The New Tricks and Traps of Human Rights Investigations. Association of Corporate Counsel- Ontario Chapter Program
|
|
- Mark Mathews
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The New Tricks and Traps of Human Rights Investigations Association of Corporate Counsel- Ontario Chapter Program Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP 200 Bay Street, Suite 3800 Toronto, ON June 18, 2013
2 Overview Reasonable Investigations & Familiarity Traps When the Investigator Gets Sued Managing the Third-Party Investigator Corroboration & Credibility 2 Footer
3 Reasonable Investigation & Familiarity Traps Zienelabdeen vs. Best Buy, [2013] HRTO 57 Allegations: Failure to accommodate prayer time; Discrimination based on creed; and Differential treatment relative to South Asian employees. Problem: HR Manager had previous experience with Zienlabdeen and no formal investigation was carried about by Best Buy in response to allegations. Issue: In the absence of a formal investigation was there a breach of the duty to respond and investigate? 3 Footer
4 Reasonable Investigation & Familiarity Traps Zienelabdeen vs. Best Buy, [2013] HRTO 57 Despite the absence of a formal investigation, Best Buy was able to demonstrate it met its duty to respond and investigate by showing: The HR Manager remained open to receiving and reviewing materials submitted by Zienelabdeen. Openness was demonstrated by proof of continued substantive communication in respect of the allegations. 4 Footer
5 Reasonable Investigation & Familiarity Traps Cry Wolf or Cry Foul? In the employment context, human rights complainants frequently have an accumulated performance history A history does not negate rights under the Code. A history does not mean a current complaint is unfounded. Managerial frustration is not an excuse: follow your policies and procedures. The Document Trail Here we go again What UN Convention did we breach this time? Bottom Line: A reasonable investigation is something determined on a case-by-case basis. 5 Footer
6 Reasonable Investigation & Familiarity Traps Cassidy v. Canada Post Corp., [2012] CHRD No day case centered on allegations of sexual harassment and the failure to provide a harassment-free workplace. The individual respondent was found personally liable for a variety of acts of harassment and sexual harassment. Canada Post was found to have done a lot right but the Commission found liability by way of errors within the execution of Canada Post s investigation and response. 6 Footer
7 Reasonable Investigation & Familiarity Traps Cassidy v. Canada Post Corp., [2012] CHRD No. 29 The Commission looked to the timeliness of Canada Post s otherwise reasonable remedial efforts and stated: [para. 190] The lack of a fax machine or scanner at Willowdale D and no automated absence message for [Ms. X s] account also contributed to the miscommunication. As well, while [Ms. X] was away, the envelope with the April 25 complaint that Mr. Tidman mailed was sitting unopened in her office for three weeks. She had no assistant or alternative person in place to deal with urgent matters in her absence, or if she did, Mr. Tidman was not aware of that person. 7 Footer
8 Reasonable Investigation & Familiarity Traps Cassidy v. Canada Post Corp., [2012] CHRD No. 29 The Take Away: In large organizations persons tasked with human rights investigations and/or broader human resources functions may be pulled in a variety of directions but a timely response remains key. Ongoing due diligence at all levels of a policy from legal updates to day to implementation remains the best defense. 8 Footer
9 When the Investigator Gets Sued Ditomene v. Boulanger, 2013 QCCQ 842 (Quebec) Ditomene was a CEGEP teacher accused of harassment by two colleagues. In accordance with its policy, the CEGEP retained an outside investigator, Boulanger to conduct an impartial investigation. Ditomene went off work on disability leave and various challenges occurred in the investigation process. Ultimately, Ditomene was terminated and Boulanger s report was cited as part of the basis of just cause. 9 Footer
10 When the Investigator Gets Sued Justice Laporte concluded: Boulanger did not benefit from any kind of adjudicative immunity. Boulanger owed a duty of procedural fairness to Ditomene which was breached by: A) The failure to provide with Ditomene with copies of the original complaints and applicable policies; B) The failure to provide the factual accounts of witnesses interviewed; C) The failure to provide Ditomene with copies of his own disposition; and D) The failure to provide Ditomene with sufficient notice of interviews, thus depriving him of time to prepare. The Court equated Boulanger s failure to follow the CEGEP s own policy with an infringement of the Ditomene s right to procedural fairness. Damages: $3,000 for moral damages and pain and suffering. 10 Footer
11 When the Investigator Gets Sued Taukar v. University of Western Ontario, [2013] HRTO 597 Arbitrator Swan was appointed pursuant to an internal policy to investigate a discrimination complaint between two unionized faculty members. Taukar alleged Swan breached the Code in the course of his investigation and acted in bad faith by: Ignoring evidence of Japanese culture and communication styles (i.e. ethnic origin, race); Applying too high a standard of proof (clear and cogent vs. balance of probabilities), and Failing to provide adequate reasons. The University was alleged to have discriminated against Taukar by virtue of its reliance on Swan s report. 11 Footer
12 When the Investigator Gets Sued Taukar v. University of Western Ontario, [2013] HRTO 597 Issues: 1) Was Swan protected by the doctrine of judicial immunity? 2) Did Swan s alleged bad faith exempt him from judicial immunity? 12 Footer
13 When the Investigator Gets Sued Taukar v. University of Western Ontario, [2013] HRTO 597 Tribunal Concluded: Swan was a neutral and impartial fact finder who carried out functions that were integral to the alternate dispute resolution process agreed to by the parties (Union and Employer) and was thus protected by judicial immunity. Bad Faith The Tribunal declined to permit Swan to be cross-examined on the alleged acts of bad faith. Judicial Review is pending 13 Footer
14 When the Investigator Gets Sued Can Taukar and Ditomeme be Reconciled? The answer lies in the appointment process: Swan was appointed under a modified union/management process. In contrast, Boulanger was appointed under an employer policy. The Take Away: The Court and Tribunal each emphasize the importance of procedural fairness in reviewing the conduct of an investigation: A) The opportunity for a full presentation of your case; B) Consideration by an unbiased adjudicator; and C) Reasons. 14 Footer
15 The Third Party Investigator Considerations: Scope of the retainer: Legal Advice vs. Fact Finder? Expert retained in contemplation of litigation? Has the investigator been fully apprised of all applicable policies? T.M.I.? Overuse of the same investigator? Benefit of Acquired Knowledge vs. Risk of Bias? 15 Footer
16 Corroboration & Credibility The Human Rights Equation: Credibility and Reliability + Corroborative Evidence + Discrimination is Seldom Overt Standard of Proof OUTCOME 16 Footer
17 Corroboration & Credibility Kowalczyk v. Hudson Bay Company, [2011] HRTO 2064: Credibility is omnibus shorthand for a broad range of factors bearing on an assessment of the testimonial trustworthiness of witnesses. It has two generally distinct aspects or dimensions: honesty and reliability. The first, honesty speaks to a witnesses sincerity, candor and truthfulness in the witness box. The second, reliability, refers to a complex admixture of cognitive, psychological, developmental, cultural, temporal and environmental factors that impact on the accuracy of a witness perception, memory and ultimately, testimonial recitation. The evidence of even an honest witness may still be dubious. 17 Footer
18 Corroboration and Credibility The Basis for Rejecting a Complaint is a Question of Strategy The Practical Take Away In a given case, which language is least likely to offend the persons involved? Evidence to the Contrary. Insufficient Evidence. Cannot be Corroborated. Alternative Explanation. Evidence does not meet the standard of proof. The Role of the Trier of Fact: Regardless of the outcome of the internal investigation, it ultimately remains a question for the trier of fact. 18 Footer
19 Investigating Harassment in the Workplace Meighan Ferris-Miles Senior Legal Counsel, Scotiabank
20 Overview How to Select the Investigator Internal vs. External Investigators Conducting Interviews Preparing for the Interviews Procedural Guidelines for Effective Interviews Recommended Sequence of the Interviews Uncooperative Participants Liability for Statements Made During the Interview How to Write the Investigation Report
21 How to Select the Investigator 耀 Investigator responsibilities include: Meeting with the individuals involved; Obtaining all necessary information; Making assessments as to credibility of evidence; and Reporting back to the employer. The investigator must feel comfortable or the investigation could be flawed. Poorly run investigations may expose the employer to further liability and unnecessary costs.
22 Reviewing the Investigator s Background Four main factors to consider: The investigator s knowledge and understanding of harassment, human rights and occupational health and safety legislation; The investigator s experience and sensitivity in dealing with employee and employment issues; The investigator s neutrality and lack of bias; and, Whether the investigator suits the situation. * Example: In a sexual harassment case, it is appropriate to have both a man and a woman conduct the investigation to ensure a gender-balanced-investigation.
23 Internal vs. External Investigators Consider the following factors when deciding: Nature and severity of the allegations Who the allegations were made against The availability of the investigator The role of legal counsel The costs and preference
24 Nature and Severity of the Allegations Consider the severity of the case Example: Allegations made in the open such as during a staff meeting Witnesses present and documented evidence relevant to dispute are more readily available May be more practical to have an internal investigator Example: Sexual harassment case A senior more experienced investigator would be appropriate to conduct the investigation given the sensitivity of the allegations
25 Who the Allegations Were Made Against If allegations were made against or involve a senior member of management or against the employee normally responsible for conducting investigations, an external investigator should be retained. An internal investigator may feel pressured to arrive at a conclusion that does not negatively affect the alleged harasser. It may also be appropriate to use an external investigator if; The allegations of harassment have been made against a number of employees; The allegations are made by or against a third party.
26 The Availability of the Investigator Important to ensure that the selected investigator has time to complete the investigation in an expeditious manner. Instances may arise where an internal investigator cannot promptly be relieved of other duties. An external investigator would then be more appropriate to ensure investigation is completed in a timely manner. Directing sufficient resources to an external investigator demonstrates to employees, the parties shared commitment to ensuring that a harassment-free workplace is being taken seriously.
27 The Role of Legal Counsel Legal counsel may assist by: Overseeing the investigation Providing recommendations to the employer based on the investigation Drafting the investigation report Conducting an expert investigation Where a lawyer acts as the investigator, the lawyer may become a witness to any subsequent legal proceeding and may be unable to represent the employer in any subsequent legal proceeding involving the matter.
28 The Costs and Preference There are a number of hidden costs associated with using an internal investigator such as: Time-loss to perform regular duties More time may be required to conduct interviews and ask follow-up questions to each witness May take more time to prepare investigation report as a result of trying to balance other duties, resulting in a delay in providing a response to both the complainant and accused
29 The Costs and Preference continued It is important to consider long-term effects the use of an internal investigator may have on internal relationships. An internal investigator may be permanently and negatively impacted in terms of operational effectiveness. An external investigator can help in avoiding potential allegations of unfairness or bias. An external investigator may also provide valuable feedback on all matters learned during investigation.
30 Conducting the Interviews The same investigator should be used to conduct all interviews If there is more than one investigator, each investigator should be present for all interviews, or at least the key interviews Interviews should be conducted during work hours in a private meeting room If there are any concerns about confidentiality or safety, particularly safety of the complainant, the interviews should be conducted off-site
31 Presence of Other Parties During an Interview An observer may be useful to confirm the investigator s version of the interview Sensitive or potentially difficult interviews should be conducted in the presence of an observer Trade Union Employees may be prudent or required to have a representative- usually a steward- present. Health and Safety situations may require that a representative or employee member of the Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee may be involved throughout the investigation process
32 Preparing for the Interviews Consider what details of the complaint may be revealed during the interview Only provide information necessary to conduct a meaningful interview Prepare a list of questions prior to the interview The investigator and observer, where applicable, should take notes throughout the interview Notes should include observations along with questions and answers given during the interview Notes should not include personal opinions, comments or judgments
33 Preparing for the Interviews continued The use of a tape recording, although effective for accuracy of the interview is not recommended A tape recorder may make the person being interviewed nervous and reluctant to speak openly If using a tape recording, it must be openly communicated to the person being interviewed and a transcript should be prepared as soon as possible following the interview At the end of the interview ask the person being interviewed if they have any additional comments, remind them to contact the investigator with any new information they may remember and thank them for participating in the process
34 Procedural Guidelines for Effective Interviews Explain the purpose of the investigation when commencing an interview Explain that the investigation is confidential and anything discussed during the meeting is to be kept confidential, this need for confidentiality should be very clearly stressed Leading questions that suggest the answer should be avoided Ask open ended questions such as What happened next? Look for any inconsistencies between stories, go back to the start of the story and ask questions for better clarification
35 Recommended Sequence of the Interviews 1. The complainant 2. The witnesses suggested by the complainant 3. The accused 4. The witnesses suggested by the accused 5. Follow up meeting to obtain clarification on any issues, or to put any allegations of the accused to the complainant 6. A final follow up meeting with the accused if any outstanding issues have arisen following the initial meeting with the accused that require comments or explanations
36 Interviewing the Complainant Meet with the complainant first to hear their story Provide an introduction and overview of the investigator and the investigation process Try to obtain answers to the seven w questions Who - who said or did the alleged conduct What - what was said or done Whom - to whom was it said or done Where - where did the incident occur, use photographs or diagrams if necessary to gain a clear picture of the scene When - when the incident occur (date and time) Why - why did the incident occur (what happened just before and after, was there a pre-existing history, including past incidents)
37 Concerns of Trivial, Frivolous, Vexatious or Bad Faith Complaints If there are concerns that the allegations, even accepted as true, are trivial, frivolous, vexatious or made in bad faith the investigator should advise the senior employee to which they report A decision should be made regarding whether to continue the investigation
38 Interviewing the Accused The objective of meeting with the accused is to provide the accused with an opportunity to respond to the allegations made and to obtain the accused s version of the events Use caution when presenting the allegations to the accused, only reiterate the facts, do not characterize the allegations Ask the accused their version of each allegations from start to finish Try to obtain answers to the seven w questions
39 Interviewing the Witnesses Witness names may be provided by both the complainant and the accused The investigator must decide which witnesses, if any, should be interviewed The investigator should start by interviewing the witness who will likely have the most information or who has information regarding the most serious incidents If witnesses are employees who will be present at the workplace, it is unnecessary to advise them of the interview in advance If the employee does not regularly attend the work-site it may be necessary to schedule the meeting in advance
40 Uncooperative Participants Complainant- If the complainant refuses to cooperate, the employer should give the complainant the option to withdraw their complaint. A complainant can withdraw their complaint at any point in the investigation. If the complainant does withdraw their complaint, the employer should ask to confirm the withdrawal in writing. Accused - If the accused refuses to cooperate, the employer should advise the accused that the decision made will be based only on the complainant and complainant 痴 witnesses versions of the events. The employer should provide the accused with a letter confirming the refusal and explaining the potential consequences of such a refusal. Witnesses - It is generally difficult to discipline an uncooperative witness for their refusal to cooperate.
41 Liability for Statements Made During the Interview Some witnesses may be concerned to share information for fear of being sued for defamation Any information obtained during a Human Rights investigation cannot be used in a defamation lawsuit because it is considered privileged
42 How to Write the Investigation Report It is critical that the investigation report be properly drafted It is recommended that the facts learned in the investigation be kept separate from the conclusions and opinions revealed as a result of these facts It is also recommended that two reports be prepared: The first report should state the facts, evidence and observations The second report should state the opinions, conclusions and recommendations The outcome of the investigation should be communicated to both the complainant and the accused The report should only be circulated among the final decision makers
43 Conclusion 43 Footer
CONDUCTING LAWFUL AND EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATIONS REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT
CONDUCTING LAWFUL AND EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATIONS REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT By Jennifer C. McGarey Secretary and Assistant General Counsel US Airways, Inc. and Tom A. Jerman O
More informationWORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS: Guidance to the Canadian Human Rights Commission from the Federal Court
The Canadian Bar Association 12 th Annual National Administrative Law and Labour & Employment Law CLE Conference November 25 26, 2011 Ottawa, Ontario WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS: Guidance to the Canadian
More informationDISCLAIMER. Policy on bullying or harassment. Adopted by PGTC January 2017
ICGP Policy on Bullying, Discrimination and Harassment for Members or Trainees acting on behalf of the College or undertaking College functions. A Policy for Trainee Complainants. DISCLAIMER The ICGP recognises
More informationAustralian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists
Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists POLICY ON BULLYING, DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT FOR FELLOWS AND TRAINEES ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE COLLEGE OR UNDERTAKING COLLEGE FUNCTIONS 1. DISCLAIMER
More informationMembers' Code of Conduct
TABLED DOCUMENT 67-17(3) TABLED ON OCTOBER 17, 2012 A~bCl..A~~nc ~'Jcr~ba...oc Cl.. r..c-
More informationPublic Complaints About Police
Public Complaints About Police Agenda Background Overview of Complaints Process Investigations OIPRD Powers Police Services Boards CSR and Mediation Questions Office of the Independent Police Review
More informationAPRIL 2017 RECOGNITION AND PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT & VIOLENCE POLICY
APRIL 2017 RECOGNITION AND PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT & VIOLENCE POLICY The Royal Canadian Golf Association, operating as ( ), is committed to providing a sport and work environment that
More informationOntario Swimming Coaches Committee Disciplinary and Complaints Procedures
Ontario Swimming Coaches Committee Disciplinary and Complaints Procedures Purpose 1. Membership as a Swim Ontario Coach brings with it many benefits and privileges. At the same time, Swim Ontario Member
More informationA POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR MINISTERIAL AND STAFF MISCONDUCT. an MCEC Policy Adopted 02, 20, 2002 Revised September 30, 2008
A POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR MINISTERIAL AND STAFF MISCONDUCT an MCEC Policy Adopted 02, 20, 2002 Revised September 30, 2008 by resolution of the MCEC Executive Council This policy and procedure is intended
More informationDiscrimination and Harassment Policy
Discrimination and Harassment Policy Category: Human Resources Approval: Board of Governors Responsibility: Human Rights Advisor Date: December 2, 2016 Part I. Discrimination & Harassment Policy Table
More informationDiscrimination and Harassment
H1 Policies and Procedures Discrimination and Harassment Originator: Vice President, Finance and Administration Approver: President s Council Effective: May 14, 2013 Replaces: February 14, 2006 1. Purpose
More informationNova Scotia House of Assembly Policy on the Prevention and Resolution of Harassment in the Workplace (Policy).
Nova Scotia House of Assembly Policy on the Prevention and Resolution of Harassment in the Workplace (Policy). Approved by the Nova Scotia House of Assembly on May 19, 2016. Effective date May 20, 2016.
More information1.2. This procedure will be reviewed and updated annually.
College Procedure PROCEDURE TYPE: Administrative PROCEDURE TITLE: Harassment, Workplace Sexual Harassment, and Discrimination PROCEDURE NO.: ADMIN-202.1 RESPONSIBILITY: Chief Administrative Officer APPROVED
More informationADDRESSING CONFLICTING HUMAN RIGHTS: SOME RECENT CASE LAW
ADDRESSING CONFLICTING HUMAN RIGHTS: SOME RECENT CASE LAW Raj Anand Partner WeirFoulds LLP 416-947-5091 ranand@weirfoulds.com - and - S. Priya Morley Associate WeirFoulds LLP 416-619-6294 pmorley@weirfoulds.com
More informationIMPRESS CIArb Arbitration Scheme Guidance
IMPRESS CIArb Arbitration Scheme Guidance What is the IMPRESS/CIArb Arbitration Scheme? IMPRESS and the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) have developed an Arbitration Scheme, as a means of resolving
More informationHUMAN RIGHTS #2-08 Discrimination Harassment
Policy & Procedures Manual HUMAN RIGHTS #2-08 Discrimination Harassment Approved: December 16, 1992 by: Board of Governors Revised and Approved: March 23, 2005 by: Board of Governors Effective: March 23,
More informationRule 1.2 (a): replaces settle with make or accept an offer of settlement Rule 1.3 Identical
Comparison of Newly Adopted South Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules SOUTH CAROLINA Rules as adopted by South Carolina Supreme Court to be effective 10/1/05. variations from the
More informationRESPECTFUL WORKPLACE AND HARASSMENT PREVENTION
RESPECTFUL WORKPLACE AND HARASSMENT PREVENTION POLICY NUMBER BRD 17-0 APPROVAL DATE MAY 28, 2009 PREVIOUS AMENDMENT NEW REVIEW DATE MAY 28, 2014 AUTHORITY PRIMARY CONTACT BOARD OF GOVERNORS GENERAL COUNSEL
More informationTOP TEN ETHICAL ISSUES THAT IMPACT FAMILY LAW LAWYERS. Safekeeping Property 5/21/2014. To Do or Not to Do
TOP TEN ETHICAL ISSUES THAT IMPACT FAMILY LAW LAWYERS To Do or Not to Do Rule 1.15 of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct requires a lawyer represent a party to sake keep their property. The lawyer
More informationMBTA Transit Police CHAPTER 120. General Order No PAGE 1 OF 8
MBTA Transit Police DEPARTMENT MANUAL CHAPTER 120 General Order No. 2016-85 SUBJECT STANDARDS OF CONDUCT REFERENCES CALEA 12.2.2, 25.1.1, 26.1.4, 26.1.8, 52.1.1-5, 52.2.2, 52.2.3, 52.2.4, 52.2.6, 52.2.8
More informationParalegal Professional Conduct Guidelines
Paralegal Professional Conduct Guidelines ~Effective October, 2008~ As of October 1, 2014, this version of the Paralegal Professional Conduct Guidelines is no longer in effect. Amendments to the Guidelines
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Financial Services Tribunal Tribunal des services financiers RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL Ce document est également disponible en français TABLE
More informationCanadian Bar Association 2011 National Administrative Law, Labour and Employment Conference. Workplace Investigations: A Management Perspective
Canadian Bar Association 2011 National Administrative Law, Labour and Employment Conference Workplace Investigations: A Management Perspective Kelly Harbridge Senior Labour & Employment Counsel Magna International
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1945/10
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1945/10 BEFORE: HEARING: J. P. Moore : Vice-Chair B. Davis : Member Representative of Employers A. Grande : Member Representative of Workers
More informationCODE OF PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT - A (PC-A) COMMITTEES University of Nebraska-Lincoln TABLE OF CONTENTS
CODE OF PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT - A (PC-A) COMMITTEES University of Nebraska-Lincoln TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Academic Rights and Responsibilities...1 1.2 Duty of University
More informationRugby Ontario Policy Manual
8.1.2 Harassment is a form of discrimination. Harassment is prohibited by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and by human rights legislation in every province and territory of Canada and in its
More informationWhat TV crime dramas teach us about investigating employee issues. presented by Sarah Williams
What TV crime dramas teach us about investigating employee issues presented by Sarah Williams this symbol and/or Red text are Super Sleuth Tips 2 THE CRIME What are the Crimes in HR? Employee Disputes
More informationADMINISTRATIVE FAIRNESS GUIDEBOOK
ADMINISTRATIVE FAIRNESS GUIDEBOOK Introduction This guidebook has been created to help you learn how the Alberta Ombudsman investigates complaints of unfair treatment by Alberta government departments,
More informationFinancial Dispute Resolution Service (FDRS)
RULES FOR Financial Dispute Resolution Service (FDRS) DATE: 1 April 2015 Contents... 1 1. Title... 1 2. Commencement... 1 3. Interpretation... 1 Part 1 Core features of the Scheme... 3 4. Purpose of the
More informationNational Association of Professional Background Screeners Member Code of Conduct and Member Procedures for Review of Member Conduct
Original Approval: 6/03 Last Updated: 7/6/2017 National Association of Professional Background Screeners Member Code of Conduct and Member Procedures for Review of Member Conduct The NAPBS Member Code
More informationWho s who in a Criminal Trial
Mock Criminal Trial Scenario Who s who in a Criminal Trial ACCUSED The accused is the person who is alleged to have committed the criminal offence, and who has been charged with committing it. Before being
More informationWhistleblowing & Serious Misconduct Policy
King s Norton Boys School Whistleblowing & Serious Misconduct Policy We recognise that children cannot be expected to raise concerns in an environment where staff fail to do so. All staff should be aware
More information3357: Discrimination Grievance Procedures
3357:13-15-031 Discrimination Grievance Procedures (A) The purpose of these procedures is to provide a prompt and equitable resolution for complaints or reports of discrimination based upon race, color,
More informationAssessment Review Board
Assessment Review Board RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (made under section 25.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act) INDEX 1. RULES Application and Definitions (Rules 1-2) Interpretation and Effect
More informationNOTE: This policy is effective for cases where the initial letter was dated 3/26/2017 or sooner.
NOTE: This policy is effective for cases where the initial letter was dated 3/26/2017 or sooner. Cases dated 3/27/2017 or later should refer to this policy i ADMINISTRATION OF STUDENT DISCIPLINE TABLE
More informationETHICS FOR THE PROBLEM-SOLVING COURT JUDGE: THE NEW ABA MODEL CODE *
ETHICS FOR THE PROBLEM-SOLVING COURT JUDGE: THE NEW ABA MODEL CODE * LOURAINE C. ARKFELD Being a judge in a problem-solving court looks very different from what has been the judge s traditional role. As
More informationGUIDELINES CONCERNING COURT APPOINTMENTS OF DECISION-MAKERS PURSUANT TO C.R.S
I. INTRODUCTION. GUIDELINES CONCERNING COURT APPOINTMENTS OF DECISION-MAKERS PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 14-10-128.3 The following policy is adopted to assist the administration of justice by providing guidelines
More informationGuide to ACCA s complaints and disciplinary procedures
Guide to ACCA s complaints and disciplinary procedures Introduction This guide aims to assist complainants and members to understand ACCA s complaints and disciplinary process. In the event of any conflict
More informationFebruary 15, Dear Ms. Westerink Robin:
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF INSOLVENCY AND RESTRUCTURING PROFESSIONALS ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES PROFESSIONNELS DE L INSOLVABILITÉ ET DE LA RÉORGANISATION Ms. Sheila Westerink Robin National Manager Policy
More informationNoteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT RB Panel: Teresa White Decision Date: March 23, 2005
Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2005-01460-RB Panel: Teresa White Decision Date: March 23, 2005 Extension of time Election Section 10 of the Workers Compensation Act Policy item #111.22 of the
More informationStatement of Principles on Self-represented Litigants and Accused Persons
Statement of Principles on Self-represented Litigants and Accused Persons Adopted by the Canadian Judicial Council September 2006 CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES ON SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS
More informationFORM 1. Complaint Handling Policy & Procedures
FORM 1 Complaint Handling Policy & Procedures WORKING DRAFT POLICY Implementation Date: 13 December 2010 Revision Date: 13 December 2013 Forms 1. Complaint form Appendix 1. Assessing and referring complaints
More informationINFORMATION BULLETIN
INFORMATION BULLETIN #18 THE DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION I. INTRODUCTION When a union becomes the exclusive bargaining agent for a unit of employees, it normally negotiates a collective agreement with
More informationFREEDOM OF INFORMATION
INTRODUCTION Freedom of information legislation, also described as open records or sunshine laws, are laws which set rules on access to information or records held by government bodies. In general, such
More informationPOLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION CITIZEN COMPLAINT INTAKE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES
POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION CITIZEN COMPLAINT INTAKE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES The Kenosha Police and Fire Commission (PFC) citizen complaint procedure is designed to address allegations of Misconduct committed
More informationCatholic Schools Office Diocese of Lismore
Catholic Schools Office Diocese of Lismore DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT AND BULLYING IN THE WORKPLACE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Policy Number: PMADHB:V2 Status: Final Date Issued: December 2014 Evaluation
More informationSTAFF COMPLAINTS & GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
STAFF COMPLAINTS & GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE Issued: July 2016 Reviewed: August 2017 Next Review Due: August 2019 Page 1 of 11 1. Introduction Bradford Diocesan Academies Trust (BDAT; the Trust) is committed
More informationGRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURES FOR ANY DISPUTES RELATING TO EMPLOYEES AND JOB APPLICANTS OF BILL S ELECTRIC COMPANY
ADR FORM NO. 2 GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURES FOR ANY DISPUTES RELATING TO EMPLOYEES AND JOB APPLICANTS OF BILL S ELECTRIC COMPANY 1. General Policy: THIS GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE does
More informationCriminal and Family Law ENG 04 FAMILY LAW FOR WOMEN IN ONTARIO. All Women. One Family Law. Know your Rights.
4 Criminal and Family Law ENG 04 FAMILY LAW FOR WOMEN IN ONTARIO All Women. One Family Law. Know your Rights. CRIMINAL AND FAMILY LAW Criminal and Family Law This booklet is meant to give you a basic understanding
More informationNDP POLICY ON Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Violence
NDP POLICY ON Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Violence EFFECTIVE APRIL 2018 NDP Policy on Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Violence 3 POLICY REGARDING HARASSMENT The following document addresses
More informationAnti-Discrimination, Harassment and Bullying Policy
DEFINTIONS Discrimination Unlawful discrimination may be either direct or indirect and takes place where a person treats another person unfavourably on the basis of: race; age; sexual orientation; lawful
More informationTHE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT
THE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT Provision PART 1 PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS Purpose of this Act 1 The purpose of this Act is (a) to facilitate the disclosure and investigation
More informationResolving tenancy disputes
Tenancy Facts Information for tenants and residents in Queensland Resolving tenancy disputes When you rent a place to live in Queensland, you have rights and responsibilities under the Residential Tenancies
More informationKENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY PRACTICE OF LAW
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY PRACTICE OF LAW SCR 3.130(1.7) Conflict of interest: current clients (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent
More informationHoly Trinity Catholic School. Whistle Blowing Policy 2017 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY 2015 ADOPTED BY HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC SCHOOL
Holy Trinity Catholic School Whistle Blowing Policy 2017 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY 2015 ADOPTED BY HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC SCHOOL Introduction 1.1 Birmingham City Council is committed
More informationREVIEW REPORT 053/2015
Ministry of Justice (Corrections & Policing) September 18, 2015 Summary: The Applicant requested access an internal privacy breach investigation report from the Ministry of Justice (Justice). Justice provided
More informationRefugee Claims: Gathering Evidence, Maureen Silcoff Barrister & Solicitor
Refugee Claims: Gathering Evidence, Maureen Silcoff Barrister & Solicitor Preparation & Time Shortened timelines for Hearing Dates: They differ for different types of claims Non-DCO claimants: 60 days
More informationIN THE MATTER OF PART 3 OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT, RSA 2000, c. L-8 AND
IN THE MATTER OF PART 3 OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT, RSA 2000, c. L-8 AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF ALLAN GARBER A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA [Editor s note: additional
More informationDiscrimination Complaint and Investigation Procedure
Discrimination Complaint and Investigation Procedure An individual filing a complaint of alleged discrimination or sexual harassment shall have the opportunity to select an independent advisor for assistance,
More informationTHE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY
THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, 1999 Section 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Object of Act 4. Interpretation 5. Non-application of Act 6. Act binds the State Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY
More informationPOLICY & PROCEDURE TO COMBAT BULLYING & HARASSMENT OF TEACHERS INCLUDING PRINCIPALS AND VICE PRINCIPALS IN GRANT AIDED SCHOOLS
POLICY & PROCEDURE TO COMBAT BULLYING & HARASSMENT OF TEACHERS INCLUDING PRINCIPALS AND VICE PRINCIPALS IN GRANT AIDED SCHOOLS TNC 2009/11 [1] GENERAL PRINCIPLES 1.1 The Board of Governors recognises that
More informationThe Exercise of Statutory Discretion
The Exercise of Statutory Discretion CACOLE Conference June 9, 2009 Professor Lorne Sossin University of Toronto, Faculty of Law R. Lester Jesudason Chair, Nova Scotia Police Review Board Tom Bell Counsel,
More informationAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Title: Integrity in Research Policy Policy Number: PO2010029 Replacing Policy Number: No prior policy Effective Date: December 11, 2012 Issuing Authority:
More informationWHAT IS A CONDITION AND PROGNOSIS REPORT AND WHAT PURPOSE DOES IT SERVE IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS?
CONDITION AND PROGNOSIS REPORTS BACK TO BASICS WHAT IS A CONDITION AND PROGNOSIS REPORT AND WHAT PURPOSE DOES IT SERVE IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS? The purpose of damages awarded in personal injury/clinical negligence
More informationDefinitions. Misconduct in Research
Preamble Research at Northern Illinois University has traditionally and routinely been performed at a high level of quality and scholarly integrity. Faculty, students, staff, and administrators accept
More informationCITY OF BELLINGHAM HEARING EXAMINER RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
CITY OF BELLINGHAM HEARING EXAMINER RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Section 1: General Provisions... 4 1.01 APPLICABILITY... 4 1.02 EFFECTIVE DATE... 4 1.03 INTERPRETATION OF RULES... 4 Section 2: Rules
More informationRevised OBJECTS AND REASONS. This Bill would (a)
Revised 2017-10-18 OBJECTS AND REASONS This Bill would (d) make provision for the protection of employees in both the public sector and private sector from sexual harassment at their workplace; provide
More informationSIERRA COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
SIERRA COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE No. AP3435 Discrimination and Harassment Investigations Date Adopted: 1/1/1983 Date Revised: 12/3/2010 Date Reviewed: 12/3/2010 References: 34 Code of Federal Regulations
More informationBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES Issuing Authority: The Office of the President and Dean of Brooklyn Law School Responsible Officer: The Dean for Student Affairs Date Issued: November
More informationDOMESTIC ENQUIRY NEED FOR DOMESTIC ENQUIRY
DOMESTIC ENQUIRY NEED FOR DOMESTIC ENQUIRY For the smooth functioning of an industry, the defined codes of discipline, contracts of service by awards, agreements and standing orders must be adhered to.
More information- and - United Steelworkers, Local 5442, - and - BEFORE: W.D. Hamilton, Chairperson
Manitoba Labour Board Suite 500, 5 th Floor - 175 Hargrave Street Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3C 3R8 T 204 945-2089 F 204 945-1296 www.manitoba.ca/labour/labbrd DISMISSAL NO. 2056 IN THE MATTER OF: THE
More informationBritish Columbia. Health Professions Review Board. Rules of Practice and Procedure for Reviews under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.
British Columbia Health Professions Review Board Rules of Practice and Procedure for Reviews under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 183 These rules for reviews to the Health Professions Review
More informationTrinity School. Whistle Blowing Policy
Trinity School Whistle Blowing Policy DOCUMENT REVIEW GOVERNOR APPROVAL DATE: 13 October 2017 COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE: Resources NEXT REVIEW DATE: October 2018 Make every effort to live in peace with everyone
More informationNEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT POLICY MANUAL
NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT POLICY MANUAL DECEMBER 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY NOTE 1 SECTION 1: STAFF 1.1 Administrator s Authority; Clerk of the Commission 2 1.2 Court of Appeals
More informationRoyal Mail Group Ltd. Bullying & Harassment Procedure Agreement. 1 st July 2013 For all employees of Royal Mail Group
Royal Mail Group Ltd Bullying & Harassment Procedure Agreement 1 st July 2013 For all employees of Royal Mail Group 1 Joint Royal Mail, CWU, Unite Statement 1. Royal Mail Group, CWU and Unite are committed
More informationPROTECTION FOR PERSONS IN CARE ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of February 20, 2015 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Queen s Printer Bookstore Suite 700, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton,
More informationInvestigating privilege: asserting and maintaining legal privilege over corporate internal investigations. Wednesday, February 1, 2017
Investigating privilege: asserting and maintaining legal privilege over corporate internal investigations Wednesday, February 1, 2017 Join the conversation Tweet using #NLawMotion and connect with @NLawGlobal
More informationNABORS INDUSTRIES, INC. HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
SUBJECT EMPLOYEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM SECTION MISCELLANEOUS NUMBER PAGE - 1 of 13 EFFECTIVE DATE - SUPERCEDES ISSUE January 1, 2002 DATED - May 1, 1998 1. Purpose and Construction The Program is
More informationImpeachment in Louisiana State Courts:
Impeachment in Louisiana State Courts: La. Code of Evidence Recognizes Eight Ways By Bobby M. Harges 252 To impeach or attack the credibility of a witness in Louisiana state courts, a party may examine
More informationCase Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators
Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators Jay E. Grenig Rocco M. Scanza Cornell University, ILR School Scheinman Institute on Conflict Resolution JURIS Questions
More informationPotential Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Legislation
PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY CENTRE LE CENTRE POUR LA DEFENSE DE L INTERET PUBLIC ONE Nicholas Street, Suite 1204, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 7B7 Tel: (613) 562-4002. Fax: (613) 562-0007. e-mail: piac@piac.ca.
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 16/10/ /10/2017
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 16/10/2017 18/10/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Johannes Christiaan Hermanus BASSON GMC reference number: 4056885 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct
More informationRELIANCE HOME FINANCE LIMITED (RHFL) Ombudspersons & Whistle Blower Policy
RELIANCE HOME FINANCE LIMITED (RHFL) Ombudspersons & Whistle Blower Policy To ensure uniformity in terms of policies and procedures which employees need to adopt, RHFL adopts the Ombudspersons & Whistle
More informationInaction in the Face of Serious Safety Risk Amounts to Criminal Negligence for Metron Supervisor
OHS & Workers Compensation Commentary for Management OCTOBER 13, 2015 Inaction in the Face of Serious Safety Risk Amounts to Criminal Negligence for Metron Supervisor Authors: Jeremy Warning and Cheryl
More informationInvestments, Life Insurance & Superannuation Terms of Reference
Investments, Life Insurance & Superannuation Terms of Reference These Terms of Reference apply to those members of the Financial Ombudsman Service Limited who have been designated as having the Investments,
More informationPRACTICE REVIEW OF TEACHERS REGULATION
Province of Alberta SCHOOL ACT PRACTICE REVIEW OF TEACHERS REGULATION Alberta Regulation 11/2010 Extract Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue
More informationFunctional Area: Legal Number: N/A Applies To: Date Issued: October 2010 Policy Reference(s): Page(s): 9 Responsible Person Purpose / Rationale
Harassment Policy Functional Area: Legal Applies To: All Faculty and Staff Policy Reference(s): Board of Regents policy located at http://www.usg.edu/hr/manual/prohibit_discrimination_harassme nt Number:
More informationREASONS FOR DECISION OF THE TORONTO LICENSING TRIBUNAL
REASONS FOR DECISION OF THE TORONTO LICENSING TRIBUNAL Date of Hearing: Panel: Melina Laverty, Chair; Aly N. Alibhai and Daphne Simon, Members Re: Arafat Bakshi (Report No. 6571) Applicant for Renewal
More informationPROTECTION AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE ACT
Province of Alberta PROTECTION AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of March 30, 2018 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer
More informationSuccessful Prosecution in Arson Cases 18 th January 2011
Legal Experience Training Ltd Learning to Make a Difference Successful Prosecution in Arson Cases 18 th January 2011 Penny Harper (MA Oxon) Solicitor Director Legal Experience Training 1 Legal Experience
More informationCHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE MADE UNDER SECTION 25.1 OF THE STATUTORY POWERS PROCEDURE ACT
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE MADE UNDER SECTION 25.1 OF THE STATUTORY POWERS PROCEDURE ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS RULE 1 GENERAL RULES... 2 RULE 2 COMPLIANCE
More informationPRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100
PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS CACI No. 100 You have now been sworn as jurors in this case. I want to impress on you the seriousness and importance of serving on a jury. Trial by jury is a fundamental right in
More information1.4 This code does not attempt to replace the law. The University therefore reserves the right to refer some matters to the police (see section 4).
Code of Discipline for Students and Disciplinary Procedures 1. Overview 1.1 The University exists primarily to provide higher education, to carry out research and to provide the facilities and resources
More informationCPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES. Non-Administered. Arbitration Rules. Effective March 1, tel fax
CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES Non-Administered Arbitration Rules Effective March 1, 2018 tel +1.212.949.6490 fax +1.212.949.8859 www.cpradr.org CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution
More informationDisclaimer. About This Manual
Disclaimer In providing this manual, the National Police Accountability Project (NPAP) does not intend this information to be relied upon by any person or entity as a substitute for legal research by a
More informationSHORT PLAT VACATION APPLICATION INTAKE CHECKLIST
Skamania County Community Development Department Building/Fire Marshal Environmental Health Planning Skamania County Courthouse Annex Post Office Box 1009 Stevenson, Washington 98648 Phone: 509-427-3900
More informationBOARD DECISION ON REMEDY AND DAMAGES AND COSTS. Counsel for the Complainant Yukon Inc. ( Intersport ) Respondent represented by owner,
Parties Board No.: 2011-01 Decision: January 21, 2013 Before the in the matter of the Yukon Human Rights Act and Devon Hanson & Yukon Human Rights Commission v. Mark Hureau & 17385 Yukon Inc. doing business
More informationHUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO DECISION
HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO B E T W E E N: Amanda Kerr Applicant -and- Global TeleSales of Canada Inc. Respondent DECISION Adjudicator: Eric Whist Date: October 9, 2012 File Number: 2011-09375-I Citation:
More informationICC Canada International Arbitration Conference Arbitrator Independence, Impartiality and Disclosure Re-visited
ICC Canada International Arbitration Conference Arbitrator Independence, Impartiality and Disclosure Re-visited Moderator: Panelists: Alison G. FitzGerald Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP Andrea Carlevaris,
More informationPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS DISCIPLINARY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS DISCIPLINARY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT LINDA ACEVEDO, Austin State Bar of Texas State Bar of Texas 36 TH ANNUAL ADVANCED FAMILY LAW COURSE August 9-12, 2010 San Antonio
More information