IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTS OF THE FLORIDA PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION
|
|
- Jeremy Mason
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT / SC SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTS OF THE FLORIDA PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION The Florida Public Defender Association, Inc. ( FPDA ) respectfully offers the following supplemental comments on the recently-adopted jury instructions involving failure to register as a sexual offender or sexual predator. Many, if not most, of the defendants charged with these crimes are indigent clients of public defenders. The FPDA consists of the twenty elected public defenders, approximately a thousand assistant public defenders, and support staff. As appointed counsel for these indigent criminal defendants, FPDA members are deeply interested in the standard jury instructions in these cases. These supplemental comments do not replace, and will not reiterate, the FPDA s original comments, filed in July Instead, these supplemental comments will direct this Court to two recent cases in the District Courts of Appeal that emphasize the need for this Court to clarify that knowingly in the jury instructions means knowingly and willfully.
2 In Smith v. State, 968 So. 2d (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), the court, while relying on this Court s decision in State v. Giorgetti, 868 So. 2d DCA 512, (Fla. 2004), went beyond that decision to hold that the mens rea element includes not just knowledge, but also a general intent: In our view, the court in Giorgetti interpreted section (4), Florida Statutes, as containing a general intent element. Giorgetti, 868 So.2d at ; see also, 21 Am. Jur. 2d Criminal Law 128 (2007) ( General intent is the term used to define the requisite mens rea for a crime that has no stated mens rea. ). And, [w]here a particular crime requires only a showing of general intent, the prosecution need not establish that the accused intended the precise harm or precise result which resulted from his acts. 21 Am. Jur. 2d Criminal Law 128 (2007). The instruction given in this case specifically tracked the language required by Giorgetti. By contrast, we view the proposed instruction 1 as requiring the State to prove specific intent, or that Smith subjectively intended to violate the statute. See 21 Am. Jur. 2d Criminal Law 128 (2007) ( Specific intent involves a subjective state of mind. ). Clearly, adding a specific intent element to section (4), Florida Statutes, would defeat the purpose of the statute. Under that standard, for example, a defendant could avoid criminal liability with testimony that he meant to register, but simply forgot. For this reason, the special instruction actually proffered below would not have been appropriate, even if Smith's testimony had supported his argued defense. See 21 Am. Jur. 2d Criminal Law 129 ( A court will not imply a mental requirement in a crime 1 The proposed instruction read: The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Smith intentionally violated the statute by Failing to Register a change in address within 48 hours of any change of address with the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. 968 So. 2d. at
3 Id. at when the statutory language cuts against such a result and the policy behind the statute would be defeated. ). General intent crimes imply that the action is taken knowingly and willfully or intentionally. See, e.g., Polite v. State, 973 So. 2d. 1107, (Fla. 2007) (for resisting law enforcement officer prosecution, a general intent crime, state must prove conduct was knowing and willful); Frey v. State, 708 So. 2d. 918 (Fla. 1998) (same); M.H. v. State, 936 So. 2d 1, 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ( Criminal mischief is similar to the general intent crime of second degree murder, in that it requires an act that is willful (intentional) and wrongful (with evil intent and the knowledge that injury or damage will or may be caused). ); N.K.D. v. State, 799 So. 2d 428, (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (in an arson case, a general intent crime, the state must show intentional act to start fire); A.L. v. State, 675 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (trespass, a general intent crime, requires proof that a person purposely or intentionally entered upon the forbidden premises. ). The jury instructions, beyond the ambiguous knowingly, do not contain any indication that the person must willfully fail to take all the various actions required by the statute. Instead, the jury instructions may (or may not, depending 3
4 on what knowingly means) 2 impose strict liability for not accomplishing registration after having been told to do so. While this Court may have thought the FPDA s examples of this problem unrealistic, the second case, Griffin v. State, 969 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), provides an undeniable example of why knowingly is not a sufficient instruction on mens rea. This opinion is also a study in how courts will construe a statute to make cases come out right in the absence of proper criminal intent elements. In that case, a person required to register as a sexual offender was evicted from his home just before Hurricane Katrina s landfall. The evidence showed that on last day of the statutory 48 hours for him to register a new address, all roads and DMV offices were closed. See id. Mr. Griffin testified that he knew of his registration obligation, and reregistered as soon as the office reopened several days later. See id. The fact that Mr. Griffin was arrested and prosecuted, given the facts and the known problems of coping with a natural disaster on the magnitude of Hurricane Katrina, indicates that this Court cannot rely on the state s prosecutorial discretion and common sense to avoid absurd prosecutions. Often the police and prosecutors are under zero tolerance policies requiring them to prosecute every case, irrespective of justice. 2 For a detailed explanation, please see the FPDA s original comments, pages
5 The First District Court of Appeal overturned his conviction for failure to reregister. The obvious problem was that Mr. Griffin s failure to reregister was not willful, even though he knew of his obligations. This case is the perfect example of where it is necessary to specify whether knowlingly means only knowledge, or means knowingly and willfully. Simple justice made it intolerable for Mr. Griffin to bear strict criminal liability for the timing of natural catastrophes. Rather than address that issue, however, the DCA engaged in statutory construction to hold that the 48 hours given to reregister was, as a matter of law, two business days. See id. While no one can argue with the outcome of that decision, the court s reasoning is suspect. When the legislature wanted to set a time limit based on business days, it explicitly used that term. See (7), Fla. Stat ( If the sexual offender is in the custody of a local jail, the custodian of the local jail shall register the offender within 3 business days after intake of the offender.... ). The DCA s dubious statutory construction is the obvious result of the tension created by Mr. Griffin not having willfully failed to register but the law being unclear whether knowingly includes willfulness. The Committee s August 2007 response uses this ambiguity as a reason to not include a willfulness element in the proposed jury instructions, going no further than this Court s language in Giorgetti. That response, however, was filed before 5
6 the Smith opinion expanded Giorgetti. That case is binding precedent statewide unless and until disagreed with by this Court or another district court of appeal. See Pardo v. State, 596 So. 2d. 665, (Fla. 1992). As a result, the jury instructions, as adopted by this Court, do not reflect the current law in Florida. Additionally, by narrowly limiting the instructions, the Committee effectively construes the statute in the way least favorable to criminal defendants. This construction is contrary to the rule of lenity, which rests on due process principles. See, e.g., Perkins v. State, 576 So. 2d. 1310, 1312 (Fla. 1991). The best solution is for this Court to follow Smith and insert appropriate language in the jury instructions that a person must knowingly and willfully fail to take the various actions required by the statute. Such a solution would take account of Smith and reflect current Florida law. 3 The second-best solution would be for the jury instructions to transparently and openly acknowledge the uncertainty in the law. While creating some tension with Pardo, this solution would at least have the virtue of alerting judges and lawyers to the issue, allowing them to make informed and reasoned arguments and decisions. The worst solution, however, would be to leave the jury instructions as they were promulgated. When this Court publishes standard jury instructions, it 3 Alternatively, this Court would need to amend all of the 48 hours references in the jury instructions to two business days pursuant to Griffin. The better solution, however, is to address the mens rea element directly rather than countenance the rather suspicious reasoning in that decision. 6
7 announces, as a matter of course, that it expresses no opinion on the correctness of the instructions. This admonition notwithstanding, this Court and other courts subsequently use the standard jury instructions as aids in interpreting underlying statute. See, e.g., State v. Smith, 840 So. 2d. 987, 993 n.5 (Fla. 2003). Judges and attorneys tend to rely on the standard instructions to be accurate statements of the law. Courts encourage this reliance by holding that standard jury instructions for criminal trials are presumed correct and are preferred over special instructions. Billie v. State, 963 So. 2d 837, 840 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Here, the standard jury instructions, as promulgated, amount to a trap for the unwary. If judges and lawyers look no further than the standard instructions, juries will be instructed only on the knowingly aspect of mens rea and will omit the willfully aspect. Where the standard jury instructions do not reflect the case law, reversible error and ineffective assistance of counsel blossom. 4 4 For instance, the standard jury instructions instructing a jury that police actions constitute execution of a legal duty leads to reversals when the legality of that action is an issue. See, e.g., Smith v. State, 907 So. 2d 582, 585 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (citing cases); cf. State v. Anderson, 639 So. 2d 609, (Fla. 1994) (standard instruction is acceptable if, and only if, the legality of the police action is not an issue). Similarly, the standard jury instruction on self-defense does not clearly place the burden of proof on the state. See Testerman v. State, 966 So. 2d 1035, (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). A final, and most problematic in terms of numbers of cases affected, example is the standard instructions creating the circular exceptions to self-defense. See, e.g., Grimsley v. State, 967 So. 2d. 1132, 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). This Court eventually had to amend the jury instructions to solve this latter problem. In re Standard Jury Instructions, 930 So. 2d. 612, 615 (Fla. 2006). 7
8 This Court ought not to create such traps with its standard jury instructions. The ensuing waste of judicial, prosecutorial and defense resources is unnecessary and easily avoided. This Court should either modify the standard jury instructions to follow Smith and require the state to prove general intent, or, at the very least, to alert the trial judges and attorneys to this issue. CONCLUSION The FPDA respectfully requests that this Court amend the proposed standard jury instructions as suggested above and in its original comments Respectfully submitted. Florida Public Defender Association, Inc. By: John Eddy Morrison Assistant Public Defender 1320 N.W. 14th Street Miami, Florida Fla. Bar No
9 CERTIFICATES I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the above comments were mailed to the Honorable Terry D. Terrell, Committee Chair, c/o Les Garringer, Office of the General Counsel, 500 S. Duval Street, Tallahassee, Florida ; and to James T. Miller, on behalf of the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, 233 E. Bay Street, Suite 920, Jacksonville, Florida 32202, this 17th day of July I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above comments are printed in 14-point Times New Roman. By: John Eddy Morrison Assistant Public Defender 9
10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT / SC REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT The Florida Public Defenders Association, Inc., hereby notifies this Court that it wishes to participate in any oral argument scheduled in this case. Respectfully submitted. Florida Public Defender Association, Inc. By: John Eddy Morrison Assistant Public Defender 1320 N.W. 14th Street Miami, Florida Fla. Bar No CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the above request was mailed to the Honorable Terry D. Terrell, Committee Chair, c/o Les Garringer, Office of the General Counsel, 500 S. Duval Street, Tallahassee, Florida ; and to James T. Miller, on behalf of the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, 233 E. Bay Street, Suite 920, Jacksonville, Florida 32202, this day of June By: John Eddy Morrison Assistant Public Defender
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC07-767 IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT NO. 2007-4. [May 22, 2008] PER CURIAM. The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES - REPORT NO.: 2007-04 / CASE NO.: SC07-767 COMMENTS OF THE FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS (FACDL) RE:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. To the Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida:
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT 2008-6 / CASE NO. To the Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida: This report regarding a proposed
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida
In the Supreme Court of Florida In the matter of use by the trial courts of the Supreme Court Standard Jury Instructions Committee in Criminal Cases / Case No. SC Report No. 2006-01 of the Supreme Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT NO , CASE NO. SC
The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases has submitted to the Florida Supreme Court a report proposing amendments to certain sexual offender (11.14, 11.14(g), and 11.14(h))
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. To the Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT 2009-01 / CASE NO. To the Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida: This report regarding proposed
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA COMMENTS OF FLORIDA PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION. offers the following comments on the proposed amendments to Florida
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.130 / SC08-1934 COMMENTS OF FLORIDA PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION The Florida Public Defender Association, Inc. (
More informationAPPENDIX B Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases The Honorable Samantha L. Ward, Chair March 1, 2011
APPENDIX B Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases The Honorable Samantha L. Ward, Chair March 1, 2011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO STANDARD CRIMINAL
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida
In the Supreme Court of Florida In the matter of use by the trial courts of the Supreme Court Standard Jury Instructions Committee in Criminal Cases / Case No. SC Report 2007-4 Committee on Standard Jury
More informationAMENDED Report No
In the Supreme Court of Florida In the matter of use by the trial courts of the Supreme Court Standard Jury Instructions Committee in Criminal Cases / Case No. SC05-1434 AMENDED Report No. 2005-03 Supreme
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC17-1822 IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT 2017-07. PER CURIAM. November 21, 2018 The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal
More informationAPPENDIX A Leaving the Scene of a Crash Involving Death or Injury
APPENDIX A Proposal 1 28.4 Leaving the Scene of a Crash Involving Death or Injury Proposal 2 28.82 Aggravated Fleeing or Eluding (Leaving a Crash Involving Injury or Death then Causing Serious Bodily Injury
More informationSC Amended Appendix A
SC05-803 Amended Appendix A INSTRUCTIONS Proposal 1 14.1 (Withdrawn) Proposal 2 10.15 Proposal 3 11.4 (new) Proposal 4(a) 8.6 Proposal 4(b) 8.7(a) Proposal 4(c) 8.7(b) Proposal 4(d) 8.8 Proposal 5 13.2
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC COMMENT ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO RULES
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 05-1684 In Re: AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR--RULE 3-7.2 / COMMENT ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR--RULE 3-7.2 The
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- EUGENE MICHAEL BYARS, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC01-1930 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- EUGENE MICHAEL BYARS, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KEITH N. SMITH, DC# 736238 JODY C. COLVIN, DC # 115879 WILLIAM WRIGHT, DC# 046175, Petitioners, vs. Case No. SC05-776 L.T. No. 2D04-2735 THE FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER TRIBUNAL NO: 4D FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN and FAMILIES, Petitioners.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC02-1985 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO: 4D02-2496 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN and FAMILIES, Petitioners -vs- WALTER FACYSON, JR., and KEN JENNE, as Sheriff of Broward County,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: SC Lower Tribunal No.: CF-1156-AXXX JAMES BELCHER, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC06-866 Lower Tribunal No.: 16-1999-CF-1156-AXXX JAMES BELCHER, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. PETITIONER
More informationAPPENDIX E. MINORITY REPORT 7.7 Manslaughter
APPENDIX E MINORITY REPORT 7.7 Manslaughter Bart Schneider Member, Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases Assistant State Attorney, Seventh Judicial Circuit Committee on Standard Jury
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC07-1851 IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT NO. 2007-9. PER CURIAM. [January 10, 2008] The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 4D ; 4D ; 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA Petitioner, vs. Case No. SC01-1596 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 4D99-4339; 4D99-4340; 4D99-4341 GREGORY BYRON ORR, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. 92,885 RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOHN WESLEY HENDERSON, v. Petitioner, CASE NO. 92,885 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH ATTORNEY GENERAL JAMES
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida LABARGA, C.J. No. SC14-1925 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC LUCAS, Respondent. [January 28, 2016] The State seeks review of the decision of the Fourth District Court of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. The Florida Bar File No ,252(11D-OSC) HAROLD M. BRAXTON,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner/Appellant, Supreme Court Case No. SC11-356 v. The Florida Bar File No. 2011-70,252(11D-OSC) HAROLD M. BRAXTON, Respondent/Appellee. / THE FLORIDA
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1998) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Lower Tribunal No. 3D JAMAR ANTWAN HILL, STATE OF FLORIDA, BRIEF OF PETITIONER ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-929 Lower Tribunal No. 3D06-468 JAMAR ANTWAN HILL, Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. BRIEF OF PETITIONER ON JURISDICTION ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. PATRICK PALUMBO Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA PATRICK PALUMBO Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. 5D08-1275 LOWER COURT NO. 05-CF-0006841-O APPELLANT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF ON REQUEST
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida In the matter of use by the trial courts of the Standard Jury Instructions Case No. SC in Criminal Cases / Report No. 2008-01 Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions
More informationSECOND AMENDMENT TO MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF. The Defendant, NELSON SERRANO, respectfully files this Second
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 10 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY CRIMINAL DIVISION CASE NO. CF01-3262 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, v. Plaintiff, NELSON SERRANO, Defendant/Petitioner. / SECOND
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA COMMENT IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED CHANGE TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.180
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE / CASE NO.SC04-100 COMMENT IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED CHANGE TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.180 The
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner/Appellant, Supreme Court Case No. SC09-922 v. PETER MARCELLUS CAPUA, Respondent/Appellee. The Florida Bar File No. 2009-71,123(11H-OSC) / THE
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2005 DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D04-3127 DEBORAH M. PATRICK, Respondent.
More informationBEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, RE: JUDGE DALE C. COHEN CASE NO.
BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, RE: JUDGE DALE C. COHEN CASE NO. SC10-348 / RESPONSE TO MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES
More informationCASE NO. 1D The Value Adjustment Board of Bay County, Florida (VAB) appeals the
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA THE VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD OF BAY COUNTY, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationFLORIDA SUPREME COURT
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT JAMES KING, Appellant, CASE NO. : SC01-1883 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. APPELLANT S INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS On appeal from a question certified by the Fifth District Court
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DANIEL L. MURRAY & JAMES L. BRINK, Petitioners, v. District Court Case No. 5D10-1376 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONERS J. BRIAN PAGE Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES - REPORT NO , CASE NO. SC07-325
The Florida Supreme Court recently authorized for use, as modified by the Court, the following Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases: 3.3(f) Aggravation of a Felony By Evidencing Prejudice; 11.11
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-901 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. To the Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida:
Filing # 40825769 E-Filed 04/28/2016 10:22:06 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT 2016-01 / CASE NO.: SC16- To the Chief Justice and Justices of
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: L.T. No.: SC12-573 3D10-2415, 10-6837 ANTHONY MACKEY, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. AMICUS CURIAE FLORIDA CARRY, INC. S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT FLETCHER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA JUNIOR JOSEPH, ) ) Appellee/Petitioner, ) ) 5th DCA Case No. 5D09-1356 ) ) Supreme Court Case No. SC11-179 STATE OF FLORIDA,) ) Appellant/Respondent. ) ) APPEAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANSWER BRIEF
THE FLORIDA BAR, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA v. Complainant, HERMAN THOMAS, Case No. SC11-925 TFB File No. 2009-00,804(2B) Respondent. / ANSWER BRIEF Allison Carden Sackett, Bar Counsel The Florida
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D CORRECTED STATE OF FLORIDA,
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2005 JOHN ALEXANDER WORSHAM, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D04-134 CORRECTED STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed January
More informationCOMMITTEE ON STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES THE HONORABLE RAND WALLIS, CHAIR SC
Filing # 36986379 E-Filed 01/26/2016 10:15:48 AM RECEIVED, 01/26/2016 10:18:29 AM, Clerk, Supreme Court AMENDED APPENDIX A COMMITTEE ON STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES THE HONORABLE RAND WALLIS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D JAMAR ANTWAN HILL, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-929 DCA CASE NO. 3D06-468 JAMAR ANTWAN HILL, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D17-177
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DARION JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Case No.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO.: 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2001 J.T. and N.T., Parents of J.L.K., J.T., JR., ET AL., Children, Appellants, v. CASE NO.: 5D01-1428 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ANTHONY COWART, DOC #H12326, Appellant, v. Case No. 2D17-2820
More informationCITY OF HOLLYWOOD POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM FORFEITURE RULES OF PROCEDURE
FORFEITURE RULES OF PROCEDURE 1. Forfeiture of Benefits Standards. a. Any member who is convicted of a specified offense committed prior to retirement, or whose employment is terminated by reason of his
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. 1999-27 ) Lt. Case No. 98-3949 STANLEY V. HUGGINS, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF ON THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Complainant, SC Case No. SC
THE FLORIDA BAR, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA v. Complainant, SC Case No. SC07-1783 TFB File No. 2007-00,671(03) RONALD HARDY PEACOCK, Respondent. / ANSWER BRIEF Clifford L. Adams Counsel for Respondent
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC07-325 IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT 2007-01. PER CURIAM. [August 30, 2007] The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC *********************************************************************
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WINYATTA BUTLER, Petitioner v. Case No. SC01-2465 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent / ********************************************************************* ON REVIEW FROM THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CHARLES STRONG, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1823 CHARLES STRONG, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA LAWRENCE T. NEWMAN DR. BEVERLY R. NEWMAN, Fla. Supreme Ct. Case No.: SC11-1117 Appellants District Court Case No: 2D10-1946 Lower Court Case No.: 2009-GA-1171
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC16-2239 IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT 2016-12. PER CURIAM. [April 27, 2017] The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. ULYSSES GONZALEZ, S.Ct. NO: SC th DCA NO: 4D Petitioner, Lower Ct. No: CF 10A
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ULYSSES GONZALEZ, S.Ct. NO: SC04-1215 4th DCA NO: 4D02-4196 Petitioner, Lower Ct. No: 01-12190 CF 10A v/ STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / PETITIONER S AMENDED INITIAL BRIEF
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DAVID WEINGRAD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D16-0446 [September 27, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ROBERT RANSONE, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 09-2084 ROBERT RANSONE, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON THE MERITS Bill McCollum Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. TASHANE M. CHANTILOUPE, Respondent. No. 4D18-162 [June 6, 2018] Petition for writ of prohibition or certiorari
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC17-2266 IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT 2017-12. PER CURIAM. [July 12, 2018] The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO.: 01-57AP JOHN SHARPE. Appellant-Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO.: 01-57AP JOHN SHARPE Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee-Respondent. A DIRECT APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT, FOURTH
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF. On Review from the District Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PAULA GORDON, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES Respondent. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID03-449 PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, RONALD HARDY PEACOCK, SC Case No. SC07-1783 TFB File No. 2007-00,671(03) Respondent. / INITIAL BRIEF James A.G. Davey, Jr., Bar Counsel
More informationON PETITION TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: 1D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Supreme Court Building 500 South Duval Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1925 (850) 488-0125 August 9, 2004 Lower Tribunal Case Number: 1D02-3026 Steve Scofield, as parent
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO PUBLIC DEFENDER, ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 09-1181 PUBLIC DEFENDER, ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC12-647 WAYNE TREACY, Petitioner, vs. AL LAMBERTI, AS SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, Respondent. PERRY, J. [October 10, 2013] This case is before the Court for review
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES WILLIAMS, Petitioner, Case No. SC03-479 v. DCA No. 2D00-5373 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / Circuit Court No. 99-2651-CA On Petition for Discretionary Review of the
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Tallahassee; Terry P. Roberts of Law Office of Terry P. Roberts, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOHNNIE J. JACKSON, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D13-2542
More informationCASE NO. 1D Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Michael T. Kennett, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D10-0172
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA RICHARD S. ROSS, ) ) Appellant/Petitioner, ) ) S. CT. CASE NO.: v. ) LOWER CASE NO.: 04D06-2712 ) DR. DIANE BLANK, ) ) Appellee/Respondent. ) ) PETITIONER S
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY ALBERT GOSLING, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D16-630 [November 30, 2016] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D FRANTZY JEAN-MARIE, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-531 DCA CASE NO. 3D04-2570 FRANTZY JEAN-MARIE, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC WILLIE L. CLARK, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1248 WILLIE L. CLARK, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST, JR Attorney General
More informationCASE NO DIVISION: 03
WILLIAM MORGAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CHADWICK E. WAGNER, Chief of ) Police of the City of Hollywood, Florida ; ) and MICHAEL J. SATZ, State Attorney for ) the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA MARK ONDREY, vs. Appellant/Petitioner, FLORENCE PATTERSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOHN WILLIAM PATTERSON, deceased. Case No.: SC04-961
More informationNos. 1D D On appeal from the County Court for Alachua County. Walter M. Green, Judge. April 18, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL JOHN EUGENE WILLIAMS, III, STATE OF FLORIDA Nos. 1D17-1781 1D17-1782 Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the County Court for Alachua County. Walter
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. PASCAL ESTIME, Appellee. No. 4D18-101 [December 19, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO.4D LT. NO CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC10-2361 DCA CASE NO.4D08-1375 LT. NO. 06-4008CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA ROBERT J. CROUCH, Petitioner, v. CASE NO.: SC 05 2140 THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Harold R. Mardenborough,
More informationLaw 12 Substantive Assignments Reading Booklet
Law 12 Substantive Assignments Reading Booklet Reading # 1: Police and the Law Training and Qualifications Police officers have to go through both physical and academic training to become members of the
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION STATE OF FLORIDA vs. DEMETRIUS L. EDDIE, Defendant. / CASE NO.: 14-CF-015754; 10-CF-010110;
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. CASE NO.: 5D STATE S RESPONSE TO THE HABEAS PETITION
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT CASEY MARIE ANTHONY, Petitioner, v. CASE NO.: 5D08-2512 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent, / STATE S RESPONSE TO THE HABEAS PETITION Pursuant
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. 93,784 RESPONDENT'S MERITS BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STANLEY SHADLER, Petitioner, v. Case No. 93,784 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / RESPONDENT'S MERITS BRIEF On Review from the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC15-339 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS. PER CURIAM. [April 23, 2015] Pursuant to the procedures approved by this Court in Amendments to the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC MATTIE LOMAX THE CITY OF MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL.,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC12-2445 District Court Case No. 3D12-2250 Lower Court Case No. 09-21176 11-13319 12,-32975 MATTIE LOMAX Petitioner, V. THE CITY OF MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION THE KING COLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2007
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2007 WILLIE PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D01-2049 [ November 7, 2007 ] ON MANDATE FROM THE SUPREME COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF On Review from the District Court of Appeal, Fifth District State of Florida
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JERRY LAYNE ROGERS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. Case Nos. SC06-1611, SC06-1612, SC06-1613 Appellate Case Nos. 5D06-979, 5D06-980, 5D06-981 Trial Court
More informationof guilt is evident or the presumption is great. 1 one knows exactly what proof evident, presumption great means.
To: The Florida Supreme Court From: Bart Schneider Date: 8/22/05 Re: Comments on Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.131 and 3.132 Case Number: SC05-739 In Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.131(a), the Court uses the language the proof
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1141 DCA CASE NO. 3D03-2169 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationCASE NO. 1D Shannon Padgett of Dale C. Carson Attorney, PA, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
FEDERICO MARTIN BRAVO, II, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationCASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charles R. McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA VICTOR REED, v. Petitioner, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-1147
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, etc., Petitioner, CASE NO. 69,430 ON APPEAL FROM THE FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT ROBERT MORROW, Petitioner, VS. DUVAL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Respondent. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, etc., Petitioner, CASE NO. 69,430 DUVAL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Respondent. ON APPEAL
More informationNancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ENOCH EUGENE DINKENS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.
More informationROGERS v. UNITED STATES. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit
252 OCTOBER TERM, 1997 Syllabus ROGERS v. UNITED STATES certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit No. 96 1279. Argued November 5, 1997 Decided January 14, 1998 Petitioner
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DAVID ANTONIO WILLIAMS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. Richard B. Davis, Jr., Judge. June 28, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D16-4248 EVERETTE LAVERNE FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. Richard B. Davis,
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC05-2381 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.790. PER CURIAM. [July 5, 2007] In response to the Court s request, The Florida Bar s Criminal Procedure
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC R.H., G.W., T.L., juveniles, Petitioners, vs.
Electronically Filed 03/14/2013 02:35:25 PM ET RECEIVED, 3/14/2013 14:38:34, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC13-326 R.H., G.W.,
More information