State Sovereign Immunity:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "State Sovereign Immunity:"

Transcription

1 State Sovereign Immunity Nuts, Bolts and More VBA Mid-Year Meeting April 1, 2016 Presenter: Jon Rose State Sovereign Immunity: Law governing suits against the State/State Officials. Basic Questions Where does sovereign immunity come from/what is it? Who/What is entitled to immunity? How can the law be enforced against the State? 1

2 Where does SI come from? English Common Law: The King cannot be sued without his consent Or, according to Blackstone: And, first, the law ascribes to the king the attribute of sovereignty, or pre eminence.... Here it is, that no suit or action can be brought against the king, even in civil matters, because no court can have jurisdiction over him. For all jurisdiction implies superiority of power. 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765) Ok, what about American Law? 2

3 A Little History Constitution, Article III, 2 The judicial Power shall extend to all.... Controversies... between a State and Citizens of another State Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 419 (1793) Under Art. III, 2, citizen of S. Carolina was allowed to sue Georgia in federal court. Not popular decision in Congress... The 11 th Amendment Adopted in response to Chisholm The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state. But what about a suit against a State by one of its own citizens? Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1 (1890) Citizen of Louisiana tried to sue that state in federal court. Suit was prohibited by the Eleventh Amendment, even though amendment seems to address suits between a state and citizen of another state. Hans has been interpreted to mean that the Eleventh Amendment confirmed the states constitutional sovereign immunity. Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996). 3

4 By the Way, Who is the State? The State State Agencies Arms of the State See, e.g., Leitner v. Westchester Comm. College, 779 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2015). Multi-factor test. Generally, exercising state power with state funds. State officials/employees acting in their official capacity. Unless Ex parte Young applies. General Rule: The Eleventh Amendment prohibits suit against a non-consenting State in federal court (speaks only about the federal judicial power ). What about suits in State court? Immunity in State Proceedings State sovereign immunity is broader than the Eleventh Amendment. Sovereign immunity is a fundamental aspect of sovereignty which the States enjoyed before the ratification of the Constitution and which they retain today. Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (2000). Thus, state cannot be sued under federal law in its own courts either. In Vt., no suit unless immunity is waived expressly by statute Jacobs v. State Teachers Ret. Sys., 174 Vt. 404 (2002) 4

5 What if Congress authorizes suit? Congressional Abrogation Seminol Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996) Congress may authorize suit against a state only under an appropriate grant of constitutional authority. Article I of the Constitution (incl. Commerce Clause) is not appropriate. What is appropriate? So far, it seems just 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 427 U.S. 445 (1976) 14 th Amendment Abrogation Congress must unequivocally express its intent to abrogate immunity. There must be congruence and proportionality between the remedy and the injury to be prevented. For example: Title I of the ADA cannot be applied to states. Bd. of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356 (2001) Title II of the ADA can. Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509 (2004) 5

6 Waiver: How does a state consent to suit? Express Waiver by Statute Receipt of Federal Funds Invocation of Jurisdiction Express Statutory Waiver Vermont Tort Claims Act (12 V.S.A. 5601) The State of Vermont shall be liable for injury to persons or property or loss of life caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of an employee of the State while acting within the scope of employment.... What about 21 V.S.A. 384(b)(7)? [A]n employer shall not pay an employee less than one and one-half times the regular wage rate for any work done... in excess of 40 hours during a workweek. However, this subsection shall not apply to... State employees who are covered by the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. (Emphasis added). Can State employees sue under the FLSA? (I.e., is this an SI waiver?) Express Statutory Waiver Waiver must be clear and unambiguous. Must be accomplished by the most clear and express language or by such overwhelming implication from the text [of a statute] as will leave no room for any other reasonable construction. Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 678 (1974). [A] State s consent to suit must be unequivocally expressed in the text of the relevant statute. Sossaman v. Texas, 131 S. Ct (2011). Not enough to simply reference federal law. Beaulieu v. Vermont, 807 F.3d 478 (2015) Section 384(b)(7) was not a sovereign immunity waiver. Sovereign immunity waiver should refer to liability or suit against the State. 6

7 Receipt of Federal Funds? Similar to express waiver standard. Not enough to show that state received funding under a statute. Statute must unambiguously condition receipt of funds on a sovereign immunity waiver. See Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234 (1995) Invocation of Jurisdiction State may waive Eleventh Amendment immunity by invoking the jurisdiction of a court. For example: File suit in federal court. Proof of claim in bankruptcy court. Removal to federal court. Lapides v. Board of Regents, 535 U.S. 613 (2002) Only immunity from fed. ct. jurisdiction. Maintain underlying immunity from liability. Can the State waive immunity by saying so during litigation? Example: In a sworn interrogatory response, State attorney represents we do not intend to rely on sovereign immunity as a defense to this action? Waiver of Sovereign Immunity? 7

8 Waiver by litigation statements? Answer s not clear. Cases: Sovereign Immunity is pseudo-jurisdictional; it can be raised at any time, even on appeal. Beauleiu v. Vermont: Suggests possibility that statements could waive immunity if there is prejudice, or duplicitous conduct by the State. To be safe, assume the State cannot waive immunity. Review so far: The State is immune from suit unless: Congress has clearly and unequivocally abrogated immunity pursuant to a valid exercise of an appropriate grant of constitutional authority (i.e., 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment); OR The State has waived its immunity: Expressly by statute; By receiving federal funds which were conditioned on a waiver of immunity; OR By affirmatively invoking federal jurisdiction (only a waiver of immunity from jurisdiction). OR maybe Through its actions in litigation, if there is prejudice or bad faith. What about state officials/employees? 8

9 Official Capacity Suit Suit against the office a person holds Considered to be a suit against the state itself, and immunity generally applies. But, Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) Individual may seek prospective injunctive relief against a state official if it is alleged that official is acting contrary to constitution or laws. Individual Capacity Suit Suit against the officer as an individual. Not considered a suit against the state, even if state has an obligation to indemnify. Damages/retrospective relief available. No prospective/injunctive relief. Common Actions 42 U.S.C Suit against state official (individual or official capacity) for violating federal const. or laws. State itself is not a person who can be sued. Bring in state or federal court. Vermont Tort Claims Act 12 V.S.A. 5601(a) suit against the State (in state court only) for certain torts of officials/employees. Can t sue the official/employee individually. 9

the king could do no wrong

the king could do no wrong SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY W. Swain Wood, General Counsel to the Attorney General November 2, 2018 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE the king could do no wrong State Sovereign Immunity vis-a-vis the federal

More information

Certiorari Denied No. 25,364, October 14, Released for Publication October 23, As Corrected January 6, COUNSEL

Certiorari Denied No. 25,364, October 14, Released for Publication October 23, As Corrected January 6, COUNSEL WHITTINGTON V. STATE DEP'T OF PUB. SAFETY, 1998-NMCA-156, 126 N.M. 21, 966 P.2d 188 STEPHEN R. WHITTINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. STATE OF NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DARREN P.

More information

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER V. FLORIDA ET AL. 517 U.S. 44 (1996)

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER V. FLORIDA ET AL. 517 U.S. 44 (1996) SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER V. FLORIDA ET AL. 517 U.S. 44 (1996) CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act provides that an Indian tribe may

More information

Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights and State Sovereign Immunity

Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights and State Sovereign Immunity Order Code RL34593 Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights and State Sovereign Immunity Updated September 17, 2008 Todd Garvey Law Clerk American Law Division Brian T. Yeh Legislative Attorney American

More information

Court upholds Board s immunity from lawsuits in federal court

Court upholds Board s immunity from lawsuits in federal court Fields of Opportunities CHESTER J. CULVER GOVERNOR PATTY JUDGE LT. GOVERNOR STATE OF IOWA IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE M A RK BOW DEN E XE C U T I V E D I R E C T O R March 9, 2010 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Court

More information

ARTICLE EX PARTE YOUNG: A MECHANISM FOR ENFORCING FEDERAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AGAINST STATES

ARTICLE EX PARTE YOUNG: A MECHANISM FOR ENFORCING FEDERAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AGAINST STATES ARTICLE EX PARTE YOUNG: A MECHANISM FOR ENFORCING FEDERAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AGAINST STATES BRUCE E. O CONNOR * AND EMILY C. PEYSER ** TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT... 19 I. INTRODUCTION... 19 II.

More information

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-218

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-218 Case 5:12-cv-00218-C Document 7-1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 132 JAMES C. WETHERBE, PH.D., Plaintiff, v. TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT

More information

Enforcing Federal Rights Against States

Enforcing Federal Rights Against States Against States By Herbert Semmel At least since the passage of the Social Security Act in 1935, the federal government has become a major source of programs and funding to assist low-income individuals

More information

How the Xechem Decision May Insulate State Universities From Correction of Inventorship Suits

How the Xechem Decision May Insulate State Universities From Correction of Inventorship Suits Indiana Law Journal Volume 81 Issue 1 Article 21 Winter 2006 How the Xechem Decision May Insulate State Universities From Correction of Inventorship Suits Stacey Drews Indiana University School of Law

More information

COMMITTEE NO. 308 Robert J. Kasunic, Chair

COMMITTEE NO. 308 Robert J. Kasunic, Chair 1999-2000 ANNUAL REPORT COMMITTEE NO. 308 Robert J. Kasunic, Chair GOVERNMENT RELATIONS TO COPYRIGHTS Scope of Committee: (1) The practices of government agencies and private publishers concerning the

More information

BYU Law Review. Eric Hunter. Volume 1999 Issue 3 Article

BYU Law Review. Eric Hunter. Volume 1999 Issue 3 Article BYU Law Review Volume 1999 Issue 3 Article 2 9-1-1999 Humenansky v. Regents of the University of Minnesota: Questioning Congressional Intent and Authority to Abrogate Eleventh Amendment Immunity with the

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 03-0607 444444444444 DALE HOFF, ANGIE RENDON, DAVID DEL ANGEL AND ELMER COX, PETITIONERS, v. NUECES COUNTY, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

More information

TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT JUSTICE

TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT JUSTICE TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT JUSTICE John Paul Stevens* When I was a law student shortly after World War II, my professors used the Socratic method of teaching. Instead of explaining rules of law, they liked to

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1010 Thomas Bradley, as Natural Guardian of, and on behalf of David Bradley, a minor; Dianna Bradley, as Natural Guardian of, and on behalf

More information

A Survey of Recent Developments in the Law: Constitutional Law

A Survey of Recent Developments in the Law: Constitutional Law William Mitchell Law Review Volume 26 Issue 4 Article 12 2000 A Survey of Recent Developments in the Law: Constitutional Law Mary L. Senkbeil Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:07-cv-424-RJC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:07-cv-424-RJC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Davis v. Central Piedmont Community College Doc. 26 MARY HELEN DAVIS, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:07-cv-424-RJC Plaintiff,

More information

Case: 5:12-cv KKC Doc #: 37 Filed: 03/04/14 Page: 1 of 11 - Page ID#: 234

Case: 5:12-cv KKC Doc #: 37 Filed: 03/04/14 Page: 1 of 11 - Page ID#: 234 Case: 5:12-cv-00369-KKC Doc #: 37 Filed: 03/04/14 Page: 1 of 11 - Page ID#: 234 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON DAVID COYLE, individually and d/b/a

More information

Strategies for Preserving the Bankruptcy Trustee's Avoidance Power Against States After Seminole Tribe

Strategies for Preserving the Bankruptcy Trustee's Avoidance Power Against States After Seminole Tribe Brooklyn Law School BrooklynWorks Faculty Scholarship 1997 Strategies for Preserving the Bankruptcy Trustee's Avoidance Power Against States After Seminole Tribe Edward J. Janger Brooklyn Law School, edward.janger@brooklaw.edu

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 1998 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes

More information

Berkeley Technology Law Journal

Berkeley Technology Law Journal Berkeley Technology Law Journal Volume 15 Issue 1 Article 19 January 2000 Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank & College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary

More information

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Journal of Dispute Resolution Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 1993 Issue 2 Article 9 1993 Monetary Damages against States - Arbitrators Have Power to Award, but Federal Courts Cannot Enforce - Tennessee Department of Human Services

More information

THE SUPREME COURT EMPLOYS THE WRONG MEANS TO REACH THE PROPER END

THE SUPREME COURT EMPLOYS THE WRONG MEANS TO REACH THE PROPER END PENNSYLVANIA V. UNION GAS COMPANY THE SUPREME COURT EMPLOYS THE WRONG MEANS TO REACH THE PROPER END Environmental protection is a growing concern in the United States and around the world.' This concern

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: 546 U. S. (2006) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 04 885 CENTRAL VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. BERNARD KATZ, LIQUIDATING SUPERVISOR FOR WALLACE S BOOKSTORES, INC.

More information

Bankruptcy Jurisdiction and the Supreme Court: Can a State be Sued for Money When It Violates a Federal Statute?

Bankruptcy Jurisdiction and the Supreme Court: Can a State be Sued for Money When It Violates a Federal Statute? Bankruptcy Jurisdiction and the Supreme Court: Can a State be Sued for Money When It Violates a Federal Statute? Janet Flaccus Professor I was waiting to get a haircut this past January and was reading

More information

REGIONAL RESOURCE The Council of State Governments 3355 Lenox Road, N.E., Suite 1050 Atlanta, Georgia /

REGIONAL RESOURCE The Council of State Governments 3355 Lenox Road, N.E., Suite 1050 Atlanta, Georgia / REGIONAL RESOURCE The Council of State Governments 3355 Lenox Road, N.E., Suite 1050 Atlanta, Georgia 30326 404/266-1271 Federalism Cases in the Most Recent and Upcoming Terms of the United States Supreme

More information

NOTES How to Assert State Sovereign Immunity Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

NOTES How to Assert State Sovereign Immunity Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure NOTES How to Assert State Sovereign Immunity Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure INTRODUCTION... 762 I. THE UNCLEAR HISTORY OF STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN THE UNITED STATES... 766 A. Importation

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-956 In the Supreme Court of the United States BIOMEDICAL PATENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE

More information

Unsheathing Alexander's Sword: Lapides v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

Unsheathing Alexander's Sword: Lapides v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia American University Law Review Volume 51 Issue 5 Article 5 2002 Unsheathing Alexander's Sword: Lapides v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia Eric S. Johnson Follow this and additional

More information

1 U.S. CONST. amend. XI. The plain language of the Eleventh Amendment prohibits suits against

1 U.S. CONST. amend. XI. The plain language of the Eleventh Amendment prohibits suits against CONSTITUTIONAL LAW STATE EMPLOYEES HAVE PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST EMPLOYERS UNDER FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES V. HIBBS, 538 U.S. 721 (2003). The Eleventh Amendment

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRYSTAL ENERGY COMPANY, No. 02-17047 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-01-01970-MHM NAVAJO NATION, Defendant-Appellee. ORDER AND AMENDED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 0 PAMELA CENTENO, MARY HOFFMAN, SUSAN ROUTH and JANICE WILEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiffs,

More information

Melanie Lee, J.D. Candidate 2017

Melanie Lee, J.D. Candidate 2017 Whether Sovereign Immunity is a Defense for States in Bankruptcy Cases 2016 Volume VIII No. 17 Whether Sovereign Immunity is a Defense for States in Bankruptcy Cases Melanie Lee, J.D. Candidate 2017 Cite

More information

THE INDIAN GAMING REGULATORY ACT: WHAT CONGRESS GIVETH, THE COURT TAKETH AWAY - SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA v. FLORIDA

THE INDIAN GAMING REGULATORY ACT: WHAT CONGRESS GIVETH, THE COURT TAKETH AWAY - SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA v. FLORIDA THE INDIAN GAMING REGULATORY ACT: WHAT CONGRESS GIVETH, THE COURT TAKETH AWAY - SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA v. FLORIDA INTRODUCTION Indian gaming is one of the most prominent means for Indian Tribes to generate

More information

Removal Plus Timely Assertion: A Better Rule for the Intersection of Removal and State Sovereign Immunity

Removal Plus Timely Assertion: A Better Rule for the Intersection of Removal and State Sovereign Immunity Removal Plus Timely Assertion: A Better Rule for the Intersection of Removal and State Sovereign Immunity DAVID KANTER* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 531 I. STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND WAIVER BACKGROUND...

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 13-635 In the Supreme Court of the United States PATRICIA G. STROUD, Petitioner, v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, ET AL. Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Court of

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:17-cv-01397-TCB Document 20 Filed 04/28/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE OF * THE NAACP, et al.,

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1406 XECHEM INTERNATIONAL, INC., v. Plaintiff-Appellant, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M.D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER and BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY

More information

RESPONSE EX PARTE YOUNG AFIER SEMINOLE TRIBE

RESPONSE EX PARTE YOUNG AFIER SEMINOLE TRIBE RESPONSE EX PARTE YOUNG AFIER SEMINOLE TRIBE DAVID P. CuRm* My message is one of calm placidity: Not to worry; Ex parte Young 1 is alive and well and living in the Supreme Court. By way of background let

More information

State Sovereign Immunity: Myth or Reality After Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida?

State Sovereign Immunity: Myth or Reality After Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida? Catholic University Law Review Volume 46 Issue 3 Spring 1997 Article 8 1997 State Sovereign Immunity: Myth or Reality After Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida? Laura M. Herpers Follow this and additional

More information

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA. Case Summary. of Ivy Tech Community College ( Ivy Tech ) on Skillman s claim under the

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA. Case Summary. of Ivy Tech Community College ( Ivy Tech ) on Skillman s claim under the ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Christopher K. Starkey Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Gregory F. Zoeller Attorney General of Indiana Kyle Hunter Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana I N T

More information

Case 3:12-cv BAJ-RLB Document /01/12 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:12-cv BAJ-RLB Document /01/12 Page 1 of 6 Case 3:12-cv-00657-BAJ-RLB Document 39-1 11/01/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KENNETH HALL, * CIVIL ACTION 3:12-cv-657 Plaintiff * * VERSUS * * CHIEF JUDGE BRIAN

More information

Holding the Sovereign's Universities Accountable for Patent Infringement after Florida Prepaid and College Savings Bank

Holding the Sovereign's Universities Accountable for Patent Infringement after Florida Prepaid and College Savings Bank California Law Review Volume 89 Issue 2 Article 5 March 2001 Holding the Sovereign's Universities Accountable for Patent Infringement after Florida Prepaid and College Savings Bank Jennifer Polse Follow

More information

Pennsylvania v. Union Gas: Congressional Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity Under the Commerce Clause, or, Living with Hans

Pennsylvania v. Union Gas: Congressional Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity Under the Commerce Clause, or, Living with Hans Fordham Law Review Volume 58 Issue 3 Article 8 1989 Pennsylvania v. Union Gas: Congressional Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity Under the Commerce Clause, or, Living with Hans Letitia A. Sears Recommended

More information

SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY UNDER THE ELEVENTH AMENDMENT: KIMEL AND GARRETT, WHAT NEXT FOR STATE EMPLOYEES?

SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY UNDER THE ELEVENTH AMENDMENT: KIMEL AND GARRETT, WHAT NEXT FOR STATE EMPLOYEES? SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY UNDER THE ELEVENTH AMENDMENT: KIMEL AND GARRETT, WHAT NEXT FOR STATE EMPLOYEES? Hillina Taddesse Tamrat The Eleventh Amendment guarantees the states immunity from suits by private individuals

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons Volume 51 Issue 5 Article 2 2006 Reaching for Immunity: The Third Circuit's Approach to the Extension of Eleventh Amendment Immunity to Instrumentalities as Arms of the State in Benn v. First Judicial

More information

SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN TEXAS YOU BREACH, YOU [DON T] PAY?

SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN TEXAS YOU BREACH, YOU [DON T] PAY? SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN TEXAS YOU BREACH, YOU [DON T] PAY? Adam Simmons* What happens when a college coach in Texas, acting as a state employee with an employment contract with a state university, is fired

More information

Notes HOW THE SPENDING CLAUSE CAN SOLVE THE DILEMMA OF STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY FROM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SUITS

Notes HOW THE SPENDING CLAUSE CAN SOLVE THE DILEMMA OF STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY FROM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SUITS Notes HOW THE SPENDING CLAUSE CAN SOLVE THE DILEMMA OF STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY FROM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SUITS JENNIFER COTNER INTRODUCTION The United States Supreme Court held in two cases, Florida

More information

Why Federal Courts Should Be Required to Consider State Sovereign Immunity Sua Sponte

Why Federal Courts Should Be Required to Consider State Sovereign Immunity Sua Sponte Why Federal Courts Should Be Required to Consider State Sovereign Immunity Sua Sponte Michelle Lawnert Suppose that a state is sued in its own courts under a provision of federal law. The state, believing

More information

CRS Report for Congress

CRS Report for Congress CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS22199 July 19, 2005 Federalism Jurisprudence: The Opinions of Justice O Connor Summary Kenneth R. Thomas and Todd B. Tatelman Legislative

More information

Intellectual Property and the Eleventh Amendment after Seminole Tribe

Intellectual Property and the Eleventh Amendment after Seminole Tribe DePaul Law Review Volume 47 Issue 3 Spring 1998 Article 4 Intellectual Property and the Eleventh Amendment after Seminole Tribe John T. Cross Follow this and additional works at: http://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review

More information

State Sovereign Immunity After Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.: The Demise of the Eleventh Amendment

State Sovereign Immunity After Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.: The Demise of the Eleventh Amendment William & Mary Law Review Volume 32 Issue 2 Article 8 State Sovereign Immunity After Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.: The Demise of the Eleventh Amendment Victoria L. Calkins Repository Citation Victoria

More information

No. 113,270¹ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. MILO A. JONES, Appellant,

No. 113,270¹ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. MILO A. JONES, Appellant, No. 113,270¹ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS MILO A. JONES, Appellant, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The Eleventh Amendment

More information

Our American federalism creatively unites states with unique cultural, political, and

Our American federalism creatively unites states with unique cultural, political, and COMMITTEE: POLICY: TYPE: LAW AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE FEDERALISM DEBATE Our American federalism creatively unites states with unique cultural, political, and social diversity into a strong nation. The Tenth

More information

Case3:11-cv JW Document14 Filed08/29/11 Page1 of 8

Case3:11-cv JW Document14 Filed08/29/11 Page1 of 8 Case:-cv-00-JW Document Filed0// Page of 0 Robert A. Rosette (CA SBN ) Richard J. Armstrong (CA SBN ) Nicole St. Germain (CA SBN ) ROSETTE, LLP Attorneys at Law Blue Ravine Rd., Suite Folsom, CA 0 () -0

More information

Case 2:16-cv MPK Document 42 Filed 10/07/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv MPK Document 42 Filed 10/07/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:16-cv-00525-MPK Document 42 Filed 10/07/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THEODORE WILLIAMS, DENNIS MCLAUGHLIN, JR., CHARLES CRAIG, CHARLES

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: 534 U. S. (2002) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 00 1514 LANCE RAYGOR AND JAMES GOODCHILD, PETITIONERS v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME

More information

Closing the Gap: The Fourth Circuit s Narrowing of the Ex Parte Young Exception in Virginia v. Reinhard and the Implications for Federal Rights

Closing the Gap: The Fourth Circuit s Narrowing of the Ex Parte Young Exception in Virginia v. Reinhard and the Implications for Federal Rights Closing the Gap: The Fourth Circuit s Narrowing of the Ex Parte Young Exception in Virginia v. Reinhard and the Implications for Federal Rights Harrison M. Gates I. Introduction..221 II. The Reinhard Decision..224

More information

CURBING STATE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST DISABLED DRIVERS: WHY THE DISABLED NEED NOT PAY THE STATES TO PARTICIPATE IN DISABLED PARKING PROGRAMS

CURBING STATE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST DISABLED DRIVERS: WHY THE DISABLED NEED NOT PAY THE STATES TO PARTICIPATE IN DISABLED PARKING PROGRAMS CURBING STATE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST DISABLED DRIVERS: WHY THE DISABLED NEED NOT PAY THE STATES TO PARTICIPATE IN DISABLED PARKING PROGRAMS Joseph Groshong INTRODUCTION Title II of the Americans with Disabilities

More information

Superfund: A Super Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity

Superfund: A Super Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity Missouri Law Review Volume 55 Issue 2 Spring 1990 Article 4 Spring 1990 Superfund: A Super Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity Lynne E. Noyes Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-956 In the Supreme Court of the United States BIOMEDICAL PATENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, v. Petitioner, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari

More information

9 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 65. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Fall, Note NOW WHAT? A LOOK AT WHAT REMAINS FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

9 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 65. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Fall, Note NOW WHAT? A LOOK AT WHAT REMAINS FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT 9 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 65 Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Fall, 2000 Note NOW WHAT? A LOOK AT WHAT REMAINS FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Stacey L. DeRosa a1 Copyright (c) 2000 by State Bar of Texas,

More information

Case 2:14-cv NBF Document 15 Filed 10/15/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cv NBF Document 15 Filed 10/15/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:14-cv-00899-NBF Document 15 Filed 10/15/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES EQUAL ) EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION, )

More information

Alden v. Maine: Infusing Tenth Amendment and General Federalism Principles into Eleventh Amendment Jurisprudence

Alden v. Maine: Infusing Tenth Amendment and General Federalism Principles into Eleventh Amendment Jurisprudence Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 51 Issue 3 2001 Alden v. Maine: Infusing Tenth Amendment and General Federalism Principles into Eleventh Amendment Jurisprudence John Allota Follow this and additional

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STUART T. GUTTMAN, M.D.

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STUART T. GUTTMAN, M.D. Appellate Case: 10-2167 Document: 01018564699 Date Filed: 01/10/2011 Page: 1 ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Nos. 10-2167 & 10-2172 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STUART T. GUTTMAN,

More information

204 F.3d 601 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Denise CHAVEZ, Plaintiff Appellee, v. ARTE PUBLICO PRESS, et al., Defendants Appellants.

204 F.3d 601 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Denise CHAVEZ, Plaintiff Appellee, v. ARTE PUBLICO PRESS, et al., Defendants Appellants. 204 F.3d 601 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Denise CHAVEZ, Plaintiff Appellee, v. ARTE PUBLICO PRESS, et al., Defendants Appellants. No. 93 2881. Feb. 18, 2000. Opinion EDITH H. JONES,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 15-60355 Document: 00513281865 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Summary Calendar EQUITY TRUST COMPANY, Custodian, FBO Jean K. Thoden IRA

More information

No In The Supreme Court of the United States DANIEL COLEMAN, v. MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS, et al.,

No In The Supreme Court of the United States DANIEL COLEMAN, v. MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS, et al., No. 10-1016 In The Supreme Court of the United States DANIEL COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS, et al., Respondents. On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The

More information

State Universities Sovereign Immunity in PTAB Trials. June 7, 2017

State Universities Sovereign Immunity in PTAB Trials. June 7, 2017 State Universities Sovereign Immunity in PTAB Trials June 7, 2017 1 Source: NAI & IPO 2 11 th Amendment of U.S. Constitution First constitutional amendment adopted after the Bill of Rights. Adopted to

More information

BURKE v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES Cite as 302 Neb N.W.2d

BURKE v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES Cite as 302 Neb N.W.2d Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 03/22/2019 09:06 AM CDT - 494 - Melissa Burke, appellant and cross-appellee, v. Board of Trustees of the Nebraska State Colleges,

More information

State Employers Are Not Sovereign: By Analogy, Transfer the Market Participant Exception to the Dormant Commerce Clause to States as Employers

State Employers Are Not Sovereign: By Analogy, Transfer the Market Participant Exception to the Dormant Commerce Clause to States as Employers Chicago-Kent College of Law Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law Louis Jackson National Student Writing Competition Institute for Law and the Workplace 1-1-2003 State Employers Are Not Sovereign:

More information

Case4:09-cv CW Document16 Filed06/04/09 Page1 of 16

Case4:09-cv CW Document16 Filed06/04/09 Page1 of 16 Case:0-cv-0-CW Document Filed0/0/0 Page of 0 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California SARA J. DRAKE Supervising Deputy Attorney General PETER H. KAUFMAN Deputy Attorney General State Bar No.

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 06-462 In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL., Petitioners, v. MARJORIE MEYERS, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals

More information

Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Eleventh Amendment: A Comment on the Decisions during the Term

Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Eleventh Amendment: A Comment on the Decisions during the Term DePaul Law Review Volume 39 Issue 2 Winter 1990: Symposium - Federal Judicial Power Article 5 Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Eleventh Amendment: A Comment on the Decisions during the 1988-89 Term

More information

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al. v. DOE. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al. v. DOE. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit OCTOBER TERM, 1996 425 Syllabus REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al. v. DOE certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 95 1694. Argued December 2, 1996 Decided

More information

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy. Case Comment. Daniel S. Tyler

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy. Case Comment. Daniel S. Tyler Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy Case Comment Daniel S. Tyler Copyright (c) 2012 Suffolk University Law School; Daniel S. Tyler The Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution declares

More information

CERCLA and the Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity

CERCLA and the Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law Volume 6 Issue 2 Article 13 5-1-1992 CERCLA and the Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity W. Shan Thompson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl

More information

Computer Software Copyright Protection: Infringement and Eleventh Amendment Immunity, 9 Computer L.J. 163 (1989)

Computer Software Copyright Protection: Infringement and Eleventh Amendment Immunity, 9 Computer L.J. 163 (1989) The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law Volume 9 Issue 2 Computer/Law Journal - Spring 1989 Article 3 Spring 1989 Computer Software Copyright Protection: Infringement and Eleventh

More information

The Eleventh Amendment Yields

The Eleventh Amendment Yields Volume 21 Issue 1 Fall 1971 Article 10 1971 The Eleventh Amendment Yields Paul M. Blayney James B. Kenin Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Paul

More information

Closing Federalism's Loophole in Intellectual Property Rights

Closing Federalism's Loophole in Intellectual Property Rights Berkeley Technology Law Journal Volume 17 Issue 4 Article 5 September 2002 Closing Federalism's Loophole in Intellectual Property Rights Robert T. Neufeld Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/btlj

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. : CIV. NO. 3:02CV2292 (HBF) RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. : CIV. NO. 3:02CV2292 (HBF) RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FEMI BOGLE-ASSEGAI : :: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : v. : CIV. NO. 3:02CV2292 (HBF) : STATE OF CONNECTICUT, : COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS : AND OPPORTUNITIES, : CYNTHIA WATTS-ELDER,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: 534 U. S. (2002) 1 Opinion of GINSBURG, J. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 00 1514 LANCE RAYGOR AND JAMES GOODCHILD, PETITIONERS v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ET AL. ON WRIT

More information

State Sovereign Immunity and the False Claims Act: Respecting the Limitations Created by the Eleventh Amendment upon the Federal Courts

State Sovereign Immunity and the False Claims Act: Respecting the Limitations Created by the Eleventh Amendment upon the Federal Courts Fordham Law Review Volume 68 Issue 1 Article 6 1999 State Sovereign Immunity and the False Claims Act: Respecting the Limitations Created by the Eleventh Amendment upon the Federal Courts James Y. Ho Recommended

More information

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS BY STEVEN TEPP* AIf angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would

More information

Does Garcia Preclude an Eleventh Amendment Affirmative Limitation on the Congress's Commerce Clause Power?

Does Garcia Preclude an Eleventh Amendment Affirmative Limitation on the Congress's Commerce Clause Power? University of Richmond Law Review Volume 23 Issue 1 Article 2 1988 Does Garcia Preclude an Eleventh Amendment Affirmative Limitation on the Congress's Commerce Clause Power? Joseph John Jablonski Jr. Follow

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 4:11-cv-00782-JHP -PJC Document 22 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 03/15/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA EDDIE SANTANA ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 11-CV-782-JHP-PJC

More information

Citizen Suits against Tribal Governments and Tribal Officials under Federal Environmental Laws

Citizen Suits against Tribal Governments and Tribal Officials under Federal Environmental Laws Tulsa Law Review Volume 36 Issue 2 Symposium: Native American Law Article 4 Winter 2000 Citizen Suits against Tribal Governments and Tribal Officials under Federal Environmental Laws Michael P. O'Connell

More information

Virginia F. Milstead, State Sovereign Immunity And The Plaintiff Bar Removal Of Actions Filed In State Court?, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev.

Virginia F. Milstead, State Sovereign Immunity And The Plaintiff Bar Removal Of Actions Filed In State Court?, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. The John Marshall Law Review Volume 38 Issue 2 Article 5 Winter 2004 State Sovereign Immunity And The Plaintiff State: Does The Eleventh Amendment Bar Removal of Actions Filed In State Court?, 38 J. Marshall

More information

NUMBER: CC IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

NUMBER: CC IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Case: 15-13552 Date Filed: 05/04/2016 Page: 1 of 35 NUMBER: 15-13552-CC IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT CHRISTINE WILLIAMS, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS,

More information

immunity to claims for monetary relief. [131 S.Ct. 1654]Held: Page

immunity to claims for monetary relief. [131 S.Ct. 1654]Held: Page immunity to claims for monetary relief. Page U.S. (2011) 131 S.Ct. 1651 Harvey Leroy SOSSAMON, III, Petitioner, v. TEXAS et al. No. 08-1438. United States Supreme Court April 20, 2011 Argued November 2,

More information

Case: 5:16-cv JMH Doc #: 11 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 1 of 9 - Page ID#: 58

Case: 5:16-cv JMH Doc #: 11 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 1 of 9 - Page ID#: 58 Case: 5:16-cv-00257-JMH Doc #: 11 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 1 of 9 - Page ID#: 58 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON REX JACKSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil

More information

COQUILLE INDIAN TRIBAL CODE

COQUILLE INDIAN TRIBAL CODE COQUILLE INDIAN TRIBAL CODE Index Subchapter/ Section 624.010 Applicability 624.100 Findings and Purpose 624.200 Definitions 624.300 Jurisdiction 624.350 Tort Claims Arising From Conduct of Tribal Officers

More information

The Eleventh Amendment: An Affirmative Limitation on the Commerce Clause Power of Congress - A Doctrinal Foundation

The Eleventh Amendment: An Affirmative Limitation on the Commerce Clause Power of Congress - A Doctrinal Foundation DePaul Law Review Volume 37 Issue 4 Summer 1988 Article 3 The Eleventh Amendment: An Affirmative Limitation on the Commerce Clause Power of Congress - A Doctrinal Foundation Joseph John Jablonski Jr. Follow

More information

Section 7: Federalism in the Rehnquist Court

Section 7: Federalism in the Rehnquist Court College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Supreme Court Preview Conferences, Events, and Lectures 2003 Section 7: Federalism in the Rehnquist Court Institute

More information

Case 3:09-cv WKW-TFM Document 12 Filed 05/04/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT

Case 3:09-cv WKW-TFM Document 12 Filed 05/04/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT Case 3:09-cv-00305-WKW-TFM Document 12 Filed 05/04/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT T.P. JOHNSON HOLDINGS, LLC. JACK M. JOHNSON AND TERI S. JOHNSON, AS SHAREHOLDERS/MEMBERS,

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT X No CAROL FISCHER, :

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT X No CAROL FISCHER, : Case: 14-2556 Document: 36 Page: 1 08/25/2014 1304312 21 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT --------------------------------------------------------------X No. 14-2556 CAROL FISCHER,

More information

Obtaining Jurisdiction Over States in Bankruptcy Proceedings After Seminole Tribe

Obtaining Jurisdiction Over States in Bankruptcy Proceedings After Seminole Tribe Obtaining Jurisdiction Over States in Bankruptcy Proceedings After Seminole Tribe Teresa K Goebelt Seminole Tribe of Florida v Florida, 1 marked a dramatic change in the Supreme Court's Eleventh Amendment

More information

Deepening the Anomaly of Sovereign Immunity: Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman

Deepening the Anomaly of Sovereign Immunity: Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman St. John's Law Review Volume 59 Issue 1 Volume 59, Fall 1984, Number 1 Article 6 June 2012 Deepening the Anomaly of Sovereign Immunity: Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman Robert G. Klepp

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 02-1031 444444444444 REATA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. CITY OF DALLAS, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION

More information

STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN BANKRUPTCY AFTER SEMINOLE TRIBE

STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN BANKRUPTCY AFTER SEMINOLE TRIBE STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN BANKRUPTCY AFTER SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA V. FLORIDA A recent Supreme Court decision in a case not involving bankruptcy will continue to have a significant impact on the role

More information

No BIOMEDICAL PATENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent.

No BIOMEDICAL PATENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent. No. 07-956 upreme eurt ef tate BIOMEDICAL PATENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, v. Petitioner, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United

More information