SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. CASE NO. 113CV Plaintiff,

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. CASE NO. 113CV Plaintiff,"

Transcription

1

2 GREEN & HALL, A Professional Corporation ROBERT L. GREEN, State Bar No MICHAEL J. PEPEK, State Bar No MEGAN J. RECHBERG lh State Bar No II 1851 East First Street, 10 Floor Santa Ana, California Telephone: ( Facsimile: ( Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant 611 WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION - I Apr 30, :00 PM David H. Yamasaki Chief Executive Officer/Clerk Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara Case #1-13-CV Filing #G By C. Pinacate, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ~~I cot! ~ 8 ~ I!.l ~ Z~S ~S~ ~ < (! 11 CILKER APARTMENTS, LLC, CASE NO. 113CV Plaintiff, DEFENDANT WESTERN NATIONAL 13 CONSTRUCTION'S CROSs.. vs. COMPLAINT FOR: 14 WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION, (I BREACH OF CONTRACT; 15 et ai., (2 EXPRESS INDElVINITY; (3 IMPLIED INDEMNITY; 16 Defendants. (4 EQUITABLE INDEMNITY; (5 COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE 1711 AND CONTRIBUTION; (6 BREACH OF IMPLIED 1811 WARRANTIES; (7 BREACH OF EXPRESS 1911 WARRANTIES; WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION, (8 NEGLIGENCE; 20 II (9 DECLARATORY RELIEF; Cross-Complainant, and 2111 (10 DECLARATORY RELIEF RE: VB. DUTY TO DEFEND 2211 ROES , inclusive, JUDGE: Hon. James P. Kleinberg 2311 DEPT.: 1 Cross-Defendants. ACTION FILED: December 26, TRlALDATE: None Set \I COMES NOW Defendant/Cross-Complainant WESTERN NATIONAL 2711 CONSTRUCTION ~"Cross-Complainant"' who, for a Cross-Complaint herein, alleges as 28 follows: DEFENDANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION'S CROSS-COMPLAINT P:\OOCS\Westem NatCilket\PleadingS\XC.docx

3 E-FllED: Apr 30, :00 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1 13-CV Filing #G GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 2 " 1. Cross-Complainant is, and was during all times herein mentioned, a business entity 3 II authorized to conduct business in the County of Santa Clara, State of California Cross-Complainant is informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that ROES through 500, inclusive, are individuals or business entities of unknown form who have 6 II conducted and/or now conduct business within the Co~ty of Santa Clara, State of California The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or 8 II otherwise, of Cross-Defendants herein designated by the fictitious names Roes 1 through 250, 911 inclusive are unknown to Cross-Complainant, who therefore sue Cross-Defendants by such 10 II fictitious n~es. When the true names and capacities of Cross-Defendants have been ascertained, 11 II Cross-Complainant will amend this pleading accordingly. Cross.. Complainant is informed and...:1 ~.~ m o(; I ~!I ~ ~ t? 12 II believes and, based thereon, alleges that each of the Cross-Defendants are in some mapner 13 II responsible for the acts, omissions and/or occurrences hereinafter alleged and actually and 14 /I proximately caused and/or contributed to the various injuries and damages set forth in the 15 II Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (iff AC" Further, Roes 251 through 500 are individuals (the "Individual Cross-Defendants" 1711 who were or are owners, principals, directors and/or officers of their respective Cross-Defendants 1811 (collectively, the "Sham Entities". The Individual Cross-Defendants were and are alter egos of 19 1/ their respective Sham Entities and, for au relevant times alleged herein, there existed such a unity 20 II of interest between the Individual Cross-Defendants and their respective Sham Entities that any 21 II separateness has ~ased to exist between them for the following reasons: 22 (a The Individual Cross-Defendants exercised complete dominance and 23 II control over their respective Sham Entities such that the Sham Entities are mere shells and 2411 instrumentalities for the conduct of the respective Individual Cross-Defendants' own business. 25 (b The Individual Cross-Defendants carried on the activities and business of 2611 their respective Sham Entities without conducting necessary directors' and shareholders' meetings 2711 and otherwise failed to adhere to requisite corporate formalities. 28 (c The Individual Cross-Defendants inadequately capitalized their respective 2 DEFENDANT WESTERN NA TIONALCONSTRUCTION'S CROSS-COMPLAINT P:\DOCS\Westem NatCilkel\Pleadings\XC.docx

4 E-FILltO: Apr 30,20145:00 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G II Sham Entities relative to the business it conducted and the risk of loss attendant thereon. 2 (d Adherence to the fiction of a separate existence between the Individual 3 /I Cross-Defendants and their respective Sham Entities would sanction fraud and permit an abuse of 4 II the corporate privilege Therefore, justice and equity can only be accomplished, and fraud and unfairness 6 II defeated, by a disregard of any distinction between the Sham Entities and the respective Individual 7 II Cross-Defendants At all times relevant hereto, each of the Cross-Defendants was acting as the agent, 9 II partner, co-developer, joint venturer, servant andlor subcontractor ofeac~ of the remaining Cross- 10 II Defendants, and was acting within the course and scope of said agency and employment ROES 1 through 500, inclusive, are sometimes collectively referred to herein as ~>~ :il~~ oqs I ~II (! 12 II "Cross-Defendants." On or about December 26, 2013, Pla.!-ntiff, Cilker Apartments, LLC (''Plaintiff', 1411 filed its Complaint in the instant action. Thereafter, on March 20, 2014, Plaintiff filed its First 15 II Amended Complaint (flfac If in which it alleges damages as a result of alleged construction 16 II defects and consequential damage at the One Pearl Place Apartments, containing 182 residential 1711 dwelling units,.located at 5230 Temer Way, San Jose, California (the "Project". Although Cross- 18 II Complainant denies any liability upon the FA C, Cross-Complainant incorporates that pleading 19 II herein by reference Cross-Complainant alleges that each of the Cross-Defendants are in some manner 21 Illegally liable for the events and happenings referred to in Plaintiff's FAC and are liable to Cross- 22 II Complainant as alleged hereinafter. 23 FmST CAUSE OF ACTION (For Breach of Contract Against All Cross-Defendants Cross-Complainant incorporates, by reference, each and every paragraph of this 26 II Cross-Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 27 1"1. CrossMDefendants entered into separate written agreements with Cross- 28 II Complainant andlor its predecessors wherein Cross-Defendants agreed to perform work and/or 3 DEFENDANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION'S CROSS-COMPLAINT P:\[(CS\Westem NatCilker\Pleadings\XC.docx:.

5 E FllED: Apr 30, :00 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G II supply materials for the construction of Plaintiff's apartment units at the Project (the 2 1/ "Subcontracts". Pursuant to the Subcontracts, Cross Defendants agreed to perform their work on 3 1/ Project in a workmanlike and quality manner, and they agreed to furnish and render their best 4 /I skill, judgment, time and supervision in the performance of the Subcontracts. Cross-Defendants 5 II also agreed in the Subcontracts to defend and indemnify Cross-Complainant to the fullest extent of 611 the law for all claims, damages and expenses arising out of Cross-Defendants' work in the Project Plaintiff's FAC on file herein alleges numerous damages resulting from alleged 8 II construction defects as well as conseq~ential damages to the Project. Although Cross- 911 Complainant denies and refutes the allegations in Plaintiffs FAC, Cross-Complainant is infonned 10 II and believes and, based thereon, alleges that any such construction defects and/or consequential 11 II damages are the direct and proximate result of the breach of the Subcontracts by Cross- ~H ~~ i mu ~ ~ o 12 II Defendants, and each of them Further, the Subcontracts required Cross-Defendants to obtain and maintain in 14 II force, for the period of Cross-Defendants' work in the Project plus an additional ten years, general 15 II liability insurance with coverage for bodily injury, property damage, completed operations and 16 II product liability coverage. In such insurance.policy(ies, Cross.. Defendants were also required to 17 II name Cross-Complainant as an additional insured, and to provide Cross-Complainant with thirty- 18 II day advance written notice of any cancellation of such insurance Cross-Complainant is informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that Cross- 20 II Defendants failed to obtain and maintain the general liability insurance required by the 21 II Subcontracts, failed to name Cross-Complainant as an additional insure~ failed to provide Cross- 22 II Complainant with thirty-day advance written notice of any cancellation of such insurance, and/or 23 II now fail and refuse to fully defend and indemnify. Cross-Complainant in connection with 2411 Plaintiff's FAC As a result of each of Cross-Defendants' breaches of the Subcontracts, Cross- 26 II Complainant has incurred and will incur substanti3l damages in an amount presently unknown Further, the Subcontracts provide that in the event of Iitigation, the prevailing party therein shall 28 II recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, and Cross-Co~plainant is therefore entitled to an 4 DEFENDANT WESlERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION'S CROSS-COMPLAINT P:\DOCS\ Western NatCil.k:<::i\Pleadings\XC.docx

6 E~FIIJED: ~pr :00 p~, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G award of its attorneys' fees and costs incurred in the defense of Plaintiffs FAC and the 2 II prosecution of this Cross-Complaint. 3 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION 4 (For Express Indemnity and Defense Against AU Cross-Defendants 5 /I 16. Cross.. Complainant incorporates, by reference, each and every paragraph of this 6 II Cross-Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 7lJ 17. Prior to the incidents alleged in the FAC, Cross-Defendants entered into the 8" Subcontracts with Cross-Complainant and/or Cross-Complainant's agen~ wherein each Cross- 9 II Defendant agreed to defend, indemnify and hold Cross-Complainant harmless to the fullest extent 10 II under the law for all claims, damages, expenses, etc. arising out of or related to Cross Defendants' 1111 work on the Project. ~~ i o(i ~ ~!I ~'! ~ Cross.. Complainant has tendered this claim to Cross-Defendants, and each of them. By service of this Cross-Complaint, Cross-Complainant hereby demands that Cross-Defendants immediately defend and indemnify Cross-Complainant for any and all fees and expenses incurred by and! or any liability that may be imposed upon them. Cross :Complainant is informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that Cross-Defendants refuse such demands. 19. As a result of the foregoing, Cross-Complainant has been forced to defend itself against Plaintiff's F AC and is entitled to complete express contractual defense and indemnity from Cross-Defendants, and an award of all attorneys' fees and Court costs incurred by Cross Complainant in the defense of this action and the prosecution ofthls Cross-Complaint. Further, if Cross-Complainant is held liable to Plaintiff or any other party in this lawsuit by way of adjudication, settlement, or otherwise, Cross-Complainant is entitled to complete express contractual indemnity from' Cross-Defendants and for reasonable attorneys' fees and Court costs incurred in the defense of this action and the prosecution of this Cross-Complaint. TmRD CAUSE OF ACTION (For Implied Indemnity Against AU Cross-Defendants 20. Cross-Complainant incorporates, by reference, each and every paragraph of this Cross-Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 5 DEFENDANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTIONS CROSS-COMPLAINT P:\DOCS\Westem N8lCilker\Pleadings\XC.doox

7 E-FIUED: ~pr 30,2014 5:00 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing In the event that Cross-Complainant is found in some manner legally liable to any 211 Plaintiffts and/or any other cross-complainant(s or anyone else as a result of the events and 311 occurrences described in Plaintiff's FAC and/or any cross-complaints which may be filed herein, 411 any liability ofcross.. Complainant, if any there be, would be solely based upon a derivative, 511 vicarious or imputed form of liability, n<?t resulting from their own conduct, but instead based 6 upon an obligation imposed upon them by law. Therefore, in the event that Cross-Complainant is 7 II found in any manner legally liable, such liability was proximately caused by the acts and/or 8 II omissions of Cross-Defendants, and Cross-Complainant is entitled to recover indemnity, whether 911 total or partial, equitable, implied and/or express~ including attorneys' fees, from said Cross- 10 II Defendants. 11 FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION ~ ~~i ~~ I Z~I ~~< d (For Equitable Indemnity Against AU Cross-Defendants Cross-Complainant incorporates, by reference, each and every paragraph of this 14 II Cross-Complaint as though fully set forth herein In equity and good conscience, if any Plaintiff or any other party to this action 1611 recovers against Cross-Complainant, then Cross-Complainant is entitled to equitable indemnity, 17 II apportionment of liability and contribution among and from Cross-Defendants, and each of them, t 8 II according to their respective liability or fault, for the injuries and damages allegedly sustained by 19 II any Plaintiff or any other party to this action, if any, by way of any and all sums paid through 20 II settlement or, alternatively, judgment rendered against Cross-Complainant in the underlying 21 II action FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION 2311 (For Comparative Negligence and Contribution Against All Cross-Defendants Cross-Complainant incorporates, by reference, each and every paragraph of this 25 1/ Cross-Complaint as though fully set forth herem In the event any Plaintiff or any other party to this action should establish liability 27 lion the part of Cross-Complainant, which liability is expressly denied, Cross-Complainant is 2811 informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that they may be obligated to extinguish such 6 DEFENDANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTIONS CROSS-COMPLAINT P:\DOCS\ Western NatCiUcer\Pleadings\xC.doex

8 E-FII!.ED:,Apr 30,20145:00 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing !I liability by payment of sums in excess of their proportionate fault and in doing so will them~elves 2 II be damaged to the extent of such excess sums. Therefore, Cross-Complainant requests an 31l adjudic,ation and determination of the respective degrees or proportion of liability or fault, if any, 411 on their part and on the part oftlle Cross-Defendants, and each of them. If Cross-Complainant is 511 found liable to any Plaintiff or any other party to this action, an adjudication and determination 6 requiring a proportionate contribution from all Cross-Defendants, and each of them, is requested. 7 8 slxm CAUSE OF ACTION (For Breach of Implied Warranties Against AU Cross-Defendants Cross-Complainant incorporates, by reference, each and every paragraph of this 10 Cross-Complaint as though fully set forth herein Cross-Complainant is informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that Cross- ~~ I o(~ ~ ~~I ~~< (! 1211 Defendants, and each of them, held themselves out to be competent design professionals, 13 II subcontractors and material suppliers and impliedly warranted to Cross-Complainant that the units 14 II located in the ~roject were ofmerchantable quality, designed ~d constructed. in a reasonably 15 II workmanlike manner, and fit for their intended purpose. 16 " 28. Cross-Complainant is informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that Cross Defendants, and each of them, knew or bad reason to know that Cross-Complainant would rely 18 II upon their professed skill and judgment in engineering, constructing and supplying materials 1911 relative to the Project, and Cross-Complainant did so rely on said professed skill and judgment Upon the filing of Plaintiff's F AC herein, Cro~s-Complainant became aware that 2111 Plaintiffwas making a claim that the Project was not designed or constructed in a reasonably 2211 workmanlike manner, was not fit for its intended use and purpose, and was not free from defects Cross-Complainanfis informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that Cross- 24" Defendants, and each of them, breached said implied warranties in that Plaintiff has alleged that 25 II the construction was defective as is more particularly set f<?rth in the F AC This CrosS-Complaint will serve as further notice of such conditions, and Cross- 27 II Complainant is informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that Cross-Defendants, and each 28/1 ofthe~ have declined or vvill. decline to acknowledge' their responsibility to repair the alleged 7 DEFENDANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION'S CROSS-COMPLAINT P:\DOCS\ Western NatCitker\Pleadings\xC.docx

9 E-FILItD: Apr 30,20145:00 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1 13-CV Filing defects as referenced above and more particularly in Plaintiff's FAC As a proximate result of the breach of the implied warranties by Cross~Defendants, 311 and each of them, Cross-Complainant is informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that 4 II they will suffer damages, including but not limited to, any sums paid by way of settlement, Or in 511 the alternative, judgment rendered against Cross-Complainant in the action herein. Cross- 6 Complainant has incurred further damages as a result of the breach of the implied warranties by 711 Cross-Defendants, and each of them, including but not limited to, litigation costs, consultants'. 811 fees, attorneys' fees, and other costs incurred in the defense of this action and prosecution of this 9 Cross-Complaint 10 It SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION (For Breach of Express Warranties Against AU Cross-Defendants ~ ~p 'oo~ I z~~ t.q~1 ~ < Cross-Complainant incorporates, by reference, each and every paragraph of this 13 II Cross-Complaint as though fully set forth herein Each and every Cross-Defendant entered into a Subcontract with Cross Complainant, their predecessor, successor, agent, or related entity relative to work performed or 16 materials supplied to the Project. The Subcontracts were intended for the benefit of the 17 II contracting parties as well as their predecessors, successors, agents, and related entities, including 18 " but not liniited to Cross-Complainant As a material part of the Subcontract, Cross-Defendants, and each of them, 20 II expressly warranted. that the materials supplied, work perfonned and services rendered would be 2111 done in a good and workmanlike manner, with due care, and free of material defects Cross-Complainant relied upon said express warranties and believed that the work 23 II was performed in a good and workm.anlike manner and that the Jabor and materials provided were 24 II properly performed by Cross-Defendants, and each of them, and were fit for the intended use and 25 II purpose and free from defects Plaintiff s FAC alleges that the Project was not designed and constructed in a good 2711 and workmanlike manner, with due care, and was not free of material defects, but rather, 2811 contained the defects more specifically described in Plaintiff's FAC. Based upon these 8 DEFENDANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION'S CROSS-COMPLAINT P:\DOCS\We.stem NatCilker\Pleadings\XC.docx.

10 E-FILflD:.Apr 30,20145:00 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara. Case #1-13-CV Filing # allegations, Cross-Complainant is informed and believe and, based thereon allege that Cross- 211 Defendants, and each of them, breached said express warranties This Cross-Complaint will serve as ~er notice of such conditions, and Cross- 411 Complainant is informed and believes and based thereon, alleges that Cross-Defendants, and each 511 of them, have declined and will decline to acknowledge their responsibility to repair the_ alleged 6 defects as referenced above and more particularly in Plaintiff's FAC As a direct and proximate result of the br~ch of the express warranties by Cross- 8 II Defendants, and each of them, Cross-Complainant is informed and believes and, based thereon, 911 alleges that they will suffer damages, including but not limited to, any sums paid by way of 10 settlement, or in the alternative, judgment rendered against Cross-Complainant in the action 11 II herein. Cross-Complainant has incurred further damages as a result of the breach of the express ~ ~~I o(~ I ffi~~ gz!<! C 12 warranties by Cross-Defendants, and each of them, including but not limited to, litigation costs, consultants' fees, attorneys' fees" and other costs incurred in the defense o,fthis action and 14 prosecution of this Cross-Complaint. 15 EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION 16 (For Negligence Against AU Cross-Defendants Cross-Complainant incorporates, by reference, each and every paragraph of this 18 II Cross-Complaint as though fully set forth herem Cross-Complainant is informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that Cross- 20 II Defendants, and each of them, had a duty to supply materials and perform their work and services 2111 with respect to the Project in a good and workmanlike manner, within the applicable standard of 22 care and free from defects. 23 /I 42. Cross-Complainant is informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that to the 2411 extent the conditions asserted by the Plaintiff in the FAC exist, which is expressly denied by 25 II Cross-Complainant, said ~nditions were directly and proximately caused by a breach of the 2611 applicable. standard of care by Cross.. Defendants, and each of them As a result of the negligence 0 f Cross-Defendants, and each of them, Cross Complainant is infonned and believes and, based thereon, alleges that it will suffer damages 9 DEFENDANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTIONS CROSS-COMPLAINT P:\oocs\Western NatCilker\Pleadings\xCdocx

11 E-FllED:.APr 30,20145:00 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G II including but not limited to, any sums paid by way of settlement, or in the alternative judgment 211 rendered against Cross-Complainant in the action herein. Cross-Complainant has incurred further 3 damages as a result of the negligence of Cross-Defendants, and each of them, including but not 4 II limited to, litigation costs, consultants' fees, attorneys' fees, and other costs incurred in the 5 II defense of this action and the prosecution of the Cross-Complaint. 6 7 NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION (For Declaratory Relief Against All Cross-Defendants 8 II 44. Cross-Complainant incorporates, by reference, each and every paragraph of this 9 II Cross-Complaint as though fully set forth herem. 10 II 45. A dispute has arisen and an actual controversy exists as between Cross-. 11 Complainant and Cross-Defendants in relation to the following: ~ ~~ I" _'""X'< ~~ ~ I!I c!. 12 a. The respective liability to any Plaintiff or any other party to this action, if 1311 any; 14 b. Whether Cross-Defendants must defend Cross-Complainant against the 1511 claims and allegations of Plaintiff andlor any other cross-complainant; 16 c. Whether Cross-Defendants must pay for the attorneys' fees and costs 1711 incurred by Cross-Complainant in the defense of this action, and the prosecution of this Cross Complaint; 19 d. Whether Cross-Defendants are obligated to obtain the insurance policy(ies 20 II and name Cross-Complainant as an additional insured under such insurance policies; and 21 e. Whether Cross-Defendants must indemnify Cross-Complainant for any 22 n settlement and/or damages which it may be obligated to pay to Plaintiff and/or any other cross- 23 II complainant A declaration of the respective Ii-ability and rights of the parties is necessary as 25 II Cross-Complainant has no other adequate remedy at law. Such declaration will avoid a 26 II multiplicity of actions that win otherwise be required if Cross-Complainant must defend this 2711 action and then bring a separat~ action against Cross-Defendants DEFENDANf WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTIONS CROSS COMPLAINT P:\DOCS\Wesrem NatQlkmPleadings\XC.doox

12 E-FIIltD; Apr 30,20145:00 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara. Case #1-13-CV Filing Cross.. Complainant desires a judicial declaration of its rights in accordance with 2 contentions. Due to the fact that Plaintiff has named Cross-Complainant as defendant in this 3 action, a judicial determination is necessary and appropriate at this time so that Cross- 4 Complainant may establish the absence of any liability on their part. 5 TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION 6 /I (For Declaratory Relief Re: Duty to Defend Against AU Cross-Defendants Cross-Complainant incorporates, by reference, each and every paragraph of this 811 Cross-Complaint as though fully set forth herein Each and every Cross-Defendant entered into a Subcontract with Cross- 10 II Complainant, their predecessor, agent, or related entity relative to work performed or materials 1111 supplied to the single family homes in the Project. Each Subcontract was intended for the benefit ~H _"":i~! O(J~ i Zlj2 i:i1 0m ~~~ c.!j 1211 of the contracting parties, as wen as their predecessors, successors, agents, and related entities, 13 II including but not limited to Cross-Complainant Th~ operative contracts contain an indemnity provision which provides, in pertinent 1511 part, that the Cross-Defendants are required to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Cross- 16 II Complainant and their related entities from and against any and all cla.ims arising out of the work 1711 performed by Cross-Defendants at the Pr9ject A claim within the meaning of the Subcontracts has arisen by virtue of the fact that 19 \I Plaintiff has filed a F AC against Cross-Complainant claiming damages for construction 20 II deficiencies in the Proj ect. The construction deficiencies claimed in Plaintiff's F AC pertain to the scope of work performed and/or materials provided by the Cross-Defendants, and each of them Cross-Defendants, and each of them, have a present duty to defend against any 23 II claims made against Cross-Complainant pursuant to the Subcontracts, California Civil Code 24 II secti on 2778, and as a result of the assertion of a claim or loss arising out of the work of the Cross- 25 II Defen~ants. Cross-Complamant has a present legal right to be provided a defense by the Cross Defendants, and each of them By way of this Cross-Complaint, Cross-Complainant hereby tenders the defense of 2811 this action to the Cross-Defendants, and each of them, pursuant to the applicable Subcontracts., 11 DEFENDANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION'S CROSS-COMPLAINT P:\DOC'S\Westem NatCiI1cer\PJeadings\XC.docx

13 E-FILW; Apr 30,20145:00 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G Cross-Complainant is informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that the Cross- 2 If Defendants, and each of them, have or will reject, ignore, or fail to properly accept the tender of 311 defense A dispute has arisen and an actual controversy now exists between Cross- 511 Complainant and th~ Cross-Defendants, and each of them, in that Cross Complainant contends 611 that it is entitled to a present defense from the Cross"Defendants, and each' of them, while the 7 II Cross-Defendants are believed to deny such obligation under the Subcontract Cross-Complainant hereby seeks a declaration by the Court as to its respective 9 /I rights and the Cross-Defendants' duties and obligations regarding the present duty to defend in 10 /I conjunction with the matters herein alleged, and a judgment in Cross-Complainant's favor as to 1111 any obligations by said Cross-Defendants, and each of them, to Cross-Complainant ~ ~~B -~~ j 111 ~~< C> II WHEREFORE, Cross-Complainant prays for judgment against Cross-Defendants, and 1411 each of them, as follows: ' 15 FIRST, SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH CAUSES OF ACTION 16 (AU Ctoss.Defendants For compensatory damages for breach of contract and breach of express and 1811 implied warranties from Cross-Defendants, and each of them; and For attorneys' fees, expert costs, and other litigation costs incurred herem. 20 SECOND. TIllRD AND FOURTH CAUSES OF ACTION (All Cross-Defendants That Cross-Complainant is entitled to indemnity, whether total or partial, equitable, 2311 implie<l and/or express, from the named Cross-Defendants, and each of them, in the event a 24 II settlement is entered into or a judgment and/or verdict is rendered in favor of any Plaintiff or any 25 II other party to this action and against the Cross-Complainant; and F or attorneys' fees and costs incurred herein. 27 III 28 III 12 DEFENDANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION'S CROSS-COMPLAINT P:\DOCS\Westem NatCilket\Pleadin~\xC.docx

14 E FIUED: Apr 30, 20145:00 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13.CV Filing # I FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION (All Cross Defendants For contribution and compen.satory damages from Cross-Defendants, and each of 4 /I them, pased upon,the respective liability and comparative negligence of said Cross-Defendants, 5 II and each of them; and 6 6. For attorneys' fees, expert costs, and other litigation costs incurred herein. 7 NINTH AND TENTH CAUSES OF ACTION 8 (All Cross.. Defendants 9 7. For a judicial declaration that the Cross-Defendants, and each of them, who entered 10 II into a contract with Cross-Complainant providing for indemnity obligations have a present duty to 11 II defend Cross-Complainant against the allegations in Plaintiff's F AC. ~H _~t: I O(J~.. ta ~ ieg~ ~~~ (j For ajudicial declaration that Cross-Complainant is entitled to a present defense 1311 from the Cross-Defendants, and each of them For ajudicial declaration regarding the parties respective rights and Cross Defendants' duties and obligations regarding their present duty to defend, and ajudgment in 1611 Cross-Complainant'S favor as to any obligations by said Cross-Defendants, and each of them AS TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION (AU Cross-Defendants O. For costs of suit incurred herein; and 20 For such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper ~~, DATED: April;.y, GREEN & HALL, A Professional Corporation By: Michael Y.Pepek Megan J. Rechberg Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION DEFENPANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTIONS CROSS-COMPLAINT p:\docs\westem NatCilker\Pleadings\XC,docx

15 ---'" " ihe SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ELECTRONIC FlUNG c/o Glotrans 2915 McClure Street Oakland, CA I TEL: ( FAX: ( I David H. Yamasaki Apr 30, :00 PM Chief Executive Officer/Clerk Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clar Case #1-13-CV Filing #G By C. Pinacate, Deputy 4 5 THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE" OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CllKER APARTMENTS, llc, Plaintiff, vs. Plaintiff, WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION; MCLARAND. VARQUEZ & PARTNERS; GROUP M ENGINEERS; GENTRY ASSOCIATES CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS; LARCO INDUSTRIES; FITCH PLASTERING; COURTNEY WATERPROOFING; CEll CRETE; los NIETOS CONSTRUCTION; MADERA FRAMING; KEllY DOOR; TARA COATINGS; ldi; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED ACTIONS Defendant. I am employed in the County of Alameda, State of California. Cilker Apartments, llc v. Western National Construction, et a!. lead Case No.1-13-CV Hon. Peter Kirwan PROOF OF SERVICE Electronic Proof of Service I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 2915 McClure 14 I Street, Oakland, CA The documents described on page 2 of this Electronic Proof of Service were submitted via the worldwide web on Wed. April 30, 2014 at 4:02 PM PDT and served by electronic mail notification. I have reviewed the Court's Order Concerning Electronic Filing and Service of Pleading Documents and am readily familiar with the contents of said Order. Under the terms of said Order, I certify the above-described document's electronic service in the following manner: The document was electronically filed on the Court's website, on Wed. April 30, 2014 at 4:02 PM PDT 19 I Upon approval of the document by the Court, an electronic mail message was transmitted to all parties 20 on the electronic service list maintained for this case. The message identified the document and provided.instructions for accessing the document on the worldwide web. 21 I I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 30, 2014 at Oakland, California. Dated: April 30, 2014 For Andy Jamieson

16 ... - ~FILED: Apr 30,20145:00 PM, Superior Court of CA. County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM - Electronic Proof of Service 2 I Page 2 3 Document(s submitted by Michael Pepek of Green & Hall. APC on Wed. April 30, 2014 at 4:02 PM PDT 1. Cross-Complaint: DEFENDANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION'S CROSS COMPLAINT

a. Name of person served:

a. Name of person served: ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address: GREEN & HALL, APC Samuel M. Danskin (SBN 136044 Michael A. Erlinger (SBN 216877 1851 E. First Street, 10th Floor Santa Ana, CA 92705

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA RICHARD N. SIEVING, ESQ. (SB #33634) JENNIFER L. SNODGRASS, ESQ. (SB #78) 2 THE SIEVING LAW FIRM, A.P.C. Attorneys at Law 3 0 Howe Avenue, Suite 2N Sacramento, California 982 4 Telephone: (96) 444-3366

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ONE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ONE EXHIBIT 7 EXHIBIT 7 1 JON B. ZIMMERMAN [SBN. 1121] GREGORY B. COHEN [SBN. 225510] 2 ROBINSON & WOOD, INC. 227 N 1st Street 3 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 298-7120 4 Facsimile: (408) 298-0477

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GREEN & HALL, A Professional Corporation MICHAEL J. PEPEK, State Bar No. 178238 mpepek@greenhall.com SAMUEL M. DANSKIN, State Bar No. 136044 sdanskin@greenhall.com MICHAEL A. ERLINGER,

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 RICHARD N. SIEVING, ESQ. (SB #133634) LUKE G. PEARS-DICKSON, ESQ. (SB #296581) THE SIEVING LAW FIRM, A.P.c. 100 Howe Avenue, Suite 220N Sacramento, California 95825 Telephone: Facsimile:

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA * * *

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA * * * BRETT L. MCKAGUE, ESQ. SBN 0 JEREMY J. SCHROEDER, ESQ. SBN FLESHER MCKAGUE LLP 0 Plaza Drive Rocklin, CA Telephone: ().0 Facsimile: (). Attorneys for defendant and cross-defendant, GENTRY ASSOCIATES CONSTRUCTION

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 RICHARD N. SIEVING, ESQ. (SB #133634) LUKE G. PEARS-DICKSON, ESQ. (SB #296581) THE SIEVING LAW FIRM, A.P.C. 100 Howe Avenue, Suite 220N Sacramento, California 95825 Telephone: Facsimile:

More information

Case3:13-cv SI Document11 Filed03/26/13 Page1 of 17

Case3:13-cv SI Document11 Filed03/26/13 Page1 of 17 Case:-cv-000-SI Document Filed0// Page of CHRISTOPHER J. BORDERS (SBN: 0 cborders@hinshawlaw.com AMY K. JENSEN (SBN: ajensen@hinshawlaw.com HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP One California Street, th Floor San

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) David L. Kagel (Calif. Bar No. 1 John Torbett (Calif. State Bar No. Law Offices of David Kagel, PLC 01 Century Park East, th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: ( -00 Fax: ( - Attorneys Admitted Pro Hac

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA GREEN & HALL, LLP MICHAEL J. PEPEK, State Bar No. 1 mpepek@greenhall.com SAMUEL M. DANSKIN, State Bar No. 10 sdanskin@greenhall.com MICHAEL A. ERLINGER, State Bar No. 1 merlinger@greenhall.com 11 East

More information

Superior Court of California

Superior Court of California Superior Court of California County of Orange Case Number : 30-2017-00910098-CU-BC-CJC Copy Request: 3073376 Request Type: Case Documents Prepared for: cns Number of documents: 1 Number of pages: 7 1 Lawrence

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID KLEHM David Klehm (SBN 0 1 East First Street, Suite 00 Santa Ana, CA 0 (1-0 Attorneys for Plaintiff, GLOBAL HORIZONS, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GLOBAL HORIZONS,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/2016 11:24 AM INDEX NO. 190043/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X JOHN D. FIEDERLEIN AND

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/16/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/16/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNT OF KINGS -------------------------------------------------------------------------X X ALFONSO GARCIA, Index No.: 502202/2014 Plaintiff, -against- WHITE PLAINS

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/2016 05:04 PM INDEX NO. 190293/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X VINCENT ASCIONE, v. ALCOA,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2016 02:54 PM INDEX NO. 190047/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X NORMAN DOIRON AND ELAINE

More information

Case 2:15-cv SVW-AS Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1

Case 2:15-cv SVW-AS Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0-svw-as Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Beverly Hills, CA 0 FREUND & BRACKEY LLP Jonathan D. Freund (SBN ) Stephen P. Crump (SBN ) Beverly Hills, CA 0 Tel: -- Fax: --0 Attorneys for

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA GREEN & HALL, A Professional Corporation MICHAEL J. PEPEK, State Bar No. mpepek@greenhall.com SAMUEL M. DANSKIN, State Bar No. 0 sdanskin@greenhall.com MICHAEL A. ERLINGER, State Bar No. merlinger@greenhall.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Ross E. Shanberg (SBN Shane C. Stafford (SBN Aaron A. Bartz (SBN SHANBERG, STAFFORD & BARTZ LLP 0 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 00 Irvine, California Tel:

More information

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0000 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 SHEILA K. SEXTON, SBN 0 COSTA KERESTENZIS, SBN LORRIE E. BRADLEY, SBN 0 BEESON, TAYER & BODINE, APC Ninth Street, nd Floor Oakland, CA 0-0 Telephone:

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/21/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 94 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/21/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/21/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 94 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/21/2013 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/21/2013 INDEX NO. 153901/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 94 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/21/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK TONY PARKER, Plaintiff, Index No.

More information

Attorney for Plaintiff WORLD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Attorney for Plaintiff WORLD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER RICHARD T. BAUM State Bar No. 0 0 West Olympic Boulevard Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Tel: ( -0 Fax: ( - Attorney for Plaintiff WORLD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

More information

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 1 1 1 COMP MATTHEW W. HOFFMANN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0001 JOHN F. BEMIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 000 ATKINSON WATKINS & HOFFMANN, LLP W. Twain Ave., Suite 0 Las Vegas, NV 1 Telephone: 0--000 Facsimile: 0--0

More information

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of H. STAN JOHNSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: BRIAN A. MORRIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: COHEN-JOHNSON, LLC Dean Martin Drive, Ste. G Las Vegas, NV (0-00 Attorneys for Plaintiff

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 0 GREEN & HALL, A Professional Corporation SAMUEL M. DANSKIN, State Bar No. 0 sdanskin@greenhall.com MICHAEL A. ERLINGER, State Bar No. merlinger@greenhall.com East First Street, 0 th Floor Santa Ana,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/ :13 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/ :13 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/2016 11:13 AM INDEX NO. 157868/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil Case No.: 18-cv (WMW/SER)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil Case No.: 18-cv (WMW/SER) CASE 0:18-cv-02420-ECT-SER Document 24 Filed 08/30/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil Case No.: 18-cv-02420 (WMW/SER) FRIDAY & COX, LLC, Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS' JOINT

More information

United States Bankruptcy Court. Northern District of California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

United States Bankruptcy Court. Northern District of California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Marc Voisenat (CSB# 0 0 Broadway, Suite Oakland, Ca. Tel: ( - Fax: ( - Attorney for Debtors Richard Souza Caporale Isabel Ann Caporale United States Bankruptcy Court Northern District of California In

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service ~ Ronald J. Tocchini CSBN Lilia G. Alcaraz CSBN 0 L Street Suite 0 Sacramento, California - USA Telephone: ( ) - Facsimile: ()- Attorneys for MARIA CHAVEZ Supertor Court Of Califs? ila, Sacramento Da,rmi&

More information

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14 Case :-cv-0-lb Document Filed 0// Page of MICHAEL A. SCHAPS (SBN ) LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL A. SCHAPS Third Street, Suite B Davis, CA Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) - mschaps@michaelschaps.com Attorney for

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-000-l-nls Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of HAINES LAW GROUP, APC Paul K. Haines (SBN ) phaines@haineslawgroup.com Tuvia Korobkin (SBN 0) tkorobkin@haineslawgroup.com Fletcher W. Schmidt (SBN

More information

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/25/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 44 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/25/2018

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/25/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 44 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/25/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX -..-....-------- ENEIDO ROMERO, Plaintiff, X Index No.: 25244/2014E -against- VERIFIED ANSWER 755 COOP CITY ASSOCIATES, LP; TRIANGLE EQUITIES MANAGEMENT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: Bobby Saadian, Esq. SBN: 0 Colin M. Jones, Esq. SBN: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM 0 Wilshire Blvd., th Floor Los Angeles, California 000 Tel: () - Fax: () - Attorneys

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-jfw-jc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: BOREN, OSHER & LUFTMAN LLP Paul K. Haines (SBN ) Email: phaines@bollaw.com Fletcher W. Schmidt (SBN ) Email: fschmidt@bollaw.com N. Sepulveda

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 0//0 0: PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by F. Caldera,Deputy Clerk 0 0 MICHAEL J. KUMP (SBN 00) mkump@kwikalaw.com

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA EDWARD J. WYNNE, SBN 11 WYNNE LAW FIRM Wood Island 0 E. Sir Francis Drake Blvd., Ste. G Larkspur, CA Telephone: (1) 1-00 Facsimile: (1) 1-00 ewynne@wynnelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and the putative

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/2016 0433 PM INDEX NO. 190115/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF 06/07/2016 LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP 137 West 25th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10001 (212) 302-2400

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK VERIFIED REPLY TO 89 BOWERY AND HUA YANG'S COUNTERCLAIMS IN VERIFIED AMENDED ANSWER Index No. 150738/2017 Plaintiff, 93 BOWERY HOLDINGS LLC ("93

More information

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA Case :-cv-000-bro-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 CHRIS BAKER, State Bar No. cbaker@bakerlp.com MIKE CURTIS, State Bar No. mcurtis@bakerlp.com BAKER & SCHWARTZ, P.C. Montgomery Street, Suite

More information

2. Denies knowledge and information suffrcient to form a belief with respect to

2. Denies knowledge and information suffrcient to form a belief with respect to SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEV/ YORK COUNTY OF ONEIDA In Te FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION This document applies to: FRANCIS JAKUBOWSKI and GLORIA JAKUBOWSKI, X Index No. EFCA2}I 6-00237

More information

led FEB SUPERIOR COURl l.h '-.. irornia BY DEPUTY 1. GENERAL NEGLIGENCE 2. WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 3. WRONGFUL DEATH 4.

led FEB SUPERIOR COURl l.h '-.. irornia BY DEPUTY 1. GENERAL NEGLIGENCE 2. WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 3. WRONGFUL DEATH 4. 0 0 Benjamin P. Tryk, Esq. () John R. Waterman, Esq. () TRYK LAW, P.C. N. Howard St., Ste. 0 Fresno, California 0 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () -0 Email: ben@tryklaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs, MABEL

More information

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 13985 STOWE DRIVE POWAY, CA 92064 TEL: (858) 513-1020 FAX: (858) 513-1002 www.lorberlaw.com May 6, 2016 Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield jgreenfield@lorberlaw.com Zachariah R. Tomlin

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. [Complaint Filed 11/24/2010] [Alameda County Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. [Complaint Filed 11/24/2010] [Alameda County Case No. RANDALL CRANE (Cal. Bar No. 0) rcrane@cranelaw.com LEONARD EMMA (Cal. Bar No. ) lemma@cranelaw.com LAW OFFICE OF RANDALL CRANE 0 Grand Avenue, Suite 0 Oakland, California -0 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile:

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 1) Americans for Safe Access Webster St., Suite 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: () - Fax: () 1-0 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN

More information

Site Builder End User License Agreement

Site Builder End User License Agreement Site Builder End User License Agreement NOTICE: THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS GOVERN ALL ACCESS TO AND USE OF CCH INCORPORATED S ( CCH ) CCH SITE BUILDER, INCLUDING ALL SERVICES, APPLICATIONS, ARTICLES,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA NAIRI PATERSON, ESQ. State Bar No. STRATMAN, PATTERSON & HUNTER 0 th Street, Suite 00 Oakland, CA -1 Phone: () -0 Fax: () - // Attorney for Cross-Defendant, VIKING DOOR, INC. (sued as ROE ; sued erroneously

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/10/ :35 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/10/2018 EXHIBIT 4

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/10/ :35 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/10/2018 EXHIBIT 4 EXHIBIT 4 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2018 04;47 PM WATER STREET REALTY GROUP LLC and YARON HERSHCO, Defendants,....----X -- â â ----- â WATER STREET REALTY GROUP LLC and YARON HERSHCO, Third-Party

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT. ) [Unlimited Jurisdiction] ) ) Case No.:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT. ) [Unlimited Jurisdiction] ) ) Case No.: SINGH, SINGH & TRAUBEN, MICH AEL A. T RAUBEN (SBN: 00 S. Beverly Drive, Suite 00 Beverly Hills, California 0 Tel: --0 Fax: -- mtrauben@singhtraubenlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs SANDBOX LLC and JUSTIN

More information

Certified Partner Agreement. THIS AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made and entered into on, between the City of Sacramento ( City ) and BACKGROUND

Certified Partner Agreement. THIS AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made and entered into on, between the City of Sacramento ( City ) and BACKGROUND Certified Partner Agreement THIS AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made and entered into on, between the City of Sacramento ( City ) and ( Owner ). BACKGROUND A. City operates a website ( City Website ) that

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-psg-pla Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Edward J. Wynne (SBN ) ewynne@wynnelawfirm.com J.E.B. Pickett (SBN ) Jebpickett@wynnelawfirm.com WYNNE LAW FIRM 0 Drakes Landing Road, Suite

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/28/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 74 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/28/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/28/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 74 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/28/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------- x IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL --------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

Case 5:18-cv EJD Document 31 Filed 05/03/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 5:18-cv EJD Document 31 Filed 05/03/18 Page 1 of 14 Case :-cv-00-ejd Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Edward J. Wynne (SBN ) ewynne@wynnelawfirm.com WYNNE LAW FIRM 0 E. Sir Francis Drake Blvd., Ste. G Larkspur, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -00 Gregg I.

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/08/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/08/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/08/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/08/2013 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/08/2013 INDEX NO. 151360/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/08/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK STEPHEN MOLINARI, Index No.: 151360/12

More information

Attorneys for Defendant SAK CONSTRUCTION, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Attorneys for Defendant SAK CONSTRUCTION, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON GARY V. ABBOTT, Oregon State Bar Number 720072 E-mail address: gabbott@abbott-law.com US Bancorp Tower, Suite 2650 111 Southwest Fifth Avenue Telephone: Facsimile : (503) 595-9519 Attorneys for Defendant

More information

Case5:02-cv JF Document3 Filed11/06/02 Page1 of 14

Case5:02-cv JF Document3 Filed11/06/02 Page1 of 14 Case:0-cv-0-JF Document Filed/0/0 Page of JAMES R. HAWLEY -- BAR NO. 0 KATHRYN CHOW BAR NO. 0 HOGE, FENTON, JONES & APPEL, INC. Sixty South Market Street, Suite 00 San Jose, California - Phone: (0) -0

More information

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Contract No.

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Contract No. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Contract No. This AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ( AGREEMENT ) is made and entered into effective as of the day of, 20, by and between the CITY OF ALHAMBRA, a charter

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )_ ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )_ ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEY LAW OFFICES OF ATTORNEY 123 Main St. Suite 1 City, CA 912345 Telephone: (949 123-4567 Facsimile: (949 123-4567 Email: attorney@law.com ATTORNEY, Attorney for P1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF

More information

Consultant Allies Terms and Conditions

Consultant Allies Terms and Conditions This Consultant Allies Member Agreement (this Agreement ) constitutes a binding legal contract between you, the Member ( Member or You ), and Consultant Allies, LLC, ( Consultant Allies ), which owns and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) E.D. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) E.D. Case No. Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 GREGORY T. MEATH (State Bar No. 0 MEATH & PEREIRA 0 North Sutter Street, Suite 00 Stockton, CA 0- Ph. (0-00 Fx. (0-0 greggmeath@hotmail.com Attorneys

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/2016 10:52 AM INDEX NO. 154973/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXA S SHERMAN DIVISION FILE D U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MAR 21200 7 DAVID J. MALANu, t;lerk BY DEPUTY PLA, LLC, individually and on

More information

1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND

1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND Case 5:16-cv-02572 Document 1 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Jose_ph R. Becerra (State Bar No. 210709) BECERRA LAW FIRM

More information

QUINTILONE & ASSOCIATES

QUINTILONE & ASSOCIATES 1 RICHARD E. QUINTILONE II (SBN 0) QUINTILONE & ASSOCIATES EL TORO ROAD SUITE 0 LAKE FOREST, CA 0-1 TELEPHONE NO. () - FACSIMILE NO. () - E-MAIL: REQ@QUINTLAW.COM JOHN D. TRIEU (SBN ) LAW OFFICES OF JOHN

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/16/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/16/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/16/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/16/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X MICHAEL TACCARDI, Index No.: 504173/2015 Plaintiff, -against- CONSOLIDATED

More information

CONSTRUCTION LICENSE AGREEMENT

CONSTRUCTION LICENSE AGREEMENT CONSTRUCTION LICENSE AGREEMENT This Construction License Agreement (this 11 Agreement") is made and entered into as of, 2013 (the "Effective Date 11 ) by and between (a) the City of Los Angeles ("City''),

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION. Case No.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION. Case No. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Christopher B. Dolan (SBN 1) Emile A. Davis (SBN ) San Francisco, California Telephone: (1) -00 Facsimile: (1) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ANG JIANG LIU, HUAN HUA KUANG, ANTHONY LIU IN SUPERIOR

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No. 1 1 1 1 0 1 Joshua H. Haffner, SBN 1 (jhh@haffnerlawyers.com) Graham G. Lambert, Esq. SBN 00 gl@haffnerlawyers.com HAFFNER LAW PC South Figueroa Street, Suite Los Angeles, California 001 Telephone: ()

More information

Case4:13-cv YGR Document23 Filed05/03/13 Page1 of 34

Case4:13-cv YGR Document23 Filed05/03/13 Page1 of 34 Case:-cv-00-YGR Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 DAVID D. SOHN, Cal. Bar No. david@sohnlegal.com SOHN LEGAL GROUP, P.C. California Street, th Floor San Francisco, California 0 --00; -- (Fax) DAVID BORGEN,

More information

E-FILED: Jun 13, :57 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G-84481

E-FILED: Jun 13, :57 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G-84481 E-FILED Jun 13, 2016 1:57 PM David H. Yamasaki Chief Executive Officer/Clerk Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara Case #1-13-CV-258281 Filing #G-84481 By A. Ramirez, Deputy Exhibit A SUPERIOR

More information

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF CHARLESTON ) NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF CHARLESTON ) NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF CHARLESTON ) NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ) Peter T. Phillips, ) Civil Action No. 15-CP-10- ) Plaintiff ) vs. ) COMPLAINT ) (Jury Trial Requested)

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ /09/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/23/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ /09/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/23/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/23/2014 06/09/2016 02:34 PM INDEX NO. 160662/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 62 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/23/2014 06/09/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

More information

COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Board of Trustees Meeting June 8, 2015

COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Board of Trustees Meeting June 8, 2015 COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Board of Trustees Meeting June 8, 2015 CONSENT CALENDAR 6 Weapons Firing Range License Agreement between College of the Sequoias Public Safety Training

More information

POLE ATTACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT SKAMANIA COUNTY PUD

POLE ATTACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT SKAMANIA COUNTY PUD POLE ATTACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT SKAMANIA COUNTY PUD PARTIES: PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT No. 1 of SKAMANIA COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation, hereinafter called PUD, and [Name] a [State

More information

Case 4:18-cv JSW Document 14 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 13. Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF VALLEJO, JARRETT TONN, KEVIN BARRETO, and SEAN KENNEY

Case 4:18-cv JSW Document 14 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 13. Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF VALLEJO, JARRETT TONN, KEVIN BARRETO, and SEAN KENNEY Case :-cv-00-jsw Document Filed 0// Page of CLAUDIA M. QUINTANA City Attorney, SBN BY: KATELYN M. KNIGHT Deputy City Attorney, SBN CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall Santa Clara Street, P.O. Box 0 Vallejo, CA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND Antrobus et al v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al Doc. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Lynette Antrobus, Individually c/o John Mulvey, Esq. 2306 Park Ave., Suite 104

More information

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and all those similarly situated.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and all those similarly situated. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Stephen L. Weber, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) Michael J. White, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) James W. Fleming, Esq. (AZ SBN 0) KASDAN SIMONDS WEBER & VAUGHAN, LLP 00 N. Central Ave., Suite 0 Phoenix, AZ 0 Phone:

More information

Case 3:18-cv BAJ-RLB Document 1 08/17/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 3:18-cv BAJ-RLB Document 1 08/17/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 3:18-cv-00776-BAJ-RLB Document 1 08/17/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CHEVRON TCI, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 18-776 ) CAPITOL HOUSE HOTEL MANAGER,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff, Defendants. General of the State of California, hereby alleges as follows:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff, Defendants. General of the State of California, hereby alleges as follows: EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California MARK J. BRECKLER Senior Assistant Attorney General JON M. ICHINAGA Supervising Deputy Attorney General SATOSHI YANAI Deputy Attorney General State Bar

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2015 04:18 PM INDEX NO. 154070/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------x

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :51 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :51 PM Exhibit G FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2016 02/07/2017 04:42 02:51 PM INDEX NO. 156798/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2016 02/07/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/ :34 AM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/ :34 AM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/2014 09:34 AM INDEX NO. 151547/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK MILERVA SANTOS, Index No.:

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/28/ :51 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/28/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/28/ :51 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/28/2017 , EXHIBITE [FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2017 04:12 PM] SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS SELVIN ESPINAL RODRJGUEZ, -against- Plaintiff, 91 & 95 28TH STREET, JACKSON HEIGHTS, IN

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/2015 01:47 PM INDEX NO. 190350/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS

More information

Case3:14-cv MEJ Document1 Filed11/24/14 Page1 of 18

Case3:14-cv MEJ Document1 Filed11/24/14 Page1 of 18 Case:-cv-000-MEJ Document Filed// Page of TINA WOLFSON, SBN 0 twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com ROBERT AHDOOT, SBN 0 rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com THEODORE W. MAYA, SBN tmaya@ahdootwolfson.com BRADLEY K. KING, SBN

More information

QUOTE DOCUMENTS FOR CALLANAN GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT center Street. Des Moines, Iowa QUOTE # Q7088

QUOTE DOCUMENTS FOR CALLANAN GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT center Street. Des Moines, Iowa QUOTE # Q7088 QUOTE DOCUMENTS FOR CALLANAN GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT 3010 center Street Des Moines, Iowa 50312 QUOTE # Q7088 Owner Des Moines Independent Community School District 1917 Dean Avenue Des Moines, IA 50316 DES

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 60 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 60 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------x LEROY BAKER, Index No.: 190058/2017 Plaintiff, -against- AF SUPPLY USA INC.,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/2015 01:23 PM INDEX NO. 190245/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

R. BRIAN DIXON, Bar No LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

R. BRIAN DIXON, Bar No LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Case :-cv-000-jgb-rao Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 R. BRIAN DIXON, Bar No. 0 bdixon@littler.com Bush Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone:..0 Facsimile:..0 DOUGLAS A. WICKHAM, Bar

More information

Case 5:07-cv RMW Document 1 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 11

Case 5:07-cv RMW Document 1 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 11 Case :0-cv-0-RMW Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Case :0-cv-0-RMW Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of. 0. This action arises out of Defendants violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, U.S.C. et seq.

More information

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0-jfw-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Nicholas Ranallo, Attorney at Law SBN 0 Dogwood Way Boulder Creek, CA 00 Phone: ( 0-0 Fax: ( 0 nick@ranallolawoffice.com PIANKO LAW GROUP, PLLC

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS INJURED PERSON, Plaintiff, v. RESPONSIBLE PARTIES Defendants. COMPLAINT AT LAW NOW COMES the plaintiff, INJURED PERSON, by and

More information

BOND FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE

BOND FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Bond No.:_ Premium: BOND FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Escondido, State of California, and (hereinafter designated as ) have entered into an agreement whereby agrees

More information

ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITIES FOR RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY, INC. FIXED PRICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. Recitals:

ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITIES FOR RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY, INC. FIXED PRICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. Recitals: ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITIES FOR RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY, INC. FIXED PRICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. THIS FIXED PRICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. is made effective this day of, 2017 by and

More information

Defendant, Prevost Car (US) Inc., Individually and as. Successor to Nova Bus, by its attorneys, MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES,

Defendant, Prevost Car (US) Inc., Individually and as. Successor to Nova Bus, by its attorneys, MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES, FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/08/2016 11:03 PM INDEX NO. 190300/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/08/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X

More information

Sequoia Park Associates, a California limited partnership, Petitioner and Plaintiff,

Sequoia Park Associates, a California limited partnership, Petitioner and Plaintiff, 1 1 1 STEVEN M. WOODSIDE # County Counsel SUE GALLAGHER, #1 Deputy County Counsel DEBBIE F. LATHAM #01 Deputy County Counsel County of Sonoma Administration Drive, Room Santa Rosa, California 0- Telephone:

More information

SEVES USA INC. PPC Insulators Division North America Purchase Order Terms & Conditions. Title and risk of loss. Governing Terms & Conditions.

SEVES USA INC. PPC Insulators Division North America Purchase Order Terms & Conditions. Title and risk of loss. Governing Terms & Conditions. SEVES USA INC. PPC Insulators Division North America Purchase Order Terms & Conditions Governing Terms & Conditions This Purchase Order ( Order ) constitutes the offer of Seves USA Inc. USA, Inc. ( Seves

More information

Assembly Bill No. 125 Committee on Judiciary

Assembly Bill No. 125 Committee on Judiciary - Assembly Bill No. 125 Committee on Judiciary CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to constructional defects; enacting provisions governing the indemnification of a controlling party by a subcontractor for certain

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 189934) Americans for Safe Access P.O. Box 427112 San Francisco, CA 94142 Telephone: (415) 573-7842

More information