Citation: 27 Am. J. Trial Advoc
|
|
- Eleanore Hubbard
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Citation: 27 Am. J. Trial Advoc Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline ( Fri Dec 11 11:20: Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: &operation=go&searchtype=0 &lastsearch=simple&all=on&titleorstdno=
2 Cross-Examination: To Lead or Not to Lead? Kenneth J. Melillil Abstract In this Trial Technique, Professor Kenneth Melilli addresses when it is appropriate to ask non-leading questions on cross-examination. Ordinarily, leading questions are permitted on cross-examination of adverse parties or witnesses.' Because leading questions provide the cross-examiner with superior control over both the witness and the information revealed to thejury, cross-examination in the form of leading questions is generally recommended. 2 Indeed, some experts counsel that virtually every question asked on cross-examination should be in the form of a leading question.' A few commentators recommend that non-leading questions be used only when any answer to the question is acceptable, 4 when the answer to the question is known, 5 when the answer to the question is obvious, 6 when the answer to the question is unimportant, 7 or when tb.a. (1976), Yale University; J.D. (1979), New York University Law School. The author is a Professor of Law at Creighton University School of Law. Professor Melilli gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Leticia Plucknett and Patrice Andersen. 1 FED. R. EVID. 61 1(c). 22 JAMES W. JEANS, SR., LITIGATION , at 1056 (1992) [hereinafter LITIGA- TION]; JAMES W. JEANS, SR., TRIALADVOCACY 13.23, at 315 (1975) [hereinafter TRIAL ADVOCACY]. 3 ROBERTO ARON ET AL., CROSS-EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES, THE LITIGATOR'S PUZZLE 8.05, at 117, & 17.12, at 309 (1989); JOHN E. DURST, JR. & FRED QUELLER, ART OF ADVOCACY, CROSS EXAMINATION OF LAY WITNESSES 1.06, at 1-23 (1992); ROGER HAYDOCK & JOHN SONSTENG, TRIAL, THEORIES, TACTICS, TECHNIQUES 10.3, at 525 (1991); STEVEN LUBET, MODERN TRIAL ADVOCACY, ANALYSIS AND PRACTICE 68 (1993); THOMAS A. MAUET, TRIAL TECHNIQUES 224 (4th ed. 1996); LARRY S. POZNER & ROGER J. DODD, CROSS-EXAMINATION: SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES 298 (1993); Judge Ernest M. Hiroshige, FinalExams, 23-Feb L.A. LAW. 26,29 (2001); Paul M. Lisnek, Mastering the Art of Cross-Examination, 6/12/95 CHI. DAILY L. BULL. 6 (1995). 4 LITIGATION, supra note 2, , at ; LUBET, supra note 3, at 68; Henry W. Asbill, The Ten Commandments of Cross-Examination Revisited, 8-WTR CRIM. JUST. 2, 5 (1994). 5TRIAL ADVOCACY, supra note 2, 13.24, at MAUET, supra note 3, at Id.; TRIAL ADVOCACY, supra note 2, 13.24, at 316.
3 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRIAL ADVOCACY [Vol. 27:149 the witness is committed to the desired answer by a prior statement. 8 Only a few writers advocate a more liberal use of non-leading questions on cross-examination. 9 At the substantial risk of disagreeing with better trial lawyers than myself, I offer here my view that non-leading questions on crossexamination are sometimes necessary and often very effective. In fact, certain questions, ifthey are to be asked at all on cross-examination, must be asked in a non-leading form or the cross-examiner risks disaster. The key is recognizing the significance of asking a leading question on crossexamination and identifying the limited circumstances in which leading questions should be asked. I start with the proposition that arguably the most important thing that develops during a trial is the relationship between the lawyer and the jurors. When the lawyer asks the jurors for their verdict, she wants them to want to give the verdict to her. She expects the jurors to want to give her their verdict not just because her client deserves it but also because they want to give it to her personally. She wants the jurors to respect and like her. This desire does not come from any need for personal gratification. Rather, the lawyer knows that obtaining the jurors' verdict is more likely to occur if their reaction to her personally is consistent with, rather than an impediment to, that conclusion. Most of all, the trial lawyer wants the jurors to trust and believe her. Her personal credibility with the jury is absolutely critical. When she argues her client's cause to the jury during her summation, her persuasiveness comes not merely from the force of her argument, but also from her personal endorsement. She cannot express her personal opinion to the jurors directly, but thejurors have no doubt of her personal conviction in the rightness of her client's position. If she has successfully earned the trust and confidence of thejurors throughout the trial, that conviction counts for something with the jurors. Much of the lawyer's strategic choices during the trial should be influenced, if not directed, by the critical importance of building personal credibility with the jury. She makes no promises in opening statement 8 MAUET, supra note 3, at See HERBERT J. STERN, TRYING CASES TO WIN, CROSS-ExAMINATION (1993); Ralph Adam Fine, Irving Younger Was Wrong When He Commanded, "Use Only Leading Questions ", 67-APR WiS. LAW. 25, 26 (1994).
4 2003] CROSS-EXAMINATION: To LEAD OR NOT TO LEAD? that she does not keep during the trial. She forgoes some objections so as not to appear to thejurors to be attempting to conceal information from them. She is careful not to appear to be manipulating the law or the evidence in any way that might be perceived by the jurors to be inconsistent with the discovery of the truth.' 0 The single most important component of the trial in which the lawyer's personal credibility comes into play is cross-examination." Specifically, the cross-examiner makes her credibility an issue every time she asks a leading question. A leading question is just a statement disguised as a question. Whether it functions as a question because of the addition of words before the statement ("Isn't it true that he walked with a limp?"), the addition of words after the statement ("He walked with a limp, didn't he?") or simply a change in voice inflection ("He walked with a limp?"), the essence of a leading question is a statement made by the cross-examiner. It is the lawyer who chooses the words of the statement contained in the leading question, 2 and consequently the focus is on the lawyer. 3 The point of the leading question is ultimately to persuade the jury to agree with the statement of the lawyer.14 Consequently, every time a lawyer asks a leading question on crossexamination, she places her personal credibility at issue. Just as a witness is discredited when his testimony is discovered by the jurors to be false, a lawyer is discredited in the eyes of the jurors on any occasion that her statement in a leading question fails to be substantiated. 5 And just as a single falsehood may destroy the credibility of a witness regarding the entirety of the witness's testimony, so too a single failure by a crossexaminer with a leading question may negatively impact the lawyer's credibility well beyond the parameters of the particular question. Therefore, a lawyer should not ask a leading question on crossexamination unless she is reasonably assured that the statement contained " 0 See Fine, supra note 9, at 25. "See Asbill, supra note 4, at TRIAL ADVOCACY, supra note 2, 13.23, at 315. ' 3 HAYDOCK & SONSTENG, supra note 3, 10.2, at 524; MAUET, supra note 3, at STERN, supra note 9, at 9. " 5 See id. at
5 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRIAL ADVOCACY [Vol. 27:149 in her question will be substantiated. In other words, she should only ask a leading question when she is reasonably sure she will win the contest of her own credibility. How can the lawyer be so reasonably assured? Obviously, if the witness agrees with the statement contained in the leading question, victory is at hand. Consequently, the cross-examiner must assess the chance of the witness dissenting from the statement. The lawyer could decide that this risk of dissent is so trivial, and the potential gain from acquiescence so great, that the risk should be tolerated and the leading question should be put to the witness. Although this risk is a contextual calculation, the downside of the loss ofpersonal credibility is so substantial that generally no significant risk should be tolerated. Acquiescence from the witness is not, however, the sole circumstance in which the cross-examiner can be reasonably assured of success with a leading question. If the witness can be impeached with his own prior statement, the enhancement of the lawyer's credibility (and the failure of the witness's credibility) will likely be even greater than if the witness had agreed with the cross-examiner in the first place.' 6 Moreover, if the proposition contained in the leading question is so manifestly correct, and the denial by the witness so patently false, the cross-examiner will have won the contest and the leading question is perfectly safe. Finally, if testimony from other witnesses or other evidence substantiates the crossexaminer's statement and discredits the witness's resistance, then again the leading question is a good choice. The bottom line on leading questions is this: do not put yourself in a position where, after the presentation of all of the evidence, the jurors can reasonably conclude that a statement contained in your leading question is false. An unthinking adherence to the admonition to ask all questions on cross-examination in a leading form, without regard to the above-stated guidelines, is fraught with peril. It by no means follows from this discussion that all questions not meeting the criteria set forth earlier may be asked, as long as they are phrased in a non-leading manner. There are many questions that should never be asked on cross-examination. Once the determination is made 6 This is precisely why prior statements of witnesses are the absolute best source for constructing leading questions for cross-examination.
6 2003] CROSS-EXAMINATION: TO LEAD OR NOT TO LEAD? that a question should not be asked as a leading question, the issue remains whether to ask the question in a non-leading form or not to ask it at all. On this point, guidance must be less specific. Many commentators advise never to ask a question on cross-examination unless the answer is already known. 7 Generally speaking, this recommendation comes from the same sources who advise asking only leading questions on cross-examination. 8 Although I believe that each of these admonitions is incorrect, considered together they do make some sense. If you are going to ask exclusively leading questions on crossexamination, then you must know the answers to these questions before you ask them. However, I have already explained why all questions on crossexamination should not be leading questions. The caution against all questions with unknown answers is also fatally rigid. 19 In criminal cases (where depositions and prior statements are less likely), but also in some civil case scenarios, lawyers sometimes do not discover the details of witnesses' testimony until the trial itself. Unless the cross-examiner merely wishes the witness to repeat what was stated on direct examination, cross-examination must include some inquiry into unknown areas and undisclosed details. Essentially, the deposition of the witness is taken on cross-examination in a carefully circumscribed manner. This may produce opportunities for more pointed cross-examination. There are, of course, risks. Nevertheless, considering the unlikelihood of damaging testimony having been omitted from the direct examination, as well as the disadvantage of leaving harmful testimony unchallenged, the risk of reticence on cross-examination might well be greater. Unless an opportunity for a leading question presents itself, this type of cross-examination should proceed entirely by non-leading questions. Obviously, if the lawyer does not know the answer to a question, she should be unwilling to endorse any particular answer with a leading question. 17ARON ET AL., supra note 3, 8.06, at 123, & 17.12, at ; DURST & QUELLER, supra note 3, 1.04, at 1-7; HAYDOCK & SONSTENG, supra note 3, 10.3, at 534; Hiroshige, supra note 3, at 29; JOHN NICHOLAS IANNUZZI, HANDBOOK OF TRIAL STRATEGIES 292 (2d ed. 2001); LUBET, supra note 3, at 121. " 8 See supra note 3 and accompanying text. ' 9 STERN, supra note 9, at
7 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRIAL ADVOCACY [Vol. 27:149 Non-leading questions in circumstances in which the answer is unknown are devastatingly effective when any conceivable answer is beneficial to the cross-examiner. The cross-examiner must consider all possible answers. Such questions are safer if phrased so as to require only a yes-or-no response, if only to minimize the possible answers that the cross-examiner must consider. This question must be asked in a nonleading form, for the lawyer is not vouching for any particular answer. 2 Although the issue of whether a cross-examiner should ask a leading question does lend itself to relatively precise guidelines, the issue of whether to ask a non-leading question (as opposed to no question) does not. Good trial lawyers trust their intelligence, skill, and experience. Those lacking the third of these ingredients sensibly proceed with greater caution. 2 In a trial that took place so long ago that I probably remember it more favorably to myself than reality would allow, I was the prosecutor cross-examining a defendant charged with a street sale of heroin to an undercover police officer. The defendant's situation was worsened by the fact that two five-dollar bills from the sale (determined by pre-recording the serial numbers of the funds used in the purchase) were found in the defendant's pants pocket. On direct, in an effort to explain the incriminating bills, the defendant claimed to have been involved in a change-making transaction shortly before his arrest. In a short cross-examination that consisted entirely of non-leading questions, the defendant told us that it was a stranger who approached him, that it was the stranger who wanted change, and that the stranger asked for one ten-dollar bill in exchange for the two damning five-dollar bills. I then asked the defendant what one could buy with a ten-dollar bill that could not be purchased with two five-dollar bills. The defendant could think of no answer to my question, several of the jurors giggled, I sat down, and, although my sight line does not permit me to state this with complete certainty, I believe the trial judge checked his calendar for a date for sentencing.
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS AND SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS AND SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE FEDERAL RULE 801(D)(1)(A): THE COMPROMISE Stephen A. Saltzburg* INTRODUCTION Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A) is a compromise. The Supreme Court
More information-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.
Citation: 38 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 317 2014-2015 Provided by: Klutznick Law Library / McGrath North Mullin & Kratz Legal Research Cente Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org)
More information4. CROSS EXAMINATION 159
4. CROSS EXAMINATION 159 160 Trial Advocacy, Cross-Examination: The Basics Ben B. Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan Cross-examination involves relatively straightforward skills. Through preparation of your case,
More informationGENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to
GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must follow the law as I state it
More informationWRITING FOR TRIALS 1
WRITING FOR TRIALS 1 2017 The Writing Center at GULC. All Rights Reserved. I. Introduction Whether you are taking a trial practice class, competing in a mock trial tournament, representing a clinic client,
More informationProsecutor Trial Preparation: Preparing the Victim of Human Trafficking to Testify
This guide is a gift of the United States Government PRACTICE GUIDE Prosecutor Trial Preparation: Preparing the Victim of Human Trafficking to Testify AT A GLANCE Intended Audience: Prosecutors working
More informationJUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Stock Opening Instructions Introduction and General Instructions... 1 Summary of the Case... 2 Role of Judge, Jury and Lawyers...
More informationMethods of impeachment. Contradiction Inconsistent statement Bad character for truthfulness Bias Lack of capacity or opportunity to observe
Methods of impeachment Contradiction Inconsistent statement Bad character for truthfulness Bias Lack of capacity or opportunity to observe 1 Oswalt rule: Extrinsic evidence is not admissible to impeach
More informationKeynote Address JUSTICE JOHN PAUL STEVENS (RET).
Keynote Address JUSTICE JOHN PAUL STEVENS (RET). Let me begin by expressing my admiration for the work performed by Justice Elana Kagan, who now occupies the seat of the Supreme Court that became vacant
More informationSecond, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.
CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, we now come to that part of the case where I must give you the instructions on the law. If you cannot hear me, please raise your hand. It is important that you
More informationWitness testimony The question and answer method (Jack Ruby essay, p. 485) 1. Free narratives are usually not permitted.
Witness testimony The question and answer method (Jack Ruby essay, p. 485) 1. Free narratives are usually not permitted. 2. Leading questions are usually not permitted on direct examination. 1 Why not
More informationFunction of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence
101.05 Function of the Jury Members of the jury, all the evidence has been presented. It is now your duty to decide the facts from the evidence. You must then apply to those facts the law which I am about
More informationHOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA
HOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA This legal guide explains the steps you will go through if you should be arrested or charged with a crime in Florida. This guide is only general information and
More information2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20
2:16-cv-02222-EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20 E-FILED Friday, 18 May, 2018 03:51:00 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD Members of the jury, you have seen and heard all the evidence and will hear the arguments
More information3:05-cv MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16
3:05-cv-02858-MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION United States of America, ex rel. ) Michael
More informationDIRECT EXAMINATION. Robert E. Harrington Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A.
DIRECT EXAMINATION Robert E. Harrington Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A. John S. Leary Association of Black Lawyers Trial Advocacy CLE September 17, 2011 DIRECT EXAMINATION UNDERSTAND THE ROLE AND IMPORTANCE
More informationWhat were the final scores in your scenario for prosecution and defense? What side were you on? What primarily helped your win or lose?
Quiz name: Make Your Case Debrief Activity (1-27-2016) Date: 01/27/2016 Question with Most Correct Answers: #0 Total Questions: 8 Question with Fewest Correct Answers: #0 1. What were the final scores
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI JOINTLY PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
Case 6:18-cr-00043-RBD-DCI Document 51 Filed 08/13/18 Page 1 of 34 PageID 307 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI
More informationCase 0:13-cr KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2014 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:13-cr-60245-KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2014 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 13-60245-CR-MARRA(s) v. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD DAVIS, No. 21, 2002 Defendant Below, Appellant, Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, v. in and for New Castle County STATE OF DELAWARE,
More informationRules of Evidence (Abridged)
Rules of Evidence (Abridged) Article IV: Relevancy and its Limits Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would
More informationThe Art and Ethics of Cross-Examination Outline
I. Cross-Examination The Art and Ethics of Cross-Examination a. What Is It? Cross-examination is the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth. You can do anything with a bayonet except
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-00-jvs-dfm Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 SHELBY PHILLIPS, III, et al. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff(s), UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LINN COUNTY
Terri Wood, OSB #88332 Law Office of Terri Wood, P.C. 730 Van Buren Street Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-484-4171 Attorney for IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LINN COUNTY STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff,
More informationCourtroom Terminology
Courtroom Terminology Accused: formally charged but not yet tried for committing a crime; the person who has been charged may also be called the defendant. Acquittal: a judgment of court, based on the
More informationArgumentative Questions (Badgering) Assuming Facts Not in Evidence (Extrapolation) Irrelevant Evidence Hearsay Opinion Lack of Personal Knowledge
Argumentative Questions (Badgering) Assuming Facts Not in Evidence (Extrapolation) Irrelevant Evidence Hearsay Opinion Lack of Personal Knowledge Asked and Answered Outside the Scope of Cross Examination
More informationPRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100
PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS CACI No. 100 You have now been sworn as jurors in this case. I want to impress on you the seriousness and importance of serving on a jury. Trial by jury is a fundamental right in
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2003 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D01-2416 MAURICE BUSH, Appellee. Opinion filed January 24, 2003 Appeal
More informationTRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005
TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005 Thomas K. Maher 312 W Franklin Street Chapel Hill, N.C. 27516 (O) 929-1043 (H) 933-5674 TKMaher@tkmaherlaw.com General Instructions 1. General Information. The class will meet
More informationDirect Examination Tips
Direct Examination Tips Lenae Pederson Meagher & Geer PLLP 33 S. Sixth Street #4400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 371-1334 lpederson@meagher.com Lenae Pederson focuses her practice on complex civil litigation
More informationv No Kalamazoo Circuit Court FH Defendant-Appellant.
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED August 17, 2017 v No. 333147 Kalamazoo Circuit Court AARON CHARLES DAVIS, JR.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 99,014. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DAMON LARON ALLEN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 99,014 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DAMON LARON ALLEN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The threshold question in a multiple acts analysis is whether
More informationMODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE
Page 1 of 25 100.00 MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. NOTE WELL: This is a sample only. Your case must be tailored to fit your facts and the law. Do not blindly follow this pattern.
More informationCase 1:09-mc EGS Document 84-7 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 9 ADDENDUM
Case 1:09-mc-00198-EGS Document 84-7 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 9 ADDENDUM Subject Attorneys' Comments and/or Objections to the Report Pursuant to the Court's Order, dated February 8, 2012 Exhibit 6 WILLIAM
More informationINTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE & INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT HANDBOOK
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE & INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT HANDBOOK [Attributed to IASAS and ISB THAIMUN will adopt the ICJ & ICC handbook compiled by ISB for the IASAS conference in November 2017 and
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1998) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ARTHUR CALDERON, WARDEN v. RUSSELL COLEMAN ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No.
More informationdeath penalty. In prosecuting the case, State v. Michael Anderson, Mr. Alford and Mr.
I. Description of Misconduct In August 2009, Orleans Parish Assistant District Attorneys Kevin Guillory and John Alford conducted a trial on behalf of the State of Louisiana. The defendant faced the death
More information14 Guilty Pleas. Part A. Introduction GUILTY PLEAS IN JUVENILE COURT
14 Guilty Pleas Part A. Introduction 14.01 GUILTY PLEAS IN JUVENILE COURT In all jurisdictions a juvenile respondent can enter a guilty plea in a delinquency case, just as an adult defendant can in a criminal
More informationTHE OPENING STATEMENT - THE PREVIEW TO VICTORY OR THE BEGINNING OF DEFEAT? THE CLOSING ARGUMENT IN AN EMPLOYMENT CASE - HOW TO FINALIZE THE VICTORY
THE OPENING STATEMENT - THE PREVIEW TO VICTORY OR THE BEGINNING OF DEFEAT? THE CLOSING ARGUMENT IN AN EMPLOYMENT CASE - HOW TO FINALIZE THE VICTORY Presented by: LEONARD COURT CROWE & DUNLEVY 20 N. BROADWAY,
More informationEthical Limits in Witness Preparation. Susan J. Kohlmann February 24, 2017
Ethical Limits in Witness Preparation Susan J. Kohlmann February 24, 2017 Ethical limits in Witness Preparation The line between permissible conduct and impermissible coaching is like the difference between
More informationNo COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO 1975-NMCA-139, 88 N.M. 541, 543 P.2d 834 December 02, 1975 COUNSEL
1 STATE V. SMITH, 1975-NMCA-139, 88 N.M. 541, 543 P.2d 834 (Ct. App. 1975) STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. Larry SMITH and Mel Smith, Defendants-Appellants. No. 1989 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW
More informationNeil Feldscher, CIH, CSP, Esq. and Chip Darius, MA, OHST
Neil Feldscher, CIH, CSP, Esq. and Chip Darius, MA, OHST Types of Witnesses Rules for Expert Witnesses Different Rules, Roles & Expectations Serving as a Consultant or Expert Qualifications Experience
More informationCase 1:08-cr EGS Document 126 Filed 10/02/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:08-cr-00231-EGS Document 126 Filed 10/02/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Crim. No. 08-231 (EGS) THEODORE
More informationBarriers to United States-Canadian Trade: Problems and Solutions, the Canadian Perspective
University of Connecticut DigitalCommons@UConn Faculty Articles and Papers School of Law 1985 Barriers to United States-Canadian Trade: Problems and Solutions, the Canadian Perspective Richard Parker University
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. DEBORAH GORE DEAN ) Criminal No. 92-181 (TJH) MOTION OF DEBORAH GORE DEAN FOR RECONSIDERATION OF RULING
More informationcase 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6
case 3:04-cr-00071-AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Cause No. 3:04-CR-71(AS)
More informationCROSS EXAMINATION AND IMPEACHMENT AS PRACTICE TOOLS. Traci A. Owens
CROSS EXAMINATION AND IMPEACHMENT AS PRACTICE TOOLS Traci A. Owens Using Prosecution Witnesses to tell Our Clients STORIES The defense often suffers from a witness shortage. THE PROSECUTOR S FRAILTY IS
More informationDELAWARE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION August 14, 2003
DELAWARE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION 2003-3 August 14, 2003 THIS OPINION IS MERELY ADVISORY AND IS NOT BINDING ON THE INQUIRING ATTORNEY OR THE COURTS OR ANY OTHER TRIBUNAL
More informationNAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1
NAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1 Question: The Ethics Counselors of the National Association for Public Defense (NAPD) have been asked to address the following scenario: An investigator working for Defense
More informationSTRUCTURE OF A CRIMINAL TRIAL: (FELONY)
TRIAL: (FELONY) STRUCTURE OF A CRIMINAL Crimes are divided into 2 general classifications: felonies and misdemeanors. A misdemeanor is a lesser offense, punishable by community service, probation, fine
More informationTrial Date and Time. In some cases, the Police Department and the defendant will reach a plea agreement in lieu of going to trial.
Trial Date and Time This dates and times of court trials are set by the Clerk of Court's office at the Portsmouth District Court. The Clerk sends an order of notice to the Police Department and issues
More informationCitation: 1 Rutgers Race & L. Rev
Citation: 1 Rutgers Race & L. Rev. 129 1998-1999 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Mon Apr 13 10:37:12 2015 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, Civ. No (RHK/JJK) v. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
CASE 0:12-cv-00472-RHK-JJK Document 362 Filed 07/22/14 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jesse Ventura a/k/a James G. Janos, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 12-472 (RHK/JJK) v. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (2000) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 99 5746 LONNIE WEEKS, JR., PETITIONER v. RONALD J. AN- GELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
More information-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.
Citation: 101 Va. L. Rev. 1105 2015 Provided by: University of Virginia Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Mon Jul 11 15:53:46 2016 -- Your use of this HeinOnline
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 529 U. S. (2000) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationFrancis DeBlanc, Bobby Freeman, Michael Morales, Kevin Guillory, and John
I. Overview of the Complaint Francis DeBlanc, Bobby Freeman, Michael Morales, Kevin Guillory, and John Alford were part of a team of Orleans Parish Assistant District Attorneys who prosecuted Michael Anderson
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed June 25, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Jon Stuart
KENNETH RAY SHARP, Applicant-Appellant, vs. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 8-006 / 05-1771 Filed June 25, 2008 STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo
More informationCase 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:17-cr-00102-MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19 ^^^'-^ ^^^^ ^'-^^ AGREEMENT Northern District of Georgia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CRIMINAL
More informationCOLORADO COURT OF APPEALS
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2016COA165 Court of Appeals No. 14CA1987 City and County of Denver District Court No. 13CV32470 Honorable Morris B. Hoffman, Judge Trina McGill, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIA Airport
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE NOVEMBER 1997 SESSION
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE NOVEMBER 1997 SESSION FILED December 23, 1997 WILLIE JOSEPH LAGANO, Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk Appellant, No. 01C01-9701-CC-00009
More informationCASE NO. 1D Shannon Padgett of Dale C. Carson Attorney, PA, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
FEDERICO MARTIN BRAVO, II, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationThe Spoofing Statute Is Here To Stay
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com The Spoofing Statute Is Here To Stay By Clifford
More informationCase 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn
Case 1:17-cr-00232-RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10 U.S. Department of Justice The Special Counsel's Office Washington, D.C. 20530 November 30, 2017 Robert K. Kelner Stephen P. Anthony Covington
More informationTHE VOIR DIRE: AN APPROACH TO RUNNING ONE IN THE LOCAL COURT. Paul Townsend and Lester Fernandez October Introduction
THE VOIR DIRE: AN APPROACH TO RUNNING ONE IN THE LOCAL COURT Paul Townsend and Lester Fernandez October 2006 What is it? Introduction A voir dire is the forum for legal argument on an application to have
More informationSteven M. Sharp, for appellant. Bruce Evans Knoll, for respondent. This appeal raises the question whether a defendant can
================================================================= This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
More informationThe Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series
The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series The American civil judicial system is slow, and imperfect, but many times a victim s only recourse in attempting to me made whole after suffering an injury. This
More informationDefending Yourself in Court on a Not Guilty Plea
Defending Yourself in Court on a Not Guilty Plea The ideal solution when you have been charged with a criminal offence is to allow a lawyer to handle your case. However, if the matter is reasonably simple
More informationSettlement Conference Techniques
Settlement Conference Techniques A Judge s Opening Statement by Morton Denlow A judge s opening statement to the parties sets the tone for a settlement conference. It provides an opportunity to explain
More informationBackground. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - v. - MICHAEL COHEN, Defendant. x INFORMATION 18 Cr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x The Special Counsel charges:
More informationA GUIDE TO THE SECURITES ARBITRATION PROCESS FOR THE PUBLIC CUSTOMER
A GUIDE TO THE SECURITES ARBITRATION PROCESS FOR THE A GUIDE TO THE SECURITES ARBITRATION PROCESS FOR THE PUBLIC CUSTOMER By Simon S. Kogan, J.D., Ll.M You come home after a long day of work and open your
More information[J ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : : DISSENTING OPINION
[J-22-2006] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant v. GREGORY REAVES, Appellee No. 21 EAP 2005 Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court entered
More informationFRCP 30(b)(6) Notice or subpoena directed to entity to require designation of witness to testify on its behalf.
I. Deposition Goals A. Each deposition and each deposition question should be aimed at accomplishing a desired result. 1. Determine knowledge of relevant facts and pin down lack of knowledge of relevant
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED January 5, 2016 v No. 323247 Ingham Circuit Court NIZAM-U-DIN SAJID QURESHI, LC No. 13-000719-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More informationFEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019
FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019 Effective July 1, 1975, as amended to Dec. 1, 2018 The goal of this 2019 edition of the Federal Rules of Evidence 1 is to provide the practitioner with a convenient copy
More informationCOUNSEL JUDGES. STOWERS, J. wrote the opinion. WE CONCUR: DAN SOSA, JR., Senior Justice, WILLIAM RIORDAN, Justice AUTHOR: STOWERS OPINION
1 STATE V. WORLEY, 1984-NMSC-013, 100 N.M. 720, 676 P.2d 247 (S. Ct. 1984) STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CURTIS WORLEY, Defendant-Appellant No. 14691 SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 1984-NMSC-013,
More informationNo th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT'S CHARGE
THE LAW OFFICES OF G. DAVID WESTFALL, P.e. v. UDO BIRNBAUM I ~;. original I certify this to be a true and exact copy of the on file in the No. 00-00619 ' ~i~.'..~ District Clerk's Office, -of lobi c:j
More informationTrial Academy Voir Dire: The Rejection Process
1 Trial Academy Voir Dire: The Rejection Process William M. Dalehite, Jr. Steen Dalehite & Pace, LLP 401 E. Capitol Street, Suite 415 Heritage Bldg., P.O. Box 900 Jackson, MS 39205 1 2 VOIR DIRE: THE REJECTION
More informationThe Duty of the Prosecutor to Disclose Unrequested Evidence: United States v. Agurs
Pepperdine Law Review Volume 4 Issue 2 Article 10 4-15-1977 The Duty of the Prosecutor to Disclose Unrequested Evidence: United States v. Agurs Christian F. Dubia Jr Follow this and additional works at:
More informationCase 5:14-cr M Document 27 Filed 05/04/15 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:14-cr-00318-M Document 27 Filed 05/04/15 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- ) No. 5:14-cr-00318
More informationPREPARING YOUR CLOSING ARGUMENT
PREPARING YOUR CLOSING ARGUMENT Matthew J. Smith, Esq. CINCINNATI, OH COLUMBUS, OH DETROIT, MI FT. MITCHELL, KY ORLANDO, FL SARASOTA, FL www.smithrolfes.com 1 I. Introduction and Overview Black s Law Dictionary
More informationRules Pertaining to Witnesses
University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Book Chapters Faculty Scholarship 1978 Rules Pertaining to Witnesses John W. Reed University of Michigan Law School,
More informationTo introduce the jury to the case, and help them get an under standing of whats going on.
Quiz name: Mock Trial Warm Up - (1-26-2016) Date: 01/26/2016 Question with Most Correct Answers: #0 Total Questions: 4 Question with Fewest Correct Answers: #0 1. What is the purpose of opening arguments?
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY CRIMINAL DIVISION. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) V. ) Case No. ) ) GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) V. ) Case No. ) ) GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY You or your attorney has indicated that you may want to plead guilty to
More informationCase 1:17-cv WYD-SKC Document 150 Filed 02/19/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 32 JURY INSTRUCTIONS
Case 1:17-cv-00844-WYD-SKC Document 150 Filed 02/19/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 32 Civil Action No. 17-cv-00844-WYD-SKC BRANDON FRESQUEZ, v. Plaintiff, BNSF RAILWAY CO., Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES
More informationADVANCED DISCOVERY TECHNIQUES
III. ADVANCED DISCOVERY TECHNIQUES DEPOSITION STRATEGIES A. START EARLY The most important aspect of a successful trial lawyer s practice is thorough preparation. Even the most eloquent and ingenious lawyers
More informationIllinois and Federal Civil and Criminal Procedure Local Practice Overview. Illinois State Bar Association Basic Skills Course
Illinois and Federal Civil and Criminal Procedure Local Practice Overview Illinois State Bar Association Basic Skills Course 2009 Prepared by: J. Randall Cox Feldman, Wasser, Draper and Cox 1307 S. Seventh
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1998) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions,
More informationSTIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No State of New Maine
STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No. 09-3031 State of New Maine Instruction Number Instruction Description 1. Preliminary Instructions 2. Functions of
More informationPreparing and Examining Your Witnesses at Trial
Preparing and Examining Your Witnesses at Trial Mick Hassell Trial Counsel for Law Firms The Paralegal Licence An Advocate s Licence 1 The Advocacy Process 1. Gather info 2. Process info 3. Present info
More informationWORKING WITH CLIENTS AND TRIAL COUNSEL IN DEPENDENCY APPEALS. By Jonathan D. Soglin 1 Staff Attorney, First District Appellate Project May, 2001
WORKING WITH CLIENTS AND TRIAL COUNSEL IN DEPENDENCY APPEALS By Jonathan D. Soglin 1 Staff Attorney, First District Appellate Project May, 2001 I. DUTY TO COMMUNICATE WITH AND PROPERLY ADVISE CLIENT. A.
More informationMinnesota Discovery Practice. By Roger S. Haydock with David F. Herr
William Mitchell Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2 Article 10 1979 Minnesota Discovery Practice. By Roger S. Haydock with David F. Herr William B. Danforth Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT People v. Dillard 1 (decided February 21, 2006) Troy Dillard was convicted of manslaughter on May 17, 2001, and sentenced as a second felony
More informationWitness Examination Strategies in Employment Litigation Best Practices for Direct and Cross Examination of Lay Witnesses
Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Witness Examination Strategies in Employment Litigation Best Practices for Direct and Cross Examination of Lay Witnesses WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 23,
More information09SC553, DeBella v. People -- Testimonial Evidence -- Videotapes -- Jury Deliberations -- Failure to Exercise Discretion.
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association
More informationAPPEAL FROM DECISION OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL TRIBUNAL ON A
* 41/93 Commissioner s File: CIS/674/1994 SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 1986 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ACT 1992 APPEAL FROM DECISION OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL TRIBUNAL ON A QUESTION OF LAW DECISION OF THE SOCIAL
More informationEthics, Bias and Other Challenges
Ethics, Bias and Other Challenges Kenneth E. Melson Professorial Lecturer in Law The George Washington University https://www.google.com/search?q=ethics+definition&rlz=1c1sfxn_enus499us499&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ah
More informationRule 613: That s not what you said before! By: Andy Moorman Assistant U.S. Attorney
Rule 613: That s not what you said before! By: Andy Moorman Assistant U.S. Attorney ATTACKING THE CREDIBILITY OF A WITNESS The theory of attack by prior inconsistent statements is not based on the assumption
More informationBYLINE: Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Special to the new york law journal
LENGTH: 2052 words HEADLINE: Preserving and Protecting the Trial Record BYLINE: Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan,web-editor@nylj.com, Special to the new york law journal BODY: There can be no doubt that
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CHARLES M. CULL and CRISSANNA CULL, UNPUBLISHED individually, and CHARLES M. CULL, February 22, 2000 Conservator for the ESTATE OF CHARLES ALAN CULL, a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-
More information