Spearman, J. Paul Brecht, who publicly endorsed a King County Council

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Spearman, J. Paul Brecht, who publicly endorsed a King County Council"

Transcription

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON PAUL BRECHT, v. Appellant, NORTH CREEK LAW FIRM, MARK LAMB and JANE DOE LAMB, Respondents. No I DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED FILED: August 1, 2011 Spearman, J. Paul Brecht, who publicly endorsed a King County Council candidate, filed a complaint for defamation against Mark Lamb and North Creek Law Firm (collectively Lamb, after Lamb told the media the basis for an opposing candidate s claim that Brecht had been convicted of domestic violence. Arguing that the remarks were true, Lamb successfully moved to dismiss, under CR 12(b (6, for failure to state a cognizable claim. Brecht appeals the dismissal of his claim and the court s exclusion of documents he filed in response to Lamb s motion. But published remarks that are substantially true are insufficient to establish a prima facie case of defamation, and any error in excluding Brecht s documents was harmless. We affirm. FACTS During the 2007 King County Council election, Brecht publicly endorsed candidate Richard Pope, who was running against incumbent Jane Hague. Before the

2 No I/2 election, Hague s campaign sent out a mailer to constituents in her district, claiming that Brecht had multiple domestic violence arrests and at least one assault conviction. Brecht filed a defamation claim against Hague and the campaign consultants who created the mailer. The lawsuit received publicity and was reported in a local newspaper. Lamb, a Hague campaign attorney, thereafter spoke to a Seattle newspaper and television station about the mailer. Based on Lamb s remarks in those media interviews, Brecht filed the defamation complaint at issue in the instant appeal. According to Brecht s complaint, Lamb s remarks to the newspaper were reported as follows: [Lamb] said... the allegation of an assault conviction was based on a Renton police report that said Brecht was convicted of violating a no-contact order[.] Lamb said Hague campaign staffers were going on the information they had when they wrote that Brecht was convicted of assault. I suppose you could make an argument it would be more accurate to say he was convicted of domestic violence Lamb said, referring to [Brecht s] violation of a no-contact order. The campaign felt that was too inflammatory to include in the thing. Lamb said he doesn t believe Hague owes Brecht an apology. It appears that Mr. Pope s complaint was that the piece didn t say that Mr. Brecht was convicted of domestic violence. That s an odd complaint. Lamb told the television station: Mr. Brecht said last night that [he does] not have a domestic violence conviction, that s not true. Brecht did not dispute that his former spouse reported to police officers that he 2

3 No I/3 assaulted her. Nor did he dispute that he violated a no-contact order protecting her, and was convicted for violating that order. Brecht s complaint detailed the facts of his arrest and conviction as follows: In 2001, Mr. Brecht s then-wife phoned police and claimed that Mr. Brecht had assaulted her. This occurred on the same evening that Mr. Brecht informed his wife that he would like a divorce, before leaving to go to his office. Mr. Brecht was later arrested at his office and a no-contact order was entered against him solely on the basis of his wife s claims against him. The no-contact order required that Mr. Brecht have no contact or communication with his estranged wife. About one month later after his wife phoned the police, Mr. Brecht violated the no-contact order when he met his estranged wife and their child in a public place in broad daylight, and gave her money she said she needed. There was no violence, nor any allegation of violence. Afterwards the wife contacted police and reported that her husband had violated the no-contact order. [Brecht] was found guilty of a misdemeanor charge of violating a nocontact order. Lamb filed his answer to Brecht s complaint, asserting that his remarks to the media were true. On November 30, 2009, Lamb moved to dismiss Brecht s complaint for failing to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, pursuant to CR 12(b(6. On January 4, 2010, two days before the scheduled hearing date, Brecht filed a response brief with attached exhibits and a declaration. The exhibits included a partial transcript from the earlier trial on Brecht s defamation claim against Hague and her campaign consultants, a verdict form from that trial, and a copy of the Hague campaign s mailer. Lamb moved to strike Brecht s documents because they contained 3

4 No I/4 matters outside the pleadings, [u]nsworn evidence, and inadmissible hearsay, and were not filed in a timely manner. 1 After hearing oral argument, the trial court granted Lamb s motion to strike Brecht s responsive pleadings on the ground that they were untimely. The court also granted Lamb s CR 12(b(6 motion, dismissing Brecht s claim. The court denied Brecht s subsequent motion for reconsideration of both rulings. Brecht appeals. ANALYSIS Brecht argues that the trial court erred by excluding his declaration, response brief, and exhibits, and by concluding that he failed to state a cognizable claim for defamation against Lamb. We conclude that the court did not err in excluding Brecht s declaration and exhibits, any error in excluding his response brief was harmless, and his complaint failed to state a cognizable claim. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court s order granting Lamb s motion to dismiss. Lamb s Motion to Strike Brecht contends that the trial court erred in excluding the materials he filed, including his response brief, declaration, and exhibits. We conclude that the trial court did not err in striking the declaration and exhibits, and that any error in striking the response brief was harmless. 1 At the hearing on Lamb s motion to dismiss, Lamb asserted that Brecht s filings were untimely and largely inadmissible.... Lamb argued that if Brecht sought to convert the hearing into a one for summary judgment, he would have been required to file the response not later than 11 calendar days before the hearing. 4

5 No I/5 An appellate court reviews a trial court's rulings on a motion to strike for an abuse of discretion. Tortes v. King County, 119 Wn. App. 1, 12, 84 P.3d 252 (2003; Stenger v. State, 104 Wn. App. 393, , 16 P.3d 655 (2001. A trial court abuses its discretion when its ruling is manifestly unreasonable or based on untenable grounds. Mayer v. STO Indus., Inc., 156 Wn.2d 677, 684, 132 P.3d 115 (2006. The trial court was within its discretion to strike Brecht s declaration and exhibits, to the extent that they relied on factual matters outside the pleadings. 2 Because factual allegations extrinsic to the complaint are immaterial for purposes of the CR 12(b(6 motion, the trial court s decision to exclude those materials was entirely reasonable. Assuming without deciding that the exclusion of Brecht s response brief was error, 3 it was nevertheless harmless. Brecht s trial court response brief is of record on this appeal. The legal arguments contained in the brief are substantially the same issues he raised in his oral argument below and in this appeal. There, as here, Brecht 2 CR 12(b(6 specifically provides that a court has discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings, when considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Similarly, CR 12(f provides that, upon motion made by a party within 20 days after the service of the pleading or upon the court's own initiative at any time, the court may order stricken any redundant, [or] immaterial matter. Here, Lamb objected to and moved to strike Brecht s filings at the earliest opportunity. 3 When the trial court asked Brecht whether he was aware of any authority, such as a court rule, providing that his documents were filed in a timely manner, Brecht was unable to identify any such authority. The applicable King County Superior Court Local Civil Rule (KCLCR 7(b(4(d provides: Any party opposing a motion shall file and serve the original responsive papers in opposition to a motion, serve copies on parties, and deliver working copies to the hearing judge no later than 12:00 noon two court days before the date the motion is to be considered. Working copies shall be submitted pursuant to the requirements in this rule. (Emphasis added. 5

6 No I/6 argued that Lamb s statements were defamation by implication, relying primarily on Mohr v. Grant, 153 Wn.2d 812, 108 P.3d 768 ( Our review of Brecht s trial court response brief, considered both on its merits and in light of the trial court proceedings, reveals that the outcome below would have been no different had the trial court considered the brief. Any error in excluding the brief was harmless, and, therefore, does not entitle Brecht to relief on this appeal. Failure to State a Claim Brecht next asserts that the trial court erred in granting Lamb s CR 12(b(6 motion. We disagree. Whether dismissal was appropriate for failure to state a claim is a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. San Juan County v. No New Gas Tax, 160 Wn.2d 141, 164, 157 P.3d 831 (2007; CR 12(b(6. The factual inquiry on a CR 12(b(6 motion presumes the allegations set forth in the complaint to be true and asks whether any set of facts can be conceived which would support a valid claim. Holiday Resort Cmty Ass n v. Echo Lake Assocs., 134 Wn. App. 210, P.3d 499 (2006, Halvorson v. Dahl, 89 Wn.2d 673, , 574 P.2d 1190 (1978. To establish a prima facie claim for defamation, Brecht was required to demonstrate that: (1 Lamb s statements were false; (2 the statements were unprivileged; (3 Lamb was at fault; and (4 that the statements proximately caused 4 In his response brief, Brecht also attempted to argue that Lamb was involved in the creation of the Hague campaign mailer. Because that argument is extrinsic to the facts alleged in his complaint, which Brecht never sought to amend, the trial court was well within its discretion in striking that portion of the response brief. 6

7 No I/7 damage. Wood v. Battle Ground Sch. Dist., 107 Wn. App. 550, , 27 P.3d 1208 (2001 (citing Mark v. Seattle Times, 96 Wn.2d 473, 486, 635 P.2d 1081 (1981. A CR 12(b(6 motion to dismiss is appropriate in defamation cases where a plaintiff's complaint fails to demonstrate the existence of one of the four elements of defamation. See Clapp v. Olympic View Publ g Co., LLC, 137 Wn. App. 470, 154 P.3d 230 (2007. Lamb asserts that his statements that Brecht was convicted of domestic violence were true. A statement must be considered as a whole to determine whether it is true or false. Clardy v. Cowles Publ g Co., 81 Wn. App. 53, 912 P.2d 1078 (1996. Statements are not false if they are substantially true. Mark, 96 Wn.2d at 494. To defeat a defamation claim, [a] defendant need only show that the statement is substantially true or that the gist of the story, the portion that carries the sting, is true. Mark, 96 Wn.2d at 494. The "sting" of a report is defined as the gist or substance of a report, when considered as a whole. Mohr v. Grant, 153 Wn.2d 812, 825, 108 P.3d 768 (2005. The sting is a question of law to be decided by the court. See Mohr, 153 Wn.2d at 826. Brecht contends the gist of Lamb s statements to the press is that Brecht was convicted of something WORSE than an assault. We disagree. The gist of Lamb s statements is that Brecht was convicted of domestic violence. And it is indisputable that Lamb s statements to this effect are true or substantially true. Under Washington law, specifically RCW (5(r, "domestic violence" includes the crime of violation of a no-contact order: (5 "Domestic violence" includes but is not limited to any 7

8 No I/8 of the following crimes when committed by one family or household member against another:... (r Violation of the provisions of a restraining order, nocontact order, or protection order restraining or enjoining the person or restraining the person from going onto the grounds of or entering a residence, workplace, school, or day care, or prohibiting the person from knowingly coming within, or knowingly remaining within, a specified distance of a location (Emphasis added, internal citations omitted. Brecht s complaint, by acknowledging his arrest for an alleged assault against his wife and his conviction for violating the ensuing no-contact order, demonstrates that Lamb s remarks, that Brecht had been convicted of domestic violence, were substantially true. Accordingly, his claim of defamation fails and the trial court did not err in granting Lamb s CR 12(b(6 motion. 5 Brecht s Motion to Strike Finally, Brecht moved to strike portions of Lamb s appellate response brief. The motion was referred to the panel as ordered by the Commissioner's ruling on October 28, Brecht correctly points out that Lamb s brief improperly cited to an unpublished portion of Citizen v. Clark County Bd. of Commr s, 127 Wn. App. 846, 113 P.3d 501 (2005. We grant Brecht s motion to strike Lamb s reference to, and argument based upon, that case. Kitsap County v. Allstate Ins. Co., 136 Wn.2d 567, 577 n.10, 964 P.2d 1173 (1998 ( Unpublished opinions have no precedential value and, therefore, we have not considered them. (Citing State v. Bays, 90 Wn. App. 731, 5 Brecht relies on Mohr to argue that Lamb s remarks constituted defamation by implication. The argument is unpersuasive because, as we have said, the implication that Brecht was convicted of domestic violence is substantially true. Moreover, Lamb s statements, even when taken together, cannot be reasonably read to imply, as Brecht suggests, that he was convicted of something worse than an assault. 8

9 No I/9 954 P.2d 301 (1998. Brecht also claims Lamb s briefing to this court misrepresented the trial court record, included new evidence not before the trial court, and responded to non-existent arguments. Because those portions of Lamb s briefing are neither relevant nor necessary to our resolution of this appeal, we decline to grant the motion to strike. We have only considered material that is properly before us in deciding this case, and determine whether the record supports the parties' contentions. We affirm the trial court s order dismissing Brecht s defamation claim pursuant to CR 12(b(6. WE CONCUR: 9

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. Plaintiffs, Defendants. Honorable Janet M. Helson IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING 1 COURTNEY ALLEN and STEVEN ALLEN, a married couple, v. Plaintiffs, TODD ZONIS and the MARITAL COMMUNITY

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two February 22, 2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II ARTHUR WEST, No. 48182-1-II Appellant, v. PIERCE COUNTY COUNCIL, RICK

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON LORA BRAWLEY, ) NO. 65399-7-I ) Appellant, ) DIVISION ONE ) v. ) ) LEYLA ROUHFAR and REZA, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION FIROUZBAKHT, husband and wife, and )

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON GLV INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) a Washington Corporation, ) DIVISION ONE ) Respondent, ) No. 67956-2-I ) v. ) ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION AMERICAN RODSMITHS, INC.,

More information

N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two May 25, 2016 N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II JAMES J. WHITE, No. 47079-9-II Appellant, v. CITY OF LAKEWOOD, PUBLISHED

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Estate of ) MICHAEL J. FITZGERALD, ) DIVISION ONE ) MARIA LUISA DE LA VEGA ) No. 66954-1-I FITZGERALD, as Personal ) Representative

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING I. RELIEF REQUESTED

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING I. RELIEF REQUESTED IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING NICHOLAS ENSLEY, v. Plaintiff, CLIFFORD PITCHER and "JANE DOE" PITCHER, husband and wife, and the marital community composed

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 67604-1-I Respondent, ) ) DIVISION ONE v. ) ) ANTHONY S. AQUININGOC, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant. ) FILED: January

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two October 16, 2018 STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 49322-5-II Respondent, v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON LEE HAYNES, an adult individual, ) NO. 66542-1-I ) Appellant, ) DIVISION ONE ) v. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) SNOHOMISH COUNTY, and ) SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY PAUL BRECHT, NO. Plaintiff, v. JANE FRANCES HAGUE a/k/a JANE HAGUE SPRINGMAN, CHARLES

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II LANCE W. BURTON, Appellant, v. HONORABLE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE ROBERT L. HARRIS and MARY JO HARRIS, husband and wife, and their marital community;

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two November 22, 2016 MICHAEL NOEL, and DIANA NOEL, individually and as the marital community

More information

AOL, INC., Appellant. DR. RICHARD MALOUF AND LEANNE MALOUF, Appellants

AOL, INC., Appellant. DR. RICHARD MALOUF AND LEANNE MALOUF, Appellants Opinion Filed April 2, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01637-CV AOL, INC., Appellant V. DR. RICHARD MALOUF AND LEANNE MALOUF, Appellees Consolidated With No.

More information

ELIZABETH S. STEWART, Plaintiff/Appellee, STERLING MOBILE SERVICES, INC., an Arizona corporation, Defendant/Appellant. No.

ELIZABETH S. STEWART, Plaintiff/Appellee, STERLING MOBILE SERVICES, INC., an Arizona corporation, Defendant/Appellant. No. NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZ. R. SUP. CT. 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE ELIZABETH

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,265 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,265 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 115,265 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of the Marriage of DANNY BRIZENDINE, Appellant, and JENNIFER RANDALL, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, V. JAMIE ALLEN WALLS, Appellant. No. 77118-3-1 DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: January 14, 2019 MANN, A.C.J.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF W DIVISION II. negligence complaint, arguing that King County owed them a duty of care under exceptions to

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF W DIVISION II. negligence complaint, arguing that King County owed them a duty of care under exceptions to DcLT Y FILED CO[JRoT On APPEAL-3 2013 SEA' 17 A19 8 14 2 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF W DIVISION II r Y TANYA and TOMMY RIDER, wife and husband and the marital community composed therof, No.

More information

MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, Plaintiff/Appellee, YARED AMELGA, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV

MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, Plaintiff/Appellee, YARED AMELGA, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two February 21, 2018 MICHAEL W. WILLIAMS, No. 50079-5-II Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COLUMBIA STATE BANK, a Washington State banking corporation, No. 65959-6-I Appellant, DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION NORMANDY PARK INVESTORS, LLC,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON LAWRENCE HILL, ADAM WISE, ) NO. 66137-0-I and ROBERT MILLER, on their own ) behalves and on behalf of all persons ) DIVISION ONE similarly situated, )

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED November 13, 2008 v No. 280300 MARY L. PREMO, LAWRENCE S. VIHTELIC, and LILLIAN VIHTELIC Defendants-Appellees. 1 Plaintiff-Appellee,

More information

FILED JANUARY 3, 2019 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III

FILED JANUARY 3, 2019 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III FILED JANUARY 3, 2019 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE MICHAEL CLARKE, an individual, v. Appellant,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Marriage of ) ) No. 66510-3-I KENNETH KAPLAN, ) ) DIVISION ONE Respondent, ) ) and ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) SHEILA KOHLS, ) FILED:

More information

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2016COA161 Court of Appeals No. 15CA0652 Weld County District Court No. 13CR1668 Honorable Shannon D. Lyons, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Brown, J. This court granted discretionary review of Deborah Daily s driving

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Brown, J. This court granted discretionary review of Deborah Daily s driving IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DEBORAH L. DAILY, Petitioner. No. 29554-1-III Division Three PUBLISHED OPINION Brown, J. This court granted discretionary

More information

LAURA MAJORANA OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. November 3, 2000 CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION

LAURA MAJORANA OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. November 3, 2000 CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION Present: All the Justices LAURA MAJORANA OPINION BY v. Record No. 992179 JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. November 3, 2000 CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAUQUIER COUNTY H.

More information

DANTAN SALDAÑA, Plaintiff/Appellant, No. 2 CA-CV Filed July 21, 2017

DANTAN SALDAÑA, Plaintiff/Appellant, No. 2 CA-CV Filed July 21, 2017 IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO DANTAN SALDAÑA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CHARLES RYAN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MARLENE COFFEY, ASSOCIATE DEPUTY WARDEN, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT

More information

2017 PA Super 292 OPINION BY MOULTON, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 08, Howard Rubin appeals the October 20, 2015 order entered in the

2017 PA Super 292 OPINION BY MOULTON, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 08, Howard Rubin appeals the October 20, 2015 order entered in the 2017 PA Super 292 HOWARD RUBIN Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. CBS BROADCASTING INC. D/B/A CBS 3 Appellee No. 3397 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Order Entered October 20, 2015 In the Court

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2016-0649, The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Construction Services of New Hampshire, LLC, the court on November 29, 2017, issued the following order:

More information

2019COA28. In this postconviction case, a division of the court of appeals. must determine whether a parolee who appeals his parole

2019COA28. In this postconviction case, a division of the court of appeals. must determine whether a parolee who appeals his parole The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries

More information

FILED MAY 22, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III

FILED MAY 22, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III FILED MAY 22, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE NANCY FECHNER, individually and as Personal

More information

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-13-00287-CV CITY OF FRITCH, APPELLANT V. KIRK COKER, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 84th District Court Hutchinson County, Texas Trial

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as Allen v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2015-Ohio-383.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT John D. Allen, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 14AP-619 v. : (Ct. of Cl. No. 2014-00030)

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. No. A-1-CA-36389

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. No. A-1-CA-36389 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 1-0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For Plaintiff-Appellee: : JOURNAL ENTRY. For Defendant-Appellant:

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For Plaintiff-Appellee: : JOURNAL ENTRY. For Defendant-Appellant: [Cite as Turner v. Crow, 2001-Ohio-4231.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 77322 PAUL E. TURNER Plaintiff-Appellee JOURNAL ENTRY -vs- AND J. HARVEY CROW OPINION Defendant-Appellant

More information

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 21 October 2014

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 21 October 2014 An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-3-2014 USA v. Victor Patela Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 13-2255 Follow this and additional

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BRUCE PIERSON and DAVID GAFFKA, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants- Appellants/Cross-Appellees, UNPUBLISHED July 19, 2005 v No. 260661 Livingston Circuit Court ANDRE AHERN,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE WOODINVILLE BUSINESS CENTER ) No. 65734-8-I NO. 1, a Washington limited partnership, ) ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) ALBERT L. DYKES, an individual

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS OMAR NAKASH and PLATINUM LANDSCAPING INC., UNPUBLISHED March 15, 2016 Plaintiff-Appellants, v No. 326152 Wayne Circuit Court JOHN ULAJ and HAMTRAMCK REVIEW, LC No. 2014-007389-CZ

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DETROIT HOUSING COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED February 2, 2016 v No. 323453 Michigan Employment Relations Commission NEIL SWEAT, LC No. 11-000799 Charging

More information

Spokane County Bar Association's Appellate Practice CLE WASHINGTON APPELLATE LAW CASE REVIEW: Significant Cases in 2017/2018

Spokane County Bar Association's Appellate Practice CLE WASHINGTON APPELLATE LAW CASE REVIEW: Significant Cases in 2017/2018 Spokane County Bar Association's Appellate Practice CLE WASHINGTON APPELLATE LAW CASE REVIEW: Significant Cases in 2017/2018 Case: Estate of Dempsey v. Spokane Washington Hospital Co., 1 Wn. App. 2d 628,

More information

FILED APRIL 3, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III

FILED APRIL 3, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III FILED APRIL 3, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE JUAN ZABALA, Appellant, v. OKANOGAN COUNTY,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LEWIS MATTHEWS III and DEBORAH MATTHEWS, UNPUBLISHED March 2, 2006 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v No. 251333 Wayne Circuit Court REPUBLIC WESTERN INSURANCE LC No. 97-717377-NF

More information

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES CHAPTER 1 7 MOTIONS EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES Paralegals should be able to draft routine motions. They should be able to collect, prepare, and organize supporting documents, such as affidavits. They may be

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II WAQAS SALEEMI, a single man, and FAROOQ SHARYAR, a single man, Respondents, v. DOCTOR S ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, PUBLISHED

More information

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2014 COA 159

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2014 COA 159 COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2014 COA 159 Court of Appeals No. 13CA1021 Grand County District Court No. 11CR114 Honorable Mary C. Hoak, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Laura

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOANN GOODMAN GLINIECKI, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 24, 2003 v No. 238144 Midland Circuit Court STATE FARM MUTUAL, LC No. 99-001553-CK Defendant-Appellee/Cross-

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c; ARCAP 28(c; Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT OF

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KATHLEEN MCGRAW BATTLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED January 15, 2013 v No. 306606 Wayne Circuit Court MICHAEL KEVIN BATTLES, LC No. 10-116277-DO Defendant-Appellee.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SCOTT E. STAFNE, a single man, ) ) No. 84894-7 Respondent and ) Cross Petitioner, ) ) v. ) En Banc ) SNOHOMISH COUNTY and ) SNOHOMISH COUNTY PLANNING ) DEPARTMENT

More information

2017 DEC ii At! 10: 27

2017 DEC ii At! 10: 27 iled COURT OF APPEALS DIV I STATE OF WASHINGTOfi 2017 DEC ii At! 10: 27 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JOSHUA K. KNUTSON and NATASHA KNUTSON, and the marital community No. 75565-0-1

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ********** STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-1412 R. CHADWICK EDWARDS, JR. VERSUS LAROSE SCRAP & SALVAGE, INC. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF VERMILION,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DIANE JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED August 26, 2014 v No. 316636 Manistee Circuit Court JOSHUA LEE GUTHERIE, LC No. 12-014507-NI Defendant-Appellee. Before:

More information

v No Saginaw Circuit Court

v No Saginaw Circuit Court S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S JASON ANDRICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED June 5, 2018 v No. 337711 Saginaw Circuit Court DELTA COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, LC No. 16-031550-CZ

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS I. B. MINI-MART II, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Appellant, UNPUBLISHED April 14, 2011 v No. 296982 Wayne Circuit Court JSC CORPORATION and ELSAYED KAZEM LC No.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. ) Respondents and ) Cross-Appellants. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. ) Respondents and ) Cross-Appellants. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JOANNE ALDERSON and ROBERT ) ALDERSON, individually and as the ) marital community composed thereof, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Division Three ) R. CRANE

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LARRY RIDNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED October 28, 2003 v No. 240710 Monroe Circuit Court CHARLEY RAFKO TOWNE and CAROL SUE LC No. 99-010343-NI TOWNE, Defendants-Appellees.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) NO. 67147-2-I Respondent/ ) Cross-Appellant, ) DIVISION ONE ) v. ) ) JUAN LUIS LOZANO, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant/ ) FILED:

More information

BROWN V. BEHLES & DAVIS, 2004-NMCA-028, 135 N.M. 180, 86 P.3d 605

BROWN V. BEHLES & DAVIS, 2004-NMCA-028, 135 N.M. 180, 86 P.3d 605 1 BROWN V. BEHLES & DAVIS, 2004-NMCA-028, 135 N.M. 180, 86 P.3d 605 RONALD DALE BROWN and LISA CALLAWAY BROWN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BEHLES & DAVIS, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, WILLIAM F. DAVIS, DANIEL J. BEHLES,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No Respondent, DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No Respondent, DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, V. Respondent, DRANOEL ENAJ BROWN, Appellant. ) ) No. 75627-3-1 DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: February 12, 2018 LEACH,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ROBERT VANHELLEMONT and MINDY VANHELLEMONT, UNPUBLISHED September 24, 2009 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v No. 286350 Oakland Circuit Court ROBERT GLEASON, MEREDITH COLBURN,

More information

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MICHAEL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED February 21, 2012 v No. 301154 Wayne Circuit Court NEW WORLD COMMUNICATIONS OF LC No. 09-020833-NZ DETROIT,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II MALICH MOTORS, INC., a Washington State Corporation d/b/a POWERBOATS NORTHWEST, Appellant, UNPUBLISHED OPINION v. REGAL MARINE INDUSTRIES,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LISA RENEE REDFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED September 23, 2014 v No. 316740 St. Clair Circuit Court AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, LC No. 11-001813-NF and

More information

2018COA143. No. 17CA1295, In re Marriage of Durie Civil Procedure Court Facilitated Management of Domestic Relations Cases Disclosures

2018COA143. No. 17CA1295, In re Marriage of Durie Civil Procedure Court Facilitated Management of Domestic Relations Cases Disclosures The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FRANCIS CLARK and SHANNON HOERNER-CLARK, husband and wife, v. Appellants, JR S QUALITY CARS, INC.; CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION, Respondents, RUSS EDWARDS

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK J. MORRISSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED February 17, 2009 v Nos. 277893, 279153 Kent Circuit Court NEXTEL RETAIL STORES, L.L.C., LC No. 05-012048-NZ and

More information

IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 IL App (1st 143089 No. 1-14-3089 Opinion filed September 29, 2015 Second Division IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT ILLINOIS SERVICE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO,

More information

v No Oakland Circuit Court JOSEPH H. HEMMING and LAW OFFICES OF LC No NM JOSEPH H. HEMMING,

v No Oakland Circuit Court JOSEPH H. HEMMING and LAW OFFICES OF LC No NM JOSEPH H. HEMMING, S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S THOMAS S. TOTEFF, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED August 21, 2018 v No. 337182 Oakland Circuit Court JOSEPH H. HEMMING and LAW OFFICES OF LC No.

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A17-1550 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mohammad

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) DIVISION ONE Respondent, ) ) No. 66331-3-I v. ) ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION EDWARD EARL COBB, ) ) Appellant. ) FILED: May 29, 2012

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued August 29, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-11-01119-CV AZEL GARRISON GOOLSBEE, Appellant V. HEB GROCERY COMPANY, OSCAR MORENO, JUANITA L. SANDOVAL, R.

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BETH ANN SMITH, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of STEPHEN CHARLES SMITH and the Estate of IAN CHARLES SMITH, and GOODMAN KALAHAR, PC, UNPUBLISHED

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II CHARITY L. MEADE, No. 37715-2-II Appellant, UNPUBLISHED OPINION v. MICHAEL A. THOMAS Respondent. Van Deren, C.J. Charity Meade appeals a summary

More information

2018COA107. A division of the court of appeals considers whether the. district court may consider documents outside the bare allegations

2018COA107. A division of the court of appeals considers whether the. district court may consider documents outside the bare allegations The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 67356-4-I Respondent, ) ) DIVISION ONE v. ) ) RODNEY ALBERT SCHREIB, JR., ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant. ) FILED: December

More information

State of Washington v. Julio Cesar Aldana Graciano

State of Washington v. Julio Cesar Aldana Graciano State of Washington v. Julio Cesar Aldana Graciano No. 86530-2 WIGGINS, J. (dissenting) I dissent from the majority opinion because it incorrectly places the burden of proving same criminal conduct onto

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON This opinion was filed for record fit 8 ~DO f\y.y..\. 0(\. ~ ~ lol\al IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON GUY H. WUTHRICH, v. Petitioner, KING COUNTY, a governmental entity, and Respondent,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv TCB.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv TCB. Case: 12-16611 Date Filed: 10/03/2013 Page: 1 of 11 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-16611 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-01816-TCB

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DOMINICK STANIN, SR. Argued: November 9, 2017 Opinion Issued: March 30, 2018

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DOMINICK STANIN, SR. Argued: November 9, 2017 Opinion Issued: March 30, 2018 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

v No Genesee Circuit Court CITY OF FLINT and GENESEE COUNTY LC No CH TREASURER, I. FACTS

v No Genesee Circuit Court CITY OF FLINT and GENESEE COUNTY LC No CH TREASURER, I. FACTS S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S BANTAM INVESTMENTS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED December 21, 2017 v No. 335030 Genesee Circuit Court CITY OF FLINT and GENESEE COUNTY

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 41956-4-II Respondent, v. Maksim Vasil Yevich Shkarin, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. Johanson, A.C.J. Maksim Vasil

More information

Illinois Official Reports

Illinois Official Reports Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Szczesniak v. CJC Auto Parts, Inc., 2014 IL App (2d) 130636 Appellate Court Caption DONALD SZCZESNIAK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CJC AUTO PARTS, INC., and GREGORY

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: KIMBERLY A. JACKSON Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana MATTHEW D. FISHER Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: DAVID M. PAYNE Ryan & Payne Marion, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana MARA MCCABE Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

More information

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Keenan, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Keenan, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Keenan, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice CAROLYN T. CASH OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No. 950720 January 12, 1996 COMMONWEALTH

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MICHAEL J. GORBACH, and Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED December 30, 2014 ROSALIE GORBACH, Plaintiff, v No. 308754 Manistee Circuit Court US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

More information

UNPUBLISHED OPINION ^ ^S

UNPUBLISHED OPINION ^ ^S IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MATT SUROWIECKI, JR. and INEZA KUCEBA, Appellants/Cross Respondents, No. 69519-3- DIVISION ONE tpo UNPUBLISHED OPINION ^ ^S HAT ISLAND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 29,570. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY Gary L. Clingman, District Judge

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 29,570. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY Gary L. Clingman, District Judge 0 0 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule -0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NOS. 34,663 & 34,745 (consolidated)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NOS. 34,663 & 34,745 (consolidated) This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule -0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS RICHARD A. BOUMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED July 28, 2011 v No. 297044 Kent Circuit Court BRAVOGRAND, INC. and BISON REALTY, LC No. 08-002750-NO LLC, and Defendants-Appellees,

More information

v No Oakland Circuit Court ARI KRESCH, LAW-FIRM, KRESCH

v No Oakland Circuit Court ARI KRESCH, LAW-FIRM, KRESCH S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S ALYSON OLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED July 19, 2018 v No. 338296 Oakland Circuit Court ARI KRESCH, 1-800-LAW-FIRM, KRESCH LC No. 2013-133304-CZ

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LARRY KLEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED January 19, 2016 v No. 323755 Wayne Circuit Court ROSEMARY KING, DERRICK ROE, JOHN LC No. 13-003902-NI DOE, and ALLSTATE

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ROSE ANN OLSZEWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED January 9, 2001 v No. 212643 Wayne Circuit Court JOE ANDREW BOYD, LC No. 96-611949-NI Defendant-Appellee. Before:

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 9, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for O'Brien County, Nancy L.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 9, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for O'Brien County, Nancy L. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-532 / 10-2076 Filed November 9, 2011 BRIAN LEE OLDENKAMP, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District

More information