Cross-Border Insolvency in the U.S. under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code
|
|
- Nicholas Bridges
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Volume 29, No. 3 April 2013 Section Insolvency Law Cross-Border Insolvency in the U.S. under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code By Garry M. Graber 1 Introduction On April 20, 2005 the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) was passed, and consequently Chapter 15 was added to the Bankruptcy Code of the U.S. Chapter 15 is the U.S. adoption and implementation of the Model Law: replacing section 304 of the Bankruptcy Code. By looking at Chapter 15 and the recent case law surrounding it, this article aims to provide insight into how Chapter 15 works, how recent cases have implemented Chapter 15 and what interested parties should consider before they decide whether to apply for Chapter 15 recognition. Chapter 15: A Brief Recap A. The Five Objectives The intention of Chapter 15 is to realize the vision of international cooperation in insolvency proceedings that underpins the Model Law, and provide a vehicle suitable for effectively dealing with insolvency cases when more than one international jurisdiction is involved. The five objectives contained at the beginning of the text outline how the provisions of Chapter 15 intends to achieve this: Cooperation between the United States and other interested parties, and the courts or other competent authorities of foreign countries involved in cross-border insolvency cases; Greater legal certainty for trade and investment; Fair and efficient administration of cross-border insolvencies that protects the interests of all interested parties including the debtor and the creditor. 1 Garry is a Partner at Hodgson Russ LLP in Rochester, New York. 1
2 Protection and maximization of the value of the debtors assets; Facilitation of the rescue of financially troubled businesses, thereby protecting investment and preserving employment. 2 B. Commencement of a Proceeding under Chapter 15 In order to exercise the rights available under Chapter 15, the primary point of contact of the foreign insolvency proceeding ( the foreign representative ) must file a petition for recognition of a foreign proceeding with the bankruptcy court, 3 accompanied by documents proving the existence of a foreign proceeding, and the appointment and authority of the foreign representative. 4 The court will then issue an order recognizing the foreign proceeding as either a foreign main proceeding or a foreign non-main proceeding after notice and a hearing. Once an application for recognition under 1515 is granted, an ancillary case under 1504 may proceed: thus, giving the foreign representative the right to sue and be sued in the courts of the United States, and to apply for the appropriate relief in that court. 5 Whether the case received recognition as a main proceeding under 1517(b)(1), or is considered to be a non-main proceeding under 1517(b)(2) determines the type and amount of relief available to the foreign representative. The main point of determination for this is the Centre of Main Interests (COMI) 6 of the defaulting individual or company. C. Orders that May be Made A recognition of a foreign proceeding as a foreign main proceeding entitles the debtor to an automatic set of reliefs under 1520, including an automatic stay on proceedings. A non-main proceeding is not entitled to automatic relief and instead must rely on 1521, which allows debtors granted main and non-main recognition to seek the discretional relief necessary to effectuate the purpose of chapter 15, and to protect the assets of the debtor or the interests of the creditors from the non-exhaustive list contained in 1521(a). The broad spectrum of relief available under 1521(a) is somewhat checked by 1522 which states that the court may only administer, modify or terminate relief if the interests of the creditors and other interested entities, including the debtor, are sufficiently protected. D. Cooperation and Communication At all times the courts are to cooperate and directly communicate with the foreign representatives and foreign courts from the trustee and the U.S. courts. 7 Suggested forms of cooperation are included in 1527 and include provisions such as agreements to cooperate, whilst 1528 limits (a) (b) 6 Under both a main and a non-main proceeding there is a rebuttable presumption under 1516 that a debtors COMI is the place of the registered office. However, as we have seen in case law under Chapter 15, the courts have utilized a wide variety of factors when determining a debtors COMI. This article will discuss this issue at a later point and
3 the U.S. Courts from interfering in the foreign proceeding by restricting jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court to assets within the U.S. In order to allow the U.S. Courts to maintain some degree of power and control in relation to enforcing the cooperation and comity intended in the legislation, Congress included 1506 which allows the court to refuse to take any action if the action would be manifestly contrary to the public policy of the United States. Recent Chapter 15 Cases A number of interesting cases were decided in 2011 that highlighted the U.S. Courts interpretation of Chapter 15. A selection of such cases are summarized below. The cases highlight the ongoing evolution of how the courts are considering the various aspects of Chapter 15. A. The Disclosure of Information Under Chapter 15 Glitnir Bank HF 8 Glitnir Bank was undergoing liquidation in Iceland in a wind up before the Financial Supervisory Authority of Iceland and the District Court of Reykjavik. After receiving recognition as a foreign main proceeding on January 7 th, 2009, the Court signed the revised amended order recognizing foreign main proceeding of Glitnir Bank and granting permanent injunction on March 18 th, Pursuant to 1521(a)(4) and paragraph 6 of the second recognition order, which tracked the statute, this allowed the foreign representative to take evidence, examine witness, seek the production of documents and information concerning the debtors assets, affairs, rights, obligations or liabilities. On March 23 rd, 2011 the foreign representatives filed a motion for an order permitting the foreign representative to conduct discovery, compelling RBC, Citibank and 50 Gramercy Park North Owners Corp. to produce documents in relation to the defendants. The Court authorized it on April 7 th Some of the requests involved disclosure of personal financial information of two individuals related to Glitnir Bank. The foreign representative brought a motion to compel disclosure and the two individuals opposed and moved to quash the motion. In its decision, the court recognized that 1521(a)(4) allows for discovery but the court retains the power to quash or modify a subpoena to protect an individual or non-party against the disclosure of personal, private financial information to avoid undue annoyance, embarrassment or oppression, 9 and that when making its decision the court must balance the relevance of the information sought against the harm to the individuals Glitnir BankI HF., (U.S. Dist. S.D.N.Y) Case No Supra Fn 7 at page Supra Fn 7 at page 12 3
4 The Court also addressed the application of Rule 2004 of the Bankruptcy Code to 1521(a)(4) stating that although Bankruptcy Rule 2004 compliments those rights, 11 the Court may not authorize the fishing expeditions associated with Rule After assessing the facts the Court allowed some of the subpoenas in line with 1521(a)(4), where the requests concerned Icelandic affiliates, the bank s interests or company information the court allowed the subpoenas, but refused others on the grounds that some of the information sought had nothing to do with bankruptcy, and had more to do with the personal information of the individuals. Awal Bank 13 The Central Bank of Bahrain placed Awal Bank in an administration proceeding on July 30, 2009, and recognition as a foreign main proceeding was granted by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on October 27, A year later the foreign representative filed under Chapter 11 in order to bring an action to avoid a set-off by HSBC Bank, and to request relief from 521 of the Bankruptcy Code requiring a list of creditors and certain statements and schedules. Awal opted to pursue an action under the more rigorous Chapter 11 even though Chapter 15 offers adequate relief with less red tape, because in this case Awal wanted to utilize reliefs that are unavailable under 1521(a)(7). On January 5, 2011 the foreign representative filed a statement of financial affairs (SOFA), and schedule of assets and liabilities that omitted some of the information required and typically provided pursuant to 521, on the grounds that disseminating foreign creditor information would directly conflict with duties and procedures of the foreign main proceeding. In addition on February 24, 2011 the foreign representative sought an action to recover the set off of $12,996, from the $75,071, owed to HSBC Bank by Awal under a credit agreement. The court allowed Awal to omit certain information in this proceeding because the court concluded that doing otherwise would harm the foreign main proceeding in Bahrain and the court ordered HSBC to repay the set-off under 553(b), thus recognizing the importance of comity. Another point to note in this case is that the court opted to use the original Chapter 15 petition date as the relevant date for the purposes of 553(b), citing the protection and maximization of value of the debtors assets in pursuance to the objectives of Chapter In reaching its judgment the court argued that the Chapter 15 proceeding remains ancillary to the foreign proceeding, and therefore the foreign representative may be relieved of duties under Chapter 7 or Chapter Supra Fn 7 at page Supra Fn 7 at page In re Awal Bank, BSC, (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) Case No (ALG) (a)(4) 4
5 B. Notification of a Change of Circumstances Pursuant to 1518 Daewoo Logistics Corporation 15 Daewoo Logistics is a Republic of Korea (ROK) company primarily involved in the shipping and trading businesses. On July 3, 2009, Daewoo applied for rehabilitation under the ROK s debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act, and the Korean court issued commencement orders on July 23, The Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Court recognized this as a foreign main proceeding on October 21, 2009 and granted an automatic stay of proceedings pursuant to 1520(a). On June 8, 2011, the proceeding in ROK was closed, and subsequently a creditor filed a complaint in the Southern District of Texas Bankruptcy Court to arrest a vessel for unpaid services supplied to the vessel, pursuant to its in rem maritime lien on it. In response Daewoo filed a motion to prohibit this action. The Texas court entered an order to show cause but ordered Daewoo to file a 1518 statement clarifying the status of the Korean proceeding. Daewoo argued in the Southern District of New York bankruptcy court on October 5, 2011 that this outcome violated the recognition order stays, and requested the creditor release Daewoo of its obligation, and that the court find the creditor in contempt of the recognition order and seek costs accordingly. The court held that Daewoo could not prevent the creditor from enforcing it s lien because the proceeding in ROK had finished, and therefore the protections of Chapter 15 had expired also - a stay imposed pursuant to chapter 15 is normally coterminous with the stay in corresponding foreign proceeding and, accordingly, the Stay is terminated at the close of the ROK Rehabilitation. 16 Additionally, the foreign representative had not complied with 1518 and notified the U.S. court of any changes in the foreign proceeding. Foreign representatives should be aware that they have an obligation under 1518 to inform the court of any changes in the foreign proceeding. A failure to do so could result in the court terminating or changing previously awarded relief under the powers conferred to the court under This case illustrates the risks associated with overlooking the statutory obligations of the foreign representative, and the different kinds of relief available to them. Not only did the foreign representative fail to notify the court of a change in proceedings under 1518 and incur the wrath of the courts, but the foreign representative also failed to utilize the powers of 1507 which allow the foreign representative to request extra assistance from the court where necessary. Had Daewoo requested this extra assistance from the court instead of inadvertently contradicting the ancillary nature of Chapter 15, they may have avoided action by the creditors. 15 In re Daewoo Logistics Corporation (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) Case No (brl) 16 Supra Fn 14 at page 3 5
6 C. Application of Chapter 15 Protection to Subsidiaries of Debtors Vitro SAB 17 Vitro SAB is a holding company that conducts most of its business through subsidiaries and is the largest manufacturer of glass containers and flat glass in Mexico. When consolidated third party indebtedness rose to approximately $1.71billion (of which $1.216billion was owed on previously issued notes), Vitro SAB entered a voluntary Mexican proceeding under the Mexican Business Reorganization Act. An application for Chapter 15 recognition was filed with the Northern District of Texas bankruptcy court on June 24, 2011 and recognition was granted on July 22, 2011 as a foreign main proceeding. It was held that the court has jurisdiction to impose the automatic stay under 1520 and reliefs under 1519 and 1521 to protect the assets of Vitro SAB, but not to extent the protection related to entities other than Vitro SAB and its assets. The court recognized that in this case it was Vitro SAB s subsidiaries that owned the assets and contracted with the creditors, and that Vitro SAB was looking to protect every member of the corporate group with Chapter 15 reliefs, and therefore would not extend the reliefs past Vitro SAB and the subsidiaries in question in the case. In its analysis, the court highlighted that Chapter 15 focuses on protecting the debtors, not the not-debtor subsidiaries, and that they were against setting an unwanted precedent allowing parent companies a blanket protection to protect non-debtor subsidiaries. 18 A definitive feature of this case is that it is a case of first impression under Chapter 15, and due to the national importance of the issue, large amounts of money involved, and the number of parties effected, it is not surprising that there are appeals pending in the 5 th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (New Orleans), U.S. District Court, Northern District Texas (Dallas, and the New York State Supreme Court, Country of New York (Manhattan). 19 D. Protection of the Public Interest Under 1506 Qimonda AG 20 Qimonda is a manufacturer of semiconductor memory devices for use in predominantly automotive and electronic goods. An application was filed in a Munich insolvency court on January 23, 2009 and received foreign main recognition under Chapter 15 on July 22, Along with a recognition order in the U.S. came a supplementary order which, amongst other things, made 356(n) of the Bankruptcy Code (allowing licensees to either terminate or enforce rights afforded to them under the patent agreement) applicable in this proceeding. This was contrary to German law whereby contracts are automatically unenforceable unless the insolvency practitioner elects to perform them. 17 In re Vitro, S.A.B. de C.V., (Bankr. N.D. Tex. ) Case No HDH Supra Fn 16 at page Supra Fn 16 at page In re QIMONDA AG (Bankr. E.D.V.A) Case No SSM 6
7 After receiving communications from licensees looking to enforce their rights under 365(n) the foreign representative applied and succeeded in having the order modified to reduce the effect of 365(n). Consequently the licensees objected on the grounds that it was manifestly contrary to the public policy of the United States to follow German law on this occasion. The bankruptcy court of the Eastern District of Virginia decided that ensuring that U.S. companies had access to Qimonda s patents was in the public interest, and therefore under 1506 it was contrary to the public interest to allow Qimonda to elect not to perform the patent contracts. The court pointed to two provisions in Chapter 15 for justifying its decision: 1522 requires the court to ensure the interests of creditor, other interested parties and the debtor are sufficiently protected; 1506 allows the court to refuse to take action governed by Chapter 15 where the action is manifestly contrary to the public policy of the U.S. Not only would the creditors interests lack sufficient protection, but also there is a large risk to the substantial investment made by the objectors in the research and manufacturing facilities in the U.S. that could result in widespread loss of employment and wasted financial resources; clearly a consideration in the current economic environment. The court, though, was careful to point out that 1506 should only be used where the action in question would effect the most fundamental policies of the U.S., and not just because the foreign law gives a different result to the U.S. law. Foreign representatives should note the contrast between this case and Awal Bank, whereby comity in this case came second to the U.S. public policy of promoting innovation, unlike in the Awal Bank case, where comity came first. Even though the court recognized that Germany clearly has a mature and well-developed system of insolvency law with goals congruent to those of the U.S. bankruptcy law, 21 the court felt that although the technology industry wouldn t collapse if the licenses were terminated, it would nevertheless slow the pace of innovation, to the detriment of the U.S. economy, 22 and would thereby undermine the fundamental U.S. public policy promoting technological innovation. 23 It highlights that the although the U.S. courts will follow the intention of Chapter 15 in most cases, they will still have the best intentions of the U.S. at heart; especially in tough economic times such as these. E. Determining the Centre of Main Interest Millennium Global Emerging Credit Master Fund Limited Supra Fn 19 at page Supra Fn 19 at page Supra Fn 19 at page In re Millenium Global Emerging Credit Master Fund Limited, et al. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) Case No
8 Both Millennium Master Fund and Feeder Fund were seeking foreign main recognition in the U.S. courts after liquidation occurred in Bermuda due to Millennium Master Funds inability to meet a margin call of the prime broker, Credit Suisse on October 6, BCP Securities challenged that the COMI of Millennium was not in Bermuda and therefore the application lacked standing and should be refused, thus preventing liquidators investigating and prosecuting claims against BCP and others in U.S. courts. The court allowed foreign main recognition in this case because the facts showed that Bermuda was the COMI on the basis that 2 of the 3 directors lived in Bermuda; the company was registered in Bermuda; Bermuda is the location of the Bank, auditors and legal advisors; and Bermuda it is the location most ascertainable by third parties - even though Millennium was managed by a Guernsey company with a manager in London. When deciding where the COMI of the company was located, the court primarily based its decision on where third parties would ascertain the location to be based on the criteria listed in the paragraph above. This objective standard is logical, fair and offers pragmatic guidelines for the determination of the COMI where the model law and Chapter 15 lacks them, as recommended by the UNCITRAL working group. 25 One controversial point worth noting is that the court stated that although there are decisions that rigidly assert that equitable factors should play no role at the recognition phase of a chapter 15 case, it would seem that a determination relative to recognition and to the center of main interests of an enterprise should take into account the existence of a fair and impartial judicial system and a sophisticated body of law, as aspects of the bona fide proceedings. 26 Foreign representatives should also note that in this case the court reaffirmed the decision in Awal Bank that the relevant date for reliefs in Chapter 15 cases is the date of the Chapter 15 application, whether the relief sought is expressly provided for in Chapter 15 or not. 25 UNCITRAL working paper A/CN.9/WG.V/WP.101 August 4, 2011, paragraph 1 26 Supra Fn 16 at page 23 8
9 F. Jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court Fairfield Sentry 27 Fairfield was a British Virgin Islands company that was the main feeder fund for BLMIS (Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC). When fraud was discovered, shareholders and creditors commenced insolvency proceedings in the BVIs in February The proceedings were awarded foreign main recognition by the U.S. courts on July 22, All of the state court actions filed before Chapter 15 recognition were moved to the Southern District of New York bankruptcy court, where currently approximately 200 actions seek nearly $6 billion from subscribers and investment advisors. In this case the defendants filed remand notices on October 4, 2010 arguing that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and it should abstain from hearing the cases. After the foreign representative amended some of the instant actions in January 2011, the bankruptcy court denied the remand motions on May 23, 2011 on the grounds that it had related to jurisdiction under title 28 of the United States Code (U.S.C) 157(b)(2) and 1334(b), and that the relief sought in the Actions strikes directly at the core bankruptcy functions of this Court under chapter On September 19, 2011 the defendants exercised their leave to appeal and appealed to the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York, citing the grounds that the bankruptcy court wrongly denied the defendants motion to remand these cases to state court, and refused to abstain from asserting jurisdiction even though it lacked jurisdiction. The district court clarified the position of when the bankruptcy court has jurisdiction, stating that the bankruptcy court may enter final judgments when it has core jurisdiction: whereby cases arise under title 11of the U.S.C (when a substantive right is created by the bankruptcy code) and arise in title 11 (when they are not based on any right expressly created by title 11, but nevertheless wouldn t exist outside of the bankruptcy). When the court lacks core jurisdiction they may only submit final proposals of fact and conclusions of law to the district court, who will then enter a final judgment. In its decision, the district court asserted that the state law claims did not arise under Title 11 because neither the causes of action or the substantive rights claimed in the cases are created by the Bankruptcy Code. The court felt that the situation presented in this case cuts against the grain of Chapters 15 s text, structure, purpose, the legislative history and prior case law. 29 The claims in this case are standard common law claims for money had and received, mistaken payment, or unjust enrichment: 30 the claims are independent of bankruptcy and contain facts antecedent to bankruptcy. 31 Additionally, by claiming jurisdiction the bankruptcy court was in fact breaching the fundamental U.S. principle of the separation of powers contained in Article III of the Constitution. 32 Upon clarifying the jurisdiction issue, the court noted that despite the broad language of the reliefs available pursuant to 1521(a)(7), allowing a foreign representative to use foreign avoidance laws in a Chapter 15 case to retrieve non-u.s. assets would be inconsistent with the purpose and structure of 27 In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd., et al. Litigation (USDC SDNY) Case 11 MC 224 (LAP) 28 In re Fairfield Sentry Limited, et al. (Bankr. SDNY) Case No (BRL) page 3 29 Supra Fn 26 at page Supra Fn 26 at page Supra Fn 26 at page Supra Fn 26 at page 12
10 10 Chapter 15. To enjoy avoidance powers under U.S. law the foreign representative must start a plenary proceeding within Chapter 15, and even then it is limited to assets within the U.S. jurisdiction, as stated in One other thing that can be drawn from this decision is that foreign representatives should take heed that although the bankruptcy courts appear to be prepared to broadly interpret the provisions of Chapter 15, the state courts may not. Conclusion The cases above highlight recent developments under Chapter 15 and the Court s continued effort to clarify aspects of the law under it. By embracing the intentions of BAPCPA whilst maintaining the interests of the U.S. at heart, the Courts have created greater cohesion and certainty during economically uncertain times and hinted that smoother cross-border insolvency proceedings are on the horizon. 33 Supra Fn 26 at page 22 10
In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.: Second Circuit Provides Guidance to COMI Determinations in Chapter 15 Cases
BNA s Bankruptcy Law Reporter Reproduced with permission from BNA s Bankruptcy Law Reporter, 25 BBLR 1166, 08/22/2013. Copyright 姝 2013 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
More informationThe Fourth Circuit Upholds Application of Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code over Contrary Foreign Law in Chapter 15 Case
December 17, 2013 The Fourth Circuit Upholds Application of Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code over Contrary Foreign Law in Chapter 15 Case In Jaffé v. Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., No. 12-1802,
More informationChapter 15 and Cross- Border Insolvency
BACKGROUND David Conaway dconaway@slk-law.com 704.945.2149 Manufacturing Customers Vendors Supply Chain Insolvency Litigation Commercial and Financial Contracts Cross-Border One by-product of the globalization
More informationEnforcement of Foreign Orders Under Chapter 15
Enforcement of Foreign Orders Under Chapter 15 Jeanne P. Darcey Amy A. Zuccarello Sullivan & Worcester LLP June 15, 2012 CHAPTER 15: 11 U.S.C. 1501 et seq. Purpose of chapter 15 is to Provide effective
More informationApril 17, COMI: What Is It And Why Does It Matter?
April 17, 2013 The Second Circuit Rules that the Filing of a Chapter 15 Petition is the Relevant Period for Determining a Foreign Debtor s Center of Main Interests (or COMI ) and that COMI Factors Include
More informationChapter 15 Turns One: Ironing Out the Details. November/December Mark G. Douglas
Chapter 15 Turns One: Ironing Out the Details November/December 2006 Mark G. Douglas October 17, 2006 marked the first anniversary of the effectiveness of chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code as part of the
More informationInternational Bankruptcy Issues in IP Transactions
International Bankruptcy Issues in IP Transactions Jeffrey D. Osterman September 2012 INTRODUCTION 1 The World of Bankruptcy 2 Agenda Overview of Bankruptcy Law Risks to IP Licensees Case Study In re Qimonda
More informationChapter 15 Recognition Mandatory and Fully Encumbered Assets Are Property of the Debtor Protected by Automatic Stay. November/December 2013
Chapter 15 Recognition Mandatory and Fully Encumbered Assets Are Property of the Debtor Protected by Automatic Stay November/December 2013 Pedro A. Jimenez Mark G. Douglas More than eight years after chapter
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division
Document Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division In re: QIMONDA AG, Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding. Case No. 09-14766-RGM (Chapter 15) MEMORANDUM
More informationmg Doc 6 Filed 02/16/12 Entered 02/16/12 11:22:25 Main Document Pg 1 of 16
Pg 1 of 16 CHADBOURNE & PARKE LLP Counsel for the Petitioners 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10112 (212) 408-5100 Howard Seife, Esq. Andrew Rosenblatt, Esq. Francisco Vazquez, Esq. UNITED STATES
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION NOTICE OF MOTION TO AMEND SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER
Hearing Date: October 28, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. (prevailing Eastern time) Objection Deadline: October 21, 2009 at 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Eastern time) Jeff A. Showalter (Va. Bar No. 73414) MORRISON & FOERSTER
More informationBankruptcy Court Rules a Foreign Insolvency Plan That Extinguishes Claims Against Non-debtor Subsidiaries is Manifestly Contrary to US Public Policy
June 15, 2012 Bankruptcy Court Rules a Foreign Insolvency Plan That Extinguishes Claims Against Non-debtor Subsidiaries is Manifestly Contrary to US Public Policy In a decision further defining when US
More informationUNCI TRAL M odel L aw on Recognition and Enfor cement of I nsolvency-relat ed Judgments
UNCI TRAL M odel L aw on Recognition and Enfor cement of I nsolvency-relat ed Judgments Decision of the United Nations Commission on I nter national Tr ade L aw (UNCITRAL) The United Nations Commission
More informationUNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW (UNCITRAL)
UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW (UNCITRAL) UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment PREAMBLE CONTENTS Part One UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY
More informationIn re Toft; Section 1506 Public Policy Exception Trumps General Grant of Comity. Malerie Ma, J.D. Candidate 2013
2012 Volume IV No. 18 In re Toft; Section 1506 Public Policy Exception Trumps General Grant of Comity Malerie Ma, J.D. Candidate 2013 Cite as: In re Toft; Section 1506 Public Policy Exception Trumps General
More informationDemystifying Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code and Recent Cross-Border Insolvency Developments
Demystifying Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code and Recent Cross-Border Insolvency Developments Speakers: Wanda Borges, Esq. BORGES & ASSOCIATES, LLC Date: June 13, 2018 Bruce Nathan, Esq. LOWENSTEIN SANDLER
More informationIP in Bankruptcy: Addressing Licensor and Licensee Concerns
IP in Bankruptcy: Addressing Licensor and Licensee Concerns Presentation to the LES Aerospace & Transportation Committee Ian G. DiBernardo idibernardo@stroock.com IP in Bankruptcy Bankruptcy Code sections
More informationscc Doc 15 Filed 06/19/18 Entered 06/19/18 12:49:01 Main Document Pg 1 of 10
Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration), 1 Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding. Chapter 15 Case No. 18-11470
More informationmg Doc 2 Filed 03/29/13 Entered 03/29/13 14:27:51 Main Document Pg 1 of 18
Pg 1 of 18 DENTONS US LLP D. Farrington Yates Oscar N. Pinkas 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10020 Tel: (212) 768-6700 Fax: (212) 768-6800 Counsel for Boris K. Frederiksen, in his capacity
More informationreg Doc 2 Filed 02/03/15 Entered 02/03/15 10:35:52 Main Document Pg 1 of 10
Pg 1 of 10 Geoffrey T. Raicht Maja Zerjal PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Eleven Times Square New York, New York 10036 Tel: (212) 969-3000 Fax: (212) 969-2900 Attorneys for the Petitioners UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY
More informationUNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency
UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency Preamble The purpose of this Law is to provide effective mechanisms for dealing with cases of cross-border insolvency so as to promote the objectives of: (a)
More informationFourth Circuit Addresses Protections for US IP Licenses in Case Under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code
Legal Update December 11, 2013 Fourth Circuit Addresses Protections for US IP Licenses in Case Under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy In a case of significant importance to licensees of US intellectual property,
More informationdirectly to a court in the United States for any relief such as operating the debtor s business
Do Foreign Representatives Need to Satisfy the Recognition Requirement? 2017 Volume IX No. 24 Do Foreign Representatives Need to Satisfy the Recognition Requirement? Parm Partik Singh, J.D. Candidate 2018
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
Case: -000 Document: - Page: 0//0 0 000 Krys v. Farnum Place, LLC 0 0 In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM, 0 ARGUED: MAY, 0 DECIDED: SEPTEMBER, 0 No. 000 IN RE: FAIRFIELD
More information2 New Decisions Clarify Chapter 15 Requirements
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 2 New Decisions Clarify Chapter 15 Requirements
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: : Chapter 11 : SPANSION, INC., et al. : Case No. 09-10690 (KJC) : (Jointly Administered) Debtors. :Hearing Date: August 11, 2009
More informationFIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
FIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 11 ) OMTRON USA, LLC ) Case No.: 12-13076 (BLS) ) Debtor. ) Hearing Date: January 23, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. ) Objection
More informationAppeal: Doc: 25-1 Filed: 10/10/2012 Pg: 1 of 44 Total Pages:(1 of 45) No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Appeal: 12-1802 Doc: 25-1 Filed: 10/10/2012 Pg: 1 of 44 Total Pages:(1 of 45) No. 12-1802 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DR. MICHAEL JAFFÉ, as Insolvency Administrator over
More informationCase Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 1 of 18
Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 LOCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC., et
More informationNo Safe Harbor in a Bankruptcy Storm: Mutuality Baked Into the Very Definition of Setoff. July/August Mark G. Douglas
No Safe Harbor in a Bankruptcy Storm: Mutuality Baked Into the Very Definition of Setoff July/August 2010 Mark G. Douglas Safe harbors in the Bankruptcy Code designed to insulate nondebtor parties to financial
More informationCase 1:12-cv VM Document 30 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 12 LJSDC NY: Plaintiff, Defendant. Debtor. VICTOR MARRERO, united States District Judge.
Case 1:12-cv-09408-VM Document 30 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 12 LJSDC NY:, DOCUl\lENT. ; ELECTRONICA[;"LY.Ft~D UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----- ----- --------------- -------X
More informationCross-Border Bankruptcy Battleground: The Importance of Comity (Part I) March/April Mark G. Douglas Nicholas C. Kamphaus
Cross-Border Bankruptcy Battleground: The Importance of Comity (Part I) March/April 2010 Mark G. Douglas Nicholas C. Kamphaus The process whereby U.S. courts recognize and enforce the judicial determinations
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST
Court File No. CV-12-9719-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED APPLICATION OF LIGHTSQUARED
More informationCOOPERATION AGREEMENT
COOPERATION AGREEMENT This Cooperation Agreement (as amended, supplemented, amended and restated or otherwise modified from time to time, this Agreement ), dated as of July 5, 2016, is entered into by
More informationCase 2:08-cv JLL-CCC Document 46 Filed 10/23/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:08-cv-04143-JLL-CCC Document 46 Filed 10/23/2009 Page 1 of 13 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY THOMASON AUTO GROUP, LLC, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 08-4143
More informationsmb Doc 135 Filed 10/06/17 Entered 10/06/17 16:36:33 Main Document Pg 1 of 13
Pg 1 of 13 ALLEN & OVERY LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 610-6300 Facsimile: (212) 610-6399 Michael S. Feldberg Attorneys for Defendant ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (presently
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. FILED: April 18, 2013
In the Matter of: SI RESTRUCTURING INCORPORATED, Debtor JOHN C. WOOLEY; JEFFREY J. WOOLEY, Appellants v. HAYNES & BOONE, L.L.P.; SAM COATS; PIKE POWERS; JOHN SHARP; SARAH WEDDINGTON; GARY M. CADENHEAD,
More informationUNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment
UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment UNITED NATIONS UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment UNITED NATIONS New York, 1999 NOTE Symbols of
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/29/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 327 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 327 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2018 NYSCEF DOC. 18-10200-shl NO. 327 Doc 4 Filed 01/29/18 Entered 01/29/18 10:55:37 RECEIVED Main Document NYSCEF: 01/29/2018 Pg 1 of 11 Kenneth R. Puhala Theodore
More information1. On November 30, 2018, Toisa Limited and certain of its affiliates,
TOGUT, SEGAL & SEGAL LLP One Penn Plaza Suite 3335 New York, New York 10119 (212) 594-5000 Frank A. Oswald Brian F. Moore Counsel to the Debtors and Debtors in Possession UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
More informationOCEAN RIG: CHARTING A COURSE THROUGH CHAPTER 15 PROVISIONAL RELIEF, RECOGNITION, AND APPEALS
Vol. 34 No. 14 August 2018 OCEAN RIG: CHARTING A COURSE THROUGH CHAPTER 15 PROVISIONAL RELIEF, RECOGNITION, AND APPEALS The Ocean Rig chapter 15 proceedings produced precedent setting rulings regarding
More informationPre-confirmation Settlements and Structured Dismissals
Pre-confirmation Settlements and Structured Dismissals The Honorable Barbara Houser, United States Bankruptcy Judge Northern District of Texas February 25, 2016 Martin A. Sosland Retired Partner Weil,
More informationCase BLS Doc 5 Filed 01/18/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 16-10121-BLS Doc 5 Filed 01/18/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 15 ) Eastern Continental Mining and ) Development Ltd., ) Case No.:
More informationBIA s.267. UNCITRAL Model Law. Proposed Wording
BIA s.267 267. The purpose of this Part is to provide mechanisms for dealing with cases of cross-border insolvencies and to promote (a) cooperation between the courts and other competent authorities in
More informationRegulations. entitled. European Communities (Electronic Money) Regulations 2002
S.I. No. 221 of 2002 Regulations entitled European Communities (Electronic Money) Regulations 2002 Presentation No.: 11644 Price: 4.06 European Communities (Electronic Money) Regulations 2002 Arrangement
More informationBankruptcy and Judicial Estoppel: Serious Problems for Creditor and Debtor Alike
Barry University From the SelectedWorks of Serena Marie Kurtz March 16, 2011 Bankruptcy and Judicial Estoppel: Serious Problems for Creditor and Debtor Alike Serena Marie Kurtz, Barry University Available
More informationCase KJC Doc 25 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 16-12590-KJC Doc 25 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ABENGOA CONCESSIONS INVESTMENTS LIMITED, 1 Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding.
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Adv. Pro. No (BRL) SIPA Liquidation
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Presentment Date: June 29, 2011 45 Rockefeller Plaza Time: 12:00 p.m. New York, NY 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Objections Due: June 29, 2011 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 Time: 11:00
More informationF R E Q U E N T L Y A S K E D Q U E S T I O N S A B O U T T H E T R U S T I N D E N T U R E A C T O F
F R E Q U E N T L Y A S K E D Q U E S T I O N S A B O U T T H E T R U S T I N D E N T U R E A C T O F 1 9 3 9 General What is the Trust Indenture Act and what does it govern? The Trust Indenture Act of
More informationSigned June 24, 2017 United States Bankruptcy Judge
The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described. Signed June 24, 2017 United States Bankruptcy Judge IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
More informationDIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY BANKRUPTCY STAYS OF LITIGATION AGAINST NON-DEBTORS JUNE 12, 2003 JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN S IMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY BANKRUPTCY STAYS OF LITIGATION AGAINST NON-DEBTORS JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP JUNE 12, 2003 Most courts have held the insured versus insured exclusion
More informationLegal Developments and the Potential Impact on Owners, Charterers and New York Arbitration John R. Keough
The O.W. Bunker Litigation: Legal Developments and the Potential Impact on Owners, Charterers and New York Arbitration John R. Keough Background: O.W. Bunker s Collapse Late October and early November
More informationPreference Dynamic Duo II: Whatever Happened to the Small Preference Venue Limitation? And Yes, There Is an Ordinary Course of Business Defense!
credit column Bruce Nathan, Esq. Preference Dynamic Duo II: Whatever Happened to the Small Preference Venue Limitation? And Yes, There Is an Ordinary Course of Business Defense! Boy, with the increase
More informationNew End Game: Current Resolutions of Chapter 11 Cases
New End Game: Current Resolutions of Chapter 11 Cases CONCURRENT SESSION A. Kyle Everett, Moderator Development Specialists, Inc.; San Francisco Hon. Julia W. Brand U.S. Bankruptcy Court (C.D. Cal.); Los
More informationSubstantive Consolidation and Nondebtor Entities: The Fight Continues. May/June Daniel R. Culhane
Substantive Consolidation and Nondebtor Entities: The Fight Continues May/June 2011 Daniel R. Culhane Although it has been described as an extraordinary remedy, the ability of a bankruptcy court to order
More information! This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 license:
IAN FLETCHER INTERNATIONAL INSOLVENCY LAW MOOT 2018 Problem created pro bono by members of INSOL International and International In the Matter of Electric Bike Holdings Ltd Insolvency Institute, assisted
More informationGebhart v. Gaughan: Clarifying the Homestead Exemption as to Post-Petition Appreciation
Golden Gate University Law Review Volume 41 Issue 3 Ninth Circuit Survey Article 6 May 2011 Gebhart v. Gaughan: Clarifying the Homestead Exemption as to Post-Petition Appreciation Natalie R. Barker Follow
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., 1 Debtors. ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 08-53104 Chapter 11 Jointly Administered Honorable
More informationOVERVIEW OF CROATIAN BANKRUPTCY SYSTEM
MARIO VUKELIC, LLB, BA in Economics President to the High Commercial Court of the Republic of Croatia OVERVIEW OF CROATIAN BANKRUPTCY SYSTEM MARCH 2010 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO 1.0 Introduction.. 2
More informationEMERGING TRENDS IN CHAPTER 15 CASES:
ABI CARIBBEAN INSOLVENCY SYMPOSIUM February 3-5, 2011 EMERGING TRENDS IN CHAPTER 15 CASES: U.S. Creditor Rights & Protections in Chapter 15 Cases Multinational Enterprise Group Insolvency Developments
More informationCLIFFORD CHANCE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
CLIFFORD CHANCE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP SCXP/C1458/04790/HNM 16 February 2000 The Bond Market Association 40 Broad Street New York NY 10004-2373 USA Dear Sirs Cross-Product Master Agreement 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationChapter 11: Reorganization
Chapter 11: Reorganization This chapter has numerous sections relevant to reorganizations, including railroad reorganizations. Committees, trustees and examiners, conversion and dismissal, collective bargaining
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 93A Article 2 1
Article 2. Real Estate Education and Recovery Fund. 93A-16. Real Estate Education and Recovery Fund created; payment to fund; management. (a) There is hereby created a special fund to be known as the "Real
More informationMandatory Subordination Under Section 510(b) Extends to Claims Arising From Purchase or Sale of Affiliate s Securities
Mandatory Subordination Under Section 510(b) Extends to Claims Arising From Purchase or Sale of Affiliate s Securities Charles M. Oellermann Mark G. Douglas Section 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides
More informationThe Japanese rule on cross-border insolvency had been severely criticized by many foreign lawyers 1, because it
New Japanese Legislation on Cross-border Insolvency As compared with the UNCITRAL Model Law Kazuhiko Yamamoto Professor of Law, Hitotsubashi University 1. Summary on the New Japanese Legislation (1) History
More informationSenate Bill No. 72 Senators Care and Amodei
Senate Bill No. 72 Senators Care and Amodei CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to business entities; adopting the Uniform Limited Partnership Act (2001) and providing for its applicability on a voluntary basis;
More informationCase Document 379 Filed in TXSB on 02/08/18 Page 1 of 9
Case 17-36709 Document 379 Filed in TXSB on 02/08/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: COBALT INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC., et.
More informationscc Doc 930 Filed 11/28/18 Entered 11/28/18 16:57:42 Main Document Pg 1 of 33
Pg 1 of 33 TOGUT, SEGAL & SEGAL LLP One Penn Plaza Suite 3335 New York, New York 10119 (212) 594-5000 Frank A. Oswald Brian F. Moore Counsel to the Debtors and Debtors in Possession UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY
More informationLaw360. 2nd Circ. Favors Appellees Under Equitable Mootness. by Gregory G. Hesse and Henry P. Long III, Hunton & Williams LLP
Law360 October 17, 2012 2nd Circ. Favors Appellees Under Equitable Mootness by Gregory G. Hesse and Henry P. Long III, Hunton & Williams LLP On Aug. 31, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the
More informationEffective Chapter 15 Strategies for Marine Equipment Lessors and Maritime Lien Creditors
Page 1 LENGTH: 11624 words 1 of 4 DOCUMENTS Copyright 2016 University of San Francisco School of Law. All Rights Reserved. University of San Francisco Maritime Law Journal 2016 University of San Francisco
More informationEnvironmental Settlements in Bankruptcy: Practice Pointers for the Business Lawyer. A. Overview of the Bankruptcy Process
Environmental Settlements in Bankruptcy: Practice Pointers for the Business Lawyer By Jeanne T. Cohn-Connor, Esq. 1 For business lawyers, the intersection of environmental law and bankruptcy law raises
More informationand Samantha Rae Bewick (together, the "Petitioners"), as the joint supervisors under the
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: SCHEFENACKER PLC, Debtor in Foreign Proceeding. Chapter 15 Case No. 07-11482 (SMB) ORDER, PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. 105(a), 1507, 1517, AND
More informationNOTICE OF DEADLINE REQUIRING FILING OF PROOF OF CLAIM ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 5, 2008
APPENDIX 1 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re Quebecor World (USA) Inc., et al., Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 08-10152(JMP) Jointly Administered Honorable James M. Peck
More informationConnectivity Services Information Document
Connectivity Services Information Document Firm: Address: USER INFORMATION City: State: Zip: Firm: Address: BUSINESS CONTACT BILLING ADDRESS City: State: Zip: ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATORS TECHNICAL CONTACT BILLING
More informationMOTION OF THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR AN ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH 11 U.S.C.
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 715-3275 Facsimile: (212) 715-8000 Thomas Moers Mayer Kenneth H. Eckstein Robert T. Schmidt Adam
More informationsmb Doc 2876 Filed 05/01/17 Entered 05/01/17 11:52:39 Main Document Pg 1 of 22
Pg 1 of 22 Lisa M. Schweitzer Jane VanLare CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP One Liberty Plaza New York, New York 10006 Telephone: 212-225-2000 Facsimile: 212-225-3999 Attorneys for SMP Ltd. UNITED
More informationDecree No. 57 for 2009 Establishing a Tribunal to decide the Disputes Related to the Settlement of the Financial Position of
Decree No. 57 for 2009 Establishing a Tribunal to decide the Disputes Related to the Settlement of the Financial Position of Dubai World and its Subsidiaries We, Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Ruler of
More informationLisa J. Rodriguez declares as follows:
Declaration of Lisa J. Rodriguez in Support of Joint Motion for Preliminary App Page 1 of 69 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY In Re NORVERGENCE, INC., Case No. 04-32079 (RG)
More informationAustrian Bankruptcy Law
Austrian Bankruptcy Law Univ.- Prof. Dr. Walter Buchegger walter.buchegger@jku.at Terms What is bankruptcy law? What is insolvency law? Difference between enforcement proceedings and bankruptcy law Enforcement
More informationCase JMC-7A Doc 2928 Filed 09/13/18 EOD 09/13/18 14:29:18 Pg 1 of 8
Case 16-07207-JMC-7A Doc 2928 Filed 09/13/18 EOD 09/13/18 14:29:18 Pg 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION IN RE: ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC., et
More informationCase bjh11 Doc 957 Filed 04/16/19 Entered 04/16/19 14:24:44 Page 1 of 12
Case 18-33967-bjh11 Doc 957 Filed 04/16/19 Entered 04/16/19 14:24:44 Page 1 of 12 The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described. Signed April 16, 2019
More informationscc Doc 848 Filed 10/04/18 Entered 10/04/18 13:26:18 Main Document Pg 1 of 41
Pg 1 of 41 TOGUT, SEGAL & SEGAL LLP One Penn Plaza Suite 3335 New York, New York 10119 (212) 594-5000 Frank A. Oswald Brian F. Moore Lauren L. Peacock Counsel to the Debtors and Debtors in Possession UNITED
More informationSecond Circuit Settles the Meaning of Settlement Payments Under Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code. November/December 2011
Second Circuit Settles the Meaning of Settlement Payments Under Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code November/December 2011 Daniel J. Merrett John H. Chase The powers and protections granted to a bankruptcy
More informationCase pwb Doc 1093 Filed 11/20/14 Entered 11/20/14 11:00:52 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8
Document Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 CGLA LIQUIDATION, INC., f/k/a Cagle s, Case No. 11-80202-PWB Inc., CF
More informationA Bankruptcy Primer for Landlord & Tenant Matters
A Bankruptcy Primer for Landlord & Tenant Matters I. Bankruptcy Code Provisions This article focuses on the relationship between, and the rights and obligations of, the landlord and tenant in bankruptcy
More informationIrving H. Picard, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am the court-appointed trustee ( SIPA Trustee ) for the liquidation of Bernard
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re BLM AIR CHARTER LLC, Debtor. Chapter 11 Case No. 09-16757 AFFIDAVIT OF IRVING H. PICARD PURSUANT TO RULE 1007-2 OF THE LOCAL BANKRUPTCY
More informationJUDICIAL DISSOLUTION OF LLCS AND THE BANKRUPTCY CODE
JUDICIAL DISSOLUTION OF LLCS AND THE BANKRUPTCY CODE Thomas E. Plank* INTRODUCTION The potential dissolution of a limited liability company (a LLC ), including a judicial dissolution discussed by Professor
More informationshl Doc 1950 Filed 05/20/14 Entered 05/20/14 11:34:43 Main Document Pg 1 of 10 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In re Chapter 11 ARCAPITA BANK B.S.C.(c), et al. Reorganized Debtors.
More informationFACTUM OF THE APPLICANT (Motion Returnable June 16, 2016)
Court File No.: CV-16-11410-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF PHOENIX
More informationYukos and the recognition of foreign bankruptcies
Yukos and the recognition of foreign bankruptcies Author: Robert van Galen Published: The European Lawyer This article discusses a problem that may arise in relation to the recognition of foreign bankruptcies
More informationDoes a Civil Protective Order Protect a Company s Foreign Based Documents from Being Produced in a Related Criminal Investigation?
Does a Civil Protective Order Protect a Company s Foreign Based Documents from Being Produced in a Related Criminal Investigation? Contributed by Thomas P. O Brien and Daniel Prince, Paul Hastings LLP
More informationCase pwb Doc 1097 Filed 11/26/14 Entered 11/26/14 10:26:12 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9
Document Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 CGLA LIQUIDATION, INC., f/k/a Cagle s, Case No. 11-80202-PWB Inc., CF
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION In re: Petters Capital, LLC Bankr. No. 09-43847-NCD Chapter 7 Debtor Randall Seaver, Trustee for Petters Capital, LLC, vs. Plaintiff,
More informationCase KJC Doc 597 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 16-12685-KJC Doc 597 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: : Chapter 11 : LIMITLESS MOBILE, LLC, : Case No. 16-12685 (KJC) : Debtor.
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
0 0 Leib M. Lerner (CA State Bar No. ) Jeffrey E. Tsai (CA State Bar No. 0) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 0 University Avenue, th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 0- Telephone: (0) -000 leib.lerner@alston.com jeff.tsai@alston.com
More informationDelaware Bankruptcy Court Confirms Lock-Up Agreements Are a Valuable Tool Not a Violation of the Bankruptcy Code
Latham & Watkins Number 1467 February 13, 2013 Finance Department Delaware Bankruptcy Court Confirms Lock-Up Agreements Are a Valuable Tool Not a Violation of the Bankruptcy Code Josef S. Athanas, Caroline
More informationBRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS INSOLVENCY ACT, 2003
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS INSOLVENCY ACT, 2003 LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2017 BVI INSOLVENCY ACT COMPENDIUM PREFACE We have prepared this Insolvency Act, 2003 Compendium as a service to our clients. The principal
More informationSecond Circuit Holds Bankruptcy Code Safe Harbors Bar State Law Fraudulent Conveyance Claims Brought By Individual Creditors
Second Circuit Holds Bankruptcy Code Safe Harbors Bar State Law Fraudulent Conveyance Claims Brought By Individual Creditors Lisa M. Schweitzer and Daniel J. Soltman * This article explains two recent
More informationshl Doc 27 Filed 03/26/12 Entered 03/26/12 12:14:21 Main Document Pg 1 of 12
12-11076-shl Doc 27 Filed 03/26/12 Entered 03/26/12 121421 Main Document Pg 1 of 12 HEARING DATE AND TIME March 29, 2012 at 1100 a.m. (Eastern Time) OBJECTION DEADLINE March 28, 2012 at 1200 p.m. (Eastern
More informationLAW ON BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
LAW ON BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS I. BASIC PROVISIONS Article 1 Subject of the Law This Law stipulates the following: 1. Conditions for opening bankruptcy proceedings, the bunkrupcy proceeding itself, the
More information