Wyoming s Big Horn River Adjudication

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Wyoming s Big Horn River Adjudication"

Transcription

1 Wyoming s Big Horn River Adjudication Ramsey L. Kropf Aspen, Colorado Arizona Colorado Oklahoma Texas Wyoming

2 Wyoming s Big Horn River Adjudication In Re The General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River System

3 What is a Special Master? The Special Master always wins. David Harrison, speaking on the Kansas v. Colorado litigation on the Arkansas River. The Special Master never decides anything. Owen Olpin, Special Master, Nebraska v. Wyoming. Rule 53, Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure

4 A Story Setting: Winkleman, AZ Cast: Ranchers, Miners, Locals, and Special Master, Arizona General Stream Adjudication & Staff (me)

5 General Background

6 Some More Terms PIA Practicably Irrigable Acreage Allottee One who is granted a parcel of land and associated water under General Allotment Act Walton rights Water rights with a treaty based priority date, awarded to successor-in-interest to Allottees

7 Wyoming s Adjudication A little about Wyoming Red Rock Canyon, Wyoming (near Lander) The basins, which lie in the rain shadow of mountains, are very dry, with an average annual precipitation of about 250 mm (about 10 in) or less. "Wyoming (state)."microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

8 Wyoming s Big Horn River 340 miles long Formed in central Wyoming by the Popo Agie and Wind rivers Main tributary of the Yellowstone River Irrigation water and hydroelectric power "Bighorn."Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

9 Big Horn Basin Agriculture Cattle Ranching Dryland Wheat farming 85% of cropland is irrigated "Wyoming (state)."microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

10 Wyoming Demographics Population 1990 = 453,588 (3.4% decrease) Population 2000 = 493,782 (8.9% increase) 5.1 people per square mile Native Americans = 2.3 % of population

11 Wyoming s Experience Broad Reasons for Case Seven Supreme Court Determinations Three Basic Prongs to the Legal Holdings Three Different Phases

12 General Background Basic concepts to remember the order of decision making: 1. Special Master s Report and Recommendation 2. District Court s Decision 3. Wyoming Supreme Court Review 4. U.S. Supreme Court Review

13 Wyoming s Statutory Adjudication - Administrative

14 Wyoming s Statutory Adjudication Elwood Mead, Wyoming s first territorial engineer State owns the water Water appropriator has a use right

15 The Winters Doctrine Pre Winters United States v. Winan (1905) Winters v. United States (1908) The tension between federal and state powers Seniority of the water right Uncertainty

16 Reasons for Today s Basin-Wide General Stream Unresolved social/policy issues Regional Growth - Post WWII Management of water across state borders (interstate apportionment concerns) Impact of senior federal reserved rights Struggle between state and federal rights Ownership of public lands

17 Big Horn General Stream Adjudication Seven Cases "Big Horn I (1989)(PIA Quantification Seminal case) "Big Horn II" (Wyo. 1990)(Walton right case). "Big Horn III" (Wyo. 1992)(Instream Flow and Administration case). Big Horn IV (Wyo. 1993) (Denial of Rule 54 Certification of initial Walton right parameters). Big Horn V (1995) (Denies Super-Walton claims).

18 Big Horn General Stream Adjudication Seven Cases (continued) "Big Horn VI (Wyo. 2002)(Confirmed Walton right if water beneficially used within reasonable time after federal project water available) "Big Horn VII" (Wyo. 2004)(Dismissal of BOR contract claims as untimely).

19 Wyoming s Adjudication In the Beginning Getting to PIA Again - Indian Water Rights and what they mean Indian Reservations in U.S.

20 Wind River Indian Water Rights Winters Doctrine Allotment Era Ends Indian Reorganization Act McCarran Amendment Arizona v. California I

21 Treaties Second Treaty of Fort Bridger, 15 Stat. 673 (July 3, 1868); Treaty initiated with the Shoshone and Bannock Indians, establishing the Wind River Reservation Brunot Agreement, 18 Stat. 291 (Lander Purchase, $25,000 - December 15, 1874) First McLaughlin Agreement, 30 Stat. 93 (Thermopolis Purchase, $60,000 - June 7, 1897) Second McLaughlin Agreement, 33 Stat (cedes additional 1,480,000 to government, $85,000, $50 payment to members, $1.25-$1.50/acre March 3, 1905)

22 Allotment Policy 1887 General Allotment Act Civilize Native Americans Encourage agrarian lifestyle Broke up reservation lands into individual allotments Loss of two-thirds of reservation territory to non- Indian ownership Zuni Agriculture

23 Wyoming s Adjudication - First Steps Local Controversy Authorizing Statute W.S Complaint Filed on January 24, 1977 Forum Skirmish

24 Wyoming s Adjudication Court appoints Special Master Teno Roncalio Parties and Special Master divide the case into three phases Critical organizational structure First Steps Phase I Determines all Indian Federal Reserved Water Rights Phase II Determines non-indian Federal Reserved Water Rights Phase III Determines State Based Water Rights

25 Wyoming s Adjudication Six years later the First Special Master s Report and Recommendation Issued (December 15, 1982) 451 page Report Four years of conferences and hearings 100 attorneys or so 15,000 pages of transcript Over 2,000 exhibits

26 Getting to PIA Two District Court Opinions Appealed to Wyoming Supreme Court February 24, 1988 Big Horn I issued by Wyoming Supreme Court Eleven years after complaint filed

27 Big Horn I Intent to Reserve Water Sensitivity to other uses Purpose of Reservation Agricultural Purpose No Federal Reserved Right to Groundwater No Retained Jurisdiction PIA Standard Applied Quantification Walton Rights Available Priority Date of Reservation 1868 Administration More

28 Big Horn I Case Affirmed by United States Supreme Court in to 4 vote; Justice Sandra Day O Connor does not participate No opinion tie vote affirms

29 Walton Rights Big Horn I Big Horn II Big Horn IV Big Horn V Big Horn VI

30 Big Horn II Res Judicata principles do not apply Answer and Appearance Treaty date priority granted to both Indian allottees and non-indian successors With conditions

31 Walton Rights And it goes on Big Horn IV Dismisses appeal (1993) Court must adjudicate all Walton Right Claims Big Horn V Super Waltons Law is a prediction of the what the Court will probably do.

32 Walton Rights And it goes on Big Horn IV Dismisses appeal (1993) Court must adjudicate all Walton Right Claims Big Horn V Super Waltons Law is a prediction of the what the Court will probably do.

33 Walton Rights Big Horn VI Special Master s Report District Court Decree Wyoming Supreme Court Reversal Remand Decree by District Court

34 Elements of a Walton Right in Wyo. A Walton claimant must prove the property claimed is either owned by an Indian allottee or was conveyed from an Indian allottee to a non-indian purchaser i.e. the property must be acquired from an Indian allottee; A Walton claimant must show that the claimed water was put to beneficial use by the Indian predecessor(s) or within a reasonable time after the property passed out of Indian allottee ownership; A Walton claimant must show that the claimed water right has been maintained by continuous use since the time of initial beneficial use; and A Walton claimant must show that the property subject to the claim is practicably irrigable.

35 Walton Rights Concern before District Court re: Administration Major Issue on Appeal - Tacking claims recommended to be denied Walton claimants cannot rely on the diligence of the United States in constructing a federal project to relate back their priority date to an 1868 treaty based water right. Affects 11 claims.

36 Walton Rights Big Horn VI Special Master s Report District Court Decree Wyoming Supreme Court Reversal Remand Decree by District Court

37 Special Master s Report District Court Decree Walton Rights Big Horn VI Wyoming Supreme Court Reverses in part, affirms in part (In re Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River, 48 P.3d 1040 (Wyo. 2002)) Remand Decree by District Court

38 Big Horn VII District Court Dismisses Stutzman s Petition to hear claims for Bureau Reclamation water in Big Horn Adjudication Grants United States and Wyoming s Motions to Dismiss under 12(b)(6) District Court determines No jurisdiction Not proper Forum Claims barred by untimely filing Wyoming Supreme Court upholds District Court

39 Allotment Water Rights Treatment in Settlements Southern Arizona Water Rights Settlement Act 1982 US Dept. of the Interior Solicitor s Memo

40 Solicitor s Memo M Three Main Concepts 1. Just and Equal Distribution of Water 2. Recognition of Tribe s Broad Regulatory Power 3. Water Actually Available

41 The above discussion shows, however, that it is inaccurate to speak of either tribal governments or agricultural allottees as having plenary rights in water vis-à-vis each other. Agricultural allottees have rights tribes cannot wholly defeat; at the same time, tribes have regulatory authority over reservation water used from which allottees are not immune.

42 Common Threads in Settlement Ensure Allottee Participation Recognize that State and Tribal Positions Shift Enact Effective Tribal Water Codes Clarify Sovereignty Bind Non-parties into Settlements

43 STATE REGULATES TRIBE REGULATES PRIORITY DATE Land Owned in Fee by Non- Indian Successors to Allottees River has no impact offreservation XX Walton (Deference to State law overridden because water has no impact off-reservation) LAND OWNERSHIP CATEGORY Land never left Trust status River has impact offreservation XX Anderson, Big Horn Date of Indian reservation to the extent federal reserved right not lost by nonuse (apply Walton or Big Horn test) Land originally owned/conveyed by allottee Water put to beneficial use by allottee or within a reasonable time after title passed out of allottee ownership Continuous beneficial use Practicably Irrigable XX (Tradition of Indian sovereignty over reservation and tribal members preempts state authority) Date of Indian reservation Land removed from Trust and reacquired by Tribes XX (Tradition of Indian sovereignty over reservation and tribal members preempts state authority) If land allotted, same right as successor to allottee (date of Indian reservation), but quantified only to the extent right is not abandoned by nonuse after leaving allotment under Walton test If land homesteaded, then reacquired water right has date of state perfection, unless never perfected then date of reacquisition

44 Final Decree Proceedings Current cooperation in the basin between U.S., State, Tribes Court and State reaching end of Phase III process for examining state based claims Desire for Completion

45 Final Decree Proceedings Current cooperation in the basin between U.S., State, Tribes Court and State reaching end of Phase III process for examining state based claims Desire for Completion

46 Contemporary Significance of Western Stream Adjudications For example, from 2000 to 2025, California is expected to increase in population by the same number of total people in Montana each year. Texas will be importing people in numbers equal to Wyoming s population each year. Water Use and Water Management Impacted by Growth. Increasing Metropolitan demands for water. Increasing demands for water for energy development.

47

48

Robert T. Anderson, Professor, University of Washington School of Law Seattle, WA. April 2018

Robert T. Anderson, Professor, University of Washington School of Law Seattle, WA. April 2018 Robert T. Anderson, Professor, University of Washington School of Law Seattle, WA April 2018 Overview Indian property rights rooted in federal law, including aboriginal title as recognized in U.S. Deep

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 137, Original ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 137, Original ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF

More information

Wyoming's Big Horn General Stream Adjudication

Wyoming's Big Horn General Stream Adjudication Wyoming Law Review Volume 15 Number 2 Article 1 9-1-2015 Wyoming's Big Horn General Stream Adjudication Jason A. Robison Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uwyo.edu/wlr Part of the

More information

THE McCARRAN AMENDMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF TRIBAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS

THE McCARRAN AMENDMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF TRIBAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS THE McCARRAN AMENDMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF TRIBAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS JAY F. STEIN SIMMS & STEIN, P.A. SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO INTRODUCTION This paper surveys developing issues in the administration

More information

Water Rights: Is the Quechan Tribe Barred from Seeking a Determination of Reservation Boundaries in Indian Country

Water Rights: Is the Quechan Tribe Barred from Seeking a Determination of Reservation Boundaries in Indian Country University of Tulsa College of Law TU Law Digital Commons Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works 1996 Water Rights: Is the Quechan Tribe Barred from Seeking a Determination

More information

SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN IN NEW MEXICO NAVAJO NATION WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN IN NEW MEXICO NAVAJO NATION WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN IN NEW MEXICO NAVAJO NATION WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into as of the dates executed below, by and among the State of New Mexico, the Navajo Nation

More information

1 of 2 DOCUMENTS. Copyright (c) 2002 University of Denver (Colorado Seminary) College of Law University of Denver Water Law Review.

1 of 2 DOCUMENTS. Copyright (c) 2002 University of Denver (Colorado Seminary) College of Law University of Denver Water Law Review. Page 1 LENGTH: 1797 words 1 of 2 DOCUMENTS Copyright (c) 2002 University of Denver (Colorado Seminary) College of Law University of Denver Water Law Review Spring, 2002 5 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 500 LITIGATION

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 137, Original In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff v. STATE OF WYOMING and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER ON WYOMING S MOTION

More information

Pueblos and tribal reservations are located within most of the larger stream

Pueblos and tribal reservations are located within most of the larger stream Water Matters! American Indian Water Rights 5-1 American Indian Water Rights Overview Pueblos and tribal reservations are located within most of the larger stream systems in New Mexico. Each has claims

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 137, Original ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- DESERT WATER AGENCY, et

More information

No. 137, Original STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF WYOMING. and. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants.

No. 137, Original STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF WYOMING. and. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants. No. 137, Original IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STATE OF MONTANA, v. Plaintiff, STATE OF WYOMING and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants. Before the Honorable Barton H. Thompson, Jr. Special Master

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:14-cv-00062-SPW Document 3 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 50 Hertha L. Lund Breeann M. Johnson Lund Law PLLC 662 S. Ferguson Ave., Unit 2 Bozeman, MT 59718 Telephone: (406 586-6254 Facsimile: (406 586-6259

More information

Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton: Indian Water Rights and Regulation in the Ninth Circuit

Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton: Indian Water Rights and Regulation in the Ninth Circuit Montana Law Review Volume 43 Issue 2 Summer 1982 Article 7 July 1982 Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton: Indian Water Rights and Regulation in the Ninth Circuit Robert Isham Jr. University of Montana

More information

Pamela Williams, Director Secretary s Indian Water Rights Office. WSWC Spring Meeting March 21, 2019 Chandler, AZ

Pamela Williams, Director Secretary s Indian Water Rights Office. WSWC Spring Meeting March 21, 2019 Chandler, AZ Pamela Williams, Director Secretary s Indian Water Rights Office WSWC Spring Meeting March 21, 2019 Chandler, AZ Settlement Era Begins For almost 4 decades, tribes, states, local parties, and the Federal

More information

Judicial Failure to Recognize a Reserved Groundwater Right for the Wind River Indian Reservation, Wyoming

Judicial Failure to Recognize a Reserved Groundwater Right for the Wind River Indian Reservation, Wyoming Tulsa Law Review Volume 27 Issue 1 Article 1 Fall 1991 Judicial Failure to Recognize a Reserved Groundwater Right for the Wind River Indian Reservation, Wyoming Paige Graening Follow this and additional

More information

III. SUMMARY OF TULE RIVER TRIBE'S HISTORIC AND FUTURE MONEY DAMAGES CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES

III. SUMMARY OF TULE RIVER TRIBE'S HISTORIC AND FUTURE MONEY DAMAGES CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES III. SUMMARY OF TULE RIVER TRIBE'S HISTORIC AND FUTURE MONEY DAMAGES CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES In 1856 the California Superintendent of Indian Affairs established a Reservation for the Tule River

More information

Introduction to Big Horn General Stream Adjudication Symposium

Introduction to Big Horn General Stream Adjudication Symposium Wyoming Law Review Volume 15 Number 2 Article 2 9-1-2015 Introduction to Big Horn General Stream Adjudication Symposium Charles Wilkinson Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uwyo.edu/wlr

More information

NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al,

NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al, Case: 13-35474, 08/22/2016, ID: 10096797, DktEntry: 123-2, Page 1 of 21 NO. 13-35474 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al, v. Appellees, STATE OF WASHINGTON,

More information

General Stream Adjudications, the McCarran Amendment, and Reserved Water Rights

General Stream Adjudications, the McCarran Amendment, and Reserved Water Rights Wyoming Law Review Volume 15 Number 2 Article 10 9-1-2015 General Stream Adjudications, the McCarran Amendment, and Reserved Water Rights Lawrence J. MacDonnell Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uwyo.edu/wlr

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 141, Original In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF TEXAS, PLAINTIFF v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO AND STATE OF COLORADO ON BILL OF COMPLAINT MOTION OF THE UNITED STATES FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

More information

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. CROW ALLOTTEES ASSOCIATION, et al.,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. CROW ALLOTTEES ASSOCIATION, et al., Case: 15-35679, 06/22/2016, ID: 10025228, DktEntry: 32, Page 1 of 23 No. 15-35679 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CROW ALLOTTEES ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants v.

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2001 1 Decree SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 108, Orig. STATE OF NEBRASKA, PLAINTIFF v. STATES OF WYOMING AND COLORADO ON PETITION FOR ORDER ENFORCING DECREE AND FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

More information

In The Supreme Court Of The United States

In The Supreme Court Of The United States No. 22O141, Original In The Supreme Court Of The United States STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO and STATE OF COLORADO, Defendants. On Motion for Leave to File Complaint REPLY BRIEF OF

More information

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America S. 612 One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen An Act

More information

Case 6:68-cv BB Document 2720 Filed 03/01/2010 Page 1 of 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 6:68-cv BB Document 2720 Filed 03/01/2010 Page 1 of 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Case 6:68-cv-07488-BB Document 2720 Filed 03/01/2010 Page 1 of 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. ) 68cv07488-BB-ACE STATE ENGINEER, ) Rio

More information

Nos and (Consolidated) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. STATE OF WYOMING, and WYOMING FARM BUREAU FEDERATION,

Nos and (Consolidated) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. STATE OF WYOMING, and WYOMING FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, Appellate Case: 14-9512 Document: 01019414647 Date Filed: 04/13/2015 Page: 1 Nos. 14-9512 and 14-9514 (Consolidated) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STATE OF WYOMING, and WYOMING FARM

More information

New Mexico Water Law Case Capsules 2-1

New Mexico Water Law Case Capsules 2-1 Water Matters! New Mexico Water Law Case Capsules 2-1 New Mexico Water Law Case Capsules New Mexico has a rich body of water law. This list contains some of the key cases decided in the state and federal

More information

Law of the River Apportionment Scheme Short Summary of Laws. (January, 2012)

Law of the River Apportionment Scheme Short Summary of Laws. (January, 2012) Law of the River Apportionment Scheme Short Summary of Laws A product of the Colorado River Governance Initiative 1 of the Western Water Policy Program (http://waterpolicy.info) (January, 2012) Summary:

More information

A Preview of Coming Attractions - Wyoming v. United States and the Reserved Rights Doctrine

A Preview of Coming Attractions - Wyoming v. United States and the Reserved Rights Doctrine Ecology Law Quarterly Volume 17 Issue 2 Article 3 March 1990 A Preview of Coming Attractions - Wyoming v. United States and the Reserved Rights Doctrine Walter Rusinek Follow this and additional works

More information

New Era of Arizona Water Challenges

New Era of Arizona Water Challenges New Era of Arizona Water Challenges May 2014 By M. Byron Lewis Water attorney I. INTRODUCTION Arizona is now entering a new era of water challenges prompted by the need to consider, confront, and find

More information

UTE INDIAN WATER COMPACT. Purpose of Compact. Legal Basis for Compact. Water

UTE INDIAN WATER COMPACT. Purpose of Compact. Legal Basis for Compact. Water Available at http://le.utah.gov/~code/title73/73_21.htm Utah Code 73-21-1. Approval of Ute Indian Water Compact. The within Compact, the Ute Indian Water Compact, providing for the execution by the State

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 141, Original ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF

More information

DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY: The United States responses to interrogatories of the Cities of Aztec and Bloomfield

DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY: The United States responses to interrogatories of the Cities of Aztec and Bloomfield STATE OF NEW MEXICO SAN JUAN COUNTY THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. STATE ENGINEER, vs. Plaintiff, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants, THE JICARILLA APACHE

More information

Unit I Flashcards. C h a p t e r s 1 7 a n d 1 8

Unit I Flashcards. C h a p t e r s 1 7 a n d 1 8 Unit I Flashcards C h a p t e r s 1 7 a n d 1 8 #1 Black codes Laws passed by states and municipalities denying many rights of citizenship to free black people before the Civil War. #2 Caminetti Act 1893

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 141, Original In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF TEXAS, PLAINTIFF v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO AND STATE OF COLORADO ON THE EXCEPTION BY THE UNITED STATES TO THE FIRST INTERIM REPORT OF THE

More information

Encyclopedia of Politics of the American West

Encyclopedia of Politics of the American West Encyclopedia of Politics of the American West Contributors: Steven L. Danver Print Pub. Date: 2013 Online Pub. Date: May 21, 2013 Print ISBN: 9781608719099 Online ISBN: 9781452276076 DOI: 10.4135/9781452276076

More information

Taming the Rapids: Negotiation of Federal Reserved Water Rights in Montana

Taming the Rapids: Negotiation of Federal Reserved Water Rights in Montana Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 6 Taming the Rapids: Negotiation of Federal Reserved Water Rights in Montana Jody Miller Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr

More information

The Rio Grande flows for approximately 1,900 miles from the

The Rio Grande flows for approximately 1,900 miles from the Water Matters! Transboundary Waters: The Rio Grande as an International River 26-1 Transboundary Waters: The Rio Grande as an International River The Rio Grande is the fifth longest river in the United

More information

RESOLVING WATER DISPUTES: COMPACTS AND THE SUPREME COURT. Matthew E. Draper ABA SEER ADR /Water Committee Webinar June 11, 2015

RESOLVING WATER DISPUTES: COMPACTS AND THE SUPREME COURT. Matthew E. Draper ABA SEER ADR /Water Committee Webinar June 11, 2015 RESOLVING WATER DISPUTES: COMPACTS AND THE SUPREME COURT Matthew E. Draper ABA SEER ADR /Water Committee Webinar June 11, 2015 JOHN WESLEY POWELL JOHN WESLEY POWELL Civil War Veteran Explorer Scientist

More information

Exhibit 6: State of Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation, City of Oklahoma City Water Settlement

Exhibit 6: State of Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation, City of Oklahoma City Water Settlement 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Exhibit : State of Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation, City of Oklahoma City Water Settlement WAIVERS AND RELEASES OF CLAIMS BY THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

More information

The Metamorphosis of the Federal Non-Reserved Water Rights Theory

The Metamorphosis of the Federal Non-Reserved Water Rights Theory Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 4 The Metamorphosis of the Federal Non-Reserved Water Rights Theory Lisa Leckie O'Sullivan Marjorie Borozan Thomas Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr

More information

Vague and Ambiguous. The terms market and marketing are not defined.as such, the

Vague and Ambiguous. The terms market and marketing are not defined.as such, the (c) (d) Not Directed to All Settling Parties. This discovery request was directed to all three Settling Parties (the United States, the Navajo Nation, and the State of New Mexico) requesting information

More information

On Appeal From the Water Court of the State of Montana, Crow Tribe of Indians Montana Compact, Case No. WC

On Appeal From the Water Court of the State of Montana, Crow Tribe of Indians Montana Compact, Case No. WC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA CASE NO. DA 15-0370 September 22 2015 Case Number: DA 15-0370 IN THE MATTER OF THE ADJUDICATION OF EXISTING AND RESERVED RIGHTS TO THE USE OF WATER, BOTH SURFACE

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 137, Original In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF MONTANA, PLAINTIFF v. STATE OF WYOMING AND STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA ON MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE IN

More information

Water Law Senior College Jonathan Carlson

Water Law Senior College Jonathan Carlson Water Law Senior College Jonathan Carlson The problem Future water shortages Supply side challenges: climate variability Demand side challenges: changes in use and demand State laws and administrative

More information

Montana Land and Water Alliance, Inc P.O. Box 1061 Polson, Montana

Montana Land and Water Alliance, Inc P.O. Box 1061 Polson, Montana Montana Land and Water Alliance, Inc P.O. Box 1061 Polson, Montana 59860 4mtlandwater@gmail.com 406-552-1357 July 21, 2017 Congressman Rob Bishop Chairman, House Committee on Natural Resources United States

More information

A DEAL IS A DEAL IN THE WEST, OR IS IT? MONTANA V. WYOMING AND THE YELLOWSTONE RIVER COMPACT

A DEAL IS A DEAL IN THE WEST, OR IS IT? MONTANA V. WYOMING AND THE YELLOWSTONE RIVER COMPACT A DEAL IS A DEAL IN THE WEST, OR IS IT? MONTANA V. WYOMING AND THE YELLOWSTONE RIVER COMPACT SHIRAN ZOHAR I. INTRODUCTION In 2002, the United Nations reported that by 2025, freshwater shortages will affect

More information

Tribal Nations United States Relations: Policy Eras and Future Developments

Tribal Nations United States Relations: Policy Eras and Future Developments Tribal Nations United States Relations: Policy Eras and Future Developments Angelique Townsend EagleWoman (Wambdi A. WasteWin) James E. Rogers Fellow in American Indian Law Associate Professor of Law University

More information

Indian Water Rights, Practical Reasoning, and Negotiated Settlements

Indian Water Rights, Practical Reasoning, and Negotiated Settlements California Law Review Volume 98 Issue 4 Article 3 8-31-2010 Indian Water Rights, Practical Reasoning, and Negotiated Settlements Robert T. Anderson boba@uw.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 141, Original ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF

More information

Senior College Session 2 Classic and Modern Water Law Cases

Senior College Session 2 Classic and Modern Water Law Cases Senior College Session 2 Classic and Modern Water Law Cases Today s session Classic and contemporary water cases Illustrate development of water law in US Historically significant decisions Tyler v. Wilkinson

More information

Update on Tribal Supreme Court Project and Fee-To- Trust Regulations January 23, 2018

Update on Tribal Supreme Court Project and Fee-To- Trust Regulations January 23, 2018 Update on Tribal Supreme Court Project and Fee-To- Trust Regulations January 23, 2018 1 OCTOBER 2017 TERM First full term of Justice Neil Gorsuch Court already has many significant cases on its docket

More information

In re Crow Water Compact

In re Crow Water Compact Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Case Summaries 2015-2016 In re Crow Water Compact Ariel E. Overstreet-Adkins Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana, arieloverstreet@gmail.com

More information

History of the Arkansas. Riverbed

History of the Arkansas. Riverbed History of the Arkansas Riverbed from 1830 to 2012 1830--Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek between the U.S. and the Choctaw Nation, Sept. 27, 1830, 7 Stat. 333-334. 1835--Treaty of New Echota between the

More information

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. SEPTEMBER 29, 1996 Referred to the Committtee on Resources AN ACT

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. SEPTEMBER 29, 1996 Referred to the Committtee on Resources AN ACT I TH CONGRESS D SESSION S. 1 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SEPTEMBER, 1 Referred to the Committtee on Resources AN ACT To provide for the settlement of the Navajo-Hopi land dispute, and for other purposes.

More information

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0145 A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to water development projects; authorizing. specified Level I and Level II studies and providing

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0145 A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to water development projects; authorizing. specified Level I and Level II studies and providing 00 STATE OF WYOMING 0LSO-0 HOUSE BILL NO. HB0 Omnibus water bill-planning. Sponsored by: Select Water Committee A BILL for AN ACT relating to water development projects; authorizing specified Level I and

More information

Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Adsit

Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Adsit Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 4 Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Adsit James L. Vogel Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended

More information

How Big Is Big - The Scope of Water Rights Suits under the McCarran Amendment

How Big Is Big - The Scope of Water Rights Suits under the McCarran Amendment Ecology Law Quarterly Volume 15 Issue 4 Article 2 September 1988 How Big Is Big - The Scope of Water Rights Suits under the McCarran Amendment Thomas H. Pacheco Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/elq

More information

Honorable James J. Wechler. Richard T. C. Tully, Esq., hereby certifies the original of this Certificate of Service TULLY LAW FIRM, P. A.

Honorable James J. Wechler. Richard T. C. Tully, Esq., hereby certifies the original of this Certificate of Service TULLY LAW FIRM, P. A. STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF SAN JUAN ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. STATE ENGINEER, Plaintiff, D-1116-CV-75-184 Honorable James J. Wechler v. San Juan River Adjudication THE UNITED

More information

Interstate Water Dispute Nears Decision by Supreme Court By Austin Anderson June 8, 2018

Interstate Water Dispute Nears Decision by Supreme Court By Austin Anderson June 8, 2018 ARTICLES Interstate Water Dispute Nears Decision by Supreme Court By Austin Anderson June 8, 2018 As our changing climate threatens to exacerbate drought conditions in parts of the country, disputes between

More information

TRIBAL SUPREME COURT PROJECT MEMORANDUM

TRIBAL SUPREME COURT PROJECT MEMORANDUM TRIBAL SUPREME COURT PROJECT MEMORANDUM NOVEMBER 30, 2017 UPDATE OF RECENT CASES The Tribal Supreme Court Project is part of the Tribal Sovereignty Protection Initiative and is staffed by the National

More information

MEMORANDUM. Senator Debby Barrett, President of the Senate Representative Austin Knudsen, Speaker of the House

MEMORANDUM. Senator Debby Barrett, President of the Senate Representative Austin Knudsen, Speaker of the House MEMORANDUM To: From: Senator Debby Barrett, President of the Senate Representative Austin Knudsen, Speaker of the House Richard A. Simms, Attorney for Montana Land and Water Alliance Re: Threat of 10,000

More information

In This Issue: INDIAN WATER RIGHT NEGOTIATIONS INTERIOR S CONSIDERATIONS WHEN APPOINTING FEDERAL NEGOTIATION TEAMS.

In This Issue: INDIAN WATER RIGHT NEGOTIATIONS INTERIOR S CONSIDERATIONS WHEN APPOINTING FEDERAL NEGOTIATION TEAMS. In This Issue: Federal for s... 1 Conjunctive Use & Water Banking in California... 8 Klamath Adjudication... 15 Water Briefs... 17 Calendar... 27 Upcoming Stories: Montana s Compact Washington s Acquavella

More information

NAVAJO WATER RIGHTS: PULLING THE PLUG ON THE COLORADO RIVER?

NAVAJO WATER RIGHTS: PULLING THE PLUG ON THE COLORADO RIVER? NAVAJO WATER RIGHTS: PULLING THE PLUG ON THE COLORADO RIVER? WILLIAM DOUGLAS BACK* and JEFFERY S. TAYLOR** INTRODUCTION The Colorado River arises largely within the states of Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and

More information

Railroad Growth, and the Federal Government s role: 4 transcontinental railroads were thus created: Union Pacific/Central Pacific Line (1869)

Railroad Growth, and the Federal Government s role: 4 transcontinental railroads were thus created: Union Pacific/Central Pacific Line (1869) RUGGED INDIVIDUALISM: THE POST CIVIL WAR WEST Look back to your notes for page 461. Draw a picture of what a part of the Great Plains would look like based on the information: Railroad Growth, and the

More information

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, AB-07-1 Claims of Navajo Nation

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, AB-07-1 Claims of Navajo Nation STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF SAN JUAN ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, Plaintiff, AB-07-1 Claims of Navajo Nation vs. No. CV 75-184 Honorable James J.

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States Nos. 17-40 and 17-42 In the Supreme Court of the United States COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS, ET AL. DESERT WATER AGENCY, ET AL., PETITIONERS

More information

Nambé, Pojoaque, San Ildefonso, and Tesuque Pueblos Settlement

Nambé, Pojoaque, San Ildefonso, and Tesuque Pueblos Settlement Water Matters! Nambé, Pojoaque, San Ildefonso, and Tesuque Pueblos Settlement 22-1 Nambé, Pojoaque, San Ildefonso, and Tesuque Pueblos Settlement The State, local and Pueblo government parties to the Aamodt

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 137, Original ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF

More information

Water and Growth Issues for Tribes and Pueblos in New Mexico Legal Considerations

Water and Growth Issues for Tribes and Pueblos in New Mexico Legal Considerations Water and Growth Issues for Tribes and Pueblos in New Mexico WATER, GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY: PLANNING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY DECEMBER NEW MEXICO WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE 2000 Peter Chestnut graduated

More information

~upreme ~ourt o[ t~e f~niteb ~tate~

~upreme ~ourt o[ t~e f~niteb ~tate~ No. 126, Original ~upreme ~ourt o[ t~e f~niteb ~tate~ STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff, STATE OF NEBRASKA and STATE OF COLORADO, Defendants. ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE KANSAS REPLY STEVE N. SIX Attorney General

More information

RIO GRANDE COMPACT VIOLATIONS. New Mexico s ever increasing water use and groundwater pumping below Elephant

RIO GRANDE COMPACT VIOLATIONS. New Mexico s ever increasing water use and groundwater pumping below Elephant RIO GRANDE COMPACT VIOLATIONS VIOLATION New Mexico s ever increasing water use and groundwater pumping below Elephant Butte Reservoir (EBR) deprives Texas of water apportioned to it under the 1938 Rio

More information

Chapter 17: The West Exploiting an Empire

Chapter 17: The West Exploiting an Empire Chapter 17: The West Exploiting an Empire AP United States History Week of February 29, 2016 Moving West What Pushed Americans After Civil War, Americans moved west of the Mississippi River, taking over

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 142, Original ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF

More information

WYOMING S COMPACTS, TREATIES AND COURT DECREES

WYOMING S COMPACTS, TREATIES AND COURT DECREES DOCUMENTS ON THE USE AND CONTROL OF WYOMING S INTERSTATE STREAMS WYOMING S COMPACTS, TREATIES AND COURT DECREES Compiled by the Interstate Streams Division Wyoming State Engineer s Office Website: http://seo.state.wy.us

More information

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Appellate Case: 17-2147 Document: 01019940123 Date Filed: 02/02/2018 Page: 1 No. 17-2147 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. State Engineer, Plaintiff-Appellees,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION Case :-cv-00-jgb-sp Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 ROBERT G. DREHER Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice F. PATRICK

More information

Manifest Destiny from in the U.S. By: Aubrey Gibson and Gabby Rodgers

Manifest Destiny from in the U.S. By: Aubrey Gibson and Gabby Rodgers Manifest Destiny from 1870-1900 in the U.S. By: Aubrey Gibson and Gabby Rodgers Government Legislation to Before: support the Move West 1864 Land Grants doubled the size of land grants Pacific Railroad

More information

Boller v. Key Bank: An Alarming Use of Brendale v. Yakima

Boller v. Key Bank: An Alarming Use of Brendale v. Yakima Copyright 1993 by National Clearinghouse for Legal Services, Inc. All rights reserved. 27 Clearinghouse Review 884 (December 1993) Boller v. Key Bank: An Alarming Use of Brendale v. Yakima By Andrew W.

More information

Exempt Wells: Problems and Approaches in the Northwest Walla Walla, Washington May 17,

Exempt Wells: Problems and Approaches in the Northwest Walla Walla, Washington May 17, Legal Aspects to Exempt Wells: A National Review Jesse J. Richardson, Jr. Policy and Research Advisor Water Systems Council Washington, D.C. Associate Professor, Virginia Tech Exempt Wells: Problems and

More information

One Hundred Years of Wyoming Water Law

One Hundred Years of Wyoming Water Law University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 1991 One Hundred Years of Wyoming Water Law Mark Squillace University of Colorado Law School Follow

More information

UNITED STATES et al. v. McINTIRE et al. FLATHEAD IRR. DIST. v. SAME.

UNITED STATES et al. v. McINTIRE et al. FLATHEAD IRR. DIST. v. SAME. 101 F.2d 650 (1939) UNITED STATES et al. v. McINTIRE et al. FLATHEAD IRR. DIST. v. SAME. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. No. 8797. January 31, 1939. *651 John B. Tansil, U. S. Atty., of Butte,

More information

Public Law Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled.

Public Law Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. Public Law 93-620 AN A C T To further protect the outstanding scenic, natural, and scientific values of the Grand Canyon by enlarging the Grand Canyon National Park in the State of Arizona, and for other

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 137, Original ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF

More information

Negotiation As a Means of Quantifying Indian Water Rights

Negotiation As a Means of Quantifying Indian Water Rights University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13) Getches-Wilkinson Center Conferences, Workshops, and Hot Topics

More information

No. 137, Original STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF WYOMING. and. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants.

No. 137, Original STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF WYOMING. and. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants. No. 137, Original IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STATE OF MONTANA, v. Plaintiff, STATE OF WYOMING and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants. Before the Honorable Barton H. Thompson, Jr. Special Master

More information

The Aamodt case is a complex, long-running adjudication of water

The Aamodt case is a complex, long-running adjudication of water Water Matters! Aamodt Adjudication 22-1 Aamodt Adjudication The State, local and Pueblo government parties to the Aamodt case, most irrigators and other people residing in the Basin, support settlement

More information

SUPREME COURT REPORTER 530 U.S. 390

SUPREME COURT REPORTER 530 U.S. 390 2304 120 SUPREME COURT REPORTER 530 U.S. 390 sure can be attributed S 391 to all of them is the words of the bill that they voted to make law. In a way, using unreliable legislative history to confirm

More information

Interstate Marketing of Indian Water Rights: The Impact of the Commerce Clause

Interstate Marketing of Indian Water Rights: The Impact of the Commerce Clause California Law Review Volume 87 Issue 6 Article 4 December 1999 Interstate Marketing of Indian Water Rights: The Impact of the Commerce Clause Chris Seldin Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview

More information

Nos , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Nos , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Appellate Case: 14-9512 Document: 01019838626 Date Filed: 07/11/2017 Page: 1 Nos. 14-9512, 14-9514 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STATE OF WYOMING, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION Case :-cv-00-jgb-sp Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 SAM HIRSCH Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice F. PATRICK BARRY,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ct. App. No. 33535 See also Nos. 33437, 33439, 33534 San Juan County D-1116-CV-1975-00184,

More information

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW District Court, Water Division 1, Colorado 901 9th Avenue P.O. Box 2038 Greeley, CO 80632 Plaintiff: The Jim Hutton Educational Foundation, a Colorado non-profit corporation, DATE FILED: December 16, 2013

More information