SENTENCING STATISTICS 2004, ENGLAND AND WALES (HOSB 15/05)

Transcription

1 SENTENCING STATISTICS 2004, ENGLAND AND WALES (HOSB 15/05) ERRATA Key points, Custodial sentences, Paragraph 6 Remove 1994 at 36% and insert 1995 at 36% in 2004 to read: Drink driving saw the lowest custody rate for the last decade of 3% while driving whilst disqualified saw the lowest custody rate since 1995 at 36% in 2004 (this is a 5 percentage point drop from 2003). Key Points, Community sentences, Paragraph 8 Change 6% to 5% to read: Between 2003 and 2004 the number increased by 5% to 201,500. Key points, Community sentences, Paragraph 12 Remove actual bodily harm (45%) to read: Of the high volume offences in the Crown Court, affray (53%) and handling stolen goods (48%), saw the highest percentages given community sentences for a decade in Key Points, Regional trends, Paragraph 19 Change Cambridge to Cambridgeshire to read: Cambridgeshire had the highest area level custody rate of 10% while Warwickshire had the lowest area level custody rate of 3%. List of figures and tables, Chapter 3, Table 3.11 Change 2003 to Chapter 2, Custodial sentences, Paragraph 2.14, Page 15 Change 1994 to 1995 to read: Drink driving saw the lowest custody rate for the last decade of 3% while driving whilst disqualified saw the lowest custody rate since 1995 at 36% in 2004 (this is a 5 percentage point drop from 2003). Chapter 2, Custodial sentences, Table 2.3, Page 20 Change 1,248,200 to 1,284,200. Chapter 3, Community sentences, Paragraph 3.11, Page 42 Change 58% to 60% to read: The use of curfew orders has risen dramatically recording a growth of approximately 60% from 5,200 in 2003 to 8,300 in Chapter 3, Community sentences, Paragraph 3.19, Page 44 Remove actual bodily harm (45%) to read: Of the high volume offences in the Crown Court, affray (53%) and handling stolen goods (48%), saw the highest percentages given community sentences for a decade in Chapter 5, Regional trends, Paragraph 5.6, Page 93 Change Cambridge to Cambridgeshire to read: Cambridgeshire had the highest area level custody rate of 10% while Warwickshire had the lowest area level custody rate of 3%.

2 Home Office Statistical Bulletin The Research, Development and Statistics Directorate exists to improve policy making, decision taking and practice in support of the Home Office purpose and aims, to provide the public and Parliament with i n f o r mat io n necessar y for i n f o rmed debate and t o publish information for future use. Sentencing Statistics /05 England and Wales RDS NOMS October 2005 Stat istical Bul let ins are p roduced by the Researc h, Development and Statistics Directorate. For further copies contact: /rds Crown Copyright 2005 ISSN X

3 Preface This publication has been prepared by the Sentencing Statistics and NOMS Projections section of RDS NOMS (Research Development and Statistics National Offender Management Service). It contains key statistics describing the sentencing of offenders in England and Wales. The tables contained in this bulletin have been placed on the RDS web site at: Detailed statistics related to this publication appear in the supplementary volumes of Criminal Statistics England and Wales (see Appendix 7 and the RDS web site for details). Related publications Copies of related publications from RDS NOMS available via the RDS web site include: annual Offender Management Caseload Statistics annual Penalty Notices for Disorder Statistics Sentencing Statistics Quarterly Brief Population in Custody Quarterly Brief Probation Statistics Quarterly Brief monthly Population in Custody Tables Appendix 6 includes a list of related web sites that contain further information and publications relating to the criminal justice system. Enquiries Further copies of this, or other Home Office statistical bulletins, may be obtained from: publications.rds@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk Press enquiries should be made to the Home Office Press Office. Enquiries about sentencing or offender management statistics should be made to: rdsnomsstatistics@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk Acknowledgements Acknowledgement is made of the contributions from Mark Abram, Damian Angelis, Terence Chow, Paul Cowell, Pat Dowdeswell, Warren Evans, Georgina Ford, Samantha Jones, Craig Medhurst, Mike Morgan-Rowe, Hehtal Patel, Naomi Shepherd, Rae Sibbitt, Robert Street, Vinayak Thakkar, Liz Whiting, Graham Wilkins, Paul Worthington and all colleagues in RDS NOMS, RDS OCJR and RDS CRCSG. We are also grateful for the input received from colleagues in the Home Office. Dr Nisha de Silva Editor and Head of Section Sentencing Statistics and NOMS Projections RDS NOMS

4 Contents Contents List of figures and tables Key points Chapter 1 National sentencing trends and key criminal justice system statistics, Chapter 2 Custodial sentences Chapter 3 Community sentences Chapter 4 Fines, other disposals and breaches Chapter 5 Regional trends Chapter 6 Criminal histories Appendix 1 Procedures within the criminal justice system Appendix 2 Legislation affecting the statistics Appendix 3 Coverage and recording practice affecting the statistics Appendix 4 Classification numbers for court proceedings Appendix 5 Glossary of terms in common usage Appendix 6 Statistics on the criminal justice system Appendix 7 Criminal statistics, England and Wales 2004, supplementary tables Symbols

5 List of figures and tables Chapter 1 Figure 1.1 Flows through the criminal justice system 2004 Figure 1.2 Average custodial sentence length for principle offences at the Crown Court for those aged 18 and over sentenced for indictable offences by offence group 1994, 1999 and 2004 Figure 1.3 Disposals at the Crown Court (indictable offences) Figure 1.4 Disposals at magistrates courts (indictable offences) Figure 1.5 Community sentence workload and Custodial Population Table 1.1 Recorded crime and defendants proceeded against, convicted, cautioned and sentenced by type of offence, Table 1.2 Offenders sentenced by offence groups and outcome, Chapter 2 Figure 2.1 Custody rates (percentage given immediate custody) at the Crown Court for all offences Figure 2.2 Percentage of custodial sentences accounted for by indictable offences Figure 2.3 Percentage of indictable offenders given custodial sentences Figure 2.4 Custody rates for indictable offences Figure 2.5 Average custodial sentence lengths for indictable offences Figure 2.6 Average custodial sentence lengths at the Crown Court for indictable offences split by indictable offence group Figure 2.7 Custody rates at magistrates courts for the ten highest volume offences Figure 2.8 Custody rates at the Crown Court for the ten highest volume offences Table 2.1 Table 2.2 Table 2.3 Table 2.4 Persons sentenced to immediate custody at magistrates courts by length of sentence and average custodial sentence length, Persons sentenced to immediate custody at the Crown Court by length of sentence and average custodial sentence length, Persons sentenced to immediate custody by age and sex showing number of prison places (excluding life sentence prisoners) required, Persons given custodial sentences by offence group and type of sentence,

6 Table 2.5 Persons sentenced to immediate custody (ten highest volume offences) at magistrates courts, Table 2.6 Persons sentenced to immediate custody (ten highest volume offences) at the Crown Court, Table 2.7 Persons sentenced under the Powers of the Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000, Table 2.8 Persons sentenced to life imprisonment by sex and age, Table 2.9 Persons given custodial sentences by age group, sex and type of sentence, Table 2.10 Number of persons sentenced to immediate custody by sex and offence group, 2004 Table 2.11 Percentage of persons sentenced to immediate custody by type of court and offence group, Table 2.12 Average length of custodial sentence by type of court and offence group, Table 2.13 Percentage of persons sentenced to immediate custody by sex and offence group, Table 2.14 Average length of custodial sentence by sex and offence group, Table 2.15 Average length of custodial sentence at the Crown Court by age and offence group, Table 2.16 Average length of custodial sentence at magistrates courts by age and offence group, Table 2.17 Percentage of persons sentenced to immediate custody by age and offence group, Table 2.18 Persons sentenced for indictable offences at the Crown Court: Plea, immediate custody and average sentence length, 2004 Table 2.19 Persons sentenced for indictable offences at the Crown Court: Plea, immediate custody and average sentence length, Chapter 3 Figure 3.1 Proportion of community sentences given at magistrates courts (all offences) Figure 3.2 Community sentences split by age and sex Figure 3.3 Proportions of different types of community sentences for indictable offences 2004 Figure 3.4 Percentage of community sentences for indictable offences Figure 3.5 Percentage of indictable offences given community sentences Figure 3.6 Community sentence rates at magistrates courts for the ten highest volume offences

7 Figure 3.7 Community sentence rates at the Crown Court for the ten highest volume offences Table 3.1 Table 3.2 Table 3.3 Table 3.4 Table 3.5 Table 3.6 Table 3.7 Table 3.8 Table 3.9 Table 3.10 Table 3.11 Table 3.12 Persons sentenced to community sentences at magistrates courts by type of community sentence, Persons sentenced to community sentences at the Crown Court by type of community sentence, Persons sentenced to community sentences and community sentence rate by age and sex, Persons given community sentences by offence group and type of sentence, Persons sentenced to community sentences at magistrates courts (ten highest volume offences), Persons sentenced to community sentences at the Crown Court (ten highest volume offences), Number of persons sentenced to community sentences by sex and offence group, 2004 Persons sentenced to community sentences by age group, sex and type of sentence Percentage of persons sentenced to community sentences by age and offence group, Percentage of persons given community sentences by offence group and type of sentence, Percentage of persons sentenced to community sentences by sex and offence group, 2003 Percentage of persons sentenced to community sentences by type of court and offence group, Chapter 4 Figure 4.1 Proportion of offenders fined at magistrates courts ( ) Figure 4.2 Proportion of offenders fined at the Crown Court ( ) Figure 4.3 Fine volume at magistrates courts for the ten highest volume offences Table 4.1 Offenders given fines at magistrates courts by sex and offence group, Table 4.2 Offenders given fines at the Crown Court by sex and offence group, Table 4.3 Offenders given fines at all courts by sex and offence group, Table 4.4 Offenders sentenced to other disposals by sex, age, type of court and type of sentence

8 Table 4.5 Offenders sentenced to other disposals by offence group, type of court and type of sentence, Table 4.6 Average fine amounts imposed at the Crown Court by type of offence and sex, Table 4.7 Average fine amounts imposed at the magistrates court by type of offence and sex, Table 4.8 Average fine amounts imposed at all courts by type of offence and sex, Table 4.9 Persons sentenced to fines at magistrates' courts (ten highest volume offences), Table 4.10 Offenders ordered to pay compensation by type of court and offence, Table 4.11 Offenders ordered to pay confiscation orders for drug trafficking offences by amount, Table 4.12 Offenders given forfeiture orders by type of court and offence, Table 4.13 Offenders breaching original sentence or order by type of sentence or order breached and the number and proportion given an immediate custodial sentence for the breach, Table 4.14 Persons aged 10 to 17 sentenced for indictable offences whose parents were ordered to pay fines or compensation, Chapter 5 Figure 5.1 Figure 5.2 Figure 5.3 Figure 5.4 Figure 5.5 Figure 5.6 Figure 5.7 Figure 5.8 Figure 5.9 Figure 5.10 Custody rate at magistrates courts for indictable offences by criminal justice area, 2004 Custody rate at the Crown Court for indictable offences by criminal justice area, 2004 Community sentences rate at magistrates courts for indictable offences by criminal justice area, 2004 Community sentences rate at the Crown Court for indictable offences by criminal justice area, 2004 Percentage given fines at magistrates courts for indictable offences by criminal justice area, 2004 Percentage given fines at the Crown Court for indictable offences by criminal justice area, 2004 Custody rates at magistrates courts petty sessional areas for driving whilst disqualified Average custodial sentence lengths at magistrates courts petty sessional areas for driving whilst disqualified Community sentence rates at magistrates courts petty sessional areas for driving whilst disqualified Custody rates at magistrates courts petty sessional areas for theft from shops

9 Figure 5.11 Figure 5.12 Figure 5.13 Figure 5.14 Figure 5.15 Figure 5.16 Figure 5.17 Figure 5.18 Figure 5.19 Figure 5.20 Figure 5.21 Figure 5.22 Figure 5.23 Figure 5.24 Average custodial sentence lengths at magistrates courts petty sessional areas for theft from shops Community sentence rates at magistrates courts petty sessional areas for theft from shops Custody rates at the Crown Court centres for burglary in a dwelling Custody rates at magistrates courts petty sessional areas for burglary in a dwelling Average custodial sentence lengths at the Crown Court centres for burglary in a dwelling Average custodial sentence lengths at magistrates courts petty sessional areas for burglary in a dwelling Community sentence rates at the Crown Court centres for burglary in a dwelling Community sentence rates at magistrates courts petty sessional areas centres for burglary in a dwelling Custody rates at the Crown Court centres for burglary in a building other than a dwelling Custody rates at magistrates courts petty sessional areas for burglary in a building other than a dwelling Average custodial sentence lengths at the Crown Court centres for burglary in a building other than a dwelling Average custodial sentence lengths at magistrates courts petty sessional areas for burglary in a building other than a dwelling Community sentence rates at the Crown Court centres for burglary in a building other than a building other than a dwelling Community sentence rates at magistrates courts petty sessional areas centres for burglary in a building other than a dwelling Table 5.1 Table 5.2 Table 5.3 Table 5.4 Table 5.5 Table 5.6 Table 5.7 Persons sentenced by criminal justice area, custody rate and average custodial sentence length, Recorded crime and defendants sentenced by criminal justice area and type of offence and those cautioned, 2004 Defendants sentenced by criminal justice area for indictable offences by court, committed for trial, and committed for sentence Defendants sentenced for indictable offences by criminal justice area, type of court and outcome, 2004 Defendants sentenced at magistrates courts by criminal justice area, type of sentence and average custodial sentence length (months), Defendants sentenced at the Crown Court by criminal justice area, type of sentence, and average custodial sentence length (months) Prison places required and the average custodial sentence length by criminal justice area and court, 2004

10 Chapter 6 Figure 6.1 Figure 6.2 Figure 6.3 Figure 6.4 Percentages of offenders (indictable offences) by number of previous convictions for standard list offences 2003 Percentages of offenders (indictable offences) by age and number of previous convictions for standard list offences 2003 Percentages of offenders by type of sentence (indictable offences) and number of previous convictions for standard list offences 2003 Percentages of offenders (indictable offences) by number of offences for which convicted at court appearances (all courts) and number of previous convictions for standard list offences 2003 Table 6.1 Sample sizes for criminal history of persons sentenced by court at which sentenced for an indictable offence, Table 6.2 Criminal history of persons sentenced by court at which sentenced for an indictable offence, Table 6.3 Criminal history of persons sentenced by offence group (indictable offences only all courts), Table 6.4 Criminal history of persons sentenced by age at sentence (indictable offences only), Table 6.5 Age at sentence by criminal history (indictable offences only), Table 6.6 Criminal history of persons sentenced by disposal received for an indictable offence at all courts, Table 6.7 Disposal received for an indictable offence at all courts by criminal history, Table 6.8 Criminal history of persons sentenced by number of offences for which convicted at court appearance (all courts),

11 Key points National sentencing trends (Chapter 1) The total number of offenders sentenced in 2004, 1,547,300, was the largest figure recorded in the last ten years and an increase of 4% over This was largely due to the increase in summary offences, especially summary motoring offences which increased by 7%. The number sentenced for indictable offences fell by 5% to 317,000. This drop was mainly due to the 7% drop in the number sentenced for indictable offences seen at magistrates courts. The total number of offenders sentenced at magistrates courts in 2004 was 1,471,100 while for the Crown Court it was 76,300. The total number of male offenders sentenced was 1,257,300. The total number of female offenders sentenced was 279,500. The total number of juveniles (aged 10-17) sentenced was 96,200 while for young adults (aged 18-20) and adults (aged 21 and over) the numbers were 156,400 and 1,284,200 respectively. Custodial sentences (Chapter 2) The total number of offenders sentenced to immediate custody increased by 53% from 1994 to Although an increasing trend was observed until 2002, the number of offenders sentenced to immediate custody decreased to reach 106,300 in The decrease in custodial sentences at magistrates courts was around 2,000 or 3% from 2003 to For indictable offences at all courts, the number of offenders sentenced to immediate custody also decreased, by 1% over 2003 to 79,900 in This was largely due to the decrease seen in number sentenced to immediate custody in the magistrates courts. Twenty five per cent of the total number of offenders sentenced for indictable offences attracted a custodial sentence in 2004, compared with 24% in Custody rates for indictable offences increased marginally in both the Crown Court and magistrates courts in In the Crown Court, the custody rate went from 60% in 2003 to 61% in 2004; in magistrates courts, the change was from 14% to 15%. Average custodial sentence lengths for indictable offences in the Crown Court increased by 32% from 1994 to In magistrates courts during this period, they remained between 2.7 months and 3.2 months. Average custodial sentence lengths for indictable offences increased in the Crown Court between 2003 and 2004, going from 26.8 to 27.0 months. At magistrates courts they remained at the same value as in 2003 at 3.0 months. Of the high volume custody offences in the magistrates courts, the number sentenced to immediate custody has steadily grown for assault on a constable (1,900 in 2004) and failing to surrender to bail (3,100 in 2004) to record the highest figures in the last decade. Drink driving saw the lowest custody rate for the last decade of 3% while driving whilst disqualified saw the lowest custody rate since 1994 at 36% (this is a 5 percentage point drop from 2003). Of the high volume offences in the Crown Court, grievous bodily harm with intent (1,500 in 2004), production supply and possession with intent to supply a controlled drug - Class A (4,500 in 2004) and dangerous driving (1,500 in 2004) recorded the

12 highest number sentenced to immediate custody in the last decade. Burglary in a dwelling recorded the lowest custody rate in a decade at 67%. Community sentences (Chapter 3) The total number of community sentences has seen a steady increase from 1994 to 2004 with the number increasing by 56% during this period. Between 2003 and 2004 the number increased by 6% to 201,500. The number of offenders given community sentences for indictable offences increased by 1% over 2003 to 111,000 in This formed 35% of the total number of offenders sentenced for indictable offences, compared with 33% in The use of curfew orders for indictable offences rose significantly recording a growth of approximately 60% from 5,200 in 2003 to 8,300 in The use of drug treatment and testing orders as well as referral orders have continued to rise since their inception and 2004 recorded their highest figures at 7,800 and 14,400 respectively. The rate of community sentence remained at 12% in the magistrates courts and 30% at the Crown Court from 2003 to The majority of high volume community sentence offences in the magistrates courts saw an increase in the number sentenced to community sentences and the percentage given community sentence recorded the highest figure in a decade. These include actual bodily harm (66%), burglary in a building other than a dwelling (57%), driving whilst disqualified (54%), handling stolen goods (52%), common assault etc. (48%) assault on a constable (39%), criminal damage ( 5,000 or less) and malicious damage (29%), and drink driving (20%). However, handling stolen goods recorded its lowest numbers sentenced to community sentence (4,342) since 1994, despite recording its highest community sentence rate for the decade, indicating that an increasingly larger proportion of those sentenced for these offences is getting community sentences. Of the high volume offences in the Crown Court, affray (53%), handling stolen goods (48%), actual bodily harm (45%), saw the highest percentages given community sentences for a decade in Fines, other disposals and breaches (Chapter 4) The proportion of all offenders fined decreased from 75% in 1994 to 70% in The number of offenders fined for indictable offences decreased by nearly 17% from 78,300 in 2003 to 65,100 in This formed 21% of the total number of offenders sentenced for indictable offences, compared with 23% in The magistrates courts recorded the lowest number fined for indictable offences for the last decade at 63,200. The number of offenders fined for all offences has grown steadily since The number of offenders fined for all offences in magistrates courts stood at 1,080,000 in 2004 the highest recorded in the last decade. The proportion of offenders fined for indictable offences, decreased at both the magistrates courts (39% - 26%) and at the Crown Court (5% - 3%) between 1994 and The total number of offenders fined at magistrates courts for all offences increased by 5% from 2003 to This was the third successive year that the number increased. The average fine imposed on persons for all offences at magistrates courts has largely

13 remained unchanged in the past decade with a marginal increased from 130 in 1994 to 140 in The average fine amount for persons for all offences imposed by the Crown Court increased from 370 in 1994 to 650 in Offenders who were sentenced to a community punishment and rehabilitation order had the highest proportion of breaches at 60% in This was an increase of 4 percentage points from 2003 and the proportion of sentences breached doubled since Fifty eight per cent more offenders were sentenced to a curfew order and the number of breaches for the order doubled. Breaches for all community sentences have increased in 2004 as compared to The number of offenders receiving fines for drug offences decreased by 37% from 2003 to Most of this decline can be explained by the reclassification of cannabis from Class B to Class C which saw a 54% reduction in fines for the possession of cannabis in 2004 as compared to Of the high volume fine offences, vehicle insurance offences, motor vehicle licences, railway offences, driving licence related offences and other miscellaneous motoring offences have seen their highest volume sentenced in a decade in Regional trends (Chapter 5) The numbers sentenced increased across the majority of criminal justice areas. Criminal justice area custody rates for indictable offences ranged from 8% to 23% for magistrates courts and 51% to 73% for the Crown Court in Cambridge had the highest area level custody rate of 10% while Warwickshire had the lowest area level custody rate of 3%. The largest drop in average custodial sentence length over the last ten years was for North Wales from 12.6 months in 1994 to 9.9 months in The greatest increases were for Cleveland (increased from 10.7 to 15.5 months) and Warwickshire (increased from 10.3 to 14.3 months). Criminal histories (Chapter 6) The number of previous convictions for standard list offences for offenders sentenced for indictable offences has remained reasonably stable over the last ten years. For instance, of those convicted in 2003, 24% had no previous convictions which compares with 26% in However, the proportion of offenders with 10 or more previous convictions has changed. In magistrates courts, this group of offenders has increased from 19% of those sentenced to 27% between 1993 and In 2003, the most common disposal for those with no previous convictions for a standard list offence was the community sentence, which comprised 39% of this group. In 1993, the comparative figure was 22%, and the most common sentence was an absolute or conditional discharge. Whilst community sentencing disposals have increased for all offenders when compared with 1993, the rate of increase for this group is higher than average. For offenders with 10 or more previous convictions, custody is now the most common disposal at 37% in 2003, compared with 26% in This represents a shift from a roughly equal split between custody and community penalties in 1993 towards custody in 2003.

14 1. National sentencing trends and key criminal justice system statistics, This chapter highlights some of the key national level statistics for It includes statistics published elsewhere (see references) and gives selected long-term trends. Changes in crime in England & Wales 1.2 The crime statistics presented in this chapter relate to the financial year 2004/05. Overall crime has fallen by 7% from 2003/04 to 2004/05 according to the British Crime Survey (BCS) (Reference 1). Since its peak in 1995, crime as measured by the BCS has fallen by 44%, with vehicle crime and burglary falling by over half (both by 58%) and violent crime falling by 43% during this period. Crimes recorded by the police in 2004/05 decreased by 6% to 5.6 million. This is a decrease in annual rate in contrast to the small 0.6% increase from 2002/03 to 2003/04 (Table 1.1). 1.3 The rate of victims reporting of crimes to the police has remained broadly stable since 1997, whereas the rate of recording of crimes by the police has been increasing, especially in the last three years, largely as a result of the nationwide introduction of the National Crime Recording Standard (NCRS). 1.4 The BCS results are based on interviews conducted in the financial year 2004/05. For the crime types it covers, the BCS can provide a better reflection of the true extent of crime because it includes crimes that are not reported to the police. The BCS count also gives a better indication of trends in crime over time because it is unaffected by changes in levels of reporting to the police, and in police recording practices. However, only crimes recorded by the police are likely to result in criminal court proceedings. 1.5 Police statistics provide a good measure of trends in well-reported crimes. They are an important indicator of police workload, and can be used for the analysis of local crime patterns. Note that the trends in recorded crime will have been affected by changes to counting rules in April 1998 and in the way the police record crimes with the introduction nationally of the NCRS in April Changes in numbers dealt with by the Criminal Justice System 1.6 Changes in the numbers of people processed through the criminal justice system can be influenced by factors unrelated to the underlying levels of crimes and the numbers of crimes detected. The flows through the criminal justice system are illustrated in Figure 1.1. A more detailed description of the procedures is given in Appendix 1. 1

15 Figure 1.1 Flows through the criminal justice system 2004 Crime measured by the BCS 10,850,000 Recorded Crime 5,563,000 Number proceeded against at court 2,023,000 Number tried at magistrates court 1,521,000 (269,000) Number tried at the Crown Court 80,000 (77,000) Number found guilty at magistrates court 1,490,000 (260,000) Number found guilty at the Crown Court 60,000 (58,000) Number sentenced at magistrates court 1,471,000 (244,000) Number committed to the Crown Court for sentencing 17,000 (16,000) Number sentenced at the Crown Court 76,000 (73,000) Fined 1,080,000 (63,000) Community Sent. 179,000 (89,000) Custody 61,000 (36,000) Other disposal 151,000 (56,000) Fined 2,000 (2,000) Community Sent. 23,000 (22,000) Custody 45,000 (44,000) Other disposal 6,000 (5,000) Total sentenced to custody 106,000 (80,000) Average Custodial Sentence Length at magistrates court 3.0 months (3.0 months) Average Custodial Sentence Length at the Crown Court 26.5 months (27.0 months) Numbers in brackets indicate figures for indictable offences (1). 1 In this publication, indictable offences include triable-only-on-indictment and triable-either-way offences. For definitions see Appendix 1. 2

16 1.7 The number of people cautioned rose in 2004 to 256,000. There was a larger increase in 2003, after reductions in 2001 and The increase from 2003 to 2004 was 6% (Table 1.1). Cautions are discussed more fully in Criminal statistics England and Wales 2004 (Reference 2). The introduction of Penalty Notices for Disorder (PND) in 2004 may have affected the numbers of people being cautioned and prosecuted in courts. See paragraph 1.19 for a fuller discussion of PNDs. 1.8 The total number of offenders sentenced in 2004, 1,547,300, was the largest figure recorded in the last ten years and increased by 4% over The increase came from an increase in summary offences, especially summary motoring offences which increased by 7%. There were increases in speed limit offences (9%, +12,200), insurance offences (5%, +10,800), vehicle licence offences (2%, +4,000) and 8 other offences. The largest increase was in other summary motoring offences (33%, +19,600); this may reflect a change in the way these offences are classified. Obstruction, waiting and parking offences ( 19%, 2,300), vehicle registration and excise licence offences ( 6%, 1,500), load offences ( 13%, 900) and two other offences decreased. There was not much change in the annual numbers of offenders for eight other offences. 1.9 The number sentenced for indictable offences (including triable-either-way offences) was 316,900, down 17,000 or 5% from The proportion of all offenders sentenced for indictable-only offences remained unchanged at 1.0% in The numbers committed for trial and for sentence to the Crown Court from the magistrates courts both decreased ( 4% and 5% respectively), but there was not much difference in the number sentenced per year at the Crown Court (Table 1.1). Overview of sentencing disposals Custodial sentences (all courts) 1.10 Following the reduction from 2002 to 2003 (the first reduction in ten years), the annual total of people receiving custodial sentences again reduced from 107,700 in 2003 to 106,300 in This is a 1.3% reduction. There were increases in the numbers of those receiving other forms of sentence in The number of community sentences increased by 5%, fines by 5%; other sentences did not change much (Table 1.2) The overall Average Custodial Sentence Length 2 (ACSL) increased by 2.4% in 2004 (shown in Table 1.2). However, for individual sentence groups, the changes in ACSLs were not consistent. There were increases in ACSL for: Burglary, Theft and handling stolen goods, Fraud and forgery, Criminal Damage, Drug offences, Indictable motoring offences, Summary non-motoring offences There were decreases in ACSL for: Sexual offences, Robbery, Other (non-motoring) indictable offences. 2 The average custodial sentence length is calculated for all custodial sentences less than life. Life sentences cannot be included as the length of the sentence is not known. 3

17 1.13 All other ACSLs were unchanged The ACSL for 1994, 1999 and 2004 are shown in Figure 1.2 (for the Crown Court). For each offence group, 2004 has the highest ACSL. More detail about custodial sentences is available in Chapter 2. Figure 1.2 Average custodial sentence lengths for principal offences at the Crown Court for those aged 18 and over sentenced for indictable offences by offence group 1994, 1999 and Months Non-custodial sentences (all courts) 1.15 The total number of community sentences imposed (all courts, all offences) has increased by 5%. This is a larger increase than in 2003, and is consistent with the linear trend over the last 10 years. The total number of fines has varied considerably over the past 10 years. In 2004, there was a 5% increase in the number of fines at all courts (the increase was 6% in 2003), this is the highest annual number since 1993 (when the total was 1,091,000) More information about non-custodial sentences may be found in Chapter 3 (community sentences) and Chapter 4 (fines and other sentences). Sentences split by court, sex and age 1.17 The total number of offenders sentenced at magistrates courts in 2004 was 1,471,000 while for the Crown Court it was 76,300. The total number of male offenders sentenced was 1,257,300 (81% of all offenders). The total number of female offenders sentenced was 279,500 (18%). The total number of juveniles (aged 10-17) sentenced was 96,200 (6%) while for young adults (aged 18-20) and adults (aged 21 and over) the numbers were 156,400 (10%) and 1,284,200 (83%) respectively. There were 10,500 (1%) sentences passed on companies, organisations, etc. Sentences for indictable offences 1.18 For indictable offences (including triable-either-way offences), immediate custody sentences did not change much, going from 80,800 in 2003 to 79,900 in 2004 at all courts. The proportion of offenders given immediate custody increased from 24% in 2003 to 25% in 2004 (back to its 2002 level). Community sentences for indictable 4

18 offences increased from 109,500 in 2003 to 111,000 in 2004 and the proportion of offenders given community sentences increased from 33% to 35%. Fines for indictable offences decreased from 78,300 in 2003 to 65,100 in 2004 and the proportion of offenders given fines reduced from 23% to 21%. Other disposals for indictable offences decreased from 65,400 in 2003 to 60,900 in 2004 and the proportion of offenders given other disposals decreased from 20% in 2003 to 19% in The proportion of each type of disposal for indictable offences is shown in Figure 1.3 (for magistrates courts) and Figure 1.4 (for the Crown Court). Figure 1.3 Disposals at the Crown Court (indictable offences) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Immediate custody Community sentence Fine other Figure 1.4 Disposals at magistrates courts (indictable offences) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Immediate custody Community sentence Fine other New sentences and pilot studies 1.19 PNDs were introduced under the provisions of the Criminal Justice and Police Act The legislation allows police to issue penalty notices to offenders for a range of minor disorder offences. From August 2002, pilots took place in four police force 5

19 areas (Essex, Metropolitan Police, North Wales and West Midlands, the latter including PNDs issued by the British Transport Police). These covered 11 disorder offences, for those aged 18 and over and ran to September The scheme was rolled out to all police forces in England and Wales during the financial year. The Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003 provided for the scheme to be extended to 16 and 17 year olds and provided a power for the Home Secretary to extend the scheme to year olds. The scheme was extended to 16 and 17 year olds from 20 January ,639 Penalty Notices for Disorder were issued by police forces in England and Wales in 2004 (Table 1.1). Detailed statistics of PNDs have been published for 2003 in Reference Intermittent custody, introduced in the 2003 Criminal Justice Act, attempts to reduce the negative outcomes that can accompany even short periods of full-time custody, such as loss of employment, loss of accommodation, and family disintegration. Intermittent custody orders were introduced in pilot areas in 2004 as an alternative to full-time custody. The sentence is for offenders who have committed serious crimes that warrant a custodial sentence, but who represent a low risk to the public if the sentence were served intermittently. An intermittent custody order can be passed for weekday or weekend custody. If the offender does not wish to serve an intermittent custody sentence then the court will impose one of full-time custody. An intermittent custody pilot began at the end of January 2004, allowing authorised courts in 11 probation areas to use the new punishment. The courts are in catchment areas that feed into two intermittent custody centres: one at HMP Kirkham for males and one at HMP Morton Hall for females. Intermittent custody orders are counted in the totals for custodial sentences in this publication. One hundred and nine intermittent custody orders were recorded in the courts data for The impact of sentencing on prison and probation services 1.23 Figures 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 all show a tendency for an increased use of custody over time. The number sentenced to custody at magistrates courts for indictable offences shows a drop from 37,300 in 2003 to 35,800 in However, this has been caused by a drop in the number sentenced for indictable offences: the custody rate has increased. The numbers sentenced to custody for summary offences (motoring and non-motoring) has increased. This (and other effects such as changes in sentence lengths) is reflected in a long-term increasing trend in the custodial population. The population has not shown a sustained decrease since Apart from the period 1999 to 2001, when the population was stable, there has been a sustained increasing trend (See Figure 1.5). 6

20 Figure 1.5 Community sentence workload and custodial population , , ,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 Community sentence supervision (estimated) Custodial population The number of offenders being supervised by the Probation Service under a community sentence increased by 21% between 1994 and 2004, reaching 135,300 in December The number of people under pre- or post-release supervision also increased between 1994 and 2004 but at a much lower rate. There were 48,500 people under such supervision in December 2004, an increase of 4% compared to the number in In total the number of people under supervision was 177,400, 1% higher than 2003 and around 16% higher than (Further information is available from Offender Management Caseload Statistics ) Summary 1.25 The total numbers proceeded against increased by 1%; if those proceeded against for summary motoring offences are not included, there was a decrease of 2%. The total number sentenced increased by 4%, whereas the numbers sentenced excluding summary motoring offences only increased by 2%. The numbers of fines increased by 5%, but if summary motoring offences are excluded, the increase is only 0.7% This indicates that although the numbers proceeded against showed a modest increase, the mixture of offences has changed to include a higher proportion of summary motoring offences that have resulted in an increase in the number of fines. The number of fines for offences other than summary motoring offences shows a more modest increase. References 1 Crime in England and Wales 2004/05; Sian Nicholas, David Povey, Alison Walker and Chris Kershaw; Home Office Statistical Bulletin 11/05; July Criminal statistics England and Wales 2004; Home Office Command Paper. 3 Penalty notices for disorder statistics England and Wales 2004; Home Office Online Report 35/05; Offender management caseload statistics England and Wales 2004; Home Office Statistical Bulletin. 7

21 Table 1.1 Recorded crime and defendants proceeded against, convicted, cautioned and sentenced by type of offence, England and Wales Number of offences and number of defendants /99 (2) 1999/ / / /03 (3) 2003/04 (4) 2004/05 Total recorded crime (1)(5) 5,252,980 5,100,241 5,036,552 4,598,327 5,109,089 5,301,187 5,170,843 5,525,024 5,898,560 5,934,580 5,562, Penalty notices for disorder (PND) (5) * * * * * * * * * * 63,639 Total proceeded against 1,947,165 1,836,307 1,919,494 1,855,333 1,951,915 1,881,765 1,904,677 1,837,733 1,924,828 2,000,822 2,022,604 Total found guilty or cautioned (5) 1,716,062 1,645,831 1,724,225 1,667,915 1,757,628 1,674,593 1,662,689 1,579,533 1,646,643 1,733,016 1,816,676 Total cautioned (5)(6) 308, , , , , , , , , , ,768 Total sentenced 1,407,057 1,354,294 1,437,754 1,384,678 1,468,949 1,407,998 1,424,349 1,348,494 1,419,607 1,489,827 1,547,353 Indictable only offences 11,613 12,354 13,399 13,307 13,477 13,219 13,160 14,574 15,845 15,478 16,273 Percentage sentenced for indictable only offences Triable either way (TEW) offences 301, , , , , , , , , , ,664 Percentage sentenced for TEW Offences Summary non-motoring offences 454, , , , , , , , , , ,498 Percentage sentenced for summary non-motoring offences Summary motoring offences 638, , , , , , , , , , ,918 Percentage sentenced for summary motoring offences Total sentenced at magistrates' courts 1,336,081 1,280,038 1,364,089 1,305,176 1,388,589 1,330,828 1,350,008 1,276,426 1,343,416 1,413,764 1,471,099 Total committed for trial to the Crown Court 88,651 79,021 81,270 87,679 73,378 (7) 72,290 70,240 79,169 82,825 81,595 78,409 Total sentenced at the Crown Court 70,976 74,256 73,665 79,502 80,360 77,170 74,341 72,068 76,191 76,063 76,254 Total committed for sentence to the Crown Court 3,979 4,180 4,853 7,303 19,192 (7) 20,417 17,296 16,882 18,220 17,756 16,937 1 Recorded crime relates to offences and sentenceing statistics relate to defendants. Because of this, the two sets of data are not directly comparable 2 The number of crimes recorded in the financial year using the expanded coverage and revised counting rules which came into effect on 1 April Numbers of recorded crimes will be affected by changes in reporting and recording. The national impact of recording changes in 2002/03 was estimated to be ten per cent for total recorded crime. The impact will vary for different types of offences. 4 Some forces have revised their 2003/04 data and totals may therefore not agree with those previously published 5 All or part of the data in these rows come from sources of data other than the courts database. 6 Includes repremands and final warnings given to 10 to 17-year-olds who are too young to receive cautions, but not warnings given for possession of cannabis. 7 The Crime (Sentences) Act 1997, implemented on 1 October 1997, extended the circumstances in which a magistrates' court may commit a person convicted of an offence triable-either-way to the Crown Court for sentence. For further details see Appendix 1, para 1.15.

22 Table 1.2 Offenders sentenced by offence groups and outcome, England and Wales Number of offenders Offence Group Outcome Violence against Total number sentenced 37,649 29,171 30,093 34,537 37,119 35,983 35,533 35,436 37,773 38,031 39,257 the person Number given: Custody 8,270 8,382 9,270 10,231 11,077 11,038 11,414 11,389 11,792 11,468 12,274 Community sentences 12,530 10,065 10,581 12,310 13,800 13,736 14,093 14,553 16,471 16,994 17,905 Fines 6,242 3,947 3,978 4,683 4,866 4,450 3,990 3,915 4,001 3,944 3,487 Other 10,607 6,777 6,264 7,313 7,376 6,759 6,036 5,579 5,509 5,625 5,591 Average custodial sentence length (months) Sexual offences Total number sentenced 4,474 4,687 4,407 4,468 4,590 4,310 3,941 4,037 4,373 4,333 4,823 Number given: Custody 1,990 2,418 2,490 2,514 2,687 2,615 2,431 2,400 2,562 2,505 2,841 Community sentences 1,203 1,139 1,116 1,140 1,176 1,160 1,060 1,047 1,207 1,169 1,403 Fines Other Average custodial sentence length (months) Burglary Total number sentenced 37,954 35,450 32,388 31,656 31,087 29,329 26,694 24,655 26,376 25,360 24,133 Number given: Custody 13,036 13,497 13,503 14,338 14,547 14,345 13,677 12,476 13,350 11,820 10,814 Community sentences 17,373 15,548 13,531 12,742 12,264 11,228 10,136 9,949 11,081 11,624 11,573 Fines 2,882 2,282 1,843 1,486 1,285 1, Other 4,663 4,123 3,511 3,090 2,991 2,655 2,063 1,614 1,336 1,371 1,278 Average custodial sentence length (months) Robbery Total number sentenced 4,902 5,162 5,909 5,597 5,562 5,652 5,944 6,846 7,731 7,339 7,513 Number given: Custody 3,363 3,451 4,199 4,008 3,962 4,085 4,341 4,775 5,881 5,150 5,063 Community sentences 1,204 1,355 1,412 1,307 1,356 1,306 1,392 1,833 1,715 2,024 2,292 Fines Other Average custodial sentence length (months) Theft and handling Total number sentenced 121, , , , , , , , , , ,241 stolen goods Number given: Custody 13,006 15,637 16,639 19,396 21,818 24,427 25,983 26,205 27,945 25,517 22,759 Community sentences 35,113 34,598 35,288 36,640 38,592 39,995 41,488 44,572 47,095 43,381 41,946 Fines 38,952 33,810 31,240 30,368 31,261 31,823 29,103 25,755 23,898 21,975 18,647 Other 34,350 32,033 31,203 31,810 33,576 34,403 31,006 29,878 27,779 27,721 26,889 Average custodial sentence length (months) Fraud and forgery Total number sentenced 18,390 17,232 16,319 16,930 19,645 20,203 19,155 18,207 18,126 18,053 18,023 Number given: Custody 2,674 3,315 3,377 3,606 4,130 4,034 3,726 3,826 3,754 3,887 4,160 Community sentences 6,427 6,258 6,064 6,468 7,573 8,300 8,036 7,710 8,176 7,347 7,428 Fines 4,554 3,636 3,095 3,040 3,457 3,512 3,223 2,930 2,686 2,952 2,728 Other 4,735 4,023 3,783 3,816 4,485 4,357 4,170 3,741 3,510 3,867 3,707 Average custodial sentence length (months) Criminal damage Total number sentenced 9,942 9,531 9,754 10,425 10,722 10,728 10,159 10,526 10,826 11,112 11,582 Number given: Custody 976 1,001 1,075 1,098 1,176 1,252 1,222 1,202 1,178 1,201 1,266 Community sentences 3,351 3,364 3,287 3,478 3,877 3,888 4,028 4,277 4,844 4,992 5,522 Fines 1,861 1,764 1,822 1,997 1,960 1,868 1,696 1,811 1,715 1,687 1,595 Other 3,754 3,402 3,570 3,852 3,709 3,720 3,213 3,236 3,089 3,232 3,199 Average custodial sentence length (months) Drug offences Total number sentenced 27,779 31,587 34,044 40,438 48,783 48,946 44,955 45,680 49,015 51,215 39,147 Number given: Custody 4,035 5,275 6,694 7,749 8,458 8,731 8,141 8,499 8,284 8,140 7,981 Community sentences 4,376 5,466 6,106 7,194 8,622 8,635 8,064 8,267 8,803 9,568 8,983 Fines 14,519 15,535 15,712 18,769 23,455 23,207 20,638 20,049 21,651 22,424 14,019 Other 4,849 5,311 5,532 6,726 8,248 8,373 8,112 8,865 10,277 11,083 8,164 Average custodial sentence length (months) Other (excl motoring Total number sentenced 38,903 41,743 43,107 47,076 49,331 47,564 44,552 43,531 47,354 50,993 53,981 offences) Number given: Custody 4,679 5,807 6,699 7,268 7,903 7,608 8,102 7,583 8,177 8,721 10,461 Community sentences 5,521 6,087 6,608 7,362 7,957 7,781 7,870 8,017 9,070 9,747 11,214 Fines 20,646 20,982 20,562 21,898 22,958 21,603 18,828 18,567 20,217 21,129 21,217 Other 8,057 8,867 9,238 10,548 10,513 10,572 9,752 9,364 9,890 11,396 11,089 Average custodial sentence length (months) Motoring offences Total number sentenced 12,020 11,218 9,935 9,508 9,016 8,301 7,697 7,875 8,453 8,900 8,237 Number given: Custody 1,321 1,593 1,498 1,652 1,554 1,653 1,747 1,918 2,228 2,385 2,319 Community sentences 1,821 1,962 1,778 1,816 1,812 1,719 1,781 1,838 2,306 2,703 2,747 Fines 7,903 6,874 5,973 5,405 5,036 4,365 3,684 3,605 3,420 3,320 2,733 Other Average custodial sentence length (months) All indictable Total number sentenced 313, , , , , , , , , , ,937 offences Number given: Custody 53,350 60,376 65,444 71,860 77,312 79,788 80,784 80,273 85,151 80,794 79,938 Community sentences 88,919 85,842 85,771 90,457 97,029 97,748 97, , , , ,013 Fines 98,195 89,424 84,617 88,035 94,592 92,121 82,110 77,466 78,470 78,250 65,095 Other 72,970 66,217 64,494 68,497 72,169 72,007 65,368 63,401 62,355 65,337 60,891 Average custodial sentence length (months)