Case: HJB Doc #: 3294 Filed: 03/07/16 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE : : :

Transcription

1 Case HJB Doc # 3294 Filed 03/07/16 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE x In re GT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al., Debtors x Chapter 11 Case No HJB Jointly Administered Re Docket No CERTIFICATE OF NO OBJECTION UNDER 28 U.S.C REQUESTING ENTRY, WITHOUT A HEARING, OF ORDER GRANTING DEBTORS FOURTEENTH OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO CLAIMS (RECLASSIFIED AND MODIFIED CLAIMS; NO LIABILITY CLAIMS), AS MODIFIED Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, and in accordance with this Court s case management procedures set forth in the Order Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 105(a) and Bankruptcy Rule 1015(c) and 9007, Implementing Certain Notice and Case Management Procedures [Docket No. 83] (the Case Management Order ), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows 1. On February 8, 2016, GT Advanced Technologies Inc. and its affiliated debtors as debtors in possession in the above-captioned cases (collectively, GTAT or the Debtors ) filed the Debtors Fourteenth Omnibus Objection to Claims (Incorrect Debtor Claims) [Docket No. 3074] (the Fourteenth Omnibus Claims Objection ) 2 in accordance with the Order Pursuant to 1 2 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each debtor s tax identification number, as applicable, are GT Advanced Technologies Inc. (6749), GTAT Corporation (1760), GT Advanced Equipment Holding LLC (8329), GT Equipment Holdings, Inc. (0040), Lindbergh Acquisition Corp. (5073), GT Sapphire Systems Holding LLC (4417), GT Advanced Cz LLC (9815), GT Sapphire Systems Group LLC (5126), and GT Advanced Technologies Limited (1721). The Debtors corporate headquarters are located at 243 Daniel Webster Highway, Merrimack, NH Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Fourteenth Omnibus Claims Objection.

2 Case HJB Doc # 3294 Filed 03/07/16 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 3 Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 3007 Approving Claims Objection Procedures, dated August 24, 2015 [Docket No. 2213] (the Claims Procedures Order ). 2. Under the Case Management Order and the Claims Procedures Order, February 29, 2016 at 400 p.m. (ET) was established as the deadline for parties to object or file a response to the Fourteenth Omnibus Claims Objection (the Response Deadline ). 3. The Debtors have agreed to extend the deadline to respond to the Fourteenth Omnibus Claims Objection as it relates to Claim No. 769, filed by Silfab S.p.A. n/k/a Silfab S.r.l. 4. At this time, the Debtors are only seeking approval of the Fourteenth Omnibus Claims Objection as it relates to the claims identified on Schedules 1 and 2 to the revised order attached hereto as Exhibit A. Schedules 1 and 2 to the revised order are identical to Schedules 1 and 2 to the proposed order filed with the Fourteenth Omnibus Claims Objection, except that Schedule 2 omits Claim No The Response Deadline has now passed and, to the best of my knowledge, as it relates to the claims identified on Schedules 1 and 2 to the revised order, no objection or other responsive pleading to the Fourteenth Omnibus Claims Objection has been filed with the Court on the docket of the above-referenced case in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Case Management Order, nor has any objection or other responsive pleading with respect to the Fourteenth Omnibus Claims Objection been served on counsel to GTAT to date. Moreover, to the best of my knowledge, no party in interest has made any informal requests for changes to the form of proposed Order. 6. The Case Management Order provides that the Court may approve the relief requested in a pleading without a hearing provided that (i) no objection or request for a hearing has been timely filed by the applicable Response Deadline and (ii) after the Response Deadline, 2

3 Case HJB Doc # 3294 Filed 03/07/16 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 3 the attorney for the moving party files with the Court a certificate stating that no objections to such pleading have been timely filed and served upon the moving party, along with an order granting the relief requested in the applicable pleading. 7. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Fourteenth Omnibus Claims Objection, GTAT respectfully requests that the Order annexed hereto as Exhibit A be approved and entered in accordance with the procedures described in the Case Management Order. I declare that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated March 7, 2016 /s/ G. Alexander Bongartz. Luc A. Despins, Esq. Andrew V. Tenzer, Esq. James T. Grogan, Esq. (BNH07394) G. Alexander Bongartz, Esq. (BNH07449) PAUL HASTINGS LLP Park Avenue Tower 75 East 55th Street, First Floor New York, New York Telephone (212) Facsimile (212) and Daniel W. Sklar, Esq. Holly J. Barcroft, Esq. NIXON PEABODY LLP 900 Elm Street Manchester, NH Telephone (603) Facsimile (603) Co-Counsel for the Debtors and Debtors in Possession 3

4 Case HJB Doc # Filed 03/07/16 Desc Exhibit A - Proposed Order Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A Proposed Order

5 Case HJB Doc # Filed 03/07/16 Desc Exhibit A - Proposed Order Page 2 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE x In re GT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al., Debtors x Chapter 11 Case No HJB Jointly Administered RE Docket No. ORDER GRANTING DEBTORS FOURTEENTH OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO CLAIMS (RECLASSIFIED AND MODIFIED CLAIMS; NO LIABILITY CLAIMS) Upon consideration of the Debtors Fourteenth Omnibus Objection to Claims (Reclassified and Modified Claims; No Liability Claims) (the Objection ), 2 filed pursuant to section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 3007, seeking entry of an order (i) reclassifying and/or modifying the claims listed on Schedule 1 hereto; and (ii) disallowing and expunging the claims listed on Schedule 2 hereto, all as more fully set forth in the Objection; and upon consideration of the Herriman Declaration; and the court having jurisdiction to consider the Objection and the relief requested therein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157 and 1334; and due and adequate notice of the Objection having been given under the circumstances; and sufficient cause appearing therefor; it is hereby ORDERED that 1. The Objection is sustained as set forth herein. 1 2 The debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each debtor s tax identification number, as applicable, are GT Advanced Technologies Inc. (6749), GTAT Corporation (1760), GT Advanced Equipment Holding LLC (8329), GT Equipment Holdings, Inc. (0040), Lindbergh Acquisition Corp. (5073), GT Sapphire Systems Holding LLC (4417), GT Advanced Cz LLC (9815), GT Sapphire Systems Group LLC (5126), and GT Advanced Technologies Limited (1721). The Debtors corporate headquarters are located at 243 Daniel Webster Highway, Merrimack, NH Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Objection.

6 Case HJB Doc # Filed 03/07/16 Desc Exhibit A - Proposed Order Page 3 of 7 2. The claims listed on Schedule 1 hereto are hereby reclassified and/or modified as specified in Schedule 1. their entirety. 3. The claims listed on Schedule 2 hereto are hereby disallowed and expunged in 4. The Debtors expressly reserve their rights to object to any of the claims listed on Schedule 1 hereto on any grounds whatsoever at a later date. 5. Nothing in the Objection or this Order constitutes a waiver of the Debtors rights to object to any claims not previously disallowed or to assert any claims, counterclaims, rights of offset or recoupment or any other claims against the claimants listed on Schedules 1 and 2 to this Order, all of which rights are expressly preserved. 6. KCC, the Debtors court-appointed notice and claims agent, is authorized and directed to reclassify and/or modify or disallow and expunge the claims as set forth in each Schedule pursuant to this Order on the official claims register in these chapter 11 cases. 7. This Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to any matters, claims, rights, or disputes arising from or related to the Objection or the implementation of this Order. Dated, 2016 Manchester, NH HONORABLE HENRY J. BOROFF UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

7 Case HJB Doc # Filed 03/07/16 Desc Exhibit A - Proposed Order Page 4 of 7 Schedule 1

8 Case HJB Doc # Filed 03/07/16 Desc Exhibit A - Proposed Order Page 5 of 7 GT Advanced Technologies Inc., et al. Fourteenth Omnibus Objection Schedule 1 Reclassified and Modified Claims NAME CLAIM # 1 SANMINA CORPORATION AND ITS SUBSIDIARY, SANMINA-SCI SYSTEMS (KUNSHAN) CO. LIMITED EDWARD T. ATTANASIO, ESQ. SANMINA CORPORATION 2700 NORTH FIRST STREET SAN JOSE, CA STEEL-PRO, INC. ANDREW C. HELMAN MARCUS, CLEGG & MISTRETTA, P.A. ONE CANAL PLAZA, SUITE 600 PORTLAND, ME FILED DATE DEBTOR /22/2015 GT Advanced Technologies Limited /26/2015 GT Advanced Technologies Limited ASSERTED CLASS 503(b)(9) Unsecured Secured Unsecured ASSERTED AMOUNT $597, $3,584,910.14* $1,819,459.00* Undetermined* MODIFIED CLASS 503(b)(9) Unsecured Secured Unsecured MODIFIED AMOUNT $597, $3,584, $0.00 $1,322, GROUNDS FOR OBJECTION Claimant also asserted an unliquidated component in addition to its claim of $4,194, According to their books and records the Debtors believe the fully liquidated amount of this claim is $4,194, Note - Claim previously modified on the Ninth Omnibus Objection (Reclassified and Modified 503(b)(9) Claims) Claim asserts secured status, but claimant is already in possession of goods that purport to secure this claim. In addition, the Debtors books and records reflect a liability owing to claimant of $1,322,424. Accordingly, the claim should be reclassified and reduced as set forth herein. * - Indicates claim contains unliquidated and/or undetermined amounts Page 1 of 1

9 Case HJB Doc # Filed 03/07/16 Desc Exhibit A - Proposed Order Page 6 of 7 Schedule 2

10 Case HJB Doc # Filed 03/07/16 Desc Exhibit A - Proposed Order Page 7 of 7 GT Advanced Technologies Inc., et al. Fourteenth Omnibus Objection Schedule 2 No Liability Claims 1 NIKOLIC, IVAN SONNENSHASSE 2 LUZERN, 6014 SWITZERLAND NAME CASE NUMBER (HJB) DEBTOR NAME GT Advanced Technologies Inc. FILED DATE CLAIM # TOTAL CLAIM DOLLARS REASON FOR PROPOSED DISALLOWANCE 01/20/ $178, Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007(d)(7), the Debtors object to this claim on the grounds that such claim is asserted on account of equity interests held by the claimant and is therefore not a "claim" as defined in section 101(5) of the Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly Debtors believe the claim should be disallowed and expunged in its entirety. Note Claim also contained on the Fifteenth Omnibus Objection (Late Filed Claims) 01/15/ $14, The Debtors books and records do not reflect a liability owing to this claimant with respect to the matters asserted in the proof of claim. 2 NILES EXPANDED METALS 310 NORTH PLEASANT AVENUE NILES, OH (HJB) GT Advanced Technologies Inc. Accordingly, the claim should be disallowed and expunged in its entirety. 01/26/ $1,200, The Debtors books and records do not reflect a liability owing to this claimant with respect to the matters asserted in the proof of claim. 3 TAIWAN POLYSILICON CORP., 6F, NO. 85, SEC 4 BLADE ROAD TAIPEI, TAIWAN, PROVINCE OF CHINA (HJB) GT Advanced Technologies Inc. Accordingly, the claim should be disallowed and expunged in its entirety. Page 1 of 1