MEMORANDUM OVERVIEW OF THE UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "MEMORANDUM OVERVIEW OF THE UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT"

Transcription

1 To: New Jersey Law Revision Commission From: Staff Re: Uniform Trade Secrets Act Date: March 10, 2008 MEMORANDUM As directed by the Commission at its January meeting, this memorandum examines the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) and whether the Commission should support the adoption of the UTSA by the New Jersey legislature. 1 OVERVIEW OF THE UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT As early as 1969, the United States National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws ( NCCUSL ) organized a committee to develop a uniform trade secrets act, relying heavily upon the definition of trade secret from the Restatement of Torts (First) in formulating their own definition. The impetus for creating a uniform act generated with the patent law bar that sought to resolve the conflict between then current state statutes, which protected trade secrets while keeping innovations secret, and the federal patent policy, which was generally designed to encourage public disclosure of innovations. The committee that drafted what would become the UTSA, although beset with a period of inactivity and the death of its original chairman, eventually prevailed in creating what appears to be a successful uniform act. As its own comments indicate, NCCUSL eventually adopted a definition of trade secret that is broader than the Restatement of Torts (First) definition. The Restatement definition required that a trade secret be continuously used in one s business. The comment notes that the UTSA definition extends protection to a plaintiff who has not yet had an opportunity or acquired the means to put a trade secret to use. With the broader definition of trade secret and clear parameters set for the proper and improper means of obtaining such proprietary information, the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) was released in 1979 and amended in Since that time, 47 jurisdictions (the District of Columbia and every State but New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts 2 and Texas) 1 The UTSA is one of five Uniform State Laws identified by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform state Laws as priorities for Other Uniform State Laws will be addressed in separate memoranda. 2 Some jurisdictions had adopted the UTSA before the 1985 amendments and then subsequently also adopted the amendments. New York and New Jersey have introduced bills adopting UTSA as will be noted in the text. Texas has a well-developed common law tradition, also derived from the Restatement of Torts (First), but no civil statute. As for Massachusetts Chapter 93, Sections 42 and 42A of the General Laws of Massachusetts regulate the embezzlement, stealing and unlawful taking, carrying away, copying or obtaining by fraud or deception of any trade secret. The statutory penalties are damages resulting from the tort, which may be increased to double the amount, as well as appropriate injunctive relief, including preliminary injunctive relief in an action by an employer against a former employee.

2 have enacted it into law, the most recent being Wyoming, which enacted it in The UTSA is pending in New York, having been introduced in both its State Senate and State Assembly as recently as January A bill based on the UTSA has been introduced in the New Jersey State Assembly in each successive legislative session since 2000, with its most recent introduction in 2007 (A2352 introduced by Assemblyman Richard A. Merkt (District 25 Morris). 3 No comparable bill appears to have been introduced in the New Jersey State Senate. The language of A2352 is virtually identical to the UTSA, unlike the enacted versions of the UTSA in some other states which deviate from the uniform version in small but significant ways, sometimes favorably so, as will be discussed below. A SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS OF THE UTSA The uniform act prohibits actual or threatened misappropriation of trade secrets, imposing both injunctive relief and damages. Misappropriation under the UTSA includes acquisition of a trade secret of another by a person who knows or has reason to know the trade secret was acquired by improper means. It also includes disclosure or use of a trade secret of another without express or implied consent by a person who (a) used improper means to acquire the secret or (b) before a material change of position, knew or had reason to know that the trade secret was secret and that knowledge of it had been acquired by accident or mistake or (c) at the time of disclosure, knew or had reason to know that his knowledge of the secret was (i) derived from or through a person who had used improper means to acquire it or (ii) derived from or through a person who owed a duty to the person seeking relief to maintain the secrecy or (iii) acquired under circumstances giving rise to a duty to maintain its secrecy. Improper means is defined as theft, bribery, misrepresentation, breach or inducement of a breach of a duty to maintain secrecy, or espionage through electronic or other means. The definition of proper means does not appear in the text of the uniform act but does appear in the comment to the act. The definition of trade secret is information that derives independent economic value from its proprietary nature and is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy. It includes a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process. The economic value may be actual or potential. Misappropriation of trade secrets may be enjoined, whether actual or threatened, and the injunction may be continued for a reasonable time in order to eliminate the commercial advantage that otherwise would be derived from the misappropriation. Damages recoverable may include both actual loss caused by misappropriation and the unjust enrichment caused by misappropriation that is not taken into account in computing 3 A2352 was also introduced by Richard Merkt in February 2006; A2188 was introduced by Mr. Merkt in February 2004; A2237 was introduced by Mr. Merkt in May 2002; A2352 was introduced by LeRoy J. Jones (District 27-Essex) in May All versions of this bill appear to be identical. 2

3 actual loss. Damages may not be recovered, however, if a material and prejudicial change of position prior to acquiring knowledge or reason to know of the misappropriation renders a monetary award inequitable. In lieu of damages measured by these methods, damages may be measured by imposition of liability for a reasonable royalty for a misappropriator s unauthorized disclosure or use of a trade secret. The comment in the uniform act explains that this royalty may be imposed as an alternative to all other methods of measuring damages caused by a misappropriator s past conduct but must be based upon a demonstrably reasonable royalty. The comment also distinguishes such a royalty from the kind of royalty that may accompany injunctive relief. In exceptional circumstances, an injunction may condition future use upon payment of a royalty for no longer than the period of time for which the use could have been prohibited. Punitive damages are also available for willful and malicious misappropriation in an amount not exceeding twice any damage award. Attorney s fees are recoverable in cases involving willful and malicious misappropriation, or if a claim of misappropriation is made in bad faith, or if a motion for injunctive relief is made or opposed in bad faith. The statute also permits the court to grant protective orders in connection with discovery proceedings, holding in-camera hearings, sealing records and ordering litigants not to disclose alleged trade secrets without prior court approval. An action for misappropriation must be brought within three years after the discovery of the misappropriation (or within three years after, with reasonable due diligence, the misappropriation should have been discovered.) The act takes effect immediately and does not apply to misappropriation occurring prior to its effective date or to a continuing misappropriation that was begun prior to the effective date but continues thereafter. The act, except as noted, expressly displaces any conflicting tort, restitutionary and other state law providing civil remedies for trade secret misappropriation. As proposed in New Jersey, any action for such misappropriation against a public entity or employee, however, is expressly governed by the New Jersey Tort Claims Act, which expressly supersedes the act. CURRENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE SECRETS LAW The current state of the trade secrets misappropriation law in New Jersey dates back to the early 1900 s with Stone v. Goss, 65 N.J. Eq. 756 (E. & A ) Resolving a dispute between an employer and its former employee not to reveal the secrets of its manufacture of depilatories (compounds to remove hair and wool from skins and hides), the court found that an express contract between the parties prohibited the disclosure of the employer s secret process because [t]he right of a manufacturer, whose goods are made by an unpatented secret process, to protection by injunction against the divulging of 3

4 his secret in a proper case, is now established by a well-considered line of cases in England and in several states. In Sun Dial Corp. v. Rideout, 16 N.J. 252 (1954), also frequently cited by recent courts, no written agreement existed between the parties that expressly prohibited the use of the plaintiff s alleged secret trade process. The Sun Dial plaintiff manufactured precision dials and panels and sought to enjoin its former employees from using and disclosing a secret process for the making of their dials. The court defined a trade secret, adopted from the Restatement of Torts (First), as consisting of a formula, process, device or compilation which one uses in his business and which gives him an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it. 16 N.J. 252, 257. Notably, the plaintiff had not entered into any written agreement with the individual defendants restraining their use of plaintiff s process after defendants left plaintiff s employ. The court determined such express agreement was unnecessary to entitle the plaintiff to relief so long as plaintiff could demonstrate that the employees learned the trade secret in confidence and, in violation of that confidence, either used or disclosed the trade secret after termination of their employment. Upholding the Appellate Division, the Sun Dial court determined that the defendants did just that--they well knew during their employment that the plaintiff s process was to remain secret in nature and they therefore could not disclose it to the detriment of plaintiff after their employment ended. The Sun Dial court made clear that the secrecy of the trade secret need not be absolute and disclosure to employees involved in its use would not necessarily result in the loss of the employer s trade secret protection. Yet the protected information must not be a matter of public knowledge or of general industry knowledge, although the fact that an ingredient may be publicly known is not controlling so long as the method of combining known ingredients, thus producing an enhanced or superior product, is proprietary information. The New Jersey law protecting trade secrets has continued to develop. It is now generally accepted that, a New Jersey plaintiff must establish six elements to support a claim of misappropriation of trade secrets. They are: (1) the existence of the trade secret; (2) that the secret information was communicated in confidence; (3) that the secret information was disclosed in breach of such confidence; (4) that the secret information was acquired by a competitor with knowledge of the breach of confidence; (5) that the secret information was used by a competitor to the detriment of plaintiff; and (6) that the plaintiff took precautions to maintain the secrecy of the trade secret. Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Richards Mfg. Co., WL (D. N.J. 2007); Rycoline Products v. Walsh, 334 N.J. Super. 62 (App Div. 2000). See also Rohm and Haas Company v. Adco Chemical Company, 689 F.2d 424 (3 rd Cir. 1982). To first determine the existence of a trade secret, New Jersey courts have looked to the Restatement of Torts definition as articulated in the Sun Dial case. Thus, the plaintiff must establish that there is a formula, pattern, device or compilation of information that is not a matter of general industry knowledge and is used in plaintiff s 4

5 business, giving plaintiff an advantage over competitors who do not know or use the information. See Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Richards Mfg. Co., WL (D. N.J. 2007) and also Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Ciavatta, 110 N.J. 609, (1988), in which the court articulates additional considerations, referred to in the Restatement, that may help a court determine whether challenged information is a trade secret, such as, inter alia, the extent to which the information is known outside of the business and the extent of measures taken by the owner to guard the secrecy of the information. 4 As to remedies, New Jersey law permits injunctive relief only where money damages are inadequate and preliminary injunctive relief only when necessary to prevent substantial immediate and irreparable harm. When monetary damages are awarded, the courts appear generally to award successful plaintiffs compensation equal to the defendants profits or the plaintiffs actual losses, but not both. See Consolidated Boiler Corp. v. Bogue Elec. Co., 58 A.2d 759, 761 (Ch. Div. 1948). The awards are decided on the particular facts and circumstances in each case. Punitive damages may be permissible. See Epcon Group, Inc. v. Danburry Farms, Inc. WL (3 rd Cir. 2002) (applying Pennsylvania law, however.) 5 ADOPTION OF THE UTSA IN NEW JERSEY AND SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS New Jersey misappropriations of trade secret law, as that of many other states who have since adopted the UTSA, is derived primarily from Restatement of Torts (First) concepts, as is the UTSA itself. New Jersey s law is also derived from the Restatement 4 At least one court, Platinum Management v. Dahms, 285 N.J. Super 274 (Law Div. 1995) relied upon the definition of trade secrets found in the Restatement (Third) of Unfair Compeition in determining that a customer list warranted protection notwithstanding the fact that the customers names could be pulled from trade directories. Notably, customer lists are not items specifically included in the definition of a trade secret in the New Jersey bill although other states do specifically include customer lists in the statutory definition. See below. 5 In Kilbarr Corp. v. Business Systems, Inc., 679 F. Supp. 422 (D. N.J. 1988), aff d, 869 F. 2d 589 (3d Cir. 1989), the court was asked to determine, in the context of a summary judgment proceeding, whether the lead time valuation limitation is applicable to an award of monetary damages for trade secret misappropriation. This lead time valuation limitation, also known as the head start defense to the assessment of damages, would limit damages to that period of time in which others in the trade, and the defendant in particular, are likely through legitimate business procedures to have become aware of the misappropriated secrets, if at all. Because of prior false testimony, then the passage of time and finally the fact that enjoining the defendant would have shut down the operation of the defendant Dutch corporation, neither a preliminary nor permanent injunction had been issued to prevent the defendant typewriter manufacturer from knowingly misappropriating the plaintiff s proprietary know-how (both trade secret and copyrighted) and continuing to use it. Even more egregious to the court than the misappropriation itself, the defendant had not returned the misappropriated information, despite several court orders to do so. The Court felt that the appropriate remedy under the circumstances was an adequate and complete monetary award. The court thus did not limit plaintiff s damages by a lead time valuation. 5

6 of Unfair Competition and in some cases from the New Jersey Criminal Code 6. Although our common law is well-established, the UTSA clearly has advantages that can only benefit New Jersey. The UTSA is streamlined, straightforward, and contains improvements to our common law more protective of persons with trade secrets. For example, the New Jersey courts now consistently rely upon a more restrictive definition of trade secret than exists in the UTSA. The common law definition requires that the proprietary information be used in the person s business, giving an opportunity for a business advantage over competitors who do not know or use the secret. Under the UTSA, actual or potential benefit from the proprietary information is sufficient. The key is that the information be (i) not generally known, (ii) not readily ascertainable by proper means by others who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and (iii) subject to reasonable efforts to keep it secret. In addition, the definition of misappropriation in the UTSA is very broad. It includes acquiring the trade secret with knowledge or the reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by improper means, or disclosing the trade secret under a variety of circumstances, including doing so without appropriate consent, by someone who acquired it by improper means or knew or had reason to know that it was acquired improperly, or disclosing it in breach of a duty to maintain its secrecy or from or through a person who had such a duty. Under the UTSA, even accidental or mistaken knowledge of the trade secret may be actionable. The remedies afforded by the UTSA are clear cut and enhanced. Attorney s fees are permitted as are both the actual loss caused by the misappropriation and the unjust enrichment not taken into account when computing the actual loss. Imposition of a reasonable royalty is also a possibility under certain circumstances. NCCUSL touts the UTSA as the first comprehensive effort to codify the law of trade secrets protection, incorporating the major common law principles while filling gaps left by the courts. Its purpose was simply to provide a person with redress, in equity and law, for trade secret misappropriation while addressing the concern that the common law of misappropriation had developed unevenly state to state, leading to forum shopping and uncertainty overall in the business community. We believe that the purpose of the UTSA makes sense and New Jersey would benefit from adopting it. However, we propose a few minor modifications to the current proposed bill that would further enhance it in significant ways. 6 See L. 1965, C. 52, 1-5, now repealed due to the consolidation of all theft offenses. A definition of trade secrets now appears in the Code of Criminal Justice at N.J.S. 2C:20-1i. It is there defined as the whole or any portion or phase of any scientific or technical information, design, process, procedure, formula or improvement which is secret and of value... At least one state, Colorado, has adopted a similar definition of trade secret in its version of the uniform act, as noted in the text below. 6

7 1. Add the Recovery of Costs in Addition to Attorney s Fees For example, California s Uniform Trade Secrets Act (California Civil Code Section 3426) provides that if a claim for misappropriation is made in bad faith, or a motion to terminate an injunction is made or resisted in bad faith, or willful and malicious appropriation exists, then the court may award reasonable attorney s fees and costs to the prevailing party including a reasonable sum to cover the service of expert witnesses. The witnesses, however, cannot be regular employees of any party and the costs must be actually incurred and reasonably necessary in either or both preparation for trial or arbitration by the prevailing party. See Cal. Civ. Code, Sec The uniform law and New Jersey bill A2352 permits an award of attorney s fees but not costs. California s modification seems one worth emulating. 2. Define Bad Faith When Awarding Attorney s Fee The recently introduced versions of the UTSA in the New York legislature, S00162 and A02296, include a definition of bad faith in their attorney s fees provision which seems useful. The definition states: For purposes of this section, a claim of misappropriation is made or continued in bad faith or a motion to terminate an injunction is made or resisted or continued in bad faith if it is undertaken or continued solely to harass or maliciously injure another or to delay or prolong the resolution of the litigation; or it is undertaken or continued without any reasonable basis in fact or law and could not be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. This appears to be an addition that could enhance New Jersey s current bill. 3. Modify the Trade Secret Definition Although not specifically delineated in the New Jersey bill, customer lists are specifically mentioned in the definition of trade secrets in the UTSA as adopted by Arkansas, Illinois, Colorado, and Connecticut. Connecticut includes drawing, cost data or customer list within the parameters of information that may be a trade secret. Illinois adds drawing and financial data to its definition, also adding a list of actual or potential customers or suppliers. Colorado rewrites the model act definition entirely. Instead, it defines trade secret as: the whole or any portion or phase of any scientific or technical information, design, process, procedure, formula, improvement, confidential business or financial information, listing of names, addresses, or telephone numbers, or other information relating to any business or profession which is secret and of value. New York s recently introduced bill s definition is: 7

8 any form and type of financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineering information, including a pattern, plan, compilation, program device, formula, design, prototype, method, technique, process, procedure, program, or code, whether tangible or intangible, and whether or how stored, compiled, or memorialized physically, electronically, graphically, photographically or in writing.... We do not recommend Colorado s approach. New York s approach seems to exclude by trying to include too much. However, the Illinois or Connecticut approaches are more appealing. The inclusion of some reference to financial or cost data, drawings and a customer or supplier list are important. Such inclusion is also consistent with the Restatement of Torts (First). Georgia s definition states that at trade secret means information, without regard to form. The words without regard to form placed after the word information seems useful. Also important is the addition of the words but not limited to after the word including to make clear that the items noted in the definition are examples but not limitations. 4. Add a Definition of Proper Means as Described in the Comment to the Uniform Act In the comment to the definitions section of the uniform act, the drafters defined proper means to include a number of independent methods by which otherwise protected information could be ascertained without committing a misappropriation. Although no one piece of legislation can be all-inclusive, it seems that delineating the ways that proprietary information can be permissibly obtained would make even clearer the definition of misappropriation. CONCLUSION We have not been able to ascertain why New Jersey has thus failed to adopt any version of the UTSA. What does appear possible is that there is little incentive to adopt the UTSA because the New Jersey s common law of trade secret misappropriation is so long-standing and well-developed. However, we believe that the adoption in New Jersey of the uniform act would enhance our current law, benefit those with trade secrets to protect and fulfill the purpose of the UTSA as articulated by NCCUSL. We therefore recommend that the UTSA be adopted in New Jersey with minor modifications as already noted. 8

THE LAW ON PROTECTION OF UNDISCLOSED INFORMATION

THE LAW ON PROTECTION OF UNDISCLOSED INFORMATION THE LAW ON PROTECTION OF UNDISCLOSED INFORMATION ( Official Gazette of Republic of Montenegro No. 16/07 and Official Gazette of Montenegro No 73/08) (consolidated text) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1

More information

Changing Landscape, US and Abroad 2017 In House Counsel Conference

Changing Landscape, US and Abroad 2017 In House Counsel Conference TRADE SECRETS Changing Landscape, US and Abroad 2017 In House Counsel Conference Presenters: Jenny Papatolis Johnson Endo Pharmaceuticals Tracy Zurzolo Quinn Reed Smith LLP Matthew P. Frederick Reed Smith

More information

Litigation Webinar Series. Trade Secret Protection and the Defend Trade Secrets Act: What s New, What s Different? Olga May Principal San Diego, CA

Litigation Webinar Series. Trade Secret Protection and the Defend Trade Secrets Act: What s New, What s Different? Olga May Principal San Diego, CA March 30, 2017 Litigation Webinar Series Trade Secret Protection and the Defend Trade Secrets Act: What s New, What s Different? Olga May Principal San Diego, CA Martina Hufnal Principal Wilmington, DE

More information

DRAFT. PJC xxx.aa Question on Existence of Trade Secret

DRAFT. PJC xxx.aa Question on Existence of Trade Secret PJC xxx.aa Question on Existence of Trade Secret QUESTION Did Paul Payne own a trade secret in the [formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, process, financial data, or list of

More information

E. I. dupont de Nemours & Co. v. Christopher: Toward a Higher Standard of Commercial Morality

E. I. dupont de Nemours & Co. v. Christopher: Toward a Higher Standard of Commercial Morality SMU Law Review Volume 25 1971 E. I. dupont de Nemours & Co. v. Christopher: Toward a Higher Standard of Commercial Morality Bruce A. Cheatham Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.smu.edu/smulr

More information

Trade Secret Misappropriation and Remedies. (including a look at the new federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016)

Trade Secret Misappropriation and Remedies. (including a look at the new federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016) Invention & Industry Trade Secret Misappropriation and Remedies (including a look at the new federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016) Eric E. Johnson ericejohnson.com Konomark Most rights sharable Remedies

More information

No. 09SC963 - Gognat v. Ellsworth: Uniform Trade Secrets Act statute of limitations definition of trade secret

No. 09SC963 - Gognat v. Ellsworth: Uniform Trade Secrets Act statute of limitations definition of trade secret Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association

More information

The Economic Espionage Act of 1996

The Economic Espionage Act of 1996 Berkeley Technology Law Journal Volume 13 Issue 1 Article 20 January 1998 The Economic Espionage Act of 1996 Spencer Simon Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/btlj

More information

Case 3:17-cv MHL Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID# 58

Case 3:17-cv MHL Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID# 58 Case 3:17-cv-00624-MHL Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID# 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ) URBAN ONE, INC., d/b/a ipower RICHMOND

More information

Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act

Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act Tex. Hum. Res. Code 36.006 Page 1 36.001. [Expires September 1, 2015] Definitions Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act (Tex. Hum. Res. Code 36.001 to 117) i In this chapter: (1) "Claim" means a written

More information

2017 Texas Trade Secrets Update

2017 Texas Trade Secrets Update 2017 Texas Trade Secrets Update Joseph F. Cleveland, Jr. J. Heath Coffman Jared D. Wilkinson Brackett & Ellis, P.C. 100 Main Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102-3090 Institute for Law and Technology 55 th Annual

More information

Chapter XIX EQUITY CONDENSED OUTLINE

Chapter XIX EQUITY CONDENSED OUTLINE Chapter XIX EQUITY CONDENSED OUTLINE I. NATURE AND SCOPE OF EQUITY B. Equitable Maxims and Other General Doctrines. C. Marshaling Assets. II. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTS B. When Specific Performance

More information

Common law reasoning and institutions Civil and Criminal Procedure (England and Wales) Litigation U.S.

Common law reasoning and institutions Civil and Criminal Procedure (England and Wales) Litigation U.S. Litigation U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3 20122 Milano Comparing England and Wales and the U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3

More information

a) You must present acceptable photo identification for admission to the test center.

a) You must present acceptable photo identification for admission to the test center. COMPUTER-BASED TESTING CANDIDATE EXAMINATION AGREEMENT READ THIS EXAMINATION AGREEMENT ( AGREEMENT ) BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE (ISC) 2 EXAM AND CERTIFICATION PROCESS. BY TAKING THE EXAMINATION, I AM AGREEING

More information

End User License Agreement

End User License Agreement End User License Agreement Pluribus Networks, Inc.'s ("Pluribus", "we", or "us") software products are designed to provide fabric networking and analytics solutions that simplify operations, reduce operating

More information

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 12650 of the Government Code is amended to read: 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may

More information

Patents. What is a Patent? 11/16/2017. The Decision Between Patent and Trade Secret Protection

Patents. What is a Patent? 11/16/2017. The Decision Between Patent and Trade Secret Protection The Decision Between Patent and Trade Secret Protection November 2017 John J. O Malley Ryan W. O Donnell vklaw.com 1 Patents vklaw.com 2 What is a Patent? A right to exclude others from making, using,

More information

Review of Elements of Fraud

Review of Elements of Fraud Review of Elements of Fraud Elements of Fraud It is critical to understand that there are several elements of fraud. Each type of fraud includes these elements, and all these specific elements must be

More information

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES Chapter 10: UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES Table of Contents Part 1. STATE DEPARTMENTS... Section 205-A. SHORT TITLE... 3 Section 206. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 207.

More information

Plaintiff Liberty Power Corporation, LLC ( Plaintiff or LPC ) moves for a preliminary

Plaintiff Liberty Power Corporation, LLC ( Plaintiff or LPC ) moves for a preliminary UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X LIBERTY POWER CORP., LLC, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 10-CV-1938 (NGG) (CLP)

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO. 653645/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------

More information

TRADE SECRETS ACT B.E (2002) BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX

TRADE SECRETS ACT B.E (2002) BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX TRADE SECRETS ACT B.E. 2545 (2002) BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX Given on the 12th Day of April B.E. 2545; Being the 57th Year of the Present Reign. His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej is graciously pleased

More information

Chapter 6. Disparagement of Property 8/3/2017. Business Torts and Online Crimes and Torts. Slander of Title Slander of Quality (Trade Libel) Defenses

Chapter 6. Disparagement of Property 8/3/2017. Business Torts and Online Crimes and Torts. Slander of Title Slander of Quality (Trade Libel) Defenses Chapter 6 Business Torts and Online Crimes and Torts Disparagement of Property Slander of Title Slander of Quality (Trade Libel) Defenses Disparagement of Property Disparagement of property occurs when

More information

RECOVERING THE PROCEEDS OF FRAUD

RECOVERING THE PROCEEDS OF FRAUD RECOVERING THE PROCEEDS OF FRAUD World Headquarters the gregor building 716 West Ave Austin, TX 78701-2727 USA TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE: THE LAW IN A FRAUD RECOVERY CASE I. LEGAL CAUSES OF ACTION IN

More information

EMC Proven Professional Program

EMC Proven Professional Program EMC Proven Professional Program Candidate Agreement version 2.0 This is a legal agreement between you and EMC Corporation ( EMC ). You hereby agree that the following terms and conditions shall govern

More information

Framework Contract for the provision of Reference Mapping Products

Framework Contract for the provision of Reference Mapping Products Framework Contract for the provision of Reference Mapping Products Tender Reference: SATCEN-OP-02/17 Annex 9 Draft Non-Disclosure Agreement - 1 - This Agreement made and entered into force as of DD/MM/YYYY

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2009

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2009 TAYLOR, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2009 PREMIER LAB SUPPLY, INC., Appellant, v. CHEMPLEX INDUSTRIES, INC., a New York corporation, and CHEMPLEX INDUSTRIES,

More information

IP Panel: Protection for Nanotechnology Innovations

IP Panel: Protection for Nanotechnology Innovations IP Panel: Protection for Nanotechnology Innovations Don Featherstone October 29, 2010 Disclaimers & Contact Information These materials are not intended and should not be used as legal advice. If you need

More information

Covenants Not to Compete in Utah: A Useful Tool for Employers

Covenants Not to Compete in Utah: A Useful Tool for Employers Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law Volume 12 Issue 1 Article 6 3-1-1997 Covenants Not to Compete in Utah: A Useful Tool for Employers Carolyn Cox Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION INNOVATION VENTURES, L.L.C., d/b/a LIVING ESSENTIALS, a Michigan limited liability company, Case No. v. Plaintiff, Hon. ASPEN

More information

Security Breach Notification Chart

Security Breach Notification Chart Security Breach Notification Chart Perkins Coie's Privacy & Security practice maintains this comprehensive chart of state laws regarding security breach notification. The chart is for informational purposes

More information

TERMS OF SERVICE FOR SUPPORT NETWORK COMMUNITY HEART AND STROKE REGISTRY SITE Last Updated: December 2016

TERMS OF SERVICE FOR SUPPORT NETWORK COMMUNITY HEART AND STROKE REGISTRY SITE Last Updated: December 2016 TERMS OF SERVICE FOR SUPPORT NETWORK COMMUNITY HEART AND STROKE REGISTRY SITE Last Updated: December 2016 THIS IS NOT INTENDED TO BE MEDICAL SERVICES. IF YOU HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, GO TO THE EMERGENCY

More information

Case 1:07-mc GBL-BRP Document 21 Filed 04/18/2008 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:07-mc GBL-BRP Document 21 Filed 04/18/2008 Page 1 of 17 Case 1:07-mc-00034-GBL-BRP Document 21 Filed 04/18/2008 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION IN RE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO AOL, LLC

More information

Grafton Data Systems, Inc. Craig Moore, et al. No CV-353 ORDER

Grafton Data Systems, Inc. Craig Moore, et al. No CV-353 ORDER MERRIMACK, SS SUPERIOR COURT Grafton Data Systems, Inc. v. Craig Moore, et al. No. 217-2016-CV-353 ORDER The Plaintiff, Grafton Data Systems, Inc. ( Grafton ), moves for a preliminary injunction against

More information

the Notices section below.

the Notices section below. BY ACCESSING THIS WEBSITE OR ANY RELATED WEB PAGES (COLLECTIVELY REFERRED TO AS THE WEBSITE ), PRINTING OR DOWNLOADING MATERIALS FROM THE WEBSITE, OR OTHERWISE USING THE WEBSITE, YOU ( YOU, YOUR OR USER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DEREK GUBALA, Case No. 15-cv-1078-pp Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION TO DISMISS

More information

IFBYPHONE RESELLER PROGRAM AGREEMENT

IFBYPHONE RESELLER PROGRAM AGREEMENT IFBYPHONE RESELLER PROGRAM AGREEMENT This Agreement between you (hereinafter referred to as You or Your ) and IFBYPHONE, INC., a Delaware Corporation registered to do business in Illinois (hereinafter

More information

Case 1:17-cv FDS Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:17-cv FDS Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:17-cv-10300-FDS Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) Molly Crane, ) Individually And On Behalf Of All ) Other Persons Similarly Situated,

More information

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO.

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO. Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 ELSTER SOLUTIONS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE THE CITY

More information

SOFTWARE SUBLICENSE AGREEMENT

SOFTWARE SUBLICENSE AGREEMENT Office 1405-14th Floor, Bedford Centre Office Tower, Cnr Smith Road & Van de Linde Road, Bedfordview, Johannesburg, South Africa 2007 +27 (0) 11 026 1902 www.entimex.com info@entimex.com SOFTWARE SUBLICENSE

More information

Case3:12-cv SI Document11 Filed07/13/12 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case3:12-cv SI Document11 Filed07/13/12 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case:-cv-0-SI Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 SHUTTERFLY, INC., v. Plaintiff, FOREVERARTS, INC. and HENRY ZHENG, Defendants. / No. CR - SI ORDER

More information

4 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Spring Note

4 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Spring Note 4 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 415 Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Spring 1996 Note LOOKING BACK AND FORTH: THE REESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF UNFAIR COMPETITION AND POTENTIAL IMPACT ON TEXAS TRADE SECRET

More information

SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS

SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS MMS Contract No: SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS These Software License Terms and Conditions (referred to interchangeably as the Terms and Conditions or the Agreement ) form a legal contract between

More information

FEDERAL AND STATE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION

FEDERAL AND STATE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION FEDERAL AND STATE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION The Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) integrity program requires that OHSU not employ individuals who are excluded from participation in federal

More information

AUGUR SITE TERMS OF USE

AUGUR SITE TERMS OF USE AUGUR SITE TERMS OF USE Last updated August 4, 2015 Welcome to the Augur website (the Augur Site ). Forecast Foundation, OU ( Augur, we, us or our ) provides the Augur Site to you subject to the following

More information

RAMBUS, INC. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Impact on Standards and Antitrust

RAMBUS, INC. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Impact on Standards and Antitrust RAMBUS, INC. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Impact on Standards and Antitrust American Intellectual Property Law Association IP Practice in Japan Committee October 2009, Washington, DC JOHN A. O BRIEN LAW

More information

INTERNET ADVERTISING AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT made as of this day of, 2004.

INTERNET ADVERTISING AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT made as of this day of, 2004. INTERNET ADVERTISING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made as of this day of, 2004. BETWEEN: THOMSON ASSOCIATES INC., a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario; (hereinafter referred

More information

Whether a Manufacturing Process is a Trade Secret Must Be Considered in the Aggregate

Whether a Manufacturing Process is a Trade Secret Must Be Considered in the Aggregate A Timely Analysis of Legal Developments A S A P In This Issue: September 2009 The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Hertz v. The Luzenac Group has clarified how to determine whether compilations are trade

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons

Follow this and additional works at:  Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Journal of Legislation Volume 43 Issue 2 Article 6 4-6-2017 Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 and Why the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1984 Still Matters for Trade

More information

State Data Breach Notification Laws

State Data Breach Notification Laws State Data Breach Notification Laws This chart should be used for informational purposes only because the recommended actions an entity should take if it experiences a security event, incident, or breach

More information

Strategic Partner Agreement Terms

Strategic Partner Agreement Terms Strategic Partner Agreement Terms Why is this important? The Strategic Partner Agreement Terms are important because they describe the terms and conditions of the referral partnership relationship that

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action Number 13-cv-1404 MYELOTEC, INC. a Georgia Corporation, Plaintiff v BIOVISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC a Colorado Corporation, Defendant

More information

State Data Breach Law Summary. November 2017

State Data Breach Law Summary. November 2017 November 2017 STATE DATA BREACH LAW SUMMARY To view the requirements for a specific state 1, click on the state name below. Alaska Idaho Minnesota Ohio Washington Arizona Illinois Mississippi Oklahoma

More information

Case 3:13-cv GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:13-cv GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case 3:13-cv-00101-GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS THOMAS R. GUARINO, on behalf of ) Himself and all other similarly

More information

BCM Policies and Procedures

BCM Policies and Procedures BCM Policies and Procedures 20.8.01 - Research: Inventions and Patents Date: 01/07/2001 Inventions and Patents Last Update: NOTE: Any questions concerning this Policy on Patents and Other Intellectual

More information

District of Columbia Model Severance Agreement

District of Columbia Model Severance Agreement District of Columbia Model Severance Agreement This is for educational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. For a legal opinion on your settlement you guessed it consult with a lawyer. THIS

More information

AGREEMENT GOVERNING USE OF VOHC SEAL. THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of, by and. between the Veterinary Oral Health Council ("VOHC") and ("Company").

AGREEMENT GOVERNING USE OF VOHC SEAL. THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of, by and. between the Veterinary Oral Health Council (VOHC) and (Company). AGREEMENT GOVERNING USE OF VOHC SEAL THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of, by and between the Veterinary Oral Health Council ("VOHC") and ("Company"). BACKGROUND A. VOHC is the owner of registered service

More information

Legal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data

Legal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data Legal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data Peter L. Ostermiller Attorney at Law 239 South Fifth Street Suite 1800 Louisville, KY 40202 peterlo@ploesq.com www.ploesq.com Overview What is Metadata?

More information

Georgia Computer System Protection Act

Georgia Computer System Protection Act Georgia Computer System Protection Act Enacted by the 1991 Georgia General Assembly Effective 1 July 1991 INTRODUCTION The "Georgia Computer Systems Protection Act" is an act enacted by the 1991 Georgia

More information

BY USING THIS CLICK-THROUGH WEBSITE, YOU INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

BY USING THIS CLICK-THROUGH WEBSITE, YOU INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS. ScanLife Terms and Conditions (the Agreement ) BY USING THIS CLICK-THROUGH WEBSITE, YOU INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS. IF YOU DO NOT ACCEPT THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, THEN DO

More information

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of H. STAN JOHNSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: BRIAN A. MORRIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: COHEN-JOHNSON, LLC Dean Martin Drive, Ste. G Las Vegas, NV (0-00 Attorneys for Plaintiff

More information

GRANT AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) Effective as at the last date of signing.

GRANT AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) Effective as at the last date of signing. GRANT AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) Effective as at the last date of signing. Between: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ALBERTA As represented by the Minister of Status of Women (the Minister ) And: [LEGAL

More information

WASA New Superintendent Workshop: Legal Issues Facing the Superintendent

WASA New Superintendent Workshop: Legal Issues Facing the Superintendent WASA New Superintendent Workshop: Legal Issues Facing the Superintendent Lorraine Wilson, J.D. Olympia, Washington July 27, 2015 lorraine@pfrwa.com (206) 622-0203 Session Overview Knowing which Attorney

More information

Devos, Ltd. v United Returns, Inc NY Slip Op 51379(U) Decided on September 28, Supreme Court, Suffolk County. Emerson, J.

Devos, Ltd. v United Returns, Inc NY Slip Op 51379(U) Decided on September 28, Supreme Court, Suffolk County. Emerson, J. [*1] Devos, Ltd. v United Returns, Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 51379(U) Decided on September 28, 2017 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Emerson, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

More information

WAVE END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

WAVE END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT WAVE END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT THE ACCOMPANYING SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION (EACH AS DEFINED BELOW) BELONG TO TWISTED PAIR SOLUTIONS, A MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS COMPANY ( LICENSOR ) OR ITS LICENSORS AND ARE

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA ORCA COMMUNICATIONS UNLIMITED, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ANN J. NODER AND CHRISTOPHER C. NODER, WIFE AND HUSBAND; PITCH PUBLIC

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: v. Defendant. CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER By stipulation and agreement of the parties,

More information

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION ADOPTED RESOLUTION 1 2 3 RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association reaffirms the black letter of the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions as adopted February, 1986, and amended February 1992,

More information

Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal Penalties Related to Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents

Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal Penalties Related to Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents Order Code RL34109 Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal Penalties Related to Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents July 27, 2007 Brian T. Yeh Legislative Attorney

More information

Case 2:06-cv JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27

Case 2:06-cv JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27 Case 2:06-cv-02163-JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27 HELLRING LINDEMAN GOLDSTEIN & SIEGAL LLP Stephen L. Dreyfuss, Esq. sldreyfuss@hlgslaw.com One Gateway Center Newark, New Jersey 07102-5386

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - : 2/2/2009

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - : 2/2/2009 [Cite as DK Prods., Inc. v. Miller, 2009-Ohio-436.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY DK PRODUCTS, INC. dba : SYSTEM CYCLE, : Plaintiff-Appellee, CASE NO. CA2008-05-060

More information

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE 1. Sale And License STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE 1.1 Controlling Conditions of Sale. All purchases and sales of Products, including all parts, kits for assembly, spare parts and components thereof

More information

USTOCKTRAIN TRADING SIMULATOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS

USTOCKTRAIN TRADING SIMULATOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS USTOCKTRAIN TRADING SIMULATOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS PLEASE READ THESE USTOCKTRAIN TRADING SIMULATOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS ( TERMS AND CONDITIONS ) CAREFULLY. THE USTOCKTRAIN TRADING SIMULATOR SIMULATES SECURITIES

More information

Survey of State Civil Shoplifting Statutes

Survey of State Civil Shoplifting Statutes University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln College of Law, Faculty Publications Law, College of 2015 Survey of State Civil Shoplifting Statutes Ryan Sullivan University

More information

Arbitration of Distribution and Franchise Disputes

Arbitration of Distribution and Franchise Disputes Arbitration of Distribution and Franchise Disputes Gerald Saltarelli Abstract: Manufacturers and other sellers of goods and services reach their markets through a variety of means, including distributor

More information

Ownership of Site; Agreement to Terms of Use

Ownership of Site; Agreement to Terms of Use Ownership of Site; Agreement to Terms of Use These Terms and Conditions of Use (the Terms of Use ) apply to the Volta Career Resource Center, being a web site located at www.voltapeople.com (the Site ).

More information

Ellis & Winters, LLP, by Paul K. Sun and Kelly Margolis Dagger, for Plaintiffs AmeriGas Propane, L.P. and AmeriGas Propane, Inc.

Ellis & Winters, LLP, by Paul K. Sun and Kelly Margolis Dagger, for Plaintiffs AmeriGas Propane, L.P. and AmeriGas Propane, Inc. AmeriGas Propane, L.P. v. Coffey, 2016 NCBC 15. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA MADISON COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 14 CVS 376 AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P. and AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC.,

More information

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS Definitions Adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court in Grievance Administrator v Lopatin, 462 Mich 235, 238 n 1 (2000) Injury is harm to a

More information

Innovation Act (H.R. 9) and PATENT Act (S. 1137): A Comparison of Key Provisions

Innovation Act (H.R. 9) and PATENT Act (S. 1137): A Comparison of Key Provisions Innovation Act (H.R. 9) and PATENT Act (S. 1137): A Comparison of Key Provisions TOPIC Innovation Act H.R. 9 PATENT Act S. 1137 Post Grant Review ( PGR ) Proceedings Claim Construction: Each patent claim

More information

Sangoma Remote Monitoring Service (RMS)

Sangoma Remote Monitoring Service (RMS) Sangoma Remote Monitoring Service (RMS) Terms and Agreement These Service Terms and Agreement, together with the purchase by the Customer of the remote monitoring service (RMS) (as defined in Section 2

More information

The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND 1 The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act being Chapter of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1990-91, as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1992, c.62; 1994,

More information

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 4 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:24

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 4 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:24 Case: 1:17-cv-01752 Document #: 4 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL FUCHS and VLADISLAV ) KRASILNIKOV,

More information

Law360. States Try To Prohibit Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims. By J. Michael Martinez de Andino and Matthew Nigriny

Law360. States Try To Prohibit Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims. By J. Michael Martinez de Andino and Matthew Nigriny Law360 June 18, 2014 States Try To Prohibit Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims By J. Michael Martinez de Andino and Matthew Nigriny Alabama In addition to some states fighting patent assertion entities

More information

Records to which the public shall have access include but are not limited to:

Records to which the public shall have access include but are not limited to: Community Relations AR 1340(a) ACCESS TO DISTRICT RECORDS Records Open to the Public Public records include any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the district's business prepared,

More information

AAPEX. Intellectual Property Policy Statement. Protecting Your Intellectual Property Rights at AAPEX

AAPEX. Intellectual Property Policy Statement. Protecting Your Intellectual Property Rights at AAPEX AAPEX Intellectual Property Policy Statement Protecting Your Intellectual Property Rights at AAPEX Protecting Your Intellectual Property Rights at AAPEX YOUR RIGHTS AT AAPEX The organizers of AAPEX have

More information

DOLPHIN SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

DOLPHIN SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT DOLPHIN SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT 1 CAREFULLY READ ALL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT BEFORE INSTALLING OR USING THIS SOFTWARE PRODUCT (THE "DOLPHIN SOFTWARE"). BY CLICKING "Yes" BELOW AND

More information

The Secret's Out: California's Adoption of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act Effects on the Employer-Employee Relationship

The Secret's Out: California's Adoption of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act Effects on the Employer-Employee Relationship Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Law Reviews 4-1-1987 The Secret's Out: California's

More information

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 10-3444 AvidAir Helicopter Supply, Inc., * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District

More information

Selected Federal Data Security Breach Legislation

Selected Federal Data Security Breach Legislation Selected Federal Data Security Breach Legislation name redacted Legislative Attorney April 9, 2012 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional Research Service

More information

Marsh USA, Inc. v Alliant Ins. Servs., Inc NY Slip Op 51555(U) Supreme Court, New York County. Ramos, J.

Marsh USA, Inc. v Alliant Ins. Servs., Inc NY Slip Op 51555(U) Supreme Court, New York County. Ramos, J. [*1] Marsh USA, Inc. v Alliant Ins. Servs., Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 51555(U) Decided on October 19, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Ramos, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

More information

Software Licence Agreement

Software Licence Agreement @tesseract.co.uk HP12 3RE United Kingdom Software Licence Agreement Cranbox Limited T/A Tesseract 1. Licence 1.1 We hereby grant you a non-exclusive, non-transferable and limited license for the term of

More information

Explanation of Notes. Section 2 Definitions

Explanation of Notes. Section 2 Definitions To: Vincent Cardi, Chair, ULC Committee on Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Louise Nadeau, Vice-Chair From: Mary Anne Franks, Reporter Re: Reporter s Notes re: Feedback on First Reading Draft

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 EAGLES NEST OUTFITTERS, INC., Plaintiff DYLAN HEWLETT, D/B/A BEAR BUTT, Defendant.

More information

Ethical Issues Facing In-House Legal Counsel

Ethical Issues Facing In-House Legal Counsel Ethical Issues Facing In-House Legal Counsel 2017 ACC Fall Symposium October 6, 2017 Today s Presenter(s): Lynn W. Hartman Member Simmons Perrine Moyer Bergman, PLC Phone: 319-896-4083 Email: lhartman@spmblaw.com

More information

Creative and Legal Communities

Creative and Legal Communities AIPLA Mergers & Acquisition Committee Year in a Deal Lecture Series Beyond the Four Corners: A Discussion of the Impact of the Choice of New York, Delaware, Texas, and California Law in Contracts Carey

More information

Pitfalls in Licensing Arrangements

Pitfalls in Licensing Arrangements Pitfalls in Licensing Arrangements Association of Corporate Counsel November 4, 2010 Richard Raysman Holland & Knight, NY Copyright 2010 Holland & Knight LLP All Rights Reserved Software Licensing Generally

More information

SUBSCRIPTION LICENSE AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

SUBSCRIPTION LICENSE AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT SUBSCRIPTION LICENSE AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS OKTA SUBSCRIPTION LICENSE AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") GOVERNS THE USE OF THE SERVICE, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND TRAINING

More information

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:14-cv-10427 Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS DERRICK SIMS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff,

More information

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT This Independent Contractor Agreement (this Agreement ), effective as of, 2017 (the Effective Date ), is by and between, a New York corporation having a principal place

More information

HEALTH INFORMATION ACT

HEALTH INFORMATION ACT Province of Alberta HEALTH INFORMATION ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of June 13, 2016 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700, Park

More information