CHAPTER IV RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF CITIZEN UNDER RTI ACT. vis-à-vis CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
|
|
- Irma Copeland
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 112 CHAPTER IV RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF CITIZEN UNDER RTI ACT vis-à-vis CONSTITUTION OF INDIA In this Chapter the researcher describes the rights and duties of the Citizen under the Right to Information Act as co-relative aspects and points out to the flaws on the part of the drafters of the Act for their failure to cast responsibilities on the information seekers so as to prevent abuse of the right. The researcher very much deals with the fundamental duties of the citizens who seek information. Chapter IV A of the Constitution of India which was introduced by the Constitution (Forty Second Amendment) Act, 1976, with effect from The researcher feels that when the citizens are entitled to know the information as one of their fundamental right they are also obliged to discharge their constitutional duties as directed by Chapter IV-A of the Constitution of India. The researcher further analyses the impact of the repeal of certain important legislations like the Official secrets Act and discusses about the lacunas that facilitate the misuse of the Act. THE UNBRIDLED RIGHT TO INFORMATION: Sir John William Salmond said that rights and duties are co relatives. Every right or duty involves a bond of obligation. Lord Acton said Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men 1. It is nevertheless true that absolute right tends to corrupts the minds of person who possess it. In a way, the citizens are unnaturally gifted with enormous unlimited power (right) to 1 In his letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton in Lord Acton expresses this opinion about the corelation of power corruption.
2 113 get information from the Authorities. However the parliament has miserably failed to indicate the duties and responsibilities of the citizen who seek information under the RTI Act. Eight years have been passed since the enactment of the RTI Act,2005. On one way of looking at the success of the RTI Act the legislators would be happy to achieve the objects of the Act. However there is no whisper about the responsibilities of the citizen from any quarters. Every citizen has fundamental duties imposed upon them by Article 51(A) 2 of the Constitution of India. Every citizen shall have the duty to uphold the constitution and its ideals and its institutions. The citizens shall have to respect the laws of the country. Sir Thomas Erskine Holland said that A moral duty is that which is demanded 2 Inserted by the 42 nd Constitution Amendment Act, They are 51A. Fundamental Duties.- It shall be the duty of every citizens of India- (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem; (b) to cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom; (c) to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India; (d) to defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so; (e) to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women; (f) to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture; (g) to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures; (h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform; (i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence; (j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.
3 114 by the public opinion of society and a legal duty is that which is enforced by the power of the state. In AIIMS Students' Union v. AIIMS and Ors 3., a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India made it clear that fundamental duties, though not enforceable by writ of the court, yet provide valuable guidance and aid to interpretation and resolution of constitutional and legal issues. In case of doubt, peoples' wish as expressed through Article 51-A can serve as a guide not only for resolving the issue but also for constructing or moulding the relief to be given by the courts. The fundamental duties must be given their full meaning as expected by the enactment of the Forty-second Amendment. The Court further held that the State is, in a sense, 'all the citizens placed together' and, therefore, though Article 51A does not expressly cast any fundamental duty on the State, the fact remains that the duty of every citizen of India is, collectively speaking, the duty of the State. A five judge constitutional bench of the Hon ble Supreme Court of India, held in the case of State Of Gujarat vs Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab 4 It is thus clear that faced with the question of testing the constitutional validity of any statutory provision or an executive act, or for testing the reasonableness of any restriction cast by law on the exercise of any fundamental right by way of regulation, control or prohibition, the Directive Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Duties as enshrined in Article 51-A of the Constitution play a significant role The very object of the RTI Act was to inform the citizens about the good governance of the administration by the elected representatives of the people. In other words the administrative authorities from Class IV employees to the Office of the 3 4 (2002) 1 SCC 428 (2005) 8 SCC 534
4 115 President must act in a transparent way. The stability of a democratic government is exposed only through the good governance which satisfies the people of the country. Section 3 of the RTI Act says that Subject to the provisions of this Act, all citizens shall have the right to information. Section 4 of the RTI Act deals about the obligations of the public authorities. But there s no duty, obligation, responsibility for the person who seek information under the Act to whom the rights are given under Section 3 of the Act. The object of the Act was to make every citizen aware of acts of the government. However, it is most prevalently seen from the reports of media that only very few groups of having interested individuals seek information as a matter of their profession by claiming themselves as RTI activists. Under the Right to information Act, 2005 the citizens enjoy (at times misused) the absolute right from authorities. Further, the overriding effect over of all other Acts by the Right to information Act, 2005 coupled with no responsibilities given to the citizens under the Act leads to an irresistible conclusion that the Right to information Act, 2005 needs to be reframed at least in respect of imposing certain responsibilities. Rather, it gives unguided protection to persons under Section 21 of the Act. It says as follows No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against any person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act or any rule made there under It is, of course, needed to protect the persons who are availing the benefits given under the Act under good faith. However the same shall not be extended to any act, which seems to be in good faith under the RTI Act, may be an offence under other Acts. For example, even though the Act said to override the Provisions of the Official Secrets Acts with regard to the disclosure of information, Still the penal provisions under the
5 116 Official Secrets Act,1923 are intact and they are still in force and unless and until the penal provisions of the Official Secrets are expressly repealed by an Act of Parliament they have the force of law. Hence a citizen can very well obtain the information under the RTI Act which may be prohibited under the Official Secrets Act, But there is no statutory relevancy/admissibility of those information received from the PIO in any of the quasi-judicial or judicial forums. However there is no objects for those information received can be used by the citizens to achieve the objects. In other words the information collected are used for debate and discussion by the public and press. In Common Cause and others v. Union of India 5, the issue before the Hon ble Supreme Court for decision was as to whether the access to official information by a whistle blower amounts to violation of the Official Secrets Act; while deciding the said issue the Hon ble Supreme Court held as follows; It is true that the Supreme Court had required the Director, CBI to ensure, by its order dated , that the secrecy of the inquiries and investigations into the allocation of coal blocks is maintained. However, if somebody accesses documents that ought to be carefully maintained by the CBI, it is difficult to find fault with such a whistleblower particularly when his or her action is in public interest. It is another matter if the whistle blower uses the documents for a purpose that is outrageous or that may damage the public interest. In that event it would be permissible for the Supreme Court or an appropriate Court to take action against the whistleblower, if he or she is identified. However, the present case is not of any such category. The whistle blower, whoever it is, acted purportedly in public interest by seeking to bring out what he or she believes is an attempt by S, Director, CBI, to scuttle the investigation into the affairs of the accused D or others in the Coal Block Allocation Case. It is not being considered whether the disclosure by the whistleblower was malafide or not. The disclosures made 5 (2015) 6 SCC 332
6 117 by the whistleblower were intended to be in public interest. Furthermore as far as the allegation that there has been a violation of the provisions of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 is concerned, the file notes in this case cannot be described as an official secret for the purposes of maintaining a prosecution under the Official Secrets Act, 1923 Section 3 to 7 and other provisions of the official Secrets Act, 1923 imposing penal provisions prescribe penal actions against the persons who pass on information to others. However a person shall have no bar or any restrictions to disseminate the information obtained under the RTI Act to publish or pass on the information. Thus the omission to provide responsibilities and duties to the citizens resulting in conflict of provisions. The above example under the Official Secrets Act,1923 also can be made to the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000, where there is immense possibility to obtain the digital signature certificates of persons under the RTU Act and the misuse of the same. Hence the literal interpretation to the provisions of the Act, in particular, the sections 22 of the Act would lead to catastrophic consequences leading to unnecessary conflict of provisions of the Act with other Central and State Acts. Hence the Mischief Rule of interpretation has to be applied while interpreting the Act in order to save the objects of the Act and to be in consonance with the other laws of the country. D.P.Mittal in his book on Interpretation of Statutes stated that literalism in interpretation may often thwart the purpose of the legislature. Purpose or object of legislation and legislative intention governing it are two different concepts. While the object of the legislation is to provide a remedy for the malady, the legislative intention relates to the meaning from the exposition of the remedy as enacted. 6 6 D.P.Mittal, Interpretation of Statutes, Taxmann, 2 nd Edition, 2005, Page No.689
7 118 The Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the rule laid down in Heydon s Case(Mischief Rule) in the case of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Madhya Pradesh And Bhopal Vs. Sodra Devi and held as follows it is a sound rule of construction of a statute firmly established in as far back as 1584 when Heydon's Case (5) was decided that- England "... for the sure and true interpretation of all statutes in general (be they penal or beneficial, restrictive or enlarging of the common law) four things are to be discerned and considered: 1st. What was the common law before the making of the Act., 2nd. What was the mischief and defect for which the common law did not provide., 3rd. What remedy the Parliament hath resolved and appointed to cure the disease of the Common wealth., and 4th. The true reason of the remedy; and then the office of all judges is always to make such construction as shall suppress the mischief, and advance the remedy, and to suppress subtle inventions and evasions for continuance of the mischief, and pro privato commodo, and to add force and life to the cure and remedy, according to the true intent of the makers of the Act, pro bono publico. It is ripe time to enumerate the guidelines for the citizens to protect the misuse of the provisions of the Act and to prescribe the duties to the citizens to make them follow it in order to balance the rights and duties to secure harmony between the interests of the society as well as individuals.
8 119 The rights and duties are the two sides of the same coin. Abraham Lincoln 7 said Lets have faith that right makes might; and in that faith let us, to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it. As Oscar Wilde Pointed out a man thinks that a duty is what others to do for him, the RTI casts duty only upon the Public authorities to do their duties by furnishing the information. The citizens shall have to realize that they too have the duty towards the society towards the Constitution and its institutions. There cannot be any law in our country which shall prescribe only rights to the citizens and no duties to the citizens. Whether the parliament has consciously omitted about the responsibilities/ duty of the citizen who apply for information under the RTI Act. If really the parliament consciously omitted then, it has forgotten about the consequences which cause undue hardship and delaying other administrative duties of the public authorities. The present trend of the people who claim as activists files frivolous applications after applications to stall the normal work of the public authorities must be taken into consideration by the legislatures and amend the Act accordingly, however without any way infringing the rights of the citizens. It is high time to formulate the necessary guidelines imposing responsibilities and duties to the citizens while getting information and after obtaining the information from the Public Information Officers under the Right to Information Act, Chapter III of the Constitution of India confers fundamental rights on every citizen which are subject to the reasonable restrictions imposed in that chapter. Chapter IV-A of the Constitution of India enumerates the duties however, those duties are not enforceable under law. When analyzing the provisions of the RTI Act, in particular, Section 3 and 4 the citizens shall have right to information which they sought for and 7 He was the 16th President of the United States.
9 120 there is a corresponding obligation on the part of the public authorities. Every information sought for should be furnished without delay except that those are falling under Section 8 of the Act, in other words an unfettered right given to the citizens to seek for information invoking the RTI Act without any corresponding duty or responsibilities on the citizens. From the above discussion coupled with the Heydon s rule of interpretation, the judgements of the Supreme Court of India, the past experience would lead to an irresistible conclusion that the information sought for must be based on a bonafide act of a responsible citizen. It is also on record in the various information commissions and courts that only the persons claiming to be Activists files petitions after petitions and also pose threat to the authorities which was not the object of the Act. As rightly pointed by His Excellency Dr.A.P.J.Abdul Kalam 8, every right has to have a checks built in to prevent its unbridled sway which is sure to lead to the certain failure of the very system 9, the RTI Act does not contain any checks on the citizens right to approach the Public authorities. Unless the Parliament wakes up to the present challenge of streamlining the bonafide of RTI applicants, the very object of RTI Act to achieve the Good governance would fail. Eventually the RTI would be used as a tool of weapon to harass the private individuals and authorities and to stall the public machinery from delivering effective administration. The citizens application for information has to first pass the test of bonafide. If found, Prima facie, that the application is made to harass any private individual or to obtain any personal information of any third party, the application ought to be rejected in limine and the parliament shall have to amend the present provisions to cut the nip in 8 Dr.A.P.J.Abdul Kalam was a Nuclear Scientist and is the most popular president of India. 9 Extracted from the book titled Implementation of the Right to information and Good Governance by S.L.Goel, Page No.76
10 121 bud and stop the menace of frivolous applications to target a government office or officer holding the post of PIO. Even though section 21of the Act gives protection to the PIOs also, it does not do so in express terms and it used the word any person and not any authority. And this anomaly in section 21 of the Act posed serious threat to the PIOs who are acting bonafide in processing the RTI applications. The penal provisions provided against the PIOs under the RTI Act coupled with the protection to the RTI applicants acts as double side sword for the PIOs. The proviso to Section 21 of the RTI Act arbitrarily casts burden to prove the due diligence on the Public Information officer, whereas there is not even single provision in the Act that necessitates the bonafide of the person seeking the information. This burned to prove the innocence and due diligence for a government servant to the satisfaction of the State Information Commission or the Central Information Commission is unwarranted for a government servant who acts bonafidely and diligently. Even the Indian Penal Code presuppose the act of government servant as an official act and most of the laws in the country treats that an act done by the statutory authority in good faith is deemed to be diligently done. However the RTI Act, the revolutionary Act, changes the dimensions of the evidence and criminal jurisprudence. When Section 20 imposes condition to the PIOs to prove their diligent, the parliament has not at all taken into consideration to put a condition to the RTI Applicants about the intended use of the information or the Duty of the RTI Applicants in obtaining the information. Moreover the penal provision has been provided under Section 21 and casting the burden to prove the due diligence on the PIOs followed with the penalty that could
11 122 extend to twenty five thousand rupees and disciplinary action against the PIOs, the Act must also have to have a safeguard to the PIOs who have acted in good faith. Otherwise no government servant would be in a safer position while acting as a PIOs. Though the act of furnishing the information sought for by the citizen appears to be an act of PIO in his administrative capacity it involves legal complications and interpretation of the provisions of law. Unless the PIOs are qualified law graduates or having legal knowledge the penal provision of the RTI Act punishes an ignorant officer. An illustration can be given to highlight the above situation. One A is appointed as a Stenographer in a Commercial Tax Department who by his experience and seniority promoted to the level of Assistant Commercial Tax Officer. Later, he was promoted as Deputy Commercial Tax officer. Under the RTI Act he was designated as Public Information officer to deal with the applications filed seeking information under the RTI Act. As he has no legal knowledge but thorough knowledge and understanding of the Sales Tax Act which he is dealing, invoking a provision(section 85 of the T.N.Value Added tax Act, 2006) under the Sales tax law, declined the request for information. He had no knowledge or understanding of the law made by the parliament and law made by the legislature and unable to understand the overriding effect of the section 22 of the RTI Act. Here the officer acted bonafidely invoking the provision under the State law. In this case he was punished with the fat fine of Rs.25,000/- and departmental proceedings, definitely it will amount to punishment to a person who acted bonfaidely referring to a statutory provision. Therefore the act of bonafide on the part of the PIO has not at all taken into consideration while imposing penalty.
12 123 In the above illustration one can see that a person who files an application seeking information need not have any bonafide intention nor has to state the reasons but the officer who acted bonafidely is being punished. Therefore the provision is not used equally to the applicant and also to the PIO. Hence to that extent equal protection to all being is violated.
FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES NEED TO EFFECTIVELY PROPAGATE THEM. Fundamental rights are enshrined in Part III of the Constitution
1 FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES NEED TO EFFECTIVELY PROPAGATE THEM By Justice A.V.Chandrashekar Fundamental rights are enshrined in Part III of the Constitution of India. Articles 11 to 35 (both inclusive) are the
More informationSUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 10 PETITIONER: VISHAKA & ORS.
http://judis.nic.in SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 10 PETITIONER: VISHAKA & ORS. Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/08/1997 BENCH: CJI, SUJATA V. MANOHAR, B. N. KIRPAL ACT:
More informationTHE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2015
AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 154 of 2015 THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2015 A 17 of 2014. 1 of 1956. 5 18 of 2013. 10 BILL further to amend the Whistle Blowers Protection Act,
More informationTHE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION ACT, 2014 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION ACT, 2014 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Provisions of this Act not to apply to Special Protection Group.
More informationChapter No- 4 Fundamental Rights
Chapter No- 4 Fundamental Rights MCQ s with Explanations 1. Which of the following rights are available to foreigners living in India? a) Equality before law b) Right to education c) Freedom of speech
More informationTHE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION BILL, 2011
AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA ON 27TH DECEMBER, 11 CLAUSES Bill No. 97-C of THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION BILL, 11 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Provisions
More informationK.K. MISHRA.APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JUDGMENT. 2. By the order impugned, the High Court. of Madhya Pradesh has negatived the challenge
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S) 547 OF 2018 [ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL] NO.6064 OF 2017] K.K. MISHRA.APPELLANT(S)
More informationWith best Compliments RSHRC
Under the guidance of Chairperson, Justice N.K. Jain (Former Chief Justice High Court of Madras & Karnataka) With best Compliments RSHRC 1 RAJASTHAN STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION SECRETARIAT Under the
More informationTable 1: Ultra vires, Repugnant, Deficient and Redundant Provisions made under Orissa RTI Rules vis-à-vis RTI Act 2005.
COMMISSIONS AND OMISSIONS IN THE ORISSA RTI RULES VIS-À-VIS RTI ACT 05 Table 1: Ultra vires, Repugnant, Deficient and Redundant Provisions made under Orissa RTI Rules vis-à-vis RTI Act 2005. Table 2: Critical
More informationNot included. Clause 17(1)(a): Lok Pal can inquire into complaints against the Prime Minister once he demits. Inclusion of the Prime Minister
The Department Related Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice tabled its 48 th Report on the Lok Pal Bill, 2011 on December 9, 2011. The Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha
More informationTHE PERSONAL DATA (PROTECTION) BILL, 2013
THE PERSONAL DATA (PROTECTION) BILL, 2013 [Long Title] [Preamble] CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. (1) This Act may be called the Personal Data (Protection) Act, 2013. (2)
More informationBy Hon ble Justice A.V.Chandrashekar, Judge, High Court of Karnataka
SENTENCING IN CRIMINAL CASES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT By Hon ble Justice A.V.Chandrashekar, Judge, High Court of Karnataka 2 Sentencing is a complex process. Most of us
More informationCHAPTER VII PROSECUTION. 1.Sanction for prosecution
CHAPTER VII PROSECUTION 1.Sanction for prosecution Under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, it is necessary for the prosecuting authority to have the previous sanction of the appropriate
More informationVISIONIAS
VISIONIAS www.visionias.in Autonomy of Important Bodies Table of Content 1. Introduction... 2 2. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)... 2 2.1. Description... 2 2.2. Autonomy Provisions... 2 2.3. Actual
More informationThe Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 [As amended by the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006 No. 43 of 2006]
The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 [As amended by the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006 No. 43 of 2006] THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS ACT, 1993* No. 10 of 1994 (8th January, 1994)
More informationTHE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007
1 AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA ON 6.9.2007 Bill No. 70-C of 2007 12 of 2003. THE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007 A BILL to amend the Competition Act, 2002. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-eighth
More informationTHE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007
1 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 70 of 2007 12 of 2003. THE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007 A BILL to amend the Competition Act, 2002. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-eighth Year of
More informationTHE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016
1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 246 of 2016 5 THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016 By SHRI BAIJAYANT PANDA, M.P. A BILL further to amend the Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2011.
More informationMisuse of Section 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Vis-à-vis Human Rights: Need for Statutory changes
Misuse of Section 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Vis-à-vis Human Rights: Need for Statutory changes By Prof (Dr) Mukund Sarda 1. Increasing number of false cases of Dowry harassment against the husbands
More informationAnnexure D. Political Parties (Registration and Regulation of Affairs, etc.) Act, 2011
Annexure D Political Parties (Registration and Regulation of Affairs, etc.) Act, 2011 (Draft prepared by committee headed by Justice M.N. Venkatachalaih) An Act to regulate the constitution, functioning,
More informationTHE DANGEROUS MACHINES (REGULATION) ACT, 1983 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
SECTIONS THE DANGEROUS MACHINES (REGULATION) ACT, 1983 1. Short title, extent and commencement. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 2. Declaration as to expediency of control by Union. 3. Definitions.
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeals (AT) No.101 to 105 of 2017 (arising out of Order dated 06.02.2017 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi in CP Nos. 16/152/2015,
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 29 th March, LPA No.777/2010
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 29 th March, 2012 + LPA No.777/2010 % ANAND BHUSHAN...Appellant Through: Ms. Girija Krishan Varma, Adv. Versus R.A. HARITASH Through: CORAM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 265-266 OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Criminal) Nos. 1815-1816 of 2016) DINESH KUMAR KALIDAS PATEL... APPELLANT
More informationTHE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2018
1 AS PASSED BY THE RAJYA SABHA ON THE 19TH JULY, 18 Bill No. LIII-C of 13 THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 18 (AS PASSED BY THE RAJYA SABHA) 49 of 1988. A BILL further to amend the Prevention
More informationThe Police Complaints Authority Act, 2003
The Police Complaints Authority Act, 2003 Part I Preliminary 1. This Act may be cited as the Police Complaints Authority Act, 2003. 2. This Act comes into operation on a date to be fixed by the President
More informationSESSION 7: PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL CASES. Public Interest Litigation
SESSION 7: PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL CASES Public Interest Litigation 1. A predominant part of the existing environmental law has developed in India through careful judicial thinking
More informationKerala Legislature Secretariat 2008
Twelfth Kerala Legislative Assembly Bill No. 228 THE KERALA (SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES) REGULATION OF ISSUE OF COMMUNITY CERTIFICATES (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2008 Kerala Legislature Secretariat 2008
More informationBRIBERY ACT NO. 47 OF 2016 LAWS OF KENYA
LAWS OF KENYA BRIBERY ACT NO. 47 OF 2016 Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org Bribery No. 47 of 2016 Section 1. Short title.
More informationCase Analysis: Minerva Mill Ltd. And Ors V Union Of India And Ors 1. By Monika Rahar
Case Analysis: Minerva Mill Ltd. And Ors V Union Of India And Ors 1 By Monika Rahar I. Introduction Minerva Mills Ltd. and Ors v Union of India and Ors is one of the most important judgments which guarded
More informationMEHTA & MEHTA. Powers vested with Supreme Court by 9 th August Dipti Mehta LEGAL & ADVISORY ARTICLE.
MEHTA & MEHTA LEGAL & ADVISORY ARTICLE Powers vested with Supreme Court by 9 th August 2017 Dipti Mehta Mehta & Mehta Legal and Advisory Services Private Limited Address: 201-206, Shiv Smriti Chambers,
More informationTHE ANTI-CORRUPTION, GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION BILL, 2011
AS INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA ON TH AUGUST, 11 Bill No. XXIII of 11 THE ANTI-CORRUPTION, GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION BILL, 11 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I CLAUSES 1. Short title,
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981
81 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 82 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 Rules Contents Page No. 1. Title 83 2. Definition 83
More informationTHE DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BILL, 2013
1 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 14 of 2013 5 THE DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BILL, 2013 By SHRI KALIKESH NARAYAN SINGH DEO, M.P. A BILL to set up an Authority for registration of lobbyists;
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1 ISSN
SCOPE OF PROTECTION AVAILABLE TO WHISTLEBLOWERS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION ACT, 2011 Introduction: **AJAY SHARMA & SHASHI BHUSHAN There are multiple Acts in India 1 which provide
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.169 OF 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.1221 of 2012) Perumal Appellant Versus Janaki
More informationTHE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (PROTECTION OF INFORMERS ) BILL 2002
Monday, January 13, 2003 THE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (PROTECTION OF INFORMERS ) BILL 2002 A Bill to encourage disclosure of information relating to the conduct of any public servant involving the commission
More informationF.No.11012/6/2007-Estt (A-III) Government of India. Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. Department of Personnel and Training
F.No.11012/6/2007-Estt (A-III) Government of India Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Department of Personnel and Training Establishment A-III Desk ****** North Block, New Delhi-110
More informationTHE KERALA PROTECTION OF RIVER BANKS AND REGULATION OF REMOVAL OF SAND (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011
Thirteenth Kerala Legislative Assembly Bill No. 15 THE KERALA PROTECTION OF RIVER BANKS AND REGULATION OF REMOVAL OF SAND (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011 Kerala Legislature Secretariat 2011 KERALA NIYAMASABHA PRINTING
More informationELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110 001. No. 3/ER/2003/JS-II Dated : 27 th March, 2003 O R D E R 1. Whereas, the superintendence, direction and control, inter alia,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1590-1591 OF 2013 (@ Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos.6652-6653 of 2013) Anil Kumar & Ors... Appellants
More informationThe Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 No. 33 OF 1989 [11th September, 1989.] An Act to prevent the commission of offences of atrocities against the members of the
More informationSailent Features of the Act
Sailent Features of the Act The Right to Information Act of 2005 received the assent of the President of India on 15-6- 2005, and the Act has come into force w.e.f 15-6-2005. Important Section of the Act
More informationTHE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY ACT, 1997
THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY ACT, 1997 (Act No.22 of 1997) [ Dated 26.3.1997 ] An Act to provide for the establishment of a National Environment Appellate Authority to hear appeals with
More informationLe Président The President
The Honourable Dato' Sri Mohd Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak Office of The Prime Minister of Malaysia Main Block Perdana Putra Building Federal Government Administrative Centre 62502 Putrajaya Malaysia Brussels,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. WP(C) No.3114/2007. Reserved on : November 19, Date of decision : December 03, 2007.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Right to Information Act, 2005 WP(C) No.3114/2007 Reserved on : November 19, 2007 Date of decision : December 03, 2007 BHAGAT SINGH... Petitioner Through
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1534 OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.1439 of 2017) N. Harihara Krishnan Appellant Versus J. Thomas Respondent
More informationChapter -6 Interpretation of statutes, deeds and documents
Chapter -6 Interpretation of statutes, deeds and documents 6.1 Document, Instrument, Deed and Interpretation. Statute : Document : Instrument Deed Interpretation Classification of Interpretation To the
More informationTHE TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1997 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
THE TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1997 SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY CHAPTER II TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY
More informationSTEELCO GUJARAT LIMITED. Whistle Blower Policy
STEELCO GUJARAT LIMITED Whistle Blower Policy INDEX Sr.No. 1.0 Preamble 2.0 Definitions 3.0 Eligibility 4.0 Guiding Principles 5.0 Whistle Blower Role & Disqualification 6.0 Procedures Essentials and handling
More informationTHE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent, application and commencement. 2. Definitions. 2A. Continuous service. 3. Controlling authority. 4. Payment of
More informationTHE BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS ACT, 1986
THE BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS ACT, 1986 No. 63 of 1986 [ 23rd December, 1986. ] An Act to provide for the establishment of a Bureau for the harmonious development of the activities of standardisation,
More informationCHAPTER 7 PENALTIES AND PROCEDURE SECTIONS 41 TO 50
CHAPTER 7 PENALTIES AND PROCEDURE SECTIONS 41 TO 50 7.1. Scope and scheme. CHAPTER 7 PENALTIES AND PROCEDURE: SECTIONS 41 TO 50. Chapter 7 of the Water Pollution Act contains provisions relating to penalties
More informationN. Harihara Krishnan vs J. Thomas on 30 August, 2017 REPORTABLE. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.
Supreme Court of India N. Harihara Krishnan vs J. Thomas on 30 August, 2017 Author: Chelameswar REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1534 OF 2017
More informationIn the Name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful. Republic of the Sudan Provisional Order The Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Bill 2009
In the Name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful Republic of the Sudan Provisional Order The Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Bill 2009 Be it hereby made, by the President of the Republic, in accordance
More informationPOLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT
POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT CHAPTER 15:05 Act 8 of 2006 Amended by 12 of 2011 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by 1 2.. 3 6.. 7 8.. 9 25.. 2 Chap. 15:05 Police Complaints Authority
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 238 OF 2019 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) No. 1434 OF 2018 PROF R K VIJAYASARATHY & ANR... APPELLANTS Versus
More informationSUBAS H.MAHTO CONSTITUTIONAL LAW F.Y.LLM
ELABORATE ON THE RIGHTS GIVEN TO THE ACCUSED PERSON UNDER THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE IMPACT OF MANEKA GANDHI S CASE IN PRISONERS RIGHT SUBAS H.MAHTO CONSTITUTIONAL LAW F.Y.LLM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH. PETITIONER
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF 2014 Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH. PETITIONER VERSUS STATE GOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY.
More informationTHE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2009
AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 136 of 2009 THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2009 A BILL to amend the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994. WHEREAS it is expedient to amend
More informationAFRICAN (BANJUL) CHARTER ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS
AFRICAN (BANJUL) CHARTER ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS (Adopted 27 June 1981, OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58 (1982), entered into force 21 October 1986) Preamble The African States members of
More informationTHE POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT, Arrangement of Sections PART II THE POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY
THE POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT, 2006 Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3 Act inconsistent with Constitution 4. Interpretation PART II THE POLICE COMPLAINTS
More informationTHE CINEMATOGRAPH ACT, 1952
SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. THE CINEMATOGRAPH ACT, 1952 ARRANGMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY 2A. Construction of references to any law not in force or any functionary
More informationThe Protection of Human Rights Act, No 10 of 1994
The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 No 10 of 1994 An Act to provide for the constitution of a National Human Rights Commission. State Human Rights Commission in States and Human Rights Courts for
More informationCommonwealth Human Rights Initiative. User s guide to Karnataka Right to Information Act*
User s guide to Karnataka Right to Information Act* The Karnataka government enacted the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000 (KRIA), after a gap of nearly two years the government formulated and notified
More informationTHE KARNATAKA SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PROHIBITION OF TRANSFER OF CERTAIN LANDS) ACT, 1978
1 THE KARNATAKA SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PROHIBITION OF TRANSFER OF CERTAIN LANDS) ACT, 1978 Statement of Object and Reasons Sections: 1. Short title and commencement. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
More informationTHE RIGHT TO INFORMATION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011
1 As INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 70 of 2011 THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011 By SHRI BHAUSAHEB R. WAKCHAURE, M.P. 22 of 2005. A BILL further to amend the Right to Information Act, 2005.
More informationArbitration: An Emerging Litigation!
Arbitration: An Emerging Litigation! E-Newsline March 2017 Introduction In today s business contracts, arbitral provisions are preferred due to various factors. These include desire for secrecy, inclination
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO. 1. O.A. No. 172 of 2016
1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO. 1 O.A. No. 172 of 2016 Thursday, this the 20 th day of July, 2017 Hon ble Mr. Justice D.P.Singh, Judicial Member Hon ble Air Marshal Anil Chopra,
More informationEQUAL REMUNERATION ACT, 1976 CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY CHAPTER II PAYMENT OF REMUNERATION OF EQUAL RATES TO MEN AND WOMEN WORKERS AND OTHER MATTERS
1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Definitions 3. Act to have overriding effect EQUAL REMUNERATION ACT, 1976 CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY CHAPTER II PAYMENT OF REMUNERATION OF EQUAL RATES TO MEN AND WOMEN
More informationWHISTLE BLOWER POLICY
WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY Page 1 of 11 OIL INDIA LIMITED WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY 1. PREAMBLE - Oil India Limited endeavours to work against corruption in all its forms, including demanding and accepting bribe,
More informationTHE ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 1986
THE ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 986 No. 9 OF 986 [3rd May, 986.] An Act to provide for the protection and improvement of environment and for matters connected there with: WHEREAS the decisions were taken
More information1 st Year Essay Answer
1 st Year Essay Answer Q1. Define Political Science and explain its scope. Ans: Introduction: Political Science is a social science. It deals with citizens in relation with State and Government. It originated
More informationBERMUDA POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT : 29
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT 1998 1998 : 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Short title Interpretation Act
More informationTHE BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE CESS ACT, 1996 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
THE BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE CESS ACT, 1996 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Levy and collection of cess. 4. Furnishing
More informationBASELINE SURVEY. Sponsored by : Deen Dayal Upadhayay State Institute of Rural Development (SIRD), Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.
BASELINE SURVEY Pilot Project on Legal Literacy in Barabanki {Under UNDP Assisted Access to Justice (A2J) Project Department of Justice, Government of India} Sponsored by : Deen Dayal Upadhayay State Institute
More informationCITIZENS RIGHT TO GRIEVANCE REDRESS BILL, A Bill. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:-
1 CITIZENS RIGHT TO GRIEVANCE REDRESS BILL, 2011 A Bill to lay down an obligation upon every public authority to publish citizens charter stating therein the time within which specified goods shall be
More informationUnofficial Translation July 20, 2007 Freedom Forum. Right to Information Act, 2064 Act to provide for Right to Information
Unofficial Translation July 20, 2007 Freedom Forum Right to Information Act, 2064 Act to provide for Right to Information Preamble: Whereas it is expedient to make the functions of the state open and transparent
More informationPaper : P-5 Rights of Women and Children Module : M-26 Constitutional Provision relating to Rights of Children
Paper : P-5 Module : M-26 1 Description of Module Subject Name Paper Name Module Name/Title Module Id 26 Pre-requisites Objectives Keywords 2 Constitutional provisions relating to Rights of Children Table
More informationCODE OF CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES 2 April 2018 non-legislative PURPOSE All City of Adelaide (CoA) employees must comply with the provisions of this Code in carrying out their functions as public officials.
More informationAn Act further to amend the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2006 NO. 9 OF 2006 [22nd March, 2006.] An Act further to amend the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-seventh Year of the
More informationSupreme Court of India Arun Vyas & Anr vs Anita Vyas on 14 May, 1999 Author: J S.Shah Quadri Bench: K.Venkataswami, Syed Shah Quadri
Supreme Court of India Arun Vyas & Anr vs Anita Vyas on 14 May, 1999 Author: J S.Shah Quadri Bench: K.Venkataswami, Syed Shah Quadri PETITIONER: ARUN VYAS & ANR. Arun Vyas & Anr vs Anita Vyas on 14 May,
More informationAN ABSTRACT. Role of Special Investigating Agencies in Criminal Justice System in India: A Study of Emerging Trends
AN ABSTRACT Role of Special Investigating Agencies in Criminal Justice System in India: A Study of Emerging Trends An Ideal legal system aims for a nation whose inhabitants are free from any kind of fear
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA R BETWEEN: WRIT PETITION
More informationNo. 1/4/2008-IR Government of India Ministry of Personnel, P.G. and Pensions Department of Personnel & Training *****
No. 1/4/2008-IR Government of India Ministry of Personnel, P.G. and Pensions Department of Personnel & Training ***** Subject: Guidelines 2005. for the public authorities under the Right to Information
More informationTransparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and. and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
The Gujarat Amendment (Bill, 2016) is a clear attempt to nullify the real effect of the enactment The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act,
More informationE X T R A O R D I N A R Y PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
MANIPUR GAZETTE E X T R A O R D I N A R Y PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 601 Imphal, Saturday, December 24, 2011 (Pausa 3, 1933) GOVERNMENT OF MANIPUR SECRETARIAT : LAW & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT N O
More informationWhistle Blower Policy
Whistle Blower Policy June 2015 CENTRAL POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (A govt. of India Society, Ministry of Power) Bangalore 560 080 www.cpri.in Page 1 of 6 CENTRAL POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE WHISTLE BLOWER
More informationKARNATAKA ORDINANCE NO. 2 OF 2012 THE KARNATAKA POLICE (AMENDMENT) ORDINANCE, 2012 Arrangement of Sections
KARNATAKA ORDINANCE NO. 2 OF 2012 THE KARNATAKA POLICE (AMENDMENT) ORDINANCE, 2012 Arrangement of Sections Sections: 1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Substitution of section 6 3. Insertion of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT. Crl. M.C. No. 2183/2011. Reserved on: 18th January, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT Crl. M.C. No. 2183/2011 Reserved on: 18th January, 2012 Decided on: 8th February, 2012 JIWAN RAM GUPTA... Petitioner Through:
More informationWHISTLE BLOWER POLICY - REPORTING IRREGULAR PRACTICES IN ANY OPERATIONAL AREAS INCLUDING FRAUDS & MALPRACTICES AT BRANCHES/ OFFICES
WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY - REPORTING IRREGULAR PRACTICES IN ANY OPERATIONAL AREAS INCLUDING FRAUDS & MALPRACTICES AT BRANCHES/ OFFICES - BASED ON PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURES & PROTECTION OF INFORMER [(PIDPI)
More informationNaga People's Movement of Human Rights vs Union of India
Note: Colin Gonsalves ceased to be a Director of the Human Rights Law Network (SLIC) a long time ago. However, our founder continues to inspire us and he is closely related to HRLN on pro bono litigation.
More informationTAMIL NADU S NEW INITIATIVES ON POLICE REFORMS - A COMMONER S PERSPECTIVE: EXERCISES IN SUBTERFUGE By V.P.SARATHI - July 22, 2008
TAMIL NADU S NEW INITIATIVES ON POLICE REFORMS - A COMMONER S PERSPECTIVE: EXERCISES IN SUBTERFUGE By V.P.SARATHI - July 22, 2008 The seven directives of the Supreme Court on bringing new reforms in the
More informationAfrican Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (Banjul Charter)
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (Banjul Charter) adopted June 27, 1981, OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58 (1982), entered into force Oct. 21, 1986 Preamble Part I: Rights and Duties
More informationJUDGMENT. (Hon ble Arijit Pasayat, J.) Leave granted.
2009 NTN (Vol. 40) [IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] Hon ble Arijit Pasayat & Hon ble Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ. Civil Appeal No. 5166 of 2006 with Civil Appeal No. 5167 of 2006 Benara Valves Ltd. & Others
More informationThe Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 (No. 60 Of 1986) [23rd December, 1986]
The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 (No. 60 Of 1986) [23rd December, 1986] An Act to prohibit indecent representation of women through advertisements or in publications, writings,
More informationPrivacy Issues and RTI
Presentation by Narayan Varma at a Seminar on RTI-Key to Good Governance organised by ISTM, DOPT, Government of India On 29.10.2010 Privacy Issues and RTI INDEX 1. Introduction 2. Article 21 of the Constitution
More informationAll About Impeachment of CJI
All About Impeachment of CJI Justice should not only be done, but must also be seen to be done What is the issue? Vice president of India/ Presiding Officer (PO) in Rajya Sabha has rejected the impeachment
More informationBar & Bench (
1 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 261 of 2018 THE AADHAAR AND OTHER LAWS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2018 A BILL to amend the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services)
More information(i) THE LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS BILL, 2011 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES PART I PRELIMINARY. 1. Short title, extent, application and commencement.
(i) CLAUSES THE LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS BILL, 11 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent, application and commencement. PART II LOKPAL FOR THE UNION CHAPTER I AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA
More information