IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No."

Transcription

1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT RICHARD TYNER, III, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, EMBARQ CORPORATION, THOMAS A. GERKE, WILLIAM A. OWENS, PETER C. BROWN, STEVEN A. DAVIS, RICHARD A. GEPHARDT, JOHN P. MULLEN, DINESH C. PALIWAL, STEPHANIE M. SHERN, LAURIE A. SIEGEL and CENTURYTEL, INC., Defendants. Proceeding Pursuant to K.S.A. Ch. 60 Case No. 08-CV Division No. 14 NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL PERSONS WHO HELD SHARES OF EMBARQ CORPORATION COMMON STOCK AT ANY TIME FROM OCTOBER 26, 2008 THROUGH AND INCLUDING JULY 1, 2009, THE DATE ON WHICH THE MERGER BETWEEN EMBARQ CORPORATION AND CENTURYTEL, INC. BECAME EFFECTIVE. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOU MAY BE AFFECTED BY A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION LITIGATION. This Notice was authorized and approved by the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas (the "Court"). This Notice, however, is not an expression of opinion by the Court as to the merits of any claims or defenses asserted by any party in this class action litigation (the "Action"). This Notice is sent for the sole purpose of informing you of the proposed Settlement 1, which is contingent on final approval by the Court. If approved, the Settlement will end litigation of the Action. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. On September 18, 2009, the Court in this Action preliminarily approved a Settlement between Plaintiff and Defendants. The Settlement provides, in part, for certain supplemental disclosures filed by Embarq with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on a Form 8-K dated January 16, 2009, a release of claims and the payment of attorneys' fees and for the reimbursement of expenses. The Form 8-K is available at http// Plaintiff and Defendants vigorously disagree on both whether Plaintiff could have prevailed at trial and the recovery, if any, that could have been achieved for the Settlement Class if Plaintiff had prevailed at trial. Plaintiff believes the claims asserted in the Action have merit. Defendants deny all of Plaintiff's allegations of wrongdoing and deny they have any liability whatsoever. Continued litigation of the Action could have resulted in either dismissal or loss at trial. In reaching this Settlement, however, Plaintiff and Defendants have avoided the costs, time, expense, distraction, and risks associated with continued litigation, including the danger of no recovery. Your rights and options and the deadlines by which to exercise them are explained in this Notice. A summary of your rights and the applicable deadlines are set forth below. Please note that the date of the Settlement Hearing is subject to change without further notice. The Court in charge of this case must decide whether to approve the Settlement. Subject to the Order of the Court, pending final determination of whether the Settlement should be approved, Plaintiff and all Members of the Settlement Class, or any of them, are barred and enjoined from commencing, prosecuting, instigating, or in any way participating in the commencement, prosecution, or instigation of any action asserting any Released Claims, either directly, representatively, derivatively, or in any other capacity, against any Released Person. 1 Except as expressly provided herein, all capitalized terms shall have the same meanings and/or definitions as set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated September 1, 2009 (the "Stipulation").

2 YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT EXCLUDE YOURSELF You may exclude yourself from the Settlement as to certain Released Claims relating solely to a claim for damages. This is the only option that allows you to participate in another lawsuit against the Defendants and the other Released Persons and it applies only to claims for damages. OBJECT You may write to the Court if you do not like this Settlement. GO TO THE SETTLEMENT If you make a written objection, you may ask to speak to the Court about your HEARING concerns relating to the Settlement. DO NOTHING You may do nothing. If you do nothing, you will give up any rights that you had to sue Defendants and the other Released Parties relating to the legal claims in the case. You will remain a member of the Settlement Class and be bound by the Judgment of the Court. DEADLINES The deadline to File Objections, Request Exclusion from the Class (With Respect to Money Damages Claims Only), and/or File an Intent to Appear at the Settlement Hearing November 10, 2009, Settlement Hearing November 20, 2009 at 1000 a.m. C.S.T. MORE INFORMATION More information concerning the Settlement can be obtained by writing to Benjamin Rozwood, Esq., Robbins Umeda LLP, 600 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California WHAT DOES THIS NOTICE CONTAIN 1. Why Did I Get This Notice Package? What Is This Lawsuit About? Why Is This a Class Action? Why Is There a Settlement? How Do I Know if I Am Part of the Settlement? What Are the Exceptions to Being Included? I Am Still Not Sure if I Am Included What Benefits Were Obtained as Part of the Settlement?... 4 THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU Do I Have a Lawyer in This Case? How Will the Lawyers Be Paid?... 4 THE SETTLMENT HEARING When and Where Will the Court Decide Whether to Approve the Settlement? How Do I Get Out of the Settlement Class? If I Do Not Exclude Myself, Can I Sue the Released Persons for the Same Thing Later? Do I Have to Come to the Hearing? May I Speak at the Hearing?... 5 IF YOU DO NOTHING What Happens if I Do Nothing at All?... 5 OBJECTING TO OR REQUESTING EXCLUSION FROM THE SETTLEMENT What Is the Difference Between Objecting and Excluding? How Do I Tell the Court that I Do Not Like the Settlement?... 6 GETTING MORE INFORMATION Are There More Details About the Settlement? How Do I Get More Information?... 6 SPECIAL NOTICE TO NOMINEES Why Did I Get This Notice Package? BASIC INFORMATION You or someone in your family may have held Embarq Corporation common stock during the period beginning on October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective. The Court directed that you be sent this Notice because, if you are a member of the Settlement Class, you have a right to know about a proposed Settlement of a class action lawsuit and about all of your options before the Court decides whether to approve the Settlement. This package describes the lawsuit, the Settlement, and your legal rights. This case is known as Tyner v. Embarq Corp., et al., Case No. 08-CV (the "Action"). The Court in charge of the Action is the District Court for Johnson County, Kansas, the Honorable Kevin P. Moriarty presiding. The individual that sued is called the Plaintiff. Embarq Corporation, CenturyTel, Inc., and the individuals that Plaintiff sued are called the Defendants. 2

3 2. What Is This Lawsuit About? This is a class action alleging claims that arose in connection with the merger agreement (the "Merger Agreement") between Embarq and CenturyTel pursuant to which Embarq merged subsequently with a subsidiary of CenturyTel and each share of Embarq common stock was converted into the right to receive 1.37 shares of CenturyTel common stock (the "Merger"). Plaintiff alleges that Embarq's directors breached their fiduciary duties by entering into the Merger Agreement, including by allegedly failing to disclose material information in the proxy materials distributed to Embarq stockholders in connection with the Merger and by allegedly failing to obtain the highest price available for Embarq's stockholders. Plaintiff also alleges that Embarq and CenturyTel aided and abetted the directors' breaches of their fiduciary duties. Plaintiff sought, among other things, class action status, court orders declaring the Merger Agreement unenforceable, and enjoining the defendants from consummating the Merger, and the payment of reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in litigating the Action. The Settlement is the product of Plaintiff's Counsel's (who has extensive experience in class action litigation) (1) independent investigation; (2) review of the various documents that have been produced in discovery and the depositions that have been taken; and (3) Plaintiff's Counsel's determination that a Settlement of the Action is in the best interests of the Settlement Class Members. If the Court approves the Settlement, all Settlement Class Members will release claims, including any claims relating to the Merger or to matters alleged in the Action, against the Defendants and certain others who are related to Defendants ("Released Persons"). The exact terms of the release are contained in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement which is available via the internet at or which may be inspected during business hours at the office of the Clerk of the Court, District Court of Johnson County, 100 North Kansas Avenue, Olathe, Kansas Why Is This a Class Action? In a class action, one or more persons sue on behalf of people who have similar claims. These people are collectively referred to herein as the Settlement Class or Settlement Class Member(s). The Court has appointed Plaintiff Richard Tyner, III to act as the representative of the Settlement Class. The Court will resolve the issues for all Settlement Class Members, except for those who exclude themselves from the Settlement Class. Johnson County, Kansas District Court Judge Kevin P. Moriarty is presiding over the Action. 4. Why Is There a Settlement? THE FOLLOWING RECITATION DOES NOT CONSTITUE FINDINGS OF THE COURT. IT IS BASED ON STATEMENTS OF THE PARTIES AND SHOULD NOT BE UNDERSTOOD AS AN EXPRESSION OF ANY OPINION OF THE COURT AS TO THE MERITS OF ANY OF THE CLAIMS OR DEFENSES RAISED BY ANY OF THE PARTIES. On November 20, 2008, Embarq and CenturyTel filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") a preliminary joint proxy statement-prospectus and Registration Statement on Form S-4 concerning the Merger and including certain disclosures related to the Merger. On December 1, 2008, Plaintiff filed the class action petition. On December 22, 2008, Embarq and CenturyTel filed with the SEC a definitive joint proxy statement-prospectus and amended Registration Statement on Form S-4/A. Thereafter, Plaintiff's Counsel conducted a detailed review and analysis of both the preliminary and definitive joint proxy statement-prospectuses. Thereafter, Plaintiff demanded and the Settling Parties engaged in arm's-length negotiations concerning certain additional information to Embarq's and CenturyTel's stockholders, (the "Supplemental Disclosures"). The Supplemental Disclosures were publicly disseminated and made available to all Embarq stockholders through a Form 8-K that was filed by Embarq with the SEC on January 16, The Form 8-K is available at http// On January 27, 2009, the special shareholder meetings of CenturyTel and Embarq were held to consider and vote upon the Merger, and at those meetings the respective shareholders of CenturyTel and Embarq approved the Merger. On July 1, 2009, the Merger closed. Prior to the Merger closing, Plaintiffs and Defendants engaged in a period of discovery in which Defendants and certain of their advisors produced thousands of pages of documents, Plaintiff's Counsel reviewed and analyzed these documents, and Plaintiff's Counsel conducted depositions of a member of Embarq's board of directors and a representative of Embarq's financial advisor. The Settling Parties to the Action then concluded that the Action should be settled. This conclusion is based upon, among other things (1) Plaintiff's Counsel's independent investigation, review of the various documents that have been produced, and the depositions that have been taken; (2) Defendants' denial that they committed any acts or omissions giving rise to any liability; (3) Defendants' acknowledgement that the pendency and prosecution of the Action and the efforts of Plaintiff's Counsel were the sole reason and cause for the decision of Defendants to file the 3

4 Supplemental Disclosures; (4) the risk to Settlement Class Members that continuing with the Action could have resulted in dismissal or loss at trial and the recognition that, by settling the Action, the parties avoid the additional costs, time, expense, disruption, distraction, and risks associated with continued litigation; (5) the benefits that the Settlement Class received in connection with the disclosures made after the Complaint was filed, including the Supplemental Disclosures; (6) the benefits that the Settling Parties and the Settlement Class will receive by reason of this Settlement; (7) Defendants' belief that the Settlement of the Action is in the best interests of Embarq's and CenturyTel's stockholders; and (8) Plaintiff's Counsel's belief that the Settlement of this Action is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of all Settlement Class Members. 5. How Do I Know if I Am Part of the Settlement? For purposes of this Settlement, the Court has preliminarily certified a Settlement Class that includes, with limited exceptions, all Embarq stockholders and their successors in interest and transferees, immediate and remote, and any person or entity acting for or on behalf of, or claiming under, any of them, and each of them, from October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the Merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective. 6. What Are the Exceptions to Being Included? You are not a Settlement Class Member if you are (1) a Defendant; (2) a member of an Individual Defendant's immediate family; or (3) any person over whom any Defendant exercises sole or exclusive control. 7. I Am Still Not Sure if I Am Included. If you are still not sure whether you are included as a member of the Settlement Class, you can ask for free help. You can call or write to Plaintiff's Counsel at the following address for more information Benjamin Rozwood, Esq. at Robbins Umeda LLP, 600 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101, Telephone (619) , Facsimile (619) What Benefits Were Obtained as Part of the Settlement? In consideration for the Settlement and dismissal with prejudice of the Action, Defendants have made and have caused to be publicly disseminated the Supplemental Disclosures contained in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC dated January 16, The Settlement will result in the dismissal of the Action on the merits with prejudice and a release of all claims by all Settlement Class Members against the Released Persons. You may exclude yourself from the Settlement Class solely with respect to a claim for money damages. If you want to keep any right to sue or continue to sue the Released Persons on your own about the same issues raised in the Action and solely with respect to a claim for money damages, then you must take the steps discussed in Questions 12 and 13 to get out of the Settlement Class. Even if you exclude yourself, you will be precluded by the Settlement from bringing any claim other than a claim solely for money damages against any of the Released Persons. 9. Do I Have a Lawyer in This Case? THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU The Court appointed the following law firm to represent the named Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members ROBBINS UMEDA LLP 600 B Street, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA Telephone (619) The Court also appointed the following lawyers as local counsel for the Settlement Class BEAM-WARD, KRUSE, WILSON, WRIGHT & FLETES, LLC 8695 College Blvd., Suite 200 Overland Park, Kansas Telephone (913) If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. 10. How Will the Lawyers Be Paid? Plaintiff's Counsel have neither received any payment for their services in conducting the Action on behalf of Plaintiff and the Settlement Class, nor have Plaintiff's Counsel been reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses incurred to date. After resolving the substantive terms of the Settlement, Plaintiff's Counsel and Defendants' Counsel negotiated an amount of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses to compensate Plaintiff's Counsel for their work in achieving the benefits of this Settlement. Subject to Court approval, Defendants shall pay to Plaintiff's Counsel an amount not to exceed one million dollars for their attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses. Neither you nor any other Settlement Class Member is personally liable for any of these fees and expenses if the Settlement is approved. The attorneys' fees 4

5 and reimbursement of expenses requested will be the only payment to Plaintiff's Counsel for their efforts in achieving this Settlement and for their risk in undertaking this representation on a wholly contingent basis. THE SETTLEMENT HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the Settlement. 11. When and Where Will the Court Decide Whether to Approve the Settlement? The Court will hold a Settlement Hearing at 1000 a.m., on November 20, 2009, before the Honorable Kevin P. Moriarty, Johnson County Courthouse, Courtroom 113, 100 North Kansas, 7th Floor, Olathe, Kansas At this hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. If there are objections, the Court will consider them. The Court will listen to people who have submitted timely written objections. Assuming the Settlement is approved, the Court will also consider how much attorney's fees and expenses Plaintiff's Counsel are to receive. The Court may decide these issues at the Settlement Hearing or take them under consideration. We do not know how long these decisions will take. 12. How Do I Get Out of the Settlement Class? To exclude yourself from the Settlement Class with respect to a claim for money damages, you must send a letter by mail stating that you want to be excluded from the Settlement Class. You must include your name, address, telephone number, your signature, the number of shares of Embarq Corporation common stock you held beginning on October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective, and a specific statement that you "request exclusion from the Settlement Class in Tyner v. Embarq Corp., et al., Case No. 08-CV (Kan. Dist. Ct. Johnson County)." You must mail your exclusion request postmarked no later than November 10, 2009 to Benjamin Rozwood, Esq., Robbins Umeda LLP, 600 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101; to Mark D. Hinderks, Esq., Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Benson, Suite 550, 12 Corporate Woods, Overland Park, Kansas 66210; and to William Savitt, Esq., Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, 51 West 52nd Street, New York, New York You cannot exclude yourself on the phone or by If I Do Not Exclude Myself, Can I Sue the Released Persons for the Same Thing Later? No. Unless you exclude yourself, you give up any right to sue the Released Persons for the claims resolved by this Settlement, including any claims for money damages. If you have a pending lawsuit against any of the Released Persons, speak to your lawyer in that case immediately. You must exclude yourself from the Settlement Class to continue your own lawsuit or arbitration against any of the Defendants solely with respect to a claim for damages. Remember, the exclusion deadline is November 10, Do I Have to Come to the Hearing? No. Plaintiff's Counsel will answer questions the Court may have. But you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you send an objection, you do not have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as you mailed your written objection on time, the Court will consider it. You may also pay your own lawyer to attend, but it is not necessary. 15. May I Speak at the Hearing? If you are a Settlement Class Member who has submitted a written objection and has not requested to be excluded from the Settlement Class, you may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Settlement Hearing. To do so, you must send a letter called a "Notice of Intention to Appear at Settlement Hearing in Tyner v. Embarq Corp., et al., Case No. 08-CV " Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, your signature, and the number of shares of Embarq Corporation common stock you held beginning on October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the Merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective. Your Notice of Intention to Appear must be received no later than November 10, 2009, by the Clerk of the Court, Plaintiff's Counsel, and Defendants' Counsel, at the addresses listed in Question 18. You cannot speak at the Settlement Hearing if you exclude yourself from the Settlement Class. IF YOU DO NOTHING 16. What Happens if I Do Nothing at All? If you do nothing, you will still be bound by the judgment of the Court. That means even if you have not excluded yourself, you will not be able to start a lawsuit, continue with a lawsuit, or be part of any other lawsuit against the Released Persons about the same claims and issues in the Action if the Settlement is approved by the Court. OBJECTING TO OR REQUESTING EXCLUSION FROM THE SETTLEMENT You can tell the Court that you do not agree with the Settlement or some part of it. 17. What Is the Difference Between Objecting and Excluding? Objecting is simply telling the Court that you do not like something about the Settlement. You can object only if you stay in the Settlement Class. Persons may exclude themselves from the Settlement Class solely with respect to a 5

6 claim for money damages. Excluding yourself is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the Settlement Class solely with respect to your right to pursue a claim for damages. 18. How Do I Tell the Court that I Do Not Like the Settlement? If you are a Settlement Class Member, you can object to the Settlement if you do not like any part of it. You must give reasons why you think the Court should not approve it. The Court will consider your views. Any objection must be in writing and include your name, address, telephone number, your signature, and the number of shares of Embarq Corporation common stock you held beginning on October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the Merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective. If you are represented by counsel, your objection must also include the name, address, and telephone number of your counsel. Any objection to the Settlement must be mailed or delivered no later than November 10, 2009, to The Court District Court for the Johnson County, Kansas Civil Department The Johnson County Courthouse 100 North Kansas Olathe, KS Counsel for Defendants STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP Attn Mark D. Hinderks Benson, Suite Corporate Woods Overland Park, KS Telephone (913) POLSINELLI SHUGHART, PC Attn Greg L. Musil 6201 College Blvd, Suite 500 Overland Park, KS Telephone (913) Are There More Details About the Settlement? Counsel for Plaintiff BEAM-WARD, KRUSE, WILSON, WRIGHT & FLETES, LLC Attn Charles T. Schimmel 8695 College Blvd., Suite 200 Overland Park, Kansas Telephone (913) MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP Attn Kenneth J. Nachbar 1201 N. Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, Delaware Telephone (302) GETTING MORE INFORMATION ROBBINS UMEDA LLP Attn Benjamin Rozwood 600 B Street, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA Telephone (619) WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ Attn William Savitt 51 West 52nd Street New York, NY Telephone (212) This Notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. This summary is qualified by, and subject to, the detailed terms of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement together with its exhibits dated September 1, You can get a copy of the Stipulation via the internet at or you may inspect the Stipulation during business hours at the office of the Clerk of the Court, District Court of Johnson County, 100 North Kansas Avenue, Olathe, Kansas How Do I Get More Information? There is additional information concerning the Settlement available via the internet at Or you can call Benjamin Rozwood Esq. at Robbins Umeda LLP, 600 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101, Telephone (619) , for additional information concerning the Settlement. DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE SPECIAL NOTICE TO NOMINEES If you held any shares of Embarq Corporation common stock beginning on October 26, 2008 up to and including July 1, 2009, the date on which the Merger between Embarq and CenturyTel became effective, as nominee for a beneficial owner, then, within ten (10) days after you receive this Notice, please either send a copy of this Notice by first class mail to all such Persons, or provide a list of the names and addresses of such Persons to Embarq Merger Litigation, c/o The Garden City Group, Inc., PO Box 9539, Dublin OH ; (the Notice Administrator ). If you choose to mail the Notice yourself, you may obtain from the Notice Administrator (without cost to you) as many additional copies of these documents as you will need to complete the mailing. Regardless of whether you choose to complete the mailing yourself or elect to have the mailing performed for you, you may obtain reimbursement for or advancement of reasonable administrative costs actually incurred or expected to be incurred in connection with forwarding the Notice and which would not have been incurred but for the obligation to forward the Notice, upon submission of appropriate documentation to the Notice Administrator. DATED September 18, 2009 BY ORDER OF THE COURT DISTRICT COURT FOR JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS 6

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>>

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>> RAMIREZ V JCPENNEY CORP ERISA CLASS ACTION ADMINISTRATOR C/O RUST CONSULTING INC - 5514 PO BOX 2572 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9572 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *CLMNTIDNO* - UAA -

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn MARJORIE MISHKIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ZYNEX, INC., f/k/a

More information

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT If you purchased goods or services using a credit card from a Lowe s store in Massachusetts

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MOBILEIRON, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Lead Case No. 1-15-cv-284001 CLASS ACTION Assigned to:

More information

Plaintiff, Defendants.

Plaintiff, Defendants. United States District Court For the District Court of Massachusetts WILTOLD TRZECIAKOWSKI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. GSI GROUP INC., SERGIO EDELSTEIN and ROBERT BOWEN,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page2 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page3 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE ALLERGAN, INC. PROXY VIOLATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 8:14-cv-2004-DOC (KES) CLASS ACTION Honorable David O.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE BOISE INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 8933-VCG NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN GIDDIENS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Case No. 12-cv-02624-LDD CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, v. FIRST ADVANTAGE

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garo Madenlian, et al. v. Flax USA, Inc. Civil Litigation No. SACV13-01748 JVS (JPRx) If you purchased flax milk sold in the United States by Flax USA, Inc.,

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you were a borrower with a loan secured by a property in Massachusetts and were assessed two or more late fees by EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") at any time during the period

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Have you purchased and used Align probiotic supplements, but received no digestive relief or other digestive benefit? If so, you may be entitled to

More information

IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR CARSON CITY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR CARSON CITY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR CARSON CITY 1 ALEX LOEB, Derivatively on Behalf of UNIVERSAL TRAVEL GROUP, vs. Plaintiff, JIANGPING JIANG, JING XIE, HUJIE GAO, JIDUAN

More information

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action IF YOU WERE CHARGED A FUEL SURCHARGE OR FUEL/ENVIRONMENTAL FEE IN FLORIDA BY SOUTHERN WASTE SYSTEMS, LLC D/B/A SUN DISPOSAL ( SWS ) FROM 01/14/12

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civ. No. 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL CLASS ACTION TO: NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case4:13-cv-02132-YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM

More information

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement.

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Bernice Polage, et al., v. Christopher H. Cole, et al. CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 24-C-13-006665 * * * * * * * * * * * NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF DERIVATIVE AND

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you purchased or otherwise acquired Corinthian Colleges, Inc. ( Corinthian ) common stock between August 23, 2010 and April 14, 2015 (both dates inclusive)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:11-cv-03701-DMG-MRW Document 87-4 Filed 12/21/12 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1484 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----------------------------------------------------X Case

More information

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc EXHIBIT A-1 Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc TO: All persons and entities who owned shares either of Thema International Fund plc or

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE Case No. 30-2009-00236910 CLASS ACTION Assigned

More information

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights. United States District Court for the Northern District of California If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY. Docket No. ESX-L

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY. Docket No. ESX-L In re Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Shareholder Litigation SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY Docket No. ESX-L-4370-07 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER CLASS ACTION OFFICIAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:10-cv APG-GWF (Consolidated) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:10-cv APG-GWF (Consolidated) CLASS ACTION FRANK J. FOSBRE, JR., et al., Plaintiffs, vs. LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA No. 2:10-cv-00765-APG-GWF (Consolidated CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOUIS GRASSO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. CV 06-02639 vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION VITESSE

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/ :28 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/ :28 PM FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/2016 08:28 PM INDEX NO. 103948/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2016 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT A SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA If You Received a Letter from the Law Firm of Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP Dated between October 23, 2009 and October 22,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: 2008 FANNIE MAE ERISA 09-CV-01350-PAC LITIGATION MDL No. 2013 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MIGHT BE AFFECTED IF

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. EFiled: Oct 20 2015 11:35AM EDT Transaction ID 58039964 Case No. 10553-VCN IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE NPS PHARMACEUTICALS STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No.

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT United States District Court for the District of New Jersey NOTICE If you rented a vehicle from Hertz in the United States at any time between July 1, 2006 and March 31, 2010, and during that vehicle rental

More information

ECF CASE ECF CASE NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION. A Federal Court authorized this Notice

ECF CASE ECF CASE NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION. A Federal Court authorized this Notice UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: GEROVA FINANCIAL GROUP, LTD. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE No.: 11-md-2275-SAS ECF CASE This document relates to: In re STILLWATER CAPITAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE FREMONT GENERAL CORPORATION LITIGATION Case No.: CV07-02693 JHN(FFMX) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 4:14-cv-11191-LVP-MKM Doc # 95 Filed 11/20/15 Pg 1 of 19 Pg ID 3450 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Anthony Williams et al. v. Duke Energy International, Inc. et al. Case No. 1:08-cv-00046 NOTICE OF (I) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT;

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MASSEY ENERGY CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY Civil Action No. 5:10-cv-00689-ICB NOTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT NOTICE The only official website from which to submit a claim is www.accountholdsettlement.com/claim. DO NOT submit a claim from any other website, including any website titled Paycoin c. PayPal

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) NICOLE COGDELL, et al., ) ) Case No. SACV 12-01138 AG (ANx) Plaintiffs, ) ) Honorable Andrew J. Guilford v. ) ) THE WET SEAL,

More information

A federal court authorized this supplemental notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this supplemental notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA A federal court authorized this supplemental notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you are a current or former owner

More information

United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS

United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS The Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING DONNA MOORE, FRENCHOLA HOLDEN, and KEITH MCMILLON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiffs,

More information

NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE FOLLOWING CLASS

NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE FOLLOWING CLASS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT In re Enron Corporation ERISA Litigation ) No. H-01-3913 (Consolidated Cases) ) ) TO ALL MEMBERS

More information

Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 3:15-cv-07350-PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In re: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc Securities Litigation

More information

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SUMMARY OF ATTACHED NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you obtained a Second Mortgage Loan on your Missouri home from Preferred

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS LEWIS F. GEER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 01-2583-JAR ) WILLIAM D. COX, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) DAVID GROGAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: Superior Court for the State of Connecticut Judicial District of Hartford If you were a customer of Starion Energy s variable rate electricity supply services you could receive a cash payment from a class

More information

If You Are A Third-Party Payor that Paid or Reimbursed for All or Part of the Cost of Ovcon 35, A Summary of Your Rights and Choices:

If You Are A Third-Party Payor that Paid or Reimbursed for All or Part of the Cost of Ovcon 35, A Summary of Your Rights and Choices: United States District Court District of Columbia If You Are A Third-Party Payor that Paid or Reimbursed for All or Part of the Cost of Ovcon 35, A Proposed Class Action Settlement May Affect Your Rights

More information

Plaintiffs, NOTICE TO CURRENT ARCA STOCKHOLDERS

Plaintiffs, NOTICE TO CURRENT ARCA STOCKHOLDERS STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: Other Civil DAVID GRAY and MICHAEL BOLLER, Derivatively and on Behalf of APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA,

More information

Case3:14-cv MMC Document53 Filed06/26/15 Page1 of 10

Case3:14-cv MMC Document53 Filed06/26/15 Page1 of 10 Case:-cv-00-MMC Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 EUNICE JOHNSON, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and the general public,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JOSEPH BULWA, MICHAEL MOHAMADIFAR, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs, PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY, INC., ROBERT

More information

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705 Case :0-cv-00-R-CW Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 JOSEPH J. TABACCO, JR. # Email: jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com NICOLE LAVALLEE # Email: nlavallee@bermandevalerio.com BERMAN DeVALERIO One California

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you purchased goods using a credit card from a Sur La Table store in California during the period of time between February

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MINNEAPOLIS FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF ASSOCIATION, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated shareholders of Terremark Worldwide, Inc., Plaintiff,

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION SUPREME COURT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION SPENCER SAVAGE and YOUSEF BARAKAT, Derivatively on Behalf of ibio, INC., Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT B. KAY, ARTHUR Y. ELLIOTT, JAMES T.

More information

If You Own or Owned a John Hancock Flex V Life Insurance Policy, a Class Action Lawsuit May Affect Your Rights.

If You Own or Owned a John Hancock Flex V Life Insurance Policy, a Class Action Lawsuit May Affect Your Rights. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA If You Own or Owned a John Hancock Flex V Life Insurance Policy, a Class Action Lawsuit May Affect Your Rights. A COURT AUTHORIZED

More information

Case 2:13-cv GHK-MRW Document Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:8311. Exhibit A. EXHIBIT A Page 46

Case 2:13-cv GHK-MRW Document Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:8311. Exhibit A. EXHIBIT A Page 46 Case 2:13-cv-04460-GHK-MRW Document 302-1 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:8311 Exhibit A EXHIBIT A Page 46 Case 2:13-cv-04460-GHK-MRW Document 302-1 Filed 02/08/16 Page 2 of 47 Page ID #:8312 CLAIM

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN RE CAST IRON SOIL PIPE AND FITTINGS ANTITRUST LITIGATION 1:14-md-2508-HMS-CHS THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0-SI Document Filed0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 ALEX SOTO and VINCE EAGEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS MONICA ROSS-WILLIAMS, derivatively, ) on behalf of SPRINT NEXTEL ) CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 11-cv-00890 ) ROBERT R. BENNETT,

More information

Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action

Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action If You Performed at any Deja Vu-Affiliated Nightclub as an Exotic Dancer, a Proposed Class Action

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTIONS AND OF SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL HOLDERS OF BARNES & NOBLE, INC. STOCK ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2007

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTIONS AND OF SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL HOLDERS OF BARNES & NOBLE, INC. STOCK ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTIONS AND OF SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL HOLDERS OF BARNES & NOBLE, INC. STOCK ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 This Notice is being sent to let you know of the proposed

More information

If you own or have owned one or more TrueSTEAM Humidifiers, you could get a new humidifier or a payment from a class action settlement.

If you own or have owned one or more TrueSTEAM Humidifiers, you could get a new humidifier or a payment from a class action settlement. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS If you own or have owned one or more TrueSTEAM Humidifiers, you could get a new humidifier or a payment from a class action settlement.

More information

BENEFICIAL HOLDER BALLOT FOR ACCEPTING OR REJECTING THE DEBTORS JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION CLASS 4 ADDITIONAL NOTES CLAIMS

BENEFICIAL HOLDER BALLOT FOR ACCEPTING OR REJECTING THE DEBTORS JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION CLASS 4 ADDITIONAL NOTES CLAIMS Global A&T Electronics Ltd., et al. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) Chapter 11 In re: ) GLOBAL A&T ELECTRONICS LTD., et al., 1 ) ) ) Debtors. ) ) ) IMPORTANT: No chapter

More information

1. What is this Notice and why should I read it?

1. What is this Notice and why should I read it? NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT In Re: Aurora Dairy Corp. Organic Milk Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation Civil Litigation No. 4:08-md-01907-ERW (ALL CASES) If you purchased Milk Products

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF COURT

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF COURT LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF COURT If, at Any Time Between December 31, 2010 and August 17, 2017, You Received One or More Text Messages from Uber Technologies, Inc., You May Be Eligible for a Payment from

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : EFiled Feb 20 2017 0339PM EST Transaction ID 60233454 Case No. 11655-VCG Exhibit A IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 3-SIGMA VALUE FINANCIAL OPPORTUNITIES LP, BRH OPPORTUNITIES FEEDER,

More information

THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Cause No ; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al.

THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Cause No ; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al. THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Cause No. 2016-74799; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al. A class action settlement involving administrative billing fees allegedly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE DIAMOND FOODS, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates to: All Actions Case No.: 11-cv-05386-WHA NOTICE

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE CONNIE CURTS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, WAGGIN TRAIN, LLC and NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE IN RE STEC, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE Lead Case No. 30-2013-659340-CU-SL-CXC CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE OF

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : :

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TD BANKNORTH SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION Consolidated C.A. No. 2557-VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE ON-POINT TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Master File No. 00cv00812BTM(POR) CLASS ACTION ALL ACTIONS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Courtroom 15B (Annex) THIS LEGAL NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS, PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Courtroom 15B (Annex) THIS LEGAL NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS, PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PERRY JOHNSON and LAYNE BUTLER, on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals and themselves individually, v. Plaintiffs, ASHLEY FURNITURE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION THE ERICA P. JOHN FUND, INC., et al., On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:02-CV-1152-M

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION CASE NO. 12-MD-02311 HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI In Re: OCCUPANT SAFETY SYSTEMS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement The original Interstate Batteries Class Action Settlement has been amended, and the Court

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

More information

A federal court authorized this Notice. It is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this Notice. It is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If you purchased and paid for brand Adderall XR any time from January 1, 2007 to April 11, 2016, your rights may be affected and you could

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. Case No. 14 Civ. 8925 (KMW) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II)

More information

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-000-jcc Document Filed // Page of THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 KIM BAROVIC, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN A. BALLMER, Defendant.

More information

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281 Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS.

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

More information

You Could Get Money From $44.95 Million in Settlements A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

You Could Get Money From $44.95 Million in Settlements A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If You Bought Electronics Such as a Portable Computer, Power Tool, Camcorder, and/or Other Items Containing a Lithium Ion Cylindrical Battery Since 2000 You Could Get Money From $44.95 Million in Settlements

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * * * * * * * * * * *

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * * * * * * * * * * * IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Bernice Polage, et al., v. Christopher H. Cole, et al. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 24-C-13-006665 * * * * * * * * * * * AMENDED STIPULATION AND

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is made by and between Martin Petersen, Susan Hurtado, Joseph Sarasua, and Charleen Swaney (collectively, Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE THIRD AVENUE TRUST SHAREHOLDER AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Consolidated C.A. No. 12184-VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF DERIVATIVE ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

More information

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA In Re: Monitronics International, Inc. Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation Case No. 1:13-md-02493 If you received telemarketing

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL FROM ZACKS OR IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL REGARDING THE ZACKS BEAT THE MARKET BOOK OR AN EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR REGARDING OPTIONS TRADING, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 7328 VCN NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION X In re TECO ENERGY, INC. : SECURITIES LITIGATION : Case No. 8:04-CA-1948-T-27EAJ : : This Document Relates To: : : ALL ACTIONS. :

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANED LOPEZ AND CRISTIAN ALAS, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

Attention IMVU Users Who Purchased Certain Audio Files On IMVU Before December 1, 2010 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully.

Attention IMVU Users Who Purchased Certain Audio Files On IMVU Before December 1, 2010 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. Attention IMVU Users Who Purchased Certain Audio Files On IMVU Before December 1, 2010 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

Notice of Proposed Settlement in Derivative

Notice of Proposed Settlement in Derivative Page 1 of 20 Notice of Proposed Settlement in Derivative Action NEWS PROVIDED BY Third Avenue Management 09:00 ET WILMINGTON, Del., April 21, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- The following is being released pursuant

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS JOHN STELL and CHARLES WILLIAMS, ) JR., on behalf of themselves individually ) and as class representatives on

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SANDRA BALABAN, On Behalf of Civil Action No. 02-4852 Herself And All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, Hon. Joel A. Pisano HENRY B. SCHACHT,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIRENA TORRES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 1:16-cv-01915-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, v. PICK-A-PART AUTO

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT If you purchased a NIVEA Good-Bye Cellulite or My Silhouette! Product, between January 1, 2007 and April 1, 2012 you could get a payment from a class action settlement. (A state court authorized this notice.

More information

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS Exhibit A IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. CAPEX LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 9318-VCL SCHEDULING ORDER WHEREAS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MARGARET B. ADAM, On Behalf of Herself ) No. C-93-20399-RMW(EAI) and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiff,

More information