Case 2:15-cv GHK-KS Document 37-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:262 EXHIBIT A JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 2:15-cv GHK-KS Document 37-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:262 EXHIBIT A JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT"

Transcription

1 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: EXHIBIT A JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

2 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 Anthony J. Orshansky CA Bar No. anthony@counselonegroup.com Justin Kachadoorian CA Bar No. 0 justin@counselonegroup.com COUNSELONE, P.C. 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Beverly Hills, CA 00 Telephone: 0.. Facsimile:.. Attorneys for Plaintiff JASMINE WHITE Spencer C. Skeen CA Bar No. spencer.skeen@ogletreedeakins.com Tim L. Johnson CA Bar No. tim.johnson@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 0 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 0 San Diego, CA Telephone:..00 Facsimile:..0 Attorneys for Defendant RBD STAFFING, INC. Harold M. Brody CA Bar No. 0 hbrody@proskauer.com Tracey L. Silver CA Bar No. tsilver@proskauer.com PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Century Park East, nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: Facsimile: 0.. Attorneys for Defendant SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JASMINE WHITE, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, RBD STAFFING, INC. dba SALESMAKERS, a Florida corporation, and SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO., a Kansas corporation, Defendants. Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx) JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Trial Date: None Set Judge: Hon. George H. King Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

3 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 This Joint Stipulation for Class Action Settlement ( Joint Stipulation ) is made and entered by and between Plaintiff Jasmine White ( Plaintiff ), on behalf of herself and on behalf of others similarly situated, and RBD Staffing, Inc., and Sprint/United Management Company (collectively Defendants ). This Joint Stipulation shall be binding on Plaintiff and the class she purports to represent, and Defendants and their insurers, brands, concepts, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, assigns, and any individual or entity which could be jointly liable with Defendants, subject to the terms and conditions hereof and the approval of the Court. THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE:. Plaintiff and Defendants are collectively referred to as the Parties.. On September,, the Parties attended mediation with the Honorable Herbert B. Hoffman (Ret.).. On December,, the Parties entered a Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU ), which is fully incorporated.. Subject to preliminary and final approval by the Court, the Parties have agreed to settle and resolve all claims, causes of actions, and primary rights asserted in the lawsuit entitled White v. RBD Staffing, Inc. et al., Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx) ( Action ), on these terms.. The Parties investigated facts and law during the prosecution of the Action. The investigation included the exchange of information pursuant to formal and/or informal discovery, numerous meetings and conferences between representatives of the Parties, and mediation. Counsel for the Parties also have investigated the applicable law as applied to the facts discovered regarding the alleged claims of Plaintiff and potential defenses thereto, and the damages claimed by Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and the class she seeks to represent. Among other things, discovery focused on Plaintiff s allegations that: () RBD conducted background checks on applicants and employees after providing an improper Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

4 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 background check disclosure and authorization form ( D&A form ), in violation of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and California s Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act ( ICRAA ); () RBD failed to provide required disclosures to applicants and employees before taking an adverse action based on a background check, in violation of the FCRA; () RBD failed to provide applicants and employees, on whom it was taking adverse action, with an adverse action disclosure in violation of the FCRA and the ICRAA. Discovery included information regarding class data and background check records. The Parties conducted their own evaluations on the potential recoveries based on the claims alleged in the Action.. Nothing in this Joint Stipulation, nor the fact of this Joint Stipulation itself, shall be construed or deemed as an admission of liability, culpability, negligence, or wrongdoing by Defendants. Nothing herein shall constitute an admission by Defendants that the Action was properly brought as a class or representative action other than for settlement purposes. The settlement of the Action, the negotiation and execution of this Joint Stipulation, and all acts performed or documents executed under or in furtherance of this Joint Stipulation or the settlement: (i) are not, shall not be deemed to be, and may not be used as, an admission or evidence of any wrongdoing or liability by Defendants or of the truth of any of the factual allegations in the operative complaint; (ii) are not, shall not be deemed to be, and may not be used as, an admission or evidence of any fault or omissions by Defendants in any civil, criminal, or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal; and (iii) are not, shall not be deemed to be, and may not be used as, an admission or evidence of the appropriateness of these or similar claims for class certification or administration other than to administer this Joint Stipulation.. For purposes of this Joint Stipulation, there shall be two separate classes: the FCRA/California Pre-Authorization Class and the FCRA/California Adverse Action Class. Members of the FCRA/California Pre-Authorization Class Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

5 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 and FCRA/California Adverse Action Class are collectively referred to as Class Members.. For purposes of this Joint Stipulation, the FCRA/California Pre- Authorization Class shall be defined as follows: ALL PERSONS RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES WHO APPLIED FOR EMPLOYMENT OR WERE EMPLOYED BY RBD STAFFING, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SALESMAKERS, INC., OR ONE OF ITS AFFILIATES, INCLUDING THOSE PLACED OR CONSIDERED FOR PLACEMENT WITH SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO., AND ON WHOM RBD STAFFING, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SALESMAKERS, INC., OR ONE OF ITS AFFILIATES, PROCURED ONE OR MORE BACKGROUND CHECKS (INCLUDING, AS DEFINED UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW, INVESTIGATIVE BACKGROUND CHECKS) THROUGH CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCIES HIRERIGHT AND/OR BACKGROUNDCHECKS.COM BETWEEN OCTOBER 0,, AND MAY,.. For purposes of this Joint Stipulation, the FCRA/California Adverse Action Class shall be defined as follows: ALL PERSONS RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES WHO APPLIED FOR EMPLOYMENT OR WERE EMPLOYED BY RBD STAFFING, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SALESMAKERS, INC., OR ONE OF ITS AFFILIATES, INCLUDING THOSE PLACED OR CONSIDERED FOR PLACEMENT WITH SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO., AND AGAINST WHOM RBD STAFFING, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SALESMAKERS, INC., OR ONE OF ITS AFFILIATES, TOOK ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION BETWEEN OCTOBER 0,, AND JULY,, BASED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, ON INFORMATION IN A BACKGROUND CHECK (INCLUDING, AS DEFINED UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW, AN INVESTIGATIVE BACKGROUND CHECK) PROCURED THROUGH CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCIES HIRERIGHT AND/OR BACKGROUNDCHECKS.COM. 0. At the time of mediation, Defendants represented that the FCRA/California Pre-Authorization Class consists of approximately, class members and the FCRA/California Adverse Action Class consists of approximately class members.. The settlement described herein will resolve fully and finally all claims due or claimed to be due in the Action by all Class Members who do not opt-out of the settlement, as well as all claims listed herein. Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

6 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0. Solely to settle the Action only, the Parties stipulate and agree that the requisites for establishing class certification regarding the Class Members have been met and are met. The Parties stipulate and agree that: A. The Class Members are ascertainable and so numerous as to make it impracticable to join all Class Members; B. There are common questions of law and fact; C. Plaintiff believes her claims are typical of the claims of the Class Members; D. Plaintiff and Class Counsel will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Class Members; E. The prosecution of separate actions by Class Members would create the risk of inconsistent adjudications, which would establish incompatible standards of conduct; and F. Plaintiff believes questions of law and fact common to the Class Members predominate over individual questions and that a class action is superior to other available means for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.. Defendants deny any liability or wrongdoing of any kind whatsoever associated with the claims alleged in the Action. Defendants further deny that, for any purpose other than settling the Action, these claims are appropriate for class or representative treatment. Plaintiff, on the other hand, believes she filed a meritorious action and that class certification is appropriate. In sum, Plaintiff contends that: () RBD conducted background checks on applicants and employees after providing an improper background check D&A form, in violation of the FCRA and ICRAA; () RBD failed to provide required disclosures to applicants and employees before taking an adverse action based on a background check, in violation of the FCRA; () RBD failed to provide applicants and employees, on whom it was taking adverse action, with an adverse action disclosure in violation of the FCRA and the ICRAA. Plaintiff also contends that these violations violate California s Unfair Competition Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

7 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 Law. Plaintiff also believes the Action is appropriate for class certification, as the requisites for class certification can be satisfied.. Defendants deny that they have engaged in any unlawful activity, have failed to comply with the law in any respect, or have any liability to anyone under the claims asserted in the Action. The Parties expressly acknowledge that this Joint Stipulation is entered into for the purpose of compromise of highly disputed claims and nothing herein is an admission of liability or wrongdoing by Defendants. Whether or not the settlement becomes final, neither the settlement, nor any document, statement, proceeding or conduct related to the settlement or this Joint Stipulation, nor any reports or accounting thereof, shall be construed as, offered or admitted in evidence as, received as, or deemed to be evidence for any purpose adverse to Defendants, including, but not limited to, evidence of a presumption, concession, indication or admission by Defendants of any liability, fault, wrongdoing, omission, concession, or damage; or, disclosed, referred to or offered in evidence against Defendants, in any further proceeding in the Action, or any other civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding except for purposes of effectuating the settlement pursuant to this Joint Stipulation. This section and all other provisions of this Joint Stipulation notwithstanding, any and all provisions of this Joint Stipulation may be admitted in evidence and otherwise used in any and all proceedings to enforce any or all terms of this Joint Stipulation or in defense of any claims released or barred by this Joint Stipulation.. The Parties hereby agree that the formula for allocating the settlement payments, as defined in herein, to the Class Members described below is reasonable and that the payments provided are designed to provide a fair settlement to the Class Members. Based on their own independent investigations and evaluations, Defendants and Plaintiff and their respective counsel are of the opinion that the settlement for the consideration and on the terms set forth in this Joint Stipulation is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and is in the best interests of the Class Members and Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

8 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 Defendants, in light of all known facts and circumstances and the risks inherent in litigation, including the potential appellate issues. Class Counsel believe that the settlement amount entered into is in the best interests of the Class Members and that the settlement for the Class Members is fair, reasonable, and adequate, especially given the inherent risk of litigation.. Plaintiff, Class Counsel, Defendants and Defendants respective counsel, agree to the conditional certification of the Class Members for the sole purpose of effectuating this settlement. Should the settlement not become final, for whatever reason, the fact that the Parties were willing to stipulate to class certification as part of the settlement shall have no bearing on, and shall not be admissible in connection with, the issue of whether a class should be certified in a non-settlement context or any other legal proceeding in any jurisdiction. Defendants expressly reserve the right to oppose class certification in the Action should the settlement not become final.. The purpose of this Joint Stipulation is to settle and compromise all claims by Plaintiff and the Class Members for (a) all claims due or claimed to be due by the Class Members asserted in the operative complaint, and (b) all claims listed herein.. The settlement embodied in this Joint Stipulation contemplates the (a) entry of an order approving certification of the Class Members; (b) entry of a final order approving settlement of the Action; (c) entry of judgment; (d) discharge of Defendants from liability for any and all claims relating to the Action; and (e) release by the Plaintiff and the Class Members of all claims arising out of Defendants background check practices.. It is the intention of the Parties that this Joint Stipulation shall constitute a full and complete settlement and release of all of Plaintiff s and the Class Members claims arising from or related to the allegations made in the Action against Defendants and other parties related to Defendants identified herein. Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

9 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0. The Parties will seek preliminary and final approval of this settlement as soon as possible. Plaintiff s counsel shall prepare all paperwork necessary to obtain preliminary and final approval. Defendants counsel agree to cooperate in good faith to accomplish this objective.. The gross settlement amount is $00,000.00, all-inclusive. The gross settlement amount is the maximum amount Defendants can be required to pay under this settlement. Payments to Class Members and payments for attorney fees and costs, claims administration fees, and incentive award to Plaintiff shall all be deducted from the gross settlement amount.. RBD Staffing, Inc. shall pay the gross settlement amount within 0 calendar days after final approval of the settlement.. This settlement is a non-reversionary and claims-made settlement. Class members must submit a claim form to receive a payment under the settlement. TERMS OF SETTLEMENT NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, and agreements set forth herein, the Parties agree, subject to the Court s approval, as follows.. It is agreed by and among Plaintiff and Defendants that any claims, damages, or causes of action arising out of the disputes which are the subject of the Action, and any claims of Plaintiff listed herein, be settled and compromised as between the Class Members and Defendants, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Joint Stipulation and the approval of the Court.. The effective date of this settlement shall be: ) Absent any objection(s) to the settlement, the date the Court enters an Order granting final approval of the settlement and entering Judgment thereon (withdrawn objections are not considered to be objections for purposes of this section); () If any objection(s) are filed, which are not withdrawn, then sixty-one () calendar days following the date final Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

10 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page 0 of Page ID #: 0 approval of the settlement was granted; or () If a timely appeal is filed, the date of final resolution of that appeal resulting in Final Approval of the Settlement.. Settlement Payments to the Class Members: After deducting from the gross settlement amount payments for attorney fees and costs, claims administration fees, and payment of Plaintiff s incentive award the residual settlement funds ( Net Settlement Fund ) will be paid on a pro rata basis to those Class Members who submit valid and timely Claim Forms as set forth herein ( Participating Claimants or Participating Class Members ). The Claims Administrator will be responsible for issuing 0 Forms only if required. (a) Allocation Method. The Claims Administrator will make equal payments to each Participating Class Member in the FCRA/California Pre-Authorization Class. Participating Class Members in the FCRA/California Pre-Authorization Class who are also Class Members in the FCRA/California Adverse Action Class will receive double the settlement amount payment.. Class Counsel Fees and Costs: Defendants will not object to a claim for attorney fees up to 0% of the gross settlement amount but the Court shall approve the fees requested. Defendants will also not object to a claim for costs up to $0,000 by Plaintiff s counsel but the Court shall approve the costs requested. Attorney fees and costs will be taken from the gross settlement amount.. Class Representative: Defendants will not object to an incentive award for Plaintiff of up to $,000, to be taken from the gross settlement amount.. The Claims Administrator shall cause the settlement payments to be mailed to the Class Members within 0 calendar days after the Court s final approval of the settlement if no objections by the Class Members have been filed, or within 0 days of the final approval order if an objection is made but no appeal is filed, or within 0 days of the date the judgment is final and no longer subject to appeal if an appeal is filed. Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

11 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 0. The Class Members shall have 0 calendar days to cash their settlement checks. The Claims Administrator shall pay any residue from uncashed checks to the National Consumer Law Center.. The Claims Administrator shall provide written notice to Defendants no later than five calendar days after the opt-out filing deadline with a complete list of the Class Members who have effectively opted-out of the settlement.. The Parties agree that if more than 0% of the Class Members opt-out of the settlement, Defendants shall have the right to rescind the settlement if the Parties cannot agree on appropriate modifications to the settlement terms. If Defendants rescind the settlement, they will be responsible for administration costs incurred at the time of rescission. CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION. The Parties have agreed to the appointment of CPT Group, Inc. to perform the customary duties of Claims Administrator. Claims administration expenses will be approximately $,000, to be paid from the gross settlement amount. The Claims Administrator shall: A. Prepare, print, and mail the Class Members the notice of settlement. The Claims Administrator will substitute electronic mail for U.S. Postal Service notice for whom it obtains an electronic mail address. B. Skip trace and r all returned, undelivered mail within seven days of receiving notice that the mailing was undeliverable. C. Establish an interactive internet website containing information about the settlement with the capability to accept on-line submissions of claim forms. D. Establish an interest bearing bank account for the deposit of the gross settlement amount and deposit those funds into such account upon receipt. E. Identify the Class Members, determine the correct settlement payments and withholdings, if necessary, and timely forward all requisite information to the Parties. Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

12 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 F. Coordinate with Defendants to research and/or investigate any disputes, challenges, or objections submitted by the Class Members. G. Identify and report opt-outs. H. Prepare and circulate a declaration of responses. I. Prepare and circulate a declaration of compliance. J. Identify any checks that are not timely cashed in accordance with the terms of this Joint Stipulation and provide such information to the Parties. K. Confirm to the Parties the payments to be remitted by the Claims Administrator and mail settlement checks to the Class Members, the fees awarded to Class Counsel, and the incentive award to Plaintiff. L. Provide written confirmation to the Parties when the notice of settlement has been served pursuant to this Joint Stipulation. M. Attempt to resolve any disagreement with the Class Members and may request any information or assistance from Defendants or Class Counsel that the Claims Administrator believes may assist in resolving the disagreement. Defendants records shall be presumed to be correct, which may only be rebutted by evidence, including any documentary evidence, submitted by the Class Members. N. Provide to the Parties a final, detailed list of all payments from the gross settlement fund and provide to Defendants the Internal Revenue Service forms, if any, provided to the Class Members. O. Any funds from checks not cashed within the requisite period of time and funds from checks returned as undeliverable shall revert to the gross settlement amount. If economically feasible, these reverted funds will be distributed pro rata to Participating Class Members. However, if the Parties and the Claims Administrator believe the pro rata payment is not economically feasible to distribute, it shall be distributed to the proposed Cy Pres recipient, the National Consumer Law Center, pursuant to Court approval. 0 Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

13 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 P. All such other tasks required by this Joint Stipulation, as the Parties mutually agree or as the Court orders. NOTICE TO THE SETTLEMENT CLASS. The Parties agree that within calendar days after preliminary approval of this Joint Stipulation, Defendants will provide to the Claims Administrator all of the following information about the Class Members in a format requested by the Claims Administrator: () name, () most current mailing address and telephone number, () most current address, and () social security number. Prior to mailing, the Claims Administrator will perform a search based on the National Change of Address Database information to update and correct for any known or identifiable address changes.. Within calendar days after receipt of the class data list by the Claims Administrator, a Postcard Notice of Settlement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit (or as modified by the Court) shall be sent by first class mail, or the Notice of Settlement shall be sent by (if known) in the form attached hereto as Exhibit (or as modified by the Court) by the Claims Administrator to the Class Members. The Claims Administrator will also create and maintain an interactive website for the submission of Claim Forms in the form attached hereto as Exhibit (or as modified by the Court). The Claims Administrator will post an Opt-Out Form in in the form attached hereto as Exhibit (or as modified by the Court). The Claims Administrator will post a Claim Form in the form attached hereto as Exhibit (or as modified by the Court).. Notices returned to the Claims Administrator as non-delivered shall be skip-traced and re-sent to the forwarding address, if any, on the returned envelope within seven days of receiving notice that a Notice of Settlement was undeliverable. A returned Notice of Settlement will be forwarded only once by the Claims Administrator. If a Class Member s address is no longer valid, Claims Administrator will used best efforts to locate a mailing address for such Class Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

14 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 Member. The Claims Administrator will follow the preceding steps applicable to mailed notices. Upon completion of these steps by the Claims Administrator, Defendants shall be deemed to have satisfied its obligation to provide the Notice of Settlement to the Class Members. Such affected persons shall be bound by a release of all claims alleged in the operative complaint in Action and all the terms of the Joint Stipulation and the Court s order and final judgment.. Subject to Court approval, the Class Members shall have calendar days from the date that the Claims Administrator mails the Notice of Settlement to him or her to properly submit a Claim Form or Opt-Out Form. Any claims or requests for exclusions submitted after the close of the period will not be honored. In order for the claim or opt-out to be valid, Class Members must electronically submit the Claim Form or Opt-Out Form on the settlement website, by the designated date (within days from the date the Notice of Settlement is first mailed/ ed).. Class Members shall have 0 days from the date the Notice of Settlement is first mailed/ ed to submit any dispute regarding their estimated settlement payments.. Class Members who do not effectively opt-out of the settlement as provided herein shall be given the opportunity to object to the terms of the settlement and to participate at the final fairness and approval hearing. Class Members seeking to file a written objection to the terms of the settlement must provide the written objection to the Claims Administrator and/or the Court no later than calendar days after the original date of mailing/ ing of the Notice of Settlement by the Claims Administrator. Class Members who fail to file and serve a timely written objection in the manner specified above shall be deemed to have waived any objections and shall be foreclosed from objecting to the terms of the settlement unless otherwise ordered by the Court. /// /// Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

15 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 RELEASE BY THE NAMED PLAINTIFF AND THE CLASS 0. Plaintiff and Class Members who have not effectively opted-out of the settlement fully release and discharge Defendants (as defined herein) from any and all claims, debts, liabilities, demands, obligations, guarantees, costs, expenses, attorney fees, penalties, damages, or causes of action which relate to or arise out of the allegations asserted in the operative complaint in the Action and any and all related claims, including but not limited to claims for violations of the FCRA and ICRAA and each and every claim that could have been alleged against Defendants arising out of the facts, circumstances, and primary rights in the Action. Plaintiff and Class Members do not release claims for unemployment compensation, disability, workers compensation, discrimination, retaliation, and other claims unrelated to the Action. The time period covered by this release is the Class Period.. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the settlement shall be effective as a full and final accord and satisfaction and settlement of, and as a bar to, each and every claim that has been alleged or could have been alleged against Defendants arising out of the facts, circumstances, and primary rights in the Action.. Class Members who have not effectively opted-out of the settlement will release all known and unknown claims against Defendants pursuant to California Civil Code that have been alleged or could have been alleged arising out of the facts, circumstances, and primary rights in the Action. The class claims will be dismissed with prejudice following final approval of settlement by the Court.. Plaintiff will generally release all known and unknown claims against Defendants pursuant to California Civil Code. Plaintiff will dismiss all claims with prejudice. Plaintiff also agrees not to apply for employment with Defendants in the future unless the Parties first agree otherwise in writing. Section states: Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

16 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. DUTIES OF THE PARTIES FOLLOWING FINAL COURT APPROVAL. Following final approval by the Court of the settlement provided for in this Joint Stipulation and payment of all funds due, Class Counsel will submit a proposed final order and judgment: A. Approving the settlement, adjudging the terms thereof to be fair, reasonable, and adequate, and directing consummation of its terms and provisions; fees and costs; B. Approving Class Counsel s application for an award of attorney C. Approving the incentive award to Plaintiff; D. Approving claims administration costs; and E. Entering judgment permanently barring and enjoining the Class Members who did not effectively opt-out from prosecuting against Defendants, any individual or class claims released herein, upon satisfaction of all payments and obligations hereunder.. Parties Authority: The signatories hereto hereby represent that they are fully authorized to enter into this Joint Stipulation and bind the Parties hereto to the terms and conditions thereof.. Payments: The settlement embodied in this Joint Stipulation shall become final on the earlier of (i) the Court s final approval of this settlement if no objections by Class Members have been filed, or (ii) the final resolution of any appeal of objections such that the judgment is no longer subject to appeal.. Confidentiality: The Parties acknowledge and agree the facts and allegations underlying the Action between the Parties shall be confidential unless they are in the public record, have previously been publically disclosed, or if any Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

17 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 confidentiality rights have been waived. In consideration for the promises set forth herein in this Joint Stipulation, the Parties agree that the terms and conditions of this Joint Stipulation shall remain strictly confidential and that the Parties shall not discuss, disclose, disseminate, or publicize the facts and allegations underlying the Action, or the terms and conditions of this Joint Stipulation, except: (i) as necessary to a tax return preparer and/or taxing agencies, (ii) as necessary to the Parties attorneys, (iii) as required by law; and/or (iv) in response to an order of a court or governmental agency of competent jurisdiction or subpoena issued under proper authority. Additional disclosures may be made by Plaintiff to her immediate family; disclosures by Defendants to their employees and agents to the extent necessary to effectuate the terms of the agreement, or who otherwise have a need to know the terms for a legitimate business purpose; tax advisors; and accounting or public filing purposes or to otherwise comply with reporting duties. Nothing in this agreement restricts, or is intended to restrict, communications between Plaintiff, her counsel, and class members. If contacted by the media, the Parties will merely inform them that the case has been resolved, and refer them to the public filings.. Continuing Jurisdiction: The Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over Action to ensure the continuing implementation of the provisions of this Joint Stipulation. This Joint Stipulation is enforceable pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure... No Prior Assignments: The Parties and their counsel represent, covenant, and warrant that they have not directly or indirectly, assigned, transferred, encumbered, or purported to assign, transfer, or encumber to any person or entity any portion of any liability, claim, demand, action, cause of action or rights herein released and discharged except as set forth herein. 0. No Admission: Nothing contained herein, nor the consummation of this Joint Stipulation, is to be construed or deemed an admission of liability, culpability, Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

18 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 negligence, or wrongdoing on the part of Defendants. The Parties hereto have entered into this Joint Stipulation solely with the intention to avoid further disputes and litigation with the attendant inconvenience and expenses.. Enforcement Actions: In the event that one of the Parties institutes any legal action or other proceeding to enforce the provisions of this Joint Stipulation or to declare rights and/or obligations under it, the successful party shall be entitled to recover from the unsuccessful party reasonable attorney fees and costs, including expert witness fees incurred in connection with any enforcement actions.. Notices: Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, all notices, demands or other communications given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given as of the third business day after mailing, addressed as follows: TO PLAINTIFF AND CLASS MEMBERS: Anthony J. Orshansky, Esq. anthony@counselonegroup.com Justin Kachadoorian, Esq. justin@counselonegroup.com COUNSELONE, P.C. 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Beverly Hills, CA 00 TO RBD STAFFING, INC.: Spencer C. Skeen, Esq. spencer.skeen@ogletreedeakins.com Tim L. Johnson, Esq. tim.johnson@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 0 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 0 San Diego, CA Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

19 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 TO SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO.: Harold M. Brody, Esq. hbrody@proskauer.com Tracey L. Silver, Esq. tsilver@proskauer.com PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Century Park East, nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 00. Construction: The Parties hereto agree that the terms and conditions of this Joint Stipulation are the result of lengthy, intensive arms-length negotiations between the Parties, and this Joint Stipulation shall not be construed in favor of or against any of the Parties.. Captions and Interpretations: Paragraph titles or captions contained herein are inserted as a matter of convenience and for reference, and in no way define, limit, extend, or describe the scope of this Joint Stipulation or any provision hereof. Each term of this Joint Stipulation is contractual and not merely a recital.. Modification: This Joint Stipulation may not be changed, altered, or modified, except in writing and signed by the Parties hereto, and approved by the Court. This Joint Stipulation may not be discharged except by performance in accordance with its terms or by a writing signed by the Parties hereto. No rights hereunder may be waived except in writing.. Binding on Assigns: This Joint Stipulation shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective heirs, trustees, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns.. Counterparts: This Joint Stipulation may be executed in counterparts and each counterpart shall be deemed an original, and, when taken together with other signed counterparts, shall constitute one Joint Stipulation, which shall be binding upon and effective as to all Parties. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] Case No. -cv-0-ghk (KLSx)

20 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:

21 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:

22 Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:

23

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 In The Case Of Kevin Burkhammer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Allied Interstate LLC; and, Does 1-20, Inclusive, 15CV0567 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS WHEREAS, on or about May 3, 2016, Plaintiff Joe Rogers filed a class action complaint ("Complaint"), against Farrelli's Management Services, LLC, Farrelli's Canyon,

More information

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Defendants

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PATRICK BIGNARDI and AARON BARRETT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, FLEXTRONICS AMERICA LLC; and DOES

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TAX CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TAX CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Clint Rasschaert, Ed Risch, Pamela Schiller, Verna Schuna, Eric Gedrose, and Justin Short, v. Plaintiffs, Frontier Communications Corporation,

More information

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed // Page of 0 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release and its attached exhibits ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ), is entered into by

More information

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement ( Agreement or Settlement ) is entered into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself

More information

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE I. Recitals. A. Introduction. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement ) details and finalizes the terms for settlement of class claims

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Eric B. Kingsley, CA Bar No. 185123 2 eric@kingsleykingsley.com Kelsey M. Szamet, CA Bar No. 04 3 kelsey@kingsleykingsley.com KINGSLEY & KINGSLEY, APC 4 16133 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1200 Encino, CA 91436

More information

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 Case 3:17-cv-05653-EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com H. Scott Leviant (SBN 200834) scott@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454

More information

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS Case 8:15-cv-01936-JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made and entered into as of July 24, 2017, between (a) Plaintiff Jordan

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ]' STUART ROSENBERG Plaintiff 93723077 93723077 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO Case No: CV-l$fetffift) I U P 2: 0 I lllll it CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC ET

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NICHOLAS CHALUPA, ) Individually and on Behalf of All Other ) No. 1:12-cv-10868-JCB Persons Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED PARCEL

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement ), effective as of the date of the last signature below, is made by and between Plaintiff Jonathan Weisberg

More information

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:08-cv-03653-BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES J HAYES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT EXHIBIT 1 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement ( Settlement Agreement ) is reached by and between Plaintiff Sonia Razon ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all members of the

More information

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 2 of 31 PAGEID #: 1034 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

EXHIBIT 1. Settlement Agreement. (to Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey)

EXHIBIT 1. Settlement Agreement. (to Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey) Case 4:14-cv-02505-YGR Document 80-2 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 26 EXHIBIT 1 Settlement Agreement (to Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey) EXHIBIT 1 Settlement Agreement (to Declaration of Christina A.

More information

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 Case 2:16-cv-05218-ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION HENRY LACE on behalf of himself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 3:12-CV-00363-JD-CAN ) v. )

More information

Case 3:16-cv GPC-JMA Document 36-2 Filed 11/22/17 PageID.307 Page 6 of 63 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 3:16-cv GPC-JMA Document 36-2 Filed 11/22/17 PageID.307 Page 6 of 63 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 3:16-cv-00370-GPC-JMA Document 36-2 Filed 11/22/17 PageID.307 Page 6 of 63 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ) is entered into

More information

denies any liability to the Plaintiffs or to members of the putative class. The Parties have reached a

denies any liability to the Plaintiffs or to members of the putative class. The Parties have reached a 0 0 denies any liability to the Plaintiffs or to members of the putative class. The Parties have reached a settlement, and have submitted for this Court s approval the Joint Statement of Class Action Settlement

More information

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 0:13-cv-61747-MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Agreement or Settlement ) is made by and

More information

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283 Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY fl RE COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, inc. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXA S SHERMAN DIVISION FILE D U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MAR 21200 7 DAVID J. MALANu, t;lerk BY DEPUTY PLA, LLC, individually and on

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement ) is entered into between each of William Richert, Maude Retchin Feil, and Ann Jamison (individually and

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE (the "Agreement") is entered into, effective August 24, 2015 (the "Effective Date"), by Dr. Arthur Hall, Ph.D. ("Dr. Hall"),

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Jeffrey Spencer, Esq. Spencer Law Firm 0 Calle Amanecer, Suite 0 San Clemente, California Telephone:.0. Facsimile:.0.1 jps@spencerlaw.net Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. Lakeshore Law Center Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite

More information

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 1:13-cv-01052-GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Dorothy R. Konicki, for herself and class members, v. Plaintiff,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS This Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims ( Agreement ) is entered into as of the last date of any signature below by and among: (a) (b) Swedish Health

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is made by and between Martin Petersen, Susan Hurtado, Joseph Sarasua, and Charleen Swaney (collectively, Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves

More information

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 1:11-cv-08066-JGK Document 130 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 11 Case 1:11-cv-08066-JGK Document 108-6 Filed 12/17/14 Page 2 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OKLAHOMA POLICE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MEDIATOR INFORMATION: Telephone: 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Case No: RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Date: Time: :0 a.m. Case Assigned to Dept. This Release

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION THE PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE FUNDS, On Behalf of Itself and Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, CFC INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT CLASS ACTION DocuSign Envelope ID: C0B-C--FD-0BFFEA 0 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT Erick Grumm, individually and on behalf of all others individually situated, Plaintiff vs.

More information

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 42-1 Filed 04/03/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 337

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 42-1 Filed 04/03/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 337 Case 4:17-cv-00133-ALM Document 42-1 Filed 04/03/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 337 Class Action Settlement Agreement This class action settlement agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between Thomas E. Whatley

More information

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 1 1 Douglas Caiafa, Esq. (SBN ) DOUGLAS CAIAFA, A Professional Law Corporation 1 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite Los Angeles, California 00 () -0 - phone; () 1-0 - fax Email: dcaiafa@caiafalaw.com Christopher

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) ) 1 2 3 4 f: I l i Clerk of lho Superior Court By: R. Lindsey-Cooper, Clerk 5 6 7 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 10 11 JEFF CARD, an individual and on behalf of

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA ALL-SOUTH SUBCONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC. and AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P. Case No.: 2014 CA

More information

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 2 of 9 BETWEEN EXHIBIT "A" CANADIAN PRE-APPROVAL ORDER ONTARIO SUPERIOR

More information

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12 Case :-md-0-dms-rbb Document 0 Filed // Page of 0 0 In re GROUPON MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. :-md-0-dms-rbb ORDER APPROVING

More information

Case 1:16-cv AOR Document 50-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2017 Page 2 of 34

Case 1:16-cv AOR Document 50-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2017 Page 2 of 34 Case 1:16-cv-23607-AOR Document 50-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2017 Page 2 of 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION TOMORROW BLACK-BROWN ) on behalf

More information

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 7:13-cv-03073-NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL GOLDEMBERG, ANNIE LE, and HOW ARD PETLACK, on behalf of themselves

More information

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page2 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page3 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70

More information

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made as of August 20, 2007 by and between MOST V AMERIKU (hereinafter MVA ) on the one hand and OLEG KAPANETS (hereinafter

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 4:14-cv-11191-LVP-MKM Doc # 94-2 Filed 11/13/15 Pg 110 of 121 Pg ID 3379 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Exhibit B NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS LEWIS F. GEER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 01-2583-JAR ) WILLIAM D. COX, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) DAVID GROGAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case

More information

DATED: May 7, 2014 B,Ii~ DATED: May 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (Attorney for Defendant Motorola Mobility, LLC) BY:~-- BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN Edelson PC (Attorney for Plaintiff and the Class) -29- Exhibit

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA Exhibit 1 ALAN HARRIS, Bar No. 0 PRIYA MOHAN, Bar No. HARRIS & RUBLE North Central Avenue, th Floor Glendale, CA 0 Telephone:.. Fax No.:..00 DAVID S. HARRIS, Bar No. NORTH BAY LAW GROUP E. Blithedale Ave.,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE HEATHER DAVIS, SBN AMIR NAYEBDADASH, SBN PROTECTION LAW GROUP, LLP Main Street, Suite A El Segundo, CA 0 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs RICHARD RAMMER and ROBERT KINSCH SUPERIOR

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :0-cv-0-RMW Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Scott D. Baker (SBN ) Donald P. Rubenstein (SBN ) Michele Floyd (SBN 0) Kirsten J. Daru (SBN ) Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA - Mailing

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ARTHUR HATTENSTY, ET AL. V. BESSIRE AND CASENHISER, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC540657 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

Case 2:15-cv DS Document 99-2 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 28. Appendix I

Case 2:15-cv DS Document 99-2 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 28. Appendix I Case 2:15-cv-06668-DS Document 99-2 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 28 Appendix I Case 2:15-cv-06668-DS Document 99-2 Filed 05/17/18 Page 2 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:16-cv-03588-BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ABANTE ROOTER AND PLUMBING, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Robert Ward, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 2:17-cv-02069-MMB v. Flagship Credit Acceptance

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE CONNIE CURTS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, WAGGIN TRAIN, LLC and NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY,

More information

Case 1:14-cv SMG Document 63 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 64 PageID #: 1167 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv SMG Document 63 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 64 PageID #: 1167 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:14-cv-03131-SMG Document 63 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 64 PageID #: 1167 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SUSAN MOSES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,

More information

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 55-1 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 38 STIPULATED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 55-1 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 38 STIPULATED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS Case 6:13-cv-00358-AA Document 55-1 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 38 STIPULATED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement ) is entered into between named

More information

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL Case 2 : 04-cv-06180 -RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 q@.^1wa7ict COURT NOV ^ 8 2007 [CENL-7'^AL CT F CALIFORNIA DEPUTY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION Case

More information

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A Case: 1:14-cv-01981 Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637 Exhibit A Case: 1:14-cv-01981 Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 2 of 32 PageID #:638 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL KAISER-NYMAN, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated, vs.

More information

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-ygr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARK NATHANSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601 Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PHILIP CHARVAT, on behalf of himself

More information

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-TPK Doc #: 97-2 Filed: 12/12/16 Page: 1 of 94 PAGEID #: Exhibit 1

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-TPK Doc #: 97-2 Filed: 12/12/16 Page: 1 of 94 PAGEID #: Exhibit 1 Case: 2:16-cv-01066-GCS-TPK Doc #: 97-2 Filed: 12/12/16 Page: 1 of 94 PAGEID #: 1038 Exhibit 1 Case: 2:16-cv-01066-GCS-TPK Doc #: 97-2 Filed: 12/12/16 Page: 2 of 94 PAGEID #: 1039 Jose Rubio-Delgado, Shalanda

More information

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND Case 1:14-cv-01343-RGA Document 57 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 873 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE VAMSI ANDAVARAPU, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF VERMONT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF VERMONT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF VERMONT SARAH E. CUMMINGS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ) TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ) ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF ) AMERICA COLLEGE

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release (the Agreement ) is made and entered into by and among the Representative Plaintiff, Monique Wilson (the

More information

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case 1:17-cv-02177-WTL-MPB Document 62-1 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 52 PageID #: 559 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION KRISTYN PLUMMER, on behalf of herself

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Paul T. Cullen, Esq. (#193575 THE CULLEN LAW FIRM, APC 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 Agoura Hills, CA 91301-1555 Tel: (818 360-2529; (626 744-9125

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. This settlement agreement was executed by and between Plaintiffs Amelia Thompson

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. This settlement agreement was executed by and between Plaintiffs Amelia Thompson SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE I. Recitals. A. Introduction. This settlement agreement was executed by and between Plaintiffs Amelia Thompson and Monique Glenn-Leufroy (collectively, Named Plaintiffs

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LEONARD BUSTOS and MARY WATTS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 06 Civ. 2308 (HAA)(ES) VONAGE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE Case: 1:12-cv-00276 Document #: 113 Filed: 11/06/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:2694 2c THURMAN ROSS, by and on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

Michael T. Gibbs, State Bar No Kevin L. Borgen, State Bar No Attorneys for Defendant MIRA COST A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Michael T. Gibbs, State Bar No Kevin L. Borgen, State Bar No Attorneys for Defendant MIRA COST A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 1 2 3 4 5 6 GIBBS & FUERSTttr 600 B STREET, SUITE 2300 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 TELEPHONE (619 702-3505 FACSIMILE (619 702-1547 Michael T. Gibbs, State Bar No. 076519 Kevin L. Borgen, State Bar No.

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Daniel L. Warshaw (SBN 185365) Bobby Pouya (SBN 245527) PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP 15165 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 400 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 Tel: (818)

More information

FIRST AMENDED RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

FIRST AMENDED RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FIRST AMENDED RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This First Amended Release and Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Plaintiff Antoine Turnage ( Plaintiff ), individually

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ("Settlement Agreement") is entered into between Petitioner ROBERT ANDRE ROBITAI LLE ("Petitioner"), individually and on behalf of

More information

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. ("LA QUINTA") YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. (LA QUINTA) YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Sergio Peralta, et al. v. LQ Management L.L.C, et al. United States District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 3:14-cv-01027-DMS-JLB ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT

More information

Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 1:11-cv-20549-KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA SID MURDESHWAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

Case3:10-cv JSW Document47-2 Filed07/06/12 Page2 of 58

Case3:10-cv JSW Document47-2 Filed07/06/12 Page2 of 58 Case:0-cv-00-JSW Document- Filed0/0/ Page of 0 MORRIS J. BALLER, CA Bar No. 0 mballer@gdblegal.com JAMES KAN, CA Bar No. 0 jkan@gdblegal.com GOLDSTEIN, DEMCHAK, BALLER, BORGEN & DARDARIAN 00 Lakeside Drive,

More information

Case 3:15-cv BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 80 PageID: 1050 EXHIBIT A

Case 3:15-cv BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 80 PageID: 1050 EXHIBIT A Case 3:15-cv-05089-BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 80 PageID: 1050 EXHIBIT A Case 3:15-cv-05089-BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 2 of 80 PageID: 1051 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

More information

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. (Denbury or Defendant) shares pursuant to the merger of Case 1:10-cv-01917-JG-VVP Document 143 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 9369 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELI BENSINGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL FROM ZACKS OR IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL REGARDING THE ZACKS BEAT THE MARKET BOOK OR AN EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR REGARDING OPTIONS TRADING, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY

More information

Case 2:15-cv ODW-PLA Document Filed 02/15/17 Page 2 of 78 Page ID #:4469 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:15-cv ODW-PLA Document Filed 02/15/17 Page 2 of 78 Page ID #:4469 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 2:15-cv-02495-ODW-PLA Document 135-2 Filed 02/15/17 Page 2 of 78 Page ID #:4469 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release (the Agreement ) is

More information

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS This Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims ( Settlement Agreement, Settlement or Agreement ), is entered into by and between Hotel

More information

Case 1:13-cv ALC-HBP Document 29 Filed 06/26/13 Page 1 of 60 ECF CASE

Case 1:13-cv ALC-HBP Document 29 Filed 06/26/13 Page 1 of 60 ECF CASE Case 1:13-cv-00933-ALC-HBP Document 29 Filed 06/26/13 Page 1 of 60 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually on Behalf

More information

SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ), by

SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ), by SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT THIS SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ), by and between ARBOR E&T, LLC ( Arbor ) and THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ( PBC School

More information

the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Certain Defendant s

the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Certain Defendant s UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3 :99CV-539- H IN RE: ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT On July 12, 2005,

More information

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 9:14-cv-81156-WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In re: Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A. Securities Litigation

More information

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST 1 1 1 1 Brian S. Kabateck, SBN 1 bsk@kbklawyers.com Cheryl A. Kenner, SBN 0 ck@kbklawyers.com KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP S. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 00 Phone: () -000 Fax: () -0 Raul Perez, SBN

More information

Case 7:08-cv KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 7:08-cv KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 7:08-cv-00264-KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE MBIA, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION File No. 08-CV-264-KMK STIPULATION AND

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 8:10-cv-00199-JFB-TDT Doc # 97-1 Filed: 04/30/12 Page 1 of 37 - Page ID # 1394 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DAVID G. RAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588 Case: 1:14-cv-08461 Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KEITH SNYDER and SUSAN MANSANAREZ,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2 :11-cv-02794-R-AGR Document 189 Filed 11/12/13 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:3574 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT

More information

Dynamic is presently under contract to purchase the Premises, does not. The undersigned Tenant was a subtenant of Master Tenant and has no

Dynamic is presently under contract to purchase the Premises, does not. The undersigned Tenant was a subtenant of Master Tenant and has no VOLUNTARY RELOCATION COMPENSATION AGREEMENT as of April This Voluntary Relocation and Compensation Agreement ( Agreement ) is dated., 2018 and effective upon the full execution of this Agreement ( Effective

More information

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:15-cv-01243-LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JANELL MOORE, et al. : CIVIL ACTION on behalf of themselves and

More information

B. The Parties wish to avoid the expense and uncertainty of further litigation without any

B. The Parties wish to avoid the expense and uncertainty of further litigation without any SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ("Settlement Agreement") is entered into by and between the Elbert County Board of County Commissioners (the "County") and the Elbert

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE This Settlement Agreemen:t and Covenant Not To Sue ("Agreement") is entered into on December 13, 2010, in San Francisco, California, by and between the City

More information

Case 3:12-cv REP Document Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 36 PageID# 11052

Case 3:12-cv REP Document Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 36 PageID# 11052 Case 3:12-cv-00097-REP Document 464-1 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 36 PageID# 11052 AMENDED HENDERSON/HINES RULE 23(b)(3) AND RULE 23(b)(2) CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Amended Henderson/Hines

More information