Case 2:15-cv GHK-KS Document 37-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:262 EXHIBIT A JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 2:15-cv GHK-KS Document 37-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:262 EXHIBIT A JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT"

Transcription

1 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: EXHIBIT A JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

2 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 Anthony J. Orshansky CA Bar No. Justin Kachadoorian CA Bar No. 0 COUNSELONE, P.C. 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Beverly Hills, CA 00 Telephone: 0.. Facsimile:.. Attorneys for Plaintiff JASMINE WHITE Spencer C. Skeen CA Bar No. Tim L. Johnson CA Bar No. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 0 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 0 San Diego, CA Telephone:..00 Facsimile:..0 Attorneys for Defendant RBD STAFFING, INC. Harold M. Brody CA Bar No. 0 Tracey L. Silver CA Bar No. PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Century Park East, nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: Facsimile: 0.. Attorneys for Defendant SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JASMINE WHITE, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, RBD STAFFING, INC. dba SALESMAKERS, a Florida corporation, and SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO., a Kansas corporation, Defendants. Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx) JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Trial Date: None Set Judge: Hon. George H. King Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

3 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 This Joint Stipulation for Class Action Settlement ( Joint Stipulation ) is made and entered by and between Plaintiff Jasmine White ( Plaintiff ), on behalf of herself and on behalf of others similarly situated, and RBD Staffing, Inc., and Sprint/United Management Company (collectively Defendants ). This Joint Stipulation shall be binding on Plaintiff and the class she purports to represent, and Defendants and their insurers, brands, concepts, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, assigns, and any individual or entity which could be jointly liable with Defendants, subject to the terms and conditions hereof and the approval of the Court. THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE:. Plaintiff and Defendants are collectively referred to as the Parties.. On September,, the Parties attended mediation with the Honorable Herbert B. Hoffman (Ret.).. On December,, the Parties entered a Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU ), which is fully incorporated.. Subject to preliminary and final approval by the Court, the Parties have agreed to settle and resolve all claims, causes of actions, and primary rights asserted in the lawsuit entitled White v. RBD Staffing, Inc. et al., Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx) ( Action ), on these terms.. The Parties investigated facts and law during the prosecution of the Action. The investigation included the exchange of information pursuant to formal and/or informal discovery, numerous meetings and conferences between representatives of the Parties, and mediation. Counsel for the Parties also have investigated the applicable law as applied to the facts discovered regarding the alleged claims of Plaintiff and potential defenses thereto, and the damages claimed by Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and the class she seeks to represent. Among other things, discovery focused on Plaintiff s allegations that: () RBD conducted background checks on applicants and employees after providing an improper Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

4 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 background check disclosure and authorization form ( D&A form ), in violation of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and California s Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act ( ICRAA ); () RBD failed to provide required disclosures to applicants and employees before taking an adverse action based on a background check, in violation of the FCRA; () RBD failed to provide applicants and employees, on whom it was taking adverse action, with an adverse action disclosure in violation of the FCRA and the ICRAA. Discovery included information regarding class data and background check records. The Parties conducted their own evaluations on the potential recoveries based on the claims alleged in the Action.. Nothing in this Joint Stipulation, nor the fact of this Joint Stipulation itself, shall be construed or deemed as an admission of liability, culpability, negligence, or wrongdoing by Defendants. Nothing herein shall constitute an admission by Defendants that the Action was properly brought as a class or representative action other than for settlement purposes. The settlement of the Action, the negotiation and execution of this Joint Stipulation, and all acts performed or documents executed under or in furtherance of this Joint Stipulation or the settlement: (i) are not, shall not be deemed to be, and may not be used as, an admission or evidence of any wrongdoing or liability by Defendants or of the truth of any of the factual allegations in the operative complaint; (ii) are not, shall not be deemed to be, and may not be used as, an admission or evidence of any fault or omissions by Defendants in any civil, criminal, or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal; and (iii) are not, shall not be deemed to be, and may not be used as, an admission or evidence of the appropriateness of these or similar claims for class certification or administration other than to administer this Joint Stipulation.. For purposes of this Joint Stipulation, there shall be two separate classes: the FCRA/California Pre-Authorization Class and the FCRA/California Adverse Action Class. Members of the FCRA/California Pre-Authorization Class Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

5 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 and FCRA/California Adverse Action Class are collectively referred to as Class Members.. For purposes of this Joint Stipulation, the FCRA/California Pre- Authorization Class shall be defined as follows: ALL PERSONS RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES WHO APPLIED FOR EMPLOYMENT OR WERE EMPLOYED BY RBD STAFFING, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SALESMAKERS, INC., OR ONE OF ITS AFFILIATES, INCLUDING THOSE PLACED OR CONSIDERED FOR PLACEMENT WITH SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO., AND ON WHOM RBD STAFFING, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SALESMAKERS, INC., OR ONE OF ITS AFFILIATES, PROCURED ONE OR MORE BACKGROUND CHECKS (INCLUDING, AS DEFINED UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW, INVESTIGATIVE BACKGROUND CHECKS) THROUGH CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCIES HIRERIGHT AND/OR BACKGROUNDCHECKS.COM BETWEEN OCTOBER 0,, AND MAY,.. For purposes of this Joint Stipulation, the FCRA/California Adverse Action Class shall be defined as follows: ALL PERSONS RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES WHO APPLIED FOR EMPLOYMENT OR WERE EMPLOYED BY RBD STAFFING, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SALESMAKERS, INC., OR ONE OF ITS AFFILIATES, INCLUDING THOSE PLACED OR CONSIDERED FOR PLACEMENT WITH SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO., AND AGAINST WHOM RBD STAFFING, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SALESMAKERS, INC., OR ONE OF ITS AFFILIATES, TOOK ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION BETWEEN OCTOBER 0,, AND JULY,, BASED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, ON INFORMATION IN A BACKGROUND CHECK (INCLUDING, AS DEFINED UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW, AN INVESTIGATIVE BACKGROUND CHECK) PROCURED THROUGH CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCIES HIRERIGHT AND/OR BACKGROUNDCHECKS.COM. 0. At the time of mediation, Defendants represented that the FCRA/California Pre-Authorization Class consists of approximately, class members and the FCRA/California Adverse Action Class consists of approximately class members.. The settlement described herein will resolve fully and finally all claims due or claimed to be due in the Action by all Class Members who do not opt-out of the settlement, as well as all claims listed herein. Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

6 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0. Solely to settle the Action only, the Parties stipulate and agree that the requisites for establishing class certification regarding the Class Members have been met and are met. The Parties stipulate and agree that: A. The Class Members are ascertainable and so numerous as to make it impracticable to join all Class Members; B. There are common questions of law and fact; C. Plaintiff believes her claims are typical of the claims of the Class Members; D. Plaintiff and Class Counsel will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Class Members; E. The prosecution of separate actions by Class Members would create the risk of inconsistent adjudications, which would establish incompatible standards of conduct; and F. Plaintiff believes questions of law and fact common to the Class Members predominate over individual questions and that a class action is superior to other available means for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.. Defendants deny any liability or wrongdoing of any kind whatsoever associated with the claims alleged in the Action. Defendants further deny that, for any purpose other than settling the Action, these claims are appropriate for class or representative treatment. Plaintiff, on the other hand, believes she filed a meritorious action and that class certification is appropriate. In sum, Plaintiff contends that: () RBD conducted background checks on applicants and employees after providing an improper background check D&A form, in violation of the FCRA and ICRAA; () RBD failed to provide required disclosures to applicants and employees before taking an adverse action based on a background check, in violation of the FCRA; () RBD failed to provide applicants and employees, on whom it was taking adverse action, with an adverse action disclosure in violation of the FCRA and the ICRAA. Plaintiff also contends that these violations violate California s Unfair Competition Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

7 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 Law. Plaintiff also believes the Action is appropriate for class certification, as the requisites for class certification can be satisfied.. Defendants deny that they have engaged in any unlawful activity, have failed to comply with the law in any respect, or have any liability to anyone under the claims asserted in the Action. The Parties expressly acknowledge that this Joint Stipulation is entered into for the purpose of compromise of highly disputed claims and nothing herein is an admission of liability or wrongdoing by Defendants. Whether or not the settlement becomes final, neither the settlement, nor any document, statement, proceeding or conduct related to the settlement or this Joint Stipulation, nor any reports or accounting thereof, shall be construed as, offered or admitted in evidence as, received as, or deemed to be evidence for any purpose adverse to Defendants, including, but not limited to, evidence of a presumption, concession, indication or admission by Defendants of any liability, fault, wrongdoing, omission, concession, or damage; or, disclosed, referred to or offered in evidence against Defendants, in any further proceeding in the Action, or any other civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding except for purposes of effectuating the settlement pursuant to this Joint Stipulation. This section and all other provisions of this Joint Stipulation notwithstanding, any and all provisions of this Joint Stipulation may be admitted in evidence and otherwise used in any and all proceedings to enforce any or all terms of this Joint Stipulation or in defense of any claims released or barred by this Joint Stipulation.. The Parties hereby agree that the formula for allocating the settlement payments, as defined in herein, to the Class Members described below is reasonable and that the payments provided are designed to provide a fair settlement to the Class Members. Based on their own independent investigations and evaluations, Defendants and Plaintiff and their respective counsel are of the opinion that the settlement for the consideration and on the terms set forth in this Joint Stipulation is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and is in the best interests of the Class Members and Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

8 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 Defendants, in light of all known facts and circumstances and the risks inherent in litigation, including the potential appellate issues. Class Counsel believe that the settlement amount entered into is in the best interests of the Class Members and that the settlement for the Class Members is fair, reasonable, and adequate, especially given the inherent risk of litigation.. Plaintiff, Class Counsel, Defendants and Defendants respective counsel, agree to the conditional certification of the Class Members for the sole purpose of effectuating this settlement. Should the settlement not become final, for whatever reason, the fact that the Parties were willing to stipulate to class certification as part of the settlement shall have no bearing on, and shall not be admissible in connection with, the issue of whether a class should be certified in a non-settlement context or any other legal proceeding in any jurisdiction. Defendants expressly reserve the right to oppose class certification in the Action should the settlement not become final.. The purpose of this Joint Stipulation is to settle and compromise all claims by Plaintiff and the Class Members for (a) all claims due or claimed to be due by the Class Members asserted in the operative complaint, and (b) all claims listed herein.. The settlement embodied in this Joint Stipulation contemplates the (a) entry of an order approving certification of the Class Members; (b) entry of a final order approving settlement of the Action; (c) entry of judgment; (d) discharge of Defendants from liability for any and all claims relating to the Action; and (e) release by the Plaintiff and the Class Members of all claims arising out of Defendants background check practices.. It is the intention of the Parties that this Joint Stipulation shall constitute a full and complete settlement and release of all of Plaintiff s and the Class Members claims arising from or related to the allegations made in the Action against Defendants and other parties related to Defendants identified herein. Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

9 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0. The Parties will seek preliminary and final approval of this settlement as soon as possible. Plaintiff s counsel shall prepare all paperwork necessary to obtain preliminary and final approval. Defendants counsel agree to cooperate in good faith to accomplish this objective.. The gross settlement amount is $00,000.00, all-inclusive. The gross settlement amount is the maximum amount Defendants can be required to pay under this settlement. Payments to Class Members and payments for attorney fees and costs, claims administration fees, and incentive award to Plaintiff shall all be deducted from the gross settlement amount.. RBD Staffing, Inc. shall pay the gross settlement amount within 0 calendar days after final approval of the settlement.. This settlement is a non-reversionary and claims-made settlement. Class members must submit a claim form to receive a payment under the settlement. TERMS OF SETTLEMENT NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, and agreements set forth herein, the Parties agree, subject to the Court s approval, as follows.. It is agreed by and among Plaintiff and Defendants that any claims, damages, or causes of action arising out of the disputes which are the subject of the Action, and any claims of Plaintiff listed herein, be settled and compromised as between the Class Members and Defendants, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Joint Stipulation and the approval of the Court.. The effective date of this settlement shall be: ) Absent any objection(s) to the settlement, the date the Court enters an Order granting final approval of the settlement and entering Judgment thereon (withdrawn objections are not considered to be objections for purposes of this section); () If any objection(s) are filed, which are not withdrawn, then sixty-one () calendar days following the date final Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

10 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page 0 of Page ID #: 0 approval of the settlement was granted; or () If a timely appeal is filed, the date of final resolution of that appeal resulting in Final Approval of the Settlement.. Settlement Payments to the Class Members: After deducting from the gross settlement amount payments for attorney fees and costs, claims administration fees, and payment of Plaintiff s incentive award the residual settlement funds ( Net Settlement Fund ) will be paid on a pro rata basis to those Class Members who submit valid and timely Claim Forms as set forth herein ( Participating Claimants or Participating Class Members ). The Claims Administrator will be responsible for issuing 0 Forms only if required. (a) Allocation Method. The Claims Administrator will make equal payments to each Participating Class Member in the FCRA/California Pre-Authorization Class. Participating Class Members in the FCRA/California Pre-Authorization Class who are also Class Members in the FCRA/California Adverse Action Class will receive double the settlement amount payment.. Class Counsel Fees and Costs: Defendants will not object to a claim for attorney fees up to 0% of the gross settlement amount but the Court shall approve the fees requested. Defendants will also not object to a claim for costs up to $0,000 by Plaintiff s counsel but the Court shall approve the costs requested. Attorney fees and costs will be taken from the gross settlement amount.. Class Representative: Defendants will not object to an incentive award for Plaintiff of up to $,000, to be taken from the gross settlement amount.. The Claims Administrator shall cause the settlement payments to be mailed to the Class Members within 0 calendar days after the Court s final approval of the settlement if no objections by the Class Members have been filed, or within 0 days of the final approval order if an objection is made but no appeal is filed, or within 0 days of the date the judgment is final and no longer subject to appeal if an appeal is filed. Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

11 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 0. The Class Members shall have 0 calendar days to cash their settlement checks. The Claims Administrator shall pay any residue from uncashed checks to the National Consumer Law Center.. The Claims Administrator shall provide written notice to Defendants no later than five calendar days after the opt-out filing deadline with a complete list of the Class Members who have effectively opted-out of the settlement.. The Parties agree that if more than 0% of the Class Members opt-out of the settlement, Defendants shall have the right to rescind the settlement if the Parties cannot agree on appropriate modifications to the settlement terms. If Defendants rescind the settlement, they will be responsible for administration costs incurred at the time of rescission. CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION. The Parties have agreed to the appointment of CPT Group, Inc. to perform the customary duties of Claims Administrator. Claims administration expenses will be approximately $,000, to be paid from the gross settlement amount. The Claims Administrator shall: A. Prepare, print, and mail the Class Members the notice of settlement. The Claims Administrator will substitute electronic mail for U.S. Postal Service notice for whom it obtains an electronic mail address. B. Skip trace and r all returned, undelivered mail within seven days of receiving notice that the mailing was undeliverable. C. Establish an interactive internet website containing information about the settlement with the capability to accept on-line submissions of claim forms. D. Establish an interest bearing bank account for the deposit of the gross settlement amount and deposit those funds into such account upon receipt. E. Identify the Class Members, determine the correct settlement payments and withholdings, if necessary, and timely forward all requisite information to the Parties. Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

12 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 F. Coordinate with Defendants to research and/or investigate any disputes, challenges, or objections submitted by the Class Members. G. Identify and report opt-outs. H. Prepare and circulate a declaration of responses. I. Prepare and circulate a declaration of compliance. J. Identify any checks that are not timely cashed in accordance with the terms of this Joint Stipulation and provide such information to the Parties. K. Confirm to the Parties the payments to be remitted by the Claims Administrator and mail settlement checks to the Class Members, the fees awarded to Class Counsel, and the incentive award to Plaintiff. L. Provide written confirmation to the Parties when the notice of settlement has been served pursuant to this Joint Stipulation. M. Attempt to resolve any disagreement with the Class Members and may request any information or assistance from Defendants or Class Counsel that the Claims Administrator believes may assist in resolving the disagreement. Defendants records shall be presumed to be correct, which may only be rebutted by evidence, including any documentary evidence, submitted by the Class Members. N. Provide to the Parties a final, detailed list of all payments from the gross settlement fund and provide to Defendants the Internal Revenue Service forms, if any, provided to the Class Members. O. Any funds from checks not cashed within the requisite period of time and funds from checks returned as undeliverable shall revert to the gross settlement amount. If economically feasible, these reverted funds will be distributed pro rata to Participating Class Members. However, if the Parties and the Claims Administrator believe the pro rata payment is not economically feasible to distribute, it shall be distributed to the proposed Cy Pres recipient, the National Consumer Law Center, pursuant to Court approval. 0 Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

13 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 P. All such other tasks required by this Joint Stipulation, as the Parties mutually agree or as the Court orders. NOTICE TO THE SETTLEMENT CLASS. The Parties agree that within calendar days after preliminary approval of this Joint Stipulation, Defendants will provide to the Claims Administrator all of the following information about the Class Members in a format requested by the Claims Administrator: () name, () most current mailing address and telephone number, () most current address, and () social security number. Prior to mailing, the Claims Administrator will perform a search based on the National Change of Address Database information to update and correct for any known or identifiable address changes.. Within calendar days after receipt of the class data list by the Claims Administrator, a Postcard Notice of Settlement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit (or as modified by the Court) shall be sent by first class mail, or the Notice of Settlement shall be sent by (if known) in the form attached hereto as Exhibit (or as modified by the Court) by the Claims Administrator to the Class Members. The Claims Administrator will also create and maintain an interactive website for the submission of Claim Forms in the form attached hereto as Exhibit (or as modified by the Court). The Claims Administrator will post an Opt-Out Form in in the form attached hereto as Exhibit (or as modified by the Court). The Claims Administrator will post a Claim Form in the form attached hereto as Exhibit (or as modified by the Court).. Notices returned to the Claims Administrator as non-delivered shall be skip-traced and re-sent to the forwarding address, if any, on the returned envelope within seven days of receiving notice that a Notice of Settlement was undeliverable. A returned Notice of Settlement will be forwarded only once by the Claims Administrator. If a Class Member s address is no longer valid, Claims Administrator will used best efforts to locate a mailing address for such Class Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

14 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 Member. The Claims Administrator will follow the preceding steps applicable to mailed notices. Upon completion of these steps by the Claims Administrator, Defendants shall be deemed to have satisfied its obligation to provide the Notice of Settlement to the Class Members. Such affected persons shall be bound by a release of all claims alleged in the operative complaint in Action and all the terms of the Joint Stipulation and the Court s order and final judgment.. Subject to Court approval, the Class Members shall have calendar days from the date that the Claims Administrator mails the Notice of Settlement to him or her to properly submit a Claim Form or Opt-Out Form. Any claims or requests for exclusions submitted after the close of the period will not be honored. In order for the claim or opt-out to be valid, Class Members must electronically submit the Claim Form or Opt-Out Form on the settlement website, by the designated date (within days from the date the Notice of Settlement is first mailed/ ed).. Class Members shall have 0 days from the date the Notice of Settlement is first mailed/ ed to submit any dispute regarding their estimated settlement payments.. Class Members who do not effectively opt-out of the settlement as provided herein shall be given the opportunity to object to the terms of the settlement and to participate at the final fairness and approval hearing. Class Members seeking to file a written objection to the terms of the settlement must provide the written objection to the Claims Administrator and/or the Court no later than calendar days after the original date of mailing/ ing of the Notice of Settlement by the Claims Administrator. Class Members who fail to file and serve a timely written objection in the manner specified above shall be deemed to have waived any objections and shall be foreclosed from objecting to the terms of the settlement unless otherwise ordered by the Court. /// /// Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

15 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 RELEASE BY THE NAMED PLAINTIFF AND THE CLASS 0. Plaintiff and Class Members who have not effectively opted-out of the settlement fully release and discharge Defendants (as defined herein) from any and all claims, debts, liabilities, demands, obligations, guarantees, costs, expenses, attorney fees, penalties, damages, or causes of action which relate to or arise out of the allegations asserted in the operative complaint in the Action and any and all related claims, including but not limited to claims for violations of the FCRA and ICRAA and each and every claim that could have been alleged against Defendants arising out of the facts, circumstances, and primary rights in the Action. Plaintiff and Class Members do not release claims for unemployment compensation, disability, workers compensation, discrimination, retaliation, and other claims unrelated to the Action. The time period covered by this release is the Class Period.. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the settlement shall be effective as a full and final accord and satisfaction and settlement of, and as a bar to, each and every claim that has been alleged or could have been alleged against Defendants arising out of the facts, circumstances, and primary rights in the Action.. Class Members who have not effectively opted-out of the settlement will release all known and unknown claims against Defendants pursuant to California Civil Code that have been alleged or could have been alleged arising out of the facts, circumstances, and primary rights in the Action. The class claims will be dismissed with prejudice following final approval of settlement by the Court.. Plaintiff will generally release all known and unknown claims against Defendants pursuant to California Civil Code. Plaintiff will dismiss all claims with prejudice. Plaintiff also agrees not to apply for employment with Defendants in the future unless the Parties first agree otherwise in writing. Section states: Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

16 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. DUTIES OF THE PARTIES FOLLOWING FINAL COURT APPROVAL. Following final approval by the Court of the settlement provided for in this Joint Stipulation and payment of all funds due, Class Counsel will submit a proposed final order and judgment: A. Approving the settlement, adjudging the terms thereof to be fair, reasonable, and adequate, and directing consummation of its terms and provisions; fees and costs; B. Approving Class Counsel s application for an award of attorney C. Approving the incentive award to Plaintiff; D. Approving claims administration costs; and E. Entering judgment permanently barring and enjoining the Class Members who did not effectively opt-out from prosecuting against Defendants, any individual or class claims released herein, upon satisfaction of all payments and obligations hereunder.. Parties Authority: The signatories hereto hereby represent that they are fully authorized to enter into this Joint Stipulation and bind the Parties hereto to the terms and conditions thereof.. Payments: The settlement embodied in this Joint Stipulation shall become final on the earlier of (i) the Court s final approval of this settlement if no objections by Class Members have been filed, or (ii) the final resolution of any appeal of objections such that the judgment is no longer subject to appeal.. Confidentiality: The Parties acknowledge and agree the facts and allegations underlying the Action between the Parties shall be confidential unless they are in the public record, have previously been publically disclosed, or if any Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

17 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 confidentiality rights have been waived. In consideration for the promises set forth herein in this Joint Stipulation, the Parties agree that the terms and conditions of this Joint Stipulation shall remain strictly confidential and that the Parties shall not discuss, disclose, disseminate, or publicize the facts and allegations underlying the Action, or the terms and conditions of this Joint Stipulation, except: (i) as necessary to a tax return preparer and/or taxing agencies, (ii) as necessary to the Parties attorneys, (iii) as required by law; and/or (iv) in response to an order of a court or governmental agency of competent jurisdiction or subpoena issued under proper authority. Additional disclosures may be made by Plaintiff to her immediate family; disclosures by Defendants to their employees and agents to the extent necessary to effectuate the terms of the agreement, or who otherwise have a need to know the terms for a legitimate business purpose; tax advisors; and accounting or public filing purposes or to otherwise comply with reporting duties. Nothing in this agreement restricts, or is intended to restrict, communications between Plaintiff, her counsel, and class members. If contacted by the media, the Parties will merely inform them that the case has been resolved, and refer them to the public filings.. Continuing Jurisdiction: The Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over Action to ensure the continuing implementation of the provisions of this Joint Stipulation. This Joint Stipulation is enforceable pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure... No Prior Assignments: The Parties and their counsel represent, covenant, and warrant that they have not directly or indirectly, assigned, transferred, encumbered, or purported to assign, transfer, or encumber to any person or entity any portion of any liability, claim, demand, action, cause of action or rights herein released and discharged except as set forth herein. 0. No Admission: Nothing contained herein, nor the consummation of this Joint Stipulation, is to be construed or deemed an admission of liability, culpability, Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

18 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 negligence, or wrongdoing on the part of Defendants. The Parties hereto have entered into this Joint Stipulation solely with the intention to avoid further disputes and litigation with the attendant inconvenience and expenses.. Enforcement Actions: In the event that one of the Parties institutes any legal action or other proceeding to enforce the provisions of this Joint Stipulation or to declare rights and/or obligations under it, the successful party shall be entitled to recover from the unsuccessful party reasonable attorney fees and costs, including expert witness fees incurred in connection with any enforcement actions.. Notices: Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, all notices, demands or other communications given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given as of the third business day after mailing, addressed as follows: TO PLAINTIFF AND CLASS MEMBERS: Anthony J. Orshansky, Esq. Justin Kachadoorian, Esq. COUNSELONE, P.C. 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Beverly Hills, CA 00 TO RBD STAFFING, INC.: Spencer C. Skeen, Esq. Tim L. Johnson, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 0 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 0 San Diego, CA Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

19 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 TO SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO.: Harold M. Brody, Esq. Tracey L. Silver, Esq. PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Century Park East, nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 00. Construction: The Parties hereto agree that the terms and conditions of this Joint Stipulation are the result of lengthy, intensive arms-length negotiations between the Parties, and this Joint Stipulation shall not be construed in favor of or against any of the Parties.. Captions and Interpretations: Paragraph titles or captions contained herein are inserted as a matter of convenience and for reference, and in no way define, limit, extend, or describe the scope of this Joint Stipulation or any provision hereof. Each term of this Joint Stipulation is contractual and not merely a recital.. Modification: This Joint Stipulation may not be changed, altered, or modified, except in writing and signed by the Parties hereto, and approved by the Court. This Joint Stipulation may not be discharged except by performance in accordance with its terms or by a writing signed by the Parties hereto. No rights hereunder may be waived except in writing.. Binding on Assigns: This Joint Stipulation shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective heirs, trustees, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns.. Counterparts: This Joint Stipulation may be executed in counterparts and each counterpart shall be deemed an original, and, when taken together with other signed counterparts, shall constitute one Joint Stipulation, which shall be binding upon and effective as to all Parties. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

20 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:

21 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:

22 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:

23

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed // Page of 0 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release and its attached exhibits ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ), is entered into by

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TAX CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TAX CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Clint Rasschaert, Ed Risch, Pamela Schiller, Verna Schuna, Eric Gedrose, and Justin Short, v. Plaintiffs, Frontier Communications Corporation,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement ), effective as of the date of the last signature below, is made by and between Plaintiff Jonathan Weisberg

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Jeffrey Spencer, Esq. Spencer Law Firm 0 Calle Amanecer, Suite 0 San Clemente, California Telephone:.0. Facsimile:.0.1 jps@spencerlaw.net Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. Lakeshore Law Center Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is made by and between Martin Petersen, Susan Hurtado, Joseph Sarasua, and Charleen Swaney (collectively, Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves

More information

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 2 of 31 PAGEID #: 1034 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement ) is entered into between each of William Richert, Maude Retchin Feil, and Ann Jamison (individually and

More information

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 Case 2:16-cv-05218-ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT CLASS ACTION DocuSign Envelope ID: C0B-C--FD-0BFFEA 0 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT Erick Grumm, individually and on behalf of all others individually situated, Plaintiff vs.

More information

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 0:13-cv-61747-MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Agreement or Settlement ) is made by and

More information

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page2 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page3 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA ALL-SOUTH SUBCONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC. and AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P. Case No.: 2014 CA

More information

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:16-cv-03588-BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ABANTE ROOTER AND PLUMBING, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly

More information

Case 1:16-cv AOR Document 50-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2017 Page 2 of 34

Case 1:16-cv AOR Document 50-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2017 Page 2 of 34 Case 1:16-cv-23607-AOR Document 50-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2017 Page 2 of 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION TOMORROW BLACK-BROWN ) on behalf

More information

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 1:13-cv-01052-GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Dorothy R. Konicki, for herself and class members, v. Plaintiff,

More information

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 2 of 9 BETWEEN EXHIBIT "A" CANADIAN PRE-APPROVAL ORDER ONTARIO SUPERIOR

More information

DATED: May 7, 2014 B,Ii~ DATED: May 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (Attorney for Defendant Motorola Mobility, LLC) BY:~-- BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN Edelson PC (Attorney for Plaintiff and the Class) -29- Exhibit

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS LEWIS F. GEER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 01-2583-JAR ) WILLIAM D. COX, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) DAVID GROGAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS This Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims ( Agreement ) is entered into as of the last date of any signature below by and among: (a) (b) Swedish Health

More information

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made as of August 20, 2007 by and between MOST V AMERIKU (hereinafter MVA ) on the one hand and OLEG KAPANETS (hereinafter

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE CONNIE CURTS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, WAGGIN TRAIN, LLC and NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY,

More information

Case 1:14-cv SMG Document 63 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 64 PageID #: 1167 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv SMG Document 63 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 64 PageID #: 1167 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:14-cv-03131-SMG Document 63 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 64 PageID #: 1167 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SUSAN MOSES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,

More information

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A Case: 1:14-cv-01981 Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637 Exhibit A Case: 1:14-cv-01981 Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 2 of 32 PageID #:638 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL FROM ZACKS OR IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL REGARDING THE ZACKS BEAT THE MARKET BOOK OR AN EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR REGARDING OPTIONS TRADING, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, vs.

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, vs. Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the. Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and

THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the. Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and

More information

Case 7:08-cv KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 7:08-cv KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 7:08-cv-00264-KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE MBIA, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION File No. 08-CV-264-KMK STIPULATION AND

More information

TERMINATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT

TERMINATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT TERMINATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT This Termination and Release Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of June 30, 2015 by and between Porter Novelli Public Services ("Porter Novelli")

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS AMANDA OTT, ET AL. AND PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. Case 3:12-cv-00486 Document 247-1 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 7164 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND

More information

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD.

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD. HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD ( Plaintiff ) and HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. GERALD M. SOLOWAY ROBERT MORTON ROBERT J.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RUN THEM SWEET LLC, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiff vs. CPA GLOBAL LIMITED and CPA GLOBAL NORTH

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE CASE 0:14-md-02522-PAM Document 653-1 Filed 12/02/15 Page 2 of 40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL No. 14-2522

More information

EXECUTION VERSION PLAN SUPPORT AGREEMENT

EXECUTION VERSION PLAN SUPPORT AGREEMENT EXECUTION VERSION PLAN SUPPORT AGREEMENT This PLAN SUPPORT AGREEMENT (as amended, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time, this Agreement ) is made and entered into as of February 1, 2014,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 4:14-cv-11191-LVP-MKM Doc # 95 Filed 11/20/15 Pg 1 of 19 Pg ID 3450 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and

More information

Case 3:14-cv SI Document Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:14-cv SI Document Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-si Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re MONTAGE TECHNOLOGY GROUP LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: All Actions

More information

Attorneys for Defendants AM RETAIL GROUP, INC. AND G-III APPAREL GROUP, LTD. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Attorneys for Defendants AM RETAIL GROUP, INC. AND G-III APPAREL GROUP, LTD. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES LAW OFFICE OF ZEV B. ZYSMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ZEV B. ZYSMAN (BAR NO. 0) 0 Ventura Boulevard th Floor Encino, California Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - zev@zysmanlawca.com Attorneys for Plaintiff

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE This Settlement Agreemen:t and Covenant Not To Sue ("Agreement") is entered into on December 13, 2010, in San Francisco, California, by and between the City

More information

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION PATRICK HENDRICKS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

Case KG Doc 2912 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : :

Case KG Doc 2912 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : Case 15-11874-KG Doc 2912 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re HH LIQUIDATION, LLC, et al. 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 15-11874 (KG) (Jointly

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE MICHAEL E. TAYLOR, et al., v. Plaintiffs, DYNAMIC PET PRODUCTS, LLC, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1616-CV11531 Division

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement ) is made and entered into this 25th day of August, 2016, by and among (1) Plaintiffs (as defined below), for themselves

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Courtroom 15B (Annex) THIS LEGAL NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS, PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Courtroom 15B (Annex) THIS LEGAL NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS, PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PERRY JOHNSON and LAYNE BUTLER, on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals and themselves individually, v. Plaintiffs, ASHLEY FURNITURE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-CAN document 2669-1 filed 06/15/16 page 2 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.,

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 27-1 Filed: 03/09/17 Page 2 of 60 PageID #:115

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 27-1 Filed: 03/09/17 Page 2 of 60 PageID #:115 Case: 1:16-cv-08655 Document #: 27-1 Filed: 03/09/17 Page 2 of 60 PageID #:115 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION N.P. and P.S., individually and

More information

VOTING AGREEMENT RECITALS

VOTING AGREEMENT RECITALS VOTING AGREEMENT THIS VOTING AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is made and entered into as of April 30, 2015 by and between Optimizer TopCo S.a.r.l, a Luxembourg corporation ( Parent ), and the undersigned shareholder

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-60661-CIV-DIMITROULEAS In re DS Healthcare Group, Inc. Securities Litigation / STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL ) EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually ) and

More information

Hon. Elihu M. Berle 323 ccw January 16, 2013

Hon. Elihu M. Berle 323 ccw January 16, 2013 GREENBERG TRAURJG, LLP JEFF E. SCOTT (SBN 126308) 2 ROBERT J. HERRINGTON (SBN 234417) ALANA C. SROUR (SBN 271905) 3 1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90067-4 Telephone: 310-586-7700 Facsimile:

More information

Employment and Settlement Agreement With Release and Waiver

Employment and Settlement Agreement With Release and Waiver This Agreement is between, and binding on, Heather Roberts, on behalf of herself, and her heirs, executors, administrators, successors, assigns, agents, attorneys, representatives and other agents, ( Roberts

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHARP COUNTY, ARKANSAS POSITION 1. PLAINTIFF Case No. CV SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHARP COUNTY, ARKANSAS POSITION 1. PLAINTIFF Case No. CV SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHARP COUNTY, ARKANSAS POSITION 1 DARRELL E. BEASON, JR., an Arkansas Resident on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. PLAINTIFF Case No. CV-2011-137 LIBERTY

More information

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9 Case Case 1:10-cv-03864-AKH Document Document 476-1 479 Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~X MARY K. JONES, Individually and

More information

Case 1:09-cv DC Document Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 290 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

Case 1:09-cv DC Document Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 290 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants. Case 1:09-cv-08486-DC Document 233-3 Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 290 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MONIQUE SYKES, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, 09 Civ. 8486 (DC) MEL S. HARRIS AND ASSOCIATES,

More information

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS Exhibit A IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. CAPEX LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 9318-VCL SCHEDULING ORDER WHEREAS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DR. HENRY ERLE CHILDERS IV, DR. GEORGE BINO RUCKER, DR. EVAN NADLER, and DR. KAMBIZ DARDASHTI, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JOSEPH BULWA, MICHAEL MOHAMADIFAR, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs, PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY, INC., ROBERT

More information

APPENDIX G MODEL FORM OF SMALL DIVERSE AND SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTOR AGREEMENT RECITALS

APPENDIX G MODEL FORM OF SMALL DIVERSE AND SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTOR AGREEMENT RECITALS APPENDIX G MODEL FORM OF SMALL DIVERSE AND SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTOR AGREEMENT This Subcontractor Agreement ("Subcontract") is made effective as of, 20, by and between, ("Contractor") and, a Small Diverse

More information

Case 1:14-cv AKH Document Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115. Exhibit 1

Case 1:14-cv AKH Document Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115. Exhibit 1 Case 1:14-cv-02392-AKH Document 152-1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115 Exhibit 1 Case 1:14-cv-02392-AKH Document 152-1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 2 of 115 EXECUTION VERSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MOBILEIRON, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Lead Case No. 1-15-cv-284001 CLASS ACTION Assigned to:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION Case 5:15-cv-01143-RGK-SP Document 63-3 Filed 03/14/16 Page 2 of 59 Page ID #:771 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 DOl!glas Caiafa, Es_q. (SBN 107747) DOUGLAS CAIAFA;.,.A Professional Law

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PACHOLDER HIGH YIELD FUND, INC., ) COPERNICUS EURO CDO-I B.V., ) TOPSAIL CBO, LTD., TCW LINC III ) CBO, LTD.,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: v. Defendant. CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER By stipulation and agreement of the parties,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (Case No. RG06254835) A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against you and you are not being sued. However,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS. This Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims ( Settlement Agreement ) is entered

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS. This Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims ( Settlement Agreement ) is entered UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Elizabeth Coble, Milagros Harper, and Dennis Harper, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, Cohen & Slamowitz,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0-SI Document Filed0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 ALEX SOTO and VINCE EAGEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document Filed 03/01/17 Page 2 of 81 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document Filed 03/01/17 Page 2 of 81 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case 1:15-cv-08321-WHP Document 101-1 Filed 03/01/17 Page 2 of 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARCUS CREIGHTON, CONSTANCE GREEN, DON ROMAN, DANIELLE SYDNOR, DARRYL FYALL,

More information

shl Doc 1149 Filed 05/22/13 Entered 05/22/13 17:21:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

shl Doc 1149 Filed 05/22/13 Entered 05/22/13 17:21:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 12 12-11076-shl Doc 1149 Filed 05/22/13 Entered 05/22/13 172128 Main Document Pg 1 of 12 PRESENTMENT DATE AND TIME May 29, 2013 at 1200 p.m. (Eastern Time) OBJECTION DEADLINE May 29, 2013 at 1130 a.m. (Eastern

More information

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case4:13-cv-02132-YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Blau v. Harrison, et al., No. 04 C

More information

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71 Case 2:17-cv-02264-JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LOGAN LANDES and JAMES GODDARD, individually and

More information

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26 Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document1 Filed04//11 Page1 of 1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (3113) DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM (24863 1) 3 Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Baltimore Division)

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Baltimore Division) Entered: July 14, 2008 Case 07-21814 Doc 840 Filed 07/14/08 Page 1 of 28 Signed: July 11, 2008 SO ORDERED IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Baltimore Division) In re:

More information

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7 Case 2:11-cv-03535-CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7 Case 2:11-cv-03535-CMR Document 29-1 Piled 05/07/12 Page 2 of 8 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division RICK LOVE, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants Case No. 03-21296-CIV-MORENO/SIMONTON

More information

Getty Realty Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Getty Realty Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) Section 1: 8-K (FORM 8-K) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No. MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.: 1:07-cv-1757-RC For Official

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Debtors. (Jointly Administered)

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Debtors. (Jointly Administered) IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 MEMORIAL PRODUCTION Case No. 17-30262 PARTNERS LP, et al., Debtors. (Jointly Administered) BENEFICIAL

More information

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 0:11-cv-61797-CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 BLAISE PICCHI, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA v. Plaintiffs, WORLD FINANCIAL NETWORK

More information

Case 2:13-cv WJM-MF Document 66-2 Filed 11/14/16 Page 7 of 75 PageID: 729 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:13-cv WJM-MF Document 66-2 Filed 11/14/16 Page 7 of 75 PageID: 729 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 2:13-cv-03417-WJM-MF Document 66-2 Filed 11/14/16 Page 7 of 75 PageID: 729 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Plaintiffs and Class Representatives Robert Gray and Makrum George ( Plaintiffs or Class

More information

Case 1:16-cv JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 77 EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:16-cv JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 77 EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:16-cv-03282-JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 77 EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:16-cv-03282-JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 2 of 77 EXECUTION COPY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

More information

Interim Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the [Proposed] Class

Interim Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the [Proposed] Class R u p a M a r y a v. W a r n e r C h a p p De ol c 1 1 1 1 FRANCIS M. GREGOREK () gregorek@whafh.com BETSY C. MANIFOLD (0) manifold@whafh.com RACHELE R. RICKERT () rickert@whafh.com MARISA C. LIVESAY ()

More information

Case 1:16-cv JPO Document 60-1 Filed 12/12/17 Page 2 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv JPO Document 60-1 Filed 12/12/17 Page 2 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:16-cv-03340-JPO Document 60-1 Filed 12/12/17 Page 2 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SIOBHAN MORROW and ASHLEY GENNOCK, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly

More information

District of Columbia Model Severance Agreement

District of Columbia Model Severance Agreement District of Columbia Model Severance Agreement This is for educational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. For a legal opinion on your settlement you guessed it consult with a lawyer. THIS

More information

Case 2:15-cv ER Document 31-1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 2 of 23 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:15-cv ER Document 31-1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 2 of 23 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 2:15-cv-05087-ER Document 31-1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 2 of 23 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement or Settlement Agreement ) is made and entered into this

More information

Plaintiffs, Defendants. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Plaintiffs, Defendants. Plaintiffs, Defendants. JEFFREY BOUDER, et al., on behalf of Case 2:06-cv-04359-CCC-MF Document 375 Filed 12/12/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 18271 1 Incorrectly referred to as Prudential Insurance Co. of America in the case caption.

More information

APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT

APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT By signing this application and agreement (the Agreement ), you are giving Green Dot Bank, as well as its agents and affiliates, permission to review your business and personal

More information

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 43 Filed: 09/12/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:107

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 43 Filed: 09/12/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:107 Case: 1:12-cv-10253 Document #: 43 Filed: 09/12/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:107 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION THOMAS ESTKA, individually and on ) behalf of all

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK. Defendants. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK JINETTE GERVE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Index No. 157953/2012 Plaintiff, - against - B & H HEALTHCARE SERVICES,

More information

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11 Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK... ~..,-... ~. d,j\...t - -------- l ;1 SHANNON TAYLOR, individually and on behalf

More information

PRIVATE PLACEMENT AGREEMENT. relating to

PRIVATE PLACEMENT AGREEMENT. relating to BRYAN CAVE LLP OCTOBER 15, 2014 relating to $6,030,000 CITY OF OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS, SERIES 2014 (CITY PLACE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PROJECT) October 20, 2014 City of Overland

More information

Case 2:07-cv PD Document Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 63 EXHIBIT 1

Case 2:07-cv PD Document Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 63 EXHIBIT 1 Case 207-cv-04296-PD Document 272-3 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 63 EXHIBIT 1 Case 207-cv-04296-PD Document 272-3 Filed 01/24/14 Page 2 of 63 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

More information

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT. This Stipulation of Settlement ("Stipulation") is made by and between Class

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT. This Stipulation of Settlement (Stipulation) is made by and between Class STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement ("Stipulation") is made by and between Class Representative, Alec Zarelli, ( Zarelli or "Plaintiff"), on behalf of himself and all others similarly

More information

mew Doc 354 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 10:23:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 15

mew Doc 354 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 10:23:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 15 Pg 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x In re: HHH Choices Health Plan, LLC, et al., 1 Debtors. - -

More information

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers

More information

8:13-cv JFB-TDT Doc # Filed: 12/21/15 Page 1 of 47 - Page ID # 2609 EXHIBIT 1

8:13-cv JFB-TDT Doc # Filed: 12/21/15 Page 1 of 47 - Page ID # 2609 EXHIBIT 1 8:13-cv-00172-JFB-TDT Doc # 166-1 Filed: 12/21/15 Page 1 of 47 - Page ID # 2609 EXHIBIT 1 8:13-cv-00172-JFB-TDT Doc # 166-1 Filed: 12/21/15 Page 2 of 47 - Page ID # 2610 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT Bias v. Wells Fargo & Company et al., Case No. 4:12-cv-00664-YGR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Para ver este aviso en español, se puede visitar www.biasvwellsfargo.com. IF YOU HAVE OR HAD

More information

BENEFICIAL HOLDER BALLOT FOR ACCEPTING OR REJECTING THE DEBTORS JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION CLASS 4 ADDITIONAL NOTES CLAIMS

BENEFICIAL HOLDER BALLOT FOR ACCEPTING OR REJECTING THE DEBTORS JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION CLASS 4 ADDITIONAL NOTES CLAIMS Global A&T Electronics Ltd., et al. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) Chapter 11 In re: ) GLOBAL A&T ELECTRONICS LTD., et al., 1 ) ) ) Debtors. ) ) ) IMPORTANT: No chapter

More information

Case 2:12-cv VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:12-cv-00829-VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 FILED 2015 Jul-15 PM 04:21 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : EFiled Feb 20 2017 0339PM EST Transaction ID 60233454 Case No. 11655-VCG Exhibit A IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 3-SIGMA VALUE FINANCIAL OPPORTUNITIES LP, BRH OPPORTUNITIES FEEDER,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Thomas L. Logue, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, West Penn Multi-List, Inc.; Barbara Kohl;

More information