Alan W. Kowalchyk. Partner. Practices. Industries
|
|
- Peregrine Cummings
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Alan W. Kowalchyk Partner Minneapolis 3200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota D In summing up his years of experience, Alan describes himself simply as a problem solver for his clients' intellectual property concerns. He helps his clients successfully meet their business goals in intellectual property matters, whether those goals involve litigation, alternative dispute resolution, counseling and strategy, or portfolio analysis. Alan practices all aspects of Intellectual Property law with an emphasis on patent litigation, client counseling and alternative dispute resolution. He is experienced in patent infringement and validity assessment, as well as advising clients on patent portfolio management, and has handled all phases of patent prosecution, patent appeals, and reexaminations. He is a frequent speaker on and writer on the new America Invents Act provisions regarding post grant procedures to challenge and defend the validity of patents in the patent office. He is a State of Minnesota Qualified Neutral for adjudicative services and mediation, a member of the American Arbitration Association's National Panel of Neutrals, and a member of the World Intellectual Property Organization's list of Arbitrators and Mediators. Alan has achieved an AV peer review rating by Martindale-Hubbell. Practices Litigation Chemical & Life Sciences Licensing Post Grant Proceedings Industries Alternative Dispute Resolution Industrial Chemistry Consumer Products Food & Beverage Medical Devices Pharmaceuticals Alan's areas of technical experience include immunology, microbiology, genetic engineering, food science, applied chemistry, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and commercial and consumer products. As a Special Assistant Attorney General for Minnesota in the early 1980's, Alan handled litigation and administrative agency matters primarily in the environmental area. Alan enjoys traveling, as well as boating and fishing at his cabin on the lake.
2 REPRESENTATIVE CASES Litigation Experience Lead Counsel Park Industries, Inc. v. Diatool LLC; Civil Action No (N.D. Ill). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing plaintiffs in a patent infringement case regarding stone-fabrication machines. Mr. Kowalchyk successfully settled the case and the defendant agreed to cease and desist from further sale and offer for sale of the infringing product. Park Industries, Inc. v. EuroStone Machine USA; Civil Action No (SC). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing plaintiffs in a patent infringement case regarding stone-fabrication machines. Mr. Kowalchyk successfully settled the case and the defendant agreed to cease and desist from further sale and offer for sale of the infringing product. Wausau Paper Towel & Tissue, LLC v. Nittany Paper Mills, Inc.; Civil Action No (Middle D. PA). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing plaintiffs in a patent infringement case regarding paper roll technology. Mr. Kowalchyk successfully settled the case with the defendant agreeing to cease and desist from further manufacture, use, and sale of the infringing product. Wausau Paper Towel & Tissue, LLC v. Murphy Supply Co.; Civil Action No (S.D. OH). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing plaintiffs in a patent infringement case regarding paper roll technology. Mr. Kowalchyk successfully settled the case with the defendant agreeing to cease and desist from further manufacture, use, and sale of the infringing product. Wausau Paper Towel & Tissue, LLC V. F&B Company, Inc.; Civil Action No (N.D. Cal). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing plaintiffs in a patent infringement case regarding paper roll technology. Mr. Kowalchyk successfully settled the case with an acknowledgment of infringement and the defendant agreeing to cease and desist from further manufacture, use, and sale of the infringing product. Worldwide Integrated Resources, Inc. v. Wausau Paper Towel & Tissue, LLC; Civil Action No (C. D. CA). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing defendant in the patent infringement case involving paper towel adapter technology. The case was settled on terms allowing Mr. Kowalchyk's client to continue pursuing its business interests. Larson Manufacturing Company of South Dakota, Inc. v. AluminArt Products Limited and ChamberDoor Industries, Inc.; Civil Action No (D. S.D.). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing defendants in a patent infringement case regarding retractable screen door technology. The case was tried to the court on the issue of inequitable conduct with Mr. Kowalchyk successfully obtaining a judgment in favor of his client that the patent-in-suit was unenforceable based on inequitable conduct. The Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court decision and remanded the case for reconsideration based on the Court's opinion. The case was settled on terms allowing Mr. Kowalchyk's client to continue pursuing its business interests.
3 Greenheck Fan Corporation v. Loren Cook Company; Case No. 3:08-cv (W.D. WI). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing plaintiff in this patent infringement case involving fan technology. The case was successfully settled. Micromesh Technology Corporation v. Red Wing Shoe Company; Civil Action No (E.D. Tex.). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing defendant in a patent infringement case regarding a laminated fabric patent. The case was successfully settled with a dismissal of the case. Cushion Technologies LLC v. American Sporting Goods Corp et al; Civil Action No. 2:07cv109 (E.D. Tex.). Mr. Kowalchyk represented defendant Red Wing Shoes Company in this patent infringement case involving shoe technology. The case was successfully settled. Sandoz Nutrition Corporation v. Nutrition Medical, Inc.; Civil Action No (D. Minn.). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing plaintiff in a patent infringement case regarding nutritional supplement patents. After discovery, the case was settled with a monetary award to Mr. Kowalchyk's client and a permanent injunction. Mr. Kowalchyk successfully obtained summary judgment for his client, finding no inequitable conduct in patents-in-suit. Master Builders, Inc. v. General Resource Technology, Inc.; Civil Action No (D. Minn.). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing plaintiff in a patent infringement case regarding industrial chemical formulation patents. The case was settled with Mr. Kowalchyk successfully obtaining a Consent Judgment and permanent injunction in favor of his client. James J. Toth v. Sheldahl Inc.; Civil Action No. 6: (D. S.C.). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing defendant in a patent infringement case regarding flexible circuit board lamination technology. Mr. Kowalchyk obtained a dismissal of the case against his client based on a lack of jurisdiction. The Toro Company v. Dixon Industries, Inc.; Civil Action No (D. Minn.). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing plaintiff in this patent infringement case regarding lawn mower equipment. The case was settled with Mr. Kowalchyk obtaining a Final Consent Judgment finding infringement, valid patents, and a significant monetary recovery for his client. The Toro Company v. Kubota Tractor Corporation and Auburn Consolidated Industries, Inc.; Civil Action No (D. Minn.). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel representing plaintiff in this patent infringement case regarding lawn mower equipment. The case was settled with Mr. Kowalchyk obtaining a Final Consent Judgment finding infringement and significant monetary recovery for his client. J&D Sales, Inc. v. Schaefer Ventilation Equipment et al.; Civil Action No. 01-C-0612-C (D. Wisconsin). Mr. Kowalchyk represented the defendant in a patent infringement action regarding commercial fans. The case was settled on terms allowing Mr. Kowalchyk's client to continue pursuing its business interests. Trencor Inc. v. Vermeer Manufacturing Company and Vermeer Equipment of Texas, Inc.; Civil Action No. 4-94CV-818-A (D. Texas). Mr. Kowalchyk represented the defendant in a patent infringement action regarding road construction equipment. The case was settled on terms allowing Mr. Kowalchyk's client to continue pursuing its business interests. Champion Brass Manufacturing Co. v. The Toro Company; Civil Action No (C.D. Cal.). Mr. Kowalchyk represented the defendant in a patent infringement action regarding an irrigation patent. The case was settled on terms allowing Mr. Kowalchyk's client to continue pursuing its business interests.
4 Mr. Kowalchyk has also handled, as lead counsel, numerous patent litigation matters in arbitration, including cases in the areas of portable hand tools and irrigation products. Litigation Experience Co-Counse The Toro Company and exmark Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Scag Power Equipment, Inc. and Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc.; Civil Action No. 8:01CV279 (D. Neb.). Mr. Kowalchyk represented the plaintiffs, Toro and exmark, in a patent infringement case involving commercial lawn mowers. The case settled after several summary judgment rulings in favor of plaintiffs, and included a finding of no inequitable conduct in patents-in-suit. The Toro Company v. Grizzle & Hunter Plastic, Inc.; Civil Case No (S.D. Cal.). Mr. Kowalchyk represented plaintiff in a trade secret infringement action against former employee's use of trade secrets for irrigation devices. Mr. Kowalchyk's responsibilities included discovery, expert work, and pretrial activities. The case settled near close of discovery with injunction limiting defendant's activity and recovery of damages by Toro. The Toro Company v. Moridge Manufacturing, Inc.; Civil Action No (D. Minn.). Mr. Kowalchyk represented plaintiff in a patent infringement case regarding lawn mower equipment. Mr. Kowalchyk's responsibilities included discovery, motion practice, expert work, and pretrial activities. The case settled near trial, with Final Consent Judgment finding infringement, valid patents, and significant monetary recovery by Toro. Honeywell Inc. v. Minolta Camera Co. Ltd. and Minolta Corp.; Civil Action Nos , (D. N.J.). Mr. Kowalchyk represented plaintiff in this patent infringement case involving autofocus camera technology. Mr. Kowalchyk's responsibilities included all aspects of conducting discovery, including depositions in Japan, and expert witness work; Mr. Kowalchyk was a member of the trial team that secured a jury verdict of patent infringement and $90+ million damages for Honeywell. R.G. Barry Corporation and Vesture Corporation v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. and Phase Change Laboratories, Inc.; Civil Action No. 1:98CV00802 (D. N.C.). Mr. Kowalchyk represented plaintiffs in a patent infringement case regarding heated pizza delivery bags. The case also involved false advertising in connection with Domino's "Heat Wave" promotion. Mr. Kowalchyk's responsibilities included discovery, motion practice, expert work, and pretrial activities. The case settled, with Consent Judgment of validity, infringement, injunction and substantial monetary recovery to plaintiffs. The Toro Company v. K-Rain Manufacturing Corporation and Carl L.C. Kah, Jr.; Civil Action No (C.D. Cal.) and Carl L.C. Kah, Jr. and K-Rain Manufacturing Corporation v. The Toro Company; Case No (M.D. Fla.). Mr. Kowalchyk represented Toro in patent infringement cases regarding irrigation equipment in which Toro was accused of patent infringement. Mr. Kowalchyk's responsibilities included discovery, motion practice, expert work, and pretrial activities. The cases were consolidated and shifted to arbitration, where Mr. Kowalchyk co-tried the case and obtained a favorable decision. Chuck Blore & Don Richman, Inc. v. 20/20 Advertising, Inc. and Duling Optical Corporation; Civil Action No (D. Minn.). Mr. Kowalchyk represented plaintiffs in a copyright and unfair competition case regarding television commercials for eyeglasses. Mr. Kowalchyk's responsibilities included discovery, motion practice, expert work, and pretrial activities. The case was settled shortly before trial with substantial monetary recovery to plaintiffs.
5 Vermeer Manufacturing Company v. The Charles Machine Works, Inc.; Civil Action No CV (D. Iowa) and The Charles Machine Works, Inc. v. Vermeer Manufacturing Company; Civil Action No CV (D. Iowa). Mr. Kowalchyk represented Vermeer in these consolidated patent infringement cases involving directional boring equipment. Mr. Kowalchyk's responsibilities included discovery, motion practice, expert work, and pretrial activities. The cases were settled. During the cases, Mr. Kowalchyk obtained a Federal Circuit decision in favor of Vermeer's claim interpretation on Vermeer patent. Representative Federal Court Appellate Experience Larson Manufacturing Company of South Dakota, Inc. v. AluminArt Products Limited and ChamberDoor Industries, Inc.; Appellate Case No , (Federal Circuit). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel for AluminArt on appeal in a patent infringement case in which determination of unenforceability was affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further consideration. Vermeer Manufacturing Company v. The Charles Machine Works, Inc.; Appellate Case No (Federal Circuit). Mr. Kowalchyk was lead counsel for Vermeer on appeal in a patent infringement case in which the summary judgment regarding claim interpretation appealed by Mr. Kowalchyk's client was vacated and remanded. Deere & Company v. The Toro Company; Appellate Case No (Federal Circuit). Mr. Kowalchyk was co-counsel on the appeal for Toro in this patent infringement case. Rain Bird Sprinkler Mfg. Corp., Rain Bird Sales, Inc., Camsco Manufacturing Corp. and Anthony Manufacturing Corp. v. The Toro Company; Appellate Case No (Federal Circuit). Mr. Kowalchyk was co-counsel on the appeal for Toro in this patent infringement case. Animal Fair Inc. v. Amfesco Industries, Inc.; Eighth Circuit Appeal No (Eighth Circuit). Mr. Kowalchyk was cocounsel on the appeal for Animal Fair in this trademark and unfair competition case. The Toro Company v. R & R Products Co.; Eighth Circuit Appeal No (Eighth Circuit). Mr. Kowalchyk was co-counsel on the appeal for Toro in this copyright, trademark and unfair competition case. EDUCATION Hamline University J.D., cum laude, 1981 University of Wisconsin-Madison M.S. Food Science, 1977 B.S. Natural Science/Microbiology, 1976 BAR & COURT ADMISSIONS The Supreme Court of the State of Illinois, 1987 United States Court of Appeals - Federal Circuit, 1986
6 United States Court of Appeals 8th Circuit, 1985 United States Patent and Trademark Office, 1984 United States District Court - Minnesota, 1982 The Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota, 1981 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Minnesota State Bar Association Federal Circuit Bar Association American Bar Association American Intellectual Property Law Association Minnesota Intellectual Property Law Association Intellectual Property Owners Association Minnesota Advisory Committee on Genetically Altered Organisms Past chair Minnesota Solid Waste Advisory Committee Past member AWARDS & RECOGNITION Selected for inclusion in Minnesota Super Lawyers, AV peer review rating by Martindale-Hubbell Alan Kowalchyk PUBLICATIONS & SPEAKING Speaker, Effective Use of ADR in Intellectual Property Cases Fitting the Process to the Problem, Minnesota CLE Conference Center, May 2, Speaker at IP Strategy Summit in New York City on November 12, 2013 on the topic Your Post-AIA IP Strategy. Panelist at Hamline University Law School, Hot Topics in Business Law, September 29, 2013 on the topic Licensing Intellectual Property
7 Post-Grant Patent Proceedings: The Limited Scope of Additional Discovery, BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, August 16, 2013 What To Consider Before Using Inter Partes Review, Law360, March 22, 2013 Panelist at Law Week Colorado, State Bar Colorado, and Merchant & Gould, October 23, 2012 on the topic: The America Invents Act & Patent Litigation. Panelist at Hamline University Law School, Hot Topics in Business Law, October 1, 2012, on the topic: The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act and what the recent changes mean to U.S. patent law. Panelist at University of Washington: High Technology Protection Summit on July 27-28, 2012 on the topic: Document Retention Policies and E-Discovery after Rambus. The American Invents Act: Key Provisions Affecting Inventors, Patent Owners, Accused Infringers and Attorneys, ABA roundtable presentation, December 7, 2011 Presenter, LexisNexis webinar, Considerations Under the America Invents Act (AIA),November 29, Panelist at University of Washington: High Technology Protection Summit on July 22, 2011 on the topic: Will Therasense Ease Administrative Burden of Complex Domestic and International Patent Prosecution. Patent Reexamination: An Effective Litigation Alternative? Landslide, ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law, Volume 3, No. 1, September/October Inequitable Conduct and Establishing Deceptive Intent - Is Guidance Coming? 2010 High Technology Protection Summit at the University of Washington School of Law, Seattle, WA, July 23-24, Facts and Myths of Patent Re-Examinations, Law360, Intellectual Property (January 15, 2010) Using Arbitration to Solve Intellectual Property Disputes, MSBA Webcast CLE presenter (August 2007) Resolving Intellectual Property Disputes Outside of Court: Using ADR to Take Control of Your Case, Dispute Resolution Journal, 61(2), (May/July 2006) The Inequitable Conduct Defense Lives On: 2003 Federal Circuit Decisions and Their Impact The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law - September 2004 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION State of Minnesota Qualified Neutral for adjudicative services and mediation
8 Member of the American Arbitration Association's National Panel of Neutrals Member of the World Intellectual Property Organization's list of Arbitrators and Mediators PATENT EXPERIENCE Patent infringement and validity assessment Patent portfolio management Patent opinion writing All phases of patent prosecution Patent appeals and reexaminations TEACHING Adjunct professor, William Mitchell College of Law QUOTED 5 Tips For Winning USPTO Review Under AIA, Law360, September 13, 2013, by Ryan Davis Sweeping patent law changes take effect, minnlawyer.com, September 24, 2012, by Jane Pribek
Barbara J. Grahn Partner
Barbara J. Grahn Partner Minneapolis, MN Tel: 612.607.7325 Fax: 612.607.7100 bgrahn@foxrothschild.com Barb assists companies in securing and enforcing their trademark rights both in the United States and
More informationCase 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 4323 EXHIBIT 8
Case 4:13-cv-00003-AWA-LRL Document 195-15 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 4323 EXHIBIT 8 Case 4:13-cv-00003-AWA-LRL Document 195-15 Filed 11/21/16 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 4324 DECLARATION OF CLIFF CANTOR
More informationCase 4:15-cv PJH Document Filed 10/25/16 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:15-cv-00760-PJH Document 140-2 Filed 10/25/16 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 WHATLEY KALLAS LLP Alan M. Mansfield (Cal. Bar No. 125998) amansfield@whatleykallas.com
More informationMorrow v. Kroger: Obtained summary judgment on all claims of employer liability for sexual harassment and retaliation, affirmed by the Fifth Circuit C
MELODY MCANALLY Memphis Office (901) 680-7322 melody.mcanally@butlersnow.com Melody focuses her practice on data privacy and security and commercial litigation. She is Co-Team Leader of Butler Snow s Data
More informationPatent. Service Area Contact. Attorneys. Related Services. Patent Procurement and Portfolio Management
Patent Patent Procurement and Portfolio Management Hinshaw has highly experienced and skilled attorneys with varied technical backgrounds including chemistry, chemical engineering, computer science, electrical
More informationMultidistrict Litigation, Forum Selection and Transfer: Tips and Trends Julie M. Holloway Partner, Latham & Watkins LLP
Multidistrict Litigation, Forum Selection and Transfer: Tips and Trends Julie M. Holloway Partner, Latham & Watkins LLP Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized
More informationStephen Orlofsky leads the Firm s appellate practice and is the administrative partner of Blank Rome s Princeton, New Jersey, office.
Stephen M. Orlofsky Partner Business Litigation 300 Carnegie Center Princeton, NJ 08540 +1.609.750.2646 orlofsky@ Stephen Orlofsky leads the Firm s appellate practice and is the administrative partner
More informationCharles M. Roesch Partner
Charles M. Roesch Partner chuck.roesch@dinsmore.com Cincinnati, OH Tel: (513) 977-8178 Chuck is the chair of the Labor and Employment department and a member of the firm s Board of Directors. He also sits
More informationJames J. Oh. Focus Areas. Overview
Shareholder 321 North Clark Street Suite 1000 Chicago, IL 60654 main: (312) 372-5520 direct: (312) 795-3261 fax: (312) 372-7880 joh@littler.com Focus Areas Class Actions Wage and Hour Discrimination and
More informationWILLIAM E. CORUM. Kansas City, MO office:
WILLIAM E. CORUM Partner Kansas City, MO office: 816.983.8139 email: william.corum@ Overview As a trial lawyer, Bill is sought out by national and global companies for his litigation strategy and direction.
More informationJeffrey D. Klobucar. Overview. Shareholder. Phone: Fax: Practice Groups
Jeffrey D. Klobucar Shareholder Email: jklobucar@bassford.com Phone: 612.376.1639 Fax: 612.746.1239 Practice Groups Bankruptcy/Creditors' Remedies, Class Action/Multidistrict Litigation, Commercial Litigation,
More informationGlobal IP Management Hot-Topic Round-Up
Global IP Management Hot-Topic Round-Up 1 Panelist Dr. Rouget F. (Ric) Henschel, Partner, Chemical, Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical Practice, and Co-Chair, Life Sciences Industry Team, Foley & Lardner Sven
More informationThe America Invents Act : What You Need to Know. September 28, 2011
The America Invents Act : What You Need to Know September 28, 2011 Presented by John B. Pegram J. Peter Fasse 2 The America Invents Act (AIA) Enacted September 16, 2011 3 References: AIA = America Invents
More informationAIA's Impact On Multidefendant Patent Litigation: Part 2
AIA's Impact On Multidefendant Patent Litigation: Part 2 Law360, New York (October 26, 2012, 12:34 PM ET) -- In the first part of this article, available here, we reviewed the background concerning the
More informationPATENT REFORM. Did Patent Reform Level the Playing Field for Foreign Entities? 1 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. No.
Reproduced with permission from BNA s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, 82 PTCJ 789, 10/07/2011. Copyright 2011 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com PATENT REFORM
More informationCase 1:11-cv RMC Document 1 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 1:11-cv-01128-RMC Document 1 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION STARLINGER & CO. GMBH, V. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.
More informationCase: 3:13-cv bbc Document #: 48 Filed: 11/14/13 Page 1 of 9
Case: 3:13-cv-00346-bbc Document #: 48 Filed: 11/14/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION O R D E R
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORP., Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & CO., et al. Defendants. O R D E R 2:06-CV-72-DF Before the Court
More informationPre-Issuance Submissions under the America Invents Act
Pre-Issuance Submissions under the America Invents Act By Alan Kendrick, J.D., Nerac Analyst The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) was signed into law By President Obama in September 2011 and the final
More informationA SUMMARY OF THE SHORT, SUMMARY, AND EXPEDITED CIVIL ACTION PROGRAMS AROUND THE COUNTRY
A SUMMARY OF THE SHORT, SUMMARY, AND EXPEDITED CIVIL ACTION PROGRAMS AROUND THE COUNTRY N.D. Cal. Expedited General Order No. 64 2011 Voluntary Absent agreement, limited to 10 interrogatories, 10 requests
More informationPost-SAS: What s Actually Happening. Webinar Presented by: Bill Robinson George Quillin Andrew Cheslock Michelle Moran
Post-SAS: What s Actually Happening Webinar Presented by: Bill Robinson George Quillin Andrew Cheslock Michelle Moran June 21, 2018 Housekeeping Questions can be entered via the Q&A Widget open on the
More informationFreedom to Operate and the Use of AIA Review
Freedom to Operate and the Use of AIA Review Mark R. Benedict Dave Schmidt IP Life Sciences Exchange, Munich Germany November 15, 2016 The recipient may only view this work. No other right or license is
More information7 Saint Paul Street Baltimore, MD Phone: Fax:
2018 Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP Richard J. Magid Senior Counsel 7 Saint Paul Street Baltimore, MD 21202-1636 Phone: 410.347.8716 Fax: 410.223.3496 Email: rmagid@wtplaw.com Experience Mr. Magid focuses
More informationScott S. Morrisson Partner
Scott S. Morrisson Partner P: (317) 238-6201 F: (317) 636-1507 E: smorrisson@kdlegal.com Carmel Office 12800 North Meridian Street Suite 300 Carmel, IN 46032-5407 Mr. Morrisson's main area of practice
More informationJohn Fargo, Director Intellectual Property Staff, Civil Division Department of Justice.
DOJ Role in Affirmative Suits John Fargo, Director Intellectual Property Staff, Civil Division Department of Justice May 6, 2009 john.fargo@usdoj.gov DOJ Role in Affirmative Suits Tech transfer involves
More informationEmily Stern. Partner Madison Avenue New York, NY Practices. Industries. Selected Experience
Emily Stern Partner +1.212.940.8515 emily.stern@kattenlaw.com 575 Madison Avenue, NY 10022-2585 Practices FOCUS: and Dispute Resolution Securities and Enforcement White Collar, Investigations and Compliance
More informationWhat is Post Grant Review?
An Overview of the New Post Grant Review Proceedings at the USPTO Michael Griggs, Boyle Fredrickson May 15, 2015 What is Post Grant Review? Trial proceedings at the USPTO created by the America Invents
More informationWhite Paper Report United States Patent Invalidity Study 2012
White Paper Report United States Patent Invalidity Study 2012 1. Introduction The U.S. patent laws are predicated on the constitutional goal to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN POPSOCKETS LLC, v. Plaintiff, CRAIG HUEFFNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A ABSOLUTE MARKETING, Defendants. Case No. 17-cv-827 JURY TRIAL
More informationEllen Matheson. PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY THE CASE (Doc. 100)
Case 8:12-cv-00021-JST-JPR Document 116 Filed 12/19/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:3544 Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Ellen Matheson Deputy Clerk ATTORNEYS PRESENT
More informationJuly 12, NPE Patent Litigation. The AIA s Impact on. Chris Marchese. Mike Amon
The AIA s Impact on NPE Patent Litigation Chris Marchese Mike Amon July 12, 2012 What is an NPE? Non Practicing Entity (aka patent troll ) Entity that does not make products Thus does not practice its
More informationCase 8:15-cv SDM-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:15-cv-01484-SDM-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION NATIONWIDE INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida corporation, v.
More informationBruce M. Sabados. Partner Madison Avenue New York, NY Practices. Industries.
Bruce M. Sabados Partner +1.212.940.6369 bruce.sabados@kattenlaw.com 575 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10022-2585 Practices FOCUS: and Dispute Resolution Securities and Enforcement Appellate and Supreme
More informationLAMAR F. JOST Partner P F
Partner jost@wtotrial.com P 303.244.1905 F 303.244.1879 EDUCATION University of Wyoming College of Law, J.D., 2002 Order of the Coif Wyoming Law Review, Comment Editor University of Wyoming, B.S., 1999,
More informationColleen P. Lewis Partner
Colleen P. Lewis Partner colleen.lewis@dinsmore.com Cincinnati, OH Tel: (513) 977-8426 Colleen's practice includes the defense of private and public employers, including several transportation clients,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:15-cv-01054-RNC Document 21 Filed 09/09/15 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PLASMA AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC., : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No: 3:15-cv-01054
More informationIDEAS ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
IDEAS ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW APRIL/MAY 2016 Defendant damaged: A patent infringement case Thanks for the memory Clarifying the patent description requirement Whom are you confusing? Clear labeling
More informationCase 2:09-cv NBF Document 604 Filed 11/05/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 604 Filed 11/05/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY, vs. Plaintiff, MARVELL TECHNOLOGY
More informationPartner Head of Media Law Practice Group
laura.prather@haynesboone.com PRACTICES: Media and Entertainment Litigation, Litigation, Intellectual Property Litigation, Media and First Amendment Appeals, Social Media, Copyright, Appellate; INDUSTRIES:
More informationNewly Signed U.S. Patent Law Will Overhaul Patent Procurement, Enforcement and Defense
September 16, 2011 Practice Groups: IP Procurement and Portfolio Management Intellectual Property Litigation Newly Signed U.S. Patent Law Will Overhaul Patent Procurement, Enforcement and Defense On September
More informationDOMESTIC OPTIONS FOR PROTECTING YOUR TRADEMARKS IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY
Protecting Your Trademarks In a Global Economy October, 2008 DOMESTIC OPTIONS FOR PROTECTING YOUR TRADEMARKS IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY TRADEMARK LITIGATION VERSES CLAIMS UNDER SECTION 337 OF THE ITC by J. Daniel
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC06-1269 PER CURIAM. IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR SUBCHAPTERS 6-25 AND 6-26. [July 6, 2006] The Florida Bar petitions this Court to consider proposed
More information2011 Foley & Lardner LLP Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative
2011 Foley & Lardner LLP Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative of clients 321 N. Clark Street, Suite 2800, Chicago,
More informationWIPO ASIAN REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SYSTEM FOR HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES
ORIGINAL: English DATE: July 2002 E MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (SIPO) WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION JAPAN PATENT OFFICE WIPO ASIAN REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM
More informationThe Halo Effect on Patent Infringement Risk: Should You Revisit Your Corporate Strategy for Mitigating Risk? March 23, 2017 Cleveland, OH
The Halo Effect on Patent Infringement Risk: Should You Revisit Your Corporate Strategy for Mitigating Risk? March 23, 2017 Cleveland, OH Steven M. Auvil, Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP Steve Auvil
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1471 CLEARPLAY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MAX ABECASSIS and NISSIM CORP, Defendants-Appellants. David L. Mortensen, Stoel Rives LLP, of Salt
More informationCase 6:12-cv MHS-JDL Document 48 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1365
Case 6:12-cv-00398-MHS-JDL Document 48 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1365 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION U.S. ETHERNET INNOVATIONS, LLC vs.
More informationRULE 2.4: LAWYER SERVING
American Bar Association CPR Policy Implementation Committee Variations of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct RULE 2.4: LAWYER SERVING AS THIRD-PARTY NEUTRAL (a) A lawyer serves as a third-party
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 16-cv-1250 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ENERGY BANK, INC.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-COHN/SELTZER ORDER STAYING CASE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 14-61798-CIV-COHN/SELTZER JLIP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. STRATOSPHERIC INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. / ORDER STAYING CASE THIS CAUSE
More informationInjunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patents
Litigation Webinar Series: INSIGHTS Our take on litigation and trial developments across the U.S. Injunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patents David Healey Sr. Principal, Fish & Richardson Houston,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit GRAPHIC CONTROLS CORPORATION, UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.,
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 97-1551 GRAPHIC CONTROLS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. William M. Janssen, Saul, Ewing, Remick
More informationLAWSON & PERSSON, P.C.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES Attorney Michael J. Persson (Mike) is a Registered Patent Attorney and practices primarily in the field of intellectual property law and litigation. The following materials
More informationChristopher J. Schulte
Christopher J. Schulte Partner Minneapolis 3200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 cschulte@merchantgould.com D 612.336.4615 The first thing Chris asks his clients is whether
More informationProducts of the Mind Require Special Handling:
Products of the Mind Require Special Handling: Arbitration Surpasses Litigation for Intellectual Property Disputes A business s competitive position, even its viability, can depend upon protecting its
More information$2 to $8 million AMERICA INVENTS ACT MANAGING IP RISK IN THE NEW ERA OF POST GRANT PROCEEDINGS 7/30/2013 MANAGING RISK UNDER THE AIA
AMERICA INVENTS ACT MANAGING IP RISK IN THE NEW ERA OF POST GRANT PROCEEDINGS John B. Scherling Antony M. Novom Sughrue Mion, PLLC July 30, 2013 1 $2 to $8 million 2 1 $1.8 billion $1.5 billion $1.2 billion
More informationR. Kenyon Meyer Partner
R. Kenyon Meyer Partner kenyon.meyer@dinsmore.com Louisville, KY Tel: (502) 540-2325 Kenyon is the office managing partner of the Louisville office. He has tried a wide variety of cases in state and federal
More informationLeveraging the AIA s Joinder Provision, Recent Decisions, and New Court Procedures in Defending Infringement Disputes
Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A NPEs in Patent Litigation: i i Latest Developments Leveraging the AIA s Joinder Provision, Recent Decisions, and New Court Procedures in Defending
More informationCase 4:17-cv RP-SBJ Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 4:17-cv-00096-RP-SBJ Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION PUTCO, INC., Plaintiffs, v. METRA ELECTRONICS, Defendants. Civil
More informationCase3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11
Case:-cv-0-VC Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 JAMES C. OTTESON, State Bar No. jim@agilityiplaw.com THOMAS T. CARMACK, State Bar No. tom@agilityiplaw.com AGILITY IP LAW, LLP Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park,
More informationKENT A. JORDAN United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 844 N. King Street - Lock Box 10 Wilmington, Delaware (302)
KENT A. JORDAN United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 844 N. King Street - Lock Box 10 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 573-6001 UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT (Wilmington,
More information2 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 59. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Fall, Recent Development RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PATENT LAW
2 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 59 Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Fall, 1993 Recent Development RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PATENT LAW Andrew J. Dillon a1 Duke W. Yee aa1 Copyright (c) 1993 by the State
More informationIntellectual Property: Efficiencies in Patent Post-Grant Proceedings
Intellectual Property: Efficiencies in Patent Post-Grant Proceedings By Ann Fort, Pete Pappas, Karissa Blyth, Robert Kohse and Steffan Finnegan The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011 (AIA) created
More informationCase 2:04-cv TJW Document 424 Filed 03/21/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case :04-cv-000-TJW Document 44 Filed 0/1/007 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION O MICRO INTERNATIONAL LTD., Plaintiff, v. BEYOND INNOVATION
More informationKCC Class Action Digest March 2019
KCC Class Action Digest March 2019 Class Action Services KCC Class Action Services partners with counsel to deliver high-quality, cost-effective notice and settlement administration services. Recognized
More informationPost-Grant for Practitioners. Evidentiary Trends at the PTAB Part II: "Paper" Witness Testimony. June 8, Steve Schaefer Principal
June 8, 2016 Post-Grant for Practitioners Evidentiary Trends at the PTAB Part II: "Paper" Witness Testimony Steve Schaefer Principal John Adkisson Principal Thomas Rozylowicz Principal Agenda #FishWebinar
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-jst ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY Re: ECF
More informationwhich we were successful in obtaining a preliminary injunction against borrowers. Additionally, SAC later received summary judgment over all of Plaint
JOHN A. (JACK) CRAWFORD, JR. Jackson Office (601) 985-4532 jack.crawford@butlersnow.com Jack is experienced in financial services litigation and commercial litigation matters. He has been AV-rated by Martindale-Hubbell
More informationEducational Briefing On Interference Proceedings Relating To CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology Patents. August 28, 2018
Educational Briefing On Interference Proceedings Relating To CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology Patents August 28, 2018 1 Today s Participants Cora Holt, Associate, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:19-cv-00737-MLB Document 1 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MAX BLU TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, v. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION
More informationFootnote 61: Abrogating MyMail, Misjoinder in Patent Cases Revived. TIMOTHY K. WILSON i
International In-house Counsel Journal Vol. 5, No. 17, Autumn 2011, 1 Footnote 61: Abrogating MyMail, Misjoinder in Patent Cases Revived TIMOTHY K. WILSON i Senior IP Counsel, SAS Institute Inc, USA abrogate
More informationAdam J. Levitt. Contact Information. Notable Representations
Adam J. Levitt Adam operates one of the nation s leading commercial litigation practices, having achieved billions in recoveries for his clients. Contact Information Email: alevitt@dlcfirm.com LinkedIn:
More informationCA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.
AL ALABAMA Ala. Code 10-2B-15.02 (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A-2-15.02.] No monetary penalties listed. May invalidate in-state contracts made by unqualified foreign corporations.
More informationInequitable Conduct and the Duty to Disclose. Tonya Drake March 2, 2010
Inequitable Conduct and the Duty to Disclose Tonya Drake March 2, 2010 Inequitable conduct Defense to patent infringement A finding of inequitable conduct will render a patent unenforceable Claims may
More informationAIA Post-Grant Implementation Begins - Is Your Business Strategy Aligned? August 27, A Web conference hosted by Foley & Lardner LLP
AIA Post-Grant Implementation Begins - Is Your Business Strategy Aligned? August 27, 2012 A Web conference hosted by Foley & Lardner LLP Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome
More informationFactors Affecting Success of Stay Motions Pending Inter Partes & Covered Business Method Review
Factors Affecting Success of Stay Motions Pending Inter Partes & Covered Business Method Review Hosted by The Federal Circuit Bar Association October 21, 2016 Moderator: Kevin Hardy, Williams & Connolly
More informationJune 29, 2011 Submitted by: Julie P. Samuels Staff Attorney Michael Barclay, Reg. No. 32,553 Fellow Electronic Frontier Foundation
To: Kenneth M. Schor, Office of Patent Legal Administration, Office of the Associate Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy To: reexamimprovementcomments@uspto.gov Docket No: PTO-P-2011-0018 Comments
More informationWORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING
43 rd World Intellectual Property Congress Seoul, Korea WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING October 21, 2012 John Kim* Admitted to practice in Maryland, the District of Columbia,
More informationL DATE FILED: ~-~-~ lll'f
Case 1:13-cv-03777-AKH Document 154 Filed 08/11/14 I USDC Page SL ~ y 1 of 10 I DOCJ.. 1.' '~"'"T. ~ IFLr"l 1-... ~~c "' ' CALL\ ELED DOL#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT L DATE FILED: ~-~-~ lll'f SOUTHERN
More informationSection 4. Table of State Court Authorities Governing Judicial Adjuncts and Comparison Between State Rules and Fed. R. Civ. P. 53
Section 4. Table of State Court Authorities Governing Judicial Adjuncts and Comparison Between State Rules and Fed. R. Civ. P. 53 This chart originally appeared in Lynn Jokela & David F. Herr, Special
More informationPresented to The Ohio State Bar Association. May 23, 2012
Your Guide to the America Invents Act (AIA) Presented to The Ohio State Bar Association May 23, 2012 Overview A. Most comprehensive change to U.S. patent law in over 60 years; signed into law Sept. 16,
More informationDrafting Trademark Settlement Agreements to Resolve IP Disputes
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Drafting Trademark Settlement Agreements to Resolve IP Disputes Negotiating Exhaustion of Infringing Materials, Restrictions on Future Trademark
More informationCase: 1:17-md DAP Doc #: 19 Filed: 12/21/17 1 of 5. PageID #: 148 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:17-md-02804-DAP Doc #: 19 Filed: 12/21/17 1 of 5. PageID #: 148 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION ) MDL No. 2804 OPIATE
More informationIntellectual Property High Court
Intellectual Property High Court 1. History of the Divisions of the Intellectual Property High Court ( IP High Court ) The Intellectual Property Division of the Tokyo High Court was first established in
More informationCase 1:15-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:15-cv-01188-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE BRANDS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, ALBAAD MASSUOT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:14-cv-04857-ADM-HB Document 203 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA M-I Drilling Fluids UK Ltd. and M-I LLC, Case No. 14-cv-4857 (ADM/HB) v. Dynamic Air
More informationKIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
Sponsored by Statistical data supplied by KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP United States Intellectual property litigation and the ITC This article first appeared in IP Value 2004, Building and enforcing intellectual
More informationof $14 first volume, $8 each additional volume. Total $ handling. P.O.# (if available)
6 Easy Ways To Contact BNA Books web: www.bna.com/bnabooks E-mail: books@bna.com CALL: 1.800.960.1220 FAX: 1.732.346.1624 Web orders 10% off! MAIL: BNA Books, A Division of BNA, PO Box 7814, Edison, NJ
More informationCase 1:15-cv RGA Document 48 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 486 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:15-cv-01188-RGA Document 48 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 486 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE BRANDS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, ALBAAD MASSUOT
More informationCOMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION WITH STATE VERSIONS AND AMENDMENTS SINCE AUGUST 2002
As of January 26, 2017 2017 American Bar Association AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY CPR POLICY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE COMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1
Case 1:18-cv-01866 Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------X AURORA LED TECHNOLOGY,
More informationCase 3:19-cv GPC-LL Document 4 Filed 03/22/19 PageID.16 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-00-gpc-ll Document Filed 0 PageID. Page of 0 0 0 LAURA L. CHAPMAN, Cal. Bar No. LChapman@SheppardMullin.com YASAMIN PARSAFAR, Cal. Bar No. YParsafar@SheppardMullin.com SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER
More informationFenner Investments, Ltd. v. Cellco Partnership Impact on IPR Practice and District Court Practice
Where Do We Go from Here? - An Analysis of Teva s Impact on IPR Practice and How the Federal Circuit Is Attempting to Limit the Impact of Teva By Rebecca Cavin, Suzanne Konrad, and Michael Abernathy, K&L
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN WILEY & SONS, LTD., and AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, Plaintiffs, MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP, and JOHN DOE
More informationArbitration Agreements and Class Action Waivers After AT&T. Mobility v. Concepcion
ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL San Diego Chapter Arbitration Agreements and Class Action Waivers After AT&T PRESENTED BY Marie Burke Kenny Aaron T. Winn DATE June 16, 2011 Mobility v. Concepcion 2011
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., v. MERUS N.V.,
Case: 16-1346 Document: 105 Page: 1 Filed: 09/26/2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 2016-1346 REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., v. MERUS N.V., Plaintiff-Appellant, Defendant-Appellee.
More informationBest Practices in Multi-Defendant Litigation
Best Practices in Multi-Defendant Litigation IPO Annual Meeting September 12-14, 2010 IPO 2010 Annual Meeting 1 Speakers Moderator: Elizabeth Ann "Betty" Morgan The Morgan Law Firm P.C. William Bergmann
More informationNANCY A. NOALL. Contact Information Nancy A. Noall
NANCY A. NOALL NANCY A. NOALL is a Partner with the Ohio based law firm of Weston Hurd LLP and is the Chair of the firm s Labor Practice Group. She concentrates her practice in the areas of labor and employment
More informationProfessor Sara Anne Hook, M.L.S., M.B.A., J.D AIPLA Spring Meeting, May 14, 2011
Professor Sara Anne Hook, M.L.S., M.B.A., J.D. 2011 AIPLA Spring Meeting, May 14, 2011 The month of May in Indiana is particularly important because of the Indianapolis 500, an event that is officially
More informationUnited Kingdom. By Penny Gilbert, Kit Carter and Stuart Knight, Powell Gilbert LLP
Powell Gilbert LLP United Kingdom United Kingdom By Penny Gilbert, Kit Carter and Stuart Knight, Powell Gilbert LLP Q: What options are open to a patent owner seeking to enforce its rights in your jurisdiction?
More information