Attorneys for BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, LLP and the class of similarly situated persons SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
- Reynold Bond
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Michael R. Brown (SBN ) MICHAEL R. BROWN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 0 Main Street Suite 0 Irvine, California Telephone: () - Facsimile: () mbrown@mrbapclaw.com Attorneys for BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, LLP and the class of similarly situated persons SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL LLP, a California limited liability partnership v. Plaintiff, THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant. Case No.: BC Filed: November, Assigned to the Hon. Meran Nelson RESPONSE TO THE COURT S ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING REGARDING PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT FILED SEPARATELY DECLARATION OF MICAEL R. BROWN WITH REVISED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REVISED DOCUMENTS LODGED ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS RED-LINED Date: October, Time: :00 a.m. Dept.: CCW SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COURT S ORDER OF AUGUST,
2 I. INTRODUCTION On July,, Plaintiff filed its Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. The matter was set for hearing on August,. On August,, the Court, after reviewing the Motion, ordered further briefing. A copy of the Order on further briefing, specifying the areas requiring further briefing, is attached as Exhibit 1 to this Brief. In its Order, the Court made suggested changes to the settlement terms as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. The Parties met and conferred and were able to reach agreement to change the Settlement Agreement to conform to the Court s comments, suggestions and instructions. The Court ordered a new, fully executed Settlement Agreement be submitted ( Revised Settlement Agreement ). The Court also ordered that any changes in the Revised Settlement Agreement be made in the Class Notice. This has been done and set forth in the documents identified below. Further, to the extent any other original submitted documents were affected by the revisions in the Revised Settlement Agreement, they have been changed. The Court also wanted to see the proposed injunction language. To assist the Court in reviewing the changes and modifications, each inquiry, suggestion or order is set forth below with a narrative response. The Revised Settlement Agreement is attached as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Michael R. Brown ( Brown decl. ), submitted as a separate document. (Ex. 1). Consistent with the original Settlement Agreement, the operative documents agreed upon are attached as Exhibits A-F to the Revised Settlement Agreement, Ex. 1. All references hereafter to Ex. 1 relate to Ex. 1 to the Brown declaration. The Court further ordered a red-lined copy of the original documents that were modified be submitted to the Court. Consistent with that Order, the Original Settlement Agreement is separately lodged with the Court and marked and referred to as Ex.. The original documents to Ex. are attached. To the extent any of these documents had substantive changes, the red-lined copies are contained in Ex. (Settlement Agreement, Class Notice, Claim Form A(1) to Refund Notice, Claim Form A(), Claim Form Group of and Summary Notice). For the convenience of the Court, a separate compilation has been made of Exhibit 1 and Exhibit so the Court may review - - SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COURT S ORDER OF AUGUST,
3 them side-by-side without the necessity of disassembling the exhibits attached to this supplemental brief. For the convenience of the Court, the Exhibits attached to the Brown declaration, are summarized as follows: A. Exhibit 1. Revised Fully Executed Settlement Agreement Exhibit-A Exhibit-B Exhibit-C Exhibit-D Exhibit-E Exhibit-F Proposed Order (not revised per Court Order) Revised Class Notice Revised Class A(1) and Crossover Claim Form now captioned Refund Notice as no Claim Form is required Class A() Claim Form Group of Claim Form Proposed Injunction Order (new document) Exhibit G- Revised Summary Class Notice (prior Ex. F) Separately Lodged: B. Exhibit Original Settlement Agreement-Redlined All exhibits same as set forth above but red-lined and blue-lined. Red-line shows deletions, blue print shows additions. When referencing the Court to the exhibits or changes, a reference to a Section is to the Revised Settlement Agreement (Ex. 1), a reference to a Para. is to the Revised Class Notice (Ex. 1- B). II. THE COURT S ORDER OF AUGUST, A. Proposed terms of the settlement 1. a. The Court inquired: If the parties will be seeking an order from the Court in the future for the cost of claims administration, please provide an estimate for claims administration costs. b. The response: The parties are not seeking administration costs. The City is paying all claims administration costs outside of any settlement money or attorney s fees. No revision was necessary to either document (Ex. 1, Section., p. ) - - SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COURT S ORDER OF AUGUST,
4 . a. The Court: Consider extending the cash checking deadline from 0 days to 0 days. b. The response: Done. (Ex. 1, Section.0, p. ). a. The Court: Consider extending the claim deadline from 0 days to 0 days b. The response: Done. (Ex. 1, Section 1.0, p. ). Once the actual dates are determined after approval of the settlement they will be filled in on the Class Notice where indicated. B. Scope of the Release. a. The Court: Please provide a more definite time period for the release of claims than from the beginning of the world until today. What are the class periods? b. The response: The time period of the released claims is for claims arising for the period May, 1, to the present date, which encompasses the class periods on the beginning date for each class, and to the present date for Class A(). Class A(1) class period ends December 1,. The words from the beginning of the world until today have been deleted and the common initial commencement date of the class period until the present date has been inserted. (Ex. 1, Section 1.1, p.). Ex. 1, Section.0, p. is also instructional on the release and limitations of the release. (The release has been further modified pursuant to the Court s order as discussed below).. a. The Court: The necessity of including a release as to the putative class members. Please be prepared to discuss the propriety of the waiver b. The response: The release has been deleted. (Ex. 1, Section VII, final, p.; Ex., red-line showing Section.0 California Code of Civil Procedure being deleted. The Class Notice has also been changed (Ex. B, Para., p.). As the Court will note, Article VII has been significantly modified (see deletions in red-line) making it a very specific and limited release. C. Submission of Claims. a. The Court: If class members are required to submit a claim to receive compensation, the motion should indicate why information is required to be furnished and an estimate of the anticipated claim rate. - - SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COURT S ORDER OF AUGUST,
5 b. The response: There are four () groups of class members that may receive compensation: CLASS A(1) AND CROSSOVERS - ELIMINATION OF PRIOR CLAIM FORM REQUIREMENT (i) Class A(1): Class A(1) class members were audited and were assessed additional tax, interest and penalties. The City knows the identity of these class members and can calculate the amount of compensation ( refund ) due each class member. (ii) Class A(1) Crossovers: These class members were also audited and the audit revealed that some Reimbursed Expenses were voluntarily included by the firm in calculating gross receipts, but others were not. This resulted in the gross receipts being recalculated by the City leaving in the voluntarily reported Reimbursed Expenses and adding to the gross receipts the additional Reimbursed Expenses the City claimed should have been included. The City has identified these class members and has determined a) the amount of additional tax paid after audit (making the member a Class A(1) member AND the tax amount on the Reimbursed Expenses voluntarily paid (making the member a Class A() member. A Crossover will have one payment as a Class A(1) member (0% of all additional taxes, interest and penalties) and one payment as a Class A() member (a voluntary payer) subject to the Class A() distribution protocol. These two class consist of class members that were audited, which means the City has actually seen the filings, and has information about the Class Member s calculation of its gross receipts. The City has paperwork from which the City can calculate refunds. In the original Settlement Agreement, as to these two groups of Class Members, the City, as a municipality, believed that because it was refunding tax payments to a taxpayer an actual claim had to be filed, with certain claimant information, signed by the taxpayer and then a refund could be administered by the City. (Ex., Section.01) However, after this Court s inquiry as to the need for a Claim Form, Class Counsel further discussed the issue with the City. Because the City has all the necessary information to identify and pay 0% of the Class A(1) Class Members and 0% of the Class A(1) Crossover Class members, the City has agreed to waive the requirement of a Claim Form for these two groups - - SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COURT S ORDER OF AUGUST,
6 of Class Members. There will be a 0% payout / participation to these two groups of Class Members with an estimated value of in excess of $1,000,000 with a portion for the Crossovers coming from the Settlement Pool. However, in order to decide whether to exclude themselves or object, Class Members needed to be notified that they are a member of Class A(1) or a Crossover. Working with the Claims Administrator, a notification method was developed. Accordingly, the previously submitted Claim Form for Class A(1) and Crossover Class Members has been revised. Class A(1) and Crossover Class Members will now get a Refund Notice that will tell them they are Members of the Class and the amount of refund they will receive. (Ex. 1, Section 1. (added)). They do NOT have to return any documents in order to receive the refund. (Ex. 1, Section.01) This Refund Notice accompanies the Class Notice and provides all the necessary information, along with reference to the Class Notice, to allow these Class members to decide what to do. The Refund Notice is attached as Ex. 1-C. The prior Claim Form is Ex. -C. This is a significant benefit to the class and will affect in excess of 1,000 Class members. CLASS A() AND GROUP OF NECESSITY FOR A CLAIM FORM (iii) Class A(): Class A() Class Members are firms that voluntarily included Reimbursed Expenses in their gross receipts during the class period. The City has no information as to what firms did this, since none of the Class A() Business Tax Applications were subject to audit. Accordingly, Class A() Class members must identify themselves to the City, re-calculate their tax liability by eliminating the Reimbursed Expenses from its gross receipts, and submit a Claim Form (similar as to what one might do if amending a tax return). This is an exceptional component to this Settlement. Law firm taxpayers that voluntarily paid this tax, and never contested it, now have the opportunity to claim a refund for the voluntarily payment, all as a result of Plaintiff timely objecting to the tax, undertaking all administrative conditions precedent to challenging the tax, and then commencing this class action litigation, resulting in this Settlement. These Claim Forms will be used to allocate and distribute compensation to Class A() Class members pursuant to the Revised Settlement Agreement (Ex 1, Section.0, p.; Section.0(c), - - SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COURT S ORDER OF AUGUST,
7 p., Ex 1-B. Para.,, ). A copy of the Claim Form for Class A() Class Members is attached as Ex. 1-D to the Revised Settlement Agreement. It is a simplified form requiring minimal information to allow the City to verify a claim made. (iv) Group of : Out of thousands of reviewed audit files, the City has identified Class Members it believes were audited but it cannot find any existing substantive audit records. The City does not know if there was any additional tax, penalty or interest assessed against the firm. These firms, known only by name, will receive a Claim Form. This is a simplified form that asks the firm to provide information so the City has something to base a refund upon to a Class Member. (Ex. 1, Section.0(d), Ex 1- B, Para. ). A copy of the simplified form is attached as to the Revised Settlement Agreement (Ex. 1-E). UNDER THE REVISED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ALL IDENTIFIABLE CLASS MEMBERS RECEIVE A REFUND WITHOUT A CLAIM FORM As presently written, the Revised Settlement Agreement provides for compensation to all Class Members that were audited and can be identified through the City s records without the need for a Claim Form. This means 0% of Class A(1) and Class A(1) Crossover Class Members will be paid. As to the return rate for the balance, it is anticipated there should be a good rate of return since Class Members still make annual filings with the City, and the claims filing process is at year end when law firms are preparing the their year-end tax information. a. The Court: Consider making the objection procedure the same as the exclusion procedure so that class members need only to mail objections to the settlement administrator and not file anything with the Court or serve the parties. Modify the class notice accordingly. b. The response: Done. However, it is assumed the Court will want to have all objections delivered to the Court prior to the Final Approval Hearing. Accordingly, the Revised Settlement Agreement and the Class Notice require submission of the objection only to the Claims Administrator by the Objection Deadline. The Claims Administrator will deliver all objections received to the Court days prior to the Final Approval Hearing, noting which ones comply with the objection requirements and which ones do not. (Ex. 1, Section.0, p., Ex.1- B, Para. ) - - SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COURT S ORDER OF AUGUST,
8 . a. The Court: Delete all language indicating that class members may only be heard at final approval if they have complied with all objection procedures b. The response: Done. (Ex. 1, Section.0, p., Ex.1- B, Para. ). However, the Parties reserve the right to object, at the Final Approval Hearing, to any objection being heard which objection did not comply with the approved objection requirements set forth in the Class Notice.. a. The Court: Please delete any requirement that class members file a Notice of Intention to Appear to be heard at final approval. b. The response: Done. (Ex. 1, Section.0, p., Ex.1- B, Para. ) D. COSTS AND FEES. a. The Court: According to the settlement agreement Class Counsel can seek attorney s fees up to $1. million. According to page of the class notice attorney fees may be sought up to $. million. Which is it? b. The response: Class Counsel and the City negotiated a fee of $1. million after the class settlement terms were negotiated and finalized. This fee, if approved by the Court, is paid separate and apart from direct payment to all Class A(1) Class Members and also not paid from the settlement pool. (Section.0 as originally written). The Class Notice has been corrected. (Ex.1- B, Para. ). E. PROPOSED JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT INCLUDE A DISMISSAL. a. The Court: Remove reference to dismissal throughout the settlement agreement. If the Court grants final approval, it must enter judgment and cannot dismiss the class claims b. The response: Done. (Ex. 1, former para..01 deleted (see Ex., p.) G. ADDITIONAL CHANGES IN THE REVISED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The foregoing represents a complete response to each issue raised by the Court. In addition to the changes requested by the Court, the Revised Settlement contains these additional changes: 1. The Parties agreed to add to the Termination provisions that if more than % of the Class members opt out, the City may elect to terminate the Revised Settlement. (Ex. 1, Section - - SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COURT S ORDER OF AUGUST,
9 .0).. The Parties also agreed that, while the City would not stipulate to the value of the Injunctive Relief obtained by Plaintiff by having the City s taxing policy changed, the City does agree this relief has value to the Class members. (Ex. 1, Section.0).. The Parties previously stipulated to extend the provisions of CCP Section. to November,. As that date is approaching, the Parties have agreed the Court may enter an Order extending the provisions to November, to allow time for the approval of this settlement, and the implementation of the settlement provisions. (Ex. 1, Section., p. ). A proposed Order will be presented to the Court at the October, hearing.. The proposed schedule leading up to the Final Approval Order has been adjusted, assuming the Preliminary Order of Approval occurs on October,. (Section. - actual dates to be placed in Class Notice where designated once approved). It remains tentative and based on the Court s timing of any approval order.. Although the actual substantive changes to any Settlement term were made where the issue was presented, to the extent that change impacted any other provisions, those provisions have been changed to be consistent with the substantive change. These appear as additional changes in the red-lining exhibits. Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL R. BROWN, APC By: Michael R. Brown Attorneys for Plaintiff Berkes Crane Robinson & Seal, LLP individually, and as representative of the class of persons similarly situated, - - SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COURT S ORDER OF AUGUST,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 In re Los Angeles Asbestos Litigation General Orders SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Case No. C 00000 THIRD AMENDED GENERAL ORDER NO. 0 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
More informationNational Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS
National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Important Notice...3 Introduction...3 Standard Clause...3 Submission Agreement...3 Administrative
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST
0 Kenneth S. Kasdan, SBN kkasdan@kasdancdlaw.com Michael D. Turner, SBN mturner@kasdancdlaw.com Bryan M. Zuetel, SBN bzuetel@kasdancdlaw.com 00 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 0 Irvine, California Tel: --000
More informationCommercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)
Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes) Rules Amended and Effective October 1, 2013 Fee Schedule Amended and Effective June 1,
More informationA court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT ( NOTICE ) Mark Thompson v. Professional Courier & Newspaper Distribution, Inc., et al. Case No. BC568018 600 South Commonwealth Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90005 If you are
More informationEXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mike Arias (State Bar No. 115385) Mikael Stahle (State Bar No. 182599) Alfredo Torrijos, Esq. (State Bar No. 222458)
More informationIN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.
NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION -CVD-, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. ) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationSigned June 24, 2017 United States Bankruptcy Judge
The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described. Signed June 24, 2017 United States Bankruptcy Judge IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Plaintiff Case No. RG11 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER re: DESIGNATED DEFENSE COUNSEL, et al., ASSIGNED FOR ALL PRE-TRIAL PURPOSES TO: JUDGE JO-LYNNE Q. LEE DEPARTMENT
More informationCase Doc 65 Filed 11/08/17 Entered 11/08/17 14:21:15 Desc Main Document Page 6 of 24
Document Page 6 of 24 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION In re BESTWALL LLC, 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 17-31795 Debtor. NOTICE, CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationWoods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058) 29229 Canwood
More informationINTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES
INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES (Including Mediation and Arbitration Rules) Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2014 available online at icdr.org Table of Contents Introduction.... 5 International
More informationWills and Trusts Arbitration RULES
Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES Effective September 15, 2005 Introduction Standard Arbitration Clause Administrative Fees Wills and Trusts Arbitration Rules 1. Incorporation of These Rules into a Will
More informationAMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
1 1 1 Douglas Caiafa, Esq. (SBN ) DOUGLAS CAIAFA, A Professional Law Corporation 1 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite Los Angeles, California 00 () -0 - phone; () 1-0 - fax Email: dcaiafa@caiafalaw.com Christopher
More informationWills and Trusts Arbitration RULES
Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2009 Introduction Standard Arbitration Clause Administrative Fees Wills and Trusts Arbitration Rules 1. Incorporation of These Rules
More informationCase 2:16-cv JNP Document 105 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 106
Case 2:16-cv-00832-JNP Document 105 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 106 Peggy Hunt (Utah State Bar No. 6060) Michael F. Thomson (Utah State Bar No. 9707) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 136 South Main Street, Suite 1000
More informationNORTH AMERICAN REFRACTORIES COMPANY ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST
February 21, 2018 NORTH AMERICAN REFRACTORIES COMPANY ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES FOR NARCO ASBESTOS TRUST CLAIMS North American Refractories Company
More informationInvestigations and Enforcement
Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 24.1.2 Last Revised January 26, 2007 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor Los Angeles,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE
HEATHER DAVIS, SBN AMIR NAYEBDADASH, SBN PROTECTION LAW GROUP, LLP Main Street, Suite A El Segundo, CA 0 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs RICHARD RAMMER and ROBERT KINSCH SUPERIOR
More informationREQUEST FOR ARBITRATION
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ARBITRATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BETWEEN: [NAME OF CLAIMANT] (CLAIMANT) -AND- [NAME OF RESPONDENT] (RESPONDENT)
More informationRules for NY Workers' Compensation Health Insurers' Match Program (HIMP)
Rules for NY Workers' Compensation Health Insurers' Match Program (HIMP) Updated: 3/1/07 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 2 RULES FOR THE ARBITRATION OF DISPUTED REQUESTS FOR REIMBURSEMENT BY HEALTH INSURERS
More informationCase 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705
Case :0-cv-00-R-CW Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 JOSEPH J. TABACCO, JR. # Email: jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com NICOLE LAVALLEE # Email: nlavallee@bermandevalerio.com BERMAN DeVALERIO One California
More informationCase3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43
Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 David Borgen (SBN 099354) dborgen@gbdhlegal.com James Kan (SBN 240749) jkan@gbdhlegal.com GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN
More informationCase 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15
Case 3:17-cv-05653-EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com H. Scott Leviant (SBN 200834) scott@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454
More informationAPG ASBESTOS TRUST. 1. A copy of these ADR Procedures; 2. Form Affidavit of Completeness; 3. Election Form and Agreement for Binding Arbitration; and
APG ASBESTOS TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES Pursuant to Section 5.10 of the First Amended and Restated APG Asbestos Trust Distribution Procedures (the TDP ), the APG Asbestos Trust
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0-SI Document Filed0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 ALEX SOTO and VINCE EAGEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ARTHUR HATTENSTY, ET AL. V. BESSIRE AND CASENHISER, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC540657 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation
More informationStanding Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals
Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act 2002-142 Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I--PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS Subpart
More informationARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties
ARBITRATION RULES 1. Agreement of Parties The parties shall be deemed to have made these rules a part of their arbitration agreement whenever they have provided for arbitration by ADR Services, Inc. (hereinafter
More informationNOTICE OF ARBITRATION
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE HONK KONG INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE ADMINISTERED ARBITRATION RULES BETWEEN: [NAME OF CLAIMANT] (CLAIMANT) -AND- [NAME OF RESPONDENT] (RESPONDENT) NOTICE
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013)
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) 1. Scope of Application and Interpretation 1.1 Where parties have agreed to refer their disputes
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. 2:17-cv-4720
Case :-cv-00 Document - Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Plaintiff, v. Commercial Credit Consultants (d.b.a.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Daniel L. Warshaw (SBN 185365) Bobby Pouya (SBN 245527) PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP 15165 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 400 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 Tel: (818)
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL CIVIL WEST ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 00 00 Agoura Road, Suite Agoura Hills, California 1 Telephone: (1 1-00 Facsimile: (1 1-01 ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and
More informationAAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes)
APPENDIX 4 AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes) Commercial Mediation Procedures M-1. Agreement of Parties Whenever, by
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PLAINTIFF(S), Plaintiff(s), Case No. RG CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: DESIGNATED DEFENSE COUNSEL DEFENDANTS, et al., ASSIGNED FOR ALL PRE-TRIAL PURPOSES TO: DEPARTMENT
More informationNOTICE OF ARBITRATION
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE BETWEEN: [NAME OF CLAIMANT] (CLAIMANT) -AND- [NAME OF RESPONDENT] (RESPONDENT) NOTICE OF ARBITRATION
More informationFLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. TRIAL PROCEEDINGS GENERAL PROVISIONS [NO CHANGE]
FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. TRIAL PROCEEDINGS 4.010. GENERAL PROVISIONS 4.020. DEFINITIONS [AMENDED] Committee vote: 21-3 4.022. PLEADINGS AND PROPOSED ORDERS
More information- 1 - Questions? Call:
Patrick Sinay, et al. v. Essendant Co., et al. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC651043 ATTENTION: ALL CURRENT AND FORMER HOURLY-PAID OR NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DAVID SANTIAGO, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. FOR THE
More informationJAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures
JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures Effective September 1, 2016 JAMS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION RULES JAMS International and JAMS provide arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationRULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1. Definitions. As used in these rules: (A) Arbitration means a process whereby a neutral third person, called an arbitrator, considers
More informationTML MultiState IEBP Executive Director EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM SERVICES Request for Qualifications
TML MultiState IEBP Executive Director EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM SERVICES Request for Qualifications For more information contact: Daniel E. Migura Jr. Phone: 512-719-6557 1821 Rutherford Lane, Suite #300
More informationADR CODE OF PROCEDURE
Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims
More informationREQUEST FOR ARBITRATION
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE ARBITRATION RULES OF THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION BETWEEN: [NAME OF CLAIMANT] (CLAIMANT) -AND- [NAME OF RESPONDENT] (RESPONDENT) REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION
More informationICDR INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION ARBITRATION RULES
APPENDIX 3.8 ICDR INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION ARBITRATION RULES (Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2009) (Fee Schedule Amended and Effective June 1, 2010) Article 1 a. Where parties have
More informationCase 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3
Case :-cv-0-hsg Document 0 Filed // Page of 0 JUSTIN M. SANDBERG, IL. BAR NO. 00 L Street NW Washington, D.C. 000 Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0-0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Jeffrey Spencer, Esq. Spencer Law Firm 0 Calle Amanecer, Suite 0 San Clemente, California Telephone:.0. Facsimile:.0.1 jps@spencerlaw.net Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. Lakeshore Law Center Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT LOCAL RULES WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT LOCAL RULES WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS November 7, 2005 i LOCAL COURT RULES OF THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ii UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL CIVIL WEST ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 2 3 4 5 6 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman (SBN 90058 29800Agoura Road, Suite 210 Agoura Hills, California 91301 Telephone: (818 991-8080 Facsimile: (818 991-8081 ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) CONTENTS
CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope of Application and Interpretation 1 Rule 2 Notice, Calculation of Periods of Time 3 Rule 3 Notice of Arbitration 4 Rule 4 Response to Notice of Arbitration 6 Rule 5 Expedited Procedure
More informationCase: 4:14-md RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1284
Case: 4:14-md-02562-RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: BLUE BUFFALO COMPANY, ) LTD. MARKETING
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:15-cv-00299 Document 2-1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Navajo Nation, Civil Action No. 15-cv-00299
More informationStreamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures
RESOLUTIONS, LLC s GUIDE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures 1. Scope of Rules The RESOLUTIONS, LLC Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures ("Rules") govern binding
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
CINDY RODRIGUEZ, STEVEN GIBBS, PAULA PULLUM, YOLANDA CARNEY, JACQUELINE BRINKLEY, CURTIS JOHNSON, and FRED ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION v. Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NICHOLAS CHALUPA, ) Individually and on Behalf of All Other ) No. 1:12-cv-10868-JCB Persons Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED PARCEL
More informationSTREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers
More informationPlease reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 13985 STOWE DRIVE POWAY, CA 92064 TEL: (858) 513-1020 FAX: (858) 513-1002 www.lorberlaw.com May 6, 2016 Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield jgreenfield@lorberlaw.com Zachariah R. Tomlin
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RUBEN AMAYA; individually, an on behalf of other members of the
More informationSUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES
SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES Justice: HON. THOMAS RADEMAKER Secretary: MARILYN McINTOSH Part Clerk: TRINA PAYNE Phone: (516) 493-3420 Courtroom: (516) 493-3423 Fax:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: v. Defendant. CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER By stipulation and agreement of the parties,
More informationREQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE PROVISION OF ENGINEERING SERVICES NORTH ARLINGTON LYNDHURST JOINT SEWER MEETING C-3 LICENSED ENGINEER
NOTE: The North Arlington Lyndhurst Joint Sewer Meeting will consider proposals only from firms or organizations that have demonstrated the capability and willingness to provide high quality services in
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-000-R-E Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Alan Harris (SBN 0) David Zelenski (SBN ) HARRIS & RUBLE Santa Monica Boulevard Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () -00 aharris@harrisandruble.com
More informationCase 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS
Case 8:15-cv-01936-JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made and entered into as of July 24, 2017, between (a) Plaintiff Jordan
More informationAttachment to Module 3
Attachment to Module 3 These Procedures were designed with an eye toward timely and efficient dispute resolution. As part of the New gtld Program, these Procedures apply to all proceedings administered
More informationPLANT ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES
PLANT ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES PLANT ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES Pursuant to Section 5.10 of the Plant Asbestos
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Paul T. Cullen, Esq. (#193575 THE CULLEN LAW FIRM, APC 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 Agoura Hills, CA 91301-1555 Tel: (818 360-2529; (626 744-9125
More informationREVISED AS OF MARCH 2014
REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014 JUDICATE WEST COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES RULE 1. INTENT AND OVERVIEW 1 RULE 1.A. INTENT 1 RULE 1.B. COMMITMENT TO EFFICIENT RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES 1 RULE 2. JURISDICTION 1 RULE
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
0 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 0 WILLY GRANADOS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant.
More informationCase 1:15-cv RDB Document 3-1 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION
Case 1:15-cv-00179-RDB Document 3-1 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU 1700 G Street NW
More informationAdopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District Court Judge John W. Smith. See Separate Section on Rules governing Criminal and Juvenile Courts Rule
LOCAL RULES FOR THE DISTRICT COURTS OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FAMILY COURT, DOMESTIC, CIVIL AND GENERAL RULES NEW HANOVER AND PENDER COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA Adopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ( Agreement is entered into as of the last undersigned date (the Execution Date, by and between Stanley H. Epstein and Harriet P. Epstein (the Epsteins or
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CPT ID SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ALL PERSONS WHO WORKED FOR DEFENDANT ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ( ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL
More informationREPORT OF THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE COMMITTEE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT NO. IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE / REPORT OF THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE COMMITTEE COME
More informationCase 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:08-cv-03653-BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES J HAYES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
More informationRESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION [NOTE: OR RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION AND COUNTERCLAIMS, IF
ARBITRATION NO. [INSERT CASE NUMBER AS PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRAR OF THE LCIA COURT] IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER ARBITRATION RULES OF LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION BETWEEN: [NAME OF
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (Case No. RG06254835) A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against you and you are not being sued. However,
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A
Case: 1:14-cv-01981 Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637 Exhibit A Case: 1:14-cv-01981 Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 2 of 32 PageID #:638 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
More informationThe court annexed arbitration program.
NEVADA ARBITRATION RULES (Rules Governing Alternative Dispute Resolution, Part B) (effective July 1, 1992; as amended effective January 1, 2008) Rule 1. The court annexed arbitration program. The Court
More informationCLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE I. Recitals. A. Introduction. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement ) details and finalizes the terms for settlement of class claims
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. MC JFW(SKx)
Case :-mc-000-jfw-sk Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 The National Coalition of Association of -Eleven Franchisees, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, -Eleven,
More informationNew Jersey No-Fault Automobile Arbitration RULES. Effective May 1, New Jersey No-Fault Automobile Arbitration Rules
New Jersey No-Fault Automobile Arbitration RULES Effective May 1, 2003 1. New Jersey No-Fault Automobile Arbitration Rules New Jersey automobile insurance law was amended in 1998 to require that all automobile
More informationLOCAL OPERATING PROCEDURES UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION COURT BUFFALO & BATAVIA, NEW YORK
LOCAL OPERATING PROCEDURES UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION COURT BUFFALO & BATAVIA, NEW YORK These rules are adopted pursuant to the authority of 8 C.F.R. 1003.40 for the purpose of facilitating the convenient,
More information[Corrected Copy] SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 211th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 13, 2004
[Corrected Copy] SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER, 00 Sponsored by: Senator ELLEN KARCHER District (Mercer and Monmouth) Senator NICHOLAS SCUTARI District (Middlesex,
More informationNASD CODE OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURE FOR INDUSTRY DISPUTES
NASD CODE OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURE FOR INDUSTRY DISPUTES As of September 10, 2008 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I Interpretive Material, Definitions, Organization, and Authority IM-13000. Failure to Act Under
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Case 5:15-cv-01143-RGK-SP Document 63-3 Filed 03/14/16 Page 2 of 59 Page ID #:771 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 DOl!glas Caiafa, Es_q. (SBN 107747) DOUGLAS CAIAFA;.,.A Professional Law
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BRUCE M. TAYLOR, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, MORGAN STANLEY DW, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
More informationNew Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules (2011)
New Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules (2011) Effective April 1, 2011 ADMINISTERED BY FORTHRIGHT New Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules 2 PART I Rules of General Application... 5 1. Scope of Rules...
More informationCase 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:15-cv-04316-ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION BRIDGET SMITH, RENE TAN, VICTOR CASTANEDA, KRISADA
More informationConsolidated Arbitration Rules
Consolidated Arbitration Rules THE LEADING PROVIDER OF ADR SERVICES 1. Applicability of Rules The parties to a dispute shall be deemed to have made these Consolidated Arbitration Rules a part of their
More informationTHE BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
THE BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS The Borough of East Rutherford is soliciting Qualification Statements from interested persons and/or firms for the provision of the professional
More informationBEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS OVERSIGHT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
0 MARY ANN SMITH Deputy Commissioner MIRANDA LEKANDER Assistant Chief Counsel ALEX M. CALERO (State Bar No. Senior Counsel CHARLES CARRIERE (State Bar No. Counsel Department of Business Oversight One Sansome
More informationAMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement
AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Defendants
More informationIllinois Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Arbitration and Mediation Rules
Illinois Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Arbitration and Mediation Rules As amended and effective January 1, 2002 Table of Contents Introduction...3 Mediation...4 The Process...4 The Mediator...4 Using
More informationCase 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:15-cv-01249-WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 15-cv-1249
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES I. APPLICATION OF STANDING ORDER Unless otherwise indicated by the Court,
More informationPLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1
PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 In The Case Of Kevin Burkhammer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Allied Interstate LLC; and, Does 1-20, Inclusive, 15CV0567 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC
More informationCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ESTABLISHING COMMUNITY FACILI- TIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-2 OF THE
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES As Amended Effective January 1, 2006 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Hall of Justice and Records 400 County Center,
More information