Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY"

Transcription

1 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: In re: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc Securities Litigation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case No. 3:15-cv PGS-DEA I, Alexander Villanova, declare and state as follows: Consolidated with 3:15-cv and 3:15-cv (per Dkt. No. 40) DECLARATION OF ALEXANDER VILLANOVA REGARDING (A) MAILING OF NOTICE AND PROOF OF CLAIM; AND THE (B) REPORT ON REQUESTS FOR EXCLUSION RECEIVED TO DATE 1. I am a Project Manager employed by Epiq Systems, Inc. ( Epiq ). The following statements are based on my personal knowledge and information provided by other Epiq employees working under my supervision, and if called on to do so, I could and would testify competently thereto. 2. Epiq was retained by Class Counsel in the above-captioned action (the Action ), and appointed pursuant to paragraph 7 of the Court s Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Authorizing Notice and Scheduling Settlement Hearing dated June 29, 2017 ( Preliminary Approval Order ), to serve as the Claims Administrator. I submit this Declaration in order to provide the Court and the parties to the Action with information regarding the mailing of the Courtapproved Notice of Pendency of Consolidated Class Action, Proposed Settlement, Settlement Hearing, and Right to Appeal (the Notice ) and the Proof of Claim and Release ( Proof of Claim ), (together, the Notice and Proof of Claim are referred to herein as the Notice Packet ), and establishment of the website and toll-free number dedicated to this Settlement, in accordance with the Court s Preliminary Approval Order.

2 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 2 of 31 PageID: DISSEMINATION OF THE NOTICE PACKET 3. Epiq is responsible for disseminating the Notice Packet to potential Settlement Class Members. By definition, Settlement Class Members are all record and beneficial holders of Amicus common stock, their respective successors in interest, successors, predecessors in interest, predecessors, representatives, trustees, executors, administrators, heirs, assigns or transferees, immediate and remote, and any person or entity acting for or on behalf of, or claiming under, any of them, and each of them, together with their predecessors and successors and assigns, who purchased or otherwise acquired (other than through Amicus September 30, 2015 acquisition of Scioderm, Inc.) shares of Amicus common stock between and including March 19, 2015 and October 1, Excluded from the Settlement Class are individuals named as defendants in the Action, Amicus current and former directors and officers and their immediate family members, and any entity controlled Amicus current and former directors and officers. Also excluded from the Class is any person or entity who excludes themselves by filing a timely Request for Exclusion. 4. On August 15, 2017, Epiq received a Microsoft Excel file from Counsel. The Excel file contained a list of record holders obtained from Amicus transfer agent. This list had a total of 50 names and addresses. Epiq extracted the names and addresses, and after clean-up and checking for duplicate entries, there remained 50 unique names and addresses of potential Class Members. 5. Epiq loaded this data into a database created for the Action. 6. Epiq thereafter formatted the Notice Packet, and caused it to be printed, personalized with the name and address of each potential Class Member, posted for first-class mail, postage prepaid, and mailed to the potential Class Members on September 1, 2017 (the Notice Date ). On the Notice Date, 50 copies of the Notice Packet were mailed. A copy of the Notice Packet is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 7. As the large majority of potential Settlement Class Members are beneficial purchasers or holders whose securities are held in street name i.e., the securities are purchased 2 DECL. OF ALEXANDER VILLANOVA REGARDING NOTICE AND EXCLUSIONS RECEIVED TO DATE CASE NO. 3:15-cv PGS-DEA

3 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 3 of 31 PageID: and held by brokerage firms, banks, institutions and other third-party nominees in the name of the nominee, on behalf of the beneficial purchasers or holders, the Notice requested that those who purchased or acquired the Amicus common stock during the Class Period; i.e., between March 19, 2015, and October 1, 2015, inclusive, for the beneficial interest of a person or organization other than themselves to either (i) send a copy of the Notice Packet to the beneficial owner of such securities, postmarked no later than 10 days after such nominees receipt of the Notice Packet, or (ii) provide to Epiq the names and addresses of such persons no later than 10 days after such nominees receipt of the Notice Packet. 8. Epiq maintains and updates an internal list of the largest and most common banks, brokers and other nominees. The Notice Packet, along with a Nominee Cover Letter requesting that its recipients forward the Notice Packet to beneficial owners or provide Epiq with mailing information for such beneficial owners, was mailed to Epiq s internal broker list containing 1,429 additional names and addresses on the Notice Date. A copy of the Nominee Cover Letter is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 9. In accordance with the instructions in the Notice, Epiq has received requests from nominees for additional Notice Packets to be mailed directly to potential Settlement Class Members identified by the nominees. Nominees have also requested additional copies of the Notice Packet for them to forward onto potential Settlement Class Members. Since the Notice Date, Epiq received requests from nominees for 15,792 Notice Packets. Each of the requests for Notice Packets has been and will continue to be completed in a timely manner. 10. As of October 11, 2017, an aggregate of 17,409 Notice Packets have been disseminated to potential Settlement Class Members and nominees by first-class mail. 3 DECL. OF ALEXANDER VILLANOVA REGARDING NOTICE AND EXCLUSIONS RECEIVED TO DATE CASE NO. 3:15-cv PGS-DEA

4 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 4 of 31 PageID: PUBLICATION OF THE SUMMARY NOTICE 11. In accordance with Paragraph 8 of the Preliminary Approval Order, Epiq caused the Summary Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Consolidated Class Action (the Summary Notice ) to be published in Investor s Business Daily on September 11, A copy of the proof of publication of the Summary Notice in Investor s Business Daily is attached hereto as Exhibit C. CALL CENTER SERVICES 12. Epiq reserved a toll-free phone number for the Settlement, (888) , which it continues to maintain. This toll-free number was set forth in the Notice Packet and is on the Settlement website. 13. The toll-free number connects callers with an Interactive Voice Recording (the IVR ). The IVR provides potential Settlement Class Members and others who call the toll-free telephone number with pre-recorded information, including a brief summary about the Settlement, the option to select one of several more detailed recorded messages addressing frequently asked questions, the option to request a copy of the Notice Packet, or the option to speak live with a trained phone agent. The toll-free telephone line with pre-recorded information is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Epiq made the IVR available on the Notice Date. 14. Monday through Friday from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time (excluding official holidays), callers are able to speak to a live phone agent regarding the status of the Settlement, to obtain help filling out and filing their Proof of Claim, and/or obtain answers to questions they may have about communications they receive from Epiq. During other hours, callers may leave a message for an agent to call them back. 15. Epiq will continue operating, maintaining and, as appropriate, updating the IVR until the conclusion of this settlement administration. Epiq will continue providing live phone agent support until the conclusion of the settlement administration. 4 DECL. OF ALEXANDER VILLANOVA REGARDING NOTICE AND EXCLUSIONS RECEIVED TO DATE CASE NO. 3:15-cv PGS-DEA

5 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 5 of 31 PageID: As of October 11, 2017, Epiq has received or placed a total of 42 calls, for a total of minutes, to the toll-free number set up for this Settlement. WEBSITE 17. Epiq established and is maintaining a website dedicated to this Settlement ( to allow Settlement Class Members to file an online claim, provide additional information to Settlement Class Members, and to download a copy of the Notice, Proof of Claim, Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, and the Preliminary Approval Order. The web address was set forth in the Notice Packet. The Settlement website was operational beginning on the Notice Date, and is accessible 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. EXCLUSION REQUESTS 18. Pursuant to this Court s Preliminary Approval Order, Settlement Class Members who wish to be excluded from the Settlement Class are required to do so in writing so that the request is postmarked by October 19, As of October 11, 2017, Epiq has received one (1) exclusion request. Epiq will submit a supplemental declaration after the deadline has passed to provide further details on those Class Members who validly request exclusion. OBJECTIONS FILED 19. Pursuant to the Court-approved Notice, all objections must be received no later than October 19, As of October 11, 2017, Epiq has received no objections. Epiq will submit a supplemental declaration after the deadline has passed to provide further details on those Class Members who validly object. 5 DECL. OF ALEXANDER VILLANOVA REGARDING NOTICE AND EXCLUSIONS RECEIVED TO DATE CASE NO. 3:15-cv PGS-DEA

6 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 6 of 31 PageID: 1603

7 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 7 of 31 PageID: 1604 Exhibit A

8 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 8 of 31 PageID: 1605 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY In re: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Litigation Case No. 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Consolidated with 3:15-cv and 3:15-cv (per Dkt. No. 40) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAL If you purchased or otherwise acquired shares of Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. common stock in a transaction that took place within the United States or its territories at any time between and including March 19, 2015 and October 1, 2015, you could receive a payment from a proposed settlement of the above-captioned consolidated class action. A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. The proposed settlement. This Notice is being sent regarding a proposed settlement (the Settlement ) of the above-captioned consolidated class action (the Action ) memorialized in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated April 14, 2017 (the Stipulation ) between and among the following parties in the Action: (i) Dr. Barry Brenner ( Lead Plaintiff ), by and through his undersigned counsel, on his own behalf and on behalf of the Class (defined below), and (ii) defendants Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. ( Amicus or the Company ), John F. Crowley, and Jay A. Barth (collectively, Defendants, and with Lead Plaintiff, each a Party and collectively, the Parties ), by and through their undersigned counsel. Securities, Class, and Class Period. The Settlement class is comprised of any and all record and beneficial holders of Amicus common stock, their respective successors in interest, successors, predecessors in interest, predecessors, representatives, trustees, executors, administrators, heirs, assigns or transferees, immediate and remote, and any person or entity acting for or on behalf of, or claiming under, any of them, and each of them, together with their predecessors and successors and assigns, who purchased or otherwise acquired shares of Amicus common stock between and including March 19, 2015 and October 1, Excluded from the Class are: Individuals named as defendants in the Action, Amicus current and former directors and officers and their immediate family members, and any entity controlled by Amicus current and former directors and officers. Also excluded from the Class is any person or entity who excludes themselves by filing a timely Request for Exclusion (defined below). The Class Period is the time-period between and including March 19, 2015 and October 1, Settlement Payment. $3,750, in cash (the Settlement Amount ). The Settlement Fund refers to the Settlement Payment plus all interest earned thereon. The lawsuit. As discussed further below, the Settlement resolves the Action over whether Defendants knowingly or recklessly disseminated false and misleading information during the Class Period. Questions? Call or visit S4501 v Page 1

9 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 9 of 31 PageID: 1606 Attorneys fees and expenses. Plaintiffs Counsel (defined below) have litigated this Action on a contingent basis and have conducted this litigation and advanced the expenses of litigation with the expectation that if they were successful in recovering money for the Class, they would receive fees and be reimbursed for their expenses from the Settlement Fund, as is customary in this type of litigation. Plaintiffs Counsel will apply to the Court (defined below) for attorneys fees not to exceed 25% of the Settlement Fund and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses not to exceed $75,000.00, along with reimbursement for reasonable time and expenses incurred by Lead Plaintiff not to exceed $10,000.00, plus interest (the Fee Application ), all to be paid from the Settlement Fund. Lead Counsel s Fee Application will be filed with the Court on or before September 28, If the above amounts are approved by the Court, the average cost per share of Amicus common stock would be approximately $0.005 per share of Amicus common stock outstanding. More information. Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the Class can be reached at: Jeffrey C. Block Jacob A. Walker Block & Leviton LLP 155 Federal Street, Suite 400 Boston, MA (617) Additional information about the Settlement can be found at Your legal rights are affected whether you act or do not act. Read this Notice carefully. Statement of Recovery Your individual recovery from the Settlement Fund will depend on numerous factors. Recovery will be split between shares acquired between March 19, 2015 and September 14, 2015 (the Long Period ), and those acquired between September 15, 2015 and October 1, 2015 (the Short Period ). Lead Counsel (defined below) estimates that approximately 61.8 million shares of Amicus common stock were purchased or otherwise acquired and potentially damaged during the Long Period, and 7.3 million shares of Amicus common stock were purchased or otherwise acquired and potentially damaged during the Short Period. Lead Counsel has allocated 95% of the Settlement Fund to the Short Period and 5% of the Settlement Fund to the Long Period based on the relative strength of the claims of stockholders who purchased in the Short and Long Periods. Based on the above, the average recovery per share of Amicus common stock under the Settlement, before deducting fees and expenses and assuming all shareholders file a claim, will be approximately $0.003 per share in the Long Period and $0.488 per share in the Short Period, before the deduction of attorneys fees, costs, and expenses as approved by the Court (defined below). The actual recovery per share will depend on (1) the number of claims filed; (2) when members of the Class purchased and/or acquired their shares during the Class Period; (3) whether members of the Class either sold their shares during the Class Period, or held their shares past the end of the Class Period; (4) administrative costs, including the costs of notice, for the Action; and (5) the amount awarded by the Court for attorneys fees and expenses. Circumstances of the Settlement The principal reason for Lead Plaintiff s consent to the Settlement is to provide a benefit to the Class. This benefit must be compared to the risk that no recovery might be achieved after contested motions (including a pending Motion to Dismiss), a contested trial, and likely appeals, possibly years into the future. While Lead Counsel believed that their claims would survive a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment and ultimately result in a verdict for the Class, Defendants believed otherwise and repeatedly asserted defenses to the allegations, and that Defendants engaged in no wrongdoing whatsoever. Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel recognized that especially here, where a jury would be required to listen to multiple experts presenting competing views, the jury could find in Defendants favor. In addition, Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel recognized that even if they prevailed, they might not succeed in winning a jury verdict of the size of the Settlement Amount. The Settlement therefore enables the Class to recover a substantial amount without incurring any additional risk or costs. Questions? Call or visit S4502 v Page 2

10 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 10 of 31 PageID: 1607 YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT Submit a Proof of Claim by January 1, 2018 Exclude Yourself by October 19, 2017 Object by October 19, 2017 Attend the Hearing on November 9, 2017 Do Nothing The only way to receive a payment. Receive no payment. This is the only option that allows you to participate in another lawsuit against Defendants or the Defendant Released Persons (defined below) concerning the legal claims being released in the Action (defined below). You may write to the Court (defined below) if you do not like anything about the Settlement, including the plan of allocation for the Settlement Funds as set forth herein or the Fee Application. You may ask to speak in Court (defined below) about the fairness of the Settlement. Receive no payment and be prohibited from asserting any Plaintiffs Settled Claims (defined below) against Defendants or any Defendant Released Persons (defined below). These rights and options and the deadlines to exercise them are explained in this Notice. The Court (defined below) in charge of the Action must decide whether to approve the proposed Settlement. Payments will be made if the Court approves the proposed Settlement and, if there are any appeals, after they are resolved. Please be patient. 1. Why did I receive this Notice package? BASIC INFORMATION You or someone in your family may be part of the Class, and purchased or otherwise acquired shares of Amicus common stock in a transaction that took place within the United States or its territories at any time between and including March 19, 2015 and October 1, If so, you have a right to know about the proposed Settlement of the Action, and about all your options, before the Court (defined below) decides whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, and after any objections or appeals are resolved, payments out of the Settlement Fund will be made. This package explains the Action, the Settlement, your legal rights, what benefits are available, who is eligible for them, and how to receive them. 2. What is the Action about? On October 7, 2015, Lifestyle Investments, LLC, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (the District Court or Court ) against Amicus and its Chairman and Chief Executive, Mr. Crowley Lifestyle Investments, LLC v. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc., et al., No. 3:15-cv (D.N.J. Oct. 7, 2015). The complaint alleged that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements to Amicus investors in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the PSLRA ), 15 U.S.C. 78j(b), 78t(a), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R b-5 (the Exchange Act ), on behalf of a class of purchasers of the Company s common stock between September 15, 2015 and October 1, On October 8, 2015, Gary Frechter filed a complaint in the same Court against Amicus, Mr. Crowley, and Amicus Chief Financial Officer, Dr. Barth Frechter v. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc., et al., No. 3:15-cv (D.N.J. Oct. 8, 2015). This action also alleged that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements to Amicus investors in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, but set a class period beginning on March 19, 2015, and running through October 1, Questions? Call or visit S4503 v Page 3

11 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 11 of 31 PageID: 1608 On October 13, 2015, Michael R. Harvey filed a complaint in the same Court against Amicus and Mr. Crowley that was virtually identical to the complaint filed by Lifestyle Investments, LLC, also alleging that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements to Amicus investors. Harvey v. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc., et al., No. 3:15-cv (D.N.J. Oct. 13, 2015). On May 26, 2016, the Court consolidated the three actions (the Securities Actions ), appointed Dr. Barry Brenner as Lead Plaintiff, and approved Lead Plaintiff s selection of Block & Leviton LLP and Gardy Notice LLP as Lead and Liaison counsel, respectively. The case is currently assigned to the Honorable Peter G. Sheridan. Dr. Brenner filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the Complaint ) against Amicus, Mr. Crowley, and Dr. Barth on July 11, The Complaint adopted the longer class period urged by the Frechter action, and alleged that (1) all Defendants made material misrepresentations and omitted from disclosure material facts necessary to make the statements made, not misleading, in violation of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act, and (2) the Individual Defendants are liable for any primary violation of the Exchange Act as alleged control persons under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. On August 25, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. Lead Plaintiff opposed that motion on September 26, Defendants replied on October 28, On November 1, 2016, Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert held a telephone conference with counsel for the Parties. During the teleconference, the Parties agreed to attend an out-of-court mediation to see if the case could be resolved before the Motion to Dismiss was decided. On January 12, 2017, the Parties participated in a mediation led by Jed D. Melnick, Esq., of JAMS. The Parties engaged in arm s-length negotiations and were unable to reach an agreement on that date, but continued settlement discussions through Mr. Melnick as a mediator. On February 16, 2017, following additional arms -length negotiations facilitated by Mr. Melnick, the Parties reached an agreement-in-principle concerning the proposed settlement of the Action. On June 29, 2017, the Court authorized this Notice to be sent to potential Class Members and scheduled the Settlement Hearing to consider whether to grant final approval of the Settlement. 3. Why is the Action a Class Action? In a class action, one or more people called class representatives (in this case the Court appointed Lead Plaintiff Brenner as class representative) sue on behalf of people who have similar claims. All of these people who have similar claims are referred to collectively as the Class, or individually as Class Members. One court resolves the issues for all members of the Class, except for those who exclude themselves from the Settlement. Judge Sheridan of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey is overseeing this class action. 4. Why is there a Settlement? The Court did not decide in favor of Lead Plaintiffs or Defendants. Instead, both sides agreed to the Settlement. That way, they avoid the costs and risks of further litigation and trial. As explained above, Lead Plaintiff and his attorneys think the Settlement is best for all Class Members. WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT To see if you will receive money from the Settlement, you first have to determine if you are a member of the Class. 5. How do I know if I am part of the Settlement? The Class includes any and all record and beneficial holders of Amicus common stock, their respective successors in interest, successors, predecessors in interest, predecessors, representatives, trustees, executors, administrators, heirs, assigns or transferees, immediate and remote, and any person or entity acting for or on behalf of, or claiming under, any of them, and each of them, together with their predecessors and successors and assigns, who purchased or otherwise acquired (other than through Amicus September 30, 2015 acquisition of Scioderm, Inc.) shares of Amicus common stock between and including March 19, 2015 and October 1, Questions? Call or visit S4504 v Page 4

12 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 12 of 31 PageID: 1609 If you sold Amicus common stock between and including March 19, 2015 and October 1, 2015, that alone does not make you a Class Member. You are a Class Member only if you purchased or otherwise acquired Amicus common stock during the Class Period. If one of your mutual funds purchased or owns shares of Amicus common stock, that alone does not make you a Class Member. Receipt of this Notice does not necessarily mean that you are a Class Member or that you are eligible to receive the proceeds from the Settlement. If you wish to participate in the Settlement, you must submit the enclosed Proof of Claim form postmarked no later than January 1, What if I am still not sure if I am included? If you are still not sure whether you are included, you can ask for free help. You can call the claims administrator, Epiq Systems (the Claims Administrator ), at , for more information. Or, you can fill out and return the Proof of Claim form described in Question 8 to see if you qualify. You can also contact Lead Counsel by telephone or in writing as noted on page 10 of this Notice. 7. What does the Settlement provide? THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU RECEIVE The Settlement provides for a $3,750, cash payment that will establish the Settlement Fund. The balance of the Settlement Fund, after payment of Court-approved attorneys fees and expenses and the costs of claims administration, including the costs of printing and mailing this Notice and the cost of publishing a summary notice, will be divided among all members of the Class who submit valid Proof of Claim (defined below) forms. HOW YOU RECEIVE A PAYMENT SUBMITTING A PROOF OF CLAIM FORM 8. How will I receive a payment? To qualify for payment, you must be an eligible member of the Class and you must submit a Proof of Claim and Release form ( Proof(s) of Claim ). A Proof of Claim is enclosed with this Notice. Read the instructions carefully, fill out the form, include all the documents the form requests, sign it, and submit it by no later than January 1, Any Class Member who fails to submit a Proof of Claim by such date shall be forever barred from receiving any distribution from the Settlement Fund (unless by order of the Court the deadline to submit a Proof of Claim is extended or such Class Member s Proof of Claim is accepted), but otherwise shall be bound by all of the terms of the Stipulation and the Settlement, including the releases in the Stipulation and described, and will be permanently barred and enjoined from bringing any action against any and all Defendant Released Persons (defined below) concerning any and all of Plaintiffs Settled Claims (defined below). Retain a copy of everything you mail, in case the materials are lost or destroyed during shipping. A Proof of Claim shall be deemed to be submitted when postmarked, if mailed by first-class mail or registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, and addressed in accordance with the instructions thereon. In all other cases, the Proof of Claim shall be deemed to have been submitted on the date when received by the Claims Administrator. Each Proof of Claim shall be submitted to and reviewed by the Claims Administrator, under the supervision of Lead Counsel, who shall determine in accordance with the Stipulation and the plan of allocation of the Settlement Fund outlined herein the extent, if any, to which each Proof of Claim shall be allowed, subject to review by the Court, as necessary, as outlined below. Proofs of Claim that do not meet the submission requirements may be rejected. Only timely and valid Proof of Claim forms will be approved for payment ( Authorized Claimant(s) ). Prior to rejecting a Proof of Claim, in whole or in part, the Claims Administrator shall communicate with the claimant in writing, to give the claimant the chance to remedy any curable deficiencies in the Proof of Claim submitted. The Claims Administrator, under supervision of Lead Counsel, shall notify, in a timely fashion and in writing, all claimants whose Proofs of Claim the Claims Administrator proposes to reject, in whole or in part, setting forth the reasons therefor, and shall indicate in such notice that the claimant whose Proof of Claim is to be rejected has the right to a review by the Court if the claimant so desires and complies with the requirements outlined below. Questions? Call or visit S4505 v Page 5

13 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 13 of 31 PageID: 1610 If any claimant whose Proof of Claim has been rejected in whole or in part desires to contest such rejection, the claimant must, within twenty (20) calendar days after the date of mailing of the notice described above and required, serve upon the Claims Administrator a notice and statement of reasons indicating the claimant s grounds for contesting the rejection along with any supporting documentation, and requesting a review thereof by the Court. If a dispute concerning a Proof of Claim cannot be otherwise resolved, Lead Counsel shall thereafter present the request for review to the Court. Each claimant shall be deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to the claimant s Proof of Claim, and the Proof of Claim will be subject to investigation and discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provided that such investigation and discovery shall be limited to that claimant s status as a Class Member and the validity and amount of the claimant s Proof of Claim. No discovery shall be allowed on the merits of the Action or of the Settlement in connection with the processing of Proofs of Claim. Lead Counsel will apply to the Court, on notice to Defendants Counsel, for a Class Distribution Order: (a) approving the Claims Administrator s administrative determinations concerning the acceptance and rejection of the Proofs of Claim submitted; (b) approving payment of any administrative fees and expenses associated with the administration of the Settlement Fund, and (c) if the effective date of the Settlement has occurred, directing payment to any Authorized Claimant. Payment pursuant to the Class Distribution Order shall be final and conclusive against all Class Members. All Class Members whose Proofs of Claim are not approved by the Court for payment shall be barred from participating in distributions from the Settlement Fund, but otherwise shall be bound by all of the terms of the Stipulation and the Settlement, including the releases in the Stipulation and described, and will be permanently barred and enjoined from bringing any action against any and all Defendant Released Persons (defined below) concerning any and all of Plaintiffs Settled Claims (defined below). No person or entity shall have any claim against Lead Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs Counsel, the Claims Administrator or any other agent designated by Lead Counsel and/or their respective counsel, arising from distributions made substantially in accordance with the Stipulation, the plan of allocation of the Settlement Fund described herein, or any order of the Court. Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel shall have no liability whatsoever for the investment of the Settlement Payment or the Settlement Fund, the determination, administration, calculation, or payment of any claim by the Claims Administrator or nonperformance of the Claims Administrator, the payment or withholding of taxes (including interest and penalties), or any losses incurred in connection therewith. No opinion or advice concerning the tax consequences of the proposed Settlement to individual Class Members is being given or will be given by the Parties to the Settlement or their counsel; nor is any representation or warranty in this regard made by virtue of the Stipulation. Each Class Member s tax obligations, and the determination thereof, are the sole responsibility of the Class Member, and it is understood that the tax consequences may vary depending on the particular circumstances of each individual Class Member. All proceedings with respect to the administration, processing, and determination of Proofs of Claim and the determination of all controversies relating thereto, including disputed questions of law and fact with respect to the validity of Proofs of Claim, shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the Court and shall be decided by the Court. ALLOCATION OF SETTLEMENT FUND AMONG MEMBERS OF THE CLASS 9. How much will my payment be? If you are entitled to a payment, your share of the Settlement Fund will depend on the number of Authorized Claimants, how many shares of Amicus common stock you purchased and/or acquired, and when you purchased, acquired, and/or sold your shares. Payments will be calculated on a pro rata basis. The Claims Administrator will distribute the Settlement Fund, less all administrative costs, including the costs of notice and attorneys fees and expenses, as awarded by the Court, on a pro rata basis after the deadline for submission of Proof of Claim forms has passed. The Claims Administrator shall determine the amount a claimant who is entitled to receive a payment from the Settlement Fund is entitled to receive based upon a plan of allocation. This plan of allocation is not intended to be an estimate of the amount a Class Member might have been able to recover after a trial, nor is it an estimate of the amount that will be paid pursuant to the Settlement. The plan of allocation is the basis upon which the Settlement Fund will be proportionately allocated to the claimants entitled to receive payment on a pro rata basis. Recognized Loss will be calculated as follows: For shares purchased between March 19, 2015 and September 14, 2015, and held or sold on or after October 2, 2015, the Recognized Loss shall be $0.40 per share. Questions? Call or visit S4506 v Page 6

14 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 14 of 31 PageID: 1611 For shares purchased between September 15, 2015 and October 1, 2015, and held or sold on or after October 2, 2015, the Recognized Loss shall be $7.65 per share. If you purchased Amicus common stock after March 19, 2015, but sold those shares on or before October 1, 2015, you are not entitled to any recovery in the Settlement. Each Authorized Claimant shall be paid their pro rata share of the Settlement Fund, which is the percentage that each Authorized Claimant s Recognized Loss bears to the total of the claims of all Authorized Claimants. For purposes of calculating Recognized Loss, shares will be matched on a first in, first out ( FIFO ) basis. Claims which result in a payment of less than $10.00 will be deemed to be de minimis and will not be issued. No Recognized Loss will be calculated for any purchase of Amicus common stock to cover a short sale and Class Members who have an overall market gain in their trading of Amicus common stock will be deemed to have no Recognized Loss. To the extent that any amount of the Settlement Fund remains after the Claims Administrator has caused distributions to be made to all Authorized Claimants whether by reason of uncashed distributions or otherwise, then, after the Claims Administrator has made reasonable and diligent efforts to have Authorized Claimants cash their distributions, any balance remaining in the Settlement Fund one (1) year after the initial distribution of such funds shall be redistributed to Authorized Claimants who have cashed their initial distributions, after payment of any unpaid Taxes and Tax Expenses or any unpaid costs or fees incurred in administering the Settlement Fund for such redistribution if Lead Counsel, in consultation with the Claims Administrator, determines that additional redistributions, after the deduction of any additional fees and expenses that would be incurred with respect to such redistributions, would be cost-effective. Additional redistributions to Authorized Claimants who have cashed their prior distribution checks may occur thereafter if Lead Counsel, in consultation with the Claims Administrator, determines that additional redistributions, after the deduction of any additional fees and expenses that would be incurred with respect to such redistributions, would be cost effective. At such time as it is determined that the redistribution of funds remaining in the Settlement Fund is not cost-effective, the remaining balance in the Settlement Fund shall be contributed to the National Organization for Rare Disorders, a 501(c)(3) organization, headquartered in Danbury, Connecticut. 10. When will I receive my payment? The Court will hold a Settlement Hearing (defined below) on November 9, 2017, to decide, among other things, whether or not to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, there may be appeals. It is always uncertain whether appeals, if any, can be resolved, and resolving them can take time, perhaps several years. In addition, the Claims Administrator must process all of the Proofs of Claim. The processing is complicated and will take many months. Please be patient. 11. What am I giving up by staying in the Class? Unless you exclude yourself, you are staying in the Class, and that means that you cannot sue, continue to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit against Defendants or the Defendant Released Persons (defined below) about the claims being released in the Settlement. It also means that all of the Court s orders will apply to you and legally bind you and you will release your claims in this Action against Defendants. If the Settlement (including any modifications made with the consent of the parties as provided for herein) is approved by the Court, following the Settlement Hearing, as being fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of the Class, the parties shall jointly request that the Court enter the order and final judgment (the Order and Final Judgment ), which shall dismiss the Action and related Putative Securities Actions contained therein with prejudice and barring, among other things, any and all actions, causes of action, claims (including Unknown Claims (defined below)), duties, debts, demands, rights, disputes, suits, matters, damages, losses, costs, expenses, obligations, proceedings, issues, judgments, and liabilities of every nature and description whatsoever, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, fixed or contingent, foreseen or unforeseen, liquidated or unliquidated, accrued or unaccrued, matured or unmatured, concealed or hidden, at law or in equity, whether class, individual, direct, derivative, representative, legal, equitable, or any other type or in any other capacity against Defendant Released Persons, which now exist, or heretofore have existed, or can, shall or may exist, whether arising under federal, state, common or foreign law, including the federal securities laws and any state disclosure law, or at equity, that (a) Lead Plaintiff or any Class Member has asserted in this Action, or could have asserted in the Action or in any other proceeding or forum that concern, arise out of, refer to, are based upon, or are related in any way to the allegations, events, acts, transactions, facts, matters, occurrences, representations, statements, or omissions alleged, involved, set forth or referred to in the Complaint or the Action, or in the Securities Actions consolidated therein, including, without limitation, all of Defendants public filings and statements cited therein; (b) would have been barred by res Questions? Call or visit S4507 v Page 7

15 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 15 of 31 PageID: 1612 judicata or collateral estoppel had the Action been fully litigated to a final judgment; or (c) could have been, or in the future could be, asserted in any forum or proceeding or otherwise by Lead Plaintiff or any Class Member that relate to purchase, sale, acquisition or holding of Amicus common stock during the Class Period; provided, however, that the Plaintiffs Settled Claims shall not release any claims to enforce the Settlement. The entry of the Order and Final Judgment shall also bar and release any and all claims (including Unknown Claims), for damages, injunctive relief, or any other remedies against Plaintiff Released Persons based upon, arising from, or related to the prosecution and/or settlement of the Action and the Putative Securities Actions by Defendants, including any claim or assertion that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 was violated in any matter; provided, however, that the Defendants Settled Claims shall not release any claims to enforce the Settlement. The releases contemplated above will extend to all claims that Lead Plaintiff and the Class Members and Defendants do not know or suspect to exist at the time of the releases, which, if known, might have affected the decision to enter into the releases and participate in the Settlement. Additionally, the Order and Final Judgment will include provisions that Defendants and Lead Plaintiff acknowledge, and each of the Class Members by operation of law shall be deemed to have acknowledged, that any or all of them may discover facts in addition to or different from those now known or believed to be true by them with respect to the subject matter of Plaintiffs Settled Claims and Defendants Settled Claims, but that it is the intention of Defendants, Lead Plaintiff, and by operation of law the intention of each of the Class Members, to completely, fully, finally, and forever compromise, settle, release, discharge, extinguish, and dismiss any and all Plaintiffs Settled Claims and Defendants Settled Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or absolute, accrued or unaccrued, apparent or unapparent, which now exist, or heretofore have existed, or may hereafter exist, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, claims relating to conduct that is negligent, reckless, intentional, with or without malice, or any breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery of additional or different facts. Defendants and Lead Plaintiff acknowledge, and each of the Class Members by operation of law shall be deemed to have acknowledged, that Unknown Claims are expressly included in the definition of Plaintiffs Settled Claims and Defendants Settled Claims, and that such inclusion was expressly bargained for and was a material element of the Settlement and was relied upon by Lead Plaintiff and Defendants in entering into the Settlement. Unknown Claims means any claim that Defendants, Lead Plaintiff, or any Class Member does not know or suspect exists in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of the Plaintiffs Settled Claims and Defendants Settled Claims as against the Defendant Released Persons and Plaintiff Released Persons, including without limitation those which, if known, might have affected the decision to enter into the Settlement, or not to object to this Settlement, or not to exclude himself, herself, or itself from the Class. The Settlement is intended to extinguish all of the Plaintiffs Settled Claims and the Defendants Settled Claims and, consistent with such intention, upon the Effective Date, Defendants and Lead Plaintiff expressly waive, and each of the Class Members shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Order and Final Judgment shall have expressly waived, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the provisions, rights, and benefits of any state, federal, or foreign law or principle of common law, which may have the effect of limiting the releases set forth above. This shall include a waiver by the Lead Plaintiff and each of the Class Members and Defendants of any rights pursuant to section 1542 of the California Civil Code (or any similar, comparable, or equivalent provision of any federal, state, or foreign law, or principle of common law), which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. Defendants and Lead Plaintiff acknowledge, and each of the Class Members shall be deemed by operation of the Order and Final Judgment to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and was a material element of the Settlement and was relied upon by each and all of the Defendants and Lead Plaintiff in entering into the Settlement. EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT If you do not want a payment from the Settlement and you want to keep the right to sue or continue to sue Defendants on your own about the claims being released in the Settlement, then you must take steps to exclude yourself from the Settlement. This is referred to as opting out of the Class. Questions? Call or visit S4508 v Page 8

16 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 16 of 31 PageID: How do I exclude myself from the Settlement? To exclude yourself from the Settlement, you must make a request for exclusion (the Request(s) for Exclusion ) stating that you want to be excluded from the Settlement. The Request for Exclusion must be made by letter, and must be submitted to the Claims Administrator by no later than October 19, 2017, and must state: (i) the name, address, and telephone number of the Class Member requesting exclusion; (ii) the purchases, acquisitions, and sales of Amicus common stock made by the Class Member during the Class Period, including the dates, the number of shares of common stock, and price paid or received per share for each purchase, acquisition, or sale; and (iii) that the Class Member wishes to be excluded from the Class. Requests for Exclusion must also be signed by the Class Member requesting exclusion. All Class Members who submit valid and timely Requests for Exclusion in the manner set forth in this paragraph shall have no rights under the Stipulation, shall not share in the distribution of the Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the Settlement or Order and Final Judgment. Again, you must submit your exclusion request by no later than October 19, 2017 to the following address: Amicus Securities Litigation Claims Administrator P.O. Box 4028 Portland, OR Requests for Exclusion shall be deemed to have been submitted when postmarked, if mailed by first-class, or registered or certified mail, postage prepaid. All other Requests for Exclusion shall be deemed to have been submitted on the date they are received by the Claims Administrator. Please keep a copy of everything you send by mail, in case it is lost or destroyed during shipping. You cannot exclude yourself over the phone or by . If you ask to be excluded, you are not eligible to receive any Settlement payment, and you cannot object to the Settlement. You will not be legally bound by anything that happens in this lawsuit. 13. If I do not exclude myself, can I sue Defendants for the same thing later? No. Unless you exclude yourself, you give up any right to sue Defendants or the Defendant Released Persons for the claims being released by the Settlement. If you have a pending lawsuit relating to the claims being released in the Action against any of Defendants, speak to your lawyer in that case immediately. Remember, the exclusion deadline is October 19, If I exclude myself, can I receive a payment from the Settlement? No. If you exclude yourself, do not send a Proof of Claim form. But, you may sue, continue to sue, or be part of a different lawsuit asserting the claims being released in the Settlement against Defendants or the Defendant Released Persons. 15. Do I have a lawyer in the Action? THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU The Court has appointed Block & Leviton LLP as Lead Counsel in the Action, and this firm represents you and the other members of the Class. You will not be directly charged for these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. 16. How will the lawyers be paid? Plaintiffs Counsel will apply to the Court for attorneys fees not to exceed 25% of the Settlement Fund and for reimbursement of their out-of-pocket expenses up to $75, (collectively, an average of less than $0.005 per share of Amicus common stock), along with a reimbursement for reasonable time and expenses incurred by Lead Plaintiff not to exceed $10,000.00, which have been advanced to Lead Counsel for purposes of providing notice of Questions? Call or visit S4509 v Page 9

17 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 17 of 31 PageID: 1614 the Settlement, plus interest on such fees and expenses at the same rate as earned by the Settlement Fund. Such sums as may be approved by the Court will be paid from the Settlement Fund. Class Members are not personally liable for any such fees or expenses. The attorneys fees and expenses requested will be the only payment to Lead Counsel for its efforts in achieving the Settlement and for their risk in undertaking this representation on a wholly contingent basis. To date, Lead Counsel has not been paid for its services for conducting this litigation on behalf of Lead Plaintiff and the Class nor for its substantial out-of-pocket expenses. The fee requested will compensate Lead Counsel for its work in achieving the Settlement Fund. The Court may, however, award less than this amount. OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT You can tell the Court that you do not agree with the Settlement or some part of it. 17. How do I tell the Court that I do not like the Settlement? If you are a member of the Class, you can object to the Settlement, if you do not like any part of it, or to the Fee Application. To object, you must file with the Court by October 19, 2017, and simultaneously with, or before such filing, serve by hand or overnight delivery upon the counsel to Lead Plaintiff and Amicus as identified by this Notice: (i) written notice of the intention to appear, identifying the name, address, and telephone number of the objector and, if represented, the objector s counsel; (ii) proof of membership in the Class including a listing of all shares of Amicus common stock purchased, acquired, or sold between and including March 19, 2015 and October 1, 2015, including the amount and date of each purchase or sale and the price paid and/or received; (iii) a signed detailed statement by the objector of his, her, or its objections to any matters before the Court; (iv) a written statement of all of the grounds for the objections, accompanied by any legal support for such objections, and reasons that the objector desires to appear and be heard; (v) copies of any papers, briefs, or other documents upon which the objections are based; (vi) a list of all persons who will be called to testify in support of the objections; (vii) a statement of whether the objector intends to appear at the Settlement Hearing; (viii) a list of other cases in which the objector or the objector s counsel has appeared either as settlement objectors or as counsel for objectors in the preceding five years; and (ix) all documents and writings which such objector desires the Court to consider. If you intend to appear at the Settlement Hearing through counsel, the objection must also state the identity of all attorneys who will appear on his, her, or its behalf at the Settlement Hearing. Such papers must be filed with the Court at the following address: Clerk of Court United States District Court, District of New Jersey 402 East State Street Trenton, NJ Such filings shall also be served on the following counsel by hand or overnight delivery: Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the Class Jeffrey C. Block Block & Leviton LLP 155 Federal Street, Suite 400 Boston, MA Counsel for Defendants Jay B. Kasner Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 4 Times Square New York, NY Questions? Call or visit S45010 v Page 10

18 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 18 of 31 PageID: 1615 Any person or entity objecting to the Settlement shall submit to the Court s jurisdiction and agrees that the Parties may depose the person or entity about their objection. Unless the Court otherwise directs, no person or entity shall be entitled to object to the approval of the Settlement, any judgment entered thereon, the adequacy of the representation of the Class by Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel, any award of attorneys fees and expenses, the allocation of the Settlement Fund, or otherwise be heard, except by serving and filing a written objection and supporting papers and documents as described above. Any person or entity who fails to object in the manner described above shall be deemed to have waived the right to object (including any right of appeal) and shall be forever barred from raising such objection in the Action or any other proceeding. Simultaneously with, or before, such filing, such papers shall be served by hand or overnight delivery upon the counsel to Lead Plaintiffs and Amicus as identified in this Notice. The Parties shall file any papers, including memoranda or briefs, in response to any objections no later than five (5) business days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 18. What s the difference between objecting and being excluded from the Settlement? Objecting is simply telling the Court that you do not like something about the Settlement. You can object only if you stay in the Class. Excluding yourself is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the Class and the Settlement. If you exclude yourself, you have no basis to object because the case no longer affects you. THE COURT S SETTLEMENT HEARING 19. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement? The Court will hold a settlement hearing (the Settlement Hearing ) at 12:00 p.m., on November 9, 2017, at the Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse, 402 East State Street, Trenton, NJ At this hearing the Court will, among other things: (i) determine whether the Class as defined above should be certified pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3); (ii) determine whether the proposed Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Class; (iii) determine whether all of Lead Plaintiff s claims should be dismissed with prejudice; (iv) determine whether the proposed Order and Final Judgment approving the Settlement should be entered; (v) determine whether, and in what amount, an award of attorneys fees and expenses should be paid to Plaintiffs Counsel; (vi) consider any objections to the proposed Settlement or to Plaintiffs Counsel s application for an award of attorneys fees and expenses; and (vii) rule on such other matters as the Court may deem necessary and appropriate. The Court has the right to adjourn the Settlement Hearing or any adjournment thereof, including the consideration of the Fee Application, without further notice of any kind to the Class. The Court has the right to approve the Settlement at or after the Settlement Hearing with such modification(s) as may be consented to by the Parties to the Stipulation and without further notice to the Class. 20. Do I have to come to the Settlement Hearing? No. Lead Counsel will answer any questions Judge Sheridan may have. But, you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you send an objection, you do not have to come to the Court to talk about it. As long as you filed and served your written objection on time as explained in Question 17, the Court will consider it. You may also pay your own lawyer to attend, but it is not necessary. 21. May I speak at the Settlement Hearing? You may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Settlement Hearing. To do so, as explained in Question 17, you must file and serve a written notice of your intention to appear. You cannot speak at the Settlement Hearing if you exclude yourself from the Settlement. Questions? Call or visit S45011 v Page 11

19 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 19 of 31 PageID: What happens if I do nothing at all? IF YOU DO NOTHING If you do nothing, you will receive no money from the Settlement. But, unless you exclude yourself, you will not be able to start a lawsuit, continue with a lawsuit, or be part of any other lawsuit against Defendants or the Defendant Released Persons about the claims being released in the Settlement. All members of the Class who do not submit valid and timely Proof of Claim forms shall be forever barred from receiving any payments from the Settlement, but will in all other respects be subject to and bound by the provisions of the Stipulation and any Order and Final Judgment entered. OBTAINING MORE INFORMATION 23. Are there more details about the Settlement? This Notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. More details are in the Stipulation. You can obtain a copy of the Stipulation or more information about the Settlement by visiting or by contacting Lead Counsel by telephone or in writing as noted on page 10 of this Notice. You can also obtain a copy of the Stipulation from the Clerk s office at the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 402 East State Street, Trenton, NJ 08608, during regular business hours. DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE. SPECIAL NOTICE TO NOMINEES If you hold shares of any Amicus common stock purchased or otherwise acquired in a transaction that took place within the United States or its territories at any time between and including March 19, 2015 and October 1, 2015, as nominee for a beneficial owner, then you must either (1) send a copy of this Notice by first-class mail to all such persons or entities; or (2) provide a list of the names and addresses of such persons or entities to the Claims Administrator: Amicus Securities Litigation Claims Administrator P.O. Box 4028 Portland, OR If you choose to mail this Notice and the Proof of Claim for yourself, you may obtain from the Claims Administrator (without cost to you) as many additional copies of these documents as you will need to complete the mailing. Regardless of whether you choose to complete the mailing yourself or elect to have the mailing performed for you, you may obtain reimbursement for, or advancement of, reasonable administrative costs actually incurred or expected to be incurred in connection with forwarding this Notice, and which would not have been incurred but for the obligation to forward this Notice, upon submission of appropriate documentation to the Claims Administrator. June 29, 2017 BY ORDER OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Questions? Call or visit S45012 v Page 12

20 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 20 of 31 PageID: 1617 Amicus Therapeutics Securities Litigation Toll Free Number: Claims Administrator Website: PO Box Portland, OR Objection/Exclusion Deadline: 10/19/17 Settlement Fairness Hearing: 11/09/17 Deadline to File a Claim: 01/01/18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED LEAD CASE NO. 3:15-CV PGS-DEA PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Before completing this form, please read the detailed instructions on page 5. PART I: Beneficial Owner s First Name CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION Beneficial Owner s Last Name Co-Beneficial Owner s First Name Co-Beneficial Owner s Last Name Entity Name (if claimant is not an individual) Representative or Custodian Name (if different from Beneficial Owner(s) listed above) Account Number (if filing for multiple accounts, file a separate Proof of Claim for each account) Address 1 (street name and number) Address 2 (apartment, unit, or box number) City State ZIP Code Foreign Country (only if not USA) Social Security Number Taxpayer Identification Number OR Telephone Number (home) Telephone Number (work) Address Claimant Account Type (check appropriate box): Individual (includes joint owner accounts) Pension Plan Trust Corporation Estate IRA/401(k) Other (please specify) 01-CA9619 S4511 v

21 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 21 of 31 PageID: 1618 PART II: SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN AMICUS COMMON STOCK A. Number of shares of Amicus common stock held at the close of trading on March 18, 2015: B. List each individual purchase or acquisition of Amicus common stock (other than through Amicus September 30, 2015, acquisition of Scioderm, Inc.) in a transaction that took place within the United States or its territories at any time between and including March 19, 2015 and October 1, 2015: Trade Date (MMDDYY) Number of Shares Purchased or Acquired Purchase Price per Share Total Purchase Price* Transaction Type (P/R)** *Including taxes, fees, and commissions **P=Purchase, R=Receipt (transfer in) C. List each individual sale of Amicus common stock between and including March 19, 2015, and October 1, 2015: Trade Date (MMDDYY) Number of Shares Sold or Delivered Sale Price per Share Total Sale Price* Transaction Type (S/D)** *Excluding taxes, fees, and commissions **S=Sale, D=Delivery (transfer out) D. Number of shares of Amicus common stock held as of the close of trading on October 1, 2015: IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL SPACE TO LIST YOUR TRANSACTIONS PLEASE PHOTOCOPY THE APPROPRIATE PAGE(S), WRITE YOUR NAME ON THE COPY, AND CHECK THIS BOX: YOU MUST READ THE RELEASE AND SIGN ON PAGE CA9619 S4512 v

22 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 22 of 31 PageID: 1619 PART III: SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION OF COURT, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND RELEASES Please review the following submission to jurisdiction and sign below on page 4. I (we) submit this Proof of Claim and Release under the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of April 14, 2017 ( Stipulation ), and in connection with the settlement (the Settlement ) of claims against Amicus, John F. Crowley, and Jay A. Barth (collectively, Defendants ) contemplated therein. I (we) also submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, with respect to my (our) claim as a Class Member and for purposes of enforcing the release set forth herein. I (we) further acknowledge that I am (we are) bound by and subject to the terms of any Order and Final Judgment (defined below) that may be entered in the Action. I (we) agree to furnish additional information to Lead Counsel and/or the Claims Administrator to support this claim if required to do so. I (we) have not submitted any other claim covering the same purchases, acquisitions, and sales of Amicus common stock during the Class Period and know of no other person or entity having done so on my (our) behalf. Please review the following release for claims against Defendants and sign below on page 4. I (We) hereby acknowledge full and complete satisfaction of, and do hereby fully, finally, and forever waive, settle, release, relinquish, discharge, and dismiss all of the Plaintiffs Settled Claims against each and all of the Defendants and the Defendant Released Persons as contemplated in the Stipulation. The Stipulation contemplates the issuance of an order and final judgment (the Order and Final Judgment ), which shall dismiss the Action and related Putative Securities Actions contained therein with prejudice and bar, among other things, any and all actions, causes of action, claims (including Unknown Claims), duties, debts, demands, rights, disputes, suits, matters, damages, losses, costs, expenses, obligations, proceedings, issues, judgments, and liabilities of every nature and description whatsoever, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, fixed or contingent, foreseen or unforeseen, liquidated or unliquidated, accrued or unaccrued, matured or unmatured, concealed or hidden, at law or in equity, whether class, individual, direct, derivative, representative, legal, equitable, or any other type or in any other capacity against Defendant Released Persons, which now exist, or heretofore have existed, or can, shall or may exist, whether arising under federal, state, common or foreign law, including the federal securities laws and any state disclosure law, or at equity, that (a) Lead Plaintiff or any Class Member has asserted in this Action, or could have asserted in the Action or in any other proceeding or forum that concern, arise out of, refer to, are based upon, or are related in any way to the allegations, events, acts, transactions, facts, matters, occurrences, representations, statements, or omissions alleged, involved, set forth, or referred to in the Complaint or the Action, or in the Securities Actions consolidated therein, including, without limitation, all of Defendants public filings and statements cited therein; (b) would have been barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel had the Action been fully litigated to a final judgment; or (c) could have been, or in the future could be, asserted in any forum or proceeding or otherwise by Lead Plaintiff or any Class Member that relate to purchase, sale, acquisition, or holding of Amicus common stock during the Class Period; provided, however, that the Plaintiffs Settled Claims shall not release any claims to enforce the Settlement (the Plaintiffs Settled Claims ). Unknown Claims are expressly included in the definition of Plaintiffs Settled Claims, and that such inclusion was expressly bargained for and was a material element of the Settlement and was relied upon by each and all of the Defendants in entering into the Stipulation. Unknown Claims means any claim that Defendants, Lead Plaintiff, or any Class Member does not know or suspect exists in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of the Plaintiffs Settled Claims and Defendants Settled Claims as against the Defendant Released Persons and Plaintiff Released Persons, including without limitation those which, if known, might have affected the decision to enter into the Settlement, or not to object to this Settlement, or not to exclude himself, herself, or itself from the Class. The Settlement is intended to extinguish all of the Plaintiffs Settled Claims and the Defendants Settled Claims and, consistent with such intention, upon the Effective Date, Defendants and Lead Plaintiff expressly waive, and each of the Class Members shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Order and Final Judgment shall have expressly waived, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the provisions, rights, and benefits of any state, federal, or foreign law or principle of common law, which may have the effect of limiting the releases set forth above. This shall include a waiver by the Lead Plaintiff and each of the Class Members and Defendants of any rights pursuant to section 1542 of the California Civil Code (or any similar, comparable, or equivalent provision of any federal, state, or foreign law, or principle of common law), which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. 03-CA9619 S4513 v

23 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 23 of 31 PageID: 1620 The foregoing waiver was separately bargained for, is a material element of the Settlement, and was relied upon by each and all of the Defendants in entering into the Settlement. This release shall be of no force or effect unless and until the Court approves the Stipulation and the Settlement becomes effective on the Effective Date. Please review the following representations and sign below. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have not assigned or transferred or purported to assign or transfer, voluntarily or involuntarily, any matter released pursuant to this release or any other part or portion thereof. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have included information about all of my (our) purchases or acquisitions of Amicus common stock that occurred during the Class Period, all of my (our) sales of that Amicus common stock between and including March 19, 2015, and October 1, 2015, and the number of shares of Amicus common stock held by me (us) at the close of business on March 18, 2015, and the number of shares of Amicus common stock held by me (us) on October 1, I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I am (we are) not excluded from the Class as defined in the Notice. I (We) declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information supplied by the undersigned is true and correct. Executed this day of, in, (Month / Year) (City) (State / Country). Signature of Claimant Print Name of Claimant Date MM DD YY Signature of Joint Claimant, if any Print Name of Joint Claimant Date MM DD YY 04-CA9619 S4514 v

24 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 24 of 31 PageID: 1621 PROOF OF CLAIM INSTRUCTIONS A. This Proof of Claim and Release form incorporates by reference the definitions in the Notice of Pendency of Consolidated Class Action, Proposed Settlement, Settlement Hearing, And Right to Appear (the Notice ), and, unless defined herein, capitalized words and terms shall have the same meanings as they have in the Notice. B. This Proof of Claim has been sent to you because you may be a member of the Class in this matter. To participate, you must complete and sign this Proof of Claim and provide supporting documents for any eligible transactions you claim. If you fail to file a properly addressed Proof of Claim and supporting documents, your claim may be rejected, and you may be determined to be ineligible for any payment from the Net Settlement Fund. C. Submission of this Proof of Claim does not assure that you will share in the proceeds of the Net Settlement Fund created in this Action. D. YOU MUST COMPLETE AND SUBMIT YOUR PROOF OF CLAIM BY MAIL POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2018, ADDRESSED TO THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR AS LISTED BELOW. E. If you are NOT a member of the Class, as defined in the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action ( Notice ), DO NOT submit a Proof of Claim. F. If you are a member of the Class and you do not timely request to be excluded from the Class, you are bound by the terms of any judgment entered in the Action, WHETHER OR NOT YOU SUBMIT A PROOF OF CLAIM. G. Use the section of this form entitled Claimant Information to identify each owner of record. THIS CLAIM MUST BE FILED BY THE ACTUAL BENEFICIAL OWNER(S), OR THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF SUCH OWNER(S) OF SHARES UPON WHICH THIS CLAIM IS BASED. H. Use the section of this form entitled Schedule of Transactions to supply all required details of your transaction(s). If you need more space or additional schedules, attach separate sheets giving all of the required information in substantially the same form. Sign and print or type your name on each additional sheet. I. Complete a separate Proof of Claim form for each account in which you qualify. J. Provide all of the requested information with respect to the Amicus securities that you acquired at any time on or between March 19, 2015, and October 1, 2015, inclusive (the Class Period ), whether such transactions resulted in a profit or a loss. Failure to report all such transactions may result in the rejection of your claim. K. List each transaction in the Class Period in chronological order, by trade date, beginning with the earliest. You must accurately provide the month, day, and year of each transaction you list. L. Documentation of your transactions in Amicus securities must be attached to your claim. Failure to provide this documentation could delay verification of your claim or result in rejection of your claim. M. The above requests are designed to provide the minimum amount of information necessary to process the most simple claims. The Claims Administrator may request additional information as required to efficiently and reliably calculate your losses. Proof of Claim forms must be postmarked no later than January 1, 2018, and mailed to Amicus Therapeutics Securities Litigation, Claims Administrator, PO Box 4028, Portland, OR ATTENTION NOMINEES AND BROKERAGE FIRMS: If you are filing claim(s) electronically on behalf of beneficial owners, detailed instructions are available on the Settlement website at along with the formatted electronic filing template. You may also send an to requesting this information. 05-CA9619 S4515 v

25 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 25 of 31 PageID: 1622 Reminder Checklist 1. Sign the Certification section of the Proof of Claim on page Remember to attach supporting documentation. If this claim is being made on behalf of joint beneficial claimants, both must sign. 3. Do not send original documents. 4. Keep a copy of your Proof of Claim and all documents submitted for your records. 5. If you desire an acknowledgment of receipt of your Proof of Claim form, send your Proof of Claim by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested. 6. If you move, please send the Claims Administrator your new address. THESE FORMS AND YOUR SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN JANUARY 1, ACCURATE CLAIMS PROCESSING CAN TAKE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. 06-CA9619 S4516 v

26 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 26 of 31 PageID: 1623 Exhibit B

27 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 27 of 31 PageID: 1624 Amicus Therapeutics Securities Litigation Website: Claims Administrator PO Box 4028 Phone: Portland, OR NOTICE TO BROKERS, BANKS, AND OTHER NOMINEES In re: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Litigation You may be a broker, bank, or other nominee that purchased or otherwise acquired Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. ( Amicus ) common stock between March 19, 2015, and October 1, 2015, inclusive, for the beneficial interest of a person or entity other than yourself. The CUSIP for Amicus common stock during the period is 03152W109. The enclosed Notice of Pendency of Consolidated Class Action (the Notice ) and Proof of Claim and Release ( Proof of Claim ) are regarding a proposed settlement of a class action entitled In re: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 3:15-cv PGS-DEA (the Action ). Beneficial owners and former owners of Amicus common stock, as defined above, may qualify for a payment and/or act on other legal rights. THE COURT HAS DIRECTED THAT WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE, YOU DO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Provide the Claims Administrator with a list of the names and last known addresses of beneficial owners of Amicus common stock (as defined above); 2. Request from the Claims Administrator additional copies of the Notice and Proof of Claim, which will be provided to you free of charge, and promptly mail the Notice and Proof of Claim directly to all such beneficial owners; OR 3. Forward copies of the enclosed Notice and Proof of Claim to the beneficial owners. IF YOU ARE PROVIDING NAMES AND ADDRESSES: 1. Compile a list of names and last known addresses of beneficial owners of Amicus common stock (as defined above); 2. Prepare the list in Microsoft Excel format following the Electronic Name and Address File Layout below. A preformatted spreadsheet can also be found on the Nominees page of the Settlement website, 3. Then, you must do one of the following: a. the list to the Claims Administrator at b. c. Upload the spreadsheet online at OR Burn the Microsoft Excel file(s) to a CD or DVD and mail the CD or DVD to Epiq, the Claims Administrator, at the following address: Amicus Therapeutics Securities Litigation Claims Administrator P.O. Box 4028 Portland, OR S5281 v

28 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 28 of 31 PageID: 1625 IF YOU ARE MAILING THE NOTICES ON YOUR OWN: If you elect to mail the Notice and Proof of Claim to beneficial owners yourself, additional copies of the Notice and Proof of Claim may be requested via to If you are providing the Notice and Proof of Claim to beneficial owners, the mailing must be completed within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the Notice and Proof of Claim from the Claims Administrator. You must also send a statement to the Claims Administrator at the address above confirming that the mailing was made, and you must retain your mailing records for use in connection with any further notices that may be provided in the Action. Failure to timely forward the Notice and Proof of Claim to beneficial owners may affect their legal rights. ELECTRONIC NAME AND ADDRESS FILE LAYOUT Column Description Length Notes A Account # 15 Unique identifier for each record B Beneficial owner's first name 25 C Beneficial owner's middle name 15 D Beneficial owner's last name 30 E Joint beneficial owner's first name 25 F Joint beneficial owner's middle name 15 G Joint beneficial owner's last name 30 H Business or record owner's name 60 Businesses, trusts, IRAs, and other I Representative or contact name 45 types of accounts J Address 1 35 K Address 2 25 L City 25 M U.S. state or Canadian province 2 U.S. and Canada addresses only 1 N ZIP Code 10 O Country (other than U.S.) 15 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT You are entitled to reimbursement for your reasonable expenses actually incurred in complying with the foregoing, including reimbursement of reasonable postage expenses and reasonable costs of obtaining the names and addresses of beneficial owners, provided you timely submit an invoice to the Claims Administrator. Please submit a copy of your invoice to the Claims Administrator within one month of the completion of the mailing or delivery date. If you have any questions, you may contact the Claims Administrator at or via at Thank you for your cooperation. 1 For countries other than the U.S. and Canada, place any territorial subdivision in Address 2 field. S5282 v

29 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 29 of 31 PageID: 1626 Exhibit C

30 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 30 of 31 PageID: 1627

31 INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 31 of 31 PageID: 1628 B3 BEVERAGE (FIZZ) Grp 22 o$ NUTRISYSTEM INC (NTRI) Grp 53 o$52.05 ELECTRONIC ARTS (EA) Grp 3 o$ NATIONAL 11.2M Shares 99 Comp. Rating 96 EPS RS 98 ROE 47% M Shares 96 Comp. Rating 99 EPS RS 93 ROE 46% M Shares 99 Comp. Rating 99 EPS RS 91 ROE 33% MAKES NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES SUCH AS MULTI-FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS, JUICE, SPRING WATER. MARKETS WEIGHT LOSS PRODUCTS AND SERVICES VIA THE INTERNET, PHONE, THE QVC NETWORK AND INDEPENDENT DISTRIBUTORS. DEVELOPS VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE AND CONTENT FOR GAME CONSOLES, PCS, HANDHELD PLATFORMS AND MOBILE PHONES. +38% Ann. EPS Gro PE 49 Avg. Daily Vol 310,100 Debt 0% Last Qtr Eps +32%6 Prior Qtr +68%6 Last Qtr Sales +20% 8 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 11/30e +42% Ann. EPS Gro PE 33 Avg. Daily Vol 524,600 Debt 0% Last Qtr Eps +48%6 Prior Qtr +54%5 Last Qtr Sales +30% 6 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 10/24 +20% Ann. EPS Gro PE 28 Avg. D. Vol 2,401,500 Debt 24% Last Qtr Eps +343%5 Prior Qtr +70%5 Last Qtr Sales +14% 3 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 10/30 R&D 25% Acc/Dis C Acc/Dis B+ Acc/Dis C+ Sup/Demand 90 Extended after breakout from late-stage base; entry. Support gives way after sell signal from entry. Sluggish, but still in buy range after breakout over HOLDING (FOXF) Grp 57 o$38.95 PAYCOM SOFTWARE INC (PAYC) Grp 18 o$73.63 COGNEX CORP (CGNX) Grp 26 o$ FOX29.2MFACTORY Shares 97 Comp. Rating 97 EPS RS 95 ROE 28% M Shares 99 Comp. Rating 97 EPS RS 93 ROE 48% M Shares 98 Comp. Rating 96 EPS RS 96 ROE 17% MAKES HIGH-PERFORMANCE SUSPENSION PRODUCTS USED ON MOUNTAIN BIKES, AND OFF-ROAD AND ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES. +21% Ann. EPS Gro PE 26 Avg. Daily Vol 353,000 Debt 34% Last Qtr Eps +22%6 Prior Qtr +119%5 Last Qtr Sales +18% 8 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Company Price íî 6 Eps Due 10/31 R&D 5% COMPANIES Acc/Dis B National Beverage Sup/Demand 77 SMARTSELECT COMPOSITE RATING Rank Rel îannual Last Qtr NxtQtr Last Qtr Mgt EPS Strë îeps Est ïîepsï EPSîë Salesîë Pretaxè Own Rtgì Rtg î% Chgî % Chgî % Chgí % Chgî ROE mrgníë % PROVIDES CLOUD-BASED HUMAN CAPITAL MGMT SOFTWARE THAT MANAGES EMPLOYMENT LIFE CYCLE FOR EMPLOYERS. MANUFACTURES MODULAR VISION SYSTEMS THAT ELIMINATE DEFECTS, VERIFY ASSEMBLIES, AND AUTOMATE PRODUCTION +138% Ann. EPS Gro PE 69 Avg. Daily Vol 481,600 Debt 25% Last Qtr Eps +24%6 Prior Qtr +42%6 Last Qtr Sales +33% 13 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 10/30 R&D 6% Acc/Dis B- +17% Ann. EPS Gro PE 53 Avg. Daily Vol 848,800 Debt 0% Last Qtr Eps +19%6 Prior Qtr +91%5 Last Qtr Sales +17% 4 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 10/30 R&D 15% Acc/Dis BSup/Demand 78 Just under entry point; light volume so far. Flat base shows entry. Company makes Shasta, La Croix, other soft drink brands Nutrisystem Inc Products include prepackaged meals for breakfast, lunch and dinner Electronic Arts Online and software game producer at forefront of gaming industry Fox Factory Holding 7Off road products are sold to over 200 original equipment makers. 8 ES TO 25 MIL STUDENTS VIA 66 SCHOOLS AND 682 CENTERS Cognex Corp Apple is a top customer of this maker of flaw detectors. 6 Extended after 1st test of 10-week line near EDU&TEC (EDU) Grp 64 o$87.89 GRUBHUB INC (GRUB) Grp 14 o$56.08 ALIGN TECH (ALGN) Grp 9 o$ NEW130.8MORIENTL Shares 96 Comp. Rating 95 EPS RS 97 ROE 18% M Shares 99 Comp. Rating 95 EPS RS 95 ROE 8% M Shares 99 Comp. Rating 94 EPS RS 97 ROE 21% CHINESE PROVIDER OF LANGUAGE TRAINING AND TEST PREP COURS- +9% Ann. EPS Gro PE 47 Avg. D. Vol 1,328,700 Debt 0% Last Qtr Eps +41% Prior Qtr +41%5 Last Qtr Sales +23% Qtrs EPS ) 15% Paycom Software Inc Eps Due 10/23 7Software firm provides human resources services via cloud Acc/Dis B+ PROVIDES AN ONLINE AND MOBILE PLATFORM FOR TAKEOUT ORDERS SERVING RESTAURANTS ACROSS THE U.S. DEVELOPED A PROPRIETARY SYSTEM FOR TREATING MALOCCLUSION, OR THE MISALIGNMENT OF TEETH. +53% Ann. EPS Gro PE 56 Avg. D. Vol 1,691,900 Debt 0% Last Qtr Eps +13%6 Prior Qtr +45%5 Last Qtr Sales +32% 0 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 10/24 R&D 9% Acc/Dis ASup/Demand % Ann. EPS Gro PE 68 Avg. Daily Vol 879,400 Debt 0% Last Qtr Eps +37%5 Prior Qtr +18%5 Last Qtr Sales +32% 2 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 10/26 R&D 7% Acc/Dis B+ Sup/Demand 81 Three-weeks-tight pattern shows add-on entry. Well extended after February breakout; no base since then New Oriental Edu 7China preparatory education industry is in "golden age," analysts say. Recovers after triggering sell rule from entry Grubhub Inc 7Platform connects local restaurants with diners in over 1,000 cities Align Technology Teens, overseas markets give teeth realignment expert opportunities. 2 PROVIDES A PLATFORM ENABLING MEMBERS TO STAY CONNECTED Facebook Inc Cl A 7Social network enters enterprise software market with Workplace. 2 Last Qtr Eps +69%6 Prior Qtr +73%6 Last Qtr Sales +45% Centene Corp Medicaid insurer grows from state Medicaid expansion under ObamaCare TransUnion 7Provides consumer reports and risk scores INC CL A (FB) Grp 14 o$ CENTENE CORP (CNC) Grp 43 o$89.54 TRANSUNION (TRU) Grp 126 o$ FACEBOOK 2322M Shares 99 Comp. Rating 99 EPS RS 90 ROE 20% M Shares 97 Comp. Rating 97 EPS RS 92 ROE 18% M Shares 96 Comp. Rating 97 EPS RS 92 ROE 21% WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY VIA FACEBOOK.COM. +77% Ann. EPS Gro PE 38 Avg. D. Vol 16,626,000 Debt 0% 7 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 10/31 3 R&D 21% PROVIDES INFORMATION, RISK MANAGEMENT TO BUSINESSES AND CONSUMERS IN U.S. AND OTHER COUNTRIES. +42% Ann. EPS Gro PE 18 Avg. D. Vol 1,299,000 Debt 79% Last Qtr Eps +23%6 Prior Qtr +51%5 Last Qtr Sales +10% 15 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 10/24 +84% Ann. EPS Gro PE 28 Avg. D. Vol 1,080,700 Debt 171% Last Qtr Eps +27%6 Prior Qtr +31%6 Last Qtr Sales +12% 14 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 10/27 Acc/Dis B Acc/Dis B Acc/Dis A CoreSite Realty Corp 7Provider of secure, high performance data center solutions. 2 Flat base shows entry PayPal Holdings Inc Former ebay subsidiary a top player in e payment business Applied Materials Demand for displays driving growth for chip equipment maker Just above flat-base entry; RS line at new high. CORESITE REALTY CORP (COR) Grp 68 o$ M Shares 97 Comp. Rating 96 EPS RS 93 ROE 13% REIT THAT OWNS, DEVELOPS AND OPERATES DATA CENTER FACILITIESIN MAJOR MARKETS ACROSS THE U.S. +46% Ann. EPS Gro PE 71 Avg. Daily Vol 532,600 Debt 158% Last Qtr Eps +24%6 Prior Qtr +30%5 Last Qtr Sales +23% 2 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 10/25 Know Your Company! Pick stocks with strong fundamentals & sound base patterns. Verify CAN SLIM vitals big earnings, sales, return on equity or profit margins, fund sponsorship & market in uptrend. Read stock story on investors.com. Check a chart. Is your stock near a sound buy point? Or is its price extended over 5% from a chart base and more risky? PROVIDES MANAGED HEALTHCARE SERVICES THROUGH GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED PROGRAMS Acc/Dis B Sup/Demand 88 Extended from entry in shallow cup with handle. 29 PAYPAL HOLDINGS INC (PYPL) Grp 44 o$ M Shares 99 Comp. Rating 95 EPS RS 94 ROE 13% PROVIDES DIGITAL AND MOBILE PAYMENTS ON BEHALF OF CONSUMERS AND MERCHANTS WORLDWIDE. Well-extended after mid-february breakout. MATERIALS (AMAT) Grp 20 o$ APPLIED 1055M Shares 98 Comp. Rating 99 EPS RS 86 ROE 26% MAKES DEPOSITION, INSPECTION, ETCHING AND CLEANING EQUIPMENT USED IN IC AND FLAT PANEL DISPLAY FABRICATION. +17% Ann. EPS Gro PE 37 Avg. D. Vol 7,618,200 Debt 0% Last Qtr Eps +28%5 Prior Qtr +19%5 Last Qtr Sales +18% 3 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 10/18 R&D 8% Acc/Dis B +41% Ann. EPS Gro PE 15 Avg. D. Vol 9,706,200 Debt 44% Last Qtr Eps +72%6 Prior Qtr +132%6 Last Qtr Sales +33% 6 Qtrs EPS ) 15% Eps Due 11/16 R&D 14% Acc/Dis CSup/Demand 76 Extended from buy point of flat base. Handle forms on cup with buy point; later stage. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case No. 3:15-cv PGS-DEA In re: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. Consolidated with 3:15-cv and Securities Litigation 3:15-cv (per Dkt. No. 40) Summary Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Consolidated Class Action To: All record and beneficial holders of Amicus Therapeutics Inc. ( Amicus ) common stock, their respective successors in interest, successors, predecessors in interest, predecessors, representatives, trustees, executors, administrators, heirs, assigns or transferees, immediate and remote, and any person or entity acting for or on behalf of, or claiming under, any of them, and each of them, together with the predecessors and successors and assigns, who purchased or otherwise acquired (other than through Amicus September 30, 2015 acquisition of Scioderm, Inc.) shares of Amicus Therapeutics in a transaction that took place within the United States or its territories at any time between and including March 19, 2015 and October 1, 2015 (the Class ). You are hereby notified, that the parties to the above-captioned consolidated class action (the Action ) pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey have entered into a Stipulation of Agreement and Settlement (the Stipulation ) to resolve the issues raised in the above-captioned consolidated class action (the Class Action ). The proposed settlement contemplated therein (the Settlement ) includes a settlement payment of $3,750,000, (the Settlement Amount ). You are hereby further notified, that the Class Action has been preliminarily certified as a class action, and that pursuant to an Order of the Honorable Peter G. Sheridan in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (the Court ), dated June 29, 2017, a hearing will be held on November 9, 2017 at 12:00 p.m. (the Settlement Hearing ) before Judge Sheridan at the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse, 402 East State Street, Trenton, New Jersey 08608, to, among other things, (1) determine whether the Class as defined below should be certified pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3); (2) determine whether the proposed Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the class; (3) determine whether all of Dr. Barry Brenner ( Lead Plaintiff ) s claims should be approved as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the class; (4) determine whether the proposed Order and Final Judgment approving the Settlement should be entered; (5) determine whether, and in what amount, an award of attorneys fees and expenses should be paid to Plaintiffs counsel (the Fee Application ); (6) consider any objections to the proposed Settlement or Fee Application; and (7) rule on such other matters as the Court may deem necessary and appropriate. If you are a member of the class described above and are not otherwise excluded, your rights will be affected and you may be entitled to share in the Settlement Amount if you submit a Proof of Claim and Release Form ( Proof of Claim ) no later than January 1, 2018, and if the information and documentation you provide in that Proof of Claim establishes that you are entitled to a recovery. If you have not yet received the full printed Notice of Pendency of Consolidated Class Action, Proposed Settlement, Settlement Hearing and Right to Appear (the Notice ) and Proof of Claim and Release form ( Proof of Claim ), you may obtain copies of these documents by contacting: Amicus Securities Litigation Claims Administrator P.O. Box 4028 Portland, OR November 2-4, 2017 Pa r i s R e s o r t Meet Face-to-Face with Over 50 of America s Top Investing & Trading Pros ATTEND FREE TO: Learn New Trading Strategies The TradersEXPO provides you with an unmatched opportunity to acquire the strategies and tools elite traders are using in today s markets. Engage with Top Pro Traders These documents are also available at Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice and Proof of Claim form, may be made to Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the class: Jeffrey C. Block Jacob A. Walker Block & Leviton LLP 155 Federal Street, Suite 400 Boston, Massachusetts (617) This Summary Notice provides only a summary of matters regarding the Action and the Settlement. The Notice describing the Action, the proposed Settlement, and the rights of the Class Members to appear in Court at the Settlement Hearing, to request to be excluded from the Class, and/or to object to the Settlement, the plan of allocation and/or the request by Lead Counsel for an award of attorney s fees and expenses, has been mailed to persons and entities known to be potential Class Members. As more fully described in the Notice, to participate in the Settlement Amount, you must submit a valid Proof of Claim by no later than January 1, As also more fully described in the Notice, the deadline for submitting any objections to the Settlement or the Fee Application, and requests for exclusion from the proposed Settlement is October 19, Please do not contact the Court directly. LAS VEGAS Some of the world s best traders will be attending and speaking at the TradersEXPO Las Vegas. Ask questions of the experts during presentations & panel discussions, attend the annual Live Trading Challenge, and much more! Test Drive Best-in-Class Trading Tools The interactive Exhibit Hall allows you to investigate, practice, and test drive the latest trading tools in one convenient location. By Order of The Court The TradersEXPO Las Vegas is free to attend. Visit or call Mention Priority Code Try MarketSmith for 3 weeks only $ I Investors.com/try 2017 Investor s Business Daily, Inc. Investor s Business Daily, IBD, CAN SLIM, Leaderboard and corresponding logos are registered trademarks owned by Investor s Business Daily, Inc. MarketSmith is a registered trademark of MarketSmith, Incorporated. Copyright 2017 Investor's Business Daily Inc. PLATINUM SPONSOR GOLD SPONSORS SILVER SPONSOR MEDIA PARTNER POWERED BY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civ. No. 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL CLASS ACTION TO: NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

Plaintiff, Defendants.

Plaintiff, Defendants. United States District Court For the District Court of Massachusetts WILTOLD TRZECIAKOWSKI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. GSI GROUP INC., SERGIO EDELSTEIN and ROBERT BOWEN,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you purchased or otherwise acquired Corinthian Colleges, Inc. ( Corinthian ) common stock between August 23, 2010 and April 14, 2015 (both dates inclusive)

More information

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 Case 2:16-cv-05218-ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION IN RE SWISHER HYGIENE, INC. SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION X X MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MOBILEIRON, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Lead Case No. 1-15-cv-284001 CLASS ACTION Assigned to:

More information

X : : X NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

X : : X NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: THERAGENICS CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION X : : X CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:99-CV-0141 (TWT) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE BOISE INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 8933-VCG NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

More information

Case 2:12-cv VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:12-cv-00829-VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 FILED 2015 Jul-15 PM 04:21 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No. MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.: 1:07-cv-1757-RC For Official

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn MARJORIE MISHKIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ZYNEX, INC., f/k/a

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE HIBERNIA FOODS, PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION ------------------------------------------------------------- THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CHINA MOBILE GAMES & ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LTD SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:14-CV-04471 (KMW) This Document Relates To: All Actions Deadline

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS HEALTH FUND, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC., CREDIT SUISSE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. Case No. 14 Civ. 8925 (KMW) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II)

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOUIS GRASSO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. CV 06-02639 vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION VITESSE

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION JOHN NICHOLAS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2013 CH 11752 Consolidated

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE DIAMOND FOODS, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates to: All Actions Case No.: 11-cv-05386-WHA NOTICE

More information

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 2 of 31 PAGEID #: 1034 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x BARBARA E. BERNARD, COURMANT AND W APNER ASSOCIATES AND ROBERT SUTHERLAND, on behal f of themselves and all others similarly situated, -against- Plaintiffs, UBS W ARBURG LLC AND ANTON W AHLMAN, Defendants.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION THE ERICA P. JOHN FUND, INC., et al., On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:02-CV-1152-M

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MARGARET B. ADAM, On Behalf of Herself ) No. C-93-20399-RMW(EAI) and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT NOTICE The only official website from which to submit a claim is www.accountholdsettlement.com/claim. DO NOT submit a claim from any other website, including any website titled Paycoin c. PayPal

More information

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 2 of 9 BETWEEN EXHIBIT "A" CANADIAN PRE-APPROVAL ORDER ONTARIO SUPERIOR

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garo Madenlian, et al. v. Flax USA, Inc. Civil Litigation No. SACV13-01748 JVS (JPRx) If you purchased flax milk sold in the United States by Flax USA, Inc.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-60661-CIV-DIMITROULEAS In re DS Healthcare Group, Inc. Securities Litigation / STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement

More information

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705 Case :0-cv-00-R-CW Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 JOSEPH J. TABACCO, JR. # Email: jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com NICOLE LAVALLEE # Email: nlavallee@bermandevalerio.com BERMAN DeVALERIO One California

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT POPTECH, L.P., individually, and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 310-cv-967 (SRU) v. STEWARDSHIP

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE COMVERGE, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION ) CONSOLIDATED ) C.A. No. 7368-VCMR STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE This Stipulation

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281 Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document

More information

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 161 Filed: 05/13/16 Page 1 of 35 PageID #:2029 EXECUTION COPY

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 161 Filed: 05/13/16 Page 1 of 35 PageID #:2029 EXECUTION COPY Case: 1:13-cv-02111 Document #: 161 Filed: 05/13/16 Page 1 of 35 PageID #:2029 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) Civ. No. 1:13-cv-2111 CONSTRUCTION WORKERS PENSION

More information

BENEFICIAL HOLDER BALLOT FOR ACCEPTING OR REJECTING THE DEBTORS JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION CLASS 4 ADDITIONAL NOTES CLAIMS

BENEFICIAL HOLDER BALLOT FOR ACCEPTING OR REJECTING THE DEBTORS JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION CLASS 4 ADDITIONAL NOTES CLAIMS Global A&T Electronics Ltd., et al. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) Chapter 11 In re: ) GLOBAL A&T ELECTRONICS LTD., et al., 1 ) ) ) Debtors. ) ) ) IMPORTANT: No chapter

More information

DATED: May 7, 2014 B,Ii~ DATED: May 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (Attorney for Defendant Motorola Mobility, LLC) BY:~-- BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN Edelson PC (Attorney for Plaintiff and the Class) -29- Exhibit

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement ), effective as of the date of the last signature below, is made by and between Plaintiff Jonathan Weisberg

More information

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement.

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, vs.

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, vs. Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Lead Case No. C EMC. (Derivative Action)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Lead Case No. C EMC. (Derivative Action) CURTIS AD CHARLOTTE WESTLE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, vs. OCLARO, IC., et al., Defendants. In re OCLARO, IC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATIO This Document Relates To:

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Debtors. (Jointly Administered)

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Debtors. (Jointly Administered) IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 MEMORIAL PRODUCTION Case No. 17-30262 PARTNERS LP, et al., Debtors. (Jointly Administered) BENEFICIAL

More information

IF YOU HELD SHARES OF CH ENERGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY, PLEASE PROMPTLY TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNER.

IF YOU HELD SHARES OF CH ENERGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY, PLEASE PROMPTLY TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNER. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO ALL CASES Index No. 775000/2012 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH IN RE RENTRAK CORPORATION SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED LEAD CASE NO. 15CV27429 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

More information

Case 3:14-cv SI Document Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:14-cv SI Document Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-si Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re MONTAGE TECHNOLOGY GROUP LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: All Actions

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALOMON ANALYST LEVEL 3 LITIGATION 02 Civ. 6919 (GEL) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IF YOU PURCHASED

More information

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 0:13-cv-61747-MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Agreement or Settlement ) is made by and

More information

Case 7:08-cv KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 7:08-cv KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 7:08-cv-00264-KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE MBIA, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION File No. 08-CV-264-KMK STIPULATION AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RUDMAN, ET AL., v. CHC GROUP, LTD., ET AL., Civil Action No. 15-cv-3773 (LAK) NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * * * * * * * * * * *

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * * * * * * * * * * * IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Bernice Polage, et al., v. Christopher H. Cole, et al. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 24-C-13-006665 * * * * * * * * * * * AMENDED STIPULATION AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 4:14-cv-11191-LVP-MKM Doc # 95 Filed 11/20/15 Pg 1 of 19 Pg ID 3450 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and

More information

Case 1:06-cv PAC Document 88 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 32 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:06-cv PAC Document 88 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 32 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case 1:06-cv-12967-PAC Document 88 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PANTHER PARTNERS INC., On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL ) EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually ) and

More information

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed // Page of 0 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release and its attached exhibits ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ), is entered into by

More information

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page2 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page3 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70

More information

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:16-cv-03588-BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ABANTE ROOTER AND PLUMBING, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly

More information

Case 1:08-cv PAC Document 264 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:08-cv PAC Document 264 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:08-cv-05653-PAC Document 264 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly

More information

Case 1:14-cv AKH Document Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115. Exhibit 1

Case 1:14-cv AKH Document Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115. Exhibit 1 Case 1:14-cv-02392-AKH Document 152-1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115 Exhibit 1 Case 1:14-cv-02392-AKH Document 152-1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 2 of 115 EXECUTION VERSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS If you received an automated call to your cell phone and were transferred to a State Farm Agent between January

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC) ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC) ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE In re General Electric Co. Sec. Litig. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE To recover from the Net Settlement Fund as

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you were a borrower with a loan secured by a property in Massachusetts and were assessed two or more late fees by EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") at any time during the period

More information

x : : : : : : : : : : : : x

x : : : : : : : : : : : : x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MASSACHUSETTS BRICKLAYERS AND MASONS TRUST FUNDS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, DEUTSCHE ALT-A SECURITIES,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MASSEY ENERGY CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY Civil Action No. 5:10-cv-00689-ICB NOTICE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY. Docket No. ESX-L

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY. Docket No. ESX-L In re Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Shareholder Litigation SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY Docket No. ESX-L-4370-07 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER CLASS ACTION OFFICIAL

More information

In re Altair Nanotechnologies Shareholder Derivative Litigation CASE NO.: 14-CV TPG-HBP

In re Altair Nanotechnologies Shareholder Derivative Litigation CASE NO.: 14-CV TPG-HBP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re Altair Nanotechnologies Shareholder Derivative Litigation CASE NO.: 14-CV-09418-TPG-HBP AMENDED NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF ALTAIR

More information

Case 1:16-cv LLS Document 50 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 34. x : : : : : : : : : : : x

Case 1:16-cv LLS Document 50 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 34. x : : : : : : : : : : : x Case 116-cv-03925-LLS Document 50 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DONALD P. BOLAND and MARY A. BOLAND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN GIDDIENS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Case No. 12-cv-02624-LDD CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, v. FIRST ADVANTAGE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JOSEPH BULWA, MICHAEL MOHAMADIFAR, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs, PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY, INC., ROBERT

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE Case No. 30-2009-00236910 CLASS ACTION Assigned

More information

THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the. Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and

THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the. Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and

More information

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A Case: 1:14-cv-01981 Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637 Exhibit A Case: 1:14-cv-01981 Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 2 of 32 PageID #:638 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. EFiled: Oct 20 2015 11:35AM EDT Transaction ID 58039964 Case No. 10553-VCN IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE NPS PHARMACEUTICALS STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No.

More information

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case4:13-cv-02132-YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS LEWIS F. GEER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 01-2583-JAR ) WILLIAM D. COX, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) DAVID GROGAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Bernice Polage, et al., v. Christopher H. Cole, et al. CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 24-C-13-006665 * * * * * * * * * * * NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF DERIVATIVE AND

More information

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SUMMARY OF ATTACHED NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you obtained a Second Mortgage Loan on your Missouri home from Preferred

More information

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26 Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document1 Filed04//11 Page1 of 1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (3113) DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM (24863 1) 3 Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re COVAD SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. C-00-3891-PJH CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND

More information

Case 1:16-cv PKC Document 120 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 45. x : : : : : : : x

Case 1:16-cv PKC Document 120 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 45. x : : : : : : : x Case 1:16-cv-02758-PKC Document 120 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re THIRD AVENUE MANAGEMENT LLC SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT RICHARD TYNER, III, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, EMBARQ CORPORATION, THOMAS A. GERKE, WILLIAM

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION JAMES SULLIVAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION v. Plaintiff, TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS AMANDA OTT, ET AL. AND PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. Case 3:12-cv-00486 Document 247-1 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 7164 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT United States District Court for the District of New Jersey NOTICE If you rented a vehicle from Hertz in the United States at any time between July 1, 2006 and March 31, 2010, and during that vehicle rental

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE CASE 0:14-md-02522-PAM Document 653-1 Filed 12/02/15 Page 2 of 40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL No. 14-2522

More information

Case 1:16-cv JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 77 EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:16-cv JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 77 EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:16-cv-03282-JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 77 EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:16-cv-03282-JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 2 of 77 EXECUTION COPY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

More information

Case 1:14-cv JGK Document Filed 02/12/16 Page 2 of 127 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv JGK Document Filed 02/12/16 Page 2 of 127 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:14-cv-06046-JGK Document 121-1 Filed 02/12/16 Page 2 of 127 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE PENN WEST PETROLEUM LTD. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 14-cv-6046-JGK

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT WITH COMPANY AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT WITH COMPANY AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS Case 1:08-cv-02940-AT Document 111-3 Filed 12/21/11 Page 2 of 128 In re CARTER S, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:08-CV-2940-AT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE ON-POINT TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Master File No. 00cv00812BTM(POR) CLASS ACTION ALL ACTIONS

More information

Case 2:15-cv ER Document 31-1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 2 of 23 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:15-cv ER Document 31-1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 2 of 23 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 2:15-cv-05087-ER Document 31-1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 2 of 23 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement or Settlement Agreement ) is made and entered into this

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA ALL-SOUTH SUBCONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC. and AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P. Case No.: 2014 CA

More information

Case 8:07-cv SDM-TGW Document 102 Filed 09/03/08 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1794 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 8:07-cv SDM-TGW Document 102 Filed 09/03/08 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1794 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:07-cv-01434-SDM-TGW Document 102 Filed 09/03/08 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1794 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION DANA M. LOCKWOOD, on behalf of herself and all others

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL FROM ZACKS OR IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL REGARDING THE ZACKS BEAT THE MARKET BOOK OR AN EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR REGARDING OPTIONS TRADING, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY

More information

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc EXHIBIT A-1 Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc TO: All persons and entities who owned shares either of Thema International Fund plc or

More information

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>>

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>> IN RE SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION STOCKHOLDER AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION C/O RUST CONSULTING INC - 5568 PO BOX 2563 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9563 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *CLMNTIDNO* - UAA -

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DR. HENRY ERLE CHILDERS IV, DR. GEORGE BINO RUCKER, DR. EVAN NADLER, and DR. KAMBIZ DARDASHTI, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated,

More information

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT Bias v. Wells Fargo & Company et al., Case No. 4:12-cv-00664-YGR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Para ver este aviso en español, se puede visitar www.biasvwellsfargo.com. IF YOU HAVE OR HAD

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA CHARLES GLASS, and ) RONNIE JENNINGS, ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) CV 2014-900163 BLACK WARRIOR ELECTRIC ) MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, ) Defendant. ) NOTICE OF CLASS

More information

~)

~) Case 1:12-cv-08466-VM Document 122 Filed 02/04/16 Page 8 of 43 Case 1:12-cv-08466-VM Document 116-1 Filed 12/10/15 Page 4 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES

More information

mew Doc 354 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 10:23:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 15

mew Doc 354 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 10:23:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 15 Pg 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x In re: HHH Choices Health Plan, LLC, et al., 1 Debtors. - -

More information

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE. THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY.

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE. THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE. THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW

More information

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>>

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>> RAMIREZ V JCPENNEY CORP ERISA CLASS ACTION ADMINISTRATOR C/O RUST CONSULTING INC - 5514 PO BOX 2572 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9572 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *CLMNTIDNO* - UAA -

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. ERISA LITIGATION II Master File No.: 08-CV-5722 (LTS) (DCF) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All Actions NOTICE

More information