Document Production in Practice: Strategies and Tips from U.S. and Swiss Counsel
|
|
- Madlyn Ray
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Document Production in Practice: Strategies and Tips from U.S. and Swiss Counsel 1 March 2016 Basel, Switzerland, ASA Group Basel Jim Nickovich, Counsel (U.S. Attorney at Law), VISCHER AG Dr. iur. Reto Marghitola, Swiss Attorney at Law, VISCHER AG
2 Early Consideration is the Key Image from The Guardian via Like a chess player, a skilled arbitration practitioner thinks several steps ahead Document Production in Practice 2
3 Opportunities to Influence the Extent of Document Production I. Selection of Arbitrators II. Influencing the Procedural Rules III. Drafting and Answering Document Production Requests Document Production in Practice 3
4 How To Request Document Production Image from Civil law Image from Common law Images from Arbitration Document Production in Practice 4
5 The Risk of a Boomerang Effect Image from Document Production in Practice 5
6 How to Answer Document Production Requests I. Completeness II. Respect of the hierarchy of objections III. No contradictions to own document production requests Document Production in Practice 6
7 Strong Objections to Document Production Requests Requested categories of documents are - not narrow and specific - not material to the outcome of the dispute - non-existing - privileged Image from Legal consequence of technical/commercial confidentiality: Redactions (principle), non-production (exception) Document Production in Practice 7
8 Weak and Controversial Objections to Document Production Requests Weak objections: Document production request is - overly burdensome - not proportional Image from Controversial objection: Requesting party does not bear the burden of proof for the facts that should be proven with the requested documents Document Production in Practice 8
9 Document Production and Guerrilla Tactics Image from Cass County Government Document production requests Image from Barnhart Investment Advisory Destruction of material documents Production of irrelevant documents Image from InGeocCouds Document Production in Practice 9
10 Model Clause for Parties Expecting Typical Arbitration Proceedings The Arbitral Tribunal shall use the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (2010) ( IBA Rules ) with the following modifications as guidelines, but shall be bound neither by the IBA Rules nor by the following modifications: 1. As a rule, the recovery of deleted data and the restoration of back-up tapes are considered unreasonably burdensome. 2. As a rule, document production requests must not include search terms. 3. There is no duty to preserve all potentially relevant documents. The parties can continue to apply their document retention policies. Document Production in Practice 10
11 Model Clause for Parties with Civil Law Expectations The Arbitral Tribunal shall use the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (2010) ( IBA Rules ) with the following modifications as guidelines, but shall be bound neither by the IBA Rules nor by the following modifications: 1. A party does not have a duty to produce internal documents. Internal documents are defined as documents that the requested party did not communicate to other parties, nor were communicated from another party to the requested party. However, internal notes of external meetings and of external conversations are not considered to be internal documents. 2. As a rule, the recovery of deleted data and the restoration of back-up tapes are considered unreasonably burdensome. 3. As a rule, document production requests must not include search terms. 4. There is no duty to preserve all potentially relevant documents. The parties can continue to apply their document retention policies. Document Production in Practice 11
12 Model Clause for Privileges The Arbitral Tribunal shall use the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (2010) ( IBA Rules ) with the following modifications as guidelines, but shall be bound neither by the IBA Rules nor by the following modifications: 1. As a minimum standard, the Arbitral Tribunal shall take into account the following privileges: a) Legal professional privilege b) Settlement privilege c) Medical privilege d) Psychotherapist-patient privilege e) Priest-penitent privilege f) Journalists privilege g) Self-incrimination privilege h) Spousal privilege 2. The legal professional privilege also extends to in-house counsel. 3. All employees of a party are considered to be clients in the attorney client relationship. 4. At request of a party, the arbitral tribunal may apply more favourable privilege rules under national laws of one of the parties or their advisors home jurisdictions to all parties. The arbitral tribunal can apply more favourable privilege rules also at its own motion, but is not obliged to do so. Document Production in Practice 12
13 Relevance of United States Laws on Document Productions in International Arbitration Today s U.S. perspective focuses on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) as applied in U.S. lawsuits in federal courts (not, e.g., the Federal Arbitration Act) May be relevant for international arbitration disputes involving U.S. companies, MNCs or US arbitrators Multi-party disputes involving both U.S. federal lawsuits and claims in international arbitration Benefit of "knowing where U.S. counsel may be coming from" regarding approach to document production Document Production in Practice 13
14 FRCP Are Predictable and Favor Robust Discovery In U.S. litigation, rules for document production set by FRCP Rules not created on a proceeding by proceeding basis FRCP increase predictability proceeding to proceeding FRCP (likely to) dictate more cumbersome document production obligations than Arbitral Tribunal procedural order Principle in United States that more discovery gets at "truth" and encourages settlement Not acceptable to go to trial in the United States with one party sitting on a "smoking gun" document Document Production in Practice 14
15 United States Judges Bound by FRCP In federal court in the United States, parties and the judge are bound by the FRCP relating to document production (e.g., Rules 26(b), 34, 37, and 45) FRCP 26(f) affords parties right to a conference to set a discovery plan, but the rules by which document requests and production will be governed are not up for discussion Contrast with first Case Management Conference in arbitral proceeding Document Production in Practice 15
16 Rule 34 FRCP 34 provides in part that: a party may serve on any other party a request within the scope of Rule 26(b) to produce and permit the requesting party or its representative to inspect, copy, test, or sample the following items in the responding party s possession, custody, or control: any designated documents or electronically stored information the request must describe with reasonable particularity each item or category of items to be inspected Document Production in Practice 16
17 Comments on Rule 34 No limits on number of document requests Request must only describe with reasonable particularity each item or category of items to be inspected. FRCP 34(b)(1)(A) Courts expansively interpret documents or ESI ( Must cross-reference Rule 26(b) to understand responding party s obligations Document Production in Practice 17
18 Rule 26(b) FRCP 26(b) provides in part that: parties may obtain discovery regarding nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the parties relative access to relevant information, the parties resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable Document Production in Practice 18
19 Comments on Rule 26(b) Relevant to any party s claim or defense Not "necessary" or "integral" or "required for" Vague pleading (including general denials) allowed in United States provides room for expansive interpretation of "relevant to a party s claim or defense" Documents can be requested even if they could never be used in trial (viz., not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable) Propounding party entitled to counterparty s internal documents (unless privileged) Document Production in Practice 19
20 U.S. Courts Have No Right to Issue Document Requests No authority for United States federal courts to issue requests for production of documents on own initiative United States is adversarial, not inquisitorial, legal system Contrast with power of Arbitral Tribunals asking for specific documents or categories of documents Document Production in Practice 20
21 When Propounding and Responding Party Disagree Responding party commonly objects to producing documents as: unduly burdensome overbroad repetitive more readily accessible in propounding party s files attorney-client privileged work-product doctrine protected etc., etc., etc. Document Production in Practice 21
22 Settling Disagreements In the first (and hopefully second, third, etc.) instance, the parties are supposed to settle any disagreement as to what documents a responding party will or will not produce without involving the court "Meet and confer" conferences. FRCP 26(f) Can be telephonic or in-person Followed up with detailed letters framing what the parties did and did not agree to (basis for motions for protective order/to compel) Document Production in Practice 22
23 Court Involvement Responding party may file motion with the court for a protective order to prevent the propounding party from accessing documents (e.g. privileged). FRCP 26(c)(1) Propounding party may file motion to compel. FRCP 37(a)(1) Meet and confer efforts must have been exhausted Exhibits are attached to memorialize meet and confer efforts Process can take many months to resolve In large cases, may involve Magistrate Judge or Special Discovery Master appointed by Federal Judge Document Production in Practice 23
24 Resolutions on Disputes Over Document Requests Parties, and if need be courts, generally find a balance between documents a propounding party needs and what a responding party can reasonably produce, e.g.,: date range limits on requested categories of documents limiting files to be searched to relevant custodians designating specific search terms to cull through vast amounts of electronically stored information third-party vendors going into business near law firms across the United States with special software to search for, and review, vast numbers of documents Document Production in Practice 24
25 Reality of the Age of E-Discovery in the U.S. Businesses store an enormous number of e-documents Searching for responsive documents is time consuming and expensive "Privilege review" often equally cumbersome U.S. law firms annointing "discovery attorneys" to handle enormous reviews internally U.S. companies facing repeat litigation sometimes outsourcing document review abroad to save expense Document Production in Practice 25
26 Metadata Metadata on a document may include a history of the document, file names, dates, authors, recipients of the file, printout dates, changes and modification dates, etc. Documents generally requested produced with metadata Documents can be produced with metadata scrubbed or locked, but doing so can waive the right to attorneyclient privilege and work-product protection of that scrubbed/locked information. Williams v. Sprint/United Mgmt. Co., 230 F.R.D. 640 (D. Kan. 2005) Document Production in Practice 26
27 Privilege Logs Claiming attorney-client privilege or work-product are surest ways responding party can withhold documents Requires producing costly privilege logs, citing: description of document dates, pages, identities of persons who prepared/received document specific privilege being asserted document by document basis Individual documents may require (time consuming and costly) redacting Document Production in Practice 27
28 Allocation of Resources on Document Request Disputes in the United States Motions for protective orders and to compel discovery are far more common (and costly) in United States litigation than international arbitration [document reviews for relevance and privilege even more costly] The effort spent on discovery battles often swallows the effort spent on the substantive dispute Tactically, a party with a superior economic position may tie the counterparty up with costly document production disputes to force counterparty to drop claim/settle Document Production in Practice 28
29 Rule 45 Rule 45 provides an avenue for a propounding party to issue subpoena and request documents from a non-party to a lawsuit. FRCP 45(a)(1)(C) and FRCP 45(e) Compare, more difficult to obtain documents from non-party in arbitration context Rule 45 subpoenas commonly directed at major players (not presently involved in litigation) sitting on incipient claims Raises interesting questions about obligation to produce, and also cost-shifting Non-party can ask for costs for responding to Rule 45 subpoena when it may in fact be preparing its case Document Production in Practice 29
30 Rule 37 Rule 37 contemplates sanctions for failure to cooperate Losing parties on motions to compel/for protective order may be ordered to pay costs of motion. FRCP 37(a)(5) Failure to perserve electronically stored information (an increasingly common issue in era of voluminous e-discovery) is sanctionable. FRCP 37(e) When responding party acts with intent to deprive counterparty of information, adverse inferences are an available sanction. FRCP 37(e)(2)(A) & (B) Also, dismisall of action/default judgment. FRCP 37(e)(2)(C) Document Production in Practice 30
31 Document Production Issues in the Appellate Context Expansive document production rules and liberal discovery in United States litigation minimize appellate issues regarding lack of access to information Document production issues not often a significant factor in appeals of United States court judgments Compare with annulment and enforcement proceedings in arbitration context Document Production in Practice 31
32 Benefits of U.S.-Styled Approach to Document Production in International Arbitration Drawbacks (cost, time, distraction to merits of case, disruption to parties business) commonly cited But the U.S. approach can offer benefits: large up front production makes annulment less likely meet and confers helps parties see merits of each others cases and aid settlement efforts privilege logs yield transparency neutrals forced to exercise restraint formulaic rules and commentary for dealing with ESI prioritizes "the facts" in a dispute Document Production in Practice 32
33 Reminder of International Arbitration Strategic Considerations In the international arbitration context, early consideration of whether document productions will most benefit your client or the counterparty is paramount: selecting arbitrators more/less likely to order robust productions advocating for procedrual rules more/less open to robust production more/less time in procedural rules for producing documents more/less time in procedural rules for settling disagreements Document Production in Practice 33
34 Different Strategic Approach in U.S. Litigation Specific U.S. federal judge/court has little influence over standardized document production rules, timetables, etc. A court s reputation for handling document production issues rarely a consideration in choosing where to file suit Consider requesting Special Discovery Master to ensure document production issues are given due consideration Consider how delay/cost of document production can benefit client/adversary in overall proceeding If case turns on "smoking gun" document in adversary s possession, courts will always welcome specific, narrowly tailored "arbitration-styled" document request Document Production in Practice 34
35 Further Detail For a deeper dive into any element of the presentation, contact: Jim Nickovich jnickovich@vischer.com Dr. Reto Marghitola rmarghitola@vischer.com Document Production in 35
36 Thank you. Zürich Schützengasse 1 Postfach 1230 CH-8021 Zürich Tel Fax Basel Aeschenvorstadt 4 Postfach 526 CH-4010 Basel Tel Fax Document Production in Practice 36
Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016
Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016 History The impetus to change these Rules was the May 2010 Conference on Civil Litigation
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationIs 'Proportionality' the Most Important Change In The 2015 Rule Amendments?
Is 'Proportionality' the Most Important Change In The 2015 Rule Amendments? Robert E. Bartkus, New Jersey Law Journal December 30, 2015 Call me a skeptic, but I sense that the current discussions surrounding
More informationR in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers
R-17-0010 in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers R-17-0010 was a rule petition filed by the Supreme Court s Committee on Civil Justice Reform in January 2017. The Supreme Court s Order in R-17-0010,
More informationThe 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
The 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Boston Bar Association Commercial and Business Litigation Section December 7, 2015 Paula M. Bagger, Cooke Clancy & Gruenthal LLP Gregory S. Bombard,
More informationCase 3:15-cv RJB Document 74 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0-rjb Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 0 ALAA ELKHARWILY, M.D., Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant. CASE NO. :-cv-0-rjb
More informationSpoliation: New Law, New Dangers. ABA National Legal Malpractice Conference
Spoliation: New Law, New Dangers ABA National Legal Malpractice Conference Speakers Ronald C. Minkoff Partner Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC New York, NY Heather K. Kelly Partner Gordon & Rees, LLP Denver,
More informationediscovery Demystified
ediscovery Demystified Presented by: Robin E. Stewart Of Counsel Kansas City Robin.Stewart@KutakRock.com (816) 960-0090 Why Kutak Rock s ediscovery Practice Exists Every case, regardless of size, has an
More informationAttorney Work-Product in the United States:
Attorney Work-Product in the United States: What Swiss lawyers need to know Jim Nickovich, Counsel (U.S. Attorney at Law), VISCHER AG BSW Online Marketing und Recht 1 U.S. doctrines matter to Swiss Counsel
More informationJeremy Fitzpatrick
Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Jeremy Fitzpatrick 402-231-8756 Jeremy.Fitzpatrick @KutakRock.com December 2015 Amendments December 2015 Amendments Discovery is out of control.
More informationTEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY
TEXAS DISCOVERY Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW 2. 1999 REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY 3. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLANS 4. FORMS OF DISCOVERY A. Discovery Provided for by the Texas
More informationProposed Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Advisory Committee on Civil Rules Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States Administrative Office of the United States Courts One Columbus Circle, N.E.
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTION [ ] DISCLOSURE PILOT FOR THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS
Draft at 2.11.17 PRACTICE DIRECTION [ ] DISCLOSURE PILOT FOR THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS 1. General 1.1 This Practice Direction is made under Part 51 and provides a pilot scheme for disclosure in
More informationReining in the Costs of E-Discovery: Amendments to Federal Rules & Where We Are Headed
ACC Litigation Committee Quick Hit Reining in the Costs of E-Discovery: Amendments to Federal Rules & Where We Are Headed Ignatius A. Grande Twitter: @igrande March 25, 2014 Rules Amendment Process After
More informationTGCI LA. FRCP 12/1/15 Changes Key ESI Ones. December Robert D. Brownstone, Esq.
TGCI LA December 2015 FRCP 12/1/15 Changes Key ESI Ones 2 0 1 5 2015 Robert D. Brownstone, Esq. 1 1 Rule 1. Scope and Purpose These rules govern the procedure in all civil actions and proceedings in the
More informationInternational Arbitration
c International Arbitration F U L B R I G H T A L E R T October 3, 2008 Visit Practice Site Protocol for E-Disclosure in Arbitration Issued Subscribe by the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Contact Us
More informationBest Practices in Litigation Holds and Document Preservation. Presented by AABANY Litigation Committee
Best Practices in Litigation Holds and Document Preservation Presented by 2017-18 AABANY Litigation Committee Speakers Vince Chang Partner, Wollmuth Maher & Deutsch Connie Montoya Partner, Hinshaw & Culbertson
More informationA Legal Perspective. By: Anne Kershaw, Esq. Proposed New Federal Civil Rules Part Two (Proportionality & New Meet and Confer Requirements)
Proposed New Federal Civil Rules Part Two (Proportionality & New Meet and Confer Requirements) By: Anne Kershaw, Esq. The first article in this three part series addressed the potential effects that the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, PREMIUM BEEF FEEDERS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. 13-CV-1168-EFM-TJJ MEMORANDUM AND
More informationPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. These rules govern the procedure in all civil actions
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Rule 1. Scope and Purpose These rules govern the procedure in all civil actions and proceedings in the United States district courts,
More information7th CIRCUIT ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY COMMITTEE PRINCIPLES RELATING TO THE DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION. Second Edition, January, 2018
General Principles Principle 1.01 (Purpose) 7th CIRCUIT ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY COMMITTEE PRINCIPLES RELATING TO THE DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION Second Edition, January, 2018 The purpose
More informationObservations on The Sedona Principles
Observations on The Sedona Principles John L. Carroll Dean, Cumberland School of Law, Samford Univerity, Birmingham AL Kenneth J. Withers Research Associate, Federal Judicial Center, Washington DC The
More informationRecords & Information Management Best Practices for the 21st Century
ATL ARMA RIM 101/201 Spring Seminar Records & Information Management Best Practices for the 21st Century May 6, 2015 Corporate Counsel Opposing Counsel Information Request Silver Bullet Litigation
More informationPRACTICAL EFFECTS OF THE 2015 AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE In House Counsel Conference
1 PRACTICAL EFFECTS OF THE 2015 AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Kenneth L. Racowski Samantha L. Southall Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC Philadelphia - Litigation Susan M. Roach Senior
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 0 H 1 HOUSE BILL 0 Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information. (Public) Sponsors: Representatives Glazier, T. Moore, Ross, and Jordan (Primary Sponsors).
More informationCommittee Note, Rule 26 (Dec. 1, 2015)
Revised Guidelines and Practices for Implementing the 2015 Discovery Amendments to Achieve Proportionality Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies March 20, 2017 (Annotated Version)a I. GUIDELINES The Guidelines
More informationCivil Procedure Act 2010
Examinable excerpts of Civil Procedure Act 2010 as at 2 October 2018 1 Purposes CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY (1) The main purposes of this Act are (a) to reform and modernise the laws, practice, procedure and
More informationBermuda-Form Insurance Coverage Arbitrations in London: Key Issues and Practical Considerations
Bermuda-Form Insurance Coverage Arbitrations in London: Key Issues and Practical Considerations Webinar September 30, 2010 Copyright 2010 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. Participants Moderator:
More informationDiscovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law
Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law Michael Grow Arent Fox LLP, Washington D.C., United States Summary and Outline Parties to civil actions or inter partes proceedings before the United
More informationELECTRONIC DISCOVERY BASICS. John K. Rubiner and Bonita D. Moore 1. I. Electronically Stored Information (ESI) Is Virtually Everything
ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY BASICS John K. Rubiner and Bonita D. Moore 1 I. Electronically Stored Information (ESI) Is Virtually Everything A. Emails B. Text messages and instant messenger conversations C. Computer
More informationSubstantial new amendments to the Federal
The 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: What Changed and How the Changes Might Affect Your Practice by Rachel A. Hedley, Giles M. Schanen, Jr. and Jennifer Jokerst 1 ARTICLE Substantial
More informationGuidelines for Seeking Access to the Steamship Authority s Public Records
Guidelines for Seeking Access to the Steamship Authority s Public Records These Guidelines have been prepared to enable persons seeking access to public records in the SSA s custody to make informed requests
More informationCounty Sheriff s Office
** Boulder ) 201 / I County Sheriff s Office JOE PELLE Sheriff April 24, 2012 SENT VIA MAIL Ms. Sara J. Rich ACLU of Colorado P.O. Box 18986 Denver, Colorado 80218-0986 Dear Ms. Rich, Thank you for your
More informationChapter 5 DISCOVERY. 5.1 Vocabulary Introduction and Discovery Deadlines Chart The Deposition 6
Chapter 5 DISCOVERY 5.1 Vocabulary 4 5.2 Introduction and Discovery Deadlines Chart 5.1 5.3 The Deposition 6 5.3.1 Deposition of a Party - Appearance Only 7 Set a Date, Time and Place for the Deposition
More informationPART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY
PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure regulate civil discovery procedures in the state. Florida does not require supplementary responses to
More informationNew Amendments to the FRCP. Birmingham Bench and Bar Conference March 2016
New Amendments to the FRCP Birmingham Bench and Bar Conference March 2016 Overview The Process of Rule Making The 1983/1993/2000 Amendments The 2006 Amendments The High Points of the 2015 Amendments Four
More informationCase 4:14-cv SOH Document 30 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 257
Case 4:14-cv-04074-SOH Document 30 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 257 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION PAMELA GREEN PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 1:14-cv-04074
More informationE-DISCOVERY IN AAA AND JAMS ARBITRATION. By Steven C. Bennett. This article summarizes how major arbitration-sponsoring organizations, including the
E-DISCOVERY IN AAA AND JAMS ARBITRATION By Steven C. Bennett This article summarizes how major arbitration-sponsoring organizations, including the American Arbitration Association ( AAA ) and JAMS (originally,
More information2010 AMENDMENTS TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Abbott Marie Jones
2010 AMENDMENTS TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Abbott Marie Jones Absent contrary action by Congress, important amendments to Rule 26, Rule 56, Rule 8, and Form 52 will take effect on December 1,
More informationCase 1:16-cv SEB-MJD Document 58 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 529
Case 1:16-cv-00877-SEB-MJD Document 58 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 529 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION BROCK CRABTREE, RICK MYERS, ANDREW TOWN,
More informationCommercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)
Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes) Rules Amended and Effective October 1, 2013 Fee Schedule Amended and Effective June 1,
More informationE-Discovery. Help or Hindrance? NEW FEDERAL RULES ON
BY DAWN M. BERGIN NEW FEDERAL RULES ON E-Discovery Help or Hindrance? E lectronic information is changing the litigation landscape. It is increasing the cost of litigation, consuming increasing amounts
More informationA Real Safe Harbor: The Long-Awaited Proposed FRCP Rule 37(e), Its Workings, and Its Guidance for ESI Preservation
BY JAMES S. KURZ DANIEL D. MAULER A Real Safe Harbor: The Long-Awaited Proposed FRCP Rule 37(e), Its Workings, and Its Guidance for ESI Preservation New Rule 37(e) is expected to go into effect Dec. 1
More informationBest Practices for Preservation of ESI John Rosenthal
Best Practices for Preservation of ESI John Rosenthal November 16, 2016 John Rosenthal Partner Washington, D.C. Antitrust and commercial litigator Chair, Winston E-Discovery & Information Governance Group
More informationSTREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3. Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN MICHAEL SWEENEY, Index No.: /2017.
Index Number: 650053/2017 Page 1 out of 15 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3 MICHAEL SWEENEY, Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN vs. Plaintiff, Index No.: 650053/2017 RJI Filing
More information231 F.R.D. 343 United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
231 F.R.D. 343 United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. 1 Definition No. 5 provides that identify when used in regard to a communication includes providing the substance of the communication.
More informationCIRCUIT AND CHANCERY COURTS:
. CIRCUIT AND CHANCERY COURTS: Advice for Persons Who Want to Represent Themselves Read this booklet before completing any forms! Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 THE PURPOSE OF THIS BOOKLET... 1 SHOULD
More informationArizona s New Civil Rules
Arizona s New Civil Rules What Every Lawyer Needs To Know BY DON BIVENS DON BIVENS is a partner in the Phoenix office of Snell & Wilmer LLP. He chaired the 25-person Civil Justice Reform Committee, which
More informationLegal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data
Legal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data Peter L. Ostermiller Attorney at Law 239 South Fifth Street Suite 1800 Louisville, KY 40202 peterlo@ploesq.com www.ploesq.com Overview What is Metadata?
More informationDevelopments in Electronic Disclosure in International Arbitration
151 Developments in Electronic Disclosure in International Arbitration David Howell* A key advantage of international arbitration is versatility. The ongoing efforts of the arbitration community to address
More informationDOCUMENT PRODUCTION IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION - IS IT A BENEFICIAL EXERCISE?
DOCUMENT PRODUCTION IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION - IS IT A BENEFICIAL EXERCISE? Peter Schradieck Attorney-at-Law, Partner and Head of Dispute Resolution Plesner, Denmark 1 INTRODUCTION As a general rule,
More informationE-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Preparing for New FRCP Amendments on Proportionality and ESI
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A E-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Preparing for New FRCP Amendments on Proportionality and ESI Strategies for Preserving, Obtaining and Protecting
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/16/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/16/2017. Exhibit D
Exhibit D SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY ----------------------------------------------------------------- MAARTEN DE JONG, -against- WILCO FAESSEN, Plaintiff, Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------------
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO: 2:11-CV-7-NBB-SAA
Holmes v. All American Check Cashing, Inc. et al Doc. 187 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION TAMIKA HOLMES PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO: 2:11-CV-7-NBB-SAA
More informationUpdate on 2015 Amendments to the FRCP
Update on 2015 Amendments to the FRCP The Honorable Jon P. McCalla, U.S. District Judge October 28, 2016 Annual Federal Practice Seminar University of Memphis Law School I. Overview Eleven Federal Rules
More informationUNITED STATES [DISTRICT/BANKRUPTCY] COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DIVISION., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. ), ) Judge ) Defendant.
UNITED STATES [DISTRICT/BANKRUPTCY] COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DIVISION, Plaintiff, vs. Case No., Judge Defendant. [PROPOSED] STANDING ORDER RELATING TO THE DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION
More informationEXHIBIT A-1 GUIDELINES OF PROFESSIONAL COURTESY AND CIVILITY FOR HAWAI I LAWYERS
EXHIBIT A-1 GUIDELINES OF PROFESSIONAL COURTESY AND CIVILITY FOR HAWAI I LAWYERS (SCRU-17-0000651) Appended by Order of August 27, 2004 The Judiciary State of Hawai i EXHIBIT A-1 GUIDELINES OF PROFESSIONAL
More informationFederal Rules of Civil Procedure
1 of 7 10/10/2005 11:14 AM Federal Rules of Civil Procedure collection home tell me more donate search V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY > Rule 26. Prev Next Notes Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery;
More informationAAA Healthcare. Payor Provider Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures. Available online at adr.org/healthcare
AAA Healthcare Payor Provider Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures Available online at adr.org/healthcare Rules Amended and Effective November 1, 2014 Rules Amended and Effective November 1, 2014.
More informationDiscovery in Justice Court
Discovery in Justice Court Bronson Tucker, Director of Curriculum bt16@txstate.edu Resources Discovery in Civil Cases TRCP 500.9 Justice Court Discovery TRCP 190-205 County/District Discovery Rules (Guidance)
More informationFebruary Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
FEBRUARY 7, 2012 E-DISCOVERY UPDATE February Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues:
More informationReliance Document Management Improving Efficiency
Reliance Document Management Improving Efficiency Introduction Murray L. Smith, LL.M., Chartered Arbitrator www.smithbarristers.com msmith@smithbarristers.com The reputation of arbitration has suffered
More informationDon t Get Burned: Proper Implementation of the Litigation Hold Process is Your Best SPF (Spoliation Protection Factor)
Don t Get Burned: Proper Implementation of the Litigation Hold Process is Your Best SPF (Spoliation Protection Factor) November 7, 2007 Susan Westover and Denah Hoard California State University Office
More informationSINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC)
GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC) Written By S. Ravi Shankar Advocate on Record - Supreme Court of India National President of Arbitration Bar of India
More informationOverview. n Discovery-Related Considerations n Scope of Discovery n Typical Types of Fact Discovery n Expert Discovery
Overview n Discovery-Related Considerations n Scope of Discovery n Typical Types of Fact Discovery n Expert Discovery 1 Discovery-Related Considerations n Preservation obligations n Local rules n Scope
More informationLet s say you are contemplating filing a lawsuit in federal court, or your client unexpectedly gets served
44 THE FEDERAL LAWYER December 2015 Preparing for Your Rule 26(f) Conference When ESI Is Involved And Isn t ESI Always Involved? AMII CASTLE Let s say you are contemplating filing a lawsuit in federal
More informationFundamentals of Civil Litigation in Federal Court
1 Fundamentals of Civil Litigation in Federal Court Faculty: Thomas Schuck, Esq. Commencing an Action - Know the facts the Law, interview the client - no matter whether plaintiff or defendant - Interview
More informationSelecting Eminent Domain Experts
Selecting Eminent Domain Experts Anthony F. Della Pelle, a partner with McKirdy & Riskin in Morristown, New Jersey, limits his practice to condemnation, eminent domain, redevelopment, and real estate tax
More informationCASE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL OAKLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT BUSINESS COURT CASES
CASE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL OAKLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT BUSINESS COURT CASES 1) Governance a) As provided in the Notice and Order to Appear, the Business Court Case Management Protocol shall be adopted as
More informationWHAT TO DO TO START PREPARING FOR DISCOVERY
Managing the Early Stages of Commercial Litigation: Critical First Steps WHAT TO DO TO START PREPARING FOR DISCOVERY Michael Feagley, Partner 312.701.7065 mfeagley@mayerbrown.com Terri Mazur, Partner 212.506.2680
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 14 C 206 )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD., and TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 14 C 206 ATTURO TIRE CORP., and SVIZZ-ONE Judge
More informationARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties
ARBITRATION RULES 1. Agreement of Parties The parties shall be deemed to have made these rules a part of their arbitration agreement whenever they have provided for arbitration by ADR Services, Inc. (hereinafter
More informationRULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS
RULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS Digital evidence or electronic evidence is any probative information stored or transmitted in digital form that a party to a court case may use at trial. The use of digital
More information4 of 7 DOCUMENTS GO TO CALIFORNIA CODES ARCHIVE DIRECTORY. Cal Code Civ Proc (2013)
Page 1 4 of 7 DOCUMENTS DEERING'S CALIFORNIA CODES ANNOTATED Copyright (c) 2013 by Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. a member of the LexisNexis Group. All rights reserved. *** This document is current through
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION. v. Case No: 2:15-cv-629-FtM-99CM ORDER
Ace American Insurance Company v. AJAX Paving Industries of Florida, LLC Doc. 49 ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION v.
More informationWhat Not To Do When Served With A Rule 45 Subpoena In The Age of E-Discovery
What Not To Do When Served With A Rule 45 Subpoena In The Age of E-Discovery Monica McCarroll Don t let it become a case of too little too late. Monica McCarroll focuses her practice on commercial litigation,
More informationCase 3:12-cv L Document 201 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 4769
Case 3:12-cv-00853-L Document 201 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 4769 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MANUFACTURERS COLLECTION COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff,
More informationARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES
1. INTRODUCTION ARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES 1.1 These procedures shall be known as the ARIAS U.S. Rules for the Resolution of U.S. Insurance and Reinsurance
More informationCORPORATE COUNSEL. FRCP: Playing by the New Rules
FEBRUARY 2017 M E T R O P O L I T A N FRCP: Playing by the New Rules Amendments driving predictability and proactivity Interview: Jennifer Brennan / idiscovery Solutions, Inc., Hon. Mitchell D. Dembin
More informationCPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES. Non-Administered. Arbitration Rules. Effective March 1, tel fax
CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES Non-Administered Arbitration Rules Effective March 1, 2018 tel +1.212.949.6490 fax +1.212.949.8859 www.cpradr.org CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS. Appellants, Respondent,
1 1 David G. Derickson, State Bar No. 000 John P. Kaites, State Bar No. 01 Michael S. Love, State Bar No. 0 RIDENOUR, HIENTON & LEWIS, P.L.L.C. Chase Tower 1 North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona
More informationOe Overview Federal Developments New rules for Electronically Stored Information (ESI) effective 12/1/06 ESI rules as applied State Law Developments P
New Challenges to CIOs in ediscovery and Electronic Records Management Presented by: Thomas Greene Special Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General 1 Oe Overview Federal Developments New
More informationIntroduction. Overview of Proposed Amendments
Introduction Courts and commentators have repeatedly noted the sea change in litigation practice brought about as a result of electronic discovery. The proliferation of email and other kinds of electronically
More informationREPRESENTATION AGREEMENT
REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT This Contingent Fee Agreement for the performance of legal services and payment of attorneys' fees (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is between (hereinafter "Client")
More informationDepositions in Oregon
Online CLE Depositions in Oregon 1 Practical Skills or General CLE credit From the Oregon State Bar CLE seminar, presented on June 22, 2017 2017 Joseph Franco. All rights reserved. ii Chapter 3 Depositions
More informationA Comprehensive Overview: 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
A Comprehensive Overview: 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Amii N. Castle* I. INTRODUCTION On December 1, 2015, amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took effect that
More informationOctober Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
OCTOBER 25, 2013 E-DISCOVERY UPDATE October Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues:
More informationP R E T R I A L O R D E R
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER COLORADO Address: City and County Building 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 COURT USE ONLY Plaintiff(s):, v. Defendant(s):. Case Number: Courtroom: 424 P R
More informationRule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]
Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ] (a) Required Disclosures; Methods to Discover Additional Matter. (1) Initial Disclosures. Except to the extent
More informationCase 3:07-cv TEH Document 32 Filed 08/06/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-TEH Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 PATRICK K. FAULKNER, COUNTY COUNSEL Stephen Raab, SBN 0 Civic Center Drive, Room San Rafael, CA 0 Tel.: () -, Fax: () - Attorney(s) for the Linda Daube
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS IN RE: MOTOR FUEL TEMPERATURE ) SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) Case No. 07-MD-1840-KHV This Order Relates to All Cases ) ORDER Currently
More informationTurning Legalese Into Tech Speak: Legal Holds in 2015
Turning Legalese Into Tech Speak: Legal Holds in 2015 Meet the Panelists Moderator Karl Heisler Co-Chair of the Electronic Discovery and Information Governance Practice Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Panelist
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 5 1
Article 5. Depositions and Discovery. Rule 26. General provisions governing discovery. (a) Discovery methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral
More informationBuilding and enforcing intellectual property value An international guide for the boardroom 11th Edition
Personalised_Covers_Layout 1 18/12/2012 11:55 Page 9 Sponsored by Controlling costs in patent litigation Building and enforcing intellectual property value An international guide for the boardroom 11th
More informationADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE
ADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE Parties who agree to arbitrate under the Rules may use the following clause in their agreement: ADRIC Arbitration
More informationIn the Circuit Court, Sixth Judicial Circuit In and for Pasco and Pinellas Counties, Florida
In the Circuit Court, Sixth Judicial Circuit In and for Pasco and Pinellas Counties, Florida Administrative Order No. PA/PI-CIR-99-46 Standards of Professional Courtesy and Professionalism Implementation
More informationRULE 16. Exhibits and Evidence
RULE 16. Exhibits and Evidence Counsel is responsible for marking all trial exhibits prior to commencement of hearing and providing two copies of all documentary exhibits to the Court. All exhibits must
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 ASUS COMPUTER INT L, v. Plaintiff, MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Defendant. SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO COMPEL;
More informationFORMAL OPINION NO Client Property: Duplication Charges for Client Files, Production or Withholding of Client Files
FORMAL OPINION NO 2017-192 Client Property: Duplication Charges for Client Files, Production or Withholding of Client Files Facts: Client A terminates Lawyer A while a matter is ongoing. Client A does
More information