A Year in Review: Top Ten Canadian Law Cases of 2010
|
|
- Owen Dalton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A Year in Review: Top Ten Canadian Law Cases of 2010 May 05, 2011 Top Ten By Crawford G. Smith, Torys LLP This resource is sponsored by: Authored by Crawford G. Smith, Torys LLP The top cases of 2010 encompass a broad variety of issues and produced favourable results for both businesses and individual plaintiffs. The cases in this list were selected for their breadth in subject matter, level of court and geography, and overall, the significant impact they are likely to have on the business community. Canadian Courts in 2010 seemed to embrace the certification of class actions in novel subject matters including competition, securities and environmental law, although commonality of the issues continued to be the area of greatest discussion, and proved to be a barrier to certification in a major unpaid wage and overtime case. Courts have also provided additional clarity on the law related to defamation, jurisdiction over foreign defendants, contract interpretation and the patentability of inventions, to name a few; all which will assist companies in making informed decisions in these areas going forward. Looking ahead, 2011 will continue to be a year to watch developments carefully, as many of the cases below are proceeding to appeal where the issues will considered anew. 10. Leave granted for securities class action - Silver v. Imax Corporation In late 2009, two decisions of the Ontario Superior Court granted leave for the plaintiffs (consisting of Imax shareholders) to proceed in a class action for alleged misrepresentations made by Imax in its public disclosure documents and press releases in The leave decision marked the first consideration these provisions of Ontario s Securities Act. In a concurrently released decision, the plaintiffs class action with respect to their statutory and common law claims was certified. Under the Ontario Securities Act ( OSA ) the right to seek leave to bring a claim for a misrepresentation in the secondary market is governed by the following test; the court must be satisfied that the claim has been brought in good faith, and that there is a reasonable possibility of success at trial. Justice van Rensberg held that both requirements imposed low thresholds. Under the first branch, the plaintiffs merely had to show that they possessed an honest belief that they had an
2 arguable claim that was consistent with the intent and purpose of the OSA, and that was not for a oblique or collateral purpose. The reasonable possibility test required something more than a de minimis possibility or chance on a reasoned consideration of the evidence. The Court also considered the role of statutory defences at the leave stage, finding that the evidence relied upon by the defendants in asserting the defence of reasonable investigation was not sufficient to preclude the possibility of success at trial ; a substantial onus for the defendants to meet. Justice van Rensberg also held that the certification of the common law claim, for negligent misrepresentation, did not require proof of actual reliance on behalf of every member of the class. The low threshold under the statutory test, and availability of common law claims expands the scope of recovery for shareholders and appears to reflect a compensatory (rather than deterrent) focused model. The availability of the common law route may also allow plaintiffs to sidestep the leave requirements and avoid the damages cap imposed by the OSA; over time this could prove to make the statutory regime redundant. 9. Defense of responsible communication is created - Grant v. Torstar and Quan v. Cusson In two companion cases in December 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada ( SCC ) addressed the defences available in defamation actions. In both cases, the SCC recognized the concerns about the state of the law of defamation; it afforded little protection to journalists who diligently attempted to verify the truth of their stories. As a result, the new defence of responsible communication was born. The test is summarized by Chief Justice McLachlin in Grant: 1) the publication must be on a matter of public interest; and 2) the publication must be responsible, i.e. the publisher must have acted diligently in attempting to verify the allegations, having regard to a number of factors including, for example; the seriousness of the allegation, the urgency of the matter, and whether the plaintiff s side of the story was sought and accurately reported. Under the first branch of the test, the public interest has been given a broad definition. The matter must engage more than mere curiosity and must be one where the public has a genuine stake in knowing about it. The plaintiff need not be a public figure, nor the subject matter limited to politics or government activities. The protection will extend to publications on any topic that falls within the public interest. Moreover, the new test applies to any individuals who publish information, which in the world of technology could include blogging, tweeting and communications via other electronic media. 8. Foreign arbitral awards are not judgments or court orders - Yugraneft Corp. v. Rexx Management Corp. Parties proceeding with international arbitration will encounter an additional complication following the SCC s decision in Yugraneft. Canada s highest court held that foreign arbitral awards are not judgments or court orders and therefore cannot be treated as such to determine appropriate limitation periods for enforcement. In this case, the International Commercial Arbitration Court made a $950,000 award in favour of Yugraneft in Three years later, Yugraneft brought an application under Alberta s International Commercial Arbitration Act for recognition and enforcement of the award. Rexx objected to the application on the basis that it was time-barred. Two provisions of Alberta s Limitations Act were at issue: on one hand the statute applied a two year period for a proceeding to obtain a remedial order, on the other hand, a ten year period applied to enforce domestic foreign judgments. The SCC held that an arbitral award is not a judgment or a court order since it arises at the will of the parties, is not part of any judicial system and requires a court order to be enforced. Though the decision specifically applies to the Alberta context, many felt that it could be a deterrent to parties to refer to arbitration and to see Canada as an arbitration-friendly venue. However, there is nothing in the decision that hinders the enforcement of these awards in Canada. Parties and their counsel must be careful to examine which Canadian statutes are applicable, and what time limits are enforced by those statutes, in order to ensure that they bring their applications in time. 7. New test for jurisdiction over foreign defendants - Van Breda v. Village Resorts Ltd. In early 2010, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided clarity on the test for bringing an action against a foreign defendant.
3 The decision involved two related cases where plaintiffs suffered damages arising from accidents that occurred while on vacation at resorts in Cuba. The resort operator, Club Resorts Ltd. was incorporated in the Cayman Islands. The Court took the opportunity to reformulate the traditional test for jurisdiction, which was perceived by many to be overly complex and unpredictable. The new test created a multi-step process. First, there are a number of situations where jurisdiction will be presumed, for example, for contracts executed in Ontario and torts committed in Ontario. The presumption is not conclusive, and it remains to the defendants to establish that the real and substantial connection test is not met. If the matter does not fall into the enumerated categories the burden will fall to the plaintiffs to show a real and substantial connection to Ontario. In the second step, the analysis centres on two main considerations; the connection that each of the parties has to Ontario. It is not required that the defendants carry on business in Ontario; the Court s decision to assume jurisdiction rested in part on the fact that both defendants had carried on substantial advertising activities in the province, including hiring advertisers and entering into contracts with tour operators for promotion of their resorts. The decision may cause an increase in the number of claims sought against foreign residents who carry on significant activities (including advertising and promotion) in Ontario. On the other hand, Ontario companies who do business internationally may increasingly be subject to claims from foreign claimants, as the Court has also suggested that foreign judgments should be recognized in Ontario on the same basis. The Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to appeal on July 8, The appeal was heard on March 21, 2011 and the reasons for the decision have yet to be released. 6. Certification denied in CIBC overtime case - Fresco v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce In September 2010, the Divisional Court upheld the decision to deny certification of a class of plaintiffs in their claims for unpaid overtime and wages against CIBC. The key allegation at the certification motion was that CIBC engaged in a systemic practice of unpaid overtime. In upholding the decision, the Court pointed to the lack of evidence supporting the plaintiffs claims. They found that it was plain and obvious that CIBC s Overtime Policy complied with the requirements of the Code, there was no evidence of any systemic practice of unpaid overtime at CIBC or that CIBC s record keeping violated the law. Overall, the decision was based on the lack of commonality amongst the plaintiffs, the Court repeatedly recognized the individual nature of the claims and highlighted the lack of evidence of any kind of systemic problem. Therefore the decision re-enforces the importance of the content of these policies, which can combat claims of systemic or collective wrongdoing brought by potential employee classes. For example, CIBC s policy required that overtime hours receive management pre-approval (or if unavailable, post approval) and included a provision which allowed an employee to choose time off in lieu of payment but which defaulted to payment if the time was not taken within 90 days. Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal was granted on Jan. 21, The issues on appeal might be expected to track the issues raised by the dissenting opinion of Justice Sachs who held that the motions judge erred in finding that it was plain and obvious that the Overtime Policy was lawful and that this holding drove her to fail to consider the evidence of systemic issues. 5. Business methods are patentable - Amazon.com, Inc. v. The Commissioner of Patents The Federal Court s landmark decision in Amazon overruled the Patent Appeal Board to hold that business methods were patentable subject matter in Canada. The decision is good news for companies that employ similar proprietary methods of using computers and software. At issue was Amazon s application for its one-click shopping system, which was rejected by the Commissioner of Patents and the Patent Appeal Board. The Board held that the claims of the proposed patent did not define a technological advance that was either a physical object, or an act performed by some physical agent upon a physical object to effect a change in character or condition. In reversing the Board s decision, Justice Phelan noted that there had
4 never been a specific prohibition on business method patents. Unlike some European jurisdictions, Canada s patent regime rests on a broad definition of invention, not a series of exclusions. The Board s interpretation was held to be too restrictive and Justice Phelan noted that an invention could properly include new and innovative methods of applying skill or knowledge provided that they had a method of practical application and a commercially useful result. Therefore, so long as the new method met the usual test for an invention, there was no reason it should not be patentable. The Patent Office has commenced an appeal attacking several aspects of Justice Phelan s analysis. The hearing of the appeal is expected in Spring Indirect purchasers certified in competition class action - Pro-Sys Consultants v. Microsoft Corp. Indirect purchasers of Microsoft s operating systems and software were granted certification for a class action, overcoming a historically difficult obstacle. The decision closely followed the B.C. Court of Appeal s decision in Infineon, which ordered certification in a similar case. The plaintiffs in Microsoft alleged that the defendant participated in anticompetitive behaviour which allowed it to charge higher prices for its products. One of the elements that the plaintiffs were required to show was harm to the plaintiff class members. Since the class was made up of indirect purchasers, they had to demonstrate that the inflated prices were passed through the distribution channels. This has been a difficult requirement for plaintiffs to meet on a class wide basis in the past. Justice Myers applied Infineon and held that it stood for the proposition that plaintiffs need only show a credible or plausible methodology for proving pass-through at trial; setting a low evidential bar for certification. Although the Court was of the opinion that the plaintiffs proposed methodologies could be sufficient to show harm to the whole class, in the alternative, on the basis of Infineon it was held that the plaintiffs could rely on the aggregate damages provisions of the Class Proceedings Act to prove harm to some of the purchasers. This represents a big shift from previous caselaw, which generally held that aggregate damages could not be used to prove the fact of the harm, only the quantum. It remains to be seen whether pass-through can be proven on a class-wide basis at trial. 3. Ontario s first environmental tort class action is decided - Smith v. Inco In July 2010, the Ontario Superior Court released its decision in Ontario s first ever environmental tort class action. The plaintiffs, representing 7000 property owners in the Port Colborne area, brought an action to recover for damage to their property values. This damage was alleged to stem from the negative publicity associated with soil contamination produced by Inco s nickel refinery. Despite the fact that Inco had ceased operations at the refinery in 1984, the damages were asserted to have been incurred in 2000; 16 years after the refinery was closed. Justice Henderson concluded that the defendant was liable for $36,000,000 on the basis of strict liability, i.e. the nickel refinery was a non-natural use of the property that created a danger to others. It was no defense to liability that the use of the property was ordinary and lawful. A cause of action in private nuisance was also made out, which required the plaintiffs to show material physical damage to their property. On the question of limitation, the Court found that the plaintiffs were not time-barred. The Court relied on the date that the residents could have been taken to be aware of the drop in their property values (through a report publicized by the Ministry of the Environment in 2000), not the date the contamination had occurred. This was despite finding that most of the class members were aware of the possibility of the presence of nickel on their properties prior to Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the case is the fact that the damages were based not on the actual presence of the nickel in the soil but on the tenor of the public message regarding the impact of the contamination. In determining the damages, the Court accepted the evidence of the plaintiffs without requiring that they had attempted to sell their properties or mitigate their damages. In addition, the trial judge did not consider the fact that Inco had remediated the soil contamination on several of the properties to be a factor in determining the outcome.an appeal has been commenced by the defendants and is set to be heard this year. 2. Supreme Court of Canada clarifies exclusion of liability clauses - Tercon Contractors Ltd. v. British Columbia
5 The SCC provided some guidance in 2010 on the treatment of exclusion of liability clauses in commercial contracts. This conflict arose from a bidding process for a $35 million road project. Ultimately, Tercon lost the bid to a joint venture which included an ineligible bidder. Tercon brought an action for breach of contract on the basis that the winning bid was invalid, however, the RFP included an exclusion clause which stated that bidders were prevented from bringing claims as a result of participating in the tendering process. The first step in the Court s analytical approach to the clause was to determine whether it applied to the facts of the case. The majority of the Court held that it did not, and that Tercon s claim was not excluded. Justice Cromwell reasoned that the claim could not be barred on the basis of the participation of other, ineligible parties. Moreover, he found that the exclusion clause could not effectively limit the liability of the province in breaching its duty to act fairly to legitimate bidders. On the facts of this case, the eligibility of the bidders was an important aspect of the RFP process, and considerations of both the integrity and fairness of the bidding process weighed in favour of allowing Tercon s claim to proceed. The decision is likely to be controversial, given the split in the Court. A majority of 5 held that the clause did not apply, whereas the minority reasoned that the clause was engaged by Tercon s involvement in the bid process, and was not so egregious as to justify interference with the contract. However, the entire Court was united in approving the principle that there will be rare circumstances where judges should refuse to enforce these types of clauses on the basis of the public policy of freedom of contract. This decision should cause parties to pay increased attention during the drafting and negotiating of RFPs, as it was found in Tercon that the clause was, at best, ambiguous. It was this ambiguity that ultimately allowed the majority to find in favour of the plaintiffs. 1. Magna s plan of arrangement is fair and reasonable to shareholders - Magna International Inc. (Re) In the summer of 2010, the Divisional Court upheld the approval of Magna s reorganization plan under s. 182(5) of the OBCA, finding it to be fair and reasonable to shareholders. Magna sought approval for a plan of arrangement that would eliminate its dual class share structure. Prior to the transaction, Magna had two classes of shares, with the Class B shares 100% owned, directly or indirectly, by the Stronach Trust. The Class B shares constituted 66% of the voting shares of the company although they made up less than 1% of the equity. A transaction was proposed where the Trust would sell all of its Class B shares in exchange for 9,000,000 Class A shares and a one-time payment of $300 million. The proposal was put to a vote of the unrelated Class A shareholders, and 75.28% voted in favour of proceeding. Magna then sought the approval of the Court. In the court application, a minority of dissenting shareholders took an opposing position. They argued that the transaction was not beneficial to shareholders as it imposed a cost (the payment and the dilution of the class A shares) when the benefits were uncertain and unquantifiable. In coming to the conclusion that the plan was fair and reasonable, the Court relied heavily on the shareholder vote, finding that it was a significant, although not determinative, factor. In addition, the Court noted that there was no evidence of: any misleading, incomplete or inadequate disclosure, a lack of information to shareholders about the transaction, or a coercive element in the structure of the plan or the voting process. The Court found that the minority shareholders claims that the benefits were uncertain were not a reason to deny the transaction; the test required only the demonstration of reasonable prospect of the benefits being realized. The information in this Top Ten should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on specific facts and should not be considered representative of the views of its authors, its sponsors, and/or the ACC. This Top Ten is not intended as a definitive statement on the subject addressed. Rather, it is intended to serve as a tool providing practical advice and references for the busy in-house practitioner and other readers.
6
Defending Cross-Border Class Actions. Chantelle Spagnola Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP
Defending Cross-Border Class Actions Chantelle Spagnola Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP February 19, 2015 Outline A. Introduction to Cross-Border Class Actions B. Differences in Approaches for Dealing
More informationConstruction Law: Recent Developments of Importance
Construction Law: Recent Developments of Importance Bruce Reynolds and James MacLellan Published in the Guide to the Leading 500 Lawyers in Canada (2002 Lexpert/American Lawyer Media) During the past year
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle December 2013 (1)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle December 2013 (1) Green Light For Indirect Purchaser Claims in Canada Mark Katz & Chantelle Spagnola Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP www.competitionpolicyinternational.com Competition
More informationTop Ten Tips for Dealing with Business Method Patents in Canada
Top Ten Tips for Dealing with Business Method Patents in Canada Sep 01, 2011 Top Ten By Christopher Van Barr Grant Tisdall This resource is sponsored by: By Christopher Van Barr and Grant Tisdall, Gowling
More informationQUICKPOLE.CA TERMS OF SERVICE. Last Modified On: July 12 th, 2018
1. PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS: QUICKPOLE.CA TERMS OF SERVICE Last Modified On: July 12 th, 2018 1.1 Introduction. Welcome to our website's Terms and Conditions ("Agreement"). The provisions of this Agreement
More informationfailing to get the contract signed (something that never ceases to amaze lawyers!);
Professionals involved in design-build projects should be aware of the risks they face when they contract with the owner to be solely responsible for both construction and design. In this respect, the
More informationCASH MANAGEMENT SERVICES MASTER AGREEMENT
This Cash Management Services Master Agreement (the Master Agreement ) and any applicable Schedules (the Master Agreement and any applicable Schedules are together referred to as the Agreement ) sets out
More informationDefamation and Social Media An Update
Defamation and Social Media An Update Presented by: Gavin Tighe Outline Overview The Legal Framework of Defamation in Canada Recent Developments Recent Jurisprudence and Amendments to the Legislative Framework
More informationUNPAID OVERTIME CLASS ACTION. FRESCO v CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION
[CIBC TO INSERT RECIPIENT ADDRESS] UNPAID OVERTIME CLASS ACTION FRESCO v CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY You are receiving
More informationBuying or Selling a Business
TAB 2 Buying or Selling a Business Restrictive Covenants in Commercial and Employment Contexts: Key Cases and Considerations Adrian Ishak, Rubin Thomlinson LLP Parisa Nikfarjam, Rubin Thomlinson LLP March
More informationforegoing restrictions do not apply if and to the extent, but only to the extent, that the restrictions are prohibited by applicable law.
Terms of Use This website is owned and operated by Natural Health Services Ltd. ( NHS ). Please carefully read these Terms of Use and the Disclaimer before using the NHS website. These Terms of Use and
More information2014 Securities Class Actions Year in Review: Five Developments That Will Change the Landscape
2014 Securities Class Actions Year in Review: Five Developments That Will Change the Landscape 2 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP 2014 Securities Class Actions Year in Review Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP 1
More informationSubstantial and Unreasonable Injurious Affection after Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v. Ontario (Transportation)
May 2013 Municipal Law Section Substantial and Unreasonable Injurious Affection after Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v. Ontario (Transportation) By Scott McAnsh Antrim Truck Stop is located just off Highway
More informationCOMFLO WEBSITE TERMS OF USE
COMFLO WEBSITE TERMS OF USE This website is owned and operated by Comflo Inc. ( Comflo ). Please carefully read these Terms of Use before using the Comflo website. These Terms of Use exempt Comflo and
More informationTo Compete or Not to Compete: Tips and Traps When Drafting Restrictive Covenants
Spring Employment and Labour Law Seminar To Compete or Not to Compete: Tips and Traps When Drafting Restrictive Covenants Jeff Mitchell Chelsea Rasmussen June 10, 2016 Agenda Context: What is the playing
More informationDirectors' Duties in Guernsey
Directors' Duties in Guernsey March 2018 1. OVERVIEW 1.1 This note provides a brief synopsis of the common law duties owed by directors of companies ("companies") incorporated in the Island of Guernsey
More informationShareholder Class Actions: A New Statutory Regime in Ontario
Shareholder Class Actions: A New Statutory Regime in Ontario Douglas M. Worndl 1 February 2003 Unlike the United States, where the statutorily based fraud on the market doctrine has enabled widespread
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
BETWEEN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: Downer v. The Personal Insurance Company, 2012 ONCA 302 Ryan M. Naimark, for the appellant Lang, LaForme JJ.A. and Pattillo J. (ad hoc) John W. Bruggeman,
More informationA RE-FORMULATION OF THE INTERJURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITY DOCTRINE
A RE-FORMULATION OF THE INTERJURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITY DOCTRINE Case comment on: Canadian Western Bank v. Alberta 2007 SCC 22; and British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Lafarge 2007 SCC 23. Presented To:
More informationA Cross-Country Review of Contaminated Land Litigation
A Cross-Country Review of Contaminated Land Litigation Marc McAree Specialist in Environmental Law Certified by the Law Society of Upper Canada Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP Toronto Maxxam Analytics
More informationJanuary
THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA REAFFIRMS THE ECONOMIC LOSS DOCTRINE, DECLINES TO IMPOSE TORT LIABILITY ON DEVELOPERS AND CONTRACTORS FOR NEGLIGENCE IN THE ABSENCE OF PROPERTY DAMAGE OR PERSONAL INJURY
More informationSupreme Court reaffirms low threshold for jurisdiction in recognition and enforcement cases
Supreme Court reaffirms low threshold for jurisdiction in recognition and enforcement cases Ted Brook Litigation Conflict of Laws Foreign Judgments Jurisdiction Enforcement and Recognition Service Ex Juris
More informationContract and Tort Law for Engineers
Contract and Tort Law for Engineers Christian S. Tacit Tel: 613-599-5345 Email: ctacit@tacitlaw.com Canadian Systems of Law There are two systems of law that operate in Canada Common Law and Civil Law
More informationModel Non-Collusion Clauses and Non-Collusive Tendering Certificate
USER GUIDE TO PROCURERS Why do we need competition? In a free market economy, businesses compete with each other by offering the best range of goods and services at the best prices to consumers. A competitive
More informationPolluter Pays Doctrine Underscored: Section 99(2) of the EPA Applied: Some Thoughts on Midwest Properties Ltd. v. Thordarson, 2015 ONCA 819
1 Polluter Pays Doctrine Underscored: Section 99(2) of the EPA Applied: Some Thoughts on Midwest Properties Ltd. v. Thordarson, 2015 ONCA 819 Some Thoughts by the Lawyers at Willms & Shier Environmental
More informationDirectors Duties Handbook
Introduction This handbook has been prepared for directors of private limited companies to provide them with a summary of their duties under the Companies Act 2006 (2006 Act). This guide should not be
More informationDigiCert, Inc. Certificate Subscriber Agreement
DigiCert, Inc. Email Certificate Subscriber Agreement Please read this document carefully before proceeding. You must not apply for, accept, or use a DigiCert-issued Email Certificate or any Service provided
More informationThe Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning. Robert John Douglas McRoberts
2010 LSBC 19 Report issued: August 03, 2010 The Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning Robert John Douglas McRoberts Applicant
More informationCraig T. Lockwood, for the Defendants B.C. Ltd. o/a Canada Drives and o/a GDC Auto and Cody Green REASONS FOR DECISION
CITATION: Kings Auto Ltd. v. Torstar Corporation, 2018 ONSC 2451 COURT FILE NO.: CV-16-551919CP DATE: 20180418 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: BEFORE: KINGS AUTO LTD. and SAPNA INC., Plaintiffs
More informationLANEAXIS AXIS TOKEN SALE TERMS
LANEAXIS AXIS TOKEN SALE TERMS Last updated: June 1, 2018 PLEASE READ THESE TOKEN SALE TERMS CAREFULLY. NOTE THAT SECTIONS 15 AND 16 CONTAIN A BINDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION WAIVER,
More informationCourt of Appeal on Smith v. Inco: Rylands v. Fletcher Revisited By Michael S. Hebert and Cheryl Gerhardt McLuckie*
Court of Appeal on Smith v. Inco: Rylands v. Fletcher Revisited By Michael S. Hebert and Cheryl Gerhardt McLuckie* In October 2011, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its much anticipated decision in
More informationTHE INTERPRETATION OF EXCLUSION CLAUSES
BRIEFING THE INTERPRETATION OF EXCLUSION CLAUSES MAY 2016 LITERAL AND NATURAL MEANING IS OF PRIMARY IMPORTANCE COMMERCIALITY MAY BE CONSIDERED THE COURT MAY ALSO CONSIDER APPLICATION OF THE CONTRA PROFERENTEM
More informationA CHANGING LANDSCAPE IN CONSUMER CLASS ACTIONS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA (AND BEYOND)
A CHANGING LANDSCAPE IN CONSUMER CLASS ACTIONS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA (AND BEYOND) Brad W. Dixon BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP Introduction British Columbia courts continue to grapple with efforts by plaintiffs
More informationELECTRONIC DEALING AGREEMENT
ELECTRONIC DEALING AGREEMENT This electronic dealing agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into between the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce ( CIBC ) and ( Customer ) as of this day of, 20 (the Effective
More informationIntroductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario
Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario Table of Contents INTRODUCTION This guide contains an overview of the Canadian legal system and court structure as well as key procedural and substantive
More informationIN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Cite as: Custom Clean Atlantic Ltd. v. GSF Canada Inc., 2016 NSSM 17 PRELIMINARY RULING ON JURISDICTION
Claim No. SCCH-449291 IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Cite as: Custom Clean Atlantic Ltd. v. GSF Canada Inc., 2016 NSSM 17 BETWEEN: CUSTOM CLEAN ATLANTIC LTD. Claimant - and - GSF CANADA INC.
More informationEnd User License Agreement
End User License Agreement Pluribus Networks, Inc.'s ("Pluribus", "we", or "us") software products are designed to provide fabric networking and analytics solutions that simplify operations, reduce operating
More informationGRANT AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) Effective as at the last date of signing.
GRANT AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) Effective as at the last date of signing. Between: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ALBERTA As represented by the Minister of Status of Women (the Minister ) And: [LEGAL
More informationRecent Developments in the Canadian Law of Contract
Honest Performance and Absolutely Everything Else By Ryan P. Krushelnitzky and Sandra L. Corbett QC Recent Developments in the Canadian Law of Contract Bhasin and Sattva represent important changes and
More informationCED: An Overview of the Law
Torts BY: Edwin Durbin, B.Comm., LL.B., LL.M. of the Ontario Bar Part II Principles of Liability Click HERE to access the CED and the Canadian Abridgment titles for this excerpt on Westlaw Canada II.1.(a):
More informationLIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY ACCOUNTANTS
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY ACCOUNTANTS Introduction 1. Traditionally, a central plank of an accountant s corporate work has been carrying out the audit. However, over the years the profession s role has
More information2014 ONSC 4841 Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Cruz v. McPherson CarswellOnt 11387, 2014 ONSC 4841, 244 A.C.W.S. (3d) 720
2014 ONSC 4841 Ontario Superior Court of Justice Cruz v. McPherson 2014 CarswellOnt 11387, 2014 ONSC 4841, 244 A.C.W.S. (3d) 720 Terra Cruz and Carmen Cruz, Plaintiffs and Jason Mcpherson, 546291 Ontario
More informationTopic. Bill Clause No. Section No. SHORT TITLE. Proposed Wording. 1. This Act may be cited as the Wage Earner Protection Program Act.
SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the Wage Earner Protection Program Act. This provision provides the short title of the Act. 2() INTERPRETATION 2. () In this Act, wages includes salaries, commissions,
More informationTHE SIX-MINUTE Environmental Lawyer
TAB 1 THE SIX-MINUTE Environmental Lawyer The Latest on Damages for Continuing Nuisance Bryan Buttigieg, C.S. Miller Thomson LLP October 20, 2016 Six-Minute Environmental Lawyer 2016 The Law Society of
More informationTercon Revisited: The Uncertainty of Liability Disclaimers
Tercon Revisited: The Uncertainty of Liability Disclaimers Paul Emanuelli General Counsel and Managing Director Procurement Law Office paul.emanuelli@procurementoffice.ca 416-700-8528 www.procurementoffice.ca
More informationBOARD OF DIRECTORS CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS PURPOSE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS PURPOSE The purpose of this Conflict of Interest Policy is to publicly affirm the commitment of the members of the Board of Directors
More informationInside Baseball: Arbitrators as Umpires
Special Report: The Law and Sports January/February 2012 Inside Baseball: Arbitrators as Umpires Moodville Dreamstime.com Photowitch Dreamstime.com Peter Bowal and Chris Hunter The Business of Baseball
More informationSHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS AND REMEDIES 1
Lawyers Patent & Trade-mark Agents 1200 Waterfront Centre 200 Burrard Street, P.O. Box 48600 Vancouver, B.C., Canada V7X 1T2 tel: (604) 687-5744 fax: (604) 687-1415 SHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS AND REMEDIES 1 Stephen
More informationSERVICES AGREEMENT No.
SERVICES AGREEMENT No. This is a services agreement ( Agreement ) by and between the WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION (WHOI), a corporation with its principal place of business in Woods Hole, Massachusetts,
More informationPart 1 Interpretation
The New Limitation Act Explained Page 1 Part 1 Interpretation This Part defines terms and provides some general principles of interpretation for the new Limitation Act ( new Act ). Division 1 Definitions
More informationREPEALED LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 266
Section 1 LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 266 Contents 1 Definitions 2 Application of Act 3 Limitation periods 4 Counterclaim or other claim or proceeding 5 Effect of confirming a cause of action 6 Running of time
More informationMNG HEALTH Website Terms and Conditions
MNG HEALTH Website Terms and Conditions Thank you for visiting the MNG Health website located at www.mnghealth.com (the Site ). The Site is owned and operated by Meta Pharmaceutical Services, LLC, d.b.a.
More informationTerms and Conditions of Apollo Display Technologies, Corp.
Terms and Conditions of Apollo Display Technologies, Corp. By using this Web site, you signify your assent to these terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms of use, please do not use the site.
More informationGlossary of Terms for Business Law and Ethics
Glossary of Terms for Business Law and Ethics MBA 625, Patten University Abusive/Intimidating Behavior Physical threats, false accusations, being annoying, profanity, insults, yelling, harshness, ignoring
More informationMICROSOFT DEVICE SERVICE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
MICROSOFT DEVICE SERVICE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SECTION 20 CONTAINS A BINDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE AND CLASS ACTION WAIVER IF YOU LIVE IN (OR IF A BUSINESS YOUR PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN) THE UNITED
More informationThe Benefits and Pitfalls of Mandatory Mediation Provisions in Commercial Contracts
The Benefits and Pitfalls of Mandatory Mediation Provisions in Commercial Contracts Presented by: David Tupper, Melanie Gaston and Chris Petrucci Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP February 25, 2015 - Calgary
More informationFrontier Justice and the End of Contract A
Frontier Justice and the End of Contract A Paul Emanuelli Managing Director The Procurement Office paul.emanuelli@procurementoffice.com 416-700-8528 www.procurementoffice.com Copyright Notice The following
More informationDRAFT. OCE Funding Agreement
(Trilateral) MIS#: This Agreement is made between ( Client ), ( Research Partner ), (Client and Research Partner collectively referred to as the Participants ), and Ontario Centres of Excellence Inc. (
More informationIndex. making the case for regulating professional standards of, 264
ACCESS TO JUSTICE, 502 alternative dispute resolution, 506 definition of, 505 ADVOCACY civility in, 11 administration of justice, relationship to, 13 as officer of the court, 15 effective advocacy, role
More informationGrand Court Approval Of Proceedings Brought By Companies In Liquidation, Litigation Funding Agreements And Contingency Fee Arrangements
28 April 2014 page 1/5 Grand Court Approval Of Proceedings Brought By Companies In Liquidation, Litigation Funding Agreements And Contingency Fee Arrangements In an unreported judgment in ICP Strategic
More informationThe things a security taker needs to know about receivership under BVI law
GUIDE The things a security taker needs to know about receivership under BVI law December 2016 Contents Introduction 3 What is receivership? 3 What types of receiver may be appointed? 3 How does the right
More informationMICROSOFT SOFTWARE CLASS ACTIONS NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS
MICROSOFT SOFTWARE CLASS ACTIONS NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS IF YOU BOUGHT MICROSOFT SOFTWARE OR A COMPUTER WITH MICROSOFT SOFTWARE BETWEEN DECEMBER 23, 1998 AND MARCH 11, 2010 (INCLUSIVE) YOUR RIGHTS MAY
More informationThe Capital Markets Act - A Revised Consultation Draft
The Capital Markets Act - A Revised Consultation Draft I. Overview of the Revised Consultation Draft The uniform Capital Markets Act 1 (CMA), which will be proposed for enactment by each participating
More informationDIFC LAW No.12 of 2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MARKETS LAW DIFC LAW No.12 of 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA
Date: 20181121 Docket: CI 16-01-04438 (Winnipeg Centre) Indexed as: Shirritt-Beaumont v. Frontier School Division Cited as: 2018 MBQB 177 COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA BETWEEN: ) APPEARANCES: ) RAYMOND
More informationProtecting Freedom of Expression in Public Debate: Anti-SLAPP legislation
Protecting Freedom of Expression in Public Debate: Anti-SLAPP legislation by Chris Wullum Tapper Cuddy LLP 1000-330 St. Mary Avenue Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 3Z5 cwullum@tappercuddy.com Background A strategic
More informationSTREETBLAST MEDIA, LLC. PO BOX 176 FAIRDALE, KENTUCKY 40118
STREETBLAST MEDIA, LLC. PO BOX 176 FAIRDALE, KENTUCKY 40118 CONTRACT & TERMS: Enterprise Social Media Strategy Consulting Agreement legal@streetblastmedia.com This Consulting Agreement (the "Agreement")
More informationLast revised: 6 April 2018 By using the Agile Manager Website, you are agreeing to these Terms of Use.
Agile Manager TERMS OF USE Last revised: 6 April 2018 By using the Agile Manager Website, you are agreeing to these Terms of Use. 1. WHO THESE TERMS OF USE APPLY TO; WHAT THEY GOVERN. This Agile Manager
More informationSOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
MMS Contract No: SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS These Software License Terms and Conditions (referred to interchangeably as the Terms and Conditions or the Agreement ) form a legal contract between
More informationProcurement Guidelines for. the Japanese Grants. (Type I)
Procurement Guidelines for the Japanese Grants (Type I) Jan 2016 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) Procurement Guidelines for the Japanese Grants (Type I) Table of Contents Preface... 5 Chapter
More informationNATIONAL POLICY GUIDANCE FOR PROXY ADVISORY FIRMS
NATIONAL POLICY 25-201 GUIDANCE FOR PROXY ADVISORY FIRMS PART 1 PURPOSE AND APPLICATION 1.1 Purpose of this Policy The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA or we) recognize that proxy voting is an important
More informationCHARITY & NFP LAW BULLETIN NO. 414
CHARITY & NFP LAW BULLETIN NO. 414 JANUARY 31, 2018 EDITOR: TERRANCE S. CARTER WHEN WAIVERS FAIL: THE IMPACT OF IMPRECISE LANGUAGE AND RESULTING LIABILITY By Sean S. Carter & Barry W. Kwasniewski * A.
More informationProvider Contract for the Provision of Legal Aid Services and Specified Legal Services
Provider Contract for the Provision of Legal Aid Services and Specified Legal Services The Parties to this Contract The Secretary for Justice (the Secretary) and (the Provider) The Secretary and the Provider
More informationBruXswick. New. Nouveau. Law Reform Notes. June 2006 #24:
New Nouveau BruXswick #24: June 2006 Law Reform Notes Office of the Attorney General Room 416, Centennial Building P.O. Box 6000, Fredericton, N.B., Canada E3B 5Hl Tel.: (506) 453-6542; Fax: (506) 457-7342
More informationEnvironmental Causes of Action
Environmental Causes of Action NEERLS / SEER April 2012, Vancouver, PhD Law 1 Overview n Negligence: Berendsen n Nuisance n Carrier n Smith v. Inco; MacQueen n Heyes n Rylands / Trespass: Inco 2 Berendsen
More informationITC MODEL CONTRACT FOR AN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL AGENCY
ITC MODEL CONTRACT FOR AN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL AGENCY EXTRACT FROM "MODEL CONTRACTS FOR SMALL FIRMS" GENEVA 2010 Contents Foreword Acknowledgements Introduction iii v ix Chapter 1 International Contractual
More informationPolarity Partnerships Software Licence Agreement
Polarity Partnerships Software Licence Agreement CAREFULLY READ THE FOLLOWING LICENCE AGREEMENT CAREFULLY! IT CONTAINS VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS, AS WELL AS LIMITATIONS
More informationINTERNET ADVERTISING AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT made as of this day of, 2004.
INTERNET ADVERTISING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made as of this day of, 2004. BETWEEN: THOMSON ASSOCIATES INC., a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario; (hereinafter referred
More informationINFORMATION BULLETIN
INFORMATION BULLETIN #18 THE DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION I. INTRODUCTION When a union becomes the exclusive bargaining agent for a unit of employees, it normally negotiates a collective agreement with
More informationRemote Deposit Capture Application End User License Agreement
Notre Dame Federal Credit Union Remote Deposit Capture Application End User License Agreement This Remote Deposit Capture Application End User License Agreement ( Agreement ) constitutes a legal agreement
More information1. Summary. 2. Methodology
THE REALITY OF SETTLEMENT IN REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT CASES Joel Wiesenfeld and Celesse Dove * 1. Summary The vast majority of concluded regulatory enforcement cases at the Ontario Securities Commission
More informationPART 5 DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS CHAPTER 1 Preliminary and definitions 219. Interpretation and application (Part 5) 220.
PART 5 DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS CHAPTER 1 Preliminary and definitions 219. Interpretation and application (Part 5) 220. Connected persons 221. Shadow directors 222. De facto director CHAPTER
More informationTwo years after Tercon: Has procurement law in Canada changed?
Two years after Tercon: Has procurement law in Canada changed? Sally Gomery Stephen Nattrass Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP May 22, 2012 Two years ago, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its eagerly
More informationNorth Carolina Uniform Power of Attorney Act Judicial Relief and Procedure
North Carolina Uniform Power of Attorney Act Judicial Relief and Procedure By Elizabeth K. Arias and James E. Hickmon The inclusion of a judicial relief mechanism under the newly enacted North Carolina
More informationProvince of Alberta ATB FINANCIAL ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter A Current as of December 15, Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 15, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue
More informationSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ENERGY SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICE AGREEMENT
Agreement Number: This Energy Service Provider Service Agreement (this Agreement ) is made and entered into as of this day of,, by and between ( ESP ), a organized and existing under the laws of the state
More informationIngles v. The Corporation of the City of Toronto Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada dated March 2, 2000
Ingles v. The Corporation of the City of Toronto Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada dated March 2, 2000 (City Council at its regular meeting held on October 3, 4 and 5, 2000, and its Special Meetings
More informationOrder F Ministry of Justice. Hamish Flanagan Adjudicator. March 18, 2015
Order F15-12 Ministry of Justice Hamish Flanagan Adjudicator March 18, 2015 CanLII Cite: 2015 BCIPC 12 Quicklaw Cite: [2015] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 12 Summary: The applicant requested records from the Ministry
More informationCANADIAN ANTI-SPAM LAW [FEDERAL]
PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] CANADIAN ANTI-SPAM LAW [FEDERAL] Published by Quickscribe Services Ltd. Updated To: [includes 2010 Chapter 23 (SI/2013-127) amendments
More informationTERMS OF USE OF AUCTUS WEBSITE
TERMS OF USE OF AUCTUS WEBSITE Last updated: March 23, 2018 AUCTUS PROJECT INC, a company incorporated under the laws of British Virgin Islands ( Auctus, we, our, The Company ), welcomes you (the User(s),
More informationLISTING AGREEMENT STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS Date: March 1, 2016
LISTING AGREEMENT STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS Date: March 1, 2016 ARTICLE 1 Definition 1.1 Definitions. In this Agreement, the following words shall have the following meanings: Agreement means this
More informationTerms and Conditions Revision January 28, 2019
Terms and Conditions Revision January 28, 2019 1. Terms and Conditions PLEASE READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ( TERMS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS, and AGREEMENT ) CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THE https://www.unitedimmigrants.com
More informationREVIEW REPORT FI December 29, 2015 Department of Finance
Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia Report of the Commissioner (Review Officer) Catherine Tully REVIEW REPORT FI-13-28 December 29, 2015 Department of Finance Summary: The
More informationGood Faith and Honesty: Bhasin v Hrynew
Good Faith and Honesty: Bhasin v Hrynew June 9, 2015 Toronto, Ontario Marc Kestenberg, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP Marlo Kravetsky, Senior Counsel, TD Bank Group Deborah Reine, Senior Counsel,
More informationRecent Delaware Corporate Governance Decisions. Paul D. Manca, Esquire Hogan & Hartson LLP Washington, DC
APRIL 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recent Delaware Corporate Governance Decisions Paul D. Manca, Esquire Hogan & Hartson LLP Washington, DC BUSINESS LAW AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICE GROUP In three separate decisions
More informationAVOIDING FROSTBITE: A PRIMER ON CANADIAN EMPLOYMENT, IMMIGRATION AND LABOUR LAWS
AVOIDING FROSTBITE: A PRIMER ON CANADIAN EMPLOYMENT, IMMIGRATION AND LABOUR LAWS ANDREA RASO AMER FRASER MILNER CASGRAIN, LLP + 1 604 622 5152 ANDREA.RASOAMER@FMC LAW.COM TONY SCHWEITZER FRASER MILNER
More informationUniform Arbitration Act
2-1 Uniform Law Conference of Canada Uniform Act 2-2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTORY MATTERS 1 Definitions 2 Application of Act 3 Contracting out 4 Waiver of right to object 5 agreements COURT INTERVENTION
More informationBUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT
PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT Published by As it read between June 23rd, 2006 and June 30th, 2007 Updated To: Important: Printing multiple
More informationFortress Real Developments Inc., Fortress Real Capital Inc., Jawad Rathore and Vince Petrozza, Plaintiffs ENDORSEMENT
CITATION: Fortress Real Developments Inc. v. Rabidoux, 2017 ONSC 167 COURT FILE NO.: CV-16-546813 DATE: 20170111 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: Fortress Real Developments Inc., Fortress Real Capital
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No [ ] QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No [ ] QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW BETWEEN: THE QUEEN on the application of WALTER HUGH MERRICKS CBE
More information