Statute Of Limitations
|
|
- Marilynn Osborne
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois IDC Quarterly Volume 18, Number 4 ( ) Recent Decisions By: Stacy Dolan Fulco* Cremer, Shaughnessy, Spina, Jansen & Siegert LLC Statute Of Limitations Appropriate for the Court to Determine When the Plaintiff Knew of Her Injury In Nair v. Bloom, 890 N.E.2d 1113 (1st Dist. June 23, 2008), the plaintiffs, Josetta Nair and her husband, Segran Nair, sued two physicians, Rush-Copley Memorial Hospital and The Rush System for Health for medical malpractice and loss of consortium. Nair, 890 N.E.2d at The plaintiffs filed their complaint against the defendants on August 29, The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, contending the complaint was untimely filed, and the trial court granted the motion. Id. at The plaintiff appealed the trial court s decision. To begin its analysis, the appellate court first cited the statute of limitations which applied to this matter, Section of the Code of Civil Procedure. Id. at Section (a) provides: (a) Except as provided in Section of this Act, no action for damages for injury or death against any physician, dentist, registered nurse, or hospital duly licensed under the laws of this State, whether based upon tort, or breach of contract, or otherwise, arising out of patient care shall be brought more than 2 years after the date on which the claimant knew, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have known, or received notice in writing of the existence of the injury or death for which damages are sought in the action, whichever of such date occurs first, but in no event shall such action be brought more than 4 years after the date on which occurred the act or omission or occurrence alleged in such action to have been the cause of such injury or death. 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a) (West 2004). The appellate court noted that the statute of limitations begins to run when a person knows or reasonably should known of his injury and also knows or reasonably should know that it was wrongfully caused. Id. at 1116 citing Knox College v. Celotex Corp., 88 Ill. 2d 407, 415, 430 N.E.2d 976 (1981). At that point the burden is upon the injured person to inquire further as to the existence of a cause of action. Nair, 890 N.E.2d at 1116 citing Witherell v. Weimer, 85 Ill. 2d 146, 156, 421 N.E.2d 869 (1981). The focus of Nair is the analysis of when the plaintiff knew, or should have known, that she was injured. According to Illinois law, the plaintiff need not have knowledge of a specific defendant s negligent conduct or of the existence of a cause of action before triggering the statute. Knox College, 88 Ill. 2d at 415, citing Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos, 85 Ill. 2d 161, , 421 N.E.2d 864 (1981). At some point the injured person becomes possessed of sufficient information concerning his injury and its cause to put a reasonable person on inquiry to determine whether actionable conduct is involved. At that point, under the discovery rule, the running of the limitations period commences. Knox College,88 Ill, 2d at 416. In most cases, the time when an injured party knows or reasonably should know of his injury and that it was wrongfully caused is an issue of fact. Witherell, 85 Ill. 2d at 156. But where it is apparent from the Page 1 of 6
2 undisputed facts that only one conclusion can be drawn, the question becomes one for the court. Id. In this case, the defendants motion for summary judgment asked the appellate court to uphold the trial court s ruling that, as a matter of law, there were sufficient facts to support the conclusion that the plaintiff knew she was injured more than two years before the complaint was filed. Id. The defendants argued that the limitations period began to run on the date of the plaintiff s second surgery, September 15, 1998, after which she experienced new symptoms of leg pain, weakness and numbness. The plaintiffs argued they did not know of the defendants alleged malpractice until August 2001, within two years of the filing of their complaint in August, Nair, 890 N.E.2d at The appellate court cited to testimony of the plaintiff, Josetta Nair, and greatly relied on that testimony in making its decision. The following testimony by plaintiff Josetta Nair was considered highly relevant to the statute of limitations issue by the appellate court: Q. By the time you went to the rehab back in 98, you knew that your leg problem was associated with your surgeries, didn t you? A. Yes. Q. You knew you didn t have the surgery on your legs, right? A. Right. Q. You knew that the thing that brought you into the hospital first on September 2nd was your abdomen and not your legs. A. Right. Q. You had never had problems whatsoever with your legs before September 16th, true? A. True. Q. So there was no question in your mind that this new problem with your legs was because of the surgeries you had undergone, surgery or surgeries you had undergone? A. That all of my physical problems were a result of that, yes. Q. But specifically your legs were a result of the surgery, right? A. Right. Id. at The appellate court also relied on the following testimony of the plaintiff Segran Nair: Q. And isn t it the truth that certainly by March of 1999 you believed that something that Dr. Bloom had done during the surgery in September of 1998 had caused this problem with her legs, isn t that true? A. Any normal person would think that a wife was walking and went to surgery of the stomach and come out not walking. So, of course, anybody would think there s got to be something, something went wrong. A. That s what I m thinking. Q. as early as March of 1999, right? A. Of course, yes. Q. So, did you have an understanding that by the spring of 2000 Miss Zelner was going to begin an investigation into the filing of a potential lawsuit on your behalf and on behalf of your wife? A. Yes. Q. And that was in April or May of 2000? A. Yes, somewhere. Id. at Page 2 of 6
3 In arguing that the complaint was timely filed, the plaintiff relied on Young v. McKiegue, 303 Ill. App. 3d 380, 708 N.E.2d 493 (1st Dist. 1999). In Young, the plaintiff was told her husband died from complications of pneumonia, and she merely suspected he may have received inappropriate medical care. Alternatively, in this case, the plaintiffs testified they knew the injuries to Josetta s legs were caused by the surgery on September 15, 1998, and they knew the leg symptoms were not a normal outcome from abdominal surgery. Plaintiff Segran Nair testified they retained a lawyer in the Spring of 2000 for the purposes of filing a lawsuit against the responsible physicians. Based on that testimony, the appellate court found that by Spring 2000, when the plaintiffs retained two attorneys to investigate a claim on their behalf, the plaintiffs knew or reasonably should have known of their injuries and that the injuries were wrongfully caused. Nair, 890 N.E.2d at The appellate court explained that there is no requirement that the plaintiff must discover the full extent of her injuries before the statute begins to run. Nair, 890 N.E.2d at 1119 citing Hoffman v. Orthopedic Systems, Inc., 327 Ill. App. 3d 1004, 1010, 765 N.E.2d 116 (1st Dist. 2002). In Hoffman, the court found it significant that the plaintiff retained an attorney within six months of her operation, demonstrating that she then was on inquiry as to whether the injury was wrongfully caused, thereby commencing the two-year limitations period within which to take appropriate legal action. Hoffman, 327 Ill. App. 3d at 1010, 765 N.E.2d 116. The courts have held that a person knows or reasonably should know an injury is wrongfully caused where he or she possesses sufficient information concerning [an] injury and its cause to put a reasonable person on inquiry to determine whether actionable conduct is involved. Knox College, 88 Ill. 2d at 416, 430 N.E.2d 976. At that point, it is plaintiff s burden to inquire further about the existence of a cause of action. Witherell, 85 Ill. 2d at 156, 421 N.E.2d 869; Nair, 890 N.E.2d at In making its holding, the appellate court made no finding that the plaintiff s injury was caused by a sudden, traumatic event. The appellate court noted that the classification of an injury as traumatic or nontraumatic merely aids in the determination of when the plaintiff discovered, or should have discovered, that the injury was caused by the wrongful conduct of a defendant. Nair, 890 N.E.2d at 1119 citing Pszenny v. General Electric Co., 132 Ill. App. 3d 964, 966, 478 N.E.2d 485 (1st Dist. 1985). The court went on to note that regardless of how the plaintiff s injuries are classified, by the time the plaintiffs consulted with two attorneys, the plaintiffs knew or reasonably should have known their injuries were wrongfully caused. Accordingly, the plaintiffs complaint was filed more than two years after the limitations period began and should have been dismissed; so the trial court s order granting summary judgment to the defendants was affirmed. Id. Good Samaritan Act Question of Fact as to Whether Doctor Failed to Charge Fee to Get Act s Protection In Hernandez v. Alexian Brothers Health System, 2008 WL (1st Dist. July 31, 2008), the plaintiff, Benjamin Hernandez, the independent administrator of the estate of Alma Hernandez, filed a complaint against the defendants, Alexian Brothers Health System, Dr. Naphtali Kogan and Cardiovascular Associated, S.C. (Cardiovascular), and alleged the defendants were the proximate cause of Alma Hernandez s death. Hernandez, 2008 WL at *1. Dr. Kogan and his employer, Cardiovascular, filed a motion for summary judgment and argued that the provisions of the Good Samaritan Act, 745 ILCS 49/25, immunized Dr. Kogan from civil liability for providing emergency medical care to Ms. Hernandez. The trial court granted the motion. Id. at *1. The plaintiff filed an appeal and presented three issues for review: (1) whether the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment because material issues of fact exist regarding whether Dr. Kogan acted in good faith when he decided not to issue a bill for his medical services; (2) whether section 25 of the Good Samaritan Act is unconstitutional special legislation (745 ILCS 49/25 (West 2002)); and (3) whether conferring immunity Page 3 of 6
4 upon physicians working in hospitals, pursuant to the provisions of section 25 of the Good Samaritan Act, defeats the purpose of the Illinois Hospital Licensing Act, 210 ILCS 85/1, et seq. (West 2002). Id. The relevant facts are that on June 6, 2002, Ms. Hernandez was an in-patient at St. Alexius Medical Center (St. Alexius). While undergoing a biopsy in the radiology department at St. Alexius, Ms. Hernandez suffered a cardiac arrest and was transferred to the emergency room, where any available cardiologist was paged over the intercom to attend to Ms. Hernandez. Id. Dr. Kogan, a board-certified cardiologist, was a member of the St. Alexius physicians staff on June 6, Dr. Kogan also had a contract with St. Alexius to provide 24-hour on-call coverage at St. Alexius on a rotational schedule. On June 6, 2002, Dr. Kogan responded to the emergency room page and found Ms. Hernandez intubated and asystolic when he began his resuscitation efforts. Dr. Kogan inserted a central line into Ms. Hernandez s femoral artery and ordered an echocardiogram, which he interpreted at her bedside. Dr. Kogan then attempted pericardiocentisis from multiple locations. These resuscitation efforts failed and Ms. Hernandez died on June 6, Id. To support his motion for summary judgment, Dr. Kogan prepared and relied on his own affidavit. In his affidavit Dr. Kogan averred, in pertinent part: 4. Though I was a member of the medical staff of St. Alexius, neither by contract, agreement, nor pursuant to any Hospital policy, rule or regulation was I obligated to respond to the request for assistance. I was not a member of any designated code response team at St. Alexius, nor was Cardiovascular Associates contracted to provide emergency response assistance to Hospital codes. I was not on call in the emergency room to respond to cardiac emergencies on June 6, I provided care to Ms. Alma Hernandez to the best of my abilities; she was in full cardiac arrest when I arrived and she was never resuscitated. 6. Neither Cardiovascular Associates nor I billed Ms. Hernandez, or her family or her insurer for my medical efforts to revive her on June 6, Id. at *2. In addition to relying on the affidavit testimony, Dr. Kogan also argued that he was immunized from civil liability by the provisions of section 25 of the Good Samaritan Act, 745 ILCS 49/25, because Dr. Kogan rendered emergency care and did not bill Ms. Hernandez.. Id. The plaintiff argued that material issues of fact existed which precluded summary judgment because Dr. Kogan s decision not to bill Ms. Hernandez was not made in good faith. The appellate court noted that the purpose of the Good Samaritan Act 9 referring to 745 ILCS 49/2) is to encourage persons to volunteer their time and talents. Hernandez, 2008 WL at *2. Section 25 of the Good Samaritan Act, 745 ILCS 49/25, immunizes volunteer physicians from civil liability only if they: (1) in good faith, (2) provide emergency care, (3) without fee. Estate of Heanue v. Edgcomb, 355 Ill. App. 3d 645, , 823 N.E.2d 1123 (2nd Dist. 2005). Therefore, the court had to first determine whether there were any genuine issues of material fact in dispute regarding Dr. Kogan s good faith in providing emergency care to Ms. Hernandez without fee, because summary judgment is only proper when the right of the moving party is free of doubt. Hernandez, 2008 WL at *7, citing 735 ILCS 5/2-1005; Jones v. Chicago HMO Ltd. of Illinois, 191 Ill. 2d 278, 291, 730 N.E.2d 1119 (2000). The appellate court noted that there is no definition for good faith in the Good Samaritan Act but the Illinois Supreme Court has held that good faith is an unambiguous phrase that means honest, lawful intent, or is the opposite of fraud and bad faith. Hernandez, 2008 WL at *7, citing People v. Guagliata, 362 Ill. 427, 432, 200 N.E. 169 (1936), quoting, Crouch v. First National Banks, 156 Ill. 342, 357, 40 N.E. 974 (1895) and McConnel v. Street, 17 Ill. 153, 254 (1855). Page 4 of 6
5 In Estate of Heanue, the court pointed out that the Good Samaritan Act provides that a physician who, in good faith, provides emergency care without fee to a person is immune. Estate of Heanue, 355 Ill. App. 3d at 650. The Estate of Heanue court also pointed out that the term good faith modifies the terms provides emergency care and without fee in the Good Samaritan Act. Id. Finally, the Estate of Heanue court stated, [r]efraining from charging a fee simply to invoke the protection of section 25 [of the Good Samaritan Act] would seem to violate the requirement that the doctor s actions were in good faith, particularly if the decision not to charge a fee was made following treatment that could potentially expose a doctor to liability. Id. Following Estate of Heanue, the appellate court in Hernandez determined that it must first determine whether Dr. Kogan provided emergency medical services to Ms. Hernandez in good faith. The court found that there were no facts in dispute concerning Dr. Kogan s good faith in providing emergency medical care to Ms. Hernandez. Hernandez, 2008 WL at *7. Next, the appellate court had to determine whether there were facts in dispute concerning Dr. Kogan s decision not to bill Ms. Hernandez for his services. The appellate court had to answer the following: (1) was a good-faith decision made because the doctor had an honest, lawful intent to provide emergency medical services to Ms. Hernandez without fee, or (2) was the doctor acting in bad faith when, after providing medical services to Ms. Hernandez, the decision was made not to bill for his medical services to invoke the protection of section 25 of the Good Samaritan Act? Id. at *8. To answer this question, the appellate court looked to Dr. Kogan s affidavit, deposition testimony and written discovery answers. In Dr. Kogan s affidavit, he established that he did not bill Ms. Hernandez for his services. Dr. Kogan s deposition testimony established: (1) that Dr. Kogan s routine practice was to submit billing information to his billing service after he had rendered care; (2) that Dr. Kogan routinely billed for interpreting echocardiograms, inserting central lines, and performing pericardiocentisis (the professional services he provided to Ms. Hernandez on June 6, 2002); and (3) that Dr. Kogan did not bill Ms. Hernandez for his medical services on June 6, 2002, because he thought it would have been inappropriate. Finally, in his answers to the supplemental good-faith interrogatories, Dr. Kogan stated that during the past five years he did not issue a bill for his professional services if he had no relationship with the patient, or if he did not enter into a doctor-patient relationship. Id. The appellate court pointed out that the deposition testimony from Ms. Biga, the CFO of Dr. Kogan s billing service since 1999, contradicted Dr. Kogan s testimony. Ms. Biga testified that she was unaware of any instance, other than Ms. Hernandez s case, when Dr. Kogan had not submitted patient information needed by the billing service to bill for professional services of the type provided to Ms. Hernandez on June 6, The plaintiff argued that Dr. Kogan s deviation from his routine billing practice raised a material question of fact as to whether the doctor s decision not to bill was made in good faith. The appellate court agreed with the plaintiff that Ms. Biga s testimony raised a question of fact. Id. The appellate court found that Dr. Kogan s answer to the supplemental good-faith interrogatory that he did not bill in cases like Ms. Hernandez s conflicted with Ms. Biga s testimony that, other than Ms. Hernandez s case, there were no other cases where Dr. Kogan had not billed patients for the same type of medical services he provided to Ms. Hernandez. The appellate court also found that Dr. Kogan s decision not to bill Ms. Hernandez raised a question of material fact as to whether Dr. Kogan acted in good faith and had an honest, lawful intent to provide medical services without fee, or whether the doctor was acting in bad faith and deviated from his routine billing practices to invoke the protection of section 25 of the Good Samaritan Act. Since questions of fact were raised, the court determined they must be resolved by a trier of fact so the trial court s granting of summary judgment was reversed and the case was remanded. Id. Page 5 of 6
6 About the Author Stacy Dolan Fulco is a partner at the Chicago law firm of Cremer, Shaughnessy, Spina, Jansen & Siegert LLC. She practices primarily in the areas of premises liability, products liability and wrongful death defense. She received her undergraduate degree at Illinois State University and her J.D./M.B.A. degree from DePaul University. She is a member of the IDC. * The author acknowledges the assistance of Katherine K. Haussermann in the preparation of this article. Page 6 of 6
Recent Decisions COLLATERAL SOURCE RULE
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 17, Number 3 (17.3.45) Recent Decisions By: Stacy Dolan Fulco* Cremer, Kopon, Shaughnessy
More informationClash of the Titans: The Interaction of the Wrongful Death Act, Statute of Repose, Statute of Limitations and the Discovery Rule
Medical Malpractice Update Edna L. McLain and Zeke N. Katz HeplerBroom LLC, Chicago Clash of the Titans: The Interaction of the Wrongful Death Act, Statute of Repose, Statute of Limitations and the Discovery
More informationDoes the Discovery Rule Apply to Claims Brought Under the Wrongful Death Act or Pursuant to the Survival Act?
Supreme Court Watch M. Elizabeth D. Kellett HeplerBroom LLC, Edwardsville Does the Discovery Rule Apply to Claims Brought Under the Wrongful Death Act or Pursuant to the Survival Act? Moon v. Rhode, No.
More informationManifestation Dates: The Moving Target of Repetitive Trauma Cases
Feature Article R. Mark Cosimini Rusin & Maciorowski, Ltd., Champaign Manifestation Dates: The Moving Target of Repetitive Trauma Cases The Illinois Appellate Court Fifth District, Workers Compensation
More informationAppealed. Judgment Rendered l iay Joseph Williams COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 2223 MEDICAL REVIEW PANEL PROCEEDING OF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 2223 IN RE MEDICAL REVIEW PANEL PROCEEDING OF EMMER WILLIAMS VS JANET E LEWIS M D PCF FILE NO 2006 01385 Judgment Rendered l iay 1 3 2009
More informationRecent Decisions. Borrowed Employee s Remedy Limited by Workers Compensation Act
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 22, Number 4 (22.4.23) Recent Decisions By: Stacy Dolan Fulco and Katherine K. Haussermann
More informationThe Scope of the Sufficiently Close Relationship Test; How Porter v. Decatur Is Changing the Landscape of Relation Back
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 21, Number 1 (21.1.44) Medical Malpractice By: Dina L. Torrisi and Edna McLain HeplerBroom,
More information2011 IL App (1st) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2011 IL App (1st 102579 FIRST DIVISION FILED: July 18, 2011 No. 1-10-2579 LISA BABIKIAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD MRUZ, M.D., Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY. No.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 23, 2004 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 23, 2004 Session MICHAEL K. HOLT v. C. V. ALEXANDER, JR., M.D., and JACKSON RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County
More informationAppellate Court Addresses Issue of First Impression Concerning Apparent Agency, Consent Forms and a Non-English Speaking Patient
Health Law Roger R. Clayton, Mark D. Hansen and J. Matthew Thompson Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Appellate Court Addresses Issue of First Impression Concerning Apparent Agency, Consent
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: STEVEN L. LANGER STEVEN R. PRIBYL Langer & Langer Valparaiso, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: MARK A. LIENHOOP MATTHEW J. HAGENOW Newby, Lewis, Kaminski & Jones,
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Moon v. Rhode, 2015 IL App (3d) 130613 Appellate Court Caption RANDALL W. MOON, Executor of the Estate of Kathryn Moon, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARISSA
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 24, 2012 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 24, 2012 Session SUSAN DANIEL V. BRITTANY SMITH Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 35636 L. Craig Johnson, Judge No. M2011-00830-COA-R3-CV
More informationNo Surprises Allowed:
No Surprises Allowed: Basics of Controlled Expert Witness Disclosure No matter how convincing your controlled experts, their testimony may be for naught if you fail to make the timely and appropriate disclosures
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 15, 2001 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 15, 2001 Session MELANIE DEE CONGER v. TIMOTHY D. GOWDER, M.D. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Anderson County No. 99LA0267 James B. Scott,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D & 5D06-874
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2007 CORINA CHRISTENSEN, INDIVIDUALLY, etc., et al., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D06-390 & 5D06-874 EVERETT C. COOPER, M.D.,
More informationARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CA09-1124 Opinion Delivered SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 DR. MARC ROGERS V. ALAN SARGENT APPELLANT APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, [NO. CV2008-236-III]
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE MARCH 18, 2003 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE MARCH 18, 2003 Session JESSE RANDALL FITTS, JR., ET AL. v. DR. DONALD ARMS d/b/a McMINNVILLE ORTHOPEDIC CLINIC, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
2014 IL 115997 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket Nos. 115997, 116009 cons.) In re ESTATE OF PERRY C. POWELL (a/k/a Perry Smith, Jr.), a Disabled Person (Robert F. Harris, Cook County
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 6, 2008 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 6, 2008 Session MELISSA MICHELLE COX v. M. A. PRIMARY AND URGENT CARE CLINIC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 51941
More informationMEDICAL YOUR HOTEL, RESTAURANT OR EMERGENCIES AT BUSINESS AN ANALYSIS OF DUTY, RISK AND LIABILITY
MEDICAL YOUR HOTEL, RESTAURANT OR EMERGENCIES AT BUSINESS AN ANALYSIS OF DUTY, RISK AND LIABILITY PRESENTER JERRY D. HAMILTON, ESQ. Founding managing shareholder of Hamilton Miller & Birthisel, LLP, a
More informationIllinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel P.O. Box 7288, Springfield, IL IDC Quarterly Vol. 16, No. 2 ( ) Medical Malpractice
Medical Malpractice By: Edward J. Aucoin, Jr. Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered Chicago First District Explains Requirements for Claims of Fraudulent Concealment Under 735 5/13-215 and Reaffirms Requirements
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 14, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 14, 2005 Session NORMA E. SHEARON v. JACK E. SEAMAN An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 03C-1357 Barbara Haynes, Circuit Judge
More informationThe Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series
The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series The American civil judicial system is slow, and imperfect, but many times a victim s only recourse in attempting to me made whole after suffering an injury. This
More informationDual Sole Proximate Causes: Asserting an Effective Oxymoronic Defense
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 20, Number 4 (20.4.22) Feature Article By Lindsay Drecoll Brown Cassiday Schade LLP Dual
More informationDon t Forget the Immunity Offered by the Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 21, Number 1 (21.1.30) Property Insurance By: Tracy E. Stevenson Robbins, Salomon & Patt,
More information2012 IL App (1st)101558
2012 IL App (1st)101558 FOURTH DIVISION MARCH 22, 2012 No. 1-10-1558 BLAINE LAMB-ROSENFELDT, Individually and ) Appeal from the as Special Administrator of the Estate of Lee ) Circuit Court of Lamb, Decedent,
More informationS13G0657. ABDEL-SAMED et al. v. DAILEY et al. We granted a writ of certiorari in Dailey v. Abdul-Samed, 319 Ga. App.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 24, 2014 S13G0657. ABDEL-SAMED et al. v. DAILEY et al. THOMPSON, Chief Justice. We granted a writ of certiorari in Dailey v. Abdul-Samed, 319 Ga. App.
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND
LC0 00 -- S STATE OF RHODE ISLAND IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 00 A N A C T RELATING TO COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE Introduced By: Senators Polisena, Roberts, Sosnowski,
More informationSettlement Apportionment and Setoff in Illinois
Feature Article Quinn P. Donnelly and Brian T. Henry Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered, Chicago Settlement Apportionment and Setoff in Illinois During the course of a lawsuit, counsel for each party evaluates
More informationFILED MAY 22, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III
FILED MAY 22, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE NANCY FECHNER, individually and as Personal
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS NO. 98-PR-1405 TOPEL BLUEPRINTING CORPORATION, APPELLANT, SHIRLEY M. BRYANT, APPELLEE.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MARIA TORRES, as parent and natural ) Guardian of LUIS TORRES,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOYCE KAPP, as Next Friend of ELIZABETH JOHNSON, UNPUBLISHED March 6, 2001 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 216020 Kent Circuit Court MARK A. EVENHOUSE, M.D. and LAURELS LC
More informationFOURTH DISTRICT CERTIFIES CLAIMS BILL QUESTION AS ONE OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE.
Clark Fountain welcomes referrals of personal injury, products liability, medical malpractice and other cases that require extensive time and resources. We handle cases throughout the state and across
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 5, 2002 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 5, 2002 Session MARY B. HARRIS v. STEVEN R. ABRAM, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 00C-3570 Marietta Shipley, Judge
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D07-349
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2008 SARAH THOMAS, AS PLENARY GUARDIAN, ETC., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D07-349 FERNANDO LOPEZ, M.D., ET AL., Appellee.
More informationStandard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)
Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j), "[t]he Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories for different classes
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2017-0412, Louis F. Clarizio v. R. David DePuy, Esq. & a., the court on October 12, 2018, issued the following order: Having considered the briefs and
More informationIllinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel P.O. Box 7288, Springfield, IL IDC Quarterly Vol. 16, No. 3 ( ) Medical Malpractice
Medical Malpractice By: Edward J. Aucoin, Jr. Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered Chicago Illinois Supreme Court s Decision in York v. Rush a Mixed Blessing? My favorite adage has always been be careful what
More informationv No Ingham Circuit Court DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CRAIG
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S MICHELE ARTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED September 12, 2017 v No. 333815 Ingham Circuit Court DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CRAIG LC No. 15-000540-CD
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BARBARA LAGACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED June 14, 2011 v No. 294946 Bay Circuit Court BAY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LC No. 09-003087 JANE/JOHN DOE, and GINNY WEAVER,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ALASKA
Pete et al v. United States of America Doc. 60 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ALASKA PEARLENE PETE; BARRY PETE; JERILYN PETE; R.P.; G.P.; D.P.; G.P; and B.P., Plaintiffs, 3:11-cv-00122 JWS vs.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 20, 2005
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 20, 2005 CLAUDE L. GLASS v. GEORGE UNDERWOOD, JR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 3-436-04 Wheeler A. Rosenbalm,
More informationI N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT Douglas E. Sakaguchi Jerome W. McKeever Pfeifer Morgan & Stesiak South Bend, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE SAINT JOSEPH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Robert J. Palmer May Oberfell Lorber
More informationLoss of a Chance. What is it and what does it mean in medical malpractice cases?
Loss of a Chance What is it and what does it mean in medical malpractice cases? Walter C. Morrison IV Gainsburgh, Benjamin, David, Meunier & Warshauer, LLC I. Introduction Kramer walks in to your office
More informationTort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records
Tort Reform 2011 Medical Malpractice Changes (SB 33; S.L. 2011 400) o Enhanced Special Pleading Requirement (Rule 9(j)) Rule 9(j) of the Rules of Civil Procedure now requires medical malpractice complaints
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. MARY MEEKINS and WILLIAM A. MEEKINS, No. 381, 1998 her husband,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARY MEEKINS and WILLIAM A. MEEKINS, No. 381, 1998 her husband, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, Court Below Superior Court v. of the State of Delaware, in and
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE OCTOBER 2, 2000 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE OCTOBER 2, 2000 Session CHERYL N. BUCKNER, ET AL. v. DAVID F. HASSELL, M.D., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 1-141-98 Dale C.
More informationv No Marquette Circuit Court KYLE DANEK, DDS, and MICHIGAN
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S ESTATE OF ANTHONY NORCZYK, by STEPHANIE PANTTI, Personal Representative, Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION October 16, 2018 9:00 a.m. v No. 339713
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice. April 18, 1997
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice SHIRLEY DICKERSON v. Record No. 961531 OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSCOE B. STEPHENSON, JR. NASROLLAH FATEHI,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Docket No. 108182. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS JANE STUDT et al., Appellees, v. SHERMAN HEALTH SYSTEMS, d/b/a Sherman Hospital, Appellant. Opinion filed June 16, 2011. CHIEF JUSTICE KILBRIDE
More informationCircuit Court for Baltimore City Case No.: 24-C UNREPORTED. Nazarian, Reed, Fader,
Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No.: 24-C-16-005327 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1811 September Term, 2017 KATRINA MEGGINSON v. THE CITY OF BALTIMORE AND THE MAYOR &
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 9, 2011 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 9, 2011 Session PAULETTA C. CRAWFORD, ET AL. v. EUGENE KAVANAUGH, M.D. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamblem County No. 10CV257 Thomas J.
More informationStandard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)
Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j), "[t]he Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories for different classes
More informationHow to Be Thankful When Settling a Wrongful Death Claim
Medical Malpractice Update Edna L. McLain and Tammera E. Banasek HeplerBroom LLC, Chicago How to Be Thankful When Settling a Wrongful Death Claim T is the season for celebration and giving thanks, and
More informationMILLER v. WILLIAM CHEVROLET/GEO, INC. 326 Ill. App. 3d 642; 762 N.E.2d 1 (1 st Dist. 2001)
MILLER v. WILLIAM CHEVROLET/GEO, INC. 326 Ill. App. 3d 642; 762 N.E.2d 1 (1 st Dist. 2001) Plaintiff Otha Miller appeals from an order of the Cook County circuit court granting summary judgment in favor
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ELMA BOGUS, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT BOGUS, UNPUBLISHED January 24, 2006 Plaintiff-Appellant, V No. 262531 LC No. 03-319085-NH MARK SAWKA, M.D.,
More informationIn this case we must decide whether Kentucky law or Illinois law governs a lawsuit arising
Third Division September 29, 2010 No. 1-09-2888 MARIA MENDEZ, as Special Administrator for the Estate ) Appeal from the of Jaime Mendez, Deceased, ) Circuit Court of ) Cook County Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 08-885 HARRY JOHN WALSH, JR. VERSUS JASON MORRIS, M.D., ET AL. ************ APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
More informationDefining the Retained Control Exception: An Update on 414
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 19, Number 3 (19.3.30) Feature Article By: Kingshuk K. Roy Purcell & Wardrope, Chtd.
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Schrempf, Kelly, Napp & Darr, Ltd. v. Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust Fund, 2015 IL App (5th) 130413 Appellate Court Caption SCHREMPF, KELLY, NAPP AND DARR,
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed July 29, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed July 29, 2015 - Case No. 2015-1244 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO JENNIFER BAKER, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of JANET COLSTON, Deceased, v. Appellant,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION CASE NO.: 5:06cv23-R MARK L. CRAWFORD, M.D., P.S.C.,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION CASE NO.: 5:06cv23-R MARK L. CRAWFORD, M.D., P.S.C., PLAINTIFF v. CENTRAL STATE, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS HEALTH AND WELFARE
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS EUSEBIO SALDANA, individually and as the personal representative of the ESTATE OF MICHAEL SALDANA, and JOSEPHINE SALDANA, UNPUBLISHED August 4, 2016 Plaintiffs-Appellants,
More informationIn the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
Schneider et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC d/b/a Wal-Mart Doc. 9 In the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas GLENN SCHNEIDER AND CYNTHIA SCHNEIDER v. WAL-MART STORES TEXAS,
More informationWILLIAM BOWEN ) CASE NO. CV ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL ) vs ) ) FARMERS INS. CO., et al. ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) Defendants.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO WILLIAM BOWEN ) CASE NO. CV 09 688770 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL ) vs ) ) FARMERS INS. CO., et al. ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) Defendants. ) John P.
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Carver Moore and La Tonya : Reese Moore, : : Appellants : : v. : No. 1598 C.D. 2009 : The School District of Philadelphia : Argued: May 17, 2010 and URS Corporation
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 24, 2008 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 24, 2008 Session EARNEST EDWIN GILCHRIST v. JUAN T. ARISTORENAS, M.D. Appeal from the Circuit Court for McNairy County No. 4825 J. Weber McCraw,
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: JANUARY 8, 2016; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2012-CA-001882-MR ESTATE OF PATRICIA CLARK APPELLANT APPEAL FROM HOPKINS CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2013-0451, Tara Carver v. Leigh F. Wheeler, M.D. & a., the court on May 7, 2014, issued the following order: The plaintiff, Tara Carver, appeals the
More informationAn Outside Bet: Reduction in the Amount of Recovery in Medical Malpractice Cases
Civil Practice and Procedure Donald Patrick Eckler and Matthew A. Reddy Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered, Chicago An Outside Bet: Reduction in the Amount of Recovery in Medical Malpractice Cases Defense practitioners
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS Term, A.D. 2003
No. 96210 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS Term, A.D. 2003 PATRICIA ABRAMS, individually, ) Petition for Leave to Appeal from the and as Special Administrator of ) First District Appellate Court of Illinois,
More informationerdict CELEBRATING 60 YEARS
Vwww.gtla.org erdict SPRING 2016 THE JOURNAL OF THE GEORGIA TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION CELEBRATING 60 YEARS LAW PRACTICE AND CLOUD COMPUTING: STAYING ETHICAL IN A DIGITAL WORLD WHAT IS THE PLAINTIFF S BURDEN
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GARY E. GIUSTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED December 2, 2003 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, Intervening Plaintiff, v No. 241714 Macomb Circuit Court MT. CLEMENS
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ANNIE BEATRICE VICKERS, Personal UNPUBLISHED Representative of the Estate of DELANSO April 14, 1998 JOHNSON, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 196365 Wayne Circuit
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BOTSFORD CONTINUING CARE CORPORATION, d/b/a BOTSFORD CONTINUING HEALTH CENTER, FOR PUBLICATION March 22, 2011 9:05 a.m. Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 294780 Oakland Circuit
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KERRY JENDRUSINA, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION August 4, 2016 9:00 a.m. v No. 325133 Macomb Circuit Court SHYAM MISHRA, M.D. and SHYAM N. LC No. 2013-003802-NH
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS THERESA BAILEY, a/k/a THERESA LONG, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of CHRISTAL BAILEY, UNPUBLISHED August 8, 2006 Plaintiff-Appellee, v
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 24, 2011 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 24, 2011 Session TISH WALKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LISA JO ABBOTT v. DR. SHANT GARABEDIAN Appeal from the Circuit Court
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DEONTE RIDLEY, a minor, by his Next Friend EDWIN ALEXANDER, UNPUBLISHED June 14, 2016 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 326517 Wayne Circuit Court KURT BRITNELL, MICKEY REDMOND,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY VANCE, ET AL., CASE NUMBER v. O P I N I O N
[Cite as Vance v. Marion Gen. Hosp., 165 Ohio App.3d 615, 2006-Ohio-146.] COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY VANCE, ET AL., CASE NUMBER 9-05-23 APPELLANTS, v. O P I N I O N MARION
More informationCase 3:04-cv JEC Document 91 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 1 of 9 ORDER. of the Court's Order dated June 9, 2005.
Case 3:04-cv-00023-JEC Document 91 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 1 of 9 ~ q C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORG~r~.~ NEWNAN DIVISION ' T ~OS WILLIAM DAVID MORRISON and KIM L. MORRISON, Plaintiffs,
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 May 2013
NO. COA12-1071 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 7 May 2013 THE ESTATE OF DONNA S. RAY, BY THOMAS D. RAY AND ROBERT A. WILSON, IV, Administrators of the Estate of Donna S. Ray, and THOMAS D. RAY,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MARILYN CHIRILUT and NICOLAE CHIRILUT, UNPUBLISHED November 23, 2010 Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross- Appellees, v No. 293750 Oakland Circuit Court WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL,
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 BERNADETTE AND TRAVIS SNYDER Appellants IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MOUNT NITTANY MEDICAL CENTER, DR. SARA BARWISE, MD, DR. MICHAEL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 20, 2009 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 20, 2009 Session SAMANTHA NABORS v. WILLIAM M. ADAMS, M.D., ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-000369-07 John R. McCarroll,
More information/STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
/STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID L. MANZO, MD, Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION May 4, 2004 9:15 a.m. v No. 245735 Oakland Circuit Court MARISA C. PETRELLA and PETRELLA & LC No. 2000-025999-NM
More informationPreparing the Physician for Deposition and Trial
Preparing the Physician for Deposition and Trial Objectives Upon completion of this seminar, attendees should be able to: 1. List ways in which the physician can act as their own advocate and take an active
More informationI N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Eric A. Frey Frey Law Firm Terre Haute, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE John D. Nell Jere A. Rosebrock Wooden McLaughlin, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 24, 2011 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 24, 2011 Session TISH WALKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LISA JO ABBOTT v. DR. SHANT GARABEDIAN Appeal from the Circuit Court
More informationNo. 2 CA-CV Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, Department B
Page 1 JEFFREY A. BOATMAN and ANNE BOATMAN, husband and wife; FRED RIEBE; and ROBERT MCDONALD, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES, INC., an Arizona corporation, Defendant-Appellee No.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SHARI RATERINK and MARY RATERINK, Copersonal Representatives of the ESTATE OF SHARON RATERINK, UNPUBLISHED May 3, 2011 Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v No. 295084
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 39 Filed: 07/10/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:149
Case: 1:16-cv-04921 Document #: 39 Filed: 07/10/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:149 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TASHA BANKS, vs. Plaintiff, DR. JOHN SANTANIELLO,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
2013 IL 114044 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 114044) COLLEEN BJORK, Appellant, v. FRANK P. O MEARA, Appellee. Opinion filed January 25, 2013. JUSTICE FREEMAN delivered the judgment
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 01-0205 444444444444 STEVEN MURK, M.D. AND GARY M. FLANGAS, M.D. V. BRIAN SCHEELE AND CINDI SCHEELE 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D AUGUST 5, 2005
NO. 07-03-0203-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D AUGUST 5, 2005 TIMOTHY RAY REEVES AND CINDY KAY WALKER INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HEIRS OF THE ESTATE OF ANITA SUE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 4, 2006 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 4, 2006 Session NORTHEAST KNOX UTILITY DISTRICT v. STANFORT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, SOUTHERN CONSTRUCTORS, INC., and AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION,
More informationHEALTH CARE LIABILITY UPDATE, 2014
HEALTH CARE LIABILITY UPDATE, 2014 PAULA SWEENEY Slack & Davis 2911 Turtle Creek Boulevard Suite 1400 Dallas Texas 75219 (214) 528-8686 psweeney@slackdavis.com State Bar of Texas ADVANCED MEDICAL TORTS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-60764 Document: 00513714839 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, United States Court of Appeals Fifth
More information