Philip J. Smallman, Esq.
|
|
- Charla Bennett
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Philip J. Smallman, Esq. 32 Court Street Suite 1702 Brooklyn, New York Phone: Fax: Work History 1994 to Present, Private Law Practice, numerous Supreme Court Trials of Class A Felony Cases, Article 81 Proceedings, Supreme Court Trial Matters, Family Court and Surrogates Court, General Civil Matters; Law Secretary to Acting Supreme Court Justice Seymour Gerschwer, Kings County; Private Law Practice; Assistant District Attorney, Kings County Special Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Special State Prosecutor for Corruption in the New York City Criminal Justice System Assistant District Attorney, Queens County PRO BONO EXPERIENCE I devoted significant parts of four years to conduct an investigation which led to overturning a wrongful conviction and freeing an innocent man who had served nine years of an eighteen year jail sentence Education J.D. Pace University Law School, 1982 B.A. Fordham University, 1977 Guest Lecturer, Pace Law School and Brooklyn Law School Volunteer Associate at The Second Look Program of Brooklyn Law School
2 Philip J. Smallman 32 Court Street Suite 1702 Brooklyn, New York Phone: Fax: BIOGRAPHY Phil Smallman was born, raised and is a lifelong Brooklyn resident. He is married, an the proud father of three and a grandfather. He graduated from Xaverian High School, Fordham University and Pace University School of Law, (J.D. 1982). He has been admitted to the practice of law in the Courts of New York State as well as the Southern and eastern Districts of the Federal Courts. His employment history includes staff, operational and management duties at the New York Daily News. Phil Smallman s law enforcement work history includes service as a Deputy U.S. Marshal, (S.D.N.Y.) and Assistant District Attorney in both Queens and Kings Counties, and a Special Assistant Attorney General for the Office of the Special Prosecutor for Corruption. In the private practice of law, Phil has tried in excess of fifty Class A felony matters many of which were also newsworthy. In the course of his practice, he conducted an investigation of the conviction of Gerald Harris, a young man who served nearly a decade for a crime he did not commit. After nearly four years of work, Phil s motion to vacate his wrongful conviction was joined by the Queens District Attorney and Mr. Harris was freed. Phil volunteers his time to coach 78 th Precinct basketball and baseball and has served on their Executive Board. He coached AYSO youth soccer and started and coached the first sports team in the history of Dominical Academy High School to two consecutive championships. He also served as President of the Genesis School Parents Advisory Committee as a member of the Father s guild of Xavier High School. Phil is a member of Bar Associations and fraternal organizations.
3 NEW YORK CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Hon. Barry Kamins 1. Arrests a) Arrests without a Warrant - CPL b) Desk Appearance Tickets - CPL 150 c) Arrest Warrant - CPL 120 i) Payton v. New York, 445 US 573 (1980) 2. Commencement of the Criminal Action a) Prosecutor s Information - CPL 1.20 b) Misdemeanor Complaint - CPL 1.20 c) Information - CPL 1.20 d) Simplified Traffic Information - CPL 1.20 e) Felony Complaint - CPL 1.20 People v. Alejandro, 70 NY2d 133 (1987) 3. Arraignment a) Bail - CPL Articles 510, 520 and 530 b) Orders of Protection - CPL c) Notices 1
4 CPL CPL People v. O Doherty, 70 NY2d 479 (1987) d) Request for Article 730 examination 4. Preliminary Examination - CPL People v. Hodge, 53 NY2d 313 (1981) 5. Release of Defendant in Custody CPL , ) Grand Jury - CPL Article 190 a) Composition and Quorum People v. Collier, 72 NY2d 298 b) Evidence c) Powers of Grand Jury People v. Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20 (1986) 1) Standard of Proof People v. Lopez, 79 NY2d 402 d) Transactional Immunity Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 NY2d 348 (1986) 1) Waiver e) Defendant s Right to Testify People v. Evans, 79 NY2d 407 (1992) f) Secrecy 2
5 Matter of DA of Suffolk Co., 58 NY2d 436 (1985) g) Prosecutor s Duty to Present Exculpatory Evidence People v. Hansen, 99 NY2d 339 (2003) h) Prosecutor s Role as Advisor People v. DeFabio, 79 NY2d 836 (1992) i) Order of Witnesses Morgenthau v. Altman, 58 NY2d 1057 (1983) j) Quorum People v. Collier, 72 NY2d 298 k) Waiver of Indictment - CPL 195 People v. Boston, 75 NY2d 585 (1990) l) Sandoval in the Grand Jury People v. Smith, 87 NY2d 715 (1996) m) Resubmission to the Grand Jury People v. Aarons, 2 NY3d 547 (2004) 7) Indictments - CPL 200, 210, 240 a) Amendments - People v. Taylor, 43 AD2d 519 b) Superceding - People v. Maye, 79 NY2d 104 c) Specificity - People v. Keindl, 68 NY2d 410 (1986) 8) Discovery a) Constitutional - Brady v. Maryland (1963) 3
6 b) Statutory - CPL c) Public Policy - People v. Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 (1961) 9) Guilty Pleas a) Voluntariness - People v. Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227 (1974) b) Serrano Pleas - People v. Serrano, 15 NY2d 304 (1965) c) Immigration Consequences Padilla v. Kentucky, US, 130 S Ct 1473 (2010) 10) Pre-Trial Hearings A) Suppression of Physical Evidence (Mapp Hearing) Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961) 1) Motion to Suppress a) Motion must be made as part of omnibus motion within 45 days of Criminal Court or Superior Court arraignment. (Court can also grant extension for good cause ). b) Motion must state a legal basis for suppression (CPL (1)). Suppression can be based upon an unlawful search and seizure under the federal or state constitutions. c) Legal basis for suppression must be supported by sworn allegations of fact (CPL (1). 1) Factual sufficiency is evaluated under the three-pronged test of People v. Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415 (1993). 4
7 a) The defendant must allege facts rather than conclusions. b) The defendant s allegations must be read in context with the prosecutor s theory of the case. c) The court must consider the defendant s access to information necessary to support suppression. 2) The facts must establish both a substantive theory of suppression and the defendant s standing to challenge the unlawful conduct. 3) A suppression court can summarily deny a motion to suppress when the defendant uses boilerplate or conclusory language (People v. Vega, 210 AD2d 41 (1 st Dept. 1994). d) Prosecution is not required to file a written answer to the motion (CPL (I); however the court can then determine the motion on the undisputed assertions of the defense. 1) If the prosecution files a written response, the failure to deny the truth of a fact alleged by the defense is deemed an admission (People v. Gruden, 42 NY2d 214 (1977). However, the People can assert that they controvert a particular allegation without filing a specific denial. (People v. Weaver, 49 NY2d 1012). 2) Disposition of Motion to Suppress 5
8 a) Court must summarily grant a motion to suppress (no hearing is necessary) when 1) The prosecution concedes the allegations of fact or the legal basis for suppression (CPL (2)(a) 2) The prosecution stipulates that it will not offer the physical evidence against the defendant (CPL (2)(b) b) Court may summarily deny a motion to suppress when 1) The defense fails to allege sworn allegations of fact to support a legal basis for the motion. 2) The defense fails to allege a legal basis for the motion c) If a court does not summarily grant or deny a suppression motion, it must conduct a hearing. (CPL (4). 3) The Hearing a) A defendant has an absolute right of counsel at a Mapp hearing (People v. Anderson, 16 NY2d 282) (1965). b) While a defendant can forfeit his right to attend the hearing by absconding, he does not forfeit his right to the hearing itself. (People v. Whitehead, 143 AD2d 1066 (2d Dept. 1988). c) Hearsay is admissible at the hearing (CPL (4). d) The defendant is entitled to Brady and Rosario material at the hearing (People v. Geaslen, 54 NY2d 510 (1981); People v. Banch, 80 NY2d 610 (1992). 6
9 e) The prosecution has the burden of going forward to establish the legality of police conduct (People v. Malinsky, 15 NY2d 86 (1965). 1) The prosecution must present credible testimony. The burden will not be met if the testimony is: a) incredible as a matter of law; b) has all the appearances of having been tailored to nullify constitutional objections; c) evasive or disingenuous; d) physically impossible; e) contrary to experience; f) self-contradictory. f) Once the prosecution meets its burden, the defendant has the ultimate burden, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, to establish the illegality of the police conduct. (People v. Berrios, 28 NY2d 361 (1971). g) There are several exceptions to the rule placing the ultimate burden on the defense. In the following situations, the People have the ultimate burden: 1) The defendant consents to a search (People v. Whitehurst, 25 NY2d 389 (1969) (by clear and positive evidence). 2) The defendant abandons property (People v. Howard, 50 NY2d 583 (1980). 7
10 4) The Court s Ruling 3) The three exceptions to the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. a) Inevitable Discovery Doctrine (People v. Bookless, 120 AD2d 950 (4 th Dept. 1986). b) Attenuation (People v. Martinez, 37 NY2d 662 (1975). c) Independent Source (People v. Arnau, 58 NY2d 27 (1982). a) The suppression court must state on the record its finding of fact, conclusions of law and the reasons for its determination (CPL (6).. b) The ruling must be made prior to jury selection (CPL (3) c) Defendant has the right to a transcript of the hearing prior to the commencement of a trial provided the request is made before the hearing concludes. (People v. Sanders, 31 NY2d 463 (1973). B) Suppression of Statements (Huntley Hearing) (People v. Huntley, 15 NY 72 (1965) 1) Motion to Suppress a) Motion must be made as part of omnibus motion within 45 days of Criminal Court or Superior Court arraignment. The 45 day period begins to run from date when statement or identification notice is served. (Court can also grant extension for good cause ). 8
11 b) Motion must state a legal basis for suppression (710.60(1)). Suppression can be based on one of the following grounds: 1) A violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) (5 th Amendment). 2) A violation of traditional involuntariness rules (14 th Amendment). 3) A violation of the New York right to counsel rules (Article 1, Section 6, New York State Constitution). 4) A violation of the prohibition against illegal searches and seizures (4 th Amendment) (See also CPL that discusses suppression of statements involuntarily made ). c) Legal basis for suppression must normally be supported by sworn allegations of fact (CPL (1)). 1) When a Huntley hearing is requested there is an exception to the factual pleading requirement. (CPL (3)(b) and (3)). 2) The absence or inadequacy of factual allegations is not a basis on which the court may summarily deny the motion. 3) The exception does not apply when the defendant seeks to suppress a confession as fruit of an unlawful search or seizure; the defendant must allege sufficient sworn allegations of fact. (People v. Rosario, 245 AD2d 151 (1 st Dept. 1997); People v. Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415 (1993). 9
12 d) Prosecution is not required to file a written answer to the motion (CPL (1)); however the court can then determine the motion on the undisputed assertions of the defense. 1) If the prosecution files a written response, the failure to deny the truth of a fact alleged by the defense is deemed an admission (People v. Gruden, 42 NY2d 214 (1977)). However, the People can assert that they controvert a particular allegation without filing a specific denial. (People v. Weaver, 49 NY2d 1012) 2) Disposition of Motion to Suppress a) Court must summarily grant a motion to suppress (no hearing is necessary) when: 1) The prosecution concedes the allegations of fact or the legal basis for suppression (CPL (2)(a))... 2) The prosecution stipulates that it will not offer the statement against the defendant (CPL (2)(b)) b) The court may summarily deny a motion to suppress if the defense fails to allege a legal basis or ground for suppression c) If a Court does not summarily grant or deny a suppression motion, it must conduct a hearing. (CPL (4)). 3) The Hearing a) A defendant has an absolute right to counsel at a Huntley hearing (People v. Anderson, 16 N&2d 282 (1965)). 10
13 b) While a defendant can forfeit his right to attend the hearing by absconding, he does not forfeit his right to attend the hearing itself. (People v. Logan, 271 AD2d 549 (2d Dept. 2000)). c) Hearsay is admissible at the hearing (CPL (4)). d) The hearing is not designed to determine the truth or accuracy of a statement or whether the defendant actually made the statement; those issues are to be determined at trial (People v. Schompert, 19 NY2d 300 (1967)). e) The defendant is entitled to Brady and Rosario material at the hearing (People v. Geaslen, 54 NY2d 510 (1981)); People v. Banch, 80 NY2d 610 (1992)). f) The prosecution has the burden of going forward to establish either a lawful rationale for the conduct of the police or some other basis for averting suppression of a statement. (People v. Wesley, 73 NY2d 351 (1989)); People v. Chavis, 147 AD2d 582 (2d Dept. 1989)). g) With respect to traditional voluntariness issues (14 th Amendment), the prosecution has the ultimate burden to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the statement was voluntary (People v. Huntley, 15 NY2d 72 (1965)); People v. Valeruis, 31 NY2d 52 (1972)). h) With respect to a violation of Miranda: 1) The people have the burden of going forward to establish: a) That the defendant was adequately advised of his Miranda rights (People v. Ringer, 140 AD2d
14 (2d Dept. 1988)); People v. Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 720 (1981). 2) Once the People meet this burden, the defendant has the ultimate burden of establishing: a) The rights were not given or understood (People v. Love, 85 AD2d 799 (3d Dept. 1981)). b) The defendant was in custody at the time he was interrogated. (Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 US 420 (1984)); cf People v. Alls, 83 N&2d 94 (1993). c) When the defendant has made two statements, and the first is obtained unlawfully, but the second lawfully, the first statement taints the later one (People v. Tanner, 30 NY2d 102 (1972)). I) With respect to New York s right to counsel rules, once the prosecution has met its burden of going forward, the defense has the ultimate burden of persuasion to establish that the defendant s right to counsel had attached at the time of the statement (People v. West, 81 NY2d 370 (1993)). 1) Once the defendant carries this burden, the prosecution then has the burden to establish: a) That the representation by counsel had ceased (People v. West, 81 NY2d 370 (1993)). b) That the right to counsel was validly waived if waiver was possible (People v. Davis, 75 NY2d 517 (1990)). 4) The Court s Ruling 12
15 a) The suppression Court must state on the record its findings of fact, conclusions of law and the reasons for its determination (CPL (6)). b) The ruling must be made prior to jury selection (CPL (3)). c) Defendant has the right to a transcript of the hearing prior to the commencement of a trial provided the request is made before the hearing concludes (People v. Sander, 31 NY2d 463 (1973)). d) A ruling suppressing a statement at trial is different from a preclusion order that prevents the People from introducing a statement because the People failed to serve proper notice of the evidence (CPL (3)). 1) The people may appeal a suppression ruling but may not appeal a preclusion order (CPL ). (People v. Laing, 79 NY2d 166 (1992)). C) Suppression of Identification Evidence (Wade Hearing) U.S. v. Wade, 388 US 218 (1967) 1) Motion to Suppress a) Motion must be made as part of omnibus motion within 45 days of Criminal Court or Superior Court arraignment. The 45 day period begins to run from date when statement or identification notice is served. (Court can also grant extension for good cause ). 13
16 b) Motion must state a legal basis for suppression (710.60(1)). Suppression can be based on one of the following three grounds: 1) Product of an unduly suggestive identification procedure (lack of due process) (14 th Amendment). 2) Violation fo an accused person s right to counsel (Sixth Amendment). 3) Fruit of an unlawful search or seizure (Fourth Amendment). c) Legal basis for suppression must normally be supported by sworn allegations of fact (CPL (1)). 1) When a Wade hearing is requested, there is an exception to the factual pleading requirement (CPL (3)(b) and (6)). 2) The absence or inadequacy of factual allegations is not a basis on which the court may summarily deny the motion. 3) The exception does not apply when the defendant seeks to suppress identification evidence as fruit of an unlawful search or seizure; the defendant must allege sufficient sworn allegations of fact. (People v. Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415 (1993)). d) Prosecution is not required to file a written answer to the motion (CPL (1)); however, the court can then determine the motion on the undisputed assertions of the defense. 14
17 1) If the prosecution files a written response, the failure to deny the truth of a fact alleged by the defense is deemed an admission. (People v. Gruden, 42 NY2d 214 (1977)). However, the People can assert that they controvert a particular allegation without filing a specific denial. (People v. Weaver, 49 NY2d 1012)). 2) Disposition of Motion to Suppress a) Court must summarily grant a motion to suppress (no hearing is necessary) when: 1) The prosecution concedes the allegations of fact or the legal basis for suppression (CPL (2)(a)). 2) The prosecution stipulates that it will not offer the identification evidence against the defendant (CPL (2)(b)). b) Court may summarily deny a motion to suppress when: 1) The defense fails to allege sworn specific facts when the identification evidence is the fruit of an unlawful search or seizure. 2) The defense fails to allege a legal basis or ground for suppression. 3) The defense alleges a legal basis for suppression but the prosecution demonstrates with sworn factual allegations that, as a matter of law, there is no identification subject to suppression under CPL , e.g. confirmatory identification. 15
18 a) If there is an issue of fact as to whether the identification is exempt from CPL , a hearing must be ordered. c) If a court does not summarily grant or deny a suppression motion, it must conduct a hearing. (CPL (4)). 3) The Hearing a) A defendant has an absolute right to counsel at a Wade hearing. (People v. Carracedo, 214 AD2d 404 (1 st Dept. 1995)). b) While a defendant can forfeit his right to attend the hearing by absconding he does not forfeit his right to the hearing itself (People v. Griffin, 225 AD2d 792 (2d Dept. 1996)); People v. Whitehead, 143 AD2d 1066 (2d Dept. 1988)). c) Hearsay is admissible at the hearing (CPL (4)). d) The defendant is entitled to Brady and Rosario material at the hearing. (People v. Geaslen, 54 NY2d 510 (1981)); People v. Banch, 80 NY2d 610 (1992). e) The prosecution has the burden of going forward with credible evidence that the police acted lawfully and that the pre-trial identification was non-suggestive (People v. Chipp, 75 NY2d 327 (1990)); People v. Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533 (1997). 1) To meet this burden the prosecution is not required to call the identifying witness, and can call the police officer who conducted the identification. People v. Brown, 111 AD2d 928 (2d Dept. 1985)). f) Once the prosecution goes forward, the defense has the burden, by a fair preponderance of the evidence to prove that the 16
19 pre-trial identification was unduly suggestive (People v. Jackson, 161 Misc.45 (Sup. Ct., Bronx Co., 1994)); People v. Chipp, 75 NY2d 327 (1990). 1) The defendant does not have the right to call the identifying witness unless the defense can make an offer of proof that the witness might fill a material gap in the police officer s narrative or that the witness account differs from the narrative (People v. Chipp, 75 NY2d 327 (1990)). g) Once the defense establishes that the pre-trial identification was unduly suggestive, the prosecution must prove, by clear and convincing evidence that there was an independent source for the identification. (People v. Ballot, 20 NY2d 600 (1967)); People v. Rahming, 26 NY2d 411 (1970)). The prosecution s purpose in doing so is to establish the admissibility of the in-court identification. 1) In order to establish independent source, the People must call the identifying witness to prove subjective facts known to that witness. (People v. Riley, 70 NY2d 523 (1987)). h) The People are expected to maintain a record of the identification procedure and a failure to retain the photographs used or a picture of the lineup creates a presumption of suggestiveness. (People v. Brennan, 222 AD2d 445 (2d Dept. 1995)). 1) The presumption may be rebutted by evidence detailing what the photographs would have demonstrated. (People v. Brennan, supra). 17
20 i) A suppression court should resolve both the issue of the prior identification as well as the admissibility of the in-court identification. 1) If a suppression court rules that there was no suggestiveness and then fails to address the issue of the in-court identification, should an appellate court reverse the ruling on suggestiveness, a new trial must be ordered (preceded by a new independent source hearing, unless the admission of the witness entire identification evidence was harmless error. (People v. Burts, 78 NY2d 20 (1991)). j) When the defendant s claim is that the right to counsel had attached, the defendant has the burden of proof as to the facts essential to that claim. (People v. Green, 188 AD2d 385 (1 st Dept. 1992)). 18
21 4) The Court s Ruling a) The suppression court must state on the record its finding of fact, conclusions of law and the reasons for its determination. (CPL (6)). b) The ruling must be made prior to jury selection (CPL (3)). c) Defendant has the right to a transcript of the hearing prior to the commencement of a trial provided the request is made before the hearing concludes. (People v. Sanders, 31 NY2d 463 (1973)). d) A ruling suppressing identification at trial is different from a preclusion order that prevents the People from introducing identification evidence because of the People s failure to serve proper notice of the evidence. (CPL (3)). 1) The People may appeal a suppression ruling but may not appeal a preclusion order (CPL ). People v. Laing, 79 NY2d 166 (1992). D) Other Pre-Trial Hearings 1) Alfinito Hearing (also called Franks hearing) Challenges veracity of affidavit in support of search warrant. (People v. Alfinito, 16 NY2d 181 (1965); Franks v. Delaware, 438 US 154 (1978)) 2) Darden Hearing In camera examination of confidential informant to establish probable cause (People v. Darden, 34 NY2d 177 (1974)) 3) Dunaway Hearing Whether evidence should be suppressed because defendant was placed in custodial detention on less 19
22 than probable cause. (Dunaway v. New York, 442 US 200 (1979)) 4) Forman Hearing Defendant challenges an order of protection that directs him to leave premises (People v. Forman, 145 Misc.2d 115 (NY Crim Ct 1989)) 5) Frye Hearing Court must rule on the admissibility of scientific evidence (still held in New York courts but superceded in federal courts by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 US 579 (1993) (Frye v. U.S., 293 F (1923)) 6) Gomberg Hearing Court s examination of defense counsel s conflict in representing more than one defendant (People v. Gomberg, 38 NY2d 307 (1975)) 7) Hinton Hearing Hearing to rule on courtroom closure (People v. Hinton, 31 NY2d 71 (1972)) 8) Martin Hearing - Admissibility of a defendant s refusal to take a breathalyzer test (People v. Martin, 143 Misc2d 341 (1989)) 9) Pringle Hearing Hearing conducted prior to conclusion of arraignment to determine whether a suspension of a driver s license would constitute a hardship (Pringle v. Wolfe, 88 NY2d 426 (1996)) 10) Rodriguez Hearing pre-wade hearing to determine whether defendant was known to the identifying witness, rendering a Wade hearing unnecessary (People v. Rodriguez, 79 NY2d 445 (1992)) 11) Sandoval Hearing Use of defendant s prior convictions for impeachment purposes (People v. Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 (1974)) 20
23 12) Sirois Hearing (also Mastrangelo Hearing) Whether grand jury testimony should be admitted because defendant caused the unavailability of a witness (Holtzman v. Hellebrand, 92 AD2d 405 (2d Dept. 1983); U.S. v. Mastrangelo, 693 F2d 269 (2d Cir 1982)) 13) Ventimiglia Hearing Admissibility of prior similar acts or crimes by defendant as part of prosecution s direct case (People v. Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350 (1981)) 14) Parker Hearing People v. Parker, 57 NY2d ) Severance Motion - CPL , ) Bruton issue Bruton v. U.S., 391 US 123 (1968) 2) Antagonistic defenses People v. Mahboubian, 74 NY2d 174 (1989) 12) Youthful Offender - CPL 720 People v. Drayton, 39 NY2d 580 (1976) 13) Juvenile Offender - CPL 1.20(42) 14) Fitness to Proceed - Article 730 CPL Incapacitated Person - CPL (1) - A defendant who, as a result of mental disease or defect, lacks capacity to 1) understand the proceeding against him; or 2) assist in his own defense 15) Defendant s right to be present at critical stages of a trial 21
24 16) Jury Selection a) Pre-trial hearings 1) Sandoval - People v. Dokes, 79 NY2d 656 (1992) 2) Ventimiglia - People v. Spotford, 85 NY2d 593 (1998) b) Jury Selection People v. Antommarchi, 80 NY2d 247 (1992) c) Closing the Courtroom People v. Hinton, 31 NY2d 71 a) Voir Dire People v. Jean, 75 NY2d 744 (1989) b) Challenge for Cause - CPL , c) Peremptory Challenge - CPL Batson v. Kentucky, 476 US 79 (1986) J.E.B. Alabama ex rel T.B. 511 US 127 (1994) People v. Garcia, 217 AD2d 119 (2d Dept. 1995) (black females People v. Kein, 75 NY2d 638 (1990) 1) Batson Challenge a) A prima facie showing of discrimination b) The race neutral explanation c) The issue of whether the explanation is pretextual 22
25 17) Removal of Sworn Jurors - CPL a) Grossly unqualified People v. Buford, 69 NY2d 290 (1987) b) Unavailable for continued service - CPL (2) 18) Preliminary Instruction - CPL ) Opening Statement - CPL (3)(4) 20) Objections by defense counsel must sufficiently preserve error People v. Balls, 69 NY2d 641 (1988) 21) Trial Order of Dismissal - end of People s Case - CPL ) Defendant s Case a) Alibi - PL (1), CPL b) Justiftication - PL c) Agency People v. Roche, 45 NY2d 78 (1978) d) Intoxication - PL e) Affirmative Defenses - PL ) Not responsible - PL 40.15, CPL ) Extreme Emotional Difference 3) Entrapment - PL
26 4) Duress - PL ) Renunciation - PL ) Motion for Trial Order of Dismissal - end of entire case - CPL ) Pre-Charge Conference - CPL ) Summation 26) Court s Charge - CPL 300 a) Must be oral b) Written notations or instructions - CPL (2) c) Jury Note Taking People v. Tucker, 77 NY2d 861 (1991) 27) Jury Deliberations a) Jurors must be kept together - CPL People v. Coons, 75 NY2d 796 (1990) b) Alternate jurors cannot converse with regular jurors c) Jurors can go home with consent of defendant People v. Webb, 78 NY2d 335 (1991) 28) Response to Jury Note a) Timing of response People v. Aleman, 12 NY2d 806 (2009) 24
27 b) Nature of response People v. Greene, 75 NY2d 875 (1990) c) Notice to counsel - CPL People v. O Rama, 78 NY2d 270 (1991) 29) Allen Charge Allen v. U.S., 164 US 492 (1896) 30) The Verdict - CPL a) Repugnant Verdicts People v. Green, 71 NY2d 1006 (1988) b) Partial Verdicts - CPL ) Polling the Jury 32) Mistrial - Deadlocked Jury Matter of Plummer v. Rothwax, 63 NY2d 243 (1984) 33) Motion to Set Aside Verdict - CPL a) Grounds which require reversal upon appeal b) Improper Jury Conduct c) Newly discovered evidence People v. Salemi, 39 NY2d 208 (1955) 34) Sentencing a) Requirement of Pre-Sentence Report - CPL b) Victim s Impact Statement - CPL (2)(b) 25
28 c) Cruel and Unusual Punishment People v. Thompson, 83 NY2d 477 (1994) d) Sentence of Probation - CPL 410 e) Sentence of Imprisonment 1) First felony offender - PL ) Second felony offender - PL ) Persistent felony offender - PL ) Persistent violent felony offender - PL ) Post Judgment Proceedings a) Judgment of Not Responsible by Reason of Mental Disease or Defect - CPL ) Orders of Conditions 2) Retention Hearing b) Motion to Vacate Judgment - CPL 440 c) Writ of Habeas Corpus People v. Bachert, 69 NY2d 593 (1987) d) Bail Pending Appeal - CPL , , ) Appeals - CPL 450, 460, 470 a) Intermediate Appellate Courts 26
29 1) Appealability 2) Reviewability 3) Verdict against the weight of evidence People v. Bleakely, 69 NY2d 490 (1987) b) Court of Appeals 1) Appealability 2) Reviewability a) Preservation People v. Balls, 69 NY2d 641 (1986) b) Questions of Law 27
30
B ridge the G ap 2 D ay 2
Prepared in connection with a Continuing Legal Education course presented at New York County Lawyers Association, 14 Vesey Street, New York, NY presented on Friday, August 9, 2013. N Y C L A - C L E I
More informationPacket Four: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 6: Introduction to Motions
Packet Four: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 6: Introduction to Motions Introduction A motion is an application to the court for an order. 1 If the court has the power or authority 2 to make the order,
More informationCriminal Litigation: Step-By-Step
Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step Path of Criminal Cases in Queens Commencement Arraignment Pre-Trial Trial Getting The Defendant Before The Court! There are four
More informationCriminal Litigation: Step-By-Step
Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step 2 Getting Defendant Before The Court! There are four methods to getting the defendant before the court 1) Warrantless Arrest 2)
More informationCriminal Law and Practice
New York Lawyers Practical Skills Series Criminal Law and Practice Lawrence N. Gray, Esq.* Honorable Leslie Crocker Snyder Honorable Alex M. Calabrese 2017 2018 * Lawrence N. Gray was the update author
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS: CRIMINAL TERM: PART K-TRP. -against- Indictment No.: ,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS: CRIMINAL TERM: PART K-TRP PRESENT: HON. SEYMOUR ROTKER Justice. -------------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE
More informationCriminal Law Table of Contents
Criminal Law Table of Contents Attorney - Client Relations Legal Services Retainer Agreement - Hourly Fee Appearance of Counsel Waiver of Conflict of Interest Letter Declining Representation Motion to
More informationPeople v Murray 2013 NY Slip Op 34063(U) March 8, 2013 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Barbara G.
People v Murray 2013 NY Slip Op 34063(U) March 8, 2013 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 12-1281-02 Judge: Barbara G. Zambelli Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationCriminal Law and Practice
New York Lawyers Practical Skills Series Includes Forms on CD Criminal Law and Practice Lawrence N. Gray, Esq.* Honorable Leslie Crocker Snyder Honorable Alex M. Calabrese 2016 2017 * Lawrence N. Gray
More informationPeople v Paulino 2018 NY Slip Op 33518(U) January 3, 2018 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Anne E. Minihan Cases posted
People v Paulino 2018 NY Slip Op 33518(U) January 3, 2018 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 16-1130 Judge: Anne E. Minihan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationAmerican Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary
American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary acquit: affidavit: alibi: amendment: appeal: arrest: arraignment: bail: To set free or discharge from accusation; to declare that the defendant is innocent
More informationPeople v Stephens 2017 NY Slip Op 33021(U) February 28, 2017 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Anne E.
People v Stephens 2017 NY Slip Op 33021(U) February 28, 2017 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 16-01098-01 Judge: Anne E. Minihan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationFall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?
Fall, 2017 F Criminal Litigation 20 17 Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal! Something must go wrong.! A wrongful act must occur. How Do We Get A Case?! If the law states that the wrongful act is
More informationTEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED
TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED 1.1 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL Order By Daniel L. Young PART ONE STATE PROCEEDINGS CHAPTER 1. BAIL 1.2 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL CURRENTLY
More informationPretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial
C H A P T E R 1 0 Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial O U T L I N E Introduction Pretrial Activities The Criminal Trial Stages of a Criminal Trial Improving the Adjudication Process L E A R N I
More informationAFFIRMATION. Sample. 1. I am a member of the law firm,, attorneys for the accused herein. I make this affirmation in support of the within motion.
COURT OF COUNTY OF -------------------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK AFFIRMATION -against- Index No. [NAME], Accused. -------------------------------------------------------------------X,
More informationLegal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A
Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A Acquittal a decision of not guilty. Advisement a court hearing held before a judge to inform the defendant about the charges against
More informationOUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS
OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS What happens during a criminal case may be confusing to a victim or witness. The following summary will explain how a case generally progresses through Oklahoma s criminal
More informationPacket Two: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 1: Background
Packet Two: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 1: Background Review from Introduction to Law The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land. The United States Supreme Court is the final
More informationThe court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON
The court process How the criminal justice system works. CONSUMER GUIDE FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON Inside The process Arrest and complaint Preliminary hearing Grand jury Arraignment
More informationPeople v Kenny 2017 NY Slip Op 33001(U) November 14, 2017 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Anne E. Minihan Cases posted
People v Kenny 2017 NY Slip Op 33001(U) November 14, 2017 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 16-1096 Judge: Anne E. Minihan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationMOTIONS TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE IN SUPERIOR COURT
MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE IN SUPERIOR COURT Jeff Welty, UNC School of Government (Jan. 2014) (modified handout for Orientation for New Superior Court Judges) Contents I. Purpose...1 II. Contents...2
More informationCourtroom Terminology
Courtroom Terminology Accused: formally charged but not yet tried for committing a crime; the person who has been charged may also be called the defendant. Acquittal: a judgment of court, based on the
More informationAn Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota
An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender s Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Federal Public Defender's Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Table of Contents
More informationPeople v Rosario 2017 NY Slip Op 32989(U) February 27, 2017 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Barbara G.
People v Rosario 2017 NY Slip Op 32989(U) February 27, 2017 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 16-1115 Judge: Barbara G. Zambelli Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationPeople v Santiago 2010 NY Slip Op 33168(U) November 5, 2010 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 11351/1989 Judge: Thomas J.
People v Santiago 2010 NY Slip Op 33168(U) November 5, 2010 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 11351/1989 Judge: Thomas J. Carroll Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationCHEAT SHEET AUTHORITIES ON BRADY & STATE HABEAS PRACTICE
Brady Issues and Post-Conviction Relief San Francisco Training Seminar July 15, 2010 CHEAT SHEET AUTHORITIES ON BRADY & STATE HABEAS PRACTICE By J. Bradley O Connell First District Appellate Project, Assistant
More informationChapter 8. Pretrial and Trial Procedures
Chapter 8 Pretrial and Trial Procedures Legal Marijuana? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dq8xyzs mfja Bail Cash bond or other security to ensure appearance in court Allows the release from custody of a
More informationPeople v Williams 2018 NY Slip Op 33516(U) April 13, 2018 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: George E.
People v Williams 2018 NY Slip Op 33516(U) April 13, 2018 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 16-1059-03 Judge: George E. Fufidio Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationPeople v Stephens 2017 NY Slip Op 33020(U) February 27, 2017 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Anne E.
People v Stephens 2017 NY Slip Op 33020(U) February 27, 2017 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 165-01098-02 Judge: Anne E. Minihan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationCRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND EVIDENCE ATTACHED ARE 11
Examinee Nwnber TEXAS BAR EXAMINATION PART II - A CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND EVIDENCE ATTACHED ARE 11 PAGES If EXAMINEE NO, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND EVIDENCE Additional Instruct ions 1. Unless otherwise shown
More informationOverview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure. Basic Concepts. What is Proof (Evidence) David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx.
Overview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx Basic Concepts PresumptionofInnocence:BurdenonStateto erase presumption by proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Absolute
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v., Defendant(s). Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER The defendant(s), appeared for
More informationCRIMINAL PROCEDURE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS IN A NUTSHELL. Fifth Edition JEROLD H. ISRAEL
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS IN A NUTSHELL Fifth Edition By JEROLD H. ISRAEL Alene and Allan E Smith Professor of Law, University of Michigan Ed Rood Eminent Scholar in Trial Advocacy
More informationVermont Bar Association Seminar Materials. 62nd Mid-Year Meeting. Criminal Law 101
Vermont Bar Association Seminar Materials 62nd Mid-Year Meeting Criminal Law 101 March 22, 2019 Lake Morey Resort Fairlee, VT Speakers: Katelyn Atwood, Esq. Katelyn B. Atwood, Esq. Rutland County Public
More informationAmendments to Rules of Criminal Procedure Affecting District Court Procedures
Amendments to Rules of Criminal Procedure Affecting District Court Procedures Mr. Timothy Baughman, JD, Wayne County Prosecutor s Office Mr. Mark Gates, JD, Michigan Supreme Court Hon. Dennis Kolenda,
More information- against- Indictment No.: Defendant.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM: PART K-19 P R E S E N T: HON. SEYMOUR ROTKER, Justice. -----------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW
More informationREPORT ON LEGISLATION
Contact: Maria Cilenti - Director of Legislative Affairs - mcilenti@nycbar.org - (212) 382-6655 REPORT ON LEGISLATION A.5899 Assembly Member O Donnell S.4091 Senator Sampson AN ACT to amend the uniform
More informationTable of Contents INTRODUCTION...17 FORWARD...23
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...17 FORWARD...23 A...31 APPEALS District Court to Superior Court Infractions Procedures When Appealing From District Court to Superior Court Pretrial Release State s Right
More informationVictim / Witness Handbook. Table of Contents
Victim / Witness Handbook Table of Contents A few words about the Criminal Justice System Arrest Warrants Subpoenas Misdemeanors & Felonies General Sessions Court Arraignment at General Sessions Court
More informationLITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS
LITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS I. OVERVIEW Historically, the rationale behind the development of the juvenile court was based on the notion that
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 89 1
Article 89. Motion for Appropriate Relief and Other Post-Trial Relief. 15A-1411. Motion for appropriate relief. (a) Relief from errors committed in the trial division, or other post-trial relief, may be
More informationState Qualifying Exam Preparation Guide
State Qualifying Exam Preparation Guide (CJ) Exams developed in partnership with Cengage Learning. Book Information Criminal Law and Procedure Author: Daniel E. Hall ISBN-13: 9781285448817 7th Edition
More informationJOSEPH M. LATONA, ESQ. 716 BRISBANE BUILDING 403 MAIN STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK (716)
Supplemental Outline on Effective Discovery JOSEPH M. LATONA, ESQ. 716 BRISBANE BUILDING 403 MAIN STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14203 (716) 842-0416 INTRODUCTION This outline supplements the thorough course
More informationFROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF DANVILLE Joseph W. Milam, Jr., Judge
PRESENT: All the Justices ELDESA C. SMITH OPINION BY v. Record No. 141487 JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY February 12, 2016 TAMMY BROWN, WARDEN, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
More informationStructure of the Criminal Justice System. Developed by Jo Ann Grode 2004
Structure of the Criminal Justice System Developed by Jo Ann Grode 2004 Sources of Law U.S. Constitution (includes Bill of Rights) U.S. Supreme Court decisions U.S. Code (federal laws) Wisconsin Constitution
More informationChapter 6. Litigation Process (Federal and State) Now that you know about the structure of the court system, now you will learn about the process.
Chapter 6 Litigation Process (Federal and State) Now that you know about the structure of the court system, now you will learn about the process. Page 1 PART A: Federal Litigation Process PROCEDURAL RULES
More informationCRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL BEST PRACTICES
CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL BEST PRACTICES 20 PRE-TRIAL TOPICS EVERY ATTORNEY SHOULD BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS 48 TH ANNUAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE August 26, 2013 JUDGE ALAN PENDLETON TRIAL ATTORNEY DEDICATION
More informationPeople v Fay 2017 NY Slip Op 31852(U) August 23, 2017 City Court of Rye, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Joseph L.
People v Fay 2017 NY Slip Op 31852(U) August 23, 2017 City Court of Rye, Westchester County Docket Number: 16-05037 Judge: Joseph L. Latwin Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationCriminal Procedure Outline
This outline was created for the July 2006 Oregon bar exam. The law changes over time, so use with caution. If you would like an editable version of this outline, go to www.barexammind.com/outlines. Criminal
More informationPeople v Alleyne 2014 NY Slip Op 33271(U) December 8, 2014 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 4856/2007 Judge: Bruce M. Balter Cases posted
People v Alleyne 2014 NY Slip Op 33271(U) December 8, 2014 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 4856/2007 Judge: Bruce M. Balter Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More information15A-903. Disclosure of evidence by the State Information subject to disclosure. (a) Upon motion of the defendant, the court must order:
SUBCHAPTER IX. PRETRIAL PROCEDURE. Article 48. Discovery in the Superior Court. 15A-901. Application of Article. This Article applies to cases within the original jurisdiction of the superior court. (1973,
More informationPeople v Nemec 2018 NY Slip Op 33517(U) July 11, 2018 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Anne E. Minihan Cases posted
People v Nemec 2018 NY Slip Op 33517(U) July 11, 2018 County Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 16-1036-01 Judge: Anne E. Minihan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationCourt Records Glossary
Court Records Glossary Documents Affidavit Answer Appeal Brief Case File Complaint Deposition Docket Indictment Interrogatories Injunction Judgment Opinion Pleadings Praecipe A written or printed statement
More informationHOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA
HOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA This legal guide explains the steps you will go through if you should be arrested or charged with a crime in Florida. This guide is only general information and
More informationPOLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT
Research Division, Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT Criminal Procedure April 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Detention and Arrest... 1 Detention and Arrest Under a Warrant... 1 Detention
More informationPRE-TRIAL PROCESSES INITIAL APPEARANCE. What you should know before you get started
PRE-TRIAL PROCESSES What you should know before you get started INITIAL APPEARANCE In person A plea of guilty or a plea of nolo contendere may be made by the defendant or his counsel in open court By mail
More informationSTUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER SEVEN
Multiple Choice Questions STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER SEVEN 1. Which of the following contributes to a large amount of public attention for a criminal trial? a. Spectacular crime b. Notorious parties c.
More informationRe: PEOPLE V. Indictment No Dear Justice Wolfgang:
Hon. PENNY WOLFGANG, J.S.C. Supreme Court 92 Franklin Street Buffalo, New York 14202- Re: PEOPLE V. Indictment No.0000000000 Dear Justice Wolfgang: Enclosed please find Defendant s Notice of Omnibus Motion
More informationUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER TEXAS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PROFESSOR SECREST. Course Description and Syllabus
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER TEXAS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PROFESSOR SECREST Course Description and Syllabus Procedural issues arising in Texas criminal practice are explored with emphasis placed on the
More informationESSAY APPROACH. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY
I. PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW a. Actus reus b. Mens rea c. Concurrence d. Causation II. III. ESSAY APPROACH www.barexamdoctor.com CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY a. Elements of accomplice liability
More informationALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1
ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1 Constitution Art. I, 6.01 Basic rights for crime victims. (a) Crime victims, as defined by law or their lawful representatives, including the next of kin of homicide victims,
More informationChapter 1. Crime and Justice in the United States
Chapter 1 Crime and Justice in the United States Chapter Objectives After completing this chapter, you should be able to do the following: Describe how the type of crime routinely presented by the media
More informationCourt of Appeals of New York, People v. Ramos
Touro Law Review Volume 19 Number 2 New York State Constitutional Decisions: 2002 Compilation Article 11 April 2015 Court of Appeals of New York, People v. Ramos Brooke Lupinacci Follow this and additional
More informationCAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MEMBERS OF THE JURY: You have found the Defendant, name, guilty of the offense of driving
More informationNEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE. The New Hampshire Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules will
NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The New Hampshire Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules will hold a PUBLIC HEARING at 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December
More informationacquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
GlosaryofLegalTerms acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. affidavit: A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making
More informationFelony Cases. Police Investigation. Associate Circuit Court. Felony Versus Misdemeanor
Felony Cases This outline describes how felony cases generally move through the criminal justice system. Cases may deviate from the outline at any time. It can be difficult to predict how a case will move
More informationCIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND. Differentiated Case Management Plan for Criminal Cases INTRODUCTION
CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND Differentiated Case Management Plan for Criminal Cases INTRODUCTION This Criminal Differentiated Case Management Plan (DCMP) is established in accordance with
More informationOHIO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
OHIO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Rule 1 Scope of rules: applicability; construction; exceptions 2 Definitions 3 Complaint 4 Warrant or summons; arrest 4.1 Optional procedure in minor misdemeanor cases
More informationORDER ON ARRAIGNMENT
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT -WC Document 132 Filed 10/18/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR NO. 2:10cr186-MHT
More informationCHAPTER 10. RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT AND THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT TRAFFIC DIVISION
PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT 234 Rule 1000 CHAPTER 10. RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT AND THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT TRAFFIC DIVISION Rule 1000. Scope of Rules.
More informationPeople v Watson 2012 NY Slip Op 32619(U) October 16, 2012 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 2247/2010 Judge: Suzanne M.
People v Watson 2012 NY Slip Op 32619(U) October 16, 2012 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 2247/2010 Judge: Suzanne M. Mondo Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.
More information6 California Criminal Law (4th), Criminal Appeal
6 California Criminal Law (4th), Criminal Appeal I. IN GENERAL A. [ 1] Appellate Jurisdiction. B. [ 2] Appellate Rules. C. Extension of Time. 1. [ 3] In General. 2. [ 4] Factors Considered. D. Right of
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 91 1
Article 91. Appeal to Appellate Division. 15A-1441. Correction of errors by appellate division. Errors of law may be corrected upon appellate review as provided in this Article, except that review of capital
More informationCriminal Justice 100
Criminal Justice 100 Based upon the "California Peace Officers Legal Sourcebook" published by the California Department of Justice. Hemet High School Hemet Unified School District (2017-2018) (Student
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 07:21:41 2014-KA-01098-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2014-KA-01098-COA SHERMAN BILLIE, SR. APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
More informationLAW 898A LSN CRIMINAL LITIGATION Spring 2010
LAW 898A LSN CRIMINAL LITIGATION Spring 2010 Professor Susan Leff Office hours: by appointment Phone: 415-420-5239 Tuesdays, 6:30 9:10 PM Email: leffs@hotmail.com CLASS LOCATIONS: Please check class locations
More informationDraft Statute for an International Criminal Court 1994
Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court 1994 Text adopted by the Commission at its forty-sixth session, in 1994, and submitted to the General Assembly as a part of the Commission s report covering
More informationSTATE BAR OF TEXAS. PERFORMANCE GUIDELINES For NON-CAPITAL CRIMINAL DEFENSE REPRESENTATION
STATE BAR OF TEXAS PERFORMANCE GUIDELINES For NON-CAPITAL CRIMINAL DEFENSE REPRESENTATION Adopted by the State Bar Board of Directors January 28, 2011 i PERFORMANCE GUIDELINES For NON-CAPITAL CRIMINAL
More informationManifest injustice is that state of affairs when an inmate. comes to realize that his/her due process rights have been
Key Concepts in Preventing Manifest Injustice in Florida Adapted from Florida decisional law and Padovano, Philip J., Florida Appellate Practice (2015 Edition) Thomson-Reuters November 2014 Manifest injustice
More informationFollow the instructions in each section carefully. Please ensure that your responses are legible.
TEXAS FAIR DEFENSE ACT HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT COURTS APPLICATION FOR COURT APPOINTMENTS TO NON-CAPITAL FELONY CASES APRIL, 2014 NOTE: This application is for attorneys who are not currently approved for
More informationBench or Court Trial: A trial that takes place in front of a judge with no jury present.
GLOSSARY Adversarial System: A justice system in which the defendant is presumed innocent and both sides may present competing views of the evidence (as opposed to an inquisitorial system where the state
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,522 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. MARTIN MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ, Appellant,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,522 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS MARTIN MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Haskell District
More information*************************************** NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
State v. Givens, 353 N.J. Super. 280 (App. Div. 2002). The following summary is not part of the opinion of the court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of the opinion may not have
More informationJUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS
JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS As a Juror, there are certain responsibilities you will be asked to fulfill. A Juror must be prompt. A trial cannot begin or continue
More informationStages of a Case Glossary
Stages of a Case Glossary Stages of a Case are the specific events in the life of an indigent defense case. Each type of case has its own events known by special names. Following are details about the
More informationThe Judicial Branch. Chapter
The Judicial Branch Chapter 11 Learning Objectives 11.1 Identify the sources of Texas law. 11.2 Compare the functions of all participants in the justice system. 11.3 Describe the judicial procedure for
More informationCOURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS
COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Title... 2 Section 2. Purpose... 2 Section 3. Definitions... 2 Section 4. Fundamental Rights of Defendants... 4 Section 5. Arraignment...
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1
SUBCHAPTER XV. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. Article 100. Capital Punishment. 15A-2000. Sentence of death or life imprisonment for capital felonies; further proceedings to determine sentence. (a) Separate Proceedings
More informationFederal Adaptation of NLADA s Performance Guidelines For Criminal Defense Representations 1
Federal Adaptation of NLADA s Performance Guidelines For Criminal Defense Representations 1 Note: These standards are intended as a guide to help ensure that people entitled to representation under the
More informationLR Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal
LR2-308. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal proceedings in the Second Judicial District Court. This
More informationLOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL
DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL Rule Effective Chapter 1. Felony Cases 800. Pretrial Motions in Felony Cases 07/01/98 805. Motions in Capital Cases 07/01/09 806. Subpoena Duces Tecum 07/01/12 Chapter 2. Misdemeanor
More informationPeople v Allah 2011 NY Slip Op 31526(U) May 13, 2011 Sup Ct, Kings County Docket Number: 1426/2000 Judge: Carolyn E. Demarest Republished from New
People v Allah 2011 NY Slip Op 31526(U) May 13, 2011 Sup Ct, Kings County Docket Number: 1426/2000 Judge: Carolyn E. Demarest Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: May 5, 2016 106916 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROBERT D. DECKER,
More informationGlossary of Terms acquit action adjudication Administrator advance sheets adversary system affidavit affidavit of prejudice affirm allegation
Glossary of Terms A acquit To find a defendant not guilty in a criminal trial. action Proceeding taken in a court of law. Synonymous with case, suit, lawsuit. adjudication A judgment or decree. Administrator
More informationCRIMINAL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY: PART B THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, DECISION and ORDER. vs. Docket No.
CRIMINAL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY: PART B THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, vs. ARTHUR Z. SCHWARTZ, Defendant DECISION and ORDER Docket No. 2015NY044144 HEIDI C. CESARE, J. Defendant,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2254 (PERSONS IN STATE CUSTODY) 1) The attached form is
More informationMock Trial Practice Law Test
Mock Trial Practice Law Test NOTE: The practice law test is provided as an example and will not be updated each year. Below are sample questions that are similar to those that students may see on the real
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (ONTARIO) PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE REPORT
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (ONTARIO) PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE REPORT (Criminal Code, s. 625.1) (Criminal Proceedings Rules, Rule 28) (Form 17) NOTE: 1. This form must be completed in full in all cases, and
More information