IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN VICARDO GONSALVES CLAIMANT AND

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN VICARDO GONSALVES CLAIMANT AND"

Transcription

1 REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN VICARDO GONSALVES CLAIMANT AND CHAN PERSAD DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances: For the Claimant: For the Defendant: Mr. H. Ramnath Mr. R. Gosine Date of Delivery: 28 th November, 2011 REASONS BACKGROUND [1] This is a claim for a sum of money advanced by the Claimant to the Defendant to execute construction works on the latter s home. Page 1 of 17

2 o THE CLAIM [2] In 2006, the Claimant, at the request of the Defendant, loaned and/or paid on behalf of the latter bills amounting to $186, The Claimant paid the said monies to the Defendant by way of cheques made in favour of her builder, Mr. Khemchan Girdharie, and to various hardware stores and/or contractors as she requested. [3] By a Promissory Note, dated the 28 th August, 2006, the Defendant agreed to repay the sum of $186, on or before 25 th December, [4] In addition to the above monies, the Claimant loaned the Defendant the followings sums: i. $43, towards the cost of labour for the said construction; and, ii. $18, towards the cost of materials for the said construction. [5] During the year 2006, the Claimant paid bills and/or the Defendant s workers in the sum of $248, on behalf of the Defendant. The Claimant pleaded that the Defendant is therefore liable to repay the said sum to him together with interest at 5% per month from January 2008 until payment. [6] Further and/or in the alternative, the Claimant contended that pursuant to the terms of the Promissory Note aforesaid, the Defendant also agreed that in default of payment of the said sums, the properties described in the Certificate of Title Volume 1646, Folio 353 and Certificate of Title in Volume 1982, Folio Page 2 of 17

3 399 would be sold and proceeds of such sale would be applied to the outstanding sums owed the Claimant by the Defendant. [7] By an agreement made on the 1 st November, 2006, the Defendant agreed to lease to the Claimant, the ground level apartment in her apartment building situate at Tabaquite, Rio Claro Road, Rio Claro Junction for a period of three (3) years at a monthly rental of $2, [8] During the period of November 2006 to January 2008, the Claimant defaulted in the payment of rent for said ground floor apartment and became indebted to the Defendant in the sum of $42, However, he settled all outstanding rent by paying to the Defendant the sum of $57,500.00, an overpayment of $15, [9] The Claimant has alleged that the sum of $15, was not refunded to him by the Defendant; as a result she was also indebted to him for that sum. [10] Thereafter, on or about the 14 th January 2008, the Claimant made a verbal request to the Defendant that she repay to him the aforesaid sums due and owing. The Defendant, in breach of the lease agreement between the parties, then gave notice to the Claimant to vacate the tenanted premises by the end of March, [11] The Claimant owns and operates a bar on the tenanted premises which makes a profit of approximately $10, per month. The purported termination of the lease is likely to cause the Claimant to lose $190, Page 3 of 17

4 [12] As a result of the foregoing, the Claimant instituted these proceedings on the 31 st January 2008 seeking the following reliefs: i. The sum of $248, with interest at the rate of 5% per month from January 2008 until payment; ii. A declaration that the Claimant is entitled to occupy the tenanted premises until October 2009; iii. An injunction restraining the Defendant, her servants and/or agents from removing, disturbing, harassing or interfering with the Claimant s occupation of the tenanted premises; iv. Alternatively to (ii) and (iii), an order that the Defendant do pay to the Claimant the following: a. $15, as over-payment of rent; b. $190, as profits made by the Claimant from April 2008 to October v. Costs. [13] At the trial of this matter, the Claimant abandoned the reliefs set out at (ii), (iii) and (iv). The Claim is therefore only in respect of the sum of $248, with interest thereon at the rate of 5% per month from January 2008 until payment and costs. o THE DEFENCE [14] The Defendant contended that she shared a very close relationship with the Claimant and she trusted him as her own son. In support of this, she pleaded the following Particulars: Page 4 of 17

5 i. She was a seamstress and had known the Claimant s parents. ii. She returned to Trinidad in 1984 and opened a sewing business at the subject premises - No Tabaquite Road. iii. The Claimant used to sell oranges. During the period , the Claimant brought oranges to the Defendant s place for her to purchase. iv. The Claimant would spend time with the Defendant at her business place and expressed an interest in sewing. v. In 1991, the Defendant opened a bar at the subject premises. Sometimes, on mornings and busy days the Claimant would come in the bar and assist the Defendant. In addition, the Claimant did errands for her. vi. The Defendant has one daughter who lives in Canada and started to treat the Claimant as her son and he, as a mother. vii. In 1999, the Defendant wanted to close the bar she operated as it had become very difficult for her to manage. The Claimant offered to run it at a rental of $ per week. The Defendant accepted and the Claimant commenced running the Bar. viii. From 1999 to present, the Defendant spent, on average, six weeks each year out of the country. During this time, the Claimant stayed at the Defendant s house during her absence. Even after he got married, The Claimant and his family stayed in the Defendant s house for this period. ix. In particular, in October 2007 the Claimant, together with his wife, stayed in the Defendant s house while she was abroad. The Page 5 of 17

6 Defendant left her keys and the control of her premises to the Claimant. [15] In 2006, the Defendant started to extend the back of her house. The Claimant agreed to assist her with the errands. She Defendant hired a builder, Khemchan Girdharie, to execute the building works. [16] When material was needed by the builder, the Defendant would telephone Ramkission s Hardware on High Street, Rio Claro and place an order. On most occasions the Defendant would give the money to the Claimant to pay for purchases at the hardware store. [17] The Defendant had significant cash flow as a result of her ongoing business ventures, rental income from several apartments, income as a seamstress, as well as a sou-sou; her sister in Canada sent her money from time to time. [18] The Claimant encouraged the Defendant to give him the monies to bank in his account and in turn would use his credit card to effect the purchases. The Claimant explained to the Defendant that payment in this manner would allow him to accumulate bonus points on his credit card. [19] As a result, all monies allegedly spent by the Claimant on the extension of the Defendant s house actually belonged to the latter. [20] The Defendant denied signing a Promissory Note with the Claimant to repay the sum of $186, and contended as follows: Page 6 of 17

7 i. It is not her handwriting or signature that appears on the document adduced by the Claimant; ii. On the 17 th March, 2007, the Defendant received her Certificate of Title from the Bank so as to execute a transaction. The Claimant requested the Defendant to make copies of the said Certificate. She acquiesced to this before returning the document to the bank; iii. The copies of the said Certificate were left in the Defendant s house; iv. In early April, 2007, the Defendant s passport and copies of the said Certificate went missing. They were later found by the Defendant in her kitchen; v. At all times the Claimant and his wife had full access to the Defendant s house and her personal belongings. The Claimant knew where everything, including important documents, were located. [21] The Defendant denied borrowing the following sums from the Claimant: i. $43, for labour costs; and, ii. $18, for building material. She asserted that all costs associated with the extension works carried out on her building were paid by her. [22] The Defendant admitted that she entered into the rental agreement dated the 1 st November, 2006 to lease ALL that premises being the Road Level Apartment of Building situate at Tabaquite Rio Claro Road, Rio Claro Junction to the Claimant. However, after signing the agreement, it was orally agreed that the Claimant would also occupy the area behind the Defendant s Page 7 of 17

8 kitchen and a corridor to place his stocks. As a result, a further $1, was added to the rent. The monthly rental was then $4, and therefore there was no excess payment of rent as alleged. [23] The Defendant contended that the Claimant never paid rent from his pockets. He was in charge of the sou-sou and whenever it was his turn to draw from it, he would pay the rent for several months at once. Consequently, rent was paid sometimes once in three months. [24] The Defendant denied that the Claimant requested repayment of the sums allegedly owed on or about the 14 th January, o THE REPLY TO THE DEFENCE [25] The Claimant admitted that he had a good business relationship with the Defendant but that one of mother and son did not exist. He denied selling oranges and stated that he learnt to sew at the Youth Training and Employment Partnership Program (YTEPP). [26] The Claimant denied that he would stay in her home while she was away visiting her daughter. He stated that he would often times stay in a kitchen behind the bar for security purposes but contended that this was not a part of her home. [27] In response to the Particulars relied upon by the Defendant in her Defence, the Claimant stated as follows: Page 8 of 17

9 i. The Defendant requested from one Mala, a friend of hers, a loan of $70, which Mala was unable to lend her as Mala s brother-in-law was buying a backhoe. The Defendant therefore requested the Claimant to assist her as her sister was coming from abroad and she wanted to complete the extension of her house; ii. The Defendant agreed that the Claimant would purchase all the building material with his credit card and in his name and use the Defendant s address for delivery. iii. The Defendant, upon repaying the Claimant, would then receive the bills; iv. He never banked any monies for the Defendant as she banked her monies in Canada; and, v. He had lent Defendant monies on previous occasions which she has since repaid. [28] The Claimant insisted that the Defendant signed and dated the promissory note of 28 th August However, he acknowledged that he wrote it. [29] He contended that the Defendant never misplaced her passport or deeds and that he had no reason to request to make copies of her documents. [30] The Claimant denied that there was ever any agreement to increase the rent and that he had always occupied the area leased and continued to do. Page 9 of 17

10 SUMMARY [31] The Claimant s case is that he had a business relationship with the Defendant, as he was once her tenant for a number of years. While still renting from the Defendant, the Claimant sought to build his own house. Around this time, the Defendant commenced extending her house. The Defendant requested that the Claimant lend her monies to carry out the extension works. The Claimant agreed to do so and the Defendant signed a promissory note in his favour to repay the sum of $186, on or before the 25 th December The Defendant has since failed and/or neglected to repay the said sum. As a result, this action was instituted on the 31 st January [32] The Defendant s case is that she shared a close relationship with the Claimant and considered him her son. She contended that she never requested to borrow or borrowed any monies from the Claimant for the extension of her house. She sought the Defendant s assistance, being an elderly woman, in the execution of the construction works by giving him monies to, inter alia, buy material and pay the workmen. She denied signing a Promissory Note in favour of the Claimant and stated that the note produced by him was a forged document. ISSUE [33] The issue to be determined by the Court is whether the Claimant loaned monies to the Defendant for the extension of her building. Page 10 of 17

11 ANALYSIS [34] This issue is one of fact to be decided upon the evidence presented to the Court. [35] It should be noted at the outset that the amount which was stated in the alleged agreement was significantly less that the final sum claimed by the Claimant. o NATURE OF RELATIONSHIP [36] The Claimant testified that he knew the Defendant for a number of years but that they did not share a relationship of mother and son. It was merely a business relationship. He used to purchase buttons from her shop and later rented premises from her. [37] On the other hand, the Defendant contended that she knew the Claimant since his birth as the Claimant s father attended primary school with her and thereafter remained close friends. When the Defendant returned to Trinidad in 1984, her relationship with the Claimant grew and he would often times have meals with her and assisted in running her bar without compensation. [38] In 1999, the Defendant decided to close her bar as it was becoming too tiring for her to operate the business alone. The Claimant offered to run it. The Defendant acquiesced although it was a family business started by her father in She stated that she did this because she considered the Claimant her son and she trusted him. Page 11 of 17

12 [39] In further support of her close relationship with the Claimant, the Defendant stated that she made annual trips to Canada to visit her daughter where she would stay for at least six (6) weeks. During this time, the Claimant would stay at her home. When the Claimant got married in 2003, his wife and son would also stay in the Defendant s home while she was away. [40] The Claimant also pleaded that he would stay at the Defendant s home when she was abroad. However, he later denied this in cross-examination. When Counsel for the Defendant pointed out this inconsistency to him, he responded that what was pleaded in his reply was an error. He further stated in cross-examination that were was no need for him to stay at the Defendant s home as there were other tenants residing there. [41] I accepted the testimony of the Defendant to that of the Claimant regarding the close nature of their relationship. The Claimant actually pleaded in his reply that he, his wife and son would often stay at the Defendant s home when she was abroad. The nature of the relationship between the parties was a central issue in the determination of this matter. If assertions on this issue were made in error, as contended by the Claimant, there should have been an Application to Amend the Statement of Case. However, this was never done. o SOURCE OF INCOME [42] At the time of the extension of her building, the Defendant was in receipt of income from several different sources, namely: i. Rent from her ten (10) tenants which totalled $10, each month; Page 12 of 17

13 ii. iii. iv. Earnings as a seamstress in the sum of approximately $2, a month; The sum of $8, every two months from sou-sou ; and, Frequent monetary gifts from her sister, who had a half-share in the property where the Defendant resided. [43] The foregoing facts were not contested by the Claimant. He agreed that when he met the Defendant she was a seamstress and that he purchased buttons from her shop. I also noted from the evidence that the Claimant was the person who managed the sou-sou from which the Defendant derived her earnings; as such he was in a position to state whether she exaggerated the said earnings. However, he did not challenge any aspect of this evidence. [44] The Claimant raised the issue of proof of income stating that the Defendant did not have a bank account in Trinidad & Tobago. The Defendant admitted same in her Witness Statement, stating that during the years all her transactions were done with cash. I did not consider this a relevant issue; wherever the Defendant kept her monies was immaterial as it was already established that she had multiple sources of income to facilitate the construction works on her house. [45] In the circumstances, I accepted the evidence of the Defendant to that of the Claimant on this issue. It was clear that the Defendant was in a financial position to personally fund the extension works on her house without assistance. Page 13 of 17

14 o PROMISSORY NOTE [46] The Claimant relied on a promissory note as evidence of the Defendant acknowledging her debt to him and which, he stated, was signed by the Defendant. The Defendant filed a Notice to Prove Documents dated 9 th November, 2009, pursuant to PART of the CIVIL PROCEEDINGS RULES 1998, challenging the authenticity of this document and required that the Claimant prove same. The burden of proof was on the Claimant to prove the authenticity of this note. However, there was no evidence called in support of his contention regarding that the signature thereon purporting to be that of the Defendant was in fact hers. [48] In McQueen v Great Western Railway Company 2, the court held: If a prima facie case if made out, capable of being displaced, and if the party against whom it is established might by calling particular witnesses and producing particular evidence displace that prima facie case, and he omits to adduce that evidence, then the inference fairly arises, as a matter of legal presumption, that the absence of that evidence is to be accounted for by the fact that even if it were adduced, it would not displace the prima facie case Further, Ian Sieunarine v Doc. s Engineering Works (1992) Limited 3, Rajnauth-Lee J. opined: 1 Notice to prove document 2 (1875) L.R. 10 Q.B. 569, p H.C.A No. 2387/2000 Page 14 of 17

15 In the absence of the witness the Court is entitled to infer that the defendant has chosen to withhold evidence which should have either supported the plaintiff s case or at the very least would not have displace the prima facie case. The Claimant, in order to discharge the burden of proving that the Defendant did in fact sign the Promissory Note should have adduced evidence of a handwriting expert or any other evidence capable of proving the issue on a balance of probabilities. This he has not done. In the circumstances, applying the case of Mc Queen and Ian Sieunarine above I hold that the Promissory Note was not executed by the Defendant. As such she incurred no liability to the Claimant by reason of same. o THE LOAN [49] The Defendant stated that because she shared a close relationship with the Claimant she sought his assistance when extending her building. At the time, she was sixty-five (65) years old and infirmed. She suffered from high blood pressure, diabetes and experienced frequent fainting spells. In addition, she did not have access to a vehicle so it was difficult to move around to source building material for the extension. [50] The Defendant asserted that this assistance she sought from the Claimant was not in the form of a loan. Instead, she asked the Claimant to purchase building material for her when he was doing the same for himself, as he was also building his house. The Defendant would often give the Claimant monies to purchase the material or permit him to place same on his credit card to make Page 15 of 17

16 the purchases thereby obtaining bonus points. This, she asserted, was the reason why some receipts were not in her name but that of the Claimant. [51] In support of this contention, the Defendant annexed to her Witness Statement a letter from B. Ramkissoon Hardware Ltd., the store where she purchased most of her construction material. The Manager of the store, Ms. Baby Ramkissoon, stated in the letter that the Defendant would occasionally come personally to purchase building material. However, it was more common for the Defendant to call the store and indicate that she was sending either the Claimant or someone else to purchase building material on her behalf. Ms. Ramkissoon highlighted that although the Defendant would point out that she was sending cash to make the payment, the Claimant always used his credit card to make the purchases. [52] Based on the forgoing, I considered that this letter substantiated the Defendant s contentions that: i. She made all the payments towards the cost of the building material for the extension to her house; ii. iii. Some receipts were not in her name but that of the Claimant because he made purchases on her behalf; and, Reinforced her assertion that there was a close relationship between herself and the Claimant to the extent that she trusted him to effect business transactions on her behalf. CONCLUSION Page 16 of 17

17 [53] Having heard and seen the evidence presented by both parties, I accepted the evidence of the Defendant to that of the Claimant and dismissed the Claim. I ordered: i. Judgment for the Defendant against the Claimant; ii. The Claimant to pay the Defendant s costs in this action, to be assessed in default of agreement. JOAN CHARLES JUDGE Page 17 of 17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND AND RAMKARRAN RAMPARAS. Before the Honourable Madame Justice Eleanor J. Donaldson- Honeywell

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND AND RAMKARRAN RAMPARAS. Before the Honourable Madame Justice Eleanor J. Donaldson- Honeywell REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2015-01399 Between SURJNATH RAMSINGH Claimant AND SURJEE CHOWBAY Defendant And by Ancillary Claim SURJEE CHOWBAY Defendant/ Ancillary

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ESAU RALPH BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER A. RAJKUMAR. Reasons for decision

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ESAU RALPH BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER A. RAJKUMAR. Reasons for decision THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV No. 2010-00120 BETWEEN MALYN BERNARD CLAIMANT AND NESTER PATRICIA RALPH ESAU RALPH DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER REASONS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER REASONS TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. Cv. 2010-03934 BETWEEN RANDY CHARLES CLAIMANT AND MARION PHILLIPS DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES Ms.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. Anand Beharrylal AND. Dhanraj Soodeen. Ricky Ramoutar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. Anand Beharrylal AND. Dhanraj Soodeen. Ricky Ramoutar THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2011-04453 BETWEEN Anand Beharrylal AND Claimant Dhanraj Soodeen Ricky Ramoutar First Defendant Second Defendant Before the Honourable

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2017-01878 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN DEOWATTIE BAKSH Claimant AND SHAIN STEVEN Defendant Before the Honourable Mr. Justice Robin N. Mohammed Appearances:

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTHONY ADRIAN AMBROSE SHARMA AND ESAU MOHAMMED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTHONY ADRIAN AMBROSE SHARMA AND ESAU MOHAMMED REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Civil Appeal No. 183 of 2010 Claim No. CV 2008-04537 BETWEEN ANTHONY ADRIAN AMBROSE SHARMA AND Appellant/Defendant ESAU MOHAMMED Respondent

More information

( ( SURAJ BAXANI DEFENDANT

( ( SURAJ BAXANI DEFENDANT 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2001 ACTION NO: 539 OF 2001 (HANS BHOJWANI ( PLAINTIFF BETWEEN( AND ( ( SURAJ BAXANI DEFENDANT Coram: Hon Justice Sir John Muria 21 January 2008 Ms L. B. Chung for

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND. Indra Singh AND Svetlana Dass AND Lenny Ranjitsingh AND Ravi Dass AND Carl Mohammed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND. Indra Singh AND Svetlana Dass AND Lenny Ranjitsingh AND Ravi Dass AND Carl Mohammed THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. C.V. 2012-00434 BETWEEN Evelyn Phulmatti Ranjitsingh Joseph Claimant AND Indra Singh AND Svetlana Dass AND Lenny Ranjitsingh

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2016-00756 BETWEEN CANDICE MAHADEO Claimant AND GEISHA MAHADEO NIRMAL MAHADEO Defendants Before the Honourable Madam Justice Margaret

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D GERALD ALEXANDER RHABURN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D GERALD ALEXANDER RHABURN IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2012 CLAIM NO. 31 of 2011 MICHELLE CARD CLAIMANT AND GERALD ALEXANDER RHABURN DEFENDANT Hearings 2012 24 th January 6 th February 7 th May 31 st May 16 th July Ms.

More information

THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO

THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV No. 2009-03221 Between HV HOLDINGS LIMITED Claimant And ADELLA HAMID JUNE HAMID TREVOR HAMID Defendants Before the Honourable Mr. Justice

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D ( ISMAEL O. SHABAZZ PLAINTIFF ( BETWEEN ( AND ( ( MILLICENT ARNOLD DEFENDANT JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D ( ISMAEL O. SHABAZZ PLAINTIFF ( BETWEEN ( AND ( ( MILLICENT ARNOLD DEFENDANT JUDGMENT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2008 Action No. 80/1989 ( ISMAEL O. SHABAZZ PLAINTIFF ( BETWEEN ( AND ( ( MILLICENT ARNOLD DEFENDANT Before the Hon. Justice T.J. Gonzalez Mr. Philip Zuniga for the

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D BEFORE the Honourable Madam Justice Sonya Young

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D BEFORE the Honourable Madam Justice Sonya Young IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2018 CLAIM NO. 628 of 2017 ASHLEY SNOW CLAIMANT AND MICHAEL TODD TADLOCK DEFENDANT BEFORE the Honourable Madam Justice Sonya Young Hearings 2018 10 th October Written

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER REASONS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER REASONS THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. CV 2009-01049 BETWEEN RUDOLPH SYDNEY CLAIMANT AND JOSEPH THOMAS DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. RAMOLA RAMESAR (the legal personal representative of Rachel Ramesar Otherwise Rachel Chinibas, deceased) AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. RAMOLA RAMESAR (the legal personal representative of Rachel Ramesar Otherwise Rachel Chinibas, deceased) AND REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HCA No. 2657 of 1997 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF BHADASE SAGAN MARAJ (deceased) BETWEEN RAMOLA RAMESAR (the legal personal representative

More information

APPENDIX FOR MARGIN ACCOUNTS

APPENDIX FOR MARGIN ACCOUNTS APPENDIX FOR MARGIN ACCOUNTS This Appendix applies if the Client opens or maintains a Margin Account in respect of margin facilities for trading in Securities. Unless otherwise defined in this Appendix,

More information

PART 5 DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS CHAPTER 1 Preliminary and definitions 219. Interpretation and application (Part 5) 220.

PART 5 DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS CHAPTER 1 Preliminary and definitions 219. Interpretation and application (Part 5) 220. PART 5 DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS CHAPTER 1 Preliminary and definitions 219. Interpretation and application (Part 5) 220. Connected persons 221. Shadow directors 222. De facto director CHAPTER

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE DYIAL LATCHMAN CLAIMANT AND BALGOBIN & SONS BANDSAWMILLING COMPANY LIMITED DEFENDANT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE DYIAL LATCHMAN CLAIMANT AND BALGOBIN & SONS BANDSAWMILLING COMPANY LIMITED DEFENDANT REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2007/02060 BETWEEN DYIAL LATCHMAN CLAIMANT AND BALGOBIN & SONS BANDSAWMILLING COMPANY LIMITED DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN

More information

The Municipalities Relief and Agricultural Aid Act

The Municipalities Relief and Agricultural Aid Act The Municipalities Relief and Agricultural Aid Act UNEDITED being Chapter 178 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1965 (effective February 7, 1966). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE LYSTRA BEROOG AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE LYSTRA BEROOG AND THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2008-004699 BETWEEN LYSTRA BEROOG INDRA BEROOG Claimants AND FRANKLYN BEROOG Defendant Before the Honorable Mr. Justice V. Kokaram

More information

JUDGMENT REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV BETWEEN D. C. DEVELOPERS LIMITED. Claimant AND

JUDGMENT REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV BETWEEN D. C. DEVELOPERS LIMITED. Claimant AND REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2006-02313 BETWEEN D. C. DEVELOPERS LIMITED AND Claimant MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS LIMITED Defendant Before The Honourable Mr.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. DANIEL JOHNSON S SCAFFOLDING COMPANY LIMITED Claimant AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. DANIEL JOHNSON S SCAFFOLDING COMPANY LIMITED Claimant AND THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2014-00204 BETWEEN DANIEL JOHNSON S SCAFFOLDING COMPANY LIMITED Claimant AND K.G.C. COMPANY LIMITED Defendant Before the Honourable

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between ROBERTO CHARLES AND SHASTRI PRABHUDIAL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between ROBERTO CHARLES AND SHASTRI PRABHUDIAL THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-02739 Between ROBERTO CHARLES BHAMINI MATABADAL Claimants AND SHASTRI PRABHUDIAL Defendant Before The Honourable Mr. Justice

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND AND AND AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE M. DEAN-ARMORER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND AND AND AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE M. DEAN-ARMORER REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2008-00409 BETWEEN WINSTON SMART CLAIMANT AND ERROL RAMDIAL FIRST DEFENDANT AND BOONIRAM RAMDIAL SECOND DEFENDANT AND STELLA RAMDIAL

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION (COMMERCIAL) ULSTER BANK LTD. -v- TERENCE McQUAID

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION (COMMERCIAL) ULSTER BANK LTD. -v- TERENCE McQUAID Neutral Citation No. [2015] NIQB 79 Ref: WEA9734 Judgment: approved by the Court for handing down Delivered: 22/06/2015 (subject to editorial corrections)* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND

More information

BYLAWS. California Board of Recreation and Part Certification, Inc. A California Public Benefit Corporation ARTICLE 1 NAME AND OFFICES

BYLAWS. California Board of Recreation and Part Certification, Inc. A California Public Benefit Corporation ARTICLE 1 NAME AND OFFICES BYLAWS OF A California Public Benefit Corporation SECTION 1. NAME ARTICLE 1 NAME AND OFFICES The name of the corporation is SECTION 2. PRINCIPAL OFFICE The Board of Directors shall designate the location

More information

BYLAWS OF CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF WORKPLACE INVESTIGATORS, INC. A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation

BYLAWS OF CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF WORKPLACE INVESTIGATORS, INC. A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation BYLAWS OF CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF WORKPLACE INVESTIGATORS, INC. A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Adopted September 25, 2009 1 BYLAWS OF CALIFORNIA ASSOSCIATION OF WORKPLACE INVESTIGATORS,

More information

CONSTITUTION AND RULES

CONSTITUTION AND RULES CONSTITUTION AND RULES 1 INTERPRETATION (1) In these Rules- Act means the Associations Incorporation Act 1981. present (a) At a management committee meeting, see Rule 22(6) (b) At a general meeting, see

More information

IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN FIRST NATIONAL CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND

IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN FIRST NATIONAL CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2011 BETWEEN FIRST NATIONAL CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED Appellant AND TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

More information

THE COMPANIES ACTS 1985 AND 1989 THE COMPANIES ACT 2006 A COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE AND NOT HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

THE COMPANIES ACTS 1985 AND 1989 THE COMPANIES ACT 2006 A COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE AND NOT HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION THE COMPANIES ACTS 1985 AND 1989 THE COMPANIES ACT 2006 A COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE AND NOT HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF OASIS COMMUNITY LEARNING COMPANY NUMBER: 05398529 16 St

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUIT NO.: 983 of 1996 BETWEEN JOAN BERNADETTE MAINGOT Executrix of the estate of Rose Mary Maingot, deceased Claimant and MONICA DEVAUX Defendant Appearances For

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between CATHY ADAMS MARJORIE ANDERSON And THE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF TIME SPIRITUAL SCHOOL LIMITED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between CATHY ADAMS MARJORIE ANDERSON And THE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF TIME SPIRITUAL SCHOOL LIMITED THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO HCA S-732 of 1991 CV 2007-02890 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between CATHY ADAMS MARJORIE ANDERSON And THE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF TIME SPIRITUAL SCHOOL LIMITED And DIANNE

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between RUDOLPH SYDNEY. (through his lawful attorney, Shirley Jones Rajkumar) And NICOLE HYACINTH JOSEPH MARSHAL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between RUDOLPH SYDNEY. (through his lawful attorney, Shirley Jones Rajkumar) And NICOLE HYACINTH JOSEPH MARSHAL THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2011 01729 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between RUDOLPH SYDNEY (through his lawful attorney, Shirley Jones Rajkumar) Claimant And NICOLE HYACINTH JOSEPH MARSHAL STEPHEN

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Date of Reserve: 5th July, Date of judgment: November 06, 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Date of Reserve: 5th July, Date of judgment: November 06, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION Date of Reserve: 5th July, 2007 Date of judgment: November 06, 2007 CS(OS) No.1440/2000 Mela Ram... Through: Plaintiff Ms.Sonia Khurana

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-04009 IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN

More information

The Municipalities Relief and Agricultural Aid Act

The Municipalities Relief and Agricultural Aid Act The Municipalities Relief and Agricultural Aid Act being Chapter 159 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1940 (effective February 1, 1941). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO BETWEEN AND BETWEEN AND. Mr. G. Mungalsingh instructed by Mr. R. Mungalsingh for the Claimant.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO BETWEEN AND BETWEEN AND. Mr. G. Mungalsingh instructed by Mr. R. Mungalsingh for the Claimant. REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim Nos. C.V. 2009-01304 C.V.2009-01305 C.V.2009-01306 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO BETWEEN KHAIMA PERSAD Claimant AND Claim No. C.V. 2009-04190 STEPHEN BAIL

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. Before: The Hon. Justice Nolan Bereaux. Mr Gaston Benjamin for Plaintiff Mr Carlton George for Defendants

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. Before: The Hon. Justice Nolan Bereaux. Mr Gaston Benjamin for Plaintiff Mr Carlton George for Defendants TRINIDAD & TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HCA. NO.1644/99 BETWEEN ENWARD ANTHONY ISAAC Plaintiff AND ANTHONY DEO GANESS & MARCINA MARCIA GANESS Defendants Before: The Hon. Justice Nolan Bereaux Appearances:

More information

1.2. "the Deposit" means any of the sums paid to BSL in accordance with clause 4.4.

1.2. the Deposit means any of the sums paid to BSL in accordance with clause 4.4. BURNHAM STORAGE Terms and Conditions 1. Interpretation In this Contract: 1.1. "BSL" means Burnham Storage Ltd and "The Customer" means the individual, company, firm or other person with whom BSL contracts,

More information

APPENDIX FOR MARGIN ACCOUNTS. 1.1 In this Appendix, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

APPENDIX FOR MARGIN ACCOUNTS. 1.1 In this Appendix, the following terms shall have the following meanings: APPENDIX FOR MARGIN ACCOUNTS This Appendix applies if the Client opens or maintains a Margin Account in respect of margin facilities for trading in Securities. Unless otherwise defined in this Appendix,

More information

THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2013-02861 IN THE MATTER OF THE WILLS AND PROBATE ACT, CH. 9:03 AND THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS RULES 1998, AS AMENDED, PART 72 AND IN THE

More information

RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE LITTLE ITALY ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ARTICLE 1 OFFICES

RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE LITTLE ITALY ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ARTICLE 1 OFFICES SECTION 1. PRINCIPAL OFFICE RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE LITTLE ITALY ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ARTICLE 1 OFFICES The principal office of the corporation for the transaction

More information

BYLAWS OF. WESTERN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. A California Nonprofit Corporation ARTICLE I FUNCTION AND PURPOSES ARTICLE II OFFICES

BYLAWS OF. WESTERN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. A California Nonprofit Corporation ARTICLE I FUNCTION AND PURPOSES ARTICLE II OFFICES BYLAWS OF WESTERN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. A California Nonprofit Corporation ARTICLE I FUNCTION AND PURPOSES Section 1.01 Function. Western Psychological Association, Inc., (hereinafter called

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN GLORIA ALEXANDER AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN GLORIA ALEXANDER AND REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2014-00250 BETWEEN GLORIA ALEXANDER AND CLAIMANT PETER ALEXANDER Also called PETER KHAN Also called PETER KELVIN DEFENDANT Before the Honourable

More information

BYLAWS OF CAPITAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation ARTICLE I NAME

BYLAWS OF CAPITAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation ARTICLE I NAME BYLAWS OF CAPITAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation ARTICLE I NAME The name of this corporation shall be Capital Facilities Development Corporation (the

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D and A.D BETWEEN: (RANDOLPH HOPE PLAINTIFF ( ( AND (

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D and A.D BETWEEN: (RANDOLPH HOPE PLAINTIFF ( ( AND ( IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 1998 and A.D. 2003 CLAIM NO: 55 OF 1998 CLAIM NO: 60 OF 2003 CLAIM NO: 55 OF 1998 BETWEEN: (RANDOLPH HOPE PLAINTIFF ( ( AND ( (CHARLES MCINTOSH DEFENDANT CLAIM NO:

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MARTIN HERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED April 12, 2016 v No. 325920 Washtenaw Circuit Court JEFFREY W. PICKELL and KALEIDOSCOPE LC No. 13-000643-NZ BOOKS AND COLLECTIBLES,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. By way of her Lawful Attorney Kenneth Antoine. And

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. By way of her Lawful Attorney Kenneth Antoine. And REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2013-04883 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between SYBIL CHIN SLICK By way of her Lawful Attorney Kenneth Antoine Claimant GAIL HICKS And Defendant Before the

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. Date of Decision: CRL.A of 2013.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. Date of Decision: CRL.A of 2013. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Date of Decision: 06.03.2014 CRL.A. 1011 of 2013 S.K. JAIN... Appellant Mr. Ajay K. Chopra, Adv. versus VIJAY KALRA... Respondent

More information

CHAPTER 75:01 CO-OPERATIVE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PART II

CHAPTER 75:01 CO-OPERATIVE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PART II LAWS OF GUYANA Co-operative Financial Institutions 3 CHAPTER 75:01 CO-OPERATIVE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. PART II

More information

CORNELIS ANDRIES VAN T WESTENDE JUDGMENT. [1] The plaintiff in this matter is claiming an amount of R299

CORNELIS ANDRIES VAN T WESTENDE JUDGMENT. [1] The plaintiff in this matter is claiming an amount of R299 IN THE HIGH OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION: GRAHAMSTOWN) In the matter between: CASE NUMBER: 259/2010 CORNELIS ANDRIES VAN T WESTENDE Plaintiff And LYNETTE CRAFFORD Defendant JUDGMENT TOKOTA AJ

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN REAL TIME SYSTEMS LIMITED APPELLANT/CLAIMANT AND

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN REAL TIME SYSTEMS LIMITED APPELLANT/CLAIMANT AND REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Civil Appeal No. 238 of 2011 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN REAL TIME SYSTEMS LIMITED APPELLANT/CLAIMANT AND RENRAW INVESTMENTS LIMITED, CCAM AND COMPANY LIMITED, AND AUSTIN

More information

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION FUNDRAISING REGULATOR

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION FUNDRAISING REGULATOR ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION FUNDRAISING REGULATOR CONTENTS CLAUSE 1. Interpretation... 1 2. Object... 4 3. Powers... 4 4. Income... 5 5. Winding up... 5 6. Guarantee... 6 7. Unanimous decisions... 6 8. Calling

More information

financial difficulty means a situation where company becomes or may become insolvent immediately or in the near future if the company is not

financial difficulty means a situation where company becomes or may become insolvent immediately or in the near future if the company is not Insolvency Act, 2063 (2006) Date of authentication and publication: 4 Mangsir 2063 (20 November 2006) Act number 20 of the year 2063 (2006) An Act Made to Provide for Insolvency Proceedings Preamble: Whereas,

More information

RULES OF THE TOWNSVILLE COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICE INC. (Version adopted 20 November 2017)

RULES OF THE TOWNSVILLE COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICE INC. (Version adopted 20 November 2017) RULES OF THE TOWNSVILLE COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICE INC. (Version adopted 20 November 2017) 1 Interpretation (1) In these rules Act means the Associations Incorporation Act 1981. present (a) at a management

More information

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION*

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION* THE COMPANIES ACTS 1985 TO 2006 COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE AND NOT HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION* -OF- PRE-SCHOOL LEARNING ALLIANCE COMPANY NUMBER: 4539003 INCORPORATED THE 18 th SEPTEMBER

More information

SEPARATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (JERSEY) LAW 2011

SEPARATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (JERSEY) LAW 2011 SEPARATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (JERSEY) LAW 2011 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2017 This is a revised edition of the law Separate Limited Partnerships (Jersey) Law 2011 Arrangement SEPARATE

More information

CHAPTER 19:05 PUBLIC CORPORATIONS ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PART II

CHAPTER 19:05 PUBLIC CORPORATIONS ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PART II LAWS OF GUYANA Public Corporations 3 CHAPTER 19:05 PUBLIC CORPORATIONS ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. PART II NEW PUBLIC CORPORATIONS 3. Establishment

More information

In the Supreme Court of Belize A.D. 2009

In the Supreme Court of Belize A.D. 2009 Claim No. 869 of 2009 In the Supreme Court of Belize A.D. 2009 BETWEEN FIRST CARIBBEAN INTERNATIONAL BANK (BARBADOS) LIMITED Claimant And GILDARDO CARDONA SANDRA ROCIO CARDONA Defendants Before: Hon. Justice

More information

2013 ONSC 5288 Ontario Superior Court of Justice. S&R Flooring Concepts Inc. v. RLC Stratford LP

2013 ONSC 5288 Ontario Superior Court of Justice. S&R Flooring Concepts Inc. v. RLC Stratford LP 2013 ONSC 5288 Ontario Superior Court of Justice S&R Flooring Concepts Inc. v. RLC Stratford LP 2013 CarswellOnt 12254, 2013 ONSC 5288, 232 A.C.W.S. (3d) 95, 31 C.L.R. (4th) 89 S&R Flooring Concepts Inc.,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PHILLIP QUASHIE CLAIMANT AND THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER PROPOSED DEFENDANT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PHILLIP QUASHIE CLAIMANT AND THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER PROPOSED DEFENDANT REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2009-02981 BETWEEN PHILLIP QUASHIE CLAIMANT AND THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER PROPOSED DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances:

More information

Kin Lung Cheung v Nicosia 2014 NY Slip Op 32176(U) July 30, 2014 Sup Ct, Kings County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Mark I. Partnow Cases posted

Kin Lung Cheung v Nicosia 2014 NY Slip Op 32176(U) July 30, 2014 Sup Ct, Kings County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Mark I. Partnow Cases posted Kin Lung Cheung v Nicosia 2014 NY Slip Op 32176(U) July 30, 2014 Sup Ct, Kings County Docket Number: 501965/13 Judge: Mark I. Partnow Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SEUKERAN SINGH CLAIMANT AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEFENDANT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SEUKERAN SINGH CLAIMANT AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEFENDANT REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-04470 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SEUKERAN SINGH CLAIMANT AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances: For

More information

Purpose The Organization is established to operate for charitable purposes and shall devote its resources to charitable activities. Article 3.

Purpose The Organization is established to operate for charitable purposes and shall devote its resources to charitable activities. Article 3. CANADIAN SERBIAN HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION MALI SVET KANADA FOUNDING BY-LAWS Apr.28.2017 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES (CONSTITUTION) PREAMBLE 1. To establish humanitarian aid to underprivileged children, orphans,

More information

CHAPTER M-37. An Act respecting the Granting of Relief and Agricultural Aid in Municipalities.

CHAPTER M-37. An Act respecting the Granting of Relief and Agricultural Aid in Municipalities. CHAPTER M-37. An Act respecting the Granting of Relief and Agricultural Aid in Municipalities. Short title Interpreta tion Powers oc Government to ma ke agreements Powers oc municipality respectmg live

More information

BYLAWS Of A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION

BYLAWS Of A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION BYLAWS Of A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ARTICLE 1 OFFICES SECTION 1. PRINCIPAL OFFICE The principal office of the corporation for the transaction of its business is located in the City

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN HAMZA HASSANALI AND HAFFIZA MOHAMMED JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN HAMZA HASSANALI AND HAFFIZA MOHAMMED JUDGMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2007-00058 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN HAMZA HASSANALI CLAIMANT AND HAFFIZA MOHAMMED AND SAYEED MOHAMMED DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between LEO LARES DAMIANA LARES BERNADINE ABRAHAM CLOTHILDA JOAN MOHAMMED THEODOTA THEODORA LARES CAMILLA ALEXANDER.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between LEO LARES DAMIANA LARES BERNADINE ABRAHAM CLOTHILDA JOAN MOHAMMED THEODOTA THEODORA LARES CAMILLA ALEXANDER. THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2014 01656 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between LEO LARES DAMIANA LARES BERNADINE ABRAHAM CLOTHILDA JOAN MOHAMMED THEODOTA THEODORA LARES CAMILLA ALEXANDER Claimants

More information

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI. Complaint No.CC/13/172

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI. Complaint No.CC/13/172 CC/13/172 1/15 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI Complaint No.CC/13/172 Galaxy Heights Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Plot No.56, Sector 20-B, Airoli, Navi Mumbai 400

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN DOC S ENGINEERING WORKS (1992) LTD DOCS ENGINEERING WORKS LTD RAJ GOSINE SHAMDEO GOSINE AND

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN DOC S ENGINEERING WORKS (1992) LTD DOCS ENGINEERING WORKS LTD RAJ GOSINE SHAMDEO GOSINE AND REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CA No. 34 of 2013 CV No. 03690 of 2011 PANEL: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN DOC S ENGINEERING WORKS (1992) LTD DOCS ENGINEERING WORKS LTD RAJ GOSINE SHAMDEO GOSINE AND

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE TELLELAU CONSTANTINE JUDY CHARLERIE-CLARKE AND SHARMIN SUBHAR TREVOR CHARLERIE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE TELLELAU CONSTANTINE JUDY CHARLERIE-CLARKE AND SHARMIN SUBHAR TREVOR CHARLERIE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2012-04185 BETWEEN TELLELAU CONSTANTINE JUDY CHARLERIE-CLARKE First Claimant Second Claimant AND SHARMIN SUBHAR TREVOR CHARLERIE

More information

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION Company No: 3044323 THE COMPANIES ACTS 1985 TO 2006 COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE AND NOT HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION of THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION (Adopted by special resolution dated

More information

JUDGMENT. Sagicor Bank Jamaica Limited (Appellant) v Taylor-Wright (Respondent) (Jamaica)

JUDGMENT. Sagicor Bank Jamaica Limited (Appellant) v Taylor-Wright (Respondent) (Jamaica) Easter Term [2018] UKPC 12 Privy Council Appeal No 0011 of 2017 JUDGMENT Sagicor Bank Jamaica Limited (Appellant) v Taylor-Wright (Respondent) (Jamaica) From the Court of Appeal of Jamaica before Lord

More information

CHAPTER 65:09 GUYANA GEOLOGY AND MINES COMMISSION ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

CHAPTER 65:09 GUYANA GEOLOGY AND MINES COMMISSION ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS LAWS OF GUYANA Guyana Geology and Mines Commission 3 CHAPTER 65:09 GUYANA GEOLOGY AND MINES COMMISSION ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE GUYANA

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND TECU CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND TECU CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2010-01135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ERNEST TROTMAN CAMILLE RICHARDS TROTMAN Claimants AND TECU CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED ************************************************

More information

REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO

REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV# 2009-01502 BETWEEN IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF TILKEY GOBIN ALSO CALLED TILKIE GOBIN DECEASED HERAWATI CHARLES CLAIMANT And (1) MONICA JANKEY MADHOSINGH (as Executrix

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ROMATI MARAJ CLAIMANT AND ASHAN ALI TIMMY ASHMIR ALI DEFENDANTS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ROMATI MARAJ CLAIMANT AND ASHAN ALI TIMMY ASHMIR ALI DEFENDANTS REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-00686 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ROMATI MARAJ CLAIMANT AND ASHAN ALI TIMMY ASHMIR ALI DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances:

More information

BERMUDA BANKS AND DEPOSIT COMPANIES ACT : 40

BERMUDA BANKS AND DEPOSIT COMPANIES ACT : 40 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA BANKS AND DEPOSIT COMPANIES ACT 1999 1999 : 40 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PRELIMINARY Short title and commencement Interpretation

More information

FILING AN EVICTION LAWSUIT

FILING AN EVICTION LAWSUIT FILING AN EVICTION LAWSUIT VENUE: Suit for possession of property, precinct in which all or part of the property is located. Suit for rent in which all or part of the property is located. REQUIITES: If

More information

GENERAL SECURITY AGREEMENT 1

GENERAL SECURITY AGREEMENT 1 GENERAL SECURITY AGREEMENT 1 1. Grant of Security Interest. 999999 B.C. Ltd. ( Debtor ), having its chief executive office at 999 Main Street, Vancouver B.C., V1V 1V1 as continuing security for the repayment

More information

CONSERVATION AREA SEASONAL CAMPING LICENCE APPLICATION

CONSERVATION AREA SEASONAL CAMPING LICENCE APPLICATION Grand River Conservation Authority CONSERVATION AREA SEASONAL CAMPING LICENCE APPLICATION "Camping Season" from May 1, 2018 to October 15, 2018 THIS APPLICATION FOR A LICENCE TO CAMP ON A SEASONAL BASIS

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. TROPICAL MAINTENANCE AND GENERAL CONTRACTING LIMITED Defendant

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. TROPICAL MAINTENANCE AND GENERAL CONTRACTING LIMITED Defendant THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No: CV2016-02551 BETWEEN CADMUS HOLDINGS LIMITED Claimant AND TROPICAL MAINTENANCE AND GENERAL CONTRACTING LIMITED Defendant Before

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D BETWEEN: HANSRAJ BHOJWANI CLAIMANTS NANDINI BHOJWANI JAGWISH PUNJABI VIJAY PUNJABI VINOD PUNJABI RAJ PUNJABI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D BETWEEN: HANSRAJ BHOJWANI CLAIMANTS NANDINI BHOJWANI JAGWISH PUNJABI VIJAY PUNJABI VINOD PUNJABI RAJ PUNJABI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2009 CLAIM NO. 774 of 2008 BETWEEN: HANSRAJ BHOJWANI CLAIMANTS NANDINI BHOJWANI AND JAGWISH PUNJABI VIJAY PUNJABI VINOD PUNJABI RAJ PUNJABI 1 st DEFENDANT 2 nd DEFENDANT

More information

BYLAWS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA HOME LOAN PROGRAM CORPORATION. a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation ARTICLE I NAME

BYLAWS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA HOME LOAN PROGRAM CORPORATION. a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation ARTICLE I NAME BYLAWS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA HOME LOAN PROGRAM CORPORATION a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation ARTICLE I NAME The name of this corporation shall be THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

More information

Meridien Resources Limited Convertible Note Certificate

Meridien Resources Limited Convertible Note Certificate Meridien Resources Limited Convertible Note Certificate Meridien Resources Limited ACN 113 758 177 Level 29 Chifley Tower, 2 Chifley Square, Sydney NSW 2000 ("Company" CERTIFICATE NO: [insert] THIS IS

More information

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Jacob Margulies (United States) v. Austria and Hungary 11 May 1929 VOLUME VI pp. 279-282 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright

More information

IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) JUDGMENT

IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) JUDGMENT .. IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) SAINT LUCIA CLAIM NO. SLLIHCV2006/0117 BETWEEN: GODDARD DARCHEVILLE Claimant And 1. LINCOLN ST. ROSE 2. NATHANIEL HAYNES 3.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between CHRISTOPHER LUCKY AND. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between CHRISTOPHER LUCKY AND. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2012-00224 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between CHRISTOPHER LUCKY AND Claimant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE

More information

Case: JMD Doc #: 54 Filed: 06/06/17 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case: JMD Doc #: 54 Filed: 06/06/17 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Case: 17-10370-JMD Doc #: 54 Filed: 06/06/17 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ******************************************* In Re: * * Chapter 7 William

More information

Defendant Mitchell Stern (Stern) moves, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for summary

Defendant Mitchell Stern (Stern) moves, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for summary FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/10/2015 11:54 PM INDEX NO. 653564/2014 2/10/2015 Peckar & Abramson, P.C. v Lyford Holdings, Ltd. (2014 NY Slip Op 50294(U)) NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/10/2015

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN YVONNE ROSE MARICHEAU. And MAUREEN BHARAT PEREIRA. And

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN YVONNE ROSE MARICHEAU. And MAUREEN BHARAT PEREIRA. And REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2013-01568 BETWEEN YVONNE ROSE MARICHEAU And Claimant MAUREEN BHARAT PEREIRA And First Defendant RICARDO PEREIRA Second Defendant

More information

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL CHAPTER SOCIETY OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY BYLAWS

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL CHAPTER SOCIETY OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY BYLAWS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL CHAPTER 101 Second Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94105 (866) 251-5169 x1108 norcalsetac@onebox.com http://www.norcalsetac.org ARTICLE I Offices Section 1 Principal Executive

More information

MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION THE ROYAL ASSOCIATION FOR DEAF PEOPLE

MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION THE ROYAL ASSOCIATION FOR DEAF PEOPLE MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE ROYAL ASSOCIATION FOR DEAF PEOPLE Company Number: 03973353 (As amended by special resolution passed on 6 th August 2008) RAD M&A 1 THE COMPANIES ACTS 1985

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. CS(OS)No.1307/2006. Date of decision:16th January, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. CS(OS)No.1307/2006. Date of decision:16th January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CS(OS)No.1307/2006 Date of decision:16th January, 2009 SMT. TARAN JEET KAUR... Through: Plaintiff Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate

More information

The Bulk Sales Act. being. Chapter B-9 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1978 (effective February 26, 1979).

The Bulk Sales Act. being. Chapter B-9 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1978 (effective February 26, 1979). The Bulk Sales Act being Chapter B-9 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1978 (effective February 26, 1979). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been incorporated for convenience

More information

RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE LITTLE ITALY ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO Amended November 2010 A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ARTICLE 1 OFFICES

RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE LITTLE ITALY ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO Amended November 2010 A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ARTICLE 1 OFFICES RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE LITTLE ITALY ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO Amended November 2010 A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ARTICLE 1 OFFICES SECTION 1. PRINCIPAL OFFICE The principal office of the corporation

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D DEBORAH DEAN RAE KILBY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D DEBORAH DEAN RAE KILBY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2011 CLAIM NO. 440 of 2007 PATRICIA STURMAN CLAIMANT AND DEBORAH DEAN RAE KILBY 1 st DEFENDANT 2 nd DEFENDANT Hearings 2011 6 th July 12 th August 18 th August 25 th

More information

STATE PROCEEDINGS ACT

STATE PROCEEDINGS ACT STATE PROCEEDINGS ACT Act 5 of 1953 15 October 1954 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1A. Short title 1B. Interpretation PRELIMINARY PART I SUBSTANTIVE LAW 1. Liability of State in contract 2. Liability of State

More information

PORTIONS OF ILLINOIS FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER ACT 735 ILCS 5/9-101 et. seq.

PORTIONS OF ILLINOIS FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER ACT 735 ILCS 5/9-101 et. seq. Sec. 9-102. When action may be maintained. (a) The person entitled to the possession of lands or tenements may be restored thereto under any of the following circumstances: (1) When a forcible entry is

More information

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 33118/2010. In the matter between:

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 33118/2010. In the matter between: SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH

More information