WHISTLEBLOWING THE LAW
|
|
- Ross Hoover
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Bar Council CPD / Employment Bar Association Update on Employment Law 2nd March 2015 WHISTLEBLOWING THE LAW Tom Mallon BL 1. Whistleblowing and whistleblower are two words which would have been very rarely spoken up until a couple of months ago. Now one could not read a daily newspaper without some article on the subject and TV and Radio interview Whistleblowers and persons close to the Whistleblower and it is fair to say that Whistleblowing is perceived as a good thing to be encouraged and protected. 2. This paper will seek to examine the law in relation to Whistleblowing by looking at what was the situation in Ireland, looking at the new legislation (the Protected Disclosures Act 2014) and also to look at the experience in the United Kingdom where their legislation has been in force for about 16 years to see whether some lessons can be learned from that experience. 3. What is a Whistleblower? Murdoch 1 defines it as Colloquial expression to describe a person who reports suspicions in respect of some wrongdoing. 4. An American law dictionary 2 defines it in slightly narrower terms as: An employee who reports employer wrongdoing to a governmental or law enforcement agency. 1 Murdoch s Dictionary of Irish law, 5 th Edition 2 Blacks Law Dictionary, 8 th Edition
2 5. The purpose and effect of Whistleblowing legislation is to protect employees who blow the whistle on their employers. Other persons may enjoy protection pursuant to other statutes however that is a subject beyond the scope of this paper. 6. The overall purpose of the legislation, it is submitted, is to encourage employees to raise genuine and reasonably held concerns about matters of public interest where knowledge of same comes to them through their employment. The encouragement to Whistle blow is given by giving protection against sanction or retaliation. THE PREVIOUS IRISH LEGISLATIVE POSITION 7. Irish law in this area had developed on a sectoral basis and accordingly the necessary protections were available only in certain professional and employment areas and only in respect of certain types of disclosures. The rationale for the approach on a sectoral basis is hard to understand but it does seem to have been a conscious decision of Government to proceed in that way. Many statutes currently contain some level of protection for Whislteblowers. 8. By way of example Sections 37 to 42 of the Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Act 2013 sets out quite an elaborate protective regime for employees who make a protected disclosure when the person making the disclosure has reasonable grounds for believing that the disclosure will show one or more of the following:- (a) That an offence under any provision of financial services legislation may have been or may now be committed. (b) That a prescribed contravention may have been or may be being committed. (c) That any other provision of financial services legislation may have been or may be being contravened. 2
3 (d) That the evidence of any matter which comes within paragraphs (a), (b) or (c) has been, is being or is likely to be deliberately concealed or destroyed. 9. There are protective disclosure provisions in among other legislation the following: i. Labour Services Act 1987 ii. Protection for Persons Reporting Child Abuse Act 1998 iii. Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act 2001 iv. Standards in Public Office Act 2001 v. Competition Act 2002 vi. Communications Regulation Act 2002 vii. Health Act 2004 viii. Employment Permits Act 2006 ix. Consumer Protection Act 2007 x. Chemicals Act 2008 xi. Charities Act 2009 xii. National Asset Management Agency Act 2009 xiii. Inland Fisheries Act 2010 xiv. Criminal Justice Act 2011 xv. Property Services (Regulation) Act 2011 xvi. Protection of Employees (Temporary Agency Workers) Act The sectoral arrangements are not appropriate. The fact that some disclosures in certain areas are protected and other are not undoubtedly can lead to confusion and the lack of an overall coherent single piece of legislation has obviously denied the ability of many to make appropriate disclosures. Individuals cannot expect to have an understanding of a vast collection of complex legislative provisions. I would submit that neither trade union advisors to employees nor HR advisors would be typically familiar with the full range of protections. Individuals working in particular industries such as banking might be familiar with the law in their area. 3
4 11. The second criticism that can be laid at sectoral regime is that some of the statutory provisions only encourage the disclosure from certain individuals and whilst such persons may be protected from civil or criminal liability there is no protection against penalisation within the workplace. Some of the legislation only protects disclosures in respect of breaches of legislation as in the Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Act 2013 above, whereas others allow for the reporting of a much wider level of wrongful activity. Further under the sectoral regime the remedies available vary considerably from statute to statue and the enforcement mechanism are not consistently applied in each particular statutory provision. Some for example provide that a complaint must be made to the appropriate employment rights body within 12 months from the date of the contravention whereas others have a time limit of six months. There are different standards for the extension of time for the making of a claim. Some of the legislation requires good faith or reasonable grounds on the part of the Whislteblower whereas some other legislation does not require that. Not all of the statutes provide for anonymity of Whislteblowers. Some of the statutory provisions deal with mandatory reporting. For example the Criminal Justice Act 1994 requires employees of financial institutions to report money laundering or suspicions of money laundering to An Garda Siochana and some statutes provide that non reporting may give rise to a criminal sanction. 12. Government policy changed in 2012 when the sectoral approach was abandoned to be replaced by a single piece of protected disclosures legislation. The Protected Disclosures Act 2014 does not repeal the present sectoral arrangements. The Act sets out amendments to a list of legislation which in effect converts the protected disclosure in the other legislation into a protected disclosure within the meaning of the Protected Disclosures Act. However the individual sectoral provision remains in force as it seems that it was felt that it would be too complex to deal with the inconsistencies within the current system whilst at the same time ensuring that those protections were not diluted or extinguished by amendment. 4
5 13. The effect of this approach is that under the 2014 Act disclosures which would have been protected under the earlier legislation will now generally come within the ambit of the Act but where a disclosure falls outside the Act it will still be protected by the sectoral legislation. The big effect of this approach is also to in many cases, substantially increase the level of compensation that might be awarded in an appropriate case. PROTECTED DISCLOSURES ACT The Protected Disclosures Act was enacted on 8 th July 2014 and it is envisaged as a single all encompassing piece of legislation to protect all workers in all sectors of the economy. 15. One might ask why do we need this piece of legislation. It seems to me that the answer will be readily forthcoming if we just consider some of the high profile Whislteblowing cases of recent months. If we consider matters in the past there can be no doubt but the availability of Whislteblower protection legislation and more particularly the encouragement to make disclosures might well have altered some very significant recent historical issues. One has only to think about the various issues that were the subject of lengthy and extensive tribunal inquiries, not to mention some of the child abuse scandals and much of the political wrongdoing of which we are now only too aware. 16. The Act seeks to encourage Whislteblowing by its structure and more particularly to protect Whislteblowers. It is appropriate to set out in some detail some of the principle definitions contained in the act so that a complete understanding of the proposed scheme is fully understood 17. Protected disclosure is defined as being a disclosure of relevant information made by a worker in accordance with Sections 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 of the Act. 5
6 18. Relevant information is defined as information which: (a) in the reasonable belief of the worker, it tends to show one or more relevant wrongdoings, and (b) it came to the attention of the worker in connection with the worker s employment. 19. Relevant wrongdoings are the following: (a) that an offence has been, is being or is likely to be committed. (b) that a person has failed, is failing or likely to fail to comply with any legal obligation, other than one rising under the worker s contract of employment or other contract whereby the worker undertakes to do or perform personally any work. (c) that a miscarriage of justice has occurred, is occurring or is likely to occur. (d) endangered. that the health or safety of an individual has been, is being or is likely to be (e) that the environment has been, is being or is likely to be damaged. (f) that an unlawful or otherwise improper use of funds or resources of a public body, or of other public money, has occurred, is occurring or likely to occur. (g) that an act or omission by or on behalf of a public body is oppressive, discriminatory or grossly negligent or constitutes gross mismanagement, or (h) that information tending to show any matter falling within any of the preceding paragraphs has been, is being or is likely to be concealed or destroyed. 20. The Act expressly provides that it is immaterial whether a relevant wrongdoing occurred within the State or elsewhere and it is also irrelevant whether the law applying to that alleged wrongdoing is that of the State or that of another country or territory 6
7 21. The Act provides a stepped or tiered disclosure process with the objective that disclosure should be, wherever possible, made internally. The stepped procedure is contained in Section 6 to 9 inclusive of the Act. 22. Section 6 provides for a disclosure to be made to the worker s employer. Section 7 provides for disclosures to prescribed persons if the employee reasonably believes that the relevant wrongdoing falls within the matters in respect of which that person is prescribed under the Act and that the information disclosed and any allegations contained in it are substantially true. Section 8 provides for the making of disclosures to a Minister by a worker employed in a public body and the relevant Minister is the Minister who has responsibility for that public body. Section 9 provides for disclosures made by the worker in the course of obtaining legal advice. That legal advice may be sought from a barrister, solicitor or trade union official. 23. It is clear that in the circumstances the protected disclosure must be made at the lowest possible level however Section 10 provides for disclosures in other cases and same will be permissible if: (a) the worker reasonably believes that the information disclosed and any allegation in it are substantially true (b) the disclosure is not made for personal gain, (c) any one or more of the conditions in subsection 10(2) is met, and (d) in all the circumstances of the case it is reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure. 24. The conditions set out in subsection 2 are that: (a) at the time of making the disclosure the worker reasonable believes that he would be subjected to penalisation by this employer if he made a disclosure in accordance with Section 6, 7 or 8. 7
8 (b) that, in a case where no relevant person is prescribed for the purposes the worker reasonably believes that it is likely that evidence relating to the relevant wrongdoing will be concealed or destroyed if he makes a disclosure under Section 6. (c) that the worker has previously made a disclosure of substantially the same information in accordance with Section 6, 7 or 8 or (d) the relevant wrongdoing is of an exceptionally serious nature. 25. Part III of the Act sets forth the protections afforded to persons who make disclosures. 26. Section 11 incorporates a number of significant amendments to the Unfair Dismissals Act insofar as the dismissal arises wholly or mainly from the making of a protected disclosure. In the first instance the qualifying service periods do not apply and secondly such a dismissal is of the automatic unfair type. Thirdly the maximum compensatory award is increased from two years remuneration to five years remuneration. 27. Section 11 of the Act provides that the award of compensation under the Unfair Dismissals Act may be reduced by up to 25% if the investigation of the relevant wrongdoing was not the sole or main motivation for making the disclosure. 28. The act also provides significant protection for Whistleblowers against penalisation. Penalisation is widely defined in the Act and an employer is prohibited from carrying out any act or omission that effects a worker to the worker s detriment including suspension, layoff or dismissal, demotion or loss of opportunity for promotion, transfer of duties or change of location of place of work or reduction in wages or a change in working hours. Penalisation also includes the imposition of any disciplinary reprimand or other penalty or other unfair treatment, coercion, intimidation or harassment. 29. Applications for redress for penalisation are made at first instance to the Rights Commissioner and the Rights Commissioner may require the employer to take a specified course of action and require the employer to pay compensation up to a maximum of five 8
9 years remuneration if the Rights Commissioner makes a finding in favour of the employee. That compensation may be reduced by up to 25% if the investigation of the relevant wrongdoing was not the sole or main motivation for the making of the original disclosure. An appeal lies to the Labour Court from a decision of the Rights Commissioner under the penalisation clause. 30. Section 13 provides that persons, including workers, employees and third parties, may have a cause of action in tort against a person who causes detriment to them because they, or another person, has made a protected disclosure. Such an action in tort cannot be brought together with a claim for penalisation under the Act or a claim under the Unfair Dismissals Act. Detriment is defined as including coercion, intimidation or harassment, discrimination, disadvantage or adverse treatment in relation to employment, injury, damage or loss and/or threat of reprisal. This provision is very interesting in that it gives protection to persons other than the employee who actually made the disclosure and one could envisage family members or perhaps even fellow workers suffering detriment because of an act of Whistleblowing. 31. The Act also provides that the making of a protected disclosure will give a defence of qualified privilege under the Defamation Act 2009 and also the worker making a protected disclosure will be immune for civil or criminal liability in respect of same. The immunity in respect of criminal liability will be limited to circumstances where the Whistleblower reasonably believed that he was making a protected disclosure. 32. The Act also creates a unique new remedy of interim relief pending a determination for claims of unfair dismissals. 33. Schedule 1 to the Act provides that an employee who claims to have been dismissed wholly or mainly for having made a protected disclosure may apply to the Circuit Court for interim relief. Such an application must be made within 21 days immediately following the date of dismissal but that period may be extended by the Court. Such an application must be made on written notice to the employer and the Court should not postpone the hearing of 9
10 any such application except where it is satisfied that special circumstances exist which justify it doing it. The envisaged procedure before the Circuit Court is very unusual. The schedule provides that where on hearing an employee s application and it appears to the Court that there are substantial grounds for contending that that dismissal results wholly or mainly on the making of a protected disclosure the Court should announce its findings and explain to both parties, if present, the powers of the Court on such applications. The Court is then required to ask the employer if he is willing, pending the determination or settlement of the unfair dismissal claim, to reinstate the employee or if not to reengage the employee in another position on terms and conditions not less favourable. If the employer states a willingness to reinstate the employee then the Court shall make the order to that effect. If the employer states a willingness to reengage in another position and specifies the terms on which he is willing to do so the Court is then obliged to ask the employee whether he is willing to accept the position on those terms and conditions. If the employee is willing to accept the position then the Court makes an order to that effect. If the employee is not willing to accept the offer of reengagement on those terms and the Court is of the view that the refusal is reasonable then the Court shall make an order for the continuation of the employee s contract of employment and otherwise the Court shall make no order. The schedule also provides that if on the hearing of an application the employer fails to attend or states an unwillingness either to reinstate or reengage then the Court shall make an order for the continuation of the contract of employment. An order for the continuation of an employee s contract requires the continuation of the payment of all benefits including pay, pension rights and similar matters and also ensures continuity of employment. The regulations also provide that an employer or an employee may apply at any time for the revocation or variation of the order and there are express provisions in relation to the calculation of normal pay and how payments are to be dealt with in respect of any subsequent order for compensation. In circumstances where an employer has not complied with the Circuit Court order in relation to reinstatement or reengagement then the Court shall make an order for the continuation of the employee s contract of employment and order the employer to pay compensation. The amount of that compensation is so much as the Court considers just and equitable. 10
11 34. The schedule to the Act does not set out any procedural rules as to how this matter is to be initiated before the Court or indeed how the Court is to deal with matters of evidence whether that be given orally or on affidavit. One can assume that the rules committee of the Circuit Court will in due course make rules and one assumes that the likelihood is that the application would be made by way of Notice of Motion probably grounded on an affidavit, although one can envisage that in some cases, oral evidence will actually be necessary. 35. This quite an extraordinary new development. At the same time as the Circuit Court appeal jurisdiction under the Unfair Dismissals Act is being removed this new and extraordinary jurisdiction is given to it. One can immediately ask why is this interim remedy only to be available to those who claim to be dismissed by reason of the making of a protected disclosure? Why is such an important remedy not available to others who are dismissed for equally objectionable reasons? The same question can be asked as to why is the compensation for disclosure dismissals to be more than doubled. Surely there are other dismissal cases equally as objectionable as ones based on Whislteblowing. COMPARISON WITH UK LEGISLATION 36. The purpose of the legislation was described by Mummery LJ in ALM Medical Services Limited v Bladon 3 as follows:- The self-evident aim of the provisions is to protect employees from unfair treatment (ie victimisation and dismissal) for reasonably raising in a responsible way genuine concerns about wrongdoing in the workplace. The provisions strike an intricate balance between (a) promoting the public interest in the detection, exposure and elimination of misconduct, malpractice and potential dangers by 3 [2002] ICR
12 those likely to have early knowledge of them, and (b) protecting the respective interests of employers and employees. There are obvious tensions, private and public, between the legitimate interest in the confidentiality of the employer's affairs and in the exposure of wrong. 37. Having regard to the similarities between the English legislation in force and the proposed legislation in this jurisdiction it may be useful to look, briefly, at some decisions under the English legislation which might give us guidelines to how things will be dealt with in the future. THE ROLE OF THE TRIBUNAL 38. In Harrow LBC v Knight 4 the UK Employment Appeals Tribunal set out briefly what it must determine in such cases as follows:- i. That the employee had made a protected disclosure. ii. iii. That the employee had suffered some identifiable detriment. That the employer had done an act or omitted to do an act by which the employee was subject to detriment. iv. That this act or omission had been done by reason of the making of the protected disclosure. WHAT CONSTITUTES A DISCLOSURE 4 [2003] IRLR
13 39. In Everett Financial Management Limited v Murrell 5 the claimant claimed constructive dismissal caused by a protected disclosure. He was an equity dealer and he and a number of other colleagues became concerned about a particular practice which they were required to carry out. They raised their concerns in a meeting and they wrote a petition to directors seeking assurances that they were not engaged in any activity that was unlawful, could be construed as unlawful or in breach of any Regulation or that could jeopardise their individual personal registration. The EAT found that there was no disclosure of any information falling within the relevant section of the Act. It referred to the fact that a number of concerns had been raised which were not of themselves a qualifying disclosure and that thereafter all they sought was assurances. Merely expressing concerns and seeking assurances that there was no breach of a legal obligation did not involve a disclosure of information within the relevant statutory provisions. 40. In Bolton School v Evans 6 the Employment Tribunal held that the dismissal was either automatically unfair and if not automatically unfair he was unfairly dismissed. Mr Evans had deliberately hacked into a computer system in the school to test and demonstrate his belief about the inadequacy of the computer security. He was disciplined for this unlawful interference with the computer and then he resigned in protest at same. The Employment Tribunal said that it would: 5 EAT 952/02 December [2006] IRLR
14 emasculate the public policy behind the legislation for us to accept the respondent s submission that the claimant was subject of a disciplinary action not because he had blown the whistle on a suspected failure to comply with a legal obligation but rather because he had hacked into the respondent s computer system without authority. To allow an employer to defeat a Public Interest Disclosure Act case in this way would be to drive a coach and horses through the intention of the legislature that whistle blowers should have employment protection. 41. The Employment Appeals Tribunal (Elias J) disagreed. The EAT held that there was no disclosure and said: An employee cannot be entitled to break into his employer s filing cabinet in the hope of finding papers which will demonstrate some relevant wrongdoing which he can then disclose to the appropriate person. He is liable to be disciplined for such conduct, and that is so whether he turns up such papers or not. Provided that his misconduct is genuinely the reason for the disciplinary action, the employee will not be protected even if he does in fact discover incriminating papers. Success does not retrospectively provide a cloak of immunity for his actions, although he will then of course be protected with respect to the subsequent disclosure of the information itself. Putting it simply, it seems to us that the law protects the disclosure of information which the employee reasonable believes tends to demonstrate the kind of 14
15 wrongdoing, or anticipated wrongdoing, which is covered by Section 43B. It does not protect the actions of the employee which are directed to establishing or confirming the reasonableness of that belief. The protection is for the whistle blower who reasonably believes, to put it colloquially if inaccurately, that something is wrong, not the investigator who seeks either to establish that it is wrong or to show that his concerns are reasonable. DISCLOSURE VERSUS ALLEGATION 42. In Cavendish Munro Professional Risks Management Ltd v Geduld 7 the EAT drew a distinction between disclosure and the making of an allegation. Slade J made the following observation: That the Employment Rights Act recognises a distinction between information and allegation is illustrated by the reference to both of these terms in Section 43E. Although that Section does not apply directly in the context of this case, nonetheless it is included in the section of the Act with which we are concerned. It is instructive that those two terms are treated differently and can therefore be regarded as having been intended to have different meanings. Further, that information and an allegation are different is clear from the victimisation provisions in the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and the Race Relations Act [2010] ICR
16 She went on to say that the ordinary meaning of giving information is conveying facts. In the course of the hearing before us, a hypothetical was advanced regarding communicating information about the state of a hospital. Communicating information would be the wards have not been cleaned for the past two weeks. Yesterday Sharps were left lying around. Contrasted with that would be a statement that you are not complying with Health and Safety requirements. In our view this would be an allegation not information. 43. In Goode v Marks & Spencer Plc 8 the company proposed to amend its redundancy scheme. The claimant told his employer that he thought the proposals were disgusting. He ed a national newspaper making other statements, including that it would be a prelude to a wave of redundancies. The Employment Tribunal found that neither his comment to his employer or the constituted disclosure of information and the EAT dismissed his appeal. 44. On Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust v Watkinson 9 the claimant was the respondent s Chief Executive. He disclosed to the respondent s Board that an opinion had been obtained from Counsel stating that the respondent Trust and the Primary Care Trust would be acting unlawfully if they did not conduct public consultation before taking a particular action in 8 EAT 0442/09 April UK EAT 0378/10 August
17 relation to certain services. This information came to the attention of the Health Authority which regarded it as a severe irritant. The claimant was suspended and dismissed. The Employment Tribunal found that the dismissal was as a result of the pressure applied by the Health Authority on the respondent as a result of the disclosure and was automatically unfair. The decision of the Employment Tribunal was upheld in the EAT who rejected the submission that the disclosure was a mere allegation rather than the making of a disclosure. It held that it was giving information as to what had to be done by the Respondent to comply with their obligations. It is interesting to note that in that case the applicant was awarded the sum of 1.2 Million initially which was reduced on review to 818,000. BURDEN OF PROOF 45. The issue arose for consideration in Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd 10. The claimant asserted that she had been dismissed for making protected disclosures. The employer argued that she was dismissed for some other substantial reason regarding her relationship with her senior colleague. The EAT held that her dismissal was unfair but not for the reasons advanced by the employer and not by reason of the protected disclosure. The EAT (Peter Clark J) set out the approach that should be followed in such matters as follows:- (1) Has the claimant shown that there is a real issue as to whether the reason put forward by the respondent, some other substantial reason, was not the true reason? Has she raised some doubt as to that reason by advancing the s.103a reason? 10 [2007] IRLR
18 (2) If so, has the employer proved his reason for dismissal? (3) If not, has the employer disproved the s.103a reason advanced by the claimant? (4) If not, dismissal is for the s.103a reason. In answering those questions it follows: (a) that failure by the respondent to prove the potentially fair reason relied on does not automatically result in a finding of unfair dismissal under s.103a; (b) however, rejection of the employer's reason, coupled with the claimant having raised a prima facie case that the reason is a s.103a reason entitles the tribunal to infer that the s.103a reason is the true reason for dismissal, but (c) it remains open to the respondent to satisfy the tribunal that the making of the protected disclosures was not the reason or principal reason for dismissal, even if the real reason as found by the tribunal is not that advanced by the respondent; (d) it is not at any stage for the employee (with qualifying service) to prove the s.103a reason. 46. The Court of Appeal 11 whilst not disapproving of the approach set out in the Employment Appeals Tribunal decision made some interesting comments on the issue. 11 [2008] IRLR
19 47. Mummery LJ stated that:- I agree that when an employee positively asserts that there was a different and inadmissible reason for his dismissal, he must produce some evidence supporting the positive case, such as making protected disclosures. This does not mean, however, that, in order to succeed in an unfair dismissal claim, the employee has to discharge the burden of proving that the dismissal was for that different reason. It is sufficient for the employee to challenge the evidence produced by the employer to show the reason advanced by him for the dismissal and to produce some evidence of a different reason. 48. In Nunn v Royal Mail Group Ltd 12 the Employment Appeals Tribunal relying on Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd drew a distinction between the approach to be taken in discrimination cases and the approach to be taken in unfair dismissal cases when it said the following: In discrimination claims, there is clearly a necessity to exercise a degree of care in relation to the establishment of primary facts. In order to set up the shifting burden of proof, the court is urged to look carefully in relation to what inferences can be drawn from those facts particularly as the basic information will often be in the hands of the employer rather than the employee. However, in unfair dismissal claims, the burden is on the employer, there being no need for the employee to set 12 [2011] ICR
20 up sufficient facts for that burden to exist. Obviously, a tribunal, in assessing what reasons the employer is putting forward, will have in mind what the employee is saying about the reason, and will need to test the employer's witnesses in relation to those matters that point to a reason other than that that the employee is putting forward. But, at the end of the day, it is a matter for the tribunal to come to a view as to whether, on the balance of probabilities, the employer has satisfied them as to the reason. 20
Whistleblower Protection Act 10 of 2017 (GG 6450) ACT
(GG 6450) This Act has been passed by Parliament, but it has not yet been brought into force. It will come into force on a date set by the Minister in the Government Gazette. ACT To provide for the establishment
More information(iii) Geduld was again considered by the EAT in Kilraine v London Borough of Wandsworth [2016] IRLR 422.
WHISTLEBLOWING AN UPDATE Andrew Blake INTRODUCTION 1 Protected disclosure claims continue to keep employment lawyers, Tribunals and the EAT busy. The attractions of whistleblowing claims for claimants
More informationWhistleblower Protection
Whistleblower Protection Background The Board and staff are committed to promoting ethical and accountable conduct, and recognize the importance of working to deter and detect wrongdoing within the operations
More informationWhistleblowing Policy
Whistleblowing Policy 1. Introduction 1.1 The University of Bristol is committed to maintaining the highest standards of honesty openness and accountability and to conducting its business in a responsible
More informationA GUIDE TO WHISTLE BLOWING WHISTLE BLOWING POLICY AND PROCEDURE
A GUIDE TO WHISTLE BLOWING WHISTLE BLOWING POLICY AND PROCEDURE 1 Version 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. WHISTLE BLOWER S RIGHTS. 3. INITIAL STEPS. 4. DECIDING ON PROCEDURES. 5. WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY AND
More informationPUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of June 7, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton, AB
More informationWHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION BILL
REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA NATIONAL ASSEMBLY WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION BILL (As read a First Time) (Introduced by the Minister of Justice) [B. 1-2017) 2 BILL To provide for the establishment of a Whistleblower
More informationTHE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT
THE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT Provision PART 1 PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS Purpose of this Act 1 The purpose of this Act is (a) to facilitate the disclosure and investigation
More informationWhistleblower Protection 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA. Act 711 WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT 2010
Whistleblower Protection 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act 711 WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT 2010 2 Laws of Malaysia ACT 711 Date of Royal Assent...... 2 June 2010 Date of publication in the Gazette......... 10 June
More informationWHISTLE BLOWER POLICY
WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY (The Board of Directors of Energy Efficiency Services Limited in their 34 th Board Meeting held on 20 th March, 2015 has adopted NTPC s whistle blower policy with suitable modifications)
More informationPUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE POLICY
1 Policy Statement At Tourism and Events Queensland (TEQ), we believe that Public Interest Disclosures (PIDs) and the ability to make such disclosures without retaliation or reprisal is critically important,
More informationWhistle Blower Policy
Whistle Blower Policy Whistle Blower Policy Prana Biotechnology Ltd 1.1 Objective Prana Biotechnology Limited is committed to achieving compliance with all applicable laws and regulations regarding accounting
More informationYr Adran Plant, Addysg, Dysgu Gydol Oes a Sgiliau Department for Children, Education, Lifelong Learning and Skills
Yr Adran Plant, Addysg, Dysgu Gydol Oes a Sgiliau Department for Children, Education, Lifelong Learning and Skills Guidance for School Governing Bodies on and Model Whistleblowing Policy Guidance Welsh
More informationWhistle Blowing Policy
Great Bedwyn CE VC Primary School Whistle Blowing Policy Date of Last Review: November 2015 Date to be Reviewed: Will stand until LA changes apply Review Body: Full Governing Body 1 Whistle Blowing Policy
More informationWhistleblowers Protection Act 1994
Queensland Whistleblowers Protection Act 1994 Reprinted as in force on 1 December 2009 Reprint No. 5D This reprint is prepared by the Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel Warning This reprint
More informationFinancial Services and Markets Act 2000
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 2000 Chapter c.8 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I THE REGULATOR Section 1.The Financial Services Authority. The Authority's general duties 2. The Authority's general
More informationHigher Education Authority
PROCEDURES for STAFF MAKING PROTECTED DISCLOSURES UNDER SI 339 of 2014 1. WHAT IS A PROTECTED DISCLOSURE? 1.1 Making a protected disclosure refers to a situation where a worker discloses information in
More informationTelephone No:
Church Hill School Burlington Rise East Barnet Herts EN4 8NN Telephone No: 020 8368 3431 Fax: 020 8368 1602 e-mail: office@churchhill.barnetmail.net Name of policy: Whistleblowing Policy REVISION HISTORY
More informationIRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY*
IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY* 1. Objective: 1.1 To establish a mechanism for Employees and Directors of the Company to report to the Management, concerns about unethical behaviour,
More informationKEI INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Wires and Cables KEI INDUSTRIES LIMITED VIGIL MECHANISM/ WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY (Amended w.e.f. November 6, 2014) 1. PREFACE KEI Industries Limited ( the Company ) is committed to adhere to the highest
More informationWhistleblowing & Serious Misconduct Policy
King s Norton Boys School Whistleblowing & Serious Misconduct Policy We recognise that children cannot be expected to raise concerns in an environment where staff fail to do so. All staff should be aware
More informationHoly Trinity Catholic School. Whistle Blowing Policy 2017 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY 2015 ADOPTED BY HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC SCHOOL
Holy Trinity Catholic School Whistle Blowing Policy 2017 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY 2015 ADOPTED BY HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC SCHOOL Introduction 1.1 Birmingham City Council is committed
More informationNumber 27 of 2007 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYMENT (EXCEPTIONAL COLLECTIVE REDUNDANCIES AND RELATED MATTERS) ACT 2007 REVISED. Updated to 7 May 2016
Number 27 of 2007 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYMENT (EXCEPTIONAL COLLECTIVE REDUNDANCIES AND RELATED MATTERS) ACT 2007 REVISED Updated to 7 May 2016 This Revised Act is an administrative consolidation of the Protection
More informationWHISTLE BLOWER POLICY
WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY Bengal Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Limited (A Government of India Enterprise) Registered & Corporate Office: 6 Ganesh Chunder Avenue, Kolkata-700013 CIN: U24299WB1981GOI033489 WHISTLE
More informationWorld Bank Group Directive
World Bank Group Directive Staff Rule 3.00 - Office of Ethics and Business Conduct (EBC) Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public Catalogue Number EXC10.03-DIR.111 Issued September 15, 2016
More informationMaking a protected disclosure blowing the whistle
Making a protected disclosure blowing the whistle If you re concerned about serious wrongdoing in or by your organisation, the Ombudsman is able to provide information and guidance. The Protected Disclosures
More informationWHISTLEBLOWING POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR: Schools. 1 April March 2018
WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR: Schools 1 April 2017 31 March 2018 %School whistle blowing procedure version updated April 2017 1 WHISTLE BLOWING POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR: School - 1 April 2015
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE ACT 1995 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1- PRELIMINARY
PUBLIC SERVICE ACT 1995 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1- PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title and Commencement 2. Object of the Act 3. Application 4. Interpretation 5. Act is ancillary to the Constitution
More informationANTI-BRIBERY & CORRUPTION POLICY
GABRIEL RESOURCES LIMITED ANTI-BRIBERY & CORRUPTION POLICY 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Board of Directors of Gabriel Resources Ltd. 1 (the Company or "Gabriel") has determined that, on the recommendation of
More informationWHISTLE BLOWER POLICY INDIAN IMMUNOLOGICALS LIMITED
WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY OF INDIAN IMMUNOLOGICALS LIMITED 1. Preface The policy is formulated to provide employees an opportunity to report instances of unethical behaviour, actual or suspected, fraud or
More informationVIGIL MECHANISM (WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY) OF STAR AGRIWAREHOUSING AND COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
VIGIL MECHANISM (WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY) OF STAR AGRIWAREHOUSING AND COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED 1 VIGIL MECHANISM (WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY) 1. Preface The Company has adopted the Code of Ethics & Business
More informationDirective. Staff Manual - Staff Rules Office of Ethics and Business (EBC) Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public
Directive Staff Manual - Staff Rules - 03.00 Office of Ethics and Business (EBC) Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public Catalogue Number Issued Effective May 14, 2012 Retired September 15,
More informationSchools' HR model whistleblowing procedure Jan
Schools' HR model whistleblowing procedure Jan 2014 1 October 2013 The policy was adopted by the governing body of [name] school on [date] Schools' HR model whistleblowing procedure Jan 2014 2 Contents
More informationNumber 27 of 2007 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYMENT (EXCEPTIONAL COLLECTIVE REDUNDANCIES AND RELATED MATTERS) ACT 2007 REVISED. Updated to 1 September 2017
Number 27 of 2007 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYMENT (EXCEPTIONAL COLLECTIVE REDUNDANCIES AND RELATED MATTERS) ACT 2007 REVISED Updated to 1 September 2017 This Revised Act is an administrative consolidation of
More informationBSE Limited WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY OF BSE LIMITED
WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY OF BSE LIMITED (A) Background BSE Limited (the Company ) believes in the conduct of the affairs of its constituents in a fair and transparent manner by adopting highest standards
More informationAn Bille um Chosaint Sonraí, 2018 Data Protection Bill 2018
An Bille um Chosaint Sonraí, 18 Data Protection Bill 18 Mar a tionscnaíodh As initiated [No. of 18] AN BILLE UM CHOSAINT SONRAÍ, 18 DATA PROTECTION BILL 18 Mar a tionscnaíodh As initiated CONTENTS Section
More informationBANK OF INDUSTRY LIMITED. Whistle blowing Policy
BANK OF INDUSTRY LIMITED Whistle blowing Policy SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Whistle blowing vary in terms of definition, depending on the role it is designed to play in the society at large and the organization
More informationDraft Resolution 67/1. The Council adopts the Whistleblowing Policy.
Whistleblowing Policy MC/14/67 Contact Name and Details Nick Moore Head of Support Services (mooren@methodistchurch.org.uk) Status of Paper Final Action Required Decision Draft Resolution 67/1. The Council
More informationPensions (Amendment) Act, No. 18/1996: PENSIONS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1996 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
Pensions (Amendment) Act, 1996 1996 18 No. 18/1996: PENSIONS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1996 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1 Definition. 2 Amendment of section 2 of Principal Act. 3 Amendment of section 3 of Principal
More informationIndustrial Relations Further Amendment Act 2006 No 97
New South Wales Industrial Relations Further Amendment Act 2006 No 97 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Industrial Relations Act 1996 No 17 2 4 Amendment of Occupational Health
More informationAn Bille um Chosaint Sonraí, 2018 Data Protection Bill 2018
An Bille um Chosaint Sonraí, 18 Data Protection Bill 18 Mar a ritheadh ag Seanad Éireann As passed by Seanad Éireann [No. b of 18] AN BILLE UM CHOSAINT SONRAÍ, 18 DATA PROTECTION BILL 18 Mar a ritheadh
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE & PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE
SECTION 15 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE CONTENTS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GENERAL BACKGROUND 3 THE COUNCIL - BACKGROUND 3 ACCOUNTABLE OFFICER 4 GOVERNING BODY: THE COUNCIL 5 SCHEME OF
More informationNumber 29 of 2003 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (FIXED-TERM WORK) ACT 2003 REVISED. Updated to 1 September 2017
Number 29 of 2003 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (FIXED-TERM WORK) ACT 2003 REVISED Updated to 1 September 2017 This Revised Act is an administrative consolidation of the Protection of Employees (Fixed- Term.
More informationDisciplinary procedures for all employees
Disciplinary procedures for all employees Comprising: A) Disciplinary rules for all employees B) Misconduct Headteacher / Principal C) Misconduct all staff except Headteacher / Principal Approved by: Trustees
More informationHead, Financial Crime Control (FCC) Supported by: Operational Risk & Compliance Committee (ORCC)
Policy: Type: Policy Owner: Whistle blowing Governance & Assurance Head, Financial Crime Control (FCC) Supported by: Operational Risk & Compliance Committee (ORCC) Date: 18 July 2014 Supported by: Executive
More informationBERMUDA 2004 : 32 OMBUDSMAN ACT 2004
BERMUDA 2004 : 32 OMBUDSMAN ACT 2004 Date of Assent: 17 December 2004 Operative Date: 1 May 2005 1 Short title 2 Interpretation 3 Application of the Act 4 Office of Ombudsman 5 Functions and jurisdiction
More informationEmployee Discipline Policy
Employee Discipline Policy Authors Mr D Brown & Mrs J Lowe Last Reviewed Next review date July 2017 Reviewed by - Laurus Trust MODEL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE CONTENTS 1. Introduction Page 1 2. Application
More informationDisciplinary Policy and Procedure
Disciplinary Policy and Procedure November 2017 Signed (Chair of Trustees): Date: November 2017 Date of Review: November 2018 The Arbor Academy Trust reviews this policy annually. The Trustees may, however,
More informationAdvocate for Children and Young People
New South Wales Advocate for Children and Young People Act 2014 No 29 Contents Page Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Preliminary 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Definitions 2 Advocate for Children and Young People
More informationOBJECTS AND REASONS. Arrangement of Sections PART I. Preliminary PART II. Licensing Requirements for International Service Providers
1 OBJECTS AND REASONS This Bill would provide for the regulation of the providers of international corporate and trust services and for related matters. Section 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Application
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2015 New Jersey
Accountability Report Card Summary 2015 New Jersey New Jersey has an uneven state whistleblower law: Scoring 63 out of a possible 100 points; and Ranking 14 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of
More informationMAKING A PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE: POLICY AND PROCEDURE
MAKING A PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE: POLICY AND PROCEDURE 1. Foreword... 2 2. Purpose... 3 3. Background... 3 4. Definitions and Acronyms... 3 5. Policy... 4 6. What is a Public Interest Disclosure?...
More informationC-451 Workplace Psychological Harassment Prevention Act
Proposed Canadian National Law C-451 Workplace Psychological Harassment Prevention Act Second Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, 51-52 Elizabeth II, 2002-2003 An Act to prevent psychological harassment
More informationHealth Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process
Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process The following notes have been prepared to explain the complaints process under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance
More informationPART 2 REGULATED ACTIVITIES Chapter I Regulated Activities 3. Regulated activities. Chapter II The General Prohibition 4. The general prohibition.
FINANCIAL SERVICES ACT 2008 (Chapter 8) Arrangement of Sections PART 1 THE REGULATOR AND THE REGULATORY OBJECTIVES 1. The Financial Supervision Commission. 2. Exercise of functions to be compatible with
More informationSTEELCO GUJARAT LIMITED. Whistle Blower Policy
STEELCO GUJARAT LIMITED Whistle Blower Policy INDEX Sr.No. 1.0 Preamble 2.0 Definitions 3.0 Eligibility 4.0 Guiding Principles 5.0 Whistle Blower Role & Disqualification 6.0 Procedures Essentials and handling
More informationPublic Interest Disclosures Procedure
Public Interest Disclosures Procedure Version Approved by Approval date Effective date Next full review 2.4 Deputy Vice-Chancellor Academic 25 July 2017 15 August 2017 October 2015 Procedure Statement
More informationANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION POLICY UK ENGINEERING RECRUITMENT LTD
Page 1 of 5 Contents: ANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION POLICY 1. Definitions 2. Introduction 3. Purpose and scope of this policy 4. The Bribery Act 2010 5. The risks of not acting with integrity 6. The benefits
More informationWhistle-blowing Policy
Whistle-blowing Policy Introduction Heath Mount School is committed to conducting its business honestly and with integrity and demands the highest standards of conduct from both its staff and its pupils.
More informationUACN WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY
UACN WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY JULY 2015 VERSION 2.0 Document approval This document was approved by the Board of UAC of Nigeria PLC on 29 th July 2015 2 Table of Contents 1. Policy Statement..... 4 2. Application.....
More informationSECOND SUBMISSION ON THE PAROLE BILL 2016 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND EQUALITY
SECOND SUBMISSION ON THE PAROLE BILL 2016 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND EQUALITY NOVEMBER 2017 2 Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Summary of Recommendations... 5 3. Nature of Parole... 7 4. Membership of the
More informationFranchising (South Australia) Bill 2009
Advance for Mr Tony Piccolo MP South Australia Franchising (South Australia) Bill 09 A BILL FOR An Act to make provision for applying the Franchising Code of Conduct made under the Trade Practices Act
More informationNumber 45 of 2001 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (PART-TIME WORK) ACT 2001 REVISED. Updated to 1 September 2017
Number 45 of 2001 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (PART-TIME WORK) ACT 2001 REVISED Updated to 1 September 2017 This Revised Act is an administrative consolidation of the Protection of Employees (Part- Time. It
More informationSAINT LUCIA EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY AND TREATMENT IN EMPLOYMENT AND OCCUPATION ACT CHAPTER 16.14
SAINT LUCIA EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY AND TREATMENT IN EMPLOYMENT AND OCCUPATION ACT CHAPTER 16.14 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 31 December 2001 Act 9 of 2000 in force 1 April 2000 (S.I.99/2000)
More informationAN BILLE UM CHOSAINT FOSTAITHE (OBAIR GHNÍOMHAIREACHTA SHEALADACH), 2011 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (TEMPORARY AGENCY WORK) BILL 2011
AN BILLE UM CHOSAINT FOSTAITHE (OBAIR GHNÍOMHAIREACHTA SHEALADACH), 2011 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (TEMPORARY AGENCY WORK) BILL 2011 Mar a ritheadh ag dhá Theach an Oireachtais As passed by both Houses of
More informationEleventh Meeting of European Labour Court Judges. Florence, 24 October 2003
Eleventh Meeting of European Labour Court Judges Florence, 24 October 2003 New initiatives to make Labour Court hearings more efficient: use of alternative disputes methods, collective (class) action Questionnaire
More informationSTATUTE SECTION STATUTORY BREACH LIABILITY DEFENCE RESPONSIBLE PARTY FEDERAL STATUTES Canada Pension Plan, R.S.C 1985, c. C-8.
FEDERAL STATUTES Canada Pension Plan, R.S.C 1985, c. C-8. s. 21 Failure to deduct or remit the prescribed amount from an employee s remuneration, as and when required, to the Receiver General. s. 21.1(1)
More informationEthical Culture. Speaking up: Information for CII members about whistleblowing. CII guidance series
Ethical Culture CII guidance series Speaking up: Information for CII members about whistleblowing www.cii.co.uk Contents 2 Introduction 3 What is whistleblowing? 6 How to be better prepared 8 FAQs 10 Concluding
More informationProtected Disclosure Act Policy and Procedures
Protected Disclosure Act 2012 Policy and Procedures South East Water ABN 89 066 902 547 CONTENTS 1. Statement of support to disclosers... 2 2. Objects of the Act... 2 3. Receiving disclosures... 2 4. Definitions
More informationCaribbean Community (CARICOM) Secretariat
The Employment (Equal Opportunity and Treatment ) Act, 1991 : CARICOM model legi... Page 1 of 30 Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Secretariat Back to Model Legislation on Issues Affecting Women CARICOM MODEL
More informationROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE ACT [FEDERAL]
PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE ACT [FEDERAL] Published by As it read up until August 19th, 2012 Updated To: Important: Printing multiple
More informationSingapore: Mutual Assistance In Criminal Matters Act
The Asian Development Bank and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development do not guarantee the accuracy of this document and accept no responsibility whatsoever for any consequences of
More information72 SUPPORT STAFF 232 BARRISTERS 13 QUEEN S COUNSEL 16/10/2015 WHISTLEBLOWING CLAIMS: PRACTICAL GUIDANCE EMPLOYMENT LAW SEMINAR 5 OCTOBER 2015
EMPLOYMENT LAW SEMINAR 5 OCTOBER 2015 232 BARRISTERS 72 SUPPORT STAFF 13 QUEEN S COUNSEL 1 ST JOHN S BUILDINGS WHISTLEBLOWING CLAIMS: PRACTICAL GUIDANCE DIARMIUD BUNTING OVERVIEW What protection does the
More informationSTATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 631 of 2017 EUROPEAN UNION (SECURITIES FINANCING TRANSACTIONS) REGULATIONS 2017
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 631 of 2017 EUROPEAN UNION (SECURITIES FINANCING TRANSACTIONS) REGULATIONS 2017 2 [631] S.I. No. 631 of 2017 EUROPEAN UNION (SECURITIES FINANCING TRANSACTIONS) REGULATIONS
More informationEMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
Appeal No. EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 2 March 2007 Before HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK (SITTING ALONE) MS P GRAVELL APPELLANT LONDON BOROUGH OF
More information2000 No TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT
SI 2000/1551 The Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 is accompanied by Guidance Notes which are issued free of charge to all purchasers. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2000
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Georgia
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Georgia Georgia does not have a strong state whistleblower law: Scoring only 37 out of a possible 100 points; and Ranking 49 th out of 51 (50 states and the District
More informationA BILL. i n t i t u l e d. An Act to amend the Labuan Offshore Trusts Act 1996.
A BILL i n t i t u l e d An Act to amend the Labuan Offshore Trusts Act 1996. [ ] ENACTED by the Parliament of Malaysia as follows: Short title and commencement 1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Labuan
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION. Under. THE PUBLIC SERVICE ACT Before THE PUBLIC SERVICE GRIEVANCE BOARD. Oral Binda. - and -
Public Service Grievance Board Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Commission des griefs de la fonction publique Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest
More informationWhistle Blower Policy
Whistle Blower Policy Background: Clause-49 of the Listing Agreement embodying Corporate Governance Code interalia provides that a company may establish Whistle Blower Policy for employees to report to
More informationYMCA NSW Whistle Blower Policy
1. Document control Overview A whistle-blower is any employee, volunteer, contractor or people associated with the YMCA NSW that detects wrongdoing, or has reasonable grounds for suspecting wrongdoing
More informationSocial Workers Registration Legislation Bill
Social Workers Registration Legislation Bill Government Bill Explanatory note General policy statement This Bill is an omnibus Bill introduced under Standing Order 263. That Standing Order states that
More informationWHISTLE BLOWER POLICY
WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY For Directors & Employees Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (A subsidiary of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited) Regd Office: Mudapadav, Kuthethur, P.O. Via Katipalla,
More informationThe Agri-Food Act, 2004
1 AGRI-FOOD, 2004 c. A-15.21 The Agri-Food Act, 2004 being Chapter A-15.21 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2004 (effective October 8, 2004) as amended by the Statutes of Sasktchewan, 2010, c.1; 2013,
More informationLEGALActs SUPPLEMENT. THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ACT 2008 Act No. 32 of 2008 I assent
LEGALActs SUPPLEMENT 2008 497 to the Government Gazette of Mauritius No. 95 of 27 September 2008 THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ACT 2008 Act No. 32 of 2008 I assent 19 th September 2008 Acting President of the
More informationTHE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP BILL, 2008
Bill No. XLVI of 2008 THE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP BILL, 2008 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY TO BE INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA CLAUSES 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions.
More informationTrinity School. Whistle Blowing Policy
Trinity School Whistle Blowing Policy DOCUMENT REVIEW GOVERNOR APPROVAL DATE: 13 October 2017 COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE: Resources NEXT REVIEW DATE: October 2018 Make every effort to live in peace with everyone
More informationPARAGON UNION BERHAD WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY AND GUIDELINES
PARAGON UNION BERHAD WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY AND GUIDELINES 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY & GUIDELINES Page l Introduction 1 2 Definitions 1 3 Policy 1 4 Reporting 2 5 Evidence Needed Before
More information2000 No. 315 POLICE. The Royal Ulster Constabulary (Conduct) Regulations 2000 STATUTORY RULES OF NORTHERN IRELAND
STATUTORY RULES OF NORTHERN IRELAND 2000 No. 315 POLICE The Royal Ulster Constabulary (Conduct) Regulations 2000 Made..... 23rd October 2000 Coming into operation.. 6th November 2000 To be laid before
More informationANTI-TERRORISM AND CRIME ACT 2003 Chapter 6
Copyright Treasury of the Isle of Man Crown Copyright reserved See introductory page for restrictions on copying and reproduction ANTI-TERRORISM AND CRIME ACT 2003 Chapter 6 Arrangement of sections PART
More informationFuneral Planning Authority Rules
Funeral Planning Authority Rules 1. GENERAL 1.1 Interpretation In these Rules: "Appellant" means the party serving a Disciplinary Appeal Notice in accordance with Rule 7.9.1; "Applicant" means a person
More informationRoyal Mail Group Ltd. Bullying & Harassment Procedure Agreement. 1 st July 2013 For all employees of Royal Mail Group
Royal Mail Group Ltd Bullying & Harassment Procedure Agreement 1 st July 2013 For all employees of Royal Mail Group 1 Joint Royal Mail, CWU, Unite Statement 1. Royal Mail Group, CWU and Unite are committed
More informationWHISTLE BLOWER POLICY ORTEL COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (CIN: U74899DL1995PLC069353)
ORTEL WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY ORTEL COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (CIN: U74899DL1995PLC069353) 1 ORTEL WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY 1. Preface: a) The Company believes in the conduct of the affairs
More informationWorkplace Surveillance Act 2005
Workplace Surveillance Act 2005 As at 20 May 2014 Long Title An Act to regulate surveillance of employees at work; and for other purposes. Part 1 ñ Preliminary 1 Name of Act This Act is the Workplace Surveillance
More informationEducation Legislation Amendment (Staff) Act 2006 No 24
New South Wales Education Legislation Amendment (Staff) Act 2006 No 24 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Teaching Service Act 1980 No 23 2 4 Amendment of Technical and Further
More informationANTI-BRIBERY POLICY. (Covering all employees) Contents
ANTI-BRIBERY POLICY (Covering all employees) Contents 1. Introduction 2. Scope 3. Compliance 4. What is Bribery? 5. What is HITRANS Position on Bribery? 6. Preventing Bribery Adequate Procedures 7. Employee
More informationMODEL FEDERAL RULES OF DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION MODEL FEDERAL RULES OF DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT Developed by Standing Committee on Professional Discipline and Center for Professional Discipline February 14, 1978 Model Federal
More informationSouth Africa Domestic Violence Act, 1998
South Africa Domestic Violence Act, 1998 Africa Legal Aid Accra The Hague Pretoria ACT To provide for the issuing of protection orders with regard to domestic violence; and for matters connected therewith.
More information(1 March 2015 to date) LABOUR RELATIONS ACT 66 OF (Gazette No , Notice No. 1877, dated 13 December 1995) Commencement:
(1 March 2015 to date) [This is the current version and applies as from 1 March 2015, i.e. the date of commencement of the Legal Aid South Africa Act 39 of 2014 to date] LABOUR RELATIONS ACT 66 OF 1995
More informationNumber 45 of 2001 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (PART-TIME WORK) ACT, 2001 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1. Preliminary and General
Number 45 of 2001 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (PART-TIME WORK) ACT, 2001 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Preliminary and General Section 1. Short title, collective citation and construction. 2. Commencement.
More information