The Federal Judiciary
|
|
- Jean Atkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Federal Judiciary Speaker: Rue Wood Thomas Paine, the author of the Revolutionary War era pamphlet, Common Sense, wrote that in America, the law will be King. He was making an argument for breaking away from Britain and monarchy. In America, there would be no kings or aristocracy, and it would be the law that would rule. Boy, was Paine a visionary on this one! The new nation WAS and still IS guided by the rule of law. Americans have great regard for the law; in fact, we re the most litigious society in the world. Every year, at least 1 million legal actions are filed in the federal courts, and about 30 million are filed in state courts. There are a couple of good historical reasons why Americans have such a high regard for the law. First, we re a nation of immigrants from different cultures, backgrounds, and traditions. A unified law has always been a peaceful means of settling disputes. Second, and ironically, our nation was born in revolution. Some would point out that the American Revolution, from the British perspective, was illegal and even treasonous. But the revolutionaries were rebelling against a system they viewed as sometimes arbitrary and repressive. To them, the revolution was civil disobedience in response to a higher calling the true rule of law and equal justice for all. It s for this reason that when studying American Government, I like to begin with the law-interpreting branch, the judiciary. Of the three branches of government, it s the one most Americans are least familiar with. It s the single branch that citizens don t elect, yet depends on to protect their rights. In this lecture we ll accomplish the following: First, we ll look at the two-tiered court system in the U.S., differentiate between types of courts, and define a few terms; Second, we ll view the three-level structure of the federal court system; Third, we ll examine the structure and ideological makeup of the Supreme Court and take a closer look at the high court s day-to-day operations Let s begin with the two-tiered court system in the U.S. The bulk of legal actions in the U.S. are dealt with in state courts. As I mentioned earlier, the state courts handle about thirty times more cases that do the federal courts. Both state courts and federal courts hear two categories of cases criminal and civil cases. A criminal case is one in which a person is charged with breaking a state or national law, where the punishment might be a fine, imprisonment, or death. A civil case is a dispute between two parties where the penalty for the losing party is monetary compensation or fines, not imprisonment or death. A higher standard of evidence is required in a criminal case. The same event might be tried as both a criminal and a civil case. For example, the former football star, O.J. Simpson, was put on trial in 1995 in criminal court for the murder of his ex-wife, Nicole, and her friend Ron Goldman. Simpson was found not guilty in the criminal trial. He then appeared in civil court on a wrongful death charge and was found guilty in the case of Ron Goldman, and assessed millions of dollars in damages to the Goldman family. Page 1 of 6
2 The Simpson cases took place in the state courts of California. But when is a case heard in federal court? This is the question of jurisdiction and when jurisdiction comes into play. Jurisdiction is the ability and right of a court to hear and decide a case. As far as criminal cases go, the federal courts have jurisdiction in any case that breaks a federal law; in other words, one passed by Congress. Some examples of this might be drug dealing across state lines, interstate auto theft, killing a federal official, counterfeiting of money, burglary of a federal installation, or killing an animal on the federally protected endangered species list. About one quarter of federal criminal cases are drug-related cases. Federal civil cases deal with lawsuits concerning U.S. treaties, acts of Congress, or violation of one s Constitutional rights. The federal courts hear lawsuits involving parties from two or more different states, if the amount in question exceeds a stated level right now, it s $75,000. The federal courts also deal with all bankruptcy, patent, copyright, and maritime cases. The reality isn t very glamorous. Well over two-thirds of all cases filed in federal court are bankruptcy cases. A person CAN be put on trial in both a state and federal court for the same violation. For example, in 1992 several Los Angeles Police Department officers were charged with using excessive force in the beating of Rodney King, an African American man they pursued on a high-speed chase. The jury found the officers not guilty in a California state court. The case then went to federal court, where two of the officers were convicted of violating King s civil rights and given 30-month sentences in a federal corrections facility. This is a course on American national government. So now that we ve differentiated between the state and federal court systems, let s more carefully look at just the federal courts. The first thing to remember is that there are three levels within the federal court system: District Courts Appeals Courts U.S. Supreme Court In total, there are at present 94 federal district courts. Each state has at least one district court; more populous states might have several. For instance, Iowa has two federal district courts. The one for the northern part of the state is located in Cedar Rapids; the district court for the southern part of the state is located in Des Moines. New York, Texas, and California each have four federal district courts. Each district court has a U.S. attorney which represents the United States, much as district attorney represents the state in state courts. The federal district courts have original jurisdiction. That means federal cases start in these courts; they re the ones within the federal court system where normal trial procedure applies. Attorneys examine witnesses and juries render verdicts. In criminal cases on the federal level, twelve persons make up the jury; in civil cases the jury is six individuals. The Appeals Courts and Supreme Court aren t trial courts, but instead, are appellate courts. About one in six cases heard in district courts are sent to the next level on appeal. Here, there are no trials or juries. Instead, a three-member panel of judges reviews the records from the district court to see if there was a Page 2 of 6
3 legal mistake in the way the case was handled. They can either uphold or strike down the lower court ruling by majority rule, meaning at least 2 of the three judges agreeing. The United States is broken up into 11 circuits for the Courts of Appeal plus an additional court for Washington D.C. and a Federal Circuit which hears mainly patent appeals and veterans claims. The final court of appeal in the federal judiciary is the U.S. Supreme Court. About 8000 cases a year are appealed to the Supreme Court, but the Court chooses which of the cases it will hear and which it won t. Each year, the High Court selects about 80 cases to hear only one in one hundred sent to them. Cases come from two places from the lower federal appeals courts, and from state supreme courts. If the U.S. Supreme Court decides to hear a case, it issues a writ of certiorari, which is an order to the lower court to send up its records in the case. The Supreme Court then examines how the case was argued and decided in the lower courts. It s important to remember that the Supreme Court is almost entirely a court of appeals, an appellate court. It hears very few cases on original jurisdiction. The only type of case that must go straight to the Supreme Court is a case between two or more states. This is known as exclusive jurisdiction. For example, a change in course of the Sabine River, which forms the border between Texas and Louisiana, caused a dispute between those two states. In 1976, the case went straight to the Supreme Court and the High Court settled the boundary issue. And, by the way, the Supreme Court settled a similar dispute way back in 1898 between Iowa and Illinois concerning their border, the Mississippi River. At that time, steamboats were plying the river, and both states wanted to know their exact boundary so they could tax the steamboats. Taxes, taxes, taxes some things never change over time! Back to our discussion of cases that can go before the High Court... The only other cases that may go straight to the Supreme Court are those involving foreign ambassadors or consuls and cases where a state is a party. This is known as original jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has the right to hear the case first, but may allow lower federal courts to hear it, instead. Today, the High Court tends not to hear these cases in their original jurisdiction, so they re filed in lower federal courts. So every term, the Supreme Court hears case after case that has made its way through the lower courts. Let s turn now to the daily operation of the Supreme Court. The High Court is one of the most traditionbound institutions in our government. By law, the term of the Court begins the first Monday in October. There s no set date for the end of the term, but it usually runs through June or into July. During the term, the Court alternates between two-week long sittings and recesses. During sittings, they hear cases and issue opinions; during the recesses they write opinions and take care of court business. So what happens when the High Court is sitting? The Court only hears cases on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays from 10am to 3pm, with an hour lunch break. The justices sit side-by-side at the front of the courtroom. The Chief Justice sits in the middle. To his right sits the longest-serving member of the court, and to his left the second longest serving member. The remaining justices alternate right and left based on this same seniority. Each side in the case gets exactly 30 minutes for presenting their case to the Court; this is known as oral argument. The justices are already very familiar with the case, having Page 3 of 6
4 reviewed the lower court records and the written arguments from each side. At any time during oral argument, a justice can interrupt with questions for the attorney. Talk about nerve-wracking! An attorney prepares his or her 30-minute argument flawlessly, but may never get to deliver the entire presentation due to questions from the bench. After the 30 minutes have lapsed, a light on the attorney s lectern indicates time is up. There are no juries or witnesses present. The attorney who represents the United States in cases where the U.S. is a party is called the Solicitor General. By tradition, the Solicitor General wears a formal morning jacket when arguing before the Supreme Court. Elena Kagan was the first woman to serve as U.S. Solicitor General, and she chose not to stick to this tradition. Kagan left her post in 2010 when she was appointed to the Supreme Court itself by President Obama. Thursdays are a workday for the justices, and on Fridays they meet in conference to discuss the cases heard that week in oral argument. Tradition dictates that all justices shake hands with each of the other justices at the beginning of conference. No records are kept of conferences and clerks aren t allowed in the room. No one but the justices know what they discuss. The Chief Justice presides and asks each of the other justices, in order of seniority, to offer his or her opinions in the case. It s Congress that decides how many justices make up the Supreme Court. Since 1869, Congress has set the number at nine. Following the Constitution, all Supreme Court justices and federal judges are appointed by the sitting President with confirmation by the Senate; they serve for life or until they choose to retire. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is not necessarily the longest-serving member. When a Chief Justice dies or retires, the current President may appoint whomever he wishes as the new Chief. The current Chief Justice, John Roberts, was not even serving on the Supreme Court when he was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2005 to replace Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who died earlier that year. During conference, the Chief Justice assigns the writing of opinions in the cases the Court has heard. It takes a majority of those justices voting to decide a case. For instance, a case may be decided by 7-2 or even 5-4. Not all justices have to vote. Sometimes a justice recuses himself from a case because he or she feels personal ties to the case compromise his or her objectivity. For example, the newest member of the court, Elena Kagan, recused herself during the term from several cases, because she had worked on the cases while serving as Solicitor General. She felt there was a conflict of interest because before 2010 she was an attorney working on cases that were now before the very court that she sits on as a Justice. In any case (no pun intended) it takes at least six voting justices to render a decision. A tie vote means the lower court ruling is upheld. Once a case is decided by majority vote, the Chief Justice assigns the writing of the opinions in the case. An opinion is the written legal argument setting down the legal reasons why the court ruled the way it did. One of the justices voting with the majority is appointed to write the majority opinion. A justice voting with the minority, in other words, the losing side, is assigned the dissenting opinion. The dissenting opinion, naturally, sets out legal arguments against the majority. If a justice agrees with the majority, but for differing legal reasons, he or she might write a concurring opinion. Page 4 of 6
5 One of the most fascinating parts of studying the Supreme Court is its ideological composition. Justices, of course, follow legal precedent and the law. But as we saw in our last lecture, they often view and interpret the Constitution and law through different lenses. Conservative justices, like Thomas, Scalia, Roberts, and Alito tend to vote together. So do liberal justices like Ginsburg and Breyer. The newest members of the Court, Sotomayor and Kagan, have yet to establish their Supreme Court legacy, but their past records in other positions and courts show them to be quite liberal judges. Justice Kennedy is known as the swing vote on the court. Although considered a conservative, he sometimes votes with the liberal judges. Overall, today the U.S. has a conservative court counterbalanced by a large liberal minority. All five conservative justices were appointed by Republican presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush, while the four liberal justices were appointed by the Democrats, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Obviously, appointment of a Supreme Court justice has longterm, significant consequences for the entire nation, since the High Court interprets laws and the Constitution. So what do we mean by conservative and liberal judges? Once again, labeling is not easy or entirely accurate, but in general, conservative judges favor a strict interpretation of the Constitution. In rulings, they are usually pro-business (especially big business), protect gun-owners rights, are anti-abortion and not strong supporters of affirmative action. They tend to be strong law-and-order advocates, and often vote against defendants in criminal procedure cases. Liberal judges, on the other hand, tend to uphold affirmative action programs and abortion rights. They often uphold regulations limiting business and vote in favor of defendants in criminal procedure cases. Let s take a recent example. In 2010, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, upheld the rights of corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts of money on political ads during campaigns. The High Court viewed the spending as form of speech protected by the First Amendment. The five justices voting in the majority were Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Scalia, and Kennedy, with Kennedy writing the majority opinion. Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Breyer, and Stevens dissented, and Justice Stevens wrote the dissenting opinion. (Elena Kagan replaced Justice Stevens later in the year when he retired.) The vote clearly reflected the ideological division between conservatives and liberals on the Court. President Obama and many Democrats spoke out loudly against the ruling, saying it gave even more power in politics to big business and special interests while diminishing the role of individual citizens. As usual, the case has more complexity to it than we can go into here. Look up the case online, if you d like it s United Citizens v. Federal Election Commission. Finally, let s briefly trace an actual case through the U.S. court system. The case I ve selected is Berghuis v. Thompkins, heard by the Supreme Court in It s a Fifth Amendment case that came from the state of Michigan. The Fifth Amendment protects a person from testifying against himself in court; in other words, it protects our right to remain silent when charged with a crime. The famous 1966 Supreme Court case, Miranda v. Arizona established the precedent for the reading of rights to people detained by law enforcement. We re all pretty familiar with this from television and movies (but hopefully not personal experience!) Police read Mr. Thompkins his Miranda rights before questioning him as a suspect in a fatal shooting that occurred in Thompkins remained silent during the entire Page 5 of 6
6 three-hour interrogation, but he never said he wanted to invoke his right to remain silent. Nor did he say he wanted an attorney. At the end of the three hours, the exasperated police asked Thompkins if he believed in God and if he prayed to God to forgive him for the shooting. Thompkins answered yes to the questions. This was used against him in his trial, where he was found guilty of murder in a Michigan state court and sentenced to life in prison. Thompkins attorney made a motion to suppress the statements, saying that his client never waived his Miranda rights, his right to remain silent under the Fifth Amendment. Thompkins appealed to the Michigan Supreme Court, which rejected his appeal. Since this was more than a murder case and had to do with a Constitutional issue the Fifth Amendment Thompkins filed his case in federal district court in Michigan. The district court refused to review his case, so he appealed to the federal appeals court. Michigan is in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, which encompasses Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan, and Tennessee, and is located in Cincinnati, Ohio. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court s ruling, saying the Michigan state court was in the wrong when it implied that Thompkins had waived his right to remain silent. The state of Michigan then appealed the Sixth Circuit Court s ruling in favor of Thompkins to the U.S. Supreme Court. So how did the High Court rule in Mr. Thompkins case? It was close, but not surprising in a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court reversed the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals and upheld Thompkins conviction. The court basically said that just staying silent doesn t mean you re invoking your right to remain silent. An accused person has to actually state they want to remain silent and end the police interview. Those voting in the majority were Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Kennedy, who wrote the opinion. Justices Ginsburg, Stevens, Breyer, and Sotomayor voted the other way, and Sotomayor wrote the dissenting opinion in fact, it was her first time to write a dissenting opinion since she arrived on the Court. Hopefully, after this lecture, you understand a bit more about our least visible branch of government, the judicial branch. In the United States, we have a two-tiered system of law the state and federal courts. Federal courts deal with specific issues spelled out in the Constitution; most of these are federal laws and disputes about personal rights guaranteed under the Constitution. The federal court system has three levels, and cases rarely make their way to the Supreme Court, since the High Court hears a select number of cases each year on appeal and most cases can be handled by the lower courts. I urge you to keep up with important federal court rulings and rulings of the Supreme Court. The justices preserve our rights as citizens and individuals an important function in a vibrant democracy. I look forward to speaking with you again in our next lecture on the peoples directly elected representatives, the U.S. Congress. Rue Wood and Indian Hills Community College Page 6 of 6
The Judicial Branch. CP Political Systems
The Judicial Branch CP Political Systems Standards Content Standard 4: The student will examine the United States Constitution by comparing the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government
More informationTHE JUDICIAL BRANCH. Article III. The Role of the Federal Court
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH Section I Courts, Term of Office Section II Jurisdiction o Scope of Judicial Power o Supreme Court o Trial by Jury Section III Treason o Definition Punishment Article III The Role of
More informationU.S. Court System. The U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington D. C. Diagram of the U.S. Court System
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/court.html Page 1 of 5 10/10/011 U.S. Court System The U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington D. C. Diagram of the U.S. Court System U.S. Supreme Court Federal
More informationAP Gov Chapter 15 Outline
Law in the United States is based primarily on the English legal system because of our colonial heritage. Once the colonies became independent from England, they did not establish a new legal system. With
More informationTHE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and THE JUDICIARY BRANCH
Elana Kagan (Obama) Samuel Alito (G.W. Bush) Sonia Sotomayor (Obama) Neil Gorsuch (Trump) Ruth Bader Ginsberg (Clinton) Unit Four- BB Anthony Kennedy (Reagan) Chief Justice John Roberts (G.W. Bush) Clarence
More informationAP Government Chapter 15 Reading Guide: The Judiciary
AP Government Chapter 15 Reading Guide: The Judiciary 1. According to Federalist 78, what s Hamilton s argument for why the SCOTUS is the weakest of the branches? Do you agree? 2. So the court has the
More informationTopic 7 The Judicial Branch. Section One The National Judiciary
Topic 7 The Judicial Branch Section One The National Judiciary Under the Articles of Confederation Under the Articles of Confederation, there was no national judiciary. All courts were State courts Under
More informationCHAPTER 9. The Judiciary
CHAPTER 9 The Judiciary The Nature of the Judicial System Introduction: Two types of cases: Criminal Law: The government charges an individual with violating one or more specific laws. Civil Law: The court
More informationCh.9: The Judicial Branch
Ch.9: The Judicial Branch Learning Goal Students will be able to analyze the structure, function, and processes of the judicial branch as established in Article III of the Constitution; the judicial branches
More informationTHE JUDICIAL BRANCH: THE FEDERAL COURTS
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH: THE FEDERAL COURTS DUAL COURT SYSTEM There are really two court systems in the United States National judiciary that extends over all 50 States Court systems found in each State (most
More informationINTRO TO POLI SCI 11/30/15
INTRO TO POLI SCI 11/30/15 Objective: SWBAT describe the type of court system in the US and how the Supreme Court works. Agenda: Turn in Late Work Judicial Branch Notes When your friend asks to borrow
More informationUnited States Judicial Branch
United States Judicial Branch Role of the Courts Resolving disputes Setting precedents Interpreting the law Strict or loose constructionists Jurisdiction -right to try and decide a case. Exclusive jurisdiction
More information3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT EXECUTIVE BRANCH President, Vice President, Cabinet QUALIFICATIONS Written Qualifications 35 years old Lived in country for 14 years Natural-born citizen Unwritten Qualifications
More informationThe Judiciary AP Government Spring 2016
The Judiciary AP Government Spring 2016 [T]hough individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter;
More informationTHE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and THE JUDICIARY BRANCH
Elana Kagan (Obama) Samuel Alito (G.W. Bush) Sonia Sotomayor (Obama) Neil Gorsuch (Trump) Ruth Bader Ginsberg (Clinton) Unit Four- BA Anthony Kennedy (Reagan) Chief Justice John Roberts (G.W. Bush) Clarence
More informationGovernment Guided Notes Unit Five Day #3 The Judicial Branch Supreme Court Processes & Justices. Latin Terms to Know. writ of certiorari Affidavit
Name: Date: Block # Government Guided Notes Unit Five Day #3 The Judicial Branch Supreme Court Processes & Justices Directions Listen and view today s PowerPoint lesson. As you view each slide, write in
More informationUnit V: Institutions The Federal Courts
Unit V: Institutions The Federal Courts Introduction to Federal Courts Categories of law Statutory law Laws created by legislation; statutes Common law Accumulation of court precedents Criminal law Government
More informationChapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1 Origins of the Judiciary The Constitution created the Supreme Court. Article III gives Congress the power to create the rest of the federal court system,
More informationUnderstanding the U.S. Supreme Court
Understanding the U.S. Supreme Court Processing Supreme Court Cases Supreme Court Decision Making The Role of Law and Legal Principles Supreme Court Decision Making The Role of Politics Conducting Research
More informationCHAPTER 18:3 Supreme Court
CHAPTER 18:3 Supreme Court Chapter 18:3 o We will examine the reasons why the Supreme Court is often called the higher court. o We will examine why judicial review is a key feature in the American System
More informationUnit 4C STUDY GUIDE. The Judiciary. Use the Constitution to answer questions #1-9. Unless noted, all questions are based on Article III.
Unit 4C STUDY GUIDE The Judiciary Use the Constitution to answer questions #1-9. Unless noted, all questions are based on Article III. 1. What power is vested in the courts? 2. The shall extend to all
More informationThe Judicial Branch. Three Levels of Courts in the U.S.
The Judicial Branch Three Levels of Courts in the U.S. The Motto Written on the front of the Supreme Court is the motto, Equal Justice Under Law What do courts do? Use different kinds of law to settle
More informationTerms to Know. In the first column, answer the questions based on what you know before you study. After this lesson, complete the last column.
Lesson 1: Federal Courts ESSENTIAL QUESTION How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly? GUIDING QUESTIONS 1. What is the role of the federal courts? 2. What kinds of cases are heard in federal
More informationChapter 8 - Judiciary. AP Government
Chapter 8 - Judiciary AP Government The Structure of the Judiciary A complex set of institutional courts and regular processes has been established to handle laws in the American system of government.
More informationAmerica s Federal Court System
America s Federal Court System How do we best balance the government s need to protect the security of the nation while guaranteeing the individuals personal liberties? I.) Judges vs. Legislators I.) Judges
More informationLEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying Chapter 16, you should be able to: 1. Understand the nature of the judicial system. 2. Explain how courts in the United States are organized and the nature of their jurisdiction.
More information4.16: Intro to Federal Judiciary AP U. S. GOVERNMENT
4.16: Intro to Federal Judiciary AP U. S. GOVERNMENT The Judicial Branch The judicial branch of the federal government consists of all federal courts. Article III of the Constitution established the U.S.
More informationChapter Outline and Learning Objectives. Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives. Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives
Chapter 16: The Federal Courts The Nature of the Judicial The Politics of Judicial Selection The Backgrounds of Judges and Justices The Courts as Policymakers The Courts and Public Policy: An Understanding
More informationAP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. Chapter 14: The Judiciary
AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT Unit Five Part 2 The Judiciary 2 1 Chapter 14: The Judiciary The Federal Court System The Politics of Appointing Judges How the Supreme Court Makes Decisions Judicial Power and Its
More informationChapter 10: The Judiciary
Chapter 10: The Judiciary Constitution and Creation of the Federal Judiciary Read Article III and answer: Discuss justices/judges: terms, appointments, remuneration What powers and jurisdiction does the
More informationLesson: The Manner in which a Democratic Society Resolves Disputes
Courts in the Community Colorado Judicial Branch Office of the State Court Administrator Updated December 2018 Lesson: The Manner in which a Democratic Society Resolves Disputes Objective: Provide students
More informationCh Identify the basic elements of the American judicial system and the major participants in it (p.486)
Ch. 15.1 Identify the basic elements of the American judicial system and the major participants in it (p.486) Unit 5 The Federal Courts 1 Current Supreme Court C 83 L 79 L? C C C 80 C L Merrick Neil Gorsuch?
More informationThe Federal Courts. Chapter 16
The Federal Courts Chapter 16 3 HISTORICAL ERAS OF INFLUENCE 1787-1865 Political Nation building (legitimacy of govt.) Slavery 1865-1937 Economic Govt. roll in economy Great Depression 1937-Present Ideological
More informationSupreme Court Watch: Recent Decisions And Upcoming CriminalCases For The Docket
American University Criminal Law Brief Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 8 Supreme Court Watch: Recent Decisions And Upcoming CriminalCases For The 2006-2007 Docket Andrew Myerberg Recommended Citation Myerberg,
More informationCreation. Article III. Dual Courts. Supreme Court Congress may create inferior courts. Federal State
The Federal Courts Creation Article III Supreme Court Congress may create inferior courts Dual Courts Federal State Federal Courts Underneath Supreme Court Two Types Constitutional exercise judicial power
More informationINTRODUCTION THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Trace the historical evolution of the policy agenda of the Supreme Court. Examine the ways in which American courts are both democratic and undemocratic institutions. CHAPTER OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION Although
More informationJurisdiction. Appointed by the President with the Advice and Consent of the Senate according to Article II, Section 2
The Judicial Branch Jurisdiction Federal Courts Article III, Section 1 vests judicial power in the Supreme Court and other inferior courts created by Congress Judges serve during good Behavior Appointed
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA PRO SE MANUAL Introduction This pamphlet is intended primarily to assist non-attorneys with the basic procedural steps which must be followed when filing
More informationMonday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday. Good to Know Vocabulary 26. Chapter Executive Notes 30. Presidential Survey Activity 30
Name: Period: Week: 14 16 Dates: 11/16 12/1 Unit: The Executive & Judicial Branch Chapters 13 15 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 16 O Flex Day Finish Iron Jawed Angels 17 E 18 O *Executive Branch
More informationFall, Court Systems 9/4/17. The Parties. Becoming a Federal Judge. Senate Judiciary Committee 60 votes for Closure (?) Senate Advise and Consent
Fall, 2017 20 E1 17 Court Systems The Parties Plaintiff Defendant Petitioner Respondent Appellant Respondent Becoming a Federal Judge President Nominates Senate Advise and Consent Senate Judiciary Committee
More informationSCOTUS Death Penalty Review. Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center
SCOTUS Death Penalty Review Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center lsoronen@sso.org Modern Death Penalty Jurisprudence 1970s SCOTUS tells the states they must limit arbitrariness in who gets the death
More informationlaws created by legislative bodies.
THE AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT STUDY GUIDE CLASSIFICATION OF LEGAL ISSUES TYPE OF CASE CIVIL CASES CRIMINAL CASES covers issues of claims, suits, contracts, and licenses. covers illegal actions or wrongful
More informationa. Exceptions: Australia, Canada, Germany, India, and a few others B. Debate is over how the Constitution should be interpreted
I. The American Judicial System A. Only in the United States do judges play so large a role in policy-making - The policy-making potential of the federal judiciary is enormous. Woodrow Wilson once described
More informationThe Judicial System (cont d)
The Judicial System (cont d) Alexander Hamilton in Federalist #78: Executive: Holds the sword of the community as commander-in-chief. Congress appropriates money ( commands the purse ) and decides the
More informationSeparation of powers and the democratic process
AMERICAN GOVERNMENT Separation of powers and the democratic process Americans regularly exercise their democratic rights by voting and by participating in political parties and election campaigns. The
More informationThe Federalist, No. 78
The Judicial Branch January 2015 [T]he judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of the other two; and that all possible
More informationChapter 7: The Judicial Branch
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch US Government Week of January 22, 2018 [T]he judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of
More informationChapter 13: The Judiciary
Learning Objectives «Understand the Role of the Judiciary in US Government and Significant Court Cases Chapter 13: The Judiciary «Apply the Principle of Judicial Review «Contrast the Doctrine of Judicial
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2004 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes
More informationThe Federal Judiciary (HAA)
The Federal Judiciary (HAA) At fewer than 500 words, Article III of the Constitution, which spells out the powers of the nation s judicial branch, is remarkably brief. The framers brevity on this topic
More informationThe full speech, as prepared for delivery, is below:
Washington, D.C. Senator Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, the senior member and former Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, spoke on the floor today about the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the United
More information10 Defining Moments of
1990 s 10 Defining Moments of 1990 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jak-tvdktc Crisis in the Middle East In 1990, Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, wanting to control of the oil-rich country.
More informationAssociate Justice Antonin Scalia
The Future of the Court Sotomayor Breyer Alito Kagan Thomas Scalia Roberts Kennedy NotoriousRBG Eric J. Williams, PhD. Dept. Chair of Criminology & Criminal Justice Studies Sonoma State University Associate
More informationJudicial Branch. Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court?
Judicial Branch Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court? What could happen if I am found guilty? What do I do if I think my rights are being violated?
More informationThe Supreme Court The Judicial Branch
The Supreme Court The Judicial Branch Judicial Branch Interprets the laws! What does that mean? Courts Apply the law to specific cases/situations Decisions: What does the law mean? Is it constitutional
More informationCopyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman
Chapter 16: The Federal Courts The Nature of the Judicial System The Structure of the Federal Judicial System The Politics of Judicial Selection The Backgrounds of Judges and Justices The Courts as Policymakers
More informationChapter 14: The Judiciary Multiple Choice
Multiple Choice 1. In the context of Supreme Court conferences, which of the following statements is true of a dissenting opinion? a. It can be written by one or more justices. b. It refers to the opinion
More informationSocial Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS
Social Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED A. The First Amendment protects five basic freedoms for all Americans. RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED
More informationChapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART. Section 2.1 A Dual Court System
Chapter 2 SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Section 2.1 Chapter 2 A Dual The Court Court System System Section 2.1 Section 2.2 Trial Procedures Why It s Important Learning the structure of
More informationWarm Up: Review Activity Declare your Powers
Mr. Cegielski S E C T I O N 1 The National Judiciary ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS: Why did the Constitution create a national judiciary? What is the structure of the national judiciary? What criteria are used to
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2012 NO AGAINST
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2012 NO. 1-001 MARY BERGHUIS, WARDEN, Petitioner, AGAINST VAN CHESTER THOMPKINS, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationCHAPTER 3. Court Systems. 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution 3-2 The Federal Court System 3-3 State Court Systems
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution 3-2 The Federal Court System 3-3 State Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution GOALS Explain how disputes can be settled without going to court
More information1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER
1 December 11-14, 2014 OMNIBUS FINAL TOPLINE N=1,001 PEW.1 As I read a list of some stories covered by news organizations this past week, please tell me if you happened to follow each news story very,
More informationSTATE STANDARDS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2016
STATE STANDARDS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2016 INTRODUCTION This memo was prepared by the ABA Death Penalty Representation Project. It contains counsel appointment
More informationCourts, Judges, and the Law
CHAPTER 13 Courts, Judges, and the Law CHAPTER OUTLINE I. The Origins and Types of American Law II. The Structure of the Court Systems III. The Federal and State Court Systems A. Lower Courts B. The Supreme
More informationThe U.S. Legal System
Overview Overview The U.S. Legal System 2012 IP Summer Seminar Katie Guarino kguarino@edwardswildman.com July 2012 2011 Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP & Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP Cameras in the Courtroom:
More informationU.S. Government. The Constitution of the United States. Tuesday, September 23, 14
U.S. Government The Constitution of the United States Background The Constitution of the United States was created during the Spring and Summer of 1787. The Framers(the people who attended the convention)
More informationIntroduction to US business law III. US Court System / Jurisdiction
Introduction to US business law III. US Court System / Jurisdiction FS 2018 Prof. Dr. Andreas Kellerhals Overview I. Repetition - Last week II. What left from previous session III. US Court System IV.
More informationPLS 103 Lecture 3 1. Today we talk about the Missouri legislature. What we re doing in this section we
PLS 103 Lecture 3 1 Today we talk about the Missouri legislature. What we re doing in this section we finished the Constitution and now we re gonna talk about the three main branches of government today,
More informationAmerican Government Chapter 18 Notes The Federal Court System
American Government Chapter 18 Notes The Federal Court System Section 1 a. The National Judiciary B. Creation of a National Judiciary a. Framers of Constitution created a national judiciary b. A Dual Court
More informationWe the People: The Role of the Citizen in the United States
We the People: The Role of the Citizen in the United States In the United States, the government gets its power to govern from the people. We have a government of the people, by the people, and for the
More informationJudicial Branch 11/11 11/14
Judicial Branch { 11/11 11/14 What Supreme Court case desegregated American schools by striking down the separate, but equal doctrine? Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Warmup Warmup Supreme Court PPT
More informationUnit 4 Assessment Amending the Constitution
Unit 4 Assessment Amending the Constitution 1. Which 1 st Amendment right does the freedom to gather and associate imply? a. speech b. assembly c. religion d. the press 2. The Fourth Amendment prevents
More informationRemarks: Liberty Panel
Remarks: Liberty Panel Jeffrey Fisher * It s a wonderful privilege to be here today, and to spend a day thinking about Justice Stevens and honoring his work. As a law clerk for the Justice during the October
More informationChapter 11 and 12 - The Federal Court System
Chapter 11 and 12 - The Federal Court System SSCG16 The student will demonstrate knowledge of the operation of the federal judiciary. Powers of the Federal Courts Federal courts are generally created by
More informationVA & US Government Exam Review: 2 nd Semester
Name: VA & US Government Exam Review: 2 nd Semester Bureaucracy 1. What is a bureaucracy? Large, highly organized group that carries out the work of the federal government 2. To which branch of American
More informationREPORTING CATEGORY 2: ROLES, RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENS
REPORTING CATEGORY 2: ROLES, RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENS SS.7.C.2.1: Define the term "citizen," and identify legal means of becoming a United States citizen. Citizen: a native or naturalized
More information9.1 Introduction When the delegates left Independence Hall in September 1787, they each carried a copy of the Constitution. Their task now was to
9.1 Introduction When the delegates left Independence Hall in September 1787, they each carried a copy of the Constitution. Their task now was to convince their states to approve the document that they
More informationThe Courts CHAPTER. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 7E by Frank Schmalleger
CHAPTER 7 The Courts 1 America s Dual Court System The United States has courts on both the federal and state levels. This dual system reflects the state s need to retain judicial autonomy separate from
More informationSS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III
SS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III ****At the end of this lesson, I will be able to do the following: recognize the structure of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. compare
More informationThe Judicial Branch INTRODUCTION TO THE FEDERAL COURTS
The Judicial Branch INTRODUCTION TO THE FEDERAL COURTS I. Types of law. A. Statutory: deals w/written statutes (laws). B. Common. 1. Based upon a system of unwritten law. 2. Unwritten laws are based upon
More informationThe Federalist Papers
The Federalist Papers If men were angels, no government would be necessary. James Madison During the Revolutionary War, Americans set up a new national government. They feared a strong central government.
More informationWhat exactly does it say? What is the law designed to do? What is the purpose (or intent) of the law?
American Law You Be The Judge a. b. c. What exactly does it say? What is the law designed to do? What is the purpose (or intent) of the law? Need to keep in mind the LETTER and the SPIRIT (intent) of
More informationIs Silence Still Golden? The Implications of Berghuis v. Thompkins on the Right to Remain Silent
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Law Reviews 3-1-2011 Is Silence Still Golden? The
More informationCh. 20. Due Process of Law. The Meaning of Due Process 1/23/2015. Due Process & Rights of the Accused
Ch. 20 Due Process & Rights of the Accused Due Process of Law How is the meaning of due process of law set out in the 5th and 14th amendments? What is police power and how does it relate to civil rights?
More informationSPOTLIGHT. The Supreme Court 1
SPOTLIGHT The Supreme Court 1 WWW.KIDSDISCOVER.COM 1 2 3 With their serious black robes, the Supreme Court may look stern and even dull to some, but it is full of high drama. Some of the most historic
More informationSupreme Court Rules On GPS Trackers: Is It 1984 Yet? Legal Question of the Week Vol. 5, Number 2 January 27, 2012
Supreme Court Rules On GPS Trackers: Is It 1984 Yet? Legal Question of the Week Vol. 5, Number 2 January 27, 2012 Brian Beasley Guy With Two Big Brothers and Legal Adviser, HPPD It was 1949 when George
More informationYOU BE THE JUDGE 2 HANDOUT C SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2
HANDOUT C YOU BE THE JUDGE 2 Directions: Read and discuss your assigned scenario below. Along with your group members, refer to Handout A: The United States Bill of Rights to identify which protection(s)
More informationUnit 7 Our Current Government
Unit 7 Our Current Government Name Date Period Learning Targets (What I need to know): I can describe the Constitutional Convention and two compromises that took place there. I can describe the structure
More informationMEMORANDUM. June 26, From: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and SCOTUSblog.com Re: End of Term Statistical Analysis October Term 2007
MEMORANDUM From: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and SCOTUSblog.com Re: End of Term Statistical Analysis October Term 2007 This memo presents the firm s annual summary of relevant statistics for the
More informationThe politics of hope and the politics of selfie. Written by MANUEL L. CABALLERO Saturday, 13 February :06
President Barack Obama delivers his speech this week at the Illinois State Capitol in Springfield. Abraham Lincoln delivered his famous House Divided speech in the same building in 1858. (TV screengrab)
More informationA. The US has two wholly separate judicial systems one federal and one state, reflecting the dual sovereignty of the United States.
Berlin Speech US Supreme Court Jurisdiction I. [Slide] [Introduction] A. Thank you. Pleasure and privilege. Professor Calliess asked if I would talk about the US Supreme Court and its jurisdiction, with
More information***JURISDICTION: A court s power to rule on a case. There are two primary systems of courts in the U.S.:
THE FEDERAL COURTS ***JURISDICTION: A court s power to rule on a case. There are two primary systems of courts in the U.S.: STATE COURTS Jurisdiction over ordinances (locals laws) and state laws (laws
More informationReading Essentials and Study Guide
Lesson 1 Sources of Presidential Power ESSENTIAL QUESTION What are the powers and roles of the president and how have they changed over time? Reading HELPDESK Academic Vocabulary contemporary happening,
More informationGrades 2-7. American Government and the Election Process Unit Study SAMPLE PAGE. A Journey Through Learning
A J T L Grades 2-7 American Government and the Election Process Unit Study A Journey Through Learning www.ajourneythroughlearning.com Copyright 2008 A Journey Through Learning 1 Authors: Paula Winget and
More informationPEW RESEARCH CENTER June 27-30, 2013 OMNIBUS FINAL TOPLINE N=1,003
8 PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 27-30, OMNIBUS FINAL TOPLINE N=1,003 PEW.1 As I read a list of some stories covered by news organizations this past week, please tell me if you happened to follow each news story
More informationTRANSCRIPT Protecting Our Judiciary: What Judges Do and Why it Matters
TRANSCRIPT Protecting Our Judiciary: What Judges Do and Why it Matters Slide 1 Thank you for joining us for Protecting Our Judiciary: What Judges Do and Why it Matters. Protecting fair, impartial courts
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 ALITO, J., concurring SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JOSHUA JOHN HESTER, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No.
More informationAn interview with Paul Turner
From the Editor By Jeffrey Isaac Ehrlich Editor-in-Chief Paul Turner is the presiding justice of Division 5 of the California Court of Appeal. He was appointed to the California Municipal Court in 1983
More informationLet s face it. Judicial elections are weird. Or used to be. If you ve. ever attended a candidates night, here s what used to happen.
Legally Speaking Judicial Elections final version 2010 Marianna Brown Bettman All Rights Reserved Judicial Elections Let s face it. Judicial elections are weird. Or used to be. If you ve ever attended
More information