IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA"

Transcription

1 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Qua Hanible, : Petitioner : : v. : : Pennsylvania Board : of Probation and Parole, : No. 721 C.D Respondent : Submitted: November 7, 2014 BEFORE: HONORABLE BERNARD L. McGINLEY, Judge HONORABLE ROBERT SIMPSON, Judge HONORABLE ANNE E. COVEY, Judge OPINION NOT REPORTED MEMORANDUM OPINION BY JUDGE McGINLEY FILED: January 8, 2015 Qua Hanible (Hanible) petitions for review from a final determination of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) that recalculated Hanible s maximum date as December 25, Hanible was effectively sentenced on July 22, 2008, to a term of one year six months to three years for the violation of his probation for a conviction for the manufacture/sale/delivery of drugs or possession with intent to deliver. Hanible was released on parole on January 24, This Court s review is limited to determining whether the Board s findings are supported by substantial evidence, are in accordance with the law, and whether constitutional rights have been violated. Krantz v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 483 A.2d 1044 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1984). This Court will interfere with the Board s exercise of administrative discretion where it has been abused or exercised in an arbitrary or capricious manner. Green v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 664 A.2d 677 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1995).

2 On January 5, 2011, the Board ordered that Hanible be detained pending the disposition of criminal charges following his arrest on November 5, 2010, by the Philadelphia Police Department. Hanible was charged with possession with intent to deliver, misdemeanor possession, criminal conspiracy, and possession of drug paraphernalia. On July 27, 2011, the Board declared Hanible delinquent for control purposes effective November 5, 2010, after he reached his original maximum date. On August 5, 2013, Hanible was convicted in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (common pleas court) of possession with intent to deliver and was sentenced to a term of one year six months to three years with three years consecutive probation with credit for time served. On August 8, 2013, the Board issued a warrant to commit and detain Hanible. The Board revoked his parole on November 3, In a decision recorded November 26, 2013, and mailed December 5, 2013, the Board recommitted Hanible to serve his unexpired term of one year, one month, and twenty-three days as a convicted parole violator and established his new maximum date as December 25, review and alleged: On or about December 30, 2013, Hanible requested administrative 6. Mr. Hanible plead [sic] guilty to the new charges on August 5, 2013 and was sentenced to 1½ to three years to 2

3 be followed by a consecutive three year probationary term. 7. The sentence was to run concurrent to any other sentence On November 26, 2013, the Board of Probation and Parole ordered Mr. Hanible recommitted to serve the unexpired term of his parole on his original case. 10. The Board calculated the unexpired term as 1 year, 1 month and 23 days. 11. In so doing, the Board credited Mr. Habile [sic] 127 days of time already served Notwithstanding the well-settled rule that a parolee is entitled to credit for time served on a detainer warrant... the Board erred when it recomputed Parolee Hanible s maximum term expiration date on his original sentence because: a. The Board incorrectly calculated the amount of credit Mr. Hanible received; we submit that Mr. Hanible has already served the balance of his back time while incarcerated pending the outcome of his new case; b. The Board incorrectly credited Mr. Hanible 127 days of back time; we submit that the Board should have credited Mr. Hanible additional time; c. The Board erroneously ignored the Court of Common Pleas judgment of sentence insomuch as the Court specified that the sentence on the new case was to be served concurrent with any other criminal justice sentence and that Mr. Hanible was to receive credit for all time served; and d. The Board erroneously used November 3, 2013 as the custody for return date; to the extent it may be pertinent, Mr. Hanible returned to SCI-Graterford on August 8,

4 Petition for Administrative Appeal and/or an Administrative Review, December 30, 2013, Paragraph Nos. 6-7, 9-11, and 14 at 1-2; Reproduced Record (R.R.) at 46a-47a. The Board denied the review and affirmed: When Mr. Hanible was released on parole from his original sentence on January 24, 2010, his maximum sentence date was July 22, 2011, which left 544 days remaining to serve on his original sentence. While on parole, Mr. Hanible was arrested and placed into SCI- Coal Township on July 22, 2011 for possible parole violation. The Board lodged its warrant to commit and detain Mr. Hanible on November 6, 2010, lifted it on July 22, 2011 (max sentence date at time of last release) and relodged it on August 8, 2013 due to violations of his parole. Mr. Hanible was arrested on November 5, 2010 by the Philadelphia City Police Department of Philadelphia County... and convicted on August 5, Mr. Hanible was released to Pennsylvania authorities on November 3, 2013 and placed in SCI- Graterford in parole violator pending status. The Board decision recorded November 26, 2013 recommitted Mr. Hanible as a convicted parole violator. With the above facts in mind, as a convicted parole violator you automatically forfeited credit for all of the time that Mr. Hanible spent on parole.... Mr. Hanible is not entitled to a back time served credit (i.e. time that Mr. Hanible was held solely on the Board s warrant prior to his recommitment order) because he was never incarcerated solely on the Board s warrant.... Mr. Hanible received back time credit from March 17, 2011 (date bail posted/made unsecured) to July 22, 2011 (date Board lifted its warrant) or 127 days. Mr. Hanible is not entitled to additional time because the Board s warrant was not relodged until August 8, Thus, when applying 127 days to 544 days yields a total of 417 days owed (or 1 year, 1 month, 23 days). Mr. Hanible became 4

5 available to Pennsylvania authorities on November 3, 2013, when the Board obtained the necessary signatures to recommit him as a parole violator.... Adding 417 days to November 3, 2013 yields a new parole violation maximum date of December 25, Therefore, Mr. Hanible s parole violation maximum sentence date is correct. (Citations omitted). (Emphasis in original). Board Decision, April 9, 2014, at 1; R.R. at 54a. Hanible contends that the Board incorrectly calculated the amount of credit he received because he had already served the balance of his backtime, that the Board should have credited Hanible with time from July 27, 2011, until October 9, 2011, when bail was raised by $1,000.00, that the Board erred when it determined that the common pleas court s sentence on the new conviction was not to be served concurrently with the prior case, and that the Board erroneously used November 3, 2013, as the custody for return date when Hanible actually returned to the State Correctional Institution at Graterford (SCI-Graterford) on August 8, Initially, Hanible contends that he had served the balance of his sentence by April 30, 2014, because the common pleas court ordered that Hanible receive credit for time served when he was originally sentenced on July 22, Because of this alleged order for time served, Hanible asserts that the Board originally miscalculated his maximum date. Hanible argues that he should have received credit for time served from November 26, 2007, to July 22, 2008, or 239 days so his maximum date should have been November 25, According to Hanible, he owed only 305 days not 544, as the Board calculated. So with the 127 days of credit, he owed only 178 days when he became available to the Board on 5

6 November 3, As a result, he would have reached his maximum on April 30, Hanible s argument is flawed because the Board does not calculate the minimum and maximum terms of a prisoner s sentence. The Department of Corrections is responsible for calculating the minimum and maximum terms of prisoners committed to its jurisdiction. Gillespie v. Department of Corrections, 527 A.2d 1061, 1065 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1987), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 540 A.2d 535 (Pa. 1988). This right and responsibility is exclusive to the Department of Corrections. Nickson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 880 A.2d 21, 24 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003). If Hanible had a problem with his original maximum date, he should have raised the issue with the Department of Corrections. He did not, so this argument fails. Hanible next contends that the Board erroneously credited him with 127 days when he should have received credit for time served until October 9, 2012, when bail was raised. Hanible argues that he should have received credit from February 1, 2011, the date the Board issued a detainer until October 9, 2011, the date bail was raised by $1, on the subsequent case. Hanible argues that he should receive credit for 251 days rather than 127. The record does not reflect that Hanible posted bail. On March 17, 2011, he was released on his own recognizance. Bail was reinstated on July 27, From February 1, 2011, to March 17, 2011, Hanible was not incarcerated solely on the Board s warrant. Any pre-sentence period of confinement where a 6

7 convicted parole violator is incarcerated on new criminal charges and a Board detainer must apply to the new sentence. Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 412 A.2d 568, 571 (Pa. 1980). Therefore, Hanible was not eligible for credit for this period. The Board did give Hanible credit from March 17, 2011, until July 22, 2011, when it lifted its warrant. The Board did not err in this calculation of the credit. Hanible next contends that the August 5, 2013, sentence should be deemed to run concurrently with the original sentence because the common pleas court did not indicate whether the sentence would be concurrent or consecutive. Section 6138(a)(5) of the Prisons and Parole Code (Code), 61 Pa.C.S. 6138(a)(5), provides that if a parolee is convicted of a new crime, the sentence for the new conviction shall precede the commencement of the balance of the sentence originally imposed subject to certain exceptions not applicable here. Hanible is not entitled to have the sentences run concurrently. Hanible next contends that because he was returned to SCI-Graterford on August 8, 2013, the Board should have used that date rather than November 3, 2013, as his custody return date. Hanible refers to Section 6138(a)(4) of the Code, 61 Pa.C.S. 6138(a)(4), which provides that [t]he period of time for which the parole violator is required to serve shall be computed from and begin on the date that the 7

8 parole violator is taken into custody to be returned to the institution as a parole violator. Hanible, however, was not a parole violator on August 8, He was returned to SCI-Graterford on that date. His parole was not revoked until November 3, 2013, when the revocation was signed. Therefore, Section 6138(a)(4) of the Code did not apply to Hanible. It is well settled law that convicted parole violators who are paroled from state correctional institutions and then receive new sentences to be served in a state correctional institution do not become available to commence the original sentence until parole has been revoked. See Hill v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 683 A.2d 699 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996). Time spent in state custody following a conviction for a new sentence and before the revocation of parole is assessed to the new sentence. Campbell v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 409 A.2d 980 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1980). The Board did not err in its calculations. Accordingly, this Court affirms. BERNARD L. McGINLEY, Judge 8

9 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Qua Hanible, : Petitioner : : v. : : Pennsylvania Board : of Probation and Parole, : No. 721 C.D Respondent : AND NOW, this 8 th O R D E R day of January, 2015, the order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole in the above-captioned matter is affirmed. BERNARD L. McGINLEY, Judge

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES E. OWENS, : Petitioner : : v. : NO. 1705 C.D. 1999 : SUBMITTED: April 12, 2000 PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Antowyne Dominique Charles, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1813 C.D. 2015 : Submitted: February 12, 2016 Pennsylvania Board : of Probation and Parole, : Respondent

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA David Brown, : Petitioner : : v. : : Pennsylvania Board of : Probation and Parole, : No. 2131 C.D. 2012 Respondent : Submitted: October 25, 2013 BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Jamal Felder, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1857 C.D. 2014 : Submitted: August 14, 2015 Pennsylvania Board of Probation : and Parole, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Mohammad Khan, M.D., Petitioner v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, State Board of Medicine, No. 1047 C.D. 2016 Respondent Submitted January 20,

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Capitol Police Lodge No. 85, : Fraternal Order of Police, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 2012 C.D. 2009 : Argued: June 21, 2010 Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board,

More information

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 10, 2016 TIME COMPUTATION

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 10, 2016 TIME COMPUTATION DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL CD-5-8 L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 10, 2016 POLICY. TIME COMPUTATION It is the policy of the Deschutes County Corrections Division to ensure

More information

The Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ) Guide. What is the purpose of the Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ)?

The Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ) Guide. What is the purpose of the Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ)? The Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ) Guide What is the purpose of the Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ)? The Revised ICJ is utilized when one state transfers their supervision

More information

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, JUNE 28, 2017

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, JUNE 28, 2017 HOUSE AMENDED PRIOR PRINTER'S NOS. 0,, 0 PRINTER'S NO. THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL No. INTRODUCED BY RAFFERTY, MARCH, Session of AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION, HOUSE

More information

2014 PA Super 159 : : : : : : : : :

2014 PA Super 159 : : : : : : : : : 2014 PA Super 159 ASHLEY R. TROUT, Appellant v. PAUL DAVID STRUBE, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 1720 MDA 2013 Appeal from the Order August 26, 2013 in the Court of Common Pleas of

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Jacob C. Clark : : v. : No. 1188 C.D. 2012 : Submitted: December 7, 2012 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Department of Transportation, : Bureau of Driver Licensing,

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA AFSCME, District Council 33 and : AFSCME, Local 159, : Appellants : : v. : : City of Philadelphia : No. 652 C.D. 2013 : Argued: February 10, 2014 BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-30-2013 USA v. Mark Allen Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 12-1399 Follow this and additional

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA K.B. In Re: M.B., : SEALED CASE Petitioner : : v. : : Department of Human Services, : No. 1070 C.D. 2016 Respondent : Submitted: January 27, 2017 BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2014-NMCA-037 Filing Date: January 21, 2014 Docket No. 31,904 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, STEVEN SEGURA, Defendant-Appellant.

More information

Appeal from the PCRA Order June 20, 2001 In the Court of Common Pleas of York County Criminal, No. 977 CA 1985

Appeal from the PCRA Order June 20, 2001 In the Court of Common Pleas of York County Criminal, No. 977 CA 1985 2002 PA Super 115 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF Appellant : PENNSYLVANIA : vs. : : JOHN MARSHALL PAYNE, III, : Appellee : No. 1224 MDA 2001 Appeal from the PCRA Order June 20,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Borough of Ellwood City, : Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, : Appellant : : No. 985 C.D. 2016 v. : : Argued: April 6, 2017 Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC : BEFORE:

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA David Payo, : Appellant : : v. : : PA Department of Corrections, : Wexford Health, : No. 845 C.D. 2014 Doctor Mohammad Naji : Submitted: September 12, 2014 BEFORE:

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Becky Fritts, : : v. : No. 193 C.D. 2017 : Submitted: November 22, 2017 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Department of Transportation, : Bureau of Driver Licensing,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 17, 2008

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 17, 2008 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 17, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TIMOTHY JEROME WASHINGTON, ALIAS TIMOTHY JEROME HUGHLETT Appeal from the Criminal Court

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Jason McGlory, : Petitioner : : v. : : Workers' Compensation Appeal : Board (A.W. Golden, Inc. Chevy/ : Cadillac and AmeriHealth Casualty : Insurance Company),

More information

The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses

The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses A Brief Overview of South Carolina s Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings 2017 CHILDREN S LAW CENTER UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Billy Moore, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1638 C.D. 2016 : Submitted: February 24, 2017 Department of Corrections, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Upper Bucks Orthopedic Associates, Petitioner v. No. 2218 C.D. 2007 Insurance Commissioner of the Argued June 11, 2008 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Respondent

More information

NEW YORK. New York Correction Law Article Discretionary Relief From Forfeitures and Disabilities Automatically Imposed By Law

NEW YORK. New York Correction Law Article Discretionary Relief From Forfeitures and Disabilities Automatically Imposed By Law NEW YORK New York Correction Law Article 23 -- Discretionary Relief From Forfeitures and Disabilities Automatically Imposed By Law Section 700. Definitions and rules of construction. 701. Certificate of

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Kenneth Sammons, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 548 M.D. 2006 : Argued: March 5, 2007 Pennsylvania State Police, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER,

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Ernest E. Liggett and Marilyn : Kostik Liggett (in their individual : and ownership capacity with Alpha : Financial Mortgage Inc., : Brownsville Group Ltd, : Manor

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Allegheny County Deputy Sheriffs : Association, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 959 C.D. 2009 : Argued: April 17, 2013 Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, : Respondent

More information

vs. : CR : FREDERICK POPOWICH, : Post-Sentence Motion Defendant : OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant s Post-Sentence Motion.

vs. : CR : FREDERICK POPOWICH, : Post-Sentence Motion Defendant : OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant s Post-Sentence Motion. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH : No s. CR-331-2011 vs. : CR-463-2011 : FREDERICK POPOWICH, : Post-Sentence Motion Defendant : OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court

More information

ARTICLE II. APPELLATE PROCEDURE

ARTICLE II. APPELLATE PROCEDURE APPEALS FROM LOWER COURTS 210 Rule 901 ARTICLE II. APPELLATE PROCEDURE Chap. Rule 9. APPEALS FROM LOWER COURTS... 901 11. APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT... 1101 13. INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Philadelphia Metro Task Force : James D. Schneller, : Appellant : No. 2146 C.D. 2012 : Submitted: July 5, 2013 v. : : Conshohocken Borough Council : BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

Comprehensive Prison Package Acts 81, 82, 83 and 84 of 2008

Comprehensive Prison Package Acts 81, 82, 83 and 84 of 2008 Comprehensive Prison Package Acts 81, 82, 83 and 84 of 2008 I. Introduction: On September 25, 2008, Governor Rendell signed into law 4 bills (House Bills 4-7) commonly referred to as the Prison Package.

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT STANDING ORDER 1-07 VIOLATION OF PROBATION PROCEEDINGS I. Scope and Purpose This standing order prescribes procedures in the Juvenile Court to be

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Stephen Izzi, No. 1420 C.D. 2013 Petitioner Submitted January 10, 2014 v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, State Real Estate Commission, Respondent

More information

: CR vs. : : CRIMINAL DIVISION : CODY HAMMAKER, : 2017 aggregate judgment of sentence of 5 to 15 years imprisonment following the

: CR vs. : : CRIMINAL DIVISION : CODY HAMMAKER, : 2017 aggregate judgment of sentence of 5 to 15 years imprisonment following the IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH : No. CR-56-2011 : CR-733-2011 vs. : : CRIMINAL DIVISION : CODY HAMMAKER, : Appellant : 1925(a) Opinion OPINION IN SUPPORT OF

More information

2017 and entered on the docket on September 29, The relevant facts follow. have any sexual offender registration requirements.

2017 and entered on the docket on September 29, The relevant facts follow. have any sexual offender registration requirements. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH : No. CP-41-CR-2173-2015 Appellant : vs. : CRIMINAL DIVISION : GREGORY PERSON, : Appellee : 1925(a) Opinion OPINION IN SUPPORT

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Condemnation By Phoenixville : Area School District, Chester County, : Penna., of Tax Parcels: 27-5D-9, : 27-5D-10 & 27-5D-10.1, Owned by : Meadowbrook

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Jesse James Spellman, : Appellant : : v. : No. 124 C.D. 2017 : Argued: November 15, 2017 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Department of Transportation, : Bureau

More information

No. SC-CV SUPREME COURT OF THE NAVAJO NATION. A.P., Minor Petitioner, Crownpoint Family Court, Respondent. OPINION

No. SC-CV SUPREME COURT OF THE NAVAJO NATION. A.P., Minor Petitioner, Crownpoint Family Court, Respondent. OPINION No. SC-CV-45-14 SUPREME COURT OF THE NAVAJO NATION A.P., Minor Petitioner, v. Crownpoint Family Court, Respondent. OPINION Before YAZZIE, H., Chief Justice, SHIRLEY, E., Associate Justice, and SLOAN, A.,

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Philadelphia Firefighters Union, : Local 22, International Association of : Firefighters, AFL-CIO by its guardian : ad litem William Gault, President, : Tim McShea,

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company LLC, Petitioner v. No. 112 C.D. 2017 Submitted May 19, 2017 Department of Environmental Protection, Respondent BEFORE HONORABLE

More information

STATE OF NEW JERSEY NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE SUSPENDING CERTAIN EMPLOYMENT, OCCUPATIONAL DISABILITIES OR FORFEITURES

STATE OF NEW JERSEY NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE SUSPENDING CERTAIN EMPLOYMENT, OCCUPATIONAL DISABILITIES OR FORFEITURES STATE OF NEW JERSEY SELECT: NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE SUSPENDING CERTAIN EMPLOYMENT, OCCUPATIONAL DISABILITIES OR FORFEITURES APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF GOOD CONDUCT

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Albert Reid, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 327 M.D. 2015 : Submitted: February 17, 2017 Department of Corrections for : Pennsylvania, William E. Vandrew : Clerk of

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 14, 2001 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 14, 2001 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 14, 2001 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SANDRA BROWN Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for White County No. CR560 Lillie Ann Sells,

More information

(d) Court services director means the director or designee of a county probation agency that is not organized under chapter 401.

(d) Court services director means the director or designee of a county probation agency that is not organized under chapter 401. M.S.A. 244.195 Minnesota Statutes Annotated Currentness Corrections (Ch. 241-244 App.) Chapter 244. Criminal Sentences, Conditions, Duration, Appeals Detention and Release 244.195. Detention and release;

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Consolidated Scrap Resources, Inc., : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1002 C.D. 2010 : SUBMITTED: October 8, 2010 Unemployment Compensation : Board of Review, : Respondent

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 642

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 642 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2011-192 HOUSE BILL 642 AN ACT TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE JUSTICE REINVESTMENT PROJECT AND TO PROVIDE THAT THE ACT SHALL BE

More information

A Guide for SelfRepresentation

A Guide for SelfRepresentation A Guide for SelfRepresentation Maryland Court of Special Appeals 2016 CONTENTS Introductory Comments..................... 1 Appellate Review in the Court of Special Appeals.......... 2 Preliminary Comments.....................

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Pennsylvania Office of Inspector : General, : Petitioner : : No. 1400 C.D. 2015 v. : : Submitted: July 15, 2016 Alton D. Brown, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Howard W. Mark and Cincinnati : Insurance Company, : Petitioners : : v. : No. 2753 C.D. 2004 : Argued: February 1, 2006 Workers' Compensation Appeal Board : (McCurdy),

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Michael J. Lello, : Petitioner : : Nos. 80 & 81 C.D. 2012 v. : : Submitted: August 3, 2012 Unemployment Compensation : Board of Review, : Respondent : BEFORE:

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Geoffrey Johnson, : Petitioner : : v. : : Pennsylvania Convention : Center Authority, : No. 1844 C.D. 2011 Respondent : Argued: May 14, 2012 BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH : CP-41-CR-0001477-1994 vs. : : CHARLES SATTERFIELD, : PCRA FIFTH Defendant : OPINION AND ORDER On August 21, 2017, Defendant

More information

Title 210 APPELLATE PROCEDURE. Title 234 RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Title 210 APPELLATE PROCEDURE. Title 234 RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Title 210 APPELLATE PROCEDURE PART I. RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE [ 210 PA. CODE CH. 17 ] Amending Rule 1736 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure; No. 214 Appellate Procedural Rules Doc. THE COURTS While

More information

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY CRIMINAL Cross Court Docket Nos: CR-0000353-07 CASE INFORMATION Judge Assigned: Date Filed: 03/04/2008 Initiation Date: 11/07/2007 OTN: K 432078-3 LOTN: Initial Issuing Authority: Henry J. Schireson Lower

More information

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2012 DONALD CONNOR, JR. STATE of MARYLAND

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2012 DONALD CONNOR, JR. STATE of MARYLAND REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1561 September Term, 2012 DONALD CONNOR, JR. v. STATE of MARYLAND Krauser, C.J. Woodward, Sharer, J. Frederick (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ.

More information

OMINBUS MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON EXPUNGEMENTS IN PENNSYLVANIA

OMINBUS MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON EXPUNGEMENTS IN PENNSYLVANIA OMINBUS MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON EXPUNGEMENTS IN PENNSYLVANIA INTRODUCTION Expungement law in Pennsylvania is well settled. The seminal Pennsylvania Supreme Court case Commonwealth v. Wexler, 431 A.2d 877

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,844. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JAMES KINDER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,844. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JAMES KINDER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 112,844 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JAMES KINDER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Interpretation of the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act (KSGA) is

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Earle Drack, : Appellant : : v. : No. 288 C.D. 2016 : Submitted: October 14, 2016 Ms. Jean Tanner, Open Records : Officer and Newtown Township : BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

A. Motion. Upon motion, or sua sponte, expungement proceedings may be commenced: 1) if a written allegation is not approved for prosecution;

A. Motion. Upon motion, or sua sponte, expungement proceedings may be commenced: 1) if a written allegation is not approved for prosecution; Rule 170. MOTION TO EXPUNGE OR DESTROY RECORDS A. Motion. Upon motion, or sua sponte, expungement proceedings may be commenced: 1) if a written allegation is not approved for prosecution; 2) if the petition

More information

CHAPTER 11. APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT

CHAPTER 11. APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT APPEALS FROM COURTS 210 Rule 1101 CHAPTER 11. APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT Rule 1101. Appeals As of Right From the Commonwealth

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Craig A. Bradosky, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1567 C.D. 2015 : Submitted: December 8, 2017 Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Omnova Solutions, Inc.), : Respondent

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Cesar Barros, : Appellant : : v. : : City of Allentown and : No. 2129 C.D. 2012 Allentown Police Department : Submitted: May 3, 2013 OPINION NOT REPORTED MEMORANDAUM

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-22-2016 USA v. Marcus Pough Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016

More information

Penalties and Sentences Act 1985

Penalties and Sentences Act 1985 Penalties and Sentences Act 1985 No. 10260 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section 1. Purposes. 2. Commencement. 3. Definitions. PART 1 PRELIMINARY PART 2 GENERAL SENTENCING PROVISIONS 4. Court may take guilty plea

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA William Strykowski, Petitioner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. 80 C.D. 2013 Respondent Submitted May 10, 2013 BEFORE HONORABLE RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER,

More information

JAIL CREDIT MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS

JAIL CREDIT MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE JAIL CREDIT MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) JAIL CREDIT PRINCIPLES... 2 2) DEFINITION OF SENTENCE... 3 3) CONCURRENT SENTENCE - GENERAL RULE... 3 4) CONSECUTIVE SENTENCE

More information

REVISOR XX/BR

REVISOR XX/BR 1.1 A bill for an act 1.2 relating to public safety; eliminating stays of adjudication and stays of imposition 1.3 in criminal sexual conduct cases; requiring sex offenders to serve lifetime 1.4 conditional

More information

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 302 WDA 2012

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 302 WDA 2012 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. VICTOR R. CAPELLE JR., Appellant No. 302 WDA 2012 Appeal from

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Robert J. Romanick, : Appellant : : v. : : Rush Township and the : No. 1852 C.D. 2012 Rush Township Board of Supervisors : Argued: March 12, 2013 BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY. STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY. STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant ) PETITION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY The defendant represents to the Court: 1. My

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER EIGHT CRIMINAL DIVISION RULES...181

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER EIGHT CRIMINAL DIVISION RULES...181 CHAPTER EIGHT CRIMINAL DIVISION RULES...181 PREAMBLE...181 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES AND BAIL...181 8.1 DUTIES OF SUPERVISING JUDGE OF THE CRIMINAL DIVISION...181 (a) Responsibility of the Supervising Judge...181

More information

William Haskins a/k/a Bilal A. Rahman v. State of Maryland, No. 1802, September Term, 2005

William Haskins a/k/a Bilal A. Rahman v. State of Maryland, No. 1802, September Term, 2005 HEADNOTES: William Haskins a/k/a Bilal A. Rahman v. State of Maryland, No. 1802, September Term, 2005 CRIMINAL LAW - MOTION TO CORRECT ILLEGAL SENTENCE - APPLICABIY OF LAW OF CASE DOCTRINE - Law of case

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re Appeal of Tenet HealthSystems Bucks County, LLC From the Bucks County Board of Assessment Appeals Tax Parcel Nos. 49-024-039 and 49-024-039-006 Municipality

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Susan E. Siegfried, : Petitioner : : No. 1632 C.D. 2013 v. : : Submitted: March 7, 2014 Unemployment Compensation : Board of Review, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

Monroe County Probation Department 43 rd Judicial District Box 777, Court House Stroudsburg, PA 18360

Monroe County Probation Department 43 rd Judicial District Box 777, Court House Stroudsburg, PA 18360 Monroe County Probation Department 43 rd Judicial District Box 777, Court House Stroudsburg, PA 18360 Steven A. Houloose Adult Probation (570) 517-3098 Chief Probation Officer Juvenil.e Probation (570)

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Francis Twardy, : Appellant : : v. : : City of Philadelphia, : Board of License and : No. 1912 C.D. 2012 Inspection Review : Submitted: March 14, 2014 BEFORE:

More information

Michael Taccetta v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Michael Taccetta v. Federal Bureau of Prisons 2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-13-2015 Michael Taccetta v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015

More information

MISSOURI VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS¹

MISSOURI VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS¹ CONSTITUTION Article I, 32. Crime victims' rights MISSOURI VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS¹ 1. Crime victims, as defined by law, shall have the following rights, as defined by law: (1) The right to be present at all

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : No C.D : Submitted: July 24, 2015 Township of Covington Zoning : Hearing Board :

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : No C.D : Submitted: July 24, 2015 Township of Covington Zoning : Hearing Board : IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Joan Lescinsky and William Lescinsky v. No. 1746 C.D. 2014 Submitted July 24, 2015 Township of Covington Zoning Hearing Board Appeal of Lorraine Sulla BEFORE HONORABLE

More information

Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining

Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining Catherine P. Adkisson Assistant Solicitor General Colorado Attorney General s Office Although all classes of felonies have

More information

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING 1. Determine the offense class 2. Determine the offender s prior conviction level 3. Select a sentence length 4. Select

More information

IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER S-2013-008 (Supersedes Administrative Order S-2012-052) CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION PROCEDURES The procedures used for

More information

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL PRINTER'S NO. 4224 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL No. 2765 Session of 2006 INTRODUCED BY O'BRIEN, BAKER, BELFANTI, BLAUM, BOYD, BUNT, CALTAGIRONE, CAPPELLI, CRAHALLA, CREIGHTON, J. EVANS,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 29, 2009 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 29, 2009 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 29, 2009 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JENNY LYNN SILER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Campbell County No. 12650 E. Shayne Sexton, Judge

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Timothy Scott Evans, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 759 C.D. 2010 : Submitted: September 24, 2010 Department of State, Bureau of : Professional and Occupational : Affairs,

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Patrick J. Doheny, Jr., an adult : individual, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 253 M.D. 2017 : Submitted: August 25, 2017 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Department

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P J-S71033-15 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. VERNON E. MCGINNIS, JR. Appellant No. 782 WDA 2015

More information

Cobb County Emergency Management Agency David Hankerson, Director Cassie Reece, Deputy Director

Cobb County Emergency Management Agency David Hankerson, Director Cassie Reece, Deputy Director Annual Criminal History Waiver for Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) I do hereby authorize the Cobb County Department of Public Safety and/or the Cobb County Emergency Management Agency to receive

More information

Chapter 1. Crime and Justice in the United States

Chapter 1. Crime and Justice in the United States Chapter 1 Crime and Justice in the United States Chapter Objectives After completing this chapter, you should be able to do the following: Describe how the type of crime routinely presented by the media

More information

H 7688 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

H 7688 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D ======== LC000 ======== 01 -- H S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE--COURTS -- EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDERS

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Daniel King, : Appellant : : v. : No. 226 C.D. 2012 : SUBMITTED: January 18, 2013 Riverwatch Condominium : Owners Association : BEFORE: HONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL. Rule 907 Notice BY: KNISELY, J. August 24, 2015

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL. Rule 907 Notice BY: KNISELY, J. August 24, 2015 Commonwealth v. Seabury No. 2212-2000 Knisely, J. August 24, 2015 Criminal Law Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) Jurisdiction Timeliness Pa.R.Crim.P. 907 Notice. Defendant s PCRA petition is time barred

More information

No. 07SA340, People v. Carbajal, - Deferred Judgment Statute Trial Courts Authority to Extend Deferred Judgment Habeas Corpus C.A.R.

No. 07SA340, People v. Carbajal, - Deferred Judgment Statute Trial Courts Authority to Extend Deferred Judgment Habeas Corpus C.A.R. Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us and are posted on the Colorado Bar Association s homepage

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : CR-1479-2014 : v. : : TIMOTHY J. MILLER, JR, : Defendant : PCRA OPINION AND ORDER On February 15, 2017, PCRA

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Solid Waste Services, Inc. d/b/a : J.P. Mascaro & Sons and M.B. : Investments and Jose Mendoza, : Appellants : : No. 1748 C.D. 2016 v. : : Argued: May 2, 2017

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Frank Tepper, : Appellant : : v. : No. 845 C.D. 2016 : Submitted: February 9, 2017 City of Philadelphia Board of : Pensions and Retirement : BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Ernie F. Markel, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1800 C.D. 2013 : Submitted: March 7, 2014 Bureau of Professional and : Occupational Affairs, State Board : of Vehicle

More information