Case: HJB Doc #: 3564 Filed: 06/30/16 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Transcription

1 Case: HJB Doc #: 3564 Filed: 06/30/16 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In re: GT Advanced Technologies, Inc., et al, Reorganized Debtors 1 Chapter 11 Case No HJB et al Jointly Administered Third ASSENTED Ex Parte MOTION OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE MOTION SEEKING DETERMINATION OF WHETHER LITIGATION TRUSTEE MUST FILE POST CONFIRMATION REPORTS AND PAY QUARTERLY FEES To the Honorable Henry J. Boroff, United States Bankruptcy Judge: William K. Harrington, United States Trustee, by his counsel, hereby files this second assented motion to enlarge the time to bring a motion before the Court to determine whether the Litigation Trustee must file post confirmation reports and pay quarterly fees and related relief through and including July 15, The Reorganized Debtors, through counsel, have represented that they consent to this request. In support of his motion, the United States Trustee respectfully states as follows: 1. On October 6, 2014, GT Advanced Technologies Inc., GTAT Corporation, GT Advanced Equipment Holding LLC, GT Equipment Holdings, Inc., Lindbergh Acquisition Corp., GT Sapphire Systems Holding LLC, GT Advanced Cz LLC, GT Sapphire Systems Group LLC, and GT Advanced Technologies Limited (collectively, Debtors ) filed voluntary chapter 11 petitions with the Court. 2. On February 26, 2016 the United States Trustee filed an Objection to confirmation 1 The Reorganized Debtors are: In re GT Advanced Technologies, Inc. (Case No (HJB)); In re GTAT Corporation; (Case No (HJB)) and In re GT Advanced Technologies Limited (Case No (HJB)).

2 Case: HJB Doc #: 3564 Filed: 06/30/16 Desc: Main Document Page 2 of 6 of the Debtors Plan, asserting, among other things, that the Litigation Trust formed pursuant to the Plan should be required to file post confirmation reports and pay quarterly fees on any disbursements made to creditors following confirmation. The United States Trustee also alleged that the Litigation Trust should be jointly and severally liable for the payment of quarterly fees incurred by the Reorganized Debtors. See Court Docket No On March 8, 2016 the Court confirmed the Debtors Plan of Reorganization. The Court s Order confirming the Debtors Plan preserved the United States Trustee s right to bring a motion seeking a determination from the Bankruptcy Court whether the Litigation Trust should be jointly and severally liable with the Reorganized Debtors for the payment of post effective date fees and whether the Litigation Trust is required to file post confirmation reports. See Court Docket No. 3310, 52 at pp The Order confirming the Debtors Plan further provided that the United States Trustee s motion to determine these issues should be brought within 60 days of the Effective Date. Id. On March 17, 2016, the Effective Date of the Plan occurred, thereby setting the deadline for the United States Trustee s motion at May 16, See Court Docket No The Court granted the United States Trustee an extension of time to file the motion to determine these issues through June 15, 2016 and again through June 30, The United States Trustee believes he has reached an agreement in principle for the resolution of the issues raised with respect to the post confirmation reporting and payment of quarterly fees. A draft Stipulation memorializing the agreement has been circulated and is under review. 6. The United States Trustee therefore respectfully requests that the Court enlarge the time for bringing the motion before the Court through July 15, 2016, so that the parties may 2

3 Case: HJB Doc #: 3564 Filed: 06/30/16 Desc: Main Document Page 3 of 6 finalize the terms of a Stipulation resolving the issues for the Court s approval. 7. The Reorganized Debtors, through counsel, have represented that they assent to the United States Trustee s requested extension. WHEREFORE, the United States Trustee respectfully requests that the Court enter an order: a) enlarging the time for the United States Trustee to file a motion to determine whether the Litigation Trust must file post confirmation reports and pay quarterly fees through and including July 15, 2016; and b) granting any and all additional relief the Court deems necessary and just. Respectfully submitted, WILLIAM K. HARRINGTON, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE By: /s/ Geraldine Karonis Geraldine Karonis Assistant United States Trustee Office of the United States Trustee 1000 Elm Street - Suite 605 Manchester, NH (603) bnh #01853 Dated: June 30, 2016 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing was forwarded to all parties on the attached list via CM/ECF unless as otherwise indicated: Jason R. Adams Christopher J. Allwarden Philip D. Anker David P. Azarian Holly Barcroft David L. Barrack Andrew D. Behlmann Joshua M. Bennett Mark I. Bernstein G. Alexander Bongartz J. William Boone Ryan M. Borden Edmund J. Boutin 3

4 Case: HJB Doc #: 3564 Filed: 06/30/16 Desc: Main Document Page 4 of 6 Peter Breslauer Christopher M. Candon James S. Carr Rosanne Ciambrone Donald H. Cram Brian Cullen Keith J. Cunningham Eleanor Wm Dahar Daniel M. Deschenes Cheryl C. Deshaies Ann Marie Dirsa Christopher M. Dube Lawrence M. Edelman John D. Elrod Marita S. Erbeck Michael S. Etkin Jeremy R. Fischer J. Mark Fisher Andrew J. Flame Christopher M. Floyd Edmond J. Ford Kenneth H. Frenchman Anthony A. Froio Kelly J. Gagliuso William S. Gannon Dustin N. Gauthier Matthew T. Gensburg Steven A. Ginther Matthew A. Gold Douglas R. Gooding Irvin D. Gordon Lawrence B. Gormley Steven E. Grill David M. Grogan James T. Grogan, III William S. Gyves James S. Harrington Honor S. Heath Jordan Hershaman Camden B. Hillas Christopher Hilson Gary T. Holtzer Daniel Holzman Nancy Isaacson Michael D. Jankowski Dennis L. Jenkins Matthew R. Johnson Brad M. Kahn Michael S. Kalis Robert J. Keach Martin S. Kedziora 4

5 Case: HJB Doc #: 3564 Filed: 06/30/16 Desc: Main Document Page 5 of 6 Brenda E. Keith Ryan F. Kelley James D. Kelly Susheel Kirpalani Michael A. Klass Louis Kornreich Lisa M. Kresge James S. LaMontagne James F. Laboe Matthew E. Lane Robert J. Lemons Kenneth S. Leonetti Michael J. Licker John Love Benjamin Loveland Lizabeth M. MacDonald Colin P. Maher Robert K. Malone Jason A. Manekas Jacob A. Manheimer Benjamin E. Marcus George J. Marcus Walter L. Maroney Sarah Mayhew Alan S. Maza Marc W. McDonald Peter B. McGlynn Joseph J. McMahon, Jr. Frank B. Mesmer, Jr. Joshua N. Mesmer Gregory A. Moffett Stephen G. Murphy Steven M. Notinger Paul F. O'Donnell, III Michael W. Ott Kelly L. Ovitt Puc Thomas J. Pappas Richard C. Pedone Charles R. Powell, III William B. Pribis William Pugh John J. Ramirez Jennifer D. Raviele David W. Rayment Alexander Rheaume Bronwyn L. Roberts Peter C.L. Roth Jennifer M. Roussil Katherine A. Scherling Sage M. Sigler Daniel W. Sklar 5

6 Case: HJB Doc #: 3564 Filed: 06/30/16 Desc: Main Document Page 6 of 6 Robert A. Soriano Jeffrey C. Spear John M. Sullivan Ryan D. Sullivan Peter N. Tamposi Lisa Snow Wade Michael F. Walsh Christopher A Ward John Robert Weiss Jack S. White Eric R. Wilson James M. Wilton Colin J. Zick Dated: June 30, 2016 /s/geraldine Karonis Geraldine Karonis 6

7 Case: HJB Doc #: Filed: 06/30/16 Desc: Proposed Order Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In re: GT Advanced Technologies, Inc., et al, Reorganized Debtors 1 Chapter 11 Case No HJB et al Jointly Administered ORDER For good cause shown, and no further hearing or notice required, and given the Reorganized Debtors assent, the Court grants the Third Assented Motion of United States Trustee to Enlarge Time to File Motion for Order Determining whether the Litigation Trust must file post confirmation reports and pay quarterly fees or for related relief. The United States Trustee may bring the motion on or before July 15, Further extensions may be granted upon a showing of cause. Dated: The Honorable Henry J. Boroff United States Bankruptcy Judge 1 The Reorganized Debtors are: In re GT Advanced Technologies, Inc. (Case No (HJB)); In re GTAT Corporation; (Case No (HJB)) and In re GT Advanced Technologies Limited (Case No (HJB)).