Lessons Learned for Experts and Advocates
|
|
- Quentin Ball
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lessons Learned for Experts and Advocates FEWA Dallas Chapter Dinner January 22, 2015 James E. Smith
2 HUI V. MEL ACRES RANCH Brief Factual Background Ranch alleged releases from HUI s industrial operation to the Ranch s property Ranch sued for permanent property damage Before trial, HUI took measures to stop any ongoing releases
3 HUI V. MEL ACRES RANCH After taking these measures, HUI s environmental consultants tested the Ranch, and determined that the Ranch had no relevant constituents above state action levels All relevant constituents were below the no action levels published by TCEQ Ranch asserted that its property suffered permanent loss of value due to stigma, even if the constituents were below the state action levels.
4 PREEMPTION BY STATE LAW? HUI and several industry amici argued that TCEQ s action levels preempt any common law cause of action, including a claim for loss of value due to stigma.
5 TEXAS SUPREME COURT PUNTS ON STIGMA In its opinion, the Texas Supreme Court stated that it could not decide the issue of state action level preemption for environmental contamination because the Ranch failed to provide legally sufficient evidence of permanent injury due to stigma. Other court s in the same situation have ruled no stigma.
6 PRACTICAL EFFECT OF THE RULING Plaintiffs will need to have legally sufficient proof of stigma damages, and only then will the Texas Supreme Court consider if Texas recognizes a claim for postremediation stigma in an environmental case.
7 Excerpt from oral argument ORAL ARGUMENT EXCERPT
8 HUI V. MEL ACRES RANCH After stating that it could not address the stigma issue, the Court made a lengthy analysis of the Ranch s stigma evidence In its analysis, the Court acknowledged that even if Texas law may allow for recovery for stigma, proof of that stigma may be legally impossible
9 ANALYSIS OF THE RANCH S EXPERT S TESTIMONY Real estate appraiser sales-comparison approach post remediation stigma lowered the market value by 60%. two comparables the Court noted that, perhaps due to the difficulty in finding comparable sales, neither example was a true sale.
10 ANALYSIS OF THE RANCH S EXPERT S TESTIMONY One of the examples was the difference between an initial offering price and a counter offer for a transaction that never closed. The other example was the sale of property by a company to its former employee, where the owner denied that the property had ever been contaminated. The owner said that the low price was a sweetheart deal as part of a retirement package. [Good job, Rudy!]
11 LESSONS FROM THE OPINION Lesson 1-adequately address alternatives The Court noted that the first property was a former Superfund site that may not have been remediated all the way to state action levels, and thus may have had lower value due to ongoing contamination, not just to stigma.
12 LESSONS FROM THE OPINION The second property may have never been contaminated, and its sales price may have been lowered for reasons other than stigma. In sum, the Ranch failed to identify a single property that was remediated to state action levels and continued to suffer from an ongoing stigma.
13 PRACTICAL EFFECT OF THE RULING Plaintiffs will need to have legally sufficient proof of stigma damages, and only then will the Texas Supreme Court consider if Texas recognizes a claim for postremediation stigma in an environmental case.
14 PRACTICAL EFFECT OF THE RULING Plaintiffs will need to have legally sufficient proof of stigma damages, and only then will the Texas Supreme Court consider if Texas recognizes a claim for postremediation stigma in an environmental case.
15 PRACTICAL EFFECT OF THE RULING Plaintiffs will need to have legally sufficient proof of stigma damages, and only then will the Texas Supreme Court consider if Texas recognizes a claim for postremediation stigma in an environmental case.
16 LESSONS FROM THE OPINION Ranch s expert claimed that the other properties need not have been comparable, because the expert identified percentage value reductions, not dollar value reductions, due to their stigma. The Court specifically rejected that approach.
17 LESSONS FROM THE OPINION The sales comparison approach never relies on other sales exactly like the subject property. Must link the final appraised value to these somewhat dissimilar comparison properties.
18 LESSONS FROM THE OPINION Have a detailed narrative in the appraisal report explaining how the properties are reasonably similar, as a starting point. Set out the differences Provide a logical analysis of the differences Use an accepted methodology to quantify those differences, consistent with the analysis
19 LESSONS FROM THE EXPERIENCE What I will do next time to win the case at trial, and avoid the appellate courts
20 LESSONS FROM THE EXPERIENCE Do not assume the trial judge will act the way the Texas Supreme Court wants trial judges to act This judge said he had never granted a Daubert motion to strike an expert. At the informal charge conference, the judge agreed to submit the to the jury the questions as submitted by the plaintiff
21 LESSONS FROM THE EXPERIENCE During the informal charge conference, the judge Voiced apprehension as to the appropriateness of the questions proposed by the plaintiff Said to the Ranch s lawyer I ll give you what you want, but it ll be your job to keep it.
22 LESSONS FROM THE EXPERIENCE I should have prepared the case based on the evidence the jury heard, even including evidence that the Texas Supreme Court ruled, unanimously, should not have been admitted and could not have supported a verdict
23 LESSONS FROM THE EXPERIENCE I should have done a better job anticipating what this judge would submit as questions to the jury. prepared my experts to help the jury answer the questions actually given by the judge to the jury, even the question that seemed clearly contrary to Texas law, at the time
24 LESSONS FROM THE EXPERIENCE For example, I could have had my real estate expert identify Texas properties that had been subject to a clean closure under the VCP or PST programs Use sales data from these properties to show no ongoing loss of market value Indeed, some properties do not show any ongoing loss even with less than a clean closure
25 LESSONS FROM THE EXPERIENCE Merely identifying properties that have been closed and that do not have any market value might not meet the requirement to use truly comparable properties, as set out in HUI However, before a judge who never grants Daubert motions, these data will probably come in to rebut opinions that the jury heard in this case.
26 EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED One week after releasing HUI, the Texas Supreme Court issued Gilbert Wheeler Inc v. Enbridge Pipelines East Texas LP Court stated that whether damage to real property was temporary or permanent was a matter of law, for the judge to decide Contrary to its own statement in Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Bates, ten years earlier
27 TEMPORARY V. PERMANENT In Gilbert Wheeler, Court noted that Texas law had traditionally been that [w]hether the injury [to real property] amounts to total or only partial destruction of value, or whether it be permanent or temporary, as well as the extent of the injury and the resulting amount of damages, are all questions for the determination of the jury under proper instructions. Trinity & S. Ry. Co. v. Schofield, 10 S.W. 575, 577 (Tex. 1889). 27
28 TEMPORARY V. PERMANENT Gilbert Wheeler went on to say that [j]urors must still decide the frequency, extent, and duration of noxious conditions... [b]ut jurors cannot decide questions such as whether damages can be estimated with reasonable certainty, whether principles of res judicata allow one or a series of suits, or when limitations ought to accrue. Schneider, 147 S.W.3d at 281. Accordingly, we instructed that jurors should determine whether a nuisance works temporary or permanent injury only to the extent there is a dispute regarding what interference has occurred or whether it is likely to continue. " Id. 28
29 TEMPORARY V. PERMANENT Therefore, Gilbert Wheeler announced that whether an injury is temporary or permanent is a question of law for the court to decide. At the same time, we recognize that questions regarding the facts that underlie the temporary-versus-permanent distinction must be resolved by the jury upon proper request. Said another way, when the facts are disputed and must be resolved to correctly evaluate the nature of the injury, the court, upon proper request, must present the issue to the jury, relying on the definitions we have provided in this opinion. 29
30 WHAT IS ATRIAL JUDGE TO DO? Ask specific questions regarding the frequency, extent, and duration of noxious conditions? Or, have the jury answer Temporary or Permanent, based on instructions from the judge, even though that answer is supposed to be a matter of law for the judge? 30
31 MY RECOMMENDATION Be prepared for both possibilities. Try to get the judge to rule on temporary or permanent injury as early as possible Be prepared for this issue to go to the jury, and have all relevant experts prepared to testify as to the position of the client on the issue Have experts prepared to address damages from both perspectives 31
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 13-0234 444444444444 GILBERT WHEELER, INC., PETITIONER, v. ENBRIDGE PIPELINES (EAST TEXAS), L.P., RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DFW ADVISORS LTD. CO., Appellant V. JACQUELINE ERVIN, Appellee
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed February 11, 2016. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00883-CV DFW ADVISORS LTD. CO., Appellant V. JACQUELINE ERVIN, Appellee On Appeal from
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 05-0630 444444444444 WESTERN STEEL COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. HANK ALTENBURG, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR
More informationSecond, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.
CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, we now come to that part of the case where I must give you the instructions on the law. If you cannot hear me, please raise your hand. It is important that you
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 01-0301 444444444444 COASTAL TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER, v. CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORP., RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationPrimacy, Recency, and the Opening Statement
Primacy, Recency, and the Opening Statement Lee Ayres Stacey Smith Melerine Ayres Shelton Williams Benson & Paine LLC 333 Texas St Ste 1400 Shreveport, LA 71101 (318) 227-3304 leeayres@arklatexlaw.com
More informationJ & D Towing, LLC v. Am. Alternative Ins. Corp.
J & D Towing, LLC v. Am. Alternative Ins. Corp. Elliott Cooper Lauren Tow S 2016 This paper and/or presentation provides information on general legal issues. It is not intended to provide advice on any
More informationEleventh Court of Appeals
Opinion filed July 24, 2014 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals No. 11-12-00201-CV DLA PIPER US, LLP, Appellant V. CHRIS LINEGAR, Appellee On Appeal from the 201st District Court Travis County, Texas Trial
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 10-0318 444444444444 ETAN INDUSTRIES, INC. AND ETAN INDUSTRIES, INC., D/B/A CMA CABLEVISION AND/OR CMA COMMUNICATIONS, PETITIONER, v. RONALD LEHMANN AND DANA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 13-0816 444444444444 EL PASO MARKETING, L.P., PETITIONER, v. WOLF HOLLOW I, L.P., RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 31, 2012 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 31, 2012 Session E. JAY MOUNGER ET AL. v. CHARLES D. MOUNGER, JR. ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Roane County No. 14402 Russell E. Simmons,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS VEE BAR, LTD, FREDDIE JEAN WHEELER f/k/a FREDDIE JEAN MOORE, C.O. PETE WHEELER, JR., and ROBERT A. WHEELER, v. Appellants, BP AMOCO CORPORATION
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
NO. 12-07-00091-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS RAY C. HILL AND BOBBIE L. HILL, APPEAL FROM THE 241ST APPELLANTS V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT JO ELLEN JARVIS, NEWELL
More informationPrintable Lesson Materials
Printable Lesson Materials Print these materials as a study guide These printable materials allow you to study away from your computer, which many students find beneficial. These materials consist of two
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued July 9, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00473-CV ROBERT R. BURCHFIELD, Appellant V. PROSPERITY BANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 127th District Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 05-0870 444444444444 T. MICHAEL QUIGLEY, PETITIONER, v. ROBERT BENNETT, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR REVIEW
More informationEMINENT DOMAIN TRENDS IN THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT. Presented to the Eminent Domain Conference Sponsored by CLE International. Mike Stafford Kate David
EMINENT DOMAIN TRENDS IN THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT Presented to the Eminent Domain Conference Sponsored by CLE International Mike Stafford Kate David Eminent Domain Trends in the Texas Supreme Court By Mike
More informationGENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to
GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must follow the law as I state it
More informationCommon law reasoning and institutions Civil and Criminal Procedure (England and Wales) Litigation U.S.
Litigation U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3 20122 Milano Comparing England and Wales and the U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3
More informationTurner v. NJN Cotton Co., 485 S.W.3d 513 (Tex. App. Eastland 2015, pet. denied).
AN ORAL AGREEMENT TO SELL GOODS IS ENFORCEABLE UNDER AN EXCEPTION IN U.C.C. 2.201 S STATUTE OF FRAUDS WHEN THE PARTY AGAINST WHOM ENFORCEMENT IS SOUGHT ADMITS IN PLEADING, TESTIMONY OR OTHERWISE IN COURT
More informationNO CV. YANETTA DEMBY, Appellant. LAMACHUS RIVERS, Appellee
Opinion issued December 3, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-08-00965-CV YANETTA DEMBY, Appellant V. LAMACHUS RIVERS, Appellee On Appeal from the 125th District Court
More informationNo th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT'S CHARGE
THE LAW OFFICES OF G. DAVID WESTFALL, P.e. v. UDO BIRNBAUM I ~;. original I certify this to be a true and exact copy of the on file in the No. 00-00619 ' ~i~.'..~ District Clerk's Office, -of lobi c:j
More informationFunction of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence
101.05 Function of the Jury Members of the jury, all the evidence has been presented. It is now your duty to decide the facts from the evidence. You must then apply to those facts the law which I am about
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
Send this document to a colleague Close This Window IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 04-0194 EMZY T. BARKER, III AND AVA BARKER D/B/A BRUSHY CREEK BRAHMAN CENTER AND BRUSHY CREEK CUSTOM SIRES, PETITIONERS
More informationAffirm in part; Reverse and Remand in part; Opinion Filed August 15, In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Affirm in part; Reverse and Remand in part; Opinion Filed August 15, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00207-CV RANDALL LEE HALER, Appellant V. BOYINGTON CAPITAL
More informationMODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE
Page 1 of 25 100.00 MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. NOTE WELL: This is a sample only. Your case must be tailored to fit your facts and the law. Do not blindly follow this pattern.
More informationMock Trial Practice Law Test
Mock Trial Practice Law Test NOTE: The practice law test is provided as an example and will not be updated each year. Below are sample questions that are similar to those that students may see on the real
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00666-CV IN RE Dean DAVENPORT, Dillon Water Resources, Ltd., 5D Drilling and Pump Service, Inc. f/k/a Davenport Drilling & Pump Service,
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. JUAN F. QUINTANILLA, Appellant V. BAXTER PAINTING, INC.
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed December 1, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00685-CV JUAN F. QUINTANILLA, Appellant V. BAXTER PAINTING, INC., Appellee On Appeal from
More informationTHE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT STATUTE
THE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT STATUTE Gordon K. Wright Cooper & Scully, P.C. Gordon.wright@cooperscully.com 2017 This paper and/or presentation provides information on general legal issues. It is not intended
More informationTexas Fiduciary Litigation Update. David F. Johnson
Texas Fiduciary Litigation Update David F. Johnson DISCLAIMERS These materials should not be considered as, or as a substitute for, legal advice, and they are not intended to nor do they create an attorney-client
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 14-0721 444444444444 USAA TEXAS LLOYDS COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. GAIL MENCHACA, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION
More informationSTATE OF TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW
STATE OF TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW Greg C. Wilkins Christopher A. McKinney Orgain Bell & Tucker, LLP 470 Orleans Street P.O. Box 1751 Beaumont, TX 77704 Tel: (409) 838 6412 Email: gcw@obt.com
More information7.32 COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: INTERROGATORIES (Approved before 1985) NOTE TO JUDGE
CHARGE 7.32 Page 1 of 9 7.32 COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: INTERROGATORIES (Approved before 1985) NOTE TO JUDGE The interrogatories selected by the Committee for submission to the jury on the issue of comparative
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-393-CV TRINITY RIVER ESTATES, L.P. V. APPELLANT PAT DIFONZO, ZENA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ZENA LAND DEVELOPMENT, L.P., MARIO SINACOLA & SONS
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued August 2, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-17-00198-CV TRUYEN LUONG, Appellant V. ROBERT A. MCALLISTER, JR. AND ROBERT A. MCALLISTER JR AND ASSOCIATES,
More informationProject Management for Lawyers 2015 The Ethics of Legal Project Management
Project Management for Lawyers 2015 The Ethics of Legal Project Management January 22, 2015 4:15 Session PANELISTS Robert L. Denby Senior Vice President - Loss Prevention Aileen Leventon President and
More informationCase 9:01-cv MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935
Case 9:01-cv-00299-MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION STATE OF TEXAS v. NO. 9:01-CV-299
More informationReverse in part; Affirm in part; and Remand; Opinion Filed May 5, In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No.
Reverse in part; Affirm in part; and Remand; Opinion Filed May 5, 2016. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00864-CV JOHNATHAN HALTON AND CAROLYN HALTON, Appellants V. AMERICAN
More informationHow the Law Works A guide to the Oregon court system and civil cases
How the Law Works A guide to the Oregon court system and civil cases The Law and You Informaion Series 10, Volume 1 How the Law Works Simply stated, the law is divided into two major areas: Criminal and
More informationForum Non Conveniens A Defendant s Initial
In This Issue Forum Non Conveniens - A Defendant s Initial Impulse Could Be The Riskiest Providing Information To Expert Witnesses: A Quick Guide To The Proper Procedures And Potential Pitfalls Lennar
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 10-0451 444444444444 NATURAL GAS PIPELINE COMPANY OF AMERICA, PETITIONER, v. WILLIAM JUSTISS, DARLENE JUSTISS, JOSEPH JUSTISS, TOMMY ALSPAUGH, JUDY ALSPAUGH,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 04-0332 444444444444 BED, BATH & BEYOND, INC., PETITIONER, v. RAFAEL URISTA, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR
More informationTwins Cities Claims Association: Updates on Rule 68, Good Faith Law, and Joint & Several Liability. Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.
Twins Cities Claims Association: Updates on Rule 68, Good Faith Law, and Joint & Several Liability Presented by: Dyan Ebert & Cally Kjellberg Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A. April 13, 2010 The New Rule 68 The
More informationPLANO LINCOLN MERCURY, INC. v. ROBERTS 167 S.W.3d 616 (Tex. App. 2005)
PLANO LINCOLN MERCURY, INC. v. ROBERTS 167 S.W.3d 616 (Tex. App. 2005) LANG, Justice. Plano Lincoln Mercury, Inc., plaintiff below, appeals the trial court s final judgment on the jury verdict. The trial
More informationCHAPTER. Criminal Trial. Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
CHAPTER 10 Criminal Trial 1 The Criminal Trial START HERE 2009 Pearson Education, Inc 2 Review 3 The Nature and Purpose of the Criminal Trial: The trial process is highly formalized and governed by rules
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 05-0132 444444444444 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, ALSO KNOWN AS USAA, PETITIONER, v. JAMES STEVEN BRITE, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 13-0409 444444444444 IN THE INTEREST OF M.G.N. AND A.C.N., MINOR CHILDREN 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM
More informationLEGAL GLOSSARY Additur Adjudication Admissible evidence Advisement Affiant - Affidavit - Affirmative defense - Answers to Interrogatories - Appeal -
Additur - An increase by a judge in the amount of damages awarded by a jury. Adjudication - Giving or pronouncing a judgment or decree; also, the judgment given. Admissible evidence - Evidence that can
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00659-CV Sutton Building, Ltd., Appellant v. Travis County Water District 10, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL
More informationMBE Civil Procedure Sample Test Questions
MBE Civil Procedure Sample Test Questions The National Conference of Bar Examiners provides these Civil Procedure sample questions as an educational tool for candidates seeking admission to the bar within
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Did you own property near and downwind from the former Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant (in Jefferson County, northwest of Denver, Colorado) on
More informationKenneth Friedman, M.D. v. Heart Institute of Port St. Lucie, Inc.
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-12-00167-CV STEVEN L. DRYZER, APPELLANT V. CHARLES BUNDREN AND KAREN BUNDREN, APPELLEES On Appeal from the 393rd District Court Denton
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued July 10, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-13-00384-CV REGINALD L. GILFORD, SR., Appellant V. TEXAS FIRST BANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 10th District
More informationJustice Court Precinct 8 Judge Tom Gillam III Justice of the Peace JUSTICE COURT PROCEDURES SMALL CLAIMS
Justice Court Precinct 8 Judge Tom Gillam III Justice of the Peace JUSTICE COURT PROCEDURES SMALL CLAIMS Justice of the Peace Courts are courts in which parties can settle disputes in a speedy, informal
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-175-CV ANNE BOENIG APPELLANT V. STARNAIR, INC. APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY ------------ OPINION ------------
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 03-0655 444444444444 MARY R. DILLARD, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS COMMUNITY SURVIVOR OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH LEWIS DILLARD, DECEASED, AND MARY R. DILLARD A/N/F
More informationTHE BASSETT BULLETIN TM
Passion. Preparation. Persistence. Volume 8, Issue 15 THE BASSETT BULLETIN TM BIC FLICKS PRODUCT LIABILITY JUDGMENT In the second round of appeals of this product liability case, we learn that even if
More informationPLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT. Plaintiff Jo N. Hopper ( Plaintiff ) asks the Court to enter a final judgment based on the
FILED 3/30/2018 9:08 AM JOHN F. WARREN COUNTY CLERK DALLAS COUNTY CAUSE NO. PR-11-3238-1 IN RE: ESTATE OF MAX D. HOPPER, DECEASED JO N. HOPPER Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. STEPHEN B. HOPPER
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Appellant
Reverse and Remand; Opinion Filed April 9, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00653-CV BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Appellant V. TCI LUNA VENTURES, LLC AND
More informationReverse and Render in part; Affirm in part; Opinion Filed July 23, In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No.
Reverse and Render in part; Affirm in part; Opinion Filed July 23, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01269-CV TIFFANY LYNN FRASER, Appellant V. TIMOTHY PURNELL,
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed March 5, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01212-CV KHYBER HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant V. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE
More informationPrejudgment Interest and Other Judgment Battlegrounds
PRESENTED AT 25 th Annual Conference on State and Federal Appeals June 4 5, 2015 Austin, Texas Prejudgment Interest and Other Judgment Battlegrounds Anne M. Johnson Jason N. Jordan Author Contact Information:
More informationBREAKING THE IMPASSE The Unique Mediation Opportunity. Rodney A. Max
BREAKING THE IMPASSE The Unique Mediation Opportunity Upchurch Watson White & Max Rodney A. Max Mediation provides a unique opportunity for the parties as it relates to the opportunity of a negotiated
More informationRULE 7: CALENDAR CALL AND PRETRIAL MEMORANDA
RULE 7: CALENDAR CALL AND PRETRIAL MEMORANDA 7.1 Calendar Call and the Order of Cases: A call of the District Court jury trial calendar will be held in the designated court at 9:00 AM on the first day
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00363-CV Mark Buethe, Appellant v. Rita O Brien, Appellee FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-06-008044, HONORABLE ERIC
More informationThe Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series
The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series The American civil judicial system is slow, and imperfect, but many times a victim s only recourse in attempting to me made whole after suffering an injury. This
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, Civ. No (RHK/JJK) v. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
CASE 0:12-cv-00472-RHK-JJK Document 362 Filed 07/22/14 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jesse Ventura a/k/a James G. Janos, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 12-472 (RHK/JJK) v. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
More informationMISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT (St. Louis City)
MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT (St. Louis City) DAYNA CRAFT (withdrawn), DEBORAH LARSEN and WENDI ALPER-PRESSMAN, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
More informationContracts I Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas. Fall Optional HW Assignment #2
Contracts I Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Optional HW Assignment #2 1. Review Beall v. Beall (EMP 88) and Eastern Michigan University v. Burgess
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed April 22, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-11-01540-CV CADILLAC BAR WEST END REAL ESTATE AND L. K. WALES, Appellants V. LANDRY S RESTAURANTS,
More informationILLINOIS LAW MANUAL CHAPTER I CIVIL PROCEDURE. On June 11, 2003, Section was amended. The change specifically prohibits
If you have questions or would like further information regarding Joint and Several Liability, please contact: David Flynn 312-540-7662 dflynn@querrey.com Result Oriented. Success Driven. www.querrey.com
More informationNO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial)
NO. IN THE COUNTY COURT Plaintiff(s), V. AT LAW NO. 1 Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial) This Final Pretrial Submission must be filed no later than nine (9) days before
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00321-CV Reginald Baugh and Bobbie H. Baugh, Appellants v. James Allan Fleming and Melissa Hatfield Fleming, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 36
APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): Michael O. Azat, Esq.; Issa Y. Azat, Jr., Esq. For Defendant(s): Stanley H. Kimmel, Esq. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Jury Trial COURT TRIAL IN PROGRESS Trial resumes from 12/14/18
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JUNE 20, 2000
NO. 07-98-0387-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JUNE 20, 2000 DEAN E. LIVELY AND FOUR J INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, APPELLANTS V. ROBERT E. GARRETT AND RANDALL
More informationDUAL BREACHES. Doug Rees & Michelle Robberson Cooper & Scully, P.C. 2019
DUAL BREACHES Doug Rees & Michelle Robberson Cooper & Scully, P.C. 2019 1 2019 This paper and/or presentation provides information on general legal issues. I is not intended to give advice on any specific
More informationCAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MEMBERS OF THE JURY: You have found the Defendant, name, guilty of the offense of driving
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0967-17 PETER ANTHONY TRAYLOR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS COLLIN
More informationAPPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: MICHAEL O. BOHREN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 2, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear
More informationPast damages $3,500, Future damages $3,500, Medical expenses $358, Lost wages $147,633.29
BY: PIERRE GROSDIDIER 1 CALCULATING JUDGMENT AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AMOUNTS IN PROPORTIONATE RESPONSIBILITY CASES Judgment and pr ejudgment interest calculations in cases involving multiple parties,
More information* * * * * * * * Members of the Jury Panel [or Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury Panel]:
Misc. Docket No. 11-9047 AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 281 AND 284 AND TO THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS UNDER TEXAS RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 226A ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to Section 22.004 of the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 05-0916 444444444444 PLEASANT GLADE ASSEMBLY OF GOD, REVEREND LLOYD A. MCCUTCHEN, ROD LINZAY, HOLLY LINZAY, SANDRA SMITH, BECKY BICKEL, AND PAUL PATTERSON,
More informationDALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION ENERGY LAW SECTION
DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION ENERGY LAW SECTION December 17, 2016 Texas Nuisance Law After Crosstex v. Gardiner Charles W. Sartain Sonya Reddy Gray Reed & McGraw, P.C. 1601 Elm Street, Suite 4600 Dallas, Texas
More informationNO CV. JOHN GANNON, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee V. MATTHEW D. WIGGINS, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Opinion issued July 8, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-08-00994-CV JOHN GANNON, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee V. MATTHEW D. WIGGINS, Appellee/Cross-Appellant On Appeal
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued June 2, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-09-01093-CV KIM O. BRASCH AND MARIA C. FLOUDAS, Appellants V. KIRK A. LANE AND DANIEL KIRK, Appellees On Appeal
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. TRO-X, L.P., Appellant V. EAGLE OIL & GAS CO.
Reverse and Remand and Opinion Filed August 31, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00052-CV TRO-X, L.P., Appellant V. EAGLE OIL & GAS CO., Appellee On Appeal from
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 9, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00788-CV SOUTHWEST GALVANIZING, INC. AND LEACH & MINNICK, P.C. Appellants V. EAGLE FABRICATORS, INC.,
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
Reverse and Render and Opinion Filed August 20, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-11-00970-CV CTMI, LLC, MARK BOOZER AND JERROD RAYMOND, Appellants V. RAY FISCHER
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs, September 6, PEGGY J. COLEMAN v. DAYSTAR ENERGY, INC.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs, September 6, 2007 PEGGY J. COLEMAN v. DAYSTAR ENERGY, INC. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County No. L-15191 Hon.
More informationDomestic Violence Advocates as Expert Witnesses
Domestic Violence Advocates as Expert Witnesses NDCAWS/CASAND Advanced Legal Issues Training August 27-28, 2009 Bismarck, ND Presented by Robin Runge, Assistant Professor, University of North Dakota School
More informationOn the Frequency of Non-Unanimous Felony Verdicts In Oregon. A Preliminary Report to the Oregon Public Defense Services Commission
On the Frequency of Non-Unanimous Felony Verdicts In Oregon A Preliminary Report to the Oregon Public Defense Services Commission May 21, 2009 Overview The following is a preliminary report developed by
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 14, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01413-CV LAKEPOINTE PHARMACY #2, LLC, RAYMOND AMAECHI, AND VALERIE AMAECHI, Appellants V.
More informationAPPELLANTS REPLY BRIEF
Case No. 05-11-00967-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016688818 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 January 20 P4:27 Lisa Matz CLERK IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS at Dallas, Texas QUI PHUOC HO and TONG HO Appellants,
More informationDiscovery. Thea Whalen. Executive Director, TJCTC
Discovery Thea Whalen Executive Director, TJCTC Copyright 2017. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued July 26, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-16-00971-CV JULIUS TABE, Appellant V. TEXAS INPATIENT CONSULTANTS, LLLP, Appellee On Appeal from the 129th District
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00810-CV Laura CASTILLO and Armando Castillo Sr., Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Armando Castillo Jr., Appellants
More informationCase 2:06-cv CJB-SS Document 29 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO:
Case 2:06-cv-00585-CJB-SS Document 29 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CLIFTON DREYFUS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 06-585 ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued July 12, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-13-00204-CV IN RE MOODY NATIONAL KIRBY HOUSTON S, LLC, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
More information