IP Part IV: Patent prosecution

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IP Part IV: Patent prosecution"

Transcription

1 IP Part IV: Patent prosecution Tech Transfer course August 2017 Griet Den Herder, PhD, IP Manager

2 Patent prosecution Interaction between applicants and a patent office regarding a patent application Pre-grant prosecution Applying for a patent Negotiating with the patent office to obtain the grant of a patent Post-grant prosecution Opposition

3 The European Patent Convention (EPC) Legal framework for the granting of European patents A uniform procedure for the EPC contracting states European Patent Office (EPO)

4 Patenting procedure

5 Patenting procedure Examination Grant Priority year International Phase National Phase 0 m 12 m 30 m 4-10 y Priority International National Phase Entry

6 Patenting procedure Examination Grant Priority year International Phase National Phase 0 m 12 m 30 m 4-10 y Priority International National Phase Entry

7 Who is allowed to file? Anyone! Applicant = may be any natural or legal person If applicant has no residence or place of business within the territory of an EPC contracting state professional representative needed in all proceedings after the filing

8 Language requirements Any language! When filing with the EPO: all languages accepted Official languages of the EPO English, French, German If not filed in an EPO official language Translation required (2 months from filing) In one of the EPO official languages Language of translation becomes language of proceedings

9 Content of a European patent application Request for grant Description of the invention Claim(s) (Drawings) Abstract

10 When to file? Too early: not enough support, narrow claim scope Too late: competitor has already filed (prior right) or has already published (prior art) Timing is critical!

11 Priority Any person who has duly filed an application for a patent... shall enjoy... in respect of the same invention, a right of priority during 12 months Consequence: the date determining the state of the art and determining which applicant filed first is for all countries determined by the priority date

12 Publish during priority year? Priority filing: 23 August 16: A Priority year Publish A + A* International filing: 23 August 17: A + A* Priority right in respect of the same invention!

13 Patenting procedure Examination Grant Priority year International Phase National Phase 0 m 12 m 30 m 4-10 y Priority International National Phase Entry

14 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) International patent law treaty, since 1970 The PCT contracting states constitute a Union for cooperation in the filing, searching, and examination of applications Unified procedure for worldwide patent filing, but not for worldwide patent grant! PCT application = International application

15 PCT contracting states 1 th August 2017: 152 member states (most of the world, except Jordan, Cambodja, Argentina, Bolivia, Ethiopia, Afghanistan, Myanmar,...)

16 Patenting procedure Examination Grant Priority year International Phase National Phase 0 m 12 m 30 m 4-10 y Priority International National Phase Entry

17 Patenting procedure Examination Grant Priority year International Phase National Phase 0 m 12 m 18 m 30 m 4-10 y Priority International National Phase Entry Publication of patent application

18 Publication Publication of the patent application is NOT the granted patent The granted patent is published after the examination procedure, claim scope is most likely different from the original application! Application content becomes part of the state of the art

19

20 Applicant versus inventor Applicant = who files the patent application The right to a European patent shall belong to the inventor If the inventor is an employee, national law determines the right to a European patent Flemish University Decree: inventions by employees belong to University German Arbeitnehmererfindungsgesetz regulates compensations to inventors/employees... Disputes about entitlement through national courts

21 Inventor is defined as: An inventor should have an intellectual contribution to the claims of the invention. So inventors might change during prosecution when claims are being reduced or amended. A person merely reducing the invention to practice is not considered an inventor: a person who worked with skill and diligence under direction someone who provided a research tool Different from authorship! Also not an inventor: - The person who heads the lab without contribution to conception or reduction to practice - Someone who should be rewarded for hard work - Personal friends, colleagues...

22 Patenting procedure Examination Grant Priority year International Phase National Phase 0 m 12 m 30 m 4-10 y Priority International National Phase Entry

23 and prosecution (VIB) Priority 0 m 23 Aug 16 International 12 m 18 m VIB evaluation 23 Aug 17 PCT (all states) Search Report & Wri en Opinion ~23 Feb 18 Publica on National Phase Entry 30 m 23 Feb 19 Elected states EP US CA AU JP 3 y 5 y 5 y 2 y 7 y Office Ac ons Examination

24 Examination procedure Appeal by Applicant

25 Examining Division (ED) ED consists of three examiners 1 st member, 2 nd member and chairman 1 st member corresponds with the Applicant ED decides together whether to grant or refuse the application The claims are the most important part of the application for the ED, they define the scope or extend of protection Description and drawings are used to interpret the claims

26 Search Reports/ Written Opinions ISR = International Search Report WO = Written Opinion The European search report shall mention those documents... which may be taken into consideration in deciding whether the invention... is new and involves an inventive step

27 ISR example

28

29 Office action example Amended claims contain subject matter beyond the content of the application as filed

30 Amendments during prosecution A patent application may be amended in proceedings (claims) BUT not in such a way that it contains subject-matter which extends beyond the content of the application as filed Claim amendments must be supported by wording in the written description Everything must be in the application, you cannot change wording/add examples etc. Later filed examples may nevertheless be taken into account by the Examiner

31 Office action example Amended claim 1:

32 Refusal If the ED is considering refusal The Applicant has the right to be heard The Applicant can ask to present arguments face to face in Oral Proceedings before the ED If at least two members of the ED are still not convinced refusal

33 Patenting procedure Examination Grant Priority year International Phase National Phase 0 m 12 m 30 m 4-10 y Priority International National Phase Entry

34 Intention to grant At least two members of the ED agree that the application meets the requirements of the EPC R. 71(3) communication Request translation of the claims in the other two official EPO languages Approval of final text Publication of the mention of grant Publication of granted patent

35 and finally a granted Patent A European patent shall... confer on its proprietor from the date of publication of the mention of the grant, in each contracting state in respect of which it is granted, the same right as would be conferred by a national patent granted in that state Belgium: proprietor may forbid third party to make, sell, offer, use, import or stock But how does the scope of the granted claims compare to the scope of the originally filed claims?

36 A granted Patent: the icing on the cake! But not the cake itself... A patent doesn t give you freedom-to-operate If you are prevented from making and selling cakes, having nice icing doesn t help a lot. Essential to ensure freedom to operate before any commercial activity! Patent rights are not absolute, there are restrictions such as: Competition law or other national laws, Private- and experimental/research use exemption.

37 Patenting procedure Examination Grant Priority year International Phase National Phase 0 m 12 m 30 m 4-10 y Postgrant Priority International National Phase Entry

38 Opposition A procedure for third party to challenge the validity of a granted patent Must be filed within 9 months of the mention of grant Allows the introduction of disclosures that may not have been available or found by the ED Allows the public to challenge the ED decision

39 Opposition Division (OD) The patent proprietor and the opponent battle it out amongst themselves The OD takes the final decision OD: three members, at least two did NOT take part in the Examination Proceedings Usually the 1 st examiner from the ED plus two others

40 OD decisions Revoke the patent in its entirety Maintain the patent in amended form Maintain the patent in unamended form (as granted)

41 Patenting procedure Costs

IP: Patent law & prosecution

IP: Patent law & prosecution IP: Patent law & prosecution Tech Transfer course 2018 28 August 2018 Griet Den Herder, PhD, IP Manager Patent law & organisations International : Vienna convention: treaty following principle of good

More information

Foreign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker

Foreign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker Foreign Patent Law Richard J. Melker Why file foreign? Medical device companies seek worldwide protection (US ~50% of market) Patents are only enforceable in the issued country Must have patent protection

More information

Patent litigation. Block 1. Module Priority. Essentials: Priority. Introduction

Patent litigation. Block 1. Module Priority. Essentials: Priority. Introduction Patent litigation. Block 1. Module Priority Introduction Due to the globalisation of markets and the increase of inter-state trade, by the end of the nineteenth century there was a growing need for internationally

More information

Foundation Certificate

Foundation Certificate Foundation Certificate International Patent Law FC3 Friday 13 October 2017 10:00 to 13:00 INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES 1. You should attempt five of questions 1 to 6. 2. Each question carries 20 marks. 3.

More information

The European Patent Office: serving the global economy. François-Régis Hannart Principal Director European and International Co-operation

The European Patent Office: serving the global economy. François-Régis Hannart Principal Director European and International Co-operation The : serving the global economy François-Régis Hannart Principal Director European and International Co-operation Pretoria, 13 September 2017 The European patent system European Patent Organisation founded

More information

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017 Question 1 Part A Your UK-based client, NC Ltd, employs 50 people and is about to file a new US patent application, US1, claiming priority from a GB patent application, GB0. US1 is not subject to any licensing.

More information

Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Substantive Patent Examination. Lutz Mailänder Head, International Cooperation on Examination and Training Section

Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Substantive Patent Examination. Lutz Mailänder Head, International Cooperation on Examination and Training Section Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Substantive Patent Examination Lutz Mailänder Head, International Cooperation on Examination and Training Section Pretoria 14 March 2016 Agenda Challenges of small and

More information

Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art

Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art Lutz Mailänder Head, International Cooperation on Examination and Training Section Harare September 22, 2017 Agenda Prior art in the presence of priorities Multiple

More information

Speed of processing at the EPO. Timely delivery of quality products

Speed of processing at the EPO. Timely delivery of quality products Speed of processing at the EPO Timely delivery of quality products John Beatty EPO September 18 th, 2017 Agenda Early certainty: 6 / 12 / 15 Accelerating & shortening the procedure: Your choices! Quality

More information

How patents work An introduction for law students

How patents work An introduction for law students How patents work An introduction for law students 1 Learning goals The learning goals of this lecture are to understand: the different types of intellectual property rights available the role of the patent

More information

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is Candidate s Answer DII 1. HVHF plugs + PP has: US2 - granted in US (related to US 1) EP1 - pending before EPO + + for all states LBP has: FR1 - France - still pending? EP2 - granted for DE, ES, FR, GB

More information

The life of a patent application at the EPO

The life of a patent application at the EPO The life of a patent application at the EPO Yves Verbandt Noordwijk, 31/03/2016 Yves Verbandt Senior expert examiner Applied Physics guided-wave optics optical measurements flow and level measurements

More information

Developing an International IP strategy. Leslie Prichard UK Chartered & European Patent Attorney European Design Attorney culverstons

Developing an International IP strategy. Leslie Prichard UK Chartered & European Patent Attorney European Design Attorney culverstons Developing an International IP strategy Leslie Prichard UK Chartered & European Patent Attorney European Design Attorney culverstons Introduction Brief overview of IP rights Patents: developing a strategy

More information

Partial Priorities and Transfer of Priority Rights. Dr. Joachim Renken

Partial Priorities and Transfer of Priority Rights. Dr. Joachim Renken Partial Priorities and Transfer of Priority Rights Dr. Joachim Renken AN EXAMPLE... 15 C Prio 20 C Granted Claim 10 C 25 C In the priority year, a document is published that dicloses 17 C. Is this document

More information

THE NEW EU PATENT: COST-EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUR BUSINESS

THE NEW EU PATENT: COST-EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUR BUSINESS THE NEW EU PATENT: COST-EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUR BUSINESS GRAHAM MURNANE (GLASGOW OFFICE), DR MARINA MAURO (MILAN OFFICE), DR BEN GRAU (MUNICH OFFICE) EUROPEAN PATENT PACKAGE EUROPEAN PATENT PACKAGE

More information

The opposition procedure and limitation and revocation procedures

The opposition procedure and limitation and revocation procedures The opposition procedure and limitation and revocation procedures Closa Daniel Beaucé Gaëtan 26-30/11/2012 Contents Introduction Legal framework Procedure Intervention of the assumed infringer Observations

More information

Candidate's Answer - DI

Candidate's Answer - DI Candidate's Answer - DI Candidate's Answer - DI Question 1 Deadline for entering European Regional Phase = 31 m from filing date or priority date if priority is claimed (Art 39(1)(b) PCT, R107 EPC). No

More information

Developments towards a unitary European patent system

Developments towards a unitary European patent system Developments towards a unitary European patent system 3rd workshop The Output of R&D Activities: Harnessing the Power of Patents Data Nikolaus Thumm Chief Economist European Patent Office Seville, 13 June

More information

The author of this article has worked as a European Patent Attorney both in private practice and in industry, and as an economics consultant.

The author of this article has worked as a European Patent Attorney both in private practice and in industry, and as an economics consultant. 1 A 'New Motivation'- Quality, Backlogs and Fees at the EPO C. Treleven, European Patent Attorney colin.treleven@optimus-patents.com www.optimus-patents.com 1. Introduction The EPO s 2007 Annual Report

More information

Threats & Opportunities in Proceedings before the EPO with a brief update on the Unitary Patent

Threats & Opportunities in Proceedings before the EPO with a brief update on the Unitary Patent Threats & Opportunities in Proceedings before the EPO with a brief update on the Unitary Patent MassMEDIC Jens Viktor Nørgaard & Peter Borg Gaarde September 13, 2013 Agenda Meet the speakers Threats &

More information

The European patent system

The European patent system The European patent system Presenter: Dominique Winne Examiner (ICT) 7 November 2017 Contents EPC PCT Granting procedure at the 2 1 Optional The patent system yesterday and today Senate of Venice, 1474

More information

Patent litigation. Block 3. Module UPC Law Essentials

Patent litigation. Block 3. Module UPC Law Essentials Patent litigation. Block 3; Module UPC Law Patent litigation. Block 3. Module UPC Law Essentials Article 32(f) of the UPC Agreement ( UPCA ) states that subject to the transitional regime of Article 83

More information

Patent Protection: Europe

Patent Protection: Europe Patent Protection: Europe Currently available options: National Patent European Patent (EP) Centralised registration procedure (bundle of nationally enforceable patents) Applicant designates the states

More information

Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Patent Examination

Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Patent Examination Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Patent Examination Lutz Mailänder Head, Patent Information Section Global IP Infrastructure Sector Bangkok 21-23 November 2012 Hanoi 26-28 November 2012 Agenda Challenges

More information

Effective Mechanisms for Challenging the Validity of Patents

Effective Mechanisms for Challenging the Validity of Patents Effective Mechanisms for Challenging the Validity of Patents Walter Holzer 1 S.G.D.G. Patents are granted with a presumption of validity. 2 A patent examiner simply cannot be aware of all facts and circumstances

More information

Topic 9: Utilizing Claims of Granted Patents

Topic 9: Utilizing Claims of Granted Patents Topic 9: Utilizing Claims of Granted Patents Lutz Mailänder Head, Patent Information Section Global IP Infrastructure Sector Manila 8 August 2014 Retrieval options Publications of granted patents (B1,

More information

EU Trade Mark Application Timeline

EU Trade Mark Application Timeline EU Trade Mark Application Timeline EU Trade Marks, which cover the entire EU, are administered by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM). The timeline below gives approximate timescale

More information

Topic 1: Overview of Search and Examination under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Topic 1: Overview of Search and Examination under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Topic 1: Overview of Search and Examination under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Lutz Mailänder Head, Patent Information Section Global IP Infrastructure Sector Tokio 26 November 2013 Agenda PCT system

More information

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes. The patent system Introduction This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes. Patents protect ideas and concepts

More information

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes. ELLIS TERRY The Patent System Introduction This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes. Patents protect ideas

More information

Overview on EPO s Current Initiatives for Improving Timeliness. Heli Pihlajamaa Director Patent Law

Overview on EPO s Current Initiatives for Improving Timeliness. Heli Pihlajamaa Director Patent Law Overview on EPO s Current Initiatives for Improving Timeliness Heli Pihlajamaa Director Patent Law 14 October 2016 Content Time matters Early Certainty Expediting the Proceedings Streamlined opposition

More information

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) IP5 Statistics Report 2011 THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) This chapter presents statistics describing various activities of the IP5 Offices that relate to the PCT system. The graphs

More information

Developments towards a unitary European patent system

Developments towards a unitary European patent system Developments towards a unitary European patent system Nikolaus Thumm Chief Economist European Patent Office Paris, 28 November 2012 The European patent system in a nutshell The European Patent Convention

More information

Strategic Use of the PCT:

Strategic Use of the PCT: Strategic Use of the PCT: A US User s Perspective David Reed, Consultant, PCT Legal Division, WIPO Published 22 July 2011 This presentation draws upon a wealth of practical filing experience and presents

More information

Patent and License Overview. Kirsten Leute, Senior Associate Office of Technology Licensing, Stanford University

Patent and License Overview. Kirsten Leute, Senior Associate Office of Technology Licensing, Stanford University Patent and License Overview Kirsten Leute, Senior Associate Office of Technology Licensing, Stanford University kirsten.leute@stanford.edu Patent Overview History Patentable subject matter Statutory

More information

The nuts and bolts of oppositions and appeals. Henrik Skødt, European Patent Attorney

The nuts and bolts of oppositions and appeals. Henrik Skødt, European Patent Attorney The nuts and bolts of oppositions and appeals Henrik Skødt, European Patent Attorney Overview Preparing a notice of opposition. Responding to an opposition. Oral proceedings Filing an appeal notice and

More information

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES This annex contains firstly definitions of the main terms used in the report 51. After that there is an explanation of the patent procedures relating

More information

Where to Challenge Patents? International Post Grant Practice Strategic Considerations Before the USPTO, EPO, SIPO and JPO

Where to Challenge Patents? International Post Grant Practice Strategic Considerations Before the USPTO, EPO, SIPO and JPO Washington, D.C. Where to Challenge Patents? International Post Grant Practice Strategic Considerations Before the USPTO, EPO, SIPO and JPO Jeffery P. Langer, PhD U.S. Patent Attorney, Partner, Washington,

More information

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface... v v About the Authors... xiii vii Summary Table of Contents... xv ix Chapter 1. European Patent Law as International Law... 1 I. European Patent Law Arises From Multiple

More information

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT? WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT? A patent is a monopoly granted by the government for an invention that works or functions differently from other inventions. It is necessary for the invention

More information

Chapter 1 DEFINITION OF TERMS. There are various types of IP rights. They can be categorized as:

Chapter 1 DEFINITION OF TERMS. There are various types of IP rights. They can be categorized as: Chapter 1 DEFINITION OF TERMS There are various types of IP rights. They can be categorized as: Patents of invention Utility model patents Industrial design patents Trademarks Copyrights Trade secrets

More information

10 tips for oppositions and the inevitable oral proceedings Barry Franks, European and Swedish patent attorney BRANN AB IP Law Firm Sweden

10 tips for oppositions and the inevitable oral proceedings Barry Franks, European and Swedish patent attorney BRANN AB IP Law Firm Sweden 10 tips for oppositions and the inevitable oral proceedings Barry Franks, European and Swedish patent attorney BRANN AB IP Law Firm Sweden Stockholm, Uppsala, Göteborg och Lund Barry Franks Background

More information

Slide 13 What rights does a patent confer?

Slide 13 What rights does a patent confer? Slide 13 What rights does a patent confer? The term of the European patent shall be 20 years from the date of filing of the application (Article 63(1) EPC. However, nothing in Article 63(1) EPC shall limit

More information

Aligning claim drafting and filing strategies to optimize protection in the EPO, GPTO and USPTO

Aligning claim drafting and filing strategies to optimize protection in the EPO, GPTO and USPTO Aligning claim drafting and filing strategies to optimize protection in the EPO, GPTO and USPTO February 25, 2011 Presented by Sean P. Daley and Jan-Malte Schley Outline ~ Motivation Claim drafting Content

More information

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2012 (OR. en) 2011/0093 (COD) PE-CONS 72/11 PI 180 CODEC 2344 OC 70

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2012 (OR. en) 2011/0093 (COD) PE-CONS 72/11 PI 180 CODEC 2344 OC 70 EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 12 December 2012 (OR. en) 2011/0093 (COD) PE-CONS 72/11 PI 180 CODEC 2344 OC 70 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: REGULATION OF THE

More information

Utilization of Prior Art Evidence on TK: Opportunities and Possibilities in the International Patent System

Utilization of Prior Art Evidence on TK: Opportunities and Possibilities in the International Patent System Utilization of Prior Art Evidence on TK: Opportunities and Possibilities in the International Patent System New Delhi, India March 23 2011 Begoña Venero Aguirre Head, Genetic Resources and Traditional

More information

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) Chapter 5 THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) This chapter presents firstly the impact of the PCT system on patenting activity. Then it describes the various activities of the IP5 Offices

More information

2015 Noréns Patentbyrå AB

2015 Noréns Patentbyrå AB Self-Collision in patent applications How to Avoid Shooting Your Client in the Foot A European perspective with some thoughts on the global situation, including other jurisdictions Jan Modin FICPI Special

More information

Overview of Trial for Invalidation and Opposition Systems in Japan. March 2017 Trial and Appeal Department Japan Patent Office

Overview of Trial for Invalidation and Opposition Systems in Japan. March 2017 Trial and Appeal Department Japan Patent Office Overview of Trial for Invalidation and Opposition Systems in Japan March 2017 Trial and Appeal Department Japan Patent Office 1 Roles of Trial and Appeal Department of JPO Reviewing the examination ->

More information

Recent developments at the European Patent Office

Recent developments at the European Patent Office Recent developments at the European Patent Office FICPI 17th Open Forum, 26 October 2017, Venice Benoît Battistelli, President The European patent system EPO: Independent international organisation, dedicated

More information

Criteria for Patentability

Criteria for Patentability 2 Criteria for Patentability Patentability Criteria v Formality Examination Documents required Procedural requirements v Substantive Examination Unity of invention Patent eligibility Novelty Inventive

More information

The role of the European Patent Office as a global partner in patent protection

The role of the European Patent Office as a global partner in patent protection The role of the as a global partner in patent protection Barcelona, 22 June 2018 Alberto Casado EPO Vice-President DG 1 Patent Granting Process The EPO at a glance Our mission As the Patent Office for

More information

European Patent Opposition Proceedings

European Patent Opposition Proceedings European Patent Opposition Proceedings www.bardehle.com 2 Content 5 Initiating opposition proceedings 5 Grounds for revocation 6 Course of first instance proceedings 8 The appeal proceedings 10 Procedural

More information

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% Question 1 a) Deadline for validating granted European patent in EPC six months after the publication of European search report 0 b) i) Germany

More information

PROPOSALS FOR CREATING UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

PROPOSALS FOR CREATING UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION PROPOSALS FOR CREATING UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION The idea of a Community Patent, a single patent that can be enforced throughout the European Union (EU), is hardly new. The original

More information

EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE PATENT LAW TREATY AND REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY * prepared by the International Bureau

EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE PATENT LAW TREATY AND REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY * prepared by the International Bureau EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE PATENT LAW TREATY AND REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY * prepared by the International Bureau * These Notes were prepared by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual

More information

Raising the Bar and EPC changes as from 1 April 2010

Raising the Bar and EPC changes as from 1 April 2010 Platform Formalities Officers 1 st Annual Formalities Officers Conference Rijswijk, 11 March 2010 Raising the Bar and EPC changes as from 1 April 2010 Luise Zimmermann European Patent Office Content Raising

More information

Summary and Conclusions

Summary and Conclusions Summary and Conclusions In this thesis, results are presented of a study on the alignment of the European Patent Convention and the Patent Cooperation Treaty with requirements of the Patent Law Treaty.

More information

Overview economic research activities at the EPO 2013/2014

Overview economic research activities at the EPO 2013/2014 Overview economic research activities at the EPO 2013/2014 Theon van Dijk EPO Chief Economist PSDM 2013, Rio de Janeiro 12 November 2013 Overview 1. Trends in European patenting 2. Follow-up IPR-intensive

More information

Recent developments at the European Patent Office

Recent developments at the European Patent Office Recent developments at the European Patent Office AIPPI World Congress, Sydney, 16 October 2017 EPO President Benoît Battistelli Presented by Mr Niclas Morey Principal Director User Support & Quality Management

More information

FC3 International Patent Law Question Paper Sample Assessment Material

FC3 International Patent Law Question Paper Sample Assessment Material SECTION A Question 1 a) List six facts relating to utility models, at least one of which should relate to a difference between utility models and patents. b) Can utility models be obtained in Germany,

More information

JETRO seminar. Recent Rule change and latest developments at the EPO:

JETRO seminar. Recent Rule change and latest developments at the EPO: JETRO seminar Recent Rule change and latest developments at the EPO: Alfred Spigarelli Director Patent procedures management DG1 Business services EPO Düsseldorf 4 November, 2010 Overview RAISING THE BAR

More information

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL DECISION

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL DECISION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL DEBASISH MUKHOPADHYAY, Applicant-Appellant, -versus- DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU PATENTS, Respondent-Appellee. X----------------------------------------------X Appeal No. 01-2011-0001

More information

13345/14 BB/ab 1 DG G3

13345/14 BB/ab 1 DG G3 Council of the European Union Brussels, 19 September 2014 (OR. en) 13345/14 PI 108 MI 672 IND 254 INFORMATION NOTE From: To: Subject: Presidency Council Competitiveness Implementation of the Patent package

More information

Amendments in Europe and the United States

Amendments in Europe and the United States 13 Euro IP ch2-6.qxd 15/04/2009 11:16 Page 90 90 IP FIT FOR PURPOSE Amendments in Europe and the United States Attitudes differ if you try to broaden your claim after applications, reports Annalise Holme.

More information

Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore E ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: JANUARY 31, 2013 Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore Twenty-Third Session Geneva, February 4 to 8, 2013

More information

The Consolidate Patents Act

The Consolidate Patents Act The Consolidate Patents Act Publication of the Patents Act, cf. Consolidated Act No. 366 of 9 June 1998 as amended by Act No. 412 of 31 May 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections Part 1: General Provisions...

More information

AUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges

AUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges AUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges Effective 1 January 2018 Applications 1 Filing non-convention Standard application (filed electronically) 370.00 630.00 1000.00 2 Filing PCT AU National

More information

Patent reform package - Frequently Asked Questions

Patent reform package - Frequently Asked Questions EUROPEAN COMMISSION MEMO Brussels, 11 December 2012 Patent reform package - Frequently Asked Questions I. Presentation of the unitary patent package 1. What is the 'unitary patent package'? The 'unitary

More information

European Patents. Page 1 of 6

European Patents. Page 1 of 6 European Patents European patents are granted according to the European Patent Convention. The European Patent Convention is administered by the European Patent Organisation, part of which is the European

More information

XVI.3. Maintenance of the patent in amended form

XVI.3. Maintenance of the patent in amended form XVI.3. Maintenance of the patent in amended form XVI.3.1. Art.101(3)(a) and R.82 contain the legal provisions for the maintenance of a patent in amended form. The current EPO practice for implementing

More information

Dr Julian M. Potter February 2014

Dr Julian M. Potter February 2014 The European Patent Court and Unitary Patent Don t Panic Be Prepared Dr Julian M. Potter February 2014 (c) Dr Julian M Potter 2014 1 Patent in Europe - now National patents through respective national

More information

IP Report Patent Law. The right of priorities: Recent developments in EPO case law Reported by Dr. Rudolf Teschemacher

IP Report Patent Law. The right of priorities: Recent developments in EPO case law Reported by Dr. Rudolf Teschemacher The right of priorities: Recent developments in EPO case law Reported by Dr. Rudolf Teschemacher Recent decisions passed by three different instances of the EPO have significant effects on the patentability

More information

EPO boards of appeal decisions. Date of decision 11 June 1981 Case number J 0015/

EPO boards of appeal decisions. Date of decision 11 June 1981 Case number J 0015/ Abstract A priority claim based on an industrial design for a subsequent European application was denied by the Receiving Section; the applicant appealed. The Board rejected the appeal, finding that Article

More information

The effects of the EPC

The effects of the EPC The effects of the EPC The second round of amendments to the European Patent Convention Implementing Regulations is imminent By Paul-Alexander Wacker and Stephan Kopp, Kuhnen & Wacker IP firm, Freising

More information

3. TITLE OF INVENTION (Must agree with the PCT publication document if applicable.)

3. TITLE OF INVENTION (Must agree with the PCT publication document if applicable.) 1. CLIENT INFORMATION Name : Telephone: Facsimile: e-mail: 2. CASE REFERENCE: 3. TITLE OF INVENTION (Must agree with the PCT publication document if applicable.) 4. DETAILS OF INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION

More information

Examiners Report on Paper DII Examiners Report - Paper D Part II

Examiners Report on Paper DII Examiners Report - Paper D Part II Examiners Report on Paper DII Examiners Report - Paper D Part II In the first part of this paper, candidates had to deal with different inventions made by Electra Optic and its new subsidiary, Oedipus

More information

Patents: opposition proceedings and nullity actions a comparison between Europe and Japan

Patents: opposition proceedings and nullity actions a comparison between Europe and Japan Murgitroyd and Sonoda & Kobayashi present Topic 1 Topic 2 Topic 3 Topic 4 Contact Patents: opposition proceedings and nullity actions a comparison between Europe and Japan Luca Escoffier Diane Beylier

More information

Digital lab notebooks and intellectual property protection

Digital lab notebooks and intellectual property protection labfolder GmbH Bismarckstr. 10-12, 10625 Berlin, Germany +49 (0) 30 86459390 www.labfolder.com Contact labfolder Team contact@labfolder.com +49 030 / 91572642 Digital lab notebooks and intellectual property

More information

News and analysis on IP law, regulation and policy from around the world. For the latest updates, visit

News and analysis on IP law, regulation and policy from around the world. For the latest updates, visit WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REPORT >>> News and analysis on IP law, regulation and policy from around the world. For the latest updates, visit www.bna.com International Information for International Business

More information

Intellectual Property Primer. Tom Utley, PhD, CLP Licensing Officer Patent Agent

Intellectual Property Primer. Tom Utley, PhD, CLP Licensing Officer Patent Agent Intellectual Property Primer Tom Utley, PhD, CLP Licensing Officer Patent Agent Outline IP overview and Statutes What is patentable Inventorship and patent process US821,393 Flying Machine O. & W. Wright

More information

European Patent with Unitary Effect

European Patent with Unitary Effect European Patent with Unitary Effect and the Unified Patent Court May 2013 Dr Lee Chapman lchapman@jakemp.com www.jakemp.com Where are we? Regulations relating to the EPUE and translation arrangements were

More information

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 51%

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 51% QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 5% Question A a) The client does qualify.5(i) as the number of employees must be 5 or fewer b) A micro entity must be an individual with 4 or fewer

More information

and Examination Reports

and Examination Reports Interpreting and Utilizing Search and Examination Reports WIPO Sub-Regional Workshop, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 29.11.-01.12.2011 Steffen Wolf, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany Work-sharing: Information

More information

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent {SEC(2010) 796} {SEC(2010) 797}

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent {SEC(2010) 796} {SEC(2010) 797} EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, COM(2010) XXX 2010/xxxx (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent {SEC(2010) 796} {SEC(2010) 797}

More information

GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK

GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK INTRODUCTION In Germany the utility model is an unexamined, technical IP right having

More information

CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (BARBADOS)

CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (BARBADOS) PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter Page 1 CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (BARBADOS) AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY INTO THE NATIONAL PHASE SUMMARY

More information

FICPI & AIPLA Colloquium, June 2007 A Comprehensive Approach to Patent Quality

FICPI & AIPLA Colloquium, June 2007 A Comprehensive Approach to Patent Quality FICPI & AIPLA Colloquium, June 2007 A Comprehensive Approach to Patent Quality Deficiencies in patent applications and problems created by applicants and attorneys Author : J Pearce, EPO Date : 8 June

More information

PCT procedure before the EPO as International Authority. Camille-Rémy Bogliolo Head, Department of PCT Affairs

PCT procedure before the EPO as International Authority. Camille-Rémy Bogliolo Head, Department of PCT Affairs PCT procedure before the EPO as International Authority Camille-Rémy Bogliolo Head, Department of PCT Affairs Madrid, 3 November 2016 PCT procedure before the EPO as ISA and IPEA Informal clarification

More information

Questionnaire. On the patent system in Europe

Questionnaire. On the patent system in Europe EUROPEAN COMMISSION Internal Market and Services DG Knowledge-based Economy Industrial property Brussels, 09/01/06 Questionnaire On the patent system in Europe 1Errore. Nome della proprietà del documento

More information

IP LAW HARMONISATION: BEYOND THE STATUTE

IP LAW HARMONISATION: BEYOND THE STATUTE IP LAW HARMONISATION: BEYOND THE STATUTE Harmonisation of the statutes Harmonisation of Patent Office practice Harmonisation of Court practice Dealing with increasing workloads Tony Maschio & John Lloyd

More information

Order on Patents and Supplementary Protection Certificates

Order on Patents and Supplementary Protection Certificates 1 The Patent and Trademark Office Order No. 25 of 18 January 2013 Order on Patents and Supplementary Protection Certificates Pursuant to section 5(2), section 6(2), section 8a, section 8b(2), section 9,

More information

FINLAND Patents Act No. 550 of December 15, 1967 as last amended by Act No. 101/2013 of January 31, 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

FINLAND Patents Act No. 550 of December 15, 1967 as last amended by Act No. 101/2013 of January 31, 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013 FINLAND Patents Act No. 550 of December 15, 1967 as last amended by Act No. 101/2013 of January 31, 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 General Provisions Section 1 Section

More information

Examination Procedure. Japan Patent Office

Examination Procedure. Japan Patent Office Examination Procedure Japan Patent Office 0 Outline I. Overview II. First Action (FA) III. Second Action (SA) 1 Outline I. Overview II. First Action (FA) III. Second Action (SA) 2 I. Overview A. General

More information

DIFFICULT EPO ACTIONS TO DOCKET uithe Reliability of your IP Data your IP Data Integrity: How to Ruin the Reliability of your IP Data

DIFFICULT EPO ACTIONS TO DOCKET uithe Reliability of your IP Data your IP Data Integrity: How to Ruin the Reliability of your IP Data DIFFICULT EPO ACTIONS TO DOCKET uithe Reliability of your IP Data your IP Data Integrity: How to Ruin the Reliability of your IP Data Difficult EPO Docketing Items Presenters and panelists: o Ann McCrackin,

More information