CONTRACTS AND SALES QUESTION 1
|
|
- Kelly Greer
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CONTRACTS AND SALES QUESTION Peter responded to an advertisement placed by Della, a dentist, seeking a dental hygienist. After an interview, Della offered Peter the job and said she would either: () pay him $50,000 per year; or (2) pay him $40,000 per year and agree to convey to him a parcel of land, worth about $50,000, if he would agree to work for her for three consecutive years. Peter accepted the offer and said, I d like to go with the second option, but I would like a commitment for an additional three years after the first three. Della said, Good, I d like you to start next week. After Peter started work, Della handed him a letter she had signed which stated only that he had agreed to work as a dental hygienist at a salary of $40,000 per year. After Peter had worked for two years and nine months, Della decided that she would sell the parcel of land and not convey it to him. Even though she had always been satisfied with his work, she fired him. What rights does Peter have and what remedies might he obtain as to employment and the parcel of land? Discuss.
2 ANSWER TO QUESTION GOVERNING LAW The U.C.C. governs contracts for the sale of goods, and the common law governs all other contracts. These facts concern an employment and land sale contract; therefore, the common law applies. CONTRACT FORMATION The next issue is whether a valid contract was formed between Della and Peter. To form a valid contract there must be mutual assent (e.g., offer and acceptance) and consideration. Offer An offer is: (i) an expression of a promise, undertaking, or commitment to enter into a contract, (ii) with certain and definite terms, (iii) communicated to an offeree. The fact that an offer gives the offeree a choice of terms does not make it too uncertain. When the offeree accepts, the terms of the contract will be certain. Here, Della expressed a commitment to enter into a contract with Peter by stating that she would pay him $50,000 per year or $40,000 per year plus a parcel of land if he would agree to work for her for three years. The terms are sufficiently definite and certain since they include the nature of the work to be performed and the duration of the work. Della spoke directly to Peter. Thus, Della made a valid contract offer. Acceptance An acceptance is a manifestation of assent to the terms of the offer. The common law requires the absolute and unequivocal acceptance of each and every term of the offer (the mirror image rule). Any different or additional terms in the acceptance make the response a rejection and counteroffer. Peter purported to accept Della s offer of $40,000 per year and the parcel of land in exchange for his promise to work for her, but he changed the term of employment from three years to six. Thus, the purported acceptance was ineffective; instead, it constituted a rejection of Della s offer and a counteroffer to Della. Della s response of Good, I d like you to start next week, will likely be deemed an acceptance of Peter s counteroffer since by this communication Della seems to have accepted all of Peter s terms. Alternatively, Peter may argue that he accepted Della s three-year offer and then made a separate offer for an additional three years of employment, which Della accepted. This would result in two separate contracts, which would affect Peter s remedies. Consideration A contract requires consideration on both sides. Consideration is a bargained-for exchange involving legal value. One promise can be consideration for another promise. Here, Della promises to pay money and land, and Peter promises to work. Thus, there is consideration on both sides of the contract. [An examinee might raise the parol evidence rule as a bar to Peter s proving the terms of the contract. Under the parol evidence rule, if the parties to a contract express their agreement in a writing with the intent that it embody the final expression of their bargain, the writing is an integration. Any other expressions written or oral made prior to the writing, as well as any oral expressions contemporaneous with the writing, are inadmissible to vary the terms of the writing. Here, the only writing is the signed letter Della gave Peter when he started work stating that he had agreed to work as a hygienist for $40,000 per year. All of the terms Peter wishes to prove were agreed to prior to Della s letter. However, the parol evidence rule requires that the parties (not one party) intend a writing to be the final expression of their agreement. That is not the case here. There was no writing that the parties intended to memorialize their agreement.
3 CONTRACTS AND SALES There was only the letter prepared and signed by one party. Thus, the parol evidence rule does not come into play.] BREACH OF CONTRACT If a promisor is under an absolute duty to perform that has not been discharged, failure to perform in accordance with the contract terms is a breach of contract. The nonbreaching party must show that he is willing and able to perform but for the breaching party s failure to perform. Here, Della was under an absolute duty to pay Peter for six years work and to convey the tract of land to him. By firing him without cause and refusing to convey the land to him, Della breached the contract. Material Breach The next issue is whether the breach is material or minor. If the obligee has not received the substantial benefit of his bargain, the breach is considered material. If the breach is material, the nonbreaching party may treat the contract as at an end and may sue immediately for remedies for breach. Here, Peter did not receive the substantial benefit of his bargain. The total value of what he was to receive under the contract was $240,000 ($40,000 per year for six years) plus land worth $50,000. At the time of the breach, he had been paid at most $20,000. Thus, the breach was material, and Peter may sue Della. Modification Argument Della may argue that she did not breach the contract because her letter setting forth the agreement simply as one for employment for $40,000 per year was an attempted modification of the oral agreement. However, to be valid, a modification of a common law contract must be agreed to by both parties and be supported by consideration. Here, nothing indicates that Peter agreed to the modification (generally silence is not acceptance), and no consideration supports the purported agreement to modify. Thus a modification argument will fail, and Della will be found to be in breach. STATUTE OF FRAUDS Contracts Not Performable Within One Year and Interests in Land To be enforceable, certain agreements must be evidenced by a writing signed by the party sought to be bound. Agreements that must be evidenced by a writing under the Statute of Frauds include promises that by their terms cannot be completed within one year and agreements concerning an interest in land. Here, the contract involves a multi-year employment agreement, which by its terms cannot be completed within one year. Furthermore, the agreement involves title to a parcel of land. Therefore, to be enforceable against Della, the agreement must be evidenced by a writing signed by Della. Sufficiency of the Writing The contract itself need not be in writing, but there must be one or more writings signed by the party to be bound that reflect the essential terms of the contract. A memorandum signed by the party to be charged is adequate. The memorandum need not contain all of the terms of the contract but must evidence that there is a contract and state the essential terms with reasonable certainty. Which terms are essential depends on the circumstances, including the nature of the dispute between the parties. However, in the case of a land sale contract, a description of the land, the parties, and price are required. A contract for services must include the nature of the services and the duration. If the writing does not include the essential terms, it does not satisfy the Statute of Frauds and extrinsic evidence cannot be submitted to supply the missing terms. Since Peter is suing Della, Della is the party to be charged. The only writing signed by Della is the letter stating that Peter agreed to work as a dental hygienist at a salary of $40,000 per year.
4 The memorandum does not state the term of employment or describe the tract of land. Thus, essential terms are missing, and the writing cannot satisfy the Statute of Frauds. Performance Exceptions to Statute of Frauds Do Not Apply Full performance of a contract that cannot be performed within one year will usually take the contract out of the Statute of Frauds. Here, Peter did not fully complete his performance, so that exception does not apply. Similarly, there is an exception for part performance of land sale contracts if the performance unequivocally indicates a contract for the sale of land and two of the following are present: payment (in whole or part), possession, and valuable improvements. Here, Peter s performance was not unequivocal because it was more consistent with an employment contract than a land sale contract. Moreover, he had only one of the two necessary factors for the exception partial payment. Therefore, the part performance exception to the Statute of Frauds does not apply to this contract. Estoppel Estoppel is sometimes applied in cases where it would be inequitable to allow the Statute of Frauds to defeat a meritorious claim. When a defendant s conduct or promise foreseeably induces a plaintiff to change position in reliance on an oral agreement, courts may use the doctrine of promissory estoppel to remove the contract completely from the Statute of Frauds. Thus, to prevent injustice, the defendant is estopped from raising it as a defense. Here, Della told Peter that she would pay him $50,000 per year or $40,000 per year for six years and at the end of the third year she would convey the $50,000 tract of land to him. Della intended by her statement to induce Peter to work at the lower rate and thus could reasonably expect her promise to induce his action or forbearance. Peter did in fact detrimentally rely. Based on Della s promise, Peter did work for Della at the reduced rate of $40,000 per year for nearly three years; i.e., he changed position in reliance on her promise. Therefore, the court could find that Della is estopped from raising the Statute of Frauds as defense to Peter s suit. [An examinee might discuss equitable estoppel. It is available when there has been a fraudulent misrepresentation. A fraudulent misrepresentation requires that, at the time the statement was made, the speaker knew the assertion was untrue or lacked confidence the assertion was true and presented it as fact. Here, the facts state that Della changed her mind; so the statement was not fraudulent when made, and an equitable estoppel argument will fail.] DAMAGES If the court finds that Della is estopped from asserting the Statute of Frauds, Peter will be able to recover damages for Della s breach of contract. Damages should put the nonbreaching party in the position he would have been in had the contract been performed. For breach by an employer of an employment contract, the standard measure for the employee s damages is the full contract price. Here, Della, the employer, breached the employment contract by firing Peter. Thus, assuming that the contract was for six years, Peter should be able to collect the $40,000 per year salary for the remaining three years ($20,000) and three months ($0,000), as well as damages for the value of the land parcel. The standard measure of damages for breach of a land sale contract is the difference between the contract price and the fair market value of the land. So, Peter will be entitled to the return of his payment (roughly $30,000 $0,000 per year for three years) and the difference between the contract price ($30,000) and the fair market value of property (presumably $50,000). Thus, Peter should be able to recover $50,000 for the loss of the property ($30,000 returned payment plus $20,000 for difference between contract price and fair market value) in addition to the $30,000 in lost salary.
5 CONTRACTS AND SALES Avoidable Damages A nonbreaching party cannot recover avoidable damages. At issue is whether Peter could have procured a comparable job in the same locale. Therefore, Della may be able to reduce the damages owed to Peter if she can show that Peter could have taken a comparable job in the same locale. If she can show that such a job was available, Peter s damages will be reduced by the amount he would have earned from that comparable job. EQUITABLE REMEDIES If the court does not accept Peter s estoppel argument, the Statute of Frauds will prevent him from recovering damages at law, but he can still pursue equitable remedies (see, e.g., quasi-contract below). Specific Performance Specific performance is an equitable remedy in which a court orders a breaching party to perform that which he has promised to perform under the contract. It is available when damages are an inadequate remedy. Generally, employment contracts are not specifically enforceable by either the employee or the employer because of the difficulty of enforcement and the adequacy of damages. Thus, Peter cannot get specific performance as to his employment contract. He can, however, seek to specifically enforce the part of the contract involving the parcel of land. Land sale contracts are always specifically enforceable by the buyer because land is unique and damages are therefore inadequate. Statute of Frauds For an equity court to decree specific performance, there must be an enforceable contract. Because contracts involving an interest in land must be in writing to be enforced, Peter s contract falls within the Statute of Frauds. Since the contract is not in writing, Peter will have to show that an exception to the Statute applies. As discussed above, Peter most likely will convince the court that Della should be estopped from asserting the Statute of Frauds defense because she induced Peter to change his position in reliance on her promise. Conveyance to Bona Fide Purchaser If the land in a land sale contract has been sold to another who purchased it for value and in good faith (i.e., a bona fide purchaser), the right to specific performance is cut off. At issue here is whether Della has sold the property and, if so, whether the buyer is a bona fide purchaser. Specific performance is an equitable remedy, and a bona fide purchaser s equities are as strong as Peter s. Thus, even though Peter may be entitled to specific performance, if Della has sold the property to a bona fide purchaser, Peter will not be able to recover the tract of land. QUASI-CONTRACT Even if the contract were found to be unenforceable, Peter may be entitled to some type of restitutionary recovery. Restitution is a remedy used to prevent unjust enrichment. When a defendant receives a benefit as a result of an unenforceable contract, the defendant may be required to pay for her unjust gain. If services have been performed, the general measure of recovery is the value of the services. The contract rate is admissible as evidence of the value of services, but it is not conclusive. The value may be more or less. Here, Peter performed his employment services for Della s benefit. If those services are valued at more than $40,000 per year, to prevent Della s unjust enrichment, Peter will be entitled to recover the difference in the amount paid and the value of his services even if his services are valued at more than $50,000 per year or the value of the land.
6 QUESTION GOVERNING LAW Issue: Whether this is a contract for the sale of goods Rules: The common law governs all contracts other than those for the sale of goods Analysis and Conclusion: This is an employment and land sale contract, and the common law applies CONTRACT FORMATION Issue: Whether Peter accepted Della s offer or whether Della accepted Peter s offer Rules: To form a contract there must be mutual assent (e.g., offer and acceptance) and consideration Offer: (i) An offer is an expression of willingness to enter into a contract with definite and certain terms communicated to an offeree. (ii) The fact that an offer gives the offeree a choice of terms does not make it too uncertain. When the offeree accepts, the terms of the contract will be certain. (one point for each enumerated statement) 2 Acceptance: (i) Bonus: An acceptance is a manifestation of assent to the terms of the offer. (ii) The common law requires unequivocal acceptance of every term of the offer (mirror image rule); any different or additional terms in the acceptance make the response a rejection and counteroffer (one point for each enumerated statement) 2 Consideration: (i) Consideration is a bargained-for exchange involving legal value. (ii) A contract requires consideration on both sides. (iii) Bonus: One promise can be consideration for another promise (one point for each enumerated statement) 3 Analysis: (i) Della expressed a commitment to enter into a contract with Peter by stating that she would pay him $50,000 per year or $40,000 per year plus a parcel of land if he would agree to work for her for three years. (ii) The terms are sufficiently definite and certain, and she spoke directly to Peter. (iii) Thus, Della made a valid contract offer. (one point for each enumerated statement) 3 (i) Peter purported to accept Della s offer of $40,000 per year and the parcel of land in exchange for his promise to work for her. (ii) But Peter changed the term of employment from three years to six, which results in a rejection of Della s offer and a counteroffer. (iii) Della s response of Good, I d like you to start next week, will likely be deemed an acceptance of Peter s counteroffer. (one point for each enumerated statement) 3 Alternative analysis: (i) Peter accepted Della s three-year offer and then made a separate offer for an additional three years of employment, which Della accepted. (ii) This would result in two separate contracts. (one point for each enumerated statement) 2 Here, Della promises to pay money and land, and Peter promises to work; thus, there is consideration on both sides of the contract. Conclusion: There was an offer, acceptance, and consideration on both sides; thus a contract was formed BREACH OF CONTRACT Issue: Whether Peter received the substantial benefit of his bargain Rules: If a promisor is under an absolute duty to perform that has not been discharged, failure to perform in accordance with the contract terms is a breach of contract
7 CONTRACTS AND SALES Bonus: The nonbreaching party must show that he is willing and able to perform but for the breaching party s failure to perform (i) If the obligee has not received the substantial benefit of his bargain, the breach is considered material. (ii) If the breach is material, the nonbreaching party may treat the contract as at an end and may sue immediately for remedies for breach. (one point for each enumerated statement) 2 Analysis: (i) Della was under an absolute duty to pay Peter for six years work and to convey the tract of land to him. (ii) By firing him without cause and failing to convey the land to him, Della breached the contract. (iii) The total value of what Peter was to receive under the contract was $240,000 ($40,000 per year for six years) plus land worth $50,000. At the time of the breach, he had been paid at most $20,000. (one point for each enumerated statement) 3 Conclusion: Peter did not receive the substantial benefit of his bargain; thus, the breach was material, and Peter may sue Della ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS MODIFICATION Rules: A modification of a common law contract must be: (i) agreed to by both parties, and (ii) supported by consideration (one point for each enumerated statement) 2 Analysis: (i) Della presented Peter with a signed letter setting forth the agreement simply as one for employment for $40,000 per year. (ii) Nothing indicates that Peter agreed to a modification (generally silence is not acceptance), and (iii) no consideration supports the purported agreement to modify. (one point for each enumerated statement) 3 Conclusion: A modification argument will fail, and Della will be found to be in breach STATUTE OF FRAUDS Issues: Whether the contract is within the Statute of Frauds and whether the writing signed by Della would satisfy the Statute Rules: (i) Agreements within the Statute of Frauds include promises that by their terms cannot be completed within one year and agreements concerning an interest in land. (ii) There must be one or more writings signed by the party to be bound. (iii) The writing must evidence that there is a contract and state the essential terms with reasonable certainty. (iv) Bonus: Which terms are essential depends on the circumstances, including the nature of the dispute between the parties. (v) In the case of a land sale contract, a description of the land, the parties, and price are required. (vi) If the writing does not include the essential terms, it does not satisfy the Statute of Frauds and extrinsic evidence cannot be submitted to supply the missing terms. (one point for each enumerated statement) 6 Analysis: (i) The contract involves a multi-year employment agreement, which by its terms cannot be completed within one year and also involves title to a parcel of land. (ii) To be enforceable against Della, the agreement must be evidenced by a writing signed by Della. (iii) The only writing signed by Della is the letter stating that Peter agreed to work as a dental hygienist at a salary of $40,000 per year. (iv) The memorandum does not state the term of employment or describe the tract of land. (one point for each enumerated statement) 4 Conclusion: The essential terms are missing, and thus the writing cannot satisfy the Statute of Frauds PERFORMANCE EXCEPTION TO THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS Issues: Whether Peter s performance is sufficient to take the contract out of the Statute and whether Della could be estopped from asserting the Statute Rules: Bonus: Full performance of a contract that cannot be performed within one year will usually take the contract out of the Statute of Frauds
8 There is also an exception for part performance of land sale contracts if (i) the performance unequivocally indicates a contract for the sale of land and (ii) two of the following are present: payment (in whole or part), possession, and valuable improvements (one point for each enumerated statement) 2 Analysis: Bonus: Peter did not fully complete his performance, so the full performance exception for service contracts does not apply Peter s performance with respect to the land was not unequivocal (it was more consistent with an employment contract than a land sale contract) and he had only one of the two necessary factors for the part performance exception partial payment Conclusion: The part performance exception to the Statute of Frauds does not apply to this contract ESTOPPEL Issue: Whether Peter relied to his detriment on Della s promise or was fraudulently induced to make the agreement Rules: If a defendant s conduct or promise foreseeably induces a plaintiff to change position in reliance on an oral agreement, courts may use the doctrine of estoppel to remove the contract completely from the Statute of Frauds (i) Equitable estoppel is also available when there has been a fraudulent misrepresentation. (ii) A fraudulent misrepresentation requires that, at the time the statement was made, the speaker intended to induce the other party to enter the agreement and knew the assertion was untrue. (one point for each enumerated statement) 2 Analysis: Della falsely (and possibly intentionally) told Peter that she would pay him $40,000 per year for six years and at the end of the third year she would convey the $50,000 tract of land to him. Note: This point would be the same if the examinee found there were two contracts, but it might apply only to the first three-year contract. The facts state that Della changed her mind; so the statement was not fraudulent when made and equitable estoppel will not apply (i) Della intended by her statement to induce Peter to work at the lower rate and thus could reasonably expect her promise to induce his action or forbearance. (ii) Based on Della s promise, Peter worked for Della at the reduced rate of $40,000 per year for nearly three years; i.e., he changed position in reliance on her promise. (iii) Peter may invoke promissory estoppel. (one point for each enumerated statement) Conclusion: The court could find that Della is estopped from raising the Statute of Frauds as defense to Peter s suit DAMAGES Issue: The measure of damages for breach of an employment contract and a land sale contract Rules: Bonus: Damages should put the nonbreaching party in the position he would have been in had the contract been performed For breach by an employer of an employment contract, the standard measure for the employee s damages is the full contract price The standard measure of damages for breach of a land sale contract is the difference between the contract price and the fair market value of the land (i) A nonbreaching party cannot recover avoidable damages. (ii) If a breaching employer can prove that a comparable job in the same locale was available, contract damages for lost wages will be reduced by the wages that the plaintiff would have received from that comparable job. (one point for each enumerated statement) 2
9 CONTRACTS AND SALES Analysis: Assuming that the employment contract was for six years, Peter should be able to collect the $40,000 per year salary for the remaining three years ($20,000) and three months ($0,000), as well as damages for the value of the land parcel For the land, Peter will be entitled to the return of his payment (roughly $30,000 $0,000 per year for three years) and the difference between the contract price ($30,000) and the fair market value of property (presumably $50,000) If Della can show that Peter could have taken a comparable job in the same locale, Peter s damages will be reduced by the amount he would have earned from that comparable job Conclusion: Assuming no avoidable damages, Peter should be able to recover $50,000 for the loss of the property in addition to the $30,000 in lost salary Even if the examinee determined there were two separate contracts, the damages should be the same for breach of both contracts EQUITABLE REMEDIES SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE Issue: Whether Peter can force Della to rehire him or convey parcel Rules: Bonus: Specific performance is an equitable remedy in which a court orders a breaching party to perform that which he has promised to perform under the contract (i) Specific performance is available when damages are an inadequate remedy. (ii) Generally, employment contracts are not specifically enforceable. (one point for each enumerated statement) 2 (i) Land sale contracts are always specifically enforceable by the buyer because land is unique and damages are therefore inadequate. (ii) If the land in a land sale contract has been sold to another who purchased it for value and in good faith (i.e., a bona fide purchaser), the right to specific performance is cut off. (one point for each enumerated statement) 2 Analysis: Peter cannot get specific performance of his employment contract Because contracts involving an interest in land must be in writing to be enforced, Peter will have to show that an exception to the Statute applies to get specific performance of the land sale contract As discussed above, Peter most likely will convince the court that Della should be estopped from asserting the Statute of Frauds defense because she induced Peter to change his position in reliance on her promise (Points awarded only once; see Statute of Frauds, above) 0 Bonus: Specific performance is an equitable remedy, and a bona fide purchaser s equities are as strong as Peter s Even though Peter may be entitled to specific performance, if Della has sold the property to a bona fide purchaser, Peter will not be able to recover the tract of land Conclusion: Peter cannot get specific performance as to his employment contract, but he can seek to specifically enforce the land sale contract QUASI-CONTRACT Issue: Whether Peter can recover in restitution if the contract is unenforceable Rules: (i) Bonus: Restitution is a remedy used to prevent unjust enrichment. (ii) When a defendant receives a benefit as a result of an unenforceable contract, the defendant may be required to pay for unjust gain; (iii) if services have been performed, the general measure of recovery is the value of the services. (iv) Bonus: The contract rate is admissible as evidence of the value of services, but the value may be more or less. (one point for each enumerated statement) 4
10 Analysis: Peter performed his employment services for Della s benefit. If Peter s services are valued at more than $40,000 per year, to prevent Della s unjust enrichment, Peter can recover the difference in the amount paid and the value of his services even if his services are valued at more than $50,000 per year or more than the value of the land. Conclusion: If the contract is unenforceable, Peter may be entitled to recover the difference via restitution PASSING SCALE Raw Score 0-4 Significantly below passing 5-8 Below passing 9-28 Slightly below passing Passing Above passing 50+ Significantly above passing
Contracts Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Spring Contract Formation
Contracts Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Contract Formation I. Foundations A. Mutual Assent: Each party to a contract manifests its assent to the
More informationAnswer A to Question 1
Answer A to Question 1 The issue is whether Pat has a valid contract with Danco and whether Danco has breached such contract, and what damages Pat is entitled to as a result. Service Contract Contracts
More informationMBE WORKSHOP: CONTRACTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
MBE WORKSHOP: CONTRACTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: CONTRACTS Editor's Note 1: The below outline is taken from the National Conference of Bar Examiners' website. NOTE:
More informationContracts II Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Spring 2003
Contracts II Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Sample Exam Question #9 - Model Answer Jenny Beasley wants to sue her former employer, The Owl s Nest,
More informationGenuineness of Assent
Genuineness of Assent A party who demonstrates that she did not genuinely assent to the terms of a contract may avoid an otherwise valid contract. Genuine assent may be lacking due to mistake, fraudulent
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Contracts And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question On April 1, Pat, a computer software
More informationQuestion If CapCo files a lawsuit against the Bears seeking damages for breach of contract, who is likely to prevail? Discuss.
Question 2 CapCo sells baseball caps to youth leagues and recently approached two new teams, the Bears and the Lions. Uncertain how many caps the team would require, the Bears team manager signed a written
More informationCONTRACTS MID-TERM EXAMINATION December 2006 Santa Barbara/Ventura Colleges of Law Instructor: Craig Smith QUESTION 1
CONTRACTS MID-TERM EXAMINATION December 2006 Santa Barbara/Ventura Colleges of Law Instructor: Craig Smith QUESTION 1 Moe was a collector of exotic cars. One day he saw an ad in the classified section
More informationTYPES OF MONETARY DAMAGES
TYPES OF MONETARY DAMAGES A breach of contract entitles the non-breaching party to sue for money damages, including: Compensatory Damages: Damages that compensate the non-breaching party for the injuries
More informationIs there a contract?
1. te whether this transaction is governed by UCC or the Restatement. 2. Does the Statute of Frauds apply? The contract must be in writing if it is in regard to land, if by its nature it takes more than
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Contracts And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Berelli Co., the largest single
More informationContracts II Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Spring 2004
Contracts II Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Sample Exam Question #5 - Model Answer In the words of renowned contracts scholar Pete Townshend, A promise
More informationCreation of the K a. Statute of Frauds land part performance one year debt 500 b. Offer master of the offer revoke mailbox rule absence of terms
Contracts outline I. Creation of the K a. Statute of Frauds requires that a sufficient writing, signed by the party to be charged be in existence for the following subject-matter (doesn t apply to restitution
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Contracts And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question On May 1, Owner asked Builder
More informationQuestion 2. Delta has not yet paid for any of the three Model 100 presses despite repeated demands by Press.
Question 2 Delta Print Co. ( Delta ) ordered three identical Model 100 printing presses from Press Manufacturer Co. ( Press ). Delta s written order form described the items ordered by model number. Delta
More informationChapter 9: Contract Formation. Copyright 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning.
Chapter 9: Contract Formation a Copyright part of South-Western 2009 South-Western Cengage Legal Learning. Studies Business, Introduction is a declaration that something will or will not happen in the
More informationCONTRACTS Mid-Term Examination Santa Barbara College of Law Fall 2000 Instructor: Craig Smith. Time Allotted - Two Hours
CONTRACTS Mid-Term Examination Santa Barbara College of Law Fall 2000 Instructor: Craig Smith Time Allotted - Two Hours An answer should demonstrate your ability to analyze the facts presented by the question,
More informationBAREXAMDOCTOR.COM UNLIMITED ESSAYS AND PTS ONLINE! ESSAY APPROACH. Bar Exam Doctor. CONTRACTS ESSAY
ESSAY APPROACH www.barexamdoctor.com CONTRACTS ESSAY I. DOES THE UCC APPLY? a. The UCC governs all Ks for the sale of goods b. The UCC also has special rule governing transactions between merchants c.
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Contracts And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question PC manufactures computers. Mart
More informationChapter 11 Consideration and Promissory Estoppel 25-1
Chapter 11 Consideration and Promissory Estoppel 25-1 Consideration Consideration: something of legal value given in exchange for a promise Necessary for the existence of a contract Elements: Something
More informationCONTRACTS. Midterm Examination Santa Barbara College of Law Fall 2001 Instructor: Craig Smith. Time Allotted - Two Hours
Santa Barbara College of Law Fall 2001 Instructor: Craig Smith Time Allotted - Two Hours An answer should demonstrate your ability to analyze the facts presented by the question, to select the material
More informationFAQ: Elements of Establishing A Contract
Question 1: What is the procedure for analyzing a set of facts to establish the existence of a contract? Answer 1: The procedure involves an examination of the facts to determine whether each element of
More informationAlthough the costs of materials and labor are roughly equal, the primary purpose of the
Claim 1: Acme Flooring Applicable Law: Although the costs of materials and labor are roughly equal, the primary purpose of the contract was for rendering services because the service component of installation
More informationCONTRACT LAW. Elements of a Contract
CONTRACT LAW Contracts: Types and Sources in Australia CONTRACT: An agreement concerning promises made between two or more parties with the intention of creating certain legal rights and obligations upon
More informationREVIEW QUESTIONS TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS (CIRCLE THE CORRECT ANSWER)
REVIEW QUESTIONS TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS (CIRCLE THE CORRECT ANSWER) 1. T F The pre-offer phase of a transaction is also known as preliminary negotiation. 2. T F Preliminary negotiation takes place after
More informationQuestion 1. Is there adequate consideration for Chip Co s agreements above-described with Pam, Dave, Bob and Silicon, Inc.? Discuss.
Question 1 Ted is the President of Chip Co, a small company that makes computer chips for the secondary personal computer market. In the regular course of Chip Co s business Ted did the following: Ted
More informationQUESTION 1. Carl said, Let me think a moment.
QUESTION 1 Zena placed an advertisement in a local newspaper: Wanted: Someone to clean my four-bedroom, four-bath house (2500 square feet) once a week for the next month; pay $35 per hour. No interview
More informationCONTRACTS Ponoroff 2016
A. Contract Law (Overview) a. Contract The promise or set of promises that the law recognizes by way of enforcement. i. Promise The liability involved in contract law is undertaken intentionally by the
More informationA) Preliminaries B) Formation
Contracts Page 1 of 12 A) Preliminaries 1) Governing law The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) governs transactions that are predominantly for goods (movable property, identifiable to the contract at formation),
More informationSpring 2018 Business Law Fundamentals O'Hara 2018 D
Page 1 of 7 as your signature PRINT your name EXAM #2 Business Law Fundamentals LAWS 3930 sections -001, -002-003 Chapters 1-4, 24, 6, 7, 9-19 INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Affix your printed name as your signature
More informationa) The body of law as made by judges through the determination of cases. d) The system of law that emerged following the Norman Conquest in 1066.
1. Who of the following was NOT a proponent of natural law? a) Aristotle b) Jeremy Bentham c) St Augustine d) St Thomas Aquinas 2. The term 'common law' has three different meanings. Which of the following
More informationOVERVIEW OF CONTRACT LAW
OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT LAW Liability is generally the key issue in regards to contractual disputes. Purpose of K law is to provide the rules which determine when one party is liable to another under or in
More informationCONTRACT LAW SUMMARY
CONTRACT LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL UK CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO CONTRACT LAW 6 DEFINITION OF CONTRACT LAW 6 1) The Classical Model of Contract Law 6 INTENTION TO CREATE LEGAL RELATIONS 8 INTRODUCTION TO INTENTION
More informationCONTRACTS TOPIC OUTLINE1
CONTRACTS TOPIC OUTLINE1 1. OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE a. offer defined b. preliminary negotiations c. advertisements d. unilateral offer e. who may accept an offer f. irrevocable offer g. material terms h.
More informationCONTRACT LAW IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC
CONTRACT LAW IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC Jennifer Corrin Care Senior Lecturer TC Beirne School of Law University of Queensland Cavendish Publishing Limited London Sydney CONTENTS Preface Table of Cases Table
More informationCONTRACTS FINAL EXAMINATION Santa Barbara/Ventura Colleges of Law Spring 2013 Instructor Craig Smith QUESTION 1
CONTRACTS FINAL EXAMINATION Santa Barbara/Ventura Colleges of Law Spring 2013 Instructor Craig Smith QUESTION 1 Peter and Paula had purchased a home by taking out a loan secured by a mortgage on the home.
More informationPrinciples of European Contract Law
Article 1:101: Application of the Principles Principles of European Contract Law CHAPTER 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1: Scope of the Principles (1) These Principles are intended to be applied as general
More informationA
Contracts with Vincent Rougeau in Spring 2008 1. Basic Theories 1.1. Classical Theory - Neutral principles can be instilled from cases 1.1.1. Characteristics 1.1.1.1. Preference for clear rules over general
More informationQuestion 3. Sam hereby agrees that he will not perform interior design services in Town for a period of two years.
Question 3 Sam decided to sell his interior design business in Town to Betty. While reviewing a purchase agreement drafted by Sam, Betty insisted on a covenant by Sam not to compete with her in the interior
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Contracts And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Travelco ran a promotional advertisement
More informationTITLE 7 CONTRACTS TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE 7 CONTRACTS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 7.01 General Provisions 7.0101 Definition 1 7.0102 Essential elements of a contract 1 7.0103 Law of place applied to contracts 1 7.0104 Time of performance 1
More informationTable of Contents. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION by Eugenia G. Carter. I. Scope [ 1.1]
Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION by Eugenia G. Carter I. Scope [ 1.1] II. Background [ 1.2] A. Definition of a Contract [ 1.3] B. Freedom of Contract [ 1.4] III. Sources of Contract Law [ 1.5]
More informationMemorandum. To: Remedies Class Fall Date: December 2004
To: Remedies Class Fall 2004 Memorandum From: Mike Allen Date: December 2004 Subject: Final Exam I have set out in this memorandum my thoughts about the essay questions on the final examination. To be
More informationChapter 14 Statute of Frauds and Equitable Exceptions 25-1
Chapter 14 Statute of Frauds and Equitable Exceptions 25-1 Statute of Frauds for Common Contracts Statute of Frauds: A state statute that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing 14-2 Contracts
More informationCONTRACT VS. PROMISE
CONTRACT VS. PROMISE Promise: A person s declaration that he will perform or refrain from performing some present or future act. Promisor: The person making the promise. Promisee: The person to whom the
More informationSimple. CONTRACTS & UCC Outline. NINETY PERCENT of the LAW in NINETY PAGES. Tim Tyler, Ph.D., Attorney at Law
NAILING THE BAR Simple CONTRACTS & UCC Outline Tim Tyler, Ph.D., Attorney at Law NINETY PERCENT of the LAW in NINETY PAGES NAILING THE BAR Simple CONTRACTS & UCC Outline Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: CONTRACT
More informationChinese Contract Law: A Brief Introduction. ZHANG Xuezhong. Assistant Professor of Law.
Chinese Contract Law: A Brief Introduction ZHANG Xuezhong Assistant Professor of Law zhangxuezhong@ecupl.edu.cn East China University of Politics and Law Overview 1. In General 2. Principles of Chinese
More informationDefine genuine agreement and rescission. Identify when duress occurs. Describe how someone may exercise undue influence.
Define genuine agreement and rescission Identify when duress occurs Describe how someone may exercise undue influence. Genuine Agreement/Assent: meeting of the minds Must be willful and voluntary Must
More informationContract Law. 2. Contract formation: a) mutual assent: offer & acceptance b) consideration: need to have an exchange of something.
Contract Law Jan 18th, 2012: 1. Sources of law: -statutory law: United Commercial Code, uniformed state law; (only for sales of goods, does not require parties to be merchants) -common law; -restatement:
More informationPromissory Estoppel : Applicability on Govt - By Divya Bhargava Tuesday, 10 November :48 - Last Updated Wednesday, 11 November :01
The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel is an equitable doctrine. This principle is commonly invoked in common law in case of breach of contract or against a Government. The doctrine is popularly called as
More informationLaw of Contracts. Determining Contractual Intent. Offer. 6 Elements of Legally Enforceable Contracts
6 Elements of Legally Enforceable Contracts Law of Contracts 1. Offer and Acceptance 2. Genuine Assent 3. Legal Purpose Business Law Chapters 6-11 4. Consideration (Exchange of value) 5. Capacity to Contract
More information--- N.E.2d ---- FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY Page N.E.2d ----, 2007 WL (Ill.App. 1 Dist.) (Cite as: --- N.E.2d ----) Nov. 13, 2007.
--- N.E.2d ---- FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY Page 1 Ross v. May Co. Ill.App. 1 Dist.,2007. Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. Appellate Court of Illinois,First District, Second Division. Gary
More informationContents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. The Agreement to Contract
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases Chapter 1: The Agreement to Contract 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Elements required for a valid simple contract 1.3 The phenomenon of agreement
More informationv No Wayne Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S JOWHARA ZINDANI and GAMEEL ZINDANI, Plaintiff-Appellees, UNPUBLISHED March 20, 2018 v No. 337042 Wayne Circuit Court NAGI ZINDANI and ANTESAR ZINDANI,
More informationContracts II Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Spring Optional Homework #1 - Model Answers
Contracts II Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Optional Homework #1 - Model Answers 1. Read King v. Trustees of Boston University, 647 N.E.2d 1196 (Mass.
More informationWald v Graev 2014 NY Slip Op 32433(U) September 15, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases
Wald v Graev 2014 NY Slip Op 32433(U) September 15, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652461/2013 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationTermination of an Offer
Termination of an Offer Lapse! If the offer contains a time limit, then it lapses according to the explicit provisions! Offer must be accepted by midnight tonight.! If the offer does not contain a time
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE 10 TH DISTRICT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN 161 East Michigan Avenue, Battle Creek, MI Case No.
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE 10 TH DISTRICT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN 161 East Michigan Avenue, Battle Creek, MI 49014 BERNARD F. ZEITLER, II, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 13-4319-GC 2 MOON PRESS, LLC, MELINDA
More informationCHAPTER 8: GENUINE AGREEMENT
CHAPTER 8: GENUINE AGREEMENT GENUINE AGREEMENT AND RESCISSION A valid offer and valid acceptance generally results in an enforceable contract. If one of the parties used physical threats to acquire the
More informationREVIEW QUESTIONS TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS (CIRCLE THE CORRECT ANSWER)
REVIEW QUESTIONS TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS (CIRCLE THE CORRECT ANSWER) 1. T F When a court or legislature protects a class, this protection extends to all members of that class in every contractual transaction.
More informationMISTAKE. (1) the other party to the contract knew or should have known of the mistake; or
MISTAKE Mistake of Fact: The parties entered into a contract with different understandings of one or more material facts relating to the contract s performance. Mutual Mistake: A mistake by both contracting
More informationPearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England and Associated Companies throughout the world
Pearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England and Associated Companies throughout the world Visit us on the World Wide Web at: www.pearsoned.co.uk Pearson Education Limited 2014
More informationContracts Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Spring Contract Terms
Contracts Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Contract Terms I. Construing and Interpreting Contracts A. Purpose: A court s primary concern is to ascertain
More informationPART 2 FORMATION, TERMS, AND READJUSTMENT OF CONTRACT. (a) A contract or modification thereof is enforceable,
1 PART 2 FORMATION, TERMS, AND READJUSTMENT OF CONTRACT SECTION 2-201. NO FORMAL REQUIREMENTS. (a) A contract or modification thereof is enforceable, whether or not there is a record signed by a party
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOHNNY S-LIVONIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED May 19, 2015 v No. 320430 Wayne Circuit Court LAUREL PARK RETAIL PROPERTIES, LLC., LC No. 12-012704-CZ Defendant-Appellee.
More informationContracts Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Spring Contract Terms (Expanded)
Contracts Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Contract Terms (Expanded) I. Construing and Interpreting Contracts A. Purpose: A court s primary concern
More informationAstor Place, LLC v NYC Venetian Plaster Inc NY Slip Op 31801(U) September 28, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15
Astor Place, LLC v NYC Venetian Plaster Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 31801(U) September 28, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651978/15 Judge: Barry Ostrager Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO 201B jul q P 12 5^
104500613 RODGER SAFFOLD, II Plaintiff 104500613. f' c IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO 201B jul q P 12 5^ Case No: CV-17-878065 CLERK OF COURTS CUYAHOGA COUNTY Judge: JOHN P O'DONNELL
More informationSchon Family Found. v Brinkley Capital Ltd NY Slip Op 33027(U) November 27, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015
Schon Family Found. v Brinkley Capital Ltd. 2018 NY Slip Op 33027(U) November 27, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653664/2015 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationNo. 115,460 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. and. TUBULAR & EQUIPMENT SERVICES, LLC, Appellant, and. WAYNE E. BRIGHT, Appellee.
No. 115,460 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS JAMES S. CUDE, JR., LISA CUDE, and ROBERT ANDERSON, Guardian and Conservator of RUTH ELEANOR CUDE, Appellees, v. TUBULAR & EQUIPMENT SERVICES,
More informationGenuine Agreement (Genuine Assent)
Chapter 7 Genuine Agreement (Genuine Assent) Business Law Ms. Turner Genuine Agreement (Genuine Assent) Agreement to enter into a contract that is evidenced by words or conduct between parties If there
More informationPetitioner Physicians' Reciprocal Insurers ("PRI") in the above-captioned proceeding.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU ---------------------------------------------------------------- x PHYSICIANS' RECIPROCAL INSURERS, ADMINISTRATORS FOR THE PROFESSIONS, INC., Petitioner,
More informationCase 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12
Case 0:17-cv-60089-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL PANARIELLO, individually and on behalf
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------x ARTEMUS USA LLC, INDEX NO. Plaintiff, - against - SUMMONS PAUL KASMIN GALLERY,
More informationTwomey Jennings: Anderson s Business Law, 23 e End of Chapter: CPA Questions and Answers
March 17, 2016 Twomey Jennings: Anderson s Business Law, 23 e End of Chapter: CPA Questions and Answers CORRECT ANSWERS IN BOLDFACE. Chapter 9: Intellectual Property Rights and the Internet 1. Multicomp
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Contracts And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Betty is a physician. One of her
More information1:15-cv JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
1:15-cv-01511-JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION Robert K. Besley, Jr., on behalf of himself ) and
More informationUNIDROIT PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS 2004 (I)
UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS 2004 (I) PREAMBLE (Purpose of the Principles) These Principles set forth general rules for international commercial contracts. They shall be applied
More informationContract Law Final Exam Version C
Contract Law Final Exam Version C True/False Indicate whether the statement is true or false. 1. Compliance and excuse are valid defenses to a breach of contract action. 2. To have a constructive or implied
More informationUniversity of Miami School of Law. CONTRACTS PROFESSOR ROBERT ROSEN Fall Syllabus 1
University of Miami School of Law CONTRACTS PROFESSOR ROBERT ROSEN Fall 2007 Syllabus 1 [Unless otherwise indicated, all page # s refer to MACAULEY, ET.AL. CONTRACTS: LAW IN ACTION (2 ND ED., 2003)]. YOU
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon. Defendants. /
2:17-cv-10413-AJT-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/08/17 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1 SPORTS MANAGEMENT NETWORK, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, KURT BUSCH, INC.
More informationTHE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS
2014 UT App 35 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ROBERT CARDON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JEAN BROWN RESEARCH AND JEAN BROWN, Defendants and Appellees. Memorandum Decision No. 20120575-CA Filed February 13,
More informationIn the Court of Appeals of Georgia
SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., DOYLE, P. J. and MILLER, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0147 Todd Anderson, Appellant, vs. Patricia Lloyd,
More informationFebruary 2014 Bar Examination Sample Answers
February 2014 Bar Examination Sample Answers DISCLAIMER These are actual answers to essay and MPT items that were written by applicants during this Bar examination. Each of these answers received a high
More informationBenedetto v Mercer 2012 NY Slip Op 33347(U) July 30, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2012 Judge: Ellen M.
Benedetto v Mercer 2012 NY Slip Op 33347(U) July 30, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150122/2012 Judge: Ellen M. Coin Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More information10/29/2007 7:36:00 PM
10/29/2007 7:36:00 PM I. Article 2 Sales of Goods II. Contractual Assent/Intent & Objective Test A. Contracts are formed by mutual consent. Both parties must intend to enter the contract and agree on its
More informationContract Law for Paralegals: Chapter 2 Chapter 2
Contract Law for Paralegals: Chapter 2 Chapter 2 Tab Text CHAPTER 2 The Offer Phase Chapter 2 is in three parts: (1) the classical offer-the promisor s promise and consideration for that promise; (2) alternatives
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK ) CASE NO. CV 13 801976 ) ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) HINDA T. APPLE ) JOURNAL ENTRY GRANTING ) HUNTINGTON
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 2 January 2007
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Business Associations And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Testco, Inc. conducts
More informationBeginning Law Essay Writing Part 2 Professor Mary Schofield
Beginning Law Essay Writing Part 2 Professor Mary Schofield The following pages provide hard copies of the hypothetical used during this session, as well as a copy of the sample answer discussed. I suggest
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS TAURUS MOLD, INC, a Michigan Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED January 13, 2009 v No. 282269 Macomb Circuit Court TRW AUTOMOTIVE US, LLC, a Foreign LC No.
More informationFULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. CONTRACTS
FULL OUTLINE www.barexamdoctor.com CONTRACTS I. VOCABULARY a. K = legally enforceable agreement (or legally enforceable promise) b. Quasi-K = equitable remedy. NOT K law. i. Elements: 1. P has conferred
More informationScaglione v Castle Restoration & Constr., Inc NY Slip Op 33727(U) April 27, 2010 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Orin R.
Scaglione v Castle Restoration & Constr., Inc. 2010 NY Slip Op 33727(U) April 27, 2010 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 700014/09 Judge: Orin R. Kitzes Republished from New York State Unified Court
More informationIntroduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 Introduction to Contracts 1 Exhibit 9.1 (page 225) 2 In Chronological Order 3 1 Second 4 Third 5 Fourth 6 2 Exhibit 9.1 (page 225) 7 The Four Essential Elements of a (Valid) Contract 1. Agreement
More informationConcord University School of Law Practice Essay
Concord University School of Law Practice Essay Instructions: This is a timed practice, and you should take no more than one hour to complete this exercise. Set a timer and allow no interruptions. Before
More informationQuestion Of what crimes, if any, can Pete be convicted? Discuss.
Question 2 Pete is a salesperson at XYZ Real Estate Company ( XYZ ). Vic owned a parcel of industrial real estate that he wanted to sell. Vic retained Pete as his agent to sell the parcel for him, and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2007 ACTION NO. 303 OF 2003 KENNETH GALE Plaintiff BETWEEN AND WILLIAM EILEY Defendant BEFORE the Honourable Abdulai Conteh, Chief Justice. Mr. Leo Bradley for the
More informationContents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. The Agreement to Contract
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases Chapter 1: The Agreement to Contract 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Elements required for a valid simple contract 1.3 The phenomenon of agreement
More information