The Federal Judiciary

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "The Federal Judiciary"

Transcription

1 The Federal Judiciary Speaker: Rue Wood Thomas Paine, the author of the Revolutionary War era pamphlet, Common Sense, wrote that in America, the law will be King. He was making an argument for breaking away from Britain and monarchy. In America, there would be no kings or aristocracy, and it would be the law that would rule. Boy, was Paine a visionary on this one! The new nation WAS and still IS guided by the rule of law. Americans have great regard for the law; in fact, we re the most litigious society in the world. Every year, at least 1 million legal actions are filed in the federal courts, and about 30 million are filed in state courts. There are a couple of good historical reasons why Americans have such a high regard for the law. First, we re a nation of immigrants from different cultures, backgrounds, and traditions. A unified law has always been a peaceful means of settling disputes. Second, and ironically, our nation was born in revolution. Some would point out that the American Revolution, from the British perspective, was illegal and even treasonous. But the revolutionaries were rebelling against a system they viewed as sometimes arbitrary and repressive. To them, the revolution was civil disobedience in response to a higher calling the true rule of law and equal justice for all. It s for this reason that when studying American Government, I like to begin with the law-interpreting branch, the judiciary. Of the three branches of government, it s the one most Americans are least familiar with. It s the single branch that citizens don t elect, yet depends on to protect their rights. In this lecture we ll accomplish the following: First, we ll look at the two-tiered court system in the U.S., differentiate between types of courts, and define a few terms; Second, we ll view the three-level structure of the federal court system; Third, we ll examine the structure and ideological makeup of the Supreme Court and take a closer look at the high court s day-to-day operations Let s begin with the two-tiered court system in the U.S. The bulk of legal actions in the U.S. are dealt with in state courts. As I mentioned earlier, the state courts handle about thirty times more cases that do the federal courts. Both state courts and federal courts hear two categories of cases criminal and civil cases. A criminal case is one in which a person is charged with breaking a state or national law, where the punishment might be a fine, imprisonment, or death. A civil case is a dispute between two parties where the penalty for the losing party is monetary compensation or fines, not imprisonment or death. A higher standard of evidence is required in a criminal case. The same event might be tried as both a criminal and a civil case. For example, the former football star, O.J. Simpson, was put on trial in 1995 in criminal court for the murder of his ex-wife, Nicole, and her friend Ron Goldman. Simpson was found not guilty in the criminal trial. He then appeared in civil court on a wrongful death charge and was found guilty in the case of Ron Goldman, and assessed millions of dollars in damages to the Goldman family. Page 1 of 6

2 The Simpson cases took place in the state courts of California. But when is a case heard in federal court? This is the question of jurisdiction and when jurisdiction comes into play. Jurisdiction is the ability and right of a court to hear and decide a case. As far as criminal cases go, the federal courts have jurisdiction in any case that breaks a federal law; in other words, one passed by Congress. Some examples of this might be drug dealing across state lines, interstate auto theft, killing a federal official, counterfeiting of money, burglary of a federal installation, or killing an animal on the federally protected endangered species list. About one quarter of federal criminal cases are drug-related cases. Federal civil cases deal with lawsuits concerning U.S. treaties, acts of Congress, or violation of one s Constitutional rights. The federal courts hear lawsuits involving parties from two or more different states, if the amount in question exceeds a stated level right now, it s $75,000. The federal courts also deal with all bankruptcy, patent, copyright, and maritime cases. The reality isn t very glamorous. Well over two-thirds of all cases filed in federal court are bankruptcy cases. A person CAN be put on trial in both a state and federal court for the same violation. For example, in 1992 several Los Angeles Police Department officers were charged with using excessive force in the beating of Rodney King, an African American man they pursued on a high-speed chase. The jury found the officers not guilty in a California state court. The case then went to federal court, where two of the officers were convicted of violating King s civil rights and given 30-month sentences in a federal corrections facility. This is a course on American national government. So now that we ve differentiated between the state and federal court systems, let s more carefully look at just the federal courts. The first thing to remember is that there are three levels within the federal court system: District Courts Appeals Courts U.S. Supreme Court In total, there are at present 94 federal district courts. Each state has at least one district court; more populous states might have several. For instance, Iowa has two federal district courts. The one for the northern part of the state is located in Cedar Rapids; the district court for the southern part of the state is located in Des Moines. New York, Texas, and California each have four federal district courts. Each district court has a U.S. attorney which represents the United States, much as district attorney represents the state in state courts. The federal district courts have original jurisdiction. That means federal cases start in these courts; they re the ones within the federal court system where normal trial procedure applies. Attorneys examine witnesses and juries render verdicts. In criminal cases on the federal level, twelve persons make up the jury; in civil cases the jury is six individuals. The Appeals Courts and Supreme Court aren t trial courts, but instead, are appellate courts. About one in six cases heard in district courts are sent to the next level on appeal. Here, there are no trials or juries. Instead, a three-member panel of judges reviews the records from the district court to see if there was a Page 2 of 6

3 legal mistake in the way the case was handled. They can either uphold or strike down the lower court ruling by majority rule, meaning at least 2 of the three judges agreeing. The United States is broken up into 11 circuits for the Courts of Appeal plus an additional court for Washington D.C. and a Federal Circuit which hears mainly patent appeals and veterans claims. The final court of appeal in the federal judiciary is the U.S. Supreme Court. About 8000 cases a year are appealed to the Supreme Court, but the Court chooses which of the cases it will hear and which it won t. Each year, the High Court selects about 80 cases to hear only one in one hundred sent to them. Cases come from two places from the lower federal appeals courts, and from state supreme courts. If the U.S. Supreme Court decides to hear a case, it issues a writ of certiorari, which is an order to the lower court to send up its records in the case. The Supreme Court then examines how the case was argued and decided in the lower courts. It s important to remember that the Supreme Court is almost entirely a court of appeals, an appellate court. It hears very few cases on original jurisdiction. The only type of case that must go straight to the Supreme Court is a case between two or more states. This is known as exclusive jurisdiction. For example, a change in course of the Sabine River, which forms the border between Texas and Louisiana, caused a dispute between those two states. In 1976, the case went straight to the Supreme Court and the High Court settled the boundary issue. And, by the way, the Supreme Court settled a similar dispute way back in 1898 between Iowa and Illinois concerning their border, the Mississippi River. At that time, steamboats were plying the river, and both states wanted to know their exact boundary so they could tax the steamboats. Taxes, taxes, taxes some things never change over time! Back to our discussion of cases that can go before the High Court... The only other cases that may go straight to the Supreme Court are those involving foreign ambassadors or consuls and cases where a state is a party. This is known as original jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has the right to hear the case first, but may allow lower federal courts to hear it, instead. Today, the High Court tends not to hear these cases in their original jurisdiction, so they re filed in lower federal courts. So every term, the Supreme Court hears case after case that has made its way through the lower courts. Let s turn now to the daily operation of the Supreme Court. The High Court is one of the most traditionbound institutions in our government. By law, the term of the Court begins the first Monday in October. There s no set date for the end of the term, but it usually runs through June or into July. During the term, the Court alternates between two-week long sittings and recesses. During sittings, they hear cases and issue opinions; during the recesses they write opinions and take care of court business. So what happens when the High Court is sitting? The Court only hears cases on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays from 10am to 3pm, with an hour lunch break. The justices sit side-by-side at the front of the courtroom. The Chief Justice sits in the middle. To his right sits the longest-serving member of the court, and to his left the second longest serving member. The remaining justices alternate right and left based on this same seniority. Each side in the case gets exactly 30 minutes for presenting their case to the Court; this is known as oral argument. The justices are already very familiar with the case, having Page 3 of 6

4 reviewed the lower court records and the written arguments from each side. At any time during oral argument, a justice can interrupt with questions for the attorney. Talk about nerve-wracking! An attorney prepares his or her 30-minute argument flawlessly, but may never get to deliver the entire presentation due to questions from the bench. After the 30 minutes have lapsed, a light on the attorney s lectern indicates time is up. There are no juries or witnesses present. The attorney who represents the United States in cases where the U.S. is a party is called the Solicitor General. By tradition, the Solicitor General wears a formal morning jacket when arguing before the Supreme Court. Elena Kagan was the first woman to serve as U.S. Solicitor General, and she chose not to stick to this tradition. Kagan left her post in 2010 when she was appointed to the Supreme Court itself by President Obama. Thursdays are a workday for the justices, and on Fridays they meet in conference to discuss the cases heard that week in oral argument. Tradition dictates that all justices shake hands with each of the other justices at the beginning of conference. No records are kept of conferences and clerks aren t allowed in the room. No one but the justices know what they discuss. The Chief Justice presides and asks each of the other justices, in order of seniority, to offer his or her opinions in the case. It s Congress that decides how many justices make up the Supreme Court. Since 1869, Congress has set the number at nine. Following the Constitution, all Supreme Court justices and federal judges are appointed by the sitting President with confirmation by the Senate; they serve for life or until they choose to retire. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is not necessarily the longest-serving member. When a Chief Justice dies or retires, the current President may appoint whomever he wishes as the new Chief. The current Chief Justice, John Roberts, was not even serving on the Supreme Court when he was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2005 to replace Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who died earlier that year. During conference, the Chief Justice assigns the writing of opinions in the cases the Court has heard. It takes a majority of those justices voting to decide a case. For instance, a case may be decided by 7-2 or even 5-4. Not all justices have to vote. Sometimes a justice recuses himself from a case because he or she feels personal ties to the case compromise his or her objectivity. For example, the newest member of the court, Elena Kagan, recused herself during the term from several cases, because she had worked on the cases while serving as Solicitor General. She felt there was a conflict of interest because before 2010 she was an attorney working on cases that were now before the very court that she sits on as a Justice. In any case (no pun intended) it takes at least six voting justices to render a decision. A tie vote means the lower court ruling is upheld. Once a case is decided by majority vote, the Chief Justice assigns the writing of the opinions in the case. An opinion is the written legal argument setting down the legal reasons why the court ruled the way it did. One of the justices voting with the majority is appointed to write the majority opinion. A justice voting with the minority, in other words, the losing side, is assigned the dissenting opinion. The dissenting opinion, naturally, sets out legal arguments against the majority. If a justice agrees with the majority, but for differing legal reasons, he or she might write a concurring opinion. Page 4 of 6

5 One of the most fascinating parts of studying the Supreme Court is its ideological composition. Justices, of course, follow legal precedent and the law. But as we saw in our last lecture, they often view and interpret the Constitution and law through different lenses. Conservative justices, like Thomas, Scalia, Roberts, and Alito tend to vote together. So do liberal justices like Ginsburg and Breyer. The newest members of the Court, Sotomayor and Kagan, have yet to establish their Supreme Court legacy, but their past records in other positions and courts show them to be quite liberal judges. Justice Kennedy is known as the swing vote on the court. Although considered a conservative, he sometimes votes with the liberal judges. Overall, today the U.S. has a conservative court counterbalanced by a large liberal minority. All five conservative justices were appointed by Republican presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush, while the four liberal justices were appointed by the Democrats, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Obviously, appointment of a Supreme Court justice has longterm, significant consequences for the entire nation, since the High Court interprets laws and the Constitution. So what do we mean by conservative and liberal judges? Once again, labeling is not easy or entirely accurate, but in general, conservative judges favor a strict interpretation of the Constitution. In rulings, they are usually pro-business (especially big business), protect gun-owners rights, are anti-abortion and not strong supporters of affirmative action. They tend to be strong law-and-order advocates, and often vote against defendants in criminal procedure cases. Liberal judges, on the other hand, tend to uphold affirmative action programs and abortion rights. They often uphold regulations limiting business and vote in favor of defendants in criminal procedure cases. Let s take a recent example. In 2010, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, upheld the rights of corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts of money on political ads during campaigns. The High Court viewed the spending as form of speech protected by the First Amendment. The five justices voting in the majority were Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Scalia, and Kennedy, with Kennedy writing the majority opinion. Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Breyer, and Stevens dissented, and Justice Stevens wrote the dissenting opinion. (Elena Kagan replaced Justice Stevens later in the year when he retired.) The vote clearly reflected the ideological division between conservatives and liberals on the Court. President Obama and many Democrats spoke out loudly against the ruling, saying it gave even more power in politics to big business and special interests while diminishing the role of individual citizens. As usual, the case has more complexity to it than we can go into here. Look up the case online, if you d like it s United Citizens v. Federal Election Commission. Finally, let s briefly trace an actual case through the U.S. court system. The case I ve selected is Berghuis v. Thompkins, heard by the Supreme Court in It s a Fifth Amendment case that came from the state of Michigan. The Fifth Amendment protects a person from testifying against himself in court; in other words, it protects our right to remain silent when charged with a crime. The famous 1966 Supreme Court case, Miranda v. Arizona established the precedent for the reading of rights to people detained by law enforcement. We re all pretty familiar with this from television and movies (but hopefully not personal experience!) Police read Mr. Thompkins his Miranda rights before questioning him as a suspect in a fatal shooting that occurred in Thompkins remained silent during the entire Page 5 of 6

6 three-hour interrogation, but he never said he wanted to invoke his right to remain silent. Nor did he say he wanted an attorney. At the end of the three hours, the exasperated police asked Thompkins if he believed in God and if he prayed to God to forgive him for the shooting. Thompkins answered yes to the questions. This was used against him in his trial, where he was found guilty of murder in a Michigan state court and sentenced to life in prison. Thompkins attorney made a motion to suppress the statements, saying that his client never waived his Miranda rights, his right to remain silent under the Fifth Amendment. Thompkins appealed to the Michigan Supreme Court, which rejected his appeal. Since this was more than a murder case and had to do with a Constitutional issue the Fifth Amendment Thompkins filed his case in federal district court in Michigan. The district court refused to review his case, so he appealed to the federal appeals court. Michigan is in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, which encompasses Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan, and Tennessee, and is located in Cincinnati, Ohio. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court s ruling, saying the Michigan state court was in the wrong when it implied that Thompkins had waived his right to remain silent. The state of Michigan then appealed the Sixth Circuit Court s ruling in favor of Thompkins to the U.S. Supreme Court. So how did the High Court rule in Mr. Thompkins case? It was close, but not surprising in a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court reversed the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals and upheld Thompkins conviction. The court basically said that just staying silent doesn t mean you re invoking your right to remain silent. An accused person has to actually state they want to remain silent and end the police interview. Those voting in the majority were Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Kennedy, who wrote the opinion. Justices Ginsburg, Stevens, Breyer, and Sotomayor voted the other way, and Sotomayor wrote the dissenting opinion in fact, it was her first time to write a dissenting opinion since she arrived on the Court. Hopefully, after this lecture, you understand a bit more about our least visible branch of government, the judicial branch. In the United States, we have a two-tiered system of law the state and federal courts. Federal courts deal with specific issues spelled out in the Constitution; most of these are federal laws and disputes about personal rights guaranteed under the Constitution. The federal court system has three levels, and cases rarely make their way to the Supreme Court, since the High Court hears a select number of cases each year on appeal and most cases can be handled by the lower courts. I urge you to keep up with important federal court rulings and rulings of the Supreme Court. The justices preserve our rights as citizens and individuals an important function in a vibrant democracy. I look forward to speaking with you again in our next lecture on the peoples directly elected representatives, the U.S. Congress. Rue Wood and Indian Hills Community College Page 6 of 6

The Judicial Branch. CP Political Systems

The Judicial Branch. CP Political Systems The Judicial Branch CP Political Systems Standards Content Standard 4: The student will examine the United States Constitution by comparing the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government

More information

THE JUDICIAL BRANCH. Article III. The Role of the Federal Court

THE JUDICIAL BRANCH. Article III. The Role of the Federal Court THE JUDICIAL BRANCH Section I Courts, Term of Office Section II Jurisdiction o Scope of Judicial Power o Supreme Court o Trial by Jury Section III Treason o Definition Punishment Article III The Role of

More information

U.S. Court System. The U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington D. C. Diagram of the U.S. Court System

U.S. Court System. The U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington D. C. Diagram of the U.S. Court System http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/court.html Page 1 of 5 10/10/011 U.S. Court System The U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington D. C. Diagram of the U.S. Court System U.S. Supreme Court Federal

More information

AP Gov Chapter 15 Outline

AP Gov Chapter 15 Outline Law in the United States is based primarily on the English legal system because of our colonial heritage. Once the colonies became independent from England, they did not establish a new legal system. With

More information

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and THE JUDICIARY BRANCH

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and THE JUDICIARY BRANCH Elana Kagan (Obama) Samuel Alito (G.W. Bush) Sonia Sotomayor (Obama) Neil Gorsuch (Trump) Ruth Bader Ginsberg (Clinton) Unit Four- BB Anthony Kennedy (Reagan) Chief Justice John Roberts (G.W. Bush) Clarence

More information

AP Government Chapter 15 Reading Guide: The Judiciary

AP Government Chapter 15 Reading Guide: The Judiciary AP Government Chapter 15 Reading Guide: The Judiciary 1. According to Federalist 78, what s Hamilton s argument for why the SCOTUS is the weakest of the branches? Do you agree? 2. So the court has the

More information

Topic 7 The Judicial Branch. Section One The National Judiciary

Topic 7 The Judicial Branch. Section One The National Judiciary Topic 7 The Judicial Branch Section One The National Judiciary Under the Articles of Confederation Under the Articles of Confederation, there was no national judiciary. All courts were State courts Under

More information

CHAPTER 9. The Judiciary

CHAPTER 9. The Judiciary CHAPTER 9 The Judiciary The Nature of the Judicial System Introduction: Two types of cases: Criminal Law: The government charges an individual with violating one or more specific laws. Civil Law: The court

More information

Ch.9: The Judicial Branch

Ch.9: The Judicial Branch Ch.9: The Judicial Branch Learning Goal Students will be able to analyze the structure, function, and processes of the judicial branch as established in Article III of the Constitution; the judicial branches

More information

THE JUDICIAL BRANCH: THE FEDERAL COURTS

THE JUDICIAL BRANCH: THE FEDERAL COURTS THE JUDICIAL BRANCH: THE FEDERAL COURTS DUAL COURT SYSTEM There are really two court systems in the United States National judiciary that extends over all 50 States Court systems found in each State (most

More information

INTRO TO POLI SCI 11/30/15

INTRO TO POLI SCI 11/30/15 INTRO TO POLI SCI 11/30/15 Objective: SWBAT describe the type of court system in the US and how the Supreme Court works. Agenda: Turn in Late Work Judicial Branch Notes When your friend asks to borrow

More information

United States Judicial Branch

United States Judicial Branch United States Judicial Branch Role of the Courts Resolving disputes Setting precedents Interpreting the law Strict or loose constructionists Jurisdiction -right to try and decide a case. Exclusive jurisdiction

More information

3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT

3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT 3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT EXECUTIVE BRANCH President, Vice President, Cabinet QUALIFICATIONS Written Qualifications 35 years old Lived in country for 14 years Natural-born citizen Unwritten Qualifications

More information

The Judiciary AP Government Spring 2016

The Judiciary AP Government Spring 2016 The Judiciary AP Government Spring 2016 [T]hough individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter;

More information

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and THE JUDICIARY BRANCH

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and THE JUDICIARY BRANCH Elana Kagan (Obama) Samuel Alito (G.W. Bush) Sonia Sotomayor (Obama) Neil Gorsuch (Trump) Ruth Bader Ginsberg (Clinton) Unit Four- BA Anthony Kennedy (Reagan) Chief Justice John Roberts (G.W. Bush) Clarence

More information

Government Guided Notes Unit Five Day #3 The Judicial Branch Supreme Court Processes & Justices. Latin Terms to Know. writ of certiorari Affidavit

Government Guided Notes Unit Five Day #3 The Judicial Branch Supreme Court Processes & Justices. Latin Terms to Know. writ of certiorari Affidavit Name: Date: Block # Government Guided Notes Unit Five Day #3 The Judicial Branch Supreme Court Processes & Justices Directions Listen and view today s PowerPoint lesson. As you view each slide, write in

More information

Unit V: Institutions The Federal Courts

Unit V: Institutions The Federal Courts Unit V: Institutions The Federal Courts Introduction to Federal Courts Categories of law Statutory law Laws created by legislation; statutes Common law Accumulation of court precedents Criminal law Government

More information

Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1

Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1 Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1 Origins of the Judiciary The Constitution created the Supreme Court. Article III gives Congress the power to create the rest of the federal court system,

More information

Understanding the U.S. Supreme Court

Understanding the U.S. Supreme Court Understanding the U.S. Supreme Court Processing Supreme Court Cases Supreme Court Decision Making The Role of Law and Legal Principles Supreme Court Decision Making The Role of Politics Conducting Research

More information

CHAPTER 18:3 Supreme Court

CHAPTER 18:3 Supreme Court CHAPTER 18:3 Supreme Court Chapter 18:3 o We will examine the reasons why the Supreme Court is often called the higher court. o We will examine why judicial review is a key feature in the American System

More information

Unit 4C STUDY GUIDE. The Judiciary. Use the Constitution to answer questions #1-9. Unless noted, all questions are based on Article III.

Unit 4C STUDY GUIDE. The Judiciary. Use the Constitution to answer questions #1-9. Unless noted, all questions are based on Article III. Unit 4C STUDY GUIDE The Judiciary Use the Constitution to answer questions #1-9. Unless noted, all questions are based on Article III. 1. What power is vested in the courts? 2. The shall extend to all

More information

The Judicial Branch. Three Levels of Courts in the U.S.

The Judicial Branch. Three Levels of Courts in the U.S. The Judicial Branch Three Levels of Courts in the U.S. The Motto Written on the front of the Supreme Court is the motto, Equal Justice Under Law What do courts do? Use different kinds of law to settle

More information

Terms to Know. In the first column, answer the questions based on what you know before you study. After this lesson, complete the last column.

Terms to Know. In the first column, answer the questions based on what you know before you study. After this lesson, complete the last column. Lesson 1: Federal Courts ESSENTIAL QUESTION How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly? GUIDING QUESTIONS 1. What is the role of the federal courts? 2. What kinds of cases are heard in federal

More information

Chapter 8 - Judiciary. AP Government

Chapter 8 - Judiciary. AP Government Chapter 8 - Judiciary AP Government The Structure of the Judiciary A complex set of institutional courts and regular processes has been established to handle laws in the American system of government.

More information

America s Federal Court System

America s Federal Court System America s Federal Court System How do we best balance the government s need to protect the security of the nation while guaranteeing the individuals personal liberties? I.) Judges vs. Legislators I.) Judges

More information

LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying Chapter 16, you should be able to: 1. Understand the nature of the judicial system. 2. Explain how courts in the United States are organized and the nature of their jurisdiction.

More information

4.16: Intro to Federal Judiciary AP U. S. GOVERNMENT

4.16: Intro to Federal Judiciary AP U. S. GOVERNMENT 4.16: Intro to Federal Judiciary AP U. S. GOVERNMENT The Judicial Branch The judicial branch of the federal government consists of all federal courts. Article III of the Constitution established the U.S.

More information

Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives. Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives. Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives

Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives. Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives. Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives Chapter 16: The Federal Courts The Nature of the Judicial The Politics of Judicial Selection The Backgrounds of Judges and Justices The Courts as Policymakers The Courts and Public Policy: An Understanding

More information

AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. Chapter 14: The Judiciary

AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. Chapter 14: The Judiciary AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT Unit Five Part 2 The Judiciary 2 1 Chapter 14: The Judiciary The Federal Court System The Politics of Appointing Judges How the Supreme Court Makes Decisions Judicial Power and Its

More information

Chapter 10: The Judiciary

Chapter 10: The Judiciary Chapter 10: The Judiciary Constitution and Creation of the Federal Judiciary Read Article III and answer: Discuss justices/judges: terms, appointments, remuneration What powers and jurisdiction does the

More information

Lesson: The Manner in which a Democratic Society Resolves Disputes

Lesson: The Manner in which a Democratic Society Resolves Disputes Courts in the Community Colorado Judicial Branch Office of the State Court Administrator Updated December 2018 Lesson: The Manner in which a Democratic Society Resolves Disputes Objective: Provide students

More information

Ch Identify the basic elements of the American judicial system and the major participants in it (p.486)

Ch Identify the basic elements of the American judicial system and the major participants in it (p.486) Ch. 15.1 Identify the basic elements of the American judicial system and the major participants in it (p.486) Unit 5 The Federal Courts 1 Current Supreme Court C 83 L 79 L? C C C 80 C L Merrick Neil Gorsuch?

More information

The Federal Courts. Chapter 16

The Federal Courts. Chapter 16 The Federal Courts Chapter 16 3 HISTORICAL ERAS OF INFLUENCE 1787-1865 Political Nation building (legitimacy of govt.) Slavery 1865-1937 Economic Govt. roll in economy Great Depression 1937-Present Ideological

More information

Supreme Court Watch: Recent Decisions And Upcoming CriminalCases For The Docket

Supreme Court Watch: Recent Decisions And Upcoming CriminalCases For The Docket American University Criminal Law Brief Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 8 Supreme Court Watch: Recent Decisions And Upcoming CriminalCases For The 2006-2007 Docket Andrew Myerberg Recommended Citation Myerberg,

More information

Creation. Article III. Dual Courts. Supreme Court Congress may create inferior courts. Federal State

Creation. Article III. Dual Courts. Supreme Court Congress may create inferior courts. Federal State The Federal Courts Creation Article III Supreme Court Congress may create inferior courts Dual Courts Federal State Federal Courts Underneath Supreme Court Two Types Constitutional exercise judicial power

More information

INTRODUCTION THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

INTRODUCTION THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Trace the historical evolution of the policy agenda of the Supreme Court. Examine the ways in which American courts are both democratic and undemocratic institutions. CHAPTER OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION Although

More information

Jurisdiction. Appointed by the President with the Advice and Consent of the Senate according to Article II, Section 2

Jurisdiction. Appointed by the President with the Advice and Consent of the Senate according to Article II, Section 2 The Judicial Branch Jurisdiction Federal Courts Article III, Section 1 vests judicial power in the Supreme Court and other inferior courts created by Congress Judges serve during good Behavior Appointed

More information

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA PRO SE MANUAL Introduction This pamphlet is intended primarily to assist non-attorneys with the basic procedural steps which must be followed when filing

More information

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday. Good to Know Vocabulary 26. Chapter Executive Notes 30. Presidential Survey Activity 30

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday. Good to Know Vocabulary 26. Chapter Executive Notes 30. Presidential Survey Activity 30 Name: Period: Week: 14 16 Dates: 11/16 12/1 Unit: The Executive & Judicial Branch Chapters 13 15 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 16 O Flex Day Finish Iron Jawed Angels 17 E 18 O *Executive Branch

More information

Fall, Court Systems 9/4/17. The Parties. Becoming a Federal Judge. Senate Judiciary Committee 60 votes for Closure (?) Senate Advise and Consent

Fall, Court Systems 9/4/17. The Parties. Becoming a Federal Judge. Senate Judiciary Committee 60 votes for Closure (?) Senate Advise and Consent Fall, 2017 20 E1 17 Court Systems The Parties Plaintiff Defendant Petitioner Respondent Appellant Respondent Becoming a Federal Judge President Nominates Senate Advise and Consent Senate Judiciary Committee

More information

SCOTUS Death Penalty Review. Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center

SCOTUS Death Penalty Review. Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center SCOTUS Death Penalty Review Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center lsoronen@sso.org Modern Death Penalty Jurisprudence 1970s SCOTUS tells the states they must limit arbitrariness in who gets the death

More information

laws created by legislative bodies.

laws created by legislative bodies. THE AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT STUDY GUIDE CLASSIFICATION OF LEGAL ISSUES TYPE OF CASE CIVIL CASES CRIMINAL CASES covers issues of claims, suits, contracts, and licenses. covers illegal actions or wrongful

More information

a. Exceptions: Australia, Canada, Germany, India, and a few others B. Debate is over how the Constitution should be interpreted

a. Exceptions: Australia, Canada, Germany, India, and a few others B. Debate is over how the Constitution should be interpreted I. The American Judicial System A. Only in the United States do judges play so large a role in policy-making - The policy-making potential of the federal judiciary is enormous. Woodrow Wilson once described

More information

The Judicial System (cont d)

The Judicial System (cont d) The Judicial System (cont d) Alexander Hamilton in Federalist #78: Executive: Holds the sword of the community as commander-in-chief. Congress appropriates money ( commands the purse ) and decides the

More information

Separation of powers and the democratic process

Separation of powers and the democratic process AMERICAN GOVERNMENT Separation of powers and the democratic process Americans regularly exercise their democratic rights by voting and by participating in political parties and election campaigns. The

More information

The Federalist, No. 78

The Federalist, No. 78 The Judicial Branch January 2015 [T]he judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of the other two; and that all possible

More information

Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch

Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch US Government Week of January 22, 2018 [T]he judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of

More information

Chapter 13: The Judiciary

Chapter 13: The Judiciary Learning Objectives «Understand the Role of the Judiciary in US Government and Significant Court Cases Chapter 13: The Judiciary «Apply the Principle of Judicial Review «Contrast the Doctrine of Judicial

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2004 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes

More information

The Federal Judiciary (HAA)

The Federal Judiciary (HAA) The Federal Judiciary (HAA) At fewer than 500 words, Article III of the Constitution, which spells out the powers of the nation s judicial branch, is remarkably brief. The framers brevity on this topic

More information

The full speech, as prepared for delivery, is below:

The full speech, as prepared for delivery, is below: Washington, D.C. Senator Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, the senior member and former Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, spoke on the floor today about the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the United

More information

10 Defining Moments of

10 Defining Moments of 1990 s 10 Defining Moments of 1990 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jak-tvdktc Crisis in the Middle East In 1990, Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, wanting to control of the oil-rich country.

More information

Associate Justice Antonin Scalia

Associate Justice Antonin Scalia The Future of the Court Sotomayor Breyer Alito Kagan Thomas Scalia Roberts Kennedy NotoriousRBG Eric J. Williams, PhD. Dept. Chair of Criminology & Criminal Justice Studies Sonoma State University Associate

More information

Judicial Branch. Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court?

Judicial Branch. Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court? Judicial Branch Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court? What could happen if I am found guilty? What do I do if I think my rights are being violated?

More information

The Supreme Court The Judicial Branch

The Supreme Court The Judicial Branch The Supreme Court The Judicial Branch Judicial Branch Interprets the laws! What does that mean? Courts Apply the law to specific cases/situations Decisions: What does the law mean? Is it constitutional

More information

Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Chapter 16: The Federal Courts The Nature of the Judicial System The Structure of the Federal Judicial System The Politics of Judicial Selection The Backgrounds of Judges and Justices The Courts as Policymakers

More information

Chapter 14: The Judiciary Multiple Choice

Chapter 14: The Judiciary Multiple Choice Multiple Choice 1. In the context of Supreme Court conferences, which of the following statements is true of a dissenting opinion? a. It can be written by one or more justices. b. It refers to the opinion

More information

Social Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS

Social Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS Social Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED A. The First Amendment protects five basic freedoms for all Americans. RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED

More information

Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART. Section 2.1 A Dual Court System

Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART. Section 2.1 A Dual Court System Chapter 2 SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Section 2.1 Chapter 2 A Dual The Court Court System System Section 2.1 Section 2.2 Trial Procedures Why It s Important Learning the structure of

More information

Warm Up: Review Activity Declare your Powers

Warm Up: Review Activity Declare your Powers Mr. Cegielski S E C T I O N 1 The National Judiciary ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS: Why did the Constitution create a national judiciary? What is the structure of the national judiciary? What criteria are used to

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2012 NO AGAINST

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2012 NO AGAINST IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2012 NO. 1-001 MARY BERGHUIS, WARDEN, Petitioner, AGAINST VAN CHESTER THOMPKINS, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

More information

CHAPTER 3. Court Systems. 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution 3-2 The Federal Court System 3-3 State Court Systems

CHAPTER 3. Court Systems. 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution 3-2 The Federal Court System 3-3 State Court Systems CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution 3-2 The Federal Court System 3-3 State Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution GOALS Explain how disputes can be settled without going to court

More information

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER 1 December 11-14, 2014 OMNIBUS FINAL TOPLINE N=1,001 PEW.1 As I read a list of some stories covered by news organizations this past week, please tell me if you happened to follow each news story very,

More information

STATE STANDARDS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2016

STATE STANDARDS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2016 STATE STANDARDS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2016 INTRODUCTION This memo was prepared by the ABA Death Penalty Representation Project. It contains counsel appointment

More information

Courts, Judges, and the Law

Courts, Judges, and the Law CHAPTER 13 Courts, Judges, and the Law CHAPTER OUTLINE I. The Origins and Types of American Law II. The Structure of the Court Systems III. The Federal and State Court Systems A. Lower Courts B. The Supreme

More information

The U.S. Legal System

The U.S. Legal System Overview Overview The U.S. Legal System 2012 IP Summer Seminar Katie Guarino kguarino@edwardswildman.com July 2012 2011 Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP & Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP Cameras in the Courtroom:

More information

U.S. Government. The Constitution of the United States. Tuesday, September 23, 14

U.S. Government. The Constitution of the United States. Tuesday, September 23, 14 U.S. Government The Constitution of the United States Background The Constitution of the United States was created during the Spring and Summer of 1787. The Framers(the people who attended the convention)

More information

Introduction to US business law III. US Court System / Jurisdiction

Introduction to US business law III. US Court System / Jurisdiction Introduction to US business law III. US Court System / Jurisdiction FS 2018 Prof. Dr. Andreas Kellerhals Overview I. Repetition - Last week II. What left from previous session III. US Court System IV.

More information

PLS 103 Lecture 3 1. Today we talk about the Missouri legislature. What we re doing in this section we

PLS 103 Lecture 3 1. Today we talk about the Missouri legislature. What we re doing in this section we PLS 103 Lecture 3 1 Today we talk about the Missouri legislature. What we re doing in this section we finished the Constitution and now we re gonna talk about the three main branches of government today,

More information

American Government Chapter 18 Notes The Federal Court System

American Government Chapter 18 Notes The Federal Court System American Government Chapter 18 Notes The Federal Court System Section 1 a. The National Judiciary B. Creation of a National Judiciary a. Framers of Constitution created a national judiciary b. A Dual Court

More information

We the People: The Role of the Citizen in the United States

We the People: The Role of the Citizen in the United States We the People: The Role of the Citizen in the United States In the United States, the government gets its power to govern from the people. We have a government of the people, by the people, and for the

More information

Judicial Branch 11/11 11/14

Judicial Branch 11/11 11/14 Judicial Branch { 11/11 11/14 What Supreme Court case desegregated American schools by striking down the separate, but equal doctrine? Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Warmup Warmup Supreme Court PPT

More information

Unit 4 Assessment Amending the Constitution

Unit 4 Assessment Amending the Constitution Unit 4 Assessment Amending the Constitution 1. Which 1 st Amendment right does the freedom to gather and associate imply? a. speech b. assembly c. religion d. the press 2. The Fourth Amendment prevents

More information

Remarks: Liberty Panel

Remarks: Liberty Panel Remarks: Liberty Panel Jeffrey Fisher * It s a wonderful privilege to be here today, and to spend a day thinking about Justice Stevens and honoring his work. As a law clerk for the Justice during the October

More information

Chapter 11 and 12 - The Federal Court System

Chapter 11 and 12 - The Federal Court System Chapter 11 and 12 - The Federal Court System SSCG16 The student will demonstrate knowledge of the operation of the federal judiciary. Powers of the Federal Courts Federal courts are generally created by

More information

VA & US Government Exam Review: 2 nd Semester

VA & US Government Exam Review: 2 nd Semester Name: VA & US Government Exam Review: 2 nd Semester Bureaucracy 1. What is a bureaucracy? Large, highly organized group that carries out the work of the federal government 2. To which branch of American

More information

REPORTING CATEGORY 2: ROLES, RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENS

REPORTING CATEGORY 2: ROLES, RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENS REPORTING CATEGORY 2: ROLES, RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENS SS.7.C.2.1: Define the term "citizen," and identify legal means of becoming a United States citizen. Citizen: a native or naturalized

More information

9.1 Introduction When the delegates left Independence Hall in September 1787, they each carried a copy of the Constitution. Their task now was to

9.1 Introduction When the delegates left Independence Hall in September 1787, they each carried a copy of the Constitution. Their task now was to 9.1 Introduction When the delegates left Independence Hall in September 1787, they each carried a copy of the Constitution. Their task now was to convince their states to approve the document that they

More information

The Courts CHAPTER. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 7E by Frank Schmalleger

The Courts CHAPTER. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 7E by Frank Schmalleger CHAPTER 7 The Courts 1 America s Dual Court System The United States has courts on both the federal and state levels. This dual system reflects the state s need to retain judicial autonomy separate from

More information

SS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III

SS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III SS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III ****At the end of this lesson, I will be able to do the following: recognize the structure of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. compare

More information

The Judicial Branch INTRODUCTION TO THE FEDERAL COURTS

The Judicial Branch INTRODUCTION TO THE FEDERAL COURTS The Judicial Branch INTRODUCTION TO THE FEDERAL COURTS I. Types of law. A. Statutory: deals w/written statutes (laws). B. Common. 1. Based upon a system of unwritten law. 2. Unwritten laws are based upon

More information

The Federalist Papers

The Federalist Papers The Federalist Papers If men were angels, no government would be necessary. James Madison During the Revolutionary War, Americans set up a new national government. They feared a strong central government.

More information

What exactly does it say? What is the law designed to do? What is the purpose (or intent) of the law?

What exactly does it say? What is the law designed to do? What is the purpose (or intent) of the law? American Law You Be The Judge a. b. c. What exactly does it say? What is the law designed to do? What is the purpose (or intent) of the law? Need to keep in mind the LETTER and the SPIRIT (intent) of

More information

Is Silence Still Golden? The Implications of Berghuis v. Thompkins on the Right to Remain Silent

Is Silence Still Golden? The Implications of Berghuis v. Thompkins on the Right to Remain Silent Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Law Reviews 3-1-2011 Is Silence Still Golden? The

More information

Ch. 20. Due Process of Law. The Meaning of Due Process 1/23/2015. Due Process & Rights of the Accused

Ch. 20. Due Process of Law. The Meaning of Due Process 1/23/2015. Due Process & Rights of the Accused Ch. 20 Due Process & Rights of the Accused Due Process of Law How is the meaning of due process of law set out in the 5th and 14th amendments? What is police power and how does it relate to civil rights?

More information

SPOTLIGHT. The Supreme Court 1

SPOTLIGHT. The Supreme Court 1 SPOTLIGHT The Supreme Court 1 WWW.KIDSDISCOVER.COM 1 2 3 With their serious black robes, the Supreme Court may look stern and even dull to some, but it is full of high drama. Some of the most historic

More information

Supreme Court Rules On GPS Trackers: Is It 1984 Yet? Legal Question of the Week Vol. 5, Number 2 January 27, 2012

Supreme Court Rules On GPS Trackers: Is It 1984 Yet? Legal Question of the Week Vol. 5, Number 2 January 27, 2012 Supreme Court Rules On GPS Trackers: Is It 1984 Yet? Legal Question of the Week Vol. 5, Number 2 January 27, 2012 Brian Beasley Guy With Two Big Brothers and Legal Adviser, HPPD It was 1949 when George

More information

YOU BE THE JUDGE 2 HANDOUT C SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2

YOU BE THE JUDGE 2 HANDOUT C SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 HANDOUT C YOU BE THE JUDGE 2 Directions: Read and discuss your assigned scenario below. Along with your group members, refer to Handout A: The United States Bill of Rights to identify which protection(s)

More information

Unit 7 Our Current Government

Unit 7 Our Current Government Unit 7 Our Current Government Name Date Period Learning Targets (What I need to know): I can describe the Constitutional Convention and two compromises that took place there. I can describe the structure

More information

MEMORANDUM. June 26, From: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and SCOTUSblog.com Re: End of Term Statistical Analysis October Term 2007

MEMORANDUM. June 26, From: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and SCOTUSblog.com Re: End of Term Statistical Analysis October Term 2007 MEMORANDUM From: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and SCOTUSblog.com Re: End of Term Statistical Analysis October Term 2007 This memo presents the firm s annual summary of relevant statistics for the

More information

The politics of hope and the politics of selfie. Written by MANUEL L. CABALLERO Saturday, 13 February :06

The politics of hope and the politics of selfie. Written by MANUEL L. CABALLERO Saturday, 13 February :06 President Barack Obama delivers his speech this week at the Illinois State Capitol in Springfield. Abraham Lincoln delivered his famous House Divided speech in the same building in 1858. (TV screengrab)

More information

A. The US has two wholly separate judicial systems one federal and one state, reflecting the dual sovereignty of the United States.

A. The US has two wholly separate judicial systems one federal and one state, reflecting the dual sovereignty of the United States. Berlin Speech US Supreme Court Jurisdiction I. [Slide] [Introduction] A. Thank you. Pleasure and privilege. Professor Calliess asked if I would talk about the US Supreme Court and its jurisdiction, with

More information

***JURISDICTION: A court s power to rule on a case. There are two primary systems of courts in the U.S.:

***JURISDICTION: A court s power to rule on a case. There are two primary systems of courts in the U.S.: THE FEDERAL COURTS ***JURISDICTION: A court s power to rule on a case. There are two primary systems of courts in the U.S.: STATE COURTS Jurisdiction over ordinances (locals laws) and state laws (laws

More information

Reading Essentials and Study Guide

Reading Essentials and Study Guide Lesson 1 Sources of Presidential Power ESSENTIAL QUESTION What are the powers and roles of the president and how have they changed over time? Reading HELPDESK Academic Vocabulary contemporary happening,

More information

Grades 2-7. American Government and the Election Process Unit Study SAMPLE PAGE. A Journey Through Learning

Grades 2-7. American Government and the Election Process Unit Study SAMPLE PAGE. A Journey Through Learning A J T L Grades 2-7 American Government and the Election Process Unit Study A Journey Through Learning www.ajourneythroughlearning.com Copyright 2008 A Journey Through Learning 1 Authors: Paula Winget and

More information

PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 27-30, 2013 OMNIBUS FINAL TOPLINE N=1,003

PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 27-30, 2013 OMNIBUS FINAL TOPLINE N=1,003 8 PEW RESEARCH CENTER June 27-30, OMNIBUS FINAL TOPLINE N=1,003 PEW.1 As I read a list of some stories covered by news organizations this past week, please tell me if you happened to follow each news story

More information

TRANSCRIPT Protecting Our Judiciary: What Judges Do and Why it Matters

TRANSCRIPT Protecting Our Judiciary: What Judges Do and Why it Matters TRANSCRIPT Protecting Our Judiciary: What Judges Do and Why it Matters Slide 1 Thank you for joining us for Protecting Our Judiciary: What Judges Do and Why it Matters. Protecting fair, impartial courts

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 ALITO, J., concurring SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JOSHUA JOHN HESTER, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No.

More information

An interview with Paul Turner

An interview with Paul Turner From the Editor By Jeffrey Isaac Ehrlich Editor-in-Chief Paul Turner is the presiding justice of Division 5 of the California Court of Appeal. He was appointed to the California Municipal Court in 1983

More information

Let s face it. Judicial elections are weird. Or used to be. If you ve. ever attended a candidates night, here s what used to happen.

Let s face it. Judicial elections are weird. Or used to be. If you ve. ever attended a candidates night, here s what used to happen. Legally Speaking Judicial Elections final version 2010 Marianna Brown Bettman All Rights Reserved Judicial Elections Let s face it. Judicial elections are weird. Or used to be. If you ve ever attended

More information