Direct Appeal of Final Judgments to the Illinois Supreme Court
|
|
- Samuel Jefferson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois IDC Quarterly Volume 21, Number 1 ( ) Appellate Practice Corner By: Brad A. Elward Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Direct Appeal of Final Judgments to the Illinois Supreme Court Direct appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court from final judgments of the circuit courts are permitted in certain situations as set forth in the Illinois Constitution of 1970 and the Illinois Supreme Court Rules. According to Article VI, Section 4 (a) of the Illinois Constitution of 1970: The Supreme Court may exercise original jurisdiction in cases relating to revenue, mandamus, prohibition or habeas corpus and as may be necessary to the complete determination of any case on review. Ill. Const. Art. VI, 4(a). Section 4(b) states further: Appeals from judgments of Circuit Courts imposing a sentence of death shall be directly to the Supreme Court as a matter of right. Ill. Const. Art. VI, 4(b). Article VI then empowers the Supreme Court to provide by rule for direct appeal in other cases. Ill. Const. Art. 6, 4(b). Direct appeals to the Supreme Court should be considered along with other means to obtain high court consideration, including Rule 381 actions for mandamus, Rule 383 motions for the exercise of supervisory authority, and Rule 315 petitions for leave to appeal. Historical Perspective Prior to these changes, the scope of cases that fell within the Court s mandatory jurisdiction was much broader. Under the Illinois Constitution of 1870, the Court was afforded original jurisdiction in three types of cases: revenue, mandamus, and habeas corpus. Ill. Const. 1870, Art. VI, 2. Per Section 75 of the Civil Practice Act, the Court permitted direct jurisdiction as follows: Appeals shall be taken directly to the Supreme Court in all cases in which a franchise or freehold or the validity of a statute or the validity of a county zoning ordinance or resolution or a construction of the constitution is involved, and in cases in which the validity of a municipal ordinance is involved and in which the trial judge shall certify that in his opinion the public interest so requires, and in all cases relating to revenue, or in which the State is interested as a party or otherwise. 110 Ill. Rev. Stat. sec. 199(1) (1949). Article VI was amended in 1964 to specifically permit direct appeals from final judgments of the circuit courts in four classes of cases: revenue, habeas corpus, capital cases, and those involving a question arising under the Page 1 of 6
2 United States or Illinois Constitution. See J. Timothy Eaton & William R. Quinlan, DIRECT APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT TO THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT AFTER FINAL JUDGMENT, IICLE CIVIL APPELLATE PRACTICE, (2008). The Court s mandatory direct appeals were narrowed even further in the 1970 Constitution, which yields the procedures we have in place today. The Supreme Court Delineates Other Areas for Direct Appeal by Rule Pursuant to the discretionary power afforded to the Supreme Court by Section 4, Supreme Court Rule 302 was revised effective July 1, 1971, to delineate the categories of matters for which it would entertain direct appeal. Rule 302(a) addresses those cases, other than those specifically enumerated in Article 6 of the Constitution, where direct appeal is possible: Appeals from final judgments of circuit courts shall be taken directly to the Supreme Court (1) in cases in which a statute of the United States or of this state has been held invalid, and (2) in proceedings commenced under Rule 21(c) of this court. For purposes of this rule, invalidity does not include a determination that a statute of this state is preempted by federal law. 210 Ill. 2d 302(a). The latter sentence of Rule 302(a) was added by a July 27, 2006 amendment, effective September 1, Ill. 2d R. 302(a). The two pressing questions when presented with a potential Rule 302(a) scenario are: (1) whether the underlying circuit court order is final and (2) whether the finding of unconstitutionality was a necessary part of the circuit court s ruling. Requirement of a Final Order Foremost, the Illinois Supreme Court has stated that as a general rule, it will only consider direct appeals from final judgments of the circuit court. Treece v. Shawnee Comm. Unit School Dist. No. 84, 39 Ill. 2d 136, 233 N.E.2d 549 (1968). Illinois considers a final judgment one that terminates the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing to be done but to proceed to execution. Kirwan v. Welch, 133 Ill. 2d 163, 167, 549 N.E.2d 348 (1989). To determine what constitutes a final order, the Court instructs parties to consult Rule 303, and further acknowledges that an otherwise final order in a multi-party or multi-issue litigation may be made appealable under Rule 304(a). Treece, 39 Ill. 2d at 139; see also Village of Niles v. Szczesny, 13 Ill. 2d 45, 48, 147 N.E.2d 371 (1958). At least two reported cases demonstrate that even a non-final order which fails to warrant review under Rule 302(a) may nevertheless be reviewed under the Court s discretionary power pursuant to Rule 302(b). In re H.G., 197 Ill. 2d 317, 757 N.E.2d 864 (2001); Berk v. Will County, 34 Ill. 2d 588, 592, 218 N.E.2d 98 (1966). Also, an interlocutory order arising under Supreme Court Rule 307 concerning injunctions may be appealable under Rule 302(a) if it involves a ruling that a state or federal statute is unconstitutional. Garcia v. Tully, 72 Ill. 2d 1, 7, 377 N.E.2d 10 (1978) (order dissolving injunction was founded upon the circuit court s ruling that provisions of the Illinois Revenue Act of 1939 were unconstitutional). See also Desnick v. Department of Professional Regulation, 171 Ill. 2d 510, 665 N.E.2d 1346 (1996). Proper jurisdiction should be considered in any potential Rule 302(a) scenario. Moreover, jurisdiction can be found lacking despite the parties consent or stipulation to jurisdiction. People ex rel Board of School Inspectors v. City Council of Peoria, 229 Ill. 225, 226, 82 N.E. 225 (1907). The Court may also visit the jurisdictional issue on its own motion. Berber v. Hass, 30 Ill. 2d 263, 195 N.E.2d 622 (1964). And on one occasion, the Court has sua sponte agreed to hear a case that it found otherwise lacked jurisdiction under Rule 302(a) for lack of a final order, on the ground that the case involved a significant public interest and should be heard under the provisions of Rule 302(b). Page 2 of 6
3 If jurisdiction is found lacking and the Illinois Supreme Court refuses to accept the case, the appeal simply returns to the appropriate appellate court for further proceedings. Constitutional Issue Must Dominate Secondly, disposition of the case must hinge on the constitutionality question. The Court will not address constitutional issues that are unnecessary for the disposition of the case, even though the Court acquired jurisdiction because of the presence of the constitutional question. Evans v. Shannon, 201 Ill. 2d 424, , 776 N.E.2d 1184 (2002). Complicating matters are the alternative, non-constitutional reasons given for denying the requested relief. In Trent v. Winningham, 172 Ill. 2d 420, 667 N.E.2d 1317 (1996), the Illinois Supreme Court, speaking of its jurisdiction based upon the declared invalidity of a statute, warned, But courts are cautioned not to compromise that stability in the first place by declaring legislation unconstitutional when the particular case does not require it. Trent, 172 Ill. 2d at 425. There, the court found it was unnecessary to address the constitutionality of the statute in question because there were other reasons to address the retroactive support issue. One additional point, when considering whether a statute is unconstitutional, the Illinois Supreme Court will not distinguish between a circuit court order holding that a statute is facially unconstitutional from an order that a statute is unconstitutional as applied. People v. Fuller, 187 Ill. 2d 1, 8, 714 N.E.2d 501 (1999). Rule 302(a) offers little guidance to practitioners as to how the direct appeal is to be taken. Reading the various rules together, however, the most logical approach is to file a notice of appeal from the circuit court final judgment directed to the Illinois Supreme Court. This notice of appeal must be filed within the standard 30 days from entry of the final judgment and should plainly state that it is being filed under Rule 302(a). 210 Ill. 2d R If the case is later deemed not appropriate for Rule 302 consideration, Rule 365 would nevertheless afford the filing timely status and the appeal could be transferred to the appropriate appellate court. 210 Ill. 2d R Application in Criminal Cases The Illinois Supreme Court has held that the provisions of Rule 302(a) do not apply to criminal cases. People v. Miller, 202 Ill. 2d 328, 781 N.E.2d 300 (2002; People v. Truitt, 175 Ill. 2d 148, 676 N.E.2d 665 (1997). Nevertheless, criminal proceedings are subject to Rule 603, a counterpart to Rule 302(a), which specifically states that [a]ppeals in criminal cases in which a statute of the United States or of this State has been held invalid and appeals by defendants from judgments of the circuit courts imposing a sentence of death shall lie directly to the Supreme Court as a matter of right. 134 Ill. 2d R In 1997, the Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Truitt took a two-step approach to what it deemed appealable under Rule 603. While acknowledging that Rule 603 applied to findings of unconstitutionality, the court went on to limit its jurisdiction to only those cases that satisfied Illinois Supreme Court Rule 603. Speaking of Rule 603, the Court stated: The problem with reliance on this rule is that it was not intended to create an independent basis for appellate review. It merely specifies which court should hear a case that is otherwise appealable. Where, as here, the State takes issue with a nonfinal order entered by the circuit court in a criminal case, the threshold question of whether that order is appealable by the State is determined exclusively by Rule 604(a)(1). Truitt, 175 Ill. 2d at 151. According to Truitt, Rule 604(a)(1) restricts the State s right to appeal in criminal cases to four situations, namely; an order or judgment which has the substantive effect of: (1) dismissing a charge for any of the grounds enumerated in section of the Code of Criminal Procedure (725 ILCS 5/114-1); (2) arresting judgment because of a defective indictment, information or complaint; (3) quashing an arrest or search Page 3 of 6
4 warrant; or (4) suppressing evidence. The Court retreated from Truitt in People v. Miller, finding that the true litmus test was simply whether the circuit court s order declared a statutory provision unconstitutional. Miller, 202 Ill. 2d at 335. Rule 302(b) Direct Appeals In Cases In Which Public Interest Requires Expeditious Determination As noted above, the Constitution also confers power on the Illinois Supreme Court to determine what other types of cases may be considered for direct appeal. Rule 302(b) was modified in 1971 to provide a mechanism for the direct appeal of certain final judgments in which the public interest requires expeditious determination. These cases begin as a traditional appeal to the appellate court, but then may be presented to the Illinois Supreme Court for discretionary consideration. According to the Rule, after the filing of a notice of appeal in the appellate court in a case in which the public interest requires prompt adjudication by the Illinois Supreme Court, the Supreme Court or a justice thereof may order that the appeal be taken directly to it. 210 Ill. 2d R. 302(b). The parties may file a petition with the Illinois Supreme Court asking for it to accept such a case or the court may order the matter transferred on its own motion. See Roanoke Agency, Inc. v. Edgar, 101 Ill. 2d 315, 461 N.E.2d 1365 (1984) (appellant s motion for direct appeal). Once permission is granted by the Illinois Supreme Court, any documents already filed in the appellate court shall be transmitted by the clerk of that court to the clerk of the Supreme Court and from that point forward, the case shall proceed in all respects as though the appeal had been taken directly to the Supreme Court. 210 Ill. 2d R. 302(b). As with Rule 302(a), companion Rule 302(b) offers little by way of guidance as to how to draft the motion for transfer or direct appeal. However, experience suggests that a motion for direct appeal pursuant to Rule 302(b) be prepared and filed with the Illinois Supreme Court asking it to accept the case and that the motion explain in detail why the appeal involves a case in which public interest requires expeditious determination. The motion should be accompanied by a supporting record containing the order appealed from as well as a file-stamped copy of the notice of appeal (to show timeliness) and any other documents necessary to demonstrate that the judgment meets the Rule 302(b) criteria. A proposed order should also be filed. Likewise, Rule 302(b) is silent as to what types of cases might fall within its purview those in which the public interest requires prompt adjudication by the Supreme Court. A review of the cases of record, however, suggest that certain topics are more appropriate than others. The following cases give some insight into the types of cases accepted: Orders upholding a statute as constitutional (versus those appealable under Rule 302(a) that have been found unconstitutional). Friends of Parks v. Chicago Park Dist., 203 Ill. 2d 312, 786 N.E.2d 161 (2003). Matters involving elections. Maddux v. Blagojevich, 233 Ill. 2d 508, 911 N.E.2d 979 (2009). Medical or health emergencies. Curran v. Bosze, 141 Ill. 2d 473, 566 N.E.2d 1319 (1990). Challenges against local governmental action. Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois v. City of Chicago, 125 Ill. 2d 164, 531 N.E.2d 9 (1988). Issues of taxation and revenue. In re Application of Rosewell, 127 Ill. 2d 404, 537 N.E.2d 762 (1989). Utility regulations. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce Comm n, 368 Ill. App. 3d 734, 858 N.E.2d 65 (2nd Dist. 2006); Landfill, Inc. v. Illinois Pollution Control Bd., 74 Ill. 2d 541, 387 N.E.2d 258 (1978). Insurance regulations. Hobbs v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 214 Ill. 2d 11, 823 N.E.2d 561 (2005). Matters of public policy affecting large numbers of litigants. Price v. Philip Morris, Inc., 219 Ill. 2d 182, 848 N.E.2d 1 (2005). While having your case fall within these sub-groups is significant, it does not guarantee acceptance of a motion for direct appeal. In re Petition to Dissolve and Discontinue Niles Park Dist., 244 Ill. App. 3d 127, 614 N.E.2d 53 (1st Dist.1993). The motions are evaluated by the court in the exercise of its discretion. Page 4 of 6
5 As an illustration of Rule 302(b) in a case of significant general importance, the rule was used in Atkins v. Deere & Co., 177 Ill. 2d 222, 685 N.E.2d 342 (1997), a case where the circuit court had certified a question of law under Rule 308(a) pertaining to application of the Illinois Structural Work Act and the legislation which repealed that Act. There, the Illinois Supreme Court granted the parties motion for direct appeal and consolidated the case with several other similar cases and ruled on whether the repealing legislation should be applied retroactively to terminate all pending cases, or limited to prospective application only. The issue was of significant importance, as it impacted cases across the state. As these numbers show, the total number of direct actions, whether as of right or discretionary, pale in comparison to the number of cases presented to the court on original motion per Rules 381, 382, and 383 or on leave to appeal per Rule 315, as is shown in the chart. Nevertheless, having a means to pursue direct review to the Supreme Court is a valuable tool for parties and should be utilized when it can be of assistance. Counsel should always be on the lookout for situations where Rule 302, especially subsection (b), might be applied. * The inflated numbers for 2001 and 2002 reflect 174 and 66 cases respectively filed on notices declaring unconstitutional all or part of PA sentencing enhancements for crimes committed with firearms. The total as of right column tallies columns 2, 4, and 5, which are nondiscretionary. SOURCE: Illinois Annual Reports, Supreme Court of Illinois Caseload and Statistical Records, Five-Year Trends, 2002, 2007, About the Author Brad A. Elward is a partner in the Peoria office of Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen. He practices in the area of appellate law, with a subconcentration in workers compensation appeals and asbestos-related appeals. He received his undergraduate degree from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, in 1986 and his law degree from Southern Illinois University School of Law in Mr. Elward is a member of the Illinois Appellate Lawyers Association, the Illinois State, Peoria County, and American Bar Associations, and a member of the ISBA Workers Compensation Section Counsel. About the IDC The Illinois Association Defense Trial Counsel (IDC) is the premier association of attorneys in Illinois who devote a substantial portion their practice to the representation of business, corporate, insurance, professional and other individual defendants in civil litigation. For more information on the IDC, visit us on the web at Page 5 of 6
6 Statements or expression of opinions in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the association. IDC Quarterly, Volume 21, Number Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel, PO Box 3144, Springfield, IL , , Page 6 of 6
The First District Revisits Rule 304(a) Requirements and the Supreme Court Changes Citation Formats
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 21, Number 3 (21.3.32) Appellate Practice Corner By: Brad A. Elward Heyl, Royster, Voelker
More informationThree Recent Appellate Court Jurisdictional Rulings Should Give Practitioners Pause When Filing Reviews
Workers Compensation Report Brad A. Elward, Brad A. Antonacci and Dana Hughes Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Three Recent Appellate Court Jurisdictional Rulings Should Give Practitioners
More informationWorkers Compensation: Never Pay Judgment Interest if You are Not Facing a Section 19(g) Judgment
Feature Article Brad A. Elward Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Workers Compensation: Never Pay Judgment Interest if You are Not Facing a Section 19(g) Judgment The past 18 months have seen
More informationAN APPEAL FOR YOUR APPEALS (OR, I FOUGHT THE LAW AND THE LAW WON)
AN APPEAL FOR YOUR APPEALS (OR, I FOUGHT THE LAW AND THE LAW WON) Presented and Prepared by: Brad A. Elward belward@heylroyster.com Peoria, Illinois 309.676.0400 Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen PEORIA SPRINGFIELD
More informationAdmissibility of Statements under Illinois Rule of Evidence 408: Control Solutions, LLC v. Elecsys
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 4 (24.4.21) Evidence and Practice Tips Joseph G. Feehan and Brad W. Keller
More informationAppellate Practice Corner
Appellate Practice Corner By: Brad A. Elward Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Peoria Securing Appeal Bonds in Workers Compensation Appeals From the Industrial Commission Employers are placed in a precarious
More informationpublished by IICLE in the 2018 edition of Civil Appeals: State and Federal and is posted or reprinted with permission.
The chapter from which this excerpt was taken was first published by IICLE in the 2018 edition of Civil Appeals: State and Federal and is posted or reprinted with permission. Book containing this chapter
More informationRecent Appellate Court Cases Touch on a Diverse Range of Topics
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 20, Number 1 (20.1.17) Workers Compensation Report By:Brad A. Elward Heyl, Royster, Voelker
More informationBlumenthal v. Brewer: Supreme Court Rule 304(a) Finding Not Enough for Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate Practice Corner Scott L. Howie Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered, Chicago Blumenthal v. Brewer: Supreme Court Rule 304(a) Finding Not Enough for Appellate Jurisdiction An entire volume could be written
More informationIllinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 3 (24.3.
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 3 (24.3.12) Evidence and Practice Tips Joseph G. Feehan and Brad W. Keller
More informationManifestation Dates: The Moving Target of Repetitive Trauma Cases
Feature Article R. Mark Cosimini Rusin & Maciorowski, Ltd., Champaign Manifestation Dates: The Moving Target of Repetitive Trauma Cases The Illinois Appellate Court Fifth District, Workers Compensation
More informationIsn t Every Party Entitled to be Represented by its Own Attorney? Take Note of Gapinski v. Gujrati
Health Law Roger R. Clayton, Mark D. Hansen and J. Matthew Thompson Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Isn t Every Party Entitled to be Represented by its Own Attorney? Take Note of Gapinski
More informationEvidence and Practice Tips By: Joseph G. Feehan and Brad W. Keller Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 1 (24.1.47) Evidence and Practice Tips By: Joseph G. Feehan and Brad W. Keller
More informationUsing Supreme Court Rule 219(e) to Discourage Abuse of Voluntary Dismissal Statute
Legal Ethics Gretchen Harris Sperry Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Chicago Using Supreme Court Rule 219(e) to Discourage Abuse of Voluntary Dismissal Statute In recognition of the principle that a plaintiff
More informationThe Scope of the Sufficiently Close Relationship Test; How Porter v. Decatur Is Changing the Landscape of Relation Back
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 21, Number 1 (21.1.44) Medical Malpractice By: Dina L. Torrisi and Edna McLain HeplerBroom,
More informationTHE MINOR LEAGUE: TAKING CARE OF JUNIOR SETTLEMENT AND CLOSURE OF MINOR S CLAIMS
THE MINOR LEAGUE: TAKING CARE OF JUNIOR SETTLEMENT AND CLOSURE OF MINOR S CLAIMS Presented and Prepared by: Joseph K. Guyette jguyette@heylroyster.com Champaign, Illinois 217.344.0060 Heyl, Royster, Voelker
More informationAppellate Court Addresses Issue of First Impression Concerning Apparent Agency, Consent Forms and a Non-English Speaking Patient
Health Law Roger R. Clayton, Mark D. Hansen and J. Matthew Thompson Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Appellate Court Addresses Issue of First Impression Concerning Apparent Agency, Consent
More informationDoes the Discovery Rule Apply to Claims Brought Under the Wrongful Death Act or Pursuant to the Survival Act?
Supreme Court Watch M. Elizabeth D. Kellett HeplerBroom LLC, Edwardsville Does the Discovery Rule Apply to Claims Brought Under the Wrongful Death Act or Pursuant to the Survival Act? Moon v. Rhode, No.
More informationPublic Act : An Unconstitutional Violation of the Inviolate Right to Trial By Jury?
Feature Article Michael L. Resis and Britta Sahltrom SmithAmundsen LLC, Chicago Terry A. Fox Kelley Kronenberg, Chicago John D. Hackett Cassiday Schade LLP, Chicago Public Act 98-1132: An Unconstitutional
More informationFor the Record: Preserving Issues for Appeal
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 4 (24.4.9) Appellate Practice Corner Scott L. Howie Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered,
More informationpublished by IICLE in the 2018 edition of Civil Appeals: State and Federal and is posted or reprinted with permission.
The chapter from which this excerpt was taken was first published by IICLE in the 2018 edition of Civil Appeals: State and Federal and is posted or reprinted with permission. Book containing this chapter
More informationDefining the Retained Control Exception: An Update on 414
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 19, Number 3 (19.3.30) Feature Article By: Kingshuk K. Roy Purcell & Wardrope, Chtd.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
M.R. 3140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Order entered March 15, 2013. (Deleted material is struck through and new material is underscored, except in Rule 660A, which is entirely new.) Effective
More informationClash of the Titans: The Interaction of the Wrongful Death Act, Statute of Repose, Statute of Limitations and the Discovery Rule
Medical Malpractice Update Edna L. McLain and Zeke N. Katz HeplerBroom LLC, Chicago Clash of the Titans: The Interaction of the Wrongful Death Act, Statute of Repose, Statute of Limitations and the Discovery
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RONALD COTE Petitioner vs. Case No.SC00-1327 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent / DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BRIEF
More informationMARTIN C. MANION, SR. and ) LOUIS WITTMER ) ) Petitioner-Objectors, ) Docket No G 03 ) v. ) ) TIMOTHY GOODCASE, ) ) Respondent-Candidate.
BEFORE THE DULY CONSTITUTED ELECTORAL BOARD FOR THE HEARING AND PASSING UPON OBJECTIONS TO THE NOMINATION PAPERS FOR CANDIDATES FOR THE OFFICE OF COUNTY BOARD MEMBER IN DISTRICT 2 IN THE COUNTY OF DUPAGE
More information3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1
3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments 2008 - Page 1 1 L.A.R. 1.0 SCOPE AND TITLE OF RULES 2 1.1 Scope and Organization of Rules 3 The following Local Appellate Rules (L.A.R.) are adopted
More informationPROPOSED RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AMENDMENT APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
PROPOSED RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AMENDMENT RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES (a) Applicability. Appeal proceedings in criminal cases shall be as in civil cases except as modified by
More information[J ] [MO: Saylor, C.J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : : : DISSENTING OPINION
[J-94-2017] [MO Saylor, C.J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, v. Appellant JUSTEN IRLAND; SMITH AND WESSON 9MM SEMI-AUTOMATIC PISTOL, SERIAL # PDW0493,
More informationA The following shall be assigned to the appellate division:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2015-13 RE: Appellate Division of the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
2014 IL 116844 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 116844) THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ex rel. JOSEPH PUSATERI, Appellee, v. THE PEOPLES GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY, Appellant. Opinion filed
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : : : : : : : : : :... O P I N I O N
[Cite as State v. Lawrence, 2016-Ohio-7626.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee v. PHILLIP H. LAWRENCE Defendant-Appellant Appellate
More informationLEAGUE ANNEXATION MANUAL UPDATE (Current as of 6/18/2013)
LEAGUE ANNEXATION MANUAL UPDATE (Current as of 6/18/2013) The information below updates the League s Annexation of Territory manual by detailing changes made to the annexation law after the manual s printing
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Elder, Petty and Alston Argued at Salem, Virginia DERICK ANTOINE JOHNSON OPINION BY v. Record No. 2919-08-3 JUDGE ROSSIE D. ALSTON, JR. MAY 18, 2010 COMMONWEALTH
More informationCASE NO. 1D Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA GEORGE LEWIS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-2806
More informationAre the IPI Instructions on Construction Negligence an Accurate Statement of Illinois Law?
Feature Article Judge Donald J. O Brien, Jr. (ret.) * Johnson & Bell, Ltd., Chicago Are the IPI Instructions on Construction Negligence an Accurate Statement of Illinois Law? The current version of the
More informationAn Outside Bet: Reduction in the Amount of Recovery in Medical Malpractice Cases
Civil Practice and Procedure Donald Patrick Eckler and Matthew A. Reddy Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered, Chicago An Outside Bet: Reduction in the Amount of Recovery in Medical Malpractice Cases Defense practitioners
More informationStanding Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals
Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act 2002-142 Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I--PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS Subpart
More informationUNDERSTANDING THE APPELLATE PROCESS IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
UNDERSTANDING THE APPELLATE PROCESS IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL (Submitted by appellate lawyer members of the Palm Beach County Appellate Practice Committee) THE INFORMATION CONTAINED BELOW
More informationDual Sole Proximate Causes: Asserting an Effective Oxymoronic Defense
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 20, Number 4 (20.4.22) Feature Article By Lindsay Drecoll Brown Cassiday Schade LLP Dual
More informationI WANT TO APPEAL NOW! A PRIMER ON INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS
I WANT TO APPEAL NOW! A PRIMER ON INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS Presented and Prepared by: Craig L. Unrath cunrath@heylroyster.com Peoria, Illinois 309.676.0400 Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen PEORIA CHICAGO EDWARDSVILLE
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond on Wednesday, the 31st day of March, 2004.
VIRGINIA: In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond on Wednesday, the 31st day of March, 2004. Dennis Mitchell Orbe, Appellant, against Record No. 040673
More informationCHAPTER 33. BUSINESS OF THE SUPREME COURT IN GENERAL ORIGINAL MATTERS Applications for Leave to File Original Process. KING S BENCH MATTERS
SUPREME COURT BUSINESS 210 Rule 3301 CHAPTER 33. BUSINESS OF THE SUPREME COURT IN GENERAL Rule 3301. Office of the Prothonotary. 3302. Seal of the Supreme Court. 3303. [Rescinded]. 3304. Hybrid Representation.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
2016 IL 120729 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 120729) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ex rel. ANITA ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. HONORABLE CAROL M. HOWARD et al., Respondents.
More informationMALICIOUS PROSECUTION CLAIMS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AS TO WHEN COVERAGE IS TRIGGERED
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CLAIMS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AS TO WHEN COVERAGE IS TRIGGERED Presented and Prepared by: John P. Heil, Jr. jheil@heylroyster.com Peoria, Illinois 309.676.0400 Heyl, Royster, Voelker
More informationBelow the Red Line. the box. Workers Compensation Update. In this issue... May 19, 2016 Bloomington, Illinois. June 16, 2016.
Below the Red Line Workers Compensation Update We ve Got You Covered! A Newsletter for Employers and Claims Professionals A Word From The Practice Group Chair This time of the year means baseball, barbeque,
More informationDon t Forget the Immunity Offered by the Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 21, Number 1 (21.1.30) Property Insurance By: Tracy E. Stevenson Robbins, Salomon & Patt,
More informationORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
DISTRICT COURT, PUEBLO COUNTY, COLORADO 501 N. Elizabeth Street Pueblo, CO 81003 719-404-8700 DATE FILED: July 11, 2016 6:40 PM CASE NUMBER: 2016CV30355 Plaintiffs: TIMOTHY McGETTIGAN and MICHELINE SMITH
More informationHow to Be Thankful When Settling a Wrongful Death Claim
Medical Malpractice Update Edna L. McLain and Tammera E. Banasek HeplerBroom LLC, Chicago How to Be Thankful When Settling a Wrongful Death Claim T is the season for celebration and giving thanks, and
More informationFLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS
FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS CITATIONS TO OPINIONS ADOPTING OR AMENDING RULES... 4 RULE 9.010. EFFECTIVE DATE AND SCOPE... 6 RULE 9.020. DEFINITIONS... 7 RULE 9.030. JURISDICTION
More informationILLINOIS. Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter /5(h)
ILLINOIS Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 20 2630/5(h) (h) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act to the contrary and cumulative with any rights to expungement of criminal records, whenever
More informationAPPELLATE ISSUES IN WORKERS COMPENSATION CASES AFFECTING GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYERS
APPELLATE ISSUES IN WORKERS COMPENSATION CASES AFFECTING GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYERS Presented and Prepared by: Brad A. Elward belward@heylroyster.com Peoria, Illinois 309.676.0400 Prepared with the Assistance
More informationFLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 2008 Edition Rules reflect all changes through 969 So.2d 357. Subsequent amendments, if any, can be found at www.floridasupremecourt.org/decisions/rules.shtml. THE
More informationDo Consumers Have Private Remedies for Violations of the Reporting Requirements Under the Rules of the Consumer Product Safety Act?
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 19, Number 4 (19.4.50) Product Liability By: James W. Ozog and Staci A. Williamson* Wiedner
More informationState of the Judiciary Report
2011 The Judiciary s Year in Review Virginia State of the Judiciary Report CLERK V I R G I N I A C O U R T S VIRGINIA JUDICIAL BRANCH 2011 SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA EXECUTIVE SECRETARY COURT OF APPEALS
More informationAUGUST 24, 2016 STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0104 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL GREGORY J. GRANT, JR. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS GREGORY J. GRANT, JR. NO. 2016-KA-0104 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 524-760, SECTION D HONORABLE CALVIN
More informationFROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY Herbert C. Gill, Jr., Judge. This appeal involves a dispute between the Board of
PRESENT: All the Justices COMCAST OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, INC. OPINION BY v. Record No. 080946 JUSTICE CYNTHIA D. KINSER February 27, 2009 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
More informationM.R IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. Effective January 1, 2013, Illinois Rule of Evidence 502 is adopted, as follows.
M.R. 24138 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Order entered November 28, 2012. Effective January 1, 2013, Illinois Rule of Evidence 502 is adopted, as follows. ILLINOIS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs, : vs. : Case No. 17CVH OHIO STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, et al.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CITY OF ATHENS, et al., : Plaintiffs, : vs. : Case No. 17CVH11-10258 OHIO STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, et al., : Judge Cain Defendants. : FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY
More information1. SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE. 2. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT. 3. STAPLE ALL ADDITIONAL PAGES 1/30/2014 3:13CV739
Case: 14-319 Document: 7-1 Page: 1 02/14/2014 1156655 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT CIVIL APPEAL PRE-ARGUMENT STATEMENT (FORM C) 1. SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE. 2. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT.
More informationSCPA Articles 2 and 3: Comparison with Prior Law
St. John's Law Review Volume 41, April 1967, Number 4 Article 28 SCPA Articles 2 and 3: Comparison with Prior Law St. John's Law Review Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview
More informationA (800) (800)
No. 14-197 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Petitioner, v. ADDOLFO DAVIS, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
More informationEMPLOYMENT (820 ILCS 130/) Prevailing Wage Act.
EMPLOYMENT (820 ILCS 130/) Prevailing Wage Act. (820 ILCS 130/0.01) (from Ch. 48, par. 39s-0.01) Sec. 0.01. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Prevailing Wage Act. (Source: P.A. 86-1324.) (820 ILCS
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D18-683
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, v. Case No.
More informationRule Change #1998(14)
Rule Change #1998(14) Chapter 32. Colorado Appellate Rules Original Jurisdiction Certification of Questions of Law Rule 21. Procedure in Original Actions The entire existing C.A.R. Rule 21 is repealed
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv UU.
Case: 12-13402 Date Filed: (1 of 10) 03/22/2013 Page: 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-13402 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-21203-UU [DO NOT PUBLISH]
More informationISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion
ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion Opinion No. 13-03 January 2013 Subject: Digest: References: Arbitration and Mediation; and Unauthorized Practice of Law A nonlawyer s representation of parties
More informationAppeals from County Court to Circuit Court Appellate Division
Appeals from County Court to Circuit Court Appellate Division Andrew Paul Kawel Kawel pllc www.kawellaw.com September 23, 2016 Contents 1 Preliminary Note 2 2 Basis of Circuit-Court Appellate Jurisdiction
More informationCh. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES GENERAL PROVISIONS
Ch. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES Sec. 41.1. Scope. 41.2. Construction and application. 41.3. Definitions. 41.4. Amendments to regulation.
More informationFILED December 15, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL
2015 IL App (4th 140941 NO. 4-14-0941 IN THE APPELLATE COURT FILED December 15, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL
More informationIN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED May 11, AP1257 DISTRICT II NO. 2010AP1256-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 11, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear
More information2012 CO 23. The supreme court reverses the judgment of the court of appeals and holds that
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association
More informationLEGISLATURE 2017 BILL (3) (a), (5) (d), (3) (b), (3) (b), (11),
0-0 LEGISLATURE 0 0 AN ACT to repeal. () (d),.0 (),.0 () (c),. () (a),. (), 0.0 () (sb) and. () (e); to renumber. () (a) to (h); to renumber and amend.0 (),. (),.0,. () (a),. (),. (),. () (e),. () (intro.),.0
More informationCommunity Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)
Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 AGENDA ITEM 7.B: PL17-0123 HOTEL
More informationCHAD CRAWFORD ROBERSON OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. February 25, 2010 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 1
Present: All the Justices CHAD CRAWFORD ROBERSON OPINION BY v. Record No. 091299 JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. February 25, 2010 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 1 FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA In this
More informationCHAPTER 25 GENERAL PROVISIONS
CHAPTER 25 GENERAL PROVISIONS PAGE NO. 25.01 Rules of Construction 25-1 25.02 Conflict and Separability 25-1 25.03 Clerk to File Documents Incorporated by Reference 25-2 25.04 Penalty Provisions 25-2 25.05
More informationTENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State ex rel. A.J. Rose Mfg. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 2012-Ohio-4367.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. A.J. Rose Manufacturing Company, Relator, v. No.
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 89 1
Article 89. Motion for Appropriate Relief and Other Post-Trial Relief. 15A-1411. Motion for appropriate relief. (a) Relief from errors committed in the trial division, or other post-trial relief, may be
More informationADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION REVISITED! BIG CHANGES!
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION REVISITED! BIG CHANGES! Prepared by: KATHLEEN FIELD ORR & ASSOCIATES 53 West Jackson Blvd. Suite 964 Chicago, Illinois 60604 kfo@kfoassoc.com 312.382.2113 I. INTRODUCTION In
More informationELY SHOSHONE RULES OFAPPELLATE PROCEDURE
[Rev. 10/10/2007 2:43:59 PM] ELY SHOSHONE RULES OFAPPELLATE PROCEDURE I. APPLICABILITY OF RULES RULE 1. SCOPE, CONSTRUCTION OF RULES (a) Scope of Rules. These rules govern procedure in appeals to the Appellate
More informationORDINANCE NO AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NOS. 89-3, 90-38, 92-14, 92-25, 93-1, AND 95-6.
ORDINANCE NO. 88-16 AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NOS. 89-3, 90-38, 92-14, 92-25, 93-1, 93-35 AND 95-6. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE PALM
More informationCOMMON ISSUES IN PROBATION REVOCATION APPEALS
COMMON ISSUES IN PROBATION REVOCATION APPEALS North Carolina Appellate Boot Camp August 21 22, 2014 David Andrews, Assistant Appellate Defender Disclaimer: This document is not intended to be an exhaustive
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
REL: 06/17/2016 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationTitle 201 RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION. Title 210 APPELLATE PROCEDURE
Title 201 RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION [ 201 PA. CODE CH. 19 ] Adoption of Rules 1907.1 and 1907.2 of the Rules of Judicial Administration; No. 408 Judicial Administration Doc. THE COURTS are defined
More information(1) the defendant waives the presence of the law enforcement officer in open court on the record;
RULE 462. TRIAL DE NOVO. (A) When a defendant appeals after conviction by an issuing authority in any summary proceeding, upon the filing of the transcript and other papers by the issuing authority, the
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
Rel: June 22, 2018 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationJUVENILE JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS 2015
State of Illinois Bruce Rauner, Governor Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission JUVENILE JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS 2015 . JUVENILE JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS, 2015 Prepared
More informationBarkley Gardner v. Warden Lewisburg USP
2017 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-4-2017 Barkley Gardner v. Warden Lewisburg USP Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2017
More informationWHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ARBITRATION
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ARBITRATION Presented and Prepared by: Scott G. Salemi ssalemi@heylroyster.com Rockford, Illinois 815.963.4454 Prepared with the Assistance of: Bhavika D. Amin bamin@heylroyster.com
More informationSTATUTES GOVERNING CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES AND THREE-JUDGE PANELS
1 STATUTES GOVERNING CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES AND THREE-JUDGE PANELS 1-267.1. Three-judge panel for actions challenging plans apportioning or redistricting State legislative or congressional districts;
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS
[Cite as State v. Phillips, 2014-Ohio-5309.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, ) ) CASE NO. 14 MA 34 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, ) ) - VS - ) OPINION ) KEITH
More informationDeferential Review of an Administrative Agency's Decision in Federal District Court: International College of Surgeons v.
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary Volume 18 Issue 1 Article 6 3-15-1998 Deferential Review of an Administrative Agency's Decision in Federal District Court: International
More informationTITLE I: GENERAL PROVISIONS. Chapter 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS
TITLE I: GENERAL PROVISIONS Chapter 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 Morristown - General Provisions Section 10.01 10.02 Title of code CHAPTER 10: GENERAL PROVISIONS Rules of interpretation 10.03 Application to
More informationCIVIL IMMIGRATION DETAINERS
Page 1 of 6 Print San Francisco Administrative Code CHAPTER 12I: CIVIL IMMIGRATION DETAINERS Sec. 12I.1. Sec. 12I.2. Sec. 12I.3. Sec. 12I.4. Sec. 12I.5. Sec. 12I.6. Sec. 12I.7. Findings. Definitions. Restrictions
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE AND BOARD OF CANVASSERS IN RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT FOR MANDAMUS
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE COURT OF APPEALS CITIZENS PROTECTING MICHIGAN S CONSTITUTION, JOSEPH SPYKE AND JEANNE DAUNT, v Plaintiffs, SECRETARY OF STATE AND MICHIGAN BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS, Michigan Court
More informationHABITUAL FELON ISSUES CHECKLIST. Stand in one place and say the same thing over and over. Eventually, they ll listen to you.
HABITUAL FELON ISSUES CHECKLIST Stand in one place and say the same thing over and over. Eventually, they ll listen to you. Patricia Poore The following is a checklist of possible issues arising under
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MACOUPIN COUNTY, ILLINOIS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MACOUPIN COUNTY, ILLINOIS FILED 9/21/2018 3:51 PM LEE ROSS CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT MACOUPIN COUNTY, ILLINOIS John Kraft, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) 17
More informationThese appeals arise out of multiple asbestos actions currently pending in. the Superior and State Courts of Cobb County. In each action, plaintiffs,
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: November 20, 2006 S06A0902. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP. et al. v. FERRANTE et al. S06A1219. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP. et al. v. MITCHELL et al. S06A1221. GEORGIA PACIFIC
More informationTHE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
THE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Effective 1 January 2019 Table of Contents I. General... 1 Rule 1. Courts of Criminal Appeals... 1 Rule 2. Scope of Rules; Title...
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: Filing Date: October 12, 2010 Docket No. 28,618 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, BRIAN BOBBY MONTOYA, Defendant-Appellee.
More information