Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
|
|
- Cecil Todd
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 BARRY GROSS, ) on behalf of plaintiff and the class ) members described below, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION vs. ) ) DOCTOR S ASSOCIATES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) COMPLAINT CLASS ACTION MATTERS COMMON TO MULTIPLE CLAIMS INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiff Barry Gross brings this action to secure redress against fraudulent marketing practices engaged in by defendant Doctor s Associates, Inc. Defendant pervasively misrepresents that the Footlong submarine sandwiches sold at defendants SUBWAY restaurants are in fact 12 inches in length. In truth, they are less than 12 inches in length. Defendant engaged in pervasive and systematic advertising contrived to induce consumers to believe that they are getting more food for their money than they actually are. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332(d). The proposed class involves more than 100 individuals. Plaintiff is a citizen of Illinois. Defendant is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Connecticut. The amount of controversy, on a classwide basis, exceeds the sum of $5,000,000 exclusive of interest and costs. 3. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391, because a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to the claims occurred in this district. PARTIES 4. Plaintiff Barry Gross is, and at all time relevant to this action has been, a resident 1
2 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:2 and citizen of Illinois residing in the Northern District of Illinois. 5. Defendant Doctor's Associates Inc. is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business at 325 BIC Drive, Milford, Connecticut. It does business in Illinois. Its registered agent and office is Illinois Corporation Service Co., 801 Adlai Stevenson Drive, Springfield, IL FACTS 6. SUBWAY is a registered trademark of defendant. 7. Defendant franchises SUBWAY restaurants throughout the world, including the Northern District of Illinois. 8. Defendant s SUBWAY brand franchise is the world s largest submarine sandwich chain, with more than 38,000 locations around the world, including approximately 24,000 locations in the United States. 9. Defendant and its franchisees heavily market SUBWAY Footlong subs as actually being 12 inches long. 10. This is made clear in defendant s marketing campaigns, which often refer to the measurement unit of one foot, or refer to measurements generally, when advertising the Footlong subs. 11. In fact, the Footlong subs that SUBWAY sells to its customers are materially shorter than the advertised 12 inches. As a result, consumers are receiving less than they are paying for. 12. Defendant s national advertising campaign for SUBWAY Footlong subs has been pervasive and extensive. Defendant has spent a significant amount of money to represent to consumers throughout the United States that its Footlong subs are in fact 12 inches long. Defendant utilizes a wide array of media to convey its claims about SUBWAY Footlong subs, including television, magazines, and the Internet. Through this massive marketing campaign, defendant has conveyed one message about these subs, Footlong subs are actually 2
3 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:3 12 inches in length. Each person who has purchased SUBWAY Footlong subs, including plaintiff, has been exposed to defendant s advertising message and purchased those subs as a result of that advertising. 13. Examples of defendant s advertising that SUBWAY Footlong subs are in fact 12 inches in length are attached as Exhibits A-D. 14. In its advertising materials, defendant repeatedly references the length of the Footlong subs by having its actors (or artists renderings) hold their hands one foot apart, and including a graphic between the actors hands indicating that the hands are 1 FT. apart (Exhibits A-D). 15. Other advertisements do not specifically reference one foot, or 12 inches, but they are designed to show that the Footlong name is associated with a measurement, by, for instance, using arrows to indicate size (Exhibit E). 16. Although SUBWAY restaurants are owned and/or operated by franchisees, defendant: a. Is wholly responsible for the advertising message complained of herein; b. Creates, maintains and enforces strict uniform standards and practices for all aspects of its SUBWAY restaurants, including the length of Footlong subs. 17. On information and belief, defendant has the right of complete or substantial control over all SUBWAY restaurants in that it could implement and direct the policies and practices of those restaurants as well as dictate the restaurants appearance, equipment, menu, hours of operation, employees appearance and demeanor, and marketing and advertising. 18. Defendant designed, created and enforces uniform standards and practices that each of its and its franchisees employees must follow relative to making SUBWAY menu items for customers, including SUBWAY Footlong subs. 19. Employees are required to undergo training programs regarding these uniform 3
4 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:4 standards and practices, and are not permitted to deviate therefrom. 20. Defendant s franchisees are required to get their bread dough from a centralized supply source, which stretches the bread dough out to a pre-set length according to defendant s specifications, and freezes it before delivering the frozen dough to SUBWAY restaurants. This pre-set length specified by defendant is the primary factor in how long SUBWAY Footlong subs will be. 21. Defendant s standards and practices relative to the creation of SUBWAY Footlong subs result in the subs routinely being materially shorter than one foot, or 12 inches, in length. 22. Defendant represents that its centralized operations department of its business enforces standards and provides training and operational assistance to franchisees and field staff. (Subway Student and Educator Resource Guide, attached hereto as Exhibit F, at page 3). 23. Defendant represents that [t]he majority of advertising happens on national TV during prime time, sports and late programming on major broadcast networks and cable networks. Additional advertising occurs via local markets on TV, radio and print. SUBWAY restaurants is also navigating the world of online social media to bring our message closer to consumers. (Resource Guide, Exhibit F, p. 3). 24. Defendant and its franchisees hold themselves out to the general public as one company SUBWAY as evidenced by the fact that the advertising materials, signs, and store appearance all are uniform and identify defendant s franchisees restaurants as SUBWAY. For example, defendant represents that its centralized marketing department of its business presents the public face of SUBWAY. It includes departments like Research & Development, which develops and test markets the food that we serve, and FAF (Franchisee Advertising Fund) responsible for the creation and placement of commercials and print ads. (Resource Guide, Exhibit F, p. 3). 25. Defendant s actions were intended to and did lead plaintiff and class members to 4
5 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:5 believe that all SUBWAY restaurants had uniform standards and practices, and that all menu items would be the same at each SUBWAY restaurant. 26. Plaintiff and class members justifiably relied on defendant s representations that the food would be identical in all material respects at each SUBWAY restaurant. 27. Defendant s advertisements relating to SUBWAY Footlong subs are intended to convey to consumers that the subs are actually 12 inches in length. 28. Defendant receives franchise fees from its franchisees based primarily on sales volume. 29. The franchise fees were increased as a result of the practices at issue. FACTS RELATING TO PLAINTIFF 30. Plaintiff was repeatedly exposed to and saw defendant s advertisements and representations regarding the SUBWAY Footlong subs in Illinois, including in the Northern District of Illinois. 31. On January 23, 2013, after seeing defendant s advertising regarding the Footlong subs, plaintiff purchased a Footlong sub to eat at Subway 40004, located at 1951 Cherry Lane, Meadow Shopping Center, Northbrook, IL At the time that plaintiff purchased his SUBWAY Footlong sub, defendant was misrepresenting the length of its Footlong subs through the advertising and marketing mediums set forth above, including marketing and advertising materials at the specific store from which plaintiff made his purchase. 33. The sub purchased by plaintiff was materially shorter than 12 inches in length, as shown by Exhibit G. MATERIALITY OF REPRESENTATIONS 34. This is not the first time defendant has engaged in misrepresentations regarding the length of SUBWAY subs. In 2007, it was reported that SUBWAY Giant Sub sandwiches, which were advertised as being 3 feet long, were materially shorter than advertised 5
6 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:6 (i.e. 2 feet 8½ inches long, and the box that they came in was only 2 feet 10¾ inches long). 35. Because of the prior complaints about defendant s advertising, defendant knew that the precise length of SUBWAY subs is material to its customers, and that its customers rely on defendant s representations regarding the length of the subs when purchasing them. 36. Defendant s statements regarding SUBWAY Footlong subs, in conjunction with the impression regarding the length of those subs defendant intended to convey by naming and promoting them as Footlong subs, were false, deceptive and misleading. 37. Plaintiff and the class members purchased SUBWAY Footlong subs in reliance on the foregoing uniform misrepresentations and omissions of the defendant. 38. As a result of SUBWAY Footlong subs not being as long as advertised, plaintiff and the class members received less food then they were promised by defendant, and paid an increased price for the Footlong subs that they would not otherwise have paid. COUNT I CONSUMER FRAUD 39. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs Defendant engaged in unfair and deceptive acts and practices, in violation of 815 ILCS 505/2, by representing that SUBWAY Footlong subs were 12 inches in length, as set forth above. 41. Defendant intended that plaintiff and the class members rely on these misrepresentations. 42. Had defendant provided accurate information, plaintiff and the proposed Class members would not have purchased the SUBWAY Footlong subs or would have paid a lesser amount for them. 43. Defendant made the representations complained of for the purpose of selling subs to plaintiff and the proposed class members. 44. Plaintiff and the class members justifiably relied on the misrepresentations and omissions to their detriment by purchasing the SUBWAY Footlong subs after seeing 6
7 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:7 defendant s advertising. 45. Defendant made no attempt to inform consumers that SUBWAY Footlong subs are not uniformly 12 inches, or one foot, in length. 46. Defendant s false advertising violates public policy and caused substantial injury to consumers. 47. Plaintiff and the class members were damaged as a result. CLASS ALLEGATIONS 48. Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of a class, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 23(a) and (b)(3). 49. The class consists of all persons who purchased, in Illinois, SUBWAY Footlong submarine sandwiches that were less than 12 inches long on or after a date 3 years prior to the filing of this action. 50. Excluded from the proposed class are defendant, its respective officers, directors and employees, any entity that has a controlling interest in defendant, and all of its respective employees, affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assignees. Claims for personal injury are excluded. 51. The class includes hundreds of thousands or millions of persons. 52. Joinder of all members of the class is impracticable. 53. There are questions of law and fact common to the class members, which predominate over any individual issues. The common questions include: a. Whether defendant represented that SUBWAY Footlong subs were 12 inches, in length; b. Whether defendant failed to disclose that SUBWAY Footlong subs were less than 12 inches in length; c. Whether defendant s claims regarding the SUBWAY Footlong subs are deceptive or misleading; 7
8 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:8 d. Whether defendant violated 815 ILCS 505/2; e. Whether defendant s advertising violates public policy; f. The measure of damages. 54. Plaintiff s claims are typical of the claims of the class members. All are based on the same legal and factual theories. 55. Plaintiff will fairly and adequately represent and protect the interests of the class. Plaintiff does not have any interests antagonistic to those of the class members. Plaintiff has retained counsel experienced in the prosecution of consumer class actions. 56. A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy. Individual litigation is not economically feasible. WHEREFORE, plaintiff requests that the Court enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and the class for: a. Compensatory damages; b. Punitive damages; c. Disgorgement of profits; d. Injunctive relief against the practices complained of; e. Attorney s fees, litigation expenses and costs of suit; f. Such other relief as the Court deems just and appropriate. COUNT II EXPRESS WARRANTY 57. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs Defendant s representations, as set forth above, became part of the basis of the bargain and created an express warranty that each Footlong sub was not less than 12 inches in length. 59. The warranty was breached by the sale of SUBWAY Footlong subs that were not 12 inches in length. 60. Plaintiff and the class members were damaged as a result. 8
9 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:9 61. Notice of breach of warranty has been given to defendant. CLASS ALLEGATIONS 62. Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of a class, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 23(a) and (b)(3). 63. The class consists of all persons, except those in Louisiana, who purchased SUBWAY Footlong submarine sandwiches that were less than 12 inches long on or after a date 4 years prior to the filing of this action. 64. Excluded from the proposed class are defendant, its respective officers, directors and employees, any entity that has a controlling interest in defendant, and all of its respective employees, affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assignees. Claims for personal injury are excluded. 65. The class includes hundreds of thousands or millions of persons. 66. Joinder of all members of the class is impracticable. 67. There are questions of law and fact common to the class members, which predominate over any individual issues. The common questions include: a. Whether defendant represented that SUBWAY Footlong subs were 12 inches, in length; b. Whether such representations created an express warranty; c. Whether the warranty was breached; d. The appropriate relief. 68. Plaintiff s claims are typical of the claims of the class members. All are based on the same legal and factual theories. 69. Plaintiff will fairly and adequately represent and protect the interests of the class. Plaintiff does not have any interests antagonistic to those of the class members. Plaintiff has retained counsel experienced in the prosecution of consumer class actions. 70. A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient 9
10 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:10 adjudication of this controversy. Individual litigation is not economically feasible. WHEREFORE, plaintiff requests that the Court enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and the class for: a. Compensatory damages; b. Costs; c. Such other relief as the Court deems just and appropriate. COUNT III UNJUST ENRICHMENT 71. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs Defendant s conduct, as set forth above, resulted in it obtaining money that it should not be permitted to retain in equity and good conscience. 73. Defendant s retention of the full amount of monies paid for the SUBWAY Footlong subs violates principles of justice, equity, and good conscience. 74. It would be inequitable for the defendant to retain the benefit of those monies, as it obtained the money through false advertising. CLASS ALLEGATIONS 75. Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of a class, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 23(a) and (b)(3). 76. The class consists of all persons who purchased SUBWAY Footlong submarine sandwiches that were less than 12 inches long on or after a date 5 years prior to the filing of this action. 77. Excluded from the proposed class are defendant, its respective officers, directors and employees, any entity that has a controlling interest in defendant, and all of its respective employees, affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assignees. Claims for personal injury are excluded. 78. The class includes hundreds of thousands or millions of persons. 79. Joinder of all members of the class is impracticable. 10
11 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 11 of 14 PageID #: There are questions of law and fact common to the class members, which predominate over any individual issues. The common questions include: a. Whether defendant represented that SUBWAY Footlong subs were 12 inches, in length; b. Whether defendant failed to disclose that SUBWAY Footlong subs were less than 12 inches in length; c. Whether defendant s claims regarding the SUBWAY Footlong subs are deceptive or misleading; d. Whether defendant was unjustly enriched as a result; e. The appropriate relief. 81. Plaintiff s claims are typical of the claims of the class members. All are based on the same legal and factual theories. 82. Plaintiff will fairly and adequately represent and protect the interests of the class. Plaintiff does not have any interests antagonistic to those of the class members. Plaintiff has retained counsel experienced in the prosecution of consumer class actions. 83. A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy. Individual litigation is not economically feasible. WHEREFORE, plaintiff requests that the Court enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and the class for: a. Restitutionary damages; b. Disgorgement of profits; c. Costs; d. Such other relief as the Court deems just and appropriate. s/daniel A. Edelman Daniel A. Edelman 11
12 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:12 Daniel A. Edelman Cathleen M. Combs James O. Latturner Francis R. Greene EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER & GOODWIN, LLC 120 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 1800 Chicago, Illinois (312) (312) (FAX) address for service: courtecl@edcombs.com 12
13 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:13 Plaintiff demands trial by jury. JURY DEMAND s/daniel A. Edelman Daniel A. Edelman 13
14 Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:14 NOTICE OF LIEN AND ASSIGNMENT Please be advised that we claim a lien upon any recovery herein for 1/3 or such amount as a court awards. All rights relating to attorney s fees have been assigned to counsel. s/daniel A. Edelman Daniel A. Edelman Daniel A. Edelman EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER & GOODWIN, LLC 120 S. LaSalle Street, 18th Floor Chicago, Illinois (312) (312) (FAX) 14
Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-01860 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MIKHAIL ABRAMOV, individually ) and on behalf
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 4 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:24
Case: 1:17-cv-01752 Document #: 4 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL FUCHS and VLADISLAV ) KRASILNIKOV,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE 1716-CV12857 Case Type Code: TI Sharon K. Martin, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated in ) Missouri, ) Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. DISTRICT COURT -- EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:18-cv-12001-AJT-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 06/26/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. DISTRICT COURT -- EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN DIPPOLITI, -vs- Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:13-cv GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:13-cv-00101-GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS THOMAS R. GUARINO, on behalf of ) Himself and all other similarly
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-05069 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BARTOSZ GRABOWSKI, ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationCase 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12
Case 0:17-cv-60089-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL PANARIELLO, individually and on behalf
More informationCase 3:15-cv DRH-DGW Document 8 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:15-cv-00775-DRH-DGW Document 8 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CATHY JOHNSON and RANDAL ) JOHNSON, on behalf of themselves
More informationv. NO. SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. and CLASS ACTION DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES. INC. Defendants. NOTICE - CIVIL ACTION - CONSUMER FRAUD CLASS ACTION
SHADEL & DeNITIIS. P.C. By: Stephen P. DeNittis, Esquire Identification No: 80080 Two Penn Center, Suite 200 1500 JFK Boulevard Philadelphia, P A 19102 (215) 564-1721 Iii. Filed and Attested by PROTHONOTARY
More informationCase 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:17-cv-00464 Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS GAYLE GREENWOOD and ) DOMINIQUE MORRISON, ) individually and on behalf of
More informationCase 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 7:18-cv-00321 Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARTIN ORBACH and PHILLIP SEGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationCase 2:13-cv KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00248-KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 FILED 2013 Feb-05 PM 12:07 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More informationCase 1:15-cv MLW Document 4 Filed 01/14/16 Page 1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:15-cv-14139-MLW Document 4 Filed 01/14/16 Page 1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KIERAN O HARA, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated individuals, v.
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:12-cv-00137 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JUAN DORADO, ) CASE: 12cv137 MICHAEL MARKZON, ) PLAINTIFFS,
More informationCase 8:16-cv JDW-JSS Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 8:16-cv-02725-JDW-JSS Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL CHMIELEWSKI, individually and as the representative
More informationCourthouse News Service
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 6/15/2009 4:12 PM CV-2009-900370.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA MAGARIA HAMNER BOBO, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA JACK MEADOWS, on behalf
More informationCase 5:18-cv TLB Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1
Case 5:18-cv-05225-TLB Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION : MICHAEL HESTER, on behalf of himself
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO: 1:15-cv RNS
JOAQUIN F. BADIAS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, LUMBER LIQUIDATORS LEASING, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
More informationCase 1:17-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:17-cv-06549-DLC Document 1 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VICTOR MALLH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 8:18-cv JVS-DFM Document 1-5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:41
r Case 8:18-cv-01125-JVS-DFM Document 1-5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:41 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jamin S. Soderstrom, Bar No. 261054 SODERSTROM LAW PC 3 Park Plaza, Suite 100 Irvine, California 92614 Tel:
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/04/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-02570 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/04/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MOUNANG PATEL, individually and on )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ARNOLD E. WEBB JR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No.: Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:1
Case: 1:14-cv-02143 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSE SANCHEZ, on behalf of himself and all
More informationCase 3:10-cv WDS -DGW Document 2 Filed 09/23/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:10-cv-00734-WDS -DGW Document 2 Filed 09/23/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DAVID WALLS, On Behalf Of Himself And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated,
More informationCase 1:18-cv ARR-RML Document 1 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1
Case 1:18-cv-04162-ARR-RML Document 1 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1 RICHMAN LAW GROUP Kim E. Richman 81 Prospect Street Brooklyn, New York 11201 Telephone: (212) 687-8291 Facsimile: (212) 687-8292
More informationSuperior Court of California
Superior Court of California County of Orange Case Number : 0-0-00-CU-BT-CXC Copy Request: Request Type: Case Documents Prepared for: cns Number of documents: Number of pages: 0 0 Thomas M. Moore (SBN
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI CHARLES ROW, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated in ) Missouri, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. ) v. ) ) CONIFER SPECIALITIES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Robert R. Ahdoot (CSB 0 rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com Theodore W. Maya (CSB tmaya@ahdootwolfson.com Bradley K. King (CSB bking@ahdootwolfson.com AHDOOT
More informationCase 1:08-cv JHR -KMW Document 37 Filed 05/04/09 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 222 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:08-cv-05668-JHR -KMW Document 37 Filed 05/04/09 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 222 Mark D. Mailman, I.D. No. MDM 1122 John Soumilas, I.D. No. JS 0034 FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. Land Title Building, 19 th Floor
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:17-cv-01320 Document 1 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP James C. Shah Natalie Finkelman Bennett 475 White Horse Pike Collingswood, NJ 08107 Telephone:
More informationCase 5:15-cv BLF Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 18
Case :-cv-00-blf Document Filed /0/ Page of BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) Julia A. Luster (State Bar No. 0) North California Boulevard, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: ()
More informationCase3:15-cv Document1 Filed07/10/15 Page1 of 12
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 Michael L. Schrag (SBN: ) mls@classlawgroup.com Andre M. Mura (SBN: ) amm@classlawgroup.com Steve A. Lopez (SBN: 000) sal@classlawgroup.com GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/02/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-00874 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/02/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 KELLY KILLEEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On
More informationCase 1:13-cv JBS-JS Document 1 Filed 12/16/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:13-cv-07585-JBS-JS Document 1 Filed 12/16/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 NORMA D. THIEL, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY v. RIDDELL, INC. ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORPORATION
More informationCase: 4:14-cv AGF Doc. #: 49 Filed: 04/03/15 Page: 1 of 49 PageID #: 637
Case: 4:14-cv-01833-AGF Doc. #: 49 Filed: 04/03/15 Page: 1 of 49 PageID #: 637 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. LOUIS DIVISION MARK BOSWELL, DAVID LUTTON, and VICKIE
More informationCase 8:14-cv CEH-MAP Document 8 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 22 PageID 56
Case 814-cv-01892-CEH-MAP Document 8 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 22 PageID 56 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Civil Case No. 814-cv-01892-CEH-MAP RYAN
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI ERIKA THORNTON, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated in ) Missouri, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. ) v. ) ) KATZ
More informationCase 2:18-cv ADS-GRB Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 2:18-cv-00809-ADS-GRB Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 United States District Court Eastern District of New York 2:18-cv-0809 ( ) ( ) Jackie Sanabria, individually and on behalf
More informationCase: 1:16-cv WOB Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/03/16 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 1:16-cv-00454-WOB Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/03/16 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI PATRICIA WILSON, on behalf of herself and
More informationCase 1:17-cv FDS Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:17-cv-10300-FDS Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) Molly Crane, ) Individually And On Behalf Of All ) Other Persons Similarly Situated,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
DB STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE MOHAMAD BAZZI, NO Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. LITTLE CAESAR PIZZA, 17-007931-NO LITTLE
More informationCase 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20
Case :-cv-000-dms-rbb Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 0 Chiharu G. Sekino (SBN 0) SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP 0 West A Street, Suite 0 San Diego, CA 0 Phone: () - Facsimile: () 00- csekino@sfmslaw.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) 0 North California Blvd., Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: () 00- Facsimile: () 0-00 E-Mail:
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/10/16 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-10488 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/10/16 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN M. ULRICH, individually and on
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/29/16 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:16-cv-02687 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/29/16 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JANINE HECHMER and ELIZABETH BIDGOOD, individually and
More informationCase 2:18-cv DMG-SK Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/18 Page 2 of 17 Page ID #:11
Case :-cv-0-dmg-sk Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-0-dmg-sk Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff bring this action on his own behalf and on behalf of all
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:17-cv-01561 Document 1 Filed 06/26/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No.: ANTHONY CHAVEZ, Individually and on Behalf of
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/28/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:17-cv-08593 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/28/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BRADLEY WEST, individually and on behalf of all others
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No:
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Jonathan Shub (CA Bar # 0) KOHN, SWIFT & GRAF, P.C. One South Broad Street Suite 00 Philadelphia, PA 0 Ph: () -00 Email: jshub@kohnswift.com Attorneys
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: Ryan J. Clarkson (SBN 0) rclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Shireen M. Clarkson (SBN ) sclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Bahar Sodaify (SBN 0) bsodaify@clarksonlawfirm.com
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/27/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:17-cv-09296 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/27/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SEAN NEILAN, individually and on behalf of all others
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1
Case: 1:14-cv-05735 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION YAZAN HUSSEIN, individually and on
More informationCLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
Benjamin Heikali (SBN 0) Joshua Nassir (SBN ) FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - E-mail: bheikali@faruqilaw.com jnassir@faruqilaw.com Attorneys
More informationCase 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Todd M. Friedman () Adrian R. Bacon (0) Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. 0 Oxnard St., Suite 0 Woodland Hills, CA Phone: -- Fax: --0 tfriedman@toddflaw.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TIMOTHY HENNIGAN, AARON MCHENRY, and CHRISTOPHER COCKS, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others
More informationCase 1:13-cv PAB-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:13-cv-03258-PAB-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. KATHY WORNICKI, on behalf of herself and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) Julia A. Luster (State Bar No. 01) 10 North California Boulevard, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: () 00- Facsimile: () 0-00 E-Mail: ltfisher@bursor.com
More informationCase 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23
Case :-cv-0-sk Document Filed 0// Page of James R. Patterson, CA Bar No. Allison H. Goddard, CA Bar No. Elizabeth A. Mitchell CA Bar No. PATTERSON LAW GROUP 0 West Broadway, th Floor San Diego, CA Telephone:
More informationCIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION
CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ANTHONY OLIVER, individually and on behalf ) of a class of similarly situated individuals, ) ) No. Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COMPASS
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 4385 Filed 10/29/2008 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SHANNON BATY, on behalf of herself and : Case No.: all others similarly situated, : :
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-03076 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION THEODORE SHEELEY, individually ) and on behalf
More informationCase 1:17-cv JFM Document 1 Filed 05/02/17 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:17-cv-01204-JFM Document 1 Filed 05/02/17 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND KOLETA ANDERSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated 6310 Snow Chief
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/02/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. - against - Complaint
Case 1:17-cv-04551 Document 1 Filed 08/02/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 United States District Court Eastern District of New York ----------------------------------------------------------------------X Josh
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI. Div. CLASS ACTION PETITION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI DARRICK REED, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, CITY OF FERGUSON, Case No. Div. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant.
More informationCase 1:13-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:13-cv-11392-GAO Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS LEAH MIRABELLA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 13-cv-11392
More informationJUDGE KARAS. "defendants") included calling plaintiff and other consumers (hereinafter "plaintiff', "class", "class. Plaintiff, 1.
Case 7:14-cv-03575-KMK Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDWARD J. REYNOLDS, D.D.S., Individually and on: Civil Action No.: behalf of all
More informationCase 3:13-cv BTM-NLS Document 1-1 Filed 10/16/13 Page 1 of 28 EXHIBIT A
Case 3:13-cv-02488-BTM-NLS Document 1-1 Filed 10/16/13 Page 1 of 28 EXHIBIT A Case 3:13-cv-02488-BTM-NLS Document 1-1 Filed 10/16/13 Page 2 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NEWPORT TRIAL GROUP A Professional
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Case :-cv-0-tln-kjn Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 0 John E. Norris Davis & Norris, LLP Highland Ave. S. Birmingham, AL 0 0-0-00 Fax: 0-0- jnorris@davisnorris.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/21/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/21/2017 EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT E Case 114-cv-08406-VSB Document 40 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEMOND MOORE and MICHAEL KIMMELMAN, P.C. v. Plaintiffs, IOD INCORPORATED
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-01860 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MIKHAIL ABRAMOV, individually ) and on behalf
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.
Case :-cv-000 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Frontier Law Center Robert Starr (0) Adam Rose (00) Manny Starr () 0 Calabasas Road, Suite Calabasas, CA 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - E-Mail: robert@frontierlawcenter.com
More informationCase: 4:18-cv JG Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/09/18 1 of 8. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 4:18-cv-00054-JG Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/09/18 1 of 8. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ERIN E. KIS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
More informationCase 7:16-cv Document 2 Filed 11/02/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, Defendant(s).
Case 7:16-cv-08532 Document 2 Filed 11/02/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ALEXA BORENKOFF, On Behalf of Herself, and All Others Similarly Situated, Case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION WALTER KURTZ, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA,
More informationCase 1:14-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:14-cv-13185-RGS Document 1 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 16 CUNEO, GILBERT & LADUCA, LLP Matthew E. Miller (BBO# 559353) 507 C Street NE Washington, DC 20002 Telephone: 202-789-3960 Facsimile: 202-589-1813
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B., EMILIO FERNANDO AZCÁRRAGA JEAN and SALVI RAFAEL
More informationCase 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Case 2:14-cv-14634 Document 1 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MIDWESTERN MIDGET FOOTBALL CLUB INC., v. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MARGARET WARD and TROY WARD, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, v. AMERICAN HONDA
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/14/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1
Case: 1:14-cv-01846 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/14/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KENNY KING, Individually and as Executive
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1
Case 1:18-cv-01254 Document 1 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1 Jason T. Brown (NY Bar # 4389854) JTB LAW GROUP, LLC 155 2nd Street, Suite 4 Jersey City, NJ 07302 Phone: (201) 630-0000 Fax: (855)
More informationCase 2:11-cv CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Case 2:11-cv-00392-CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION PHELAN HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a PINCHER=S CRAB SHACK,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT MCKEAGE, ) JANET MCKEAGE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 6:12-CV-3157 ) BASS PRO SHOPS ) OUTDOOR WORLD,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA MICHAEL CAIOLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, v. Plaintiff. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:18-mi-99999-UNA Document 2095 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NADA TADIC, all on behalf of ) herself and all
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-rbk-js Document Filed 0// Page of PageID: 0 ROSE F. LUZON (SBN ) SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: (0) -0 Facsimile: () 00- Email: rluzon@sfmslaw.com
More informationCase 2:13-cv DSF-MRW Document 14 Filed 12/16/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:150
Case :-cv-00-dsf-mrw Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 Case :-cv-00-dsf-mrw Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0. Plaintiff brings this class action to secure injunctive relief and restitution for
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-06244 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DANIEL BANAKUS, individually and on
More informationAttorney for Plaintiff Sidney Greenbaum and the Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: THE LAW OFFICE OF KEITH ALTMAN Keith L. Altman (SBN 0) 0 Calle Avella Temecula, CA () - kaltman@lawampmmt.com Attorney for Plaintiff Sidney Greenbaum and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) Joel D. Smith (State Bar No. 0) Thomas A. Reyda (State Bar No. ) 0 North California Blvd., Suite
More informationCase 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:13-cv-01052-GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Dorothy R. Konicki, for herself and class members, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/18/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-06052 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/18/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION BENITO VALLADARES, individually and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: Bobby Saadian, Esq. SBN: 0 Colin M. Jones, Esq. SBN: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM 0 Wilshire Blvd., th Floor Los Angeles, California 000 Tel: () - Fax: () - Attorneys
More informationCase 9:11-cv KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.
Case :-cv-0-kam Document Entered on FLSD Docket 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JAMES AND JESSICA JEFFERYS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationCase 1:16-cv LLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.
Case 1:16-cv-08986-LLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NICHOLAS PARKER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
More informationCase 2:18-cv GW-MAA Document 1 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0-gw-maa Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 David R. Shoop (0) david.shoop@shooplaw.com SHOOP, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 0 S. Beverly Drive, Suite 0 Beverly Hills, CA 0 Tel: () -0 Fax: ()
More informationCase 1:15-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2015 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:15-cv-20440-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2015 Page 1 of 16 SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP Nathan C. Zipperian (Fl. Bar No. 61525 1640 Town Center Circle Suite 216 Weston,
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiff and the Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 9
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Keith L. Altman, SBN 0 Solomon Radner (pro hac vice to be applied for) EXCOLO LAW, PLLC 00 Lahser Road Suite 0 Southfield, MI 0 -- kaltman@lawampmmt.com Attorneys
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Friday, November 07, 2014 9:09:03 AM CASE NUMBER: 2014 CV 06322 Docket ID: 19573197 GREGORY A BRUSH CLERK OF COURTS MONTGOMERY COUNTY OHIO IN THE COURT OF COMMON
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE MICHELLE MEADE, and ALI BAZZI, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, NO vs. LITTLE CAESAR PIZZA, LITTLE
More information