Size: px
Start display at page:

Download ""

Transcription

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35 Exhibit A Settlement Agreement and Release Reniger et al. v. Hyundai Motor America et al. United States District Court, Northern District of California Case No. 14-cv CW

36 CLAIM FORM To make a claim in the class action settlement in the above case, please complete and mail this form, postmarked no later than to: Reniger et al. v. Hyundai Motor America, et al. [ADDRESS] [ADDRESS] You may also submit your claim online at This Claim Form applies to claims for reimbursement for Out-Of-Pocket Costs, Rebate Certificates, or Enhanced Rebate Certificates, as these underlined terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement and Release and Class Notice. This Claim Form requests that you provide certain Hyundai documentation such as repair orders and invoices. If you no longer possess this documentation you may be able to obtain it from the Hyundai dealership at which your Class Vehicle was serviced. A. REGISTERED VEHICLE OWNER/LESSEE INFORMATION Name: Address: City, State, ZIP Code: Telephone Number (day/evening): Address (if available): B. INFORMATION ON CLASS VEHICLE Model & Model Year: Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): C. CLAIMS FOR OUT-OF-POCKET COSTS Please answer questions 1 through 5, and check YES for any box that applies to your claim for Out-of-Pocket Costs. 1. Did your Class Vehicle experience a 929A Condition stall? Some vehicle stalls generate a code that is stored in your vehicle s on-board computer system and that dealers often note in the repair order. A 929A Condition stall is a stall that does not generate such a code. If your repair order does not identify a particular code or cause for the stall, it will be considered a 929A Condition stall. If you are unsure whether your documentation shows that your vehicle experienced a 929A Condition stall, you may check YES and submit your claim for review. Yes No If your answer is NO, you are not eligible to make a claim Note: If your answer is NO, you are not eligible to make a claim and should not answer questions Did you pay money to a Hyundai dealership for a repair associated with a 929A Condition stall? Yes No Amount claimed: $ 3. Did you pay money to a Hyundai dealership for diagnostic costs associated with a 929A Condition stall? Yes No Amount claimed: $ 4. Did you incur towing costs as a result of a 929A Condition stall? Yes No Amount claimed: $

37 5. Did you incur car rental costs as a result of a 929A Condition stall? Yes No Amount claimed: $ REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION FOR OUT-OF-POCKET COSTS: If your answer to 1 is YES, please provide documentation that evidences a 929A Condition stall. A Hyundai repair order, invoice or other Hyundai documentation that does not reference a particular code or cause for the stall will be considered evidence of a 929A Condition stall. If your answers to either 2, 3, 4, or 5 is YES, you must also provide a receipt, cancelled check, credit card statement, or other proof of payment for the Out-Of-Pocket Cost you are seeking to have reimbursed. Costs claimed in (4) and (5) are subject to a $250 maximum reimbursement, combined total for both categories. D. CLAIM FOR A REBATE OR ENHANCED REBATE CERTIFICATE Please answer the questions below to determine if you are eligible to make a claim for a Rebate Certificate or Enhanced Rebate Certificate. 1. Did your Class Vehicle experience a 929A Condition stall? Some vehicle stalls generate a code that is stored in your vehicle s on-board computer system and that dealers often note in the repair order. A 929A Condition stall is a stall that does not generate such a code. If your repair order does not identify a particular code or cause for the stall, it will be considered a 929A Condition stall. If you are unsure whether your documentation shows that your vehicle experienced a 929A Condition stall, you may check YES and submit your claim for review. 2. Did your Class Vehicle experience at least two 929A Condition stalls? Note: If your answer is NO, you may skip question 3. You are not eligible to make a claim for an Enhanced Rebate Certificate. 3. Did one of your two or more 929A Condition stalls occur after your vehicle received the Campaign 929A Software Update? Note: If your answer is NO, you are not eligible to make a claim for an Enhanced Rebate Certificate. Yes Yes Yes No No No If you only answered YES to question 1, you may make a claim for a Rebate Certificate. If you answered YES to questions 1, 2, and 3, you make a claim for an Enhanced Rebate Certificate. Certificate Requested (check only one): Rebate Certificate Enhanced Rebate Certificate REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION FOR REBATE OR ENHANCED REBATE CERTIFICATE: To receive a Rebate or Enhanced Rebate Certificate, you must provide in addition to this claim form all documentation that you claim evidences a 929A Condition stall. A Hyundai repair order, invoice or other Hyundai documentation that does not reference a particular code or cause for the stall will be considered evidence of a 929A Condition stall. If your answer to (3) is YES and you wish to receive an Enhanced Rebate Certificate, you must also provide a Hyundai repair order, invoice or other Hyundai documentation that identifies when your vehicle received the Campaign 929A Software Update to verify that at least one of your 929A Condition stalls occurred after your vehicle received the Campaign 929A Software Update. E. CERTIFICATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY I declare under penalty of perjury that (a) all of the answers and information submitted in this Claim Form and in the documentation supplied with this Claim Form for Out-Of-Pocket Costs, a Rebate Certificate, or Enhanced Rebate Certificate is true and authentic to the best of my knowledge, (b) I am (or was at the time of the stall(s)) the registered owner or lessee of the Class Vehicle identified in section A

38 herein, and (c) that I have not submitted any other Claim for Out-Of-Pocket Costs, a Rebate Certificate, or an Enhanced Rebate Certificate in connection with the settlement in the Reniger et al. v. Hyundai Motor America et al. matter. Signature Date / /

39 Exhibit B Settlement Agreement and Release Reniger et al. v. Hyundai Motor America et al. United States District Court, Northern District of California Case No. 14-cv CW

40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If You Have Ever Owned Or Leased A Model Year Hyundai Santa Fe with a 3.5L Engine You May Be Entitled To Benefits Under This Proposed Class Action Settlement. Please Read This Notice Carefully, As It Affects Your Legal Rights. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Under the terms of a proposed class action settlement, you may be entitled to receive benefits, as set forth in this notice, if: (1) you currently own or lease, or previously owned or leased, a 2010 through 2012 model year Hyundai Santa Fe with a 3.5L engine ( Class Vehicle ); and (2) have at least one documented stalling complaint for the Class Vehicle that pre-dates this Class Notice; and (3) the stall was caused by the 929A Condition (please see 929A Condition definition in Section 5 below). YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT If you agree with the proposed settlement, you need not do anything to remain in the class. EXCLUDE YOURSELF You will not be entitled to participate in the settlement if you choose this option. OBJECT Write to the Court about why you do, or do not, like the settlement. You must remain in the class to comment in support of or in opposition to the settlement. ATTEND THE HEARING Ask to speak to the Court about the fairness of the settlement. 1. THE LITIGATION: Plaintiffs Julia Reniger and Greg Battaglia filed this class action in August 2013 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is captioned Reniger et al. v. Hyundai Motor America et al., Case No. 14-cv CW (the Litigation or Action ). The complaint was later amended to add representative plaintiffs Lucia Saitta and Ann Mancuso. The operative complaint alleges the Class Vehicles are prone to stalling while driving and seeks relief on behalf of a nationwide class from Hyundai Motor America (the authorized United States distributor of Hyundai vehicles) and Hyundai Motor Company (the Korea-based manufacturer of Hyundai vehicles) (together Defendants or Hyundai ). Plaintiffs alleged Defendants are liable to them and the putative class for alleged (1) violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Cal. Civ. Code 1750 et seq.), (2) violation of the California Unfair Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code et seq.), (3) violation of New York Deceptive Practice Act (N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. 349, et seq.), (4) breach of implied warranty pursuant the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Cal. Civ. Code 1792 and et seq.), (5) breach of implied warranty pursuant to New York Uniform Commercial

41 Code (N.Y. U.C.C ), (6) violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301), and (7) common law fraud. 2. HYUNDAI S POSITION: Hyundai has expressly denied and continues to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability against it arising out of the allegations and claims asserted in the Litigation, including that the vehicles are defective or prone to stalling. Hyundai maintains that its April 2015 service campaign ( Campaign 929A ) (which provides a free software update) eliminates any ongoing stalling concerns. Hyundai has vigorously resisted the lawsuit s allegations and claims and has asserted and continues to assert defenses to those claims. 3. NOTICE: This notice is designed to inform members of the class of the pendency of this litigation and of the proposed settlement, and to describe your rights and options if you are a member of the class. 4. SETTLEMENT CLASS: The District Court has conditionally certified a class that includes all residents of the United States and the District of Columbia (excluding any U.S. territories) who currently own or lease, or who previously owned or leased, a Class Vehicle. The Settlement Class excludes: (1) Hyundai Motor America, its subsidiaries and affiliates, officers, directors and employees; (2) Insurers of the Class Vehicles; (3) All persons or entities claiming to be subrogated to the rights of Class Members; (4) Issuers or providers of extended vehicle warranties or providers of extended service contracts; (5) Individuals and/or entities who validly and timely opt-out of the Settlement; (6) Consumers or businesses that have purchased Class Vehicles deemed a total loss (i.e. salvage) (subject to verification through Carfax or other means); (7) Current and former owners of a Class Vehicle that previously have released their claims against Hyundai Motor America with respect to the issues raised in the Litigation; (8) Individuals or entities that have purchased and/or leased Class Vehicles as fleet vehicles (i.e. rentals or company vehicles); (9) Any judge to whom this matter is or may be assigned, and his or her immediate family (spouse, domestic partner, or children). To represent the above class for purposes of the settlement, the Court has appointed Julia Reniger, Greg Battaglia, Lucia Saitta and Ann Mancuso to serve as the class representatives, and has appointed the law firm of Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP ( to act as Class Counsel. 5. SETTLEMENT BENEFITS. The following description of the settlement benefits and the defined terms used herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release, a copy of which is on file with the Court and available at Please refer to the complete Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release for a full description of all settlement terms and conditions. The following definitions apply to the summary below: Campaign 929A Software Update. Campaign 929A Software Update means the software update that Hyundai Motor America made available for the Class Vehicles with respect to the 929A Condition, and that was the subject of a customer notice service campaign announced in April 2015 known as Service Campaign 929A. 929A Condition. 929A Condition is a documented stall in a Class Vehicle that does not generate a diagnostic trouble code ( DTC ). Specifically, some vehicle stalls generate a code that is stored in your vehicle s on-board computer system and that Dealers often note in the repair order. A 929A Condition stall is a stall that does not generate such a code. If your repair order does not identify a particular code or cause for the stall, it will be considered a 929A Condition stall

42 Effective Date. The Effective Date is the date on which the District Court s approval of the settlement becomes final. Updates on the Effective Date and other deadlines under the settlement will be posted on SUMMARY OF BENEFITS IF SETTLEMENT IS APPROVED Hyundai will reimburse you for reasonable and documented Out-of-Pocket Costs incurred prior to the date of this notice as a result of a stall associated with the 929A Condition. An Out-of-Pocket Cost that may be claimed for reimbursement is any of the following costs that are documented and that have not otherwise been reimbursed by insurance, warranty or goodwill: REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR OUT OF POCKET COSTS (a) Costs paid to a Hyundai dealership for a repair associated with a 929A Condition stall; (b) Diagnostic costs paid to a Hyundai dealership for a stall associated with the 929A Condition; (c) Third-party towing costs incurred as a result of a 929A Condition stall; (d) Car rental costs incurred as a result of a 929A Condition stall. Reimbursement for cost categories (c) and (d) are subject to a total $250 maximum reimbursement amount. To obtain reimbursement for an Out-of-Pocket Cost, you must make a Claim by submitting a Claim Form on or before [date] and also provide (a) a Hyundai dealership repair order, invoice or other Hyundai dealership documentation evidencing a stall complaint associated with the 929A Condition, and (b) acceptable proof of an Out-Of- Pocket Cost such as receipts, cancelled checks, credit card statements, costs verifiable, etc. A Claim Form is available at the settlement website, Rebate Certificate If you have had at least one documented stall complaint associated with the 929A Condition as of the date of this Class Notice, you may make a claim for a Rebate Certificate. The Rebate Certificate is non-transferrable and can be redeemed for cash after you submit proof that you have purchased or leased a new Hyundai vehicle. The redemption value of the certificate depends on the specific new vehicle you purchase or lease, as follows: $250 Hyundai Accent NEW VEHICLE PURCHASE / LEASE INCENTIVE PROGRAM $400 Hyundai Elantra, Elantra GT, Veloster, Sonata (non-hybrid) $600 Hyundai Tucson, Santa Fe, Sonata Hybrid/Plug-in Hybrid, Genesis Coupe (or its functional equivalent at the time of purchase) $750 Hyundai Azera, Genesis Sedan (or its functional equivalent at the time of purchase) $1,000 Equus (or its functional equivalent at the time of purchase)

43 Any dealer or customer incentives that otherwise would be available to you at the time of the new vehicle purchase or lease will remain available notwithstanding availability of the Rebate Certificate. To receive a Rebate Certificate, you must make a Claim by submitting a Claim Form and a Hyundai dealership repair order, invoice or other Hyundai dealership documentation evidencing a stall complaint associated with the 929A Condition not later than one hundred and twenty (120) days after receipt of this Class Notice. A Claim Form is available at the settlement website, The Rebate Certificate is valid for one (1) year from the date it is issued. To redeem the Rebate Certificate after a new Hyundai vehicle purchase or lease, you must submit a Redemption Claim Form and provide documents that evidence the purchase or lease or a new Hyundai vehicle after the Effective Date of the Settlement and prior to the expiration of the Rebate Certificate. A Redemption Claim Form is available at the settlement website, Enhanced Rebate Certificate If you have had at least two documented stall complaints associated with the 929A Condition as of the date of this Class Notice, with at least one documented 929A Condition stall complaint that post-dates receipt of the Campaign 929A Software Update, you may make a claim for an Enhanced Rebate Certificate. The Enhanced Rebate Certificate is non-transferrable and can be redeemed for cash after you submit proof that you purchased or leased a new Hyundai vehicle. The redemption value of the certificate depends on the specific new vehicle you purchase or lease, as follows: $500 Hyundai Accent $800 Hyundai Elantra, Elantra GT, Veloster, Sonata (non-hybrid) $1,200 Hyundai Tucson, Santa Fe, Sonata Hybrid/Plug-in Hybrid, Genesis Coupe (or its functional equivalent at the time of purchase) $1,500 Hyundai Azera, Genesis Sedan (or its functional equivalent at the time of purchase) $2,000 Equus (or its functional equivalent at the time of purchase) Any dealer or customer incentives that otherwise would be available to you at the time of the new vehicle purchase or lease will remain available notwithstanding availability of the Enhanced Rebate Certificate. To receive an Enhanced Rebate Certificate, you must submit a Claim Form and Hyundai dealership repair orders, invoices or other Hyundai dealership documentation evidencing at least two stall complaints associated with the 929A Condition, with at least one documented 929A Condition stall complaint that post-dates receipt of the Campaign 929A Software Update, not later than one hundred and twenty (120) days after receipt of this Class Notice. A Claim Form is available at the settlement website,

44 The Enhanced Rebate Certificate is valid for one (1) year from the date it is issued. To redeem the Enhanced Rebate Certificate after a new Hyundai vehicle purchase or lease, you must submit a Redemption Claim Form and documents that evidence the purchase or lease or a new Hyundai vehicle after the Effective Date and prior to the expiration of the Enhanced Rebate Certificate. A Redemption Claim Form is available at the settlement website, CAMPAIGN 929A SOFTWARE UPDATE The Campaign 929A Software Update (or its functional equivalent) will remain available free of charge for 10 years after the date the Class Vehicles were first put into circulation as new vehicles. 6. ATTORNEYS FEES, EXPENSES AND INCENTIVE AWARD: To date, Class Counsel has not received any payment for their services in prosecuting the case, nor have they been reimbursed for any out-of-pocket costs. If the Court approves the proposed settlement, Class Counsel will apply to the Court for an award of attorneys fees and reimbursement for costs not to exceed $745,000. Class Counsel also will apply to the Court for a service award of $2,500 to the each of the representative Plaintiffs Julia Reniger, Greg Battaglia, Lucia Saitta and Ann Mancuso, for their initiative and effort in pursuing this litigation for the benefit of the class. Any award of attorneys fees and expenses and any service award will be paid by Hyundai and will not reduce the benefits available to you under the settlement. You are not personally liable for these attorneys fees and costs or the service award. 7. RESULT IF COURT APPROVES SETTLEMENT: If you fall within the class definition and elect to remain in the class, and the settlement is approved, the Court will enter a judgment dismissing the lawsuit with prejudice, and releasing any and all claims that you may have against Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor Company, and their respective subsidiaries and related entities, and every entity involved in the design, development, supply, manufacture, sale, lease, repair, or distribution of the Class Vehicles, and the foregoing entities past and present officers, directors, shareholders, predecessors in interest, successors in interest, and employees, including any claim for violations of federal, state, or other law, whether known or unknown, from any and all claims or causes of action that were, or that could have been, asserted by the Plaintiffs or any Class Members regarding the 929A Condition. The settlement and judgment will not release any claims or rights of Class Members who timely and properly request exclusion from the Settlement Agreement, or Class Member claims for personal injury, property damage, or claims for subrogation. 8. YOUR OPTIONS: If you are a member of the class, you have the following options: (a) PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT: If you agree with the proposed Settlement, you need not do anything to remain the class. You are, however, required to submit a timely claim as set forth herein, or comply with other deadlines as set forth here and in the Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release. For information on the status of settlement approval, applicable deadlines, and other settlement related information, please visit If you wish to comment in favor of the Settlement, you may send your comment to Class Counsel: Mark S. Greenstone, Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, California 90067, (310) (Telephone), mgreenstone@glancylaw.com. (b) REQUEST TO BE EXCLUDED: If you do not want to stay in the Class, then you must send a written notice of your request to exclude yourself from the Class, postmarked no later than to the following address:

45 Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP Attn: Eric Y. Kizirian, Esq. Reniger et al. v. Hyundai Motor America et al. (Request for Exclusion) 633 W. 5th Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California Your request must be signed by you, include your name and address, and specifically state that you request to be excluded from the Class in Reinger et al. v. Hyundai Motor America et al. If you validly and timely request exclusion from the class, (1) you will be excluded from the class; (2) you will not be entitled to the settlement benefits; (3) you will not be bound by the terms of the settlement, the judgment dismissing the lawsuit, or the release of claims provided by the settlement; and (4) you will not be entitled to object to the proposed settlement or be heard at the fairness hearing described in Paragraph 9 below. (c) OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT: If you are a member of the class and you do not request to be excluded, you may object to the terms of the settlement or to Class Counsel s request for attorneys fees and costs. You may, but need not, enter an appearance through counsel of your choice, but you will be responsible for your own attorneys fees and costs. If you object to the settlement, you must, on or before : (1) file with the Clerk of the Court of United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California and (2) serve upon the Class Counsel and Hyundai s counsel at the addresses listed below, a written objection, including (i) a reference to Reniger et al. v. Hyundai Motor America et al., Case No. 14-cv CW; (ii) your full name, address and telephone number; (iii) the year, model, and vehicle identification number (VIN) of the Class Vehicle that you own or lease or previously owned or leased; (iv) a written statement of all grounds for the objection accompanied by any legal support for your objection; (v) copies of any papers, briefs, or other documents upon which the objection is based; (vi) a list of all persons who will be called to testify in support of the objection (if any); (vii) a statement of whether you intend to appear at the fairness hearing; and (viii) your signature or if you are represented by counsel, your counsel s signature. Defendants Counsel Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP Attn: Eric Y. Kizirian, Esq. 633 W. 5th Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California Class Counsel Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP Attn: Mark S. Greenstone, Esq Century Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, California To retain your right to appeal from any provision of the order approving the Settlement as fair, reasonable and adequate, the award of incentive payments, or to the award of reasonable attorneys fees and expenses awarded to Class Counsel, you must file an objection. If you intend to appear at the fairness hearing through counsel, the objection must also state the identity of all attorneys representing you who will appear at the fairness hearing. Class members who do not timely make their objections in this manner will be deemed to have waived all objections and shall not be heard or have the right to appeal approval of the settlement. 9. FAIRNESS HEARING: On, in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland Courthouse, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612, the Honorable Claudia Wilken, United States District Judge, will hold a fairness hearing for the purpose of deciding (a) whether the settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate for the class; (b) whether a judgment granting approval of the settlement and dismissing the lawsuit with prejudice should be entered; and (c) whether Class Counsel s application for attorneys fees and expenses and incentive award for the named Plaintiffs should be granted. The hearing may be

46 postponed, adjourned, or rescheduled by the Court without further notice to the class. You do not need to attend this hearing to remain a member of the class or participate in the settlement. 10. EXAMINATION OF PAPERS FILED IN THE CASE: This notice is a summary and does not describe all details of the settlement. For full details of the matters discussed in this notice, you may wish to review the Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release dated June 2016, on file with the Court, and also available at the settlement website, A complete copy of the Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release, Claim Forms, and all other pleadings and papers filed in the lawsuit are also available for inspection and copying during regular business hours at the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California and at ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: You can get more information by viewing the settlement website at or contacting Class Counsel: Mark S. Greenstone, Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, California 90067, (310) (Telephone), mgreenstone@glancylaw.com. Please include the reference Reniger v. Hyundai Motor America. PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT WITH QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS NOTICE. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Dated: Clerk of the Court

47 Exhibit C Settlement Agreement and Release Reniger et al. v. Hyundai Motor America et al. United States District Court, Northern District of California Case No. 14-cv CW

48 GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP Lionel Z. Glancy (#134180) Mark S. Greenstone (#199606) 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, California Telephone: (310) Facsimile: (310) info@glancylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs JULIA RENIGER, GREG BATTAGLIA, OREN JAFFE, LUCIA SAITTA and ANN MANCUSO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, a California corporation, and HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, a foreign corporation, v. Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 4:14-cv CW Hon. Claudia Wilken [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Case No. 4:14-cv CW

49 Capitalized terms used in this order shall have the meaning set forth in the Settlement Agreement unless otherwise indicated. [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Case No. 4:14-cv CW IT IS on this day of, 2017, HEREBY ADJUDGED AND DECREED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 58 THAT: 1. The Settlement of Julia Reniger, et al. v. Hyundai Motor America, et al., Case No. 14-cv-3612-CW, pending in the United States District Court, Northern District of California (the Action ), on the terms set forth in the parties Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release, with exhibits (collectively, the Agreement ), and definitions included therein 1, signed and filed with this Court on, 2016, is finally approved. 2. The following class is granted final certification, for settlement purposes only, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a), (b)(2) and (b)(3): all residents of the United States and the District of Columbia (excluding U.S. territories), who currently own or lease, or previously owned or leased, a Class Vehicle that was originally purchased or leased in the United States. Specifically excluded from the Class are: (1) Hyundai Motor America, its subsidiaries and affiliates, officers, directors and employees; (2) Insurers of the Class Vehicles; (3) All persons or entities claiming to be subrogated to the rights of Class Members; (4) Issuers or providers of extended vehicle warranties or providers of extended service contracts; (5) Individuals and/or entities who validly and timely opt-out of the Settlement; (6) Consumers or businesses that have purchased Class Vehicles deemed a total loss (i.e. salvage) (subject to verification through Carfax or other means); (7) Current and former owners of a Class Vehicle that previously have released their claims against Hyundai Motor America with respect to the issues raised in the Litigation; (8) Individuals or entities that have purchased and/or leased Class Vehicles as fleet vehicles (i.e. rentals or company vehicles); (9) Any judge to whom this matter is or may be assigned, and his or her immediate family (spouse, domestic partner,

50 or children). The Class Vehicle(s) are 2010 through 2012 model year Hyundai Santa Fe vehicles with 3.5L engines The dissemination of the Class Notice in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and this Court s Preliminary Approval Order, as described in the Settlement Administrator s Declaration filed before the Fairness Hearing: (a) constituted the best practicable notice to Class Members under the circumstances; (b) constituted notice that was reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Class Members of the pendency of the Action, the terms of the Settlement and their rights under the Settlement, including, but not limited to, their right to object to any aspect of the proposed Settlement or exclude themselves from the proposed Settlement and to appear at the Fairness Hearing, and the binding effect of the Final Orders and this Final Judgment on all persons and entities who did not request exclusion from the Class; (c) were reasonable and constituted due, adequate and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to be provided with notice; and (d) met all applicable requirements of law, including, but not limited to, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. 1715, the United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), and the Rules of this Court, as well as complied with the Federal Judicial Center s illustrative class action notices. 4. Only those persons listed in Exhibit A to this Final Judgment have submitted timely and valid requests for exclusion from the Class and are therefore not bound by this Final Judgment and the accompanying Final Order Approving Class Action Settlement. 5. The claims in the Action are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice pursuant to the terms (including the Release) set forth in the Parties Agreement and in the Court s Final Order Approving Class Action Settlement and Final Order Approving [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Case No. 4:14-cv CW - 2 -

51 Attorneys Fees and Expenses and Incentive Awards, without costs to any party except as provided in these Final Orders Plaintiffs and Class Members and/or their representatives, and all persons acting on behalf of, or in concert or participation with Plaintiffs or Class Members (including but not limited to the Released Parties), who have not been timely excluded from the Class are hereby permanently barred and enjoined from: (a) filing, commencing, asserting, prosecuting, maintaining, pursuing, continuing, intervening in, or participating in, or receiving any benefits from, any lawsuit, arbitration, or administrative, regulatory or other proceeding or order in any jurisdiction based upon or asserting any of the Released Claims; and (b) bringing an individual action or class action on behalf of Plaintiff or Class Members, seeking to certify a class that includes Plaintiff or Class Members, or continuing to prosecute or participate in any previously-filed and/or certified class action, in any lawsuit based upon or asserting any of the Released Claims. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) and 2283, the Court finds that issuance of this permanent injunction is necessary and appropriate in aid of the Court s continuing jurisdiction and authority over the Action. 7. Class Counsel shall take all steps necessary and appropriate to provide Class Members with the benefits to which they are entitled under the terms of the Agreement and pursuant to the Orders of the Court. 8. Class Counsel shall be awarded $ in attorneys fees and costs and expenses, which amount is approved as fair and reasonable, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Case No. 4:14-cv CW - 3 -

52 Plaintiffs Julia Reniger, Greg Battaglia, Lucia Saitta and Ann Mancuso, shall each be awarded $ as an Incentive Award in their capacity as Representative Plaintiffs in the Action. 10. The case is hereby dismissed. Notwithstanding this dismissal, the Court will retain continuing jurisdiction over the parties and the Action for the reasons and purposes set forth in this Final Judgment, the Final Order Approving Class Action Settlement, and the Final Order Approving Attorneys Fees and Expenses and Incentive Awards. Without in any way affecting the finality of these Final Orders and/or this Final Judgment, this Court expressly retains jurisdiction as to all matters relating to the administration, consummation, enforcement and interpretation of the Agreement and of these Final Orders and this Final Judgment, and for any other necessary purpose. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, (1994) Dated:, THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA ANN WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Case No. 4:14-cv CW - 4 -

53 1 Exhibit A List of Persons Who Requested Exclusion [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Case No. 4:14-cv CW - 5 -

54 Exhibit D Settlement Agreement and Release Reniger et al. v. Hyundai Motor America et al. United States District Court, Northern District of California Case No. 14-cv CW

55 REDEMPTION CLAIM FORM This Rebate Redemption Form should be used to redeem a Rebate Certificate or Enhanced Rebate Certificate following your purchase or lease of a new Hyundai vehicle. A. NEW HYUNDAI PURCHASER / LESSEE INFORMATION Name: Address: City, State, ZIP Code: Telephone Number (day/evening): Address (if available): B. INFORMATION ON NEW HYUNDAI VEHICLE PURCHASED OR LEASED Vehicle Model & Model Year: Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Vehicle Purchase / Lease Date Dealership where vehicle was Purchased or Leased Required Documentation: Please submit proof of purchase for your new Hyundai vehicle purchase or lease identified herein. A copy of the Retail Installment Sales Contract for your vehicle purchase or the lease agreement for your new vehicle lease is sufficient. C. CERTIFICATE REDEMPTION AMOUNT REQUESTED Check the appropriate box for the redemption value for the certificate you are redeeming based on the Qualifying New Vehicle you purchased or leased. REBATE CERTIFICATE ENHANCED REBATE CERTIFICATE $250 $500 Hyundai Accent QUALIFYING NEW VEHICLE PURCHASE/LEASE $400 $800 Hyundai Elantra, Elantra GT, Veloster, Sonata (non-hybrid) $600 $1,200 Hyundai Tucson, Santa Fe, Sonata Hybrid/Plug-in Hybrid, Genesis Coupe (or its functional equivalent at the time of purchase) $750 $1,500 Hyundai Azera, Genesis Sedan (or its functional equivalent at the time of purchase) $1,000 $2,000 Equus (or its functional equivalent at the time of purchase) D. CERTIFICATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY I declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this Rebate Redemption Form and in the documentation supplied with this Rebate Redemption Form is true and authentic to the best of my knowledge. Signature Date / /

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement The original Interstate Batteries Class Action Settlement has been amended, and the Court

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Parkinson v. Hyundai Motor America ) Case No. SACV AHS (MLGx) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Parkinson v. Hyundai Motor America ) Case No. SACV AHS (MLGx) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Parkinson v. Hyundai Motor America ) Case No. SACV 06-345 AHS (MLGx) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO: ALL CURRENT OR FORMER OWNERS AND

More information

A federal court authorized this supplemental notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this supplemental notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA A federal court authorized this supplemental notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you are a current or former owner

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0-SI Document Filed0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 ALEX SOTO and VINCE EAGEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

DATED: May 7, 2014 B,Ii~ DATED: May 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (Attorney for Defendant Motorola Mobility, LLC) BY:~-- BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN Edelson PC (Attorney for Plaintiff and the Class) -29- Exhibit

More information

Case 3:15-cv JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 29

Case 3:15-cv JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 2 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 3 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD

More information

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058) 29229 Canwood

More information

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 Case 3:17-cv-05653-EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com H. Scott Leviant (SBN 200834) scott@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454

More information

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT If you purchased goods or services using a credit card from a Lowe s store in Massachusetts

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ROBERT COHEN and ASHLEY BELTRAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FEDEX OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT NOTICE The only official website from which to submit a claim is www.accountholdsettlement.com/claim. DO NOT submit a claim from any other website, including any website titled Paycoin c. PayPal

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you have or had a residential purchase or refinance mortgage loan owned and/or serviced by Chase and Chase, directly or indirectly,

More information

Case 5:09-cv JZ-OP Document Filed 01/21/14 Page 2 of 64 Page ID #:6304

Case 5:09-cv JZ-OP Document Filed 01/21/14 Page 2 of 64 Page ID #:6304 Case :0-cv-0-JZ-OP Document - Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 ARIAS, OZZELLO & GIGNAC, LLP Mike Arias (SB No. ) 0 Center Drive West, th Floor Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: () 0-00 Facsimile: () 0-

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Courtroom 15B (Annex) THIS LEGAL NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS, PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Courtroom 15B (Annex) THIS LEGAL NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS, PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PERRY JOHNSON and LAYNE BUTLER, on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals and themselves individually, v. Plaintiffs, ASHLEY FURNITURE

More information

If you own or have owned one or more TrueSTEAM Humidifiers, you could get a new humidifier or a payment from a class action settlement.

If you own or have owned one or more TrueSTEAM Humidifiers, you could get a new humidifier or a payment from a class action settlement. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS If you own or have owned one or more TrueSTEAM Humidifiers, you could get a new humidifier or a payment from a class action settlement.

More information

Notice of Honda and Acura Rear Brake Pad Settlement

Notice of Honda and Acura Rear Brake Pad Settlement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Honda and Acura Rear Brake Pad Settlement If you received this Notice by mail, or if you are a current or former owner or lessee of

More information

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156 Case 4:10-cv-01811-YGR Document 259-1 Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156 Case 4:10-cv-01811-YGR Document 259-1 Filed 06/17/16 Page 9 of 156 Case 4:10-cv-01811-YGR Document 259-1 Filed 06/17/16 Page 10 of 156

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly

More information

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES Authorized by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action Involving Stericycle, Inc. BASIC INFORMATION 1. What is this Notice about? A Court

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garo Madenlian, et al. v. Flax USA, Inc. Civil Litigation No. SACV13-01748 JVS (JPRx) If you purchased flax milk sold in the United States by Flax USA, Inc.,

More information

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB If you received more than one call to your telephone from DISH One Satellite,

More information

Case4:10-cv CW Document75 Filed03/08/12 Page1 of 9

Case4:10-cv CW Document75 Filed03/08/12 Page1 of 9 Case:0-cv-0-CW Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 DENO MILANO, vs. Plaintiff, INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC.; INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

Case: 1:15-cv SJD Doc #: 38-1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 607

Case: 1:15-cv SJD Doc #: 38-1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 607 Case: 1:15-cv-00748-SJD Doc #: 38-1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 607 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Vicki Linneman et al. v. Vita-Mix Corporation,

More information

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314 Case: 1:14-cv-01741 Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JASON DOUGLAS, individually and on

More information

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. (Denbury or Defendant) shares pursuant to the merger of Case 1:10-cv-01917-JG-VVP Document 143 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 9369 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELI BENSINGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) NICOLE COGDELL, et al., ) ) Case No. SACV 12-01138 AG (ANx) Plaintiffs, ) ) Honorable Andrew J. Guilford v. ) ) THE WET SEAL,

More information

Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No. Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 1:15-cv-24326-CMA If you made a purchase at a Microsoft retail store using a credit card

More information

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL Case 2 : 04-cv-06180 -RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 q@.^1wa7ict COURT NOV ^ 8 2007 [CENL-7'^AL CT F CALIFORNIA DEPUTY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION Case

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT Matthews, et al. v. TCL Communication, Inc. et al., Case No. NO. 3:17-cv-95 (WDNC) OWNERS OF CERTAIN MODELS OF ALCATEL ONETOUCH IDOL 3 BRAND SMARTPHONES IN NORTH CAROLINA AND KENTUCKY MAY CLAIM SETTLEMENT

More information

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT Bias v. Wells Fargo & Company et al., Case No. 4:12-cv-00664-YGR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Para ver este aviso en español, se puede visitar www.biasvwellsfargo.com. IF YOU HAVE OR HAD

More information

Case3:14-cv MMC Document53 Filed06/26/15 Page1 of 10

Case3:14-cv MMC Document53 Filed06/26/15 Page1 of 10 Case:-cv-00-MMC Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 EUNICE JOHNSON, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and the general public,

More information

Case 2:13-cv WJM-MF Document 66-2 Filed 11/14/16 Page 7 of 75 PageID: 729 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:13-cv WJM-MF Document 66-2 Filed 11/14/16 Page 7 of 75 PageID: 729 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 2:13-cv-03417-WJM-MF Document 66-2 Filed 11/14/16 Page 7 of 75 PageID: 729 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Plaintiffs and Class Representatives Robert Gray and Makrum George ( Plaintiffs or Class

More information

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 2:16-cv-07102-JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LEONARD BUSTOS and MARY WATTS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 06 Civ. 2308 (HAA)(ES) VONAGE

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GREGORY M. JORDAN, ELI GOLDHABER and JOSEPHINA GOLDHABER individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date:

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date: IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A proposed Settlement has been reached in a class action alleging that HD Supply, Inc. ( HDS or Defendant ) sent marketing

More information

Case 2:13-cv GHK-MRW Document Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:8311. Exhibit A. EXHIBIT A Page 46

Case 2:13-cv GHK-MRW Document Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:8311. Exhibit A. EXHIBIT A Page 46 Case 2:13-cv-04460-GHK-MRW Document 302-1 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:8311 Exhibit A EXHIBIT A Page 46 Case 2:13-cv-04460-GHK-MRW Document 302-1 Filed 02/08/16 Page 2 of 47 Page ID #:8312 CLAIM

More information

A Federal Court authorized this notice. You are not being sued. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this notice. You are not being sued. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Bishop, et al. v. Behr Process Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-04464 (N.D. Ill.) If you used Behr DeckOver between September 1,

More information

THESE RIGHTS AND OPTIONS AND THE DEADLINES TO EXERCISE THEM ARE EXPLAINED IN THIS NOTICE. WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

THESE RIGHTS AND OPTIONS AND THE DEADLINES TO EXERCISE THEM ARE EXPLAINED IN THIS NOTICE. WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A proposed settlement has been reached in a class action alleging that Hewlett-Packard Company, now known as HP Inc.

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ) is made and

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ) is made and SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ) is made and entered into as of this 30 th day of January, 2014, by and among: (1) (a) Stephanie Grieve, individually

More information

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: Rodriguez v. El Toro Medical Investors Settlement Administrator PO Box. 404041 ETZ «Barcode» Postal Service: Please do not mark barcode Claim#: ETZ-«Claim8»-«CkDig» «First1» «Last1» «Addr1» «Addr2» «City»,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL FROM ZACKS OR IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL REGARDING THE ZACKS BEAT THE MARKET BOOK OR AN EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR REGARDING OPTIONS TRADING, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY

More information

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case4:13-cv-02132-YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM

More information

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID»

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID» American Casino Recording Class Action c/o Dahl Administration LLC P.O Box 3614 Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614 *«Barcode_print»* «SeqID» UNIQUE ID:

More information

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-13-000352 IN RE PERVASIVE SOFTWARE INC, SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT RICHARD TYNER, III, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, EMBARQ CORPORATION, THOMAS A. GERKE, WILLIAM

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT TO: All persons who have performed in a motion picture, television program, or certain other audiovisual work that has earned foreign royalties. THIS NOTICE

More information

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case:-cv-0-WHO Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 JASON TRABAKOOLAS, SHEILA STETSON, CHRISTIE WHEELER, JACK MOONEY, and KEVEN TURNER individually

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X ANTHONY CAIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN GAUQUIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC., WILLIAM MARTH,

More information

Get out of the lawsuit and the settlement. This is the only YOURSELF

Get out of the lawsuit and the settlement. This is the only YOURSELF Attention purchasers of Safeway Select Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and December 16, 2016 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant.

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant. Case 116-cv-02487-KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x SHIVA STEIN, Plaintiff, - against

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ALBERT VIESSE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:16-cv-01026-JCC Hon. John C. Coughenour

More information

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights. United States District Court for the Northern District of California If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IF YOU PURCHASED OR USED CLOROX AUTOMATIC TOILET BOWL CLEANER YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CASH PAYMENT THIS NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS. A Federal

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Richard Terry v. Hoovestol, Inc. Case No. 3:16-cv-05183-JST A court authorized this notice. This is

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Seifi et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC Doc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 0 MAJEED SEIFI, et al., v. Plaintiffs, MERCEDES-BENZ U.S.A., LLC, Defendant.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are an individual who while residing in the United States between January 21, 2007 and October 15, 2009 owned a Harmony 1000

More information

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc EXHIBIT A-1 Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc TO: All persons and entities who owned shares either of Thema International Fund plc or

More information

Attention purchasers of Bertolli Brand Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2018

Attention purchasers of Bertolli Brand Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2018 Attention purchasers of Bertolli Brand Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2018 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

Submit a Claim Exclude Yourself Object Go to a Hearing Do Nothing

Submit a Claim Exclude Yourself Object Go to a Hearing Do Nothing If you purchased a Tire Protection Package, Service Central Road Hazard, King Royal Tire Service or other vehicle service contract providing for road hazard protection from Big O Tires, LLC on or after

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Daniel L. Warshaw (SBN 185365) Bobby Pouya (SBN 245527) PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP 15165 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 400 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 Tel: (818)

More information

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 9:14-cv-81156-WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In re: Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A. Securities Litigation

More information

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page2 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page3 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. MODEL N, INC., et al., SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

Attention California purchasers of Canada Dry Ginger Ale Between December 28, 2012 and June 26, 2018

Attention California purchasers of Canada Dry Ginger Ale Between December 28, 2012 and June 26, 2018 Attention California purchasers of Canada Dry Ginger Ale Between December 28, 2012 and June 26, 2018 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court has authorized this notice. This

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X CEASAR DAHINGO, ISMAEL DOMINGONO, On behalf of Themselves and All

More information

Case 1:14-cv SMG Document 68 Filed 09/19/17 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1270

Case 1:14-cv SMG Document 68 Filed 09/19/17 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1270 Case 1:14-cv-03131-SMG Document 68 Filed 09/19/17 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1270 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SUSAN MOSES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BRUCE M. TAYLOR, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, MORGAN STANLEY DW, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

More information

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mike Arias (State Bar No. 115385) Mikael Stahle (State Bar No. 182599) Alfredo Torrijos, Esq. (State Bar No. 222458)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JEROME JENSON, BETTY TAIT, EILEEN HORTON and JOSEPH RISSE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A federal court authorized this notice. This notice is not an endorsement of plaintiff

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON COBB, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON COBB, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,, Case :0-cv-00-DOC-AN Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON COBB, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIRENA TORRES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 1:16-cv-01915-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, v. PICK-A-PART AUTO

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK If you purchased any Babyganics Products Between September 7, 2010 and June 26, 2018 You May be Eligible to Receive a Payment from a Class

More information

- 1 - Questions? Call:

- 1 - Questions? Call: Patrick Sinay, et al. v. Essendant Co., et al. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC651043 ATTENTION: ALL CURRENT AND FORMER HOURLY-PAID OR NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. CACE-15-001612 (02) LYNN PHILLIPS, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,

More information

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7 Case:0-cv-0-RMW Document0 Filed0// Page of Michael W. Sobol (State Bar No. ) Roger N. Heller (State Bar No. ) LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Battery Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA - Telephone:

More information

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 730 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 730 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Case :0-cv-0-CW Document 0 Filed /0/ Page of 0 GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. ) SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. ) KRISTEN SIMPLICIO (State Bar No. ) 00 Pine Street, Suite 0 San Francisco,

More information

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement.

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit

More information

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 Case 1:15-cv-01249-WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 15-cv-1249

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you were a borrower with a loan secured by a property in Massachusetts and were assessed two or more late fees by EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") at any time during the period

More information

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71 Case 2:17-cv-02264-JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LOGAN LANDES and JAMES GODDARD, individually and

More information

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 127 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 127 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-si Document Filed 0/0/ Page of + UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 ALEX SOTO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-si

More information

Case 4:06-cv CW Document 81 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:06-cv CW Document 81 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 10 Case 4:06-cv-03153-CW Document 81 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 James M. Finberg (SBN 114850) Eve H. Cervantez (SBN 164709) Rebekah

More information

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action IF YOU WERE CHARGED A FUEL SURCHARGE OR FUEL/ENVIRONMENTAL FEE IN FLORIDA BY SOUTHERN WASTE SYSTEMS, LLC D/B/A SUN DISPOSAL ( SWS ) FROM 01/14/12

More information

: : : : : : CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Class Action Settlement Agreement (the Agreement or Settlement Agreement )

: : : : : : CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Class Action Settlement Agreement (the Agreement or Settlement Agreement ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------- X LOCKMAN, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

Case 1:17-cv WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736

Case 1:17-cv WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736 Case 1:17-cv-02177-WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION KRISTYN PLUMMER, on behalf of herself and

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Perez, et al. v. Centinela Feed, Inc. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC575341 PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY To: A California

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION PAWEL I. KMIEC, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

More information

Case 1:17-cv MGC Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2018 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:17-cv MGC Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2018 Page 1 of 21 Case 1:17-cv-23307-MGC Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2018 Page 1 of 21 AUSTIN BELANGER, v. Plaintiff, ROUNDPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 In The Case Of Kevin Burkhammer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Allied Interstate LLC; and, Does 1-20, Inclusive, 15CV0567 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RAMON GOMEZ, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BIDZ.COM, INC., and DAVID ZINBERG, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

More information

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No. Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD If you made a purchase at a Godiva store in the United States

More information