IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL"

Transcription

1 Page 1 of 18 IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL REGIONAL BENCH, GUWAHATI. OA. NO. 23/2012 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H. N. Sarma, Member (J) HON BLE CMDE MOHAN PHADKE (Retd), Member (A) Smti Anupama Sinha W/O.Ex Riflemen No N Satyendra Sinha,son of Shri Satyaban Kuber Sinha Village Hatirhar P.O. Srikona PS Silchar, In the District of Cachar,Assam. - Versus- 1. The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary of Ministry of Defence, Government of India, New Delhi Chief of the Army Staff Ministry of Defence (Army) New Delhi Appellant Mr.L.P.Sharma Legal practitioner for the applicant.

2 Page 2 of 18 3.The Commandant, TAC H/Q 32 Assam Rifles, C/O. 99 APO Respondents Mr.C.Boruah, CGSC Legal practitioner For the respondents. Date of Hearings : Date of Judgment & Order : ( H.N.Sarma,J) JUDGMENT & ORDER ( Oral) The subject matter of challenge in this application is the impugned order of the conviction and sentence dated imposed against the husband of the applicant Ex Rifleman Satyendra Sinha by the Summary Court Martial (SCM in short) held on dismissing him from service under section 38(1) of the Army Act which was affirmed by the appellate authority. The present application, as filed by the applicant on behalf of her husband was admitted on the basis of the statement in her OA that her husband suffers

3 Page 3 of 18 from mental ailment and is still suffering from mental disease. 2. Ex-Rifleman Satyendra Sinha, the husband of the applicant was employed in the organization of Assam Rifles on After rendering a certain period of service he started showing the symptom of mental ailment. The Commanding Officer referred the Ex-Rifleman Satyendra Sinha (hereinafter referred to as Ex Rifleman ) to the Unit Hospital 31 Assam Rifles. On , he was referred to the Deptt. of Psychiatrics, G.N.Bordoloi Regional Institute of Psychiatric for specialist opinion. The Rifleman reported to the said hospital on wherein he underwent psychiatric evaluation upto and was discharged from the hospital on In the report dated of the Command it is stated with reference to the mental outlook and personal habits of applicant that he was phobic-afraid of people and surroundings. As regards his behaviour in the unit, he was reported to be non-violent but confused. Similarly, as regards retention in service, it was opined by the Commanding Officer that he could be retained in service if cured permanently. At the time of discharge from

4 Page 4 of 18 the G.N.Bordoloi Institute of Psychiatric on , he was advised to be kept under supervision, to record any abbormality if noticed, and sent for review if necessary. After spending sometime in the unit, the Ex-Rifleman again left the unit w.e.f It is found that leaving the unit the rifleman came to his native place at Silchar and he got himself treated in the Silchar Medical College and Hospital and necessary prescriptions/documents to that effect have also been placed on record. Upon getting relief from ailment at Silchar Medical College the Ex-Rifleman rejoined his unit on Due to his absence without leave, a Court of Inquiry was held and Apprehension Roll was issued against him on , which was, however, subsequently recalled on on his re-joining the unit. In the Court of Inquiry, the rifleman was held to be a deserter from the unit vides order dated which was duly accepted. After the rejoining of Ex-Rifleman Satyendra Sinha on , a Summary Court Martial (SCM) was ordered and he was informed vide order dated that he would be tried by the Summary Court Martial for his offence under section 39(a) of the Army Act for deserting from Unit from Prior to that the Commanding Officer of the

5 Page 5 of 18 Unit Col. S. S. Salkar vide order dated ordered the recording of the summary evidence against him which was accordingly recorded. In the said summary of evidence, 3 witnesses were examined and the statement of the Ex- Rifleman was also recorded. Having found a prima facie case, the Ex-Rifleman was tried by the Summary Court Martial headed by Col. S. S. Salkar, who was the Commanding Officer of the Unit. 3. It is pertinent to mention here that initially the respondents proposed to book Ex-Rifleman Satyendra Sinha under section 39 (a) of the Army Act, that is, for the offence of remaining absent without leave. Accordingly, a tentative charge-sheet dated was forwarded to him. However, the final charge-sheet was drawn under section 38(1) of the Army Act, which prescribes punishment for the offence for desertion. In the said summary Court Martial, Ex- Rifleman Satyendra Sinha was stated to have admitted his guilt and accordingly, he was found guilty under section 38(1) of the Army Act and punished with dismissal from service vide order dated

6 Page 6 of An appeal filed against the said order of punishment before the Chief of the Army Staff (COAS) was also rejected vide order dated , with modification that the sentence of dismissal was altered to that of discharge with effect from the date of dismissal. Hence, this application, seeking necessary relief, is made by the applicant on behalf of her husband who is stated to be still suffering mentally as well as physically. 5. We have heard Mr. L. P. Sarma, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. C. Baruah, learned CGSC assisted by Col. M. S. Yadav, appearing for the respondents. 6. The respondents contested the case by filing a counter affidavit. The stand of the respondents in the affidavit filed is that the Ex-Rifleman was held to be a deserter after holding necessary Court of Inquiry and accordingly he was tried under the Army Act by holding Summary Court Martial. It is also admitted in the counter affidavit that the tentative charge sheet dated under section 39 (a) of the Army Act

7 Page 7 of 18 was served upon him and summary of evidence was recorded and final charge sheet dated was drawn up. The final charge sheet, as indicated above, is under section 38(1) of the Army Act. The further case of the respondents is that Ex- Rifleman Satyendra Sinha pleaded guilty before the Court and accordingly he was punished by passing the impugned order of dismissal. 7. From the pleadings of the parties as well as materials on record placed before us, it is crystal clear that Ex-Rifleman Satyendra Sinha was suffering from some amount of mental ailment and on the advice of the Commanding Officer of the Unit, he was examined in the unit Hospital and then in the Gopinath Bordoloi Regional Institute of Mental Health, Tezpur. He thereafter left the Unit and got himself treated at Silchar Medical College and Hospital. Further, the prescriptions dated , , and reflect the fact that he was, in fact, treated by the Registrar of Psychiatric Deptt. of Silchar Medical College and Hospital and prescribed necessary medicines. After getting relief from ailment, he reported back to his unit and rejoined on

8 Page 8 of The applicant was tried for offence of desertion under Section 38(1) of the Army Act. The word deserter is not defined in the Army Act, but from the note appended below section 38 of the Army Act, 1950 available in the Manual of Military Law, Vol II, it is sufficiently clear that there must be an intention to desert the service in order to attract the provisions of section 38 (1) of the Army Act. According to that section the intention to leave the Army must be established. Absence without leave may also, in certain circumstances, be deemed to be desertion under section 106 of the Army Act. But in the instant case, Ex-Rifleman Satyendra Sinha after getting himself treated by the Head of the Deptt. of Psychiatric in the Silchar Medical College and after getting relief from ailment, reported back to his Unit and rejoined on Had there been any intention to desert from service he would not have rejoined subsequently. Section 106 (2) of the Army Act can therefore, not be applied to treat him as deserter. This position is not disputed by the respondents. 9. From the records we find that initially the Ex Rifleman was sought to be tried under section 39 (a) of the Army Act which prescribes punishment for absence without

9 Page 9 of 18 leave. The charge under section 38(1) of the Army Act is not attracted to the facts and circumstances of this case wherein the applicant rejoined after recovery from the ailment nullifying the intention to desert from service. Section 38 (1) of the Army Act which relates to desertion is not at all attracted to the facts and circumstances of the case. Framing of final charge under section 38 (1) of the Army Act, 1950 as against the initially proposed Section 39 of the Army Act, was, therefore, legally untenable and the proper course ought to have been to charge him under section 39 (a) of the Army Act as earlier proposed. 10. Mr. L. P.Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the applicant further pointed out that the punishment of offence of desertion is a very serious one and the offender, upon proof of desertion, is liable to be punished with death or such lesser punishment as provided in Section 38 (1) 0f the Act. On the other hand, the power of Summary Court Martial as prescribed under section 120 of the Army Act is restricted to pass any sentence which may be passed under the Act, except a sentence of death or transportation, or of imprisonment for a term exceeding limit specified in Sub section 5 of the Act. Sub section 5 of Section 120 provided the limit mentioned in

10 Page 10 of 18 section 120(4) as one year if the Officer holding the Summary Court Martial is of the rank of Lt.Col and upwards, and 3 months, if such officer is below that rank. It is thus contended that since the Officer holding the SCM was not authorized to inflict a sentence of more than one year, the the offence ought not to have been tried by way of SCM as has been done in the instant case. 11. We find substance in the arguments advanced by the learned Counsel for the applicant. As the trial for such a serious offence under Section 38(1), as charged against the Ex Rifleman was done by the SCM which is not authorized to inflict the punishment as provided, we hold that the trial by SCM as conducted in the present case does not commensurate with the requirement of law on this ground. 12. In addition to the above we find that the SCM suffered from several other serious defects in this case. For example, the Summary Court Martial was started on at 10 a.m. and concluded at 11 a.m., the same day. In the said Court Martial Proceedings which lasted for just one hour, the

11 Page 11 of 18 Ex Rifleman was stated to have pleaded guilty to the serious charge under section 38 (1) of the Army Act, 1950 in terms of the procedure prescribed in section 115 (2) of the Army Rules. This rule reads as follows:- If an accused person pleads Guilty, that plea shall be recorded as the finding of the Court; but before it is recorded, the court shall ascertain that the accused understands the nature of the charge to which he has pleaded guilty and shall inform him of the general effect of that plea, and in particular of the meaning of the charge to which he has pleaded guilty and of the difference in procedure which will be made by the plea of guilty, and shall advise him to withdraw that plea if it appears from the summary of evidence ( if any) or otherwise that the accused ought to plead not guilty It may be seen that the aforesaid rule provides several mandatory procedures to be followed before recording the plea of guilty. These are, (a) the Court shall ascertain that the accused understands the nature of the charge to which he has pleaded guilty, (b) the Court is to further inform the accused of the general effect of his plea and in particular the meaning of the charge to which he has pleaded guilty and of the difference in procedure which will be made by the plea of guilty, (c) the Court is further - and more importantly - required to advise the accused to withdraw that plea if it appears from the summary of evidence or otherwise that the accused ought to plead not guilty.

12 Page 12 of We are of the view that it is not just possible to comply with all these procedures only within an hour unless it is mechanically proceeded with without compliance of the real terms of the requirement of law The resultant consequences of the illegality and irregularity in holding the Summary Court Martial in violation of Rule 115 of the Army Rule came up for consideration before us in TA 49/2010 (Bhupal Ram Okesa vs Union of India & Ors) decided on ; OA 08/2011 (Prem Bahadur Thapa vs Union of India & Ors) decided on and in TA 06/2012 (Ex Rfn Sri Amar Nath Yadav vs Union of India & Ors) decided on In the case of Prem Bahadur Thapa (supra) at paragraph it has been held as under:- 10. It is found that after arraignment of the accused he was straightway asked whether he pleads guilty or not and the answer of the accused recorded as guilty. The necessary pre-requisite which was mandatorily required to be followed by the Court as incorporated in Rule 115(2) as indicated above has not been followed. We find from the record that by inserting in a footnote the requirement of Rule 115(2) has been incorporated, which is again found to be in a typed form recorded before asking the accused as to whether he pleads guilty or not. We find that by such incorporation in a footnote the provisions regarding compliance mentioned under Rule 115(2) cannot be held to be sufficient compliance in discharging the duties and responsibilities of the court as mandatorily required by Rule 115(2).

13 Page 13 of In the instant case, we also find from the record of Summary Court Martial proceeding that the appellant was not given warning as required under Rule 34 of the Army Rules. For the consequence of such omission we may profitably refer to the decision of the Apex Court rendered in Union of India & Ors vs A.K.Pandey, reported in (2009 ) 10 SCC 552, wherein Army Rule 34 has been interpreted as a mandatory one When tested in applying the above statutory requirement under the Army Rule 115(2), we find that none of the procedures, as prescribed, were properly and scrupulously followed. In view of long history of mental ailment that the accused suffered from - and which was known to the Commanding Officer - the SCM should in the first instance have advised him to plead not guilty to the serious charge of desertion which has, as it s essential ingredient, the intention to not return to the establishment. In the present case, the accused had voluntarily reported back for duty after getting relief on treatment and, therefore, the Commanding Officer should not, in the first instance, have framed the charge of desertion. He should have adhered to the charge of absence without leave under section 39 (a) of the Army Act, 1950 as

14 Page 14 of 18 earlier framed in the tentative chargesheet. Having not done so, he should have referred the matter to the appropriate superior military authority in terms of Army Rule 24 (b). Again having not done so, he should in the least have advised the accused to plead not guilty in view of the facts and circumstance of this case which involved a long history of mental ailment. We also find that after altering the charge from section 39 (a) (absence without leave), as it was initially framed in the tentative chargesheet, to a charge under section 38 (1) of the Army Act (desertion), the Commanding Officer should have issued a fresh notice to the accused applicant in terms of Army Rule 34 considering the gravity of the charge. This was not done as the trial was started at 10 a.m. on and concluded at 11 a.m., the same day. It is not practically possible to comply with all the procedure within just one hour. We, therefore, hold that the certificate in terms of Rule 115 which is seen to have been recorded was more by way of a ritual than in the interest of justice showing nonapplication of mind. This is further confirmed by the fact that the said certificate is a part of the pre-typed format of Summary Trial Proceedings. The said certificate, therefore, does not inspire confidence of necessary compliance of Army

15 Page 15 of 18 Rule 115(2) in the facts and circumstances of the case. We accordingly hold that the mandatory procedures provided in Army Rule 115 were not duly complied with, which has caused serious prejudice to the Ex Rifleman. 13. Recording the plea of guilty is a solemn act. The underlying principle of adhering to such precaution provided under section 115 (2) of the Army Act is that on the face of such plea of guilty the accused can be punished to whatever extent the Court deems fit commensurating with the gravity of the offence without any further evidence. Accordingly, the Court is required to be more and more cautious and careful in recording the plea of guilty with full compliance of the procedure prescribed. It appears from the record that Ex Rifleman after getting relief from his ailment rejoined on and, therefore, the SCM ought to have applied its mind to this aspect which prima-facie signifies the fact that applicant had no intention to desert. On this count, the SCM should have advised Ex-Rifleman Satyendra Sinha not to plead guilty but that was not done.

16 Page 16 of Thus, we find that the SCM finding in this case suffered from several serious violations of the mandatory procedures as prescribed under the law as indicated above. In the first instance, the charge itself is liable to be quashed on the ground that the charge framed in terms of section 38 (1) of the Army Act, 1950 for desertion was not at all attracted to the facts and circumstances of the case. Further the proceedings of the SCM are also liable to be quashed on account of serious violations of Army Rules 115 and In view of the above discussion, we do not approve of the finding of the SCM holding the Ex-Rifleman guilty under Section 38(1) of the Army Act vide order dated Accordingly, the charge of desertion under Section 38(1) of the Army Act levelled against the husband of the petitioner and the order dated finding him guilty of a charge under section 38(1) of the Army Act, 1950 is hereby set aside and quashed. Consequently, the order passed by the appellate authority i.e. Chief of the Army Staff (COAS) dated is also set aside and quashed.

17 Page 17 of In the present case, the accused/applicant is stated to be still suffering from mental disease and therefore his reinstatement in service could not be ordered. However, with the quashing of the charge and final order in the SCM proceeding as well as the appellate order, the Ex Rifleman will, as a necessary corollary, be deemed to be in service but till such time as appropriate orders are passed in the matter in accordance with law. The respondents are further directed to grant all consequential benefits to the applicant as may accrue from his deemed reinstatement except the back wages. In this regard, the respondents are directed to pass necessary order(s) within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the order. 17. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Original Application stands allowed to the extent indicated above. 18. No costs. MEMBER (A) MEMBER(J)

18 Page 18 of 18

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) -Vs- WP(C) No. 1846/2010 Sri Ram Prakash Sarki, Constable (Since dismissed from

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE. Versus

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE. Versus *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.807/2008. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR. Petitioner Through: Mr Prem Kumar and Mr Sharad C.

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2. OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014. Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2. OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014. Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015 1 RESERVED ORDER A.F.R ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2 OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014 Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015 Hon ble Mr. Justice Virendra Kumar DIXIT, Judicial Member

More information

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd.

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd. IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) The Federal Bank Ltd. Petitioner VERSUS Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. Respondents CRP No. 220/2014 The Federal

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1956 W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005 Judgment decided on: 14.02.2011 C.D. SINGH Through: Mr Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

MENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT 1998 BERMUDA 1998 : 32 MENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT 1998

MENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT 1998 BERMUDA 1998 : 32 MENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT 1998 BERMUDA 1998 : 32 MENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT 1998 [Date of Assent 13 July 1998] [Operative Date 13 July 1998] WHEREAS it is expedient to amend the Mental Health Act 1968: Be it enacted by The Queen's

More information

CHAPTER 3:04 SUMMARY JURISDICTION (APPEALS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

CHAPTER 3:04 SUMMARY JURISDICTION (APPEALS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Summary Jurisdiction (Appeals) 3 CHAPTER 3:04 SUMMARY JURISDICTION (APPEALS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. MAKING OF APPEAL 3. (1) Right of appeal. (2) Appeals

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 932 OF 2016 (Arising out SLP (Crl.) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 932 OF 2016 (Arising out SLP (Crl.) No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 932 OF 2016 (Arising out SLP (Crl.) No. 7284 of 2016) CHANDRAKESHWAR PRASAD @ CHANDU BABU Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No. 131/2013 AND IN THE MATTER OF: ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR. PETITIONER

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1534 OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.1439 of 2017) N. Harihara Krishnan Appellant Versus J. Thomas Respondent

More information

COURT NO. 3, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI T.A. No. 60 of 2010 Delhi High Court W.P (C) No. 621 of 2003

COURT NO. 3, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI T.A. No. 60 of 2010 Delhi High Court W.P (C) No. 621 of 2003 COURT NO. 3, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI T.A. No. 60 of 2010 Delhi High Court W.P (C) No. 621 of 2003 IN THE MATTER OF:...Applicant Through Shri P.D.P Deo counsel for the Applicant.

More information

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeals (AT) No.101 to 105 of 2017 (arising out of Order dated 06.02.2017 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi in CP Nos. 16/152/2015,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 6

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 6 http://judis.nic.in SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 6 CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 2412 of 2006 PETITIONER: Prem Singh & Ors. RESPONDENT: Birbal & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/05/2006 BENCH: S.B. Sinha & P.K.

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- TA 111 of 2012 (arising out of SWP 165 of 2009)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- TA 111 of 2012 (arising out of SWP 165 of 2009) 1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- TA 111 of 2012 (arising out of SWP 165 of 2009) Mustaq Ahmad Sheikh Petitioner(s) Vs Union of India and others Respondent(s) -.- For

More information

Union of India, represented by the Assistant Commissioner of Guwahati Custom Division, Nilomani Phukan Path, Christianbasti, Guwahati - 5

Union of India, represented by the Assistant Commissioner of Guwahati Custom Division, Nilomani Phukan Path, Christianbasti, Guwahati - 5 1 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam : Nagaland: Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Union of India, represented by the Assistant Commissioner of Guwahati Custom Division, Nilomani Phukan Path,

More information

W.P. (C) No. 45 of 2013

W.P. (C) No. 45 of 2013 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) A I Z A W L B E N C H :: A I Z A W L W.P. (C) No. 45 of 2013 Sh. J. Vanlalchhuanga, S/o Ralkapliana R/o Ramhlun,

More information

I have had the benefit of perusing the judgment of my. esteemed learned brother, Hon ble Justice Shri S.B. Sinha,

I have had the benefit of perusing the judgment of my. esteemed learned brother, Hon ble Justice Shri S.B. Sinha, TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI DATED 18 th JULY, 2011 Petition No. 275 (C) of 2009 Reliance Communications Limited.. Petitioner Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited..... Respondent

More information

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. W.P. No.750/2017. Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. W.P. No.750/2017. Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR W.P. No.750/2017 Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.P and another Shri Sameer Seth, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri R.K. Sahu,

More information

Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017

Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017 Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 31.07.2017 Heard Mr. Pallab Kataki, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Nava Kumar Kalita, learned Additional Public

More information

BERMUDA MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS ACT : 38

BERMUDA MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS ACT : 38 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS ACT 1950 1950 : 38 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 5AA 5AB 5A 5B 6 7 7A 7B 8 9 10 11 12 12AA 12A 13 13A 14 15 16 17 PRELIMINARY Interpretation Unqualified

More information

CHAPTER VII PROSECUTION. 1.Sanction for prosecution

CHAPTER VII PROSECUTION. 1.Sanction for prosecution CHAPTER VII PROSECUTION 1.Sanction for prosecution Under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, it is necessary for the prosecuting authority to have the previous sanction of the appropriate

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012 DESIGN WORKS Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Adv.... Appellant Versus ICICI BANK LTD... Respondent

More information

1990 CHAPTER S HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan, enacts as follows:

1990 CHAPTER S HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan, enacts as follows: 1990 CHAPTER S-63.1 An Act respecting Summary Offences Procedure and Certain consequential amendments resulting from the enactment of this Act (Assented to June 22, 1990) HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 Date of decision: 24.05.2011 WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.7523/2011 YUDHVIR SINGH Versus Through: PETITIONER Mr.N.S.Dalal,

More information

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) DISTRICT : KOLKATA IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P. No. (W) of 2017 In the matter of :- An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ;

More information

BELIZE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT CHAPTER 318 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

BELIZE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT CHAPTER 318 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 BELIZE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT CHAPTER 318 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH 1. Mr. N. Asangba, Presently serving as Surveyor Grade-II, PHE Central Store, under the establishment

More information

Australia-Malaysia Extradition Treaty

Australia-Malaysia Extradition Treaty The Asian Development Bank and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development do not guarantee the accuracy of this document and accept no responsibility whatsoever for any consequences of

More information

Indian Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976

Indian Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976 Indian Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976 In exercise of the Powers conferred by Section 19 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 16 th February, Versus

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 16 th February, Versus *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.815/2007 % Date of decision: 16 th February, 2010 OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.... Petitioner Through: Mr. V.N. Kaura with Ms. Paramjit Benipal

More information

WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN 14.05.2015 WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN Heard Mr. SK Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. P Roy, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam assisted by Ms. B Hazarika,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Reserved on: 5th August, Date of decision: 19th September, 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Reserved on: 5th August, Date of decision: 19th September, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Reserved on: 5th August, 2011 Date of decision: 19th September, 2011 FAO(OS) 502/2009 LT. COL S.D. SURIE Through: -versus-..appellant

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C) 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C) No. 3768 of 2015 ------ M/s Tata Steel Limited, an existing Company under previous Company Law, through Mrs. MeenaLall wife of Shri BehariLall,

More information

ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH

ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH W.A. NO.122 OF 2014 In the matter of a reference made by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.09.2014... Sri Kasinath Nayak. Petitioner -Versus- State

More information

DRAFT RULES UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013

DRAFT RULES UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 DRAFT RULES UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 CHAPTER XX COMPANIES (WINDING UP) RULES 2013 Ministry of Corporate Affairs Notification New Delhi Dated GSR No..:- In exercise of the powers conferred by section

More information

Cr.M.P. No of Putul Rani Dey 2. Ravi Chandra Dey 3. Ashish Dey 4. Sangam Dey... Petitioners CORAM :- HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K.

Cr.M.P. No of Putul Rani Dey 2. Ravi Chandra Dey 3. Ashish Dey 4. Sangam Dey... Petitioners CORAM :- HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1151 of 2007 1. Putul Rani Dey 2. Ravi Chandra Dey 3. Ashish Dey 4. Sangam Dey... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2 Chhaya Rani Bose.. Opposite

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION CM No. 15134 of 2005 in W.P. (C) No. 1043 of 1987 Orders reserved on : 26th July, 2006 Date of Decision : 7th August, 2006 LATE BAWA HARBANS

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE EX.P. 133/2011 Reserved on: January 6, 2012 Decision on: January 9, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE EX.P. 133/2011 Reserved on: January 6, 2012 Decision on: January 9, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE EX.P. 133/2011 Reserved on: January 6, 2012 Decision on: January 9, 2012 AMAR SINGH SEWARA In person.... Petitioner versus REGIONAL

More information

DOMESTIC ENQUIRY NEED FOR DOMESTIC ENQUIRY

DOMESTIC ENQUIRY NEED FOR DOMESTIC ENQUIRY DOMESTIC ENQUIRY NEED FOR DOMESTIC ENQUIRY For the smooth functioning of an industry, the defined codes of discipline, contracts of service by awards, agreements and standing orders must be adhered to.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 5568/2017 & CM No /2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 5568/2017 & CM No /2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 18.09.2017 + W.P.(C) 5568/2017 & CM No. 23379/2017 M/S EPSILON PUBLISHING HOUSE PVT LTD... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS... Respondents

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI. O.A.No. 27 of 2014 THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014/20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936 CORAM:

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI. O.A.No. 27 of 2014 THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014/20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936 CORAM: ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI O.A.No. 27 of 2014 THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014/20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHRIKANT TRIPATHI, MEMBER (J) HON'BLE VICE ADMIRAL

More information

W.P.(S) No. 960 of 2005 [In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India]

W.P.(S) No. 960 of 2005 [In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India] 1 W.P.(S) No. 960 of 2005 [In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India] 1. Shiv Shankar Prasad Sinha 2. Dhirendra Mishra...... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand

More information

BERMUDA PHARMACY AND POISONS ACT : 26

BERMUDA PHARMACY AND POISONS ACT : 26 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA PHARMACY AND POISONS ACT 1979 1979 : 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 4A 4B 5 6 7 7A 8 9 10 10A 10B 11 12 13 14 Short title Interpretation The Pharmacy Council Membership of

More information

THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1952 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1952 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1952 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and application. 2. Definitions. 2A. Establishment to

More information

An Act further to amend the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

An Act further to amend the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2006 NO. 9 OF 2006 [22nd March, 2006.] An Act further to amend the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-seventh Year of the

More information

THE MAGISTRATES' COURTS ACT, Title PART I. Short title and commencement. Interpretation. PART II

THE MAGISTRATES' COURTS ACT, Title PART I. Short title and commencement. Interpretation. PART II Section 1. 2. THE MAGISTRATES' COURTS ACT, 1984 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Title PART I PRELIMINARY Short title and commencement. Interpretation. PART II ESTABLISHMENT, CONSTITUTION AND SET UP OF MAGISTRATES'

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus: 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4043 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.10173 of 2011) Central Bank of India Appellant :Versus: C.L. Vimla & Ors.

More information

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 THE CONSUMER PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 ( 62 OF 2002 ) { Passed by Rajya Sabha on 11.3.

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 THE CONSUMER PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 ( 62 OF 2002 ) { Passed by Rajya Sabha on 11.3. THE CONSUMER PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 The Act has been brought in force from 15.03.2003 wide Notification F.O. No. 270(E) date 10.03.2003 THE CONSUMER PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 ( 62 OF 2002

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. WP (C) No.4604/1996. Reserved on: Date of decision:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. WP (C) No.4604/1996. Reserved on: Date of decision: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER WP (C) No.4604/1996 Reserved on: 11.07.2008 Date of decision: 11.08.2008 SOHAN LAL KAPOOR Through: Major K.Ramesh, Advocate..PETITIONER

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6105/2011. % SADHNA BHARDWAJ.. Petitioner Through: Mr. Dipak Bhattarcharya, Adv.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6105/2011. % SADHNA BHARDWAJ.. Petitioner Through: Mr. Dipak Bhattarcharya, Adv. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6105/2011 Date of decision: 1 st September, 2011 % SADHNA BHARDWAJ.. Petitioner Through: Mr. Dipak Bhattarcharya, Adv. Versus THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010. Decided on: 9th August, 2011.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010. Decided on: 9th August, 2011. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010 Decided on: 9th August, 2011. DEEPAK GARG Through: Mr. Vijay Agarwal, Advocate.... Petitioner versus

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. Crl. M.C.No. 4264/2011 & Crl.M.A /2011 (stay)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. Crl. M.C.No. 4264/2011 & Crl.M.A /2011 (stay) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Crl. M.C.No. 4264/2011 & Crl.M.A. 19640/2011 (stay) Decided on: 22nd February, 2012 SHORELINE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS LTD.

More information

THE SECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES,

THE SECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES, THE SECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES, 2002 1 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 38 read with subsections (4), (10) and (12) of section

More information

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI BY COURT: 1 W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution of India) Parmanand Pandey & Anr.. Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors.....

More information

Cont.Cas(C). No. 18of 2013

Cont.Cas(C). No. 18of 2013 Cont.Cas(C). No. 18of 2013 HON BLE THE, Shri H.S.Thangkhiew, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Shri N.Mozika, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Smti. T.Yangi, Advocate, present for the respondents. Learned

More information

BERMUDA DEFENCE ACT : 165

BERMUDA DEFENCE ACT : 165 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA DEFENCE ACT 1965 1965 : 165 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 5A 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 12A 13 13A 14 15 15A 16 17 17A 17B PART I Interpretation Military service to be performed in Bermuda,

More information

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (IJM)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (IJM) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (IJM) ISSN 0976-6502 (Print) ISSN 0976-6510 (Online) Volume 7, Issue 2, February (2016), pp. 177-182 http://www.iaeme.com/ijm/index.asp Journal Impact Factor (2016):

More information

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Arbitration Petition No. 21 of 2017 KLA Const. Technologies Private Limited..Petitioner Versus Kajima India Private Limited Respondent Present:- Dr. Amit George,

More information

COURT-MARTIAL DATA SHEET

COURT-MARTIAL DATA SHEET 1. OG NUMBER 2. NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial) 3. SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 4. RANK 5. UNIT/COMMAND NAME INSTRUCTIONS When an item is not applicable to the record of trial being reviewed, mark the proper

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: TRADE MARKS ACT, Judgment delivered on :3rd September, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: TRADE MARKS ACT, Judgment delivered on :3rd September, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 Judgment delivered on :3rd September, 2012 IA No.10795/2011 in CS(OS) 514/2010 STOKELY VAN CAMP INC & ANR... Plaintiff Through Ms.

More information

Number 11 of 2006 CRIMINAL LAW (INSANITY) ACT 2006 REVISED. Updated to 3 November 2014

Number 11 of 2006 CRIMINAL LAW (INSANITY) ACT 2006 REVISED. Updated to 3 November 2014 Number 11 of CRIMINAL LAW (INSANITY) ACT REVISED Updated to 3 November 2014 This Revised Act is an administrative consolidation of the. It is prepared by the Law Reform Commission in accordance with its

More information

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) CONTENTS

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) CONTENTS CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope of Application and Interpretation 1 Rule 2 Notice, Calculation of Periods of Time 3 Rule 3 Notice of Arbitration 4 Rule 4 Response to Notice of Arbitration 6 Rule 5 Expedited Procedure

More information

HIGH COURT (BISHO) JUDGMENT. 1. The appellant who was accused no. 3 in the proceedings in the court a quo,

HIGH COURT (BISHO) JUDGMENT. 1. The appellant who was accused no. 3 in the proceedings in the court a quo, HIGH COURT (BISHO) CASE No. CA & R 21/2000 DUMISANIMBEBE Appellant and THE STATE Respondent JUDGMENT EBRAHIM J: 1. The appellant who was accused no. 3 in the proceedings in the court a quo, was convicted

More information

CRP No. 429 of The Ahmed Tea Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., K.N.C.B. Path, Boiragimath, Dibrugarh, Assam, represented by its Director Mrs. Nazrana A. Islam.

CRP No. 429 of The Ahmed Tea Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., K.N.C.B. Path, Boiragimath, Dibrugarh, Assam, represented by its Director Mrs. Nazrana A. Islam. THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) CRP No. 429 of 2008 The Ahmed Tea Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., K.N.C.B. Path, Boiragimath, Dibrugarh, Assam, represented by its

More information

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5295 of 2010 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5296 OF 2010 AND SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5297 OF 2010 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA

More information

THE SUPREME COURT ACT, 2011

THE SUPREME COURT ACT, 2011 LAWS OF KENYA THE SUPREME COURT ACT, 2011 NO. 7 OF 2011 Revised Edition 2012 (2011) Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org 2 No.

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 4071/2013 Rahim Ali @ Rahimuddin @ Md. Abdul Rahim, S/o. Late Kuddush Ali @ Kaddus Ali @ Kurdush

More information

CHAPTER 127A CRIMINAL RECORDS (REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS)

CHAPTER 127A CRIMINAL RECORDS (REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS) CHAPTER 127A CRIMINAL RECORDS (REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS) 1997-6 This Act came into operation on 27th March, 1997. Amended by: 1999-2 Law Revision Orders The following Law Revision Order or Orders authorized

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 SMT. SALONI MAHAJAN Through: Mr. Puneet Saini, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: 07.03.2012 I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.1674/2011 SURENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Through Mr. J.S. Mann, Adv....

More information

The Summary Offences Procedure Act, 1990

The Summary Offences Procedure Act, 1990 Consolidated to June 9, 2015 1 SUMMARY OFFENCES PROCEDURE, 1990 c.s-63.1 The Summary Offences Procedure Act, 1990 being Chapter S-63.1* of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1990-91 (effective January 1, 1991)

More information

Through : Mr.P.V.Kapur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.V.K.Nagrath, Mr.Abhay Varma & Mr.Sidhant Kapur, Advocates.

Through : Mr.P.V.Kapur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.V.K.Nagrath, Mr.Abhay Varma & Mr.Sidhant Kapur, Advocates. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY RESERVED ON : 27th NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON : 11th DECEMBER, 2014 CS (OS) 1980/2011 & CC No.21/2012 SHIV SHAKTI MADAN... Plaintiff Through

More information

The Summary Offences Procedure Act, 1990

The Summary Offences Procedure Act, 1990 1 SUMMARY OFFENCES PROCEDURE, 1990 S-63.1 The Summary Offences Procedure Act, 1990 being Chapter S-63.1* of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1990-91 (effective January 1, 1991) as amended by the Statutes

More information

CHAPTER 559 MENTAL DISEASES

CHAPTER 559 MENTAL DISEASES [Cap.559 CHAPTER 559 Ordinances AN ORDINANCE TO MAKF FURTHER AND BRTTFR PROVISION RELATING TO THE CARE AND Nos. 1 of 1873. 3 of 1882, 3 of 1883. 2 of 1889. 13 of 1905. 16 of 1919, 3 of 1940. 13 of 1940.

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 81 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 82 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 Rules Contents Page No. 1. Title 83 2. Definition 83

More information

LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MEDICAL BOARD ACT CHAPTER 29:50

LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MEDICAL BOARD ACT CHAPTER 29:50 MEDICAL BOARD ACT CHAPTER 29:50 Act 35 of 1960 Amended by 24 of 1961 172/1961 136/1976 *15 of 1980 **22 of 1981 36 of 1997 31 of 2007 7 of 2009 See page 2 for *Note on Part II. **Note on Amendment. Note

More information

THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013 SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Prevention of sexual harassment. ARRANGEMENT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017 Om Sai Punya Educational and Social Welfare Society & Another.Petitioners Versus All India Council

More information

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3945 OF 2018 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.35786 OF 2016) SISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH OF CLUNY APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No of 2013 with W.P. (T) No of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No of 2013 with W.P. (T) No of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No. 1686 of 2013 with W.P. (T) No. 1687 of 2013 M/s. The Rameshwara Jute Mills Ltd, Mining Lessee, through Krishna Kant Dubey, Orissa. Versus Petitioner

More information

PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE-PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE-PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE-PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI June, 2017 CONTENTS PAGES 1. Extracts from the Constitution... 1 10 2. The Presidential and

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF 2011 Federation of SBI Pensioners Association & Ors....... Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors...............

More information

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$5,64 WINDHOEK - 6 December 1994 No. 992 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 235 Promulgation of Social Security Act, 1994 (Act 34 of 1994), of the Parliament.

More information

THE CENSUS ACT, 1948 ACT NO. 37 OF [3rd September, 1948.] An Act to provide for certain matters in connection with the taking of census.

THE CENSUS ACT, 1948 ACT NO. 37 OF [3rd September, 1948.] An Act to provide for certain matters in connection with the taking of census. THE CENSUS ACT, 1948 ACT NO. 37 OF 1948 1 [3rd September, 1948.] An Act to provide for certain matters in connection with the taking of census. WHEREAS it is expedient to provide for the taking of census

More information

An Act to regulate certain conditions of service of working journalists and other persons employed in newspaper establishments.

An Act to regulate certain conditions of service of working journalists and other persons employed in newspaper establishments. THE WORKING JOURNALISTS AND OTHER NEWSPAPER EMPLOYEES (CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1955 ACT NO. 45 OF 1955 1 [20th December, 1955.] An Act to regulate certain conditions of

More information

JUDGMENT DELIVERED 24 NOVEMBER 2017

JUDGMENT DELIVERED 24 NOVEMBER 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) REPORTABLE Case Numbers: 16996/2017 In the matter between: NEVILLE COOPER Applicant and MAGISTRATE MHLANGA Respondent JUDGMENT DELIVERED

More information

Working with Children Act 2005

Working with Children Act 2005 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section Page PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 1. Purpose 1 2. Commencement 2 3. Definitions 2 4. Meaning of finding of guilt 7 5. Meaning of "charged with an offence" 8 6. When is a charge "pending"?

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.595/2003 Reserved on: 4th January, 2012 Pronounced on: 13th January, 2012 SHRI VIRENDER SINGH Through: Mr. R.C. Chopra,

More information

THE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010

THE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA CLAUSES THE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Applicability of Act. 3. Definitions.

More information

CLERGY DISCIPLINE MEASURE 2003 as amended by the Clergy Discipline (Amendment) Measure 2013 and the Safeguarding and Clergy Discipline Measure 2016

CLERGY DISCIPLINE MEASURE 2003 as amended by the Clergy Discipline (Amendment) Measure 2013 and the Safeguarding and Clergy Discipline Measure 2016 CLERGY DISCIPLINE MEASURE 2003 as amended by the Clergy Discipline (Amendment) Measure 2013 and the Safeguarding and Clergy Discipline Measure 2016 CONTENTS Introductory 1 Duty to have regard to bishop

More information

outside and saw that the light in front of the house of Inderjit Singh was on and two Sikh youths armed with Kirpans stained with blood were shouting

outside and saw that the light in front of the house of Inderjit Singh was on and two Sikh youths armed with Kirpans stained with blood were shouting IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal Nos. 786-789 of 2003 Decided On: 28.05.2009 State of Punjab Vs. Manjit Singh and Ors. Hon'ble Judges: Mukundakam Sharma and B.S. Chauhan, JJ. Mukundakam Sharma,

More information

THE TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1997 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1997 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS THE TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1997 SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY CHAPTER II TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 911 2007 Ejaj Ahmad Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Binay Kumar Opposite Parties CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner:

More information

CHAPTER A19 ARCHITECTS (REGISTRATION, ETC,) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Architects Registration Council of Nigeria SCHEDULES SECTION FIRST SCHEDULE

CHAPTER A19 ARCHITECTS (REGISTRATION, ETC,) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Architects Registration Council of Nigeria SCHEDULES SECTION FIRST SCHEDULE SECTION CHAPTER A19 ARCHITECTS (REGISTRATION, ETC,) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Architects Registration Council of Nigeria 1 Use of appellation of architect. 2 Establishment of the Architects Registration

More information

THE ADMINISTRATORS-GENERAL ACT, 1963

THE ADMINISTRATORS-GENERAL ACT, 1963 THE ADMINISTRATORS-GENERAL ACT, 1963 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II 3. Appointment of Administrator-General.

More information

LNDOCS01/ COMMERCIAL LICENSING REGULATIONS 2015

LNDOCS01/ COMMERCIAL LICENSING REGULATIONS 2015 LNDOCS01/895081.5 COMMERCIAL LICENSING REGULATIONS 2015 Section TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART 1: LICENSING OF CONTROLLED ACTIVITIES...4 1. The general prohibition...4 2. Controlled activities...4 3. Contravention

More information

Reserved on: 7 th August, Pronounced on: 13 th August, # SAIL EX-EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION...Petitioner

Reserved on: 7 th August, Pronounced on: 13 th August, # SAIL EX-EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION...Petitioner * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.2254/2002 Reserved on: 7 th August, 2009 Pronounced on: 13 th August, 2009 # SAIL EX-EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION...Petitioner! Through: None VERSUS $ STEEL

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014 DR. ZUBAIR UL ABIDIN Through: Mr.Suraj Rathi, Adv.... Petitioner versus STATE

More information

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017 1 IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017 [Arising out of Order dated 25 th July, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority

More information

The Child and Family Services Act

The Child and Family Services Act 1 The Child and Family Services Act being Chapter C-7.2 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1989-90 (consult Table of Saskatchewan Statutes for effective date) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan,

More information