INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA 6(18)/4-1353/12 BETWEEN SHANMUGAM A/L SUPRAMANIAM AND MALAYSIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM BERHAD AWARD NO: 819 OF 2018

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA 6(18)/4-1353/12 BETWEEN SHANMUGAM A/L SUPRAMANIAM AND MALAYSIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM BERHAD AWARD NO: 819 OF 2018"

Transcription

1 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA 6(18)/4-1353/12 BETWEEN SHANMUGAM A/L SUPRAMANIAM AND MALAYSIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM BERHAD AWARD NO: 819 OF 2018 Before Venue : Y.A. TUAN GULAM MUHIADDEEN BIN ABDUL AZIZ - CHAIRMAN : Industrial Court, Kuala Lumpur. Date of reference : 6 September 2012 Dates of mention Dates of Hearing Claimant s Written Submission : : : 6 November 2012, 4 December 2012, 8 January 2013, 7 February March 2013, 10 April 2013, 2 May 2013, 3 June 2013, 8 April 2014, 5 February 2015, 14 May 2015, 9 June 2015, 2 June 2016 and 10 June July 2017 and 25 July November 2017 Company s Written Submission : 26 September 2017 Representation : Encik V. Kanagaratnam Malaysian Airline System Employee s Union (MASEU) (Representative for the Claimant) Cik Jamice Anne Leo Selvanathan with Encik Arjun Chandra Kumar (PDK) Messrs. Shook Lin & Bok (Learned Counsel for the Company) 1

2 AWARD The reference of the Honourable Minister of Human Resources is regarding the dismissal of Shanmugam A/L Supramaniam (hereafter referred to as the Claimant ) by Malaysia Airlines System Berhad (hereinafter referred to as the Company ) on 26 August The reference was dated 6 September 2012 and received by the Court on 13 September Background Facts The Claimant commenced employment with the Company on 14 November 1991 as a Traffic Hand. The Claimant s last position was Traffic Hand and his last drawn basic salary was RM1, and also entitled to Uniform Laundry Allowance of RM60.00 and Shift Allowance of RM On 13 May 2011, the Claimant was stopped and searched by the Malaysia Airport Berhad s ( MAB ) security personnel at the Staff Entrance of the Penang International Airport as he was carrying pieces of cardboard boxes and plastic sheets ( the said items ) out of the airside area. The attending security personnel logged evidence of the said items by taking photographs of the same. They further confiscated the Claimant s airport pass and immediately drew up an Incident Report which was submitted to their superior. In the Incident Report, the Security Personnel stated as follows: Pada jam lebih kurang 04.50hrs saya Sjn PB 7041 Mohamad Sapri dan Konst. PB 7099 Mohd Taufiq membuat pemeriksaan mengejut di Staf Entrance bersama anggota Operasi Konst. Hazwahadini telah menahan seorang kakitangan MAS Trafik Hand di laluan kakitangan aras 2 kerana membawa keluar kotak dan plastik 2

3 daripada kawasan airside. Beliau dibawa ke bilik Task Force bersama barang bukti untuk disoaljawab. Setelah disoaljawab didapati beliau juga tidak mempunyai borang pengisytiharan barang. Tindakan anggota Task Force menahan Pas KSE (Tetap) selama 02 minggu dan barang bukti ditahan untuk tindakan seterusnya. Untuk makluman pihak Tuan ini adalah kesalahan kali kelima pelbagai kesalahan dilakukan sejak tahun 2008, dua daripadanya adalah kes seperti di atas. Sekian laporan saya untuk tindakan Tuan selanjutnya. Nama : Shanmugam A/L Subramaniam No. K/P : Majikan : MAS (Trafik Hand) Pas Tamat : AUG Following this, on 19 May 2011, MAB s Security Department issued a letter to the Company s Station Manager at Penang International Airport informing him of the incident on 13 May 2011 involving the Claimant and further states as follows: 3. Untuk makluman pihak tuan, ini adalah kesalahan kelima pelbagai kesalahan dilakukan oleh beliau sejak tahun 2008 dan dua daripadanya adalah kes seperti di atas. Ini adalah merupakan kesalahan yang serius yang telah dilakukan oleh penama di mana beliau seringkali tidak mematuhi prosedur keselamatan lapangan terbang. Pas keselamatan beliau telah ditahan dan beliau tidak dibenarkan mengambil sebarang pas keselamatan selama dua minggu berkuatkuasa mulai daripada 19 Mei 2011 (sehingga selesai siasatan dijalankan terhadap beliau). On 30 May 2011, the Company issued a letter to the Claimant suspending him for fourteen (14) days with full pay pending investigations. On 23 June 2011, the Claimant was issued a Notice to Show Cause in which two allegations of misconduct were levelled against him as follows: 3

4 Tuduhan 1 Bahawa anda sebagai Pekerja Trafik, di Jabatan Operasi Lapangan Terbang yang berpengkalan di Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Bayan Lepas Pulau Pinang, pada 22hb Mac 2011 lebih kurang antara jam 1500 petang hingga 1600 petang dan pada 13hb Mei 2011 lebih kurang jam 0650 pagi, didapati telah mengambil dan menyimpan harta syarikat tanpa kebenaran iaitu bungkusan plastik dan kotak-kotak terpakai dengan membawa keluar melalui Laluan Kakitangan Aras 2 tanpa kebenaran. Anda dengan ini telah melakukan satu perbuatan salahlaku yang bertentangan dengan syarat-syarat perkhidmatan anda dengan syarikat seperti yang tercatat di bawah Fasa 16, Perenggan 16.1 di dalam Lampiran A. Acara Tatatertib Penerbangan Malaysia, jika sabit kesalahan anda boleh dikenakan hukuman yang berat. Tuduhan 2 Bahawa anda sebagai Pekerja Trafik, di Jabatan Operasi Lapangan Terbang yang berpengkalan di Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Bayan Lepas Pulau Pinang telah didapati melanggar dan engkar arahan yang telah dikeluarkan sebelum ini supaya tidak mengulangi kesalahan yang anda telah lakukan tetapi anda masih berdegil dan terus mengulangi melakukannya walaupun telah diberi surat amaran, kaunseling dan juga telah dihukum melalui penahanan sementara pas tetap selama dua (2) bulan oleh pihak keselamatan Malaysia Airport Sendirian Berhad. Anda dengan ini telah melakukan satu perbuatan salahlaku yang bertentangan dengan syarat-syarat perkhidmatan anda dengan syarikat seperti yang tercatat di bawah Fasa 11, Perenggan 11.1 di dalam Lampiran A. Acara Tatatertib Penerbangan Malaysia, jika sabit kesalahan anda boleh dikenakan hukuman yang berat. The Claimant replied to the Notice to Show Cause on 4 July 2011 and stated among others as follows; (i) He admitted to removing the cardboard boxes and plastic sheets from the airside area; (ii) That he did not know that the removal of the cardboard boxes and plastic sheets were an offence/misconduct; (iii) If it was in fact an offence/misconduct, he apologise for his actions; and 4

5 (iv) The cardboard boxes and plastic sheets were found in the rubbish bins. The Company found the Claimant s explanation to the charges to be untenable. In this regard and in consideration of all the surrounding circumstances, the Company dismissed the Claimant by Notice of Termination dated 26 August 2011 with immediate effect. The Claimant appealed by way of letter dated 7 September 2011 against the Company s decision to dismiss him. However the Company, upon consideration of the appeal rejected the same. The Law The function of the Industrial Court in a reference under s.20 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 has been clearly stated by the Federal Court in the case of Goon Kwee Phoy v J & P Coats (M) Sdn. Bhd. [1981] 1 LNS 30; [1981] 2 MLJ 129 where His Lordship Raja Azlan Shah, CJ (Malaya) stated at p. 136: Where representations are made and are referred to the Industrial Court for inquiry, it is the duty of that Court to determine whether the termination or dismissal is with or without just cause or excuse. If the employer chooses to give a reason for the action taken by him the duty of the Industrial Court will be to inquire whether that excuse or reason has or has not been made out. If it finds as a fact that it has not been proved, then the inevitable conclusion must be that the termination or dismissal was without just cause or excuse. The proper inquiry of the Court is the reason advanced by it and that Court or the High Court cannot go into another reason not relied on by the employer or find one for it. 5

6 In the case of Wong Yuen Hock v Syarikat Hong Leong Assurance Sdn. Bhd. & Another Appeal [1995] 3 CLJ 344 at p. 352 Mohd Azmi FCJ delivering the grounds of judgment of the Court had this to say: On the authorities, we were of the view that the main and only function of the Industrial Court in dealing with a reference under section 20 of the Act (unless otherwise lawfully provided by the terms of reference) is to determine whether the misconduct or irregularities complained of by the management as the grounds of dismissal were in fact committed by the workman, and if so, whether such grounds constitute just cause or excuse for the dismissal. In our opinion, there was no jurisdiction by the Industrial Court to change the scope of reference by substituting its own reason. Burden and Standard of Proof The burden of proving misconduct that justifies dismissal lies on the employer who has to establish such misconduct to the standard of a balance of probabilities. In Century Mahkota Hotel Melaka & Anor v. Michele Geraldine Kensler [1999] 3 ILR 60, the Industrial Court stated: "It is settled law that in cases of direct dismissal such as this, the burden is always on the employer to satisfy the Court by way of cogent and convincing evidence, albeit on a balance of probabilities that such misconduct as are alleged have indeed been committed by the employee and if so, whether it deserves a dismissal." 6

7 In Ireka Construction Berhad v. Chantiravathan Subramaniam James [1995] 2 ILR 11, it was stated that: "It is a basic principle of industrial jurisprudence that in a dismissal case, the employer must produce convincing evidence that the workman committed that offence of which the workman is alleged to have been dismissed. The burden of proof is on the employer to prove that he has just cause or excuse for taking the decision to impose the disciplinary measure of dismissal upon the employee. The just cause must be, either a misconduct, negligence or poor performance based on the case. Evaluation and Findings The primary allegation against the Claimant is the unauthorised removal of cardboard boxes and plastic sheets from the airside area of the Penang International Airport. From the following evidence, it is obvious that the Claimant admitted to the said removal from the airside area, namely, (i) In his Witness Statement the Claimant states as follows: 4. S. Merujuk kepada surat tuduhan bertarikh 23hb. Jun 2011, adakah anda tahu bahawa bungkusan plastik dan kotak-kotak terpakai yang anda membawa keluar adalah satu kesalahan? J. Tidak. 5. S. Di manakah anda jumpa barang-barang tersebut? J. Saya jumpa barang-barang tersebut di tong sampah dan di merata-rata tempat. 7

8 (ii) Statement in Investigation dated 30 May 2011: J1. Sewaktu dalam perjalanan memasuki pejabat Ramp, saya telah terlihat beberapa keping kotak lama yang diletakkan berhampiran locker kakitangan. Saya telah mengambil kotak tersebut, lalu telah menyusun serta mengikatnya dan telah meletakkannya berhampiran locker kakitangan di hadapan pejabat Ramp kemudian saya telah pergi ke trolly bagasi untuk mengutip plastik buruk. Setelah saya mengambil plastik yang tersebut, saya telah mengikatnya lalu membawanya keluar bersama-sama dengan kotak buruk yang telah saya ikat tadi melalui laluan kakitangan. S10. Di manakah anda telah mengambil kotak dan plastik yang tersebut? Kotak telah saya jumpai berhampiran locker kakitangan Traffic MAS manakala plastik telah saya pungut dari trolly MAS. S.11. Apakah tujuan anda mengambil kotak dan plastik yang tersebut? Kotak dan plastik yang dibuang itu diambil untuk dijual. S12. Dimanakah anda menjual kotak dan plastik yang tersebut? Di mana-mana kedai berhampiran Bayan Lepas. S13. Adakah anda meminta kebenaran dari pihak atasan MAS untuk mengambil plastik yang tersebut bagi tujuan untuk dijual? Tiada. S16. Adakah anda mengakui bahawa gambar lelaki yang sedang membawa satu bungkusan plastik melalui laluan kakitangan di aras dua LTAB Pulau Pinang pada 22hb Mac 2011, pada jam lebih kurang 1527hrs sepertimana yang 8

9 tercatat di gambar tersebut adalah gambar anda? Ya, gambar lelaki tersebut adalah saya. S17. Apakah tujuan anda membawa plastik yang tersebut keluar? Untuk dijual bagi menyara hidup. S18. Di manakah anda mengambil plastik yang tersebut? Dekat trolly bagasi MAS. S19. Adakah anda meminta kebenaran dari pihak atasan MAS untuk mengambil plastik yang tersebut bagi tujuan untuk dijual? Tiada. S20. Adakah anda mengakui bahawa pada 21hb Mac 2008, pihak Keselamatan MAB telah menahan anda sewaktu anda hendak membawa keluar plastik penutup bagasi melalui Pos Kawalan Keselamatan MAB Gate 03? Tidak pasti tetapi biasa mereka tahan saya di situ kerana membawa plastik buruk keluar. (iii) The Claimant admitted that the person in the CCTV images seen carrying cardboard boxes and plastic sheets was him. (iv) In cross-examination during the trial of this matter the Claimant states as follows: Tengok bundle hijau, mukasurat 20, COB1, En. Shanmugam diberi show cause kerana pada mereka nampak Encik Shanmugam keluarkan plastik, tengok MS21, ini jawapan Encik Shanmugam ya, Encik Shanmugam sendiri tulis surat ini, saya tidak tahu barang yang saya keluarkan.. 9

10 Jumpa dalam tong sampah Encik Shanmugam mengaku memang keluarkan plastik betul? Ya. Tapi saya nak tahu, tadi mukasurat 48, SMG sudah diberitahu, tengok muka surat 21 kata saya tak tahu ini serious offence. Kenapa 3 tahun buat lagi? Saya tahu kesalahan tapi saya kutip sebab orang lain kutip. Di mukasurat 30 COB-1, sini Encik kata plastik dan kotak lama itu dibuang di tempat tong sampah. Sebenarnya plastik dan kotak lama itu ditempat locker dan troli, bukan tong sampahkan? Dua-dua tempat saya kutip. Kenapa masa sekuriti tanya soalan dalam siasatan lain dan jawapan dalam show cause lain? Ada sikit campur. As a consequence of the above, the Claimant s airport security pass was detained for two weeks. The Company s Witness, Muhammad Fauzi bin Mahayuddin ( COW-2 ) who was the Senior Manager, Industrial Relation, Business Integrity Department, testified that MAB is the Malaysian Airport Company that manages most of the airports in Malaysia. This includes the management and upkeep of airport facilities as well as airport security. The Company is an airline operator and rents the usage of the airport facilities from MAB. Although the Company has its own security divisions which is responsible for its own flight operations, MAB is responsible for security of the entire airport area in Malaysia. The conduct of the Claimant had caused disrepute to the Company. 10

11 Shahiza bt Mohamad Sariff ( COW-1 ), the Company s former Head of Human Capital (Northern Region) testified that airside area is the security areas accessible to aircraft, including runways, taxiways and apron/ramps. She further stressed that the removal of boxes and plastic sheets from the airside area is deemed to be an offence. The plastic sheets and boxes are used when the baggage are transported to the aircraft for loading or when it is being unloaded. These are property belonging to the Company and are usually handed over to MAS Cargo for disposal. COW-1 further reiterated that the said item was the property of the Company as follows:- You said these are property are handed over for disposal. Any instructions of this sort that it should be given for disposal? Or is it your understanding or what? To my understanding those are company s items and it is not allowed to be carried out from office premises by unauthorised personnel. But earlier you said this is not company property. Can you confirm that these are company s items? Yes. Any proof to show it? Those items are in the companies premises by default it is company s belongings. Q ; You were asked about the boxes and sheets and if there was MAS logo on it, explain why you say it was not necessary to check if the logo was on the box? Regardless, whether the Company logo is on the box or not, it is still the company s belongings. 11

12 On 23 August 1999, the Company issued a Circular to all staff reminding them that the unauthorised removal of property of the Company is a serious misconduct and may result in dismissal. The Disciplinary Procedure of the Company under Appendix A also provides that the removals of Company property are acts of misconduct. Clause 16 of the Disciplinary Procedure states as follows: Without prejudice to the generality of the term misconduct it shall be deemed to include the following:- 16. Removal of Company Property Removing without proper authority Company property or property entrusted to the Company from the aircraft or company premises. The Claimant confirmed in cross-examination that he was aware of the policies and procedures of the Company and the consequences of failing to comply with the same as follows:- Encik Shanmugam lihat di sini, mukasurat 5 ikatan warna hijau, di perenggan 4 ia berkata bahawa tuan akan tertakluk kepada peraturan-peraturan pekeliling dan arahan-arahan yang dikeluarkan oleh Syarikat dari masa ke semasa. Syarikat akan mengambil tindakan tatatertib terhadap tuan/puan sekiranya didapati melanggar peraturan serta arahan tersebut. Tuan/puan dikehendaki mengambil tahu akan Peraturan Tatatertib Sistem Penerbangan Malaysia Berhad. Sekiranya tuan/puan ingin menyemak peraturan tersebut, sila berhubung dengan Ketua Jabatan tuan/puan. Encik Shanmugam faham dan setuju? Ya. 12

13 Encik Shanmugam faham? Dia kata peraturan-peraturan pekeliling, arahan-arahan dan syarat-syarat dari Syarikat mesti ikutkan? Ya, betul. Kalau tidak ikut, syarikat akan ambil tindakan tatatertibkan? Ya, betul. Encik Shanmugam, tengok ms13, ini adalah, tengok ms15, itu tanda tangan Encik Shanmugam? Ya. Encik Shanmugam tengok mukasurat 13, nombor 4, dia kata mencuri, menipu atau tidak jujur adalah satu salahlaku kan? Ya. Encik Shanmugam tengok nombor 31, dia kata jika membawa keluar harta benda syarikat ia adalah satu salahlaku? Setuju? Betul. Mukasurat 5 dokumen sama ini, tengok soalan 23, masa itu Encik Shanmugam tahu kalau ambik barang tanpa kebenaran ia adalah salah? Tahukan? Ya, tahu. Based on the above evidence, the claimant was aware of the policies and procedures of the Company. However, the Claimant deliberately and indignantly failed to comply with the same. In the case of Ahmad Aziz Othman v Felda Palm Industries Sdn. Bhd. [2014] 1 ILR 382, upheld the dismissal of the employee in view of breaches of company policies in the following terms:- 13

14 [39] The claimant conceded in cross-examination that he signed the Visitor Gate Passes on 7 February 2007 and 10 June 2008 as COW4 was on leave and it is the procedure according to the company s Prosedur Memasuki Pintu Utama.. Clearly, the claimant was in breach of the company s Standard Operating Procedure and prudent practice when the claimant instructed the Auxiliary Police Officers not to issue the Visitor Gate Pass to the lorry in question. The claimant owed a duty of trust and confidence in the performance of his duty as an Assistant Manager but in the circumstances and factual matrix of this case, the claimant had breached such duty. The court is inclined to agree with the submissions of the company that the claimant had failed to exercise the responsibilities and accountabilities expected of an employee in his position. It is clear from the evidence that the claimant had chosen to blatantly ignore the standard procedures and guidelines that had been placed to safeguard the company and its interest. [emphasis added] Zulkifli Abdul Latif v Sistem Penerbangan Malaysia Berhad [2006] 3 ILR 1923, the Industrial Court affirmed the dismissal of employee on the grounds of his noncompliance with the relevant company procedures. The following was the relevant finding of the Court: [42] In the court s view none of the above mentioned reasons stated by the Claimant form part of the said Procedures. Based on the evidence of the claimant, I am of the view that none of the emotional and superficial reasons stated by the claimant are satisfactory to exculpate himself from not complying with the mandatory requirements of the said Procedures. I am of the firm view that the said Procedures are in existence to be complied with as the claimant knew, should or must have known or ought to have known them. The Court in the Zulkifli Abdul Latif (supra) case further state as follows in respect of an employee s deemed knowledge of the Company s policies and procedures:- 14

15 [28] In the court s view even if there was uncertainty as whether CO14 was in fact placed on the said Notice Board the important question to be determined is whether the claimant having been so many years in the company (for about 13 years) knew, should or must have known or ought to have known regarding the said procedures for purchasing rebated tickets by his conduct. This fact cannot be ignored. I am of the view that having read the evidence of the witnesses in the notes of proceedings the claimant knew or should know or must have known or ought to have known regarding the said Procedures. [Emphasis added] Accordingly, the Claimant must be deemed to have had the requisite knowledge of the applicable rules, provisions and procedures of the Company. The Claimant stated in cross-examination that he was not aware of the Circular dated 23 August Despite his purported lack of knowledge, the Claimant was verbally warned, on numerous occasions by the MAB Security Department, and issued a written warning by the Company on 20 June 2008, not to remove property belonging to the Company without authorisation. The Company had on 28 March 2008 issued a show cause letter to the Claimant as follows; Dear Encik Shanmugam, SHOW CAUSE LETTER ATTEMPT TO REMOVE AIRCRAFT BAGGAGE PLASTIC SHEET FROM SECURITY POST GATE 3 We received a letter from Head Security Unit, Malaysia Airports Sdn. Bhd. (MASB) ref(18) MASB.PP/9/02.1 Jld. 8 dated 27 March 2008 who mentioned that:- 1. On 21 March 2008, MASB Task Force stopped you from attempting to remove aircraft baggage plastic sheet from Security Post Gate You have tried to bring these aircraft baggage plastic sheets out through the staff entrance at the terminal building before this incident and have been given a warning by their Security Personnel not to do it. 15

16 3. As a result of the incident on 21 March 2008, your MASB Airport Pass has been confiscated pending investigation into this case. Kindly submit a written explanation to me within 3 days on receipt of this letter the reason for your act of misconduct and why disciplinary action should not be taken against you. Thank you. Yours sincerely - Signed - Zulkifli bin Mohamed STATION MANAGER PENANG. The Claimant replied to the show cause letter on 10 April 2008 as follows: 10 th April 2008 Station Manager Mr. Zulkifli bin Mohamed PENANG AIRPORT (SHANMUGAM s/o SUPRAMANIAM) (S/No: ) Saya Shanmugam s/o Supramaniam ingin menyatakan perkara tersebut mengambil plastic berkenaan adalah dari trolley dan di tempat buangan. Saya mengutip untuk menampung perbelanjaan anak-anak saya. Diminta Encik Zulkifli bin Mohamed pertimbangkan perkara tersebut. Diberitahu Bukan saya saja yang mengutip ramai MAB staff yang mengutip plastic dan lain-lain lagi. The Company on receipt of the Claimant s letter issued a warning letter dated 20 June 2008 as follows: Dear Encik Shanmugam, SHOW CAUSE LETTER ATTEMPT TO REMOVE AIRCRAFT BAGGAGE PLASTIC SHEET FROM SECURITY POST GATE 3 We acknowledge receipt of your letter of explanation dated 10 April 2008 on the above-mentioned subject in reply to our letter ref PENKD 061 PF dated 28 March A thorough investigation was conducted by Security Department into your case taking into consideration your past records as well. This serves as a warning to you not to repeat a similar offence in future otherwise appropriate action will be taken against you. As such, even if he was not aware of the specific Circular dated 23 August 1999, he was aware that he was not permitted to remove properties belonging to the Company. 16

17 In amplification, the Claimant admitted that he was warned not to remove property belonging to the Company but he failed to heed to the same. The Claimant s representative raised the issue that the said items were merely disposable boxes and plastics sheets which are of no material importance to the Company. COW-2 testified that even though the said items are disposable items, it cannot be removed without due authorisation. The value of the said items is not material but the action committed by the Claimant has somewhat effected the Company s image because the Company received the report from MAB who is a third party and managing the airport security and affairs. The Claimant was wearing the Company s uniform with logo while carrying the said item from the airside area. The Claimant was also stopped and warned by the MAB Security Department on many occasion but still continued to do the same. In Ros Sazilla Rashid & Anor v. Sistem Penerbangan Malaysia Bhd. [2013] 1 ILR 490 the two employees were the stewardess and steward of the Company respectively. They were dismissed for having found in possession 3 bottles of Dom Perignon Vintage 1996 which were reported missing from the bar cart of the first class cabin of a MAS aircraft returning from London. It was held that:- [22] The Court makes reference to the case of K A Sanduran Nehru Ratnam v. I-Berhad [2007] 1 CLJ 347, where the Court of Appeal held that the correct approach that the court must take in the adjudication of the issues of this nature before it is not the condition or the type of the material that was taken out, but the taking out without authorisation. This should be the relevant consideration. The value of the material taken out would be immaterial. What is material is that the material was the company s property and the claimant was not authorised to take it out of the company s premises. [Emphasis Added] 17

18 Therefore, there is no basis in the Claimant s contention that the said items taken out by the Claimant are of no material importance to the Company. The value of the plastic sheets and boxes are immaterial here. What is imperative is the fact that the Claimant removed the said item from the Company s premises without any authority. In the circumstances, the Company has proved the charges on balance of probabilities and that it had terminated the Claimant s employment with just cause and excuse. Is the Dismissal Justified? The Company, in view of the seriousness of the misconduct committed by the Claimant, decided that dismissal was the most appropriate punishment. The Company s Senior Manager, Industrial Relations, Business Integrity Department, Encik Muhammad Fauzi bin Mahayuddin ( COW-2 ) explained the reasons as follows:- Q.14 : Please tell the Court why the Company dismissed the Claimant. The Claimant s act of removing Company property from the Company premises is a very serious misconduct. The Claimant was fully aware that his actions were serious misconducts as he had been previously cautioned for similar incidences. Further, the Claimant had agreed to abide by all disciplinary rules and regulations imposed by the Company when he signed his contract of employment in 1991 (see pp. 4-15), COB). The Company s strict policy on unauthorized removal of the property of the Company was reiterated to the Claimant by way of a Circular dated (see p.16-9, COB). This Circular emphasizes that the unauthorized removal of property and possession of property is a serious misconduct and the disciplinary punishment imposed, if found guilty, would include 18

19 dismissal. This Circular also reminds employees of the Company that they will be liable to security checks by the police, Department of Civil Aviation or MAS Security (see paragraph 3, p.17, COB). It was during this security checks that the Claimant was found to be in possession of the plastic sheets and cardboard boxes (see pp , COB). In the circumstances, the Claimant had been found to have committed an act of misconduct when he breached the rules and regulations imposed by the Company (see para 16.1 and 11.1 Appendix A (Acts of Misconduct) of the Company s Disciplinary Procedure at pp. 23 and 25, COB-2). The Claimant s collective actions of repeatedly committing the same offence despite prior cautions and further denying knowledge that his actions were in breach of the Company s policy are indicative of his intention to continue to disregard Company policy. Given the circumstances, and as the Claimant had been previously warned, the Company viewed this case very seriously and exercised its managerial prerogative to terminate the services of the Claimant. [Emphasis Added] In Roslan Mohamed Noor v Malaysian Airlines System Berhad [2013] 2 LNS 0419, the employee was found to be in possession of the passenger oxygen mask and breathing oxygen system component which belonged to the Company and the items were meant to be the aircraft s emergency equipment for breathing purposes. The Claimant alleged that he took the items from the rubbish bin in front of his office but the Industrial Court held that it did not entitle him to take it without the permission of the Company. The Company issued a Circular to all staff on 19 th December, 2006 vide SGMHR 192/06 that unauthorized possession of Company s property by staff during the course of their daily activities would be considered as serious misconduct. In affirming the dismissal of the employee, the Industrial Court held as follows:- 19

20 As regards the punishment, it has been submitted that the claimant was a long standing employee of 17 years and that his misconduct did not cause severe financial loss to the company. The fact that the said parts were of nominal value is irrelevant [see K.A. Sanduran Nehru Ratnam supra]. Punishment is a management prerogative and the court cannot imposed its view on the employer, so long as the employer had acted reasonably. [see British Leyland [UK] Ltd. V. Swift [1981] ICR 524] which was approved by the Federal Court in Ng Hock Cheng v Pengarah Penjara & Ors [1998] 1 CLJ 405. In the instant case, the company had made it clear that employees within the KLIA area were liable to security checks and they must ensure that they were not in possession inter alia of any items used by the company or items similar to those used by other airlines. The Claimant in spite of having worked for 17 years with the company yet did not heed the company s warning. In the circumstances, the punishment of dismissal is certainly warranted. [Emphasis Added] In K.A. Sanduran Nehru a/l Ratnam v I-Berhad [2007] 2 MLJ 430, the employee was dismissed for the removal of 1.5 litre of thinner belonging to the employer. The Industrial Court concluded that as the loss suffered by the employer was minimal, the dismissal was not reasonable or justified. On judicial review to the High Court, the High Court remitted the matter for readjudication before a different Chairman. On appeal, the Court of Appeal found as follows: [26] We are of the view that the learned judge adopted the correct approach when he said that what matters is not type off thinner that was taken out, but the taking out of 1.5 litre of thinner without authorization. It is not disputed that the thinner was taken out without authorization. We are also of the view that the learned judge was right when he found that the Industrial Court had committed an error in law in finding that the thinner that was taken by the appellant was not the thinner that was used for the mixing of paint and that it was unwanted thinner. The evidence clearly showed that the thinner used for mixing paint in the store was the same thinner that was given upon request for cleaning the spray gun and the worker s hands. In relation to this, we noticed that the learned Chairman had also taken into account an irrelevant consideration in arriving at the decision that she 20

21 made, namely, that the respondent only suffered a loss which is minimal as it involved only 1.5 litre of thinner. We are of the view that the value of the thinner which was taken out of the factory by the appellant is immaterial. What is material is that the thinner was the respondent s property and the appellant was not authorized to take it out of the respondent s premises. [Emphasis Added] Conclusion For reasons adumbrated and having regards to the evidence in its totality, the Court is of the considered view that the Company has proved on a balance of probability that the Claimant's termination was reasonable and justified. Based on equity and good conscience and the substantial merit of the case without regard to technicality and legal form, the Court find that the Claimant's termination was carried out with just cause or excuse. The claim is hereby dismissed. HANDED DOWN AND DATED THIS 12 APRIL 2018 tt (GULAM MUHIADDEEN BIN ABDUL AZIZ ) CHAIRMAN INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA AT KUALA LUMPUR 21

ILANGOVAN KRISHNAN v. SHIYA SDN BHD

ILANGOVAN KRISHNAN v. SHIYA SDN BHD 374 ILANGOVAN KRISHNAN v. SHIYA SDN BHD Industrial Court, Johor Mohd Azari Harun Award No: 515 of 2016 [Case No: 16/4-157/15] 27 April 2016 Dismissal: Misconduct due to poor performance Claimant dismissed

More information

PERATURAN-PERATURAN PERLINDUNGAN DATA PERIBADI (PENGKOMPAUNAN KESALAHAN) 2016 PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION (COMPOUNDING OF OFFENCES) REGULATIONS 2016

PERATURAN-PERATURAN PERLINDUNGAN DATA PERIBADI (PENGKOMPAUNAN KESALAHAN) 2016 PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION (COMPOUNDING OF OFFENCES) REGULATIONS 2016 WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 14 Mac 2016 14 March 2016 P.U. (A) 60 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PERATURAN-PERATURAN PERLINDUNGAN DATA PERIBADI (PENGKOMPAUNAN KESALAHAN) 2016 PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION (COMPOUNDING

More information

D.R. 48/96 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah.

D.R. 48/96 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah. D.R. 48/96 Naskhah Sahih Bahasa Inggeris RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah. [ ] MAKA INILAH DIPERBUAT UNDANG-UNDANG oleh Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-pertuan

More information

THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 5/4-1546/05 BETWEEN ENCIK SAIFUL NAFIS BIN SHARIFF AND AIRASIA SDN BHD AWARD NO: 2239 OF 2007

THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 5/4-1546/05 BETWEEN ENCIK SAIFUL NAFIS BIN SHARIFF AND AIRASIA SDN BHD AWARD NO: 2239 OF 2007 THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 5/4-1546/05 BETWEEN ENCIK SAIFUL NAFIS BIN SHARIFF AND AIRASIA SDN BHD AWARD NO: 2239 OF 2007 Before : TUAN CHEW SOO HO - CHAIRMAN Venue : The Industrial Court

More information

CIRCULAR 2017/02. Tick ( ) where applicable. Please reply to any of Sara Worldwide Vacations Berhad Member Service Centres by 20 September 2017.

CIRCULAR 2017/02. Tick ( ) where applicable. Please reply to any of Sara Worldwide Vacations Berhad Member Service Centres by 20 September 2017. CIRCULAR 2017/02 Dear Valued Members, Warmest greetings from Easturia Vacation Club! 1. EASTURIA VACATION CLUB 6 th MEMBERS ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING We are pleased to inform that the 6 th Members Annual

More information

PERINTAH UNIVERSITI DAN KOLEJ UNIVERSITI (PERLEMBAGAAN UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA) (PINDAAN) 2012

PERINTAH UNIVERSITI DAN KOLEJ UNIVERSITI (PERLEMBAGAAN UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA) (PINDAAN) 2012 WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 22 November 2012 22 November 2012 P.U. (A) 401 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PERINTAH UNIVERSITI DAN KOLEJ UNIVERSITI (PERLEMBAGAAN UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA) (PINDAAN)

More information

Setem (Pindaan) 1 D.R. 14/2010 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Setem Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa

Setem (Pindaan) 1 D.R. 14/2010 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Setem Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa Setem (Pindaan) 1 D.R. 14/2010 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Setem 1949. [ ] DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut: Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa

More information

VALID AND INVALID VARIATION OMISSION OF WORKS MOTHILAL A/L MUNIANDY

VALID AND INVALID VARIATION OMISSION OF WORKS MOTHILAL A/L MUNIANDY VALID AND INVALID VARIATION OMISSION OF WORKS MOTHILAL A/L MUNIANDY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science (Construction Contract

More information

D.R. 41/94. b er nama. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah [ ]

D.R. 41/94. b er nama. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah [ ] D.R. 41/94 Naskhah Sahih Bahasa Inggeris RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b er nama Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah [ ] MAKA INILAH DIPERBUAT UNDANG-UNDAN oleh Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-pertuan Agong

More information

LEE PEI SZE v. SWIFTLET GARDEN SDN BHD

LEE PEI SZE v. SWIFTLET GARDEN SDN BHD 482 LEE PEI SZE v. SWIFTLET GARDEN SDN BHD Industrial Court, Johor Duncan Sikodol Award No: 167 of 2017 [Case No: 16/4-664/16] 23 January 2017 Dismissal: Probationer Pleadings Allegations of misconduct

More information

CONSTRUING CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE LITERAL RULE CHAI SIAW HIONG UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

CONSTRUING CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE LITERAL RULE CHAI SIAW HIONG UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA CONSTRUING CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE LITERAL RULE CHAI SIAW HIONG UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA CONSTRUING CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE LITERAL RULE CHAI SIAW HIONG A master s project report submitted in fulfillment

More information

UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA. Peperiksaan Semester Pertama Sidang Akademik 2000/2001

UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA. Peperiksaan Semester Pertama Sidang Akademik 2000/2001 Angka Giliran... No. Tempat Duduk... UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA Peperiksaan Semester Pertama Sidang Akademik 2000/2001 September 2000 HBT203/3 - BAHASA, UNDANG-UNDANG DAN PENTERJEMAHAN II (Language, Law

More information

PERMOHONAN PEMBAHARUAN PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RENEWAL OF PERMIT

PERMOHONAN PEMBAHARUAN PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RENEWAL OF PERMIT Borang SPAN/P/2 JADUAL KEEMPAT [subkaedah 8(2)/subrule 8(2)] AKTA INDUSTRI PERKHIDMATAN AIR 2006 WATER SERVICES INDUSTRY ACT 2006 KAEDAH-KAEDAH INDUSTRI PERKHIDMATAN AIR (PERMIT) 2007 WATER SERVICES INDUSTRY

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI PULAU PINANG RAYUAN JENAYAH KES NO : MT-42S-10-07/2016 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI PULAU PINANG RAYUAN JENAYAH KES NO : MT-42S-10-07/2016 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI PULAU PINANG RAYUAN JENAYAH KES NO : MT-42S-10-07/2016 ANTARA 1. SYED MOHAMMAD YASER BIN SYED SOPIAN 2. SHAIFUL FAREZZUAN BIN RAMLI - PERAYU-PERAYU LAWAN PENDAKWA RAYA -

More information

HBT Bahasa, Undang-Undang Dan Penterjemahan II (Language, Law and Translation II)

HBT Bahasa, Undang-Undang Dan Penterjemahan II (Language, Law and Translation II) UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA Peperiksaan Semester Pertama Sidang Akademik 2001/2002 September 2001 HBT 203 - Bahasa, Undang-Undang Dan Penterjemahan II (Language, Law and Translation II) Masa : 2½ jam Sila

More information

MOK YONG KONG & ANOR v MOK YONG CHUAN

MOK YONG KONG & ANOR v MOK YONG CHUAN Page 1 Malayan Law Journal Reports/2002/Volume 2/MOK YONG KONG & ANOR v MOK YONG CHUAN - [2002] 2 MLJ 718-20 February 2002 [2002] 2 MLJ 718 MOK YONG KONG & ANOR v MOK YONG CHUAN COURT OF APPEAL (KUALA

More information

PERKHIDMATAN UTAMA. Kod Dokumen: SOK/PIC/SS10 CHECKLIST FOR IKHTISAS APPLICATION PLEASE USE CAPITAL LETTERS. Name:

PERKHIDMATAN UTAMA. Kod Dokumen: SOK/PIC/SS10 CHECKLIST FOR IKHTISAS APPLICATION PLEASE USE CAPITAL LETTERS. Name: PERKHIDMATAN UTAMA PUTRA INTERNATIONAL (PUSAT ANTARABANGSA) UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Tel: 603-8946 6048 / 6198 E-mail: intl@upm.edu.my Kod Dokumen: SOK/PIC/SS10 CHECKLIST

More information

UNDANG-UNDANG MALAYSIA

UNDANG-UNDANG MALAYSIA Maktab Kerjasama (Perbadanan) (Pindaan) 1 UNDANG-UNDANG MALAYSIA Akta A1398 akta MAKTAB KERJASAMA (PERBADANAN) (PINDAAN) 2011 2 Undang-Undang Malaysia Akta A1398 Tarikh Perkenan Diraja...... 5 Ogos 2011

More information

PENYERTAAN SOSIAL Social Participation

PENYERTAAN SOSIAL Social Participation Perarakan Hari Kebangsaan (National Day Parade) PENYERTAAN SOSIAL Social Participation Penyertaan sosial boleh meningkatkan kualiti hidup kerana ia mencerminkan komitmen dan kerelaan orang ramai untuk

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA (DALAM BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B /2016

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA (DALAM BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B /2016 DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA (DALAM BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B-164-09/2016 ANTARA ZI PRODUCTIONS SDN. BHD. (NO PENDAFTARAN SYARIKAT:

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC /2015

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC /2015 DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC-10794-12/2015 BERKENAAN : KAMALASAN A/L TANGARAJOO (NO. K/P: 850522-08-6763). PENGHUTANG

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA GUAMAN SIVIL NO: DA-22-NCVC-6-02/2017 ANTARA MESRA BUDI SDN.

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA GUAMAN SIVIL NO: DA-22-NCVC-6-02/2017 ANTARA MESRA BUDI SDN. DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA GUAMAN SIVIL NO: DA-22-NCVC-6-02/2017 ANTARA MESRA BUDI SDN. BHD PLAINTIF DAN LEMBAGA KEMAJUAN TANAH PERSEKUTUAN (FELDA) DEFENDAN

More information

PROGRAM PERTUKARAN PELAJAR DAN JARINGAN PENDIDIKAN ANTARABANGSA 2016

PROGRAM PERTUKARAN PELAJAR DAN JARINGAN PENDIDIKAN ANTARABANGSA 2016 PROGRAM PERTUKARAN PELAJAR DAN JARINGAN PENDIDIKAN ANTARABANGSA 2016 Sila Tanda Program yang anda ingin sertai; Program Ke Jepun Siri ( ) Program Ke Korea Siri ( ) London Siri ( ) Australia Siri ( ) Europe

More information

Notice of Annual General Meeting

Notice of Annual General Meeting Notice of Annual General Meeting NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Twelfth (12th) Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at Ballroom Selangor 1, Sheraton Subang Hotel & Towers, Jalan SS 12/1,

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI DI KUALA LUMPUR DALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR (BAHAGIAN SIVIL) GUAMAN NO. WA- 22NCVC / 2017 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI DI KUALA LUMPUR DALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR (BAHAGIAN SIVIL) GUAMAN NO. WA- 22NCVC / 2017 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI DI KUALA LUMPUR DALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR (BAHAGIAN SIVIL) GUAMAN NO. WA- 22NCVC -341-07 / 2017 ANTARA 1. A. SANTAMIL SELVI A/P ALAU MALAY @ ANNA MALAY [Wakil Administratrix

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: W-01(NCVC)(W) /2016 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: W-01(NCVC)(W) /2016 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: W-01(NCVC)(W)-308-08/2016 ANTARA 1. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA 2. KEMENTERIAN PERDAGANGAN DALAM NEGERI KOPERASI DAN KEPENGGUNAAN.. PERAYU-

More information

ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB

ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB Abdul Aziz Ismail & Ors [2015] 2 MELR v. Royal Selangor Club 325 ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB Industrial Court, Kuala Lumpur Eddie Yeo Soon Chye Award No: 327 of 2015 [Case No: 13(25)(22)(25)/4-1255/2011]

More information

UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA. Peperiksaan Semester Kedua Sidang Akademik April 2008 HBT 203. BAHASA, UNDANG.UNDANG DAN PENTERJEMAHAN II

UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA. Peperiksaan Semester Kedua Sidang Akademik April 2008 HBT 203. BAHASA, UNDANG.UNDANG DAN PENTERJEMAHAN II UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA Peperiksaan Semester Kedua Sidang Akademik 2007 12008 April 2008 HBT 203. BAHASA, UNDANG.UNDANG DAN PENTERJEMAHAN II Masa : 3 jam Sila pastikan bahawa kertas peperiksaan ini mengandungi

More information

Mengikut plaintif, pengubahsuaian bangunan itu telah dimulakan tanpa kebenaran plaintif terlebih dahulu.

Mengikut plaintif, pengubahsuaian bangunan itu telah dimulakan tanpa kebenaran plaintif terlebih dahulu. 1 PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN TAMAN BUKIT JAMBUL lwn. PERBADANAN PEMBANGUNAN BANDAR & LAIN LAGI MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA, PULAU PINANG ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD J GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 21-1-1996 24 SEPTEMBER 1996 [1997]

More information

Held (dismissing the appeal): Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad FCJ:

Held (dismissing the appeal): Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad FCJ: 1 SEJAHRATUL DURSINA v. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA & ORS FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, FCJ; PAJAN SINGH GILL, FCJ; ALAUDDIN MOHD SHERIFF, FCJ; RICHARD MALANJUM, FCJ; AUGUSTINE PAUL, FCJ CRIMINAL

More information

Kanun Tatacara Jenayah (Pindaan) (No. 2) 1 D.R. 17/2012 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Tatacara Jenayah.

Kanun Tatacara Jenayah (Pindaan) (No. 2) 1 D.R. 17/2012 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Tatacara Jenayah. Kanun Tatacara Jenayah (Pindaan) (No. 2) 1 D.R. 17/2012 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Tatacara Jenayah. [ ] DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut: Tajuk

More information

D.R. 40/95 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Tanah Negara.

D.R. 40/95 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Tanah Negara. D.R. 40/95 Naskhah Sahih Bahasa Inggeris RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Tanah Negara. [ ] BAHAWASANYA adalah suaimanfaat hanya bagi maksud memastikan keseragaman undang-undang

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR DALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BAHAGIAN DAGANG) GUAMAN SIVIL NO: D ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR DALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BAHAGIAN DAGANG) GUAMAN SIVIL NO: D ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR DALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BAHAGIAN DAGANG) GUAMAN SIVIL NO: D7-22-453-2005 ANTARA SOUTHERN FINANCE BERHAD. PLAINTIF (Dahulunya dikenali sebagai United

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN PERMOHONAN SEMAKAN KEHAKIMAN NO /2017 ANTARA LAWAN

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN PERMOHONAN SEMAKAN KEHAKIMAN NO /2017 ANTARA LAWAN DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN PERMOHONAN SEMAKAN KEHAKIMAN NO. 44-16-01/2017 ANTARA AZLI BIN TUAN KOB (NO. K/P : 670326-71-5309) PEMOHON LAWAN 1. LEMBAGA PENCEGAHAN

More information

UNDANG-UNDANG TANAH Diputuskan: [1]

UNDANG-UNDANG TANAH Diputuskan: [1] 1 Mohamed Abdul Kader Shaukat Ali LWN. Loo Cheong Foo Mahkamah Tinggi MALAYA, Pulau Pinang ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD GUAMAN SIVIL NO. 22-87-88 8 OKTOBER 1991 [1991] 1 CLJ Rep 699; [1991] 3 CLJ 2801 UNDANG-UNDANG

More information

D.R. 22/2006 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Penduduk dan Pembangunan Keluarga 1966.

D.R. 22/2006 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Penduduk dan Pembangunan Keluarga 1966. D.R. 22/2006 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Penduduk dan Pembangunan Keluarga 1966. DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut: Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN DALAM KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC /2016 ANTARA. Dan

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN DALAM KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC /2016 ANTARA. Dan DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN DALAM KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC-384-01/16 5 ANTARA Berkenaan : LIM CHENG POW (NRIC NO : 4401-71-5375) Dan Ex-Parte : LIM CHENG POW

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: /2013

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: /2013 DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29-3300-03/2013 PER : YASMIN PEREMA BINTI ABDULLAH (NO. K/P: 730427-05-5030). PERAYU/ PENGHUTANG

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SEREMBAN DALAM NEGERI SEMBILAM DARUL KHUSUS, MALAYSIA PERMOHONAN JENAYAH NO : NA /2017 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SEREMBAN DALAM NEGERI SEMBILAM DARUL KHUSUS, MALAYSIA PERMOHONAN JENAYAH NO : NA /2017 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SEREMBAN DALAM NEGERI SEMBILAM DARUL KHUSUS, MALAYSIA PERMOHONAN JENAYAH NO : NA-44-29-08/2017 ANTARA AL FAITOURI BIN KAMAL PEMOHON DAN PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDEN PENGHAKIMAN

More information

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION IN MALAYSIA BY GENDER AND LOCALITY PERSPECTIVES

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION IN MALAYSIA BY GENDER AND LOCALITY PERSPECTIVES UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION IN MALAYSIA BY GENDER AND LOCALITY PERSPECTIVES NOR AMNA A LIAH BINTI MOHAMMAD NOR FEP 2014 11 LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION IN MALAYSIA BY GENDER AND

More information

D.R. 5/94 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Ordinan Perkapalan Saudagar 1952.

D.R. 5/94 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Ordinan Perkapalan Saudagar 1952. D.R. 5/94 Naskhah Sahih Bahasa Inggeris RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Ordinan Perkapalan Saudagar 1952. MAKA INILAH DIPERBUAT UNDANG-UNDANG oleh Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-pertuan

More information

MAYBANK GOLD INVESTMENT ACCOUNT AGREEMENT

MAYBANK GOLD INVESTMENT ACCOUNT AGREEMENT To: Malayan Banking Berhad (the Bank ) Branch / Cawangan MAYBANK GOLD INVESTMENT ACCOUNT AGREEMENT Dear Sirs: I/We the undersigned hereby request and authorize the Bank from time to time at my/our direction

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(NCVC)(W) /2013] ANTARA DAN

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(NCVC)(W) /2013] ANTARA DAN DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(NCVC)(W)-143-01/2013] ANTARA 1. MUAFAKAT KEKAL SDN BHD 2. PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN PALM SPRING @ DAMANSARA... PERAYU DAN 1. PESURUHJAYA

More information

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO 02(f)-55-08/2015(B)

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO 02(f)-55-08/2015(B) IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO 02(f)-55-08/2015(B) BETWEEN 1. MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA.. APPELLANT AND 1. RAJEHGOPAL A/L VELU 2. GANASHALINGAM A/L RAJAH.. RESPONDENTS

More information

SETTING ASIDE AN AWARD: ARBITRATOR S MISCONDUCT LEE SEE KIM MB UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

SETTING ASIDE AN AWARD: ARBITRATOR S MISCONDUCT LEE SEE KIM MB UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA SETTING ASIDE AN AWARD: ARBITRATOR S MISCONDUCT LEE SEE KIM MB 091119 UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA SETTING ASIDE AN AWARD: ARBITRATOR S MISCONDUCT LEE SEE KIM A project report submitted in partial fulfillment

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN JENAYAH NO. B /2014 (IRN)] ANTARA MORTEZA HOSSEINKHANI MOSTAFA DAN

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN JENAYAH NO. B /2014 (IRN)] ANTARA MORTEZA HOSSEINKHANI MOSTAFA DAN DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN JENAYAH NO. B-05-267-09/2014 (IRN)] ANTARA MORTEZA HOSSEINKHANI MOSTAFA PERAYU DAN PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDEN [DIDENGAR BERSEKALI DENGAN RAYUAN

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-629/01 BETWEEN SHARIKAT PERMODALAN KEBANGSAAN BERHAD AND MOHAMED JOHARI BIN ABDUL RAHMAN

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-629/01 BETWEEN SHARIKAT PERMODALAN KEBANGSAAN BERHAD AND MOHAMED JOHARI BIN ABDUL RAHMAN INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-629/01 BETWEEN SHARIKAT PERMODALAN KEBANGSAAN BERHAD AND MOHAMED JOHARI BIN ABDUL RAHMAN AWARD NO : 921 OF 2004 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - Chairman (Sitting Alone)

More information

BETWEEN NIK ADIB BIN NIK MAT... APPELLANT AGAINST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR... RESPONDENT GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT (ON SENTENCE)

BETWEEN NIK ADIB BIN NIK MAT... APPELLANT AGAINST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR... RESPONDENT GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT (ON SENTENCE) DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 42S(A)-39-7/16 (MAHKAMAH SESYEN KOTA BHARU, KELANTAN [NO. SKB(A):61-11-09/16] BETWEEN NIK ADIB BIN NIK MAT...

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B-22-02/2016 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B-22-02/2016 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B-22-02/2016 1. PARIS BIN ARIFF ANTARA 2. ASRINA BINTI MD MISDAR PERAYU-PERAYU DAN WAN YA BIN

More information

PERATURAN-PERATURAN SKIM KEPENTINGAN 2017 INTEREST SCHEMES REGULATIONS 2017

PERATURAN-PERATURAN SKIM KEPENTINGAN 2017 INTEREST SCHEMES REGULATIONS 2017 WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 26 Januari 2017 26 January 2017 P.U. (A) 36 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PERATURAN-PERATURAN SKIM KEPENTINGAN 2017 INTEREST SCHEMES REGULATIONS 2017 DISIARKAN OLEH/ PUBLISHED BY

More information

BETWEEN AND KHAFASLIZA BINTI SHAFII... RESPONDENT (IC.NO: ) GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT

BETWEEN AND KHAFASLIZA BINTI SHAFII... RESPONDENT (IC.NO: ) GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 42LB(A)-2-1/2016 (MAHKAMAH SESYEN KOTA BHARU, KELANTAN NO. SKB(A)61-08-12/2013) BETWEEN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR...

More information

TAWARAN MENGISI JAWATAN SECRETARY GENERAL (SG) OF AFRO-ASIAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (AARDO)

TAWARAN MENGISI JAWATAN SECRETARY GENERAL (SG) OF AFRO-ASIAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (AARDO) Ketua Eksekutif FELCRA Berhad Wisma FELCRA Lot PT 4780, Jalan Rejang 50722 KUALA LUMPUR Lembaga Kemajuan Johor Tenggara (KEJORA) Ibu Pejabat KEJORA Jalan Dato' ann, Bandar Penawar 81900 Kota Tinggi,. JOHOR.

More information

Informasi Teknik. : Semua pihak yang berkepentingan : Kampanye Inspeksi Terkonsentrasi oleh Paris MOU mengenai Maritime Labour Convention, 2006.

Informasi Teknik. : Semua pihak yang berkepentingan : Kampanye Inspeksi Terkonsentrasi oleh Paris MOU mengenai Maritime Labour Convention, 2006. Informasi Teknik No. : 067-2016 19 Agustus 2016 Kepada Perihal : Semua pihak yang berkepentingan : Kampanye Inspeksi Terkonsentrasi oleh Paris MOU mengenai Maritime Labour Convention, 2006. Ringkasan Informasi

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: T-01(NCVC)(W)-13-01/2017 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: T-01(NCVC)(W)-13-01/2017 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: T-01(NCVC)(W)-13-01/2017 ANTARA 1. KETUA POLIS DAERAH MARANG 2. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA... PERAYU-PERAYU DAN HASMALIZZA BINTI

More information

BRG Polo Haus Sdn Bhd dan satu lagi lwn Blay International (M) Sdn Bhd dan lain-lain

BRG Polo Haus Sdn Bhd dan satu lagi lwn Blay International (M) Sdn Bhd dan lain-lain 176 Malayan Law Journal [2015] 8 MLJ R Polo aus Sdn hd dan satu lagi lwn lay nternational (M) Sdn hd dan lain-lain MKM TN (KUL LUMPUR) UMN NO 22Nv-66 01 TUN 2013 ROSL YOP PK 30 JUN 2014 Kontrak Penjualan

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BINDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: M-02(NCVC)(W) /2016

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BINDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: M-02(NCVC)(W) /2016 DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BINDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: M-02(NCVC)(W)-1142-06/2016 1. SHA KANNAN 2. KAMBARAMAN SHANMUKHAM...PERAYU PERAYU DAN 1. ARUNACHALAM A/L VENKATACHALAM 2. VENKATACHALAM

More information

Held (dismissing the application)

Held (dismissing the application) 1 SIA CHENG SOON & ANOR v. TENGKU ISMAIL TENGKU IBRAHIM FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, CJ; ZAKI TUN AZMI, PCA; ARIFFIN ZAKARIA, FCJ CIVIL APPLICATION NO: 08-151-2007 (N) 15 MAY 2008 [2008]

More information

1.0 PENGENALAN. 1.5 Berdasarkan keadaan semasa,

1.0 PENGENALAN. 1.5 Berdasarkan keadaan semasa, 1.0 PENGENALAN 1.1 TATIUC telah mengadakan jalinan kerjasama dengan agensi-agensi luar yang antaranya bertujuan untuk menjalinkan kerjasama akademik, penyelidikan/mobiliti kakitangan dan pelajar dan persidangan.

More information

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 1 YONG TECK LEE v. HARRIS MOHD SALLEH & ANOR COURT OF APPEAL, KUALA LUMPUR ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, JCA; MOHD SAARI YUSOFF, JCA; K C VOHRAH, JCA CIVIL APPEAL NO: S-04-75-2001 6 JUNE 2002 [2002] 3 CLJ 422 CIVIL

More information

BETWEEN MOHAMAD SHAKIR ZUFAYRI BIN ARIFFIN... APPELLANT (IC.NO: ) AND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR... RESPONDENT GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT

BETWEEN MOHAMAD SHAKIR ZUFAYRI BIN ARIFFIN... APPELLANT (IC.NO: ) AND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR... RESPONDENT GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 42H-15-4/2016 (MAHKAMAH SESYEN KOTA BHARU, KELANTAN NO. SKB(A)62JS-144-09/2014) BETWEEN MOHAMAD SHAKIR ZUFAYRI

More information

Mok Yong Chuan v Mok Yong Kong & Anor

Mok Yong Chuan v Mok Yong Kong & Anor Page 1 Malayan Law Journal Reports/2006/Volume 7/Mok Yong Chuan v Mok Yong Kong & Anor - [2006] 7 MLJ 526-31 March 2005 HIGH COURT (JOHOR BAHRU) SYED AHMAD HELMY J CIVIL SUIT NO MT1-22-289 OF 1998 31 March

More information

KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY

KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 29 Jun 2011 29 June 2011 P.U. (A) 210 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ PUBLISHED

More information

Possession - Exclusive possession. CRIMINAL LAW: Dangerous Drugs Act Section 39(B)(1)(a) - Knowledge, how inferred

Possession - Exclusive possession. CRIMINAL LAW: Dangerous Drugs Act Section 39(B)(1)(a) - Knowledge, how inferred 1 GUNALAN RAMACHANDRAN & ORS v. PP COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA DENIS ONG, JCA; ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, JCA; ABDUL AZIZ MOHAMAD, JCA CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS: W-05-26-2002, W-05-27-2002 & W-05-28-2002 6 AUGUST 2004

More information

1. Make Sure That You Fulfill The Necessary Requirements

1. Make Sure That You Fulfill The Necessary Requirements Apply For A Foreign Maid (Pembantu Rumah Asing-PRA) in Malaysia (Feb 18, 2005 at 10:29 AM) - Contributed by Dr Azmi Mohd Tamil - Last Updated (Oct 29, 2005 at 06:20 PM) I just came back from the immigration

More information

CONSTITUTION PERSATUAN UNIQUEVARCITY PENDAKI (UNIQUEVARCITY OF HIKERS ASSOCIATION)

CONSTITUTION PERSATUAN UNIQUEVARCITY PENDAKI (UNIQUEVARCITY OF HIKERS ASSOCIATION) CONSTITUTION PERSATUAN UNIQUEVARCITY PENDAKI (UNIQUEVARCITY OF HIKERS ASSOCIATION) CLAUSE 1 NAME 1. The Association shall be known as PERSATUAN UNIQUEVARCITY PENDAKI (UNIQUEVARCITY OF HIKERS ASSOCIATION)

More information

CIMB Bank HP Slate 21 Redemption Order Form

CIMB Bank HP Slate 21 Redemption Order Form CIMB BANK BERHAD (13491-P) CIMB Bank HP Slate 21 Redemption Order Form Section A: Gift Redemption Please tick in the boxes where applicable. HP Slate 21 only HP Slate 21 + Optional keyboard, mouse and

More information

PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION

PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION 1 LEE KEW SANG v. TIMBALAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI, MALAYSIA & ORS FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA AHMAD FAIRUZ, CJ; SITI NORMA YAAKOB, CJ (MALAYA); ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, FCJ CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 05-23-2004 (J) 2

More information

DATO' SERI ANWAR BIN IBRAHIM v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

DATO' SERI ANWAR BIN IBRAHIM v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Page 1 Malayan Law Journal Reports/2002/Volume 3/DATO' SERI ANWAR BIN IBRAHIM v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR - [2002] 3 MLJ 193-10 July 2002 36 pages [2002] 3 MLJ 193 DATO' SERI ANWAR BIN IBRAHIM v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

More information

KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE FEDERAL COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY

KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE FEDERAL COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY WARTA KERAJAAN PERSE EKUTUAN 29 Jun 2011 29 June 2011 P.U. (A) 208 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE FEDERAL COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA SAMAN PEMULA NO: DA-24NCVC /2016

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA SAMAN PEMULA NO: DA-24NCVC /2016 DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA SAMAN PEMULA NO: DA-24NCVC-383-11/2016 Dalam Perkara berkenaan dengan sebidang tanah pegang dibawah Hakmilik No Grn 50491 (dahului

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) MAHKAMAH RAYUAN JENAYAH NO. B /2014 (RAYUAN JENAYAH SELANGOR NO. 45A TAHUN 2012)

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) MAHKAMAH RAYUAN JENAYAH NO. B /2014 (RAYUAN JENAYAH SELANGOR NO. 45A TAHUN 2012) DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) MAHKAMAH RAYUAN JENAYAH NO. B-05-381-12/2014 (RAYUAN JENAYAH SELANGOR NO. 45A-241-10 TAHUN 2012) ANTARA BARRY ABDOUL (W/N: GUINEA)... PERAYU (NO. P/P:

More information

KOMEN JOINT ACTION GROUP FOR GENDER EQUALITY (JAG) KE ATAS CADANGAN-CADANGAN PINDAAN KEPADA KANUN KESEKSAAN DAN KANUN TATACARA JENAYAH

KOMEN JOINT ACTION GROUP FOR GENDER EQUALITY (JAG) KE ATAS CADANGAN-CADANGAN PINDAAN KEPADA KANUN KESEKSAAN DAN KANUN TATACARA JENAYAH KOMEN JOINT ACTION GROUP FOR GENDER EQUALITY (JAG) KE ATAS CADANGAN-CADANGAN PINDAAN KEPADA KANUN KESEKSAAN DAN KANUN TATACARA JENAYAH ROGOL Seksyen 375(f) Rogol dengan keizinan dalam keadaan tertentu

More information

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA U.S. POLICIES TOWARD IRAN AND IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SECURITY IN THE PERSIAN GULF FROM

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA U.S. POLICIES TOWARD IRAN AND IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SECURITY IN THE PERSIAN GULF FROM UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA U.S. POLICIES TOWARD IRAN AND IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SECURITY IN THE PERSIAN GULF FROM 1979 2008 SEYED MOHSEN MIRHOSSEINI FEM 2012 22 U.S. POLICIES TOWARD IRAN AND IMPLICATIONS

More information

THE ROLE, FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE INDUSTRIAL COURT IN RELATION TO RETRENCHMENT, TERMINATION AND DISMISSAL TREVOR GEORGE DE SILVA 14TH JANUARY 2009

THE ROLE, FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE INDUSTRIAL COURT IN RELATION TO RETRENCHMENT, TERMINATION AND DISMISSAL TREVOR GEORGE DE SILVA 14TH JANUARY 2009 THE ROLE, FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE INDUSTRIAL COURT IN RELATION TO RETRENCHMENT, TERMINATION AND DISMISSAL TREVOR GEORGE DE SILVA 14TH JANUARY 2009 JW MARRIOT 1 The long title of the Industrial Relations

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12NCVC-7-01/2016 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12NCVC-7-01/2016 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12NCVC-7-01/2016 ANTARA OBNET SDN BHD (DAHULU DIKENALI SEBAGAI INTELLIGENT EDGE SOLUTIONS SDN BHD)

More information

Skim. Ibadah Korban. Korban Ritual Scheme

Skim. Ibadah Korban. Korban Ritual Scheme Skim Ibadah Korban Korban Ritual Scheme KANDUNGAN contents Latar Belakang 2 Background Skim Ibadah Korban Korban Ritual Scheme Kemudahan Di Bawah Skim 3 Facilities Under The Scheme Syarat Menyertai Skim

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA [BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN] ANTARA SITI NOOR AISHAH BINTI ATAM DAN

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA [BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN] ANTARA SITI NOOR AISHAH BINTI ATAM DAN DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA [BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN] RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: W-05(SH)-219-05/2017 ANTARA SITI NOOR AISHAH BINTI ATAM PERAYU DAN PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDEN (Dalam Perkara Mahkamah Tinggi

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-170/02 BETWEEN SEMANGAT RAKYAT SDN. BHD. AND

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-170/02 BETWEEN SEMANGAT RAKYAT SDN. BHD. AND INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-170/02 BETWEEN SEMANGAT RAKYAT SDN. BHD. AND JESUMARAN ANTHONY A/L J. MARIADASS @ MUHAMAD ADAM JESU ABDULLAH AWARD NO : 766 OF 2004 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN -

More information

ERRATA TO THE ANNUAL REPORT 2009

ERRATA TO THE ANNUAL REPORT 2009 ERRATA TO THE ANNUAL REPORT 2009 To: The Shareholders of Petra Energy Berhad, Following the resignation of Mr. Siew Boon Yeong as Director of the Company with effect from 25 May 2010, sections of the Annual

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA YEOH LIANG CHUAN (No. K/P: 481027-07-5351). PERAYU DAN JAGJIT SINGH (mendakwa sebagai

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: P-01(NCVC)(W) /2015 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: P-01(NCVC)(W) /2015 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: P-01(NCVC)(W)-303-09/2015 ANTARA 1. JUGAJORTHY A/P VISVANATHAN PERAYU PERTAMA 2. JUGAJORTHY A/P VISVANATHAN (Sebagai Pentadbir Harta

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA GUAMAN SIVIL NO: DA-22-NCC-10-11/2016 ANTARA DAN

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA GUAMAN SIVIL NO: DA-22-NCC-10-11/2016 ANTARA DAN DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA GUAMAN SIVIL NO: DA-22-NCC-10-11/2016 ANTARA LEE WENG CHUN (NO.K/P: 650601-04-5269) PLAINTIF DAN 1. TAN KICK YONG (NO.K/P: 630204-01-5471)

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA AT PUTRAJAYA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: B-05(LB) /2015 (IND) BETWEEN AND AND

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA AT PUTRAJAYA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: B-05(LB) /2015 (IND) BETWEEN AND AND IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA AT PUTRAJAYA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: B-05(LB)-285-10/2015 (IND) BETWEEN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR APPELLANT AND NI KOMANG YUNINGSIH RESPONDENT AND [IN THE

More information

A RELATION BETWEEN TUDUNG SAJI WEAVING PATTERNS AND GROUP THEORY SITI NORZIAHIDAYU AMZEE ZAMRI UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

A RELATION BETWEEN TUDUNG SAJI WEAVING PATTERNS AND GROUP THEORY SITI NORZIAHIDAYU AMZEE ZAMRI UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA A RELATION BETWEEN TUDUNG SAJI WEAVING PATTERNS AND GROUP THEORY SITI NORZIAHIDAYU AMZEE ZAMRI UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA A RELATION BETWEEN TUDUNG SAJI WEAVING PATTERNS AND GROUP THEORY SITI NORZIAHIDAYU

More information

KAEDAH-KAEDAH SYARIKAT (MEKANISME PENYELAMAT KORPORAT) 2018 COMPANIES (CORPORATE RESCUE MECHANISM) RULES 2018

KAEDAH-KAEDAH SYARIKAT (MEKANISME PENYELAMAT KORPORAT) 2018 COMPANIES (CORPORATE RESCUE MECHANISM) RULES 2018 WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 28 Februari 2018 28 February 2018 P.U. (A) 64 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE KAEDAH-KAEDAH SYARIKAT (MEKANISME PENYELAMAT KORPORAT) 2018 COMPANIES (CORPORATE RESCUE MECHANISM) RULES

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. P-06A-7-03/2017 [CRIMINAL APPLICATION PENANG NO.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. P-06A-7-03/2017 [CRIMINAL APPLICATION PENANG NO. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. P-06A-7-03/2017 [CRIMINAL APPLICATION PENANG NO. PA-44-3-01/2017] BETWEEN LIM GUAN ENG APPELLANT AND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

More information

Contents Menilai Kehidupan

Contents Menilai Kehidupan ULANG TAHUN KE-60 1 A Contents 3 3 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 Ucapan Salam Mesra Tan Eng Hong Cabaran Sebenar J. Solomon Keahlian Memang Berbaloi Peringatan Kepada Semua Juruwang Laporkan Lebihan / Kekurangan

More information

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA BALANCE OF PAYMENT OF ASEAN FIVE PLUS THREE YONG CHEN CHEN FEP

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA BALANCE OF PAYMENT OF ASEAN FIVE PLUS THREE YONG CHEN CHEN FEP UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA EFFECTS OF TRADE LIBERALIZATION ON ECONOMIC GROWTH AND BALANCE OF PAYMENT OF ASEAN FIVE PLUS THREE YONG CHEN CHEN FEP 2007 15 EFFECTS OF TRADE LIBERALIZATION ON ECONOMIC GROWTH

More information

PERLEMBAGAAN BAGI PERTUBUHAN INDUK PERSATUAN DERMATOLOGI MALAYSIA (DERMATOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALAYSIA)

PERLEMBAGAAN BAGI PERTUBUHAN INDUK PERSATUAN DERMATOLOGI MALAYSIA (DERMATOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALAYSIA) PERLEMBAGAAN BAGI PERTUBUHAN INDUK PERSATUAN DERMATOLOGI MALAYSIA (DERMATOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALAYSIA) FASAL 1 NAMA (1) Pertubuhan ini dikenali dengan nama PERSATUAN DERMATOLOGI MALAYSIA (DERMATOLOGICAL

More information

PERKATAAN & ISTILAH: "perbelanjaan hidup" - Akta Undang-Undang Sivil 1956, s. 7

PERKATAAN & ISTILAH: perbelanjaan hidup - Akta Undang-Undang Sivil 1956, s. 7 1 RAJA GUPPAL RAMASAMY lwn. SAGARAN PAKIAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA, PULAU PINANG ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD H RAYUAN SIVIL NO: 12-45-97 13 JANUARI 1998 [1998] 5 CLJ 656 KETERANGAN: Keterangan dokumentar - Ikatan

More information

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA CONTROL PATTERNS AMONG MULTINATIONAL SUBSIDIARIES IN MALAYSIA RAJA NERINA BT. RAJA YUSOF GSM

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA CONTROL PATTERNS AMONG MULTINATIONAL SUBSIDIARIES IN MALAYSIA RAJA NERINA BT. RAJA YUSOF GSM UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA CONTROL PATTERNS AMONG MULTINATIONAL SUBSIDIARIES IN MALAYSIA RAJA NERINA BT. RAJA YUSOF GSM 2003 11 CONTROL PATTERNS AMONG MULTINATIONAL SUBSIDIARIES IN MALAYSIA By RAJA NERINA

More information

MINISTRY OF TOURISM MALAYSIA

MINISTRY OF TOURISM MALAYSIA FOR INDIVIDUAL APPLICANT / SPOUSE (THROUGH MM2H LICENSED COMPANY) v1.11 MINISTRY OF TOURISM MALAYSIA Malaysia My Second Home Centre Telephone: +603 88917424 Fax: +603 88917414 APPLICATION FORM FOR THE

More information

Amendments to Rules of Court 2012, Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994, and Rules of the Federal Court 1995

Amendments to Rules of Court 2012, Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994, and Rules of the Federal Court 1995 Circular No 067/2018 Dated 9 Mar 2018 To Members of the Malaysian Bar Amendments to Rules of Court 2012, Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994, and Rules of the Federal Court 1995 Please be informed of the

More information

Held (dismissing the appeal with costs) Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad FCJ (dissenting):

Held (dismissing the appeal with costs) Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad FCJ (dissenting): 1 PERWIRA HABIB BANK MALAYSIA BHD v. LUM CHOON REALTY SDN BHD FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA STEVE SHIM, CJ (SABAH & SARAWAK); ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, FCJ; PAJAN SINGH GILL, FCJ CIVIL APPLICATION NO: 02-13-2003

More information

ACICIS Study Indonesia

ACICIS Study Indonesia ACICIS Study Indonesia APPLICATION PACKAGE for Family Members These guidelines contain information for family members (spouses and/or children) accompanying ACICIS students on Indonesian semester study

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W /2014 BETWEEN

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W /2014 BETWEEN DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02-1480-09/2014 BETWEEN ANEKA MELOR SDN. BHD. PERAYU (No. Syarikat: 0227188-T) DAN SERI SABCO (M) SDN BHD RESPONDEN (No. Syarikat:

More information

ADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD

ADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD 353 ADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD Industrial Court, Kuala Lumpur Mary Shakila G Azariah Award No: 521 of 2012 [Case No: 24/4-906/10] 24 April 2012 Dismissal: Retrenchment - Redundancy - Company

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 25/4-278/06 ENCIK RAVINDAR SINGH A/L JESWANT SINGH AND ISLAND AIR SDN BHD AWARD NO: 175 OF 2009

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 25/4-278/06 ENCIK RAVINDAR SINGH A/L JESWANT SINGH AND ISLAND AIR SDN BHD AWARD NO: 175 OF 2009 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 25/4-278/06 ENCIK RAVINDAR SINGH A/L JESWANT SINGH AND ISLAND AIR SDN BHD AWARD NO: 175 OF 2009 BEFORE VENUE : DATO JALALDIN HJ. HUSSAIN CHAIRMAN (Sitting Alone) :

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO : K-05(M) /2015 BETWEEN AND HEARD TOGETHER WITH

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO : K-05(M) /2015 BETWEEN AND HEARD TOGETHER WITH 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO : K-05(M)-338-12/2015 BETWEEN GOBINATHAN A/L VALAYLAM APPELLANT AND PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDENT HEARD TOGETHER WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL

More information

Debtors 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 256 DEBTORS ACT Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006

Debtors 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 256 DEBTORS ACT Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 Debtors 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 256 DEBTORS ACT 1957 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION

More information