IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. L.T. Case No. 3D STUART KALB, TRUSTEE, Petitioner, NACK HOLDINGS, LLC, Respondent.
|
|
- Walter Wilkinson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. L.T. Case No. 3D STUART KALB, TRUSTEE, Petitioner, v. NACK HOLDINGS, LLC, Respondent. BRIEF OF PETITIONER STUART KALB, TRUSTEE ON JURISDICTION Elliot H. Scherker Florida Bar No Brigid F. Cech Samole Florida Bar No Greenberg Traurig, P.A Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida Telephone: (305) Facsimile: (305) Counsel for Petitioner Stuart Kalb, Trustee
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CITATIONS... ii STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT... 3 ARGUMENT... 4 THE THIRD DISTRICT S CONSTRUCTION OF SECTION (1), FLORIDA STATUTES (2008), EXPRESSLY AND DIRECTLY CONFLICTS WITH THE SECOND DISTRICT S INTERPRETATION OF THE SAME STATUTE BY CONSTITUTING THE PROVISION AS A SUBSTANTIVE LIMITATION ON PRIVATE CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS, RATHER THAN AS A PROCEDURAL STATUTE THAT CREATES AN OBLIGATION TO EXECUTE AND RECORD A SATISFACTION ONLY UPON A REQUEST FOR AND EXECUTION OF AN ESTOPPEL LETTER CONCLUSION... 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE... 9 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE i
3 TABLE OF CITATIONS Page Cases Drake Lumber Co. v. Semple 100 Fla. 1757, 130 So. 577 (1930)... 6 Farkus v. Fla. Land Sales & Dev. Co. 915 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)... 7 Fla. House of Representatives v. Crist 999 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 2008)... 4 Harris v. Gonzalez 789 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)... 5 JP Morgan Chase v. New Millennial, LC 6 So. 3d 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)... 3, 4, 5 School Bd. of Palm Beach County v. Survivors Charter Schools, Inc. 3 So. 3d 1220 (Fla. 2009)... 7 Wachovia Ins. Servs. v. Toomey 994 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 2008)... 7 State Statutes (1), Fla. Stat. (2008)... passim , Fla. Stat. (2008)...4, 6 ii
4 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS In October 2002, a foreclosure judgment was entered against ZPO, Inc. (ZPO), after ZPO defaulted on a mortgage loan on two lots located on Collins Avenue in Miami Beach (the Collins Lots). Appendix (hereinafter A ) 1. ZPO was wholly owned by a developer, Mucio Athayde. (A:2). Before the foreclosure sale, the judgment creditor assigned the judgment to Florida Capital, LLC (Florida Capital), and an amended final judgment was thereafter entered, to reflect the assignment. Id. The total judgment debt was $531,305.92, as of June (A:3). The amended judgment was thereafter assigned to United Funding, LLC (United Funding), in August 2003, leaving United Funding as ZPO s judgment creditor and the lienholder on the Collins Lots. (A:2-3). In September 2003, United Funding loaned $2.6 million to New Florida Holdings, Inc. (NFH), which was also wholly owned by Athayde, ZPO s principal. (A:3). The loan was intended to facilitate Athayde s bankruptcy reorganization of NFH s wholly owned subsidiary, New Florida Properties, Inc. (NFP), which had been in bankruptcy proceedings since Id. The loan agreement between United Funding and NFH included a pledge by NFH and Athayde to satisfy the existing ZPO, Inc. loan from [Florida Capital], which was assigned to [United Funding], except that the existing mortgage shall not be satisfied of record until [United Funding s] loans have been paid in full, because the Collins Lots are serving as additional collateral for said loans. (A:4). The September 24, 2003 closing statement shows a $550, charge to the loan for payment on ZPO, Inc. loan, which amount was paid out. (A:5). 1
5 According to the settlement agent, United Funding s $2.6 million loan was secured by the June 2003 amended final judgment on the Collins Lots, along with other collateral. (A:5-6). United Funding s loan has not been fully repaid. (A:5). Respondent Nack Holdings (Nack) became fee owner of the Collins Lots in (A:4). Petitioner Stuart Kalb, Trustee (Kalb) took an assignment of United Funding s amended foreclosure judgment in Id. Their dispute arose when Nack began to question whether the United Funding judgment lien remained in force or had been satisfied. (A:4). The trial court ruled for Kalb, declaring that the August 2003 amended foreclosure judgment remained enforceable. (A:1-2). The Third District recognized Kalb s rational argument which was accepted by the trial court based on competent, substantial evidence in the record that the September 2003 loan agreement express[ed] an intention that the amended final judgment (with its lien over ZPO s Collins Lots) was to collateralize the 2003 United Funding-NFH loan, that the parties to that loan agreement are the only witnesses with the right to prove the[ir] less-than-obvious intentions, and that Nack is a stranger to the 2003 loan terms. (A:4-6). But the court invoked Section (1), Florida Statutes (2008) (upon payment of mortgage, written instrument acknowledging satisfaction shall be executed and recorded), to hold that the loan proceeds were either disbursed or credited to pay or satisfy the amended final judgment in September 2003, such that the foreclosure judgment had been effectively satisfied : As creative and flexible as we may wish to allow contracting parties to be in their agreements, those parties do not have the right to use judgments as another form of mortgage; only the court that issued a 2
6 judgment may approve what sums are included in, and enforceable under, such an instrument. In this case, no court authorized the inclusion of United Funding s new advances to NFH as a judgment debt. * * * * The concept of both paying and not satisfying of record a judgment lien is a kind of legal cognitive dissonance that cannot be resolved. The intention to contravene a controlling Florida statute, section (1), will not be given effect. The amended final judgment, having been paid, did not collaterize the post-judgment United Funding loan. (A:6-7). The court accordingly directed the trial court to grant Nack s requested relief from the judgment, determining that the amended final judgment was paid on September 24, 2003, and is therefore cancelled and satisfied of record. (A:8-9). SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Section (1), Florida Statutes (2008), properly construed, entitles a mortgagor to request an estoppel letter from a mortgagee or judgment creditor and, upon the issuance of a letter, to pay off the mortgage or other debt. At that point, the mortgagee is obligated to execute and deliver a satisfaction of judgment. The statute creates a rational procedure for clearing title to mortgaged property, but it does not provide a basis for invalidating a private contractual agreement that a mortgagor will not invoke Section (1) to commence the statutory process. The Third District s opinion, which construes Section (1) to serve precisely that role, is in express and direct conflict with the Second District s decision in JP Morgan Chase v. New Millennial, LC, 6 So. 3d 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). The Second District correctly construed Section (1) as creating a 3
7 duty to execute a satisfaction only upon a request for an estoppel letter and a subsequent payment of the outstanding debt. No rational construction of the entire statute can allow its protections to become a means by which a private contract can be invalidated in part, long after its execution, and by an assignee who would otherwise properly be bound by the agreement. ARGUMENT THE THIRD DISTRICT S CONSTRUCTION OF SECTION (1), FLORIDA STATUTES (2008), EXPRESSLY AND DIRECTLY CONFLICTS WITH THE SECOND DISTRICT S INTERPRETATION OF THE SAME STATUTE BY CONSTITUTING THE PROVISION AS A SUBSTANTIVE LIMITATION ON PRIVATE CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS, RATHER THAN AS A PROCEDURAL STATUTE THAT CREATES AN OBLIGATION TO EXECUTE AND RECORD A SATISFACTION ONLY UPON A REQUEST FOR AND EXECUTION OF AN ESTOPPEL LETTER. The Third District s invocation of Section , Fla. Stat. (2008), to invalidate a contractual provision that was undisputedly intended to constitute the amended final judgment, to which Kalb succeeded as an assignee, as partial security for their loan agreement, conflicts with the Second District s interpretation of Section in JP Morgan Chase v. New Millennial, LC, 6 So. 3d 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). [A]n agreement that is violative of a provision of a constitution or a valid statute, or an agreement which cannot be performed without violating such a constitutional or statutory provision, is illegal and void. Fla. House of Representatives v. Crist, 999 So. 2d 601, 616 (Fla. 2008) (citation omitted). Thus, a contract establishing a commercial relationship that is banned by the law and public policy will not be enforced by the Florida courts. Harris v. Gonzalez, 789 4
8 So. 2d 405, (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The question whether the loan agreement so egregiously violates Section turns, in the first instance, on what the statute means and it is on this fundamental point that the Third District s opinion conflicts with the Second District s JP Morgan decision. Section (1) states: Within 14 days after receipt of the written request of a mortgagor, the holder of a mortgage shall deliver to the mortgagor an estoppel letter setting forth the unpaid balance of the loan secured by the mortgage, including principal, interest, and any other charges properly due under or secured by the mortgage and interest on a per-day basis for the unpaid balance. Whenever the amount of money due on any mortgage, lien, or judgment shall be fully paid to the person or party entitled to the payment thereof, the mortgagee, creditor, or assignee, or the attorney of record in the case of a judgment, to whom such payment shall have been made, shall execute in writing an instrument acknowledging satisfaction of said mortgage, lien, or judgment and have the same acknowledged, or proven, and duly entered of record (1), Fla. Stat. (2008). On its face, the statute does not purport to impose any obligation in the absence of a request for an estoppel letter in the first instance, much less provide any basis for invalidating a private contractual arrangement. In JP Morgan, the Second District interpreted Section (1) as a precondition to a party s right to claim satisfaction of mortgage, the inapplicability of which bars a court from finding a satisfaction. That interpretation is directly contrary to the Third District s application of the statute to create a satisfaction that the parties have expressly disavowed. The plaintiff bank in JP Morgan took an assignment of two mortgages from the original lender, and thereafter sought to foreclose against a subsequent 5
9 purchaser of the property and the purchaser s lender. 6 So. 3d at Although the trial court found that the defendants had diligently inquired about the mortgages and had been advised by the original bank lender that they had been paid in full, the Second District held that the defendants were subject to the original mortgage because the procedures outlined in section were not followed in this case. Id. at The court explained: The plain effect of the [statute] is to enable the closing agent to timely obtain a satisfaction of mortgage if it remits to the mortgagee the amount set for in an estoppel letter. * * * * [I]t is the debt and not the mere evidence of it which is secured. Drake Lumber Co. v. Semple, 100 Fla. 1757, 130 So. 577, 581 (1930). [I]n the absence of cancelled notes or recorded satisfactions of the two mortgages, the trial court could not legally declare the loans ineffective and unenforceable. To do so deprived JP Morgan of its right to pursue the means and remedies of foreclosure, which are legal attributes of the mortgages it purchased. 6 So. 3d at 688 (emphasis added). Here, as in JP Morgan, there was no request for an estoppel letter and, accordingly, no satisfaction of the foreclosure judgment within the meaning of Section (1). Yet the Third District converted the statutory shield into a sword to be wielded by a subsequent purchaser, whom the court has freed from an indisputable contractual obligation because that obligation purportedly violates the statute. (A:4-8). The Third District did so by reading Section (1) s second clause in isolation, that is, divorced from the predicate clause upon which the Second 6
10 District relied to construe the statute. Indeed, the Third District s quotation of the statute omits the first clause entirely. (A:6). The statute must, of course, be construed as a whole. E.g., School Bd. of Palm Beach County v. Survivors Charter Schools, Inc., 3 So. 3d 1220, 1223 (Fla. 2009) ( [b]asic to our examination of statutes is the elementary principle of statutory construction that significance and effect must be given to every word, phrase, sentence, and part of the statute if possible, and words in a statute should not be construed as mere surplusage ) (citations and internal quotations omitted). That is how the Second District read Section (1), but the Third District s construction depends entirely on treating the statute s first sentence as surplusage, which the courts cannot do. Section (1) could have been invoked by the mortgagor at the time of the loan agreement in 2003, but ZPO expressly agreed to the contrary, i.e., that the mortgage would remain unsatisfied until United Funding s loan was repaid. (A:3). Under JP Morgan, ZPO was fully entitled to do so, in that the statutory obligation to execute a satisfaction only comes into existence upon the mortgagor s request for an estoppel letter and subsequent payment of the outstanding debt. Nack, as assignee, was bound by its predecessor s agreements. E.g., Farkus v. Fla. Land Sales & Dev. Co., 915 So. 2d 688, 689 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) ( an assignee succeeds to his assignor s rights under the assignment of a contract and takes it with all the burdens to which it is subject in the hands of the assignor ) (citation omitted). Just as ZPO could not disavow the loan agreement with United Funding, Nack cannot rewrite the agreement to alter the parties indisputably established intent. See Wachovia Ins. Servs. v. Toomey, 994 So. 2d 980, 986 (Fla. 2008) 7
11 (reaffirming deeply rooted principle of Florida law that the intent of the parties controls interpretations of their releases ). The express and direct conflict between the Third District s opinion and JP Morgan warrants discretionary review. The Third District itself recognized that Kalb s position is a rational argument, and that the trial court s acceptance of that argument would ordinarily [be] affirm[ed] because of the competent substantial evidence in the record to support the interpretation of the loan agreement upon which Kalb relied. (A:4-5). It is only the Third District s conflict-laden application of Section (1) that interceded between the parties intentions and the enforcement of their agreement, again a stranger to that agreement who has now been allowed to invalidate a key provision thereof. It is an act of judicial rarity to invalidate a contract as violative of constitutional or statutory law, and here that power has been exercised without regard to legislative intent or governing statutory-construction principles. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, Kalb requests the Court to grant discretionary review. 8
12 Respectfully submitted, Elliot H. Scherker Florida Bar No Brigid F. Cech Samole Florida Bar No Greenberg Traurig, P.A Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida Telephone: (305) Facsimile: (305) Counsel for Stuart Kalb, Trustee By: Elliot H. Scherker CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of this brief was mailed on August, 2009 to: Robert H. Cooper 2999 N.E. 191 Street, Suite 704 Aventura, Florida Raoul G. Cantero, III White & Case, LLP 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 4900 Miami, Florida Martin A. Feigenbaum P.O. Box Surfside, Florida Elliot H. Scherker 9
13 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that this brief was prepared in Times New Roman, 14-point font, in compliance with Rule 9.210(a)(2) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Elliot H. Scherker MIA SCHERKERE180,754,124v
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 11, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D15-2576 Lower Tribunal No. 12-19409 Heartwood 2,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D L.T. CASE NO
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC10-2453 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D 09-161 L.T. CASE NO. 05-15300 BARBARA J. TUCKER, Petitioner, vs. LPP MORTGAGE LTD., f/k/a LOAN PARTICIPANT PARTNERS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. LAURENCE ZIMMERMAN and CASE NO. 4D KIMBERLY ZIMMERMAN, L.T. NO. CA AN Petitioners,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LAURENCE ZIMMERMAN and CASE NO. 4D05-2037 KIMBERLY ZIMMERMAN, L.T. NO. CA 03-8973 AN Petitioners, vs. OLYMPUS FIDELITY TRUST, LLC and COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC., f/k/a PALM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. L.T. NO.: 3D ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE RIGGINS, Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC06-205 vs. L.T. NO.: 3D04-2620 AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, Respondent. / ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: SC Lower Tribunal Case Number: 2D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: SC05-1304 Lower Tribunal Case Number: 2D04-5257 JANETTA YORK, Petitioner, v. EMMETT ABDONEY, Respondent. PETITIONER S AMENDED INITIAL BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JOY CHATLOS D ARATA, etc., Petitioner, THE CHATLOS FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Respondents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-2097 JOY CHATLOS D ARATA, etc., Petitioner, v. THE CHATLOS FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Respondents. BRIEF OF RESPONDENTS ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Electronically Filed 05/20/2013 12:08:02 PM ET RECEIVED, 5/20/2013 12:08:39, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC13-782 L.T. Case Nos. 4DII-3838; 502008CA034262XXXXMB
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT RECEIVED, 10/17/2017 3:44 PM, Joanne P. Simmons, Fifth District Court of Appeal TOWN OF PONCE INLET, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D14-4520
More informationIN THE SUPREME OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM A DECISION OF THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC06-88 4DCA CASE NO.: 4D 04-1350 MICHAEL GLYNN vs. Petitioner, FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, Respondent. / RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC. Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-1397 PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, v. V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC Respondent. RESPONDENT V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2014
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2014 WE HELP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida non-profit corporation, Appellant, v. CIRAS, LLC, an Ohio limited
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 15572814 Electronically Filed 07/03/2014 05:32:02 PM RECEIVED, 7/3/2014 17:33:34, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court MOHAMMAD ANWAR FARID AL-SALEH, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Second District Court of Appeal Case Number: 2D L.T. No. 05-CA Parrot Cove Marina, LLC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Second District Court of Appeal Case Number: 2D06-4582 L.T. No. 05-CA-2397 Parrot Cove Marina, LLC Petitioner, vs. Duncan Seawall Dock & Boatlift, Inc. Respondent.
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010 Opinion filed May 26, 2010. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D08-133 Lower Tribunal No. 07-297
More informationCLS HOLDINGS USA, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SANDRA P. CASTILLO, Sc12.-16n Petitioner, DCA Case No.: 3D11-2132 VS. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I 2 INC. TRUST 2006-HE7
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC DCA Case No. 3D v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANGELO KYRELIS, Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC12-642 DCA Case No. 3D11-1730 v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992 ONEWEST BANK, FSB (SUBSTITUTED PARTY FOR FORMER PLAINTIFF INDYMAC
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BEVERLY PENZELL and BANK OF AMERICA N.A., CASE NO. LOWER TRIBUNAL: THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL DCA NO. 3D04-2487 CONSOLIDATED DCA NO. 3D04-2726 Petitioners versus STATE
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida A.K. GIFT SHOP, INC., Petitioner,
In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC12-362 A.K. GIFT SHOP, INC., Petitioner, v. DTRS INTERCONTINENTAL MIAMI, LLC, as Assignee of Intercontinental Hotels Corporation, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA ORMOND BEACH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., Petitioners, Case No. SC03-371 v. CITATION MORTGAGE, LTD., ET AL., Respondents. / RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA VIRGINIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: SC04-1603 vs. Petitioner, THOMAS ALBERT DUNFORD and RACHEL PEERY, Respondents. Application For Discretionary Review
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CHRISTINE BAUER and THOMAS BAUER, Petitioners, ONE WEST BANK, FSB, Respondent.
Filing # 17071819 Electronically Filed 08/13/2014 05:11:43 PM RECEIVED, 8/13/2014 17:13:41, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC14-1575 CHRISTINE BAUER and
More informationCase 0:14-cv WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:14-cv-60975-WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 WENDY GRAVE and JOSEPH GRAVE, vs. Plaintiffs, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC06-56 BEVERLY PENZELL AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC06-56 BEVERLY PENZELL AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioners, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondent. RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF
More informationIN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC WILLIAM DAVID MILLSAPS. Petitioner, MARIJA ARNJAS, Respondent.
IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC05-1297 WILLIAM DAVID MILLSAPS Petitioner, v. MARIJA ARNJAS, Respondent. AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER WILLIAM DAVID MILLSAPS In propria persona 528
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO.: SC11-734 THIRD DCA CASE NO. s: 3D09-3102 & 3D10-848 CIRCUIT CASE NO.: 09-25070-CA-01 UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC12-216
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MIKE HARIDOPOLOS, in his official capacity as the Florida Senate President, Petitioner, vs. L.T. Case Nos.: 1D10-6285, 2009-CA-4534, 2010-CA-1010 CITIZENS FOR STRONG SCHOOLS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC L.T. NOs: 4D , 4D THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC07-2402 L.T. NOs: 4D07-2378, 4D07-2379 THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Petitioner, v. SURVIVORS CHARTER SCHOOLS, INC., Respondent. On Discretionary
More informationSUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA DONALD M. MACLEOD AND KIM MACLEOD, Petitioners, v. CASE NO. SC08-825 L.T. No. 1D07-1770 ORIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., f/k/a ORIX CREDIT ALLIANCE, INC., Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC DCA Case No.: 4D RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JACQUELINE HARVEY, Petitioner, vs. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST, etc., et al., Case No.: SC11-1909 DCA Case No.: 4D10-674 Respondent. / RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PAMELA A. BARCLAY 4D RESPONDENT S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION. On Review from the District Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT C. MALT & CO., INC., Petitioner, v. Case No. SCO8-1527 PAMELA A. BARCLAY 4D07-3104 Respondent. / RESPONDENT S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Review from the District
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Third DCA Case Nos. 3D / 3D L.T. Case No CA 15
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC08-1877 Third DCA Case Nos. 3D07-2875 / 3D07-3106 L.T. Case No. 04-17958 CA 15 VALAT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD. Petitioner, vs. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LT CASE NOS. 4D & JEAN W. PHADAEL, Appellant,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12-814 LT CASE NOS. 4D11-905 & 09-042013 04 JEAN W. PHADAEL, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS AS TRUSTEE FOR RALI 2007QS9, Appellee. ANSWER
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED MDTR LLC AS TRUSTEE UNDER THE 6161 SEQUOIA
More informationRESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1365 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D02-4510 RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF GARY A. BARCUS Appellant/Petitioner vs. GROVE AT GRAND PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Respondent
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE Plaintiff, Case No.: 07-24338-CACE vs. DIVISION: 02. JAMES
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida
In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC06-1808 GARY DOEHLA, Petitioner, v. JAMES J. CLINTON, III, Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationCASE NO. SC ( ~ JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR CASE NO. SC ( ~ ATE OF FLORIDA L. T. CASE NO. 4D12-570 PALM BEACH MARKETPLACE, LLC, Petitioner, ALEYDA'S MEXICAN RESTAURANTE, INC., Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF Jennifer S.
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOHN OLIVERA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Nelsa
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. L.T. NO.: 3D ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE RIGGINS Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC06-205 vs. L.T. NO.: 3D04-2620 AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, Respondent. / ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM
More informationCITY OF MIAMI, PETITIONER, RESPONDENTS.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1449 CITY OF MIAMI, PETITIONER, VS. FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF DADE COUNTY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. BRIEF ON JURISDICTION OF CITY OF MIAMI ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents. PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Richard Zaldivar, Esquire Jay M. Levy,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2012
LEVINE, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2012 ALAN SCHEIN and RESULTS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, a Delaware
More informationSTANLEY S. DAVIDSON, LUIS M. JUEGA GARCIA, FETlTIONER'S AMEN DED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
E]cctronically Filed 04/09/2013 (M:S5:06 PM ET RECE]VED. 4/9/2013 18:23:35. Thomas D. Hall, Clerk. Supreme Court IN THE SUPREMF COURf OF F1 ORIDA CASENO. SCl3-332 STANLEY S. DAVIDSON, Petitioner. LUIS
More informationJohn Cottle and Jay Roberts of Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., Fort Walton Beach, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA WATERVIEW TOWERS YACHT CLUB - THE ULTIMATE, OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION
More informationGuarantee. THIS DEED is dated. 1. Definitions and Interpretation. 1.1 Definitions. In this Deed:
Guarantee THIS DEED is dated 1. Definitions and Interpretation 1.1 Definitions In this Deed: We / us / our / the Lender Bank of Cyprus UK Limited, trading as Bank of Cyprus UK, incorporated in England
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DAVID LUIZ, Appellant, v. LYNX ASSET SERVICES, LLC, Appellee. No. 4D15-558 [August 24, 2016] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CHARLES MASON, ) S. Ct. Case No.: SC03-778 ) 4DCA Case No. 4D01-3122 Petitioner, ) L.T. Case Nos. 91-42 CA ) 98-549 CA v. ) 98-561 CA ) E. SPEER & ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., ) )
More informationCASE NO. SC CORAL REEF DRIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, etc. et al., DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a foreign limited partnership,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-2367 CORAL REEF DRIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, etc. et al., vs. Petitioners, DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a foreign limited partnership, Respondent. On a
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DIME, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED July 29, 2014 v No. 314752 Oakland Circuit Court GRISWOLD BUILDING, LLC; GRISWOLD LC No. 2009-106478-CK PROPERTIES, LLC; COLASSAE,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. RED REEF, INC 4 th DCA Case Number: 4DO D L.T. Case No.: CL (AF) Plaintiff/Petitioner
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC 06-809 RED REEF, INC 4 th DCA Case Number: 4DO4-194 4D04-013 L.T. Case No.: CL 00-5104(AF) Plaintiff/Petitioner vs. ERNEST WILLIS and SUNDAY WILLIS Defendants/Respondents
More informationReferred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to the Foreclosure Mediation Program. (BDR 9-488)
REQUIRES TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY VOTE (, ) S.B. 0 SENATE BILL NO. 0 COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY MARCH, 0 Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to the Foreclosure Mediation Program.
More informationObligation of good faith.
Article 4. Satisfaction. 45-36.2. Obligation of good faith. Every action or duty within this Article imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement. (1953, c. 848; 2005-123, s. 1.)
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. Washington, D.C FORM 8-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC: L.T. Case No. 3D CASTELO DEVELOPMENTS, LLC. Petitioner, NAKIA RAWLS, et al. Respondents.
Electronically Filed 10/24/2013 05:29:35 PM ET RECEIVED, 10/24/2013 17:33:39, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA L.T. Case No. 3D12-1332 CASTELO DEVELOPMENTS, LLC Petitioner,
More informationTHE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS. (Filed: April 18, 2012)
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. (Filed: April 18, 2012) SUPERIOR COURT THE BANK OF NEW YORK : MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF : NEW YORK, AS SUCCESSOR IN : TO JP MORGAN CHASE
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DATE OF REPORT August 7, 2003 (Date of Earliest
More information(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 17, 2017) SECOND REPRINT S.B. 33. Referred to Committee on Judiciary
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May, ) SECOND REPRINT S.B. SENATE BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY (ON BEHALF OF THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR) PREFILED NOVEMBER, Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT HFC COLLECTION CENTER, INC., Petitioner, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Court of Appeal s Case No.: 4D JAN KRZYNOWEK, Petitioner, -vs- TZVI SCHACHTER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Court of Appeal s Case No.: 4D06-2266 JAN KRZYNOWEK, Petitioner, -vs- TZVI SCHACHTER Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. EARL STEWART, JR., and STEWART AGENCY, INC., d/b/a STEWART TOYOTA OF NORTH PALM BEACH, Petitioners,
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-752 EARL STEWART, JR., and STEWART AGENCY, INC., d/b/a STEWART TOYOTA OF NORTH PALM BEACH, Petitioners, v. RAYMOND G. INGALSBE, RAYMOND G. INGALSBE,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT NOTICE OF APPEAL
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, dlbla CHAMPION MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. MARIE ANN GLASS, Appellee. --~-------~--~I DCA CASE NO.:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC A.I.G. URUGUAY COMPANIA DE SEGUROS, S.A., Plaintiff/Petitioner, LANDAIR TRANSPORT, et al.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC05-1243 A.I.G. URUGUAY COMPANIA DE SEGUROS, S.A., Plaintiff/Petitioner, v. LANDAIR TRANSPORT, et al., Defendant/Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT T. MOSHER, CASE NO.: SC00-1263 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D99-1067 Petitioner, v. STEPHEN J. ANDERSON, Respondent. / PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS John T. Mulhall
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC
Filing # 23534893 E-Filed 02/09/2015 03:05:31 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC13-2384 COMMENTS AS TO AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RECEIVED, 02/09/2015 03:08:43 PM, Clerk,
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUNDING ASSOCIATES, ) L.P., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. )
More informationCASE NO. 1D Craig S. Barnett of Greenberg Traurig P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA BIEL REO, LLC, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-46
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 8, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Nos. 3D17-368 and 3D16-2092 Lower Tribunal No. 13-21464 Wells
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LUTHER EDWARD SPICER and CLARA JEAN MAY, Appellants, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, RIVERWALK OF THE PALM BEACHES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,
More informationAPPENDIX FOR MARGIN ACCOUNTS. 1.1 In this Appendix, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
APPENDIX FOR MARGIN ACCOUNTS This Appendix applies if the Client opens or maintains a Margin Account in respect of margin facilities for trading in Securities. Unless otherwise defined in this Appendix,
More informationDocket No. 27,465 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO 2008-NMCA-081, 144 N.M. 264, 186 P.3d 256 May 7, 2008, Filed
1 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. V. MONTOYA, 2008-NMCA-081, 144 N.M. 264, 186 P.3d 256 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., as nominee for DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS,
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida. CUSTOM SCREENING & CRUSHING INC., and CUSTOM CRUSHING & MATERIAL, INC. Petitioners, vs. GLOBETEC CONSTRUCTION, LLC
In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC12-403 CUSTOM SCREENING & CRUSHING INC., and CUSTOM CRUSHING & MATERIAL, INC. Petitioners, vs. GLOBETEC CONSTRUCTION, LLC Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationSECURITY AGREEMENT. NOW, THEREFORE, the Debtor and the Secured Party, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
SECURITY AGREEMENT THIS SECURITY AGREEMENT (this Agreement ), dated as of this day of, is made by and between corporation (the Debtor ), with an address at (the Secured Party ), with an address at.. Under
More informationIn the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida
In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida CASE NO. (Circuit Court Case No. and Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE INDYMAC INDA MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2005-AR2,
More informationDEMARIO v. FRANKLIN MORTGAGE & INV. CO., INC., 648 So.2d 210, 20 FLW D25, 1995 Fla.4DCA 32
DEMARIO v. FRANKLIN MORTGAGE & INV. CO., INC., 648 So.2d 210, 20 FLW D25, 1995 Fla.4DCA 32 ROBERT DEMARIO and ROBERT A. DEMARIO, and DOROTHY H. WILKEN, as Clerk of the Circuit Court, Appellants, v. FRANKLIN
More informationSECURITY AGREEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT OF ACCOUNT
THIS ACCOUNT CONTROL AGREEMENT dated as of, 20 (the Agreement ), among, a (together with its successors and assigns, the Debtor ),, a (together with its successors and assigns, the Secured Party ) and
More informationDeed of Guarantee and Indemnity
Deed of Guarantee and Indemnity To: Shenwan Hongyuan Securities (H.K. Limited Shenwan Hongyuan Futures (H.K. Limited 1. In consideration of your granting and/or continuing to make available advances, credit
More informationAPPENDIX FOR MARGIN ACCOUNTS
APPENDIX FOR MARGIN ACCOUNTS This Appendix applies if the Client opens or maintains a Margin Account in respect of margin facilities for trading in Securities. Unless otherwise defined in this Appendix,
More informationGENERAL APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT OF INDEMNITY CONTRACTORS FORM
MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING, INC. P.O. Box 14498, Des Moines, iowa 50306-3498 Phone (800) 678-8171 FAX (515) 243-3854 GENERAL APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT OF INDEMNITY CONTRACTORS
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 18, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-1493 Lower Tribunal No. 16-4 Valerie Viviane Bensoussan
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOY CHATLOS D ARATA, etc., Petitioner, vs. Case No. SC04-2097 DCA Cases Nos. 5D02-3330 & 5D02-3590 (Consolidated Appeals) THE CHATLOS FOUNDATION, INC., et al. Respondents.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D CITY OF MIAMI. Petitioner. vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D01-3050 CITY OF MIAMI Petitioner vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL. Respondents RESPONDENTS ANSWER BRIEF TO PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationCASE NO. SC L.T. CASE NO. 4D IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE STANEK-COUSINS, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
CASE NO. SC05-1987 L.T. CASE NO. 4D05-1129 ========================================================== IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE STANEK-COUSINS, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
More informationJ P MORGAN CHASE & CO
J P MORGAN CHASE & CO FORM 8-K (Current report filing) Filed 11/07/07 for the Period Ending 11/01/07 Address 270 PARK AVE 39TH FL NEW YORK, NY 10017 Telephone 2122706000 CIK 0000019617 Symbol JPM Fiscal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: SC Lower Tribunal Case Number: 2D RESPONDENT S RESPONSE TO PETITIONER JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: SC05-1304 Lower Tribunal Case Number: 2D04-5257 JANETTA YORK, v. Petitioner, EMMETT ABDONEY, Respondent. RESPONDENT S RESPONSE TO PETITIONER JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Filed 7/29/16 Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage CA2/1 Opinion on remand from Supreme Court NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC Lower Tribunal No.: 3D LATAM INVESTMENTS, LLC., a Florida Liability Company, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-2245 Lower Tribunal No.: 3D10-3042 LATAM INVESTMENTS, LLC., a Florida Liability Company, vs. Petitioner, HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP., ET. AL. Respondent. PETITIONER
More informationCAN BRING THE ACTION BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THE CONTRACT SAYS, BUT THEY CAN'T DEFEND THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS
STANDING VERSUS NECESSARY AND INDISPENSABLE PARTIES FLORIDA 2D DCA HOLDS that fact that mortgagee MERS lacked the beneficial interest in note did not deprive it of standing to sue Azize but leaves open
More informationORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS. THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant s Motion for Attorney s Fees
LIBERTY HOME EQUITY SOLUTIONS INC. FORMERLY KNOWN AS GENWORTH FINANCIAL HOME EQUITY ACCESS INC., IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2016-8579-CA-01
More informationCASE NO. 1D Mark Elliot Pollack, Pollack & Rosen, P.A., Coral Gables, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA COLLINS ASSET GROUP, LLC, v. Appellant, PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. and DELVERT CAMPFIELD, ET AL., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 13, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D13-716 Lower Tribunal No. 12-49371 Allscripts Healthcare
More informationFiling # E-Filed 09/22/ :42:05 PM
Filing # 46814510 E-Filed 09/22/2016 04:42:05 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2014CA007769 AH MICHELLE SMITH, as Personal Representative
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D LT. CASE NO.: CA-13
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT RECEIVED, 10/26/2016 3:44 PM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal SFL PROPERTY HOLDING LLC, v. Appellant, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, aka NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA, aka, PNC BANK NA, UNPUBLISHED July 31, 2012 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 304469 Washtenaw Circuit Court MERCANTILE
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS NEW CENTER COMMONS CONDOMINIUMS ASSOCIATION, UNPUBLISHED June 24, 2014 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 314702 Wayne Circuit Court ANDRE ESPINO and QUICKEN LOANS, INC., LC
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD., Petitioner, L.T. Case No.: 1D10-6780/1D11-0130 vs. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC04-442 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D02-101 JOHN RHAMES, DAN MATHIS, and ROBERT MARTO, vs. Petitioners, CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, a Municipality, Respondent. / On
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D
Electronically Filed 10/09/2013 11:26:52 AM ET RECEIVED, 10/9/2013 11:28:34, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC2013-1834 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D11-3004
More informationUNANIMOUS SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT. among REFRESHMENTS CANADA. - and - COTT CORPORATION. - and - ALBERTA BEVERAGE COUNCIL LTD.
UNANIMOUS SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT among REFRESHMENTS CANADA COTT CORPORATION ALBERTA BEVERAGE COUNCIL LTD. ALBERTA DAIRY COUNCIL ALBERTA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING CORPORATION DATED: June 22 nd, 2009.
More information