Nursing and Midwifery Council:
|
|
- Emma Chapman
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 23 February 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Miss Ann Wright 08C0024E Part(s) of the register: Registered Nurse Sub Part 1 Adult July 2008 Area of Registered Address: Type of Case: Panel Members: Legal Assessor: Panel Secretary: Miss Wright: Nursing and Midwifery Council: England Conviction Eileen Skinner (Chair, Lay member) Anne Phillimore (Lay member) Mary Hattie (Registrant member) Andrew Reid Tafadzwa Taz Chisango Not present and not represented in absence Represented by Mr Simon Newman, Case Presenter Consensual Panel Determination: Facts proved by admission: Fitness to practise: Sanction: Interim Order: Accepted All Impaired Striking off order Interim suspension order 1
2 Detail of Charges That you, a registered nurse 1. On 16 July 2015 at Lewes Crown Court were convicted of being a holder of a public office wilfully neglected to perform her duty/wilfully misconducted herself contrary to Common Law. 2. On 16 July 2015 at Lewes Crown Court were convicted of Conspiracy to convey list B articles into a prison contrary to Section of the Offenders Management Act 2007 AND in light of the above, your fitness to practise is impaired by reason of your conviction. Found proved by way of admission Decision on Service of Notice of Hearing The panel was informed at the start of this hearing that Miss Wright was not in attendance and that written notice of this hearing had been sent to Miss Wright s registered address by recorded delivery and by first class post on 19 January Further, the panel noted that notice of this hearing was also sent to Miss Wright s representative at the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) on 19 January The panel took into account that the notice letter provided details of the allegation, the time, dates and venue of the hearing and, amongst other things, information about Miss Wright s right to attend, be represented and call evidence, as well as the panel s power to proceed in her absence. 2
3 Mr Newman submitted that the NMC had complied with the requirements of Rules 11 and 34 of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, as amended ( the Rules ). The panel accepted the advice of the legal assessor. In the light of all of the information available, the panel was satisfied that Miss Wright has been served with notice of this hearing in accordance with the requirements of Rules 11 and 34. It noted that the rules do not require delivery and that it is the responsibility of any registrant to maintain an effective and up-to-date registered address. Decision on proceeding in the absence of the Registrant The panel next considered whether it should proceed in the absence of Miss Wright. The panel had regard to Rule 21 (2) which states: (2) Where the registrant fails to attend and is not represented at the hearing, the Committee (a) shall require the presenter to adduce evidence that all reasonable efforts have been made, in accordance with these Rules, to serve the notice of hearing on the registrant; (b) may, where the Committee is satisfied that the notice of hearing has been duly served, direct that the allegation should be heard and determined notwithstanding the absence of the registrant; or (c) may adjourn the hearing and issue directions. Mr Newman invited the panel to continue in the absence of Miss Wright on the basis that she had voluntarily absented herself. Mr Newman drew the panel s attention to an submitted by Miss Wright s representative at the RCN dated 19 February
4 which states, Our member will not be in attendance but will be available by telephone should the panel have any questions, which can be directed to me by telephone or on 23 February Therefore, there was no reason to believe that an adjournment would secure her attendance on some future occasion. The panel accepted the advice of the legal assessor. The panel noted that its discretionary power to proceed in the absence of a registrant under the provisions of Rule 21 is not absolute and is one that should be exercised with extreme care and caution. The panel considered the correspondence from Miss Wright s representative in which she stated that Miss Wright and she would not be in attendance but would be available by telephone if required. The panel took into account that a provisional agreement has been signed by Miss Wright on 4 February 2018 which stated that Miss Wright is aware of the hearing. Miss Wright does not intend to attend the hearing and is content for it to proceed in her absence. In these circumstances, the panel has decided that it is fair, appropriate and proportionate to proceed in the absence of Miss Wright. The panel will draw no adverse inference from Miss Wright s absence. Consensual panel determination At the outset of this hearing, Mr Newman, on behalf of the NMC, informed the panel that prior to this hearing a provisional agreement of a consensual panel determination had been reached with regard to this case between the NMC and Miss Wright. The agreement, which was put before the panel, sets out Miss Wright s full admission to the facts alleged in the charges, and that Miss Wright s fitness to practise is currently 4
5 impaired by reason of her conviction. It is further stated in the agreement that an appropriate sanction in this case would be a striking off order. The panel has considered the provisional agreement reached by the parties. That provisional agreement reads as follows: Conduct and Competence Committee Consensual panel determination: provisional agreement Miss Wright is aware of the CPD hearing. Miss Wright does not intend to attend the hearing and is content for it to proceed in her and her representative s absence. Miss Wright will endeavour to be available by telephone should any clarification on any point be required. The Nursing and Midwifery Council and Miss Ann Wright, PIN 08C0024E ( the parties ) agree as follows: 1. Miss Wright admits the following charges: That you, a registered nurse 1. On 16 July 2015 at Lewes Crown Court were convicted of being a holder of a public office wilfully neglected to perform her duty/wilfully misconducted herself contrary to Common Law. 2. On 16 July 2015 at Lewes Crown Court were convicted of Conspiracy to convey list B articles into a prison contrary to Section of the Offenders Management Act
6 AND in light of the above, your fitness to practise is impaired by reason of your conviction. Facts 2. The facts are as follows: 3. Miss Wright entered onto the NMC Register on 26 July In 2007 she began working bank shifts at HMP Lewes. 4. On 16 July 2015 Miss Wright entered guilty pleas and was convicted of one count of misconduct in a public office and one of conspiracy to convey list B articles into a prison. The certificate of conviction is attached as Appendix 1. The allegations underlying both counts arise from the same facts. 5. While working as a bank nurse at HMP Lewes Miss Wright engaged in a nonphysical but intimate relationship with a prisoner. 6. On 10 October 2014 officers conducted a cell search on A wing of HMP Lewes, during which a black and green sock was found in a bucket next to the toilet. That sock was found to contain mobile phones. 7. Miss Wright s home was subsequently searched. Letters between Miss Wright and the prisoner, evidencing the intimate relationship, were discovered along with the box for a phone with the same IMEI number as one of those recovered in the prison. 8. Following the discovery of phones in the cell, Miss Wright had disposed of a phone with a number she had used for over 12 years and obtained a new phone and phone number. Text messages on the phones were analysed and over 1000 messages between Miss Wright s new phone and the prisoner 6
7 from October and November, were discovered including photographs sent from within the prison to Miss Wright s phone and discussion about taking another phone into the prison. 9. The dates on which the phones could be shown to have entered the prison matched dates on which Miss Wright had been working. 10. On 26 November 2014 Miss Wright was arrested. On the same day the cell was searched again and another mobile phone found, which contained Miss Wright s phone number. Miss Wright s response 11. On arrest Miss Wright denied having been involved in taking any prohibited items into prison despite having been asked to do so, a position she maintained in police interview. 12. On 29 April 2015 Miss Wright was interviewed again and admitted having a relationship with the prisoner, as well as her association with others accused of being part of the conspiracy. 13. On 28 May 2015 Miss Wright telephoned the Registrations Department informing the NMC that she had been arrested and bailed for the offences. 14. Miss Wright initially denied the allegations in interview but pleaded guilty at Lewes Crown Court And has admitted the charges at all stages before the NMC 15. In correspondence with the NMC, Miss Wright s representatives have expressed her remorse. Miss Wright has chosen not to produce a reflective piece due to the outcome agreed between the parties. 7
8 Sentence 16. Having pleaded guilty to both counts, Miss Wright was sentenced on 2 December She was sentenced as follows: Count One: 20 months imprisonment; Count Two: 10 months imprisonment to be served concurrently to the sentence for Count One. Local Investigation 17. In the days before her first court appearance, Miss Wright was permanently removed from the Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Bank register at the conclusion of an investigation conducted into the, then, charges by the Trust. Impairment 18. Miss Wright accepts that her fitness to practise is currently impaired by reason of her convictions, in accordance with the following principles laid down in CHRE v (1) NMC and (2) Grant [2001] EWHC 927 (Admin): (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) [ ] Her conduct brought the profession into disrepute; Her conduct breached a fundamental tenet of the profession; Her conduct was dishonest 19. The parties agree that the convictions are of a serious nature, breaching fundamental tenets of the nursing profession as set out in The Code (NMC, 8
9 2015) which require that a nurse keep the laws of the country in which they practise and uphold the reputation of the profession at all times. 20. The parties agree that the offences committed do not relate directly to patient care and do not place patients at a risk of undue harm. However, the parties agree that the serious nature of the convictions gives rise to a wider public interest to protect the reputation of the profession. 21. The parties have considered specifically the comments of Cox J in Grant at paragraph 101: The Committee should therefore have asked themselves not only whether the Registrant continued to present a risk to members of the public, but whether the need to uphold proper professional standards and public confidence in the Registrant and in the profession would be undermined if a finding of impairment of fitness to practise were not made in the circumstances of the case. 22. The facts of Miss Wright s convictions show that she used her position as a nurse in a prison to commit her offences. Those offences, by their nature, abused the trust placed in her by her employer and the access she was afforded by virtue of her position. 23. In terms of insight, Miss Wright s guilty plea and, more importantly, acceptance at all stages before the NMC, imply a degree of insight into the fact that her conduct is unacceptable. Her decision to self-refer demonstrates her understanding of the importance of her regulator being kept informed. However, she has not, and does not intend to, explore her insight in writing before the Panel given the position as agreed between the parties. There is therefore no evidence of insight into the impact of her actions on public confidence in the profession. 9
10 24. The parties agree that it is extremely difficult to demonstrate remediation for the type of offences committed. 25. The parties have also considered the NMC Remediation and Insight Guidance: Examples of conduct which may not be possible to remedy and where steps such as training courses of supervision at work are unlikely to address concerns include: criminal convictions that led to custodial sentences; inappropriate personal or sexual relationships with patients, service users or other vulnerable people; dishonesty, particularly if it was serious and sustained over a period of time, or directly linked to the nurse or midwife s practice [ ] 26. Miss Wright has not worked in a healthcare setting since her release from prison, nor has she engaged in any training with the aim of remediating. 27. The parties agree that in light of the very serious nature of Miss Wright s convictions, a finding of impairment is required in the wider public interest in order to declare and uphold proper standards of behaviour and conduct. The conduct underlying her convictions fell so far short of what is expected and required of a registered nurse that confidence in the profession and in the NMC as a regulator would be severely undermined if a finding of impairment were not made in this case. Sanction 10
11 28. The parties agree that the appropriate and proportionate sanction in this case is a striking-off order. In reaching this decision, the following factors have been taken into account: Aggravating factors (i) Serious criminal offences committed; (ii) Relationship with a prisoner; (iii) Nursing position used to commit offences; (iv) Breach of employer s trust; (v) Offence committed by conspiring with others; (vi) Offence committed over a period of some time; (vii) Lack of insight, remorse and remediation demonstrated, although Miss Wright has positively chosen not to provide a reflective piece in light of the agreed sanction. Mitigating factors (i) No previous convictions; (ii) No previous referrals in a long career; (iii) Self-referral when charged; (iv) Admissions from an early stage; (v) No clinical concerns. 29. The parties are mindful that the least restrictive sanction which properly addresses the public interest concern should be imposed and that any sanction imposed must be proportionate. 30. The parties agree that it would be inappropriate to take no action and to take such a course would be inconsistent with the parties agreed position on impairment. 11
12 31. The parties further agree that a caution order would be inappropriate and disproportionate given the impact on public confidence of a Registrant acting as Miss Wright did, in particular using her position as a prison nurse to facilitate her offending. 32. The parties also agree that a conditions of practice order would be inappropriate. Miss Wright s convictions, although committed in the workplace and related to her employment, do not relate to her clinical conduct and there are no identifiable areas of her practice in need of assessment or retraining as a result of her convictions. It is not possible to formulate conditions that could be imposed to assist in remediating the criminality underlying the convictions. 33. Further, the parties agree that a conditions of practice order would not sufficiently address the impact that Miss Wright s convictions have on public confidence in the profession. 34. The parties agree that the seriousness of this case is such as to require temporary removal from the register but that a period of suspension would be insufficient to protect the public interest and to declare and uphold proper standards of conduct. 35. The parties agree that Miss Wright s conviction is fundamentally incompatible with her continued registration as a nurse such that the appropriate and proportionate sanction in this case is a striking-off order. The parties agree that only a striking-off order is capable of restoring public confidence in the profession and the regulator given the circumstances of Miss Wright s convictions. In reaching this conclusion the parties have considered the NMC Sanctions Guidance in respect of a striking-off order: 12
13 This sanction is likely to be appropriate when the behaviour is fundamentally incompatible with being a registered professional, which may involve any of the following factors: A serious departure from the relevant professional standards as set out in key standards, guidance and advice. [ ] Abuse of position, abuse of trust, or violation of the rights of patients, particularly in relation to vulnerable patients. [ ] Dishonesty, especially where persistent or covered up (consider the guidance on the seriousness of dishonesty). [ ] Convictions or cautions involving any of the conduct or behaviour in the above examples. The courts have supported decisions to strike off healthcare professionals where there has been lack of probity, honesty or trustworthiness, notwithstanding that in other regards there were no concerns around the professional s clinical skills or any risk of harm to the public. 1 Striking-off orders have been upheld on the basis that they have been justified for reasons of maintaining trust and confidence in the professions. 36. The parties agree that a striking-off order is proportionate when the need to maintain public trust and confidence in the profession, and the need to uphold proper professional standards is considered. Interim Order 37. Due to the basis on which impairment has been agreed by the parties, it is further agreed that an interim order is necessary to protect the public interest. 13
14 38. The parties agree that an 18-month suspension order is appropriate and necessary in this case, to uphold the public interest. An 18-month order covers the 28 day period before the substantive order takes effect and, in the event of an appeal, the period of those proceedings. The parties understand that this provisional agreement cannot bind a panel, and that the final decision on findings, impairment and sanction is a matter for the panel. The parties understand that, in the event that a panel does not agree with this provisional agreement, the admissions to the charges set out at section 1 above, and the agreed statement of facts set out at section 2 above, may be placed before a differently constituted panel that is determining the allegation, provided that it would be relevant and fair to do so. Here ends the provisional agreement between the NMC and Miss Wright. The provisional agreement was signed by Miss Wright on 4 February 2018 and by the NMC on 20 February Decision and reasons on the consensual panel determination: The panel decided to accept the agreement. The panel heard and accepted the legal assessor s advice. He referred the panel to the NMC Sanctions Guidance (SG) and to the NMC s guidance on Consensual Panel Determinations. He reminded the panel that they could accept, amend or outright reject the provisional agreement reached between the NMC and Miss Wright. Further, the panel should consider whether the provisional agreement would be in the public interest. This means that the outcome must ensure an appropriate level of public protection, maintain public confidence in the profession and the regulatory body, and declare and uphold proper standards of conduct and behaviour. 14
15 The panel noted that Miss Wright admitted the facts of the charges. Accordingly, the panel was satisfied that the charges are found proved by way of Miss Wright s admissions as set out in the signed provisional agreement before the panel. The panel then went on to consider whether Miss Wright s fitness to practise is currently impaired. Whilst acknowledging the agreement between the NMC and Miss Wright, the panel has exercised its own independent judgement in reaching its decision on impairment. The panel considered whether Miss Wright s fitness to practise is currently impaired by reason of her convictions. The panel is of the view these convictions are of a serious nature. Miss Wright used her position as a nurse in a prison to commit these offences. She abused her position of trust. The panel noted that Miss Wright has not worked since the incidents and has been unable to demonstrate any remediation although it would be difficult for this type of offence. Although, Miss Wright made admissions to the charges, she has not provided the panel with any evidence of insight. The panel determined that Miss Wright s fitness to practise is currently impaired. In this respect the panel endorsed paragraphs 18 to 27 of the provisional agreement. Having found Miss Wright s fitness to practise currently impaired the panel went on to consider what sanction, if any, it should impose in this case. The panel has borne in mind that any sanction imposed must be appropriate and proportionate. The purpose of any sanction is not intended to be punitive even though it may have a punitive effect. The panel has considered this case very carefully. It endorses paragraphs of the provisional agreement. It directs the registrar to strike Miss Ann Wright off the register. The effect of this order is that the NMC register will show that Miss Wright has been struck-off the register. In reaching this decision, the panel has had regard to the information in the consensual panel determination and had regard to the submissions from Mr Newman. The panel 15
16 noted the guidance provided in the case of GDC and Fleischmann [2005] EWHC 87 (admin) that where a registrant has been convicted of a serious criminal offence they should not be permitted to resume their practice until they have satisfactorily completed their sentence. The panel noted that although Miss Wright was released from prison on licence after serving 6 months of her 20 month sentence, that sentence has yet to be completed. The panel accepted the advice of the legal assessor. The panel has borne in mind that any sanction imposed must be appropriate and proportionate and, although not intended to be punitive in its effect, may have such consequences. The panel had careful regard to the Sanctions Guidance ( SG ) published by the NMC. It recognised that the decision on sanction is a matter for the panel, exercising its own independent judgement but it considered itself bound by the guidance provided in the case of Fleischmann as set out above The panel first considered whether to take no action but concluded that this would be inappropriate in view of the seriousness of the case. The panel decided that it would be neither proportionate nor in the public interest to take no further action. Next, in considering whether a caution order would be appropriate in the circumstances, the panel took into account the SG, which states that a caution order may be appropriate where the case is at the lower end of the spectrum of impaired fitness to practise and the panel wishes to mark that the behaviour was unacceptable and must not happen again. The panel considered that Miss Wright s actions were not at the lower end of the spectrum and that a caution order would be inappropriate in view of the seriousness of the case. The panel decided that it would be neither proportionate nor in the public interest to impose a caution order. The panel next considered whether placing conditions of practice on Miss Wright s registration would be a sufficient and appropriate response. The panel is mindful that any conditions imposed must be proportionate, measurable and workable. The panel took into account the SG. 16
17 The panel is of the view that there are no practical or workable conditions that could be formulated, given the nature of the charges in this case. Miss Wright s conviction related to actions that took place in her employment, however they did not relate to her clinical conduct. There are no identifiable areas of her practice in need of assessment or retraining as a result of her convictions and could not be remedied by way of retraining. Furthermore the panel concluded that the placing of conditions on Miss Wright s registration would not adequately address the seriousness of this case and would not address the public interest. The panel then went on to consider whether a suspension order would be an appropriate sanction. The panel had regard to the SG guidance on a suspension order. The conduct, as highlighted by the facts found proved, was a significant departure from the standards expected of a registered nurse. The panel noted that the serious breach of the fundamental tenets of the profession evidenced by Miss Wright s actions is fundamentally incompatible with her remaining on the register. The panel have had no evidence of any insight from Miss Wright. The panel determined that there remains a high risk of repetition of the actions found proved. Balancing all of these factors, the panel has determined that a suspension order would not be an appropriate or proportionate sanction. Finally, in considering a striking-off order, the panel took note of the following paragraphs of the SG: A serious departure from the relevant professional standards as set out in key standards, guidance and advice. [ ] Abuse of position, abuse of trust, or violation of the rights of patients, particularly in relation to vulnerable patients. [ ] 17
18 Dishonesty, especially where persistent or covered up (consider the guidance on the seriousness of dishonesty). [ ] Convictions or cautions involving any of the conduct or behaviour in the above examples. Miss Wright s convictions were extremely serious and significant departures from the standards expected of a registered nurse, and are fundamentally incompatible with her remaining on the register. The panel determined that to allow Miss Wright to continue practising would undermine public confidence in the profession and in the NMC as a regulatory body. Balancing all of these factors and taking into account all the evidence before it, the panel determined that the appropriate and proportionate sanction is a striking-off order. The panel considered that this order was necessary to mark the importance of maintaining public confidence in the profession, and to send to the public and the profession a clear message about the standard of behaviour required of a registered nurse. Determination on Interim Order The panel was satisfied that an interim suspension order is necessary and is otherwise in the public interest. The panel had regard to paragraph 37 and 38 of the provisional agreement, and had taken into consideration the seriousness of the matters in this case, in reaching the decision to impose an interim order. The period of this order is for 18 months to allow for the possibility of an appeal to be made and determined. 18
19 If no appeal is made, then the interim order will be replaced by the striking off order 28 days after Miss Wright is sent the decision of this hearing in writing. That concludes this determination. 19
Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Hearing 17 December 2018
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 17 December 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of registrant: NMC
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 26 January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: Mr Richard Imperio NMC
More informationConduct & Competence Committee. Substantive Meeting. 20 October Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, London E20 1EJ
Conduct & Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 20 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, London E20 1EJ Registrant: NMC PIN: Sean Michael Ridout 10H3375E Part(s) of the register:
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing Friday, 5 January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Mr Razvan
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 20 October 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant: NMC
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting NMC, 20 Old Bailey, London, EC4M 7LN 18 June 2014 Name of Registrant: Mr Matthew Robin Pitts NMC PIN: 93A0777E Part(s) of the register: Registered Nurse
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 22 July 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Nomathemba Amanda Primrose Socikwa 10G0506E
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 23 December 2015 at 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 23 December 2015 at 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Richard James Rees 01I2055E Part(s) of the
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 16 July 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Part(s) of the register:
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 1 December 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Part(s) of the register:
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 6 March 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 114-116 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4LH Name of registrant: Deborah Iris Gallagher
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting Monday 17 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting Monday 17 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Miss Vicky Cross 10I0617E Part(s)
More informationPart(s) of the register: Registered Nurse Sub Part 1. Eileen Skinner (Chair Lay member) Colin Kennedy (Lay member) Catherine Gale (Registrant member)
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting (CPD) Date: Thursday 13 August 2015 Nursing and Midwifery Council 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC MAYCOCK, Andrew Edward Registration No: 170502 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2018 Outcome: Erased with Immediate order of Suspension Andrew Edward MAYCOCK, a dental nurse,
More informationPart(s) of the register: RNHM, Registered nurse sub part 1 Mental health Sept 2011 Area of Registered Address: England
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing Consensual Panel Disposal 26 January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC LARKIN, Matthew Peter Registration No: 74917 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2017 Outcome: Erased with Immediate Suspension Matthew Peter LARKIN, a dentist, BDS Lpool 1998
More informationGood decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance
Good decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance Revised March 2017 The text of this document (but not the logo and branding) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC CROOK, Stacey Registration No: 199655 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE AUGUST 2017 Outcome: Erased with Immediate Suspension This case was heard in parallel with the case of MOLLOY,
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 26/07/ /07/2018. GMC reference number: Tyne
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 26/07/2018-27/07/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Neil Ineson GMC reference number: 2431350 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB BS 1978 University
More informationGuidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance
Guidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance Effective 1 st October 2016 1 2 Contents 1 Introduction and background... 4 2 The Professional Conduct Committee (PCC)... 5
More informationINDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE DRAFT
INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE DRAFT Contents Purpose of document... 2 What is this document about?... 2 Who is this document for?... 3 1. Part 1: Fitness to Practise stages... 3 Investigation... 3 Scrutiny
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC LIMBU, Dino Registration No: 246153 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE AUGUST 2015 Outcome: Fitness to practise impaired; erasure with an immediate suspension order Dinu LIMBU, a dental
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC BANNATYNE, Ashleigh Registration No: 214342 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE JUNE 2017 - JUNE 2018* Most recent outcome: Suspension extended for 12 months (with a review) *See page
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE*
HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE* *The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from this text. GRAHAM, Lisa Marie Registration
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 01/11/2017 03/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Mohamed AMRANI GMC reference number: 3419692 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MD 1987 Universite
More informationUniversiteto. That being registered under the Medical Act 1983, as amended:
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 29/01/2018 30/01/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Ali ISMAIL GMC reference number: 6168323 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct Gydytojas 2006 Kauno Medicinos
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 31 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), Regus, Cromac Square, Belfast BT2 8LA
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 31 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), Regus, Cromac Square, Belfast BT2 8LA Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Aaron Ravel 91A1968E Part(s)
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC UPTON, Natalie Jane Registration No: 110087 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE JULY 2018 Outcome: Suspension for 12 months with immediate suspension (with a review) Natalie UPTON, a
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Date: Thursday 4 July 2013 to Friday 5 July 2013
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Date: Thursday 4 July 2013 to Friday 5 July 2013 Nursing and Midwifery Council, The Hilton Belfast, 4 Lanyon Place, Belfast BT1 3LP Name of Registrant
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC MARQUEZ LOPEZ, Daniel Registration No: 260732 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE JULY 2018 OUTCOME: Fitness to Practise Impaired. Reprimand Issued Daniel MARQUEZ LOPEZ, a dentist, Grado
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC AYOR-AYO, Auma Hilda Registration No: 198660 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE AUGUST 2017 Outcome: Suspended for 12 months with immediate suspension (with a review) Auma Hilda AYOR-AYO,
More information3.2 The Code to maintain patient safety and public confidence in the profession.
OUTCOME OF FITNESS TO PRACTISE HEARING Case Number 2013/01 Name Paul John Tallon Registration Number 3560 Date of Hearing 5 th 6 th and 14 th June 2013 The Notice of Allegation The Chairman of the Statutory
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC HOUGHTON, Nicola Louise Registration No: 130502 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2015 Outcome: Erasure (with immediate order) Nicola Louise HOUGHTON, Verified competency
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 16/10/ /10/2017
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 16/10/2017 18/10/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Johannes Christiaan Hermanus BASSON GMC reference number: 4056885 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC BAPU, Raisha Registration No: PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2015 Outcome: Erasure and immediate suspension
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC BAPU, Raisha Registration No: 110944 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2015 Outcome: Erasure and immediate suspension Raisha BAPU, a dental nurse, NVQ L3 Oral Health Care:Dental
More informationThat being registered under the Medical Act 1983 (as amended):
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 09/11/2017 10/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Andrew MACKENZIE GMC reference number: 6134691 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB ChB 2006
More informationDETERMINATION ON THE FACTS AND IMPAIRMENT - 25/10/2017
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 25 to 26 October 2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Swathi Deepak PAI GMC reference number: 5202874 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct MB BS 1998 Manipal
More informationIn accordance with Rule 41 of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004 the hearing was held in public.
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 27/11/2018-29/11/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Stamatios OIKONOMOU GMC reference number: 6072884 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct Ptychio Iatrikes
More informationGood decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance
Good decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance Revised March 2017 The text of this document (but not the logo and branding) may be reproduced free of charge in any format
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Date: 22/10/2018. GMC reference number: Medyczny. Review - Misconduct
PUBLIC RECORD Date: 22/10/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Shazia Akram GMC reference number: 7094045 Primary medical qualification: Type of case XXX Review - Misconduct Lekarz 2010 Warszawski Uniwersytet
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE
HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from the text. ROBERTSON, Harry Gordon Registration
More informationGUIDANCE FOR CASE EXAMINERS The purpose of this guidance 1. The General Optical Council (GOC) recognises that it is important that patients, registrants, professional and representative organisations,
More informationImpaired Impaired. instructed
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 15/05/2018 21/05/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Martin GEORGE GMC reference number: 6094870 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution New - Misconduct
More informationGuide to sanctioning
Guide to sanctioning Contents 1. Background. 2 2. Application for registration or continued registration 3 3. Purpose of sanctions. 3 4. Principles in determining sanction.. 4 A. Proportionality... 4 B.
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 15/08/ /08/2018. GMC reference number:
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 15/08/2018-17/08/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Zholia Alemi GMC reference number: 4246372 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct MB ChB 1992 University
More information[2015] EWHC 854 (QB) 2015 WL
Dr Saima Alam v The General Medical Council Case No: CO/4949/2014 High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division Administrative Court 27 March 2015 [2015] EWHC 854 (QB) 2015 WL 1310679 Before: Mr Justice
More informationYou are therefore liable to disciplinary action in accordance with Bye-law 5.2.2(d)
Disciplinary Panel Hearing Case of David Ager MRICS On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 Paper hearing By telephone Panel Dr Angela Brown (Lay Chair) Rosalyn Hayles (Lay Member) Christopher Pittman (Surveyor Member)
More informationCARLOS EGIDO CORTES MRCVS DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE
ROYAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SURGEONS INQUIRY RE: CARLOS EGIDO CORTES MRCVS DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE 1. The Respondent did not appear before the Disciplinary Committee to answer the following
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 20/02/2017 22/02/2017 & 12/06/2017 13/06/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Hadiza BAWA-GARBA GMC reference number: 6080659 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC JAMALI, Nisreen Registration No: 86173 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE September 2014 Outcome: Erased with immediate suspension. Nisreen JAMALI, BDS Karachi 2002, Statutory Exam
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Miss Emma Hoy Heard on: Monday, 15 May 2017 Location: The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators,
More informationAllegation and Findings of Fact That being registered under the Medical Act 1983 (as amended):
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 06/11/2017 07/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Erik MILNER GMC reference number: 3317501 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB ChB 1989 University
More informationGMC reference number: Primary medical qualification: MB ChB 2013 University of Glasgow. Impaired Impaired
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 09/10/2017 11/10/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Ediz Halit EKREM GMC reference number: 7277403 Primary medical qualification: MB ChB 2013 University of Glasgow Type of case New
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 19/06/ /06/2018 & 2 August GMC reference number:
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 19/06/2018 21/06/2018 & 2 August 2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Muhammad Bhatti GMC reference number: 6067212 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution
More informationNotice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee
Notice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee Name: Radu Nasca SCR No: 6005361 Date: 22 August 2014 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Conduct Committee of the Northern
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 13/11/ /11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Katy MCALLISTER
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 13/11/2017 15/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Katy MCALLISTER GMC reference number: 7042366 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB ChB 2009
More informationMinutes of Investigation Committee (Oral) hearing
Minutes of Investigation Committee (Oral) hearing Date of hearing: 19 May 2017 Name of doctor: Dr Richard Allan Reference Number: 6055488 Registered qualifications: BM BCh 2002 Oxford University Committee
More informationNRPSI INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE
NRPSI INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE Introduction Purpose of sanctions Warnings What sanctions are available Questions for the Panel to consider Mitigation and aggravating factors Guidance on considering
More informationCouncil meeting 15 September 2011
Council meeting 15 September 2011 Public business GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) Recommendation: The Council is asked to agree the GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) at Appendix 1.
More informationConsolidated Practice Committee Rules
Consolidated Practice Committee Rules Health and Care Professions Council (Practice Committees and Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2009 Health and Care Professions Council (Investigating Committee) (Procedure)
More informationCONSOLIDATED PRACTICE COMMITTEE RULES
CONSOLIDATED PRACTICE COMMITTEE RULES Health and Care Professions Council (Practice Committees and Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2009 Health and Care Professions Council (Investigating Committee) (Procedure)
More informationNotice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee
Notice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee Name: Paula Curran Registration No: 2002171 Date: 30 January 2013 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Conduct Committee of
More informationRe: Dr Jonathan Richard Ashton v GMC [2013] EWHC 943 Admin
Appeals Circular A11/13 14 06 2013 To: Fitness to Practise Panel Panellists Legal Assessors Copy: Interim Orders Panel Panellists Investigation Committee Panellists Panel Secretaries Medical Defence Organisations
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 08/11/2017 10/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Imran QURESHI GMC reference number: 7063588 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New Conviction/Caution MB BS 1997 University
More informationDeclarations guidance for fullyqualified
Declarations guidance for fullyqualified registrants How we consider information that applicants or registrants declare. A guide for fully qualified optometrists and dispensing opticians, and those who
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 20/04/ /04/2017 (Adjourned Part Heard) 02/10/2017 (Reconvened)
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 20/04/2017 27/04/2017 (Adjourned Part Heard) 02/10/2017 (Reconvened) Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Ahmed Mohsen TOLBA GMC reference number: 6118042 Primary medical qualification:
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council: Investigating Committee. Fraudulent/Incorrect Entry. 25 September 2018
Nursing and Midwifery Council Investigating Committee Fraudulent/Incorrect Entry Hearing 25 September 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Mr Harry
More informationDeclarations guidance for student registrants
Declarations guidance for student registrants How we consider information that applicants or registrants declare. A guide for students. November 2013 Contents Who is this document for?... 3 About this
More informationNon-compliance hearings guidance for medical practitioners tribunals
Non-compliance hearings guidance for medical practitioners tribunals Introduction 1 The aim of this guidance is to promote consistency and transparency in decision making relating to non-compliance hearings.
More informationAdministrative Sanctions: imposing warnings and fines
Administrative Sanctions: imposing warnings and fines Introduction This leaflet provides an overview of the Bar Standards Board s (BSB s) use of administrative sanctions as one of the tools available to
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 15/01/ /01/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Baldeep AUJLA
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 15/01/2018 23/01/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Baldeep AUJLA GMC reference number: 7084996 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution New - Misconduct
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 13/06/ /06/2018. GMC reference number: New - Conviction / Caution
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 13/06/2018-15/06/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Chizoro Edohasim GMC reference number: 6039653 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB BCh 1997
More information4. This guidance is a public document and is available from the GOC s website at:
GUIDANCE FOR CASE EXAMINERS The purpose of this guidance 1. The General Optical Council (GOC) recognises that it is important that patients, registrants, professional and representative organisations,
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Date: 05/12/2017. Medical practitioner s name: Dr Wladyslaw Stanislaw STANEK
PUBLIC RECORD Date: 05/12/2017 Medical practitioner s name: Dr Wladyslaw Stanislaw STANEK GMC reference number: 7344756 Primary medical qualification: Type of case Review - Non-compliance with an English
More informationHEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004
2004 No 2608 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004 Made 4th October 2004 Laid before Parliament 7th October 2004 Coming
More informationNorthern Ireland Social Care Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2016
Northern Ireland Social Care Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2016 The Northern Ireland Social Care Council, with the consent of the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety, makes the
More informationGuidance for decision makers on the impact of criminal convictions and cautions
Guidance for decision makers on the impact of criminal convictions and cautions Page 1 of 11 Contents Introduction... 3 Reporting Criminal Proceedings... 4 General Principles... 5 Applications for Registration...
More informationGuidance on Undertakings
Guidance on Undertakings Introduction and overview 1 The purpose of this guidance is to demonstrate the way in which Rule 10 of the Fitness to Practise Rules 2004 (revised) is to be put into effect by
More informationHealth and Character Declarations Policy
Introduction Health and Character Declarations Policy The Health and Social Work Professions Order 2001 (the Order) provides that registration decisions, including decisions on whether a person meets the
More informationRegulations for the consideration of criminal convictions for students on courses leading to professional registration
Regulations for the consideration of criminal convictions for students on courses leading to professional registration Responsibility of: University Secretary Initial Approval date: 27 April 2016 Reviewed:
More informationIndicative Sanctions Guidance Note
Indicative Sanctions Guidance Note Introduction The CAA Global Limited Board ( the Board ) has prepared this guidance note for use by Adjudication Panels, Interim Order Panel, Disciplinary Tribunal Panels
More informationTeacher misconduct - the prohibition of teachers
Teacher misconduct - the prohibition of teachers Advice on factors relating to decisions leading to the prohibition of teachers from the teaching profession 1 Contents 1. About this advice 3 2. Who is
More informationIndicative Sanctions Guidance
Indicative Sanctions Guidance AAT is a registered charity. No. 1050724 Indicative Sanctions Guidance Contents Introduction... 3 Policy detail... 4 Sanctions... 5 Aggravating factors... 7 Mitigation...
More informationSOCIAL CARE WALES (INVESTIGATION) RULES 2017 INTERNAL VERSION
SOCIAL CARE WALES (INVESTIGATION) RULES 2017 INTERNAL VERSION APRIL 2017 PLEASE NOTE: this copy of the Rules is for the use of Social Care Wales staff, panel members, presenters and legal advisers only.
More informationThe Code. for Crown Prosecutors
The Code for Crown Prosecutors January 2013 Introduction 1.1 The Code for Crown Prosecutors (the Code) is issued by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) under section 10 of the Prosecution of Offences
More informationThis case was reviewed on the papers, with the agreement of both parties, by a Legally Qualified Chair.
PUBLIC RECORD Date: 19 December 2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Hadiza BAWA-GARBA GMC reference number: 6080659 Primary medical qualification: Type of case Conviction/ Caution MB ChB 2003 University
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
The Tribunal s Order is subject to appeal to the High Court (Administrative Court) by the Respondent. The Order remains in force pending the High Court s decision on the appeal. SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 14/02/2018. Medical practitioner s name: Dr Martin Uylyam MEMBE
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 14/02/2018 Medical practitioner s name: Dr Martin Uylyam MEMBE GMC reference number: 7114460 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Non-compliance with a performance assessment
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Date: 03/12/2018. GMC reference number: Review - Misconduct
PUBLIC RECORD Date: 03/12/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Bassel Hayssam EL-OSTA GMC reference number: 6046674 Primary medical qualification: Type of case Review - Misconduct Vrac 2000 Kazan State
More informationSRA Assessment of Character and Suitability Rules
SRA Assessment of Character and Suitability Rules Introduction All individuals applying for admission or seeking restoration to the roll of solicitors or those applying to become or renewing their registration
More information[ Nursing and Midwifery Council (Practice Committees) (Constitution) Rules 2008 ] 1 (SI 2008/3148)
[ Nursing and Midwifery Council (Practice Committees) (Constitution) Rules 2008 ] 1 (SI 2008/3148) Unofficial consolidated text Effective from 31 March 2017 This consolidated text has been produced for
More informationHealth and Care Professions Tribunal Service PRACTICE NOTE. Finding that Fitness to Practise is Impaired
Health and Care Professions Tribunal Service PRACTICE NOTE Finding that Fitness to Practise is Impaired This Practice Note has been issued by the Council for the Guidance of Panels and to assist those
More informationFitness to Practise. > Criminal convictions and fitness to practise
Fitness to Practise February 2012 Criminal convictions and fitness to practise ebulletin Being convicted of a criminal offence will bring osteopaths before the GOsC s fitness to practise panels. A small
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 11332-2015 BETWEEN: SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant and VICTORIA BARBARA WADSWORTH Respondent Before: Miss T.
More informationDelegated powers policy
Delegated powers policy Revised September 2013 1 Contents Introduction... 3 The Association of Accounting Technicians... 3 The compliance framework and procedures of AAT... 3 Compliance framework... 4
More informationAccountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance
Guidance Financial Reporting Council April 2018 Accountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance The FRC s mission is to promote transparency and integrity in business. The FRC sets the UK Corporate Governance and
More information2004 No 2608 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004
This is a version of The General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules which incorporates the 2004 Rules and amendments made to those rules in 2009, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2017 2004 No 2608 HEALTH
More informationassist do not programme; is also Determination GSCC means [1]
Social Work Student Suitabilityy Scheme Introduction This Scheme applies to relevant programmes in social work w which, on a transitional basis, are being treated as approved by the HCPC. Its purpose is
More informationRegulations for Disclosure and Barring Service Screening
Regulations for Disclosure and Barring Service Screening Responsibility of: University Secretary Approval date: 27 April 2016 Review date: April 2021 Approved by: Academic Board Consultation via: Academic
More informationGuidelines Fit and Proper Person Assessments
Guidelines Fit and Proper Person Assessments (Registration and Renewal of Registration) Approved by the Registration Committee 4 September 2017 2 Guidelines Fit and Proper Person Assessments (Registration
More information