IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. BRIAN PATRICK CLEMENS. Defendant-Appellant.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. BRIAN PATRICK CLEMENS. Defendant-Appellant."

Transcription

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO ELECTRONICALLY FILED JUN 08, 2017 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, BRIAN PATRICK CLEMENS. Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR MAHASKA COUNTY HONORABLE RANDY DEGEEST, JUDGE APPELLEE S FINAL BRIEF AND CONDITIONAL REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT vs. THOMAS J. MILLER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF IOWA Emily Willits David M. Ranscht Assistant Attorneys General Licensing & Administrative Law Division Hoover State Office Building, 2 nd Floor Des Moines, Iowa Ph: (515) Fax: (515) Emily.Willits@iowa.gov David.Ranscht2@iowa.gov 1

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES...3 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE PRESENTED FOR REVIEW...6 ROUTING STATEMENT...9 STATEMENT OF THE CASE...9 STATEMENT OF FACTS...10 ARGUMENT...13 I. EXPUNGEMENT IS NOT AVAILABLE TO CLEMENS BECAUSE A CRIMINAL CASE UNDER CHAPTER 901C INVOLVES ALL CHARGES ARISING FROM THE SAME TRANSACTION OR OCCURRENCE A. Preservation and Standard of Review...13 B. Argument...13 CONCLUSION...21 REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT...22 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE...22 PROOF OF SERVICE...23 CERTIFICATE OF FILING

3 Cases TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page No. Hadjis v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 275 N.W.2d 763 (Iowa 1979)...17 Jacobs v. Iowa Dep t of Transp., 887 N.W.2d 590 (Iowa 2016)...9 Judicial Branch v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 800 N.W.2d 569 (Iowa 2011) Marzen v. Klousia, 316 N.W.2d 688 (Iowa 1982)...17 McFadden v. Dep t of Transp., 877 N.W.2d 119 (Iowa 2016)...16 Stoddard v. State, 911 A.2d 1245 (Md. 2006)...18 State v. Alvarado, 875 N.W.2d 713 (Iowa 2016)...18 State v. Basinger, 721 N.W.2d 783 (Iowa 2006)...20 State v. Bobola, 138 A.3d 519 (N.H. 2016)...18 State v. Boggs, 741 N.W.2d 492 (Iowa 2007)...15 State v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 889 N.W.2d 467 (Iowa 2017)...13 State v. J.R.A., 714 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006)...19 State v. L.W., 350 S.W.3d 911 (Tenn. 2011)...19 State v. McFarland, 721 N.W. 2d 783 (Iowa 2006) State v. Nicoletto, 862 N.W.2d 621 (Iowa 2015)...20 State v. Paye, 865 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2015)...20 State v. Senn, 822 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2016)

4 Woodbury Cty. Att y v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 448 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 1989) Statutes Iowa Code 155A Iowa Code 155A Iowa Code Iowa Code 708.2A(2)(a)...10 Iowa Code Iowa Code Iowa Code 901C.2 (1) Iowa Code 901C.2(1)(a)(1) (2016 Supp.)... 9, 12-15, Iowa Code 907.9(4)(b) Iowa Acts ch. 1073, 184, Other Authorities Iowa Const. art. I, Iowa R. App. P (2)(c)...9 Iowa R. App. P (2)(f)...9 Iowa R. Crim. P Iowa Rs. Crim. P Iowa Rs. Crim. P

5 Black s Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014)...15 Webster s Third New Int l Dictionary (1993)

6 STATEMENT OF ISSUE PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. DOES A CRIMINAL CASE WITHIN THE MEANING OF IOWA CODE SECTION 901C.2(1)(a) REFER ONLY TO A PARTICULAR DOCKET NUMBER, OR TO A SET OF FACTUALLY RELATED CRIMINAL CHARGES REGARDLESS OF DOCKET? Iowa R. App. P (2)(c) Authorities Jacobs v. Iowa Dep t of Transp., 887 N.W.2d 590 (Iowa 2016) Iowa R. App.P (2)(f) Iowa Code 901C.2(1)(a)(1) (2016 Supp.) Iowa Code 724.4(1) Iowa Code Iowa Code 155A.21 Iowa Code 155A.23 Iowa Code 708.2A(2)(a) Iowa Code 901C.2(1)(a) State v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 889 N.W.2d 467 (Iowa 2017) Iowa Code 901C Iowa Acts ch. 1073, 184, 188 Iowa Code 901C.2(1) 6

7 Case, Black s Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014) Case, Webster s Third New Int l Dictionary (1993) State v. Boggs, 741 N.W.2d 492, 502 (Iowa 2007) Iowa Code 907.9(4)(b) Judicial Branch v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 800 N.W.2d 569 (Iowa 2011) McFadden v. Dep t of Transp., 877 N.W.2d 119 (Iowa 2016) Judicial Branch, 800 N.W.2d at 575 Iowa Const. art. I, 11 Marzen v. Klousia, 316 N.W.2d 688 (Iowa 1982) Iowa Rs. Crim. P Iowa Rs. Crim. P Hadjis v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 275 N.W.2d 763 (Iowa 1979) Woodbury Cty. Att y v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 448 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 1989) Iowa R. Crim. P State v. Alvarado, 875 N.W.2d 713 (Iowa 2016) Stoddard v. State, 911 A.2d 1245 (Md. 2006) State v. Bobola, 138 A.3d 519 (N.H. 2016) State v. J.R.A., 714 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006) State v. L.W., 350 S.W.3d 911 (Tenn. 2011) 7

8 Iowa Code 901C.2(1)(b) State v. Basinger, 721 N.W.2d 783 (Iowa 2006) State v. McFarland, 721 N.W. 2d 783 (Iowa 2006) State v. Paye, 865 N.W.2d 1, 7 (Iowa 2015) State v. Nicoletto, 862 N.W.2d 621 (Iowa 2015) State v. Senn, 882 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2016) 8

9 ROUTING STATEMENT The State agrees retention is appropriate. Because chapter 901C in its current form is relatively new, its provisions (especially those relevant to this case) present an issue of first impression. See Iowa R. App. P (2)(c); see also Jacobs v. Iowa Dep t of Transp., 887 N.W.2d 590, (Iowa 2016) (retaining an appeal that involved newly enacted procedural rules governing electronic filing). Relatedly, to the extent chapter 901C changed the law of expungement, interpretation of the new language presents a question of changing legal principles. See id. r (2)(f). Finally, this case presents an opportunity for the Court in its supervisory capacity to guide the lower courts efficient administration of judicial business. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Brian Clemens appeals from the district court s denial of his motion to expunge the dismissed charge in Mahaska County docket SMSM The district court concluded Mr. Clemens has not met the requirements for expungement under Iowa Code section 901C.2 because his is not a case in which an acquittal was entered for all criminal charges, or in which all criminal charges were otherwise dismissed. Iowa Code 901C.2(1)(a)(1) (2016 Supp.). (Dist. Ct. Ruling p. 2, App. 41.) 9

10 STATEMENT OF FACTS On May 31, 2011, the State charged Mr. Clemens by trial information in Mahaska County with five crimes: Count 1 carrying weapons in violation of Iowa Code section 724.4(1) (aggravated misdemeanor); Count 2 harassment in the first degree in violation of Iowa Code section (aggravated misdemeanor); Counts 3 and 4 unlawful possession of a prescription drug in violation of Iowa Code sections 155A.21 and 155A.23 (serious misdemeanor); and Count 5 carrying weapons in violation of Iowa Code section (aggravated misdemeanor). (AGIN Trial Information 5/31/2011, App. 13.) Mr. Clemens was also charged by complaint and affidavit with domestic abuse assault in violation of Iowa Code section 708.2A(2)(a), which is a simple misdemeanor. (SMSM Criminal Complaint 5/23/2011, Supp. App. 4.) Counts 1 5 were assigned docket no. AGIN107785, and the simple misdemeanor was assigned docket no. SMSM Mr. Clemens moved to sever Count 2 (first-degree harassment) and the domestic abuse assault misdemeanor charge from the other counts. 1 (AGIN Mot. to Sever 11/8/2011, App ) According to the motion 1 The motion references Count I as the harassment charge in some places, but that appears to be a typo. As the charging document reflects, the harassment charge was Count 2. 10

11 to sever, the harassment and domestic abuse assault charges arose from allegations relating to an incident that occurred at a storage facility, while the remaining charges arose out of a subsequent incident when state troopers stopped Mr. Clemens as he drove away from the storage facility. Mr. Clemens asserted the harassment charge and the simple misdemeanor domestic abuse charge should be severed from the other charges because the harassment and domestic abuse charges arose from the same facts and circumstances, whereas the remaining charge arose from a subsequent set of events. (AGIN Mot. to Sever 11/8/2011, App ) The district court granted the motion. (AGIN Docket Entry 12/19/2011, App. 3.) Mr. Clemens subsequently pled guilty to harassment in the third degree, a lesser included offense of Count 2, in docket AGIN (AGIN Judgment Entry March 6, 2012, App. 23.) The Judgment Entry reflects that the simple misdemeanor was dismissed as part of the plea agreement in which Mr. Clemens pled guilty to the harassment charge: All violations of the Code of Iowa which arose from the same transaction or occurrence pending in magistrate division (SMSM168241) and Counts 3, 4 and 5 of the Trial Information are dismissed in accordance with the plea agreement. (AGIN Judgment Entry March 6, 2012, App. 23.) The district court entered a dismissal in docket 11

12 SMSM on the same date the judgment was entered in docket AGIN (SMSM docket entry 3/6/2012, App. 9.) On August 22, 2016, Mr. Clemens moved to expunge the charge docketed as SMSM under the newly enacted expungement statute, Iowa Code section 901C.1 (now codified at Iowa Code section 901C.2). (Motion to Expunge, App. 25.) The State resisted the motion on the basis that Mr. Clemens had pled guilty to harassment in the third degree, and therefore not all charges in the case had been dismissed, as section 901C.2 requires. See Iowa Code 901C.2(1)(a). (Resistance to Motion to Expunge, App ) The magistrate handling SMSM denied the motion. Mr. Clemens appealed to the district court, which affirmed. Mr. Clemens then sought discretionary review, and this Court granted his application. 12

13 ARGUMENT I. EXPUNGEMENT IS NOT AVAILABLE TO CLEMENS BECAUSE A CRIMINAL CASE UNDER CHAPTER 901C INVOLVES ALL CHARGES ARISING FROM THE SAME TRANSACTION OR OCCURRENCE. A. Preservation and Standard of Review. On appeal, issues of statutory construction are reviewed for correction of errors at law. State v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 889 N.W.2d 467, 470 (Iowa 2017). The State agrees Clemens s assorted motions and briefs below preserved error. B. Argument. In 2015, the Iowa Legislature passed Senate File 385, which was codified as Iowa Code section 901C.1 and went into effect January 1, The law allows for the expungement of criminal records in cases resulting in dismissal or acquittal, if certain conditions are met: 1. a. Except as provided in paragraph b, upon application of a defendant or a prosecutor in a criminal case, or upon the court s own motion in a criminal case, the court shall enter an order expunging the record of such criminal case if the court finds that the defendant has established that all of the following have occurred, as applicable: 2 In 2016, the legislature enacted minor amendments, re-codifying the statute at section 901C.2 and placing definitions in section 901C Iowa Acts ch. 1073, 184, 188. These changes went into effect July 1, 2016, roughly a month before Mr. Clemens filed his initial motion to expunge. This brief therefore references the current version of the statute. 13

14 (1) The criminal case contains one or more criminal charges in which an acquittal was entered for all criminal charges, or in which all criminal charges were otherwise dismissed. (2) All court costs, fees, and other financial obligations ordered by the court or assessed by the clerk of the district court have been paid. (3) A minimum of one hundred eighty days have passed since entry of the judgment of acquittal or of the order dismissing the case relating to all criminal charges, unless the court finds good cause to waive this requirement for reasons including but not limited to the fact that the defendant was the victim of identity theft or mistaken identity. (4) The case was not dismissed due to the defendant being found not guilty by reason of insanity. (5) The defendant was not found incompetent to stand trial in the case. b. The court shall not enter an order expunging the record of a criminal case under paragraph a unless all the parties in the case have had time to object on the grounds that one or more of the relevant conditions in paragraph a have not been established. Iowa Code 901C.2(1). This appeal turns solely on the meaning of a criminal case in section 901C.2(1)(a)(1). The statute does not define case. Nor are dictionary definitions particularly helpful under the circumstances presented here. Black s Law Dictionary defines case as [a] civil or criminal proceeding, action, suit, or 14

15 controversy at law or in equity. Case, Black s Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014). Other definitions include a special set of circumstances or conditions, a set of circumstances constituting a problem, and the matters of fact or conditions involved in a suit. Case, Webster s Third New Int l Dictionary (1993). The various descriptors proceeding, controversy, suit lend little clarity to the issue at hand because a docket number may or may not represent the entire proceeding or controversy. Without a statutory definition or a clear dictionary definition, the Court must search for a reasonable interpretation that best achieves the purpose of the statute. State v. Boggs, 741 N.W.2d 492, 502 (Iowa 2007). Prior to the enactment of chapter 901C, Iowa law permitted expungement of criminal records for charges that resulted in a deferred judgment (and charges related to the deferred judgment), but did not provide for expungement of charges that were dismissed without a deferred judgment or for which an acquittal was obtained. See Iowa Code 907.9(4)(b); see also Judicial Branch v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 800 N.W.2d 569, 578 (Iowa 2011). Documents in cases where the charges were dismissed or for which an acquittal was entered were public records, with no option for expungement. The legislature sought to remedy this discrepancy and broaden the 15

16 availability of expungement by enacting chapter 901C. In doing so, the legislature struck a balance between two important policy concerns: innocent individuals right to have their records cleared, and the public s right to access court dockets and records. Cf. McFadden v. Dep t of Transp., 877 N.W.2d 119, 121 (Iowa 2016) (balancing two competing principles in resolving a legal dispute). The Iowa Supreme Court recognized the importance of court dockets and the public s access to them in Judicial Branch, holding that dockets are public records under both statutory and common law. Judicial Branch, 800 N.W.2d at 575. Section 901C.2(1)(a)(1) s requirement that all charges in a case must have resulted in acquittal or dismissal in order to obtain an expungement reflects the legislature s policy determination that the public should be able to view the universe of charges in a criminal proceeding if a guilty plea or verdict was entered for any charge. It is apparent from the record that dismissal of the simple misdemeanor charge was part of a plea bargain in which Mr. Clemens agreed to plead guilty to third-degree harassment. The guilty plea and dismissal were documented in a single plea agreement and a single judgment entered in AGIN AGIN Judgment Entry March 6, 2012, App. 23.) The plea agreement underscores the intertwined nature of the two charges; the prosecutor was 16

17 willing to drop one in exchange for a guilty plea in the other. The fact that one charge against Clemens was an indictable offense and the other was a simple misdemeanor should not alone dictate whether the charges are part of the same case. The distinction between indictable offenses and simple misdemeanors is grounded in the Iowa Constitution, which allows (but does not mandate) non-jury trials for offenses that are not felonies and for which the punishment does not exceed a fine of $100 or imprisonment of 100 days. Iowa Const. art. I, 11; Marzen v. Klousia, 316 N.W.2d 688, 691 (Iowa 1982). To effectuate the goals of the Iowa Constitution, the Iowa Rules of Criminal Procedure contain one set of rules for indictable offenses and a second set of rules for simple misdemeanors. See Iowa Rs. Crim. P (indictable offenses); Iowa Rs. Crim. P (simple misdemeanors). The purpose of the simple misdemeanor procedural rules is to facilitate disposition of criminal charges with as much speed and as little cost as can be accomplished consistent with a fair trial. Hadjis v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 275 N.W.2d 763, 766 (Iowa 1979). Because they are governed by different procedural rules, simple misdemeanors and indictable offenses are assigned different case numbers at the outset. See generally Woodbury Cty. Att y v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 448 N.W.2d 20, 22 17

18 (Iowa 1989) (discussing case docketing procedures). A simple misdemeanor may be tried to a magistrate, district associate judge, or, by request of the defendant, to a six-person jury. Iowa R. Crim. P But the differing procedural track cannot alter the fact that charges may arise from the same incident. Cf. State v. Alvarado, 875 N.W.2d 713, (Iowa 2016) (discussing two charges, one a felony and one an aggravated misdemeanor, that could both arise from one episode). Indeed, while the harassment and domestic abuse charges against Clemens were placed on differing procedural tracks, they arose from the same incident (as Clemens s motion to sever expressly asserted) and were ultimately re-joined in the plea agreement. Other states examining similar statutes have concluded that expungement is not available when the record for which expungement is sought arose from the same set of circumstances as another charge for which a guilty plea or verdict was entered. See Stoddard v. State, 911 A.2d 1245, (Md. 2006) (noting charges arising out of the same incident as a charge to which the defendant pled guilty constitute a unit, preventing their expungement ); State v. Bobola, 138 A.3d 519, 525 (N.H. 2016) (concluding annulment was not available where the assault charge to be annulled was an alternative theory to the assault charge that resulted in a conviction, and observing that [t]he fact that, 18

19 administratively, the charges were assigned separate docket numbers does not, standing alone, mean that these charges were separate cases ); cf. State v. J.R.A., 714 N.W.2d 722, 727 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006) (concluding a condition of expungement that all pending actions or proceedings be resolved in the defendant s favor referred to multiple charges based on the same incident, and granting expungement because all charges based on the same incident were in fact dismissed as part of a plea deal for an unrelated charge); State v. L.W., 350 S.W.3d 911, (Tenn. 2011) (permitting expungement of one charge after a guilty plea to a related charge because the statute referred to the charge that was dismissed not all charges). Mr. Clemens argues that the district court erroneously added a factual inquiry to the statute. (Clemens Br. at 8.) But Iowa Code section 901C.2(1)(a) necessitates a factual analysis by placing the burden on the defendant and requiring the court to make findings that each of the five enumerated requirements have been satisfied. Iowa Code 901C.2(1)(a) ( [T]he court shall enter an order expunging the record of such criminal case if the court finds that the defendant has established that all of the following have occurred, as applicable.... (emphasis added)). The decision whether to enter an expungement is not merely ministerial, but rather requires the court to conduct a 19

20 factual analysis to ensure the requirements are met. The district court s duty to inquire whether the requirements have been satisfied is further underscored by the requirement in section 901C.2(1)(b) that [t]he court shall not enter an order expunging the record of a criminal case under paragraph a unless all the parties in the case have had time to object on the grounds that one or more of the relevant conditions in paragraph a have not been established. Mr. Clemens relies on the Iowa Supreme Court s decisions in State v. Basinger, 721 N.W.2d 783 (Iowa 2006) and State v. McFarland, 721 N.W. 2d 783 (Iowa 2006), to support the notion that SMSM and AGIN were two separate cases for purposes of the expungement statute. However, those cases deal with specific statutes regarding the assessment of court fees and court reporter fees, which are inapposite here because they arise in a much different context. Although a word used multiple times in the same statute should have the same meaning each time, State v. Paye, 865 N.W.2d 1, 7 (Iowa 2015), the same word used in different code chapters fulfilling different statutory purposes may properly carry a different interpretation in each distinct context, see State v. Nicoletto, 862 N.W.2d 621, 626 n.3 (Iowa 2015). Accordingly, it is both possible and consistent with precedent to conclude that case means something different in chapter 901C than it did in Basinger and 20

21 McFarland. Likewise, the question of when a case starts under the Iowa Constitution, which the Court explored in State v. Senn, 882 N.W.2d 1, 8 9 (Iowa 2016), has little bearing on the word s meaning for other purposes like expungement. In addition, Basinger and McFarland are not controlling here because those cases turned on a long-standing rule that court costs are not apportioned in criminal cases. McFarland, 721 N.W.2d at 794; Basinger, 721 N.W.2d at 786. There is no similar long-standing rule in the expungement context that requires the Court to reach a similar conclusion. CONCLUSION Factual relatedness is not an impossible or cumbersome standard, especially under the circumstances presented here; the judgment entry on its face refers to the related charges and the negotiated plea agreement. Not all charges in the harassment/abuse case were dismissed, so Clemens is ineligible for expungement, and this Court should affirm. 21

22 CONDITIONAL REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT The interpretive issue is relatively narrow and is crystallized in the parties briefs. Therefore, oral argument would likely not be a significant aid to the Court. However, if the Court grants oral argument, the State asks to be heard. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE This brief complies with the type-volume limitation of Iowa R. App. P (1)(d) and 6.903(1)(g)(1) or (2) because this brief has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using Times New Roman in 14-point font size and contains 2,768 words, excluding the parts of the brief exempted by Iowa R. App. P (1)(g)(1). /s/ Emily Willits EMILY WILLITS Assistant Attorney General 22

23 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Emily Willits hereby certify that on the 8th day of June, 2017, I or a person acting on my behalf did serve Appellee Final Brief on all other parties to this appeal by EDMS to the respective counsel for said parties: Brandon Brown Gina Messamer Parrish Kruidenier Dunn Boles Gribble Gentry Brown & Bergmann L.L.P Grand Avenue Des Moines, Iowa /s/ Emily Willits EMILY WILLITS Assistant Attorney General CERTIFICATE OF FILING I, Emily Willits, hereby certify that on the 8th day of June, 2017, I or a person acting on my behalf filed Appellee Final Brief with the Clerk of the Iowa Supreme Court by EDMS. /s/ Emily Willits EMILY WILLETS Assistant Attorney General 23

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued May 2, 2017 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-16-00814-CV TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant V. J.A.M., Appellee On Appeal from the 149th District

More information

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-14-00258-CV TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, APPELLANT V. JOSEPH TRENT JONES, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court Childress County,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO. 16-1290 ELECTRONICALLY FILED DEC 30, 2016 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BRIAN JAMES MAXWELL, vs. Petitioner - Appellant, IOWA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent - Appellee.

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE TIMOTHY BOBOLA. Submitted: January 7, 2016 Opinion Issued: April 7, 2016

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE TIMOTHY BOBOLA. Submitted: January 7, 2016 Opinion Issued: April 7, 2016 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

E-FILED 2017 MAY 01 10:33 AM BUCHANAN - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR BUCHANAN COUNTY

E-FILED 2017 MAY 01 10:33 AM BUCHANAN - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR BUCHANAN COUNTY IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR BUCHANAN COUNTY STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff, vs. CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS SOULES, CASE NO. FECR081656 MR. SOULES BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant. I. Introduction

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO. 17-0431 SCOTT COUNTY COUNTY NO. PCCE126221 ELECTRONICALLY FILED MAY 02, 2018 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT TROY A WILLIAMS, Claimant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 18, 2010

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 18, 2010 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 18, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LATOYA T. WALLER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2005-D-2715 J.

More information

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00082-CV THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLANT V. N.R.J. APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-20001-158

More information

People v. Lincoln Staple, 2016 IL App (4th) (December 20,2016)

People v. Lincoln Staple, 2016 IL App (4th) (December 20,2016) People v. Lincoln Staple, 2016 IL App (4th) 160061 (December 20,2016) DOUBLE JEOPARDY On double-jeopardy grounds, the trial court dismissed a felony aggravated DUI charge after defendant pleaded guilty

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 17, 2009 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 17, 2009 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 17, 2009 Session KATHY MICHELLE FOWLER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2005-C-1625

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed August 25, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Henry County, Emily S.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed August 25, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Henry County, Emily S. STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 0-455 / 09-1235 Filed August 25, 2010 FRANCISCO SEBASTIAN DIEGO-MATEO, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court

More information

2018COA90. No. 16CA1787, People v. McCulley Criminal Law Sex Offender Registration Petition for Removal from Registry

2018COA90. No. 16CA1787, People v. McCulley Criminal Law Sex Offender Registration Petition for Removal from Registry The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries

More information

Court Records Glossary

Court Records Glossary Court Records Glossary Documents Affidavit Answer Appeal Brief Case File Complaint Deposition Docket Indictment Interrogatories Injunction Judgment Opinion Pleadings Praecipe A written or printed statement

More information

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals RENDERED: OCTOBER 13, 2017; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2016-CA-001739-MR COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY APPELLANT APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF IOWA NO STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee. vs. JEREMY M. WERNER, Defendant-Appellant.

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF IOWA NO STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee. vs. JEREMY M. WERNER, Defendant-Appellant. IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF IOWA NO. 17-1232 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee ELECTRONICALLY FILED APR 25, 2018 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT vs. JEREMY M. WERNER, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM

More information

ORDERS AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Division II Opinion by JUDGE GABRIEL Casebolt and Booras, JJ.

ORDERS AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Division II Opinion by JUDGE GABRIEL Casebolt and Booras, JJ. COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 09CA0847 Boulder County District Court No. 04CR2193 Honorable Kristina Hansson, Magistrate The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Boulder

More information

Promoting Second Chances: HR and Criminal Records

Promoting Second Chances: HR and Criminal Records AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN Adult arrests without charges; records with inaccuracies Only cases of mistaken identity or false accusations are expungeable No expungement or sealing permitted

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RONALD COTE Petitioner vs. Case No.SC00-1327 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent / DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 19, 2017 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 19, 2017 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 19, 2017 Session 05/03/2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSHUA THIDOR CROSS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 107165 G. Scott

More information

1 HB By Representative Beckman. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 02/06/2017. Page 0

1 HB By Representative Beckman. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 02/06/2017. Page 0 1 HB92 2 181710-1 3 By Representative Beckman 4 RFD: Judiciary 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 02/06/2017 Page 0 1 181710-1:n:02/01/2017:MA/th LRS2017-457 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SYNOPSIS: Under existing law, the

More information

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS. No CR No CR

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS. No CR No CR IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15-00133-CR No. 10-15-00134-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, v. LOUIS HOUSTON JARVIS, JR. AND JENNIFER RENEE JONES, Appellant Appellees From the County Court at Law No. 1 McLennan

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed September 8, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Warren County, Kevin A.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed September 8, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Warren County, Kevin A. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-628 / 10-1647 Filed September 8, 2011 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ARMANDO GARCIA, JR., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Warren

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA SUPREME COURT NO Upon the Petition of. THE STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, And Concerning

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA SUPREME COURT NO Upon the Petition of. THE STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, And Concerning IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA SUPREME COURT NO. 18-1366 ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAN 03, 2019 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Upon the Petition of THE STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, And Concerning JANE DOE, Defendant-Appellant

More information

J^^N '14 7U(lq CLERK OF COURT SUPREME 9pURT OF' ph10 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME C URT FOHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO SUPREME COURT CASE NO.

J^^N '14 7U(lq CLERK OF COURT SUPREME 9pURT OF' ph10 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME C URT FOHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO SUPREME COURT CASE NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO Appellee, vs. DOUGLASFUTRALL Appellant. SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2008-2391 ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS, NINTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 08CA009388 LORAIN COUNTY

More information

2018COA181. A division of the court of appeals considers whether, when a. felony case is commenced in county court pursuant to section 16-5-

2018COA181. A division of the court of appeals considers whether, when a. felony case is commenced in county court pursuant to section 16-5- The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA. SUPREME COURT NO Johnson County No. CVCV07149

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA. SUPREME COURT NO Johnson County No. CVCV07149 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA SUPREME COURT NO. 18-1427 Johnson County No. CVCV07149 ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAN 25, 2019 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT HEATHER YOUNG, DEL HOLLAND, AND BLAKE HENDRICKSON Plaintiffs-Appellants

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 29, 2009 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 29, 2009 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 29, 2009 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JENNY LYNN SILER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Campbell County No. 12650 E. Shayne Sexton, Judge

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION April 15, 2003 9:10 a.m. v No. 225337 Oakland Circuit Court GEORGE WASHINGTON SCRUGGS, LC No. 99-168826-FC

More information

INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO EXPUNGE

INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO EXPUNGE INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO EXPUNGE FEES REQUIRED: (1) $250.00 MONEY ORDER MADE OUT TO THE BUREAU OF CRIMINAL IDENTIFICATION AND INFORMATION. (2) $50.00 MONEY ORDER MADE OUT TO THE LAFOURCHE PARISH DISTRICT

More information

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Sheila G. Farmer, J. Julie A. Edwards, J. -vs- Case No. 2007 CA 0087 JAMES

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : vs. : No. CR 886-2011 : SHAWN MICHAEL NEFF, : : Defendant : Cynthia A. Dyrda-Hatton, Esquire

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO Muscatine County No. PCCV019353

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO Muscatine County No. PCCV019353 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO. 17-0007 Muscatine County No. PCCV019353 ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAN 28, 2018 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT CATHRYN ANN LINN, ) Applicant-Appellant, ) ) vs. ) ) STATE OF IOWA, ) Respondent-Appellee.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 11, 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 11, 2018 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 11, 2018 12/06/2018 CYNTOIA BROWN v. CAROLYN JORDAN Rule 23 Certified Question of Law from the United States Court of Appeals for

More information

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: COA: Wayne CC: FH VIRGIL SMITH, Defendant-Appellee.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: COA: Wayne CC: FH VIRGIL SMITH, Defendant-Appellee. Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 11, 2017 156353 & (83) PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 156353 COA: 332288 Wayne CC: 15-005228-FH VIRGIL SMITH, Defendant-Appellee.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO. 16-1684 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, ELECTRONICALLY FILED AUG 04, 2017 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT vs. BRADLEY ELROY WICKES, Defendant-Appellant. CLINTON COUNTY, NO. FECR071368

More information

TENNESSEE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 3 APPEAL AS OF RIGHT: AVAILABILITY; METHOD OF INITIATION

TENNESSEE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 3 APPEAL AS OF RIGHT: AVAILABILITY; METHOD OF INITIATION TENNESSEE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 3 APPEAL AS OF RIGHT: AVAILABILITY; METHOD OF INITIATION [Amend Rule 3(b) and (c) by adding the underlined text and deleting the overstricken text below; paragraphs

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC09-941 CLARENCE DENNIS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. CANADY, C.J. [December 16, 2010] CORRECTED OPINION In this case we consider whether a trial court should

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WARREN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WARREN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 6 2014 13:34:19 2013-CA-01501 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CLARENCE JONES VERSUS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT 2013-CA-01501 APPELLEE APPEALED FROM THE

More information

1 HB By Representative Williams (JD) 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 11-MAR-15. Page 0

1 HB By Representative Williams (JD) 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 11-MAR-15. Page 0 1 HB232 2 164710-1 3 By Representative Williams (JD) 4 RFD: Judiciary 5 First Read: 11-MAR-15 Page 0 1 164710-1:n:02/18/2015:PMG/th LRS2015-591 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SYNOPSIS: Under existing law, the district

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO. 16-1658 ELECTRONICALLY FILED FEB 13, 2017 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT CITY OF EAGLE GROVE, IOWA, Plaintiff- Appellant, vs. CAHALAN INVESTMENTS, LLC, FIRST STATE BANK AND WRIGHT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed March 26, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuque County, Lawrence H.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed March 26, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuque County, Lawrence H. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 8-122 / 07-0723 Filed March 26, 2008 JERRY LEE COLE JR., Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuque

More information

JURISDICTION WAIVER RECENT SENTENCING AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES

JURISDICTION WAIVER RECENT SENTENCING AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES JURISDICTION WAIVER RECENT SENTENCING AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES Presentation provided by the Tonya Krause-Phelan and Mike Dunn, Associate Professors, Thomas M. Cooley Law School WAIVER In Michigan, there

More information

2017COA155. No. 16CA0419, People in Interest of I.S. Criminal Law Sex Offender Registration

2017COA155. No. 16CA0419, People in Interest of I.S. Criminal Law Sex Offender Registration The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries

More information

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR 10-554 ALEX BLUEFORD, VS. STATE OF ARKANSAS, APPELLANT, APPELLEE, Opinion Delivered JANUARY 20, 2011 APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI C O U N T Y C IR C U I T C O U R T, FOURTH

More information

ON APPEAL FROM THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY HONORABLE ROBERT J. BLINK, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

ON APPEAL FROM THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY HONORABLE ROBERT J. BLINK, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE SUPREME COURT NO. 17-1075 POLK COUNTY NO. FECR217722 ELECTRONICALLY FILED JUN 13, 2018 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA STATE OF IOWA Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENNETH LEROY HEARD Defendant-Appellant.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 24, 2006 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 24, 2006 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 24, 2006 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RONNIE DALE GENTRY Appeal from the Criminal Court for Loudon County No. 10711 E. Eugene Eblen,

More information

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-09-00159-CR RAYMOND LEE REESE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court Gregg

More information

Judicial Branch. Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court?

Judicial Branch. Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court? Judicial Branch Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court? What could happen if I am found guilty? What do I do if I think my rights are being violated?

More information

TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * On October 20, 2006, Jonearl B. Smith was charged by complaint with

TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * On October 20, 2006, Jonearl B. Smith was charged by complaint with FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 23, 2011 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff - Appellee,

More information

2018COA30. No. 16CA1524, Abu-Nantambu-El v. State of Colorado. Criminal Law Compensation for Certain Exonerated Persons

2018COA30. No. 16CA1524, Abu-Nantambu-El v. State of Colorado. Criminal Law Compensation for Certain Exonerated Persons The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed June 15, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jefferson County, Crystal S.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed June 15, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jefferson County, Crystal S. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-1440 Filed June 15, 2016 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. WILLIAM J. KIRCHNER JR., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jefferson County,

More information

CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS

CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS CHAPTER 15 CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS 15-1 Corporations and Associations... 299 CHAPTER 15 CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS 1. Corporations and Associations Whether corporations

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY [Cite as State v. Goodman, 2002-Ohio-818.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 3220-M Appellee v. RAYMOND L. GOODMAN Appellant

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 13, 2010 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 13, 2010 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 13, 2010 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GARY VINCENT ELMORE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2007-C-2022 Cheryl Blackburn,

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 91 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 91 1 Article 91. Appeal to Appellate Division. 15A-1441. Correction of errors by appellate division. Errors of law may be corrected upon appellate review as provided in this Article, except that review of capital

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY INTRODUCTION

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY INTRODUCTION [Cite as State v. Tanner, 2009-Ohio-3867.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 24614 Appellant v. ROGER L. TANNER, JR. Appellee

More information

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY. The STATE OF OHIO, CASE NUMBER v. O P I N I O N

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY. The STATE OF OHIO, CASE NUMBER v. O P I N I O N [Cite as State v. Stanovich, 173 Ohio App.3d 304, 2007-Ohio-4234.] COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY The STATE OF OHIO, CASE NUMBER 6-06-10 APPELLEE, v. O P I N I O N STANOVICH, APPELLANT.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 09 0239 Filed March 11, 2011 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. DAVID EDWARD BRUCE, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, James C. Bauch (trial

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 27, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Des Moines County, Mary Ann

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 27, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Des Moines County, Mary Ann IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-145 / 10-0218 Filed July 27, 2011 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DENNIS DUANE RICHARDS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Des Moines

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 9, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for O'Brien County, Nancy L.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 9, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for O'Brien County, Nancy L. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-532 / 10-2076 Filed November 9, 2011 BRIAN LEE OLDENKAMP, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District

More information

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2016COA19 Court of Appeals No. 14CA2387 Weld County District Court No. 13CR642 Honorable Shannon Douglas Lyons, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee,

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUNKLIN COUNTY. Honorable Stephen R. Sharp, Circuit Judge

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUNKLIN COUNTY. Honorable Stephen R. Sharp, Circuit Judge STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD30959 ) Filed: August 25, 2011 JOHN L. LEMONS, ) ) Appellant. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUNKLIN COUNTY Honorable Stephen R. Sharp, Circuit Judge

More information

109 East Main Street SCHNITTKE & SMITH McConnelsville, Ohio South High Street, P. O. Box 542 New Lexington, Ohio 43764

109 East Main Street SCHNITTKE & SMITH McConnelsville, Ohio South High Street, P. O. Box 542 New Lexington, Ohio 43764 [Cite as State v. Biggers, 2005-Ohio-5956.] COURT OF APPEALS MORGAN COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- KENNETH BIGGERS Defendant-Appellant JUDGES: Hon. John F.

More information

STRUCTURE OF A CRIMINAL TRIAL: (FELONY)

STRUCTURE OF A CRIMINAL TRIAL: (FELONY) TRIAL: (FELONY) STRUCTURE OF A CRIMINAL Crimes are divided into 2 general classifications: felonies and misdemeanors. A misdemeanor is a lesser offense, punishable by community service, probation, fine

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-1138 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL JOSEPH M. LAMBERT FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-1138 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL JOSEPH M. LAMBERT FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JOSEPH M. LAMBERT * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2014-KA-1138 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 519-880, SECTION

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 89 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 89 1 Article 89. Motion for Appropriate Relief and Other Post-Trial Relief. 15A-1411. Motion for appropriate relief. (a) Relief from errors committed in the trial division, or other post-trial relief, may be

More information

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John L. Miller, Judge. July 9, 2018

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John L. Miller, Judge. July 9, 2018 FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-555 TREVOR AMOS BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John L. Miller, Judge. July

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document May 3 2017 12:58:02 2015-CA-01650-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA-01650 DERRICK DORTCH APPELLANT vs. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION FOR REHEARING

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 11, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, J. Hobart Darbyshire,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 11, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, J. Hobart Darbyshire, IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-576 / 10-1815 Filed July 11, 2012 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CHRISTINE MARIE LOCKHEART, Defendant-Appellant. Judge. Appeal from the Iowa District Court

More information

Glossary. FY Statistical Reference Guide 11-1

Glossary. FY Statistical Reference Guide 11-1 Glossary Florida Office of the State Courts Administrator The glossary contains definitions of terms most frequently encountered in the collection and reporting of Summary Reporting System data. Generally,

More information

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 102

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 102 COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 102 Court of Appeals No. 10CA1481 Adams County District Court Nos. 08M5089 & 09M1123 Honorable Dianna L. Roybal, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee,

More information

POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT

POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT Research Division, Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT Criminal Procedure April 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Detention and Arrest... 1 Detention and Arrest Under a Warrant... 1 Detention

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR A113296

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR A113296 Filed 4/25/08 P. v. Canada CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT VINTON COUNTY APPEARANCES:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT VINTON COUNTY APPEARANCES: [Cite as Carr v. State, 2015-Ohio-3895.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT VINTON COUNTY DAVID L. CARR, : Case No. 14CA697 Plaintiff-Appellant, : v. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

More information

TMCEC Bench Book. a. Determine if the court should dismiss the case on its own motion. Go to Checklist 4-2.

TMCEC Bench Book. a. Determine if the court should dismiss the case on its own motion. Go to Checklist 4-2. CHAPTER 5 PLEAS AND DRIVING SAFETY COURSE (DSC) Most of the requirements relating to acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere are contained in Article 26.13, C.C.P. The Court of Criminal Appeals

More information

FIFTY STATES AND D.C. SURVEY OF LAWS THAT AUTHORIZE OR RECOGNIZE PRIVATE CITIZEN-INITIATED INVESTIGATION AND/OR PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES

FIFTY STATES AND D.C. SURVEY OF LAWS THAT AUTHORIZE OR RECOGNIZE PRIVATE CITIZEN-INITIATED INVESTIGATION AND/OR PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES FIFTY STATES AND D.C. SURVEY OF LAWS THAT AUTHORIZE OR RECOGNIZE PRIVATE CITIZEN-INITIATED INVESTIGATION AND/OR PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES The National Crime Victim Law Institute (NCVLI) makes no

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT STANDING ORDER 1-07 VIOLATION OF PROBATION PROCEEDINGS I. Scope and Purpose This standing order prescribes procedures in the Juvenile Court to be

More information

***Please see Nunc Pro Tunc Entry at 2003-Ohio-826.*** IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY APPEARANCES

***Please see Nunc Pro Tunc Entry at 2003-Ohio-826.*** IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY APPEARANCES [Cite as State v. Clark, 2002-Ohio-6684.] ***Please see Nunc Pro Tunc Entry at 2003-Ohio-826.*** IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY State of Ohio, : : Plaintiff-Appellee,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed February 13, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Fremont County, James M.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed February 13, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Fremont County, James M. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 7-892 / 06-1102 Filed February 13, 2008 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. BRIAN JAMES WARD, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Fremont

More information

No SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Joseph Jones, Desmond Thurston, and Antuwan Ball Petitioner- Appellants,

No SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Joseph Jones, Desmond Thurston, and Antuwan Ball Petitioner- Appellants, No. 13-10026 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Joseph Jones, Desmond Thurston, and Antuwan Ball Petitioner- Appellants, v. United States, Respondent- Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEVIN M. FRIERSON Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2007-C-2329

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA ELECTRONICALLY FILED MAY 17, 2018 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA ELECTRONICALLY FILED MAY 17, 2018 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA ELECTRONICALLY FILED MAY 17, 2018 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT STATE OF IOWA, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ) V. ) ) RONALD SKYLER STEENHOEK,) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) S.CT. NO. 17-1727

More information

ORDER REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Division I Opinion by JUDGE ROMÁN Taubman and Fox, JJ., concur

ORDER REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Division I Opinion by JUDGE ROMÁN Taubman and Fox, JJ., concur 12CA0378 Peo v. Rivas-Landa 07-11-2013 COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 12CA0378 Adams County District Court No. 10CR558 Honorable Chris Melonakis, Judge The People of the State of Colorado,

More information

Firearms - Deferred Adjudication

Firearms - Deferred Adjudication Firearms - Deferred Adjudication http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/docs/gv/htm/gv.411.htm GOVERNMENT CODE TITLE 4. EXECUTIVE BRANCH SUBTITLE B. LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PUBLIC PROTECTION CHAPTER 411. DEPARTMENT

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 29, 2005

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 29, 2005 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 29, 2005 ROBERT MICHAEL WINTERS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No.

More information

No. 45,202-CA No. 45,203-CA No. 45,204-CA. (Consolidated cases) COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *

No. 45,202-CA No. 45,203-CA No. 45,204-CA. (Consolidated cases) COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * Judgment rendered April 14, 2010. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 45,202-CA No. 45,203-CA No. 45,204-CA (Consolidated cases) COURT OF APPEAL

More information

STATE V. GONZALES, 1997-NMCA-039, 123 N.M. 337, 940 P.2d 185 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. JOE GONZALES, Defendant-Appellee.

STATE V. GONZALES, 1997-NMCA-039, 123 N.M. 337, 940 P.2d 185 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. JOE GONZALES, Defendant-Appellee. 1 STATE V. GONZALES, 1997-NMCA-039, 123 N.M. 337, 940 P.2d 185 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. JOE GONZALES, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 16,677 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO 1997-NMCA-039,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 20 2016 15:53:20 2015-CP-00893-COA Pages: 30 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ERNIE WHITE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00893-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2007

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2007 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MAURICE LASHAUN NASH Appeal from the Circuit Court for Tipton County Nos. 5385, 5386,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 29 2015 16:09:56 2015-CP-00263-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00263-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

cook county state,s attorney 2017 DATA REPORT

cook county state,s attorney 2017 DATA REPORT cook county state,s attorney 7 DATA REPORT Kimberly M. Foxx February 8 Dear Friends, Thank you for your interest in the Cook County State s Attorney s 7 Annual Data Report. This report is our second such

More information

v No Mackinac Circuit Court

v No Mackinac Circuit Court S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S FRED PAQUIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION October 19, 2017 9:00 a.m. v No. 334350 Mackinac Circuit Court CITY OF ST. IGNACE, LC No. 2015-007789-CZ

More information

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION WATER PIK, INC. a subsidiary of CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. An Equal Opportunity Employer

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION WATER PIK, INC. a subsidiary of CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. An Equal Opportunity Employer EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION WATER PIK, INC. a subsidiary of CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. An Equal Opportunity Employer *Required fields are highlighted in yellow. THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CREATE A CONTRACT OF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GABRIEL LAU, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Filed: July 2, 2007

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GABRIEL LAU, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Filed: July 2, 2007 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GABRIEL LAU, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Filed: July 2, 2007 Cite as: 2007 Guam 4 Supreme Court Case No.: CRA06-003 Superior Court

More information

ELIGIBILITY AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING OF CRIMINAL RECORDS Based upon Ohio Revised Code

ELIGIBILITY AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING OF CRIMINAL RECORDS Based upon Ohio Revised Code ELIGIBILITY AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING OF CRIMINAL RECORDS Based upon Ohio Revised Code 2953.31-2953.61 The Clerk of Courts, Common Pleas Court and Adult Probation Department personnel are not permitted

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 37 / 04-0078 Filed April 21, 2006 ISAAC BENJAMIN KRUSE, Plaintiff, vs. IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR HOWARD COUNTY, Defendant. Certiorari to the Iowa District Court for Howard

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Mar 13 2017 09:59:29 2015-CP-01388-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DANA EASTERLING APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01388-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1141 DCA CASE NO. 3D03-2169 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs. : AND

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs. : AND [Cite as State v. Quran, 2002-Ohio-4917.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 80701 STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : AND KHALED QURAN, : OPINION Defendant-Appellant

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA. No DEBORAH FERGUSON, ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAN 29, 2019 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA. No DEBORAH FERGUSON, ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAN 29, 2019 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18-1600 DEBORAH FERGUSON, ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAN 29, 2019 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND FRED GILBERT Defendants-Appellants.

More information