPINE AND ORTHOPEDIC LC No NI SURGERY CENTER, S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PERCY BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION April 5, 2018 9:00 a.m. and No. 335931 Wayne Circuit Court SYNERGY SPINE AND ORTHOPEDIC LC No.

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #19-5042 Document #1779028 Filed: 03/24/2019 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : DAMIEN GUEDUES, et al., : : No. 19-5042 Appellants : : Consolidated

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Bogullavsky v. Conway Doc. 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ILYA BOGUSLAVSKY, : No. 3:12cv2026 Plaintiff : : (Judge Munley) v. : : ROBERT J. CONWAY, : Defendant

More information

RHYTHM MOTOR SPORTS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Plaintiff/Appellant,

RHYTHM MOTOR SPORTS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Plaintiff/Appellant, NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI CHRISTINE DENT, Cause No: Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED vs. PAUL CERAME AUTO GROUP Serve: Spenserv - St. Louis, Inc. 1 North Brentwood Blvd.

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #15-1166 Document #1671681 Filed: 04/18/2017 Page 1 of 10 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT WALTER COKE, INC.,

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #15-1385 Document #1670218 Filed: 04/07/2017 Page 1 of 10 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Murray Energy Corporation,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI JANE TURNER, et al., Plaintiffs, Cause No. 07SL-CC00605 vs. Division No. 9 Date: October 21, 2010 SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CLAYTON, et. al., Defendants.

More information

Kyles v. Celadon Trucking Servs.

Kyles v. Celadon Trucking Servs. Kyles v. Celadon Trucking Servs. United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Southern Division October 19, 2015, Decided; October 19, 2015, Filed Case No. 6:15-cv-03193-MDH Reporter

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI THE SAINT LOUIS COUNTY COUNCIL, SAM PAGE, ERNIE TRAKAS, ROCHELLE WALTON GRAY, and HAZEL ERBY, Plaintiffs, v. Case Number: SUE DANIELS,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ROBERT PONTE, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant- Appellant, UNPUBLISHED April 24, 2012 v Nos. 298193; 298194 Washtenaw Circuit Court SANDRA HAZLETT, d/b/a HAZLETT & LC No.

More information