MODEL BRADY POLICY I. THE BRADY RULE
|
|
- Tyrone Bates
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MODEL BRADY POLICY This Policy sets forth the prosecuting authority s disclosure requirements regarding witnesses and is intended to assure compliance with the law, to protect witnesses and defendants rights, to prosecute criminals effectively and efficiently, and to allow for effective law enforcement investigation. This policy will focus on the Brady Rule. This policy is dependant on law enforcement establishing a separate Brady policy/procedure applicable to their organization. I. THE BRADY RULE The prosecution must disclose to the defense evidence that is favorable to a defendant which is either exculpatory or impeachment and is material to guilt or punishment. 1. Materiality. Evidence is material if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different. 2. Exculpatory Evidence. Evidence is exculpatory if it tends to negate the defendant s responsibility for the charged crime and is material to guilt or punishment. Exculpatory evidence must be disclosed. 3. Impeachment Evidence. Impeachment evidence is governed by Evidence Rules 607, 608(b), 609 and 613, as well as state case law. Impeachment evidence is evidence that demonstrates that a witness is biased or prejudiced against a party, has some other motive to fabricate testimony, has a poor reputation for truthfulness or has past specific incidents that are probative of the witness truthfulness or untruthfulness. Prior inconsistent statements are impeachment evidence. Impeachment evidence that is favorable to the defendant and material to guilt or punishment must be disclosed, unless it is cumulative or impeaches on a collateral issue. Brady is violated if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different. 4. Evidence harmful to prosecution. Favorable evidence is evidence that either helps the defense or hurts the prosecution, therefore evidence harmful to the prosecution must be disclosed under Brady. III. CATEGORIES OF POSSIBLE LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED BRADY MATERIAL. 1. Substantiated findings reflective of officer s honesty or truthfulness. 2. Conviction involving dishonesty or untruthfulness. 3. Information regarding ongoing investigation of allegation of officer s dishonesty or untruthfulness, (related or unrelated to criminal prosecution case). 1
2 4. Information regarding a resignation, demotion or other action in-lieu of a negative agency finding or action. 5. Unsubstantiated findings regarding accusations of officer dishonesty or untruthfulness. 6. Information regarding officer s use of force and history of use of force when use of force is pertinent to ongoing criminal prosecution. IV. PROSECUTOR'S DUTIES A. Generally. Prosecutors must disclose to the defense evidence that is favorable to a defendant which is either exculpatory or impeachment and is material to guilt or punishment. B. Identify and Disclose Brady Evidence Under Prosecutor s Knowledge or Control. Brady information within the knowledge, control or possession of the prosecutor, deputy prosecutor, prosecutor s staff, or law enforcement who is working on behalf of the prosecution must be disclosed. Prosecution is not required to search court, incarceration, or other files possessed by a separate office or agency. Evidence held by law enforcement that is favorable to a defendant which is either exculpatory or impeachment and is material to guilt or punishment must be disclosed to the defense; The prosecution must request and/or turn over to the defense such information pursuant to section V. below. C. Preserve Evidence. Prosecutors must preserve Brady evidence. Evidence that is only potentially useful, (not material), should be preserved. Prosecutors aware of potentially useful evidence in the possession or control of law enforcement, investigators or any other entity acting on the State s behalf in the investigation or prosecution of a case, should request that the potentially useful evidence be preserved. D. Err on the Side of Disclosure. The United States Supreme Court has urged the careful prosecutor to err on the side of disclosure of possible Brady information. E. Protect Witness Right to Privacy. Pursuant to RCW (2), personal information in files maintained for employees, appointees, or elected officials of any public agency is exempt from public inspection and copying under the Washington State Public Records Act to the extent that disclosure would violate their right to privacy. Law enforcement and other government employees that act on behalf the prosecution have personal information in employee files. Law enforcement agencies are the custodian of law enforcement personnel files. Some information in an employee s files, if disclosed, may violate that employee s right to privacy. Prosecutors shall request disclosure of and disclose Brady information contained in law enforcement personnel records pursuant to section V. below. 2
3 F. Protect Law Enforcement Investigations. Pursuant to RCW , specific investigative records compiled by law enforcement agencies are exempt if nondisclosure is essential to effective law enforcement. Some investigation information about a law enforcement officer or a witness, if disclosed, may jeopardize an investigation. Prosecutors shall request disclosure of and disclose Brady information contained in investigative records pursuant to section V. below. V. BRADY PROCEDURE REGARDING LAW ENFORCEMENT WITNESSES A. Potential Brady Information Request. Immediately upon filing of criminal charges or the receipt of a law enforcement agency incident report the prosecuting attorney s office shall review its files for Brady information regarding all potential law enforcement witnesses involved in the case and disclose the same. If information is found that was disclosed pursuant to Brady, the prosecutor shall determine if disclosure is still required pursuant Brady. If a potential law enforcement witness is from an agency other than that of the prosecution s, the prosecution shall complete the REQUEST THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT CONDUCT A REVIEW OF ITS FILES FOR POSSIBLE BRADY DOCUMENTS, (form attached hereto as Exhibit A ) and send the completed form(s) to the appropriate agency(ies). The prosecutor shall ensure that the date by which the agency must return the form provides sufficient time for the court to evaluate the possible Brady material. B. Response to Brady Notification. 1. Substantiated Finding or Conviction. Upon notice that there exists Brady material that the prosecution has not previously been made aware of, the prosecution shall review the notice received from law enforcement and shall disclose the same to the defense if required by law or, at the sole discretion of the prosecution, request an in camera review pursuant to section V. below. 2. Unsubstantiated Finding or In Lieu of Action. Upon notice that there exists potential Brady material that the prosecution has not previously been made aware of, the prosecution shall confer with the law enforcement agency to determine if a Brady disclosure needs to be submitted to prosecution for disclosure consideration or submitted to the Court via the in camera review pursuant to section V. below. 3. Current or Ongoing Investigation. Upon notice that there is an ongoing investigation into an officer s actions in a current criminal case, the prosecution may confer with the law enforcement agency to determine if a Brady disclosure needs to be submitted to prosecution for disclosure consideration or submitted to the Court for an in camera review pursuant to section V. below. 4. Use of Force. Upon notice that there a law enforcement officer witness use of force history or a current or ongoing use of force investigation, the prosecution shall review any use of force history information submitted by the law enforcement agency for disclosure as required 3
4 by law or, in the prosecutions sole discretion, may submit the use of force history to the Court for an in camera review pursuant to section V. below. C. Disclosure of Brady Information. Nothing in this policy prohibits the prosecution from disclosing any information about an officer that the prosecution, in its sole discretion, determines must be disclosed pursuant to Brady, CrR 4.7(a)(3) or CrRLJ 4.7(a)(3). D. In Camera Review of Potential Brady Information. Upon receipt or knowledge of possible Brady material that the prosecution has determined should be reviewed by the court for a disclosure determination, the prosecution shall request a hearing for an in camera review by the court to determine if the information is Brady material and must be disclosed to the prosecution and/or defense. The prosecution shall subpoena the appropriate law enforcement personnel to deliver the possible Brady notification or information to the hearing. If the prosecution has the subject information in its possession, the information will be filed under seal. The prosecution shall send a copy of the notice of hearing to the officer who is the subject of the possible Brady information. The notice will provide sufficient time for the law enforcement agency and subject officer(s) to respond to the potential disclosure or review, but shall be no shorter than five business days prior to the scheduled hearing. If the court rules that all or some of the information is not subject to disclosure, should not be turned over the prosecution and/or defense, or is not admissible at any proceeding in the case, the prosecution shall request that the information or the portion not subject to disclosure be returned to the law enforcement agency or be sealed in the court records. A copy of the court s order(s) regarding the information shall be forwarded to the law enforcement agency. If the court determines that some or all of the information should be turned over to the prosecution and/or the defense, or is Brady information, the prosecution shall maintain a copy of the said information in its files, along with the disclosure order. Prior court rulings regarding information shall guide the prosecution in further disclosure determinations. Law enforcement agencies investigation and response, if any and if known to the prosecution, and the similarity and difference in the allegations, facts and criminal charges and those before the disclosing court shall be considered. Most likely, if information was ruled discloseable pursuant to Brady in a prior proceeding, the information will be disclosed pursuant to Brady in subsequent cases. If there is sufficient doubt as to whether the information should be disclosed again, as determined solely by the prosecution, the prosecution shall submit the previously disclosed information to a court and request an in camera review and follow the procedures above. E. Continuing Obligation to Disclose. Despite previously disclosed Brady information, the prosecution is under a continuing duty to disclose Brady information and must submit a request for a search for Brady information with each criminal prosecution. 4
5 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY REQUEST FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT REVIEW OF FILES FOR POSSIBLE BRADY DOCUMENTS The Office of the County Prosecuting Attorney has determined that the following employees of your department may be material witnesses in: State v. Case # Therefore, it is requested that you review any files in your agency in order to locate any possible Brady documents for: Please review your files pursuant to your Brady procedure. We are NOT seeking allegations of misconduct that are without merit, unfounded, false or unsubstantiated. We ARE, in addition to substantiated, with merit, or founded allegations, or allegations that result in discipline of any kind, seeking allegations that are currently under investigation or resulted in an action in lieu of another administrative action. If no Brady information is located for any of the above-listed employees, please so indicate on this form and return it to: Prosecutor/Deputy Prosecutor at on or before If Brady information does exist for any of the above-listed employees, please identify the name and employment status of any such employee on this form and return it as indicated above, along with the Brady notification. If there is an ongoing investigation and/or any in lieu of action has been taken regarding any of the above-listed employees, please identify the name and employment status of any such employee on this form and return it as indicated above. ONLY INDICATE THE ABOVE REQUESTED INFORMATION & BRADY NOTIFICATION IF APPLICABLE. DO NOT RETURN OR DISCLOSE ANY UNDERLYING DOCUMENTS. Upon return of the completed form, the Prosecuting Attorney s Office will: 1) disclose the Brady notice to the defense; 2) contact your agency to determine whether there is possible Brady information that needs to be disclosed to the prosecution for review and possible disclosure to the defense; or 3) request that your agency submit possible Brady information to court for review in camera by the court in order to decide whether to release any possible Brady documents to both the prosecution and defense. The obligation to provide Brady documents is ongoing. If your department receives any new Brady information regarding your above-listed employees, notify the above named Prosecutor/Deputy Prosecutor. Date Prosecutor/Deputy Prosecutor 5
6 TO BE COMPLETED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY: Brady information exists and the Brady notice is attached hereto for the following employees: No documents reasonably foreseen as constituting Brady exist for any the abovenamed employees or, none exists for the following employees: Brady notice or documents have previously been provided to the Court for review, (attached is the court s order regarding disclosure) regarding the following employee(s): Possible Brady (or new/additional Brady) documents exist for the following employees: Date Name Print Signature Contact telephone number 6
7 SAMPLE BRADY NOTIFICATION ABC County Sheriff s Deputy Joe Smith was disciplined by the ABC County Sheriff s Office on November 22, 1996 for lack of candor. No charges were filed after the incident was reviewed by the XYZ County Prosecuting Attorney s Office. 7
Serving the Law Enforcement Community and the Citizens of Washington
WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF SHERIFFS & POLICE CHIEFS 3060 Willamette Drive NE Lacey, WA 98516 ~ Phone: (360) 486-2380 ~ Fax: (360) 486-2381 ~ Website: www.waspc.org Serving the Law Enforcement Community
More informationADOPTED JUNE 19, 2013 MODEL POLICY DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE FOR RECURRING INVESTIGATIVE OR PROFESSIONAL WITNESSES
ADOPTED JUNE 19, 2013 MODEL POLICY DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE FOR RECURRING INVESTIGATIVE OR PROFESSIONAL WITNESSES WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS 2013 1 This written
More informationKing County Prosecuting Attorney's Office Brady Committee Protocol
DANIEL T. SATTERBERG PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Office of the Prosecuting Attorney CRIMINAL DIVISION W554 Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 296-9000 Prosecuting Attorney's Office Brady
More informationBRADY DISCOVERY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT (INTERNAL POLICY) Revised April 22, 2010 INTRODUCTION
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY COUNTY OF VENTURA BRADY DISCOVERY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT (INTERNAL POLICY) Revised April 22, 2010 INTRODUCTION The following is an internal policy that addresses
More informationProcedural Rights. The Brady Rule
The Factual Scenario Continues The local district attorney asks to review the internal affairs file, and later decides that one of the officers was not truthful. The DA places the officer on his agency
More informationDISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE FOR RECURRING INVESTIGATIVE OR PROFESSIONAL WITNESSES
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE FOR RECURRING INVESTIGATIVE OR PROFESSIONAL WITNESSES 1 I, BACKGROUND ln representing the State of Washington, Prosecuting Attorneys function as ministers of
More informationNew Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses
New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses N.J.R.E 601. General Rule of Competency Every person is competent to be a witness unless (a) the judge finds that the proposed witness is incapable of
More informationInvestigations and Enforcement
Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 24.1.2 Last Revised January 26, 2007 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor Los Angeles,
More informationHONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT
HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY SUPPORT OPERATIONS j February 26, 2016 I COMPLAINTS AND INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS POLICY Anyone who reports a complaint (administrative or criminal) about the Honolulu Police
More informationInvestigations and Enforcement
Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Sections 24.21 24.29 Last Revised August 14, 2017 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor
More informationBrady Disclosure Requirements
IACP NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT POLICY CENTER Brady Disclosure Requirements Concepts and Issues Paper August 2008 I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of the Document This paper is designed to accompany the Model
More informationEffective January 1, 2016
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COMMISSION ON CHARACTER AND FITNESS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA Effective January 1, 2016 SECTION 1: PURPOSE The primary purposes of character and fitness screening before
More informationFEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)
FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07) In American trials complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to
More informationOklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope
Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101. Scope These Simplified Federal Rules of Evidence (Mock Trial Version) govern the trial proceedings of the
More information2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)
2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) In American trials, complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure that
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. 92,885 RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOHN WESLEY HENDERSON, v. Petitioner, CASE NO. 92,885 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH ATTORNEY GENERAL JAMES
More informationCHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE
CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE 20-1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to set forth a definition that must be met in order to use the title paralegal,
More informationHello! I am Artin DerOhanian
DISCOVERY IN MUNICIPAL COURT Artin DerOhanian Senior Associate Attorney 1380 Pantheon Way, Suite 110 San Antonio, Texas 78232 (210) 257-6357 Artin.DerOhanian@rshlawfirm.com 1 Hello! I am Artin DerOhanian
More informationthe defense written or recorded statements of the defendant or codefendant, the defendant s
DISCOVERY AND EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE I. Introduction In Utah, criminal defendants are generally entitled to broad pretrial discovery. Rule 16 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that upon request
More informationEvents such as the fatal
istockphoto.com/cranach/ioanmasay/mokee81 Events such as the fatal shooting of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, growing officer safety concerns, and divergent accounts of officer-involved
More informationIN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
Edwin S. Wall, A7446 ATTORNEY AT LAW 8 East Broadway, Ste. 405 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801 523-3445 Facsimile: (801 746-5613 Electronic Notice: edwin@edwinwall.com IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL
More information[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]
(Filed - April 3, 2008 - Effective August 1, 2008) Rule XI. Disciplinary Proceedings. Section 1. Jurisdiction. [UNCHANGED] Section 2. Grounds for discipline. [SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED] (c)
More informationRULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003
Article I. General Provisions 101. Scope 102. Purpose and Construction RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003 Article IV. Relevancy and its Limits 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence"
More informationExcerpts from NC Defender Manual on Third-Party Discovery
Excerpts from NC Defender Manual on Third-Party Discovery 1. Excerpt from Volume 1, Pretrial, of NC Defender Manual: Discusses procedures for obtaining records from third parties and rules governing subpoenas
More information2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE
2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version Article I. General Provisions 101. Scope 102. Purpose and Construction Article IV. Relevancy and its Limits 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence"
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO CASE NO. 91,325
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO. 97-04 CASE NO. 91,325 RE: ELIZABETH LYNN HAPNER / ELIZABETH L. HAPNER'S RESPONSE TO THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION'S REPLY COMES NOW, Elizabeth
More informationDELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE
DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE In American trials, complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure that
More informationTHE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005
THE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005 The ability to call the state laws to witness must be given prime importance, without being influenced solely by what is said by the incumbents. Zhabdrung Rimpochhe THE
More informationCriminal Law Section Luncheon The Current State of Discovery in Virginia vs. The Intractable John L. Brady
Criminal Law Section Luncheon The Current State of Discovery in Virginia vs. The Intractable John L. Brady Shannon L. Taylor Commonwealth's Attorney's Office P.O. Box 90775 Henrico VA 23273-0775 Tel: 804-501-5051
More informationDistrict of Columbia False Claims Act
District of Columbia False Claims Act 2-308.03. Claims by District government against contractor (a) (1) All claims by the District government against a contractor arising under or relating to a contract
More informationFederal Rules Of Evidence (2012)
of 27 2/26/2012 10:34 AM Published on Federal Evidence Review (http://federalevidence.com) Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012) The Federal Rules of Evidence Page provides the current version of the Federal
More informationDiscovery in Justice Court
Discovery in Justice Court Bronson Tucker, Director of Curriculum bt16@txstate.edu Resources Discovery in Civil Cases TRCP 500.9 Justice Court Discovery TRCP 190-205 County/District Discovery Rules (Guidance)
More informationSeptember 1, 2015 Le 1 er septembre 2015 DISCLOSURE
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CABINET DU PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS OPERATIONAL MANUAL MANUEL DES OPÉRATIONS DE POURSUITES PUBLIQUES TYPE OF DOCUMENT TYPE DE DOCUMENT : Policy Politique CHAPTER
More informationSECURING ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES
SECURING ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES Robert Farb, UNC School of Government (April 2015) Contents I. Reference... 1 II. Witness Subpoena... 1 A. Manner of Service... 2 B. Attendance Required Until Discharge...
More informationSIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE
SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...3 TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Title 1, Chapter 38...3 TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I: General Provisions...4 Article IV: Relevancy
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA. STATE OF ALABAMA, ) ) ) ) v. ) CASE NO. CC ) ) ) FELIX BARRY MOORE, ) ) Defendant.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA ELECTRONICALLY FILED 7/31/2014 3:20 PM 43-CC-2014-000226.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA MARY B. ROBERSON, CLERK STATE OF ALABAMA, v. CASE NO. CC-2014-000226
More informationPierce County Ethics Commission Administrative Procedures (Promulgated pursuant to Pierce County Code Ch. 3.12) Revised December 13, 2017
(Promulgated pursuant to Pierce County Code Ch. 3.12) Revised December 13, 2017 I. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES 1.1 Description of Organization The Pierce County Ethics Commission ("Commission") was established
More informationRules of Procedure and Evidence*
Rules of Procedure and Evidence* Adopted by the Assembly of States Parties First session New York, 3-10 September 2002 Official Records ICC-ASP/1/3 * Explanatory note: The Rules of Procedure and Evidence
More informationCIRCUIT AND CHANCERY COURTS:
. CIRCUIT AND CHANCERY COURTS: Advice for Persons Who Want to Represent Themselves Read this booklet before completing any forms! Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 THE PURPOSE OF THIS BOOKLET... 1 SHOULD
More informationSTATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
PAGE: 1 of 5 TITLE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION POLICY REFERENCE NUMBER: 8-0-107 DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITY: Human Resource Services DATE OF LAST REVISION: June 15, 2018 DISCLAIMER PURSUANT TO SECTION 41-1-110
More informationCOURT DOCUMENTS AND THE FOIA Annual Meeting August 25, 2011
COURT DOCUMENTS AND THE FOIA Danny C. Crowe Municipal Court Administration Turner Padget Graham & Laney, PA Association of South Carolina 803.227.4239 Annual Meeting dcrowe@turnerpadget.com August 25,
More informationO.C.G.A. TITLE 23 Chapter 3 Article 6. GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved.
O.C.G.A. TITLE 23 Chapter 3 Article 6 GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2015 Regular Session *** TITLE 23. EQUITY CHAPTER 3. EQUITABLE REMEDIES
More informationLauren Ordner, MS, LPC 1220 State Route 31 N, Suite 17 Lebanon, New Jersey (908)
Lauren Ordner, MS, LPC 1220 State Route 31 N, Suite 17 Lebanon, New Jersey 08833 (908) 210 3086 LaurenOrdner@gmail.com www.laurenordnerlpc.com Notice of Privacy Practices Receipt and Acknowledgment of
More informationRhode Island False Claims Act
Rhode Island False Claims Act 9-1.1-1. Name of act. [Effective until February 15, 2008.] This chapter may be cited as the State False Claims Act. 9-1.1-2. Definitions. [Effective until February 15, 2008.]
More informationCHAPTER 9 RECORDS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Last Updated: June 13, 2016 PREFACE
CHAPTER 9 RECORDS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Last Updated: June 13, 2016 PREFACE This Chapter of the P&P is intended to be consistent with those portions of the Utah Government Records Access and Management
More information6.17. Impeachment by Instances of Misconduct
6.17. Impeachment by Instances of Misconduct (1) Subject to paragraph (c), (a) the credibility of a witness may be impeached on cross-examination by asking the witness about prior specific criminal, vicious,
More informationCODE OF ETHICS CODE OF ETHICS BYLAWS CODE OF ETHICS REGULATIONS STATEMENT OF ETHICS VIOLATION INITIAL SCREENING INQUIRY
CODE OF ETHICS I II III IV CODE OF ETHICS BYLAWS CODE OF ETHICS REGULATIONS STATEMENT OF ETHICS VIOLATION INITIAL SCREENING INQUIRY I ARTICLE II CODE OF ETHICS CODE OF ETHICS PREAMBLE Section 1. Dedication
More information2010 PA Super 230 : :
2010 PA Super 230 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. JOHN RUGGIANO, JR., Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 1991 EDA 2009 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence of June 10, 2009 In
More informationUNRAVELING THE MYSTERY OF THE CHARACTER AND FITNESS PROCESS
UNRAVELING THE MYSTERY OF THE CHARACTER AND FITNESS PROCESS By Diane Van Aken Manager, State Bar of Michigan Character and Fitness Department In addition to completing law school and passing the Michigan
More informationFEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)
FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (ADOPTED 9/4/2012) INDEX ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101 Scope... 1 Rule 102 Purpose and Construction... 1 ARTICLE II. JUDICIAL NOTICE... 1 Rule 201
More informationWASHINGTON STATE MEDICAID FRAUD FALSE CLAIMS ACT. This chapter may be known and cited as the medicaid fraud false claims act.
Added by Chapter 241, Laws 2012. Effective date June 7, 2012. RCW 74.66.005 Short title. WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAID FRAUD FALSE CLAIMS ACT This chapter may be known and cited as the medicaid fraud false
More informationINDIANA UNIVERSITY Policy and Procedures on Research Misconduct DRAFT Updated March 9, 2017
INDIANA UNIVERSITY Policy and Procedures on Research Misconduct DRAFT Updated March 9, 2017 Policy I. Introduction A. Research rests on a foundation of intellectual honesty. Scholars must be able to trust
More informationRULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULES 3:26 BAIL
RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULES 3:26 BAIL Rule 3:26-1. Right to Pretrial Release Before Conviction (a) Persons Entitled; Standards for Fixing. (1) Persons Charged on a Complaint-Warrant
More informationSIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Editor's Note 1: This handout contains a detailed answer explanation for each Evidence question that appeared
More informationDiscussion. Discussion
R.C.M. 404(e) ( e ) U n l e s s o t h e r w i s e p r e s c r i b e d b y t h e S e c r e t a r y c o n c e r n e d, d i r e c t a p r e t r i a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n u n d e r R.C.M. 405, and, if
More informationOverview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure. Basic Concepts. What is Proof (Evidence) David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx.
Overview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx Basic Concepts PresumptionofInnocence:BurdenonStateto erase presumption by proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Absolute
More informationIndex. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,
Index References in this index from 900 to 911 are to sections of the Wisconsin Rules of Evidence, and references from 1 to 33 are to chapters of this book. A Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, 902.01
More informationMethods of impeachment. Contradiction Inconsistent statement Bad character for truthfulness Bias Lack of capacity or opportunity to observe
Methods of impeachment Contradiction Inconsistent statement Bad character for truthfulness Bias Lack of capacity or opportunity to observe 1 Oswalt rule: Extrinsic evidence is not admissible to impeach
More informationFBOR DISCIPLINARY APPEAL PROCEDURE City of Seaside
FBOR DISCIPLINARY APPEAL PROCEDURE City of Seaside The following appeals procedures are adopted pursuant to Government Code 3254.5 of the Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act. 1. DEFINITIONS a. The
More informationPMI MEMBER ETHICAL STANDARDS MEMBER CODE OF ETHICS
PMI MEMBER ETHICAL STANDARDS MEMBER CODE OF ETHICS The Project Management Institute (PMI) is a professional organization dedicated to the development and promotion of the field of project management. The
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN GRAHAM, a.k.a. JOHN BOY PATTON, and VINE RICHARD MARSHALL, a.k.a. RICHARD VINE
More informationAttorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters
Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters Code of Civil Procedure 1985.8 Subpoena seeking electronically stored information (a)(1) A subpoena in a civil proceeding may require
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: v. Defendant. CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER By stipulation and agreement of the parties,
More informationColorado Medicaid False Claims Act
Colorado Medicaid False Claims Act (C.R.S. 25.5-4-303.5 to 310) i 25.5-4-303.5. Short title This section and sections 25.5-4-304 to 25.5-4-310 shall be known and may be cited as the "Colorado Medicaid
More informationCOLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 4
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 4 Court of Appeals No. 11CA0241 Larimer County District Court No 02CR1044 Honorable Daniel J. Kaup, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
More informationSCSBA Annual Convention New Board Member Orientation
(schedule of collateral) HALLIGAN MAHONEY WILLIAMS SMITH FAWLEY & REAGLE, PA THE TOWER AT 1301 GERVAIS STREET, SUITE 900 PO BOX 11367 COLUMBIA, SC 29211 PH 803.254.4035 HMWLEGAL.COM WILLIAM F. [BICK] HALLIGAN
More informationTHE RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE FIREMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO
THE RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE FIREMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO Procedural Rules Established Pursuant to 40 ILCS 5/6-191 Governing Applications for and Administrative Hearings upon Applications
More informationMEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY AND THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION (SLSF)
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY AND THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION (SLSF) RE: Uniform Investigation Rule for UTU represented employees. ARTICLE I - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
More informationLOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B
124 NORTH CAROLINA ROBESON COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B Rule 1. Name. These rules shall
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 28, 2018 D-78-18 In the Matter of MARY ELIZABETH RAIN, an Attorney. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE
More informationDISCOVERY & E-DISCOVERY
DISCOVERY & E-DISCOVERY The Supreme Court of Hawai i seeks public comment regarding proposals to amend Rules 26, 30, 33, 34, 37, and 45 of the Hawai i Rules of Civil Procedure. The proposals clarifies
More informationMichigan Medicaid False Claims Act
Michigan Medicaid False Claims Act (Mich. Comp. Laws 400.601 to.615) i 400.601. Short title. Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as "the medicaid false claim act". 400.602. Definitions. Sec.
More informationThis article may be cited as the Access to Justice Post-Conviction DNA Testing Act.
Page 1 Code of Laws of South Carolina 1976 Annotated Currentness Title 17. Criminal Procedures Chapter 28. Post-Conviction DNA Testing and Preservation of Evidence Article 1. Post-Conviction DNA Procedures
More informationThe Psychologists Act, 1997
1 The Psychologists Act, 1997 being Chapter P-36.01 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1997 (subsections 54(1), (2), (3), (6), (7) and (8), effective December 1, 1997; sections 1 to 53, subsections 54(4),
More informationThe Registered Music Teachers Act, 2002
Consolidated to August 31, 2010 1 REGISTERED MUSIC TEACHERS, 2002 c. R-11.1 The Registered Music Teachers Act, 2002 being Chapter R-11.1 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2002 (effective August 1, 2004);
More informationImpeachment by attack on character for truthfulness. 608(a) opinion and reputation evidence 608(b) specific acts -- prior convictions
Impeachment by attack on character for truthfulness 608(a) opinion and reputation evidence 608(b) specific acts 609 -- prior convictions 1 Question. Rule 608(b) codifies the Oswalt rule prohibiting use
More informationAmerican Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE
Last Updated: January 6, 2014 American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I. Rule 101. Scope; Definitions (a) Scope. These rules apply to proceedings in the courts of the State of
More informationThe Medical Radiation Technologists Act, 2006
1 MEDICAL RADIATION TECHNOLOGISTS c. M-10.3 The Medical Radiation Technologists Act, 2006 being Chapter M-10.3 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2006 (effective May 30, 2011) as amended by the the Statutes
More informationCriminal Procedure Act 2009
Examinable excerpts of Criminal Procedure Act 2009 as at 2 October 2017 CHAPTER 2 COMMENCING A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING PART 2.1 WAYS IN WHICH A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IS COMMENCED 5 How a criminal proceeding
More informationThe Canadian Information Processing Society of Saskatchewan Act
CANADIAN INFORMATION 1 The Canadian Information Processing Society of Saskatchewan Act being Chapter C-0.2 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2005 (effective June 24, 2005) as amended by the Statutes of
More informationPEACE OFFICER PRIVILEGES IN CIVIL LITIGATION: An Introduction to the Pitchess Procedure
PEACE OFFICER PRIVILEGES IN CIVIL LITIGATION: An Introduction to the Pitchess Procedure Presented by Tony M. Sain, Esq. tms@manningllp.com MANNING & KASS, ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP Five Questions Five
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR JOSEPHINE COUNTY. CASE No. 07-CR-0043
Terri Wood, OSB # Law Office of Terri Wood, P.C. 0 Van Buren Street Eugene, Oregon 0 1--1 Fax: 1-- Email: twood@callatg.com Attorney for Benjamin Jones IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR JOSEPHINE
More informationRule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]
Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ] (a) Required Disclosures; Methods to Discover Additional Matter. (1) Initial Disclosures. Except to the extent
More informationINDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT
Indiana False Claims and Whistleblower Protection Act, codified at 5-11-5.5 et seq (as amended through P.L. 109-2014) Indiana Medicaid False Claims and Whistleblower Protection Act, codified at 5-11-5.7
More informationThe Assessment Appraisers Act
1 ASSESSMENT APPRAISERS c. A-28.01 The Assessment Appraisers Act being Chapter A-28.01* of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1995 (effective November 1, 2002) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan 2009,
More information2. Witness statement: by the maker of the witness statement;
This leaflet is designed to provide you with a brief outline of the practice and procedure of the High Court and the District Court on statements of truth. You should read Order 41A of Rules of the High
More informationWest Virginia University Research Integrity Procedure Approved by the Faculty Senate May 9, 2011
West Virginia University Research Integrity Procedure Approved by the Faculty Senate May 9, 2011 1 I. Introduction 2 3 A. General Policy 4 5 Integrity is an obligation of all who engage in the acquisition,
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY. v. Case No CF 381 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
BY THE COURT: Case 2005CF000381 Document 989 Filed 09-06-2018 Page 1 of 11 DATE SIGNED: September 6, 2018 FILED 09-06-2018 Clerk of Circuit Court Manitowoc County, WI 2005CF000381 Electronically signed
More informationILLINOIS. Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter /5(h)
ILLINOIS Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 20 2630/5(h) (h) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act to the contrary and cumulative with any rights to expungement of criminal records, whenever
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THECOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO INDEX
October 1, 1996 Last Update: February 23, 2018 Index Page 1 RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THECOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO INDEX RULE 1 - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION...
More informationTEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, Title, Scope, and Applicability of the Rules; Definitions
TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, 2016 ARTICLE I. Rule 101. Rule 102. Rule 103. Rule 104. Rule 105. Rule 106. Rule 107. ARTICLE II. Rule 201. Rule 202. Rule 203. Rule 204. ARTICLE III. Rule 301.
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC96979 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. MELODY RIDGLEY FORTUNATO, Respondent. [March 22, 2001] PER CURIAM. We have for review a referee s report recommending that attorney
More informationEFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION TIPS LAWRENCE J. WHITNEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW
EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION TIPS LAWRENCE J. WHITNEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW I. GENERAL REMARKS A. Accountability (Advocate) 1. Just you 2. No one else is there for client - never do or say anything that goes
More informationCriminal Law Table of Contents
Criminal Law Table of Contents Attorney - Client Relations Legal Services Retainer Agreement - Hourly Fee Appearance of Counsel Waiver of Conflict of Interest Letter Declining Representation Motion to
More informationRULE 19 APPEALS TO THE CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE (Effective January 10, 2018; Rule Revision Memo 33D)
RULE 19 APPEALS TO THE CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE (Effective January 10, 2018; Rule Revision Memo 33D) Purpose Statement: The purpose of this rule is to provide a fair, efficient, and speedy administrative
More informationADVOCATE MODEL RULE 3.1
ADVOCATE MODEL RULE 3.1 1 RULE 3.1 - MERITORIOUS CLAIMS AND CONTENTIONS (a) A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and
More informationMagistrate Court of Cherokee County The Warrant Application Process
Magistrate Court of Cherokee County The Warrant Application Process The issuance of a criminal arrest warrant is a serious matter. The court does not take lightly the arrest and incarceration of an individual.
More informationPARAMEDICS. The Paramedics Act. being
1 PARAMEDICS c. P-0.1 The Paramedics Act being Chapter P-0.1* of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2007 (effective September 1, 2008; except section 54 effective April 1, 2007) as amended by the Statutes of
More informationJOSEPH M. LATONA, ESQ. 716 BRISBANE BUILDING 403 MAIN STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK (716)
Supplemental Outline on Effective Discovery JOSEPH M. LATONA, ESQ. 716 BRISBANE BUILDING 403 MAIN STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14203 (716) 842-0416 INTRODUCTION This outline supplements the thorough course
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
September 22, 2015: Criminal Trial Scheduling and Discovery IN THE MATTER OF : CRIMINAL TRIAL SCHEDULING : STANDING ORDER AND DISCOVERY : The Court having considered a revised protocol for scheduling in
More information