IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No."

Transcription

1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT RICHARD TYNER, III, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, EMBARQ CORPORATION, THOMAS A. GERKE, WILLIAM A. OWENS, PETER C. BROWN, STEVEN A. DAVIS, RICHARD A. GEPHARDT, JOHN P. MULLEN, DINESH C. PALIWAL, STEPHANIE M. SHERN, LAURIE A. SIEGEL and CENTURYTEL, INC., Defendants. Proceeding Pursuant to K.S.A. Ch. 60 Case No. 08-CV Division No. 14 NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL PERSONS WHO HELD SHARES OF EMBARQ CORPORATION COMMON STOCK AT ANY TIME FROM OCTOBER 26, 2008 THROUGH AND INCLUDING JULY 1, 2009, THE DATE ON WHICH THE MERGER BETWEEN EMBARQ CORPORATION AND CENTURYTEL, INC. BECAME EFFECTIVE. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOU MAY BE AFFECTED BY A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION LITIGATION. This Notice was authorized and approved by the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas (the "Court"). This Notice, however, is not an expression of opinion by the Court as to the merits of any claims or defenses asserted by any party in this class action litigation (the "Action"). This Notice is sent for the sole purpose of informing you of the proposed Settlement 1, which is contingent on final approval by the Court. If approved, the Settlement will end litigation of the Action. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. On September 18, 2009, the Court in this Action preliminarily approved a Settlement between Plaintiff and Defendants. The Settlement provides, in part, for certain supplemental disclosures filed by Embarq with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on a Form 8-K dated January 16, 2009, a release of claims and the payment of attorneys' fees and for the reimbursement of expenses. The Form 8-K is available at http// Plaintiff and Defendants vigorously disagree on both whether Plaintiff could have prevailed at trial and the recovery, if any, that could have been achieved for the Settlement Class if Plaintiff had prevailed at trial. Plaintiff believes the claims asserted in the Action have merit. Defendants deny all of Plaintiff's allegations of wrongdoing and deny they have any liability whatsoever. Continued litigation of the Action could have resulted in either dismissal or loss at trial. In reaching this Settlement, however, Plaintiff and Defendants have avoided the costs, time, expense, distraction, and risks associated with continued litigation, including the danger of no recovery. Your rights and options and the deadlines by which to exercise them are explained in this Notice. A summary of your rights and the applicable deadlines are set forth below. Please note that the date of the Settlement Hearing is subject to change without further notice. The Court in charge of this case must decide whether to approve the Settlement. Subject to the Order of the Court, pending final determination of whether the Settlement should be approved, Plaintiff and all Members of the Settlement Class, or any of them, are barred and enjoined from commencing, prosecuting, instigating, or in any way participating in the commencement, prosecution, or instigation of any action asserting any Released Claims, either directly, representatively, derivatively, or in any other capacity, against any Released Person. 1 Except as expressly provided herein, all capitalized terms shall have the same meanings and/or definitions as set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated September 1, 2009 (the "Stipulation").

2 YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT EXCLUDE YOURSELF You may exclude yourself from the Settlement as to certain Released Claims relating solely to a claim for damages. This is the only option that allows you to participate in another lawsuit against the Defendants and the other Released Persons and it applies only to claims for damages. OBJECT You may write to the Court if you do not like this Settlement. GO TO THE SETTLEMENT If you make a written objection, you may ask to speak to the Court about your HEARING concerns relating to the Settlement. DO NOTHING You may do nothing. If you do nothing, you will give up any rights that you had to sue Defendants and the other Released Parties relating to the legal claims in the case. You will remain a member of the Settlement Class and be bound by the Judgment of the Court. DEADLINES The deadline to File Objections, Request Exclusion from the Class (With Respect to Money Damages Claims Only), and/or File an Intent to Appear at the Settlement Hearing November 10, 2009, Settlement Hearing November 20, 2009 at 1000 a.m. C.S.T. MORE INFORMATION More information concerning the Settlement can be obtained by writing to Benjamin Rozwood, Esq., Robbins Umeda LLP, 600 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California WHAT DOES THIS NOTICE CONTAIN 1. Why Did I Get This Notice Package? What Is This Lawsuit About? Why Is This a Class Action? Why Is There a Settlement? How Do I Know if I Am Part of the Settlement? What Are the Exceptions to Being Included? I Am Still Not Sure if I Am Included What Benefits Were Obtained as Part of the Settlement?... 4 THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU Do I Have a Lawyer in This Case? How Will the Lawyers Be Paid?... 4 THE SETTLMENT HEARING When and Where Will the Court Decide Whether to Approve the Settlement? How Do I Get Out of the Settlement Class? If I Do Not Exclude Myself, Can I Sue the Released Persons for the Same Thing Later? Do I Have to Come to the Hearing? May I Speak at the Hearing?... 5 IF YOU DO NOTHING What Happens if I Do Nothing at All?... 5 OBJECTING TO OR REQUESTING EXCLUSION FROM THE SETTLEMENT What Is the Difference Between Objecting and Excluding? How Do I Tell the Court that I Do Not Like the Settlement?... 6 GETTING MORE INFORMATION Are There More Details About the Settlement? How Do I Get More Information?... 6 SPECIAL NOTICE TO NOMINEES Why Did I Get This Notice Package? BASIC INFORMATION You or someone in your family may have held Embarq Corporation common stock during the period beginning on October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective. The Court directed that you be sent this Notice because, if you are a member of the Settlement Class, you have a right to know about a proposed Settlement of a class action lawsuit and about all of your options before the Court decides whether to approve the Settlement. This package describes the lawsuit, the Settlement, and your legal rights. This case is known as Tyner v. Embarq Corp., et al., Case No. 08-CV (the "Action"). The Court in charge of the Action is the District Court for Johnson County, Kansas, the Honorable Kevin P. Moriarty presiding. The individual that sued is called the Plaintiff. Embarq Corporation, CenturyTel, Inc., and the individuals that Plaintiff sued are called the Defendants. 2

3 2. What Is This Lawsuit About? This is a class action alleging claims that arose in connection with the merger agreement (the "Merger Agreement") between Embarq and CenturyTel pursuant to which Embarq merged subsequently with a subsidiary of CenturyTel and each share of Embarq common stock was converted into the right to receive 1.37 shares of CenturyTel common stock (the "Merger"). Plaintiff alleges that Embarq's directors breached their fiduciary duties by entering into the Merger Agreement, including by allegedly failing to disclose material information in the proxy materials distributed to Embarq stockholders in connection with the Merger and by allegedly failing to obtain the highest price available for Embarq's stockholders. Plaintiff also alleges that Embarq and CenturyTel aided and abetted the directors' breaches of their fiduciary duties. Plaintiff sought, among other things, class action status, court orders declaring the Merger Agreement unenforceable, and enjoining the defendants from consummating the Merger, and the payment of reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in litigating the Action. The Settlement is the product of Plaintiff's Counsel's (who has extensive experience in class action litigation) (1) independent investigation; (2) review of the various documents that have been produced in discovery and the depositions that have been taken; and (3) Plaintiff's Counsel's determination that a Settlement of the Action is in the best interests of the Settlement Class Members. If the Court approves the Settlement, all Settlement Class Members will release claims, including any claims relating to the Merger or to matters alleged in the Action, against the Defendants and certain others who are related to Defendants ("Released Persons"). The exact terms of the release are contained in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement which is available via the internet at or which may be inspected during business hours at the office of the Clerk of the Court, District Court of Johnson County, 100 North Kansas Avenue, Olathe, Kansas Why Is This a Class Action? In a class action, one or more persons sue on behalf of people who have similar claims. These people are collectively referred to herein as the Settlement Class or Settlement Class Member(s). The Court has appointed Plaintiff Richard Tyner, III to act as the representative of the Settlement Class. The Court will resolve the issues for all Settlement Class Members, except for those who exclude themselves from the Settlement Class. Johnson County, Kansas District Court Judge Kevin P. Moriarty is presiding over the Action. 4. Why Is There a Settlement? THE FOLLOWING RECITATION DOES NOT CONSTITUE FINDINGS OF THE COURT. IT IS BASED ON STATEMENTS OF THE PARTIES AND SHOULD NOT BE UNDERSTOOD AS AN EXPRESSION OF ANY OPINION OF THE COURT AS TO THE MERITS OF ANY OF THE CLAIMS OR DEFENSES RAISED BY ANY OF THE PARTIES. On November 20, 2008, Embarq and CenturyTel filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") a preliminary joint proxy statement-prospectus and Registration Statement on Form S-4 concerning the Merger and including certain disclosures related to the Merger. On December 1, 2008, Plaintiff filed the class action petition. On December 22, 2008, Embarq and CenturyTel filed with the SEC a definitive joint proxy statement-prospectus and amended Registration Statement on Form S-4/A. Thereafter, Plaintiff's Counsel conducted a detailed review and analysis of both the preliminary and definitive joint proxy statement-prospectuses. Thereafter, Plaintiff demanded and the Settling Parties engaged in arm's-length negotiations concerning certain additional information to Embarq's and CenturyTel's stockholders, (the "Supplemental Disclosures"). The Supplemental Disclosures were publicly disseminated and made available to all Embarq stockholders through a Form 8-K that was filed by Embarq with the SEC on January 16, The Form 8-K is available at http// On January 27, 2009, the special shareholder meetings of CenturyTel and Embarq were held to consider and vote upon the Merger, and at those meetings the respective shareholders of CenturyTel and Embarq approved the Merger. On July 1, 2009, the Merger closed. Prior to the Merger closing, Plaintiffs and Defendants engaged in a period of discovery in which Defendants and certain of their advisors produced thousands of pages of documents, Plaintiff's Counsel reviewed and analyzed these documents, and Plaintiff's Counsel conducted depositions of a member of Embarq's board of directors and a representative of Embarq's financial advisor. The Settling Parties to the Action then concluded that the Action should be settled. This conclusion is based upon, among other things (1) Plaintiff's Counsel's independent investigation, review of the various documents that have been produced, and the depositions that have been taken; (2) Defendants' denial that they committed any acts or omissions giving rise to any liability; (3) Defendants' acknowledgement that the pendency and prosecution of the Action and the efforts of Plaintiff's Counsel were the sole reason and cause for the decision of Defendants to file the 3

4 Supplemental Disclosures; (4) the risk to Settlement Class Members that continuing with the Action could have resulted in dismissal or loss at trial and the recognition that, by settling the Action, the parties avoid the additional costs, time, expense, disruption, distraction, and risks associated with continued litigation; (5) the benefits that the Settlement Class received in connection with the disclosures made after the Complaint was filed, including the Supplemental Disclosures; (6) the benefits that the Settling Parties and the Settlement Class will receive by reason of this Settlement; (7) Defendants' belief that the Settlement of the Action is in the best interests of Embarq's and CenturyTel's stockholders; and (8) Plaintiff's Counsel's belief that the Settlement of this Action is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of all Settlement Class Members. 5. How Do I Know if I Am Part of the Settlement? For purposes of this Settlement, the Court has preliminarily certified a Settlement Class that includes, with limited exceptions, all Embarq stockholders and their successors in interest and transferees, immediate and remote, and any person or entity acting for or on behalf of, or claiming under, any of them, and each of them, from October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the Merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective. 6. What Are the Exceptions to Being Included? You are not a Settlement Class Member if you are (1) a Defendant; (2) a member of an Individual Defendant's immediate family; or (3) any person over whom any Defendant exercises sole or exclusive control. 7. I Am Still Not Sure if I Am Included. If you are still not sure whether you are included as a member of the Settlement Class, you can ask for free help. You can call or write to Plaintiff's Counsel at the following address for more information Benjamin Rozwood, Esq. at Robbins Umeda LLP, 600 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101, Telephone (619) , Facsimile (619) What Benefits Were Obtained as Part of the Settlement? In consideration for the Settlement and dismissal with prejudice of the Action, Defendants have made and have caused to be publicly disseminated the Supplemental Disclosures contained in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC dated January 16, The Settlement will result in the dismissal of the Action on the merits with prejudice and a release of all claims by all Settlement Class Members against the Released Persons. You may exclude yourself from the Settlement Class solely with respect to a claim for money damages. If you want to keep any right to sue or continue to sue the Released Persons on your own about the same issues raised in the Action and solely with respect to a claim for money damages, then you must take the steps discussed in Questions 12 and 13 to get out of the Settlement Class. Even if you exclude yourself, you will be precluded by the Settlement from bringing any claim other than a claim solely for money damages against any of the Released Persons. 9. Do I Have a Lawyer in This Case? THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU The Court appointed the following law firm to represent the named Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members ROBBINS UMEDA LLP 600 B Street, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA Telephone (619) The Court also appointed the following lawyers as local counsel for the Settlement Class BEAM-WARD, KRUSE, WILSON, WRIGHT & FLETES, LLC 8695 College Blvd., Suite 200 Overland Park, Kansas Telephone (913) If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. 10. How Will the Lawyers Be Paid? Plaintiff's Counsel have neither received any payment for their services in conducting the Action on behalf of Plaintiff and the Settlement Class, nor have Plaintiff's Counsel been reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses incurred to date. After resolving the substantive terms of the Settlement, Plaintiff's Counsel and Defendants' Counsel negotiated an amount of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses to compensate Plaintiff's Counsel for their work in achieving the benefits of this Settlement. Subject to Court approval, Defendants shall pay to Plaintiff's Counsel an amount not to exceed one million dollars for their attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses. Neither you nor any other Settlement Class Member is personally liable for any of these fees and expenses if the Settlement is approved. The attorneys' fees 4

5 and reimbursement of expenses requested will be the only payment to Plaintiff's Counsel for their efforts in achieving this Settlement and for their risk in undertaking this representation on a wholly contingent basis. THE SETTLEMENT HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the Settlement. 11. When and Where Will the Court Decide Whether to Approve the Settlement? The Court will hold a Settlement Hearing at 1000 a.m., on November 20, 2009, before the Honorable Kevin P. Moriarty, Johnson County Courthouse, Courtroom 113, 100 North Kansas, 7th Floor, Olathe, Kansas At this hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. If there are objections, the Court will consider them. The Court will listen to people who have submitted timely written objections. Assuming the Settlement is approved, the Court will also consider how much attorney's fees and expenses Plaintiff's Counsel are to receive. The Court may decide these issues at the Settlement Hearing or take them under consideration. We do not know how long these decisions will take. 12. How Do I Get Out of the Settlement Class? To exclude yourself from the Settlement Class with respect to a claim for money damages, you must send a letter by mail stating that you want to be excluded from the Settlement Class. You must include your name, address, telephone number, your signature, the number of shares of Embarq Corporation common stock you held beginning on October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective, and a specific statement that you "request exclusion from the Settlement Class in Tyner v. Embarq Corp., et al., Case No. 08-CV (Kan. Dist. Ct. Johnson County)." You must mail your exclusion request postmarked no later than November 10, 2009 to Benjamin Rozwood, Esq., Robbins Umeda LLP, 600 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101; to Mark D. Hinderks, Esq., Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Benson, Suite 550, 12 Corporate Woods, Overland Park, Kansas 66210; and to William Savitt, Esq., Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, 51 West 52nd Street, New York, New York You cannot exclude yourself on the phone or by If I Do Not Exclude Myself, Can I Sue the Released Persons for the Same Thing Later? No. Unless you exclude yourself, you give up any right to sue the Released Persons for the claims resolved by this Settlement, including any claims for money damages. If you have a pending lawsuit against any of the Released Persons, speak to your lawyer in that case immediately. You must exclude yourself from the Settlement Class to continue your own lawsuit or arbitration against any of the Defendants solely with respect to a claim for damages. Remember, the exclusion deadline is November 10, Do I Have to Come to the Hearing? No. Plaintiff's Counsel will answer questions the Court may have. But you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you send an objection, you do not have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as you mailed your written objection on time, the Court will consider it. You may also pay your own lawyer to attend, but it is not necessary. 15. May I Speak at the Hearing? If you are a Settlement Class Member who has submitted a written objection and has not requested to be excluded from the Settlement Class, you may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Settlement Hearing. To do so, you must send a letter called a "Notice of Intention to Appear at Settlement Hearing in Tyner v. Embarq Corp., et al., Case No. 08-CV " Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, your signature, and the number of shares of Embarq Corporation common stock you held beginning on October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the Merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective. Your Notice of Intention to Appear must be received no later than November 10, 2009, by the Clerk of the Court, Plaintiff's Counsel, and Defendants' Counsel, at the addresses listed in Question 18. You cannot speak at the Settlement Hearing if you exclude yourself from the Settlement Class. IF YOU DO NOTHING 16. What Happens if I Do Nothing at All? If you do nothing, you will still be bound by the judgment of the Court. That means even if you have not excluded yourself, you will not be able to start a lawsuit, continue with a lawsuit, or be part of any other lawsuit against the Released Persons about the same claims and issues in the Action if the Settlement is approved by the Court. OBJECTING TO OR REQUESTING EXCLUSION FROM THE SETTLEMENT You can tell the Court that you do not agree with the Settlement or some part of it. 17. What Is the Difference Between Objecting and Excluding? Objecting is simply telling the Court that you do not like something about the Settlement. You can object only if you stay in the Settlement Class. Persons may exclude themselves from the Settlement Class solely with respect to a 5

6 claim for money damages. Excluding yourself is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the Settlement Class solely with respect to your right to pursue a claim for damages. 18. How Do I Tell the Court that I Do Not Like the Settlement? If you are a Settlement Class Member, you can object to the Settlement if you do not like any part of it. You must give reasons why you think the Court should not approve it. The Court will consider your views. Any objection must be in writing and include your name, address, telephone number, your signature, and the number of shares of Embarq Corporation common stock you held beginning on October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the Merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective. If you are represented by counsel, your objection must also include the name, address, and telephone number of your counsel. Any objection to the Settlement must be mailed or delivered no later than November 10, 2009, to The Court District Court for the Johnson County, Kansas Civil Department The Johnson County Courthouse 100 North Kansas Olathe, KS Counsel for Defendants STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP Attn Mark D. Hinderks Benson, Suite Corporate Woods Overland Park, KS Telephone (913) POLSINELLI SHUGHART, PC Attn Greg L. Musil 6201 College Blvd, Suite 500 Overland Park, KS Telephone (913) Are There More Details About the Settlement? Counsel for Plaintiff BEAM-WARD, KRUSE, WILSON, WRIGHT & FLETES, LLC Attn Charles T. Schimmel 8695 College Blvd., Suite 200 Overland Park, Kansas Telephone (913) MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP Attn Kenneth J. Nachbar 1201 N. Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, Delaware Telephone (302) GETTING MORE INFORMATION ROBBINS UMEDA LLP Attn Benjamin Rozwood 600 B Street, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA Telephone (619) WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ Attn William Savitt 51 West 52nd Street New York, NY Telephone (212) This Notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. This summary is qualified by, and subject to, the detailed terms of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement together with its exhibits dated September 1, You can get a copy of the Stipulation via the internet at or you may inspect the Stipulation during business hours at the office of the Clerk of the Court, District Court of Johnson County, 100 North Kansas Avenue, Olathe, Kansas How Do I Get More Information? There is additional information concerning the Settlement available via the internet at Or you can call Benjamin Rozwood Esq. at Robbins Umeda LLP, 600 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101, Telephone (619) , for additional information concerning the Settlement. DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE SPECIAL NOTICE TO NOMINEES If you held any shares of Embarq Corporation common stock beginning on October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the Merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective, as nominee for a beneficial owner, then, within ten (10) days after you receive this Notice, please either send a copy of this Notice by first class mail to all such Persons, or provide a list of the names and addresses of such Persons to Embarq Merger Litigation, c/o The Garden City Group, Inc., PO Box 9539, Dublin OH ; (the Notice Administrator ). If you choose to mail the Notice yourself, you may obtain from the Notice Administrator (without cost to you) as many additional copies of these documents as you will need to complete the mailing. Regardless of whether you choose to complete the mailing yourself or elect to have the mailing performed for you, you may obtain reimbursement for or advancement of reasonable administrative costs actually incurred or expected to be incurred in connection with forwarding the Notice and which would not have been incurred but for the obligation to forward the Notice, upon submission of appropriate documentation to the Notice Administrator. DATED September 18, 2009 BY ORDER OF THE COURT DISTRICT COURT FOR JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS 6

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-13-000352 IN RE PERVASIVE SOFTWARE INC, SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE THE HONORABLE GREG CANOVA RICHARD CARRIGAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, ADVANCED DIGITAL INFORMATION CORPORATION,

More information

THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, CLASS ACTION

THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, CLASS ACTION THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, Plaintiff, v. DAVID P. ANASTASI, et al., Lead Case No. 08-2-31902-4 SEA CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BRAD WIND, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, v. Case No. 07-2380CI-20 CATALINA

More information

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF MONROE ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X IN RE BAUSCH & LOMB INC. : BUYOUT LITIGATION : -------------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil

More information

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BRUCE M. TAYLOR, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, MORGAN STANLEY DW, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION PAWEL I. KMIEC, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JEROME JENSON, BETTY TAIT, EILEEN HORTON and JOSEPH RISSE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY No. 3:04-cv SRC ) ) CLASS ACTION ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY No. 3:04-cv SRC ) ) CLASS ACTION ) ) In re INTERPOOL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY No. 3:04-cv-00321-SRC CLASS ACTION ELECTRONICALLY FILED NOTICE OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re INTERMUNE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. C-03-2954-SI CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION PETER KALTMAN, MALCOLM LORD, CELESTE NAVON, DAVID W. ORTBALS, PAUL E. STEWARD, GARCO INVESTMENTS, LLP Individually

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re TERAYON COMMUNICATION ) Master File No. C-00-1967-MHP SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CLASS ACTION ) This Document Relates To:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN GAUQUIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC., WILLIAM MARTH,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To ALL ACTIONS. x x Civil Action No. 05-CV-2827-RMB ELECTRONICALLY

More information

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>>

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>> RAMIREZ V JCPENNEY CORP ERISA CLASS ACTION ADMINISTRATOR C/O RUST CONSULTING INC - 5514 PO BOX 2572 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9572 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *CLMNTIDNO* - UAA -

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-00715-KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND HEARING If you

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA SARATOGA ADVANTAGE TRUST and THEODORE HYER, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. ICG, INC. a/k/a INTERNATIONAL COAL

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SAMCO PARTNERS, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, JOSEPH M. O DONNELL, EDWARD

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

MASTER FILE NO. 2: 03-CV-1270 (JS) (ETB)

MASTER FILE NO. 2: 03-CV-1270 (JS) (ETB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re ACCLAIM ENTERTAINMENT, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To ALL ACTIONS. x x MASTER FILE NO. 2 03-CV-1270 (JS) (ETB) NOTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA In re GMH COMMUNITIES TRUST SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 2:06-cv-01444-PBT CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re VELTI PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. 3:13-cv-03889-WHO (Consolidated

More information

If You Were a Stockholder of Primedia, Inc. Between January 11, 2011 and July 13, 2011 You May Be Entitled to Money From a Class Action Settlement

If You Were a Stockholder of Primedia, Inc. Between January 11, 2011 and July 13, 2011 You May Be Entitled to Money From a Class Action Settlement Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Settlement Hearing and Right to Appear If You Were a Stockholder of Primedia, Inc. Between January 11, 2011 and July 13, 2011 You May Be Entitled to Money

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT If you purchased Polycom, Inc. securities between January 20, 2011 and July 23, 2013, you could receive a payment from a class-action settlement. A federal court

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, Plaintiffs, v. DOUGLAS W. BROYLES, MARVIN D. BURKETT, STEPHEN L. DOMENIK, DR. NORMAN GODINHO, RONALD

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE

IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE In re PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master Docket

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE RAYTHEON COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 19018 NC NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY KENTON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION I CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 07-CI-00627

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION

More information

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 133 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A (Revised)

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 133 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A (Revised) Case 1:14-cv-03125-VEC Document 133 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A (Revised) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK If you applied for employment with Halstead Management

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION DETERMINATION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION DETERMINATION IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE CHAPARRAL RESOURCES, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 2001-VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-02400-RWS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA FREDRIC ELLIOTT, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. CHINA GREEN AGRICULTURE, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BROADCOM CORPORATION CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Lead Case No.: CV-06-5036-R (CWx) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-00580-BEN-RBB NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION A court in Nevada authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Please be advised that if you held the common stock of ClubCorp

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE 360NETWORKS SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) 02 CV 4837 (MGC) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS'

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL MONAHAN, on behalf of himself And all persons similarly interested Civil Action No. 02-CV-496M Plaintiffs, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VISWANATH V. SHANKAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. IMPERVA, INC., et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT If you purchased goods or services using a credit card from a Lowe s store in Massachusetts

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn MARJORIE MISHKIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ZYNEX, INC., f/k/a

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT POPTECH, L.P., individually, and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 310-cv-967 (SRU) v. STEWARDSHIP

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF DOUGLAS, COLORADO 4000 Justice Way, Suite 2009 Castle Rock, CO 80109 IN RE ADVANCED EMISSIONS SOLUTIONS, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY ROBERT ENGLEHART, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. CHARLES M. BROWN, PATRICK J. BYRNE, JERRY

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION MARVIN E. SIKES, v. Plaintiff, CRAIG A. WINN, THOMAS MORGAN, REX SCATENA and DEAN M. JOHNSON, Civil Action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION IN RE BROADWING INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. C-1-02-795 JUDGE WALTER H. RICE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 2:09-cv-12830-AJT-DAS Doc # 82-3 Filed 02/28/13 Pg 1 of 23 Pg ID 2183 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case No. 2:09-cv-12830-AJT-DAS IN RE CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL

More information

Case 1:11-cv CM Document Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2

Case 1:11-cv CM Document Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2 Case 1:11-cv-02279-CM Document 103-3 Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2 Case 1:11-cv-02279-CM Document 103-3 Filed 04/25/13 Page 2 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. KPMG, LLP, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN

More information

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE CHINACAST EDUCATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. CV 12-4621-JFW (PLAx NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION To: All persons

More information

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION 12 In re KINDER MORGAN, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION (This Order Relates to All Actions.) Consolidated Case No. 06-C-801 ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TERRI MORSE BACHOW, Individually on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff v. C.A. No. 3:09-CV-0262-K

More information

Case: 1:15-cv SJD Doc #: 38-1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 607

Case: 1:15-cv SJD Doc #: 38-1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 607 Case: 1:15-cv-00748-SJD Doc #: 38-1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 607 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Vicki Linneman et al. v. Vita-Mix Corporation,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-11044-DJC Document 70-4 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X ANTHONY CAIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION x IN RE PROFIT RECOVERY GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION x ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IBEW LOCAL UNION 98, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IBEW LOCAL UNION 98, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IBEW LOCAL UNION 98, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., WAYNE P. YETTER, PETER BRANDT,

More information

x : : x NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON

x : : x NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. SECURITIES LITIGATION x : : x No. CV 01-3285 (JBW) (MDG) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT,

More information

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION ------------------------------------------------------x IN RE CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES : Civil Action No. W-04-CA-177 SECURITIES LITIGATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

Case 2:05-cv DRH-AKT Document 202 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 8234 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:05-cv DRH-AKT Document 202 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 8234 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 2:05-cv-03923-DRH-AKT Document 202 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 8234 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : (ECF CASE)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : (ECF CASE) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CELESTICA INC. SEC. LITIG. : : : : : Civil Action No.: 07-CV-00312-GBD (ECF CASE) Hon. George B. Daniels NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

Joy L. Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union

Joy L. Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union Joy L. Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING ACCOUNT

More information

Frequently Asked Questions regarding the Bristol-Myers Squibb Securities Litigation- Civil Action No (SRC)

Frequently Asked Questions regarding the Bristol-Myers Squibb Securities Litigation- Civil Action No (SRC) Frequently Asked Questions regarding the Bristol-Myers Squibb Securities Litigation- Civil Action No. 00-1990 (SRC) This page provides short answers to class members' most frequently asked questions. The

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md MJP. Lead Case No. C MJP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md MJP. Lead Case No. C MJP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ERISA Action No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. MODEL N, INC., et al., SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

CAUSE NO. DC C

CAUSE NO. DC C CAUSE NO. DC-13-06601-C JACOB HULSEBUS, IBEW LOCAL 363 PENSION TRUST FUND, IBEW LOCAL 363 MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN and PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN JOSEPH SCOTT SHERRILL and KEITH A. SIVERLY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Case No. 04-72949 Plaintiffs,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MOBILEIRON, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Lead Case No. 1-15-cv-284001 CLASS ACTION Assigned to:

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JOE M. WILEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. ENVIVIO, INC., et al., SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Plaintiff, Defendants. Master File No.

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLMENT HEARING

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLMENT HEARING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA PETER ROSENBLUM, on behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. TEAVANA HOLDINGS, INC., ANDREW T. MACK, F. BARRON FLETCHER

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ARTHUR STEIN, EDWIN HUMPHRIES, DAVID BAILEY, and ROBERT MACCINI, on behalf of the Employee Investment Plan of Stone & Webster Incorporated and Participating

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:11-cv KMW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:11-cv KMW SID MURDESHWAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA v. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:11-cv-20549-KMW SEARCHMEDIA HOLDINGS LTD.,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND SANDRA KAFENBAUM and STEVEN SCHULMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, CA 00 413L vs. GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMY SILVIS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. 2:14-cv-05005 CLASS ACTION AMBIT NORTHEAST,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Master File No. HG16804359 This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS NOTICE OF DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE REVLON, INC. SECURITIES : Master File No. LITIGATION : 99-CV-10192 (SHS) x This Document Relates to: : All Actions : x NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

IF YOU HELD SHARES OF CH ENERGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY, PLEASE PROMPTLY TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNER.

IF YOU HELD SHARES OF CH ENERGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY, PLEASE PROMPTLY TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNER. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO ALL CASES Index No. 775000/2012 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

Case 8:10-ml DOC-RNB Document 626 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:29073

Case 8:10-ml DOC-RNB Document 626 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:29073 Case 8:10-ml-02145-DOC-RNB Document 626 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:29073 Case 8:10-ml-02145-DOC-RNB Document 626 Filed 06/24/13 Page 2 of 13 Page ID #:29074 Case 8:10-ml-02145-DOC-RNB Document

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RAMON GOMEZ, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BIDZ.COM, INC., and DAVID ZINBERG, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE HIBERNIA FOODS, PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION ------------------------------------------------------------- THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY HOWARD GRADEN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:05-cv-00695-SRC CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC., DWIGHT W.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE ALLERGAN, INC. PROXY VIOLATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 8:14-cv-2004-DOC (KES) CLASS ACTION Honorable David O.

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TRADING STRATEGIES FUND, on CIVIL DIVISION Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, No. 12-11460 Plaintiff, -against- NOORUDDIN S.

More information

Plaintiff, Defendants.

Plaintiff, Defendants. United States District Court For the District Court of Massachusetts WILTOLD TRZECIAKOWSKI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. GSI GROUP INC., SERGIO EDELSTEIN and ROBERT BOWEN,

More information

DATED: May 7, 2014 B,Ii~ DATED: May 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (Attorney for Defendant Motorola Mobility, LLC) BY:~-- BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN Edelson PC (Attorney for Plaintiff and the Class) -29- Exhibit

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x : : CLASS ACTION : : : : Master File No. 1:08-cv LTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x : : CLASS ACTION : : : : Master File No. 1:08-cv LTS In re TELETECH LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x : Master File No. 1:08-cv-00913-LTS : : CLASS ACTION : : : x NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION EBRAHIM SHANEHCHIAN, et al., Plaintiff, v. MACY S, INC. et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07-cv-00828-SAS-SKB Judge S. Arthur Spiegel

More information

CAUSE NO

CAUSE NO CAUSE NO. 2002-55406 x DYNEGY INC. and DYNEGY HOLDINGS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiffs v. 129 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT BERNARD D. SHAPIRO and PETER STRUB, Individually and On Behalf of Themselves and

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you were a borrower with a loan secured by a property in Massachusetts and were assessed two or more late fees by EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") at any time during the period

More information