CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CHARTER COURSE SYLLABUS
|
|
- Richard Dickerson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CHARTER COURSE SYLLABUS COURSE INFORMATION Time: Wednesdays, 2:00pm-3:00pm Fridays, 1:30pm-2:30pm Location: Room 122 INSTRUCTOR INFORMATION: Dr. Bethany Hastie Allard Hall, Room COURSE DESCRIPTION This full year course provides an introduction to Canadian constitutional law. In this section of Canadian Constitutional Law, we will examine the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. We will spend the first half of the course learning the architecture of the Charter: to whom, when, and how it applies, its scope and limitations, and its remedial options. We will then examine two substantive Charter rights, exploring their nature, scope and limitations: freedom of expression under section 2(b), and the section 7 guarantee to life, liberty and security of the person. 2. COURSE OBJECTIVES This course aims to: Introduce students to Canadian constitutional law, and to the place and purpose of the Charter within our broader constitutional framework. Introduce students to the nature and structure of the Charter and its application. Explore key substantive Charter rights and their evolution within Canadian jurisprudence. Provide an opportunity for critical engagement with fundamental constitutional law concepts through course readings and in-class participation. 3. READING MATERIALS Required text: Canadian Constitutional Law, 4 th ed (Toronto: Emond Montgomery, 2010). Additional readings for the course are posted on the course s Connect website. Please note that readings and cases listed in the course schedule are only a starting point for our work in class. During each lecture, additional material may be introduced, and the ideas and arguments in both the readings and cases discussed and developed. Students should assume that 1 of 10
2 all the material in the reading and discussed in class is examinable. Students are strongly encouraged to attend all classes and take detailed notes. 4. COURSE EVALUATION This course will be evaluated through an examination in April Detailed information on the examination for this course will be provided at a later date. Please note that I have no discretion regarding deferral of examinations or other assessments; a request for deferment of or accommodation for any assignment or examination must be made to the Examinations Committee. For policies related to accommodation requests, please see: 5. GRADING CRITERIA The grading in this course must conform to the Faculty of Law s grading and mark distribution rules. The Faculty of Law provides the following general grading guidelines: 80% to 100% (A- to A+): Exceptional/Excellent performance: strong evidence of original thinking; good organization; capacity to analyze and synthesize; superior grasp of subject matter with sound critical evaluations; evidence of extensive knowledge base. 68% to 79% (B- to B+): Competent/Good performance: evidence of grasp of subject matter; some evidence of critical capacity and analytic ability; reasonable understanding of relevant issues; evidence of familiarity with the readings. 55% to 67% (C- to C+): Adequate/Satisfactory performance: understanding of the subject matter; ability to develop solutions to simple problems in the material; acceptable but uninspired work, not seriously faulty but lacking style and vigour. 50% to 54% (D): Barely adequate understanding, serious flaws, inability to communicate course content. 00% to 49% (F): Inadequate performance: little or no evidence of understanding of the subject matter; weakness in critical and analytic stills; limited or irrelevant use of the material in answers. 6. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY All students are subject to the University s rules on Academic Misconduct: All students are subject to these rules, and are expected to act with academic integrity at all times. 2 of 10
3 Students should be particularly attuned to the University s rules regarding plagiarism ( Plagiarism includes: copying or paraphrasing from another author or source without proper footnoting; copying work from another student; copying your own work used for another course either during this degree or another degree; or otherwise passing off the ideas of another person as your own. Plagiarism is a serious offence; any student caught plagiarizing will be subject to penalties set out in the UBC calendar: Academic honesty is an essential requirement in an institution of higher learning. Academic misconduct may have serious implications not only for your education, but also for your future career in law. Students are encouraged to consult the following resources guide on academic integrity: 7. CLASSROOM EXPECTATIONS The classroom is intended to provide a safe, open and respectful space for the exchange of ideas and collaborative learning. All students are expected to maintain a respectful and professional demeanor in the classroom. Timely attendance is expected in this course. However, if you arrive late or have to leave early on occasion, please endeavor to avoid disrupting the classroom as much as possible. Please ensure that all cell phones are turned off during class. Portable music devices are not permitted in the classroom. Students who are observed to repeatedly use their laptops for nonacademic purposes (Facebook, Twitter, , etc.) during class may be asked to leave the classroom and may result in a reduction of your participation mark. Please do not record lectures without prior permission from the instructor. If you require any accommodations in the classroom, please do not hesitate to contact me. 8. COMMUNICATION Students are encouraged to me with questions and/or to make an appointment to discuss any questions or queries related to the course in person. I will strive to respond to all s promptly, ideally within hours. Please note that if a response to your inquiry cannot be sufficiently answered in a few sentences, I will request that you make an appointment to see me in person to discuss the matter. I will communicate with the class as needed through our course website on Connect and its system. Please ensure you have the correct assigned in Connect and to your UBC account. 3 of 10
4 9. SCHEDULE AND DESCRIPTION OF CLASSES Wk Date Topic, & Class 1 January 6 Introduction to the Charter Casebook, pp Today s class introduces us to the ongoing debates and positions surrounding the Charter, and its place and purpose in Canadian law and society. This class will serve as an introduction to the multiplicity of issues we will explore throughout the course. January 8 The Framework of the Charter Casebook, pp Frank Iacobucci, The Charter: Twenty Years Later (2002) 21 Windsor YB Access Just 3. This class will provide a basic overview of the framework of the Charter, which we will go on to explore in greater depth throughout the course. Today s class will focus particularly on the approach taken to the interpretation of rights under the Charter. The article by Justice Iacobucci builds on an understanding of the interpretation of rights under the Charter by considering its influence, impact and evolutionary relationship within Canada. 2 January 13 Applicability of the Charter Casebook, pp RWDSU v Dolphin Delivery McKinney v University of Guelph Godbout v Longueuil Today s class will begin our examination of the applicability of the Charter who it applies to, what kind of conduct or acts it applies to, and who is protected by it. Today we will focus on who the Charter applies to, and particularly, on who is included as a government actor under s.32. January 15 Applicability of the Charter Casebook, pp Eldridge v British Columbia (Attorney General) Vriend v Alberta Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto 4 of 10
5 Today we continue our examination of applicability issues, focusing on what kinds of conduct or action are subject to Charter scrutiny. We will also consider the application of the Charter to the courts and the common law. 3 January 20 Applicability of the Charter Casebook, pp Canada v Khadr, 2008 SCC 28. Singh v Minister of Employment and Immigration, [1985] 1 SCR 177 at , Today we will consider issues surrounding territoriality, as well as who is protected by the Charter. While we will continue to explore issues of protection in the topics of standing and in respect of substantive rights later in the course, today s class will focuses on preliminary understandings of protection based on the citizenship status and territorial location of individuals through the Khadr and Singh cases. January 22 Standing: Who Can Raise Charter Issues? Casebook, pp54-55, R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 SCR 295 at , Minister of Justice (Can.) v. Borowski, [1981] 2 SCR 575. Charter, s24(1), s52(1). This class will outline the issue and approach to standing who can raise a Charter challenge. In this class, we will canvass the basic principles and issues related to standing. 4 January 27 Standing: Who Can Raise Charter Issues? Jane Bailey, Reopening Law's Gate: Public Interest Standing and Access to Justice (2011) 44:2 UBC L Rev 255. Canada (Attorney General) v. Downtown Eastside Sex Workers United Against Violence Society, 2012 SCC 45. Building from our previous class on standing, today we will focus on the issue of public interest standing, and the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in SWUAV. January 29 No Class Reorientation Day 5 of 10
6 5 February 3 Defining Limitations: Section 1 Casebook, pp R v Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society R v Oakes Today we will begin discussing limitations on the protection of Charter rights. An infringement on a Charter right may be justified under section 1. This reflects the balanced and purposive approach taken to understanding fundamental rights in Canada. Today, we will discuss the two elements laid out under section 1: that limits are prescribed by law and that the limits are demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society. In respect of the latter element, we will focus on the R v Oakes, which sets out the test for determining a reasonable and justifiable infringement under section 1. February 5 Defining Limitations: Section 1 Casebook, pp Edmonton Journal v Alberta Irwin Toy Ltd v Quebec Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony, 2009 SCC 37, paras 1-13, This class will explore the developments and evolution of the Oakes test since its development nearly 30 years ago. The casebook provides an overview of its development during this time, while the Alberta v Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony case discusses the issue of minimal impairment in greater depth, and provides an updated view of the court in respect of section 1. 6 February 10 Remedies and Enforcement of Rights Casebook, pp Schachter v Canada Vriend v Alberta M v H Today s class will introduce the remedial options available where a Charter rights is infringed and not saved by section 1. We will focus in this first class on remedies under s.52 nullification of laws. We will canvass the court s options of reading in, reading down and striking down legislation under this section. February 12 Remedies and Enforcement of Rights Casebook, pp Canada v Hislop 6 of 10
7 7 February 17 R. v. Ferguson, 2008 SCC 6, paras Today s class will continue our exploration on remedies under s.52 declarations of invalidity. This class will discuss issues of retroactive versus prospective relief, as set out in the Hislop case. We will also discuss constitutional exemptions in the Ferguson case, and the use of temporary suspensions on declarations of invalidity that courts employ as part of their institutional dialogue with Parliament. No Class Reading Week February 19 8 February 24 Remedies and Enforcement of Rights No Class Reading Week Casebook, pp Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v Canada Doucet-Boudreau v Nova Scotia Vancouver (City) v. Ward, 2010 SCC 27 Today s class focuses on remedies available under s.24(1) of the Charter the ability for courts to grant such remedies as it considers appropriate and just in the circumstances to individuals for breaches of their Charter rights. Little Sisters and Doucet-Boudreau set out the primary principles and elements of determining an appropriate remedy under s.24(1). Ward considers the specific remedial option of damages under s.24(1). February 26 Freedom of Expression: Overview Casebook, pp R v Keegstra RWDSU v Dolphin Delivery Irwin Toy Ltd v Quebec Today s class will introduce the right to freedom of expression guaranteed under s.2(b) of the Charter. We will discuss the purpose of the guarantee, as well as its general scope and limits. 9 March 2 Freedom of Expression: Hate Speech Casebook, pp R v Keegstra Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott, 2013 SCC 11, paras 8-11, , of 10
8 In today s class, we will examine another particular category of jurisprudence in relation to freedom of expression: hate speech. In addition to canvassing what constitutes hate speech, and how this is balanced against the right to freedom of expression, the readings for today also consider some distinct features of Canada s approach to this issue, compared to other countries like the United States. March 4 Freedom of Expression: Explicit Expression Casebook, pp R v Butler R v Labaye Today s class focuses on the regulation of sexually explicit expression. Like with hate speech, this category requires courts to balance freedom of expression against criminal offences enacted to protect against specific and societal harms. 10 March 9 Freedom of Expression: Access to Public Property Casebook, pp Montreal (City) v Quebec Inc Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority v. Canadian Federation of Students British Columbia Component, 2009 SCC 31, paras 1-12, Having canvassed some of the substantive issues pertaining to freedom of expression, today s class will focus on exploring issues related to the geographic or territorial space in which communication or freedom of expression occurs. March 11 Section 7: Principles of Fundamental Justice Casebook, pp Reference re Section 94(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford, 2013 SCC 72, paras 1-6, Peter Hogg, The Brilliant Career of Section 7 of the Charter (2012), 58 S.C.L.R. (2d) 195. Today s class will introduce section 7, the right to life, liberty and security of the person. In particular, we will focus on the meaning ascribed to the principles of fundamental justice under section 7. The excerpt from Reference re Section 94(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act presents a discussion on the meaning of principles of fundamental justice from early Charter jurisprudence. As the court notes in Bedford, this meaning has evolved over the 30 years of Charter jurisprudence in many ways, and today focuses particularly on identifying three potential issues: 8 of 10
9 arbitrariness, overbreadth, and gross disproportionality, each of which are discussed in both Beford and the Hogg article. 11 March 16 Section 7: Bodily Integrity and Security of the Person Casebook, pp R v Morgentaler R v Rodriguez In this class, we will begin examining cases related to the protection of bodily integrity and dignity with the Morgentaler and Rodriguez decisions. Though characterized more traditionally as topics dealing with bodily integrity, notions of dignity and decisional autonomy are more prevalent in discussions on these and related topics today, and so we can examine and understand how these decisions articulate important principles under section 7 related not only to bodily integrity in the strict sense, but to broader ideas about human dignity and personal autonomy. March 18 Section 7: Bodily Integrity and Security of the Person Carter v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5. Building from our discussion of Rodriguez, today s class will discuss the recent Carter decision at the Supreme Court of Canada. We will consider how section 7 jurisprudence evolved in the time span between these two decisions, as well as the importance of evolving social understandings or changing social conditions, scientific data, and other evidence relevant to assessing the Charter claim. 12 March 23 Section 7: Decisional Autonomy and Liberty Casebook, pp B(R) v Children s Aid Society Blencoe v British Columbia (Human Rights Commission), 2000 SCC 44, paras 1-2, R v Malmo-Levine, 2003 SCC 74, paras 1-6, This class will build from the previous line of cases to explore other ways and issues in which the courts have emphasized the relationship between personal (or decisional) autonomy and section 7 protection, particularly in examining the liberty interest. We will also revisit and discuss Bedford and Carter as cases concerned with decision autonomy and liberty. March 25 No Class 9 of 10
10 13 March 30 Section 7: Security of the Person vs National Security Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9. Kent Roach, Section 7 of the Charter and National Security: Rights Protection and Proportionality versus Deference and Status ( ) 42:3 Ottawa L Rev 337. In this class, we will discuss the threat of terrorism and national security in its relationship to section 7. Unlike developments in domestic criminal law and related issues, Charter cases under section 7 that deal with issues of national security and immigration appear to present unique challenges for the courts. As we will see through the Charkaoui case, threats of terrorism have given rise to various immigration law reforms, many of which have been subject to Charter scrutiny. The security certificate regime at issue in Charkaoui considers the balancing of national security interests against the fundamental rights protected by section 7. April 1 Special Topics in Charter TBA Our last two classes of the year will focus on contemporary topics related to the Charter. 14 April 6 Special Topics in Charter TBA Our last two classes of the year will focus on contemporary topics related to the Charter. April 8 Review In our final class of the term, we will review the semester s material and prepare for the exam. We will revisit the topics from this term, outlining the basic principles, elements and tests that apply to the framework and substance of the Charter as we have explored throughout the term. Students are encouraged to come to class having reviewed this term s materials and with any questions on the substance of the materials, as well as on the process of the examination in general. 10 of 10
Syllabus. Canadian Constitutional Law
Syllabus Canadian Constitutional Law (Revised February 2015) Candidates are advised that the syllabus may be updated from time-to-time without prior notice. Candidates are responsible for obtaining the
More informationSyllabus. Canadian Constitutional Law
Syllabus Canadian Constitutional Law (Revised February 2015) Candidates are advised that the syllabus may be updated from time-to-time without prior notice. Candidates are responsible for obtaining the
More informationAP/PPAS A Public Law II: The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Limits of Public Administration
AP/PPAS3136 3.0 A Public Law II: The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Limits of Public Administration Course Director: Danny O Rourke Class Hours: Monday and Wednesday 4pm-7pm Class Location: 133
More informationKeith Pridgen and Steven Pridgen (applicants) v. The University of Calgary (respondent) ( ; 2010 ABQB 644)
In The Matter Of Keith Pridgen and Steven Pridgen on Findings of Non-Academic Misconduct on Appeal from the Ad Hoc Review Committee of the General Faculties Council Keith Pridgen and Steven Pridgen (applicants)
More informationPublic Law II: The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Limits of Public Administration
Public Law II: The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Limits of Public Administration Public Law II Thursdays 7:00 10:00 SLH B Syllabus Course Director: Soren Frederiksen email: sdfred@yorku.ca office:
More informationCASL Constitutional Challenge An Overview
McCarthy Tétrault Advance Building Capabilities for Growth CASL Constitutional Challenge An Overview Charles Morgan Direct Line: 514-397-4230 E-Mail: cmorgan@mccarthy.ca October 24, 2016 Overview Freedom
More informationIN BRIEF SECTION 1 OF THE CHARTER AND THE OAKES TEST
THE CHARTER AND THE OAKES TEST Learning Objectives To establish the importance of s. 1 in both ensuring and limiting our rights. To introduce students to the Oakes test and its important role in Canadian
More informationThe Constitutional Validity of Bill S-201. Presentation to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights
The Constitutional Validity of Bill S-201 Presentation to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights Professor Bruce Ryder Osgoode Hall Law School, York University 22 November 2016 I am pleased
More informationTHE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
E S S E N T I A L S OF C A N A D I A N L A W THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS F O U R T H E D I T I O N HON. ROBERT J. SHARPE Court of Appeal for Ontario KENT ROACH Faculty of Law, University of Toronto
More informationSa Majesté la Reine (appelante) v. Adjudant J.G.A. Gagnon (intimé)
Sa Majesté la Reine (appelante) v. Adjudant J.G.A. Gagnon (intimé) Sa Majesté la Reine (appelante) v. Caporal A.J.R. Thibault (intimé) (CMAC-577; CMAC-581; 2015 CMAC 2; 2015 CACM 2) Indexed As: R. v. Gagnon
More informationInstructor: Dr. Carol Walker Office: TBD Office Hours: Please contact instructor to make an appointment.
Schar School of Policy and Government Government 423 Constitutional Law: Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (10134) Spring Semester 2019 Monday, 7:20 10:00 PM Planetary Hall 129 Instructor: Dr. Carol Walker
More informationTOP FIVE R v LLOYD, 2016 SCC 13, [2016] 1 SCR 130. Facts. Procedural History. Ontario Justice Education Network
Each year at OJEN s Toronto Summer Law Institute, former Ontario Court of Appeal judge Stephen Goudge presents his selection of the top five cases from the previous year that are of significance in an
More informationFramework for Aboriginal Rights
Framework for Aboriginal Rights This test will apply in the context of Aboriginal rights, Aboriginal title and claims to Self-government. Note: there is a modified test if Metis rights are involved AND
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Court File No. A-145-12 FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA APPELLANT - and- CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, FIRST NATIONS CHILD AND FAMILY CARING SOCIETY, ASSEMBLY OF FIRST
More informationCharter Remedies and Jurisdiction to Grant Them: The Evolution of Section 24(1) and Section 52(1)
The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 25 (2004) Article 1 Charter Remedies and Jurisdiction to Grant Them: The Evolution of Section 24(1) and Section 52(1)
More informationBedford v. Canada, 2010 ONSC 4264 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT - HIMEL J.:
Bedford v. Canada, 2010 ONSC 4264 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT - HIMEL J.: [ ] II. THE IMPUGNED PROVISIONS [6] The applicants do not challenge all of the prostitution-related provisions in the Criminal Code. They
More informationAlberta s Health Information Act and the Charter: A Discussion Paper
Alberta s Health Information Act and the Charter: A Discussion Paper Prepared for: Canadian Mental Health Association (Alberta Division) Alberta Medical Association B.C. Freedom of Information and Privacy
More informationRm. D120 Hilliard, Glendon College Thurs. 1:00-2:00 pm (or by appointment) Ext (Glendon)
York University School of Public Policy and Administration Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional Studies AP PPAS 4130 6.0 C Politics, Law and the Courts 2015-2016 Prof: Dr. Radha Persaud Office: Office
More informationThe Increasing Irrelevance of Section 1 of the Charter
The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 14 (2001) Article 11 The Increasing Irrelevance of Section 1 of the Charter Christopher D. Bredt Adam M. Dodek Follow
More informationA SECOND CHANCE FOR THE HARM PRINCIPLE IN SECTION 7? GROSS DISPROPORTIONALITY POST-BEDFORD
APPEAL VOLUME 20 n 71 ARTICLE A SECOND CHANCE FOR THE HARM PRINCIPLE IN SECTION 7? GROSS DISPROPORTIONALITY POST-BEDFORD Alexander Sculthorpe* CITED: (2015) 20 Appeal 71 INTRODUCTION For what purposes
More informationCoram: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ.
Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ. The following is the judgment delivered by The Court: I. Introduction [1] Omar Khadr, a Canadian citizen,
More informationTuesday: 1 3pm. NOTE: I do not answer substantive questions by please come and see me in person.
1. COURSE NAME AND NUMBER: Criminal Law, LAWS 1001 2. COURSE INSTRUCTOR Name: Professor Adelina Iftene Office number: 427 Office telephone number: 902-494-1296 E-mail: aiftene@dal.ca Office Hours: Fall
More informationConstitutional Law Tests:
Constitutional Law Tests: Colonial Government Powers: - Common law power was given to Colonies by the Crown (Royal Proclamation) - Governors of colonies can make laws (Royal Proclamation) - Colonial government
More informationFreedom of Expression in the Context of Airports Richard J. Charney Global Head, Employment and Labour Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP September 24,
Freedom of Expression in the Context of Airports Richard J. Charney Global Head, Employment and Labour Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP September 24, 2016 Freedom of Expression and the Charter: s.2(b)
More informationCases That Have Changed Society
Cases That Have Changed Society Many cases are started by individuals or groups, to respond to a particular event or to change a situation. The outcomes of these cases will often lead to changes in certain
More informationFreedom of Expression, Academic Freedom, and Equality: Seven Institutional Responsibilities
The Peter A. Allard School of Law Allard Research Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Publications 11-25-2017 Freedom of Expression, Academic Freedom, and Equality: Seven Institutional Responsibilities
More informationTort Law (Law 1060) Bora Laskin Faculty of Law Lakehead University
Tort Law (Law 1060) Bora Laskin Faculty of Law Lakehead University 2015-2016 Julian N. Falconer, Falconers LLP julianf@falconers.ca Asha James, Falconers LLP ashaj@falconers.ca Overview This is a compulsory
More informationAboriginal Rights The Test
Aboriginal Rights The Test 1. Characterize the right based on the pleadings Types of Aboriginal Rights: A. FSC/Activity/Cultural Rights: Sparrow Drift Net Van der Peet Selling 10 Salmon Sappier/Gray Harvesting
More informationRm. D120 Hilliard, Glendon College Thurs. 1:00-2:00 pm (or by appointment) Ext (Glendon)
[Tentative Outline] York University School of Public Policy and Administration Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional Studies AP PPAS 4130 6.0 A Politics, Law and the Courts Summer 2014 Prof: Dr. Radha
More informationR v Sinclair: Balancing Individual Rights and Societal Interests Outside of Section 1 of the Charter
R v Sinclair: Balancing Individual Rights and Societal Interests Outside of Section 1 of the Charter Vanessa A MacDonnell* The majority judgment in R v Sinclair reflects what the author sees as a problematic
More informationMedical Marihuana Suppliers and the Charter
January 20 th, 2009 Medical Marihuana Suppliers and the Charter By Jennifer Koshan Cases Considered: R. v. Krieger, 2008 ABCA 394 There have been several cases before the courts raising issues concerning
More informationPOLS 327: Congress and the Legislative Process (Fall 2014)
POLS 327: Congress and the Legislative Process (Fall 2014) Instructor: Andre P. Audette Email: aaudette@nd.edu Office: 421 Decio Hall Meeting Schedule: MWF 10:30-11:20am Office Hours: MTR 11:30-12:30,
More informationADMINISTRATIVE LAW LAW COURSE SYLLABUS
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LAW 372-003 COURSE SYLLABUS Instructor: David E. Gruber, F.C.I.Arb., B.Sc.Arch. (McGill), J.D. (U. of Vic), LL.M (Cantab) Contact: dgruber@mail.ubc.ca; (604) 661-9361 M-F 9:00 a.m. to
More informationCity of Toronto Clamps Down on Medical Marihuana Dispensaries
Background City of Toronto Clamps Down on Medical Marihuana Dispensaries By Peter Gross On May 26, 2016, the City of Toronto (the City ) by-law enforcement officers laid charges against 79 medical marihuana
More informationThe Supreme Court of Canada and Hate Publications: Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v. Whatcott
The Supreme Court of Canada and Hate Publications: Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v. Whatcott Tom Irvine Ministry of Justice, Constitutional Law Branch Human Rights Code Amendments May 5, 2014 Saskatoon
More informationMEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF THE INTERVENER, BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION
REGISTRY NO. IMM-3411-16 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: DAVID ROGER REVELL APPLICANT MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION RESPONDENT -and- -and- BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION INTERVENER MEMORANDUM
More informationMigration, Citizenship, and the City
GEOG 4023: Special Topics on the City Migration, Citizenship, and the City Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Carleton University, Fall 2018 Instructor: Dr. Jennifer Ridgley Office: LA
More informationProfessor Parker Hevron Roosevelt Hall, 107 Chapman University 1 University Drive Orange, CA 92866
POLITICAL SCIENCE 110-02 INTRO TO AMERICAN POLITICS FALL 2011 COURSE OUTLINE AND SYLLABUS Professor Parker Hevron Roosevelt Hall, 107 Chapman University 1 University Drive Orange, CA 92866 Office Hours:
More informationWhich laws do students frequently disobey and which laws would they never consider breaking?
CHAPTER 1 LAW, SOCIETY, AND BUSINESS Chapter 1 emphasizes the important and integrated relationship among law, business and ethics. This chapter justifies the placement of a law course in the business
More informationTHE ROAD TO THE PROMISED LAND RUNS PAST CONWAY: ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS AND CHARTER REMEDIES
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS AND CHARTER REMEDIES 783 THE ROAD TO THE PROMISED LAND RUNS PAST CONWAY: ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS AND CHARTER REMEDIES RANJAN K. AGARWAL * I. INTRODUCTION In the 30 years since
More informationFACTUM OF THE APPELLANT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) BETWEEN Dylan Jacob Appellant and Attorney General of Canada Respondent FACTUM OF THE APPELLANT TEAM #8 TABLE
More informationLaw or Politics? The U.S. Supreme Court and the Meaning of the Constitution
Law or Politics? The U.S. Supreme Court and the Meaning of the Constitution GVPT 202 Spring 2017 Lecture: Monday & Wednesday 1:00-1:50pm, 1101 Tydings Hall Discussion Section: Friday (time & room location
More informationIndexed as: Edmonton Journal v. Alberta (Attorney General)
Page 1 Indexed as: Edmonton Journal v. Alberta (Attorney General) IN THE MATTER OF sections 2(b) and 52(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, being Part 1 of the Constitution Act, 1982; AND
More informationThe Constitutionality of Classification
The Constitutionality of Classification Aboriginal Overrepresentation and Security Policy in Canadian Federal Penitentiaries D Arcy Leitch THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CLASSIFICATION Aboriginal Overrepresentation
More informationADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS IN CANADA -AN OVERVIEW-
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS IN CANADA -AN OVERVIEW- CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN D. RICHARD FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL, CANADA Bangkok November 2007 INTRODUCTION In Canada, administrative tribunals are established by
More information1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. (On Appeal from the Court of Appeal of Alberta) BETWEEN:
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (On Appeal from the Court of Appeal of Alberta) BETWEEN: DELWIN VRIEND and GALA-GAY AND LESBIAN AWARENESS SOCIETY OF EDMONTON and GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTRE OF EDMONTON
More informationAmerican National Government Spring 2008 PLS
Class Meetings M, W, F 9:00-9:50 a.m. (Leutze Hall 111) American National Government Spring 2008 PLS 101-003 Instructor Dr. Jungkun Seo (Department of Public and International Affairs) Office Location
More informationConstitutional Cases 2000: An Overview
The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 14 (2001) Article 1 Constitutional Cases 2000: An Overview Patrick J. Monahan Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
More informationLaw 201. Section 003. Professor Margot Young TOTAL MARKS: 75
THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA FACULTY OF LAW WINTER EXAM - DECEMBER 12, 2016 THIS EXAMINATION CONSISTS OF THREE PAGES. PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE A COMPLETE PAPER. end of the exam before you leave
More informationCanada s Visible Minorities: Andrew Cardozo and Ravi Pendakur
Canada s Visible Minorities: 1967-2017 Andrew Cardozo and Ravi Pendakur Introduction Introductory remarks Demographic overview Labour market outcomes Policy initiatives Some defining moments Demographic
More informationIndexed As: Figueiras v. York (Regional Municipality) et al. Ontario Court of Appeal Rouleau, van Rensburg and Pardu, JJ.A. March 30, 2015.
Paul Figueiras (applicant/appellant) v. Toronto Police Services Board, Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, and Mark Charlebois (respondents/respondents) (C58771; 2015 ONCA 208) Indexed
More informationReligious Freedom and the State in Canada and the U.S.: A Comparative Analysis of Saguenay, Town of Greece, Loyola, and Hobby Lobby
Religious Freedom and the State in Canada and the U.S.: A Comparative Analysis of Saguenay, Town of Greece, Loyola, and Hobby Lobby Prepared For: Legal Education Society of Alberta Constitutional Law Symposium
More informationThe College of Charleston. Spring POLI American Government. Tu-Th 9:25-10:40. Maybank 207. Tuesdays 3:00-4 P.M. and by appointment
The College of Charleston Spring 2019 POLI 101.02- American Government Tu-Th 9:25-10:40 Maybank 207 Instructor Office Hours: Marguerite Archie-Hudson, Ph.D. Mondays 10:00 A.M. - 3:00 P.M. Tuesdays 3:00-4
More informationTHE NEED TO PROTECT RULE OF LAW: A RESPONSE TO BILL C-24
POLICY BRIEF May 2014 THE NEED TO PROTECT RULE OF LAW: A RESPONSE TO BILL C-24 Andrew S. Thompson Andrew S. Thompson is an adjunct assistant professor of Political Science at the University of Waterloo,
More informationBatty v City of Toronto: Municipalities at Forefront of Occupy Movement
Batty v City of Toronto: Municipalities at Forefront of Occupy Movement By Tiffany Tsun As part of the global Occupy Wall Street movement throughout October and November, many Canadian municipalities found
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL LAW I
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW SPRING 2018 Course: Instructor: Office Hours: Administrative Assistant: Course Days/Time: Constitutional Law I (4 credits) 650 319 Professor Mortimer
More informationUNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW SPRING Capital Punishment and the Constitution Seminar LAW 871 (3 credits)
UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW SPRING 2019 Course: Instructor: Capital Punishment and the Constitution Seminar LAW 871 (3 credits) John Bessler Phone: (410) 837-4690 Office: AL 1108 E-mail: jbessler@ubalt.edu
More informationIntroduction to Canadian Politics POLI 204/2B. Concordia University Fall 2005
Introduction to Canadian Politics POLI 204/2B Concordia University Fall 2005 Professor: Mebs Kanji Office: H1255-3 Phone: TBA Email: mkanji@alcor.concordia.ca COURSE DESCRIPTION This course provides an
More informationSubmission to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights on Bill C-75
Submission to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights on Bill C-75 September 1, 2018 Introduction The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada (EFC) is the national association of evangelical Christians
More informationLandmark Case SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND THE CHARTER VRIEND v. ALBERTA
Landmark Case SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND THE CHARTER VRIEND v. ALBERTA Prepared for the Ontario Justice Education Network by Counsel for the Department of Justice Canada. Vriend v. Alberta (1998) Delwin Vriend
More informationSECTION ONE OF THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS: AN EXAMINATION AT TWO LEVELS OF INTERPRETATION
SECTION ONE OF THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS: AN EXAMINATION AT TWO LEVELS OF INTERPRETATION Paul G. Murray* I. INTRODUCTION... 633 I. SECTION ONE: AN EXAMINATION AT THE FIRST LEVEL OF INTERPRETATION...
More informationCASES THAT HAVE CHANGED SOCIETY
YOUTH ENGAGEMENT ON SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES ACTIVE CITIZENS CASES THAT HAVE Many cases are started by individuals or groups, to respond to a particular event or to change a situation. The outcomes of these
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL LAW I SYLLABUS
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I SYLLABUS UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW SPRING 2018 Course: Instructor: Days/Time: Location: Constitutional Law I LAW 650-329 NUMBER 2010 Professor Phillip J. Closius, Office
More informationUNIVERSITY OF REGINA. G. BRETT LEDINGHAM McDougall Gauley LLP. OR Direct Phone:
UNIVERSITY OF REGINA G. BRETT LEDINGHAM McDougall Gauley LLP Brett.Ledingham@uregina.ca OR bledingham@mcdougallgauley.com Direct Phone: 306-565-5151 BUSINESS LAW 307-001 MONDAY, WEDNESDAY 8:30 a.m. to
More informationAlberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony: A walk through and brief case analysis By Don Hutchinson
of Wilson Colony: A walk through and brief case analysis By Don Hutchinson Some have regarded this decision as a hard loss. It s true that we would have preferred a different result from the application
More informationPA 311: Policy Analysis & Program Evaluation
Syllabus PA 311: Policy Analysis & Program Evaluation Fall 2017 Room: Old Mill 523 Tuesdays, 04:35 07:35 pm Instructor: Office: Phone: Email: Asim Zia, Ph.D. 208E Morrill Hall 802-656-4695 (Office); 802-825-0920
More informationBill C-10: Criminal Code Amendments (Mental Disorder) NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTION CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION
Bill C-10: Criminal Code Amendments (Mental Disorder) NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTION CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION November 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Bill C-10: Criminal Code Amendments (Mental Disorder) PREFACE...
More informationPHIL : Social and Political Philosophy , Term 1: M/W/F: 12-1pm in DMP 301 Instructor: Kelin Emmett
PHIL330-001: Social and Political Philosophy 2018-2019, Term 1: M/W/F: 12-1pm in DMP 301 Instructor: Kelin Emmett Email: kelin.emmett@ubc.ca Course Description: Political philosophy reflects on questions
More informationThe Non-Discrimination Standards for Government and the Public Sector. Guidelines on how to apply the standards and who is covered
The Non-Discrimination Standards for Government and the Public Sector Guidelines on how to apply the standards and who is covered March 2002 Table Of Contents INTRODUCTION... 4 WHAT IS THE AIM OF THESE
More informationPUBLICATION BANS FIRST ISSUED: NOVEMBER 23, 2015 EDITED / DISTRIBUTED: NOVEMBER 23, 2015
DOCUMENT TITLE: PUBLICATION BANS NATURE OF DOCUMENT: PRACTICE NOTE FIRST ISSUED: NOVEMBER 23, 2015 LAST SUBSTANTIVE REVISION: EDITED / DISTRIBUTED: NOVEMBER 23, 2015 NOTE: THIS POICY DOCUMENT IS TO BE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Canada (Attorney General) v. Hislop, 2007 SCC 10 DATE: 20070301 DOCKET: 30755 BETWEEN: Attorney General of Canada Appellant/Respondent on cross-appeal and George Hislop,
More informationITT Technical Institute. CJ333 Constitutional Law Onsite Course SYLLABUS
ITT Technical Institute CJ333 Onsite Course SYLLABUS Credit hours: 4 Contact/Instructional hours: 40 (40 Theory Hours) Prerequisite(s) and/or Corequisite(s): Prerequisite: CJ123 Criminal Law or equivalent
More informationLakehead University Contemporary Political Thought (2012) POLI-4513-FA T 11:30-2:30 Ryan Building 2026
Lakehead University Contemporary Political Thought (2012) POLI-4513-FA T 11:30-2:30 Ryan Building 2026 Instructor: Dr. Patrick Cain (Political Science) Office: Ryan Building 2033 Phone: 343-8304 Email:
More informationLaw 200: Law and Society Syllabus: Spring 2018
Law 200: Law and Society Syllabus: Spring 2018 Mark E. Haddad, Lecturer in Law, USC Gould School of Law: mhaddad@law.usc.edu Emily Cronin, Teaching Assistant, USC Gould School of Law: emily.cronin.2018@lawmail.usc.edu;
More informationRE: The Board s refusal to allow public access to the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Hearings
Direct Line: 604-630-9928 Email: Laura@bccla.org BY EMAIL January 20, 2016 Peter Watson, Chair National Energy Board 517 Tenth Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2R 0A8 RE: The Board s refusal to allow public
More informationPOL 300H1 Topics in Comparative Politics Comparative Civil-Military Relations
POL 300H1 Topics in Comparative Politics Comparative Civil-Military Relations Department of Political Science, University of Toronto Summer 2012 Instructor: Abouzar Nasirzadeh, PhD Candidate Office hours:
More informationEmilian Peter (applicant) v. The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (respondent) (IMM ; 2014 FC 1073)
Emilian Peter (applicant) v. The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (respondent) (IMM-12508-12; 2014 FC 1073) Indexed As: Peter v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
More informationEastern Michigan University PLSC 202 H: State and Local Government Winter 2014; T-R 9:30-10:45am; Room 426 P-H
Eastern Michigan University PLSC 202 H: State and Local Government Winter 2014; T-R 9:30-10:45am; Room 426 P-H Dr. Joe Ohren Office: 601K Pray Harrold e-mail: johren@emich.edu Phone: 734.487.1452 (Faculty
More informationFINAL. EXAMINATION - APRIL LAW 201 SECTION 4
THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA FACULTY OF LAW FINAL. EXAMINATION - APRIL 2015 LAW 201 CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FEDERALISM, CHARTER and ABORIGINAL AND TREATY RIGHTS SECTION 4 DR. JEFFREY MEYERS and
More informationFREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND ADVERTISING TO CHILDREN: IRWIN TOY LIMITED v. QUEBEC (AG)
Landmark Case FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND ADVERTISING TO CHILDREN: IRWIN TOY LIMITED v. QUEBEC (AG) Prepared for the Ontario Justice Education Network by a Law Student from Pro Bono Students Canada Irwin
More informationCanadian Constitutional Law
Canadian Constitutional Law Fourth Edition THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW GROUP Executive Editors Patrick Macklem Carol Rogerson Joel Bakan University of British Columbia John Borrows University of Victoria Sujit
More informationLAW 435 CONSTITUTIONAL BILLINGSLEY
LAW 435 CONSTITUTIONAL BILLINGSLEY 1 TOPIC 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE CONSTITUTION Patriation Reference Allows us to amend our own constitution without having to go to UK for approval. Developed a test for
More informationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY University Honors Program One University Drive Orange, CA COURSE SYLLABUS
CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY University Honors Program One University Drive Orange, CA 92866 COURSE SYLLABUS HON 345 IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE LAW AND POLICY Tu/Th 1:00-2:15 PM DH 146 Professor Marisa S. Cianciarulo
More informationGeography 320H1 Geographies of Transnationalism, Migration, and Gender Fall Term, 2015
Geography 320H1 Geographies of Transnationalism, Migration, and Gender Fall Term, 2015 Dr. Rachel Silvey Department of Geography and Program in Planning, Sidney Smith Hall 5036 Lectures: Thursdays 10-12
More informationSeminar in American Politics: The U.S. Supreme Court GVPT 479F Fall 2015 Wednesday, 2:00 4:45pm, 0103 Jimenez Hall
Seminar in American Politics: The U.S. Supreme Court GVPT 479F Fall 2015 Wednesday, 2:00 4:45pm, 0103 Jimenez Hall Instructor: Prof. Patrick Wohlfarth E-mail: patrickw@umd.edu Office: 1115C Tydings Hall
More informationSeveral years ago, Canada s Parliament identified two concerns with our justice system as it applies to sentencing:
The Conditional Sentence Option Chief Justice Michael MacDonald Chief Justice of Nova Scotia May 2003, Updated August 2013 As a result of an amendment made to the Criminal Code in 1996, judges are now
More informationATTORNEY-GENERAL. Report of the. under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 on the End of Life Choice Bill
J.4 Report of the ATTORNEY-GENERAL under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 on the End of Life Choice Bill Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Section 7 of the New Zealand Bill of
More informationFACTUM OF THE INTERVENER WEST COAST WOMEN S LEGAL EDUCATION AND ACTION FUND
Court of Appeal File No. CA036762 COURT OF APPEAL ON APPEAL FROM the Order of the Honourable Mr. Justice Ehrcke of the Supreme Court of British Columbia pronounced the 15 th day of December 2008. BETWEEN:
More informationLaw Society of Alberta Policy Statement: Implementation of Amendments
Law Society of Alberta Policy Statement: Implementation of Amendments June 11, 2016 Table of Contents Purpose... 1 Background... 1 Coming into Force: Prospectivity and Retroactivity at Law... 1 Impact
More informationPS4610: European Political Systems University of Missouri-Columbia
PS4610: European Political Systems University of Missouri-Columbia Dr. Robin E. Best Fall 2010 Email: bestre@missouri.edu MWF, 2:00-2:50 Office: 220 Professional Building Pickard 106 Office Hours: Mondays
More informationPROGRESSIVE LABOUR LAW REFORM
PROGRESSIVE LABOUR LAW REFORM THE CASE FOR ENHANCING UNION ORGANIZING AND REVERSING DECLINING UNION DENSITY A review of Key Policy Reforms for Improving Bargaining Unit Certifications (August 2017) By
More informationENYC-GE Fall 2015 Instructor: Michelle D. Land ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY SYLLABUS
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY SYLLABUS NOTE: Syllabus is subject to change throughout the semester, for example to accommodate guest lecturers. All changes will be announced in class. INSTRUCTOR: Michelle D. Land
More informationParliamentary Research Branch THE RODRIGUEZ CASE: A REVIEW OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA DECISION ON ASSISTED SUICIDE
Background Paper BP-349E THE RODRIGUEZ CASE: A REVIEW OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA DECISION ON ASSISTED SUICIDE Margaret Smith Law and Government Division October 1993 Library of Parliament Bibliothèque
More informationPSCI 2003 Canadian Political Institutions Lecture: Fridays, 11:35am - 1:25 pm Mackenzie 3275 Please confirm location on Carleton Central
PSCI 2003 Canadian Political Institutions Lecture: Fridays, 11:35am - 1:25 pm Mackenzie 3275 Please confirm location on Carleton Central Instructor: Dr. Scott Pruysers Office: D683 Loeb Building Email:
More informationPA 372 Comparative and International Administration
PA 372 Comparative and International Administration Winter 2018 Mondays and Wednesdays 3-4:15 pm AuSable Hall 2302 Instructor: Dr. Davia Downey E-Mail: downeyd@gvsu.edu Phone: 616-331-6681 Office: 242C
More informationFreedom of Majoritarian Exclusivity and Why Ms. Clitheroe Should Have Joined a Union: Charter Developments in Ontario Courts
Freedom of Majoritarian Exclusivity and Why Ms. Clitheroe Should Have Joined a Union: Charter Developments in Ontario Courts 2008 2009 Robert E. Charney This paper considers two Charter cases decided by
More informationThird Party Records Disclosure Applications s. 278 Criminal Code. D. Brian Newton, Q.C.
Third Party Records Disclosure Applications s. 278 Criminal Code D. Brian Newton, Q.C. Preamble Several years ago, I was approached by Victim Services of the Department of Justice in regards to providing
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA
Citation: Stadler v Director, St Boniface/ Date: 20181010 St Vital, 2018 MBCA 103 Docket: AI18-30-09081 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA B ETWEEN : K. A. Burwash for the Applicant A. J. Ladyka MARTIN
More informationLAWS 4308 B SENTENCING
1 LAWS 4308 B SENTENCING COURSE OUTLINE COURSE: LAWS 4308 B Sentencing TERM: Fall 2012 PREREQUISTES: LAWS 2004 Fourth Year Honours Standing CLASS: INSTRUCTOR: OFFICE HOURS: CONTACT: Tuesday 6:00 9:00 pm
More informationR. v. Ferguson, 2008
R. v. Ferguson, 2008 RCMP Constable Michael Ferguson was convicted by a jury of manslaughter in an Alberta court in 2004. Ferguson was involved in a scuffle with a detainee in a police detachment cell
More information