Delaware Law Update: Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstills
|
|
- Mervin Nash
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Delaware Law Update: Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstills Subcommittee on Acquisitions of Public Companies February 1, 2013 Jennifer Fonner DiNucci Cooley LLP Patricia O. Vella Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
2 Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill A Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill prohibits the recipient of confidential information under a confidentiality agreement from privately or publicly requesting a waiver from the target board of the agreed standstill in the confidentiality agreement in order to make a topping bid. 2
3 Sample Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill You further agree that neither you nor any of your Affiliates (defined below) nor any other person acting at your or your Affiliates direct or indirect instruction will, directly or indirectly, alone, jointly, or in concert with any other person, for a period of eighteen (18) months after the date of this Agreement, without the prior written consent of the Company: (i) acquire, announce an intention to acquire, offer or propose to acquire, or agree to acquire, directly or indirectly, by purchase or otherwise, beneficial ownership of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock, equity securities, debt securities or indebtedness of the Company;... (ix) take any action challenging the validity or enforceability of this Section; or (x) make a public request to the Company or its stockholders to take any action in respect of the foregoing matters or request that the Company amend or waive any provision of this Section. 3
4 Works in Tandem with Provisions of Acquisition Agreement No-shop provides that target will not engage in discussions or negotiations with a third party; provided that target is permitted if third party makes an acquisition proposal the target board believes will lead to a Superior Proposal. Acquisition agreements may also prohibit the target board from waiving any standstills. 4
5 Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill: A Misnomer? Don t Ask : Provision in standstill where potential buyer agrees to not ask target to waive the standstill + Don t Waive : Provision in acquisition agreement where target agrees with buyer to not waive any existing standstills = Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill 5
6 Benefit of Don t Ask Don t Waive Standstills? In Topps, notwithstanding the Court s order enjoining the stockholder vote on the merger until, among other things, the Topps Board waived provisions in the Standstill Agreement that prohibited a third party from (1) disclosing its negotiations with Topps and (2) launching a hostile tender offer to compete with the wining bidder, the Court hypothesized that a standstill agreement might be properly used as an auction gavel: Contemplate, for example, a final round auction involving three credible, but now tired bidders, who emerged from a broad market canvass. One can easily imagine how a board striving in good faith to extract the last dollar they could for their stockholders might promise the three remaining bidders that the top bidder at 8:00 p.m. on the next Friday will get very strong deal protections including a promise from the target not to waive the Standstill as to the losers. Is a Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill a value maximizing tool? 6
7 The Issue Can a target board, consistent with its fiduciary duty to maximize value for stockholders, agree to a Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill when definitive merger agreement will limit board from shopping and waiving existing standstills? 7
8 Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstills: Getting Attention in Delaware In re Celera Corp. S holder Litig., 2012 WL (Del. Ch. Mar. 23, 2012). In re Complete Genomics, Inc. S holder Litig., C.A. No VCL (Del. Ch. Nov. 9, 2012) (Transcript). In re Complete Genomics, Inc. S holder Litig., C.A. No VCL (Del. Ch. Nov. 27, 2012) (Transcript). In re Ancestry.com Inc. S holder Litig., C.A. No CS, Tr. at *19 (Del. Ch. Dec. 17, 2012) (Transcript) ( Now I ll get to the emerging issue of December of Who would have thunk that this would be the no-ask, no-waiver month? ). 8
9 In re Celera Corp. S holder Litig., 2012 WL (Del. Ch. Mar. 23, 2012): Facts In 2010, the board of directors of Celera retained Credit Suisse to market all or part of Celera. Five bidders signed confidentiality agreements and received diligence. Each confidentiality agreement included a standstill provision and a provision prohibiting requests for waivers of the standstill: The Counterparty... agrees... not to request [Celera] (or its directors, officers, employees or agents), directly or indirectly, to amend or waive any provision of this paragraph (including this sentence). Quest offered $10.25/share in cash, conditioned on entering into agreements with management. Quest withdrew its offer in June 2010, after being unable to agree on employment terms with Celera s CEO. Quest returned in January 2011 with a $7.75/share offer. Celera countered at $8.25 and a merger agreement was signed for $8.00/share, including a no-solicitation provision. In a proposed settlement with plaintiffs, approved by the Court, defendants agreed to reduce the termination fee, waive standstills and extend the tender offer period. To be clear, I do not find, either in the circumstances of this case or generally, that provisions expressly barring a restricted party from seeking a waiver of a standstill necessarily are unenforceable. Such a ruling should be made, if ever, only on the merits of an appropriately developed record.... 9
10 In re Celera Corp. S holder Litig.: Discussion of the Standstill Viewed in isolation, these Don t-ask-don t-waive Standstills arguably foster legitimate objectives: ensur[ing] that confidential information is not misused... [,] establishing rules of the game that promote an orderly auction, and... giv[ing] the corporation leverage to extract concessions from the parties who seek to make a bid. Similarly, the No Solicitation Provision, viewed in isolation, appears legitimate; although it prevented the Company from contacting potentially interested parties, including the previously identified parties, it also contained a fiduciary out permitting the Board to waive the Don t-ask-don t-waive Standstills if strict compliance with the Merger Agreement would violate the Board s fiduciary duty to maximize shareholder value. Taken together, however, the Don t-ask-don t-waive Standstills and No Solicitation Provision are more problematic.... Here, the Don t-ask-don t-waive Standstills block at least a handful of once-interested parties from informing the Board of their willingness to bid... and the No Solicitation Provision blocks the Board from inquiring further into those parties interest. The Court suggested that the interaction of these provisions collectively operate[d] to ensure an informational vacuum in violation of Delaware law. 10
11 In re Complete Genomics, Inc. S holder Litig., C.A. No VCL (Del. Ch. Nov. 9, 2012) (Transcript): First Hearing Target s banker solicited potential acquirors and four signed agreements with a version of a Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill provision. The Court distinguished between public and private requests to waive standstill; was under the impression that the agreements only prohibited public bear hug requests to waive. Target agreed to a negotiated two-step merger including a provision preventing the target from waiving or modifying the standstills. Stockholder plaintiff sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin enforcement of the nowaiver provision in the merger agreement. The Court denied a preliminary injunction against the no-waiver provision but on the following condition: that the [target] board provide prompt notice to the plaintiff... if any party to a standstill agreement makes a non-public request to be released from the agreement. That would make litigation over the waiver non-hypothetical. The November 9 ruling was not in writing, in order to not risk making a kind of equitable rule of law by proclamation, because none of the parties bound by standstills was requesting relief in order to make a bid. 11
12 In re Complete Genomics, Inc. S holder Litig., C.A. No VCL (Del. Ch. Nov. 27, 2012) (Transcript): Second Hearing Following the November 9, 2012 ruling, target s counsel informed the Court that an agreement with one of the potential acquirors (Party J) contained a true Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill, purporting to prohibit even private requests to waive. Plaintiffs moved for reconsideration. Target s counsel argued that Party J was not a likely bidder anyway and given Topps would have a road map for coming forward if [it] were seriously interested in making an offer, particularly in light of the questionable viability or enforceability of such agreement. The Court noted that Party J would need to breach the Don t Ask, Don t Waive provision to even express interest, regardless of the provision s validity: I have to assume that this provision would at least to some degree have inhibiting effect.... [S]ome people might say, Look, I promised not to do this. I m not going to do it. Acquiror s counsel: It s obviously not my provision, but I do think the point to be made is that [the Don t Ask, Don t Waive] provision merely serves to force participation in the open and public auction process... and make their best bid as part of the process. 12
13 In re Complete Genomics, Inc. S holder Litig.: Second Hearing Enjoining Genomics from enforcing the standstill agreement with Party J. In my view, a Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill resembles a bidder-specific notalk clause, in violation of a board s ongoing obligation to remain informed and to provide a current, candid and accurate merger recommendation. By agreeing to this provision, the Genomics board impermissibly limited its ongoing statutory and fiduciary obligations to properly evaluate a competing offer, disclose material information, and make a meaningful merger recommendation to its stockholders. 13
14 In re Complete Genomics, Inc. S holder Litig.: Blue Pencil? Merger Agreement, 6.1(c) closing condition: The consummation of the Merger shall not then be restrained, enjoined or prohibited by any order, judgment, decree, injunction or ruling (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) of a court of competent jurisdiction or any other Governmental Entity.... The Court interpreted its targeted injunction as not triggering 6.1(c) (and similarly not triggering the injunction-related termination right) because it does not enjoin the capital M Merger. Merger Agreement, 8.7 severability clause included a caveat that it would only apply so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to any party. Finally, the merger agreement has a severability provision that indicates that the parties anticipated that this type of equitable relief would be available.... Yes, in some attenuated sense, any change in a state of the world alters the risk profile that someone anticipated... but I do not believe that that s what [the] economic rights [carveout to the severability provision] is getting at. 14
15 In re Ancestry.com Inc. S holder Litig., C.A. No CS (Del. Ch. Dec. 17, 2012) (Transcript): Facts Ancestry s banker engaged in an active pre-signing market check, soliciting 17 potential strategic and financial bidders and signing confidentiality agreements containing Don t Ask, Don t Waive provisions with 12 of them. In an 8-month process, the bidders were narrowed to 3: Permira submitted the winning cash bid and signed up a merger with a no-shop provision. Ancestry did not waive the standstill provisions, or the Don t Ask provisions, of the losing bidders prior to signing the merger, and it did not assign to Permira the ability to waive standstill provisions. Stockholder plaintiffs sought an injunction of the merger, arguing, among other things, that the no-shop, coupled with the Don t Ask provision, created an informational vacuum because all of the losing bidders were prevented from indicating interest to make a topping bid, and prevented the target board from complying with its Revlon duty to maximize short-term value. Plaintiffs also sought additional disclosures regarding the terms of the standstills and the fact that, after litigation was filed, Ancestry waived the Don t Ask element. In discovery, plaintiffs determined that the Board was unaware of the effect of the Don t Ask, Don t Waive provisions. 15
16 In re Ancestry.com Inc. S holder Litig.: Ruling Don t Ask provisions may not be per se illegal, but could be found inequitable. I know of no statute, I know of nothing, that says that [Don t Ask, Don t Waive] provisions are per se invalid. And I don t think there has been a prior ruling of the court to that effect. I know people have read a bench opinion [i.e., Complete Genomics] that way. I think there was a lot going on in that case.... And the Celera case expressly went out of its way to say it s not making a per se rule. I think what Genomics and Celera both say, though, is Woah [sic], this is a pretty potent provision. And precisely because of... the equitable overlay of the law, directors need to use these things consistently with their fiduciary duties, and they better be darn careful about them. Because they re often used in cases like this which are governed by Revlon and the board s obligation to try to get the highest value. 16
17 In re Ancestry.com Inc. S holder Litig. (cont d.) I m not prepared to rule out that they can t be used for value-maximizing purposes. But the value-maximizing purpose has to be to allow the seller as a well-motivated seller to use it as a gavel, to impress upon the people that it has brought into the process the fact that the process is meaningful; that if you re creating an auction, there is really an end to the auction for those who participate. And therefore, you should bid your fullest because if you win, you have the confidence of knowing you actually won that auction at least against the other people in the process. That s what I understand the... no-ask part of the waiver provision is.... [I]t s on this idea of we ve identified the most likely potential bidders. In advance of any deal protections inhibiting them from making a bid, we re bringing them in. We think they re the most likely. We recognize that other people may come forward, and they ll be subject to different rules. But how do we, in a public company context, get these most likely bidders to actually put their full bid on the table rather than hold something in reserve? We can use this tool to gain credibility so that those final-round bidders know the winner is the winner, at least as to them. 17
18 In re Ancestry.com Inc. S holder Litig. (cont d.) Finding that defendants should disclose the effect, and eventual waiver of, the Don t Ask provisions. I think the plaintiffs have pretty obviously shown that this board was not informed about the potency of this clause. The CEO was not aware of it. It s not even clear the banker was aware of it.... The only way [a Don t Ask provision] has value as an auction gavel is if it has the meaning I ve just described. [W]hen the electorate votes if these things are going to be used... then the electorate should know that with respect to the comfort they should take in the ability to make a superior proposal, they should understand that there is a segment of the market where that segment cannot take advantage of that.... I don t want to tip [the acquiror], but I would have had you guys sign [the merger agreement] first. And then the nanosecond after you didn t sign, I would have sent a letter to all those people and said, We re waiving the sentence in your standstill that says, Blank has hereby waived. The remainder remains in force and effect. Which then makes clear to all of them that if they wish to ask for a waiver in order to make a superior proposal, that they are legally allowed to do that. 18
19 Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstills: Considerations Consider banker and board input to determine if standstill will fall away or if parties will be bound by Don t Ask, Don t Waive provisions. Consider waiver of Don t Ask, Don t Waive provisions later in process, prior to signing definitive acquisition agreement, if circumstances warrant. But consider effect of representations in definitive acquisition agreement. Consider existence of standstills entered into outside of current sale process possibility of limiting those parties, who were not involved in current sale process, from making a topping bid. Advise board of interplay between no-shop provision in definitive acquisition agreement and Don t Ask, Don t Waive provision in confidentiality agreements. Consider extent of disclosure required of details of standstills entered into by various bidders. 19
20 Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstills: Considerations Can a party bound by a standstill agreement bring a claim to get a Topps ruling without violating the standstill by bringing the claim? In terrorem benefit See Ventas, Inc. v. HCP, Inc., 647 F.3d 291 (6 th Cir. 2011) (finding breach of a standstill agreement by topping bidder relevant in finding topping bidder liable for $100 million in damages). 20
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THIS CAUSE, designated a complex business case by Order of the Chief Justice
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE DOUGLAS D. WHITNEY, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CHARLES M. WINSTON, EDWIN B. BORDEN, JR., RICHARD L. DAUGHERTY, ROBERT
More informationVOTING AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT. (the Agreement ) Re: Business Combination between ianthus Capital Holdings, Inc. and MPX Bioceutical Corporation
VOTING AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) October 18, 2018 (the Effective Date ) Dear Securityholder: Re: Business Combination between ianthus Capital Holdings, Inc. and MPX Bioceutical Corporation
More informationWilmington Update. Delaware Supreme Court and the Court of Chancery Offer Obligation Guidance for Financially Troubled Entities
www.pepperlaw.com Winter 2008 message from partner in charge This issue features recent Delaware corporate decisions that may affect corporate law cases across the county. If the onslaught of litigation
More informationPATENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT
PATENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT This PATENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is entered into by and between Google Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway,
More informationAMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER BY AND BETWEEN THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES INC. AND JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. Dated as of March 24, 2008
Execution Version AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER BY AND BETWEEN THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES INC. AND JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. Dated as of March 24, 2008 W/1236164v4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE
More informationCOOPERATION AGREEMENT
COOPERATION AGREEMENT This Cooperation Agreement (as amended, supplemented, amended and restated or otherwise modified from time to time, this Agreement ), dated as of July 5, 2016, is entered into by
More informationCase 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/11/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:18-cv-01028-UNA Document 1 Filed 07/11/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MICHAEL KENT, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly
More informationVOTING AGREEMENT RECITALS
VOTING AGREEMENT THIS VOTING AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is made and entered into as of April 30, 2015 by and between Optimizer TopCo S.a.r.l, a Luxembourg corporation ( Parent ), and the undersigned shareholder
More informationSECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF TRANSUNION * * * * * ARTICLE I NAME. The name of the Corporation is TransUnion.
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF TRANSUNION * * * * * The present name of the corporation is TransUnion (the Corporation ). The Corporation was incorporated under the name Spartan
More informationCONTRACTUAL LIMITATIONS ON SELLER LIABILITY IN M&A AGREEMENTS
CONTRACTUAL LIMITATIONS ON SELLER LIABILITY IN M&A AGREEMENTS By BYRON F. EGAN Jackson Walker L.L.P. 901 Main Street, Suite 6000 Dallas, TX 75202 PATRICIAO. VELLA Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP 1201
More informationCERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF WINGSTOP INC.
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF WINGSTOP INC. ARTICLE I - NAME The name of the corporation is Wingstop Inc. (the Corporation ). ARTICLE II - REGISTERED OFFICE AND AGENT The address of the Corporation s
More information[HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES/DELAWARE STATE SENATE] 149th GENERAL ASSEMBLY [HOUSE/SENATE] BILL NO.
Draft 3/29/18 [HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES/DELAWARE STATE SENATE] 149th GENERAL ASSEMBLY [HOUSE/SENATE] BILL NO. SPONSOR: AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 8 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW.
More informationROADMAP OF AN M&A TRANSACTION ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL PRESENTATION BY VINCE GAROZZO, GREENSFELDER HEMKER & GALE, P.C.
ROADMAP OF AN M&A TRANSACTION ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL PRESENTATION BY VINCE GAROZZO, GREENSFELDER HEMKER & GALE, P.C. OUTLINE Review of the M&A Transaction Process Letters of Intent and the Duty
More informationBEGINNING A DEAL: NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS AND LETTERS OF INTENT
BEGINNING A DEAL: NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS AND LETTERS OF INTENT Robert Dickey October 17, 2017 2016 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Topics Covered Initial Considerations Contents of a Confidentiality Agreement
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT RICHLAND
Case :-cv-00-smj ECF No. filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 ADAM FRANCHI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT RICHLAND
More informationCase 1:17-cv WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1
Case 1:17-cv-02418-WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PAUL PARSHALL, Individually
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated shareholders of Landry s Restaurants, Inc.,
More informationBaxter International Inc. One Baxter Parkway Deerfield, Illinois 60015
EXECUTION COPY Baxter International Inc. One Baxter Parkway Deerfield, Illinois 60015 January 11, 2016 Shire plc 5 Riverwalk, Citywest Business Campus Dublin 24 Republic of Ireland Attention: Bill Mordan,
More informationEquity Investment Agreement
Equity Investment Agreement THIS EQUITY INVESTMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is dated as of DATE (the "Effective Date") by and between, a Delaware business corporation, having an address at ("Company")
More informationFreeport-McMoRan Inc. Amended and Restated By-Laws. (as amended and restated through June 8, 2016) ARTICLE I
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. Amended and Restated By-Laws (as amended and restated through June 8, 2016) ARTICLE I Name The name of the corporation is Freeport-McMoRan Inc. ARTICLE II Offices 1. The location
More informationDrafting and Negotiating Corporate Agreements 2015
CORPORATE LAW AND PRACTICE Course Handbook Series Number B-2144 Drafting and Negotiating Corporate Agreements 2015 Co-Chairs Alyssa A. Grikscheit Deborah J. Ludewig Kevin L. Morris To order this book,
More informationForward Momentum: Trulia Continues to Impact Resolution of Deal Litigation in Delaware and Beyond
Forward Momentum: Trulia Continues to Impact Resolution of Deal Litigation in Delaware and Beyond Contributors Edward B. Micheletti, Partner Jenness E. Parker, Counsel Bonnie W. David, Associate > See
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION JOHN NICHOLAS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2013 CH 11752 Consolidated
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF VMWARE, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF VMWARE, INC. VMWARE, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the Corporation ), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY AS FOLLOWS:
More informationDELAWARE STATE SENATE 149th GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE BILL NO. 180 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 8 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW.
DELAWARE STATE SENATE 149th GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE BILL NO. 180 SPONSOR: Sen. Townsend & Sen. Henry & Rep. Mitchell & Rep. M. Smith Sens. Delcollo, Ennis, Hansen; Reps. Brady, J. Johnson, Lynn, Paradee,
More informationCERTIFICATE OF THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED
CERTIFICATE OF THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED Pursuant to the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes 78.390 and 78.403, the undersigned officer of Wynn Resorts,
More informationBY-LAWS OF THE BOEING COMPANY. (as amended and restated effective December 17, 2017)
BY-LAWS OF THE BOEING COMPANY (as amended and restated effective December 17, 2017) TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I Stockholders Meetings...1 SECTION 1. Annual Meetings...1 SECTION 2. Special Meetings...1
More informationThis PDF was updated May 1, For the latest available governance information, please visit
Unisys Corporate Governance About Governance The Unisys Board of Directors and management team take our corporate governance responsibilities very seriously and are committed to managing the company in
More informationBYLAWS OF ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY ARTICLE I. MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS
BYLAWS OF ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY ARTICLE I. MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS Section 1.1. Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of stockholders shall be held at such date, time and place, either within or
More informationAMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. BY-LAWS. Amended November 16, 2015 ARTICLE I. Stockholders
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. BY-LAWS Amended November 16, 2015 ARTICLE I Stockholders Section 1.1. Annual Meetings. An annual meeting of stockholders shall be held for the election of directors at
More informationDELAWARE LAW REVIEW VOLUME NUMBER 1
DELAWARE LAW REVIEW VOLUME 14 2013 NUMBER 1 Key Decisions Of 2012 In Delaware Corporate And Alternative Entity Law Bruce L. Silverstein, Kathaleen St. J. McCormick and Tammy L. Mercer Developments In Delaware
More informationPROPOSAL SUBMISSION AGREEMENT
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AGREEMENT THIS PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is made and entered into effective on, 2014 (the Effective Date ), by, a ( Bidder ), in favor of Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
More informationDelaware Chancery Clarifies Duty Of Disclosure
Page 1 of 12 Portfolio Media. Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Delaware Chancery Clarifies Duty
More information$ CITY OF ALBANY (Alameda County, California) 2016 General Obligation Refunding Bonds BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT
11030-23 JH:SRF:KD:brf AGENDA DRAFT 8/29/2016 $ CITY OF ALBANY (Alameda County, California) 2016 General Obligation Refunding Bonds BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT City Council City of Albany 1000 San Pablo Avenue
More informationVoting and Support Agreement and Release of Claims
Voting and Support Agreement and Release of Claims VOTING AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS (this Agreement ), dated as of, 2016, by and among the Stockholder listed on the signature page hereto
More informationIf You Were a Stockholder of Primedia, Inc. Between January 11, 2011 and July 13, 2011 You May Be Entitled to Money From a Class Action Settlement
Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Settlement Hearing and Right to Appear If You Were a Stockholder of Primedia, Inc. Between January 11, 2011 and July 13, 2011 You May Be Entitled to Money
More informationAnalysis of the 2014 Amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law. Jeffrey R. Wolters, Esq. James D. Honaker, Esq.
Analysis of the 2014 Amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law Jeffrey R. Wolters, Esq. James D. Honaker, Esq. ela Analysis of the 2014 Amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law 1 Corp.
More informationI n its last session, the Delaware legislature passed a. Corporate Law & Accountability Report
Corporate Law & Accountability Report Reproduced with permission from Corporate Accountability Report, 13 CARE 30, 07/24/2015. Copyright 2015 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
More informationEXECUTION VERSION PLAN SUPPORT AGREEMENT
EXECUTION VERSION PLAN SUPPORT AGREEMENT This PLAN SUPPORT AGREEMENT (as amended, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time, this Agreement ) is made and entered into as of February 1, 2014,
More informationCase 3:17-cv G Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 1
Case 3:17-cv-02412-G Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MATTHEW SCIABACUCCHI, Individually and On Behalf
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS. AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION (a Delaware Corporation)
AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS OF AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION (a Delaware Corporation) AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION (a Delaware Corporation) AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I. OFFICES...
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF MASTERCARD INCORPORATED
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF MASTERCARD INCORPORATED MasterCard Incorporated (the Corporation ), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, hereby
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS AMAZON.COM, INC.
SECTION 1. OFFICES AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF AMAZON.COM, INC. The principal office of the corporation shall be located at its principal place of business or such other place as the Board of Directors
More informationCase 3:18-cv WHO Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendants.
Case :-cv-0-who Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Evan J. Smith (SBN) BRODSKY & SMITH, LLC Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 00 Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: (0) -00 esmith@brodskysmith.com Attorneys
More informationGENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS AS OF DECEMBER 13, 2017 ARTICLE I MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS AS OF DECEMBER 13, 2017 ARTICLE I MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS 1.1 Annual Meetings. The annual meeting of shareholders for the election of directors, ratification
More informationCorporate Law Update from the First State: The Latest Developments in Delaware Corporate Law, Cases and Statutes
Corporate Law Update from the First State: The Latest Developments in Delaware Corporate Law, Cases and Statutes Andrew M. Johnston Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP Dallas Bar Association Securities
More informationDelaware Court of Chancery Upholds Merger Agreement Termination Based on Failure to Deliver Formal Notice of Extension
Delaware Court of Chancery Upholds Merger Agreement Termination Based on Failure to Deliver Formal Notice of Extension On March 14, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery upheld the disputed termination
More informationVOTING AGREEMENT. THE PERSONS LISTED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO (collectively, the Securityholders and each individually a Securityholder )
BETWEEN: VOTING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the 25 th day of August, 2017. THE PERSONS LISTED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO (collectively, the Securityholders and each individually a Securityholder -and-
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, Plaintiffs, v. DOUGLAS W. BROYLES, MARVIN D. BURKETT, STEPHEN L. DOMENIK, DR. NORMAN GODINHO, RONALD
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY EFiled: Oct 19 2004 1:11PM EDT Filing ID 4402259 JOLLY ROGER FUND LP and JOLLY ROGER OFFSHORE FUND, LTD., individually and
More informationAGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER. dated as of FEBRUARY 23, by and among MURRAY KENTUCKY ENERGY, INC., WESTERN KENTUCKY MERGER SUB, LLC,
EXECUTION VERSION AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER dated as of FEBRUARY 23, 2018 by and among MURRAY KENTUCKY ENERGY, INC., WESTERN KENTUCKY MERGER SUB, LLC, WESTERN KENTUCKY COAL RESOURCES, LLC and MURRAY
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. DAVID JOHNSON, individually and on : behalf of all others similarly : situated, : : Plaintiff, : :
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DAVID JOHNSON, individually and on : behalf of all others similarly : situated, : : Plaintiff, : : v BRIAN J. DRISCOLL, ROBERT J. : ZOLLARS, EDWARD A.
More informationCase 4:18-cv HSG Document 1 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-hsg Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Michael Schumacher (#0) RIGRODSKY & LONG, P.A. Jackson Street, #0 San Francisco, CA Telephone: () - Facsimile: (0) -0 Email: ms@rl-legal.com Attorneys for Plaintiff
More informationAppendix E. Reservation of ESI Rights and Other RFP Terms. For
Appendix E Reservation of ESI Rights and Other RFP Terms 2016 Request Proposals Long-Term Renewable Generation Resources Entergy Louisiana, LLC Entergy Services, Inc. June 8, 2016 APPENDIX E RESERVATION
More informationi Case No (KJC)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: WAVE SYSTEMS CORP.,! Chapter 7 i Case No. 16-10284 (KJC) Debtor. Re: Docket No. 29, 68,73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 86, 90, 94, and 96 ORDER PURSUANT
More informationSale of NPL accounts by Dena Bank Invitation for submission of EoI
Sale of NPL accounts by Dena Bank Invitation for submission of EoI Dena Bank (or the Bank ) invites Expression of Interest from ARCs, Banks, FIs and eligible NBFCs for the proposed sale of its Non Performing
More information2016 Request For Proposals For Long-Term Renewable Generation Resources For Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Appendix E Reservation of EAI Rights and Other RFP Terms For 2016 Request For Proposals For Long-Term Renewable Generation Resources For Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Entergy Arkansas, Inc. May 26, 2016 Page
More informationRESTATED AND AMENDED BYLAWS OF JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES, INC. (Effective September 22, 2017) ARTICLE I. Registered and Corporate Offices
RESTATED AND AMENDED BYLAWS OF JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES, INC. (Effective September 22, 2017) ARTICLE I Registered and Corporate Offices Section 1.1 Registered Office. The registered office of the corporation
More informationBYLAWS OF UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED. A Delaware Corporation (Effective as of August 15, 2017) ARTICLE I OFFICES, CORPORATE SEAL
BYLAWS OF UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED A Delaware Corporation (Effective as of August 15, 2017) ARTICLE I OFFICES, CORPORATE SEAL Section 1.01. Registered Office. The address of the corporation s registered
More informationVOTING AGREEMENT VOTING AGREEMENT
This Voting Agreement ("Agreement ") is entered into as of [EFFECTIVE DATE], between [COMPANY], [CORPORATE ENTITY] (the "Company") and [STOCKHOLDER NAME] ("Stockholder"). RECITALS A. Stockholder is a holder
More informationSTOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
EX-1 2 wbmdsch13damd10102113ex1.htm STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT Execution Version STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 18, 2013 (this Agreement ), by and among WebMD Health
More informationAnnotated Form Fund Formation Opinion for Delaware Limited Liability Company. (Prepared by Louis G. Hering) [Date]
Annotated Form Fund Formation Opinion for Delaware Limited Liability Company (Prepared by Louis G. Hering) TO: Re: [Fund Name] LLC Ladies and Gentlemen: We have acted as special [Delaware] counsel to [Fund
More informationCORPORATE LITIGATION: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NON-RELIANCE PROVISIONS. Underlying Principles
CORPORATE LITIGATION: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NON-RELIANCE PROVISIONS JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN AND YAFIT COHN * SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP April 15, 2016 This month we continue our discussion of contractual
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION DETERMINATION
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE CHAPARRAL RESOURCES, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 2001-VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION
More informationPosted by Jenness E. Parker and Kaitlin E. Maloney, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, May 21, 2017
Posted by Jenness E. Parker and Kaitlin E. Maloney, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, May 21, 2017 Editor s note: Jenness E. Parker is Counsel and Kaitlin E. Maloney is an associate
More informationTop 10 Delaware Corporate Opinions of 2008
Top 10 Delaware Corporate Opinions of 2008 2008 was marred by economic downturns, financial scandals and collapses, but the influence and importance of Delaware corporate law has remained stable. With
More informationBYLAWS KKR & CO. INC. (Effective July 1, 2018) ARTICLE I OFFICES
BYLAWS OF KKR & CO. INC. (Effective July 1, 2018) ARTICLE I OFFICES Section 1.01 Registered Office. The registered office and registered agent of KKR & Co. Inc. (the Corporation ) shall be as set forth
More informationRealogy Holdings Corp. Realogy Group LLC
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BRAD WIND, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, v. Case No. 07-2380CI-20 CATALINA
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE GAP, INC. (February 1, 2015) ARTICLE I OFFICES
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE GAP, INC. (February 1, 2015) ARTICLE I OFFICES Section 1. Registered Office. The registered office of the Corporation in the State of Delaware shall be in the City of
More informationAMBASSADOR PROGRAM AGREEMENT
AMBASSADOR PROGRAM AGREEMENT This Ambassador Program Agreement (this Agreement ) is by and between Cambly Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company ), and [Name], and individual with its principal place
More informationSTATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 255 of European Communities (Takeover Bids (Directive 2004/25/EC)) Regulations 2006
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS S.I. No. 255 of 2006 European Communities (Takeover Bids (Directive 2004/25/EC)) Regulations 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE DUBLIN To be purchased directly from the GOVERNMENT
More informationPORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO /OR/
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO /OR/ FORM SC 13D (Statement of Beneficial Ownership) Filed 4/5/2006 Address 121 SW SALMON ST PORTLAND, Oregon 97204 Telephone 503-464-7439 CIK 0000784977 Fiscal Year 12/31
More informationTHIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC. (hereinafter called the Corporation ) Effective June 13, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * *
THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC. (hereinafter called the Corporation ) Effective June 13, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * ARTICLE I Offices The registered office of the Corporation
More informationAppendix E. Reservation of ESI Rights and Other RFP Terms. For
Appendix E Reservation of ESI Rights and Other RFP Terms 2016 Request Proposals Long-Term Renewable Generation Resources Entergy New Orleans, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. July 13, 2016 APPENDIX E RESERVATION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-00145-RMC Document 29 Filed 03/18/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES RYAN, DAVID ALLEN AND ) RONALD SHERMAN, on Behalf of ) Themselves and
More informationTHE DAVID J. JOSEPH COMPANY USER ADMINISTRATOR AGREEMENT FOR SCRAPCONNECT
USER ADMINISTRATOR AGREEMENT FOR SCRAPCONNECT THIS USER ADMINISTRATOR AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made effective as of the day of, 20 ( Effective Date ), among The David J. Joseph Company, a Delaware corporation
More informationRecent Delaware Corporate Governance Decisions. Paul D. Manca, Esquire Hogan & Hartson LLP Washington, DC
APRIL 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recent Delaware Corporate Governance Decisions Paul D. Manca, Esquire Hogan & Hartson LLP Washington, DC BUSINESS LAW AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICE GROUP In three separate decisions
More informationRECITALS. WHEREAS, this Agreement constitutes the Stockholders Agreement referred to in the Disclosure Statement (as hereinafter defined);
STOCKHOLDERS AND REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT (this Agreement ), dated as of December 30, 2016, by and among UCI International Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware
More informationEXHIBIT B (Redlines)
Case 13-11482-KJC Doc 3406-2 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 61 EXHIBIT B (Redlines) Case 13-11482-KJC Doc 3406-2 Filed 03/26/15 Page 2 of 61 EXHIBIT 6.12 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS \ Case 13-11482-KJC
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS SYSCO CORPORATION. (A Delaware Corporation) ARTICLE I STOCKHOLDERS
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF SYSCO CORPORATION (A Delaware Corporation) ARTICLE I STOCKHOLDERS 1. CERTIFICATES REPRESENTING STOCK; UNCERTIFICATED SHARES. Shares of stock in the Corporation may be represented
More informationTHE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) Consolidated C.A. No VCL
THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE REHABCARE GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION Consolidated C.A. No. 6197 - VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION,
More informationBY-LAWS JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. Office of the Secretary 270 Park Avenue, 38th floor New York, New York 10017
BY-LAWS OF JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. As amended by the Board of Directors Effective January 19, 2016 Office of the Secretary 270 Park Avenue, 38th floor New York, New York 10017 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I
More informationNOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES
NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES THE OFFER AND SALE OF THIS INSTRUMENT HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE SECURITIES ACT ), OR UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION NRG YIELD, INC. ARTICLE ONE ARTICLE TWO
Exhibit 3.1 AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF NRG YIELD, INC. NRG Yield, Inc. (the Corporation ) was incorporated under the name NRG Yieldco, Inc. by filing its original certificate
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS OF AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION (a Delaware Corporation) Effective as of February 12, 2016
AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS OF AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION (a Delaware Corporation) Effective as of February 12, 2016 AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION (a Delaware Corporation) AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS TABLE
More informationFor personal use only
MARKET RELEASE SYDNEY, 29 August 2014 CLEARVIEW WEALTH LIMITED AND MATRIX HOLDINGS LIMITED ENTER INTO A MERGER IMPLEMENTATION DEED ClearView and Matrix have entered into a Merger Implementation Deed (MID)
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION THE PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE FUNDS, On Behalf of Itself and Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, CFC INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
More informationSTOCKHOLDER VOTING AGREEMENT
STOCKHOLDER VOTING AGREEMENT THIS STOCKHOLDER VOTING AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is made, entered into, and effective as of October 4, 2007, by and among Lighting Science Group Corporation, a Delaware
More informationEX v333748_ex3 1.htm SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION. Exhibit 3.1
EX 3.1 2 v333748_ex3 1.htm SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION. Exhibit 3.1 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF GLOBAL EAGLE ACQUISITION CORP. Global Eagle
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO 8 DEL. C. 211
EFiled: May 13 2008 6:46PM EDT Transaction ID 19820480 Case No. 3695-CC IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEEL PARTNERS II, L.P., v. Plaintiff, POINT BLANK SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware
More informationBY-LAWS. As Amended through February 15, 2019 NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
! -! 1- BY-LAWS As Amended through February 15, 2019 NOBLE ENERGY, INC. I. OFFICES Section 1. The registered office of the Corporation shall be 100 West Tenth Street, City of Wilmington, New Castle County,
More informationSHAREHOLDER APPROVAL RIGHTS AGREEMENT. dated October 2, between PATTERN ENERGY GROUP INC. and PATTERN ENERGY GROUP LP
Exhibit 10.6 EXECUTION VERION SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL RIGHTS AGREEMENT dated October 2, 2013 between PATTERN ENERGY GROUP INC. and PATTERN ENERGY GROUP LP This Shareholder Approval Rights Agreement, dated
More informationAnnex A. Proposed National Instrument Security Holder Rights Plans. Table of Contents
Annex A Proposed National Instrument 62-105 Security Holder Rights Plans Table of Contents PART 1 DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION 1. Definitions PART 2 EFFECTIVENESS OF RIGHTS PLAN 2. Requirements 3. Scope
More informationMATTEL, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS ARTICLE I STOCKHOLDERS
As of August 26, 2015 MATTEL, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS ARTICLE I STOCKHOLDERS Section 1. Annual Meeting. An annual meeting of the stockholders, for the election of directors to succeed those whose
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY (A Delaware Corporation) ARTICLE I CORPORATE OFFICES
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY (A Delaware Corporation) ARTICLE I CORPORATE OFFICES 1.1 Registered Office. The registered office of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
More informationmew Doc 354 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 10:23:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 15
Pg 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x In re: HHH Choices Health Plan, LLC, et al., 1 Debtors. - -
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 8-K BARNES & NOBLE, INC.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
More information$ GROVER BEACH IMPROVEMENT AGENCY INDUSTRIAL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT AREA TAX ALLOCATION BONDS SERIES 2011B PURCHASE CONTRACT, 2011
$ GROVER BEACH IMPROVEMENT AGENCY INDUSTRIAL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT AREA TAX ALLOCATION BONDS SERIES 2011B PURCHASE CONTRACT, 2011 Grover Beach Improvement Agency 154 South Eighth Street Grover Beach, CA
More informationMERGERS AND AQUISITIONS
Volume 26 Number 3, March 2012 MERGERS AND AQUISITIONS Delaying Judgment Day: How to Defer Stockholder Votes in Contested M&A Transactions In connection with an M&A transaction, public companies sometimes
More information